Nanoparticle encapsulation system and method

Abstract
The present invention generally relates to nanocapsules and methods of preparing these nanocapsules. The present invention includes a method of forming a surfactant micelle and dispersing the surfactant micelle into an aqueous composition having a hydrophilic polymer to form a stabilized dispersion of surfactant micelles. The method further includes mechanically forming droplets of the stabilized dispersion of surfactant micelles, precipitating the hydrophilic polymer to form precipitated nanocapsules, incubating the nanocapsules to reduce a diameter of the nanocapsules, and filtering or centrifuging the nanocapsules.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The present invention generally relates to a field of controlled-release delivery systems for macromolecules, particularly those for nucleic acids and gene therapy. More specifically, the present invention relates to nanocapsules having a diameter of less than about 50 nanometers, in which a bioactive component is located in a core of the nanocapsule, and to methods of forming these nanocapsules.




Over the past several decades, active and extensive research into the use of nanoparticles in the delivery of bioactive agents has generated a number of approaches in the preparation of nanoparticles. These approaches typically include the use of heat, high pressure homogenization, or high intensity ultrasound sonication to prepare nanoparticles having a diameter of more than 100 nanometers, or high amounts of solvents or oils, cytotoxic chemicals, such as cross-linking agents, adjuvants, catalysts or any combination of any of these, to prepare nanoparticles having a diameter of less than 100 nanometers. Furthermore, these approaches are challenging due to a number of variables.




For example, when organic solvents are included in the manufacturing process for nanoparticles, the organic solvent may denature the bioactive agent which reduces most, if not all, efficacy of the bioactive agent. In fact, denaturation of the bioactive agent may promote a toxic response upon administration of the nanoparticle, to a human subject, for example.




In addition, when an organic solvent is used to prepare nanoparticles, the organic solvent or solvent soluble polymer may undergo degradation to form a low pH environment that destroys the efficacy of the bioactive agent. Therefore, organic solvents may generally denature the bioactive agent during or after preparation of a nanoparticle.




As a result, organic solvents are typically removed during the manufacturing process of nanoparticles. However, inclusion of one or more organic solvent removal techniques generally increases the costs and complexity of forming nanoparticles.




The incorporation of high pressure homogenization or high intensity ultrasound sonication to prepare nanoparticles typically results in entangling or embedding the bioactive agent in a polymeric matrix of the nanoparticle. Entangling or embedding the bioactive agent in the polymeric matrix may also denature the bioactive agent to thereby reduce the efficacy of the bioactive agent.




Entangling or embedding the bioactive agent in the polymeric matrix of the nanoparticle may also reduce the efficacy of the bioactive agent by permitting premature release of the bioactive agent prior to reaching a target cell. Premature release of the bioactive agent typically promotes cytotoxicity or cell death during administration of the nanoparticle.




Furthermore, nanoparticles that reach the target cell are typically transported into the target cell via endosomal regulated pathways that results in lysosomal degradation of the bioactive agent and the nanoparticle. Therefore, functional activity of the bioactive agent inside the target cell may not occur since the bioactive agent and the nanoparticle undergoes degradation. As used herein, the term “functional activity” refers to an ability of a bioactive agent to function within a target cell for purposes of providing a therapeutic effect on the target cell.




Additionally, high pressure homogenization or high intensity ultrasound sonication techniques often require complex and expensive equipment that generally increases costs in preparing nanoparticles. Therefore, an urgent need exists to prepare nanoparticles without the use of cytotoxic chemicals like organic solvents or the use of complex and expensive equipment. Furthermore, an urgent need exists to prepare nanoparticles that do not entangle nor embed the bioactive agent in the nanoparticle so that cytotoxic responses are minimized. Additionally, an urgent need exists to develop a nanoparticle that may be transported into a target cell where the bioactive agent is released to accomplish therapeutic delivery of the bioactive agent.




BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention generally relates to nanocapsules and methods of preparing these nanocapsules. The present invention includes a method of forming a surfactant micelle and dispersing the surfactant micelle into an aqueous composition having a hydrophilic polymer to form a stabilized dispersion of surfactant micelles. The method further includes mechanically forming droplets of the stabilized dispersion of surfactant micelles, precipitating the hydrophilic polymer to form precipitated nanocapsules, incubating the nanocapsules to reduce a diameter of the nanocapsules, and filtering or centrifuging the nanocapsules.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a schematic of a method of the present invention for preparing nanocapsules.




FIG.


2


A: “Nanocapsules prepared under different dispersion conditions” illustrates atomic force microscopy of nanocapsule formulations prepared under different dispersion conditions.




FIG.


2


B: “Cumulative release studies for nanocapsule formulations” illustrates results from an experiment documenting quantitative recovery of small amounts of DNA from releasing solutions.




FIG.


2


C: “Quantitative recovery of DNA from receiver solutions” illustrates cumulative release over 72 hours for nanocapsules prepared under different dispersion conditions.




FIG.


3


: “Nanocapsule modulation of cellular uptake” illustrates relative pinocytotic activity of HacaT keratinocyte cultures treated with DNA complexes, nanocapsules containing DNA or no treatment.




FIG.


4


: “Dose response for a nanocapsule formula” illustrates western blotting of total protein from rat fibroblast cultures.




FIG.


5


A: “Nanocapsule-delivered transgene production in porcine dermis” illustrates western blotting of porcine dermal tissue.




FIG.


5


B: “Macromolecule delivery across keratinized barrier epithelial” illustrates immunofluorescence microscopy of porcine dermal tissue sections from organ culture study demonstrating topical nanocapsule delivery across keratinized barrier epithelial.




FIG.


6


: “Incorporation of nanocapsules into a suture” shows incorporation of nanocapsules into a solid dosage form.




FIG.


7


A: “PVP nanocapsules are taken up by fibroblasts but not keratinocytes” illustrates polyvinylpyrrolidone nanocapsule uptake and Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) expression in 35 mm human dermal fibroblast and immortalized keratinocyte cultures.




FIG.


7


B: “Nanocapsule design for tumor-targeting” illustrates tumor targeting of GFP plasmid DNA by Tenascin nanocapsules.




FIG.


7


C: “Nanocapsule coating design for increased drug safety” illustrates an effect of nanocapsules that are coated with Tenascin and nanocapsules that are not coated with Tenascin on growth inhibition of squamous cell carcinoma and human dermal fibroblast (HDF) cultures.




FIG.


8


A: “Cellular uptake and lysosomal sequestration of RNA oligomers complexed with polyethyleneimine” shows uptake of HDF cultures treated with nanocapsules containing 20 mer Fitc-labeled O-methyl RNA oligonucleotides.




FIG.


8


B: “Nanocapsules avoid lysosomal sequestration at 18 hours post-addition” shows uptake of HDF cultures treated with nanocapsules containing 20 mer Fitc-labeled O-methyl RNA oligonucleotides.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




The present invention generally relates to nanocapsules having a diameter of less than about 50 nanometers (nm). The present invention also relates to a method of preparing these nanocapsules. According to the method of the present invention, a nanocapsule is formed by partitioning a bioactive component within a core of surfactant molecules, and surrounding the surfactant molecules with a biocompatible polymer shell.




A method for producing the nanocapsule is generally depicted at


10


in FIG.


1


. In the method


10


, a bioactive component


12


is homogeneously dispersed into a first aqueous composition


14


to form a hydrophilic composition (not shown). Next, a surfactant composition


16


, including a surfactant component (not shown) that contains a plurality of surfactant molecules, and an optional biocompatible oil component


18


, are introduced into a first dispersing apparatus


20


along with the hydrophilic composition. The surfactant composition


16


is subjected to conditions in the first dispersing apparatus


20


that initiate at least partial adsorption of the surfactant molecules onto a surface of the bioactive component


12


.




Partial adsorption of surfactant molecules onto the surface of the bioactive component


12


initiates partitioning of the bioactive component


12


into a core of a shell formed from the surfactant molecules in the first aqueous composition


14


. Adsorption of the surfactant molecules onto the surface of the bioactive component


12


may proceed until an entire surface of the bioactive component


12


is covered by the surfactant molecules to complete partitioning of the bioactive component


12


into the core of surfactant molecules and form a surfactant micelle


22


.




Next, a biocompatible polymer component


24


is added to the surfactant micelle


22


to stabilize the surfactant micelle


22


located in the first aqueous composition


14


. Preferably, the biocompatible polymer component


24


surrounds the surfactant micelle


22


in a stabilizing apparatus


26


to form a stabilized surfactant micelle


28


.




After stabilization, the stabilized surfactant micelle


28


is transferred from the stabilizing apparatus


26


into a second aqueous composition


30


located in a second dispersing apparatus


32


. Preferably, the second aqueous composition


30


includes a solute (not shown) that is capable of precipitating the biocompatible polymer component


24


that coats the stabilized surfactant micelle


28


. After precipitating the biocompatible polymer component


24


of the stabilized surfactant micelle


28


, dispersed, optionally atomized precipitated nanocapsules


36


, hereinafter referred to as nanocapsules


36


, are formed.




It has been discovered that dispersing a surfactant composition, that includes a surfactant component having a hydrophile-lipophile-balance (HLB) value of less than about 6.0 units, into an aqueous composition that contains a bioactive component forms surfactant micelles that surround the bioactive component. It has further been discovered that stabilizing the surfactant micelles by adding a biocompatible polymer coats the surfactant micelles to form nanocapsules having a diameter of less than about 50 nm.




As used herein, the term “nanoparticle” refers to a particle having a matrix-type structure with a size of less than about 1,000 nanometers. When the nanoparticle includes a bioactive component, the bioactive component is entangled or embedded in the matrix-type structure of the nanoparticle.




The term “nanosphere”, as used herein, refers to a particle having a solid spherical-type structure with a size of less than about 1,000 nanometers. When the nanosphere includes a bioactive component, the bioactive component is adsorbed onto the surface of the nanosphere or embedded in the nanosphere.




Similarly, the term “nanocore”, as used herein, refers to a particle having a solid core with a size of less than about 1,000 nanometers. When the nanocore includes a bioactive component, the bioactive component is entangled in the nanocore.




As used herein, the term “nanocapsule” refers to a particle having a hollow core that is surrounded by a shell, such that the particle has a size of less than about 1,000 nanometers. When a nanocapsule includes a bioactive component, the bioactive component is located in the core that is surrounded by the shell of the nanocapsule. The term “nanocapsule” is not meant to encompass, and generally does not include, a particle having a size of less than about 1,000 nanometers, in which a bioactive component is entangled or embedded in the matrix of the nanocapsule or adsorbed onto the surrounding shell of the nanocapsule.




The bioactive component


12


may be included into the first aqueous composition


14


as a liquid, vapor or in granular form. The form of the bioactive component


12


that is selected preferably permits the bioactive component


12


to (1) remain stable prior to dissolving or dispersing into the first aqueous composition


14


, (2) be homogeneously dispersed into the first aqueous composition


14


, (3) be optionally condensed to reduce a size of the bioactive component


12


, (4) be partitioned into the core of the surfactant micelles


22


, (5) be released upon degradation of the biocompatible polymer shell


24


of the nanocapsule


36


, and (6) be functionally active upon release from the nanocapsule


36


.




The bioactive component


12


may be characterized as “hydrophilic” or “hydrophobic”. As used herein, the term “hydrophilic” and “hydrophilicity” refers to an ability of a molecule to adsorb water or form one or more hydrogen-bond(s) with water. All references to “hydrophilic” are also understood as encompassing any portion of the molecule that is capable of adsorbing water or forming one or more hydrogen-bond(s) with water. As used herein, the term “hydrophobic” and “hydrophobicity” refers to an ability of a molecule to not adsorb water nor form one or more hydrogen-bond(s) with water. All references to “hydrophobic” are also understood as encompassing any portion of the molecule that is not capable of adsorbing water nor forming one or more hydrogen-bond(s) with water.




When the bioactive component


12


is a hydrophilic bioactive component, the hydrophilic bioactive component may be directly added to the first aqueous composition


14


. As an alternative, the hydrophilic bioactive component


12


may be optionally dissolved or dispersed in one or more solvents, such as water, a nonpolar solvent, a polar solvent, or any combination of any of these.




As used herein, the term “nonpolar solvent” refers to a solvent that does not have a permanent electric dipole moment, and therefore has no ability for an intramolecular association with a polar solvent. Additionally, a nonpolar solvent may be characterized as a solvent that includes molecules having a dielectric constant of less than about 20 units. Similarly, the term “immiscible”, as used herein, refers to an inability of two or more substances, such as two or more liquids, solids, vapors, or any combination of any of these, to form an intramolecular association with another substance. Some non-exhaustive examples of nonpolar solvents may be found in Perry's Chemical Engineer's Handbook, Sixth Edition, which is incorporated herein by reference.




As used herein, the term “polar solvent” refers to a solvent that has a permanent electrical dipole moment, and therefore has an ability to form an intramolecular association with another polar substance, such as a liquid, a solid, a vapor or any combination of any of these. Additionally, a polar solvent may be characterized as a solvent that includes molecules having a dielectric constant of more than about 20 units. Likewise, the term “miscible”, as used herein, refers to an ability of two or more substances to form an intramolecular association with each other. Some non-exhaustive examples of polar solvents may be found in Perry's Chemical Engineer's Handbook, Sixth Edition, which has been incorporated herein by reference.




When the bioactive component


12


is a hydrophobic bioactive component, the hydrophobic bioactive component may be dispersed or dissolved in a solvent that is capable of dispersing or dissolving the hydrophobic molecule, such as the above-mentioned water, a nonpolar solvent, a polar solvent, or any combination of any of these. Preferably, when the bioactive component


12


is a hydrophobic bioactive component


12


, the hydrophobic bioactive component


12


is dissolved or dispersed in a water-miscible solvent, such as, acetone, acetonitrile, ethanol, dimethyl acetamide (DMA), tetrahydrofuran (THF), dioxane, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), and dimethylformamide (DMF). Other suitable non-exhaustive examples of water-miscible solvents may be found in Perry's Chemical Engineer's Handbook, Sixth Edition, which has been incorporated herein by reference.




As noted, the bioactive component


12


may be optionally condensed in the first aqueous composition


14


prior to forming the surfactant micelle


16


. For example, when the bioactive component is a polynucleotide, the polynucleotide may be condensed using a DNA-condensing agent. As used herein, a “DNA-Condensing Agent” is a molecule that facilitates condensation or a size reduction of DNA.




While condensation of the bioactive component


12


is not critical to the present invention, condensation of the bioactive component


12


maybe practiced to reduce the size of the bioactive component


12


. Condensation of the bioactive component


12


generally reduces the size of the bioactive component


12


prior to partitioning into the core of the surfactant micelle


16


. Reducing the size of the bioactive component


12


may permit maximum incorporation of the bioactive component


12


into the surfactant micelle


22


or may assist a reduction in the overall size of the nanocapsule


36


. Increasing the amount of the bioactive component


12


that may be included as part of the nanocapsule


36


permits incorporation of macromolecules having a large number of monomers, such as a large number of base pairs or amino acids, for example. Some non-exhaustive examples of condensing agents have been reviewed in Rolland, A. P. (1998).


Crit. Rev. Therapeutic Drug. Carr. Syst


. 15:143-198, and is incorporated herein by reference.




The bioactive component


12


may further include additional components that are compatible with, and that do not interfere with solvation or dispersion of the bioactive component


12


. Some non-exhaustive examples of additional components that may be added to the bioactive component


12


include a DNA-associating moiety, which refers to a molecule, or portions thereof, that interact in a non-covalent fashion with nucleic acids. DNA-associating moieties may include, but are not limited to, a major-and minor-groove binder, a DNA intercalator, a polycation, a DNA-masking component, a membrane-permeabilizing component, a subcellular-localization component, or the like. Major- and minor-groove binders, as used herein, are molecules thought to interact with DNA by associating with the major or minor groove of double-stranded DNA.




Similarly, the term “DNA intercalator” as used herein, refers to a planar molecule or planar portion of a molecule thought to intercalate into DNA by inserting themselves between, and parallel to, a nucleotide base pair. As used herein, a “polycation” is thought to associate with the negative charges on the DNA backbone. The DNA-associating moiety may be covalently linked through a “reactive group” to a functional component of this invention. The reactive group is easily reacted with a nucleophile on the functional component. Some non-exhaustive examples of reactive groups (with their corresponding reactive nucleophiles) include, but are not limited to N-hydroxysuccinimide (e.g., amine), maleimide and maleimidophenyl (e.g., sulfhydryl), pyridyl disulfide (e.g., sulfhydryl), hydrazide (e.g., carbohydrate), and phenylglyoxal (e.g., arginine).




The term “DNA-masking component”, as used herein, refers to a molecule capable of masking all or part of a polynucleotide following release from a nanocapsule to increase its circulatory half-life by inhibiting attack by degrading reagents, such as nucleases, present in the circulation and/or interfering with uptake by the reticuloendothelial system. Similarly, the term “membrane-permeabilizing component”, as used herein, refers to any component that aids in the passage of a polynucleotide or encapsulated polynucleotide across a membrane. Therefore, “membrane permeabilizing component” encompasses in part a charge-neutralizing component, usually a polycation, that neutralizes the large negative charge on a polynucleotide, and enables the polynucleotide to traverse the hydrophobic interior of a membrane.




Many charge-neutralizing components can act as membrane-permeabilizers. Membrane-permeabilization may also arise from amphipathic molecules. A “membrane permeabilizer”, as used herein, is a molecule that can assist a normally impermeable molecule to traverse a cellular membrane and gain entrance to the cytoplasm of the cell. The membrane permeabilizer may be a peptide, bile salt, glycolipid, phospholipid or detergent molecule. Membrane permeabilizers often have amphipathic properties such that one portion is hydrophobic and another is hydrophilic, permitting them to interact with membranes.




The term “subcellular-localization component”, as used herein, refers to a molecule capable of recognizing a subcellular component in a targeted cell. Recognized subcellular components include the nucleus, ribosomes, mitochondria, and chloroplasts. Particular subcellular-localization components include the “nuclear-localization components” that aid in carrying molecules into the nucleus and are known to include the nuclear localization peptides and amino acid sequences.




The bioactive component


12


may be included at an amount that is therapeutically effective to transform a plurality of cells, such as in vitro, in vivo or ex vivo cells. As used herein, “transform” refers to a presence and/or functional activity of the bioactive component in the plurality of cells after exposing the nanocapsules to the plurality of cells.




Furthermore, those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the amount of the bioactive component


12


may vary depending upon the bioactive component


12


, the temperature, pH, osmolarity, any solutes, any additional component or optional solvents present in the first aqueous composition


14


, the surfactant composition


16


, a type or an amount of the surfactant micelle


22


, the biocompatible polymer component


24


, any desired characteristics of the stabilized surfactant micelle


28


, any desired characteristics of the nanocapsules


36


, or any combination of any of these.




The bioactive component


12


of the nanocapsule


36


may be supplied as an individual macromolecule or supplied in various prepared mixtures of two or more macromolecules that are subsequently combined to form the bioactive component


12


. Some non-exhaustive examples of hydrophilic macromolecules that ay be suitable for inclusion as part of the bioactive component


12


include, but are not limited to polynucleotides, polypeptides, genetic material, peptide nucleic acids, aptamers, carbohydrates, mini-chromosomes, molecular polymers, aggregates or associations of an inorganic or organic nature, genes, any other hydrophilic macromolecule or any combination of any of these.




Some non-exhaustive examples of hydrophobic macromolecules that may be included part of the bioactive component


12


include, but are not limited to, adrenergic, adrenocortical steroid, adrenocortical suppressant, aldosterone antagonist, and anabolic agents; analeptic, analgesic, anesthetic, anorectic, and anti-acne agents; anti-adrenergic, anti-allergic, anti-amebic, anti-anemic, and anti-anginal agents; anti-arthritic, anti-asthmatic, anti-atherosclerotic, antibacterial, and anticholinergic agents; anticoagulant, anticonvulsant, antidepressant, antidiabetic, and antidiarrheal agents; antidiuretic, anti-emetic, anti-epileptic, antifibrinolytic, and antifungal agent; antihemorrhagic, inflammatory, antimicrobial, antimigraine, and antimiotic agents; antimycotic, antinauseant, antineoplastic, antineutropenic, and antiparasitic agents; antiproliferative, antipsychotic, antirheumatic, antiseborrheic, and antisecretory agents; antispasmodic, antithrombotic, anti-ulcerative, antiviral, and appetite suppressant agents; blood glucose regulator, bone resorption inhibitor, bronchodilator, cardiovascular, and cholinergic agents; fluorescent, free oxygen radical scavenger, gastrointestinal motility effector, glucocorticoid, and hair growth stimulant agent; hemostatic, histamine H2 receptor antagonists; hormone; hypocholesterolemic, and hypoglycemic agents; hypolipidemic, hypotensive, and imaging agents, immunizing and agonist agents; mood regulators, mucolytic, mydriatic, or nasal decongestant; neuromuscular blocking agents; neuroprotective, NMDA antagonist, non-hormonal sterol derivative, plasminogen activator, and platelet activating factor antagonist agent; platelet aggregation inhibitor, psychotropic, radioactive, scabicide, and sclerosing agents; sedative, sedative-hypnotic, selective adenosine A1 antagonist, serotonin antagonist, and serotonin inhibitor agent; serotonin receptor antagonist, steroid, thyroid hormone, thyroid hormone, and thyroid inhibitor agent; thyromimetic, tranquilizer, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, cerebral ischemia, and Paget's disease agent; unstable angina, vasoconstrictor, vasodilator, wound healing, and xanthine oxidase inhibitor agent; immunological agents, antigens from pathogens, such as viruses, bacteria, fungi and parasites, optionally in the form of whole inactivated organisms, peptides, proteins, glycoproteins, carbohydrates, or combinations thereof, any examples of pharmacological or immunological agents that fall within the above-mentioned categories and that have been approved for human use that may be found in the published literature, any other hydrophobic bioactive component, or any combination of any of these.




