Nanoporous composite separators with increased thermal conductivity

Abstract
Nanoporous composite separators are disclosed for use in batteries and capacitors comprising a nanoporous inorganic material and an organic polymer material. The inorganic material may comprise Al2O3, AlO(OH) or boehmite, AlN, BN, SiN, ZnO, ZrO2, SiO2, or combinations thereof. The nanoporous composite separator may have a porosity of between 35-50%. The average pore size of the nanoporous composite separator may be between 10-90 nm. The separator may be formed by coating a substrate with a dispersion including the inorganic material, organic material, and a solvent. Once dried, the coating may be removed from the substrate, thus forming the nanoporous composite separator. A nanoporous composite separator may provide increased thermal conductivity and dimensional stability at temperatures above 200° C. compared to polyolefin separators.
Description
FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE

The present disclosure relates generally to the field of porous membranes and to electric current producing cells and separators for use in electric current producing cells. More particularly, this disclosure pertains to a porous separator membrane comprising an inorganic oxide or other inorganic material where the membrane has increased thermal conductivity compared to porous separator membranes consisting of polyolefin materials. Also, the present disclosure pertains to electric current producing cells, such as lithium ion cells and capacitors, comprising such porous separators with increased thermal conductivity.


BACKGROUND OF THE DISCLOSURE

Lithium batteries, including rechargeable or secondary lithium ion batteries, non-rechargeable or primary lithium batteries, and other types such as lithium-sulfur batteries, are typically made by interleaving a plastic separator, a metal substrate with a cathode layer coated on both sides, another plastic separator, and another metal substrate with an anode layer coated on both sides. To maintain the alignment of the strips of these materials and for other quality reasons, this interleaving is usually done on automatic equipment, which is complex and expensive. Also, in order to achieve sufficient mechanical strength and integrity, the separators and the metal substrates are relatively thick, such as 10 μm or more in thickness. For example, a typical thickness of the copper metal substrate for the anode coating layers is 10 μm, a typical thickness of the aluminum metal substrate for the cathode coating layers is 12 μm, and the plastic separators typically have thicknesses ranging from 12-20 μm. These thick separators and metal substrates are not electrochemically active and thus lower the volume of the electroactive material in the electrodes of the lithium batteries. This limits the energy density and power density of the lithium batteries.


SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

One aspect of the present disclosure pertains to a porous battery separator including ceramic particles and a polymeric binder, wherein the porous separator has a porosity between 35-50% and an average pore size between 10-50 nm. In some cases, the ceramic particles are selected from the group consisting of inorganic oxide particles and inorganic nitride particles. In some cases, the porous separator exhibits less than 1% shrinkage when exposed to a temperature of 200° C. for at least one hour. In some cases, the ceramic particles include at least one of Al2O3, AlO(OH) or boehmite, AlN, BN, SiN, ZnO, ZrO2, SiO2, and combinations thereof. In some cases, the ceramic particles include between 65-95% boehmite and a remainder of BN. In some cases, the ceramic particles include between 65-95% boehmite and a remainder of AlN. In some cases, the average pore size is between 10-90 nm. In some cases, less than 1% of the pores have a size outside of 10-90 nm. In some cases, the porosity is between 35-50%. In some cases, the polymeric binder includes a polymer selected from polyvinylidene difluoride (PVdF) and copolymers thereof, polyvinyl ethers, urethanes, acrylics, cellulosics, styrene-butadiene copolymers, natural rubbers, chitosan, nitrile rubbers, silicone elastomers, PEO or PEO copolymers, polyphosphazenes, and combinations thereof. In some cases, the porous separator has a thermal conductivity that increases when temperature is raised from 25° C. to 50° C. and tested using one of ASTM E1461 and ASTM 1530. In some cases, the separator has a pore volume and greater than 90% of the pore volume includes pores having a pore diameter of less than 100 nm.


Another aspect of the present disclosure pertains to an electrochemical cell including an anode, a cathode, an organic electrolyte, comprising a lithium salt, and a porous separator layer including an organic polymer and a ceramic material, wherein the porous separator layer has a porosity between 35-50% and an average pore size between 10-90 nm and exhibits less than 1% shrinkage when exposed to a temperature of 200° C. for at least one hour. In some cases, the inorganic ceramic particles are selected from the group consisting of inorganic oxide particles and inorganic nitride particles. In some cases, the inorganic ceramic particles include Al2O3, AlO(OH) or boehmite, AlN, BN, SiN, ZnO, ZrO2, SiO2, and combinations thereof; and the organic polymer includes PVdF and copolymers thereof, polyvinyl ethers, urethanes, acrylics, cellulosics, styrene-butadiene copolymers, natural rubbers, chitosan, nitrile rubbers, silicone elastomers, PEO or PEO copolymers, polyphosphazenes, and combinations thereof. In some cases, the average pore size is between 25-35 nm. In some cases, the porosity is between 40-45%.


Another aspect of the present disclosure pertains to a method of manufacturing a flexible porous composite separator. The method includes formulating a dispersion, wherein the dispersion includes an organic polymeric material, an inorganic ceramic material, and a solvent; applying the dispersion to a substrate to form a coating; drying and curing the coating; and removing the coating from the substrate thereby forming a flexible porous composite separator, wherein the porous separator has a porosity between 35-50% and an average pore size between 10-50 nm and exhibits less than 1% shrinkage when exposed to a temperature of 200° C. for at least one hour. In some cases, the average pore size is between 20-40 nm and the porosity of the porous composite separator is between 40-45%. In some cases, the inorganic ceramic material includes at least one of boehmite, BN, and AlN.


Another aspect of the present disclosure pertains to a method of transferring heat through a battery including raising the temperature of an electrode in a lithium ion battery, and transferring heat from the electrode through a separator to a second electrode, the separator comprising porous ceramic particles and a polymer, wherein the separator has a porosity of 35-50% and an average pore size between 10-50 nm. In some cases, the average pore size is between 20-40 nm. In some cases, the separator has a plurality of pores and each of the pores has a diameter between 10-50 nm. In some cases, the separator has a plurality of pores and none of the pores has a diameter greater than 100 nm. In some cases, the separator has a porosity between 40-45%. In some cases, the separator exhibits less than 1% shrinkage when exposed to a temperature of 200° C. for at least one hour.


