The present invention relates generally to the field of composite materials including nanomaterial structures. In particular, the present invention is directed to a new method and system for manufacturing nanoparticle or nanomaterial sheets, and reinforcing them to render them suitable for a variety of uses, especially as part of composite materials, or laminates.
Polymer composite materials have been widely used in the aerospace, transportation, and energy generation industries due to their superior specific strength, lower density, higher corrosion resistance, and generally lower cost when compared to monolithic metal alloys. Nevertheless, certain physical properties, such erosion resistance and desired electrical conductivity levels are still lower than those of their metal counterparts.
State of the art research and development efforts to improve the erosion resistance and electrical conductivity of light-weight, composite materials has focused on the adaptation of nanomaterials such as Carbon Nanotubes (CNTs), Carbon Nanofibers (CNFs), and nanographites. The most widely used method of incorporating these nanomaterials is to disperse them into a desired polymer matrix by means of high shear mixing, as in the case of thermosets, or twin screw compounding, as in the case of thermoplastics. Unfortunately, incorporating nanomaterials by these conventional techniques results in a loading maximum beyond which there is agglomeration and loss of desired properties.
Nanomaterials based non-woven fabrics (NNWF) have excellent erosion and wear resistance as well as electrical conductivity characteristics suitable for applications, which include but are not limited to de-icing/anti-icing, EMI shielding, ESD protection, lightning strike protection, and solid particle erosion protection. As such, NNWF is particularly appropriate for many aerospace security and communications uses.
Unfortunately, structures made of nanomaterials are extremely difficult to manufacture in sufficient bulk to obtain desirable sizes and configurations. Likewise, nanomaterials structures are often very fragile, and difficult to manipulate for inclusion into composite products, such as laminated sheets. Nanomaterial structures with desirable characteristics can be extremely expensive to manufacture, and very often cannot be produced in sufficient quantities to be useful in many applications, such as large aircraft panels.
Conventional nanomaterials fabrication technologies are cost-prohibitive and not commercially viable due to the limitations of their fabrication processes. Additionally, conventional nanomaterial-based films are all in a fragile dry form, necessitating special handleability and safety protocols. Conventional NNWF structures, especially sheets or films, do not admit to being prepregged post-production as a secondary step in the overall fabrication of a reinforced nanomaterials sheet.
Consequently, there exists a need for a system and a process for using that system to produce large amounts of nanomaterial structures, such as sheets. The process must include arrangements for handling the normally fragile nanomaterial structures, and conditioning them for future use in composite products. The method for protecting the nanomaterial structures must be comprehensive, and must take advantage of the desirable characteristics of the nanoparticle material. Further, the overall results of the system must be a structure with desirable characteristics, such as those required of composite materials in a number of industries, such as aerospace.
It is a primary object of the present invention to optimize the use of nanoparticle or nanomaterial structures in the manufacture of composite structures, such as laminates.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a manufacturing process that can produce non-woven, nanoparticle sheets in a wide range of sizes and configurations.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a manufacturing system that is more efficient than conventional systems for manufacturing nanoparticle sheets, and produces less waste in doing so.
It is an additional object of the present invention to provide a reinforced nanoparticle sheet that admits to handling and facilitates use in composite structures.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide a manufacturing process having a desired range of nanomaterial loadings, and that facilitates efficient manufacture of both nanomaterial-based woven fabric (NWF) and nanomaterial-based non-woven fabric (NNWF) materials.
It is again a further object of the present invention to provide a low-cost mass-production-scalable system to enhance the performance of composites, such as laminates.
It is still an additional object of the present invention to provide a manufacturing system and end product which can enhance the performance of nanoparticle structures, including improved erosion resistance and electrical conductivity, as well as other desirable properties.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a manufacturing process that overcomes the limitations of conventional prepregging techniques.
It is yet a further object of the present invention to provide a system for manufacturing nanoparticle structures, such as sheets or films, using a wide variety of different manufacturing options for wide range of end products.
It is a again an additional object of the present invention to provide a reinforced nanoparticle sheet that can be used to enhance laminates or other composite structures, employing a wide range of additional materials.
It is still a further object of the present invention to provide a manufacturing system that reduces possible damage to nanoparticle structures.
These and other goals and objects of the present invention are achieved by a composite structure having at least one prepregged nanoparticle structure wherein resin is infused in the nanoparticle structure while individual nanoparticles maintain contact with each other within the resin matrix.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a process for manufacturing a nanoparticle structure is provided where the process includes the steps of forming a nanoparticle dispersion in a solvent. Next, at least a portion of the nanoparticle dispersion is deposited on a support structure. Finally, the solvent is removed from the deposited portion of the nanoparticle dispersion so as to form a nanoparticle sheet on the support structure.
