1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates broadly to surgical devices. More particularly, this invention relates to an orthopedic fracture fixation system, and instrumentation for implanting the same.
2. State of the Art
The proximal humerus comprises the upper portion of the humerus, i.e. upper arm of the human body, commonly known as the shoulder area. Fractures of the proximal humerus typically result from traumatic injuries such as sporting accidents and can be more frequent with age due to reduction in bone density. Fractures of the proximal humerus are treated by exposing the fracture site, reducing the bone fracture, and then placing a plate over a relatively large area of the bone to immobilize the fracture in the reduced position for healing. Reducing the fracture includes realigning and positioning the fractured portions of the bone to their original position or similar stable position. Fixating the fracture includes positioning a plate over the fractured portions and securing the plate onto the fractured bones and adjacent non-fractured bones with bone screws.
Conventional fixation plates have several shortcomings when applied to the proximal humerus. In general, they are generally not well contoured for the humeral anatomy, and when provided in a size necessary to provide the structural rigidity for stability of a humeral fracture are not easily shaped by the surgeon. Furthermore, they require that a significant amount of tissue be exposed and displaced in order to position and secure the plate.
It is therefore an object of the invention to provide a humeral fracture fixation system which is anatomically appropriate for the humerus.
It is another object of the invention to provide a humeral fracture fixation system which provides a stable framework for support of a proximal humeral fracture.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a humeral fracture fixation system which does note require displacing a large amount of tissue.
It is also object of the invention to provide a humeral fracture fixation system which is relatively minimally invasive.
It is yet another object of the invention to provide a humeral fracture fixation system which facilitates alignment of the fixation device with the humeral shaft and fasteners with the head of the humerus.
It is still another object of the invention to provide a humeral fracture fixation system which is non-irritating to surrounding tissue.
It is still a further object of the invention to provide instrumentation for implanting a humeral fracture fixation system.
In accord with these objects, which will be discussed in detail below, a humeral fracture fixation system is provided and includes a nail-plate fixation device having a plate-like head portion, an intramedullary nail portion, and a bent neck portion therebetween which creates an angle between the plate and nail portions.
The upper surface of the nail portion is substantially straight, while a lower portion tapers in dimension. The nail portion includes cortical screw holes which preferably are provided with machine threads for receiving the threaded shaft of a screw with machine threads.
The head portion includes locking holes for receiving fixed-angle locking pegs or locking screws, and K-wire alignment holes. The front of the head portion includes suture holes. Preferably such suture holes are tunnel-like, accessible by a curved suture needle. In a preferred embodiment, three tunnels are provided: a first central tunnel perpendicular to a proximal-distal axis of the head portion and extending through the central plate of the head portion, and second and third tunnels on either side of the first which are at angle of about 45°±15° degrees with respect to the first tunnel. According to the invention, the upper and front contours of the head portion are devoid of scallops and protrusions and practically unaffected by the existence of the suture holes. The advantage of a smooth front end is that it presents no side-to-side resistance to tissue moving across the head portion.
An implantation jig is also provided which can be coupled to device, and specifically the head portion. The jig attaches to the head portion via a catch at the front end of the head portion nail plate and a locking screw. This catch is defined by two grooves in between the three suture holes at the front end of the plate. The grooves also allow a suture needle to enter the tunnels.
The handle of the jig can be in first position directed away from the nail portion or in a second position in which it overlies a portion of the nail portion. In the first position, the handle is used to insert the plate into the bone, and in the second position the handle is used to drill holes for the cortical screws.
A system is provided for implanting the cortical screws, and includes a screw guide cannula, a drill guide cannula, and an obturator. These three units assembled together form a tapered end that permits them to be inserted through a small skin incision and to dissect the tissue down to the bone. Then the obturator is pulled out and the drill is introduced and used to drill through the cortex. The drill guide is then pulled out and the screw introduced, attached by friction to the driver. The screw guide has a constant inside diameter just big enough for the head of the screw all the way to just shy of the distal end. At the distal end of the screw guide, the diameter is just a bit smaller than the head of the screw. This is achieved by, for example, (i) leaving a small lip (e.g., by machining) in this area so as to create a slight interference relative to the screw head or (ii) by bending in the end, e.g., with or without the help of slits. In accord with the invention, the force required to overcome the interference between the size of the head of the screw and the smaller diameter at the end of the screw guide is sufficiently small so that the screw head can be driven right through the drill guide. Thus, the purpose of this feature is to retain the screw and allow the surgeon to pull out the screw in case the screw is separated from the driver while the screw is inside the cannula.
