Natural combination hormone replacement formulations and therapies

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10806740
  • Patent Number
    10,806,740
  • Date Filed
    Friday, October 10, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 20, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
Pharmaceutical formulations for co-administering estradiol and progesterone are provided herein. In some embodiments, the formulation comprises solubilized estradiol, suspended progesterone, and a medium chain (C6-C12) oil.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This application relates to natural estrogen and progesterone replacement therapies, with formulations provided for each estradiol and progesterone alone and in combination for the treatment of pre, peri-menopausal, menopausal and post-menopausal females in relation to the treatment of Estrogen- and Progesterone-deficient states, each as herein below defined.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) is a medical treatment that involves the use of one or more of a group of medications designed to increase hormone levels in women who lack adequate hormone production. HRT can mitigate and prevent symptoms caused by diminished circulating estrogen and progesterone hormones regardless as to whether the subject is pre-menopausal, peri-menopausal, menopausal or post-menopausal. However, specific symptomatic states can exist during each stage of menopausal progression.


HRT is presently available in various forms. One therapy involves administration of low dosages of one or more estrogens. Another involves administration of progesterone or a chemical analogue, called a progestin. Progesterone administration acts, among treating other disease states, to mitigate certain undesirable side effects from estrogen administration including, for example, endometrial hyperplasia (thickening) and reducing the incidence of endometrial cancer.


Timing for dosage administration is often varied cyclically, with estrogens taken daily and progesterone taken for approximately two weeks of every month; a method often referred to as “Cyclic-Sequential” or “Sequentially-Combined HRT.” This method is intended to mimic the natural menstrual cycle and typically causes menstruation similar to a period after the progesterone is stopped. This regimen is most typically used in peri-menopausal or newly menopausal women as the alternative continuous method often results in irregular bleeding in such women. An alternate method, a constant dosage with both estrogen and progesterone taken daily, is called “Continuous-Combined HRT.” This method usually results in no menstruation and is used most often after a woman has been menopausal for some time.


Estrogen, in its various forms, and progesterone, in its various forms, are used in HRT via a variety of administered dosage forms including, for example, via tablets, capsules and patches.


“Bio-identical” or “body-identical” hormones, which are identical in chemical structure to the hormones naturally produced by human bodies, can be used and are often referred to as Natural Hormone Replacement Therapy, or NHRT.


These natural or bio-identical hormones are formulated from various ingredients to match the chemical structure and effect of estradiol, estrone, or estriol (the 3 primary estrogens) as well as progesterone that occurs naturally in the human body (endogenous).


Currently, bio-identical estradiol is available in both branded and generic FDA approved versions. FDA-approved bio-identical progesterone for HRT is available as the branded stand-alone drug commercially identified as PROMETRIUM® (progesterone, USP) (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Ill.), with a generic authorized by the innovator, and generic products provided by Teva (Israel) and Sofgen Americas, Inc. (New York). PROMETRIUM® was approved for sale in the United States on May 14, 1998 under NDA # N019781. According to the prescribing information approved for this product (Rev June 2009) (“PROMETRIUM® prescribing information”), PROMETRIUM® comprises synthetic progesterone that is chemically identical to progesterone of human ovarian origin. Capsules comprise 100 mg or 200 mg of micronized progesterone. The inactive ingredients include peanut oil, gelatin, glycerin, lecithin, titanium dioxide, and yellow and red dyes.


Other products such as PREMPRO® (conjugated estrogens/medroxyprogesterone acetate tablets) and PREMPHASE® (conjugated estrogens plus medroxyprogesterone acetate tablets) (Wyeth Laboratories, a division of Pfizer, Inc., New York) provide both continuous-combined and cyclic-sequential products containing PREMARIN® (estrogen derived from mare's urine) and synthetic medroxyprogesterone acetate. Other products are available. However, no FDA approved product exists on the market today with combination bio-identical estradiol and bio-identical progesterone.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one aspect, pharmaceutical formulations for co-administering estradiol and progesterone to a mammal in need thereof are provided. In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical formulation comprises: solubilized estradiol, suspended progesterone, and a medium chain (C6 to C12) oil.


In some embodiments, the medium chain oil comprises medium chain fatty acid esters of glycerol, polyethylene glycol, or propylene glycol, or mixtures thereof, wherein the medium chain fatty acids are predominantly: C6 to C12 fatty acids, C6 to C10 fatty acids, C8 to C12 fatty acids, or C8 to C10 fatty acids. In some embodiments, the medium chain oil comprises a glyceride containing a C6-C12 fatty acid. In some embodiments, the glyceride is a mixture of mono- and diglycerides. In some embodiments, the fatty acid is predominantly a C8 to C10 fatty acid. In some embodiments, the fatty acids are predominantly saturated fatty acids. In some embodiments, the fatty acids are predominantly unsaturated fatty acids. In some embodiments, the medium chain oil comprises CAPMUL® MCM.


In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical formulation further comprises one or more surfactants, e.g., one or more non-ionic surfactants. In some embodiments, the surfactant comprises lauroyl polyoxyl-32-glycerides. In some embodiments, the surfactant comprises GELUCIRE® 44/14.


In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical formulation further comprises solubilized progesterone, wherein at least 50% (e.g., at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90%, or about 100%) of the total progesterone is solubilized.


In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical formulation is in a hard capsule, a soft capsule, or a tablet for oral administration. In some embodiments, the hard capsule or soft capsule comprises gelatin, glycerol, and coloring agents.


In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical formulation comprises:


30 to 35 wt % progesterone;


0.1 to 0.4 wt % estradiol;


55 to 75 wt % medium chain oil; and


0.5 to 10 wt % non-ionic surfactant.


In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical formulation comprises about 2 mg estradiol and about 200 mg progesterone.


