Nasal valve treatment method and apparatus

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10292812
  • Patent Number
    10,292,812
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, April 12, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 21, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
A method and apparatus for treating a nasal valve condition including surgically forming an access path to create a pocket on a side of the patient's nose. The pocket is positioned between a soft tissue layer and opposing surfaces of upper and lower cartilages of the nose. The pocket spans a junction between the upper and lower cartilages. An implant is placed through the access path into the pocket with a length oriented to span the junction. A delivery system for placement of the implant includes a surgical tool for forming the access path and for delivering the implant into the access path.
Description
II.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


This invention pertains to a treatment method and apparatus for treating a nasal valve. More particularly, this invention pertains to a method and apparatus for treating a nasal valve collapse.


2. Description of the Prior Art


Nasal valve dysfunction is a prevalent medical condition. Nasal valve collapse is due to weakness of the lateral wall of the nose. At the junction of the upper and lower nasal cartilages, this wall moves medially during the inspiratory phase of nasal breathing.


The nasal valve acts as a restriction to nasal airflow. The nasal valve disrupts the laminar flow characteristics of air, which would otherwise insulate the airflow from the mucosa of the nose. The nasal valve imparts an airflow disturbance which performs crucial nasal functions of mixing in the air stream and enhancing the air/mucosa contacts that are essential for effective exchanges of heat, water and contaminants between inspiratory air and the nasal mucosa. A description of the nasal valve and its functions are more fully described in Cole, “The Four Components of the Nasal Valve”, American Journal of Rhinology, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 107-110 (2003). See also, Cole, “Biophysics of Nasal Air Flow: A Review”, American Journal of Rhinology, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 245-249 (2000).


While the airflow restriction of the nasal valve is an important function, a weakened or otherwise compromised nasal valve can obstruct the nasal passage. Such compromise of the nasal valve can be a function of aging. Also, such compromise can result from prior nasal surgery which commonly include cosmetic surgeries.


Surgery to strengthen the nasal valve has been shown to significantly improve quality of life. Rhee, et al., “Nasal Valve Surgery Improves Disease—Specific Quality of Life”, Laryngoscope, Vol. 115, pp. 437-440 (2005). The most common procedure for treating nasal valve collapse is so-called alar batten grafting. In batten grafting, a patient's cartilage is harvested from any one of a number of locations such as the nasal septum or the ear. The cartilage is sculpted to an appropriate size and shape and beveled on the edges for improved cosmetics. The batten graft is placed through either an external or endonasal approach. A pocket is formed overlying the cartilages of the nose with the pocket sized to receive the batten graft. Placement of the batten graft is shown in FIG. 4 (page 577) of Millman, et al., “Alar Batten Grafting for Management of the Collapsed Nasal Valve”, Laryngoscope, Vol. 112, pp. 574-579 (2002). Other nasal valve surgeries are described in Kalan, et al., “Treatment of External Nasal Valve (Alar Rim) Collapse with an Alar Strut”, Journal of Laryngology and Otology, Vol. 115, pages 788-791 (2001); Karen, et al., “The Use of Percutaneous Sutures for Graft Fixation in Rhinoplasty”, Archives Facial Plastic Surgery, Vol. 5, pp. 193-196 (2003) and Fanous, “Collapsed Nasal-Valve Widening by Composite Grafting to the Nasal Floor”, Journal of Otolaryngology, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 313-316 (1996).


The harvesting of a portion of the patient's natural cartilage is an additional procedure and requires sculpting or other modification of the graft prior to use. Accordingly, synthetic nasal dilators have been suggested. An example of such is found in U.S. Pat. No. 6,106,541 to Hurbis dated Aug. 22, 2000. In the '541 patent, the nasal dilator has a V-shape with an apex placed over the bridge of the nose to support the nose in a manner similar to that of external nasal dilators such as devices sold under the “BREATHE RIGHT” trademark by CNS Inc., 1250 Park Road, Chanhassen, Minn. 55317 and as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,533,499. Other types of external nasal dilators are known such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. RE. 35,408. Other examples include U.S. Pat. No. 6,322,590 to Sillers et al., dated Nov. 27, 2001. Less invasive procedures include the placement of a device within the nasal cavity without surgically implanting the device. However, such devices can be uncomfortable and may require the patient to remove and replace the device on a periodic basis.