Another aspect of the present disclosure pertains to a flexible composite ceramic separator including a polymer; a first inorganic particulate material dispersed uniformly in the polymer; a second inorganic particulate material dispersed uniformly in the polymer, the second inorganic particulate material differing in either particle size or composition from the first inorganic particulate material; and wherein the flexible composite ceramic separator exhibits a thermal conductivity that is greater than the thermal conductivity of a comparative composite ceramic separator of the same composition that differs only in that it only includes a single inorganic particulate material at the same weight loading as the sum of the loadings of the first and second inorganic particulate materials. In some cases, the single inorganic particulate in the comparative composite ceramic separator is the same as one of the inorganic particulate materials of the flexible composite ceramic separator.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

For the purpose of illustrating the disclosure, particular experimental data are shown in the figures. It should be understood, however, that the disclosure is not limited to the precise data shown.



FIGS. 1-2 show thermograms of a polymeric separator and boehmite-based separator prepared according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.



FIG. 3 shows a chart of the thermal conductivity (measured in W/m-K) of a polymeric separator compared to that of a nanoporous composite separator prepared according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.



FIG. 4 shows a chart of the thermal conductivity (measured in W/m-K) of a polymeric separator material, a ceramic-coated polymeric separator material, and a nanoporous composite separator material prepared according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.



FIGS. 5-6 are graphs of the dimensional stability of various separator materials, including a nanoporous composite separator prepared according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.



FIGS. 7-8 are graphs of the dimensional stability of various separator materials, including a nanoporous composite separator prepared according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.



FIG. 9 is a graph of the differential intrusion as a function of pore size diameter of a polymeric separator material and a nanoporous composite separator material prepared according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.



FIG. 10 is a graph of the tensile stress as a function of percent extension of two separator materials, including a nanoporous composite separator material prepared according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.



FIG. 11 is a graph of the particle size distribution of various boehmite and boron nitride (BN) blends, according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.



FIG. 12 is a graph of the particle size distribution of various boehmite and alumina nitride (AlN) blends, according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.



FIG. 13 is a graph of the viscosity profiles for various boehmite and BN blends, in liquid form, according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.



FIG. 14 is a flow chart illustrating a method for preparing a nanoporous composite separator, according to an embodiment of the present invention





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCLOSURE

Nanoporous composite separators are disclosed comprising a composite of porous/nanoporous inorganic material and an organic polymer material. Such composite separators may be used, for instance, in batteries and/or capacitors. The inorganic material may comprise Al2O3, AlO(OH) or boehmite, AlN, BN, SiN, ZnO, ZrO2, SiO2, or combinations thereof. The organic polymer material may include, for example, polyvinylidene difluoride (PVdF) and/or copolymers thereof, polyvinyl ethers, urethanes, acrylics, cellulosics, styrene-butadiene copolymers, natural rubbers, chitosan, nitrile rubbers, silicone elastomers, polyethylene oxide (PEO) or PEO copolymers, polyphosphazenes, or combinations thereof. In one embodiment, the flexible nanoporous composite separator has a porosity between 35-50% or between 40-45% and an average pore size between 10-50 nm. The separator may be formed by coating a substrate with a dispersion including the inorganic material, organic material, and a solvent. Once dried, the coating may be removed from the substrate, thus forming the nanoporous composite separator. A nanoporous composite separator may provide thermal conductivity and dimensional stability at temperatures above 200° C.


General Overview

The porous separator serves a key role in battery designs including prevention of physical contact between the anode and cathode, while facilitating ion transport for electrochemical energy supply as needed. Large format Li-ion batteries may operate in an average temperature range between 20-70° C.; however, spikes in battery charge and/or discharge can push short term temperatures of such batteries beyond 110° C. Separators used for lithium ion batteries are typically polyolefin separators, such as polypropylene or polyethylene that may shrink and/or melt at such high temperatures due to, among other things, chemical breakdown. Although these plastic separators have the low electrical conductivity needed to insulate the electrodes of batteries from each other, plastic separators also have very low thermal conductivity and are therefore slow or inefficient in dissipating heat within a battery. As lithium ion batteries are increasingly utilized for higher capacity applications, such as for electric and/or hybrid vehicles, the need for improved safety is greatly increased because of the large size and high power rates of these batteries. In some cases, the battery separators may be required to maintain dimensional stability (i.e., <5.0% shrinkage of the separator material) at temperatures at or above 200° C. in order to ensure battery performance and safety. Coating of polyolefin separators with ceramic-based materials, and/or selecting higher melting polymer-based materials (PET, polyamides, PVdF, etc.) may increase the thermal stability/battery failure temperature somewhat; however, such techniques increase costs and fail to address a fundamental separator design issue: rapid, efficient, and uniform heat transfer throughout the cell.


Thus, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure, nanoporous inorganic separator materials are disclosed which are electrically isolating, thermally conductive, and maintain dimensional stability at temperatures above 200° C. In one embodiment, a nanoporous separator layer includes an inorganic material (also called ceramic and/or ceramic filler material) and an organic polymer which acts as a binder to hold the inorganic material together. This nanoporous composite separator exhibits a balance of mechanical strength, ionic conductivity, thermal conductivity, and electrical insulation rendering it suitable as a separator membrane for electrochemical cells. Suitable inorganic ceramic materials may include, for example, high thermal-conductivity ceramic particles such as Al2O3, AlO(OH) or boehmite, AN, BN, SiN, ZnO, ZrO2, SiO2, and combinations of the above. A nanoporous composite separator may be formed, in some embodiments, by dispersing one or more of these inorganic materials with an organic or inorganic polymer material including, but not limited to: PVdF and/or copolymers thereof, polyvinyl ethers, urethanes, acrylics, cellulosics, styrene-butadiene copolymers, natural rubbers, chitosan, nitrile rubbers, silicone elastomers, PEO or PEO copolymers, polyphosphazenes, and combinations of the above.


Table 1 provides a number of suitable example inorganic ceramic materials suitable for forming the nanoporous composite separator disclosed herein. The inorganic materials are listed along with their corresponding thermal and electrical properties.