In some embodiments, a pharmaceutical formulation as described herein (e.g., comprising solubilized estradiol, suspended progesterone, and a medium chain (C6-C12) oil), when administered to a human subject, produces:


(a) one or more progesterone-related parameters selected from: (i) an area under the curve (AUC)(0-t) for progesterone that is from 96 ng·hr/ml to 150 ng·hr/ml; (ii) an AUC(0-∞) for progesterone that is from 105 ng·hr/ml to 164 ng·hr/ml; and (iii) a Cmax for progesterone that is from 71 ng/ml to 112 ng/ml; and


(b) one or more estrogen-related parameters selected from: (i) an AUC(0-t) for estradiol that is from 1123 pg·hr/ml to 1755 pg·hr/ml; (ii) an AUC(0-∞) for estradiol that is from 1968 pg·hr/ml to 3075 pg·hr/ml; and (iii) a Cmax for unconjugated estradiol that is from 52 pg/ml to 81 pg/ml.


In some embodiments, administration of the formulation to the subject produces both an AUC(0-t) for progesterone that is from 96 ng·hr/ml to 150 ng·hr/ml and a Cmax for progesterone that is from 71 ng/ml to 112 ng/ml. In some embodiments, administration of the formulation to the subject produces both an AUC(0-t) for unconjugated estradiol that is from 1123 pg·hr/ml to 1755 pg·hr/ml and a Cmax for unconjugated estradiol that is from 52 pg/ml to 81 pg/ml.


In some embodiments, when the formulation is administered to a human subject, the formulation further produces one or more of the following:


(i) an AUC(0-t) for estrone sulfate that is from 7277 pg·hr/ml to 11370 pg·hr/ml;


(ii) an AUC(0-∞) for estrone sulfate that is from 9596 pg·hr/ml to 14994 pg·hr/ml; or


(iii) a Cmax for estrone sulfate that is from 341 pg/ml to 533 pg/ml.


In some embodiments, administration of the formulation to the subject produces both an AUC(0-t) for estrone sulfate that is from 7277 pg·hr/ml to 11370 pg·hr/ml and a Cmax for estrone sulfate that is from 341 pg/ml to 533 pg/ml.


In some embodiments, when the formulation is administered to a human subject, the formulation further produces one or more of the following:


(i) an AUC(0-t) for total estrone that is from 161 pg·hr/ml to 252 pg·hr/ml;


(ii) an AUC(0-∞) for total estrone that is from 171 pg·hr/ml to 267 pg·hr/ml; or


(iii) a Cmax for total estrone that is from 28 pg/ml to 44 pg/ml.


In some embodiments, administration of the formulation to the subject produces both an AUC(0-t) for total estrone that is from 161 pg·hr/ml to 252 pg·hr/ml and a Cmax for total estrone that is from 28 pg/ml to 44 pg/ml.


In some embodiments, the progesterone and the estradiol in the pharmaceutical formulation demonstrate comparable bioavailability to their individual drug references of PROMETRIUM® and ESTRACE®, respectively (“Referenced Products”), when said formulation is administered to a human subject.


In some embodiments, the progesterone and the estradiol in said formulation demonstrate about 80% to about 125% of the Cmax and/or AUC of their individual references of PROMETRIUM® and ESTRACE®, respectively, when said formulation is administered to a human subject.


In some embodiments, when administered to a human subject, the formulation produces one or more of the following:


(i) an AUC(0-t) for progesterone comparable to the AUC(0-t) for progesterone obtained with PROMETRIUM®;


(ii) an AUC(0-∞) for progesterone comparable to the AUC(0-∞) for progesterone obtained with PROMETRIUM®; or


(iii) a Cmax for progesterone comparable to the Cmax for progesterone obtained with PROMETRIUM®.


In some embodiments, when administered to a human subject, the formulation produces one or more of the following:


(i) an AUC(0-t) for unconjugated estradiol comparable to the AUC(0-t) for progesterone obtained with ESTRACE®;


(ii) an AUC(0-∞) for unconjugated estradiol comparable to the AUC(0-∞) for progesterone obtained with ESTRACE®; or


(iii) a Cmax for unconjugated estradiol comparable to the Cmax for progesterone obtained with ESTRACE®.


In some embodiments, when administered to a human subject, the formulation produces one or more of the following:


(i) an AUC(0-t) for unconjugated estrone comparable to the AUC(0-t) for progesterone obtained with ESTRACE®;


(ii) an AUC(0-∞) for unconjugated estrone comparable to the AUC(0-∞) for progesterone obtained with ESTRACE®; or


(iii) a Cmax for unconjugated estrone comparable to the Cmax for progesterone obtained with ESTRACE®.


In some embodiments, when administered to a human subject, the formulation produces one or more of the following:


(i) an AUC(0-t) for total estrone comparable to the AUC(0-t) for progesterone obtained with ESTRACE®; or


(ii) an AUC(0-∞) for total estrone comparable to the AUC(0-∞) for progesterone obtained with ESTRACE®.


In another aspect, methods of treating a subject having one or more symptoms of estrogen deficiency (e.g., one or more symptoms of menopause) are provided. In some embodiments, the method comprising administering to the subject an effective amount of a pharmaceutical formulation as described herein. In some embodiments, the subject is female. In some embodiments, the subject is a woman having a uterus.


In yet another aspect, methods of effecting hormone replacement therapy in a woman in need thereof are provided. In some embodiments, the method comprises orally administering to the woman an effective amount of a pharmaceutical formulation as described herein.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein and form a part of the specification, illustrate the present disclosure and, together with the description, further serve to explain the principles of the disclosure and to enable a person skilled in the pertinent art to make and use the disclosed embodiments.



FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary manufacturing process of a fill material in accordance with various embodiments of the invention;



FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary manufacturing process of a softgel material in accordance with various embodiments of the invention;



FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary manufacturing process in accordance with various embodiments of the invention;



FIG. 4 illustrates a graph of the particle distribution obtained in Example 10; and



FIG. 5 illustrates a dissolution study of a formulation in accordance with various embodiments of the invention.



FIG. 6 illustrates a flow chart of subject disposition for a study comparing the bioavailability of a 17β-estradiol and progesterone combination formulation to the bioavailability of co-administered PROMETRIUM® and ESTRACE®.



FIG. 7 illustrates pharmacokinetic parameters for progesterone for the combination formulation (T) versus co-administered PROMETRIUM® and ESTRACE® (R1 and R2).