Additional objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reference to the detailed description taken in conjunction with the provided figures.
Nail plates specifically for the fixation of metaphyseal fractures of the distal radius are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,730,090 and 6,706,046, from which this application claims priority and which are previously incorporated by reference in their entireties herein. The following nail plate is designed for the proximal humerus and includes several novel and significant modifications relative to prior nail plates, as well as a new implantation jig, which are now described.
Referring to
The upper (anatomically lateral) surface 17 of the nail portion 14 defines a substantially straight line for contact with the endosteum of the medullary canal, while a lower (anatomically medial) surface 18 curves or angles to approach the upper surface to cause the nail portion to taper in dimension toward a tail end 19. The tail end 19 has a substantially uniform smaller diameter to facilitate entry into the medullary canal. The nail portion 14 includes three cortical screw holes 20, 22, 24 which preferably are provided with machine threads for receiving the threaded shaft of a preferably unicortical screws with machine threads. Referring to
The head portion 12 includes locking holes 26, 28, 30, 32, 34 for receiving fixed-angle locking pegs 46, 48, 50, 52, 54 or locking screws (
The front of the head portion 12 includes tunnel-like suture holes accessible by a curved suture needle. In a preferred embodiment, three tunnels are provided: a first central tunnel 70 perpendicular to a proximal-distal axis A1 of the head portion and extending through the central plane P of the head portion 12, and second and third tunnels 72, 74 on either side of the first 70 which are at an angle of about 45°±15° degrees with respect to the first tunnel. Each tunnel preferably includes a side which is longer than the thickness of the head portion. A catch is defined by two grooves 76 in between the three suture holes 70, 72, 74 or by other suitable structure at the front end of the head portion 12. The grooves 76 also allow a suture needle to enter the tunnels. According to the invention, the upper and front contours of the head portion 12 are devoid of scallops and protrusions such that there is no apparent disruption to the contour of the plate by the suture holes. The advantage of a smooth front end is that it presents no side-to-side resistance to tissue moving across the head portion.
Referring to
A screw guide cannula 170, a drill guide cannula 180, and an obturator 190 are provided for use with the jig 100 (See
Referring to
Regardless of exactly how the screw is driven to engage the hole 20, 22, 24 in the nail portion 14 of the device 10, driving the screw into the nail portion causes the nail portion to be pulled against the endosteal surface of the cortex, with the head of the screw seating on the outer surface of the bone. The process is repeated for the other holes 20, 22, 24 to insert unicortical screws 190, 390 with machine threads into the holes to clamp the nail portion 14 against the bone.
Turning now to
Referring now to
Referring to
More particularly, a method of using the nail plate 10 (or 210), jig 100 and cannula 170 is now briefly described. A small incision is made over the fracture down to the bone. A small piece of bone is then removed (using, e.g., a rongeur) on the distal (diaphyseal) side of the fracture to define a space to accommodate the neck 16 of the nail plate 10. The fracture is reduced. The jig 100 is coupled to the nail plate with the handle 122 secured in the first position generally opposite the nail portion 14. The small end 19 of the nail portion 14 is then maneuvered through the incision and intrafocally into the medullary canal until the neck 16 seats within the space defined in the bone and the head portion 12 rests relatively flat on the metaphysis, as shown in
One or more K-wires are preferably then drilled into the head of the proximal humerus and viewed under fluoroscopy to assure alignment of the head portion over the metaphysis. Assuming the K-wires indicate proper alignment, holes are drilled through the locking holes and into the metaphysis for receiving locking pegs or locking screws. If the K-wire(s) indicate an alignment which is less than desirable, the plate humeral head are relatively realigned, and K-wire(s) are reinserted and reevaluated for alignment and once the alignment is satisfactory, the holes are drilled. The locking pegs 150 or locking screws are inserted into the drilled holes and locked relative to the plate 10 to stabilize the humeral head relative to the head portion 12 of the nail plate.
The handle 122 of the jig 100 is then reversed (or attached) to overlie the nail portion 14 (
It is recognized that various steps in the method can be interchanged in order without affecting the minimally invasive aspects, efficiency, and fixation provided by the nail plate and the procedure.
