N-dimensional affinity confluencer

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8688087
  • Patent Number
    8,688,087
  • Date Filed
    Friday, April 15, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 1, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
An N-dimensional affinity confluencer comprises an affinity table to maintain a plurality of affinities for each of a plurality of wireless devices. A sphere of influence (SPIN) table provides an influence for determination of a confluence between affinities maintained in the affinity table. An affinity confluence determination module determines an affinity confluence between the plurality of wireless devices and an influence parameter associated with the sphere of influence (SPIN) table. An affinity confluence is determined from among a plurality of wireless devices by determining a confluence of at least two predefined affinities from among a plurality of wireless devices. A sphere of influence parameter is applied to the confluence to determine those of the plurality of wireless devices defined by an affinity confluence. The plurality of wireless devices need not be within a common communication network.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


This invention relates generally to telecommunications. More particularly, it relates to wireless based technologies.


2. Background of the Related Art


People perceive the universe as existence within the three (3) dimensions of space and the fourth (4th) dimension of time and they generally think of themselves as “passing through” these dimensions. In other words, people generally think of space as fixed or static and think of themselves as traveling through space from one point to another. People generally think of themselves as traveling forward through time where any particular moment is simply “now” and that “now” then immediately becomes part of “the past”.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with the principles of the present invention, an N-dimensional affinity confluencer comprises an affinity table to maintain a plurality of affinities for each of a plurality of wireless devices. A sphere of influence (SPIN) table provides an influence for determination of a confluence between affinities maintained in the affinity table. An affinity confluence determination module determines an affinity confluence between the plurality of wireless devices and an influence parameter associated with the sphere of influence (SPIN) table.


In accordance with a method of determining an affinity confluence from among a plurality of wireless devices in accordance with another embodiment of the invention comprises determining a confluence of at least two predefined affinities from among a plurality of wireless devices. A sphere of influence parameter is applied to the confluence to determine those of the plurality of wireless devices defined by an affinity confluence. The plurality of wireless devices need not be within a common communication network.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Features and advantages of the present invention become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following description with reference to the drawings:



FIG. 1 depicts the function of an exemplary N-dimensional affinity confluencer, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.



FIG. 2 depicts five (5) exemplary data structures established within the N-dimensional affinity confluencer (in this example a 5-dimensional affinity confluencer), to manage affinities, SPINs, and the identification of relationships therebetween.



FIG. 3 elaborates the juxtaposition of attractive and repulsive inducement versus receptive and projective influence, and defines several permutations of influence between wireless devices, as represented by their sphere of influence, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.



FIG. 4 depicts a wireless device user's location, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.



FIG. 5 shows an exemplary location (LOC) table, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.



FIG. 6 shows an exemplary primary matrix, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.



FIG. 7 shows an exemplary network and server architecture, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.



FIG. 8 shows an exemplary data structure used as elements within all tiers of the GeoTrove to assist with rapidly updating a SPIN's location.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS


FIG. 1 depicts the function of an exemplary N-dimensional affinity confluencer, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.


In particular, as depicted in FIG. 1, the present invention inverts the relationship of a wireless device within space-time and instead depicts a human being's wireless device as a “personal sphere of influence” 105 (Hereafter referred to as a SPhere of INfluence or “SPIN”) transected by a virtually infinite number of “planes of interaction”. This allows the perception of potential interactions between not just the physically concrete elements of day to day life but also the many digital (i.e. virtual) elements of modern life which have little if any physically concrete representation.


A simple embodiment of an N-dimensional affinity confluencer 100 in accordance with the principles of the present invention implements several dimensions of affinity, e.g., a plurality of wireless device users' respective locations 110, a plurality of user's interest in health and fitness 114, and retailers' offerings 112. The combination of these three (3) exemplary “planes of interaction” define a specific affinity confluence 101 for a given wireless device where the location of the user of that wireless device, and their interest in health and fitness, creates an opportunity for influence.


The opportunity for influence may be a projection of influence. For example, a broadcast of a wireless device user's interest in health & fitness, in combination with the user's location, may elicit an action on the part of a member of a third dimension of affinity, in this case a retailer.


Alternatively, or additionally, the opportunity for influence may be a reception of influence; if, for example, the person had joined a health & fitness social group (opt-in) affiliated with a particular natural foods and supplements retailer, then the intersection with a fourth dimension—location—of the plurality of users provide a proximity of a wireless device user to a given retailer's outlet store (i.e., a confluence of an intersection of affinity planes of a given user with the retail affinity plane 112) might elicit some form of message from the retailer to the user of the wireless device at the affinity confluence 101 identified by the affinity confluencer 100. The proximity is preferably configurable and defined by a region in the location plane.


Note that in this description of the invention use of the word “network” is purposely avoided as the word “network” has been so overloaded and over-used that resulting undesired connotations are inevitable. Each affinity plane does not necessarily define a group of wireless devices that necessarily are in communication with one another. Rather, the affinity planes are defined by configurable parameters of wireless devices, mostly configured by the respective users, and thus each affinity plane of interaction/interest may be and likely are constantly changing.


For illustrative purposes, the present invention represents each affinity plane as flat and skewed in any of a number of different directions, but the fact of the matter is that affinity planes of interaction/interest are constantly in a state of flux, constantly rippling and vibrating with changes caused by other wireless device users and/or other spheres of influence. It's the very dynamism of plane of interaction and the transitory nature of affinity confluences, and the determination of the same by the N-dimensional affinity confluencer 100, that are a principal focus of the present invention. The N-dimensional affinity confluencer 100 automatically resolves and acts upon these highly transitory affinity confluences.


The N-dimensional affinity confluencer 100 may be implemented in an appropriate server and established at an appropriate location on a carrier or provider's wireless network.



FIG. 2 depicts five (5) exemplary data structures established within the N-dimensional affinity confluencer 100 (in this example a 5-dimensional affinity confluencer), to manage affinities, SPINs, and the identification of relationships therebetween.


In particular, as shown in FIG. 2, one (1) active plane of affinity is uniquely identified by two (2) keywords and two (2) active SPINs.


In the given example, all affinities are maintained using two (2) specific data structures: an Affinity Table 110, and a Keyword-List Table 114.


All participating SPINs are maintained using one (1) primary data structure: a SPIN Table 112.


The relationship between affinities and SPINs is managed using, e.g., two (2) additional data structures: a SPIN-List Table 116, and an Affinity-List Table 118.


Each record or row in the Affinity Table 110 includes (but is not limited to) an “Affinity ID” as the primary key, a “Keyword-List Link”, and a “SPIN-List Link”. In the given example every defined Affinity must have at least one Keyword-List entry (i.e. at least one keyword) with which to uniquely identify the Affinity; Keyword-List Link fields are preferably not allowed to be set to a TERMINATOR value. Affinities that are defined but have zero (0) associated SPINs must set the Affinity's SPIN-List Link to a TERMINATOR value 111.


Note that in this description the word “Link” is used to denote any reference/dereference mechanism used to access information from a data structure other than the data structure in which the Link resides.


Each record or row in the Keyword-List Table 114 includes (but is not limited to) a “Keyword-List ID” used as the primary key, a “Keyword”, an “Affinity Link”, and two (2) Keyword-List Link values called “Precede” and “Succeed” which are used to create a doubly-linked list of the keywords used to uniquely identify the Affinity. The Keyword field of a Keyword-List entry may be set to any representation of a keyword except the null or empty set. The Affinity Link field of a Keyword-List entry must refer back to one and only one associated Affinity Table entry; the Affinity Link fields are not allowed to be set to a TERMINATOR value. The PRECEDE and SUCCEED fields of a Keyword-List entry are also not allowed to be set to a TERMINATOR value. The PRECEDE and SUCCEED fields must always refer to an entry in the Keyword-List Table. Keyword-Lists that are comprised of one and only one (1) keyword will set the values of both PRECEDE and SUCCEED to refer to that one Keyword-List entry; PRECEDE and SUCCEED will refer to or point to each other 115.


Every participating SPhere of INfluence (SPIN) is represented by one (1) and only one entry in the SPIN Table 112. Each record or row in the SPIN Table 112 includes (but is not limited to) a SPIN ID used as the primary key, miscellaneous SPIN information that may be a multitude of sub-fields some of which may actually refer to other data structures or other data sources entirely, and an Affinity-List Link. Participating SPINs for which zero (0) affinities have been identified must set the SPIN's Affinity-List Link to a TERMINATOR value 113.


Relationship or association between Affinities and SPINs is managed with the SPIN-List Table 116 and the Affinity-List Table 118. The SPIN-List Table is 116 intended to allow someone to start with one (1) entry in the Affinity Table and find all SPINs associated with that Affinity. The Affinity-List Table is intended to allow someone to start with one (1) entry in the SPIN table and find all Affinities with which the SPIN is associated.


Each record or row in the SPIN-List Table 116 includes (but is not limited to) a SPIN-List ID used as the primary key, an Affinity Link, a SPIN Link, and two (2) SPIN-List link values used to create a doubly-linked list of the SPINs associated with the Affinity. The Affinity Link and SPIN Link fields are not allowed to be set to a TERMINATOR value; entries in the SPIN-List Table are only created when a relationship between an Affinity and a SPIN is created so there will always be both a reference to an Affinity as well as a reference to a SPIN. PRECEDE and SUCCEED fields must always refer to an entry in the SPIN-List Table. SPIN-Lists that are comprised of one and only one (1) SPIN set the values of both PRECEDE and SUCCEED to refer to that one SPIN-List entry; PRECEDE and SUCCEED refer to or point to each other 117.


Each record or row in the Affinity-List Table 118 includes (but is not limited to) an Affinity-List ID used as the primary key, an Affinity Link, a SPIN Link, and two (2) Affinity-List link values used to create a doubly-linked list of the Affinities with which the SPIN is associated. The Affinity Link and SPIN Link fields are not allowed to be set to a TERMINATOR value; entries in the Affinity-List Table are only created when a relationship between an Affinity and a SPIN is created so there is always both a reference to an Affinity as well as a reference to a SPIN. PRECEDE and SUCCEED fields must always refer to an entry in the Affinity-List Table. Affinity-Lists that are comprised of one and only one (1) Affinity set the values of both PRECEDE and SUCCEED to refer to that one Affinity-List entry; PRECEDE and SUCCEED refer to or point to each other 119.


Persons adept in the art of data management will readily understand that there are many, many interesting ways of accessing and using information contained in the five (5) structures defined above. The tenets of this invention are not intended to encompass only the uses described above but rather any mechanism, methodology, or use which enterprising persons find for the data contained therein.