In another embodiment of the present invention a method of prepregging a nanoparticle structure includes forming a finished nanoparticle structure, and then impregnating the nanoparticle structure with at least one of a resin or polymer.
In a further embodiment of the present invention a system is provided for manufacturing nanoparticle structures. This system includes at least one mixing portion to produce a dispersion of nanoparticles in a solvent, Next, at least part of the nanoparticles in the solvent is sprayed to deposit the dispersion on an external support. Then, that part of the nanoparticle dispersion that is not deposited is recirculated back to the mixing portion.
The present invention has two manufacturing aspects which are preferably integrated into the same manufacturing process. The first aspect is novel manufacture of a nanoparticle sheet using a continuous manufacturing cycle (as opposed to conventional “batch” methods). The use of spray deposition in manufacturing nanoparticle sheets permits large, non-woven (NNWF) structures to be quickly and efficiently manufactured. Because the resulting nanoparticle structures are porous and “fluffy”, they are reinforced by prepregging to create a structure that can be handled and used in a wide variety of new composite laminates (such s those depicted in
It should be noted that while the present invention is particularly applicable to NNWF's, due to the fragility of such structures, the present invention can also be applied to the more robust woven nanomaterial products (NWF). It should also be noted that the prepregged nanoparticle sheet can also be reinforced with various types of fibers (including but not limited to woven, nonwoven, stitch, filament, yarn, unidirectional, and chalk) before the prepregging process is conducted, or even after the prepregging process is conducted. This a conventional reinforcing technique that can be added to the inventive aspects of the novel manufacturing process and novel nanoparticle product (preferably in sheet or film form).
Referring to
The flow diagram of
In
However, the final product, preferably a nanoparticle sheet requires additional processing before it can be used in any practical sense in one of the aforementioned applications in which nanoparticle structures are desirable. This process is entirely novel with regard to nanoparticle structures and includes the use of prepregging using selected resin products. Further, the method and system for applying the method are unique since nanoparticle structures are not prepregged in the conventional art. Thin nanoparticle structures are too fragile for conventional techniques.
A number of prepregging techniques are suggested in the flow diagram of
There are a number of different steps that can be used to protect the nanoparticle sheets and prepare them for the full prepregging processes described with respect to
Other techniques for handling the sheet as soon as the nanoparticle network is fully consolidated is the use of a transport, substrate support or backing upon which the nanoparticle sheets can be formed. This can be used to convey the nanoparticle sheet to another part of the prepregging system, such as depicted in
Other prepregging techniques, such as that depicted in
Because of fragility or the freshly formed nanoparticle sheet, it is crucial that prepregging take place in immediately. This allows the sheet to be formed virtually as a film, which mitigates against transport of the nanoparticle sheet. Should a nanoparticle sheet be conventionally formed to a sufficient density to be easily handled for transfer to another processing area then the sheet will lose a certain amount of its porosity. This makes prepregging more difficult and far less effective. Once a polymer has properly permeated the nanoparticle sheet, then pressure rollers and a bleeder ply will aid in removing excess resin by squeezing and absorbing the resin out of the prepregged sheet to achieve the desired fiber volume fraction and resin content. This immediate prepregging process of a nanoparticle material permits the exact prepregging to achieve the desired constituency of the prepregged nanoparticle sheet.
The bleeder ply is constituted two or more materials or films. The first film which would be in contact with the nanoparticle material sheet has small perforations in an evening distributed pattern which allows resin to follow through these perforations. The second layer is comprised of a “felt” or coarse material that absorbs the excess resin a possible third layer might also be used, and includes an additional perforated polymer film.
Likewise, the laminated products depicted in
The fabrication scheme displayed in
The first step in the fabrication scheme outlined in
The second step in the fabrication scheme outlined in
The third step in the fabrication scheme outlined in
The fourth step in the fabrication scheme outlined in
The first prepregging method consists of infiltration of diluted or non-diluted resin into the NNWF by means of dip-prepregging utilizing any type of resin or combination thereof with or without any type or combination thereof of solvent. Referring to
The second prepregging method consists of infiltration of a resin or polymer film into the NNWF by means of roller lamination by taking any type of resin film. Referring to
Polymers used in this prepregging process may be either thermosetting polymer or thermoplastic polymer. Suitable thermosetting polymer resin systems include but are not limited to Epoxies (Epoxide), Bis-Maleimides (BMI), Phenolics (PF), Polyesters, Vinyl Esters, Polyimides, Polyurethanes (PUR). Suitable thermoplastic polymers include but are not limited to High Density Polyethylene (HDPE), Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE), Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC), Polypropylene (PP), Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET), Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), Polycarbonate (PC), Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS), Polyamide (Nylon 6), Polyimide (PI), Polysulfone (PSF), Polyamide-imide (PAI), Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), Polyetherimide (PEI), Poly ether ketone (PEEK), Polyaryletherketone (PEAK), and Polyphenylene.