There have been described and illustrated herein several embodiments of a fracture fixation system, a jig, and a method of using the jig and implanting the system. While particular embodiments of the invention have been described, it is not intended that the invention be limited thereto, as it is intended that the invention be as broad in scope as the art will allow and that the specification be read likewise. Thus, while the fixation system has been described with respect to the repairing fractures of the humerus, it will be appreciated that the design shown or similar designs with the inventive aspects may be used on other bones, and particularly long bones. It will therefore be appreciated by those skilled in the art that yet other modifications could be made to the provided invention without deviating from its spirit and scope as claimed.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/648,989, filed Jan. 28, 2005, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1091674 | Lee | Mar 1914 | A |
2077804 | Morrison | Apr 1937 | A |
2500370 | McKibbin | Jun 1947 | A |
2685877 | Dobelle | Aug 1954 | A |
2821979 | Cameron | Feb 1958 | A |
3025853 | Mason | Mar 1962 | A |
3236141 | Smith | Feb 1966 | A |
3489143 | Halloran | Jan 1970 | A |
3552389 | Allgower et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
3668972 | Allgower et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3716050 | Johnston | Feb 1973 | A |
3779240 | Kondo | Dec 1973 | A |
3791380 | Dawidowski | Feb 1974 | A |
3939498 | Lee et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
RE28841 | Allgower et al. | Jun 1976 | E |
4135507 | Harris | Jan 1979 | A |
4153953 | Grobbelaar | May 1979 | A |
4172452 | Forte et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4219015 | Steinemann | Aug 1980 | A |
4408601 | Wenk | Oct 1983 | A |
RE31628 | Allgower et al. | Jul 1984 | E |
4465065 | Gotfried | Aug 1984 | A |
4483335 | Tornier | Nov 1984 | A |
4493317 | Klaue | Jan 1985 | A |
4498468 | Hansson | Feb 1985 | A |
4506662 | Anapliotis | Mar 1985 | A |
4513744 | Klaue | Apr 1985 | A |
4561432 | Mazor | Dec 1985 | A |
4565193 | Streli | Jan 1986 | A |
4622959 | Marcus | Nov 1986 | A |
4632101 | Freedland | Dec 1986 | A |
4721103 | Freedland | Jan 1988 | A |
4733654 | Marino | Mar 1988 | A |
4776330 | Chapman et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4794919 | Nilsson | Jan 1989 | A |
4838252 | Klaue | Jun 1989 | A |
4858602 | Seidel et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4923471 | Morgan | May 1990 | A |
4927421 | Goble et al. | May 1990 | A |
4957118 | Erlebacher | Sep 1990 | A |
4957497 | Hoogland et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4988350 | Herzberg | Jan 1991 | A |
5002544 | Klaue et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5006120 | Carter | Apr 1991 | A |
5013314 | Frica et al. | May 1991 | A |
5035697 | Frigg | Jul 1991 | A |
5041114 | Chapman et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5085660 | Lin | Feb 1992 | A |
5127914 | Calderale et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5129901 | Decoste | Jul 1992 | A |
5151103 | Tepic et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5160335 | Wagenknecht | Nov 1992 | A |
5180383 | Haydon | Jan 1993 | A |
5190544 | Chapman et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5197966 | Sommerkamp | Mar 1993 | A |
5269784 | Mast | Dec 1993 | A |
5275601 | Gogolewski et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5304180 | Slocum | Apr 1994 | A |
5324290 | Zdeblick et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5324291 | Ries et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5352229 | Goble et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5356410 | Pennig | Oct 1994 | A |
5364398 | Chapman et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5364399 | Lowery et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5366457 | McGuire et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5382248 | Jacobson et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5429641 | Gotfried | Jul 1995 | A |
5458654 | Tepic | Oct 1995 | A |
5472444 | Huebner et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5484438 | Pennig | Jan 1996 | A |
5489284 | James et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5514138 | McCarthy | May 1996 | A |
5531748 | De la Caffiniere | Jul 1996 | A |
5536127 | Pennig | Jul 1996 | A |
5578035 | Lin | Nov 1996 | A |
5591168 | Judet et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5601553 | Trebing et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5603715 | Kessler | Feb 1997 | A |
5658283 | Huebner | Aug 1997 | A |
5662655 | Laboreau et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5665087 | Huebner | Sep 1997 | A |
5674222 | Berger et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5676667 | Hausman | Oct 1997 | A |
5702399 | Kilpela et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5709682 | Medoff | Jan 1998 | A |
5709686 | Talos et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5718705 | Sammarco | Feb 1998 | A |
5728099 | Tellman et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5749872 | Kyle et al. | May 1998 | A |
5759184 | Santangelo | Jun 1998 | A |
5766174 | Perry | Jun 1998 | A |
5776194 | Mikol et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5797913 | Dambreville et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5810823 | Klaue et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5840078 | Yerys | Nov 1998 | A |
5843127 | Li | Dec 1998 | A |
5849004 | Bramlet | Dec 1998 | A |
5853415 | Bertin et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5882351 | Fox | Mar 1999 | A |
5897557 | Chin et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5928234 | Manspeizer | Jul 1999 | A |
5931839 | Medoff | Aug 1999 | A |
5938664 | Winquist et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5976139 | Bramlet | Nov 1999 | A |