FIG. 8 illustrates pharmacokinetic parameters for free estradiol for the combination formulation (T) versus co-administered PROMETRIUM® and ESTRACE® (R1 and R2).





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Frequently, higher recommended oral dosages of pharmaceuticals are necessary to treat a given disease state because many active ingredients are not completely absorbed by a patient in need of treatment. In other words, a better-absorbed dosage form of a medicament such as, for example, progesterone or estradiol, or dosage forms that provide greater consistency of absorption of progesterone or estradiol among subjects, alone or in combination with estradiol, may be able to be administered at dosage strengths lower than presently recommended, potentially resulting in a reduced or minimized side effect profile, among other potential benefits.


I. DEFINITIONS

The term “area under the curve” (“AUC”) refers to the area under the curve defined by changes in the blood concentration of an active pharmaceutical ingredient (e.g., estradiol or progesterone), or a metabolite of the active pharmaceutical ingredient, over time following the administration of a dose of the active pharmaceutical ingredient. “AUC0-∞” is the area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity following the administration of a dose. “AUC0-t” is the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to time t following the administration of a dose, wherein t is the last time point with measurable concentration.


The term “Cmax” refers to the maximum value of blood concentration shown on the curve that represents changes in blood concentrations of an active pharmaceutical ingredient (e.g., progesterone or estradiol), or a metabolite of the active pharmaceutical ingredient, over time.


The term “Tmax” refers to the time that it takes for the blood concentration an active pharmaceutical ingredient (e.g., estradiol or progesterone), or a metabolite of the active pharmaceutical ingredient, to reach the maximum value.


Collectively AUC, Cmax and, optionally, Tmax are the principal pharmacokinetic parameters that can characterize the pharmacokinetic response of a particular drug product, such as progesterone or estradiol, in an animal, especially a mammal, including human, subject.


An “active pharmaceutical ingredient” (API), as used herein, means the active compound or compounds used in formulating a drug product. APIs are generally safe for administering to animals, especially mammals, including humans, according to established governmental standards, including those promulgated by the United States Food and Drug Administration.


The term “bioavailability” has the meaning as defined in 21 C.F.R. § 320.1(a): the rate and extent to which an API or active ingredient or active moiety is absorbed from a drug product and becomes available at the site of action. For drug products that are not intended to be absorbed into the bloodstream, bioavailability may be assessed by measurements intended to reflect the rate and extent to which the API or active ingredient or active moiety becomes available at the site of action. For example, bioavailability can be measured as the amount of API in the blood (serum or plasma) as a function of time. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters such as AUC, Cmax, or Tmax may be used to measure and assess bioavailability.


The term “bioequivalent” has the meaning as defined in 21 C.F.R. § 320.1(e): the absence of a significant difference in the rate and extent to which the API or active ingredient or active moiety in pharmaceutical equivalents or pharmaceutical alternatives becomes available at the site of drug action when administered at the same molar dose under similar conditions in an appropriately designed study. Where there is an intentional difference in rate (e.g., in certain extended release dosage forms), certain pharmaceutical equivalents or alternatives may be considered bioequivalent if there is no significant difference in the extent to which the active ingredient or moiety from each product becomes available at the site of drug action. This applies only if the difference in the rate at which the active ingredient or moiety becomes available at the site of drug action is intentional and is reflected in the proposed labeling, is not essential to the attainment of effective body drug concentrations on chronic use, and is considered medically insignificant for the drug. In practice, two products are considered bioequivalent if the 90% confidence interval of the AUC, Cmax, or optionally Tmax is within 80.00% to 125.00%.


As used herein, the term “comparable,” as used with reference to comparing a bioavailability characteristic (including but not limited to area under the curve (AUC), Cmax, or Tmax) for a test composition, means that the test composition has a value for the bioavailability characteristic that is from 80% to 125% of the value of the bioavailability characteristic of a reference composition. In some embodiments, the reference composition is a commercially available progesterone composition (e.g., progesterone in a peanut oil, e.g., PROMETRIUM®) or a commercially available estradiol composition (e.g., a micronized estradiol tablet, e.g., ESTRACE®). In some embodiments, the reference composition is a co-administration of a commercially available progesterone composition (e.g., PROMETRIUM®) and a commercially available estradiol composition (e.g., ESTRACE®). In some embodiments, the reference composition is a combination formulation comprising progesterone and estradiol as provided herein. Thus, in some embodiments, a test composition is “comparable” to a reference combination formulation comprising progesterone and estradiol as provided herein when the test composition has a value for a bioavailability characteristic (e.g., AUC(0-t), AUC(0-∞), Cmax, and/or Tmax for one or more analytes, e.g., progesterone, unconjugated estradiol, unconjugated estrone, or total estrone) that is from 80% to 125% of the value of the bioavailability characteristic of the reference combination formulation.


The term “bio-identical hormone” or “body-identical hormone” refers to an active pharmaceutical ingredient that is structurally identical to a hormone naturally or endogenously found in the human body (e.g., estradiol and progesterone).


The term “estradiol” refers to (17β)-estra-1,3,5(10)-triene-3,17-diol. Estradiol is also interchangeably called 17β-estradiol, oestradiol, or E2, and is found endogenously in the human body. As used herein, estradiol refers to the bio-identical or body-identical form of estradiol found in the human body having the structure:




embedded image


As used herein, unless specified, estradiol includes estradiol in anhydrous and hemihydrate forms. For the purposes of this disclosure, the anhydrous form or the hemihydrate form can be substituted for the other by accounting for the water or lack of water according to well-known and understood techniques.


The term “solubilized estradiol” means that the estradiol or a portion thereof is solubilized or dissolved in the solubilizing agents or the formulations disclosed herein. Solubilized estradiol may include estradiol that is about 80% solubilized, about 85% solubilized, about 90% solubilized, about 95% solubilized, about 96% solubilized, about 97% solubilized, about 98% solubilized, about 99% solubilized or about 100% solubilized. In some embodiments, the estradiol is “fully solubilized” with all or substantially all of the estradiol being solubilized or dissolved in the solubilizing agent. Fully solubilized estradiol may include estradiol that is about 97% solubilized, about 98% solubilized, about 99% solubilized or about 100% solubilized. Solubility can be expressed as a mass fraction (% w/w, which is also referred to as wt %).


