N-way doherty distributed power amplifier with power tracking

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9184703
  • Patent Number
    9,184,703
  • Date Filed
    Friday, November 22, 2013
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 10, 2015
    8 years ago
Abstract
A power amplifier using N-way Doherty structure with adaptive bias supply power tracking for extending the efficiency region over the high peak-to-average power:ratio of the multiplexing modulated signals such as wideband code division multiple access and orthogonal frequency division multiplexing is disclosed. In an embodiment, present invention uses a dual-feed distributed structure to an N-way Doherty amplifier to improve the isolation between at least one main amplifier and at least one peaking amplifier and, and also to improve both gain and efficiency performance at high output back-off power. Hybrid couplers can be used at either or both of the input and output. In at least some implementations, circuit space is also conserved due to the integration of amplification, power splitting and combining.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to high power communication systems. More specially, the present invention relates to high efficiency high power amplifiers for such systems.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In modern digital wireless communication systems, such as IS-95, PCS, WCDMA, OFDM and so on, the power amplifiers have advanced towards having a wide bandwidth and large number of carriers. Recently, orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) modulation is an attractive technique for transmitting information efficiently within a limited bandwidth like WiBRO and WiMAX. However, since the OFDM signal consists of a number of independently modulated sub-carriers, it produces a higher peak-to-average power ratio (PAR) signal. A typical PAR for a 64-subcarrier OFDM signal is around 8-13 dB. When the number of sub-carriers is increased to 2048, the PAR also increases, typically from 11 to 16 dB. The power amplifiers designed to operate with these high PARs typically have significantly deteriorated efficiency.


The Doherty amplifier is known as a technique for improving the efficiency at high output back-off power. Its primary advantage is the ease of configuration when applied to high power amplifiers, unlike other efficiency enhancement amplifiers or techniques such as switching mode amplifiers, EER, LINC and so on. Recent results have been reported on its use as: a symmetric Doherty structure, an asymmetric Doherty structure with uneven power transistors, and a N-way Doherty structure using multi-paralleled transistors. In the case of the symmetric Doherty amplifier, the maximum efficiency point is obtained at 6 dB back-off power.


The asymmetric Doherty amplifier can obtain a high efficiency at various back-off powers using a combination of different power device sizes for the main and peaking amplifiers. Unfortunately, it is difficult to optimize the gain and output power of the asymmetric Doherty amplifier because of the different device matching circuits and the delay mismatch between the main amplifier and the peaking amplifier.


The conventional N-way Doherty amplifier has an efficiency enhancement over a conventional 2-way Doherty structure by using multiple parallel transistors of identical devices. Its one drawback is that the total gain will be reduced due to the loss of the N-way input power splitter. Under low gain situations this will increase the power dissipation of the driving amplifier.


Further, while the conventional N-way Doherty amplifier can offer improved efficiency at high output back-off power, the performance of conventional N-way Doherty amplifiers deteriorates as to both gain and efficiency for higher peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) signals.


Hence, a need remains in the arts for a method of applying both circuit-level and system-level techniques simultaneously for improving the gain and efficiency performance of N-way Doherty amplifier at high output back-off power in the high power communication systems.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, the present invention has been made in view of the above problems, and it is an object of the present invention to provide a method for improving the gain and efficiency performance of the Doherty amplifying structure at high output back-off power for high power communication system applications. To achieve the above objects, according to the present invention, the technique employs dual-feed distributed amplifying. The power splitter and combiner of the conventional N-way Doherty amplifier are replaced by hybrid couplers with transmission lines. Compared to the conventional N-way Doherty amplifier, the present invention is able to achieve good isolation at the input and output as well as high gain performance with high efficiency. In an embodiment, a power tracking adaptive bias supply technique is employed. The drain bias voltages and gate bias voltages are adaptively controlled by the input power level. Two alternative approaches as disclosed: 1) Envelope tracking 2) Average power tracking. The envelope tracking technique requires a fast switching power supply whereas the average power tracking technique adapts significantly slower. The power detection circuit can be implemented either using analog circuitry or using digital signal processing.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Further objects and advantages of the invention can be more fully understood from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:



FIG. 1 is schematic diagram showing an embodiment of an N-way Doherty amplifier using a dual-feed distributed (DFD) method in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 2 is a graph showing efficiency characteristics of an N-way Doherty dual-feed distributed amplifier at various levels of output back-off power with analog adaptive power tracking in accordance with the invention.



FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram showing an embodiment of a 3-way Doherty distributed amplifier with digital adaptive power tracking in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 4 is a graph showing simulation results of gain and power added efficiency performance (PAE) of an embodiment of a 3-way Doherty distributed amplifier in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 5 is a graph showing measurement results of gain and power added efficiency performance (PAE) of an embodiment of a 3-way Doherty distributed amplifier in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 6 is a graph showing measurement results of gain and PAE performance variation as a function of the shunt capacitor and bias voltage of peaking amplifiers for a single-tone signal using an embodiment of a 3-way Doherty distributed amplifier in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 7 is a graph showing measurement results of spectrum for a single WCDMA carrier using the 3-way Doherty distributed amplifier of the present invention.



FIG. 8 shows a hybrid mode power amplifier system in accordance with the invention.



FIG. 9 shows an adaptive power tracking system based on digital signal processing.



FIG. 10 shows an adaptive power tracking technique based on analog power tracking.



FIG. 11 shows an embodiment of an analog adaptive power tracking circuit.



FIG. 12 shows an embodiment of a digital power tracking algorithm.



FIG. 13 depicts an embodiment of an envelope tracking algorithm.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In general, the present invention, involves the use of a single-ended dual-feed distributed (SEDFD) amplifying method with an N-way Doherty amplifier structure, so as to achieve high gain and high efficiency performances at high output back-off power. In some embodiments, the gain and efficiency performance is also maximized by adjusting the gate bias of N-way peaking amplifiers and shunt capacitors at the end of the half-wave length gate and drain lines, respectively. Compared to conventional N-way Doherty amplifiers, therefore, the present invention achieves higher power added efficiency (PAE) and higher gain for the multiplexing modulated signals. The method and apparatus provided by the present invention is therefore referred as an N-way Doherty Distributed Power Amplifier (NWDPA) hereafter. Various embodiments of the NWDPA according to the present invention will now be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.



FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing an N-way Doherty amplifier using the SEDFD method of the present invention. The RF input signal 101 is provided as an input to main SEDFD amplifier 108 and peaking SEFDF amplifier 107 by means of a power splitter. Each SEDFD amplifier consists of two transmission lines 109, 110, 111, 112 and N multiple transistors 113, 114. All transistors 113, 114 in the SEDFD main amplifier 107 and peaking amplifier 108 are connected by both gate and drain lines 109, 110, 111, 112 with a half-wave length at the center frequency and operate identically. The input signal of the SEDFD amplifier 107, 108 is distributed along the gate line 109, 111 and the amplified output signal is combined along the drain line 110, 112. Since each transistor adds power in phase to the signal, the SEDFD amplifier 107, 108 is able to provide higher gain. A λ/4 microstrip line 103 is prior to the SEDFD peaking amplifier 107 in order to synchronize the phases between the SEDFD main amplifier 108 and the SEDFD peaking amplifier 107. The output signal of the SEDFD main amplifier 108 is passed through a microstrip λ/4 impedance transformer 104 and combined with the output signal of the SEDFD peaking amplifier 107 by the power combiner 105.



FIG. 2 is a graph showing efficiency characteristics of an NWDPA at various output back-off power. The efficiency of the NWDPA for the maximum power level is given by







n
=

π
4


,





and the efficiency for the medium power level is given by






n
=


π
4





(


P
M

+
1

)

·


(


v
o


v
max


)

2





(


P
M

+
2

)

·

(


v
o


v
max


)


-
1








where vo and vmax, are the output voltage and the maximum output voltage, respectively, M is the number of transistors for the main amplifier, and P the number of transistors for the peaking amplifier. Depending upon the embodiment, the main and peaking amplifiers can be either single transistors or multiple transistors, or other forms of amplifiers. In addition, the transistors can be discrete or integrated, again depending upon the embodiment.