TABLE 1







inorganic
thermal conductivity
volume resistivity



material
(W/m-K)
(′Ω-cm)









h-BN
600/30*
>1014



AlN
285
>1014



Al2O3
30
>1014



AlON
12.3




silica
1.3
>1010



TiO2
11.7
~1012



ZrO2
1.7
>1010










The thermal conductivity of hexagonal-Boron Nitride (h-BN) may be 600 or 30, in some embodiments, depending on its orientation. In addition to the inorganic materials shown in Table 1, the inorganic material may include boehmite, or a combination of any of these materials. Boehmite is a hydrated form of alumina that may be stable up to temperatures exceeding 600° C. The crystal structure of boehmite is octahedral and is arranged in corrugated layers and is thus less prone to moisture pick-up than other aluminum based materials. In some embodiments, the various properties of the nanoporous composite separator may be tailored by adjusting, for example, particle size, organic polymer, particle size distribution, porosity of the inorganic material, specific surface area, and/or surface treatment of the nanoporous material. In some embodiments, the particle size distribution of the composite separator may be customized by blending boehmite with the various other inorganic materials in various proportions. For example, the nanoporous separator material may be pure boehmite (having less than 1% impurities), may be 90% boehmite and 10% BN or AlN, or it may be 70% boehmite and 30% BN or AlN. Various other proportions and combinations of these inorganic materials will be apparent, in light of this disclosure, and the present disclosure is not intended to be limited to any particular combination or proportion of inorganic materials. In some embodiments, the nanoporous composite separator includes inorganic particles and an organic polymer to bond the inorganic particles together to form a homogeneous separator.


In one specific example embodiment, a nanoporous composite separator was prepared by mixing a 4:1 by weight blend of a boehmite pigment with a PVdF polymer and dispersants in an organic solvent blend comprising N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP) and 2-butanone and coating this mixture onto a silicone release film. In other embodiments, the solvent may comprise other suitable solvents or combinations of solvents such as, for example, benzene, ethyl benzene, toluene, xylene, MEK, NMP, or 2-butanone. Upon oven drying and subsequent delamination from the release substrate, a porous boehmite-based separator of 20 μm in thickness was obtained. The porosity of this separator was about 42%, and the separator showed less than 1% shrinkage when heated in an oven at 220° C. for 1 hour. In another embodiment, the nanoporous composite separator showed less than 0.5% shrinkage under similar heating conditions.


In another example embodiment, the organic polymer material may be a high molecular weight grade of PVdF, such as Solvay® Solef 5130 PVdF. This particular organic material can provide strong adhesion to current collectors, and in one specific example the nanoporous composite separator includes 4.5 parts boehmite to 1 part Solef 5130 by weight. In other embodiments, incorporation of a small amount of co-monomer may enhance the cohesive strength of the separator material. In some embodiments, decreasing the ratio of inorganic oxide to organic polymer will lower the porosity and cycling rate capability of the separator material while increasing its mechanical strength.


In another example embodiment, the nanoporous composite separator may have a porosity between 35-50%, a uniform pore distribution over the entire separator material, and/or an average pore diameter of between 20-40 nm. In different sets of embodiments, the porosity of the separator is between 40-45%. In other sets of embodiments, the inorganic material may include no pores greater than 100 nm, 90 nm, 80 nm, 70 nm, 60 nm, 50 nm, or 40 nm. In still other sets of embodiments, less than 1% or less than 0.1% of the pores are greater than 100 nm, 90 nm, 80 nm, 70 nm, 60 nm, 50 nm, or 40 nm. In other sets of embodiments, the average pore size is between 10-50 nm, 20-40 nm, or 25-35 nm. In still other sets of embodiments, more than 99% or 99.9% of the pores of the composite separator are between 10-90 nm, 10-50 nm, 20-40 nm, or 25-35 nm. The nanoporous composite separator may exhibit similar properties in the machine direction (along the length of the sample) as in the transverse direction (along the width of the sample) if the separator material is not oriented during manufacturing.


In contrast to the cylindrical metal cells commonly used in lithium batteries for portable computers and other applications, many of the lithium batteries for vehicles are of a flat or prismatic design. In some cases, manufacturing high energy and economical lithium batteries for vehicles or other applications may involve increasing the proportion or percentage of the volume of the electroactive material in each battery and reducing the complexity and expense of the automated equipment to fabricate the battery. In some embodiments, a lithium battery may increase the content of electroactive material by implementing thinner separator and/or metal substrate layers. Such lithium batteries may be fabricated, for example, on less complex and less expensive automated processing equipment than, for example, the winding equipment utilized for portable computer batteries. In some embodiments, automated processing equipment may be particularly adapted for making flat or prismatic batteries.


In one embodiment, a dispersion may be prepared including the inorganic material, a polymer material, and a solvent in the desired proportions. The dispersion may then be coated on a temporary carrier substrate and allowed to dry and/or cure in order to obtain the desired mechanical properties prior to removal from the substrate. Once dried and/or cured, the composite material may be removed from the substrate (or the substrate may be removed from the composite material), thus forming a nanoporous composite separator. In various embodiments, the porous separator layer may be a film with a thickness between 5-50 μm, 10-30 μm, 7-20 μm, 10-20 μm, or 15-25 μm.


Nanoporous Composite Separator Examples


FIGS. 1-2 show thermograms produced using an infrared camera (FLIR Model 8300) of a polymeric separator and boehmite-based separator prepared according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. FIG. 1 is a thermogram of a polyethylene separator film upon exposure to a heated stainless steel substrate, while FIG. 2 is a thermogram of a boehmite-based separator film of similar thickness exposed in like manner to the heated stainless steel substrate. The bright patches 101 in FIG. 1 correspond to areas of increased heat concentration, while the darker patches 103 correspond to areas of decreased heat concentration. The uniform heat distribution observed in the boehmite-based separator of FIG. 2 is evident compared to the uneven heat distribution seen with the plastic separator.



FIG. 3 shows a chart of the thermal conductivity (measured in W/m-K) of a polymeric separator compared to that of a nanoporous composite separator prepared according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. The measurements in FIG. 3 were done according to ASTM E1461 by the laser flash (transient) method using an LFA-447 from Netszch® Instruments, Burlington, Mass. These measurements illustrate the higher thermal conductivity of the nanoporous composite separator compared to a typical polyolefin separator material. Columns 301 and 303 chart the thermal conductivity of the nanoporous composite separator exposed to temperatures of 25° C. and 50° C., respectively, while columns 305 and 307 chart the thermal conductivity of the polyolefin separator material exposed to 25° C. and 50° C., respectively. In this particular embodiment, the polyolefin separator material used was 18 μm thick polyethylene, and the nanoporous composite separator was 21 μm thick and comprised a 4.5:1 ratio of Boehmite (Disperal® 10SR) to Solvay® Solef 5130. As can be seen in FIG. 3, the thermal conductivity of the nanoporous composite separator is more than four times greater than that of the polyolefin separator of a similar thickness. This enhanced thermal conductivity is further increased, in some embodiments, when the temperature is increased from 25° C. to 50° C. This property of increasing thermal conductivity as the temperature increases is particularly useful for safety in lithium ion batteries since they typically operate at temperatures around 50° C. due to the heat generated during cell operation. It is important to rapidly and evenly distribute the heat throughout the cell to minimize the localized buildup of heat from any “hot spots” or other unevenly heated areas.