The term “progesterone” refers to pregn-4-ene-3,20-dione. Progesterone is also interchangeably called P4 and is found endogenously in the human body. As used herein, prostergone refers to the bio-identical or body-identical form of progesterone found in the human body having the structure:




embedded image


The term “solubilized progesterone” means that the progesterone or a portion thereof is solubilized or dissolved in the solubilizing agents or the formulations disclosed herein disclosed herein. In some embodiments, the progesterone is “partially solubilized” with a portion of the progesterone being solubilized or dissolved in the solubilizing agent and a portion of the progesterone being suspended in the solubilizing agent. The term “partially solubilized progesterone,” as used herein, means progesterone which is in any state of solubilization up to but not including about 100%, e.g., about 1% solubilized, about 5% solubilized, about 10% solubilized, about 15% solubilized, about 20% solubilized, about 30% solubilized, about 40% solubilized, about 50% solubilized, about 60% solubilized, about 70% solubilized, about 80% solubilized, about 85% solubilized, about 90% solubilized, about 95% solubilized, or about 98% solubilized. In other embodiments, the progesterone is “fully solubilized” with all or substantially all of the progesterone being solubilized or dissolved in the solubilizing agent, e.g., at least about 98% solubilized, about 99% solubilized or about 100% solubilized. Solubility can be expressed as a mass fraction (% w/w, which is also referred to as wt %).


The terms “micronized progesterone” and “micronized estradiol,” as used herein, include micronized progesterone and micronized estradiol, respectively, having an X50 particle size value below about 15 microns and/or having an X90 particle size value below about 25 microns. The term “X50,” as used herein, means that one-half of the particles in a sample are smaller in diameter than a given number. For example, micronized progesterone having an X50 of 5 microns means that, for a given sample of micronized progesterone, one-half of the particles have a diameter of less than 5 microns. Similarly, the term “X90” means that ninety percent (90%) of the particles in a sample are smaller in diameter than a given number.


The terms “uniform distribution,” “uniform dispersal,” and “uniformly dispersed,” as used with reference to estradiol or progesterone, means at least one of uniform dispersion, solubility, or lack of agglomeration of estradiol or progesterone in a dissolution test compared to a reference product (e.g., PROMETRIUM® or ESTRACE®, respectively) at a similar dosage strength and the same USP dissolution apparatus.


The terms “solubilizer” and “solubilizing agent” refer to any substance or mixture of substances that may be used to solubilize or to enhance the solubility of an active pharmaceutical ingredient (e.g., estradiol or progesterone). For example and without limitation, suitable solubilizing agents include medium chain oils and other solvents and co-solvents (e.g., surfactants) that solubilize or dissolve an active pharmaceutical ingredient to a desirable extent. Solubilizing agents suitable for use in the formulations disclosed herein are pharmaceutical grade solubilizing agents (e.g., pharmaceutical grade medium chain oils). It will be understood by those of skill in the art that other excipients or components can be added to or mixed with the solubilizing agent to enhance the properties or performance of the solubilizing agent or resulting formulation. Examples of such excipients include, but are not limited to, surfactants, emulsifiers, thickeners, colorants, flavoring agents, etc. In some embodiments, the solubilizer or solubilizing agent is a medium chain oil and, in some other embodiments, the medium chain oil is combined with a co-solvent(s) or other excipient(s).


The term “medium chain” is used to describe the aliphatic chain length of fatty acid containing molecules. As used herein, “medium chain” means any medium chain carbon-containing substance, including C4-C18, and including C6-C12 substances, fatty acid esters of glycerol, fatty acids, and mono-, di-, and tri-glycerides of such substances. In some embodiments, “medium chain” refers to fatty acids, fatty acid esters, or fatty acid derivatives that contain fatty acid aliphatic tails or carbon chains that contain between 6 (C6) and 14 (C14) carbon atoms. As non-limiting examples, C6-C14 fatty acids, C6-C12 fatty acids, and C8-C10 fatty acids are all medium chain fatty acids and may be used in instances in which this specification calls for use of medium chain fatty acids, e.g., medium chain fatty acid esters of glycerol or other glycols. Examples include, without limitation, caproic acid, caprylic acid, capric acid, lauric acid, myristic acid, and derivatives thereof.


The term “oil,” as used herein, may be any pharmaceutically acceptable oil, such as an organic oil other than peanut oil, that would suspend and/or solubilize any suitable progesterone or estradiol, starting material, or precursor, including micronized progesterone or estradiol as described herein. In some embodiments, oils may include, for example and without limitation, medium chain fatty acids, generally of the group known as medium chain fatty acids consisting of at least one mono-, di-, or triglyceride, or derivatives thereof, or combinations thereof.


The term “medium chain oil” refers to an oil wherein the composition of the fatty acid fraction of the oil is substantially or predominantly medium chain (e.g., C6 to C14) fatty acids, i.e., the composition profile of fatty acids in the oil is substantially medium chain. As used herein, “substantially” or “predominantly” means that between 20% and 100% (inclusive of the upper and lower limits) of the fatty acid fraction of the oil is made up of medium chain fatty acids. In some embodiments, about 25%, about 30%, about 35%, about 40%, about 45%, about 50%, about 55%, about 60%, about 65%, about 70%, about 75%, about 80%, about 85%, about 90%, or about 95% of the fatty acid fraction of the oil is made up of medium chain fatty acids. It will be understood by those of skill in the art that the medium chain oils suitable for use in the formulations disclosed herein are pharmaceutical grade (e.g., pharmaceutical grace medium chain oils). Examples of medium chain oils include, for example and without limitation, medium chain fatty acids, medium chain fatty acid esters of glycerol (e.g., for example, mono-, di-, and triglycerides), medium chain fatty acid esters of propylene glycol, medium chain fatty acid derivatives of polyethylene glycol, and combinations thereof.