As used herein, the term “polypeptide” refers to a polymer of amino acids not limited by the number of amino acids. It is also to be understood that the term “polypeptide” is meant to encompass an oligopeptide, a peptide, or a protein, for example.




As used herein, the term “polynucleotide” refers to RNA or DNA sequences of more than 1 nucleotide in either single chain, duplex or multiple chain form. The term “polynucleotide” is also meant to encompass polydeoxyribonucleotides containing 2′-deoxy-D-ribose or modified forms thereof, RNA and any other type of polynucleotide which is an N-glycoside or C-glycoside of a purine or pyrimidine base, or modified purine or pyrimidine base or basic nucleotide. The polynucleotide may encode promoter regions, operator regions, structural regions, termination regions, combinations thereof or any other genetically relevant material. Similarly, the term “genetic” as used herein, refers to any material capable of modifying gene expression.




The first aqueous composition


14


may be included in the method of the present invention as a gel, liquid, or in vapor form. The form of the first queous composition


14


that is selected preferably permits the first aqueous composition


14


to (1) remain stable prior to dissolving or dispersing the bioactive component, the surfactant composition


16


, the surfactant micelle


22


, or optionally the stabilizer surfactant micelle


28


, (2) homogeneously disperse the bioactive component


12


, the surfactant composition


16


, the surfactant micelle


22


, or optionally the stabilizer surfactant


28


, (3) function as a continuous phase in an oil-in-water emulsion, (4) not interfere with, or mask the functional activity of the bioactive component


12


, and (5) not modify or degrade the bioactive component


12


, the surfactant composition


16


, the surfactant micelle


22


, or optionally the stabilized surfactant micelle


28


.




The first aqueous composition


14


may include only water, or may optionally include additional solutes or solvents that do not interfere with the method of forming the nanocapsules


36


nor mask the functional activity of the bioactive component


12


. Furthermore, those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that an amount of the first aqueous composition


14


used to prepare the nanocapsules


36


may vary depending upon the bioactive component


12


, the surfactant composition


16


, the temperature, pH, osmolarity, optional solutes or optional solvents, the surfactant micelle


22


, the biocompatible polymer component


24


, any desired characteristics of the stabilized surfactant micelle


28


or the nanocapsules


36


.




The bioactive component


12


may be added to the first aqueous composition


14


or the first aqueous composition


14


may be added to the bioactive component


12


. While the order of addition of the bioactive component


12


and the first aqueous composition


14


is not critical to the present invention, the hydrophilic composition (not shown) that is formed when the bioactive component


12


is dissolved or dispersed in the first aqueous composition


14


is preferably capable of maintaining a homogeneous solution or dispersion in the hydrophilic composition.




The first aqueous composition


14


may be supplied as an individual component or supplied in various prepared mixtures of two or more components that are subsequently combined to form the first aqueous composition


14


. Some non-exhaustive examples of the first aqueous composition


14


include, but are not limited to, the above-mentioned water, nonpolar solvents, polar solvents, or any combination of any of these. Preferably, water is the first aqueous composition


14


.




The surfactant composition


16


may be introduced into the bioactive component


12


, the first aqueous composition


14


, the hydrophilic composition as a liquid, vapor or in granular form. The form of the surfactant composition


16


that is selected preferably permits the surfactant composition


16


to (1) remain stable prior to introducing into the bioactive component


12


, the first aqueous composition


14


, or the hydrophilic composition, (2) be homogeneously dispersed into the bioactive component


12


, the first aqueous composition


14


, or the hydrophilic composition, (3) form a micellar structure, (4) be adsorbed onto a surface of the bioactive component


12


, the first aqueous composition


14


, the hydrophilic composition (5) displace the first aqueous composition that is located on the surface of the bioactive component


12


, (6) partition the bioactive component


12


or the hydrophilic composition into a core of the micellar structure to form the surfactant micelle


22


, and (7) provide a thermodynamic driving force that is effective to reduce a size of the bioactive component


12


, surfactant micelle


22


, the stabilized surfactant


28


or the nanocapsule


36


.




As used herein, a “surfactant” refers to any molecule containing a polar portion that thermodynamically prefers to be solvated by a polar solvent, and a hydrocarbon portion that thermodynamically prefers to be solvated by a non-polar solvent. The term “surfactant” is also meant to encompass anionic, cationic, or non-ionic surfactants. As used herein, the term “anionic surfactant” refers to a surfactant with a polar portion that ionizes to form an anion in aqueous solution. Similarly, a “cationic surfactant” refers to a surfactant having a cationic polar portion that ionizes to form a cation in aqueous solution. Likewise, a “non-ionic” surfactant refers to a surfactant having a polar portion that does not ionize in aqueous solution.




While not wanting to be bound to theory, it is generally believed that a surfactant refers to a molecule that is effective to reduce a surface or an interfacial tension between a first substance dispersed in a second substance such that the first substance is solvated and any molecular groups of the first substance are dispersed. Typically, a hydrodynamic diameter of the first substance increases after addition of the surfactant. Nonetheless, the surfactant composition


16


is believed to be effective to reduce the size or diameter of the surfactant micelles


22


in the first aqueous composition


14


, to thereby reduce the size of the nanocapsule


36


when practicing the present invention.




The surfactant composition


16


may include the surfactant component only (not shown), or may optionally include the biocompatible oil component


18


. The surfactant component may be characterized on the HLB (Hydrophile-Lipophile Balance) scale that ranges from less than about 1 to more than about 13 units.




A surfactant component having an HLB value of less than about 6.0 units may be described as being poorly, or not dispersable in an aqueous or water-based composition. In addition, a surfactant component having an HLB value of less than about 6.0 units may be characterized as a hydrophobic or non-ionic surfactant. A surfactant component having an HLB value of more than about 7.0 units may be described as being capable of forming a milky to translucent to clear dispersion when the surfactant having an HLB value of more than about 7.0 units is dispersed in an aqueous or water-based composition.




Preferably, the surfactant component of the surfactant composition


16


has an HLB value of less than about 6.0 units when practicing the method of the present invention. Still more preferably the surfactant component of the surfactant composition


16


has an HLB value of less than about 5.0 units to facilitate preparation of nanocapsules having a diameter of less than about 50 nm.




The surfactant component may also be characterized in terms of a critical micelle concentration (CMC) value. Preferably, the surfactant component of the surfactant composition


16


has a CMC value of less than about 300 micromolars (μm). Still more preferably, the surfactant component has a CMC value of less than about 200 μm.




While not wanting to be bound to theory, it is believed that the surfactant component of the surfactant composition


16


adsorbs onto the surface of the bioactive component


12


when introduced into the first aqueous composition


14


to minimize exposure of a surface of the hydrophobic surfactant component to a thermodynamically unfavorable environment created by the first aqueous composition


14


. Therefore, the surfactant component adsorbs onto the surface of the bioactive component to reduce the surface area of the surfactant component that may be exposed to the first aqueous composition


14


. Adsorption of the surfactant component onto the bioactive component


12


is believed to facilitate the size reduction of the bioactive component


12


and/or the surfactant micelle


22


.




The surfactant component of the surfactant composition


16


may be supplied as individual surfactants or supplied in various prepared mixtures of two or more surfactants that are subsequently combined to form the surfactant composition


16


. Some non-exhaustive examples of suitable surfactants having an HLB value of less than about 6.0 units or a CMC value of less than about 200 μm be listed in


Dermatological Formulations


(Barry, B., Marcel Dekker, (1983)), or in


Percutaneous absorption: drug, cosmetics, mechanisms, methodology


, 3


rd


ed., Bronough, R. ed., 1999, or the


Handbook of Industrial Surfactants


(Ash, M, Ed., Gower Pub. (1993), which are incorporated herein by reference. As an example, the surfactant component maybe 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyn-4,7-diol(TM-diol), blends of 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyn-4,7-diol(TM-diol), molecules having one or more acetylenic diol groups, cetyl alcohol or any combination of any of these.




The optional biocompatible oil component


18


of the surfactant composition


16


may be combined with the surfactant component as a liquid, vapor or in granular form. The form of the optional biocompatible oil component


18


that is selected preferably permits the optional biocompatible oil component


18


to (1) remain stable prior to introduction into the surfactant composition


16


, (2) be homogeneously blended into the surfactant composition


16


, (3) dissolve or disperse the surfactant component, and (4) increase the hydrophobicity of the surfactant composition


16


, and therefore, the degree to which the size of the bioactive component


12


, the surfactant micelle


22


, the stabilizer surfactant micelle


28


, or the nanocapsule


36


may be reduced when practicing the present invention.




Preferably, the concentration of the optional biocompatible oil component


18


in the surfactant composition


16


ranges from about 10


−7


weight percent to about 10 weight percent, based upon a total volume of the stabilized surfactant micelles


28


. Concentrations of the optional biocompatible oil component


18


higher than about 10 weight percent, based upon the total volume of the stabilized surfactant micelles


28


, may be less desirable because such higher concentrations increase a phase volume of the biocompatible oil, and consequently may cause difficulties in preparing, dispersing and/or handling the surfactant micelles


22


, the stabilized surfactant micelles


28


or the nanocapsules


36


. Concentrations of the optional biocompatible oil component lower than about 10


−7


weight percent in the surfactant composition


16


may be less preferred, because such lower concentrations would not be effective to solvate the surfactant component, or increase the hydrophobicity of the surfactant composition


16


, and may ultimately increase the diameter of the nanocapsules


36


.




The optional biocompatible oil component


18


of the surfactant composition


16


may be supplied as an individual biocompatible oil or supplied in various prepared mixtures of two or more biocompatible oils that are subsequently combined to form the optional biocompatible oil component


18


. Some non-exhaustive examples of suitable biocompatible oils that may be included as part of the biocompatible oil component


18


maybe found in


Dermatological Formulations


(Barry, B., Marcel Dekker, (1983)), or in


Percutaneous absorption: drug, cosmetics, mechanisms, methodology


, 3


rd


ed., Bronough, R. ed, 1999, or in the


Handbook of industrial Surfactants


(Ash, M, Ed., Gower Pub. (1993), which have been incorporated herein by reference. Preferably, food or USP grade oils, such as DMSO, DMF, castor oil, or any combination thereof, are used to practice the present method.




The surfactant composition


16


may be included at an amount that is effective to form the micellar structure that partitions the bioactive component


12


, the first aqueous composition


14


or the hydrophilic composition into the core of the micellar structure when forming the surfactant micelle


22


. Still more preferably, the surfactant composition


16


is included at an amount that is effective to provide a maximum thermodynamic driving force that minimizes the size of the bioactive component


12


, the surfactant micelle


22


, and ultimately, the size of the nanocapsule


36


when practicing the present invention.




Furthermore, those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the amount of the surfactant composition


16


may be varied based upon the bioactive component


12


, the first aqueous composition


14


, a ratio of the surfactant component to the optional biocompatible oil


18


, any desired characteristics of the surfactant micelles


22


, the stabilized surfactant micelles


28


or the nanocapsules


36


. For example, a surfactant composition containing a surfactant component having an HLB value of about 6.0 units mixed with a nonpolar biocompatible oil like castor oil, may provide the same degree of a thermodynamic driving force as a second surfactant composition containing a surfactant component of about 4.0 units mixed with DMSO.




The amount of the surfactant composition


16


may range up to about 0.5 weight percent, based upon a total volume of the stabilized surfactant micelles


28


. Still more preferably, the amount of the surfactant composition


16


is less than about 0.25 weight percent, based upon the total volume of the stabilized surfactant micelles


28


. Most preferably, the surfactant composition


16


is present at an amount of less than about 0.05 weight percent, based upon the total volume of the stabilized surfactant micelles


28


. As one non-exhaustive example, the surfactant composition


16


may be added to the total volume of the hydrophilic composition at a concentration of about 500 ppm, based on the total volume of the stabilized surfactant micelles


28


.




The first dispersing apparatus


20


initiates and promotes formation of the micellar structures that are based on the bioactive component


12


, the first aqueous composition


14


and the surfactant composition


16


. Adsorption of surfactant component onto the surface of the bioactive component


12


, or hydrophilic composition continues until all of the surfactant molecules cover, and therefore, entrap the bioactive component


12


or hydrophilic composition in the core of the micellar structure to form surfactant micelles


22


. Formation of a plurality of surfactant micelles


22


in the first aqueous composition


14


forms a dispersion of surfactant micelles


22


.




In general, any conventional dispersing apparatus


20


that is capable of homogenously blending or dispersing may be suitable for use in forming the dispersion of surfactant micelles in accordance with the present invention. Furthermore, those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the first dispersing apparatus


20


may vary depending upon the desired characteristics of the nanocapsules


36


. For example, the first dispersing apparatus


20


may include any device, such as a sonicating or a vortexing apparatus (not shown), or the like to disperse the bioactive component


12


in the hydrophilic composition, and the formation of the surfactant micelles


22


after addition of the surfactant composition


16


. Nonetheless, while the first dispersing apparatus


20


may include a sonicating or a vortexing apparatus, the sonicating or the vortexing apparatus is not critical when practicing the method of the present invention.




As used herein, a “surfactant micelle” may be characterized as a close packed mono-molecular barrier of surfactant molecules at an interface between the bioactive composition


12


and the surfactant composition


16


, such that the barrier encapsulates the bioactive component


12


, the first aqueous composition


14


or the hydrophilic composition. It is also to be understood that the term “surfactant micelle” encompasses partial or hemi-surfactant micelles that partially enclose the bioactive component


12


, the first aqueous composition


14


or the hydrophilic composition.




When the bioactive component


12


is a hydrophilic bioactive component, the polar portion of the surfactant molecule associates with a surface of the hydrophilic bioactive component. When the bioactive component


12


is a hydrophobic bioactive component, the hydrocarbon portion of the surfactant micelle associates with a surface of the hydrophobic bioactive component.




The formation of a surfactant micelle typically occurs at a well defined concentration known as the critical micelle concentration. As noted, surfactant components having a CMC value of less than about 200 micromolars are preferred when practicing the present invention.




After forming the dispersion of surfactant micelles


22


, the dispersion of surfactant micelles


22


is transferred into the stabilizing apparatus


26


where a biocompatible polymer component


24


is added to stabilize the dispersion of surfactant micelles


22


. Alternatively, the biocompatible polymer component


24


may be added to the dispersion of surfactant micelles


22


in the first dispersing apparatus


20


which obviates the need for the stabilizing apparatus


26


.




The biocompatible polymer component


24


stabilizes the dispersion of surfactant micelles


22


to form stabilized surfactant micelles


28


within the first aqueous composition


14


. Therefore, a dispersion of stabilized surfactant micelles


28


are present within the first aqueous composition


14


after addition of the biocompatible polymer component


24


.




As used herein, the term “biocompatible” refers to a material that is capable of interacting with a biological system without causing cytotoxicity, undesired protein or nucleic acid modification or activation of an undesired immune response.




The biocompatible polymer component


24


may be introduced into the dispersion of surfactant micelles


22


as a liquid, vapor or in granular form. The form of the biocompatible polymer component


24


that is selected preferably permits the biocompatible polymer component


24


to (1) remain stable prior to addition into the dispersion of surfactant micelles


22


, (2) be homogeneously dispersed into the dispersion of surfactant micelles


22


, (3) increase a viscosity of the first aqueous composition


14


, (4) form a boundary layer at an interface of the surfactant micelle


22


and the first aqueous composition


14


, (5) be absorbed onto a surface of the surfactant micelles


22


, (6) be capable of iontophoretic exchange, (7) be capable of being precipitated upon addition of a solute, (8) be capable of enzymatic degradation, surface and/or bulk erosion, (9) not interfere with or mask the functional activity of the bioactive component


12


, (10) prevent aggregation and/or agglomeration of the dispersion of surfactant micelles


22


, and (11) be capable of obtaining a particular dissolution profile.




The biocompatible polymer component


24


may be included at an amount that is effective to coat and therefore stabilize the surfactant micelle


22


. Furthermore, those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the amount of the biocompatible polymer component


24


used to stabilize the surfactant micelles


22


may vary depending upon the bioactive component


12


, the first aqueous composition


14


, the surfactant composition


16


, the temperature, pH, osmolarity, presence of any optional solutes or optional solvents, the surfactant micelle


22


, any desired characteristics of the stabilized surfactant micelle


28


, the nanocapsules


36


, or a desired dissolution profile.




While the concentration of the biocompatible polymer component


24


is not critical to the present invention, the concentration of the biocompatible polymer


24


is preferably based upon the bioactive component


12


and on the desired dissolution profile. When the concentration of the biocompatible polymer component


24


is too high, the shell of the nanocapsule


36


may not dissolve. If the concentration of the biocompatible polymer component


24


is too low, the shell of the nanocapsule


36


may dissolve rapidly in a manner that promotes cytotoxicity, for example. In addition, too low a concentration of the biocompatible polymer component


24


may not provide an effective degree of mechanical force to stabilize the surfactant micelles


28


.




Concentrations of the biocompatible polymer component


24


that are too high may also be less desirable because such higher concentrations may increase the viscosity of the first aqueous composition


14


, and consequently may cause difficulties in preparing, mixing and/or transferring the stabilizer surfactant micelles


28


. Concentrations of the biocompatible polymer component


24


that are too low may be less preferred, because lower concentrations may not provide the needed viscosity to stabilize the surfactant micelles


22


, nor be capable of effectively coating the surfactant micelles


22


to prevent aggregation of the surfactant micelles


22


in the first aqueous composition


14


.




The biocompatible polymer component


24


may be supplied as individual biocompatible polymers or supplied in various prepared mixtures of two or more biocompatible polymers that are subsequently combined to form the biocompatible polymer component


18


. Some non-exhaustive examples of biocompatible polymers include polyamides, polycarbonates, polyalkylenes, polyalkylene glycols, polyalkylene oxides, polyalkylene terepthalates, polyvinyl alcohols, polyvinyl ethers, polyvinyl esters, polyvinyl halides, polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyglycolides, polysiloxanes, polyurethanes and copolymers thereof, alkyl cellulose, hydroxyalkyl celluloses, cellulose ethers, cellulose esters, nitro celluloses, polymers of acrylic and methacrylic esters, methyl cellulose, ethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, hydroxy-propyl methyl cellulose, hydroxybutyl methyl cellulose, cellulose acetate, cellulose propionate, cellulose acetate butyrate, cellulose acetate phthalate, carboxylethyl cellulose, cellulose triacetate, cellulose sulphate sodium salt, poly(methylmethacryl ate), poly(ethylmethacrylate), poly(butylmethacrylate), poly(isobutylmethacrylate), poly(hexlmethacrylate), poly(isodecylmethacrylate), poly(laurylmethacrylate), poly(phenylmethacrylate), poly(methacrylate), poly(isopropacrylate), poly(isobutacrylate), poly(octadecacrylate), polyethylene, polypropylene poly(ethylene glycol), poly(ethylene oxide), poly(ethylene terephthalate), poly(vinyl alcohols), poly(vinyl acetate), poly vinyl chloride, polystyrene, polyhyaluronic acids, casein, gelatin, gluten, polyanhydrides, polyacrylic acid, alginate, chitosan, any copolymers thereof, and any combination of any of these.




Additionally, biocompatible polymers that have been modified for desirable enzymatic degradation, or change upon application of light, ultrasonic energy, radiation, a change in temperature, pH, osmolarity, solute or solvent concentration may also be included as part of the biocompatible polymer component


24


. Preferably, the biocompatible polymer component


24


is a hydrophilic polymer that is capable of substantially coating, and preferably continuously coating the surfactant micelle


22


. Still more preferably, the hydrophilic biocompatible polymer component


24


is capable of ionotophoretic exchange.




Though descriptions of the present invention are primarily made in terms of a hydrophilic biocompatible polymer component


24


, it is to be understood that anyotherbiocompatible polymer, such as hydrophobic biocompatible polymers may be substituted in place of the hydrophilic biocompatible polymer, in accordance with the present invention, while still realizing benefits of the present invention. Likewise, it is to be understood that any combination of any biocompatible polymer may be included in accordance with the present invention, while still realizing benefits of the present invention.




In general, any conventional apparatus and technique that is suitable for permitting the biocompatible polymer component


24


to stabilize the surfactant micelles


22


may be used as the stabilizing apparatus


26


in accordance with the present invention. Furthermore, any other device, such as high pressure homogenization or high ultrasound sonication is preferably not included during stabilization.




After stabilizing the surfactant micelles


22


, the stabilized surfactant micelles


28


may be transferred into a second aqueous composition


30


located in a second dispersing apparatus


32


. The stabilized surfactant micelles


28


may be transferred by mechanically forming droplets of the stabilized surfactant micelle


28


that are subsequently introduced into the second aqueous composition


30


.




The second aqueous composition


30


may include water only, or may optionally include a solute to precipitate the biocompatible polymer component


24


surrounding the stabilized surfactant micelle


28


. Some non-exhaustive examples of solutes that may be used to precipitate the biocompatible polymer


24


include ionic species derived from elements listed in the periodic table.