As another embodiment of this invention, location forms the lynchpin for defining N-Dimensional Affinity Confluences. In this case the principal plane of interaction transecting the sphere of influence is location. Use of location as the primary vector of every Affinity Confluence juxtaposes the exertion of influence (i.e. projection and reception) versus “Attraction” and “Repulsion” inducements to fully parameterize the bounds of the invention.


For the purposes of this invention, influence will be defined from the standpoint of a wireless device user's SPhere of INfluence (SPIN). Projection of influence specifically means that the wireless device's location and other pre-defined affinities configured by its user cause an unplanned action by someone or something else such that the action is directed at the wireless device. The wireless device's location+affinities+projected influence cause an instantaneous and unplanned action. The projection of influence can also be represented as “unprofiled” or “analytic” in the sense that it was not the result of settings or parameters of a personal profile defined by the person prior to the time of the action but rather the result of analysis of a gamut of various data that results in the instantaneous realization of influence. Reception of influence specifically means that the wireless device's location and pre-defined affinities cause an action planned by someone or something else such that the action is directed at the wireless device (i.e., subscription or opt-in). Not that the planned action is not simply scheduled to take place on a particular day at an appointed hour—rather in accordance with the principles of the present invention if a wireless device configured or otherwise associated with given affinities also satisfies specific location parameters, then that wireless device receives action/influence from another wireless device, network server, third party, or other device in communication with that wireless device. The reception of influence can be represented as “profiled” or “deterministic” in the sense that it was the result of settings or parameters of a personal profile defined by the person prior to the time of the action. There is, of course, some analysis involved in the determination of either projective or receptive influence but the fundamental difference is the existence (or non-existence) of predefined parameters.


For the purposes of this invention, Attractive Inducement and Repulsive Inducement are defined from the standpoint of elements within the planes of affinity. Elements of Interaction that prefer to garner or concentrate a wireless device user's attention upon the element exert Attractive Inducement. Elements of Interaction that prefer to dissuade a wireless device user from concentrating on the element exert Repulsive Inducement.



FIG. 3 elaborates the juxtaposition of attractive and repulsive inducement versus receptive and projective influence, and defines several permutations of influence between wireless devices, as represented by their sphere of influence, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.


In particular, as shown in FIG. 3, the invention uses communication in various forms to represent the exertion of influence and inducement regardless of whether projected or received versus attractive or repulsive. This invention contemplates the use of any appropriate mode of communication to the wireless device user, in all its many forms, if that communication involves these human senses:


Audible—depending on the sense of hearing.


Visible—depending on sight.


Tactile—depending on the sense of touch.


Olfactory—depending on the sense of smell.


This invention uses communication to represent the exertion of influence/inducement but does not limit the concept to just communication. For instance, the projection of repulsive inducement from a secure US Military complex toward a wireless device user perceived to be an intruder may, conceivably, be physical.


Yet another embodiment of the invention uses proximity as the foundation for actualizing location based N-Dimensional Affinity Confluences. For the purposes of this embodiment the proximity evaluation is designed for speed of performance during proximity evaluation processing.



FIG. 4 depicts a wireless device user's location, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.


In particular, as shown in FIG. 4, the invention reduces a wireless device's location, represented, e.g., in decimal degrees of latitude and longitude, into indices of latitude and indices of longitude within four (4) layers: 1) Primary 120: tens of degrees (˜700 statute mile resolution); 2) Secondary 121: degrees (˜70 statute mile resolution); 3) Tertiary 122: minutes (˜6000 foot resolution); and 4) Quaternary 123: seconds (˜100 foot resolution). This figuratively covers the Earth's surface with successively finer grained gridlines. Seconds of latitude and longitude yield a grid whose vertices are approximately 100 feet apart at the equator and somewhat closer together the farther away from the equator (North or South) the person is located.


Should the need arise to attain even finer granularity than seconds, a fifth (Quinary) and even sixth (Senary) layer may be added to represent 10ths of seconds (˜10 feet) and 100ths of seconds (˜12 inches).


Every time a person's location is registered the GeoTrove will save that person's identifier, location (latitude and longitude), and optimization indices in a LOC table.



FIG. 5 shows an exemplary location (LOC) table, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.


In particular, as shown in FIG. 5, the Lat and Lon values are normalized to be decimal degrees in the range −90.0 through +90.0 for Latitude and −180.0 through +180.0 for Longitude. The indices are computed thusly:

PrimaryX=int(round((Lon/10.0)−0.5))
PrimaryY=int(round((Lat/10.0)−0.5))
PrimaryZ=Altitude modulo 700 statute miles
SecondaryX=int(truncate(Lon−(PrimaryX*10.0)))
SecondaryY=int(truncate(Lat−(PrimaryY*10.0)))
SecondaryZ=Altitude modulo 70 statute miles
TertiaryX=int(truncate((Lon−((PrimaryX*10.0)+SecondaryX))*60.0))
TertiaryY=int(truncate((Lat−((PrimaryY*10.0)+SecondaryY))*60.0))
TertiaryZ=Altitude modulo 6000 feet
QuaternaryX=int(truncate((Lon−((PrimaryX*10.0)+SecondaryX+(TertiaryX/60.0)))*3600.0))
QuaternaryY=int(truncate((Lat−((PrimaryY*10.0)+SecondaryY+(TertiaryY/60.0)))*3600.0))
QuaternaryZ=Altitude modulo 100 feet


Note that these equations presume that the round( ) function always rounds an “n.5” value up so that 0.5 becomes 1.0, 2.5 becomes 3.0, −3.5 becomes −3.0, etc. Some adjustments may be necessary to accommodate specific hardware architectures, operating systems, and compilers, as will be appreciated by those of skill in the art.


The intent, though, is to compute an index based on the lower left corner of the square in which the wireless device is located. The Primary square (See ‘Q’ in FIG. 4) is a 10 degree by 10 degree square. The Secondary square (See ‘R’ in FIG. 4) is a one degree by one degree square located within the Primary. The Tertiary square (See ‘S’ in FIG. 4) is a one minute by one minute square located within the Secondary. The Quaternary square (See ‘T’ in FIG. 4) is a one second by one second square located within the Tertiary.


These computations produce values in the following ranges:


−18<=PrimaryX<=18−9<=PrimaryY<=9−1<=PrimaryZ<=36


0<=SecondaryX<=9 0<=SecondaryY<=9−1<=SecondaryZ<=357


0<=TertiaryX<=60 0<=TertiaryY<=60−1<=TertiaryZ<=22,000


0<=QuaternaryX<=60 0<=QuaternaryY<=60−3<=QuaternaryZ<=1.32e06



FIG. 6 shows an exemplary primary matrix, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.


In particular, as shown in the primary matrix of FIG. 6, the GeoTrove maintains a collection of matrices. This collection of matrices always includes a matrix for the Primary indices (i.e. a “Primary Matrix”).


The primary matrix is accompanied by a PrimaryCount indicating how many wireless devices or SPIN are present.


The Primary Matrix is also accompanied by an array or list of the primary matrix elements in which wireless devices/SPIN can be found. (The list is empty if PrimaryCount is zero.)


Each element in the 36×18 Primary matrix contains: (1) a count of how many wireless devices/SPIN are present in that particular 10 deg×10 deg area; and (2) a reference to a Secondary Matrix. (The reference is NULL if count is zero).


Secondary (10×10 matrix), Tertiary (60×60), and Quaternary (60×60) matrices are allocated, maintained, and eliminated as needed to manage GeoTrove memory use.


Each Secondary Matrix is accompanied by a SecondaryCount indicating how many wireless devices/SPIN are present in that 10 deg×10 deg area.


Each Secondary Matrix is also accompanied by an array or list of the secondary matrix elements in which wireless devices/SPIN can be found. (The list is empty if its SecondaryCount is zero.)


Each element in a 10×10 Secondary matrix contains: (1) a count of how many wireless devices/SPIN are present in that particular 1 deg×1 deg area; and (2) a reference to a Tertiary Matrix. (The reference will be NULL if the count is zero.)


Each Tertiary Matrix is accompanied by a TertiaryCount indicating how many wireless devices/SPIN are present in that 1 deg×1 deg area.


Each Tertiary Matrix is also accompanied by an array or list of the tertiary matrix elements in which wireless devices/SPIN can be found. (The list is empty if its TertiaryCount is zero.)


Each element in a 60×60 Tertiary matrix contains: (1) a count of how many wireless devices/SPIN are present in that particular 1 minute×1 minute area; and (2) a reference to a Quaternary Matrix. (The reference is NULL if count is zero.)


Each Quaternary Matrix is accompanied by a QuaternaryCount indicating how many wireless devices/SPIN are present in that 1 min×1 min area.


Each Quaternary Matrix is also accompanied by an array or list of the quaternary elements in which wireless devices/SPIN can be found. (The list is empty if QuaternaryCount is zero.)


Each element in a 60×60 Quaternary matrix contains: (1) a count of how many wireless devices/SPIN are present in that particular 1 second×1 second area; and (2) an array or list of wireless device/SPIN Identifiers that are present in the 1 sec×1 sec area. (The list is empty if count is zero.)


The evaluation of ‘Z’ axis differences are preferably not managed in a matrix structure but rather are evaluated in near real-time as a simple difference of like Z values (i.e. primary, secondary, tertiary, etc.). If the absolute value of the computed Z-difference (i.e. delta Z) is within the defined vertical bounds of proximity, then proximity has been successfully established. The same kind of approaching or retreating event (described in more detail later in this disclosure) results if the delta Z grew or shrank because a wireless device user was, e.g., riding an elevator, or climbing stairs within a building, even if the lateral X and Y components stayed well within the bounds of a predefined or configured proximity.


This four (4) tier data structure makes it possible for the GeoTrove to rapidly identify all of the wireless devices/SPIN in a predefined or preconfigured close proximity to an Affinity Confluence so that Influence and Inducement are resolved in a timely manner.


Proximity may be a configured reference value, e.g., defined in terms of hundreds of feet, thousands of feet, tens of miles, or hundreds of miles. The GeoTrove is able to rapidly identify which wireless devices/SPIN meet the criteria. The broader the defined proximity value, the longer it takes the GeoTrove to send all the notifications due to latencies imposed by the communication media.