The structure of an implant for treating the nasal valve should consider the ease by which such a device may be placed as well as cosmetic effects following placement of the device. Devices requiring a general anesthetic or intravenous anesthetic can only be placed in a hospital setting. It is desirable that a device for treating nasal valves be designed to accommodate placement in an office setting requiring only needle injection local anesthetic.


III.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the method and apparatus are disclosed for treating a nasal valve condition. The method includes surgically forming an access path to create a pocket on a side of the patient's nose. The pocket is positioned between a soft tissue layer (external skin or nasal mucosa) and opposing surfaces of upper and lower cartilages of the nose. The pocket spans a junction between the upper and lower cartilages. An implant is selected having a length, width and thickness sized to reside within the pocket. The length is sized to span the junction. The width is sized to be less than the width of the upper and lower cartilages. The thickness of the implant is as thin as possible while maintaining material strength to resist bending in response to inhalation pressures at the nasal valve. The implant is placed through the access path into the pocket with the length oriented spanning the junction. A delivery system for placement of the implant includes a surgical tool for forming the access path and for delivering the implant into the access path.





IV.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the front, top and left side of a patient's nose showing skeletal components and cartilages;



FIG. 2 is a bottom plan view of the components of FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 is a right side elevation view of the components of FIG. 1;



FIG. 4 is a schematic view of upper and lower cartilages (between inner and outer soft tissue layers) with the nasal valve components shown in a non-collapsed state;



FIG. 5 is the view of FIG. 4 showing the nasal valve components shown in a collapsed state;



FIG. 6 is the view of FIG. 3 showing a relative placement of a first embodiment of an implant according to the present invention;



FIG. 7 is the view of FIG. 6 showing a relative placement of a second embodiment of an implant according to the present invention;



FIG. 8 is a perspective view of a first embodiment of an implant according to the present invention;



FIG. 9 is a side elevation view of the implant of FIG. 8;



FIG. 10 is a perspective view of a second embodiment of the implant according to the present invention;



FIG. 11 is a side cross-sectional view of the implant of FIG. 10;



FIG. 12 is a top plan view of a delivery apparatus according to the present invention shown in a fully retracted state;



FIG. 13 is a side sectional view taken along line 13-13 of FIG. 12 and showing the apparatus forming a pocket between nasal cartilage and mucosa and prior to delivery of the implant of FIGS. 10 and 11;



FIG. 14 is a top, front and left side perspective view of the delivery apparatus of FIG. 12;



FIG. 15 is the view of FIG. 12 showing the apparatus in position for delivery of the implant into a pocket formed between the cartilage and the mucosa;



FIG. 16 is a view similar to FIG. 13 and taken along line 16-16 of FIG. 15 showing the implant releasing from the delivery apparatus;



FIG. 17 is a perspective view of the apparatus of FIG. 15;



FIG. 18 is a view similar to that of FIGS. 12 and 15 showing a slider mechanism partially retracted for leaving an implant within a pocket;



FIG. 19 is a view similar to FIGS. 13 and 16 and taken along line 19-19 of FIG. 18 showing an implant within a formed pocket and showing partial retraction of a slider mechanism;



FIG. 20 is a perspective view of the apparatus of FIG. 18;



FIG. 21 is a view showing the implant of FIGS. 10 and 11 in a pocket between cartilage and mucosa and with the delivery tool fully retracted;



FIG. 22 is a view showing the implant of FIGS. 8 and 9 in a pocket between cartilage and mucosa and with the delivery tool fully retracted; and



FIG. 23 is a bottom plan view of a nose of a patient showing incision locations for beginning an implantation procedure according to the present invention.





V.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

With reference now the various drawing figures in which identical elements are numbered identically throughout, a description of the preferred embodiment of the present invention will now be provided.


A. Anatomy


Before proceeding with a description of the apparatus and method of the present invention, a review of relevant anatomy will facilitate an understanding of the present invention. FIGS. 1-3 show in perspective, bottom plan and right side elevation, respectively, components of the nose with skeletal muscle, soft tissue (such as external skin or nasal mucosa) and blood vessels removed.