Preferably, the second aqueous composition


30


includes a solute in an amount that is effective to precipitate the biocompatible polymer component


24


and form the dispersed, and optionally atomized nanocapsules


36


of the present invention. As used herein, the term “precipitate” refers to a solidifying or a hardening of the biocompatible polymer component


24


that surrounds the stabilized surfactant micelles


28


. It is also to be understood that the term “precipitation” is also meant to encompass any crystallization of the biocompatible polymer


24


that may occur when the biocompatible polymer component


24


is exposed to the solute.




Additionally, any other component that is capable of modulating the efficacy the nanocapsules


36


may be included as part of the second aqueous composition to thereby modulate the functional activity of the nanocapsule


36


. For example, the second aqueous composition may include additional coating excipients, such as a cell recognition component or various ionic species, such as Mn


2+


, Mg


2+


, Ca


2+


, Al


3+


, Be


2+


, Li


+


, Ba


2+


, Gd


3+


, or any other ionic species that is capable of interacting with the biocompatible polymer component


24


.




The term “cell recognition component”, as used herein, refers to a molecule capable of recognizing a component on a surface of a targeted cell. Cell recognition components may include an antibody to a cell surface antigen, a ligand for a cell surface receptor, such as cell surface receptors involved in receptor-mediated endocytosis, peptide hormones, and the like.




It has been observed that when the stabilized surfactant micelles


28


are allowed to incubate in the second aqueous composition


30


that includes the solute to precipitate the biocompatible polymer component


24


, the nanocapsules


36


undergo a reduction in size. Furthermore, the formation of a flocculated suspension of the nanocapsules


36


has also been observed after incubating the stabilized surfactant micelles


28


in the second aqueous composition.




As used herein, “a flocculated suspension” refers to the formation of a loose aggregation of discrete particles held together in a network-like structure either by physical absorption of bioactive components, bridging during chemical interaction (precipitation), or when longer range van der Waals forces of attraction exceed shorter range forces of repulsion. The flocculated suspension of nanocapsules


36


may entrap varying amounts of the first aqueous composition


14


or the second aqueous composition


30


within the network-like structure. Additionally, the flocculated suspension of nanocapsules may be gently tapped to disperse the nanocapsules


36


.




The stabilized surfactant micelles


28


may be transferred into the second aqueous composition


30


via atomization through a nozzle (not shown) having a particular orifice size or through an aerosolizing apparatus (not shown). Atomizing or aerosolizing the stabilized surfactant micelles


28


typically includes the application of a shear force that may be capable of further dispersing the stabilized surfactant micelles


28


. Furthermore, the application of the shear force during transfer may also be effective to (1) reduce the size of the nanocapsules


36


, or (2) break up any agglomerates or associations between stabilized surfactant micelles


28


that may have formed in the stabilizing apparatus


26


. Feed pressures of less than about 100 psi to the nozzle, for example, may be used to atomize the stabilized surfactant micelles


28


.




The diameter of the nanocapsules


36


may also be varied depending upon the orifice size of the nozzle that may be used to transfer the stabilized surfactant micelles


28


into the second aqueous composition. Alternatively, the stabilized surfactant micelles


28


may be added to the second aqueous composition


30


containing the solute that precipitates the biocompatible polymer


24


to form a dispersion of nanocapsules


36


for purposes of providing the dispersion for sub-cutaneous delivery of the nanocapsules, for example.




After precipitating and/or optionally incubating the nanocapsules


36


in the second aqueous composition


30


, the nanocapsules


36


may be filtered, centrifuged or dried to obtain separate and discrete nanocapsules


36


. The nanocapsules


36


may be frozen or reconstituted for later use or may be delivered to a target cell or tissue by such routes of administration as oral, intravenous, subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, intrathecal, intramuscular, inhalational, topical, transdermal, suppository (rectal), pessary (vaginal), intra urethral, intraportal, intrahepatic, intra-arterial, intra-ocular, transtympanic, intraumoral, intrathecal, transmucosal, buccal, or any combination of any of these.




The nanocapsules


36


having a diameter of less than about 50 nm are advantageous in the delivery of bioactive components to target cells for several reasons. First, nanocapsules


36


having a diameter of less than about 50 nm enhances delivery of bioactive components by protecting the bioactive components against degradation during transport to the target cell.




Second, nanocapsules


36


having a diameter of less than about 50 nm promotes efficient cellular uptake. Efficient cellular uptake into the target cell typically occurs when a particle has a diameter of less than about 50 nm, as opposed to when a particle has a diameter of more than about 50 nm.




Third, it is believed that uptake of the nanocapsules


36


by the target cell occurs via transport systems, such as a non-endosomal pathway, that prevents lysosomal degradation of the nanocapsules


36


. Indeed, it is believed that the nanocapsules


36


of the present invention are efficiently exported into a cell via a caveolin-regulated pathway that circumvents most, if not all, endosomal-regulated pathways that typically degrade nanocapsules


36


.




Fourth, the nanocapsules


36


have a biocompatible polymer shell that is separate from the bioactive component. In fact, the bioactive component is not entangled in, embedded in, or adsorbed onto the biocompatible polymer shell of the nanocapsules


36


. When the bioactive component is not entangled in, embedded in, or adsorbed onto the biocompatible polymer shell, the cell that incorporate the nanocapsules


36


avoid apoptosis or cell death.




Fifth, enclosing the bioactive component within a core surrounded by the biocompatible polymer shell when preparing the nanocapsules


36


in accordance with the present method is advantageous in avoiding premature degradation of the nanocapsules


36


, or a cytotoxic response during in vivo transport of the nanocapsule. Enclosing the bioactive component within the core results in a linear release rate of the bioactive component without any zero burst phenomenon during release from the nanocapsules


36


.




The linear release rate of the bioactive component from the nanocapsule without any zero burst phenomenon is also an advantageous feature as the linear release rate allows rational design of coating dissolution profiles to minimize cytotoxicity. As used herein, the term “dissolution profile” refers to a rate at which the biocompatible polymer shell is dissolved or degraded to release a bioactive agent from a core of a nanocapsule.




Another benefit of the nanocapsules


36


prepared by the method of the present invention is that little, if any, addition of an organic solvent is required to form the nanocapsules


36


. Eliminating the use of most, if not all, organic solvents from the method of the present invention is beneficial since organic solvents may damage the bioactive component


12


, destroy the target cells, or be toxic during preparation of the nanocapsule


36


. The elimination of most, if not all, use of organic solvents eliminates the need for complex solvent removal techniques, such as solvent dilution, vacuum evaporation, or the like, and obviates any associated costs or complex process strategies during preparation of the nanocapsules


36


.




The nanocapsules


36


of the present invention further permits stable encapsulation of a bioactive component, and in particular, hydrophilic bioactive components, such as polynucleotides and polypeptides. “Stable encapsulation”, as used herein, refers to maintenance of the encapsulated bioactive component's structure. For nucleic acids, the appearance of low molecular weight nucleic acid breakdown products, which maybe assayed for by electrophoresis, is substantially eliminated. The nanocapsules


36


may also be used to encapsulate any bioactive component regardless of water solubility or charge density.




APPLICATIONS




The nanocapsules


36


may be combined with additional polymeric binders, surfactants, fillers, and other excipients to incorporate the nanocapsules


36


into solid dosage forms such as granules, tablets, pellets, films or coatings for use in enhanced bioactive component


12


delivery. In this way, design of the dissolution profile, control of the particle size, and cellular uptake remains at the level of the nanocapsule. Such applications include, but are not limited to, creation of rapidly dissolving pellets of nanocapsules for pulmonary delivery or nanocapsule films for device-mediated delivery.




In another application, the nanocapsules


36


may be designed for specific cellular or tissue uptake by polymer selection and/or inclusion of cell-recognition components in the nanocapsule biocompatible polymer shell or coating. Such coatings will have utility for specific or increased delivery of the bioactive agent to the target cell. Such applications include, but are not limited to tumor-targeting of chemotherapeutic agents or anti-sense DNA, antigen delivery to antigen-presenting cells, ocular delivery of ribozymes to retinal cells, transdermal delivery of protein antibodies, or transtympanic membrane delivery of peptide nucleic acids.




Property Determination and Characterization Techniques




Various analytical techniques are employed herein. An explanation of these techniques follows:




FIG.


2


A: Samples were prepared on freshly cleaved mica as dispensed, dried in air and imaged using a Nanoscope II multimode AFM (Digital Instruments) with a J type scanner and ambient tapping mode holder. 125 μm long silicon cantilevers type IBMSC were from IBM and have resonant frequencies of 250-450 kHz. Due to the size similarity of the AFM cantilever tip to the size capsules, reported particle diameter may vary by as much as 50%. All imaging was in tapping mode, images were 512×512 pixels and scanning frequency was 1 kHz. Height, amplitude and phase images were collected. Images were processed in DI software and analyzed in NIH Image SXM. A: Formula Q from 2-phase system, low HLB surfactant, B: Formula S from 2-phase system, high HLB surfactant, C: Formula T from 1-phase system, high HLB surfactant, D: Formula V from 2-phase system, surfactant below CMC.




FIG.


2


B: Nanocapsules were released into a solution of 10% isobutanol in Phosphate-buffered Saline (PBS), pH=7.2. Samples were run in duplicate.




FIG.


2


C: Nominal 300 ng samples of DNA were aliquoted from a master batch containing surfactant and processed through commercial miniprep columns. Eluate was recycled through Qiaquik™ columns and collected either 3 times (4, 5) or twice (6, 7) or recycled through Zymoclean™ columns and collected twice (8, 9). Samples were alcohol precipitated using a commercial coprecipitant, electrophoresed on 1.5% agarose gels modified with Synergel™, stained with SybrGold™ dye, digitized on a Storm 860™ and compared to unmodified but reprecipitated samples from the same master batch (10, 11). Lanes 1-3: 100, 50 and 5 ng of lambda-DNA.




FIG.


3


: Endocytic activity was assessed by immunosignal levels of clathrin (Chemicon). Potocytotic activity was assessed by immunosignal for caveolin-1 as described in the literature (Transduction Laboratories). Lysosomal activity was detected by a monoclonal antibody to Lamp-1 (Transduction Laboratories). Nanocapsule coatings were spiked with ovine IgG to enable this detection strategy.




FIG.


4


: Immortalized Rt-1 fibroblast cultures at 70% confluence were treated for 4 days with increasing amounts of nanocapsule formula K and transiently treated (3 hours) with an optimized liposomal formula (dosed, 500 ng) Results are expressed as a percentages of cellular actin integrated intensity and compared to the liposomal formula. Expression vector was code 448: pEF/myc-his/GFP (Invitrogen).




FIG.


5


A: Radiated porcine biopsies were snapfrozen 7 days after treatment with saline or 6 μg of controlled release nanocapsules, then homogenized in RIPA. 100 μg lysate samples were electrophoresed on SDS-Page gradient gels, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and detected for either beta-galactosidase (about 121 kilo Dalton (kD)) or involucrin (about 100 kD) using chemiluminescence. Results were normalized to the post-transfer gel stained with Coomassie due to interference at 100 kD from a gel defect. Involucrin, a component of the cornified membrane, manufactured by suprabasal cells can be detected in radiated porcine skin and used for future normalization purposes. Lane A: N, topical, biopsy oc-2; B: N, topical, biopsy oc-3; C: O, topical, biopsy 1—1; D: PBS only, biopsy 1-5; E: N, subcutaneous injection, biopsy 1-6.




FIG.


5


B: The beta-galactosidase reporter protein was detected by a monoclonal antibody directed at an incorporated fusion protein tag. A: N, topical, biopsy oc-1, detection with anti-Xpress™; B: Matching view to A with detection for anti-von Willenbrand factor (Sigma); C: untreated biopsy, detection with anti-Xpress™ (Invitrogen).




FIG.


6


: Nanocapsules were incorporated into an aqueous suture coating and sutures were applied to pigskin biopsies in organ culture. Nanocapsules were detected with Cy3 conjugated-streptavidin-biotin complexes to incorporated ovine IgG and nuclear localized GFP transgene expression was detected by rabbit polyclonal antibodies to GFP (Abcom) in combination with Fitc-conjugated polyclonal antibodies to rabbit IgG and Alexa 488-conjugated polyclonal antibodies to Fitc (Molecular Probes). Cell nuclei were counterstained with 10 μg/ml bisbenzamide. Controls omitting primary antibodies were included for specificity determination and signal-to-background level estimation.




FIG.


7


A: Nanocapsules were detected as previously described and nuclear-localized GFP transgene expression was detected by rabbit polyclonal antibodies to GFP in combination with Cy3-conjugated antibodies to rabbit IgG (Jackson Laboratories).




FIG.


7


B: GFP expression was detected as described in FIG.


6


and cell nuclei were counterstained with 10 μg/ml bisbenzamide.




FIG.


7


C: Carcinoma cells and HDF's were seeded overnight into 96 well plates at 2000 and 6000 cells per well respectively. Cisplatin preparations were added to wells for 18 hours as noted on the graph than washed out. After 72 hours, cell viability was assessed by a commercial MTT assay (WST assay, Boehringer Mannheim). Wells were executed in duplicate.




FIGS.


8


A and


8


B: Colocalization with lysosomes was detected using a monoclonal antibody to Lamp-1 (Transduction Laboratories). AFM images are included of O-methyl RNA formulated by nanoencapsulation or complexation with 27 kD polyethyleneimine.




EXAMPLES




The present invention is more particularly described in the following Examples which are intended as illustrations only since numerous modifications and variations within the scope of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art.




Reagents




A. Nucleic Acid Condensing Agents




Poly(ethylenimine) (PEI) at 27 KiloDalton (kD). PEI was used at optimized conditions (90% charge neutralization)




Polylysine (PLL) at 70-150,000 molecular weight. PLL condensing materials were conjugated with nuclear signal localization peptides, either SV-40 T antigen or cys-gly-tyr-gly-pro-lys-lys-lys-arg-lys-val-gly-gly using carboxiimide chemistry available from Pierce Chemical (Rockford, Ill.).




Preparations of nuclear matrix proteins (NMP). NMP were collected from a rat fibroblast cell line, and a human keratinocyte cell line using a procedure described in Gerner et al.


J. Cell. Biochem


. 71 (1998):363-374 which is incorporated herein by reference. Protein preparations were conjugated with nuclear signal localization peptides as described.




B. Surfactants




2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyn-4,7-diol (TM-diol): HLB=4-5, CMC is not determined




Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediol), a-(4-nonylphenol)-w-hydroxy, Tergitol NP-40 (NP40), Nonoxynol-40, POE (40) nonyl phenyl ether: HLB=17.8, CMC 232 μM,




Polyoxyethylene 80 sorbitan monooleate (Tween 80): HLB=10, CMC 12 μM,




Cetyl Alcohol: HLB=4,CMC is not determined.




C. Polymers




Hyaluronan, recombinant, 1 million kiloDalton (MM kD) and conjugated with nuclear localization signal peptides as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,846,561, which is incorporated herein by reference.




Hyaluronan, derived from human umbilical cord, about 4 MM kD and not conjugated.




Povidone (polyvinylpyrrolidone, PVP) 10,000 kD MW and not bioconjugated.




Povidone (polyvinylpyrrolidone, PVP) 40,000 kD MW and not bioconjugated.




Povidone (polyvinylpyrrolidone, PVP) 360,000 kD MW and not bioconjugated.




Tenascin, 220 kD and not bioconjugated.




D. Expression Vectors




334: pcDNA/His/LacZ, produces beta-galactosidase, incorporates CMV promoter, based on pcDNA 3.1. (Invitrogen), 8.6 kilobases




425: pEGFP-c/farn, enhanced GFP (green fluorescent protein) expression vector modified with a famasyl moiety to improve microscopy, CMV promoter, 4.6 kB




423: pEGFP-c3/p57(Kpn/Sma) Clontech enhanced GFP (green fluorescent protein) expression vector modified with a nuclear localization tag from a cyclin dependent kinase to improve microscopy, 4.6 kB




E. Cells




CCRL 1764: Immortalized rat neonatal fibroblast cell line (RT-1's)




HaCaT: immortalized human keratinocyte cell line




Ca9: human tumor cells derived from a squamous cell carcinoma of tongue origin.




Example 1A




Effect of Changing Dispersion Conditions on Hydrophillic Nanocapsules




The importance of appropriate dispersion conditions was investigated in the following series of formulations. Formulae were produced by i) predispersing 25 μg of DNA (425) on ice using a bath sonicator, ii) condensing DNA in a small amount of water by vortexing then incubating on ice for 20 minutes, iii) adding surfactant then oil followed by 30 seconds of probe sonication at 10 Watts, iv) dispersion dilution to 3 milliliters (mL) by first adding saline then 1 MM kD hyaluronan polymer (1%) as a protective colloid with bath sonication, v) mechanically shearing emulsion into droplets by pumping through a 250 micrometer (μm) orifice into 22 mL of PBS, 10 millimolar (mM) Ca


2+


, 200 mM Li


+


, vi) incubating overnight end over end and vii) centrifuging to recover nanoparticles for resuspension and filter sterilization. The condenser-to-DNA weight ratio was determined by dye exclusion at 90% charge neutralization. TM-diols were used in this experiment to represent water-immiscible surfactants, while Tergitol NP40 and Tween 80 were used to represent water-soluble and even more water-soluble emulsifiers/dispersing aids.




Dispersion conditions were systematically varied to discourage micelle formation in aqueous media by i) choosing water-soluble surfactants (Formulae S,T,U, W and V), ii) removing the dispersed phase (Formula T) and iii) decreasing surfactant loading below that required for micelle formation (Formula V). Formula U featured use of a water-immiscible oil (silicone oil). Formulas were characterized physically and tested for functionality in in vitro gene transfer. Quantitative results are summarized in Table 1A:












TABLE 1A









Effect of changing dispersion conditions on hydrophillic nanocapsules.


























Formula




Q




R




S









Experimental Modification:






Critical Micelle Concentration




surf > CMC




surf > CMC




surf > CMC






(CMC)




˜0




˜0




460 ppm






Pre-aerosol surfactant




500 ppm




500 ppm




600 ppm






Concentration (3 ml basis)






HLB number




4-5




4




17.8






Phases




Water/misc. oil




Water/misc. oil




Water/misc. oil






Formula Characteristics:






Nucleic Acid Incorporation (%)




86 ± 8




67 ± 1.4




50.3 ± 12






Low MW DNA Appearance




15.00




76




93.00






(% above background, Post






nanocapsule digest by






electrophoresis)






Supercoil retention




87%




65%




66%






(post 100 hrs release)






(area %, initial






distribution = 76% supercoiled)






Particle Size (mean ± SE)




42 ± 2




45 ± 3




73 ± 4






Secondary Structure(s)




25%




30%




70%






Flocculation Status




100-200 nm




500 nm




300 nm







stringy flocs




stringy flocs




spheroid aggregates






Comments:






Performance:






Transduced GFP Protein




420




340




0






Generation






(pixel units, % of control






liposome formula, 100 μg total






protein, Day 11)


















Formula




T




U




W




V









Experimental Modification:






Critical Micelle Concentration




surf > CMC




surf > CMC




surf > CMC




surf < CMC






(CMC)




460 ppm




460 ppm




15 ppm




460 ppm






Pre-aerosol surfactant




600 ppm




600 ppm




4000 ppm




90 ppm






Concentration (3 ml basis)






HLB number




17.8




17.8




10




17.8






Phases




Water only




Water/




Water/misc. oil




Water/misc. oil








immisc. oil






Formula Characteristics:






Nucleic Acid Incorporation (%)




39 ± 1.7




33 ± 6




37 ± 1.4




58 ± 16






Low MW DNA Appearance




53.00




66




28




41.00






(% above background, Post






nanocapsule digest by






electrophoresis)






Supercoil retention




59%




43%




65%




80%






(post 100 hrs release)






(area %, initial






distribution = 76% supercoiled)






Particle Size (mean ± SE)




226 ± 11




291 ± 25




150 ± 7




199 ± 11






Secondary Structure(s)




S < 10%




S < 10%




S > 40%




S > 80%






Flocculation Status






yeast-like aggregates




400 nm










aggregates






Comments:




ppt. during





ppt. during




ppt. during







aerosolization





aerosolization




aerosolization






Performance:






Transduced GFP Protein




0




0




0




0






Generation






(pixel units, % of control






liposome formula, 100 μg total






protein, Day 11)














Nanocapsule sizing was determined by tapping mode AFM and images are illustrated in FIG.


2


A. The data indicate average nanocapsule sizes less than 50 nm are achievable only with multi-phase systems in combination with low water solubility surfactants (Table 1A: Formulae Q,R vs. S,T,U,V, and W). Furthermore, only nanocapsules of less than 50 nm resulted in detectable transgene production in CRL-1764 rat fibroblast cells (Table 1A). Effective dispersion also corresponded with decreased aggregation and enhanced DNA stability (as indicated by decreased electrophoretic breakdown products). The starting DNA was partially relaxed (76% supercoiled by electrophoresis). Using this value as a basis, supercoil retention in DNA still encapsulated following 100 hours of release testing, was excellent in multi-phase systems.




Release profiles for hydrophillic dispersed atomized nanocapsules were linear, showed no zero burst and resulted in about 60% release after 72 hours (See FIG.


2


B). Formula W, manufactured with a standard surfactant (Tween 80) at a reasonable loading value (0.4%) failed to completely release loaded DNA.