The “Time Tag” element of each row in the LOC table (e.g., as shown in FIG. 5) is specifically intended to allow the quantification and actualization of time as one of the many affinity planes (or planes of interaction) that transect all SPheres of INfluence (SPINs). The confluence of time and location plus many other potential affinity planes of interaction give each wireless device the ability to quantify when it authorizes to either project or receive influence, or when it authorizes to be subject either to attractive or repulsive inducement. In this way particular affinity confluences may be scheduled in the N-dimensional affinity confluencer 100 for particular hours during the day or particular days of the week.


Similarly, an affinity confluence of location and business interests or a confluence of location and interests in art (or politics or music or whatever) that is typically not temporally constrained could be scheduled NOT to exert influence or react to inducement during a specific timeframe (e.g. for instance during a vacation of a particular wireless device user).


Proximity lends itself quite well to providing life enhancing service to wireless device users without unduly compromising privacy of information thereon because proximity notifications reveal neither the location of the wireless device receiving the notification, nor the person operating the wireless device to whom the notification refers. The GeoTrove certainly maintains as precise a location for every participating wireless device/SPIN as it is able to acquire, but the GeoTrove is intended to run inside a secure environment and reveal as little about the actual location(s) of the participants as is practical for any particular application or service. This simple fact makes proximity an excellent mechanism with which to actualize location based N-Dimensional Affinity Confluences in the N-dimensional affinity confluencer 100.


Primary facets of that actualization are proximity events. There are, e.g., two (2) principal proximity events about which some type of notification would be sent: (1) An Approaching event (i.e., a distance between evaluees is reducing); or (2) A Retreating event (i.e., a distance between evaluees is increasing).


Proximity events can be parameterized to even multiples of the base unit of measure for each of the four (4) to six (6) levels of accuracy/fidelity that the GeoTrove uses to track location data. If, for example, the GeoTrove provides four (4) levels of fidelity, then proximity events may be keyed to, e.g., even multiples of ˜700 statute miles, even multiples of ˜70 statute miles, even multiples of ˜6000 feet, and even multiples of ˜100 feet. Some of these overlapping fidelities clearly match, in the detail.


In yet another embodiment of the invention, the GeoTrove uses the lowest level of fidelity (i.e., the most coarse granularity) of matrix with which to satisfy any proximity event detection. So, for example, if a proximity event were parameterized as 12,000 feet, then the GeoTrove uses an even multiple of ‘2’ against the Tertiary Matrix rather than an even multiple of 120 against the Quaternary Matrix. This is performed as an optimization for proximity event evaluations.


An alternate form of such an evaluation parameterizes the numeric value at which the fidelity of proximity events gets “rounded up” to provide nearly the same level of fidelity as was requested by the wireless device while providing the maximum performance possible (i.e. minimum evaluation time duration).


The GeoTrove includes configurable and parameterized hysteresis so that if the wireless device stimulating the proximity event, e.g., takes a track that skirts the edge of the proximity boundary, then the wireless device to which the event notification(s) is sent doesn't get barraged with the digital equivalent of “proximity SPAM”. As such a wireless device stimulating a proximity event needs to approach (or retreat) a certain distance past the notification threshold before it would be possible to generate the opposite form of proximity notification.


In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, the method or mechanism constantly re-computes, within the bounds of any particular element within the proximity matrix, an indication of that node's current “Affinity-Vector”. The Affinity-Vector is simply a reference from each proximity matrix element to the single Affinity entry (See FIG. 2) that is represented within that proximity matrix element in the greatest numbers. If, for example, there were 40 wireless devices in a particular Quaternary node (i.e. ˜100 ft resolution) and 25 of them are associated with an “Alaska Sport Fishing” affinity plane, where no other affinity to which those 40 wireless devices are associated totaled more than 7 or 8 wireless devices, then the Affinity-Vector for that quaternary node is a link to the “Alaska Sport Fishing” affinity plane. A key point, with regard to a node's affinity-vector, is that the affinity-vector is computed specifically for the purposes of manifesting attractive or repulsive inducement.



FIG. 7 shows an exemplary network and server architecture, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.


In particular, as shown in the network and server architecture of FIG. 7, the different facets of the current invention (i.e. the Adapter Layer 130, the GeoTrove Layer 131, the Analytics & Affinity Layer 132, and a Value-Add Function Layer 133) are depicted such that the current invention demonstrates how each is related to and connected with the others. The Adapter layer 130 manages the multitude of interfaces with external entities (constituted both by SPINs and by elements of interaction) so as to exchange both location and pertinent other information with a subset of the N-Dimensional Confluencer layers. The GeoTrove layer 131 maintains the structures described in FIGS. 4, 5, and 6. The GeoTrove layer 131 exchanges pertinent information and some location events with the Analytics & Affinity Layer 132 and the Value-Add Function Layer 133. The Analytics & Affinity layer 132 maintains the structures described in FIGS. 2 and 3. The Analytics & Affinity Layer 132 exchanges pertinent information and affinity events with the GeoTrove Layer 130 and the Value-Add Function Layer 133. The Value-Add Function Layer 133 maintains structures whose purpose is to combine and translate location events and affinity events into services (i.e. information and actions) valuable to both SPINs and elements of interaction.


To demonstrate the specific mechanics of this invention, one use case—a single embodiment of the present invention—will herein be described in detail:


The owner of charter fishing boat named “Orca” operating out of Ketchikan, Ak., uses his desktop computer (stationary IP communication) to subscribe to a “Charter Assist” service provided by the Network Xypoint Location Service Agent (NXLSA), a part of the Value-Add Functions Layer 133. The subscription charges a small monthly recurring fee to a credit card designated by the Orca's owner. The web pages hosted by the NXLSA are exposed to the public via proxy within the Adapter Layer 130.


The nature of NXLSA “Charter Assist” service is to help charter owners find persons in their vicinity interested in participating in the type of charter trips they offer. In this case, during the subscription process, the Orca's owner selects “Fishing” as the primary charter service and then adds “salmon” and “halibut” as secondary affinity qualifiers. These are specific embodiments of two aspects of the current invention but the invention isn't limited to just those examples of service type and sub-type.


NXLSA's service also allows the owner to interactively adjust charter fees in near-realtime via smartphone (mobile IP communication) or cellular phone (cellular communication) to help the owner attempt to charter a full complement of fisherman for every trip. These are specific embodiments of two aspects of the current invention but the invention isn't limited to just these two (2) examples of technology.


In addition, the NXSLA service allows the Orca's owner to designate a number of potential location sources or technologies with which to track the Orca's current location. The Orca's owner knows that he'll always be captaining Orca during the charter fishing trips and so during the subscription process he indicates that the Orca's location can be attained via “Cellular Phone” and proceeds to list the make & model of his cell phone, the carrier with whom he has subscribed for cellular service, and his cellular phone number. The Orca's owner also indicates that his cell phone is GPS capable (i.e. contains a GPS receiver with which the cell phone can locate itself) and that he prefers NXLSA to get his location via the GPS capability of his cell phone. The Orca's owner is prompted, during the subscription process, to download a handset application compatible with his cell phone. After successfully installing the handset application, the handset application auto-starts and asks the Orca's owner if he'd like to enable his cell phone's GPS capability. The handset application also asks the Orca's owner to designate the frequency at which the location of his cell phone will be reported. The Orca's owner selects “yes” and “every 60 minutes”. Consequently, the handset application enables the GPS receiver, reports the cell phone's current location, and then goes into background operation mode waiting for 60 minutes to expire. At that time the Orca's owner's cell phone begins to report its location every hour. This is a specific embodiment of one aspect of the current invention but the invention is not limited to just this one example of location technology and methodology.


The NXLSA's “Charter Assist” service registers the Orca's owner with the Analytics & Affinity Layer 132 for affinities associated with CHARTER && FISHING && [SALMON∥HALIBUT]. The Affinity Processors will search the Keyword-List Table (see FIG. 2114) for both CHARTER+FISHING+SALMON and CHARTER+FISHING+HALIBUT. If both can be found then the Affinity Processors proceed to SPIN registration for the Orca's owner. If either CHARTER+FISHING+SALMON or CHARTER+FISHING+HALIBUT cannot be found then either one or both combinations will be created in the Keyword-List Table 114 and saved in the Affinity Table 110 with a newly created Affinity ID. The Affinity Processors will look for the Orca's owner in the SPIN Table 112. If not found then a new SPIN Table entry will be created for the Orca's owner, two new entries in the Affinity-List Table 118 will be created—one for CHARTER+FISHING+SALMON and another for CHARTER+FISHING+HALIBUT—the two new entries in the Affinity-List Table will be linked to the Orca's owner's new SPIN record and then linked to one another. Both new entries in the Affinity-List Table will also be linked to the appropriate records in the Affinity Table 110. Lastly two (2) new entries will be added to the SPIN-List Table 116. The first will be linked to the CHARTER+FISHING+SALMON affinity record and the second will be linked to the CHARTER+FISHING+HALIBUT affinity record. Each of the two (2) new SPIN-List records will also be linked to the Orca's owner's SPIN record. Of course if the Orca's owner's SPIN record is found then the Affinity-List Table 118 will be searched for references to both the CHARTER+FISHING+SALMON affinity and the CHARTER+FISHING+HALIBUT affinity; said Affinity-List Table records will be created, if necessary, and properly linked to the related records in the Affinity Table 110 as well as causing updates to related records in the SPIN-List Table 116. If all Affinity Table 110, Keyword-List Table 114, SPIN Table 112, Affinity-List Table 118, and SPIN-List Table 116, are found and properly linked then no modifications will be made to any table. There are many possible permutations of the management of the five (5) tables described in FIG. 2. Said permutations are obvious to those skilled in the art of linked list management.