The nose N includes nasal bone NB at an upper end of the nose. The bottom of the nose N includes the lower cartilage also referred to as the major alar cartilage. There is both a right lower cartilage RLC and a left lower cartilage LLC, which are generally symmetrical in structure.


The lower cartilages RLC, LLC include an external component referred to as the lateral crus LC and an internal component referred to as the medial crus MC. The medial crus and septal nasal cartilage create a nasal septum NS that divides the nose N into a left nostril LN and a right nostril RN.


Upper cartilages reside between the lower cartilages and the nasal bones NB. The upper cartilages include both a right upper cartilage RUC and a left upper cartilage LUC separated by a septal cartilage SC extending down the bridge of the nose N. The opposing edges of the lower cartilage LLC, RLC and upper cartilage LUC, RUC may move relative to one another. Disposed between the opposing edges is an accessory nasal cartilage (left and right) LANC, RANC.


Both inner and outer surfaces of the cartilages LLC, RLC, LUC, RUC and LANC, RANC are covered with soft tissue shown schematically in FIGS. 4 and 5 as an inner mucosal tissue MT and an outer skin tissue ST. In FIGS. 4 and 5 only the left upper and lower cartilages LUC, LLC are shown with positioning relative to the septum NS.


When congested, during inhalation, airflow through the nostrils creates an inward pressure at the junction between the upper and lower cartilages. This pressure is expressed as a function of nasal resistance which is estimated as 10 centimeters of water per one liter per second. Cole, “The Four Components of the Nasal Valve”, American Journal of Rhinology, pages 107-110 (2003).


In response to these forces, a weakened nasal valve may collapse inwardly as illustrated in FIG. 5. In FIG. 5, it will be appreciated that the inward deflection is exaggerated for ease of illustration. It will be noted with reference to FIGS. 4 and 5 that the junction between the upper and lower cartilages is a hinge point at the inward deflection.


B. Implant



FIGS. 8-11 illustrate examples of implants in which can be placed on the nasal cartilages for treatment according to the present invention. The implant of FIGS. 8 and 9 is substantially rectangular with the implant 10 having dimensions including a length L, width W and thickness T. The implant 10 has rounded ends 11. The flat implant 10 has a small curvature R between the ends 11 with the first surface 10a concave and the second surface 10b convex. The length L is sized to span the junction J (FIG. 6) between the upper and lower cartilages (i.e., greater than a spacing between LUC, LLC and RUC, RLC). The width W is sized to be less than the width W* (FIG. 6) of the upper and lower cartilages such that the apparatus 10 may be placed opposing the cartilages and reside completely on one side of the nose without extending over the bridge of the nose N. The width W of the implant 10 may be greater than the length L of the implant 10.


As will be more fully described, the implant 10 may be placed opposing the outer surfaces of the cartilages (between the cartilages and skin) or may be placed opposing the inner surfaces of the cartilages (between the cartilages and mucosa). The thickness T of the implant is selected so that when opposing the outer surfaces of the cartilages beneath a skin layer, the implant 10 does not substantially alter the external appearance of the skin. When placed opposing the internal surfaces of the cartilages, the implant thickness avoids adding to an obstruction or a narrowing of the nasal passage.


By way of a non-limiting example, the length L may be six millimeters, the width W three millimeters, and the thickness T may be 0.4 millimeters. The radius of curvature R is 12.5 mm. The height H is 0.74 mm. The height H is the distance between the plane of the ends 11 to the maximum thickness of the implant 10. In the event, the implant 10 is not formed with a curvature R, the height H equals the thickness T.



FIGS. 10 and 11 illustrate an alternative embodiment of the implant. The implant 10′ is a disk having a diameter D′ of 6 millimeters. For the purpose of interpreting the present application and the claims which are appended hereto, the disk 10′ has a length of 6 millimeters and a width of 6 millimeters.


The disk 10′ is a hollow dome 12′ with a radius of curvature R′ of 6.0 mm for a total height H′ of 0.7 millimeters. The first surface 10a′ of the implant 10′ is concave and the second surface 10b′ is convex. The disk 10′ includes an annular flange portion 11′ having a diameter D″ of 0.5 millimeters. The wall thickness T′ is 0.4 mm.


