The invention relates generally to welding and, more particularly, to systems and methods for welding in narrow grooves. The present disclosure is related to and incorporates previously filed U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/767,392, entitled “Adaptable Rotating Arc Welding Method and System,” filed on Feb. 14, 2013, previously filed U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/526,278, entitled “Metal Cored Welding Method and System,” filed on Jun. 18, 2012, previously filed U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/681,687, entitled “DC Electrode Negative Rotating Arc Welding Method and System,” filed on Nov. 20, 2012, and concurrently filed U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/481,507, entitled “Synchronized Rotating Arc Welding Method and System,” filed on Sep. 9, 2014.
A range of techniques have been developed for joining workpieces by welding operations. These include diverse processes and materials, with most modem processes involving arcs developed between a consumable or non-consumable electrode and the workpieces. The processes are often grouped in such categories as constant current processes, constant voltage processes, pulsed processes, and so forth. However, further divisions between these are common, particularly in processes that consume an electrode to add filler metal to the weld. In virtually all such cases, the process selected is highly linked to the filler material and its form, with certain processes exclusively utilizing a particular type of electrode. For example, certain types of metal inert gas (MIG) welding processes, which form part of a larger group sometimes referred to as gas metal arc welding (GMAW).
In GMAW welding, an electrode in the form of a wire is consumed by the progressing weld pool, melted by the heat of an arc between the electrode wire and the workpiece. The wire is continuously fed from a spool through welding gun where a charge is imparted to the wire to create the arc. The electrode configurations used in these processes are often referred to as either solid wire, flux cored wire, or metal cored wire. Each type is considered to have distinct advantages and disadvantages over the others, and careful adjustments to the welding process and weld settings may be required to optimize their performance. For example, solid wire, while less expensive than the other types, is typically used with inert shielding gases, which can be relatively expensive. Flux cored wires may not require separate shielding gas feeds, but are more expensive than solid wires. Metal cored wires do require shielding gas, but these may be adjusted to mixes that are sometimes less expensive than those required for solid wires.
All three of these electrode types may be used with different transfer modes, referring to the mechanical and electromechanical phenomena of moving metal from the electrode tip to the progressing weld bead. A number of such transfer modes exist, such as short circuit transfer, globular transfer, spray transfer, and pulsed spray transfer. In practice, transfer physics may appear as a hybrid of these, and the actual material transfer may transition between them during welding, although the process and electrode are often selected to maintain a certain transfer mode.
Manufacturers are constantly looking for new ways to improve automated welding methods, increase the success rate of the welded pieces, and speed up the manufacturing process overall. In particular, welding workpieces together when there is a relatively deep and narrow groove between the workpieces presents certain space constraints that are difficult to overcome even using automated welding methods.
In one embodiment, a system includes a welding torch assembly configured to establish a welding arc between an electrode and workpieces separated by a narrow groove utilizing power from a power supply while moving the electrode radially in a desired pattern by a motion control assembly within the welding torch assembly. The welding torch assembly includes a nozzle through which the electrode is fed and within which the electrode is radially moved.
In another embodiment, a system includes a welding torch assembly configured to establish a welding arc between an electrode and workpieces separated by a narrow groove utilizing power from a power supply while moving the electrode radially in a desired pattern by a motion control assembly within the welding torch assembly. The welding torch assembly comprises two separate shielding arms disposed on opposite sides of the electrode.
