Patent Grant
10188811
This invention relates to a nasal spray device and particularly to a nasal spray device for the delivery of a pharmaceutical formulation to the nasal cavity in metered doses.
Nasal spray devices for the delivery of medicament to the nasal cavity, particularly the nasal mucosa, can be useful for the prophylaxis and/or treatment of certain diseases and disorders of the nasal cavity. Such devices are also capable of delivering medicament to the systemic circulation via the turbinates and lymphoid tissues located at the back of the nasal cavity and to the central nervous system via the olfactory region at the top of the nasal cavity.
Nasal spray devices include unit-dose (single use) devices having syringe-like mechanisms and metered-dose devices intended for multiple usage cycles. Unit dose devices are appropriate for delivering certain medicaments such as vaccines, whereas metered-dose devices are more suited to long-term dosage regimes, for example for the treatment of rhinitis. A known metered-dose device comprises a vial containing an aqueous suspension of a suitable medicament. The vial is provided with a manually operated pump adapted to atomise metered doses of the medicament formulation for delivery to the nasal cavity. Examples of this type of nasal spray device include FLIXONASE® (fluticasone propionate, GSK), NASACORT AQ® (triamcinolone acetoinide, Sanofi-Aventis) and NASONEX® (momethasone furoate monohydrate, Schering-Plough).
Although nasal spray devices having manually operated pumps have achieved some success in the marketplace, they have a number of drawbacks. For example, manually operated pumps have a relatively large actuation force which may, for some users, such as the very young and the elderly, be difficult to achieve on a repeatable basis. Moreover, variations in the applied actuation force can lead to some users receiving medicament doses with less than optimal spray characteristics.
To address the problems associated with these known metered-dose nasal spray devices, it may be contemplated to replace the manually operated pump with a pressurised aerosol canister. A typical aerosol canister comprises a cylindrical vial containing the medicament. The medicament is typically an active ingredient together with a suitable propellant. The medicament may be in the form of a solution or a suspension in the propellant and excipients may be added to facilitate dissolution of the active ingredient (e.g. co-solvents) or to stabilise the suspension (e.g. surfactants). The vial is provided with a metering valve having an axially extending valve stem. Displacement of the valve stem relative to the vial causes the dispensation of a metered dose of the medicament formulation as an aerosol. Compared to manually operated pumps, pressurised aerosol canisters require low actuation forces and provide consistent aerosol characteristics.
However, whereas pressurised metered dose inhalers (MDIs) have found broad market acceptance in devices intended for the pulmonary administration of medicaments by inhalation via the mouth into the lungs, MDIs have not found applications in nasal spray devices. It has generally been considered that nasal spray formulations cannot tolerate the excipients found in pMDI formulations. In particular, the high levels of co-solvents, such as ethanol, found in solution formulations are poorly tolerated by patients on account of the unpleasant sensation which they produce in the nasal cavity on administration. By way of an example, WO 92/06675 describes a medicament formulation for a pMDI comprising beclomethasone dipropionate, a co-solvent and an HFA propellant. The disclosure is principally directed to administration of the formulation by inhalation into the lungs via the mouth. There is a mention that the formulation may be administered nasally; however, there is no disclosure of how this method of administration can be achieved and there is no consideration of the problem of poor patient tolerability for nasal applications.
Accordingly, the present invention provides a nasal spray device for the delivery of a pharmaceutical formulation to the nasal cavity in metered doses, the device comprising:
a pressurised aerosol canister including a vial containing a pharmaceutical formulation comprising an active ingredient, a propellant and, optionally, a co-solvent, the aerosol canister further including a metering valve having a valve stem; and
an actuator for the aerosol canister, the actuator including a stem block having a receptacle into which the valve stem of metering valve of the aerosol canister is received and axially located and being displaceable relative to the vial of the aerosol canister to actuate the metering valve of the aerosol canister, a sump extending below the receptacle, the stem block further defining a discharge orifice for the pharmaceutical formulation and a transfer channel through which a dispensed dose of the pharmaceutical formulation is able to pass from the sump to the discharge orifice,
wherein the actuator further comprises a delivery outlet for the aerosol plume, the discharge orifice being arranged to direct the aerosol plume through the delivery outlet, and wherein the device is adapted to produce an aerosol plume for a dispensed dose having a spray force value no greater than 40 mN measured at a distance of 30 mm from the discharge orifice.