FIG. 4 shows a chart of the thermal conductivity (measured in W/m-K) of a polymeric separator material, a ceramic-coated polymeric separator material, and a nanoporous composite separator prepared according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. The thermal conductivities charted in FIG. 4 were measured according to the ASTM E1530 guarded hot plate (steady state) method with an estimated variation of +3.0%. These measurements illustrate the higher thermal conductivity of the nanoporous composite separator compared to a typical polymeric separator material and a ceramic-coated polymeric separator material. The samples measured, in this particular example, include the two separator materials measured in FIG. 3, as well as a third sample made from coating each side of the 18 μm thick polyethylene with a 3.5 μm layer comprising a 5.5:1 ratio of boehmite to polymeric binder material. Columns 401 and 403 chart the thermal conductivity of the nanoporous composite separator measured at 25° C. and 50° C., respectively; columns 405 and 407 chart the thermal conductivity of the polyolefin separator material measured at 25° C. and 50° C., respectively; and columns 409 and 411 chart the thermal conductivity of the ceramic-coated polymeric separator material measured at 25° C. and 50° C., respectively. In this particular embodiment, the thermal conductivity of the nanoporous composite separator is about twice that of the polyolefin separator material of a similar thickness, while the ceramic-coated separator material shows a slight improvement of about 20% in thermal conductivity over that of the polyolefin separator material.



FIGS. 5-6 are graphs of the dimensional stability of various separator materials, including a nanoporous composite separator prepared according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. FIG. 5 graphs the dimensional change (measured in μm) as a function of temperature of the various separator materials measured along the length of the samples, while FIG. 6 graphs the dimensional change measured along the width of the material samples. In the example embodiments shown in FIGS. 5-6, 501 graphs the dimensional change of a polymeric separator material, 503 graphs the dimensional change of a one-side ceramic-coated polymeric separator material, 505 graphs the dimensional change of a two-side ceramic-coated polymeric separator material, and 507 graphs the dimensional change of a nanoporous composite separator prepared according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. In this particular example, the polymeric separator corresponding to graph 501 was a polyethylene polyolefin with a thickness of 18 μm and a Gurley air permeability of 300 sec/100 cc. The separator corresponding to graph 503 was coated on a single side with a 3.5 μm layer comprising a 5.5:1 ratio of Boehmite (Disperal® 10SR) to Arkema Kynar® 761, and the separator had a Gurley air permeability of 470 sec/100 cc. The separator corresponding to graph 505 was coated on two sides with a 3.5 μm layer comprising a 5.5:1 ratio of Boehmite (Disperal® 10SR) to Arkema Kynar® 761, and the separator had a Gurley air permeability of 600 sec/100 cc. The nanoporous composite separator corresponding to graph 507 comprised a 4.5:1 ratio of Boehmite (Disperal® 10SR) to Solvay® Solef 5130, was 21 μm thick, had a Gurley air permeability of 900 sec/100 cc, and a porosity of 40%. As seen in FIGS. 5-6, the dimensional stability of the polymeric separator 501 and the ceramic-coated polymeric separators 503-505 changes greatly between 100-170° C., while the nanoporous composite separator 507 maintains a high dimensional stability well beyond 200° C.



FIGS. 7-8 are graphs of the dimensional stability (measured as percent shrinkage) of various separator materials, including a nanoporous composite separator prepared according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. FIG. 7 graphs the percent shrinkage as a function of temperature of the various separator materials measured along the length of the samples, while FIG. 8 graphs the percent shrinkage measured along the width of the various material samples. The percent shrinkage graphed in FIGS. 7-8 was measured unrestrained over one hour according to the ASTM 1204 standard test method for measuring linear dimensional changes. In the example embodiments shown, 701 graphs the percent shrinkage of a polymeric separator material, 703 graphs the percent shrinkage of a one-side ceramic-coated polymeric separator material, 705 graphs the percent shrinkage of a two-side ceramic-coated polymeric separator material, and 707 graphs the percent shrinkage of a nanoporous composite separator prepared according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. In this particular embodiment, the various separators corresponding to graphs 701, 703, 705, and 707 were the same separators described above in reference to graphs 501, 503, 505, and 507, respectively. As can be seen in FIGS. 7-8, the percent shrinkage of the polymeric separator material 701 and the first ceramic-coated polymeric separator 703 increases dramatically at temperatures above 100° C. The second ceramic-coated polymeric separator material 705 experiences a less dramatic increase in percent shrinkage, while the nanoporous composite separator material 707 maintains a low percent shrinkage at or below 0.5% at temperatures above 160° C.



FIG. 9 is a graph of the log of the differential intrusion (measured as mL/g) as a function of pore size diameter (measured in μm) of a polymeric separator material and a nanoporous flexible composite separator prepared according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. In this particular embodiment, 901 graphs the differential intrusion of a nanoporous composite separator 20 μm thick, with a porosity of about 40%, and comprising a 4.5:1 ratio of boehmite (Disperal® 10SR) to Solvay® Solef 5130; and 903 graphs the differential intrusion of a 18 μm thick polyethylene polymeric separator material. As can be seen in this embodiment, the pore size distribution 901 corresponding to the nanoporous composite separator is concentrated at around 30 nm, and has a smaller mean size compared to the distribution 903 corresponding to the polymeric separator. In some embodiments, such a narrow pore size distribution and small average size may minimize the risk of dendritic penetration of the separator, which may cause localized short-circuits. In other embodiments, the pore size distribution of the nanoporous composite separator may be concentrated between 10-90 nm, 10-50 nm, 20-40 nm, or 25-35 nm. The pore size may be tailored, in some embodiments, through the formulation parameters of the nanoporous composite separator. As discussed above, decreasing the ratio of inorganic oxide to organic polymer will lower the porosity and cycling rate capability while increasing the mechanical strength of the material.