In another embodiment, a welding method includes establishing an arc between a welding electrode and workpieces separated by a narrow groove during a welding process. The welding method also includes feeding the electrode from a welding torch assembly while moving the electrode radially in a desired pattern by a motion control assembly within the welding torch assembly to establish a weld bead during the welding process. The welding method further includes altering a parameter of the welding process based at least in part on a position of the electrode within the narrow groove while maintaining the arc and weld bead.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood when the following detailed description is read with reference to the accompanying drawings in which like characters represent like parts throughout the drawings, wherein:
The embodiments described herein relate to a welding system for welding workpieces together, wherein the groove between the workpieces is characterized by a relatively narrow and/or deep groove (collectively referred to herein as a “narrow groove”) as compared to typical weld grooves. Certain embodiments described herein include a slim profile nozzle such that the sides of the nozzle are narrower, thereby facilitating the nozzle fitting within the narrow groove. In addition, in certain embodiments, the nozzle is retractable as the depth of the weld in the groove changes. The embodiments described herein also include a nozzle changing system such that one of a plurality of nozzles may be selected from the nozzle changing system based on the depth of the groove for a specific weld pass. For example, the weld process may begin at the bottom of the narrow groove and, as the groove is filled with deposited metal, a different nozzle may be selected to compensate for changing depth of the weld formed in the groove. In addition, in certain embodiments, tubing may be attached near the front and back (e.g., forward and aft) sides of the nozzle to deliver gas proximate the weld pool. In certain embodiments, the spin tube and contact tip may be protected with a non-conductive coating that can withstand high temperatures to prevent unintended incidental contact between the spin tube and the base metal.
Turning now to the drawings,
In the illustrated embodiment, the power supply 16 will include power conversion circuitry 26 coupled to control circuitry 28 that regulates operation of the power conversion circuitry 26 to produce power output suitable for the welding operation. The power supply 16 may be designed and programmed to produce output power in accordance with a number of processes, welding regimes, and so forth, including constant current processes, constant voltage processes, pulsed processes, short circuit transfer processes, and so forth. In a presently contemplated embodiment, the control circuitry 28 controls the power conversion circuitry 26 to produce a DCEN (sometimes referred to as a “straight” polarity) welding regime that aids in the transfer of material from the welding wire to a progressing weld bead. However, other welding regimes may of course be used. An operator interface 30 allows a welding operator to alter both the welding process and the process settings. Moreover, in certain contemplated embodiments, the operator interface 30 may allow selection modification of certain parameters related to movement of the welding torch 24 and the welding wire. Finally, the power supply 16 may include valving 32 for regulating the flow of shielding gas from the gas source 18.
The wire feeder 22 will typically include control circuitry, illustrated generally by reference numeral 34, which regulates the feed of welding wire from a spool 36, barrel, or other methods for delivering welding wire. The welding wire is advanced by a drive assembly 38, typically through the use of a small electric motor under the control of the control circuitry 34. Welding wire, gas, and control and feedback data may be exchanged between the wire feeder 22 and the welding torch 24 via a weld cable 40. The workpieces 14 are also coupled to the power supply 16 by a work cable 42 to complete an electrical circuit through the electrode 44 when an electric arc is established between the electrode 44 and the workpieces 14. As described more fully below, the electrode 44 advancing from the welding torch 24 is forced to move, such as in a rotary motion, as indicated by reference numeral 46.
The welding system 10 illustrated in
The present techniques are designed for use with solid wire, flux cored or metal cored welding wires. The characteristics of the welding wire (i.e., the electrode 44) may be selected for a particular application, particularly depending upon the metallurgy of the components to be joined, the type of shielding gas to be used, the anticipated fill volumes of the weld bead, and so forth. Certain geometries of the welding wire may assist in enhancing the benefits of the electrode movement. For example, the welding wire will typically be selected to have a desired diameter. In flux cored or metal cored welding wires, the diameter comprises a sheath wall thickness and a core diameter. These parameters may be altered and optimized to enhance the performance of the welding wire and to provide such characteristics as improved arc establishment, arc maintenance, material transfer, metallurgy of the resulting weld bead, weld bead penetration, and so forth.
In certain embodiments, specific wires may be selected for use with DCEN welding regimes. As discussed more fully below, for example, it has been found that the combination of “spin-arc” movement with DCEN processes and wires such as wires comprising stabilizers, and other components, such as manganese (e.g., AWS E5.18 70C-6; and more generally, E5.18 XXC-6, where “XX” denotes tensile strength) provide excellent results. One such wire is commercially available under the name Metalloy® X-Cel™ from Hobart Brothers of Troy, Ohio. Still further, certain formulations of welding wire are believed to provide benefits beyond those obtainable with other wires. Such formulations are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,723,954, entitled Straight Polarity Metal Cored Wire, issued to Nikodym et al. on Apr. 20, 2004; U.S. Pat. No. 7,087,860, entitled Straight Polarity Metal Cored Wire, issued to Nikodym et al. on Aug. 8, 2006; and U.S. Pat. No. 7,863,538, entitled Metal-Core Gas Metal Arc Welding of Ferrous Steels with Noble Gas Shielding, issued to Barhorst et al. on Jan. 4, 2011, which are all hereby incorporated into the present disclosure by reference. Moreover, certain composition modifications may be made to such wires to enhance their performance in DCEN processes with forced movement of the arc, as discussed below.