Every location report sent by the Orca's owner's cell phone is routed by the Adapter Layer 130 to the Position Processors within the GeoTrove Layer 131. The Position Processors first mark the LOC Table (see FIG. 5) record associated with the Orca's owner by negating the SPIN ID value. This marks the Orca's owner's LOC Table record as “update in progress”. If the position is reported as a latitude/longitude pair, as is the case with the Orca's owner, then the Position Process proceed directly to computing the Hash Index from the Lat/Lon pair. If the position is reported as a civic address or some other common form of location report then the Position Processors geocode the input or perform some type of translation between mapping projections in order to achieve a high accuracy Latitude/Longitude pair. The Lat/Lon pair is used to compute a multi-byte HASH index representing the specific region within the Primary 120, Secondary 121, Tertiary 122, and Quaternary 123 matrices in which the Orca's owner's cell phone is located. If Quinary and Senary tiers are also being maintained then the HASH index is extended to accommodate the additional tiers of fidelity. The HASH index is first used to determine which specific Position Processor is maintaining the data structures for the PRIMARY geographic area associated with the Lat/Lon pair. Position Processors may be hierarchically related such that ocean areas and land areas that are sparsely populated are controlled by a small set of Position Processors (potentially just a single Position Processor) whereas land areas with very large populations and significant adoption of mobile technology (e.g. Los Angeles County, Calif.) are controlled by a multitude of Position Processors. The Hierarchical relationship of the Position Processors is such that a small collection of Position Processors attain the Lat/Lon pair, compute the HASH index, look up the resource indicator for the associated Primary 120 fidelity Position Processor, and then hand off to that Position Processor. The Position Processor associated with the Primary 120 fidelity updates the PRIMARY data structures (described previously in this disclosure) and then uses the HASH index to determine which Position Processor is handling the Secondary fidelity 121 for that geographic area. The same Position Processing that is maintaining the PRIMARY data structures for the computed geographic area may be maintaining the SECONDARY data structures too. If that is the case then all higher fidelity structures (i.e. Tertiary, Quaternary, Quinary, and Senary) will also be handled by that same Position Processor and no additional handoffs will be necessary. Addition of Position Processors to maintain a given geographic area occurs first in the highest fidelity tiers (Senary for a six tier system and Quaternary for a four tier system) and only affects lower fidelity tiers (e.g. Tertiary or Secondary) when population densities and mobile technology use grows to the point where additional processing power is needed to achieve acceptable performance. Each succeeding geographic tier processes the HASH index and updates the data structures associated with that tier and then hands off to the Position Processor maintaining the next higher fidelity tier. The SPIN's record within the LOC Table isn't updated until after the highest fidelity tier has been updated. There are two (2) critical things to remember about maintaining the multi-tiered geographic location system that is one embodiment of this invention: the GeoTrove. First, that the Position Processors must put the SPIN being updated into the appropriate tier segments associated with the new location. Second, that the Position Processors must take the SPIN being updated OUT of the tier segments associated with the SPIN's previous location. The tier references saved in the SPIN's record within the LOC table isn't updated with new tier references until all tiers have been updated so that the SPINs old location can be easily and quickly erased from every tier. Only then is the HASH index decomposed & saved as new tier references within the SPIN's LOC Table entry. Finally, the SPIN ID is once again negated (thus making it a positive value once more) to remove the indication of “update in progress”.


In a related embodiment of this invention the management of the data within the GeoTrove Layer 131 for each and every tier of location fidelity (i.e. Primary, Secondary, Tertiary, Quaternary, etc.) is accomplished using doubly linked lists (see FIG. 8). Every record within the LOC table 140 (see FIG. 5) provides links into collections of element records used to keep track of SPINs within the PRIMARY tier 141, SECONDARY tier 142, TERTIARY tier 143, and QUATERNARY tier 144. The only time a SPIN's associated LOC record has NULL links to Primary, Secondary, Tertiary, and Quaternary matrix elements is if the location of that SPIN was once being monitored but is no longer being monitored. Subsets of element records may be associated with any one grid “node” within the associated matrix. Of course if there are no SPINs in that particular grid node then the count for the node is zero and the link from the grid master is NULL (as is described earlier in this disclosure). If there are one or more SPINs within this grid node then the grid master has a link into the ring of matrix elements; the specific matrix element to which the grid master links is irrelevant but is set when the first matrix element is added to the grid node and reset to a new element if the element to which the grid master has linked is deleted (i.e. moved to a different grid node). The LOC record associated with every SPIN points directly to the matrix element associated with that SPIN. To move a PRIMARY matrix element from one grid node (i.e. referred to in the following example as Grid Node “A”) to a different PRIMARY matrix grid node (i.e. referred to in the following example as Grid Node “R”), the following actions are taken:















1)
NewGridPtr := GridNode[R].MatrixLink


2)
OldGridPtr := LOC_Table[SPIN ID].Precord_Ptr










Note:
the syntax “LOC_Table[SPIN ID] was used here for









convenience and is not meant to necessarily denote just a



simple table index. A simple table index is certainly one



embodiment of the present invention but the nomenclature is



intended to represent any form of dereference of a single



LOC_Table record from a collection of LOC_Table records



using SPIN ID as the distinguishing criteria.








3)
If (OldGridPtr→succeed == LOC_Table[SPIN ID].Precord_Ptr)



then









// the matrix element was pointing to itself which means there was only one (1)



// matrix element in Grid Node from which the element is being moved; that Grid



// Node will now be empty



GridNode[A].MatrixLink := NULL









else









// link the matrix element that formerly preceded & succeeded the matrix element



// being moved to one another to take the matrix element being moved out of the



// ring



OldGridPtr→precede→succeed := LOC_Table[SPIN ID].Precord_Ptr→succeed



OldGridPtr→succeed→precede := LOC_Table[SPIN ID].Precord_Ptr→precede



// if the GridNode[A].MatrixLink was pointing to OldGridPtr,



// then GridNode[A].MatrixLink needs to be re-established.



if ( GridNode[A].MatrixLink == OldGridPtr )



then









GridNode[A].MatrixLink := OldGridPtr→succeed









end if









end if


4)
If (NewGridPtr == NULL)



then









// the new Grid Node is empty so force it to point to the new matrix element and



// then link the element to itself



GridNode[R].MatrixLink := LOC_Table[SPIN ID].Precord_Ptr



LOC_Table[SPIN ID].Precord_Ptr→succeed := LOC_Table[SPIN ID].Precord_Ptr



LOC_Table[SPIN ID].Precord_Ptr→precede := LOC_Table[SPIN ID].Precord_Ptr









else









// add the new matrix element to the ring that already exists for the new Grid Node



LOC_Table[SPIN ID].Precord_Ptr→precede := NewGridPtr→precede



LOC_Table[SPIN ID].Precord_Ptr→succeed := NewGridPtr



NewGridPtr→precede→succeed := LOC_Table[SPIN ID].Precord_Ptr



NewGridPtr→precede := LOC_Table[SPIN ID].Precord_Ptr









end if










The act of moving the matrix element referred to by LOC_Table[SPIN ID].Precord_Ptr (or Srecord_Ptr, or Trecord_Ptr, etc.) does not actually change the content of Precord_Ptr but rather just changes the precede & succeed links contained within the matrix element structure such that the element is threaded into a ring within another Grid Node. The specifics of finding GridNodes “A” and “R” so as to dereference the forms listed above as “GridNode[A]” and “GridNode[R]” is considered obvious to one skilled in the art of data structure maintenance and list mechanics.


All of the Orca's owner's actions set the stage for a confluence of affinities but another spin is needed in order to create the juxtaposition needed for a confluence of location, desire (i.e. receptive and projective influence), and service (i.e. attractive or repulsive interaction).


Mr. Smith, of Memphis, Tenn., has long been a fan of fishing. Mr. Smith has recently become a member of a free social networking service—offered by the NXLSA—that allows him to use his home computer to register his interests in order to find and interact with other, like-minded folks in his vicinity. In order to allow the social networking service to provide timely notification of opportunities (i.e. confluences of affinity) Mr. Smith allows the service to locate his cell phone via non-GPS means twice a day between the hours of 7:30 am and 5:30 pm, local time. Mr. Smith generally fly fishes in fresh water rivers and streams near his home but Mr. Smith is planning an Alaskan cruise to Anchorage, Ak., that starts and ends in Seattle, Wash. Mr. Smith's fishing associates have told him that salmon fishing in Alaska is the best in the world so, in preparation for his trip Mr. Smith enhances his lists of interest to add “charter” and “salmon” as a qualifiers to his declared interest in fishing. The cruise Mr. Smith has chartered advertises a service to help cruise ship passengers go on half day or full day fishing trips at some of the cruise's ports of call but the sum of the cruise ship's service fee and the charter fees advertised at various ports of call is nearly double what Mr. Smith is willing to pay to try fishing for salmon. Mr. Smith uses his home computer to further enhance his declared interest in fishing once again with “willing to travel <=10 miles” and “prefer reduced charter fee” as subordinate qualifiers to his interest in salmon fishing.


This creates the opportunity for an Affinity-Vector action trigger. The Analytics & Affinity Layer 132 builds Affinity-Vectors down through the various tiers in the GeoTrove 131 starting with the PRIMARY tier and honing the ActionIndex of each Affinity-Vector as each is refined in the better fidelity location tiers (e.g. Secondary, Tertiary, Quaternary, etc.). There are many Affinity-Vectors for every declared affinity. The Analytics & Affinity Layer 132 maintains an ActionThreshold value for every Position Processor in the GeoTrove 131 which allows ActionThresholds values to be kept very high for low fidelity location tiers like the PRIMARY and SECONDARY tiers but also allows much lower ActionThreshold values for location tiers where proximity is measured in smaller units of distance. ActionIndex values are computed in direct proportion to proximity; the closer SPINs with the same affinities are the greater the computed ActionIndex becomes. ActionIndex values rarely exceed the ActionThreshold for PRIMARY or SECONDARY tier Position Processors because the ActionThresholds are set high enough to prevent that for most areas. Exceptions occur in areas of low population density. The great majority of Actions initiated by the Analytics & Affinity Layer trigger as a result of ActionThreshold values maintained for the TERTIARY or QUATERNARY tier fidelity location tiers.


In the case of Mr. Smith, his cruise ship reached Ketchikan, Ak., at 5:00 pm AKDT. NXLSA had already detected that Mr. Smith was traveling West from Memphis, Tenn., so it temporarily increased the frequency of location determination so it could compute an appropriate delay for the “twice daily @ 7:30 am && 5:30 pm local time” location determinations stipulated by Mr. Smith. When Mr. Smith's NXLSA social networking service initiated a location determination at 5:30 pm AKDT and located him in Ketchikan the Analytics & Affinity Layer was able to refine a Charter+Fishing+Salmon AffinityVector to the TERTIARY location tier where, for Ketchikan, Ak., its AffinityIndex exceeded the 10 mile AffinityThreshold defined for that Position Processor. No action was initiated at that time, however, because of the subordinate “prefer reduced charter fee” qualifier. The next morning, when the Orca's owner received notification that one of the persons scheduled for that day's charter trip was unable to participate, Orca's owner used his cell phone to notify NXLSA that he was reducing the daily charter fee by 50% for one fisherman for that day only. This caused further refinement to the AffinityIndex value which triggered an early morning notification to both Mr. Smith and the Orca's owner asking both if they'd like to be connected. Both Mr. Smith and the Orca's owner replied “yes” so NXLSA created a conference bridge allowing Mr. Smith to arrange the details of his reduced-fee charter salmon fishing trip with the Orca's owner.


