Nanolayer catalysts useful in promoting oxidation, and their manufacture and use

Abstract
A novel nanocatalyst is disclosed containing titanium oxide, iron oxide, and calcium oxide. The catalyst comprises a layer of iron oxide in the gamma form supported on a titanium oxide core. Addition of calcium cations helps to stabilize the iron oxide in the gamma form. The iron oxide layer is on the order of a few nanometers thick on the surface of the titanium oxide core, in an “egg-in-shell” structure. The nanocatalyst is highly active in promoting the oxidation of compounds such as hydroquinone, catechol, other hydrocarbons, chlorinated phenols, and carbon monoxide, even at moderately elevated temperatures. The catalyst remains active in a pyrolytic environment for extended periods of time, and possesses high redox cycling potential. The efficiency of the catalyst is not strongly affected by coking in a combustion environment. The catalyst may be used, for example, to reduce levels of radicals, catechols, dioxins, other toxic hydrocarbons, and carbon monoxide in cigarette smoke, incinerator waste streams, and waste streams from other, combustion sources. The catalyst operates efficiently at temperatures typical of tobacco smoke, is formed from nontoxic materials, and is relatively inexpensive. Methods of making and using the catalyst are also disclosed.
Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 depicts the percentage conversion of 2-monochlorophenol over four embodiments of the novel nanocatalyst, and over a standard Fe2O3/TiO2 catalyst.



FIG. 2 depicts the percentage conversion of carbon monoxide over embodiments of the novel nanocatalyst, both with and without pre-exposure of the catalyst to cigarette smoke.



FIGS. 3(A) and 3(B) depict the oxidation of catechol and hydroquinone over embodiments of the novel nanocatalyst.





The iron and calcium sources used in the preparation may be chosen from a variety of precursors, both organometallic and inorganic. The precursors should be soluble in the preparation solvent. Otherwise, most organometallic sources of calcium or iron are suitable, as are inorganic sources that, upon decomposition (e.g., oxidation), do not leave substantial amounts of the counter-anion in the structure of the nanoparticle. (For example, chlorides and sulfonates would generally be undesirable, as they would have a tendency to leave residues of chlorine or sulfur, respectively, in the crystal structure.) Titanium isopropoxide is the preferred titanium precursor.


A preferred method for preparing uses the following sequential steps:


(a) mixing a substantially anhydrous solution of titanium isopropoxide with a substantially anhydrous solution of an iron (Ill) salt and a substantially anhydrous solution of a calcium salt;


(b) adding to the mixture a sufficient amount of water and acid to initiate hydrolysis and gelation;


(c) allowing sufficient time for the mixture to gel;


(d) removing the solvent with heat under reduced pressure to make a sol; and


(e) calcining the sol in the presence of oxygen; whereby oxides are formed having catalytic properties.


EXAMPLE 1
Preparation of Catalyst

In experiments to date, our best results have been obtained when either iron (III) nitrate, or iron (III) acetylacetonate was used as the active phase precursor.


The active phase precursor was dissolved in absolute ethanol in a 1:100 molar ratio at room temperature, in the absence of substantial amounts of water. Next, calcium acetylacetonate was dissolved in the solution. (The amount of calcium is chosen to achieve the desired concentration of calcium in the final product.) A few drops of water and hydrochloric acid were added to make the solution slightly acidic (e.g., pH around 6.0-6.9).


A titanium isopropoxide solution was prepared in absolute ethanol in a 1:150 molar ratio at room temperature.


The two solutions were then mixed, and the mixture was left standing at room temperature for gelation (about 2 weeks). After gelation and subsequent drying at room temperature for 3 days, the samples were dried at 80° C. under vacuum for 24 hours. The dried samples were then calcined in air at 400° C. for 4 hours. The samples were ground to obtain the desired mesh size, and separated into size fractions. Preferred size is 100-120 mesh, but the size can vary depending on the particular use to which the catalyst will be put.


Scanning electron micrographs (not shown) confirmed that a thin layer (˜3.5 nm) of iron oxide had formed on the exterior of the titanium oxide core. More generally, this layer may be between about 1 nm and about 20 nm.