In an embodiment according to the present invention, wherein the formulation is a solution formulation. In an alternative embodiment according to the present invention, wherein the formulation is a suspension formulation. Accordingly, use of the term formulation encompasses is both solution and suspension formulations.
The present invention also provides the use of the nasal spray device for the delivery of a pharmaceutical formulation (solution or suspension) to the nasal cavity in metered doses.
It has now surprisingly been found that even formulations containing high levels of co-solvent are well tolerated in a nasal spray formulation, provided the nasal spray device used to deliver the formulation to the nasal cavity is adapted to provide a so-called “soft spray”. The nasal spray device having the propellant-based formulation described hereinbelow provides the advantages of a metered dose pressurised aerosol canister without suffering from the disadvantage of poor patient tolerability.
The present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The nasal spray device of the present invention contains an active ingredient. The pharmaceutical formulation of the present invention comprises an active ingredient and a propellant. In principle, any pharmaceutically active ingredient which is soluble or suspended in the formulation and acts via the cavity, such as the nasal mucosa, may be used in the present invention. The active ingredient is generally present in the formulation of the invention in a therapeutically effective amount, i.e. an amount such that metered volumes of the medicament administered to the patient contains an amount of drug effective to exert the intended therapeutic action. Non-limiting examples of the active ingredient which may be used in the formulation of the present invention are as follows:
A therapeutically effective amount of the active ingredient needs to be delivered and this amount will vary depending on the nature of the active ingredient. A typical range is 1 μg to 1 mg. In a preferred embodiment, the nasal aerosol device of the present invention provides a delivered dose of the active ingredient of at least 50 μg, more preferably at least 60 μg and most preferably at least 70 μg, while at the same time providing the desirable “soft spray”.
The propellant of the pharmaceutical formulation of the present invention is preferably a hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) propellant, more preferably P134a (1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane), P227 (1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane) or mixtures thereof. Other hydrofluorocarbons, hydrocarbons or aliphatic gases (e.g. butane or dimethylether) may be added to modify the propellant characteristics as required. However, it is preferred that P134a and/or P227 are the sole propellants present. The propellant preferably constitutes 80% to 99% w/w, more preferably 90 to 98% w/w, based on the total weight of the formulation.
The present invention is applicable to nasal spray devices for delivering all types of pharmaceutical formulations, but is particularly effective for delivering pharmaceutical formulations which include a co-solvent for the active ingredient. The co-solvent is generally present in order to solubilise the active ingredient and the precise nature of the co-solvent will therefore depend on the nature of the active ingredient. However, the co-solvent is preferably a C2-6 aliphatic alcohol, such as ethanol or propylene glycol, and preferably ethanol. When required, the co-solvent is present in an amount sufficient to dissolve substantially all of the medicament present in the formulation and to maintain the medicament dissolved over the time period and conditions experienced by commercial aerosol products. Preferably the solvent is present in an amount to prevent precipitation of the active ingredient even at temperatures down to −20° C. The solvent is preferably anhydrous, although trace amounts of water absorbed by the ingredients, for example during manufacture of the medicament, may be tolerated. Anhydrous ethanol is particularly preferred. The co-solvent, preferably ethanol, is typically present at 1-20% w/w, more preferably 6-15% w/w and most preferably about 8% w/w, based on the total weight of the formulation.
In a specific embodiment of the present invention, the pharmaceutical formulation comprises beclomethasone dipropionate, ethanol and a propellant selected from 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (P134a), 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane (P227) and a mixture thereof. This formulation is typically used for the prophylaxis and/or treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis (including hay fever) and perennial rhinitis. The active ingredient beclomethasone dipropionate is generally present in a formulation of the present invention in a therapeutically effective amount, i.e. an amount such that metered volumes of the medicament administered to the patient contains an amount of drug effective to exert the intended therapeutic action. The aerosol formulation preferably contains 0,02% to 0,8% w/w, more preferably 0.05% to 0.5% w/w of beclomethasone dipropionate, based on the total weight of the formulation.