FIG. 2C

illustrates that small amounts of DNA (in this case 300 nanograms of DNA) can be recovered accurately in a procedure comprising butanol extraction of 10% butanol/saline releasing fluid followed by isolation on a miniprep column and measurement of absorbance at 260 nm excitation. Results obtained from UV spectroscopy are confirmed by electrophoresis of recovered DNA following alcohol coprecipitation with a commercial coprecipitant aid. Experiment 1A demonstrates the importance of a multi-phase system in creating coated particles from the micellar solution, defines surfactant requirements and validates method for measuring in vitro release profiles.




Example 1B




Effect of Process Parameters on Particle Functionality




To investigate the effect of modulating process parameters on nanocapsule functionality for DNA delivery, a series of formulas (designed to release in 3 days) were prepared. The transduction efficiency of these formulas for delivering a nuclear Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) reporter transgene in rat fibroblast cultures was measured 5 days later. Charge neutralization of the DNA molecule, the surfactant/oil system, total surfactant phase volume, the inclusion of probe sonication, the absolute requirement for atomization and receiving bath osmolality were modulated. Results for this experiment are summarized in the Table 1B:












TABLE 1B









Effective of process parameters on particle functionality

































charge






Oil Phase









Nano





neutral-





Bio-




Volume (%,





Atomize




Receiving






capsule




Formula




ization by




Surf-




compatible




4.5 ml




Emulsify by




Diameter




bath Osmo-






Design




Name




condensor




actant




Oil




basis)




soni-cation




(μm)




lality (mOs)









1




q.co.2




+




Cetyl




Castor




4




+




250




220









OH




oil/Etoh






2




q.co









Cetyl




Castor




4




+




250




220









OH




oil/Etoh






3




o.35




+




TM-diol




DMSO




4




+




1.4




220






4




ea0.2




+




TM-diol




DMSO




4














220






5




ea0.1









TM-diol




DMSO




4














220






6




ed0.2




+




TM-diol




DMSO




0.05









250




220






7




ed0a.12.di




+




TM-diol




DMSO




0.05









250




 0




















Nanocapsule





Transduction








diameter (nm)*




Encapsulation yield




Efficiency, (5 days,






Nanocapsule Design




Formula name




n = 20




(%, mean ± SE)




rat fibroblasts)









1




q.co.2




20 ± 3, rods




48.6 ± 11




87 ± 7%






2




q.co




12 ± 0.7, irregular




48.6 ± 2




 71 ± 28%






3




o.35




17 ± 1.2, spheres




82.3 ± 7 (4)




86 ± 2%






4




ea0.2




24 ± 2, s/r




32 ± 10




72 ± 2%






5




ea0.1




36 ± 3, irregular




57 ± 2




85 ± 1%






6




ed0.2




39 ± 3, r/e




39 ± 5




 96%






7




ed0a12.di




39 ± 3, ellipse




69 ± 2




100%











*Nanocapsule diameter is reported as average of the minor and major particle axis using digital image analysis, while nanocapsule morphology is reported as irregular, rods (r), ellipse (e) or spheres (s). As the radius of curvature for the AFM silicon cantilever can be 10-30 nm, dilation effects can result in diameter overestimates by as much as 50%.













Aqueous dispersions of DNA condensates with poorly soluble surfactants in the inventive method produced average nanocapsule diameters under 50 nm. A number of successful operating regimes were feasible with varying effects on encapsulation yield. In a cetyl alcohol/castor oil system, under condensation resulted in an average particle diameter decrease from 20 to 12 nm (Table 1B: F1 vs. F2). The same decrease in condenser weight ratio induced an average particle size increase from 24 to 36 nm, while still maintaining nanocapsule functionality for transgene delivery, when using a TM-dio/IDMSO surfactant system for initial micelle formation (Table 1B: F4 vs. F5). This finding teaches surfactant selection impacts final average nanocapsule diameters.




The removal of moderate energy input (dropped probe sonication, atomization but kept bath sonication) during nanocapsule formation resulted in functional particles with decreased yield (Table 1B: F3 vs. F4). This finding indicates that optimal nanocapsule production is not dependent on any spontaneous micro-emulsification process. Cosolvent phase volume was reduced from 4 weight percent to 500 ppm without any negative effect on particle functionality (Table 1B: F4 vs. F6). This finding indicates that essentially solvent-free nanocapsules can be made by the inventive method. Finally, salt was removed from the atomization receiving bath without any negative effects on nanocapsule functionality (Table 1B: F6 vs. F7).




Example 2




Effect of Nanocapsule Sizing on a Nanocapsule Uptake in Human Keratinocvtes




The effect of nanocapsule sizing on intracellular trafficking in immortalized HacaT human keratinocyte cultures (HacaT's) was investigated in this example. In this series of formulae, three micellar dispersion were sheared by syringes of different orifice diameter. The coating weight was also lowered from 1:1 DNA: Polymer (w/w) to 1:40 to shorten the dissolution profile from 5 to 3 days. In these experiments, nanocapsule formulae were compared to standard polyplexes of DNA and PEI, and lipoplexed plasmid DNA. Table 2 summarizes the experimental design and results:












TABLE 2











Effect of particle size on nanocapsule functionality for gene transfer





















Transduction







Particle Size




4 hr.




4 hr.




10 hr.




Efficiency,






Formula




(mean, nm:




colocalization




colocalization




colocalization




(5 days, human






Name




morphology)




with caveolin-1*




with clathrin




with lysosomes




keratinocytes)









o.22




47 ± 3, rods




0




++




+




16 ± 13






o.27




21 ± 2, rods




+




++




ND




81 ± 8 






o.35




17 ± 1.2, spheres




+++




0




0




78 ± 9 






pei-




67 ± 4,




0




+++




+++




40 ± 15






pDNA




spheres, irreg.






Lipoplex




48 ± 2




+




+




+++




41 ± 27






pDNA




200 nm







aggregates











*Key:










0 = no change from unstimulated condition,










+ greater than 25% increase,










++ greater than 50% increase,










+++ greater than 75% increase in number of cells stimulated.










ND = not determined.













It was observed that compared to the unstimulated state, nanocapsules increased cellular pinocytotic activity relative to standard formulations, and smaller nanocapsules shifted pinocytotic fly activity to caveolae from clathrin-coated pits (Table 2: Formula O vs. pei-DNA and lipoplex pDNA). It was further observed that nanocapsules avoided lysosome co-localization at 10 hours post-addition with smaller nanocapsules being particularly effective (see Table 2: Formula O vs. pei-DNA and lipoplex pDNA). These results are illustrated further in FIG.


3


. This improvement is further emphasized by comparison with published uptake studies for HacaT keratinocytes. Compared to primary keratinocytes, uptake of naked DNA oligonucleotides (20 μM) was very poor in HacaT's and showed accumulation of oligonucleotides in punctate vesicles consistent with lysosomes at 2 hours. In contrast, using hydrophillic dispersed atomized nanocapsules of the inventive method, complete avoidance of lysosomes at 10 hours post-addition was demonstrated (FIG.


3


). These results indicate that products of the inventive process will have increased and prolonged effectiveness.




Example 3




Effect of Nanocapsule Delivery on DNA and Reapent-induced Cytotoxicity




To test whether soluble exogenous DNA released from liposomes or dendrimers induces apoptosis, Rt-1's were treated with loaded/unloaded liposome complexes, dendrimer complexes, nanocapsule and 1 μg/ml etoposide, a DNA intercalating agent as a positive control. Cultures were treated with standard formulas for 3 hours then assayed for gene product expression 30 hours later. Cultures were treated with nanocapsules for 4 days to ensure full DNA release during the experiment. Controls included as a positive control for apoptotic cell death, 1 μg/ml etoposide, a DNA intercalating agent that was applied to cultures overnight before experiment termination. Other controls included standard PEI-DNA complexes, empty nanocapsules and nanocapsules containing empty vector plasmid DNA. Hydrophillic nanocapsules were produced for this experiment as described earlier using a 35-gage syringe.




One of the later steps in apoptosis is DNA fragmentation mediated by activation of endonucleases as part of the apoptotic program. Therefore, DNA fragmentation was assayed by end-labeling of fragments using an exogenous enzyme and a substituted nucleotide (TUNEL: tdt-mediated uridine nucleotide and labeling. Results are expressed as a Fragmentation Index, or the percent of cells in the total culture exhibiting BRDU end-labeled DNA. Cultures were run in duplicate. The experimental design and results are summarized in Table 3:












TABLE 3











Effect of nanocapsule coating weight on






nonspecific reagent and plasmid DNA-associated cytoxicity.















Formula




Y.35




Lipoplex GP




Lipoplex L+




Polyplex









Particle Design:










DNA Condensing




27 kD




cationic




cationic




dendrimer






Agent




PEI




lipid




lipid






Coating Ratio




0.0025






(DNA/polymer)






Performance:






dose: (30 hrs for




5




1 μg




500 ng




2 μg






Std. Formulas,





500 ng




250 ng




1 μg






100 hrs for





0 ng




0 ng




0 μg






nanocapsules)






Cytotoxicity:




9 ± 8




27 ± 8




9.3 ± 0.2




6.63 ± 1.4






(Fragmentation





6 ± 3




12.8 ± 1.5




5.7 ± 1.8






Index, %)





4 ± 2.5




7.8 ± 0.1




3.1 ± 0.3






cytotoxicity






controls:






(1 μg etoposide (8






hr): 25 ± 10%)






(Pei-DNA






polyplexes (100






hr): 24 ± 7%)






(Empty vector






nanocapsules:






1.25 ± 1.25%)






(Empty vector






nanocapsules:






0.9 ± 0.7%)






Transduction




24 ± 4




17 ± 2




dead




dead






Efficiency: (%






cells) 120 hrs,






dose as listed)






Formula






Characteristics:






Nucleic: Acid




667 ± 0.2




ND




ND




ND






Incorporation:






(%)






Cumulative




ND




ND




ND




ND






Release:






(%, 48 hr)






Particle Size




57 ± 5




48 ± 2




ND




22.4 ± 2






(mean ± SE, nm)






Agglomerates (as




g.t. 50%






25% 300 nm






dispensed)




300 nm




300 nm





hard-fused






















TABLE 3B











Dose response of nanoencapsulated pDNA
















Dose




GFP/Actin Production







Formula




(100 hr.)




(density ratio, %)











K.35




  9 μg




94.8







K.35




4.5 μg




83.5







K.35




1.5 μg




83.3







Lipoplex GP




0.5 μg




94.9















It was observed that use of controlled-release nanocapsules reduced the fraction of apoptotic cells in fibroblast cultures 3 to 100 fold. Conventional reagents without DNA showed a 4-fold increase in FI (Fragmentation Index) over empty nanocapsules, but increased another 50-100% in the presence of additional DNA without additional reagents. Decreasing the coating weight from 1:40 to 1:400 resulted in an increase in average nanocapsule diameter from 20 to 57 rim and the appearance of regions of apoptotic induction in cultures (Table 3: Formula omicron vs. Formula upsilon 35). Decreasing the coating weight from 1:40 to an intermediate 1:100 reduced transduction efficiency without increasing particle size and the appearance of cytotoxicity. These findings indicate that nanocapsule design plays a role in maintaining nanocapsule integrity and that size effects and dissolution profiles can contribute to observed cytotoxicity and functionality. We concluded that application of nanocapsule formulations increased dosing to useful efficiency levels without induction of an apoptotic program.




Table 3B exemplifies this improvement with a dose response of Formula K.35 measured in fibroblast lysates. GFP production was measured in fibroblast lysates after 4 days of treatment with increasing doses of nanocapsules. A 9.5 μg dose of nanocapsules equaled the production of a liposomal formulation without any evidence of cytotoxicity.




Example 4




Nanocapsule Delivery of Macromolecules to Porcine Tissue Across Keratinized Barrier Epithelia by Transdermal and Subcutaneous Means




The utility of nanocapsules for nonviral nucleic acid delivery to tissue in a pig biopsy organ culture system was investigated. 6 and 8 mm circular biopsies were collected under sterile conditions from sedated research animals and cultured on meshes in partial contact with media containing 20% Fetal Calf Serum. Biopsies were either injected with 90 μl (6.3 μg) or treated topically with 3×30 μl aliquots. Biopsies were snapfrozen 7 days later and sectioned/homogenized for β-galactosidase production measurement. Formulation information and results from this experiment are summarized in Table 4:












TABLE 4











Functionality of dispersed atomized nanocapsules for macromolecule delivery across keratinized barrier membranes.













Formula




N




O









Exp. Modification (from Formula Q)




coating wt. is 2.5x




coating wt. is 2.5x







Polymer MW is 1x




Polymer MW is 4x






Formula Characteristics:






Nucleic Acid Incorporation (%)




70.00




70.50






Cumulative Release (%, 169 hr 2.5 μg sample




83




83.5 ± 1.5






Low MW DNA in postdigested Electrophoresis Samples




0




0






Supercoil retention (sc) (237 hr release, initial = 69.7%




100%




100%






sc/relaxed)






Particle Size (mean ± SE, major species)




18.2 ± 0.2 nm




ND






Particle Description




spherical






Agglomerates




20% 100 yeast-like clusters




20% 100 yeast-like clusters






Performance:






Transduced Protein Production (Shown in FIG. 3B)




312 ± 74 (topical)




191 (topical)






(pixel units, % of negative control, 100 μg total protein,




142 (s.c.)






normalized by protein)






Reporter Gene Product Distribution






(6.3 μg dose, 6 mm (N), 8 mm (O) porcine biopsy, 1 wk)






keratinocytes (% cells), n = 2 fields/200 cells,




100%




100%






negative control: 6%






endothelial cells, (% vwf −+ area) papillary and/or reticular,




73 ± 20 (papillary)*




13.8 ± 0.5 (papillary)*






n = 2-4 fields, negative control: 1.07 ± 0.72




32 ± 15 (reticular)*




8 ± 2 (reticular)*






dermis (% area); negative control:




2.74 ± 0.96*




1.77 ± 0.49*






0.24 ± 0.03, n = 4/20x fields











*= p < 0.05













Western blotting of radiated tissue lysates showed a 3-fold increase in beta-galactosidase in duplicate biopsies treated topically with Formula N over an identically cultured 6 mm biopsy treated with saline. Only a 2-fold increase was measured in a 8 mm biopsy treated topically with formula O nanocapsules (see FIG.


5


A). Formula O was produced with a higher molecular weight analog of the Formula N polymer suggesting a difference in particle morphology, a dose effect or differing in situ release profiles between the two formulations related to this difference. To identify initial cell type-specific differences in nanocapsule delivery effectiveness, tissue sections were analyzed for beta-galactosidase expression in double-label experiments using antibodies to cell-specific epitopes (see FIG.


5


B). Digital image analysis of these sections indicated that radiated keratinocytes and endothelial cells are readily transduced in organ culture 7 days after treatment with a 10 day releasing formula. Specific quantitation of fibroblastic cells was not possible without inclusion of a cell-specific marker, however, an 11-fold increase in area of expression was measured in Formula N biopsy dermis (see FIG.


5


B). Interestingly, for both the formulae N and O topically-treated biopsies examined, the area percentage of blood vessels transduced decreased about 50% in nearby fields between 100 μm and 300 μm of depth (Table 4: papillary (pap) vs. reticular endothelial (ret) cells). These data suggest that nanocapsules are penetrating the epidermis to enter the dermis.




Example 5




Incorporation of Inventive Nanocapsules into a Solid Dosage Form for Additional Utility in Physical Targeting




Nanocapsules containing a nuclear GFP transgene or empty vector were incorporated into a suture coating by vortexing the following components: i) 50 μg of nanocapsules containing plasmid DNA, ii) 200 μg of bovine mucin, and iii) 75 μg of sucrose (60% w/w) in a 1000 μl volume. Sutures were aseptically coated by drawing sutures 5× through punctured microcentrifuge tubes containing the coating. Coating functionality for gene transfer was tested by applying sutures in cultured porcine skin biopsies. Biopsies were cultured on a mesh such that the biopsy bottom was in contact with cell culture media. Biopsies were treated for 7 days, then snap-frozen and sectioned for immunofluorescence microscopy to assess nanocapsule penetration and transgene delivery.




Nanocapsule penetration was detected by streptavidin biotin immunocomplexes directed at sheep IgG. Nanocapsule coatings are spiked with ovine IgG to enable this detection strategy.

FIG. 6A

shows distribution of sheep IgG signal throughout porcine dermal tissue with accumulation on capillaries. In FIG.


6


A′, primary antibody is omitted during slide processing to determine level of background fluorescence. A suture is visible in this view. Sutures were identifiable as smooth objects without positive nuclear counterstain. GFP expression was confirmed using a polyclonal GFP antibody to obviate the effect of nonspecific tissue green fluorescence.

FIG. 6B

shows nuclear-localized GFP expression throughout the suture-treated dermis using a GFP polyclonal antibody. A suture was visible 750 microns away.

FIG. 6C

shows the lack of GFP expression in a biopsy treated with empty vector coating. This example demonstrates the usefulness of nanocapsules for use in physically targeted macromolecule delivery.




Example 6




Utility of Nanocapsules for Local Targeting by Design of Nanocapsule Coating




Fibroblast Targeting




GFP nanocapsules were prepared by dispersion atomization as described in Example 1. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP, MW 10,000) was used as the coating basis. A coating weight ratio of 1:40 was used and rod-shaped nanocapsules of 23±2 nm were produced. 1 μg of PVP nanocapsules were applied to both human dermal fibroblasts (HDF) and HacaT keratinocyte cultures for 4 hours then fixed for detection for nanocapsule uptake by streptavidin-biotin immunocomplexes to sheep IgG. Nanocapsule coatings were spiked with ovine IgG to enable this detection strategy.

FIG. 7A

illustrates positive nuclear localization of PVP nanocapsules in HDF's and negative colocalization of PVP nanocapsules in keratinocytes (FIG.


7


A:


7


Aa vs.


7


Ab). Views of untreated cultures are included for comparison (


7


A′a,


7


A′ b). Cultures were also treated with 5 μg of PVP nanocapsules for 5 days then tested for GFP transgene production. Consistent with uptake studies results, only the fibroblast cultures showed production of GFP transgene (


7


A:


7


Aa′ vs.


7


Ab′).




Tumor-targeting




GFP nanocapsules were prepared by dispersion atomization as described in example 1. Tenascin (TN, MW 200,000) was used as the coating basis. A coating weight ratio of 1:20 was used and spherical nanocapsules of 19±0.9 nm were produced. 500 ng of TN nanocapsules were applied topically in successive small aliquots to pig biopsies maintained in organ culture. Biopsies were rinsed in media after 3 minutes of topical application in culture media was changed to preclude any delivery followed by exchange for new media in the organ culture to preclude any delivery other than topical.




To simulate tumor nests of epithelial-derived origin, biopsies had been seeded 12 hours previously with 50,000 human squamous carcinoma cells. 7 days later biopsies were snapfrozen and sectioned for immunological detection of GFP production. In

FIG. 7B

, view “a” shows intense GFP fluorescence in the tumor center, view “b” confirms this GFP expression with polyclonal antibodies to GFP, view “c” shows cell positioning in the section using a counterstain for cell nuclei and view “d” shows the level of background fluorescence by omission of GFP antibodies. Tumor origin was confirmed by positive detection with antibody to keratin 10/1, an epithelial marker. Comparison of view “b” and view “c”indicates that GFP expression is limited to cells within the tumor. As already demonstrated in example 5, expression throughout a tissue is also feasible and can modulated by coating design. This example demonstrates that nanocapsule delivery can be productively targeted.




Cell-specific Delivery for Enhanced Drug Therapeutic Window




Nanocapsules were prepared as described in Example 1 to encapsulate cisplatin, a hydrophobic molecule and a common cancer chemotherapeutic with serious side effects. A coating weight ratio of 1:100 was used and irregular nanocapsules of 29±3 nm were produced. Targeting efficacy was demonstrated by changes in the dose response for cell growth inhibition in fibroblast vs. squamous cell carcinoma cultures. Cells were seeded overnight into 96 well plates, treated for 18 hours with increasing amounts of encapsulated or naked drug. Drug was then removed and cultures were assessed for cell growth inhibition using an MTT assay 48 hours later for a total growth time of 72 hours. Results are illustrated in FIG.


7


C. The data shows that tenascin nanocapsules protected non-target cells from cell death (zero death) at drug levels that killed non-target cells using naked drug (FIG.


7


Ca: open vs. closed circles). In carcinoma cultures, TN nanocapsules productively decreased the inhibition concentration (IC50) for cell survival an estimated 200% from 350 to 165 μg/ml. Example 6 demonstrates the usefulness of nanocapsules for use in coating-targeted macromolecule delivery.




Example 7




Utility of Nanoencapsulation for Improved Cellular Uptake of Other Species used as Pharmaceutical, Nutraceutical, Research or Cosmetic Agents




Nanocapsules containing either 500 kD Fitc-labeled dextran, 20 mer Fitc-labeled mer O-methylated RNA oligonucleotide and 16 mer phosphodiester DNA oligonucleotide were prepared as described in Example 1. A 1:40 coating weight ratio was used and 1 MM kD recombinant hyaluronan was used a coating basis. PEI was used to condense the phosphodiester DNA oligonucleotide, but no PEI was included in the dextran or RNA oligonucleotide nanocapsule formulas. Nanocapsule functionality for drug delivery was tested by evaluating changes in cellular uptake and lysosomal activity in 35 mm cultures of human dermal fibroblast. Nanocapsule formulas were compared to naked species or species formulated as complexes. Quantitative results are summarized in Table 7.