FIG. 10 is a graph of the tensile stress (measured in psi) as a function of percent extension of two separator materials, including a nanoporous composite separator prepared according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. In this example embodiment, 1001 graphs the tensile stress of a 18 μm thick polyethylene polymeric separator material; while 1003 graphs the tensile stress of a nanoporous composite separator 20 μm thick, with a porosity of about 40%, and comprising a 4.5:1 ratio of boehmite (Disperal® 10SR) to Solvay® Solef 5130. In this particular embodiment, the separators corresponding to graphs 1001, and 1003 were the same separators described above in reference to graphs 501, 503, 505, and 507, respectively. The U.S. Advanced Battery Consortium (USABC) target tensile stress is 1000 psi, and is shown by line 1005. The tensile stresses graphed in FIG. 10 were measured along the length of the material samples using the ASTM D882-00 standard method for measuring the tensile properties of thin plastic sheeting. In another embodiment, the nanoporous composite separator 1003 has more than twice the compression strength of the polymeric separator material 1001.



FIG. 11 is a graph of the particle size distribution (volume percent as a function of particle size in μm) of various boehmite and boron nitride (BN) blends, according to various embodiments of the present disclosure. In one specific example embodiment, the BN used is Saint-Gobain® Carbotherm PCTP05. As can be seen in this example, 1101 plots the particle size distribution of a 100% boehmite material, 1103 plots the particle size distribution of a composition including 90% boehmite and 10% BN, and 1105 plots the particle size distribution of a composition including 70% boehmite and 30% BN, according to three embodiments of the present disclosure. The mode of the boehmite material distribution 1101 is at about 0.1 μm. In this particular example the boehmite material distribution 1101 includes a single mode, while the 90% boehmite composition 1103 and the 70% boehmite composition 1105 each display a bimodal distribution with modes at about 0.15-0.19 μm, and at about 2-3 μm.



FIG. 12 is a graph of the particle size distribution (volume percent as a function of particle size in μm) of various boehmite and alumina nitride (AlN) blends, according to various embodiments of the present disclosure. As can be seen in this example, 1201 plots the particle size distribution of a separator material comprising 100% boehmite, 1203 plots the particle size distribution of a separator material comprising 90% boehmite and 10% AlN, and 1205 plots the particle size distribution of a separator material comprising 70% boehmite and 30% AlN, according to three embodiments of the present disclosure. In one embodiment, the mode of the boehmite material 1201 distribution is at about 0.1 μm, similar to the mode of the boehmite material distribution 1101 graphed in FIG. 11. In this particular example the boehmite material distribution 1201 includes a single mode, while the 90% boehmite material 1203 and the 70% boehmite material 1205 each display a bimodal distribution. The modes of the 90% boehmite material distribution 1203 are at about 0.15-0.19 μm, and at about 8-11 μm, while the modes of the 70% boehmite material distribution 1205 are at about 0.12-0.18 μm and about 7-10 μm.


In some embodiments, the inorganic particles may be of different sizes that are grouped around two, three or more modes. It is believed that by using a multi-modal distribution of particles of different sizes, the particles may be packed in a configuration in the separator that provides for increased heat transfer and better compression strength while maintaining or even improving porosity of the separator. The particles grouped around different modes may be of the same or different composition. For example, boehmite particles having a modal distribution centered at about 100 nm may be combined with additional boehmite particles having a modal distribution centered at about 2 μm. In other embodiments, boehmite particles having a modal distribution centered at about 100 nm may be combined with AlN or BN particles having a modal distribution centered at about 2 μm. The ratio of the particle size at a first mode to the particle size at a second mode can be, for example, greater than 1:2, 1:3, 1:5 or 1:10. In other embodiments, the ratio of the particle sizes of the two modes can be, for example, less than 1:100, 1:50, 1:20, 1:10, 1:5 or 1:3. The ratio (wt/wt) of the amounts of the two different sized particles used in a separator can be greater than 1:1, 2:1, 5:1 or 10:1.



FIG. 13 is a graph of the viscosity profiles (measured as viscosity in cPs as a function of spindle speed in rpms) for the various boehmite and BN blends, in liquid form, according to various embodiments of the present disclosure. As can be seen in this example, 1301 plots the viscosity profile of a 100% boehmite material, 1303 plots the viscosity profile of a composition including 90% boehmite and 10% BN, and 1305 plots the viscosity profile of a composition including 70% boehmite and 30% BN, according to three embodiments of the present disclosure.


In some embodiments, the BN-modified compositions 1103-1105 and 1303-1305 may have higher thermal conductivities than a pure boehmite composition due to a dense packing of the blended filler that is enabled by the bimodal particle size distribution. Likewise, in other embodiments the AlN-modified compositions 1203-1205 may have higher thermal conductivities than a pure boehmite composition due to the bimodal particle size distribution of the AlN-modified composition.



FIG. 14 is a flow chart illustrating a method for preparing a nanoporous composite separator, according to an embodiment of the present invention. The method may begin by mixing 1401 inorganic particles with a solvent. In some embodiments, the inorganic particles may include Al2O3, AlO(OH) or boehmite, AlN, BN, SiN, ZnO, ZrO2, SiO2, or combinations thereof, and the solvent may include toluene, xylene, MEK, NMP, 2-butanone, or any other suitable solvent or combinations thereof. The method may continue with adding 1402 the polymeric binder material in order to form a dispersion. In some embodiments, the polymeric binder material may include polyvinylidene difluoride (PVdF) and copolymers thereof, polyvinyl ethers, urethanes, acrylics, cellulosics, styrene-butadiene copolymers, natural rubbers, chitosan, nitrile rubbers, silicone elastomers, PEO or PEO copolymers, polyphosphazenes, or combinations thereof. The method may continue with coating 1403 the dispersion onto a substrate and drying/curing 1404 the dispersion, thus forming the nanoporous composite separator. Once dried, the method may continue with removing 1405 the nanoporous composite separator from the substrate.


While the disclosure has been described in detail and with reference to specific and general embodiments thereof, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope thereof.