A preferred formulation according to the present invention comprises 0.02% to 0.6% w/w beclomethasone dipropionate, 1% to 20% w/w ethanol and 80 to 99% w/w of propellant, wherein the percentages by weight are based on the total weight of the aerosol. A particularly preferred formulation consists essentially of beclomethasone dipropionate, ethanol and a propellant selected from 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane, 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane and a mixture thereof; more preferably the formulation consists of these components.
The pharmaceutical formulation of the present invention is preferably substantially free of surfactant. Surfactants are often added to suspensions to stabilise the suspension. However, when the formulation of the present invention is a solution, a surfactant is not required. Nevertheless, small quantities can be tolerated without adversely affecting the formulation. Preferably the formulation contains no more than 0.0005% w/w of a surfactant based on the total weight of the formulation. Preferred formulations contain no surfactant. The presence of a significant amount of a surfactant is believed to be undesirable for solution formulations of beclomethasone dipropionate because surfactants such as oleic acid and lecithin are believed to promote chemical degradation of the active ingredient when the latter is dissolved in the mixture of the propellant and ethanol.
The pharmaceutical formulation of the present invention may be prepared by dissolving the desired amount of active ingredient in the desired amount of co-solvent accompanied by stirring or sonication. The aerosol canister may then be filled using conventional cold-fill or pressure-fill methods.
The present invention provides a nasal spray device for the delivery of a pharmaceutical formulation to the nasal cavity in metered doses. The device comprises a pressurised aerosol canister. Such canisters are known in the art and are commercially available. The aerosol canister 3 is typically composed of aluminium or an aluminium alloy. The internal surfaces of the aerosol canister 3 may be coated with a fluorocarbon polymer, such as PTFE or FEP, optionally together with non-fluorinated polymer to promote adhesion, such as PES. The canister includes a vial containing a pharmaceutical formulation comprising an active ingredient and a propellant. The aerosol canister further includes a metering valve having a valve stem axially displaceable relative to the vial to cause the dispensation of a metered dose of the pharmaceutical formulation through the valve stem. The device also comprises an actuator for the aerosol canister including a stem block having a receptacle into which the valve stem of the aerosol canister is received and axially located, and being displaceable relative to the vial of the aerosol canister to actuate the metering valve of the aerosol canister. The stem block further defines a discharge nozzle for the pharmaceutical formulation and a transfer channel through which a dispensed dose of the pharmaceutical formulation is able to pass from the valve stem to the discharge orifice. The actuator further comprises a delivery outlet, such as a nose piece, for the aerosol plume, the discharge orifice being arranged to direct the aerosol plume through the delivery outlet.
According to the present invention, the device is adapted to produce an aerosol plume for a dispensed dose of a formulation composition preferably having a spray force value no greater than 40 mN measured at a distance of 30 mm from the discharge orifice.
With reference to
The aerosol canister 3 is constructed to a standard design and specification and comprises a substantially cylindrical vial body 4 which contains the pharmaceutical formulation. The aerosol canister 3 is charged with a pharmaceutical formulation as described hereinabove. The vial body 4 is provided with a ferrule 5 which is crimped over a lip of the body to hermetically seal the pharmaceutical formulation under pressure.
The ferrule 5 of the aerosol canister 3 is provided with a metering valve 6 designed to deliver a metered amount of the pharmaceutical formulation to the user for each actuation of the valve 6. The metering valve 6 is of a known type available from manufacturers such as Consort Medical plc and 3M Drug Delivery Systems. See WO 99/47195 for further details of the metering valve suitable for use in the device of the present invention. The valve 6 generally comprises a metering chamber 7 (not visible in
With further reference to
Although similar in the above-described respects, the nasal spray device 1 according to the present invention differs from conventional pMDIs in two important respects.