For the low power level, the efficiency of the NWDPA is expressed as






n
=


π
4

·

(


P
M

+
1

)

·



v
o


v
max


.






The efficiency of the amplifier for various levels of output back-off power is calculated as a function of the number of the main and peaking amplifiers. The relationship between the extended back-off state XBO and the number of main and peaking amplifiers is given by







X
BO

=

20
·



log
10



(


P
M

+
1

)


.







FIG. 3. is a schematic diagram showing an embodiment of a 3-way Doherty SEDFD amplifier of the present invention. In order to provide high efficiency at a back-off power of 9.5 dB, the amplifier consists of one main amplifier 203 and two peaking amplifiers 204, 205 using the same type of transistors. The RF input signal 201 is passed through a 90° hybrid coupler 202 and divided to a main amplifier 203 and two peaking amplifiers 204, 205. Input impedance matching circuits 206, 207, 208 are connected between the coupler and the main amplifier 203 and the peaking amplifiers 204, 205, respectively. In at least some embodiments, the main amplifier 203 is biased as a Class-AB amplifier and the peaking amplifiers 204, 205 biased as Class-C amplifiers. If the main amplifier is generally biased in Class AB mode, it will have a gain compression characteristic. In contrast, if the peaking amplifier is generally biased in Class C mode, it will have a gain expansion characteristic. In at least some embodiments, the present invention takes advantage of the complimentary characteristics, so that the gain compression of the Class AB main amplifier will be compensated by the gain expansion of the Class C peaking amplifiers to create a more linear power amplifier.


In order to achieve optimized power, output impedance matching circuits 209, 210, 211 are connected to the outputs of the main amplifier 203 and the peaking amplifiers 204, 205. A shunt capacitor CM 212 is connected to the output impedance matching circuit 209 of the main amplifier 203 so as to optimize the linearity of the NWDPA based on the linearity optimized Doherty amplifier method of U.S. provisional application No. 60/846,905 filed on November 2006, incorporated herein by reference. To obtain peak efficiency point at a desired output back-off power, compensation lines 213 are inserted between output impedance matching circuits 209, 210, 211 and λ/4 impedance transformers 214, 215. The peaking amplifiers 204, 205 are combined using the dual-feed distributed structure which has, in some embodiments, half-wave micro-strip lines 217, 218 at each gate and drain of the first peaking amplifier, shown as a FET for purposes of illustration and clarity. In FIG. 3, the peaking amplifier 1 is combined with the peaking amplifier 2 using a dual-feed distributed structure. The dual-feed distributed structure comprises the half wavelength and quarter wavelength lines and short-circuited quarter-wave length micro-strip lines 219, 220 at each gate and drain of the second peaking amplifier, respectively, connected through the associated input and output impedance matching circuits. The second peaking amplifier is shown in the illustrated embodiment as a single transistor for purposes of simplicity, but could be one or more transistors. The quarter wavelength transmission lines at the output could in some embodiments be replaced by a hybrid coupler.


The half-wave lines 217 and 218 are, in some embodiments, set at the center frequency of the operating power amplifier bandwidth. Shunt capacitors CP 221, 222 are connected in some embodiments to both ends of the short-circuited quarter-wave length micro-strip lines 219, 220 for optimizing both gain and efficiency characteristics of the NWDPA. Offset line 213 can be included to prevent leakage power between the main amplifier 203 and the peaking amplifiers 204, 205. In some embodiments, the hybrid coupler 202 will cause some gain compression, and this can be compensated by the gain expansion of the peaking amplifiers. An additional hybrid coupler can be connected at the output in some embodiments. Further, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the main distributed amplifiers and peaking distributed amplifiers can be constructed either as separate miniature microwave integrated circuits or on one integrated MMIC.