Claims
  • 1. A flexible porous composite battery separator, comprising: a first group and a second group of inorganic particles, wherein the first group of inorganic particles comprises boehmite particles having a first particle size andthe second group of inorganic particles is selected from the group consisting of silica, zirconium oxide, and boehmite particles having a second particle size that is different from the first particle size; anda polymeric binder, whereinthe first group of inorganic particles and the second group of inorganic particles are dispersed in the polymeric binder to form the flexible porous composite battery separator,the flexible porous composite battery separator does not comprise an additional polymeric separator layer, andthe flexible porous composite battery separator has a thermal conductivity of at least 0.6 W/m-K at 25° C. when measured by an ASTM E1461 method.
  • 2. The flexible porous composite battery separator of claim 1, wherein said flexible porous composite battery separator exhibits less than 1% shrinkage when exposed to a temperature of 200° C. for one hour.
  • 3. The flexible porous composite battery separator of claim 2, wherein said flexible porous composite battery separator exhibits less than 1% shrinkage when exposed to a temperature of 220° C. for one hour.
  • 4. The flexible porous composite battery separator of claim 1, wherein the thermal conductivity of said flexible porous composite battery separator is higher at 50° C. than at 25° C.
  • 5. The flexible porous composite battery separator of claim 1, wherein a ratio (weight/weight) of the boehmite particles having the first particle size to the boehmite particles having the second particle size is selected from the group consisting of 1:1, 2:1, 5:1 and 10:1.
  • 6. The flexible porous composite battery separator of claim 1, wherein a ratio (weight/weight) of the first group and the second group of inorganic particles to the polymeric binder is about 4.5:1.
  • 7. The flexible porous composite battery separator of claim 1, wherein the boehmite particles having the first particle size are grouped around a first mode and the boehmite particles having the second particle size are grouped around a second mode that differs from the first mode.
  • 8. The flexible porous composite battery separator of claim 7, wherein the first mode is between 100-200 nm.
  • 9. The flexible porous composite battery separator of claim 1, wherein the first group and the second group of inorganic particles comprise at least 90% boehmite by weight.
  • 10. The flexible porous composite battery separator of claim 1, wherein an average pore size is between 10-50 nm.
  • 11. The flexible porous composite battery separator of claim 1, wherein a porosity is between 35-50%.
  • 12. The flexible porous composite battery separator of claim 1, wherein the polymeric binder comprises polyvinylidene difluoride (PVdF) and/or copolymers thereof.
  • 13. The flexible porous composite battery separator of claim 12, wherein the polymeric binder comprises high molecular weight grade PVdF and/or copolymers thereof.
  • 14. The flexible porous composite battery separator of claim 1, wherein the polymeric binder comprises a polymer selected from the group consisting of polyvinyl ethers, urethanes, acrylics, cellulosics, styrene-butadiene copolymers, natural rubbers, chitosan, nitrile rubbers, silicone elastomers, PEO or PEO copolymers, and polyphosphazenes.
  • 15. The flexible porous composite battery separator of claim 1, wherein the polymeric binder further comprises a co-monomer.
  • 16. The flexible porous composite battery separator of claim 1, wherein a dimensional stability of the flexible porous composite battery separator is substantially constant at temperatures from 50° C. to 250° C.
  • 17. The flexible porous composite battery separator of claim 9, wherein the first group and the second group of inorganic particles comprise at least 95% boehmite by weight.
  • 18. An electrochemical cell comprising: an anode;a cathode:an organic electrolyte comprising a lithium salt; anda flexible porous composite battery separator, comprising: a first group and a second group of inorganic particles, wherein the first group of inorganic particles comprises boehmite particles having a first particle size andthe second group of inorganic particles is selected from the group consisting of silica, zirconium oxide, and boehmite particles having a second particle size that is different from the first particle size; anda polymeric binder;wherein the flexible porous composite battery separator has a thermal conductivity of at least 0.6 W/m-K at 25° C. when measured by an ASTM E1461 method,wherein the first group of inorganic particles and the second group of inorganic particles are dispersed in the polymeric binder to form the flexible porous composite battery separator, andwherein the flexible porous composite battery separator does not comprise an additional polymeric separator layer.
  • 19. The electrochemical cell of claim 18, wherein the flexible porous composite battery separator exhibits less than 1% shrinkage when exposed to a temperature of 200° C. for one hour.
  • 20. The electrochemical cell of claim 19, wherein the flexible porous composite battery separator exhibits less than 1% shrinkage when exposed to a temperature of 220° C. for one hour.
  • 21. The electrochemical cell of claim 18, wherein the thermal conductivity of said flexible porous composite battery separator is higher at 50° C. than at 25° C.
  • 22. The electrochemical cell of claim 18, wherein a ratio (weight/weight) of the boehmite particles having the first particle size to the boehmite particles having the second particle size is selected from the group consisting of 1:1, 2:1, 5:1 and 10:1.
  • 23. The electrochemical cell of claim 18, wherein a ratio (weight/weight) of the first group and the second group of inorganic particles to the polymeric binder is about 4.5:1.
  • 24. The electrochemical cell of claim 18, wherein the first group and the second group of inorganic particles comprise at least 90% boehmite by weight.
  • 25. The electrochemical cell of claim 18, wherein the polymeric binder comprises polyvinylidene difluoride (PVdF) and/or copolymers thereof.
  • 26. The electrochemical cell of claim 24, wherein the first group and the second group of inorganic particles comprise at least 95% boehmite by weight.
  • 27. The electrochemical cell of claim 26, wherein the first group and the second group of inorganic particles comprise at least 99% boehmite by weight.
  • 28. The electrochemical cell of claim 27, wherein the first group and the second group of inorganic particles comprise only boehmite.
  • 29. The flexible porous composite battery separator of claim 17, wherein the first group and the second group of inorganic particles comprise at least 99% boehmite by weight.
  • 30. The flexible porous composite battery separator of claim 29, wherein the first group and the second group of inorganic particles comprise only boehmite.