The NNWFP 18 that results after 17 may include the outer substrate supports of the resin or polymer films, sandwiching the prepregged NNWF constituting the final NNWFP product, which may be in roll form, if desired.
The third prepregging method consists of infiltration of diluted or non-diluted resin or polymer into the NNWF by means of curtain coating and/or roller lamination utilizing any type of resin or polymer or combination thereof with or without any type of combination thereof of solvent. This method may also include the application of a milled or powdered polymer in place of the diluted or non-diluted resin or polymer. Referring to
Polymers used in this prepregging process may be either thermosetting polymer or thermoplastic polymer. Suitable thermosetting polymer resin systems include but are not limited to Epoxies (Epoxide), Bis-Maleimides (BMI), Phenolics (PF), Polyesters, Vinyl Esters, Polyimides, Polyurethanes (PUR). Suitable thermoplastic polymers include but are not limited to High Density Polyethylene (HDPE), Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE), Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC), Polypropylene (PP), Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET), Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), Polycarbonate (PC), Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS), Polyamide (Nylon 6), Polyimide (PI), Polysulfone (PSF), Polyamide-imide (PAI), Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), Polyetherimide (PEI), Poly ether ketone (PEEK), Polyaryletherketone (PEAK), and Polyphenylene.
After the NNWF has passed through 23, it continues to a point at which the support substrate from the fourth step in the fabrication scheme outlined in
The double lamination of the prepregging process as depicted in
Without the immediate application of one or a combination of all three prepregging techniques to the freshly consolidated nanoparticle structure, prepregging of the nanoparticle structure could not occur. Even the prepregged nanoparticle sheet is still relatively fragile. Consequently, the lamination of the prepregged nanoparticle sheet with other products must be accomplished as soon as possible upon the drying of the resin from the prepregging. Such products are described below with respect to
The NNWF and or the NWF and or the NNWFP materials may take form in a variety of configurations and laminate schedules, where they may or may not be the only component or constituent in the final standalone prepreg. Depending on the desired performance target, and the inherent application where the final standalone prepreg will be placed, one particular configuration will be more favorable over the other possible configurations, i.e., an optimum tailored configuration specific to a particular use with selected constituents.
While
The first component of the continuous nanomaterial desperation and spray deposition recirculation system is the solution reservoir 52. This is constituted primarily by an inlet 51, and an electric or pneumatic motor which drives a propeller type shear mixing shaft 53, housed within the subject reservoir.
Inlet 51 is crucial in that it completes a continuous recirculation of the entire system after the dispersed material goes through a diverting outlet 79, if it has not been distributed by atomizing spray nozzle 78. The flow from diverting outlet 79 goes back into inlet 1 to complete the cycle. This is crucial for the continuous operation of the present system. This aspect of the system is novel with regard to the manufacture of nanomaterials structures.
After the first mixing stage, the suspended nanomaterial flows into a peristaltic pump 54, which constitutes the second component of the system. This pump is constituted primarily by a set of rollers for the forced positive displacement of the fluid suspension housed in a looped flexible chemically resistant tube 55. While the mixing of nanoparticle solutions are well known in the conventional art, this particular technique has not been used.
Upon exiting the peristaltic pump the displaced fluid continues to flow into the third component of the system, a hydraulic pressure damper, through inlet 56 which measures a higher pressure set point than outlet 57 of the hydraulic pressure damper. This hydraulic pressure damper is also constituted by an electric or pneumatic motor 59 which drive a propeller type shear mixing shaft 70, which is housed within the reservoir of the hydraulic pressure damper. The hydraulic pressure damper also includes an inlet valve 58 that introduces compressed air into the damper. This inlet valve has a pressure set point below that of inlet 56 and higher than that of outlet 57.
After the fluid suspension exits the hydraulic pressure damper via outlet 57, it flows into the ultrasonic flow cell via inlet 71 into the sonication flow cell 75. At this point, the transducer horn 16 creates cavitations, disrupting and dispersing any solid material conglomerates into individual nanomaterial particles within a suspension. The transducer horn 76 is powered by an ultrasonic generator 77, and is temperature regulated by the flow of liquid coolant which is introduced via inlet 73, and extracted via outlet 74 in a continuous recirculating manner. The fully dispersed nanomaterial suspension moves to the sonication stage, which constitutes the fourth component of the system, via outlet 72.