An embodiment of an analog power tracking system in accordance with the invention is shown in FIG. 10 and comprises two primary blocks: Power detection circuitry 234 and Adaptive Bias Supply Circuit 233, together with the N-way Doherty Amplifier of FIG. 3. For simplicity and clarity, like elements from FIG. 3 are shown with like reference numerals. A directional coupler 232 is typically used at the input of the N-Way Doherty power amplifier. The directional coupler extracts a sampling of the input signal. The output of the Adaptive Bias Supply Circuit 233 is fed to the various gate and drain voltage terminals via an RF choke. The RF choke serves to supply DC bias to the active devices while not altering the RF performance. One possible embodiment of the Power detection circuit 234 is shown in FIG. 11 and comprises an attenuator 1100, logarithmic detector 1105, rectifier 1110 including capacitor 1115 and resistor 1120, and operational amplifiers 1125 and 1130. The value of the capacitor 1115 in the rectifier circuit implementation of FIG. 11 controls the averaging time constant. By setting this time constant much faster than the incoming modulation, the circuit of FIG. 11 performs envelope tracking By setting this time constant much slower than the incoming modulation, the circuit of FIG. 11 performs average power tracking.


The digital power tracking system in FIG. 9 comprises baseband digital signal processing using DSP 230 to extract either the envelope or the average power of the incoming signal as well as an adaptive bias supply circuit 231. The input signal modulation is accessible at baseband using digital signal processing. Therefore, a power detection algorithm can be easily developed at baseband. The output of the DSP power detection algorithm is fed to a Digital to Analog converter which feeds the Adaptive Bias Supply circuit. FIG. 12 shows an embodiment of the average power tracking algorithm based on a digital signal processing implementation, and comprises a square law function 1200 followed by a low pass filter function 1210 and an averaging of the function X; from 1 to N, as shown, at 1220. The value of N controls the time window for averaging the input power. FIG. 13 depicts an embodiment of an envelope tracking algorithm. The magnitude of the incoming modulation is processed and followed by a low pass filter. No averaging occurs in this implementation.


In examining the performance of NWDPA, a 42 dBm high power amplifier is designed and implemented by using LDMOS FET's with p1 dB of 150 W.



FIG. 4 is a graph showing simulation results of gain and PAE for a single tone signal at the frequency of 2140 MHz using a 3-way Doherty distributed amplifier such as shown in FIG. 3. The operating point of the Class AB biased main amplifier is: IDQ=510 mA, VGS=3.82 V and VDS=27 V. The operating points of the Class C biased peaking amplifiers are: 1) Peaking amplifier 1; IDQ=0 mA, VGS=2.4 V and VDS=27 V, 2) Peaking amplifier 2; IDQ=0 mA, VGS=2.6 V and VDS=27 V. The output impedance of the combined peaking amplifier using a dual-feed distributed structure is 4.65+j2.1Ω. An offset line of approximately 0.25λ, was inserted; this corresponds to an optimum output resistance of 521Ω. From the simulated results, 43% PAE was obtained at a peak envelope power (PEP) of around 200 W. Consequently, a 40% PAE at 9.5 dB back-off power from the peak efficiency point was achieved. This was an efficiency improvement of approximately 7% in comparison to that of the 2-way conventional Doherty amplifier at a 6 dB peaking point, also shown in FIG. 4. A gain of approximately 10.5 dB was obtained from 2130 to 2150 MHz.



FIG. 5 is a graph showing measurement results of gain and PAE of the 3-way Doherty distributed amplifier of the present invention. The main amplifier's operating point is: IDQ=480 mA, VGS=3.9 V. The operating points of the peaking amplifiers are: 1) Peaking amplifier 1; IDQ=0 mA, VGs=2.1 V, 2) Peaking amplifier 2; IDQ=0 mA, VGs=1.9 V. The shunt capacitors, CP and CM, of 15 pF and 0.5 pF are used, respectively. A 42.7% PAE at PEP of 131 W and 39.5% PAE at 9.5 dB back off are achieved, respectively. A gain of approximately 11 dB was obtained at 9.5 dB back off.



FIG. 6 is a graph showing measurement results of gain and PAE performance variation as a function of the shunt capacitor and bias voltage of peaking amplifiers for single-tone signal using the 3-way Doherty distributed amplifier of the present invention. Optimization of CP and the bias point of the two-peaking amplifiers produced efficiency and gain improvement of approximately 8% and 2 dB at 9.5 dB back off, even though the PAE is reduced at PEP.