Firstly, the actuator body 10 defines a delivery outlet in the form of a nose piece 12 (rather than a mouth piece) for delivering the atomised pharmaceutical formulation to the nasal cavity. The delivery outlet may be a tubular nose piece adapted for insertion into the nostril, and a circular end of the nose piece may have an inner diameter of 5 to 7.5 mm, preferably about 7.2 mm. The delivery outlet, the delivery orifice and the transfer channel may be aligned with each other, that is to say they may have substantially identical axes. The axis of the delivery outlet may be substantially perpendicular, or at an angle of up to 20° to the perpendicular, to the aerosol canister and the receptacle of the stem block. Preferably an axis of the nose piece 12 defines an angle of about 80° with the sleeve-like portion of the actuator body 10. The nose piece 12 directly faces the stem block 11 so that an aerosol plume produced at the valve stem can be delivered through the nose piece 12 into the nasal cavity.
Secondly, the nasal spray device 1 according to the present invention differs from conventional pMDIs in relation to the design of the stem block 11. A stem block of a conventional pMDI is moulded with a discharge orifice facing the delivery outlet, and the discharge orifice is fluidly connected to the receptacle of the stem block so that the pharmaceutical formulation is able to pass from the aerosol canister out through the delivery outlet. By comparison, the nasal spray device 1 according to the present invention has a stem block 11 that is provided with a transfer channel 13 (not shown fully in
The second part 18 of the transfer channel 13 and the discharge orifice 19 are shown as defined by a separate insert 17 received into an opening formed in the stem block 11 of the actuator 2. Such a configuration may provide a number of benefits. For example, a nasal spray device can then be configured simply by altering the design of the insert. Furthermore, the insert may be manufactured with smaller tolerances than those of other components of the nasal spray device. In this way, it may be possible to reduce unit-to-unit variation in the delivered dose and spray force value of the device. However, the device of the present invention is not limited to a separate insert and the first 14 and second parts 18 of the transfer channel 13 may be integrally formed into a unitary structure. Such a unitary structure may be produced by injection moulding.
The transfer channel 13 preferably has circular cross-section. It also preferably tapers down towards the discharge orifice 19. The transfer channel 13 may taper down towards the discharge orifice end, for example such that a side wail of the chamber defines an angle of 0.5 to 3°, preferably about 1°. It is believed that the risk of blockages may be reduced by tapering the chamber in this way. The risk of blockages may also be reduced by avoiding sharp corners in the fluid path. A further preferred feature is a maximum transverse dimension of 1.0 to 3.0 mm, preferably from 1.2 to 2 mm and most preferably about 1.5 mm. The transfer channel 13 has a length of 3 to 20 mm, more preferably 4 mm to 15 mm, more preferably 4 to 10 mm and most preferably about 7 mm. The transfer channel 13 serves as an expansion chamber for modifying the spray characteristics of the aerosol plume, in particular by reducing the spray force value for the plume, as compared to the plume generated using a device with no expansion chamber.
The discharge orifice 19 has a diameter of 0.15 to 0.65 mm, preferably 0.20 to 0.50 mm and most preferably about 0.4 mm. It is believed that discharge orifices smaller than 0.15 mm may be prone to blockages. A length of the outlet orifice, measured between the outlet end of the transfer channel 13 and the opening of the outlet orifice, (also known as the “land length”) is 0.5 to 1.0 mm, preferably 0.6 to 0.9 mm and most preferably about 0.65 mm. The length of the outlet orifice is believed to be significant because it may strongly influence the shape (spread) of the aerosol plume. A focused plume is important in ensuring that a large proportion of the dose is delivered to the nasal cavity of the user and not retained on the surfaces of the actuator 2.
Before use of the nasal spray device 1 described hereinabove, the user shakes the device 1 several times, as is normal practice for pMDIs. To use the device 1, the user inserts the nose piece 12 into a nostril and depresses the exposed end of the aerosol canister 3. Displacement of the canister 3 relative to the valve stem 8 causes actuation of the metering valve 6 and a metered amount of the pharmaceutical formulation is vented from the metering chamber in the aerosol canister 3. The formulation passes through the sump 15 and into the transfer channel 13 where it undergoes controlled expansion, before finally being discharged through the discharge orifice 19 and the nose piece 12.