From outlet 72, the fully dispersed nanomaterial suspension flows into the fifth component of the system, the recirculating atomizing spray nozzle array 78. Here the fully dispersed nanomaterial suspension is sprayed and deposited on an appropriate receptor (not shown). When the spray nozzle array 78 is not engaged, the fully dispersed nanomaterial suspension continues to flow through outlet 79 and back into inlet 51. This continuous operation is not found in any known nanoparticle manufacturing or deposition technique.
It should be understood that the use of sonication in the aforementioned system is a critical step in dispersing solid materials into liquids. This is especially clear when the materials desired to be dispersed are in a micrometer or nanometer range. The materials to be dispersed, such as nanomaterial, are normally held together by attractive forces such as Vander Waals forces and physical entanglement. Once nanomaterial is introduced in the solvent, they are dispersed to form a semi-homogeneous solution by means of mechanical stirring, and or, high shear mixing. Once nanomaterial is dispersed to the point where there are no agglomerates larger than one millimeter, the solution is in fluid to an ultrasonic flow cell. The flow cell exposes the solutions to an ultrasonic transducer horn or tip which creates cavitation in the solution forcing any conglomerates in dispersing into individual particles within a solution.
The process variables that affect dispersion and particle size are the frequency and vibrations used, as well as the amplitude of the waves being used. These variables are adjusted based on these specific nanomaterial used and the desired characteristics of the final nanoparticle structure. Examples of sonication devices that could be used in the present system of those manufactured by Hielscher Ultrasonic GmbH or Branson (in particular to the ultrasonic device product line from Emerson Industrial Automation).
The solution reservoir 52 is also referred to as a mixing tank. This mixing tank is constructed of stainless steel which is resistant to organic solvents used to disperse nanomaterial in the inventive process. The mixing tank has an inlet valve 51 at the top of the tank allows the introduction of solvent or solution into the tank. The tank also has a second dispersing valve at the bottom of the tank for delivering solvent or solution to the next component in the industrial process. The other part of the mixing tank is an electrical agitator with various speeds, which maintains the undispersed materials in suspension. Examples of this kind of components would be mixing tanks manufactures from Walther Pilot North America.
The peristaltic pump is a type of positive displacement pump which uses a flexible tube contained within a circular pump casing which is compressed by a roller in a revolving fashion, forcing fluid through the flexible tube and creating flow. This kind of positive displacement pump allows the solution to never come in contact with any complex geometrical element, as of those found in conventional pumps. Such contact when using nanoparticles could lead to filing or clogging of conventional pumps. Peristaltic pumps are also used when the solution to be displaced are corrosive or dangerous in nature. This peristaltic pump will flow the solution to the pressurized mixing tank at pressure between 10 and 80 psi. Examples of this type of pump are manufactured by Graco.
The hydraulic pressure damper is generally known as a pressurized mixing tank. This is similar in nature to the regular mixing tanks except that it has the capability to pressurized between 5 and 60 pounds per square inch. This pressure allows incoming fluid from the peristaltic pump to be introduced to the tank while also pressurizing the fluid within the tank and forcing it to flow to the ultrasonic flow cell downstream. Components such as this are manufactured by Walther Pilot North America.
The recirculating atomizing spray nozzle can be adjusted for high pressure and low volume or high volume and low pressure. A variety of different nozzles can be used within the concept of the present invention, depending upon the thickness of the nanomaterial deposition, and the particular type of nanomaterial being used. Of course, for the present invention the recirculating atomizing spray nozzle is modified with the addition of a special front body with both a material supply inlet as well as a material recirculation or material outlet. The basic unmodified nozzle can be obtained by Walther Pilot North America.
It is crucial that aspects of the combined process (spray depositing a nanoparticle sheet and prepregging that sheet) be performed at the same location to minimize damage to both the bare nanoparticle sheet and the prepregged nanoparticle sheet. Once the nanomaterial is deposited on an appropriate backing scrim, substrate, support or carrier, the carrier is conveyed directly to a point to be infused or impregnated with resin. This is done to minimize handling, and as a result imposing very little mechanical force on the bare nanomaterial sheet. This arrangement allows the sheet to be well expanded and to exhibit a very low bulk density and a very high porosity. This in turn results in more effective infusion of the resin into the sheet.