5993449 | Schlapfer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6096040 | Esser | Aug 2000 | A |
6139552 | Horiuchi | Oct 2000 | A |
6146384 | Lee et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6183474 | Bramlet et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6183475 | Lester et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206881 | Frigg et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
D443060 | Benirschke et al. | May 2001 | S |
6238395 | Bonutti | May 2001 | B1 |
6270499 | Leu et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287310 | Fox | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6322562 | Wolter | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6355041 | Martin | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358250 | Orbay | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364882 | Orbay | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379359 | Dahners | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6406477 | Fujiwara | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409768 | Tepic et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6440135 | Orbay et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6443954 | Bramlet et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454770 | Klaue | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6468278 | Muckter | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6514253 | Yao | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6527775 | Warburton | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6527776 | Michelson | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6558388 | Bartsch et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6562042 | Nelson | May 2003 | B2 |
6579293 | Chandran | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6579294 | Robioneck | Jun 2003 | B2 |
D479331 | Pike et al. | Sep 2003 | S |
6623486 | Weaver et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6648889 | Bramlet et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6648890 | Culbert et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6669701 | Steiner et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6685706 | Padget et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6689135 | Enayati | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6692496 | Wardlaw | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6706046 | Orbay et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6730090 | Orbay et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6746453 | Deloge et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6866665 | Orbay | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6926720 | Castaneda | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7153309 | Huebner et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7425213 | Orbay | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7588577 | Fencl et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7648508 | Lutz et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7686808 | Orbay et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7722611 | Cavallazzi et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
20010011172 | Orbay et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020049445 | Hall, IV et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020058941 | Clark et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020143337 | Orbay et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156474 | Wack et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161369 | Bramlet | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030004514 | Frigg et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030055428 | Swanson | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030083661 | Orbay et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105461 | Putnam | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030216742 | Wetzler et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040111090 | Dahners | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050010226 | Grady, Jr. et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021033 | Zeiler et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050049594 | Wack et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065520 | Orbay | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080421 | Weaver et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085818 | Huebner | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050182406 | Orbay et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060015101 | Warburton et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070173839 | Running et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173843 | Matiyahu | Jul 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
611147 | May 1979 | CH |
8907443 | Sep 1989 | DE |
9200328 | Apr 1992 | DE |
4341980 | Jun 1995 | DE |
4343117 | Jun 1995 | DE |
4438264 | Mar 1996 | DE |
9321544 | Oct 1999 | DE |
19857279 | Jun 2000 | DE |
29907161 | Aug 2000 | DE |
20200705 | Mar 2002 | DE |
0207884 | Jan 1987 | EP |
0737444 | Oct 1996 | EP |
1086655 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1468655 | Oct 2004 | EP |
2233973 | Jan 1975 | FR |
2405062 | May 1979 | FR |
2405705 | May 1979 | FR |
2405706 | May 1979 | FR |
2606268 | May 1988 | FR |
04138152 | May 1992 | JP |
1279626 | Dec 1986 | SU |
WO 9709000 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO 0053110 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0053111 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 02096309 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO2005037117 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2005053548 | Jun 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060189996 A1 | Aug 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60648989 | Jan 2005 | US |