There are presently two known techniques in which nanovolt-meters may reduce amplifier offset drift. The first technique, generally referred to as the measure zero method and illustrated by
When the switch 102 is in the first state, e.g., at Hi (as shown), the resulting voltage VOUT
When the switch 102 is in the second state, e.g., at Lo (not shown), the resulting voltage VOUT
Thus, the measurement voltage VMeas may be determined by the following:
The second technique, generally referred to as the chopping method and illustrated by
When the switch 202 is in the first state (as shown), the resulting voltage VOUT
When the switch 202 is toggled (not shown), the resulting voltage VOUT
Thus, the measurement voltage VMeas may be determined by the following:
Because both measurements in this technique measure the input, the measurement noise is half compared to that of the gain stage illustrated by
Accordingly, a need remains for a more stable measurement than provided by present circuits and, more particularly, for rejection of both amplifier offset and attenuator offset while measuring the input signal in both phases.
Embodiments of the disclosed technology are generally directed to circuits designed to achieve rejection of both the amplifier offset and the attenuator offset while measuring the input signal in both phases.
An amplifier design with two phases: a positive gain & a negative gain. The offsets of the input amplifier, the gain setting attenuator and the measurement circuit sensing the amplifiers output are cancelled out when the difference of two phases is calculated.
A two phase gain stage comprised of a differential gain stage and an attenuator. One phase has the Hi input connected to the positive input of the differential gain stage which is configured as a buffer driving one end of the attenuator and the Lo input connected to a tap on the attenuator with the remaining end of the attenuator connected to circuit common. The other phase has Hi connected to the negative input and Lo connect to the output of the differential gain stage with the output also connected to one end of the attenuator, the positive input connected to an attenuator tap and the remaining end connected to circuit common.
Embodiments of the disclosed technology are generally directed to circuits that are designed to achieve rejection of both the amplifier offset and the attenuator offset while measuring the input signal in both phases. Such embodiments generally yield a more stable measurement than that provided by prior art circuits in use today.
Toggling the switches 302-306 reverses the input voltage that is applied across R1 while VOS and VT1 are not reversed. Averaging the difference of the measurements of VOUT from the two phases generally yields a result in which errors caused by VOS, VT1 and VMos are cancelled out. This effectively yields half the signal-to-noise ratio for both the amplifier noise and the measurement circuit noise.
When in the positive phase, the resulting voltage VOUT+ is given by the following:
When in the negative phase, the resulting voltage VOUT− is given by the following:
Thus, the measurement voltage VMeas may be determined by the following:
When the switches 402-406 are positioned such that the circuit is in the positive phase, as illustrated by
When the switches 402-406 are toggled such that the circuit is in the negative phase, as illustrated by
Thus, the output voltage VOUT may be determined by the following:
In this configuration, the Lo input, in the positive phase, is connected through the attenuator. Thus, any common mode on the input signal will need to charge the parasitic capacitance CP from the power supply common to the chassis. This current will flow through R1 during the first phase.
An optional buffer (here, amplifier C) can be added to provide a low impedance path to common. However, the offset voltage and noise voltage of amplifier C is added at the input. The offset voltage is cancelled by the difference of the two phases, and the noise voltage is RMS with the noise voltage of amplifier A. Therefore, the noise quality of the amplifier may be critical to the overall circuit performance. In order to keep the bias current of the input low, amplifier A usually has a JFET input stage. This serves to limit its noise voltage performance to about 2 nV/√{square root over (Hz)}.
In the example, the input of amplifier C is connected to the attenuator which generally has a low impedance for R1 in order to keep the resistor noise low, e.g., less than 100Ω. The low impedance thus allows amplifier C to be a bipolar input stage. Op-amps having a noise voltage specification of ≦1 nV/√{square root over (Hz)} may be used. In certain embodiments where amplifier C is at 1 nV/√{square root over (Hz)}, about 24% additional noise is added to the circuit if amplifier A has 2 nV/√{square root over (Hz)} input noise.
Having described and illustrated the principles of the invention with reference to illustrated embodiments, it will be recognized that the illustrated embodiments may be modified in arrangement and detail without departing from such principles, and may be combined in any desired manner. And although the foregoing discussion has focused on particular embodiments, other configurations are contemplated. In particular, even though expressions such as “according to an embodiment of the invention” or the like are used herein, these phrases are meant to generally reference embodiment possibilities, and are not intended to limit the invention to particular embodiment configurations. As used herein, these terms may reference the same or different embodiments that are combinable into other embodiments.
Consequently, in view of the wide variety of permutations to the embodiments described herein, this detailed description and accompanying material is intended to be illustrative only, and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention. What is claimed as the invention, therefore, is all such modifications as may come within the scope and spirit of the following claims and equivalents thereto.