As described hereinabove, the present invention provides a nasal spray device in which the conventionally unpleasant effects of using a propellant-based formulations are avoided by providing the device with soft spray characteristics; by which is meant a spray force value of no greater than 40 mN measured at 30 mm from the discharge orifice 19. The minimum spray force is less critical and may be any positive non-zero value. Preferably the spray force is 10 to 40 mN measured at 30 mm from the discharge orifice 19. It has been found that such soft sprays are well tolerated by users and allows pMDI technology to be applied to the nasal delivery of medicaments, thereby avoiding the disadvantages associated with pump-action devices.
The desired spray force value may be achieved by appropriate combination of the orifice diameter, land length and the geometry of the transfer channel as described hereinabove. In particular, a lower spray force value is favoured by a smaller orifice diameter. However, a longer land length and a geometry of the transfer channel such that the transverse dimension tapers down towards the discharge orifice is also preferred. Moreover, a balance must be obtained in order to prevent deposition of the active ingredient on the internal surfaces of the device which in turn can lead to reduced dose uniformity and even clogging of the device. In a preferred embodiment, the discharge orifice has a diameter of 0.16 to 0.65 mm and a length of 0.5 to 1.0 mm, and the transfer channel has a transverse dimension which tapers down towards the discharge orifice end.
It has further been found that the proportion of the dose of active ingredient that is retained by the device described herein may be no greater than 40%, preferably no greater than 30% and more preferably no greater than 20%. It has been found that the delivered dose uniformity of the device may be acceptable, with a relative standard deviation (RSD) no greater than 20%, preferably no greater than 10%.
The spray force value is given as the value measured at a predetermined distance, typically 30 mm, from the discharge orifice 19. Spray force values may be measured using conventional techniques, such as with an impaction plate coupled to a digital load cell, e.g. a Copley SFT 1000 spray force tester available from Copley Scientific Limited, Nottingham, United Kingdom. This device comprises a circular impaction plate coupled to a digital load mail for measuring forces acting on the impaction plate. The device includes a movable carriage to which a spray device is mounted so that its spray outlet is centred on and faces the impaction plate. The spray device is then actuated and the load cell measures the spray force value of the spray.
Spray force values are measured under controlled conditions of temperature of 25° C., pressure of 101 kPa and relative humidity of 50%. The impaction plate is mounted in a vertical orientation. The spray device is mounted in the movable carriage so that the discharge orifice of the device is positioned 30 mm from the impaction plate. The spray device is then actuated and the maximum compression force of the impaction plate recorded. Six actuations are measured for each device to be tested. The mean of these six values is recorded as the spray force value for the device. The measurements are preferably taken using an actuation velocity of 70 mm/s and an acceleration of 7,000 mm/s2, although this is not critical as the spray force is not significantly affected by these variables.
Spray force values for a nasal spray device according to the present invention were measured using a variety of actuation velocities and accelerations. The device tested was of the type shown in
The testing was carried out using a Copley SFT 1000 spray force tester available from Copley Scientific Limited, Nottingham, United Kingdom following the test procedure described hereinabove. The nasal spray device according to the present invention (Example 1) was actuated for the tests using a SPRAYVIEW® Vereo MDx Automated Actuation System available from Proveris Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, Mass., USA. The manual pump-type nasal spray devices (Comparative Examples 1 to 3) were actuated using a SPRAYVIEW® Vereo NSx Automated Actuation System available from Proveris Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, Mass., USA.
The actuation velocities and accelerations used for the testing, together with the results of the testing, are set out in Table 2. The results are also illustrated in
Statistical analysis was performed on the results for all four devices tested to look for significant sources of variation in the spray force value data. The following equation was used to conduct ANOVA (Analysis of Variance):
yijk=μ+τi+vj+αk+(vα)jk+(τv)ij+(τα)jk+(τvα)ijk+εijk (equation 1)
The ANOVA yielded values of F for each source of possible variation. The F values and associated p-values are recorded in Table 3.
It will be seen from Table 3 that the spray force value data is significantly affected by the particular device being used, the velocity of actuation, and the interaction of the device and the velocity of actuation. Subsequently, reduced ANOVA for the manual pump-type nasal spray devices only (Comparative Examples 1 to 3) was conducted. The following equation was used:
yijk=μ+τj+vj+αk+(vα)jk+εijk (equation 2)
The F values and associated p-values are recorded in Table 4.