EXAMPLES 2-5
Oxidation of 2-Monochlorophenol


FIG. 1 depicts a comparison of the degradation of a chlorinated hydrocarbon, namely 2-monochlorophenol, over unmodified iron oxide particles, versus degradation over four embodiments of the novel catalyst. These catalytic oxidation experiments were conducted over a packed bed, one-pass, gravitational quartz reactor (¼ inch=0.64 cm inner diameter). Onto a quartz wool bed were placed 30 mg of catalyst mixed with 30 mg of quartz powder. The reactor was positioned in a high-temperature furnace, maintained at constant temperature in the range 275-450° C. Prior to running an experiment, each catalyst sample was activated in 20% O2/He (20 mL/min) for 1 hour at 450° C. 2-monochlorophenol (2-MCP) was introduced into the gas stream by bubbling a 20% O2/He stream through a saturator that was maintained at room temperature and filled with liquid 2-MCP. The catalytic reactor was connected in-line with an HP5890 Series II gas-chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector. Reaction products and bypass reagent were sampled with a six-port valve equipped with a 2 mL stainless steel loop. The products were separated from one another with a Chrompack CP-Sil 8 CB capillary column (30 m long, 0.32 mm inner diameter).


Control tests of the empty reactor without catalyst, and of the reactor containing the quartz wool bed and quartz powder but without catalyst, showed no significant destruction of 2-MCP over the studied temperature range.


Four different catalyst compositions were tested. The “standard” 5% Fe2O3/TiO2 composition (i.e., a more conventional catalyst) was prepared by impregnating TiO2 with an aqueous solution of iron (III) nitrate. Modified catalysts 14 were sol-gel samples prepared as described above. These four catalysts had the following compositions:


















Modified catalyst 1:
5% Fe2O3/Titania



Modified catalyst 2:
5% Fe2O3/Titania + 1% Ca



Modified catalyst 3:
5% Fe2O3/Titania + 3% Ca



Modified catalyst 4:
5% Fe2O3/Titania + 5% Ca










The novel catalysts had substantially improved properties, with the high conversion regime shifted about 100-150° C. lower than with the conventional catalyst.


EXAMPLES 6 AND 7
Oxidation of Carbon Monoxide

In this experiment we compared the oxidation of carbon monoxide as a function of temperature over Modified Catalyst 3 (as described above.) The reaction feed comprised 0.75% CO mixed with air (i.e., ˜20% O2). Total gas flow was 100 cm3 per minute over 30 mg catalyst.


These catalytic oxidation experiments were conducted over a packed bed, one-pass, gravitational quartz reactor (¼ inch=0.64 cm inner diameter). Onto a quartz wool bed were placed 30 mg of catalyst mixed with 30 mg of quartz powder. The reactorwas positioned in a high-temperature furnace, maintained at constant temperature in the range 50-600° C. Prior to running an experiment, each catalyst sample was activated in 20% O2/He (20 mL/min) for 1 hour at 450° C. For samples that are denoted as “smoked,” the smoke from one whole commercial Marlboro cigarette, whose filter had previously been cut off, was pulled in “puff mode” through the catalyst bed, which was maintained at 200° C. The temperature was then set to the desired value, and a mixture of 0.75% CO and 20% O2 (by weight) in He was pulled through the catalyst bed at a total flow rate of 100 mL/min. The gasses exiting the catalyst bed (particularly CO) were analyzed on a MIDAC 2000 FTIR spectrometer in real time.


Control tests of the empty reactor without catalyst, and of the reactor containing the quartz wool bed and quartz powder but without catalyst, showed no significant destruction of CO over the studied temperature range.


The novel catalyst was superior to the conventional iron oxide catalyst for CO oxidation. We also found that the catalyst retained most of its activity for CO oxidation following exposure to cigarette smoke. The activity of the catalyst remained high despite its contact with the coke and tar from cigarette smoke.


Similar results are expected when the experiment is repeated for oxidation of CO (and other compounds) directly in a stream of cigarette smoke or other tobacco smoke.


EXAMPLES 8 AND 9
Oxidation of Catechol and Hydroquinone

We have also tested the activity of the novel iron oxide catalyst in promoting the oxidation of two known radical precursors in cigarette smoke, namely catechol and hydroquinone. The results of these experiments are shown in FIGS. 3(A) and (B), respectively. The catalytic oxidation experiments were conducted over a packed bed, one-pass, gravitational quartz reactor (¼ inch=0.64 cm inner diameter). Onto a quartz wool bed were placed 30 mg of catalyst mixed with 30 mg of quartz powder. The reactor was positioned in a high-temperature furnace, maintained at constant temperature of 120° C. Prior to running an experiment, each catalyst sample was activated in 20% O2/He (20 mL/min) for 1 hour at 450° C. Either catechol or hydroquinone was introduced into the gas stream using a Varian Chromatoprobe at an injection port held at 90° C. for catechol or 120° C. for hydroquinone, at a rate to maintain a constant 20 ppm concentration of the reactant in the input stream. The outlet of the heated injection port connected directly to the reactor. Helium (with no oxygen) was used as the carrier gas for both reagents at a flow rate of 100 mL/min. The catalytic reactor was connected in-line with an HP5890 Series II gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector. Reaction products and by-pass reagent were sampled with a six-port valve equipped with a 2 mL stainless steel loop. The products were separated from one another with a Chrompack CP-Sil 8 CB capillary column (30 m long, 0.32 mm inner diameter).