The disk 10′ has an added advantage over the elongated implant 10 in that orientation of the implant 10′ relative to the cartilage is not critical. Further, the dome 12 provides an opportunity for improved tactile feel for a surgeon identifying positioning of the implant 10′ by feeling for the implant by palpating the soft tissue.



FIG. 6 shows placement of the implant 10 on the upper and lower cartilages RUC, RLC with the implant 10 spanning the junction J between the cartilages and residing completely on the right side of the nose. It will be appreciated that an identical implant identically placed is positioned on the left side of the nose overlying the left upper cartilage LUC and the left lower cartilage LLC. FIG. 7 is a similar view to that of FIG. 6 with the implant 10′ similarly positioned spanning the upper and lower cartilages RUC, RLC.


It will be appreciated that while the implants 10, 10′ in FIGS. 6 and 7 are shown on the interior surfaces of the upper and lower cartilages RUC, RLC, the implants 10, 10′ can be placed opposing the exterior surfaces of the upper and lower cartilages RUC, RLC with the same relative positioning over the junction J between the cartilages. FIGS. 21 and 22 show the implants 10′, 10 placed against the internal surfaces of the cartilages LUC, LLC in a schematic representation with the implants 10′, 10 spanning the junction J between the cartilages LUC, LLC. FIGS. 21 and 22 are not to scale and the amount of alteration of the contour of the mucosal tissue MT is exaggerated.


The implants 10, 10′ may be formed of any suitable material such as steel, titanium, PTFE, hydroxylapitite or any other bio-compatible material having a sufficient stiffness to resist deformation in response to the pressures and suctions within the nostril. While the implants 10, 10′ are shown smooth, they could be provided with ribs or other raised surfaces or surface deformations to assist the surgeon in palpating for the implant following placement. Further, the devices 10, 10′ could be provided with tissue in-growth surfaces either through surface modification or application of in-growth agents. Also, the devices could be drug-eluting to facilitate a healing process following implantation.


C. Delivery System



FIGS. 12-20 illustrate a delivery apparatus 20 for placing the implant in a minimally invasive procedure. Apparatus 20 includes a handle 22, a flat blade 24, and a slider mechanism 26. The apparatus 20 is preferably disposable with the handle 22 formed of rigid plastic and, at its proximal end, may include raised ribs 28 or other surface contours to facilitate gripping by a surgeon.


The blade 24 is secured to the handle 22 and projects away there from in a common plane. The blade 24 includes a blade tip 30 aligned with the longitudinal axis of the handle 22. Knife edges 30a extend outwardly and rearward away from the tip 30 on both sides thereof and include edges 30b extending substantially parallel and spaced from the longitudinal axis X-X of the handle 22.


The blade 24 includes an opening 25 extending through the blade 24. The opening 25 is sized to pass an implant as previously described. In the embodiment shown in the figures, the apparatus 20 is designed for delivery of the disk implant 10′ of FIGS. 10 and 11. Accordingly, the opening 25 is circular in shape having a diameter greater than the diameter of the implant 10′. For delivery of the implant 10 of FIGS. 8 and 9, the opening 22 would be provided with a length aligned with the longitudinal axis of the handle 22 and with a length and width of the opening being greater than the length and width of the implant 10.


The slider mechanism 26 includes a body portion 34, which is received within a slot 36 formed in the handle 22. Accordingly, the sliding mechanism 26 may be urged by a surgeon to move along the longitudinal axis of the handle 22. The body portion 34 has raised ribs 38 for easy gripping by a surgeon.


A distal end of the slider 26 includes a hole 40 (FIG. 13) sized to receive the implant 10′ and retain the implant in the hole 40 as the slider mechanism 26 is moved relative to the handle 22. The first surface 10a′ of the implant 10′ opposes the handle 22. In FIGS. 12-14, the slider mechanism 26 is shown in a retracted position with the hole 40 positioned proximal relative to the hole 25 and the blade 24. The slider mechanism 34 also includes a leaf spring 44 having a proximal end secured to the slider mechanism 26 and with a distal end 45 positioned opposing second surface 10b′ of the implant 10′ within hole 40.