  • 31. The flexible porous composite battery separator of claim 1, wherein greater than 90% of a pore volume of the flexible porous composite battery separator comprises pores having a pore diameter of less than 100 nm.
  • 32. The electrochemical cell of claim 18, wherein greater than 90% of a pore volume of the flexible porous composite battery separator comprises pores having a pore diameter of less than 100 nm.
  • 33. The flexible porous composite battery separator of claim 1, wherein a tensile stress of the flexible porous composite battery separator is 1500 psi or greater at 2% extension.
  • 34. The flexible porous composite battery separator of claim 1, wherein a tensile stress of the flexible porous composite battery separator is 1000 psi or greater at 0.5% extension.
  • 35. The electrochemical cell of claim 18, wherein a tensile stress of the flexible porous composite battery separator is 1500 psi or greater at 2% extension.
  • 36. The electrochemical cell of claim 18, wherein a tensile stress of the flexible porous composite battery separator is 1000 psi or greater at 0.5% extension.
  • 37. The electrochemical cell of claim 18, wherein the boehmite particles having the first particle size are grouped around a first mode and the boehmite particles having the second particle size are grouped around a second mode that differs from the first mode.
  • 38. The electrochemical cell of claim 37, wherein the first mode is between 100-200 nm.
  • 39. The electrochemical cell of claim 18, wherein the flexible porous composite battery separator has an average pore size of between 10-50 nm.
  • 40. The electrochemical cell of claim 18, wherein the flexible porous composite battery separator has a porosity of between 35-50%.
  • 41. The electrochemical cell of claim 25, wherein the polymeric binder comprises high molecular weight grade PVdF and/or copolymers thereof.
  • 42. The electrochemical cell of claim 18, wherein the polymeric binder comprises a polymer selected from the group consisting of polyvinyl ethers, urethanes, acrylics, cellulosics, styrene-butadiene copolymers, natural rubbers, chitosan, nitrile rubbers, silicone elastomers, PEO or PEO copolymers, and polyphosphazenes.
  • 43. The electrochemical cell of claim 18, wherein the polymeric binder further comprises a co-monomer.
  • 44. The electrochemical cell of claim 18, wherein a dimensional stability of the flexible porous composite battery separator is substantially constant at temperatures from 50° C. to 250° C.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application is a U.S. National Phase application under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/US2014/035947, filed Apr. 29, 2014, entitled NANOPOROUS COMPOSITE SEPARATORS WITH INCREASED THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/817,119, filed Apr. 29, 2013, each of which is incorporated by reference herein.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US2014/035947 4/29/2014 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2014/179355 11/6/2014 WO A
US Referenced Citations (172)
Number Name Date Kind
3625771 Arrance et al. Dec 1971 A
3647554 Arrance et al. Mar 1972 A
5162175 Visco et al. Nov 1992 A
5194341 Bagley et al. Mar 1993 A
5314765 Bates May 1994 A
5326391 Anderson et al. Jul 1994 A
5340669 Chaloner-Gill et al. Aug 1994 A
5350645 Lake et al. Sep 1994 A
5415954 Gauthier et al. May 1995 A
5418091 Gozdz et al. May 1995 A
5439760 Howard et al. Aug 1995 A
5549717 Takeuchi et al. Aug 1996 A
5569520 Bates Oct 1996 A
5597659 Morigaki et al. Jan 1997 A
5691005 Morigaki et al. Nov 1997 A
5731104 Ventura et al. Mar 1998 A
5778515 Menon Jul 1998 A
5824434 Kawakami et al. Oct 1998 A
5840087 Gozdz et al. Nov 1998 A
5882721 Delnick Mar 1999 A
5894656 Menon et al. Apr 1999 A
5948464 Delnick Sep 1999 A
6148503 Delnick et al. Nov 2000 A
6153337 Carlson et al. Nov 2000 A
6162563 Miura et al. Dec 2000 A
6183901 Ying et al. Feb 2001 B1
6190426 Thibault Feb 2001 B1
6194098 Ying et al. Feb 2001 B1
6224846 Hurlburt et al. May 2001 B1
6268087 Kim et al. Jul 2001 B1
6277514 Ying et al. Aug 2001 B1
6287720 Yamashita et al. Sep 2001 B1
6306545 Carlson et al. Oct 2001 B1
6328770 Gozdz Dec 2001 B1
6344293 Geronov Feb 2002 B1
6410182 Ying et al. Jun 2002 B1
6423444 Ying et al. Jul 2002 B1
6432586 Zhang Aug 2002 B1
6444344 Saito et al. Sep 2002 B1
6451484 Han et al. Sep 2002 B1
6488721 Carlson Dec 2002 B1
6497780 Carlson Dec 2002 B1
6679926 Kajiura Jan 2004 B1
6723467 Yoshida et al. Apr 2004 B2
6811928 Aihara et al. Nov 2004 B2
6846435 Bohnen et al. Jan 2005 B1
7014948 Lee et al. Mar 2006 B2
7029796 Choi et al. Apr 2006 B2
7066971 Carlson Jun 2006 B1
7070632 Visco et al. Jul 2006 B1
7081142 Carlson Jul 2006 B1
7115339 Nakajima et al. Oct 2006 B2
7160603 Carlson Jan 2007 B2
7378185 Fujikawa et al. May 2008 B2
7396612 Ohata et al. Jul 2008 B2
7402184 Ikuta et al. Jul 2008 B2
7419743 Fujikawa et al. Sep 2008 B2
7422825 Inoue et al. Sep 2008 B2
7470488 Lee et al. Dec 2008 B2
7560193 Ikuta et al. Jul 2009 B2
7575606 Fukumoto et al. Aug 2009 B2
7595130 Kawabata et al. Sep 2009 B2
7638230 Fujita et al. Dec 2009 B2
7638241 Lee et al. Dec 2009 B2
7662517 Lee et al. Feb 2010 B2
7674559 Min et al. Mar 2010 B2
7682740 Yong et al. Mar 2010 B2
7682751 Kato et al. Mar 2010 B2
7687202 Nishino et al. Mar 2010 B2
7695870 Park et al. Apr 2010 B2
7704641 Yong et al. Apr 2010 B2
7709140 Hennige May 2010 B2
7709152 Kim et al. May 2010 B2
7709153 Lee et al. May 2010 B2
7745042 Fujino et al. Jun 2010 B2
7745050 Kajita et al. Jun 2010 B2
7754375 Fujikawa et al. Jul 2010 B2
7754377 Ohata et al. Jul 2010 B2
7758998 Ohata et al. Jul 2010 B2
7759004 Ikuta et al. Jul 2010 B2
7811700 Hennige et al. Oct 2010 B2
7816038 Ohata et al. Oct 2010 B2
7829242 Hörpel et al. Nov 2010 B2
7981548 Mimura Jul 2011 B2
8277981 Kim et al. Oct 2012 B2
8883347 Baba et al. Nov 2014 B2
8883354 Carlson et al. Nov 2014 B2
8962182 Carlson Feb 2015 B2
9065120 Carlson Jun 2015 B2
9070954 Carlson et al. Jun 2015 B2
9118047 Carlson Aug 2015 B2
9180412 Jo et al. Nov 2015 B2
9209446 Carlson Dec 2015 B2
9660297 Carlson May 2017 B2
9871239 Carlson et al. Jan 2018 B2
20010000485 Ying et al. Apr 2001 A1
20010038938 Takahashi et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010053475 Ying et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020092155 Carlson et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020106561 Lee et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020141029 Carlson et al. Oct 2002 A1
20030003363 Daido Jan 2003 A1
20030035995 Ohsaki et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030118910 Carlson Jun 2003 A1
20030171784 Dodd et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040038090 Faris Feb 2004 A1
20040043295 Rodriguez et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040058246 Choi et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040185335 Carlson Sep 2004 A1