TABLE 6













4.5 hours post-addition




18 hours post-addition




















Increase in cellular





Bioactive component










uptake activity,




Nuclear Uptake




Colocalization




Detection








Particle size




(% cells above baseline,




Efficiency




with lysosomes,




persistence,






Bioactive





(mean, SE, nm,




caveolin-1/clathrin)




(% cells,




(% cells,




(% cells,

















Component




Formulation




morphology)




dose




fibroblast)




human fibroblasts)




human fibroblast)






















500 kd




nanocapsule




22 ± 2, s/r




89/20




25 μg*




95 ± 2




2 ± 2




5 μg




88 ± 11






fitc-dextran




naked, Fitc-









75/18




100 μg




10




100 ± 10




100 μg




61 ± 20







labelled






20 mer o-




nanocapsule




13 ± 0.7, r




78/90




2 μg




74 ± 5




0 ± 0




5 μg




80 ± 6






methylated




naked, Fitc-









—/73




5 μg




14 ± 7

















RNA oligo




labelled







PEI/Fitc-




236 ± 26, r




—/—














100 ± 0




5 μg




94 ± 10







labelled






16 mer PO




nanocapsule




17 ± 1, r




70/94




1 μg




34 ± 25




0 ± 0




5 μg




91 ± 8






DNA oligo




PEI/Fitc-




67 ± 4, s/r




72%




2 μg




95 ± 2




80 ± 7




5 μg




66







labelled





lysosomes






Nominal n





20 particles




70 cells





140 cells




50 cells





50 cells











Nanoencapsulation improves cellular uptake of other species used as pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, research or cosmetic agents.










At 18 hours post-addition, lysosomes are only evident in conventionally formulated species.










*Dose was estimated for encapsulation dextran assuming 100% encapsulation.










s = sphere










r = rod













Table 7 shows that average diameters for all nanocapsules were below 50 nm by AFM. PEI complexes of DNA oligonucleotides were measured at 67 nm and PEI complexes of uncharged RNA O-methyl oligonucleotides were measured at 236 nm. As discussed in Example 2 using keratinocyte cultures and plasmid DNA, nanocapsules stimulate uptake activity as indicated by increased signal levels of clathrin and caveolin-1. In the 500 kD dextran case, uptake activity shifts productively towards caveolae and potocytosis with nanoencapsulation (Table 7, 500 kD Dextran). At 4.5 hours post-addition, nuclear uptake is enhanced for encapsulated dextran and RNA relative to naked species.




For the case of DNA oligonucleotides, cellular uptake of the nanoencapsulated oligonucleotides is decreased relative to complexed oligonucelotides. However, by 4.5 hours post-addition, a majority of the simply complexed DNA oligonucleotide is already nonproductively sequestered in lysosomes (Table 7). At 18 hours post-addition, nanocapsule species show continued exclusion from lysosomes, while the DNA oligonucleotide polyplexes show high levels of sequestration.




This pattern of nanocapsule exclusion from lysosomes and polyplex sequestration in lysosomes is illustrated in

FIGS. 8A and 8B

for an O-methyl RNA oligonucleotide species labeled with fluorescein (Fitc). Views


8


Aa and


8


Ba show fluorescein detection in cultures at 18 hours post-addition indicating that distribution is exclusively nuclear for the nanocapsules of RNA oligonucleotides. Punctate inclusions are visible that co-localize with an immunological marker for lysosomes in the cultures treated with RNA oligonucleotide polyplexes (FIG.


8


A:a vs a′). Particle sizing results from AFM microscopy for polyplexes and nanocapsules are included to the dramatic differences in sizing following nanoencapsulation. (

FIGS. 8A

,


8


B:


8


Ab vs.


8


Bb,


8


Bb′). Formulas encapsulating lower molecular weight dextrans and unstabilized RNA were also prepared with similar uptake, nanocapsule size and yield to demonstrate that nanoencapsulation can provide not only a targeting function but aid in stabilizing molecules sensitive to chemical or enzymatic degradation. These examples demonstrates the usefulness of nanocapsules


36


for use in delivery of a broad range of macromolecules.




Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.







5




1


6232


DNA


Artificial Sequence




Supplied by Invitrogen of Carlsbad, California





1
gtaccgaatt caagcttcgt gaggctccgg tgcccgtcag tgggcagagc gcacatcgcc 60
cacagtcccc gagaagttgg ggggaggggt cggcaattga accggtgcct agagaaggtg 120
gcgcggggta aactgggaaa gtgatgtcgt gtactggctc cgcctttttc ccgagggtgg 180
gggagaaccg tatataagtg cagtagtcgc cgtgaacgtt ctttttcgca acgggtttgc 240
cgccagaaca caggtaagtg ccgtgtgtgg ttcccgcggg cctggcctct ttacgggtta 300
tggcccttgc gtgccttgaa ttacttccac ctggctccag tacgtgattc ttgatcccga 360
gctggagcca ggggcgggcc ttgcgcttta ggagcccctt cgcctcgtgc ttgagttgag 420
gcctggcctg ggcgctgggg ccgccgcgtg cgaatctggt ggcaccttcg cgcctgtctc 480
gctgctttcg ataagtctct agccatttaa aatttttgat gacctgctgc gacgcttttt 540
ttctggcaag atagtcttgt aaatgcgggc caggatctgc acactggtat ttcggttttt 600
gggcccgcgg ccggcgacgg ggcccgtgcg tcccagcgca catgttcggc gaggcggggc 660
ctgcgagcgc ggccaccgag aatcggacgg gggtagtctc aagctggccg gcctgctctg 720
gtgcctggcc tcgcgccgcc gtgtatcgcc ccgccctggg cggcaaggct ggcccggtcg 780
gcaccagttg cgtgagcgga aagatggccg cttcccggcc ctgctccagg gggctcaaaa 840
tggaggacgc ggcgctcggg agagcgggcg ggtgagtcac ccacacaaag gaaaagggcc 900
tttccgtcct cagccgtcgc ttcatgtgac tccacggagt accgggcgcc gtccaggcac 960
ctcgattagt tctggagctt ttggagtacg tcgtctttag gttgggggga ggggttttat 1020
gcgatggagt ttccccacac tgagtgggtg gagactgaag ttaggccagc ttggcacttg 1080
atgtaattct ccttggaatt tggccttttt gagtttggat cttggttcat tctcaagcct 1140
cagacagtgg ttcaaagttt ttttcttcca tttcaggtgt cgtgaacacg tggccaccat 1200
ggcccaggtg cagctgcaga tggctagcaa aggagaagaa cttttcactg gagttgtccc 1260
aattcttgtt gaattagatg gtgatgttaa tgggcacaaa ttttctgtca gtggagaggg 1320
tgaaggtgat gctacatacg gaaagcttac ccttaaattt atttgcacta ctggaaaact 1380
acctgttcca tggccaacac ttgtcactac tttctcttat ggtgttcaat gcttttcccg 1440
ttatccggat catatgaaac ggcatgactt tttcaagagt gccatgcccg aaggttatgt 1500
acaggaacgc actatatctt tcaaagatga cgggaactac aagacgcgtg ctgaagtcaa 1560
gtttgaaggt gatacccttg ttaatcgtat cgagttaaaa ggtattgatt ttaaagaaga 1620
tggaaacatt ctcggacaca aactcgagta caactataac tcacacaatg tatacatcac 1680
ggcagacaaa caaaagaatg gaatcaaagc taacttcaaa attcgccaca acattgaaga 1740
tggatccgtt caactagcag accattatca acaaaatact ccaattggcg atggccctgt 1800
ccttttacca gacaaccatt acctgtcgac acaatctgcc ctttcgaaag atcccaacga 1860
aaagcgtgac cacatggtcc ttcttgagtt tgtaactgct gctgggatta cacatggcat 1920
ggatgagctc tacaaagcgg ccgcagatcc aaaaaagaag agaaaggtag atccaaaaaa 1980
gaagagaaag gtagatccaa aaaagaagag aaaggtagat acggccgcag aacaaaaact 2040
catctcagaa gaggatctga atggggccgc atagtctaga agctcgctga tcagcctcga 2100
ctgtgccttc tagttgccag ccatctgttg tttgcccctc ccccgtgcct tccttgaccc 2160
tggaaggtgc cactcccact gtcctttcct aataaaatga ggaaattgca tcgcattgtc 2220
tgagtaggtg tcattctatt ctggggggtg gggtggggca ggacagcaag ggggaggatt 2280
gggaagacaa tagcaggcat gctggggatg gcccgggctc tatggcttct gaggcggaaa 2340
gaaccagctg gggctctagg gggtatcccc acgcgccctg tagcggcgca ttaagcgcgg 2400
cgggtgtggt ggttacgcgc agcgtgaccg ctacacttgc cagcgcccta gcgcccgctc 2460
ctttcgcttt cttcccttcc tttctcgcca cgttcgccgg ctttccccgt caagctctaa 2520
atcggggcat ccctttaggg ttccgattta gtgctttacg gcacctcgac cccaaaaaac 2580
ttgattaggg tgatggttca cgtagtgggc catcgccctg atagacggtt tttcgccctt 2640
tgacgttgga gtccacgttc tttaatagtg gactcttgtt ccaaactgga acaacactca 2700
accctatctc ggtctattct tttgatttat aagggatttt ggggatttcg gcctattggt 2760
taaaaaatga gctgatttaa caaaaattta acgcgaatta attctgtgga atgtgtgtca 2820
gttagggtgt ggaaagtccc caggctcccc aggcaggcag aagtatgcaa agcatgcatc 2880
tcaattagtc agcaaccagg tgtggaaagt ccccaggctc cccagcaggc agaagtatgc 2940
aaagcatgca tctcaattag tcagcaacca tagtcccgcc cctaactccg cccatcccgc 3000
ccctaactcc gcccagttcc gcccattctc cgcccctagg ctgactaatt ttttttattt 3060
atgcagaggc cgaggccgcc tctgcctctg agctattcca gaagtagtga ggaggctttt 3120
ttggaggcct aggcttttgc aaaaagctcc cgggaggtcc acaatgattg aacaagatgg 3180
attgcacgca ggttctccgg ccgcttgggt ggagaggcta ttcggctatg actgggcaca 3240
acagacaatc ggctgctctg atgccgccgt gttccggctg tcagcgcagg ggcgcccggt 3300
tctttttgtc aagaccgacc tgtccggtgc cctgaatgaa ctccaggacg aggcagcgcg 3360
gctatcgtgg ctggccacga cgggcgttcc ttgcgcagct gtgctcgacg ttgtcactga 3420
agcgggaagg gactggctgc tattgggcga agtgccgggg caggatctcc tgtcatctca 3480
ccttgctcct gccgagaaag tatccatcat ggctgatgca atgcggcggc tgcatacgct 3540
tgatccggct acctgcccat tcgaccacca agcgaaacat cgcatcgagc gagcacgtac 3600
tcggatggaa gccggtcttg tcgatcagga tgatctggac gaagagcatc aggggctcgc 3660
gccagccgaa ctgttcgcca ggctcaaggc gcgtatgccc gacggcgagg atctcgtcgt 3720
gactcatggc gatgcctgct tgccgaatat catggtggaa aatggccgct tttctggatt 3780
catcgactgt ggccggctgg gtgtggcgga ccgctatcag gacatagcgt tggctacccg 3840
tgatattgct gaagagcttg gcggcgaatg ggctgaccgc ttcctcgtgc tttacggtat 3900
cgccgctccc gattcgcagc gcatcgcctt ctatcgcctt cttgacgagt tcttctgagc 3960
gggactctgg ggttcgaaat gaccgaccaa gcgacgccca acctgccatc acgagatttc 4020
gattccaccg ccgccttcta tgaaaggttg ggcttcggaa tcgttttccg ggacgccggc 4080
tggatgatcc tccagcgcgg ggatctcatg ctggagttct tcgcccaccc caacttgttt 4140
attgcagctt ataatggtta caaataaagc aatagcatca caaatttcac aaataaagca 4200
tttttttcac tgcattctag ttgtggtttg tccaaactca tcaatgtatc ttatcatgtc 4260
tgtataccgg atctttccgc ttcctcgctc actgactcgc tgcgctcggt cgttcggctg 4320
cggcgagcgg tatcagctca ctcaaaggcg gtaatacggt tatccacaga atcaggggat 4380
aacgcaggaa agaacatgtg agcaaaaggc cagcaaaagg ccaggaaccg taaaaaggcc 4440
gcgttgctgg cgtttttcca taggctccgc ccccctgacg agcatcacaa aaatcgacgc 4500
tcaagtcaga ggtggcgaaa cccgacagga ctataaagat accaggcgtt tccccctgga 4560
agctccctcg tgcgctctcc tgttccgacc ctgccgctta ccggatacct gtccgccttt 4620
ctcccttcgg gaagcgtggc gctttctcaa tgctcacgct gtaggtatct cagttcggtg 4680
taggtcgttc gctccaagct gggctgtgtg cacgaacccc ccgttcagcc cgaccgctgc 4740
gccttatccg gtaactatcg tcttgagtcc aacccggtaa gacacgactt atcgccactg 4800
gcagcagcca ctggtaacag gattagcaga gcgaggtatg taggcggtgc tacagagttc 4860
ttgaagtggt ggcctaacta cggctacact agaaggacag tatttggtat ctgcgctctg 4920
ctgaagccag ttaccttcgg aaaaagagtt ggtagctctt gatccggcaa acaaaccacc 4980
gctggtagcg gtggtttttt tgtttgcaag cagcagatta cgcgcagaaa aaaaggatct 5040
caagaagatc ctttgatctt ttctacgggg tctgacgctc agtggaacga aaactcacgt 5100
taagggattt tggtcatgag attatcaaaa aggatcttca cctagatcct tttaaattaa 5160
aaatgaagtt ttaaatcaat ctaaagtata tatgagtaaa cttggtctga cagttaccaa 5220
tgcttaatca gtgaggcacc tatctcagcg atctgtctat ttcgttcatc catagttgcc 5280
tgactccccg tcgtgtagat aactacgata cgggagggct taccatctgg ccccagtgct 5340
gcaatgatac cgcgagaccc acgctcaccg gctccagatt tatcagcaat aaaccagcca 5400
gccggaaggg ccgagcgcag aagtggtcct gcaactttat ccgcctccat ccagtctatt 5460
aattgttgcc gggaagctag agtaagtagt tcgccagtta atagtttgcg caacgttgtt 5520
gccattgcta caggcatcgt ggtgtcacgc tcgtcgtttg gtatggcttc attcagctcc 5580
ggttcccaac gatcaaggcg agttacatga tcccccatgt tgtgcaaaaa agcggttagc 5640
tccttcggtc ctccgatcgt tgtcagaagt aagttggccg cagtgttatc actcatggtt 5700
atggcagcac tgcataattc tcttactgtc atgccatccg taagatgctt ttctgtgact 5760
ggtgagtact caaccaagtc attctgagaa tagtgtatgc ggcgaccgag ttgctcttgc 5820
ccggcgtcaa tacgggataa taccgcgcca catagcagaa ctttaaaagt gctcatcatt 5880
ggaaaacgtt cttcggggcg aaaactctca aggatcttac cgctgttgag atccagttcg 5940
atgtaaccca ctcgtgcacc caactgatct tcagcatctt ttactttcac cagcgtttct 6000
gggtgagcaa aaacaggaag gcaaaatgcc gcaaaaaagg gaataagggc gacacggaaa 6060
tgttgaatac tcatactctt cctttttcaa tattattgaa gcatttatca gggttattgt 6120
ctcatgagcg gatacatatt tgaatgtatt tagaaaaata aacaaatagg ggttccgcgc 6180
acatttcccc gaaaagtgcc acctgacgtc agatcgacgg atcgggagat cg 6232