Other embodiments within the principles of the present invention are possible, including but not limited to the following types or examples of N-Dimensional Affinity Confluencers:


1) My Location+“people against speeding tickets”+cellular announcement of radar/laser detection ahead (see, e.g., Cellular Augmented Radar/Laser Detector U.S. Pat. No. 7,471,236).


2) Location of my vehicle+vehicle theft deterrence+activation of vehicle's alarm (see, e.g., Cellular Augmented Vehicle Alarm U.S. Pat. No. 7,825,780).


3) My Location+interest in locally broadcast, pseudo-anonymous, text communication (CB-SMS).


4) Location+advertised interest in social interaction+‘N’ element list of hobbies & interests (SMS-Roulette).


5) My Location+interest in Quisine|Theater|Sporting-Event|Retail-Offering|Childrens-Event|Street-Fair|Street-Performer+desire to participate.


6) My Location+interest in Quisine|Theater|Sporting-Event|Retail-Offering|Childrens-Event|Street-Fair|Street-Performer+desire to avoid.


7) My Location+cruise ship arrival schedule+desire to successfully secure parking.


8) My Location+Crime/Accident/Fire/HAZMAT incident+desire to avoid.


9) My Location+planned roadwork+desire to avoid.


10) My location+unplanned roadwork+desire to avoid.


11) Child's Location|Elder Parent's Location|Dependant's Location+miscellaneous event+desire to help them participate.


12) Child's Location|Elder Parent's Location|Dependant's Location+miscellaneous event+desire for them to avoid.


13) Location of preferred Band|Taco-Bus|Rave-Event|Team|Car-Club(s)+desire to participate.


14) My Location+anti-affinity+others' location+others' affinity+desire to avoid.


15) Strong affinities over an area+area advertisement.


16) Strong anti-affinities over an area+elimination of strongly unwanted area advertisements.


17) Lack of affinities over an area+area advertisement+desire to discover new things.


18) Political affinities over a region+candidates' desire to focus campaign spending.


19) My Location (or future location)+weather in an area+desire to be alerted.


20) My vehicles location+vehicle onboard computer measuring gas levels+gas stations location (ranked by price)+alert when gas level is low.


21) My vehicles location+vehicle onboard computer estimating miles left before out of gas+gas station location+alert you better get gas now.


22) My vehicles location+highway rest areas+time of continuous driving+alert rest area ahead (and how far) or better stop at this rest area.


23) My vehicles location+vehicle onboard computer measuring mileage since oil change+oil changing stations+alert when time to change oil.


While the invention has been described with reference to the exemplary embodiments thereof, those skilled in the art will be able to make various modifications to the described embodiments of the invention without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. An N-dimensional affinity confluencer, comprising: an affinity table comprising a plurality of different affinities for each of a plurality of wireless devices;a sphere of influence (SPIN) table comprising a mapping of influence parameters corresponding to said plurality of different affinities; andan affinity confluence determination module to determine a sub-plurality of said plurality of wireless devices having an affinity confluence based on a selected plurality of said influence parameters maintained in said sphere of influence (SPIN) table.
  • 2. The N-dimensional affinity confluencer according to claim 1, wherein: said affinities maintained in said affinity table include attractive associations between said plurality of wireless devices.
  • 3. The N-dimensional affinity confluencer according to claim 1, wherein: said affinities maintained in said affinity table include repulsive associations between said plurality of wireless devices.
  • 4. The N-dimensional affinity confluencer according to claim 1, wherein: said affinities maintained in said affinity table include attractive and repulsive associations between said plurality of wireless devices.
  • 5. The N-dimensional affinity confluence according to claim 1, wherein: said selected plurality of influence parameters include location.
  • 6. A method of determining an affinity confluence from among a plurality of wireless devices, comprising: building a database of at least two different affinities for each of a plurality of wireless devices;deriving a sphere of influence parameters corresponding to said different affinitiesdetermining a sub-plurality of said wireless devices having an affinity confluence based on a selected plurality of said influence parameters;wherein said plurality of wireless devices need not be within a common electrical network.
  • 7. The method of determining an affinity confluence from among a plurality of wireless devices according to claim 6, wherein: said affinity confluence includes an attractive association between said plurality of wireless devices.
  • 8. The method of determining an affinity confluence from among a plurality of wireless devices according to claim 6, wherein: said affinity confluence includes a repulsive association between said plurality of wireless devices.
  • 9. The method of determining an affinity confluence from among a plurality of wireless devices according to claim 6, wherein: said affinity confluence both an attractive association and a repulsive association between said plurality of wireless devices.
  • 10. The method of determining an affinity confluence from among a plurality of wireless devices according to claim 6, wherein said selected plurality of influence parameters include location.
Parent Case Info