II. FORMULATIONS

In one aspect, this disclosure relates to pharmaceutical formulations for co-administering estradiol and progesterone to a human subject in need thereof. In some embodiments, the formulation comprises estradiol, progesterone, and a medium chain oil (e.g., a C6-C12 oil). In some embodiments, a pharmaceutical formulation comprising progesterone and estradiol as described herein demonstrates comparable bioavailability to their individual drug references of PROMETRIUM® and ESTRACE®, respectively, when the formulation is administered to a human subject or a population of subjects.


Another aspect of the present disclosure includes a pharmaceutical formulation of micronized progesterone, micronized progesterone with partially solubilized progesterone and fully solubilized progesterone, wherein the formulation may provide increased progesterone bioavailability in a treated subject compared to the bioavailability provided by PROMETRIUM® when administered at equal dosage strengths.


Additional objects of the present disclosure includes: providing increased patient compliance secondary to ease of use; providing increased physician adoption secondary to ease of use/instruction with less worry of side effects from inappropriate usage; providing decreased side-effects from erroneous use (decreased irregular bleeding); providing better efficacy/control of symptoms secondary to appropriate use; reducing the metabolic and vascular side effects of the commonly used synthetic progestins when administered alone or in combination with an estrogen (norethindrone acetate, medroxyprogesterone acetate, etc.) including, for example, stroke, heart attacks, blood clots and breast cancer.


Formulations of Estradiol and Progesterone


In some embodiments, a pharmaceutical formulation for use as described herein comprises solubilized estradiol without progesterone; micronized progesterone without estradiol; micronized progesterone with partially solubilized progesterone; solubilized estradiol with micronized progesterone; solubilized estradiol with micronized progesterone in combination with partially solubilized progesterone; or solubilized estradiol with solubilized progesterone. The underlying formulation concepts provided herein may be used with other natural or synthetic forms of estradiol and progesterone. Unless otherwise specified, “natural,” as used herein with reference to hormones discussed herein, means bio-identical or body-identical hormones formulated to match the chemical structure and effect of those that occur naturally in the human body (endogenous). An exemplary natural estrogen is estradiol (also described as 17β-estradiol and E2) and a natural progestin is progesterone. Micronization specifications, aspects and embodiments are further defined herein.


Other aspects of the present disclosure further provide: more uniform dissolution of progesterone, and reduced intra- and inter-patient blood level variability in formulations of progesterone of the present disclosure, typically in combinations with solubilized estradiol, when compared to equal dosages of PROMETRIUM®). Blood level variability is also compared at equal sampling times following administration. Not to be limited by theory, these aspects are believed to be influenced by the percentage of solubilized progesterone in a respective formulation wherein such more uniform dissolution of progesterone, and lower intra- and inter-patient blood level variability, are influenced by a greater proportion of solubilized progesterone relative to total progesterone. A reduced food effect with the present formulations comprising progesterone may also be implicated.


According to the PROMETRIUM® prescribing information, clinical trials have shown significant patient variability. For example, a clinical trial involving post-menopausal women who were administered PROMETRIUM® once a day for five days resulted in the mean PK parameters listed in the following table:










TABLE 1








PROMETRIUM Capsules Daily Dose










Parameter
100 mg
200 mg
300 mg





Cmax (ng/ml)
17.3 +/− 21.9
 38.1 +/− 37.8
60.6 +/− 72.5


Tmax (hr)
 1.5 +/− 0.8 
 2.3 +/− 1.4 
1.7 +/− 0.6


AUC0-10 (ngxhr/ml)
43.4+/− 30.8
101.2 +/− 66.0
175.7 +/− 170.3









In particular illustrative aspects and embodiments of this invention, it is possible, though not necessary, to reduce the standard deviations in one or more of these PK parameters.


More uniform dissolution of progesterone in a formulation of the present disclosure compared to the dissolution of PROMETRIUM® at equal dosage strengths and using the same USP apparatus can be determined using standard techniques established for API dissolution testing, including that which is described in the examples below.


Reduced intra- and inter-patient variability of progesterone formulated pursuant to the present disclosure compared to PROMETRIUM can be demonstrated via a fed bio-study such as that described below.


Exemplary dosage strengths for estradiol for use in the formulations described herein include, without limitation, 0.125, 0.25, 0.375, 0.50, 0.625, 0.75, 1.00, 1.125, 1.25, 1.375, 1.50, 1.625, 1.75 and 2.00 mg. Exemplary dosage strengths for progesterone for use in the formulations described herein include, without limitation, 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 250, 300, 350 and 400 mg. These dosage strengths for each of estradiol and progesterone can be administered in formulations described herein either alone or in combination.


In some embodiments, estradiol is solubilized. Estradiol solubilization helps ensure high content uniformity and enhanced stability. Solubilized estradiol may include estradiol that is approximately 80% to 100% soluble in a solubilizing agent, including specifically embodiments that are: 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, or 100% soluble in a solubilizing agent. Solubility may be expressed as a mass fraction (% w/w, also referred to as wt %).


In some embodiments, the composition comprises micronized progesterone. Progesterone active pharmaceutical ingredient may be micronized via any one of the multiple methods typically utilized by the ordinarily skilled artisan. In various embodiments, micronized progesterone has an X50 particle size value of less than about 15 microns, less than about 10 microns, less than about 5 microns and/or less than about 3 microns. In various embodiments, micronized progesterone has an X90 particle size value of less than about 25 microns, less than about 20 microns, and/or less than about 15 microns.


Particle size may be determined in any suitable manner. For example, a Beckman Coulter LS 13 320 Laser Diffraction Particle Size Analyzer (the “Beckman Device”) may be used to determine particle size. As described above, particle size may be represented by various metrics, for example, through an X50 particle size, and/or X90 particle size, or similar descriptions of particle size.