2


2200


PRT


Homo sapiens



2
Met Gly Ala Met Thr Gln Leu Leu Ala Gly Val Phe Leu Ala Phe Leu
1 5 10 15
Ala Leu Ala Thr Glu Gly Gly Val Leu Lys Lys Val Ile Arg His Lys
20 25 30
Arg Gln Ser Gly Val Asn Ala Thr Leu Pro Glu Glu Asn Gln Pro Val
35 40 45
Val Phe Asn His Val Tyr Asn Ile Lys Leu Pro Val Gly Ser Gln Cys
50 55 60
Ser Val Asp Leu Glu Ser Ala Ser Gly Glu Lys Asp Leu Ala Pro Pro
65 70 75 80
Ser Glu Pro Ser Glu Ser Phe Gln Glu His Thr Val Asp Gly Glu Asn
85 90 95
Gln Ile Val Phe Thr His Arg Ile Asn Ile Pro Arg Arg Ala Cys Gly
100 105 110
Cys Ala Ala Ala Pro Asp Val Lys Glu Leu Leu Ser Arg Leu Glu Glu
115 120 125
Leu Glu Asn Leu Val Ser Ser Leu Arg Glu Gln Cys Thr Ala Gly Ala
130 135 140
Gly Cys Cys Leu Gln Pro Ala Thr Gly Arg Leu Asp Thr Arg Pro Phe
145 150 155 160
Cys Ser Gly Arg Gly Asn Phe Ser Thr Glu Gly Cys Gly Cys Val Cys
165 170 175
Glu Pro Gly Trp Lys Gly Pro Asn Cys Ser Glu Pro Glu Cys Pro Gly
180 185 190
Asn Cys His Leu Arg Gly Arg Cys Ile Asp Gly Gln Cys Ile Cys Asp
195 200 205
Asp Gly Phe Thr Gly Glu Asp Cys Ser Gln Leu Ala Cys Pro Ser Asp
210 215 220
Cys Asn Asp Gln Gly Lys Cys Val Asn Gly Val Cys Ile Cys Phe Glu
225 230 235 240
Gly Tyr Ala Gly Ala Asp Cys Ser Arg Glu Ile Cys Pro Val Pro Cys
245 250 255
Ser Glu Glu His Gly Thr Cys Val Asp Gly Leu Cys Val Cys His Asp
260 265 270
Gly Phe Ala Gly Asp Asp Cys Asn Lys Pro Leu Cys Leu Asn Asn Cys
275 280 285
Tyr Asn Arg Gly Arg Cys Val Glu Asn Glu Cys Val Cys Asp Glu Gly
290 295 300
Phe Thr Gly Glu Asp Cys Ser Glu Leu Ile Cys Pro Asn Asp Cys Phe
305 310 315 320
Asp Arg Gly Arg Cys Ile Asn Gly Thr Cys Tyr Cys Glu Glu Gly Phe
325 330 335
Thr Gly Glu Asp Cys Gly Lys Pro Thr Cys Pro His Ala Cys His Thr
340 345 350
Gln Gly Arg Cys Glu Glu Gly Gln Cys Val Cys Asp Glu Gly Phe Ala
355 360 365
Gly Leu Asp Cys Ser Glu Lys Arg Cys Pro Ala Asp Cys His Asn Arg
370 375 380
Gly Arg Cys Val Asp Gly Arg Cys Glu Cys Asp Asp Gly Phe Thr Gly
385 390 395 400
Ala Asp Cys Gly Glu Leu Lys Cys Pro Asn Gly Cys Ser Gly His Gly
405 410 415
Arg Cys Val Asn Gly Gln Cys Val Cys Asp Glu Gly Tyr Thr Gly Glu
420 425 430
Asp Cys Ser Gln Leu Arg Cys Pro Asn Asp Cys His Ser Arg Gly Arg
435 440 445
Cys Val Glu Gly Lys Cys Val Cys Glu Gln Gly Phe Lys Gly Tyr Asp
450 455 460
Cys Ser Asp Met Ser Cys Pro Asn Asp Cys His Gln His Gly Arg Cys
465 470 475 480
Val Asn Gly Met Cys Val Cys Asp Asp Gly Tyr Thr Gly Glu Asp Cys
485 490 495
Arg Asp Arg Gln Cys Pro Arg Asp Cys Ser Asn Arg Gly Leu Cys Val
500 505 510
Asp Gly Gln Cys Val Cys Glu Asp Gly Phe Thr Gly Pro Asp Cys Ala
515 520 525
Glu Leu Ser Cys Pro Asn Asp Cys His Gly Gln Gly Arg Cys Val Asn
530 535 540
Gly Gln Cys Val Cys His Glu Gly Phe Met Gly Lys Asp Cys Lys Glu
545 550 555 560
Gln Arg Cys Pro Ser Asp Cys His Gly Gln Gly Arg Cys Val Asp Gly
565 570 575
Gln Cys Ile Cys His Glu Gly Phe Thr Gly Leu Asp Cys Gly Gln His
580 585 590
Ser Cys Pro Ser Asp Cys Asn Asn Leu Gly Gln Cys Val Ser Gly Arg
595 600 605
Cys Ile Cys Asn Glu Gly Tyr Ser Gly Glu Asp Cys Ser Glu Val Ser
610 615 620
Pro Pro Lys Asp Leu Val Val Thr Glu Val Thr Glu Glu Thr Val Asn
625 630 635 640
Leu Ala Trp Asp Asn Glu Met Arg Val Thr Glu Tyr Leu Val Val Tyr
645 650 655
Thr Pro Thr His Glu Gly Gly Leu Glu Met Gln Phe Arg Val Pro Gly
660 665 670
Asp Gln Thr Ser Thr Ile Ile Gln Glu Leu Glu Pro Gly Val Glu Tyr
675 680 685
Phe Ile Arg Val Phe Ala Ile Leu Glu Asn Lys Lys Ser Ile Pro Val
690 695 700
Ser Ala Arg Val Ala Thr Tyr Leu Pro Ala Pro Glu Gly Leu Lys Phe
705 710 715 720
Lys Ser Ile Lys Glu Thr Ser Val Glu Val Glu Trp Asp Pro Leu Asp
725 730 735
Ile Ala Phe Glu Thr Trp Glu Ile Ile Phe Arg Asn Met Asn Lys Glu
740 745 750
Asp Glu Gly Glu Ile Thr Lys Ser Leu Arg Arg Pro Glu Thr Ser Tyr
755 760 765
Arg Gln Thr Gly Leu Ala Pro Gly Gln Glu Tyr Glu Ile Ser Leu His
770 775 780
Ile Val Lys Asn Asn Thr Arg Gly Pro Gly Leu Lys Arg Val Thr Thr
785 790 795 800
Thr Arg Leu Asp Ala Pro Ser Gln Ile Glu Val Lys Asp Val Thr Asp
805 810 815
Thr Thr Ala Leu Ile Thr Trp Phe Lys Pro Leu Ala Glu Ile Asp Gly
820 825 830
Ile Glu Leu Thr Tyr Gly Ile Lys Asp Val Pro Gly Asp Arg Thr Thr
835 840 845
Ile Asp Leu Thr Glu Asp Glu Asn Gln Tyr Ser Ile Gly Asn Leu Lys
850 855 860
Pro Asp Thr Glu Tyr Glu Val Ser Leu Ile Ser Arg Arg Gly Asp Met
865 870 875 880
Ser Ser Asn Pro Ala Lys Glu Thr Phe Thr Thr Gly Leu Asp Ala Pro
885 890 895
Arg Asn Leu Arg Arg Val Ser Gln Thr Asp Asn Ser Ile Thr Leu Glu
900 905 910
Trp Arg Asn Gly Lys Ala Ala Ile Asp Ser Tyr Arg Ile Lys Tyr Ala
915 920 925
Pro Ile Ser Gly Gly Asp His Ala Glu Val Asp Val Pro Lys Ser Gln
930 935 940
Gln Ala Thr Thr Lys Thr Thr Leu Thr Gly Leu Arg Pro Gly Thr Glu
945 950 955 960
Tyr Gly Ile Gly Val Ser Ala Val Lys Glu Asp Lys Glu Ser Asn Pro
965 970 975
Ala Thr Ile Asn Ala Ala Thr Glu Leu Asp Thr Pro Lys Asp Leu Gln
980 985 990
Val Ser Glu Thr Ala Glu Thr Ser Leu Thr Leu Leu Trp Lys Thr Pro
995 1000 1005
Leu Ala Lys Phe Asp Arg Tyr Arg Leu Asn Tyr Ser Leu Pro Thr
1010 1015 1020
Gly Gln Trp Val Gly Val Gln Leu Pro Arg Asn Thr Thr Ser Tyr
1025 1030 1035
Val Leu Arg Gly Leu Glu Pro Gly Gln Glu Tyr Asn Val Leu Leu
1040 1045 1050
Thr Ala Glu Lys Gly Arg His Lys Ser Lys Pro Ala Arg Val Lys
1055 1060 1065
Ala Ser Thr Glu Gln Ala Pro Glu Leu Glu Asn Leu Thr Val Thr
1070 1075 1080
Glu Val Gly Trp Asp Gly Leu Arg Leu Asn Trp Thr Ala Ala Asp
1085 1090 1095
Gln Ala Tyr Glu His Phe Ile Ile Gln Val Gln Glu Ala Asn Lys
1100 1105 1110
Val Glu Ala Ala Arg Asn Leu Thr Val Pro Gly Ser Leu Arg Ala
1115 1120 1125
Val Asp Ile Pro Gly Leu Lys Ala Ala Thr Pro Tyr Thr Val Ser
1130 1135 1140
Ile Tyr Gly Val Ile Gln Gly Tyr Arg Thr Pro Val Leu Ser Ala
1145 1150 1155
Glu Ala Ser Thr Gly Glu Thr Pro Asn Leu Gly Glu Val Val Val
1160 1165 1170
Ala Glu Val Gly Trp Asp Ala Leu Lys Leu Asn Trp Thr Ala Pro
1175 1180 1185
Glu Gly Ala Tyr Glu Tyr Phe Phe Ile Gln Val Gln Glu Ala Asp
1190 1195 1200
Thr Val Glu Ala Ala Gln Asn Leu Thr Val Pro Gly Gly Leu Arg
1205 1210 1215
Ser Thr Asp Leu Pro Gly Leu Lys Ala Ala Thr His Tyr Thr Ile
1220 1225 1230
Thr Ile Arg Gly Val Thr Gln Asp Phe Ser Thr Thr Pro Leu Ser
1235 1240 1245
Val Glu Val Leu Thr Glu Glu Val Pro Asp Met Gly Asn Leu Thr
1250 1255 1260
Val Thr Glu Val Ser Trp Asp Ala Leu Arg Leu Asn Trp Thr Thr
1265 1270 1275
Pro Asp Gly Thr Tyr Asp Gln Phe Thr Ile Gln Val Gln Glu Ala
1280 1285 1290
Asp Gln Val Glu Glu Ala His Asn Leu Thr Val Pro Gly Ser Leu
1295 1300 1305
Arg Ser Met Glu Ile Pro Gly Leu Arg Ala Gly Thr Pro Tyr Thr
1310 1315 1320
Val Thr Leu His Gly Glu Val Arg Gly His Ser Thr Arg Pro Leu
1325 1330 1335
Ala Val Glu Val Val Thr Glu Asp Leu Pro Gln Leu Gly Asp Leu
1340 1345 1350
Ala Val Ser Glu Val Gly Trp Asp Gly Leu Arg Leu Asn Trp Thr
1355 1360 1365
Ala Ala Asp Asn Ala Tyr Glu His Phe Val Gln Val Gln Glu Val
1370 1375 1380
Asn Lys Val Glu Ala Ala Gln Asn Leu Thr Leu Pro Gly Ser Leu
1385 1390 1395
Arg Ala Val Asp Ile Pro Gly Leu Glu Ala Ala Thr Pro Tyr Arg
1400 1405 1410
Val Ser Ile Tyr Gly Val Ile Arg Gly Tyr Arg Thr Pro Val Leu
1415 1420 1425
Ser Ala Glu Ala Ser Thr Ala Lys Glu Pro Glu Ile Gly Asn Leu
1430 1435 1440
Asn Val Ser Asp Ile Thr Pro Glu Ser Phe Asn Leu Ser Trp Met
1445 1450 1455
Ala Thr Asp Gly Ile Phe Glu Thr Phe Thr Ile Glu Ile Ile Asp
1460 1465 1470
Ser Asn Arg Leu Leu Glu Thr Val Glu Tyr Asn Ile Ser Gly Ala
1475 1480 1485
Glu Arg Thr Ala His Ile Ser Gly Leu Pro Pro Ser Thr Asp Phe
1490 1495 1500
Ile Val Tyr Leu Ser Gly Leu Ala Pro Ser Ile Arg Thr Lys Thr
1505 1510 1515
Ile Ser Ala Thr Ala Thr Thr Glu Ala Leu Pro Leu Leu Glu Asn
1520 1525 1530
Leu Thr Ile Ser Asp Ile Asn Pro Tyr Gly Phe Thr Val Ser Trp
1535 1540 1545
Met Ala Ser Glu Asn Ala Phe Asp Ser Phe Leu Val Thr Val Val
1550 1555 1560
Asp Ser Gly Lys Leu Leu Asp Pro Gln Glu Phe Thr Leu Ser Gly
1565 1570 1575
Thr Gln Arg Lys Leu Glu Leu Arg Gly Leu Ile Thr Gly Ile Gly
1580 1585 1590
Tyr Glu Val Met Val Ser Gly Phe Thr Gln Gly His Gln Thr Lys
1595 1600 1605
Pro Leu Arg Ala Glu Ile Val Thr Glu Ala Glu Pro Glu Val Asp
1610 1615 1620
Asn Leu Leu Val Ser Asp Ala Thr Pro Asp Gly Phe Arg Leu Ser
1625 1630 1635
Trp Thr Ala Asp Glu Gly Val Phe Asp Asn Phe Val Leu Lys Ile
1640 1645 1650
Arg Asp Thr Lys Lys Gln Ser Glu Pro Leu Glu Ile Thr Leu Leu
1655 1660 1665
Ala Pro Glu Arg Thr Arg Asp Leu Thr Gly Leu Arg Glu Ala Thr
1670 1675 1680
Glu Tyr Glu Ile Glu Leu Tyr Gly Ile Ser Lys Gly Arg Arg Ser
1685 1690 1695
Gln Thr Val Ser Ala Ile Ala Thr Thr Ala Met Gly Ser Pro Lys
1700 1705 1710
Glu Val Ile Phe Ser Asp Ile Thr Glu Asn Ser Ala Thr Val Ser
1715 1720 1725
Trp Arg Ala Pro Thr Ala Gln Val Glu Ser Phe Arg Ile Thr Tyr
1730 1735 1740
Val Pro Ile Thr Gly Gly Thr Pro Ser Met Val Thr Val Asp Gly
1745 1750 1755
Thr Lys Thr Gln Thr Arg Leu Val Lys Leu Ile Pro Gly Val Glu
1760 1765 1770
Tyr Leu Val Ser Ile Ile Ala Met Lys Gly Phe Glu Glu Ser Glu
1775 1780 1785
Pro Val Ser Gly Ser Phe Thr Thr Ala Leu Asp Gly Pro Ser Gly
1790 1795 1800
Leu Val Thr Ala Asn Ile Thr Asp Ser Glu Ala Leu Ala Arg Trp
1805 1810 1815
Gln Pro Ala Ile Ala Thr Val Asp Ser Tyr Val Ile Ser Tyr Thr
1820 1825 1830
Gly Glu Lys Val Pro Glu Ile Thr Arg Thr Val Ser Gly Asn Thr
1835 1840 1845
Val Glu Tyr Ala Leu Thr Asp Leu Glu Pro Ala Thr Glu Tyr Thr
1850 1855 1860
Leu Arg Ile Phe Ala Glu Lys Gly Pro Gln Lys Ser Ser Thr Ile
1865 1870 1875
Thr Ala Lys Phe Thr Thr Asp Leu Asp Ser Pro Arg Asp Leu Thr
1880 1885 1890
Ala Thr Glu Val Gln Ser Glu Thr Ala Leu Leu Thr Trp Arg Pro
1895 1900 1905
Pro Arg Ala Ser Val Thr Gly Tyr Leu Leu Val Tyr Glu Ser Val
1910 1915 1920
Asp Gly Thr Val Lys Glu Val Ile Val Gly Pro Asp Thr Thr Ser
1925 1930 1935
Tyr Ser Leu Ala Asp Leu Ser Pro Ser Thr His Tyr Thr Ala Lys
1940 1945 1950
Ile Gln Ala Leu Asn Gly Pro Leu Arg Ser Asn Met Ile Gln Thr
1955 1960 1965
Ile Phe Thr Thr Ile Gly Leu Leu Tyr Pro Phe Pro Lys Asp Cys
1970 1975 1980
Ser Gln Ala Met Leu Asn Gly Asp Thr Thr Ser Gly Leu Tyr Thr
1985 1990 1995
Ile Tyr Leu Asn Gly Asp Lys Ala Gln Ala Leu Glu Val Phe Cys
2000 2005 2010
Asp Met Thr Ser Asp Gly Gly Gly Trp Ile Val Phe Leu Arg Arg
2015 2020 2025
Lys Asn Gly Arg Glu Asn Phe Tyr Gln Asn Trp Lys Ala Tyr Ala
2030 2035 2040
Ala Gly Phe Gly Asp Arg Arg Glu Glu Phe Trp Leu Gly Leu Asp
2045 2050 2055
Asn Leu Asn Lys Ile Thr Ala Gln Gly Gln Tyr Glu Leu Arg Val
2060 2065 2070
Asp Leu Arg Asp His Gly Glu Thr Ala Phe Ala Val Tyr Asp Lys
2075 2080 2085
Phe Ser Val Gly Asp Ala Lys Thr Arg Tyr Lys Leu Lys Val Glu
2090 2095 2100
Gly Tyr Ser Gly Thr Ala Gly Asp Ser Met Ala Tyr His Asn Gly
2105 2110 2115
Arg Ser Phe Ser Thr Phe Asp Lys Asp Thr Asp Ser Ala Ile Thr
2120 2125 2130
Asn Cys Ala Leu Ser Tyr Lys Gly Ala Phe Trp Tyr Arg Asn Cys
2135 2140 2145
His Arg Val Asn Leu Met Gly Arg Tyr Gly Asp Asn Asn His Ser
2150 2155 2160
Gln Gly Val Asn Trp Phe His Trp Lys Gly His Glu His Ser Ile
2165 2170 2175
Gln Phe Ala Glu Met Lys Leu Arg Pro Ser Asn Phe Arg Asn Leu
2180 2185 2190
Glu Gly Arg Arg Lys Arg Ala
2195 2200




3


8578


DNA


Artificial Sequence




Supplied by Invitrogen of Carlsbad, California





3
gacggatcgg gagatctccc gatcccctat ggtcgactct cagtacaatc tgctctgatg 60
ccgcatagtt aagccagtat ctgctccctg cttgtgtgtt ggaggtcgct gagtagtgcg 120
cgagcaaaat ttaagctaca acaaggcaag gcttgaccga caattgcatg aagaatctgc 180
ttagggttag gcgttttgcg ctgcttcgcg atgtacgggc cagatatacg cgttgacatt 240
gattattgac tagttattaa tagtaatcaa ttacggggtc attagttcat agcccatata 300
tggagttccg cgttacataa cttacggtaa atggcccgcc tggctgaccg cccaacgacc 360
cccgcccatt gacgtcaata atgacgtatg ttcccatagt aacgccaata gggactttcc 420
attgacgtca atgggtggac tatttacggt aaactgccca cttggcagta catcaagtgt 480
atcatatgcc aagtacgccc cctattgacg tcaatgacgg taaatggccc gcctggcatt 540
atgcccagta catgacctta tgggactttc ctacttggca gtacatctac gtattagtca 600
tcgctattac catggtgatg cggttttggc agtacatcaa tgggcgtgga tagcggtttg 660
actcacgggg atttccaagt ctccacccca ttgacgtcaa tgggagtttg ttttggcacc 720
aaaatcaacg ggactttcca aaatgtcgta acaactccgc cccattgacg caaatgggcg 780
gtaggcgtgt acggtgggag gtctatataa gcagagctct ctggctaact agagaaccca 840
ctgcttactg gcttatcgaa attaatacga ctcactatag ggagacccaa gctggctagc 900
gtttaaactt aagcttacca tggggggttc tcatcatcat catcatcatg gtatggctag 960
catgactggt ggacagcaaa tgggtcggga tctgtacgac gatgacgata aggtacctaa 1020
ggatcagctt ggagttgatc ccgtcgtttt acaacgtcgt gactgggaaa accctggcgt 1080
tacccaactt aatcgccttg cagcacatcc ccctttcgcc agctggcgta atagcgaaga 1140
ggcccgcacc gatcgccctt cccaacagtt gcgcagcctg aatggcgaat ggcgctttgc 1200
ctggtttccg gcaccagaag cggtgccgga aagctggctg gagtgcgatc ttcctgaggc 1260
cgatactgtc gtcgtcccct caaactggca gatgcacggt tacgatgcgc ccatctacac 1320
caacgtaacc tatcccatta cggtcaatcc gccgtttgtt cccacggaga atccgacggg 1380
ttgttactcg ctcacattta atgttgatga aagctggcta caggaaggcc agacgcgaat 1440
tatttttgat ggcgttaact cggcgtttca tctgtggtgc aacgggcgct gggtcggtta 1500
cggccaggac agtcgtttgc cgtctgaatt tgacctgagc gcatttttac gcgccggaga 1560
aaaccgcctc gcggtgatgg tgctgcgttg gagtgacggc agttatctgg aagatcagga 1620
tatgtggcgg atgagcggca ttttccgtga cgtctcgttg ctgcataaac cgactacaca 1680
aatcagcgat ttccatgttg ccactcgctt taatgatgat ttcagccgcg ctgtactgga 1740
ggctgaagtt cagatgtgcg gcgagttgcg tgactaccta cgggtaacag tttctttatg 1800
gcagggtgaa acgcaggtcg ccagcggcac cgcgcctttc ggcggtgaaa ttatcgatga 1860
gcgtggtggt tatgccgatc gcgtcacact acgtctgaac gtcgaaaacc cgaaactgtg 1920
gagcgccgaa atcccgaatc tctatcgtgc ggtggttgaa ctgcacaccg ccgacggcac 1980
gctgattgaa gcagaagcct gcgatgtcgg tttccgcgag gtgcggattg aaaatggtct 2040
gctgctgctg aacggcaagc cgttgctgat tcgaggcgtt aaccgtcacg agcatcatcc 2100
tctgcatggt caggtcatgg atgagcagac gatggtgcag gatatcctgc tgatgaagca 2160
gaacaacttt aacgccgtgc gctgttcgca ttatccgaac catccgctgt ggtacacgct 2220
gtgcgaccgc tacggcctgt atgtggtgga tgaagccaat attgaaaccc acggcatggt 2280
gccaatgaat cgtctgaccg atgatccgcg ctggctaccg gcgatgagcg aacgcgtaac 2340
gcgaatggtg cagcgcgatc gtaatcaccc gagtgtgatc atctggtcgc tggggaatga 2400
atcaggccac ggcgctaatc acgacgcgct gtatcgctgg atcaaatctg tcgatccttc 2460
ccgcccggtg cagtatgaag gcggcggagc cgacaccacg gccaccgata ttatttgccc 2520
gatgtacgcg cgcgtggatg aagaccagcc cttcccggct gtgccgaaat ggtccatcaa 2580
aaaatggctt tcgctacctg gagagacgcg cccgctgatc ctttgcgaat acgcccacgc 2640
gatgggtaac agtcttggcg gtttcgctaa atactggcag gcgtttcgtc agtatccccg 2700
tttacagggc ggcttcgtct gggactgggt ggatcagtcg ctgattaaat atgatgaaaa 2760
cggcaacccg tggtcggctt acggcggtga ttttggcgat acgccgaacg atcgccagtt 2820
ctgtatgaac ggtctggtct ttgccgaccg cacgccgcat ccagcgctga cggaagcaaa 2880
acaccagcag cagtttttcc agttccgttt atccgggcaa accatcgaag tgaccagcga 2940
atacctgttc cgtcatagcg ataacgagct cctgcactgg atggtggcgc tggatggtaa 3000
gccgctggca agcggtgaag tgcctctgga tgtcgctcca caaggtaaac agttgattga 3060
actgcctgaa ctaccgcagc cggagagcgc cgggcaactc tggctcacag tacgcgtagt 3120
gcaaccgaac gcgaccgcat ggtcagaagc cgggcacatc agcgcctggc agcagtggcg 3180
tctggcggaa aacctcagtg tgacgctccc cgccgcgtcc cacgccatcc cgcatctgac 3240
caccagcgaa atggattttt gcatcgagct gggtaataag cgttggcaat ttaaccgcca 3300
gtcaggcttt ctttcacaga tgtggattgg cgataaaaaa caactgctga cgccgctgcg 3360
cgatcagttc acccgtgcac cgctggataa cgacattggc gtaagtgaag cgacccgcat 3420
tgaccctaac gcctgggtcg aacgctggaa ggcggcgggc cattaccagg ccgaagcagc 3480
gttgttgcag tgcacggcag atacacttgc tgatgcggtg ctgattacga ccgctcacgc 3540
gtggcagcat caggggaaaa ccttatttat cagccggaaa acctaccgga ttgatggtag 3600
tggtcaaatg gcgattaccg ttgatgttga agtggcgagc gatacaccgc atccggcgcg 3660
gattggcctg aactgccagc tggcgcaggt agcagagcgg gtaaactggc tcggattagg 3720
gccgcaagaa aactatcccg accgccttac tgccgcctgt tttgaccgct gggatctgcc 3780
attgtcagac atgtataccc cgtacgtctt cccgagcgaa aacggtctgc gctgcgggac 3840
gcgcgaattg aattatggcc cacaccagtg gcgcggcgac ttccagttca acatcagccg 3900
ctacagtcaa cagcaactga tggaaaccag ccatcgccat ctgctgcacg cggaagaagg 3960
cacatggctg aatatcgacg gtttccatat ggggattggt ggcgacgact cctggagccc 4020
gtcagtatcg gcggagttcc agctgagcgc cggtcgctac cattaccagt tggtctggtg 4080
tcaaaaataa taaagccgaa ttctgcagat atccagcaca gtggcggccg ctcgagtcta 4140
gagggcccgt ttaaacccgc tgatcagcct cgactgtgcc ttctagttgc cagccatctg 4200
ttgtttgccc ctcccccgtg ccttccttga ccctggaagg tgccactccc actgtccttt 4260
cctaataaaa tgaggaaatt gcatcgcatt gtctgagtag gtgtcattct attctggggg 4320
gtggggtggg gcaggacagc aagggggagg attgggaaga caatagcagg catgctgggg 4380
atgcggtggg ctctatggct tctgaggcgg aaagaaccag ctggggctct agggggtatc 4440
cccacgcgcc ctgtagcggc gcattaagcg cggcgggtgt ggtggttacg cgcagcgtga 4500
ccgctacact tgccagcgcc ctagcgcccg ctcctttcgc tttcttccct tcctttctcg 4560
ccacgttcgc cggctttccc cgtcaagctc taaatcgggg catcccttta gggttccgat 4620
ttagtgcttt acggcacctc gaccccaaaa aacttgatta gggtgatggt tcacgtagtg 4680
ggccatcgcc ctgatagacg gtttttcgcc ctttgacgtt ggagtccacg ttctttaata 4740
gtggactctt gttccaaact ggaacaacac tcaaccctat ctcggtctat tcttttgatt 4800
tataagggat tttggggatt tcggcctatt ggttaaaaaa tgagctgatt taacaaaaat 4860
ttaacgcgaa ttaattctgt ggaatgtgtg tcagttaggg tgtggaaagt ccccaggctc 4920
cccaggcagg cagaagtatg caaagcatgc atctcaatta gtcagcaacc aggtgtggaa 4980
agtccccagg ctccccagca ggcagaagta tgcaaagcat gcatctcaat tagtcagcaa 5040
ccatagtccc gcccctaact ccgcccatcc cgcccctaac tccgcccagt tccgcccatt 5100
ctccgcccca tggctgacta atttttttta tttatgcaga ggccgaggcc gcctctgcct 5160
ctgagctatt ccagaagtag tgaggaggct tttttggagg cctaggcttt tgcaaaaagc 5220
tcccgggagc ttgtatatcc attttcggat ctgatcaaga gacaggatga ggatcgtttc 5280
gcatgattga acaagatgga ttgcacgcag gttctccggc cgcttgggtg gagaggctat 5340
tcggctatga ctgggcacaa cagacaatcg gctgctctga tgccgccgtg ttccggctgt 5400
cagcgcaggg gcgcccggtt ctttttgtca agaccgacct gtccggtgcc ctgaatgaac 5460
tgcaggacga ggcagcgcgg ctatcgtggc tggccacgac gggcgttcct tgcgcagctg 5520
tgctcgacgt tgtcactgaa gcgggaaggg actggctgct attgggcgaa gtgccggggc 5580
aggatctcct gtcatctcac cttgctcctg ccgagaaagt atccatcatg gctgatgcaa 5640
tgcggcggct gcatacgctt gatccggcta cctgcccatt cgaccaccaa gcgaaacatc 5700
gcatcgagcg agcacgtact cggatggaag ccggtcttgt cgatcaggat gatctggacg 5760
aagagcatca ggggctcgcg ccagccgaac tgttcgccag gctcaaggcg cgcatgcccg 5820
acggcgagga tctcgtcgtg acccatggcg atgcctgctt gccgaatatc atggtggaaa 5880
atggccgctt ttctggattc atcgactgtg gccggctggg tgtggcggac cgctatcagg 5940
acatagcgtt ggctacccgt gatattgctg aagagcttgg cggcgaatgg gctgaccgct 6000
tcctcgtgct ttacggtatc gccgctcccg attcgcagcg catcgccttc tatcgccttc 6060
ttgacgagtt cttctgagcg ggactctggg gttcgaaatg accgaccaag cgacgcccaa 6120
cctgccatca cgagatttcg attccaccgc cgccttctat gaaaggttgg gcttcggaat 6180
cgttttccgg gacgccggct ggatgatcct ccagcgcggg gatctcatgc tggagttctt 6240
cgcccacccc aacttgttta ttgcagctta taatggttac aaataaagca atagcatcac 6300
aaatttcaca aataaagcat ttttttcact gcattctagt tgtggtttgt ccaaactcat 6360
caatgtatct tatcatgtct gtataccgtc gacctctagc tagagcttgg cgtaatcatg 6420
gtcatagctg tttcctgtgt gaaattgtta tccgctcaca attccacaca acatacgagc 6480
cggaagcata aagtgtaaag cctggggtgc ctaatgagtg agctaactca cattaattgc 6540
gttgcgctca ctgcccgctt tccagtcggg aaacctgtcg tgccagctgc attaatgaat 6600
cggccaacgc gcggggagag gcggtttgcg tattgggcgc tcttccgctt cctcgctcac 6660
tgactcgctg cgctcggtcg ttcggctgcg gcgagcggta tcagctcact caaaggcggt 6720
aatacggtta tccacagaat caggggataa cgcaggaaag aacatgtgag caaaaggcca 6780
gcaaaaggcc aggaaccgta aaaaggccgc gttgctggcg tttttccata ggctccgccc 6840
ccctgacgag catcacaaaa atcgacgctc aagtcagagg tggcgaaacc cgacaggact 6900
ataaagatac caggcgtttc cccctggaag ctccctcgtg cgctctcctg ttccgaccct 6960
gccgcttacc ggatacctgt ccgcctttct cccttcggga agcgtggcgc tttctcaatg 7020
ctcacgctgt aggtatctca gttcggtgta ggtcgttcgc tccaagctgg gctgtgtgca 7080
cgaacccccc gttcagcccg accgctgcgc cttatccggt aactatcgtc ttgagtccaa 7140
cccggtaaga cacgacttat cgccactggc agcagccact ggtaacagga ttagcagagc 7200
gaggtatgta ggcggtgcta cagagttctt gaagtggtgg cctaactacg gctacactag 7260
aaggacagta tttggtatct gcgctctgct gaagccagtt accttcggaa aaagagttgg 7320
tagctcttga tccggcaaac aaaccaccgc tggtagcggt ggtttttttg tttgcaagca 7380
gcagattacg cgcagaaaaa aaggatctca agaagatcct ttgatctttt ctacggggtc 7440
tgacgctcag tggaacgaaa actcacgtta agggattttg gtcatgagat tatcaaaaag 7500
gatcttcacc tagatccttt taaattaaaa atgaagtttt aaatcaatct aaagtatata 7560
tgagtaaact tggtctgaca gttaccaatg cttaatcagt gaggcaccta tctcagcgat 7620
ctgtctattt cgttcatcca tagttgcctg actccccgtc gtgtagataa ctacgatacg 7680
ggagggctta ccatctggcc ccagtgctgc aatgataccg cgagacccac gctcaccggc 7740
tccagattta tcagcaataa accagccagc cggaagggcc gagcgcagaa gtggtcctgc 7800
aactttatcc gcctccatcc agtctattaa ttgttgccgg gaagctagag taagtagttc 7860
gccagttaat agtttgcgca acgttgttgc cattgctaca ggcatcgtgg tgtcacgctc 7920
gtcgtttggt atggcttcat tcagctccgg ttcccaacga tcaaggcgag ttacatgatc 7980
ccccatgttg tgcaaaaaag cggttagctc cttcggtcct ccgatcgttg tcagaagtaa 8040
gttggccgca gtgttatcac tcatggttat ggcagcactg cataattctc ttactgtcat 8100
gccatccgta agatgctttt ctgtgactgg tgagtactca accaagtcat tctgagaata 8160
gtgtatgcgg cgaccgagtt gctcttgccc ggcgtcaata cgggataata ccgcgccaca 8220
tagcagaact ttaaaagtgc tcatcattgg aaaacgttct tcggggcgaa aactctcaag 8280
gatcttaccg ctgttgagat ccagttcgat gtaacccact cgtgcaccca actgatcttc 8340
agcatctttt actttcacca gcgtttctgg gtgagcaaaa acaggaaggc aaaatgccgc 8400
aaaaaaggga ataagggcga cacggaaatg ttgaatactc atactcttcc tttttcaata 8460
ttattgaagc atttatcagg gttattgtct catgagcgga tacatatttg aatgtattta 8520
gaaaaataaa caaatagggg ttccgcgcac atttccccga aaagtgccac ctgacgtc 8578