If the use of binders or resins in the nanomaterial solution (such as is done in the Armeniades et.al patent) is avoided, the nanomaterial can be consolidated while simultaneously removing the solvent by evaporation or drying. This greatly accelerates the overall inventive process over that of the Armeniades et.al patent. Further, this also assures the desired level of porosity in the nanoparticle sheet.
There is a distinct difference between the final product of the Armeniades et al. patent, as depicted in
In contrast, there are no resins used in the nanoparticle solution of the present invention. Rather, the nanoparticle spray is deposited, solvents evaporated, and the nanoparticles fully consolidated before resin is added as part of a prepregging process. This is illustrated in
The result of the present invention is found in
Because the present inventive system uses spray deposition from an atomizing spray 18 (or its equivalent), the present invention is scalable. For example, sprays with wider distribution or multiple spray heads can be used to create larger nanoparticle sheets. These sheets in turn can be immediately prepregged with a spray (or other type of application) of resin, once the nanoparticles are fully consolidated and the solvents evaporated. The spray deposition of the nanoparticle sheets allows for very thin, highly porous (“fluffy”) structures.
This arrangement also facilitates the use of multiple films or sheets of nanoparticle material piled on each other, either with or without the prepregging of each nanoparticle sheet or film. All that is necessary is either that the spray head moves in a sweeping pattern, or the bed supporting the nanoparticle sheet move in the same fashion. Further, the combined movement of both is also possible to facilitate more rapid deposition of multiple nanoparticle sheets or films. The prepregging operation can also be combined so that a nanoparticle sheet is made using spray deposition and immediately prepregged once the solvents have evaporated. The key to this is having the prepregging operation at or very close to the location of the nanoparticle deposition sprayer.
Once the fully consolidated nanoparticle structure is prepregged, it is best to immediately continue with the lamination process using other materials. This takes advantage of the fresh prepregging to serve as an adhesive without the addition of further resin which could compromise the final nanoparticle structure by leaving too much resin in the overall laminated product. The consolidation of all three sub-routines (deposition of the nanoparticle sheet or structure, prepregging of the nanoparticle structure, and lamination of the freshly prepregged nanoparticle structure) is crucial to maximum efficiency and to maintaining the final product at the correct constitution of resin in relationship to other materials. It also protects the product by limiting movement and handling until the final laminated product is ready to be applied to its final purpose.
Many of the advantages of the present invention come from the use of spray deposition using a continuous dispersion process, aided by sonication. The use of continuous dispersion means that the limitations and drawbacks of batch processing are avoided. In particular, agglomeration of nanoparticle materials, which occurs in conventional processes, is avoided.
In contrast, conventional methods of making nanoparticle sheets include the suspension filtration method. This method is based on dispersing nanoparticles in solvent, then flowing the suspension through a filter or porous membrane, depositing nanoparticles on the membrane in order to produce the sheet. Another traditional technique is the “paper making process” in which nanoparticles are suspended in a solvent or liquid. This is followed by a straining process to deposit the nanoparticles onto a screen or mesh to create the sheet. The carbon vapor deposition process consists of directly growing nanoparticle material on a carbon vapor deposition reactor. The material is then deposited onto a conveyer-type system and flattened to create a sheet.
Only the present inventive system uses spray deposition. The result is the capability of making very thin, very porous nanoparticle structures, easily creating multi-layer structures, controlling the amount of prepregging resin applied, as well as the types of materials used in the prepregging and the individual nanoparticle films. The present invention also avoids difficulties in handling the nanoparticle sheets, and further allows for the perfect combination of tensile strength and precocity to facilitate the prepregging process. Further, since the binder (normally used to strengthen the nanoparticle structure for handling) can be removed from the inventive process, the precision and effectiveness of the prepregging process is enhanced, thereby enhancing the final product.
It should be clear that a wide range of variations can be applied to the inventive system, process and final product. Because the nanoparticle sheets of the present invention constitute unique products not found in other nanoparticle processes, any product, such as a laminate with other materials, that includes the products made by the inventive process and system, are also novel.
While many embodiments of the present invention have been made by way of example, the present invention is not limited thereto. Rather, the present invention should be understood to include any and all variations, permutations, modifications, adaptations, derivations and embodiments that would occur to one skilled in this technology, and having possession of the teachings of the present invention. Consequently, the present invention should be construed as being limited only by the following claims.
The present utility application is based upon U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/652,612, filed on May 29, 2012, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/791,465, filed on Mar. 15, 2013.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61791465 | Mar 2013 | US | |
61652612 | May 2012 | US |