This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Appl. No. 61/457,061 to PITT et al., entitled “N-Dimensional Affinity Confluencer,” filed Dec. 17, 2010; and from U.S. Provisional Appl. No. 61/457,145 to PITT et al., entitled “N-Dimensional Affinity Confluencer,” filed Jan. 14, 2011, the entirety of both of which are explicitly incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (747)
Number Name Date Kind
1103073 O'Connell Jul 1914 A
4445118 Taylor Apr 1984 A
4494119 Wimbush Jan 1985 A
4651156 Martinez Mar 1987 A
4706275 Kamil Nov 1987 A
4868570 Davis Sep 1989 A
4891638 Davis Jan 1990 A
4891650 Sheffer Jan 1990 A
4910767 Brugliera et al. Mar 1990 A
4952928 Carroll Aug 1990 A
4972484 Theile Nov 1990 A
5014206 Scribner May 1991 A
5043736 Darnell Aug 1991 A
5055851 Sheffer Oct 1991 A
5068656 Sutherland Nov 1991 A
5068891 Marshall Nov 1991 A
5070329 Jasimaki Dec 1991 A
5081667 Drori Jan 1992 A
5119104 Heller Jun 1992 A
5126722 Kamis Jun 1992 A
5144283 Arens Sep 1992 A
5161180 Chavous Nov 1992 A
5166972 Smith Nov 1992 A
5177478 Wagai Jan 1993 A
5193215 Olmer Mar 1993 A
5208756 Song May 1993 A
5214789 George May 1993 A
5218367 Sheffer Jun 1993 A
5223844 Mansell Jun 1993 A
5239570 Koster Aug 1993 A
5265630 Hartmann Nov 1993 A
5266944 Carroll Nov 1993 A
5283570 DeLuca Feb 1994 A
5289527 Tiedemann Feb 1994 A
5293642 Lo Mar 1994 A
5299132 Wortham Mar 1994 A
5301354 Schwendeman Apr 1994 A
5311516 Kuznicke May 1994 A
5325302 Izidon Jun 1994 A
5327529 Fults Jul 1994 A
5334974 Simms Aug 1994 A
5335246 Yokev Aug 1994 A
5343493 Karimulah Aug 1994 A
5347568 Moody Sep 1994 A
5351235 Lahtinen Sep 1994 A
5361212 Class Nov 1994 A
5363425 Mufti Nov 1994 A
5365451 Wang Nov 1994 A
5374936 Feng Dec 1994 A
5379451 Nakagoshi Jan 1995 A
5381338 Wysocki Jan 1995 A
5387993 Heller Feb 1995 A
5388147 Grimes Feb 1995 A
5390339 Bruckery Feb 1995 A
5394158 Chia Feb 1995 A
5396227 Carroll Mar 1995 A
5398190 Wortham Mar 1995 A
5406614 Hara Apr 1995 A
5418537 Bird May 1995 A
5422813 Schuchman Jun 1995 A
5423076 Westergren Jun 1995 A
5432841 Rimer Jul 1995 A
5434789 Fraker Jul 1995 A
5454024 Lebowitz Sep 1995 A
5461390 Hosher Oct 1995 A
5470233 Fruchterman Nov 1995 A
5479408 Will Dec 1995 A
5479482 Grimes Dec 1995 A
5485161 Vaugh Jan 1996 A
5485163 Singer Jan 1996 A
5488563 Chazelle Jan 1996 A
5494091 Freeman Feb 1996 A
5497149 Fast Mar 1996 A
5506886 Maine Apr 1996 A
5508931 Snider Apr 1996 A
5513243 Kage Apr 1996 A
5515287 Hakoyama May 1996 A
5517199 DiMattei May 1996 A
5519403 Bickley May 1996 A
5530655 Lokhoff Jun 1996 A
5530914 McPheters Jun 1996 A
5532690 Hertel Jul 1996 A
5535434 Siddoway Jul 1996 A
5539395 Buss Jul 1996 A
5539398 Hall Jul 1996 A
5539829 Lokhoff Jul 1996 A
5543776 L'Esperance Aug 1996 A
5546445 Dennison Aug 1996 A
5552772 Janky Sep 1996 A
5555286 Tendler Sep 1996 A
5568119 Schipper Oct 1996 A
5568153 Beliveau Oct 1996 A
5574648 Pilley Nov 1996 A
5579372 Angstrom Nov 1996 A
5588009 Will Dec 1996 A
5592535 Klotz Jan 1997 A
5594780 Wiedeman Jan 1997 A
5604486 Lauro Feb 1997 A
5606313 Allen Feb 1997 A
5606618 Lokhoff Feb 1997 A
5606850 Nakamura Mar 1997 A
5610815 Gudat Mar 1997 A
5611050 Theimer Mar 1997 A
5614890 Fox Mar 1997 A
5615116 Gudat Mar 1997 A
5621793 Bednarek Apr 1997 A
5628051 Salin May 1997 A
5629693 Janky May 1997 A
5633912 Tsoi May 1997 A
5636276 Brugger Jun 1997 A
5661652 Sprague Aug 1997 A
5661755 Van de Kerkhof Aug 1997 A
5682600 Salin Oct 1997 A
5689245 Noreen Nov 1997 A
5699053 Jonsson Dec 1997 A
5704029 Wright, Jr. Dec 1997 A
5721781 Deo Feb 1998 A
5731785 Lemelson Mar 1998 A
5740534 Ayerst Apr 1998 A
5761618 Lynch Jun 1998 A
5765152 Erickson Jun 1998 A
5767795 Schaphorst Jun 1998 A
5768509 Gunluk Jun 1998 A
5771353 Eggleston Jun 1998 A
5774533 Patel Jun 1998 A
5774670 Montulli Jun 1998 A
5787357 Salin Jul 1998 A
5794142 Vantilla Aug 1998 A
5797094 Houde Aug 1998 A
5797096 Lupien Aug 1998 A
5802492 DeLorrme Sep 1998 A
5806000 Vo Sep 1998 A
5809415 Rossmann Sep 1998 A
5812086 Bertiger Sep 1998 A
5812087 Krasner Sep 1998 A
5822700 Hult Oct 1998 A
5828740 Khue Oct 1998 A
5835907 Newman Nov 1998 A
5841396 Krasner Nov 1998 A
5857201 Wright, Jr. Jan 1999 A
5864667 Barkam Jan 1999 A
5874914 Krasner Feb 1999 A
5896369 Warsta Apr 1999 A
5920821 Seaholtz Jul 1999 A
5922074 Richard Jul 1999 A
5930250 Klok Jul 1999 A
5930701 Skog Jul 1999 A
5943399 Banister Aug 1999 A
5945944 Krasner Aug 1999 A
5946629 Sawyer Aug 1999 A
5946630 Willars Aug 1999 A
5950130 Coursey Sep 1999 A
5950137 Kim Sep 1999 A
5953398 Hill Sep 1999 A
5960362 Grob Sep 1999 A
5974054 Couts Oct 1999 A
5978685 Laiho Nov 1999 A
5983099 Yao Nov 1999 A
5987323 Huotari Nov 1999 A
5998111 Abe Dec 1999 A
5999124 Sheynblat Dec 1999 A
6014602 Kithol Jan 2000 A
6032051 Hall Feb 2000 A
6035025 Hanson Mar 2000 A
6049710 Nilsson Apr 2000 A
6052081 Krasner Apr 2000 A
6058300 Hanson May 2000 A
6061018 Sheynblat May 2000 A
6061346 Nordman May 2000 A
6064336 Krasner May 2000 A
6064875 Morgan May 2000 A
6067045 Castelloe May 2000 A
6070067 Nguyen May 2000 A
6075982 Donovan Jun 2000 A
6081229 Soliman Jun 2000 A
6081508 West Jun 2000 A
6085320 Kaliski, Jr. Jul 2000 A
6101378 Barabash Aug 2000 A
6104931 Havinis Aug 2000 A
6108533 Brohoff Aug 2000 A
6121923 King Sep 2000 A
6122503 Daly Sep 2000 A
6122520 Want Sep 2000 A
6124810 Segal Sep 2000 A
6131028 Whittington Oct 2000 A
6131067 Girerd Oct 2000 A
6133874 Krasner Oct 2000 A
6134316 Kallioniemi Oct 2000 A
6134483 Vayanos Oct 2000 A
6138003 Kingdon Oct 2000 A
6148197 Bridges Nov 2000 A
6148198 Anderson Nov 2000 A
6149353 Nilsson Nov 2000 A
6150980 Krasner Nov 2000 A
6154172 Piccionelli Nov 2000 A
6169891 Gorham Jan 2001 B1
6169901 Boucher Jan 2001 B1
6169902 Kawamoto Jan 2001 B1
6173181 Losh Jan 2001 B1
6178505 Schnieder Jan 2001 B1
6178506 Quick, Jr. Jan 2001 B1
6181935 Gossman Jan 2001 B1
6181939 Ahvenainen Jan 2001 B1
6188354 Soliman Feb 2001 B1
6188752 Lesley Feb 2001 B1
6188909 Alanara Feb 2001 B1
6189098 Kaliski, Jr. Feb 2001 B1
6195555 Dent Feb 2001 B1
6195557 Havinis Feb 2001 B1
6198431 Gibson Mar 2001 B1
6199045 Giniger Mar 2001 B1
6199113 Alegre Mar 2001 B1
6205330 Windbladh Mar 2001 B1
6208290 Krasner Mar 2001 B1
6208854 Roberts Mar 2001 B1
6215441 Moeglein Apr 2001 B1
6219557 Havinis Apr 2001 B1
6223046 Hamill-Keays Apr 2001 B1
6226529 Bruno May 2001 B1
6239742 Krasner May 2001 B1
6247135 Feaugue Jun 2001 B1
6249680 Wax Jun 2001 B1
6249744 Morita Jun 2001 B1
6249873 Richard Jun 2001 B1
6253074 Carlsson Jun 2001 B1
6253203 O'Flaherty Jun 2001 B1
6260147 Quick, Jr. Jul 2001 B1
6266614 Alumbaugh Jul 2001 B1
6275692 Skog Aug 2001 B1
6275849 Ludwig Aug 2001 B1
6278701 Ayyagari Aug 2001 B1
6289373 Dezonno Sep 2001 B1
6297768 Allen, Jr. Oct 2001 B1
6307504 Sheynblat Oct 2001 B1
6308269 Proidl Oct 2001 B2
6313786 Sheynblat Nov 2001 B1
6317594 Gossman Nov 2001 B1
6321091 Holland Nov 2001 B1
6321092 Fitch Nov 2001 B1
6321257 Kotala Nov 2001 B1
6324524 Lent Nov 2001 B1
6327473 Soliman Dec 2001 B1
6327479 Mikkola Dec 2001 B1
6330454 Verdonk Dec 2001 B1
6333919 Gaffney Dec 2001 B2
6360093 Ross Mar 2002 B1
6360102 Havinis Mar 2002 B1
6363254 Jones Mar 2002 B1
6367019 Ansell Apr 2002 B1
6370389 Isomursu Apr 2002 B1
6377209 Krasner Apr 2002 B1
6397074 Pihl May 2002 B1
6400314 Krasner Jun 2002 B1
6400958 Isomursu Jun 2002 B1
6411254 Moeglein Jun 2002 B1
6421002 Krasner Jul 2002 B2
6427001 Contractor Jul 2002 B1
6429808 King Aug 2002 B1
6433734 Krasner Aug 2002 B1
6434381 Moore Aug 2002 B1
6442391 Johansson Aug 2002 B1
6449473 Raivisto Sep 2002 B1
6449476 Hutchinson, IV Sep 2002 B1
6456852 Bar Sep 2002 B2
6463272 Wallace Oct 2002 B1
6477150 Maggenti Nov 2002 B1
6504491 Christians Jan 2003 B1
6505049 Dorenbosch Jan 2003 B1
6510387 Fuchs Jan 2003 B2
6512922 Burg Jan 2003 B1
6512930 Sandegren Jan 2003 B2
6515623 Johnson Feb 2003 B2
6519466 Pande Feb 2003 B2
6522682 Kohli Feb 2003 B1
6526026 Menon Feb 2003 B1
6529500 Pandharipande Mar 2003 B1
6529829 Turetzky Mar 2003 B2
6531982 White Mar 2003 B1
6538757 Sansone Mar 2003 B1
6539200 Schiff Mar 2003 B1
6539232 Hendrey et al. Mar 2003 B2
6539304 Chansarkar Mar 2003 B1
6542464 Takeda Apr 2003 B1
6542734 Abrol Apr 2003 B1
6542743 Soliman Apr 2003 B1
6549776 Joong Apr 2003 B1
6549844 Egberts Apr 2003 B1
6553236 Dunko Apr 2003 B1
6556832 Soliman Apr 2003 B1
6560456 Lohtia May 2003 B1
6560461 Fomukong May 2003 B1
6560534 Abraham May 2003 B2
6564261 Gudjonsson May 2003 B1
6570530 Gaal May 2003 B2
6571095 Koodli May 2003 B1