4


4748


DNA


Artificial Sequence




Provided by Dr. Brett Levay-Young of the
University of Minnesota






4
tagttattaa tagtaatcaa ttacggggtc attagttcat agcccatata tggagttccg 60
cgttacataa cttacggtaa atggcccgcc tggctgaccg cccaacgacc cccgcccatt 120
gacgtcaata atgacgtatg ttcccatagt aacgccaata gggactttcc attgacgtca 180
atgggtggag tatttacggt aaactgccca cttggcagta catcaagtgt atcatatgcc 240
aagtacgccc cctattgacg tcaatgacgg taaatggccc gcctggcatt atgcccagta 300
catgacctta tgggactttc ctacttggca gtacatctac gtattagtca tcgctattac 360
catggtgatg cggttttggc agtacatcaa tgggcgtgga tagcggtttg actcacgggg 420
atttccaagt ctccacccca ttgacgtcaa tgggagtttg ttttggcacc aaaatcaacg 480
ggactttcca aaatgtcgta acaactccgc cccattgacg caaatgggcg gtaggcgtgt 540
acggtgggag gtctatataa gcagagctgg tttagtgaac cgtcagatcc gctagcgcta 600
ccggtcgcca ccatggtgag caagggcgag gagctgttca ccggggtggt gcccatcctg 660
gtcgagctgg acggcgacgt aaacggccac aagttcagcg tgtccggcga gggcgagggc 720
gatgccacct acggcaagct gaccctgaag ttcatctgca ccaccggcaa gctgcccgtg 780
ccctggccca ccctcgtgac caccctgacc tacggcgtgc agtgcttcag ccgctacccc 840
gaccacatga agcagcacga cttcttcaag tccgccatgc ccgaaggcta cgtccaggag 900
cgcaccatct tcttcaagga cgacggcaac tacaagaccc gcgccgaggt gaagttcgag 960
ggcgacaccc tggtgaaccg catcgagctg aagggcatcg acttcaagga ggacggcaac 1020
atcctggggc acaagctgga gtacaactac aacagccaca acgtctatat catggccgac 1080
aagcagaaga acggcatcaa ggtgaacttc aagatccgcc acaacatcga ggacggcagc 1140
gtgcagctcg ccgaccacta ccagcagaac acccccatcg gcgacggccc cgtgctgctg 1200
cccgacaacc actacctgag cacccagtcc gccctgagca aagaccccaa cgagaagcgc 1260
gatcacatgg tcctgctgga gttcgtgacc gccgccggga tcactctcgg catggacgag 1320
ctgtacaagt actcagatct cgagctcaag cttaaccctc cggacgagag cggccctggc 1380
tgtatgtcct gcaagtgcgt gctgtcctga tcaccggatc tagataactg atcataatca 1440
gccataccac atttgtagag gttttacttg ctttaaaaaa cctcccacac ctccccctga 1500
acctgaaaca taaaatgaat gcaattgttg ttgttaactt gtttattgca gcttataatg 1560
gttacaaata aagcaatagc atcacaaatt tcacaaataa agcatttttt tcactgcatt 1620
ctagttgtgg tttgtccaaa ctcatcaatg tatcttaacg cgtaaattgt aagcgttaat 1680
attttgttaa aattcgcgtt aaatttttgt taaatcagct cattttttaa ccaataggcc 1740
gaaatcggca aaatccctta taaatcaaaa gaatagaccg agatagggtt gagtgttgtt 1800
ccagtttgga acaagagtcc actattaaag aacgtggact ccaacgtcaa agggcgaaaa 1860
accgtctatc agggcgatgg cccactacgt gaaccatcac cctaatcaag ttttttgggg 1920
tcgaggtgcc gtaaagcact aaatcggaac cctaaaggga gcccccgatt tagagcttga 1980
cggggaaagc cggcgaacgt ggcgagaaag gaagggaaga aagcgaaagg agcgggcgct 2040
agggcgctgg caagtgtagc ggtcacgctg cgcgtaacca ccacacccgc cgcgcttaat 2100
gcgccgctac agggcgcgtc aggtggcact tttcggggaa atgtgcgcgg aacccctatt 2160
tgtttatttt tctaaataca ttcaaatatg tatccgctca tgagacaata accctgataa 2220
atgcttcaat aatattgaaa aaggaagagt cctgaggcgg aaagaaccag ctgtggaatg 2280
tgtgtcagtt agggtgtgga aagtccccag gctccccagc aggcagaagt atgcaaagca 2340
tgcatctcaa ttagtcagca accaggtgtg gaaagtcccc aggctcccca gcaggcagaa 2400
gtatgcaaag catgcatctc aattagtcag caaccatagt cccgccccta actccgccca 2460
tcccgcccct aactccgccc agttccgccc attctccgcc ccatggctga ctaatttttt 2520
ttatttatgc agaggccgag gccgcctcgg cctctgagct attccagaag tagtgaggag 2580
gcttttttgg aggcctaggc ttttgcaaag atcgatcaag agacaggatg aggatcgttt 2640
cgcatgattg aacaagatgg attgcacgca ggttctccgg ccgcttgggt ggagaggcta 2700
ttcggctatg actgggcaca acagacaatc ggctgctctg atgccgccgt gttccggctg 2760
tcagcgcagg ggcgcccggt tctttttgtc aagaccgacc tgtccggtgc cctgaatgaa 2820
ctgcaagacg aggcagcgcg gctatcgtgg ctggccacga cgggcgttcc ttgcgcagct 2880
gtgctcgacg ttgtcactga agcgggaagg gactggctgc tattgggcga agtgccgggg 2940
caggatctcc tgtcatctca ccttgctcct gccgagaaag tatccatcat ggctgatgca 3000
atgcggcggc tgcatacgct tgatccggct acctgcccat tcgaccacca agcgaaacat 3060
cgcatcgagc gagcacgtac tcggatggaa gccggtcttg tcgatcagga tgatctggac 3120
gaagagcatc aggggctcgc gccagccgaa ctgttcgcca ggctcaaggc gagcatgccc 3180
gacggcgagg atctcgtcgt gacccatggc gatgcctgct tgccgaatat catggtggaa 3240
aatggccgct tttctggatt catcgactgt ggccggctgg gtgtggcgga ccgctatcag 3300
gacatagcgt tggctacccg tgatattgct gaagagcttg gcggcgaatg ggctgaccgc 3360
ttcctcgtgc tttacggtat cgccgctccc gattcgcagc gcatcgcctt ctatcgcctt 3420
cttgacgagt tcttctgagc gggactctgg ggttcgaaat gaccgaccaa gcgacgccca 3480
acctgccatc acgagatttc gattccaccg ccgccttcta tgaaaggttg ggcttcggaa 3540
tcgttttccg ggacgccggc tggatgatcc tccagcgcgg ggatctcatg ctggagttct 3600
tcgcccaccc tagggggagg ctaactgaaa cacggaagga gacaataccg gaaggaaccc 3660
gcgctatgac ggcaataaaa agacagaata aaacgcacgg tgttgggtcg tttgttcata 3720
aacgcggggt tcggtcccag ggctggcact ctgtcgatac cccaccgaga ccccattggg 3780
gccaatacgc ccgcgtttct tccttttccc caccccaccc cccaagttcg ggtgaaggcc 3840
cagggctcgc agccaacgtc ggggcggcag gccctgccat agcctcaggt tactcatata 3900
tactttagat tgatttaaaa cttcattttt aatttaaaag gatctaggtg aagatccttt 3960
ttgataatct catgaccaaa atcccttaac gtgagttttc gttccactga gcgtcagacc 4020
ccgtagaaaa gatcaaagga tcttcttgag atcctttttt tctgcgcgta atctgctgct 4080
tgcaaacaaa aaaaccaccg ctaccagcgg tggtttgttt gccggatcaa gagctaccaa 4140
ctctttttcc gaaggtaact ggcttcagca gagcgcagat accaaatact gtccttctag 4200
tgtagccgta gttaggccac cacttcaaga actctgtagc accgcctaca tacctcgctc 4260
tgctaatcct gttaccagtg gctgctgcca gtggcgataa gtcgtgtctt accgggttgg 4320
actcaagacg atagttaccg gataaggcgc agcggtcggg ctgaacgggg ggttcgtgca 4380
cacagcccag cttggagcga acgacctaca ccgaactgag atacctacag cgtgagctat 4440
gagaaagcgc cacgcttccc gaagggagaa aggcggacag gtatccggta agcggcaggg 4500
tcggaacagg agagcgcacg agggagcttc cagggggaaa cgcctggtat ctttatagtc 4560
ctgtcgggtt tcgccacctc tgacttgagc gtcgattttt gtgatgctcg tcaggggggc 4620
ggagcctatg gaaaaacgcc agcaacgcgg cctttttacg gttcctggcc ttttgctggc 4680
cttttgctca catgttcttt cctgcgttat cccctgattc tgtggataac cgtattaccg 4740
ccatgcat 4748




5


4992


DNA


Artificial Sequence




Supplied by BD Biosciences Clonetech of Palo
Alto, California






5
tagttattaa tagtaatcaa ttacggggtc attagttcat agcccatata tggagttccg 60
cgttacataa cttacggtaa atggcccgcc tggctgaccg cccaacgacc cccgcccatt 120
gacgtcaata atgacgtatg ttcccatagt aacgccaata gggactttcc attgacgtca 180
atgggtggag tatttacggt aaactgccca cttggcagta catcaagtgt atcatatgcc 240
aagtacgccc cctattgacg tcaatgacgg taaatggccc gcctggcatt atgcccagta 300
catgacctta tgggactttc ctacttggca gtacatctac gtattagtca tcgctattac 360
catggtgatg cggttttggc agtacatcaa tgggcgtgga tagcggtttg actcacgggg 420
atttccaagt ctccacccca ttgacgtcaa tgggagtttg ttttggcacc aaaatcaacg 480
ggactttcca aaatgtcgta acaactccgc cccattgacg caaatgggcg gtaggcgtgt 540
acggtgggag gtctatataa gcagagctgg tttagtgaac cgtcagatcc gctagcgcta 600
ccggtcgcca ccatggtgag caagggcgag gagctgttca ccggggtggt gcccatcctg 660
gtcgagctgg acggcgacgt aaacggccac aagttcagcg tgtccggcga gggcgagggc 720
gatgccacct acggcaagct gaccctgaag ttcatctgca ccaccggcaa gctgcccgtg 780
ccctggccca ccctcgtgac caccctgacc tacggcgtgc agtgcttcag ccgctacccc 840
gaccacatga agcagcacga cttcttcaag tccgccatgc ccgaaggcta cgtccaggag 900
cgcaccatct tcttcaagga cgacggcaac tacaagaccc gcgccgaggt gaagttcgag 960
ggcgacaccc tggtgaaccg catcgagctg aagggcatcg acttcaagga ggacggcaac 1020
atcctggggc acaagctgga gtacaactac aacagccaca acgtctatat catggccgac 1080
aagcagaaga acggcatcaa ggtgaacttc aagatccgcc acaacatcga ggacggcagc 1140
gtgcagctcg ccgaccacta ccagcagaac acccccatcg gcgacggccc cgtgctgctg 1200
cccgacaacc actacctgag cacccagtcc gccctgagca aagaccccaa cgagaagcgc 1260
gatcacatgg tcctgctgga gttcgtgacc gccgccggga tcactctcgg catggacgag 1320
ctgtacaagt actcagatct cgagctcaag cttaccatgg ggggttctca tcatcatcat 1380
catcatggta tggctagcat gactggtgga cagcaaatgg gtcgggatct gtacgacgat 1440
gacgataagg ggactgctgc ggccaatgcg aacgacttct tcgccaagcg caagagaact 1500
gcgcaggaga acaaggcgtc gaacgacgtc cctccagggt gtccctctcc aaacgtggct 1560
cctggggtgg gcgcggtgga gcagaccccg cgcaaacgtc tgagatgagg atccagtgtg 1620
gtggaattct gcagatatcc agcacagtgg cggccgctcg agtctagata actgatcata 1680
atcagccata ccacatttgt agaggtttta cttgctttaa aaaacctccc acacctcccc 1740
ctgaacctga aacataaaat gaatgcaatt gttgttgtta acttgtttat tgcagcttat 1800
aatggttaca aataaagcaa tagcatcaca aatttcacaa ataaagcatt tttttcactg 1860
cattctagtt gtggtttgtc caaactcatc aatgtatctt aacgcgtaaa ttgtaagcgt 1920
taatattttg ttaaaattcg cgttaaattt ttgttaaatc agctcatttt ttaaccaata 1980
ggccgaaatc ggcaaaatcc cttataaatc aaaagaatag accgagatag ggttgagtgt 2040
tgttccagtt tggaacaaga gtccactatt aaagaacgtg gactccaacg tcaaagggcg 2100
aaaaaccgtc tatcagggcg atggcccact acgtgaacca tcaccctaat caagtttttt 2160
ggggtcgagg tgccgtaaag cactaaatcg gaaccctaaa gggagccccc gatttagagc 2220
ttgacgggga aagccggcga acgtggcgag aaaggaaggg aagaaagcga aaggagcggg 2280
cgctagggcg ctggcaagtg tagcggtcac gctgcgcgta accaccacac ccgccgcgct 2340
taatgcgccg ctacagggcg cgtcaggtgg cacttttcgg ggaaatgtgc gcggaacccc 2400
tatttgttta tttttctaaa tacattcaaa tatgtatccg ctcatgagac aataaccctg 2460
ataaatgctt caataatatt gaaaaaggaa gagtcctgag gcggaaagaa ccagctgtgg 2520
aatgtgtgtc agttagggtg tggaaagtcc ccaggctccc cagcaggcag aagtatgcaa 2580
agcatgcatc tcaattagtc agcaaccagg tgtggaaagt ccccaggctc cccagcaggc 2640
agaagtatgc aaagcatgca tctcaattag tcagcaacca tagtcccgcc cctaactccg 2700
cccatcccgc ccctaactcc gcccagttcc gcccattctc cgccccatgg ctgactaatt 2760
ttttttattt atgcagaggc cgaggccgcc tcggcctctg agctattcca gaagtagtga 2820
ggaggctttt ttggaggcct aggcttttgc aaagatcgat caagagacag gatgaggatc 2880
gtttcgcatg attgaacaag atggattgca cgcaggttct ccggccgctt gggtggagag 2940
gctattcggc tatgactggg cacaacagac aatcggctgc tctgatgccg ccgtgttccg 3000
gctgtcagcg caggggcgcc cggttctttt tgtcaagacc gacctgtccg gtgccctgaa 3060
tgaactgcaa gacgaggcag cgcggctatc gtggctggcc acgacgggcg ttccttgcgc 3120
agctgtgctc gacgttgtca ctgaagcggg aagggactgg ctgctattgg gcgaagtgcc 3180
ggggcaggat ctcctgtcat ctcaccttgc tcctgccgag aaagtatcca tcatggctga 3240
tgcaatgcgg cggctgcata cgcttgatcc ggctacctgc ccattcgacc accaagcgaa 3300
acatcgcatc gagcgagcac gtactcggat ggaagccggt cttgtcgatc aggatgatct 3360
ggacgaagag catcaggggc tcgcgccagc cgaactgttc gccaggctca aggcgagcat 3420
gcccgacggc gaggatctcg tcgtgaccca tggcgatgcc tgcttgccga atatcatggt 3480
ggaaaatggc cgcttttctg gattcatcga ctgtggccgg ctgggtgtgg cggaccgcta 3540
tcaggacata gcgttggcta cccgtgatat tgctgaagag cttggcggcg aatgggctga 3600
ccgcttcctc gtgctttacg gtatcgccgc tcccgattcg cagcgcatcg ccttctatcg 3660
ccttcttgac gagttcttct gagcgggact ctggggttcg aaatgaccga ccaagcgacg 3720
cccaacctgc catcacgaga tttcgattcc accgccgcct tctatgaaag gttgggcttc 3780
ggaatcgttt tccgggacgc cggctggatg atcctccagc gcggggatct catgctggag 3840
ttcttcgccc accctagggg gaggctaact gaaacacgga aggagacaat accggaagga 3900
acccgcgcta tgacggcaat aaaaagacag aataaaacgc acggtgttgg gtcgtttgtt 3960
cataaacgcg gggttcggtc ccagggctgg cactctgtcg ataccccacc gagaccccat 4020
tggggccaat acgcccgcgt ttcttccttt tccccacccc accccccaag ttcgggtgaa 4080
ggcccagggc tcgcagccaa cgtcggggcg gcaggccctg ccatagcctc aggttactca 4140
tatatacttt agattgattt aaaacttcat ttttaattta aaaggatcta ggtgaagatc 4200
ctttttgata atctcatgac caaaatccct taacgtgagt tttcgttcca ctgagcgtca 4260
gaccccgtag aaaagatcaa aggatcttct tgagatcctt tttttctgcg cgtaatctgc 4320
tgcttgcaaa caaaaaaacc accgctacca gcggtggttt gtttgccgga tcaagagcta 4380
ccaactcttt ttccgaaggt aactggcttc agcagagcgc agataccaaa tactgtcctt 4440
ctagtgtagc cgtagttagg ccaccacttc aagaactctg tagcaccgcc tacatacctc 4500
gctctgctaa tcctgttacc agtggctgct gccagtggcg ataagtcgtg tcttaccggg 4560
ttggactcaa gacgatagtt accggataag gcgcagcggt cgggctgaac ggggggttcg 4620
tgcacacagc ccagcttgga gcgaacgacc tacaccgaac tgagatacct acagcgtgag 4680
ctatgagaaa gcgccacgct tcccgaaggg agaaaggcgg acaggtatcc ggtaagcggc 4740
agggtcggaa caggagagcg cacgagggag cttccagggg gaaacgcctg gtatctttat 4800
agtcctgtcg ggtttcgcca cctctgactt gagcgtcgat ttttgtgatg ctcgtcaggg 4860
gggcggagcc tatggaaaaa cgccagcaac gcggcctttt tacggttcct ggccttttgc 4920
tggccttttg ctcacatgtt ctttcctgcg ttatcccctg attctgtgga taaccgtatt 4980
accgccatgc at 4992