The Beckman Device may be used with various modules for introducing a sample for analysis. The Beckman Device may be used with the LS 13 320 Universal Liquid Module (“ULM”). The ULM is capable of suspending samples in the size range of 0.017 μm to 2000 μm. The ULM is a liquid based module that allows for delivery of the sample to the sensing zone. The ULM recirculates the sample through the Beckman Device. The ULM comprises two hoses, one for fluid delivery and another for waste. The total volume used may be 125 mL or less. A sample mass of from about 1 mg to about 10 g may be used. The ULM may interact with the Beckman Device via pins that fit into slots on the ULM. The ULM may use a variety of suspension fluids, for example, water, butonol, ethanol, chloroform, heptanes, toluene, propanol, COULTER Type 1B Dispersant (“Coulter 1B”), and a variety of other suspension fluids. Surfactants may also be used, though pump speed should be adjusted to prevent excessive bubbling. Coulter 1B may comprise one or more of acetaldehyde, ethylene oxide, and/or 1,4-dioxane. The Beckman Device may be configured to use a variety of optical theories, including the Fraunhofer optical model and the Mie Theory.


The Beckman Device may comprise software to control the Beckman Device while the ULM is in use. The software may control, for example, pump speed, use of de-bubble routine, rinse routine, sonicate routine, and fill routine, among others. Parameters regarding the sample run may also be configured. For example, run length may be set. Though any suitable run length may be used, in various embodiments, a time period of 30 seconds to 120 seconds, and preferably between 30 seconds and 90 seconds may be used.


The Beckman Device may be used with the LS 13 320 Micro Liquid Module (“MLM”). The MLM is capable of suspending samples in the size range of 0.4 μm to 2000 μm. The MLM is a liquid based module that allows for delivery of the sample to the sensing zone. The MLM includes a stirrer. The total volume used may be 12 mL or less. The MLM may use a variety of suspension fluids, both aqueous and non-aqueous.


In some embodiments, the progesterone is solubilized. Fully solubilized progesterone formulations or partially solubilized progesterone formulations, in which at least about 50% of the progesterone, e.g., 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, or >95% is solubilized, appear to provide improved PK-related properties.


In some embodiments, the estradiol and the progesterone are both in the solubilizing agent. In some embodiments, the estradiol and the progesterone are both uniformly dispersed in the pharmaceutical formulation.


In accordance with various aspects and embodiments, the solubility proportion (i.e., the proportion of a solute that enters solution) is notable. The weight ratio of estradiol to the weight of the entire solution is also notable due to the intended dose amounts, discussed herein. In particular, it is desirable to obtain a target dosage of estradiol in an amount of solution that may be readily administered via a capsule. For example, if it is desired to have a dose of estradiol in a capsule of between about 0.125 mg to about 2 mg, it would also be desirable to have a total solution weight to be between about 250 mg to about 400 mg, preferably about 300 mg to about 350 mg and more preferably about 325 mg. In various embodiments, the following weight ratios of estradiol to total solution are from about 0.125/50 mg to about 0.125/1000 mg, from about 1 mg:500 mg to about 1 mg:50 mg; from about 1 mg:250 mg to about 1 mg:60 mg; from about 1 mg:100 mg to about 1 mg:66 mg; from about 2 mg/50 mg to about 2 mg/1000 mg. In various embodiments, the target for single dose product is 325 mg, and a target fill weight for a combination product (e.g., two or more sterol APIs) is 650 mg.


In illustrative embodiments, total progesterone, i.e., dissolved and micronized, is 20 to 50 wt %, e.g., 30 to 35 wt %; estradiol is 0.1 to 0.8 wt %, e.g., 0.15 to 0.35 wt %.


Solubilizing Agents


In various embodiments, the solubilizing agent is selected from at least one of a solvent or co-solvent. Suitable solvents and co-solvents include any mono-, di- or triglyceride and glycols, and combinations thereof.


In some embodiments, formulations of the present disclosure (e.g., estradiol and progesterone formulations) are prepared via blending with a pharmaceutically acceptable oil; generally, the oil comprises at least one medium chain fatty acid such as medium chain fatty acids consisting of at least one mono-, di-, or triglyceride, or derivatives thereof, or combinations thereof. Optionally added are other excipients including, for example and without limitation, anti-oxidants, lubricants and the like. Sufficient oil is used to form a suspension of micronized progesterone or, in the alternative, solubilize progesterone.


In illustrative embodiments of the invention, oils used to solubilize estradiol and to suspend, partially solubilize, or fully solubilize progesterone include medium chain fatty acid esters (e.g., esters of glycerol, polyethylene glycol, or propylene glycol) and mixtures thereof. In illustrative embodiments, the medium chain fatty acids are C6 to C14 or C6 to C12 fatty acids. In illustrative embodiments, the medium chain fatty acids are saturated, or predominantly saturated, e.g., greater than about 60% or greater than about 75% saturated.


Mixtures of medium chain fatty acid glycerides, e.g., C6-C12, C8-C12, or C8-C10 fatty acid mono- and diglycerides or mono-, di-, and triglycerides are very well suited for dissolving estradiol; good results have been obtained with an oil that is predominantly a mixture of C8-C10 saturated fatty acid mono- and diglycerides. Longer chain glycerides appear to be not as well suited for dissolution of estradiol. On the other hand, high solubility of progesterone has been obtained in mixtures that are predominantly medium chain fatty acid triglycerides.


Pharmaceutically acceptable oils include, without limitation, the use of at least one of caproic fatty acid; caprylic fatty acid; capric fatty acid; tauric acid; myristic acid; linoleic acid; succinic acid; glycerin; mono-, di-, or triglycerides and combinations and derivatives thereof; a polyethylene glycol; a polyethylene glycol glyceride (GELUCIRE®, a polyethylene glycol glyceride); GATTEFOSSE SAS, Saint-Priest, France); a propylene glycol; a caprylic/capric triglyceride (MIGLYOL® (caprylic/capric triglyceride) SASOL Germany GMBH, Hamburg; MIGLYOL® includes MIGLYOL® 810, 812, 816 and 829); a caproic/caprylic/capric/lauric triglyceride; a caprylic/capric/linoleic triglyceride; a caprylic/capric/succinic triglyceride; propylene glycol monocaprylate; propylene glycol monocaprate; (CAPMUL® PG-8 (propylene glycol monocaprylate) and 10; the CAPMUL® MCM (medium chain mono- and diglycerides) brands are owned by ABITEC, Columbus Ohio); propylene glycol dicaprylate; propylene glycol dicaprylate; medium chain mono- and di-glycerides (CAPMUL® MCM); a diethylene glycol mono ester (including 2-(2-Ethoxyethoxy)ethanol: TRANSCUTOL® (diethylene glycol monoethyl ether); esters of saturated coconut and palm kernel oil and derivatives thereof; triglycerides of fractionated vegetable fatty acids, and combinations and derivatives thereof.