FIG. 7 is a graph showing measurement results of spectrum for a single WCDMA carrier using a 3-way Doherty distributed amplifier in accordance with the present invention. The operating points were VGS=3.79 V (Main PA), VGS=3.1 V (Peaking PA1) and VGS=2.5V (Peaking PA2), respectively. The shunt capacitors, CP and CM of 9.1 pF and 0.5 pF were used, respectively. In order to achieve high linearity, both memoryless and memory-based digital predistortion were applied. The ACLR performances of −51 dBc after memoryless and −54 dBc after memory compensation were obtained at 41 dBm output power and +2.5 MHz offset frequency.


In summary, the NWDPA of the present invention, compared to the conventional N-way Doherty amplifier, improves the gain performance more effectively since the NWDPA uses a SEDFD structure in conjunction with a Doherty amplifier. A hybrid mode power amplifier system in accordance with the invention is shown in FIG. 4, in which a modulated RF input signal 800 is provided to a digital predistortion controller 805, which in turn provides its output to a power amplifier 810 in accordance with the present invention. The RF output 815 is monitored, and a signal representative of the output is fed back to the controller 805 as a feedback signal 820.


Although the present invention has been described with reference to the preferred embodiments, it will be understood that the invention is not limited to the details described thereof. Various substitutions and modifications are disclosed in the foregoing description, and others will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art based on the teachings herein. Therefore, all such substitutions and modifications are intended to be embraced within the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A power tracking system for power amplifiers, the power tracking system comprising: an N-way Doherty distributed amplifier comprising a power splitter with a plurality of outputs and N amplifiers, wherein N is an integer of three or more and an output of the plurality of outputs is coupled to a plurality of the N amplifiers; andan adaptive bias supply circuitry for adjusting DC bias applied to the N-way Doherty distributed amplifier based on a characteristic of an RF signal,wherein the adaptive bias supply circuit is configured to adjust gate biases of an amplifier and a shunt capacitor, the N-way Doherty distributed amplifier comprising the amplifier and shunt capacitor.
  • 2. The power tracking system of claim 1 wherein the characteristic comprises a power characteristic.
  • 3. The power tracking system of claim 1 wherein the characteristic comprises an average power.
  • 4. The power tracking system of claim 1 wherein the characteristic relates to a power envelope.
  • 5. The power tracking system of claim 1 wherein the RF signal corresponds to an input signal.
  • 6. The power tracking system of claim 1 wherein the N amplifiers comprise a main amplifier and a plurality of peak amplifiers.
  • 7. The power tracking system of claim 1 wherein a first output of the adaptive bias supply circuitry corresponds to a first DC bias and is transmitted to a first of the N amplifiers, and wherein a second output of the adaptive bias supply circuitry corresponds to a second DC bias and is transmitted to a second of the N amplifiers.
  • 8. The power tracking system of claim 1 further including an input matching circuit connected to an input of at least one of the N amplifiers.
  • 9. The power tracking system of claim 1 further including an output matching circuit connected to an output of at least one of the N amplifiers.
  • 10. The power tracking system of claim 1 further including an input matching circuit connected to an input of at least one of the N amplifiers; and an output matching circuit connected to an output of the at least one of the N amplifiers.
  • 11. The power tracking system of claim 1 wherein the adaptive bias supply circuit is operable to output a plurality of gate biases.
  • 12. The power tracking system of claim 1 further comprising an RF choke coupling the bias supply circuitry to an active device, the N-way Doherty distributed amplifier comprising the active device.
  • 13. The power tracking system of claim 1 further comprising detection circuitry for detecting the characteristic.
  • 14. A method for processing an RF input, the method comprising: dividing the RF input into a plurality of resultant signals;routing at least one of the resultant signals to a main amplifier;routing another of the resultant signals to a plurality of peaking amplifiers;detecting a power variable of a signal representative of the RF input; andadaptively controlling one or more bias voltages of at least one of the amplifiers and a shunt capacitor based at least partly on one or more characteristics corresponding to the RF input,wherein an N-way Doherty distributed amplifier comprises the main and peaking amplifiers and the shunt capacitor.
  • 15. The method of claim 14 wherein the characteristic comprises a power characteristic.
  • 16. The method of claim 14 wherein the adaptively controlling one or more bias voltages of at least one of the amplifiers comprises: adjusting a first DC bias of a first of the plurality of peaking amplifiers; andadjusting a second DC bias of a second of the plurality of peaking amplifiers.
  • 17. The method of claim 14 further comprising performing an impedance matching using an input of at least one of the plurality of peaking amplifiers.
  • 18. The method of claim 14 further comprising performing an impedance matching using an output of at least one of the plurality of peaking amplifiers.
  • 19. The method of claim 14 further comprising detecting the one or more characteristics.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/553,967, filed Jul. 20, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/603,419, filed Oct. 21, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,274,332, issued Sep. 25, 2012, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/108,507, filed Apr. 23, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,688,135, issued Mar. 30, 2010, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/925,577, filed Apr. 23, 2007. Each of these applications is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.