Control tests of the empty reactor without catalyst, and of the reactor containing the quartz wool bed and quartz powder but without catalyst, showed no significant destruction of either catechol or hydroquinone over the studied temperature range.


In both cases, 20 ppm of catechol or 20 ppm of hydroquinone, as appropriate, were passed over 30 mg of the novel catalyst, under pyrolytic conditions. Both cathecol and hydroquinone readily decomposed over the novel catalyst at the relatively low temperature of 120° C. FIG. 3B depicts the total conversion of hydroquinone to CO2, as well as the appearance of organic decomposition products after 5 hours of reaction. (These organic decomposition products were not further analyzed.) High efficiency was maintained for several hours, after which the conversion rate started to decline. It appears that there was sufficient structural oxygen in the active phase (i.e., in the nanoparticles, rather than in the gas phase) to sustain complete oxidation of both cathecol and hydroquinone for about 4 hours. No other organic products were detected during the first 4 hours of either reaction, suggesting efficient oxidation to CO2.


EXAMPLE 10
Removal of Semiquinone Radicals from Cigarette Smoke

We have also tested the activity of the novel iron oxide catalyst to removing semiquinone radicals from cigarette smoke. Marlboro™ Red cigarettes were purchased from a local retail outlet. The filter of each cigarette was removed, and replaced with 30 mg of modified catalyst 4, placed between two quartz wool stoppers. Downstream of the catalyst an acetate filter was placed to remove particulate matter from the smoke stream. As a control, otherwise identical experimental cigarettes were prepared, but without the catalyst. The cigarettes were lit, and experimental “puffs” of 180 mL each were pulled through each cigarette. Thus each “puff” corresponded to approximately two “real puffs” by ordinary human smokers, and each cigarette was consumed after 4 such experimental puffs. The acetate filter was replaced after each puff, and each of the acetate filters with deposited total particulate matter (TPM) was left in air for 96 hours and then analyzed for semiquinone radical content. The total EPR radical signal per gram of total particulate matter decreased by 58%, from 168×106 for the control cigarettes to 72×106 spins per gram of TPM for the cigarettes with the incorporated catalyst. As shown in the table below, radical removal was greatest in the middle of the cigarette (puffs 2 and 3), although not inconsiderable at the beginning of the cigarette (puff 1), and still significant at the end (puff 4).









TABLE 1







Semiquinone radical destruction












Puff 1
Puff 2
Puff 3
Puff 4















EPR radical
85.46 × 106
  49 × 106
  10 × 106
23.77 × 106


signal intensity


per gram total


particulate


matter, control


EPR radical
43.56 × 106
7.37 × 106
1.55 × 106
19.60 × 106


signal intensity


per gram total


particulate


matter, catalyst


Percent
49%
85%
85%
18%


reduction









Definitions. As used in the specification and claims, the “diameter” of an object refers to the longest distance between any two points that both lie on the surface of the object. Thus the use of the term “diameter” should not be construed as implying that an object is necessarily spherical, nor that it necessarily has a circular cross-section.


The “thickness” of a layer refers to the mean thickness of the layer, averaged over the entire layer. Thus the use of the term “thickness” should not be construed as implying that a layer necessarily has a uniform thickness.


Miscellaneous. The complete disclosures of all references cited in this specification are hereby incorporated by reference. Also incorporated by reference is the entire disclosure of the following publication by the inventors, a publication that is not prior art to the present application: S. Lomnicki et al., “Development of a supported iron oxide catalyst for destruction of PCDD/F,” Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 37, pp. 4254-4260 (2003). In the event of an otherwise irreconcilable conflict, however, the present specification shall control.