The spring 44 urges the implant 10′ towards the handle 22. Slots, aligned with the longitudinal axis of the handle 22 and blade 24, are formed in the handle 22, blade 24 and slider 26 so that the spring 44 may travel to a full rest position shown in FIG. 19. FIG. 13 shows the spring 44 biased against its spring constant to a deflected position.


In the retracted positions of FIGS. 12-14, the spring 44 captures the implant 10′ within the hole 40. When the slider mechanism 26 is moved relative to the handle 22, the implant 10′ is urged to move with the slider mechanism 26.



FIG. 15-17 illustrate the apparatus 20 in a deployed position with the implant 10′ positioned over the hole 25. In the deployed position, the spring 44 urges the implant 10′ through the hole 25 to a bottom surface of the handle.


In FIGS. 18-20, the apparatus 20 is shown in the process of being retracted from the surgical site. A bottom side of the distal end of the spring 44 is curved to have a thickness to completely urge the implant through the hole 25. At the bottom surface 24a of the blade 24, the hole 25 is angled outwardly (e.g., at 25a) so that the surfaces of the blade act as a cam surface to ride over the implant 10′ to leave the implant in a desired location as will be described.


D. Delivery of Implant


In order to place an implant, the surgeon uses a local anesthetic to anesthetize the incision locations of the nose. FIG. 23 illustrates incision location IL at the alar rim near the nostrils so that the incisions IL do not having a cosmetic appearance for the patient. FIG. 23 shows incision locations IL on both the left and right side of the nose. It will be appreciated that a separate apparatus 20 is used for deploying a separate implant on the left and right sides of the nose.



FIGS. 12-20 illustrate, in sequence, placement of an implant 10′ on the left side of the nose with the implant between the cartilages LUC, LLC and an inner mucosal tissue MT. It will be appreciated the implant 10′ can be similarly placed between the cartilages LUC, LLC and the outer skin tissue ST.


The surgeon grasps the apparatus 20 which is preloaded with the implant 10′ and with the apparatus 20 in the fully retracted position of FIGS. 12-14. The surgeon then makes the incision at the alar rim of the nose using the blade tip 30 to form the incisions.


Using the blade 24 to form a pocket P from the incision location IL to the junction between the upper and lower cartilages, the surgeon advances the tool 20 toward the lower cartilage. The surgeon may guide the tool 20 so that an incision path is formed, at the surgeon's option, against the upper surfaces of the cartilages or against the lower surfaces of the cartilages. Since the tool 20 presents a thickness of extremely low profile, the incision tool 20 forms an incision pathway separating the mucosal layer MT from the cartilages LUC, LLC.


The surgeon advances the tool so that the blade 24 forms a pocket P on the side of the nose (again, at the surgeon's option, between the outer skin tissue ST and the cartilages or between the inner mucosal tissue MT and the cartilages). The pocket P is positioned between the soft tissue layer (mucosal tissue ST in the example of FIG. 13) and opposing the upper and lower cartilages LUC, LLC of the nose. Further, the pocket spans a junction J between the upper and lower cartilages as illustrated in FIG. 13. FIG. 13 illustrates the fully retracted device 20 positioned with the opening 25 spanning the junction J between the upper and lower cartilages LUC, LLC.


When the physician determines that the positioning of FIG. 13 has been achieved, the physician then urges the slider mechanism 26 forward to the position of FIGS. 15-17 at which point the leaf spring 44 urges the implant 10′ through the hole 25 and with assurance that the implant 10′ is positioned with its length spanning the junction J and with a first surface 10a′ of the implant 10′ opposing the upper and lower cartilages and with a second surface 10b′ of the implant 10′ opposing the soft tissue (mucosal tissue MT in FIG. 19).


The surgeon then retracts the apparatus 20 leaving the slide in the deployed position (as shown in FIGS. 18-20). During the retraction, the angled surfaces of the blade 24 permit the blade to ride over the implant 10′. The spring 44 continues to urge against the implant 10′ to avoid the implant 10′ moving back into the hole 25 and being retracted with the handle.


As illustrated in FIG. 21, when the handle 22 is fully retracted, the implant 10′ remains in the pocket P spanning the cartilages LUC, LLC and residing between the cartilages and the mucosal tissue MT. The implant 10′, by reason of its material strength, strengthens the cartilages LUC, LLC at the junction and resists excessive inward movement of the cartilages during inhalation.