It will be seen from Table 4 that velocity of actuation is a significant source of variation for spray force values of manual pump-type nasal spray devices. Reduced ANOVA was also conducted for the nasal spray device according to the present invention (Example 1). The following equation was used:
yijk=μ+vj+αk+(vα)jk+εjk (equation 3)
The F values and associated p-values are recorded in Table 5.
It will be seen from Table 5 that none of velocity of actuation, acceleration of actuation and the interaction between velocity and acceleration of actuation are considered to be significant sources of variation for spray force values. Accordingly, the nasal spray device according to the present invention provides the advantage of consistent spray force values, regardless of the velocity and/or acceleration of actuation. This advantage is particularly important in relation to use by the very young and the elderly, who may find it difficult to actuate the device repeatedly with a consistent velocity.
Further testing was carried out on the test devices of the type shown in
The nasal spray devices were tested for spray force values using the test procedure set out hereinabove. The results of the testing are set out in Table 7.
It will be seen that all four examples provided spray force values no greater than 40 mN. The two comparative examples provided spray force values in excess of this figure, and are therefore outside the scope of the present invention. In all cases the relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 20%. It will be appreciated that the spray force value fora nasal spray device according to the present invention depends to a large degree on the size and shape of the stem block insert. In general, for any given dose size, lower spray force values may be obtained with smaller orifice diameters and with shorter insert lengths.
The nasal spray devices were also tested for spray content uniformity (SCU) to measure variation in delivered doses of the active ingredient. The results of this hosting are set out in Table 8.
It will be seen that all of the tested examples and comparative examples provided a delivered dose through the actuator of at least 70 μg, with an acceptable relative standard deviation (RSD). Furthermore, in all cases, less than 40% of the dose delivered through the valve was retained on the surfaces of the actuator. Examples 2 and 4, for which the insert length was 10 mm, exhibited markedly reduced retention of the dose in the actuator.
This patent application is a continuation patent application of U.S. Non-Provisional patent application Ser. No. 13/271,940, filed Oct. 12, 2011, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/392,223, filed Oct. 12, 2010, each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5116311 | Lofstedt | May 1992 | A |
| 7055541 | Seifert et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 20030178022 | Davies | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20050220717 | Wu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060107949 | Davies et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20070175469 | Rohrschneider et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20080163874 | Djupesland | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080203193 | Kakade | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20090050158 | Wassenaar et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090159081 | Stadelhofer | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20100218760 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 412524 | Feb 1991 | EP |
| 2367011 | Mar 2002 | GB |
| WO 9206675 | Apr 1992 | WO |
| WO 9947195 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO 0078286 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO 0158508 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Intellectual Property Office of Singapore Written Opinion of counterpart Singapore Patent Application No. 201302792-5, dated Jan. 10, 2014. |
| Newman, S.P., et al. Principles of Metered-Dose Inhaler Design, Respir Care, Sep. 1, 2005, vol. 50, No. 9, pp. 1177-1190. |
| International Preliminary Report of Patentability corresponding to International Application No. PCT/EP2011/005118, dated Apr. 16, 2013. |
| Guo, C. et al., Assessment of the influence factors on in vitro testing of nasal sprays using Box-Behnken experimental design, European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 35, No. 5, Dec. 18, 2008, pp. 417-426. |
| Gabrio, B. J., Stein, S. W. , Velasquez, D. J., A new method to evaluate plume characteristics of hydrofluoroalkane and chlorofluorocarbon metered dose inhalers, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 186, No. 1, Sep. 10, 1999, pp. 3-12. |
| Changning, Guo et al., Evaluation of Impaction Force of Nasal Sprays and Metered-Dose Inhalers Using the Texture Analyser, Dec. 18, 2008, J of Pharmaeceutrical Scienses, vol. 98, No. 8, 2799-2806. |
| European Patent Office Communication, “Extended European Search Report,” dated Jun. 24, 2015, corresponding to Application No. 15164095.0-1662, 8 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160082204 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61392223 | Oct 2010 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13271940 | Oct 2011 | US |
| Child | 14865823 | US |