Claims
  • 1. A particle comprising a core and a shell, wherein: (a) said shell adheres to said core;(b) said core comprises titanium oxide, and the diameter of said core is between about 50 nm and about 100 μm;(c) said shell comprises iron oxide and calcium oxide, and the thickness of said shell is between about 1 nm and about 20 nm;(d) the fraction of iron oxide in the particle is between about 1% and about 15% by weight; and the ratio of calcium to iron is between about 0.5 mole-% and about 10 mole-%.
  • 2. A composition comprising a plurality of particles as recited in claim 1.
  • 3. Tobacco admixed with a composition as recited in claim 2.
  • 4. A cigarette comprising tobacco as recited in claim 3.
  • 5. A filter cigarette comprising tobacco and a filter, wherein said filter comprises a composition as recited in claim 2.
  • 6. A particle as recited in claim 1, wherein: said core consists essentially of titanium oxide, the diameter of said core is between about 100 nm and about 50 μm, and said shell consists essentially of iron oxide and calcium oxide.
  • 7. A particle as recited in claim 1, wherein at least some of the iron oxide has a gamma-form crystal structure.
  • 8. A particle as recited in claim 1, wherein at least about 10% of the iron oxide has a gamma-form crystal structure.
  • 9. A composition comprising a solid support and a plurality of particles as recited in claim 1, wherein said particles adhere to said support.
  • 10. A method for catalytically oxidizing or catalytically destroying at least one compound selected from the group consisting of carbon monoxide, acrolein, formaldehyde, acetone, benzene, halogenated benzenes, other substituted benzenes, phenol, halogenated phenols, other substituted phenols, other hydroxylated aromatic hydrocarbons, hydroxylated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, catechol, substituted catechols, hydroquinone, substituted hydroquinones, chloroform, bromoform, furan, substituted furans, dioxane, substituted dioxanes, dibenzo-p-dioxin, halogenated dibenzo-p-dioxins, other substituted dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofuran, halogenated dibenzofurans, other substituted dibenzofurans, lignin, lignin decomposition products, ketones, substituted ketones, other aldehydes, substituted aldehydes, other halogenated volatile organic compounds, other unsubstituted hydrocarbons, other substituted hydrocarbons, radicals derived from any of the above compounds, and other organic gas-phase radicals; said method comprising reacting the compound with oxygen at a temperature between about 120° C. and about 900° C. in the presence of a composition as recited in claim 2; wherein the compound is oxidized at a rate that is substantially greater than the rate at which the same compound would be oxidized under conditions that are otherwise identical, except that the composition of claim 2 is absent.
  • 11. A method as recited in claim 10, wherein both carbon monoxide, and at least one further compound as recited, in addition to carbon monoxide, are catalytically oxidized or catalytically destroyed simultaneously.
  • 12. A method as recited in claim 10, wherein the composition is admixed with tobacco prior to combustion of the tobacco, wherein the compound is a component of smoke produced by combustion of the tobacco, and wherein a temperature sufficient for the catalytic oxidation is produced by the combustion of the tobacco.
  • 13. A method as recited in claim 12, wherein the tobacco is a component of a cigarette.
  • 14. A method as recited in claim 10, wherein the composition of claim 2 is contained in a filter for a cigarette, wherein the compound is a component of smoke produced by combustion of tobacco, wherein a temperature sufficient for the catalytic oxidation is produced by the combustion of the tobacco, and wherein the catalytic oxidation occurs as cigarette smoke passes through the filter.
  • 15. A method as recited in claim 10, wherein the compound is carbon monoxide.
  • 16. A method as recited in claim 10, wherein the compound is a catechol.
  • 17. A method as recited in claim 10, wherein the compound is a quinone or a hydroquinone.
  • 18. A method as recited in claim 10, wherein the compound is phenol or a halogenated phenol.
  • 19. A method as recited in claim 10, wherein the compound is a chlorinated hydrocarbon.
  • 20. A method as recited in claim 10, wherein the compound is benzene, dibenzo-p-dioxin, a halogenated dibenzo-p-dioxin, dibenzofuran, a halogenated dibenzofuran, or benzene.
  • 21. A method as recited in claim 10, wherein the compound is a semiquinone radical, a substituted semiquinone radical, a phenoxyl radical, a substituted phenoxyl radical, an oxy-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon radical, or a substituted oxy-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon radical.
  • 22. A process for making a catalyst, said process comprising the sequential steps of: (a) mixing a substantially anhydrous solution of titanium isopropoxide with a substantially anhydrous solution of an iron (Ill) salt and a substantially anhydrous solution of a calcium salt;(b) adding to the mixture a sufficient amount of water and acid to initiate hydrolysis and gelation;(c) allowing sufficient time for the mixture to gel;(d) removing the solvent with heat under reduced pressure to make a sol; and(e) calcining the sol in the presence of oxygen; whereby oxides are formed having catalytic properties.
  • 23. A catalyst produced by the process of claim 22.
Parent Case Info

The benefit of the Jul. 20, 2004 filing date of provisional application Ser. No. 60/589,239 is claimed under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e).

Government Interests

The development of this invention was funded in part by the Government under grant number R827719-01-0 awarded by the Environmental Protection Agency. The Government has certain rights in this invention.

Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60589239 Jul 2004 US