As described in greater detail below, the welding system 10 may also include a nozzle changing system 48, which may be used to selectively interchange nozzles of the welding torch 24 based on current operational parameters of the welding system 10, such as current depth of the weld 12 being formed in the narrow groove. It will be appreciated that the nozzle changing system 48 may be controlled by the control circuitry 28 of the power supply 16 in certain embodiments. In other words, the control circuitry 28 may determine that the current nozzle being used in the welding torch 24 should be changed based on input received from an operator via the operator interface 30, based on a timed schedule programmed into the control circuitry 28, and so forth.
As shown in
In contrast, as illustrated in
As illustrated in
Parameters that may be varied in the technique may include factors such as the rate of movement of the electrode 44, and the degree of movement of the electrode 44 about a normal or central position. In particular, while the invention is certainly not limited to a circular pattern, where circular patterns have been used, it is believed that rates of rotation higher than 50 Hz, and extending to 100-120 Hz and higher may be desirable, obtaining flatter weld beads and higher deposition rates. In some embodiments, the electrode 44 may move (e.g., spin) circumferentially while moving radially (e.g., in circular pattern). Molten balls transferred from the moving electrode 44 may have a tangential velocity due to the radial electrode movement that causes the balls to interface with the workpieces 14 at positions other than directly below where the ball detaches from the electrode 44. As described herein, the rate of radial movement of the electrode 44 may be controlled so that the balls are deposited at desired locations on the workpieces 14, the joint, and/or the weld pool. For rates of radial movement less than approximately 150 Hz, the centripetal force on the balls from the radial movement may enable substantially consistent control of the deposition location of the balls.
In general, the rate of radial movement of the electrode 44 may be greater than approximately 2.5 Hz, greater than approximately 3.0 Hz, greater than approximately 3.5 Hz, greater than approximately 4.0 Hz, greater than approximately 4.5 Hz, or greater than approximately 5.0 Hz. In some embodiments, the rate of radial movement of the electrode 44 may be between approximately 5 to 200 Hz, approximately 10 to 150 Hz, approximately 30 to 100 Hz, or approximately 50 to 90 Hz. The rate of radial movement may be based at least in part on a shielding gas, the wire diameter, the wire material, the workpiece material, the welding process, the movement pattern, or the surface tension of the molten electrode ball, or any combination thereof. The range of radial movement rates may correspond to certain types of transfer processes and/or movement patterns. For example, the radial movement rate for SAW welding processes may be less (e.g., 5 Hz to 30 Hz) than MIG welding processes, which may be utilized with radial movement rates between approximately 50 Hz to 100 Hz. In some embodiments, a figure-8 or a circular movement pattern may have a lower radial movement rate than a zigzag movement pattern. Moreover, diameters of rotation are presently contemplated on the order of approximately 1.0 to 1.5 mm, but higher diameters, such as on the order of approximately 4.0 mm may be desired. These various parameters may assist in the penetration into the base materials, the deposition of the electrode material, the maintenance of the arc, as well as other welding parameters.
It is also believed that the weld puddle may move better with movement of the electrode 44, possibly due to mechanical forces (e.g., centrifugal forces) imparted on the molten ball or spray that develops at the electrode tip. The process may thus be able to run cooler than previous processes. Enhanced benefits may be offered as well on certain types of workpieces 14 and workpiece metallurgies. Furthermore, the process may allow for less expensive shielding gasses, such as CO2 rather than argon mixes are currently used with such welding electrodes. As discussed earlier, sold wires, metal cored wires, and flux cored wires may be used with the present techniques as well and may each bring their own advantages to the process.