Particularly on the inside of the nostrils, the mucosal tissue MT is tight against the cartilages LUC, LLC. As a result, sutures or other attachment mechanisms are not necessary since the soft tissue will hold the implant in its desired positioning spanning the junction of the cartilages. However, if desired, the implant could be sutured or, provided with a bio-adhesive for adhering to the cartilages or the soft tissue at the desired positioning. Also, if so desired, the implants can be formed with surfaces to promote tissue in-growth to maintain their relative positioning in the position shown in FIGS. 21 and 22.


Having disclosed the invention in a preferred embodiment, modifications and equivalents may occur to one of ordinary skill in the art. It is intended that such modifications and equivalents be included within the scope of the claims.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus for use in a treatment of a nasal valve condition of a patient's nose where said treatment includes surgically forming an access path to create a pocket on a side of said nose with said pocket positioned between a soft tissue layer and opposing upper and lower cartilages of said nose, and with said pocket spanning a junction between upper and lower cartilages on said side of said nose; said apparatus comprising: a. an implant having a curvature, said implant having a length, width and thickness sized for said implant to reside within said pocket with: i. said length sized to span said junction,ii. said width sized to be less than a width of said upper and lower cartilages on said side,iii. said thickness separating first and second surfaces of said implant and said thickness sized to be smaller than either of said length and width, said first surface defining a concave surface with an open volume underneath the concave surface, said second surface defining a convex surface,iv. said implant is a disk with an annular flange having a diameter defined by the length and width, the length and width being equal, wherein the annular flange is flat and extends from the concave surface;b. said implant is non-collapsible in response to pressures and suctions within a nostril to prevent a collapse of said nasal valve and is configured to provide a tactile feel of the convex surface through the soft tissue layer to assist in locating the implant after implantation; andc. said implant includes a tissue in-growth surface, wherein said implant is made of a material selected from a group of: steel, titanium, PTFE, and hydroxyl apitite, and wherein the material is solid.
  • 2. An apparatus according to claim 1 wherein said implant is a domed body.
  • 3. An apparatus for use in a treatment of a nasal valve condition of a patient's nose where said treatment includes surgically forming an access path to create a pocket on a side of said nose with said pocket positioned between a soft tissue layer and opposing upper and lower cartilages of said nose, and with said pocket spanning a junction between upper and lower cartilages on said side of said nose; said apparatus comprising: a. an implant having a domed body that includes an annular flange, said implant having a length, width and thickness sized for said implant to reside within said pocket with: i. said length sized to span said junction,ii. said width sized to be less than a width of said upper and lower cartilages on said side;iii. said thickness separating first and second surfaces of said implant and said thickness sized to be smaller than either of said length and width, said first surface defining a concave surface with an open volume underneath the concave surface, said second surface defining a convex surface,iv. said implant is a disk having a diameter defined by the length and width, the length and width being equal, wherein the concave surface has a radius of curvature of 6.0 millimeters, wherein the annular flange is flat with a diameter of 0.5 millimeters and extends from the concave surface; andb. said implant is further selected to prevent collapse of the nasal valve in response to inhalation pressures at said nasal valve and configured to provide a tactile feel of the domed body through the soft tissue layer to assist in locating the implant after implantation, and wherein said implant is made of a material selected from a group of: steel, titanium, PTFE, and hydroxyl apitite, wherein the material is solid.
  • 4. An apparatus for use in a treatment of a nasal valve condition of a patient's nose where said treatment includes surgically forming an access path to create a pocket on a side of said nose with said pocket positioned between a soft tissue layer and opposing upper and lower cartilages of said nose, and with said pocket spanning a junction between upper and lower cartilages on said side of said nose; said apparatus comprising: a. an implant having a curvature with raised surface deformations located on the curvature, wherein the raised surface deformations are ribs that are configured to provide a tactile feel through the soft tissue layer to assist in locating the implant after implantation, said implant having a length, width and thickness sized for said implant to reside within said pocket with: i. said length sized to span said junction,ii. said width sized to be less than a width of said upper and lower cartilages on said side,iii. said thickness separating first and second surfaces of said implant and said thickness sized to be smaller than either of said length and width, said first surface defining a concave surface with an open volume underneath the concave surface, said second surface defining a convex surface,iv. said implant is a disk having a diameter defined by the length and width, the length and width being equal, wherein the curvature and a wall thickness of the implant define the height of the disk; andb. said implant is non-collapsible in response to pressures and suctions within a nostril to prevent a collapse of said nasal valve and wherein said implant is made of a material selected from a group of: steel, titanium, PTFE, and hydroxyl apitite, and wherein the material is solid.
I.