6574558 Kohli Jun 2003 B2
6580390 Hay Jun 2003 B1
6584552 Kuno Jun 2003 B1
6587691 Granstam Jul 2003 B1
6594500 Bender Jul 2003 B2
6597311 Sheynblat Jul 2003 B2
6600927 Hamilton Jul 2003 B2
6603973 Foladare Aug 2003 B1
6606495 Korpi Aug 2003 B1
6606554 Edge Aug 2003 B2
6609004 Morse Aug 2003 B1
6611757 Brodie Aug 2003 B2
6618593 Drutman Sep 2003 B1
6618670 Chansarkar Sep 2003 B1
6621452 Knockeart Sep 2003 B2
6621810 Leung Sep 2003 B1
6628233 Knockeart Sep 2003 B2
6633255 Krasner Oct 2003 B2
6640184 Rabe Oct 2003 B1
6650288 Pitt Nov 2003 B1
6661372 Girerd Dec 2003 B1
6665539 Sih Dec 2003 B2
6665541 Krasner Dec 2003 B1
6671620 Garin Dec 2003 B1
6677894 Sheynblat Jan 2004 B2
6680694 Knockheart Jan 2004 B1
6680695 Turetzky Jan 2004 B2
6687504 Raith Feb 2004 B1
6690940 Brown Feb 2004 B1
6691019 Seeley Feb 2004 B2
6694258 Johnson Feb 2004 B2
6694351 Shaffer Feb 2004 B1
6697629 Grilli Feb 2004 B1
6698195 Hellinger Mar 2004 B1
6701144 Kirbas Mar 2004 B2
6703971 Pande Mar 2004 B2
6703972 Van Diggelen Mar 2004 B2
6704651 Van Diggelen Mar 2004 B2
6707421 Drury Mar 2004 B1
6714793 Carey Mar 2004 B1
6718174 Vayanos Apr 2004 B2
6720915 Sheynblat Apr 2004 B2
6721578 Minear Apr 2004 B2
6721871 Piispanen Apr 2004 B2
6724342 Bloebaum Apr 2004 B2
6725159 Krasner Apr 2004 B2
6728701 Stoica Apr 2004 B1
6731940 Nagendran May 2004 B1
6734821 Van Diggelen May 2004 B2
6738013 Orler May 2004 B2
6738800 Aquilon May 2004 B1
6741842 Goldberg May 2004 B2
6744856 Karnik Jun 2004 B2
6744858 Ryan Jun 2004 B1
6745038 Callaway, Jr. Jun 2004 B2
6747596 Orler Jun 2004 B2
6748195 Phillips Jun 2004 B1
6751464 Burg Jun 2004 B1
6756938 Zhao Jun 2004 B2
6757544 Rangarajan Jun 2004 B2
6757545 Nowak Jun 2004 B2
6771742 McCalmont et al. Aug 2004 B2
6771971 Smith Aug 2004 B2
6772340 Peinado Aug 2004 B1
6775255 Roy Aug 2004 B1
6775267 Kung Aug 2004 B1
6775534 Lindgren Aug 2004 B2
6775655 Peinado Aug 2004 B1
6775802 Gaal Aug 2004 B2
6778136 Gronemeyer Aug 2004 B2
6778885 Agashe Aug 2004 B2
6781963 Crockett Aug 2004 B2
6788249 Farmer Sep 2004 B1
6795444 Vo Sep 2004 B1
6795699 McGraw Sep 2004 B1
6799049 Zellner Sep 2004 B1
6799050 Krasner Sep 2004 B1
6801159 Swope Oct 2004 B2
6804524 Vandermaijden Oct 2004 B1
6807534 Erickson Oct 2004 B1
6810323 Bullock Oct 2004 B1
6813264 Vassilovski Nov 2004 B2
6813499 McDonnell Nov 2004 B2
6813501 Kinnunen Nov 2004 B2
6813560 Van Diggelen Nov 2004 B2
6816111 Krasner Nov 2004 B2
6816580 Timmins Nov 2004 B2
6816710 Krasner Nov 2004 B2
6816719 Heinonen Nov 2004 B1
6816734 Wong Nov 2004 B2
6820269 Baucke et al. Nov 2004 B2
6829475 Lee Dec 2004 B1
6832373 O'Neill Dec 2004 B2
6839020 Geier Jan 2005 B2
6839021 Sheynblat Jan 2005 B2
6839417 Weisman Jan 2005 B2
6842715 Gaal Jan 2005 B1
6847618 Laursen Jan 2005 B2
6847822 Dennison Jan 2005 B1
6853916 Fuchs Feb 2005 B2
6856282 Mauro Feb 2005 B2
6861980 Rowitch Mar 2005 B1
6865171 Nilsson Mar 2005 B1
6865395 Riley Mar 2005 B2
6865538 Chithambaram Mar 2005 B2
6867733 Sandhu Mar 2005 B2
6867734 Voor Mar 2005 B2
6873854 Crockett Mar 2005 B2
6876734 Summers Apr 2005 B1
6882850 McConnell Apr 2005 B2
6885874 Grube Apr 2005 B2
6885940 Brodie Apr 2005 B2
6888497 King May 2005 B2
6888932 Snip May 2005 B2
6895238 Newell May 2005 B2
6895249 Gaal May 2005 B2
6898633 Lyndersay May 2005 B1
6900758 Mann May 2005 B1
6903684 Simic Jun 2005 B1
6904029 Fors Jun 2005 B2
6907224 Younis Jun 2005 B2
6907238 Leung Jun 2005 B2
6912230 Salkini Jun 2005 B1
6912395 Benes Jun 2005 B2
6912545 Lundy Jun 2005 B1
6915208 Garin Jul 2005 B2
6917331 Gronemeyer Jul 2005 B2
6930634 Peng Aug 2005 B2
6937187 Van Diggelen Aug 2005 B2
6937872 Krasner Aug 2005 B2
6940826 Simard Sep 2005 B1
6940950 Pitt Sep 2005 B2
6941144 Stein Sep 2005 B2
6944540 King Sep 2005 B2
6947772 Minear Sep 2005 B2
6950058 Davis Sep 2005 B1
6957073 Bye Oct 2005 B2
6961562 Ross Nov 2005 B2
6963557 Knox Nov 2005 B2
6965754 King Nov 2005 B2
6965767 Maggenti Nov 2005 B2
6968044 Beason Nov 2005 B2
6970917 Kushwaha Nov 2005 B1
6973320 Brown Dec 2005 B2
6975266 Abraham Dec 2005 B2
6978453 Rao Dec 2005 B2
6980816 Rohler Dec 2005 B2
6985747 Chithambaram Jan 2006 B2
6993355 Pershan Jan 2006 B1
6996720 DeMello Feb 2006 B1
6999782 Shaughnessy Feb 2006 B2
7024321 Deninger Apr 2006 B1
7024393 Peinado Apr 2006 B1
7047411 DeMello May 2006 B1
7065351 Carter Jun 2006 B2
7065507 Mohammed Jun 2006 B2
7072667 Olrik Jul 2006 B2
7079857 Maggenti Jul 2006 B2
7103018 Hansen Sep 2006 B1
7103574 Peinado Sep 2006 B1
7106717 Rosseau Sep 2006 B2
7110773 Wallace Sep 2006 B1
7123874 Brennan Oct 2006 B1
7136466 Gao Nov 2006 B1
7136838 Peinado Nov 2006 B1
7151946 Maggenti Dec 2006 B2
7174153 Ehlers Feb 2007 B2
7177397 McCalmont Feb 2007 B2
7177398 Meer Feb 2007 B2
7177399 Dawson Feb 2007 B2
7200380 Havlark Apr 2007 B2
7209758 Moll et al. Apr 2007 B1
7209969 Lahti Apr 2007 B2
7218940 Niemenna May 2007 B2
7221959 Lindquist May 2007 B2
7245900 Lamb Jul 2007 B1
7246187 Ezra Jul 2007 B1
7260186 Zhu Aug 2007 B2
7260384 Bales et al. Aug 2007 B2
7269428 Wallenius Sep 2007 B1
7302582 Snapp Nov 2007 B2
7321773 Hines Jan 2008 B2
7330899 Wong Feb 2008 B2
7333480 Clarke Feb 2008 B1
7369508 Parantainen May 2008 B2
7369530 Keagy May 2008 B2
7382773 Schoeneberger Jun 2008 B2
7392240 Scriffignano Jun 2008 B2
7394896 Norton Jul 2008 B2
7428571 Ichimura Sep 2008 B2
7436785 McMullen Oct 2008 B1
7440442 Grabelsky et al. Oct 2008 B2
7444342 Hall Oct 2008 B1
7450951 Vimpari Nov 2008 B2
7471236 Pitt Dec 2008 B1
7573982 Breen Aug 2009 B2
7602886 Beech Oct 2009 B1
7623447 Faccin Nov 2009 B1
7711094 Olshansky May 2010 B1
7764961 Zhu Jul 2010 B2
7783297 Ishii Aug 2010 B2
7787611 Kotelly Aug 2010 B1
7792989 Toebes Sep 2010 B2
7825780 Pitt Nov 2010 B2
7881233 Bieselin Feb 2011 B2
7937067 Maier May 2011 B2
8005683 Tessesl Aug 2011 B2
8027658 Suryanarayana Sep 2011 B2
8060389 Johnson Nov 2011 B2
8200291 Steinmetz Jun 2012 B2
8308570 Fiedler Nov 2012 B2
20010011247 O'Flaherty Aug 2001 A1
20010040886 Jimenez Nov 2001 A1
20010049274 Degraeve Dec 2001 A1
20020002036 Uehara Jan 2002 A1
20020037735 Maggenti Mar 2002 A1
20020052214 Maggenti May 2002 A1
20020061760 Maggenti May 2002 A1
20020069079 Vega Jun 2002 A1
20020069529 Wieres Jun 2002 A1
20020077083 Zellner Jun 2002 A1
20020077084 Zellner Jun 2002 A1
20020077118 Zellner Jun 2002 A1
20020077897 Zellner Jun 2002 A1
20020085538 Leung Jul 2002 A1
20020086676 Hendry Jul 2002 A1
20020098832 Fleischer Jul 2002 A1
20020102996 Jenkins Aug 2002 A1
20020102999 Maggenti Aug 2002 A1
20020111172 DeWolf Aug 2002 A1
20020112047 Kushwaha Aug 2002 A1
20020118650 Jagadeesan Aug 2002 A1
20020123327 Vataja Sep 2002 A1
20020123354 Nowak Sep 2002 A1
20020126656 Park Sep 2002 A1
20020138650 Yamamoto Sep 2002 A1
20020147023 Sawada Oct 2002 A1
20020156732 Odijk Oct 2002 A1
20020158777 Flick Oct 2002 A1
20020164998 Younis Nov 2002 A1
20020173317 Nykanen Nov 2002 A1
20020191595 Mar Dec 2002 A1
20030009277 Fan Jan 2003 A1
20030009602 Jacobs Jan 2003 A1
20030012148 Peters Jan 2003 A1
20030013449 Hose Jan 2003 A1
20030016804 Sheha Jan 2003 A1
20030026245 Ejzak Feb 2003 A1
20030037163 Kitada Feb 2003 A1
20030040272 Lelievre Feb 2003 A1
20030044654 Holt Mar 2003 A1
20030065788 Salomaki Apr 2003 A1
20030072318 Lam Apr 2003 A1
20030078064 Chan Apr 2003 A1
20030081557 Mettala May 2003 A1
20030086422 Klinker et al. May 2003 A1
20030086539 McCalmont May 2003 A1
20030100320 Ranjan May 2003 A1
20030101329 Lahti May 2003 A1
20030101341 Kettler May 2003 A1
20030103484 Oommen Jun 2003 A1
20030108176 Kung Jun 2003 A1
20030109245 McCalmont Jun 2003 A1
20030114157 Spitz Jun 2003 A1
20030118160 Holt Jun 2003 A1
20030119521 Tipnis Jun 2003 A1
20030119528 Pew Jun 2003 A1
20030125042 Olrik Jul 2003 A1
20030137961 Tsirtsis Jul 2003 A1
20030153340 Crockett Aug 2003 A1
20030153341 Crockett Aug 2003 A1
20030153342 Crockett Aug 2003 A1
20030153343 Crockett Aug 2003 A1
20030161298 Bergman Aug 2003 A1
20030169881 Niedermeyer Sep 2003 A1
20030186709 Rhodes Oct 2003 A1
20030196105 Fineberg Oct 2003 A1
20030204640 Sahineja Oct 2003 A1
20030223381 Schroderus Dec 2003 A1
20040002326 Maher Jan 2004 A1
20040032485 Stephens Feb 2004 A1
20040043775 Kennedy Mar 2004 A1
20040044623 Wake Mar 2004 A1
20040047461 Weisman Mar 2004 A1
20040068724 Gardner Apr 2004 A1
20040070515 Burkley Apr 2004 A1
20040077359 Bernas Apr 2004 A1
20040078694 Lester Apr 2004 A1
20040092250 Valloppillil May 2004 A1
20040098497 Banet May 2004 A1
20040132465 Mattila Jul 2004 A1
20040143852 Meyers Jul 2004 A1