US Referenced Citations (111)
Number Name Date Kind
4638248 Schweickert Jan 1987 A
4700151 Nagata Oct 1987 A
4890300 Andrews Dec 1989 A
4929906 Voyce et al. May 1990 A
5049832 Cavers Sep 1991 A
5121412 Borth Jun 1992 A
5132639 Blauvelt et al. Jul 1992 A
5396190 Murata Mar 1995 A
5486789 Palandech et al. Jan 1996 A
5579342 Crozier Nov 1996 A
5675287 Baker et al. Oct 1997 A
5678198 Lemson Oct 1997 A
5732333 Cox et al. Mar 1998 A
5757229 Mitzlaff May 1998 A
5786728 Alinikula Jul 1998 A
5936464 Grondahl Aug 1999 A
5937011 Carney et al. Aug 1999 A
5949283 Proctor et al. Sep 1999 A
5959499 Khan et al. Sep 1999 A
5963549 Perkins et al. Oct 1999 A
6054896 Wright et al. Apr 2000 A
6055418 Harris et al. Apr 2000 A
6091941 Moriyama et al. Jul 2000 A
6141390 Cova Oct 2000 A
6166601 Shalom et al. Dec 2000 A
6240144 Ha May 2001 B1
6242979 Li Jun 2001 B1
6246286 Persson Jun 2001 B1
6246865 Lee Jun 2001 B1
6275685 Wessel et al. Aug 2001 B1
6301579 Becker Oct 2001 B1
6400774 Matsuoka et al. Jun 2002 B1
6424225 Choi et al. Jul 2002 B1
6512417 Booth et al. Jan 2003 B2
6552609 Hamada et al. Apr 2003 B2
6552634 Raab Apr 2003 B1
6625429 Yamashita Sep 2003 B1
6639050 Kieliszewski Oct 2003 B1
6677870 Im et al. Jan 2004 B2
6697436 Wright et al. Feb 2004 B1
6703897 O'Faltherty et al. Mar 2004 B2
6741663 Tapio et al. May 2004 B1
6747649 Sanz-Pastor et al. Jun 2004 B1
6751447 Jin et al. Jun 2004 B1
6794931 Kenington Sep 2004 B2
6798295 Pengelly et al. Sep 2004 B2
6963242 White et al. Nov 2005 B2
6983025 Schell Jan 2006 B2
6985704 Yang et al. Jan 2006 B2
7035345 Jeckeln et al. Apr 2006 B2
7042287 Robinson May 2006 B2
7061314 Kwon et al. Jun 2006 B2
7064606 Louis Jun 2006 B2
7079818 Khorram Jul 2006 B2
7102442 Anderson Sep 2006 B2
7103329 Thon Sep 2006 B1
7104310 Hunter Sep 2006 B2
7106806 Kenington Sep 2006 B1
7109792 Leffel Sep 2006 B2
7109998 Smith Sep 2006 B2
7151913 Ahmed Dec 2006 B2
7158765 Blair et al. Jan 2007 B2
7193472 Gotou et al. Mar 2007 B2
7248642 Vella-Coleiro Jul 2007 B1
7259630 Bachman et al. Aug 2007 B2
7262656 Shiikuma Aug 2007 B2
7321635 Ocenasek et al. Jan 2008 B2
7321636 Harel et al. Jan 2008 B2
7342444 Kim et al. Mar 2008 B2
7372918 Muller et al. May 2008 B2
7382194 Apel Jun 2008 B2
7469491 McCallister et al. Dec 2008 B2
7688135 Kim et al. Mar 2010 B2
7831221 Leffel et al. Nov 2010 B2
7847630 Okubo et al. Dec 2010 B2
RE42287 Apodaca et al. Apr 2011 E
7986186 Marbell et al. Jul 2011 B2
8274332 Cho et al. Sep 2012 B2
8618883 Cho et al. Dec 2013 B2
20020034260 Kim Mar 2002 A1
20020044014 Wright et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020080891 Ahn et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020101937 Antonio et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020101938 Horaguchi et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020179830 Pearson et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020186783 Opas et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020187761 Im et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020193085 Mathe et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030095608 Duperray May 2003 A1
20030179829 Pinckley et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030179830 Eidson et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030207680 Yang et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040017859 Sills et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040174212 Kim et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040212428 Ode et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040240585 Bishop et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050059360 Kenington Mar 2005 A1