Because of the relatively deep and narrow nature of the narrow grooves described herein, multiple weld passes may be required to fill the groove 50 between the workpieces 14. The illustrations of the progressing weld beads illustrated in
In certain embodiments, the welding torch assembly 78 also includes a trolley system 82 that facilitates alignment of the welding torch 24 within the narrow groove 50. As illustrated, the trolley system 82 includes a trolley 84 having a plurality of wheels 86 that interface with top surfaces of the workpieces 14 to be welded together. A cylindrical welding torch body 88, through which the contact element 52 extends, is insertable and retractable into and out of a mating cylindrical aperture through the trolley 84, as illustrated by arrows 90, to facilitate insertion and extraction of a nozzle of the welding torch assembly 78 into and out of the narrow groove 50. As illustrated in
In certain embodiments, as illustrated in
In addition, in certain embodiments, shielding gas may be delivered through the upper portion 104 of the nozzle 100 into both a forward cavity 116 between the forward wall section 102 and the contact element 52 and an aft cavity 118 between the aft wall section 102 and the contact element 52. In particular, as illustrated in
It will be appreciated that, in certain embodiments, the lengths of the first and second gas delivery tubes 122, 126 may be different than illustrated in
Furthermore, in certain embodiments, the gas delivery tubes 122, 126 may not be disposed internal to the nozzle 100, but rather external to the nozzle 100. For example, as illustrated in
As described above, as welding is performed to fill the narrow groove 50 between the workpieces 14, the nozzle 100 may be gradually retracted from the groove 50 as the progressing weld moves upward between the workpieces 14. It will be appreciated that due at least in part to the changing depth as the welds are stacked on top of each other, the operational parameters of the contact element 52, the nozzle 100, and the welding torch assembly 78 as a whole may change. As such, to facilitate these changing operational parameters, the nozzle changing system 48 described above with respect to
As illustrated in
As also illustrated in
In certain embodiments, the oscillation of the contact element 52 and, thus, the welding wire electrode 44 may be controlled by the control circuitry 28 described with respect to
Additional operating parameters which affect these adjustments may include such factors as the materials of the workpieces 14, the type and size of wire electrode 44, the voltage and/or current supplied by the power supply 16, and so forth. Any and all of these operational parameters may be adjusted by the control circuitry 28 based on the other operational parameters. As a non-limiting example, the frequency and/or shape of the oscillation of the welding wire electrode 44 may be different when the welding wire electrode 44 is near one of the walls of one of the workpieces 14 than when the wire electrode 44 is near the middle of the groove 50. The operational parameters listed above may be sensed by sensors positioned throughout the system 10 or may be known by the system 10 in the case of robotic welding.
It should be noted that when parameters are adjusted, these parameters are generally controlled by the appropriate system component involved. For example, changes in weld power are adjusted by the power supply 16. Changes in wire feed speed are made by the wire feeder 22. Changes in gas flow rates may be made by the valving 32 in the power supply 16 or other similar components of the wire feeder 22. Changes in travel speed, in automated applications, are adjusted by the robot that moves the welding torch 24. Changes in spin geometry are implemented by the motion control assembly 54 that moves the welding wire electrode 44. Those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that these devices may be designed to implement the altered parameters during the welding operation.
As such, the control circuitry 28 (and/or the control circuitry 34 and/or the motion control assembly 54) may control any of the parameters described herein based at least in part on a position of the wire electrode 44 (and/or contact element 52) within the weld groove 50. For example, the parameters may be controlled by the control circuitry 28 based at least in part on a position of the wire electrode 44 (and/or contact element 52) at a depth within the weld groove 50 (e.g., as along depth d illustrated in
In addition to the foregoing examples, it has been found that the use of DCEN welding procedures with the welding wire discussed above, with mechanical movement of the arc, may provide particularly good results, and may be even more attractive on certain types of workpieces 14. For example, the Metalloy® X-Cel™ wire mentioned above is particularly well suited to reduce spatter, while enhancing weld metal wetting (avoiding overly “crowned” beads). The use of a DCEN process, moreover, with arc movement and in combination with such wires, reduces overheating.