20040181689 Kiyoto Sep 2004 A1
20040184584 McCalmont Sep 2004 A1
20040185875 Diacakis Sep 2004 A1
20040190497 Knox Sep 2004 A1
20040198332 Lundsgaard Oct 2004 A1
20040198386 Dupray Oct 2004 A1
20040203876 Drawert Oct 2004 A1
20040203922 Hines Oct 2004 A1
20040205151 Sprigg Oct 2004 A1
20040209594 Naboulsi Oct 2004 A1
20040225878 Costa-Requena Nov 2004 A1
20040229632 Flynn Nov 2004 A1
20040235493 Ekerborn Nov 2004 A1
20040242238 Wang Dec 2004 A1
20040267445 De Luca Dec 2004 A1
20050020242 Holland Jan 2005 A1
20050028034 Gantman Feb 2005 A1
20050039178 Marolia Feb 2005 A1
20050041578 Huotari Feb 2005 A1
20050043037 Loppe Feb 2005 A1
20050053209 D'Evelyn Mar 2005 A1
20050071251 Linden Mar 2005 A1
20050071671 Karaoguz Mar 2005 A1
20050074107 Renner Apr 2005 A1
20050083891 Chuang Apr 2005 A1
20050083911 Grabelsky Apr 2005 A1
20050086467 Asokan Apr 2005 A1
20050090236 Schwinke Apr 2005 A1
20050107673 Ball May 2005 A1
20050112030 Gaus May 2005 A1
20050119012 Merheb Jun 2005 A1
20050134504 Harwood Jun 2005 A1
20050135569 Dickinson et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050136885 Kaltsukis Jun 2005 A1
20050148346 Maloney Jul 2005 A1
20050149430 Williams Jul 2005 A1
20050169248 Truesdale Aug 2005 A1
20050174991 Keagy Aug 2005 A1
20050192822 Hartenstein Sep 2005 A1
20050201529 Nelson Sep 2005 A1
20050209995 Aksu Sep 2005 A1
20050213716 Zhu Sep 2005 A1
20050216300 Appelman Sep 2005 A1
20050232252 Hoover Oct 2005 A1
20050238156 Turner Oct 2005 A1
20050239458 Hurtta Oct 2005 A1
20050250516 Shim Nov 2005 A1
20050259675 Tuohino Nov 2005 A1
20050265318 Khartabil Dec 2005 A1
20050271029 Iffland Dec 2005 A1
20050282518 D'Evelyn Dec 2005 A1
20050287979 Rollender Dec 2005 A1
20050289097 Trossen Dec 2005 A1
20060008065 Longman et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060010200 Mousseau Jan 2006 A1
20060023747 Koren et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060026288 Acharya Feb 2006 A1
20060036680 Shim Feb 2006 A1
20060053225 Poikselka Mar 2006 A1
20060058042 Shim Mar 2006 A1
20060058045 Nilsen Mar 2006 A1
20060058102 Nguyen et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060068753 Karpen Mar 2006 A1
20060079249 Shim Apr 2006 A1
20060079330 Dvorak Apr 2006 A1
20060104306 Adamczkk May 2006 A1
20060106774 Cohen May 2006 A1
20060120517 Moon Jun 2006 A1
20060128395 Muhonen Jun 2006 A1
20060135177 Winterbottom Jun 2006 A1
20060154710 Serafat Jul 2006 A1
20060188083 Breen Aug 2006 A1
20060193447 Schwartz Aug 2006 A1
20060212558 Sahinoja Sep 2006 A1
20060212562 Kushwaha Sep 2006 A1
20060225090 Shim et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060234639 Kushwaha Oct 2006 A1
20060234698 Fok Oct 2006 A1
20060239205 Warren Oct 2006 A1
20060258380 Liebowitz Nov 2006 A1
20060293024 Benco Dec 2006 A1
20060293066 Edge Dec 2006 A1
20070003024 Olivier Jan 2007 A1
20070019614 Hoffmann Jan 2007 A1
20070022011 Altberg Jan 2007 A1
20070026854 Nath Feb 2007 A1
20070026871 Wager Feb 2007 A1
20070027997 Polk Feb 2007 A1
20070030539 Nath Feb 2007 A1
20070036139 Patel Feb 2007 A1
20070037585 Shim Feb 2007 A1
20070041513 Gende Feb 2007 A1
20070041516 Dickinson Feb 2007 A1
20070049288 Lamprecht Mar 2007 A1
20070060097 Edge Mar 2007 A1
20070072553 Barbera Mar 2007 A1
20070072624 Niemaenmaa Mar 2007 A1
20070081635 Croak Apr 2007 A1
20070082681 Kim Apr 2007 A1
20070082682 Kim Apr 2007 A1
20070115941 Patel May 2007 A1
20070121601 Kikinis May 2007 A1
20070149213 Lamba Jun 2007 A1
20070160036 Smith Jul 2007 A1
20070161382 Melinger et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070162228 Mitchell Jul 2007 A1
20070167177 Kraufvelin Jul 2007 A1
20070182547 Wachter Aug 2007 A1
20070182631 Berlinsky Aug 2007 A1
20070201623 Hines Aug 2007 A1
20070206568 Silver Sep 2007 A1
20070206613 Silver Sep 2007 A1
20070242660 Xu Oct 2007 A1
20070243885 Shim Oct 2007 A1
20070263610 Mitchell Nov 2007 A1
20070270164 Maier Nov 2007 A1
20080032703 Krumm Feb 2008 A1
20080037715 Prozeniuk Feb 2008 A1
20080059304 Kimsey Mar 2008 A1
20080063153 Krivorot Mar 2008 A1
20080065775 Polk Mar 2008 A1
20080080691 Dolan Apr 2008 A1
20080109650 Shim May 2008 A1
20080117859 Shahidi May 2008 A1
20080146343 Sullivan Jun 2008 A1
20080186164 Emigh Aug 2008 A1
20080208671 Ehrlich Aug 2008 A1
20080214202 Toomey Sep 2008 A1
20080235511 O'Brien Sep 2008 A1
20080268769 Brown Oct 2008 A1
20080313000 Degeratu Dec 2008 A1
20090005076 Forstall et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090020447 Potterfield et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090029675 Steinmetz Jan 2009 A1
20090198733 Gounares Aug 2009 A1
20090204600 Kalik Aug 2009 A1
20090215466 Ahl Aug 2009 A1
20090224931 Dietz Sep 2009 A1
20090298488 Snapp Dec 2009 A1
20090323636 Dillon Dec 2009 A1
20100010860 Bose Jan 2010 A1
20100021013 Gale Jan 2010 A1
20100029244 Moodbidri Feb 2010 A1
20100062788 Nagorniak Mar 2010 A1
20100069034 Dickinson Mar 2010 A1
20100125892 Tanizawa May 2010 A1
20100167691 Howarter Jul 2010 A1
20100178973 Snoddy Jul 2010 A1
20100218664 Toledano Sep 2010 A1
20110109468 Hirschfeld May 2011 A1
20110113060 Martini May 2011 A1
20110131414 Cheng Jun 2011 A1
20110137549 Gupta Jun 2011 A1
20110151837 Winbush Jun 2011 A1
20110165861 Wilson Jul 2011 A1
20110273568 Lagassey Nov 2011 A1
20120001750 Monroe Jan 2012 A1
20120189107 Dickinson Jul 2012 A1
20130072308 Peck Mar 2013 A1
20130079152 Hall Mar 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (9)
Number Date Country
WO2006075856 Jul 2006 KR
PCTSE9801887 Oct 1998 WO
PCTUS9928848 Dec 1999 WO
WO0145342 Jun 2001 WO
PCTUS0146666 Nov 2001 WO
WO2004025941 Mar 2004 WO
PCTUS05022090 Jun 2005 WO
WO2005051033 Jun 2005 WO
WO 2009105603 Aug 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (23)
Entry
Intrado Inc., Qwest Detailed SR/ALI to MPC/GMLC Interface Specification for TCP/IP Implementation of TIA/EIA/J-STD-036 E2 with Phase I Location Description Addition, Intrado Informed Response; Apr. 2004; Issue 1.11; pp. 1-57.
International Search Report in PCT/US2007/23243 dated Apr. 2, 2008.
PCT International Search Report (PCTUS2007/23714) and Written Opinion of International Searching Authority, Apr. 18, 2008.
Le-Pond Chin, Jyh-Hong Wen, Ting-Way Liu, The Study of the Interconnection of GSM Mobile Communication System Over IP based Network, May 6, 2001, IEEE, Vehicular Technology Conference, vol. 3, pp. 2219-2223.
Location Based Services V2 Roaming Support (non proprietary), 80-V8470-2NP A, dated Jan. 27, 2005, pp. 1-56.
Yilin Ahao, Efficient and reliable date transmission for cellular and GPS based mayday systems, Nov. 1997, IEEE, IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation System, 1997. ITSC 97, 555-559.
Qualcomm CDMA Technologies, LBS Control Plane/User Plane Overview—80-VD378-1NP B, 2006, pp. 1-36.
Bhalla et al, TELUS, Technology Strategy—LBS Roaming Summit, Sep. 19, 2006.
Alfredo Aguirre, Ilusacell, First and Only Carrier in Mexico with a 3G CDMA Network, 2007.
Mike McMullen, Sprint, LBS Roaming Summit, Sep. 19, 2006.
Andrew Yeow, BCE, LBS Roaming Summit, Sep. 19, 2006, pp. 1-8.
Nars Haran, U.S. Cellular, Packet Data—Roaming and LBS Overview, Nov. 2, 2007, pp. 1-15.
Qualcomm CDMA Technologies, LBS Control Plane Roaming—80-VD377-1NP A, 2006, pp. 1-10.
Qualcomm CDMA Technologies, MS Resident User Plane LBS Roaming—80-VC718-1 E, 2006, pp. 1-37.
PCT International Search Report in PCT.US2007/23243 dated Apr. 2, 2008.
PCT International Search Report in PCT.US2007/23714 dated Apr. 18, 2008.
International Search Report Received in PCT/US11/01971 dated Feb. 28, 2013.
International Search Report Received in PCT/US12/067932 dated Feb. 6, 2013.
International Search Report received in PCT/US2012/00208 dated Jul. 6, 2012.
International Search Report received in PCT/US2012/00266 dated Aug. 3, 3012.
Intrado MSAG Prep for E911 Program and Documentation. Intrado Inc., Longmont, CO. Sep. 14, 2006. Accessed: Nov. 8, 2011. Idaho PSAP Standards Committee. Idaho Emergency Communications Commission,http://idahodispatch.com/index.php?option=com—documan&task=doc—download&gid=3&Itemid=7.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received in PCT/US2011/01990 dated Dec. 13, 2012.
International Search Report received in PCT/US2012/000422 dated Dec. 10, 2012.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120157136 A1 Jun 2012 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
61457061 Dec 2010 US
61457145 Jan 2011 US