20050079834 Maniwa et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050159117 Bausov et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050262498 Ferguson et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060012426 Nezami Jan 2006 A1
20060097783 Okubo et al. May 2006 A1
20060270366 Rozenblit et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070075780 Krvavac et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070171234 Crawfis et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070241812 Yang et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080191801 Kim et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080265996 Kim et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090115512 Grondahl et al. May 2009 A1
20110175677 Jeong et al. Jul 2011 A1
20130009707 Kim et al. Jan 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (14)
Number Date Country
1822492 Aug 2006 CN
1833358 Sep 2006 CN
102089966 Aug 2011 CN
1 677 414 Jul 2006 EP
2 145 385 Mar 2009 EP
03-190310 Aug 1991 JP
2000-278237 Oct 2000 JP
2002-536902 Oct 2002 JP
2003-304122 Oct 2003 JP
2006-191590 Jul 2006 JP
5474764 Feb 2014 JP
10-2010-0017214 Feb 2010 KR
WO 0046916 Aug 2000 WO
WO 2009031042 Mar 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (19)
Entry
Stapleton, S., et al. “An Adaptive Predistorter for a Power Amplifier Based on Adjacent Channel Emissions”, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 41, No. 1, 1992, 8 pages.
Yang, Y., “A Fully Matched N-Way Dehrty Amplifier With Optimized Linearity”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Mar. 2003, vol. 51, 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2008/061355 mailed on Aug. 4, 2008, 6 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/IB2008/003079 mailed on May 11, 2009, 6 pages.
English Translation and Office Action for corresponding Japanese Application No. 2010-506483 dated Jan. 10, 2012, 6 pages.
English Translation and Office Action for corresponding Japanese Application No. 2010-504909 dated Aug. 14, 2012, 7 pages.
English Translation and First Office Action for corresponding Chinese Application No. 200880021149.0 dated Apr. 2, 2013, 11 pages.
English Translation and Office Action for corresponding Japanese Application No. 2010-504909 dated Aug. 6, 2013, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/108,507 mailed on Jun. 19, 2009, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/603,419 mailed on Jan. 24, 2011, 7 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/603,419 mailed on Sep. 27, 2011, 8 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/603,419 mailed on Dec. 5, 2011, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/603,419 mailed on Mar. 15, 2012, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/603,419 mailed on Apr. 13, 2012, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/603,419 mailed on May 25, 2012, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/553,967 mailed on Nov. 23, 2012, 7 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/553,967 mailed on Feb. 26, 2013, 4 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/553,967 mailed on Apr. 30, 2013, 9 pages.
Extended European Search Report for corresponding European Application No. 08829011.9 dated May 12, 2014, 9 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140191805 A1 Jul 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60925577 Apr 2007 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 13553967 Jul 2012 US
Child 14087682 US
Parent 12603419 Oct 2009 US
Child 13553967 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12108507 Apr 2008 US
Child 12603419 US