It is currently believed that welding wires suitable for these applications (corresponding generally to the X-Cel™ wire mentioned) are characterized by components that stabilize the arc (producing stable arcs with reduced spatter). For example, such stabilizers may include potassium and compounds that contribute potassium during the welding process (such as potassium feldspar, potassium titanate, potassium manganite-titanate, potassium sulfate, potassium carbonate, potassium phosphate, potassium molybdate, potassium nitrate, potassium fluosilicate, and complex oxide compounds containing potassium). Moreover, graphitic and non-graphitic carbon sources may provide stabilization by sublimating into the arc column and by rendering finer droplet metal transfer. Possible modification of existing welding wires (such as those mentioned) could include potassium from any other or more sources noted above, and a suitable carbon source, such as graphite or carbon containing iron and/or alloy powders.
Regarding the particular DCEN processes involved, these will typically be performed at currents and voltages selected based at least in part on the electrode diameter, the electrode extension (e.g., contact tip to plate), the welding position, the workpiece or base plate type and diameter, the travel speed and deposition rates, the wire feed speed, and so forth. For example, voltages ranging from 21 to 30 Volts may be suitable, with currents ranging from 150 to 450 Amps. Moreover, regarding shielding gases, appropriate gas mixes are believed to include argon and carbon dioxide, with a minimum of 75% and a maximum of 95% argon (although other amounts and combinations may be satisfactory, such as 98% argon, 2% oxygen). Still further, it is contemplated that the DCEN polarity selected may include non-pulsed and pulsed current.
While only certain features of the invention have been illustrated and described herein, many modifications and changes will occur to those skilled in the art. It is, therefore, to be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit of the invention.
This application claims priority from and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/878,452, entitled “NARROW GROOVE WELDING METHOD AND SYSTEM,” filed Sep. 16, 2013, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2340796 | Chyle | Feb 1944 | A |
3072779 | Masters | Jan 1963 | A |
3172992 | Keller | Mar 1965 | A |
3818176 | Brown | Jun 1974 | A |
4010346 | Cecil | Mar 1977 | A |
4356378 | Cloos | Oct 1982 | A |
4441011 | Nomura | Apr 1984 | A |
4621185 | Brown | Nov 1986 | A |
4631386 | Slavens | Dec 1986 | A |
4704513 | Sugitani | Nov 1987 | A |
4717807 | Parks | Jan 1988 | A |
4835360 | Parks | May 1989 | A |
4897523 | Parks | Jan 1990 | A |
4954691 | Parks | Sep 1990 | A |
4999478 | Bushey | Mar 1991 | A |
5030812 | Sugitani | Jul 1991 | A |
5040125 | Okumura | Aug 1991 | A |
5864115 | Ikeda | Jan 1999 | A |
5938955 | Ikeda | Aug 1999 | A |
5961863 | Stava | Oct 1999 | A |
5981906 | Parker | Nov 1999 | A |
6002104 | Hsu | Dec 1999 | A |
6051810 | Stava | Apr 2000 | A |
6093906 | Nicholson | Jul 2000 | A |
6172333 | Stava | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6204478 | Nicholson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215100 | Stava | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6267291 | Blankenship | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6441342 | Hsu | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6501049 | Stava | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6510984 | Blankenship | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6536660 | Blankenship | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6708877 | Blankenship | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6723954 | Nikodym | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730875 | Hsu | May 2004 | B2 |
6909066 | Zheng | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6942139 | Lipnevicius | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7032814 | Blankenship | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7067767 | Hsu | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7087860 | Nikodym | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7109439 | Stava | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7204792 | Hagihara | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7304269 | Fulmer | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7397015 | Peters | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7683290 | Daniel | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7745757 | Enyedy | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7863538 | Barhorst | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8203099 | Peters | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8283598 | Fulmer | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8373093 | Peters | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8410398 | Daniel | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8445816 | Cole | May 2013 | B2 |
8937267 | Peters | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9511442 | Panelli | Dec 2016 | B2 |
20030116548 | Blankenship | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040026396 | Nikodym | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050103766 | Iizuka | May 2005 | A1 |