Claims
  • 1. A method of forming a dispersion of micelles, the method comprising:forming a plurality of surfactant micelles, wherein the plurality of surfactant micelles comprises: a surfactant associated with coating a surface of a bioactive component, wherein the surfactant has an HLB value of less than about 6.0 units; and dispersing the surfactant micelles into an aqueous composition, wherein the aqueous composition comprises a hydrophilic polymer, wherein the hydrophilic polymer associates with the surfactant micelles to form stabilized surfactant micelles having an average diameter of less than about 50 nanometers.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the surfactant molecule is a non-ionic surfactant.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the bioactive component is a hydrophilic component.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the bioactive component is a polynucleotide or a polypeptide.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the bioactive component is a carbohydrate or a hydrophobic bioactive molecule.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the bioactive component consists essentially of a fluorescent molecule.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 and further including precipitating the stabilized surfactant micelles to form particles having an average diameter of less than about 50 nanometers as measured by atomic force microscopy of the particles following drying of the particles.
  • 8. The method of claim 7 wherein the bioactive component is partitioned from the hydrophilic polymer in the particles.
  • 9. The method of claim 7 and further including incubating the particles in the presence of at least one cation.
  • 10. The method of claim 9 wherein the at least one cation comprises lithium.
  • 11. A method of forming a dispersion of surfactant micelles, the method comprising:dispersing surfactant molecules into a first hydrophilic composition, the first hydrophilic composition comprising a hydrophilic bioactive component, wherein the surfactant molecules have an HLB value of less than about 6.0 units, and wherein the surfactant molecules form a shell around the hydrophilic bioactive component to form a dispersion of surfactant micelles; adding a biocompatible hydrophilic polymer to the dispersion of surfactant micelles; and wherein the biocompatible hydrophilic polymer stabilizes the dispersion.
  • 12. The method of claim 11 wherein the biocompatible hydrophilic polymer forms a shell around the surfactant micelle.
  • 13. A method of forming a particle, the method comprising:dispersing a surfactant molecule into an aqueous composition comprising a hydrophilic bioactive component, wherein the surfactant molecule has an HLB value of less than about 6.0 units, and wherein the surfactant molecule is associated with the hydrophilic bioactive component to form a plurality of surfactant micelles; exposing the surfactant micelles to a biocompatible polymer to form a plurality of stabilized surfactant micelles; and solidifying the stabilized surfactant micelles to form particles by exposing the stabilized surfactant micelles to at least one cation, wherein the particles have an average diameter of less than about 50 nanometers as measured using atomic force microscopy of the particles following drying of the particles.
  • 14. The method of claim 13 wherein the surfactant molecule has a critical micelle concentration of less than about 200 micromolar.
  • 15. The method of claim 13 wherein the biocompatible polymer forms a shell around the surfactant micelle.
  • 16. The method of claim 13 further comprising dispersing droplets comprising stabilized surfactant micelles into a second aqueous composition.
  • 17. The method of claim 13 wherein the hydrophilic bioactive component is condensed.
  • 18. The method of claim 13 wherein the biocompatible polymer is associated with or comprises a cell recognition component.
  • 19. The method of claim 13 wherein the bioactive component is a carbohydrate or a hydrophobic bioactive molecule.
  • 20. The method of claim 13 wherein the bioactive component consists essentially of a fluorescent molecule.
  • 21. The method of claim 13 and further including dispersing the surfactant molecule into a biocompatible oil prior to dispersing the surfactant molecule into the aqueous composition.
  • 22. The method of claim 13 further comprising:combining a plurality of the particles, with a binder and an excipient to form a matrix capable of releasing the particles.
  • 23. The method of claim 13 wherein the surfactant molecule is at a concentration of less than about 500 parts per million.
  • 24. The method of claim 22 and further including applying, pellitizing, tableting, or granulating the matrix.
  • 25. A particle prepared by the method of claim 13.
  • 26. A method of making a particle, the method comprising:condensing a bioactive component to form a condensed bioactive component; dispersing a surfactant into an aqueous composition comprising the condensed bioactive component, wherein the surfactant has an HLB value of less than about 6.0 units, and wherein the surfactant associates with the condensed bioactive component to form a plurality of surfactant micelles; exposing the surfactant micelles to a biocompatible polymer to form a plurality of stabilized surfactant micelles; and precipitating the stabilized surfactant micelles to form particles having an average diameter of less than about 50 nanometers as measured by atomic force microscopy of the particles following drying of the particles; wherein the bioactive component comprises DNA or a polypeptide.
  • 27. The method of claim 26 wherein the biocompatible polymer is an iontophoretic polymer.
  • 28. The method of claim 26 and further including decreasing the average size of the particles by incubating the particles in the presence of a cation.
  • 29. A method of preparing particles, the method comprising:forming a plurality of hydrophobic compositions, wherein the hydrophobic composition comprises a surfactant associated with a bioactive hydrophobic component, and wherein the surfactant has an HLB value of less than about 5.0 units; adding a biocompatible polymer to the hydrophobic composition to form a stabilized composition; and precipitating the stabilized composition to form a particle having an average diameter of less than about 50 nanometers as measured using atomic force microscopy of dried particles.
  • 30. The method of claim 29 wherein the biocompatible polymer is capable of iontophoretic exchange.
  • 31. The method of claim 29 wherein the hydrophobic composition further includes a water-miscible solvent.
  • 32. The method of claim 29 further comprising mechanically forming a plurality of droplets of the stabilized composition; anddispersing the plurality of droplets into an aqueous composition.
  • 33. The method of claim 29 wherein the surfactant is 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyn-4,7-diol, molecules containing an acetylenic diol portion, or blends of 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyn-4,7-diol.
  • 34. The method of claim 29 wherein the hydrophobic component is entangled or embedded in the biocompatible polymer.
  • 35. The method of claim 29 and further including filtering the particles.
  • 36. The method of claim 29 wherein the biocompatible polymer is a hydrophilic polymer.
  • 37. The method of claim 29 and wherein precipitating the particles in the presence of at least one cation.
  • 38. The method of claim 29 and further including adding the particles into a solid dosage form.
  • 39. The method of claim 36 and further including centrifuging the particles.
  • 40. The method of claim 37 wherein incubating the particles reduces the average diameter of the particles.
  • 41. The method of claim 38 wherein the solid dosage form is selected from the group consisting of granules, tablets, pellets, films and coatings.
  • 42. A particle prepared by the method of claim 29.
  • 43. A method of forming a particle, the method comprising:dispersing a surfactant molecule into an aqueous composition comprising a hydrophilic bioactive component, wherein the surfactant molecule has an HLB value of less than about 5.0 units, and exposing the surfactant molecule to the hydrophilic component to form a plurality of surfactant micelles; adding a biocompatible polymer to the plurality of surfactant micelles to form a plurality of stabilized surfactant micelles; solidifying the stabilized surfactant micelles to form a plurality of particles by exposing the stabilized surfactant micelles to at least one cation, wherein the particles have an average diameter of less than about 50 nanometers as measured by atomic force microscopy of the particles following drying of the particles; and applying a cell recognition component to the particles.
  • 44. A method of forming a targeted particle, the method comprising:dispersing a surfactant molecule into an aqueous composition comprising a bioactive molecule, wherein the surfactant molecule has an HLB value of less than about 6.0 units, and wherein the surfactant molecule associates with the bioactive molecule to form a surfactant micelle; adding a biocompatible polymer and a cell recognition component to the surfactant micelle to form a stabilized aqueous composition comprising a plurality of stabilized surfactant micelles; and exposing the stabilized surfactant micelles to at least one cation to precipitate the stabilized surfactant micelles to form particles having an average diameter of less than about 50 nanometers as measured by atomic force microscopy of the particles following drying of the particles.
  • 45. A method of forming a particle, the method comprising:dispersing a surfactant molecule into an aqueous composition comprising a hydrophilic biocompatible component, wherein the surfactant molecule has an HLB value of less than about 6.0 units, and wherein the surfactant molecule is associated with the hydrophilic biocompatible component to form a plurality of surfactant micelles; exposing the surfactant micelles to a biocompatible polymer to form a plurality of stabilized surfactant micelles; and solidifying the stabilized surfactant micelles to form particles by exposing the stabilized surfactant micelles to at least one cation, wherein the particles have an average diameter of less than about 50 nanometers as measured using atomic force microscopy of the particles following drying of the particles.
  • 46. The method of claim 45 further including adding the particles into a solid dosage form.
  • 47. The method of claim 45 wherein the biocompatible polymer is associated with or comprises a cell recognition component.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION(S)

The present application claims priority from application Ser. No. 60/185,282 filed on Feb. 28, 2000 entitled “NANOPARTICLE ENCAPSULATION SYSTEM AND METHOD” by Gretchen M. Unger.

US Referenced Citations (41)
Number Name Date Kind
4107288 Oppenheim et al. Aug 1978 A
4177177 Vanderhoff et al. Dec 1979 A
4913908 Couvreur et al. Apr 1990 A
4920016 Allen et al. Apr 1990 A
4937119 Nikles et al. Jun 1990 A
4968350 Bindschaedler et al. Nov 1990 A
5133908 Stainmesse et al. Jul 1992 A
5145684 Liversidge et al. Sep 1992 A
5384133 Boyes et al. Jan 1995 A
5439686 Desai et al. Aug 1995 A
5498421 Grinstaff et al. Mar 1996 A
5503851 Mank et al. Apr 1996 A
5516507 N'Guyen et al. May 1996 A
5578709 Woiszwillo Nov 1996 A
5629021 Wright May 1997 A
5639473 Grinstaff et al. Jun 1997 A
5639480 Bodmer et al. Jun 1997 A
5648095 Illum et al. Jul 1997 A
5648097 Nuwayser Jul 1997 A
5736156 Burke Apr 1998 A
5759582 Leong et al. Jun 1998 A
5858398 Cho Jan 1999 A
5874111 Maitra et al. Feb 1999 A
5916803 Sedlacek et al. Jun 1999 A
5962427 Goldstein et al. Oct 1999 A
5962566 Grandfils et al. Oct 1999 A
5985832 Roodman et al. Nov 1999 A
5990089 Szoka, Jr. et al. Nov 1999 A
6033645 Unger et al. Mar 2000 A
6051258 Kantor Apr 2000 A
6136295 Edwards et al. Oct 2000 A
6139870 Verrecchia Oct 2000 A
6143037 Goldstein et al. Nov 2000 A
6143211 Mathiowitz et al. Nov 2000 A
6146663 Bissery et al. Nov 2000 A
6165440 Esenaliev Dec 2000 A
6165988 Noe et al. Dec 2000 A
6177103 Pace et al. Jan 2001 B1
6197346 Mathiowitz et al. Mar 2001 B1
6322805 Kim et al. Nov 2001 B1
6372714 Tanaka et al. Apr 2002 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (7)
Number Date Country
0 860 167 Aug 1988 EP
WO 8808011 Oct 1988 WO
WO 9703702 Jun 1997 WO
WO 9843664 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9900113 Jan 1999 WO
WO 9933558 Jul 1999 WO
WO 0047130 Aug 2000 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (45)
Entry
Modlin, Robert L. (2000): A Toll for DNA vaccines. Nature (408): 659-660.
Noonberg, B., et al., (1993): Characteristics of Oligonucleotide Uptake in Human Keratinocyte Cultures. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology (101):727-731.
Gerner et al., (1998): Similarity Between Nuclear Matrix Proteins of Various Cells Revealed by an Improved Isolation Method. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry (71):363-374.
Quintanar-Guerrero et al., (1998): Preparation Techniques and Mechanisms of Formation of Biodegradable Nanoparticles from Preformed Polymers. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 24(12): 1113-1128.
Golan et al., (1999): DNA Toroids: Stages in Condensation, Biochemistry (38): 14069-14076.
Yuan et al., (1994): Microvascular Permeability and Interstitial Penetration of Sterically Stabilized (Stealth) Liposomes in a Human Tumor Xenograft1 Cancer Research (54): 3352-3356.
Göpferich, Achim, (1995): Polymer Degradation and Erosion: Mechanisms and Applications. Eur J. Pharm. Biophar 42(1):1-11.
Brannon-Peppas, (1997): Polymers in Controlled Drug Delivery. Medical Plastics and Biomaterials Magazine: 1-17.
Zhang et al., (1997): Comparison of Integrins in Human Skin, Pig Skin, and Perfused Skin: An In Vitro skin Toxicology Model. Journal of Applied Toxicology 17(4): 247-253.
Akhtar, et al., (2000): The delivery of antisense therapeutics. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews (44): 3-21.
Dokka et al., (2000): Novel non-endocyte delivery of antisense oligonucleotides, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews (44): 35-49.
Brand et al., (2000): Transdermal delivery of antisense compounds. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews (44): 51-57.
Bally et al., (1999) “Biological barriers to cellular delivery of lipid-based DNA carriers”, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews (38):291-315.
Gaur et al., (2000): Biodistribution of fluoresceinated dextran using novel nanoparticles evading reticuloendothelial system, International Journal of Pharmaceutics (202):1-10.
Li et al., (2000): Nonviral gene therapy: promises and challenges, Gene Therapy (7): 31-34.
Rolland, A. P. (1998): From Genes to Gene Medicines: Recent Advances in Nonviral Gene Delivery. Critical Reviews™ in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems 15(2): 143-198.
Kibbe, Arthur, H., Editor, (1986): Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients, American Pharmaceutical Association, 3rd Ed. pp. 94-95, 117-120.
Barry, Brian W. Dermatological Formulations: Percutaneous Absorption, pp. 127-351.
Liberman, H. A., et al. (1996): Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: Disperse Systems, vol. 2, 2nd Ed. pp. 1-109.
Dean, J. A., Lange's Handbook of Chemistry, 15th Ed pp. 1.74 to 1.343, 10.69 to 10.73.
Smith, E. W., et al., (1995): Percutaneous Penetration Enhancers, pp. 1-20.
Lide, D. R., Editor in Chief (1922): CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics: A Ready-Reference Book of Chemical and Physical Data, Chemical Rubber Publishing Co., 81st pp. 7-7 to 7-9; 16-10 to 16-11; 16-43 to 16-47; Appendix.
(1934): Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook, 7th Ed. pp. 2-24 to 2-47.
Gennaro, A. R. Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy, 20th Ed., Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp. 288-334, 721-752, 836-857 and 903-929.
Bronaugh, R. L., et al.,Editors (1999): Percutaneous Absorption Drugs-Cosmetics-Mechanisms-Methodology, 3rd Ed. pp. 177-193, 597-613 and 879-886.
Damgé, C. et al. (1996): Intestinal absorption of PLAGA microspheres in the rat, J. Anat (189): 491-501.
Kreuter, J. (1996): Mini-review: Nanoparticle and microparticles for drug and vaccine delivery, J. Anat. (189): 503-505.
Calvo, Pilar et al., (1995): Comparative in vitro Evaluation of Several Colloidal Systems, Nanoparticles, Nanocapsules, and Nanoemulstions, as Ocular Drug Carriers, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 85 (5): 530-536.
Schmidt, Christoph et al., (1999): Incorporation of polymeric nanoparticles into solid dosage forms, Journal of Controlled Release (57): 115-125.
Vile, RG et al., (2000): Millenium Review: Cancer gene therapy: hard lessons and new courses, Gene Therapy (7): 2-8.
Ash, Michael et al., (1993): Handbook of Industrial Surfactants, Gower Publishing Co., pp. 885-905.
Sigma Company Catalog, (1999): Sigma Biochemicals and Reagents FOR Life Science Research, St Louis, MO, p. 1918.
Calvo, Pilar et al., Evaluation of cationic polymer-coated nanocapsules as ocular drug carriers, International Journal of Pharmaceutics (1997), pp. 41-50.
Kreuter, Jörg, Nanoparticles-based drug delivery systems, Journal of Controlled Relese (1991), pp. 169-176.
Lamaze, Christophe et al., The emergence of clathrin-independent pinocytic pathways, Current Opinion in Cell Biology (1995), pp. 573-580.
Kreuter, Jörg, Naoparticles—Preparation And Applications, Microcapsules and Nanoparticles in Medicine and Pharmacy, pp. 125-148.
Pinto, J.F. et al., Pellets as carriers of solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) for oral administration of drugs, Pharmazie (1999), pp. 506-509.
Kawashima, Yoshiaki, Nanoparticle systems for improved drug delivery, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews (2001), pp. 1-2.
Müller, R.H. et al., Nanosuspensions as particulate drug formulations in therapy Rationale for deveopment and what we can expect for the future, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews (2001), pp. 3-19.
Kreuter, Jörg, Nanoparticulate systems for brain delivery of drugs, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews (2001), pp. 65-81.
Janes, K. A. et al., Polysaccharide colloidal particles as delivery systems for macromolecules, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews (2001), pp. 83-97.
Katoaka, Kazunori et al., Block copolymer micelles for drug delivery: design, characterization and biological significance, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews (2001), pp. 113-131.
Sakuma, Shinji et al., Design of nanoparticles composed of graft copolymers for oral peptide delivery, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews (2001), pp. 21-37.
Takeuchi, Hirofumi et al., Mucoadhesive nanoparticle systems for peptide drug delivery, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews (2001), pp. 39-54.
Nishioka, Yukiko et al., Lymphatic targeting with nanoparticulate system, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews (2001), pp. 55-64.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/185282 Feb 2000 US