This application is a divisional of application Ser. No. 11/144,354, filed Jun. 3, 2005, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 7,947,076, which application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (111)
Number Name Date Kind
261501 Vandermark Jul 1882 A
3395709 Rubin Aug 1968 A
3866249 Flom Feb 1975 A
4055378 Feneberg et al. Oct 1977 A
4105035 Rella Aug 1978 A
4147164 Behney Apr 1979 A
D263747 Jaramillo et al. Apr 1982 S
4466705 Michelson Aug 1984 A
4700692 Baumgartner Oct 1987 A
4753636 Free Jun 1988 A
4778466 Brotman Oct 1988 A
4787903 Grendahl Nov 1988 A
4898461 Portney Feb 1990 A
4900304 Fujioka et al. Feb 1990 A
4938234 Capriotti Jul 1990 A
4941874 Sandow et al. Jul 1990 A
4950234 Fujioka et al. Aug 1990 A
4952045 Stoyan Aug 1990 A
4995714 Cohen Feb 1991 A
4995715 Cohen Feb 1991 A
5030232 Pham Jul 1991 A
5076684 Simpson et al. Dec 1991 A
5084057 Green et al. Jan 1992 A
5094233 Brennan Mar 1992 A
5098439 Hill et al. Mar 1992 A
5112353 Johansson et al. May 1992 A
5116111 Simpson et al. May 1992 A
5117306 Cohen May 1992 A
5120120 Cohen Jun 1992 A
5159717 Drew et al. Nov 1992 A
5166711 Portney Nov 1992 A
5178636 Silberman Jan 1993 A
5229797 Futhey et al. Jul 1993 A
5336163 DeMane et al. Aug 1994 A
5413600 Mittelman May 1995 A
5553499 Johnson Jul 1996 A
RE35408 Petruson Dec 1996 E
5716405 Mittelman Feb 1998 A
5782913 Schindler et al. Jul 1998 A
5824086 Silvestrini Oct 1998 A
5931799 Guastella et al. Aug 1999 A
5984890 Gast et al. Nov 1999 A
6096077 Callahan et al. Aug 2000 A
6099568 Simonian et al. Aug 2000 A
6106541 Hurbis Aug 2000 A
6110207 Eichhorn et al. Aug 2000 A
6186965 Patterson Feb 2001 B1
6203560 Blach et al. Mar 2001 B1
6250307 Conrad et al. Jun 2001 B1
6261243 Burney et al. Jul 2001 B1
6322590 Sillers et al. Nov 2001 B1
6347241 Burbank et al. Feb 2002 B2
6357436 Kreitzer et al. Mar 2002 B1
6390622 Muckenhirn et al. May 2002 B1
6406420 McCarthy et al. Jun 2002 B1
6431174 Knudson et al. Aug 2002 B1
6454803 Romo, III Sep 2002 B1
6595998 Johnson Jul 2003 B2
6626172 Karow et al. Sep 2003 B1
6632245 Kim Oct 2003 B2
6662041 Burbank et al. Dec 2003 B2
6666887 Callahan et al. Dec 2003 B1
6725083 Burbank et al. Apr 2004 B1
6786928 Callahan et al. Sep 2004 B2
6899105 Krueger et al. May 2005 B2
6921415 Callahan et al. Jul 2005 B2
6993375 Burbank et al. Jan 2006 B2
6996433 Burbank et al. Feb 2006 B2
7001341 Gellman et al. Feb 2006 B2
7047063 Burbank et al. May 2006 B2
7060723 Ehring et al. Jun 2006 B2
7093938 Morris et al. Aug 2006 B2
7125908 Ehring et al. Oct 2006 B2
7232218 Morris et al. Jun 2007 B2
7416533 Gellman et al. Aug 2008 B2
7651505 Lubock et al. Jan 2010 B2
7670350 Sells Mar 2010 B2
7780734 Johnson et al. Aug 2010 B2
7811331 Johnson et al. Oct 2010 B2
7905885 Johnson et al. Mar 2011 B2
20010018310 Lyman Aug 2001 A1
20020000227 Duyke et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020004682 Zhou et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020062128 Amis May 2002 A1
20020170564 Knudson et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020173848 Sachs Nov 2002 A1
20030033013 Callahan et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030171812 Grunberg et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030225456 Ek Dec 2003 A1
20030229614 Kotler Dec 2003 A1
20030233101 Lubock et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040002746 Ryan et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040054374 Weber et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040097980 Ferree May 2004 A1
20040097981 Selis May 2004 A1