20050224480 | Lipnevicius | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20080041834 | Nishimura | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080053978 | Peters | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080245774 | Kim | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090045172 | VanErk | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090321402 | Doyle | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100176104 | Peters | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100301029 | Meckler | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110155710 | Farah | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110297658 | Peters | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120061364 | Purslow | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120097655 | Daniel | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120097656 | Peters | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120152920 | Enyedy | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120152921 | Peters | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130001210 | Pagano | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130015170 | Peters | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130043219 | Peters et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130048619 | Doyle | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130092667 | Peters | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130112675 | Peters | May 2013 | A1 |
20130146575 | Hillen | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130153557 | Pagano | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130175247 | Peters | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130193124 | Peters | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130213948 | Peters | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130228555 | Peters | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130264323 | Daniel | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140027422 | Panelli | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20150076119 | Hsu | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150076120 | Pagano | Mar 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1212215 | Jul 2005 | CN |
1665633 | Sep 2005 | CN |
101655705 | Feb 2010 | CN |
102581436 | Jul 2012 | CN |
202894634 | Feb 2013 | CN |
4315780 | Nov 1994 | DE |
0076498 | Apr 1983 | EP |
0278620 | Aug 1988 | EP |
0402648 | Dec 1990 | EP |
0824985 | Feb 1998 | EP |
1710043 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1733838 | Dec 2006 | EP |
S58107271 | Jun 1983 | JP |
S59101280 | Jun 1984 | JP |
S644875 | Jan 1989 | JP |
S1071580 | Mar 1989 | JP |
H0191965 | Apr 1989 | JP |
H0191966 | Apr 1989 | JP |
3018474 | Jan 1991 | JP |
4187380 | Jul 1992 | JP |
4200866 | Jul 1992 | JP |
0523856 | Feb 1993 | JP |
H5023856 | Feb 1993 | JP |
H2050023856 | Feb 1993 | JP |
H05309476 | Nov 1993 | JP |
H6122074 | May 1994 | JP |
0866771 | Mar 1996 | JP |
H0866771 | Mar 1996 | JP |
9094658 | Apr 1997 | JP |
H0994658 | Apr 1997 | JP |
09-094658 | Aug 1997 | JP |
H09300072 | Nov 1997 | JP |
106004 | Jan 1998 | JP |
H106004 | Jan 1998 | JP |
10052754 | Feb 1998 | JP |
H11239878 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2000158132 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000301332 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2001259838 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2002239733 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002316264 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2006159246 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2010253533 | Nov 2010 | JP |
1106619 | Aug 1984 | SU |
1593831 | Sep 1990 | SU |
2012076750 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2013045214 | Apr 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report from PCT application No. PCT/US2014/055094, dated Apr. 30, 2015, 14 pgs. |
International Search Report from PCT application No. PCT/US2014/055090, dated Dec. 18, 2014, 9 pgs. |
Steve Barhorst: “Metal cored electrode basics”, The American Welder, Dec. 31, 2000 (Dec. 31, 2000), p. 1, XP002685315, American Welding Society Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.aws.org/wj/amwelder/11-00/barhorst.html [retrieved on Oct. 16, 2012]. |
International Search Report from PCT application No. PCT/US2012/044466 dated Nov. 5, 2012, 11 pgs. |
Iwata, Shinji, Murayama, Masatoshi, and Kojima, Yuji; “Application of Narrow Gap Welding Process with High Speed Rotating Arc to Box Column Joints of Heavy Thick Plates,” JFE Technical Report, No. 14, Dec. 2009, pp. 16-21. |
Sugitani, Y, Kobayashi, Y, and Murayama, M, “Development and application of automatic high speed rotation and arc welding,” Welding International, 5 (7), pp. 577-583, 1991. |
International Search Report from PCT application No. PCT/US2012/069378 dated Apr. 2, 2013, 15 pgs. |
International Search Report from PCT application No. PCT/US2013/052356 dated Dec. 2, 2013, 15 pgs. |
Korean Office Action Appln. No. 10-2014-7019335 dated Oct. 17, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150076120 A1 | Mar 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61878452 | Sep 2013 | US |