Illustrative examples of mono- and diglycerides of medium chain fatty acids include, among others, CAPMUL® MCM, CAPMUL® MCM C10, CAPMUL® MCM C8, and CAPMUL® MCM C8 EP. These oils are C8 and C10 fatty acid mono- and diglycerides. Illustrative examples of oils that are triglycerides of medium chain fatty acids include, among others, MIGLYOL® 810 and MIGLYOL® 812.


Illustrative examples of oils that are medium chain fatty acid esters of propylene glycol include, among others, CAPMUL® PG-8, CAPMUL® PG-2L EP/NF, CAPMUL® PG-8 NF, CAPMUL® PG-12 EP/NF and CAPRYOL™. Other illustrative examples include MIGLYOL® 840.


Illustrative examples of oils that are medium chain fatty acid esters of polyethylene glycol include, among others, GELUCIRE® 44/14 (PEG-32 glyceryl laurate EP), which is polyethylene glycol glycerides composed of mono-, di- and triglycerides and mono- and diesters of polyethylene glycol. Without intending to be bound to any particular mechanism, it appears that at least in formulations comprising small amounts of GELUCIRE®, e.g., 10 wt % or less, the primary function of this oil is as a non-ionic surfactant.


These illustrative examples comprise predominantly medium chain length, saturated, fatty acids, specifically predominantly C8 to C12 saturated fatty acids.


In accordance with various embodiments, the formulations of the present disclosure do not include peanut oil.


It will be understood that commercially available fatty acid esters of glycerol and other glycols are often prepared from natural oils and therefore may comprise components additional to the fatty acid esters that comprise the predominant (by weight) component(s) and that therefore are used to characterize the product. Such other components may be, e.g., other fatty acid triglycerides, mono- and diesters, free glycerol, or free fatty acids. So, for example, when an oil/solubilizing agent is described herein as a saturated C8 fatty acid mono- or diester of glycerol, it will be understood that the predominant component of the oil, i.e., >50 wt % (e.g., >75 wt %, >85 wt % or >90 wt %) are caprylic monoglycerides and caprylic diglycerides. For example, the Technical Data Sheet by ABITEC for CAPMUL® MCM C8 describes CAPMUL® MCM C8 as being composed of mono and diglycerides of medium chain fatty acids (mainly caprylic) and describes the alkyl content as ≤1% C6, ≥95% C8, ≤5% C10, and ≤1.5% C12 and higher.


By way of further example, MIGLYOL® 812 is generally described as a C8-C10 triglyceride because the fatty acid composition is at least about 80% caprylic (C8) acid and capric (C10) acid. However, it can also comprise small amounts of other fatty acids, e.g., less than about 5% of caproic (C6) acid, lauric (C12) acid, and myristic (C14) acid.


Specifically, a product information sheet for MIGLYOL® by SASOL provides the composition of fatty acids as follows:









TABLE 2







MIGLYOL ® Fatty Acid Composition













MIGLYOL ®
MIGLYOL ®
MIGLYOL ®
MIGLYOL ®
MIGLYOL ®


Fatty acid
810
812
818
829
840





Caproic acid
max. 2.0
max. 2.0
max. 2
max. 2
max. 2


(C6:0)







Caprylic acid
65.0-80.0
50.0-65.0
45-65
45-55
65-80


(C8:0)







Capric acid
20.0-35.0
30.0-45.0
30-45
30-40
20-35


(C10:0)







Lauric acid
max. 2  
max. 2  
max. 3
max. 3
max. 2


(C12:0)







Myristic acid
max. 1.0
max. 1.0
max. 1
max. 1
max. 1


(C14:0)







Linoleic acid


2-5




(C18:2)







Succinic acid



15-20










Where certain embodiments of this invention are described as comprising (or consisting essentially of) a capsule shell, estradiol solubilized in C8-C10 triglycerides, and a thickening agent, it will be understood that the fatty acid esters component of the formulation may be, e.g., MIGLYOL® 812 or a similar product.


By way of further illustration, GELUCIRE® 44/14 is generally described as lauroyl polyoxyl-32 glycerides, i.e., polyoxyethylene 32 lauric glycerides (which is a mixture of mono-, di-, and triesters of glycerol and mono- and diesters of PEGs) because the fatty acid composition is 30 to 50% lauric acid and smaller amounts of other fatty acids, e.g., up to 15% caprylic acid, up to 12% capric acid, up to 25% myristic acid, up to 25% palmitic acid, and up to 35% stearic acid. The product may also contain small amounts of non-esterified glycols. Where certain embodiments of this invention are described as described as comprising (or consisting essentially of) a capsule shell, estradiol solubilized in triglycerides, and a thickening agent that is a non-ionic surfactant comprising C8 to C18 fatty acid esters of glycerol and polyethylene glycol, it will be understood that the thickening agent component of the formulation may be, e.g., GELUCIRE® 44/14 or a similar product.


Similarly, where certain embodiments of this invention are as described as comprising (or consisting essentially of) a capsule shell, estradiol solubilized in triglycerides, and a thickening agent that is a non-ionic surfactant comprising PEG-6 stearate, ethylene glycol palmitostearate, and PEG-32 stearate, it will be understood that the thickening agent component of the formulation may be, e.g., TEFOSE® 63 or a similar product.


In addition to the oils referenced above, other solubilizers include, for example and without limitation, glyceryl mono- and di-caprylates, propylene glycol and 1,2,3-propanetriol (glycerol, glycerin, glycerine).