20050043706 Eaton et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050046794 Silvestrini et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050049287 Ehring et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050054695 Ehring et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050055097 Grunberg et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050101967 Weber et al. May 2005 A1
20050246016 Miller et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060015003 Moaddes et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060050234 Morris et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060111646 Gellman et al. May 2006 A1
20070066944 Nyte Mar 2007 A1
20090318875 Friedman Dec 2009 A1
20100145363 Selis Jun 2010 A1
20110009971 Johnson et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110098816 Jacob et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110264228 Johnson et al. Oct 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
WO 2005082452 Sep 2005 WO
WO 2006072571 Jul 2006 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (15)
Entry
Matbase. “PMMA”. Material Properties of PMMA, Commodity Polymers | Polymers Data Sheets. Downloaded from <http://www.matbase.com/material/polymers/commodity/pmma/properties> on Dec. 19, 2012.
Wikipedia. “Deformation (engineering)”. Downloaded from <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deformation_%28engineering%29> on Mar. 19, 2015.
Rusmee, Pichai. “Fracture Failure of Engineering Materials”. Fracture of Engineering Materials. 1998. Downloaded from <http://www.mech.utah.edu/˜rusmeeha/labNotes/fracture1.html> on Mar. 19, 2015.
Cole, P., “Biophysics of Nasal Airflow: A Review,” American Journal of Rhinology, vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 245-249 (Jul.-Aug. 2000).
Cole, P., “The Four Components of the Nasal Valve,” American Journal of Rhinology, vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 107-110 (Mar.-Apr. 2003).
Ersek et al., “Minimally Invasive Macro Implants,” Worldplast, vol. I, No. 4, pp. 275-285 (1996).
Fanous, N. et al., “Collapsed Nasal-Valve Widening by Composite Grafting to the Nasal Floor,” The Journal of Otolaryngology, vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 313-316 (1996).
Huizing et al., “Functional Reconstructive Nasal Surgery,” New York: Thieme. Screenshots were taken from Google Books website at http://books.google.com/books (2003).
Kalan, A. et al., “Treatment of External Nasal Valve (alar rim) Collapse with an Alar Strut,” The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, vol. 115, pp. 788-791 (Oct. 2001).
Karen, M. et al., “The Use of Percutaneous Sutures for Graft Fixation in Rhinoplasty,” Arch Facial Plast. Surg., vol. 5, pp. 193-196 (Mar./Apr. 2003).
Mendelsohn, M., “Use of medpor splints to manage alar collapse,” Australian Journal of Oto-Laryngology, downloaded from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3868/is_200101/ai_n8932300/ (2001).
Millman, B., “Alar Batten Grafting for Management of the Collapsed Nasal Valve,” The Laryngoscope, vol. 112, pp. 574-579 (Mar. 2002).
Rhee, J. et al., “Nasal Valve Surgery Improves Disease-Specific Quality of Life,” The Laryngoscope, vol. 115, pp. 437-440 (Mar. 2005).
Becker et al.; “Treatment of Nasal Obstruction from Nasal Valve Collapse with Alar Battent Grafts”—Begel House, Inc., copyright 2003; 11 pages.
Toriami et al.; “Rhinoplasty Dissection Manual”—Lippencott Williams & Wilkins, copyright 1999; 185 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110190883 A1 Aug 2011 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11144354 Jun 2005 US
Child 13085131 US