20040188880 Bauer et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040241540 Tsutsumi et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050221190 Sudano et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050266305 Ohata et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060008698 Kim et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060127753 Nakashima et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060172158 Min et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060172185 Mimura Aug 2006 A1
20060177732 Visco et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060222954 Skotheim et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060275661 Kim et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070009803 Kim Jan 2007 A1
20070065714 Hambitzer et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070108120 Carlson May 2007 A1
20070110990 Carlson May 2007 A1
20070111070 Carlson May 2007 A1
20070178384 Kajita et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070184350 Kim et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070189959 Carlson et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070190408 Inoue et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070190427 Carlson et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070204458 Fujita et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070243460 Carlson et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070269714 Watanabe et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080032197 Horpel et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080166202 Dunlap et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080182174 Carlson et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080285208 Sung et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090017380 Honda et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090067119 Katayama et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090087728 Less et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090155678 Less Jun 2009 A1
20090197183 Kato Aug 2009 A1
20090202912 Baba et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090246636 Chiang et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090269489 Hennige et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100055370 Diehl Mar 2010 A1
20100003595 Baba Jul 2010 A1
20100175245 Do et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100261065 Babinec et al. Oct 2010 A1
20110052987 Katayama et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110097623 Marinis, Jr. et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110281171 Yong et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120064399 Carlson Mar 2012 A1
20120064404 Carlson Mar 2012 A1
20120141877 Choi et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120189898 Wakizaka et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120258348 Hayakawa Oct 2012 A1
20130089770 Nishikawa Apr 2013 A1
20130171500 Xu et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130260207 Uemura Oct 2013 A1
20140170464 Iwase Jun 2014 A1
20150162586 Fleischmann et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150249249 Ortega et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150299551 Ota et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150364790 Yonehara et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160141621 Negishi et al. May 2016 A1
20160164145 Carlson Jun 2016 A1
20170012264 Carlson et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170098857 Carlson Apr 2017 A1
20170222206 Carlson Aug 2017 A1
20170271638 Xu et al. Sep 2017 A1
20180047963 Carlson et al. Feb 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (67)
Number Date Country
2605874 Jan 2007 CA
101796668 Aug 2010 CN
102437302 May 2012 CN
102640329 Aug 2012 CN
0143562 Jun 1985 EP
0523840 Jan 1993 EP
0600718 Jun 1994 EP
0814520 Dec 1997 EP
0836238 Apr 1998 EP
0848435 Jun 1998 EP
0875950 Nov 1998 EP
0892449 Jan 1999 EP
1156544 Nov 2011 EP
H06140077 May 1994 JP
H06275313 Sep 1994 JP
H08255615 Oct 1996 JP
H0927343 Jan 1997 JP
H10214639 Aug 1998 JP
H11233144 Aug 1999 JP
2000323129 Nov 2000 JP
2002042882 Feb 2002 JP
2002203542 Jul 2002 JP
2003517418 May 2003 JP
2003223926 Aug 2003 JP
2004119367 Apr 2004 JP
2005235695 Feb 2005 JP
2007227136 Sep 2007 JP
2007258160 Oct 2007 JP
2008041404 Feb 2008 JP
2008048838 Mar 2008 JP
2008123988 May 2008 JP
2009064566 Mar 2009 JP
2010056036 Mar 2010 JP
4932263 May 2012 JP
5183016 Apr 2013 JP
2013535773 Sep 2013 JP
1020090052556 May 2009 KR
9102385 Feb 1991 WO
9103080 Mar 1991 WO
9708763 Mar 1997 WO
9931751 Jun 1999 WO
9933125 Jul 1999 WO
99057770 Nov 1999 WO
0076011 Dec 2000 WO
0103824 Jan 2001 WO
0139303 May 2001 WO
2001039293 May 2001 WO
2005022674 Mar 2005 WO
2006123892 Nov 2006 WO
2007095348 Aug 2007 WO
2007120763 Oct 2007 WO
2007135790 Nov 2007 WO
2008150070 Dec 2008 WO
2009014388 Jan 2009 WO
2009026467 Feb 2009 WO
2009066946 May 2009 WO
2010016881 Feb 2010 WO
2010138176 Dec 2010 WO
2010138177 Dec 2010 WO
2010138178 Dec 2010 WO
2010138179 Dec 2010 WO
2012011944 Jan 2012 WO
2013146126 Oct 2013 WO
2014119665 Aug 2014 WO
2015004069 Jan 2015 WO
2016168715 Oct 2016 WO
2017008081 Jan 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (12)
Entry
JP 5183016 B2 (a raw machine translation) (Abstract) (Apr. 17, 2013).
Yoshinobu et al. (JP, 2008-210541) (a raw machine translation) (Abstract and Detailed Description) (Sep. 11, 2008).
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/035947, dated Sep. 5, 2014, 15 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received in PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/035947, dated Nov. 3, 2015, 10 pages.
First Office Action for CN Application No. 201480026808.5, dated Apr. 19, 2017.
Second Office Action for CN Application No. 201480026808.5, dated Mar. 19, 2018.
“Notification of Reasons for Refusal” for JP Application No. 2016-511812, dated Mar. 6, 2018.
Min Kim et al., “Preparation of a Trilayer Separator and its Application to Lithium-ion Batteries”, Journal of Power Sources, Elesevier SA, CH, vol. 195, No. 24, Jul. 2, 2010, pp. 8302-8305.
Daigo Takemura, et al., “A Powder Particle Size Effect on Ceramic Powder Based Separator for Lithium Rechargeable Battery”, Journal of Power Sources, Elesevier SA, vol. 146, 2005, pp. 779-783.
R.J.R. Uhlhorn, et al., “Synthesis of Ceramic Membranes”, Journal of Materials Science 27 (1992) 527-537.
Third Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201480026808.5, dated Nov. 19, 2018, which is a CN counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 14/787,426.
Korean Intellectual Patent Office, “Office Action”, dated Mar. 18, 2020 in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2015-7033742, which is a KR counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 14/787,426, including cited references and English language translation thereof.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160104876 A1 Apr 2016 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61817119 Apr 2013 US