Anionic and/or non-ionic surfactants can be used in other embodiments of the presently disclosed formulations containing estradiol, progesterone or a combination thereof. In certain embodiments, a non-ionic surfactant is used. Exemplary non-ionic surfactants may include, for example and without limitation, one or more of oleic acid, linoleic acid, palmitic acid, and stearic acid esters or alcohols. In further embodiments, the non-ionic surfactant may comprise polyethylene sorbitol esters, including polysorbate 80, which is commercially available under the trademark TWEEN 80® (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.). Polysorbate 80 comprises approximately 60%-70% oleic acid with the remainder comprising primarily linoleic acids, palmitic acids, and stearic acids. Polysorbate 80 may be used in amounts ranging from about 5 to 50%, and in certain embodiments, about 30% of the formulation total mass.


In various other embodiments, the non-ionic surfactant is selected from one or more of glycerol and polyethylene glycol esters of fatty acids, for example, lauroyl macrogol-32 glycerides and/or lauroyl polyoxyl-32 glycerides, commercially available as GELUCIRE®, including, for example, GELUCIRE® 44/11 and GELUCIRE® 44/14. These surfactants may be used at concentrations greater than about 0.01%, and typically in various amounts of about 0.01%-10.0%, 10.1%-20%, and 20.1%-30%. In certain examples, below, GELUCIRE® 44/14 is used as a surfactant in amounts of 1 to 10 wt %. See, e.g., Tables 13-17, below. Other non-ionic surfactants include, e.g., LABRASOL® PEG-8 Caprylic/Capric Glycerides (Gattefosse) and LABARAFIL® corn/apricot oil PEG-6 esters (Gattefosse).


Other Excipients


In other embodiments, a lubricant is used. Any suitable lubricant may be used, such as for example lecithin. Lecithin may comprise a mixture of phospholipids.


In additional embodiments, an antioxidant is used. Any suitable antioxidant may be used such as, for example and without limitation, butylated hydroxytoluene.


For example, in various embodiments, a pharmaceutical formulation comprises about 20% to about 80% carrier by weight, about 0.1% to about 5% lubricant by weight, and about 0.01% to about 0.1% antioxidant by weight.


The choice of excipient will, to a large extent, depend on factors such as the particular mode of administration, the effect of the excipient on solubility and stability, and the nature of the dosage form. Excipients used in various embodiments may include colorants, flavoring agents, preservatives and taste-masking agents. Colorants, for example, may comprise about 0.1% to about 2% by weight. Preservatives may comprise methyl and propyl paraben, for example, in a ratio of about 10:1, and at a proportion of about 0.005% and 0.05% by weight.


As is with all oils, solubilizers, excipients and any other additives used in the formulations described herein, each is to be non-toxic and pharmaceutically acceptable.


Formulation and Administration


In some embodiments, combinations of solubilizing agents (e.g., two or more oils or combinations of one or more oils and one or more surfactants) are used to form estradiol and progesterone compositions. Various ratios of these solubilizing agents (e.g., oils or surfactants) can be used. CAPMUL® MCM and a non-ionic surfactant, e.g., GELUCIRE® 44/14 (lauroyl macrogol-32 glycerides EP; lauroyl polyoxyl-32 glycerides NF; lauroyl polyoxylglycerides (USA FDA IIG)), can be used at ratios of about 99:1 to 2:1, including, for example and without limitation: 60:40, 65:35, 70:30, 75:25, 80:10, 80:15, 85:20, 90:10, and 98:1. The ratios of oil (e.g., medium chain fatty acid esters of monoglycerides and diglycerides) to non-ionic surfactant can be significantly higher. For example, in certain examples, below, CAPMUL® MCM and GELUCIRE® were used in ratios of up to about 65:1, e.g., 8:1, 22:1, 49:1, 65:1 and 66:1. See, e.g., Tables 20-24, below. Thus, useful ratios can be 8:1 or greater, e.g., 60 to 70:1. Among other combinations, these solubilizers, as defined herein, and combinations thereof, can be used to form combination estradiol and progesterone formulations of the present disclosure.


In illustrative embodiments, estradiol or progesterone is soluble in the oils at room temperature, although it may be desirable to warm the oils up until they are in a liquid state. In illustrative embodiments, the oil or oil/surfactant is liquid at between room temperature and about 50° C., e.g., at or below 50° C., at or below 40° C., or at or below 50° C. In illustrative embodiments, GELUCIRE® 44/14 is heated to about 65° C. and CAPMUL® MCM is heated to about 40° C. to facilitate mixing of the oil and non-surfactant, although such heating is not necessary to dissolve the estradiol or progesterone. In illustrative embodiments, the solubility of estradiol in the oil (or oil/surfactant) is at least about 0.5 wt %, e.g., 0.8 wt % or higher, or 1.0 wt % or higher. However, much higher solubility can be achieved. For example, as shown in Example 4, below, estradiol is stable in solution in CAPMUL® MCM at 12 mg/g (which is approximately equal to 12 mg/ml). As shown in Example 19, such solubility is favored over results observed in longer chain and unsaturated fatty acid esters.


High solubility of estradiol has been obtained in 2-(2-Ethoxyethoxy)ethanol, e.g., TRANSCUTOL® and in Propylene glycol monocaprylate, e.g., CAPRYOL™ 90 (Gattefosse).


In some embodiments, progesterone is fully solubilized using, for example and without limitation, sufficient amounts of: TRANSCUTOL® and MIGLYOL®; TRANSCUTOL®, MIGLYOL® and CAPMUL® PG 8 and/or PG 10; CAPMUL® MCM; CAPMUL® and a non-ionic surfactant; and CAPMUL® MCM and GELUCIRE®.


Combinations of these oils can produce partially solubilized progesterone, depending upon the desired unit dosage amount of progesterone. The greater the amount of progesterone per unit dosage form, the less progesterone may be solubilized. The upward limit of dosage strength per unit dose it generally limited only by the practical size of the final dosage form.


In illustrative embodiments of the invention, the selected oil does not require excessive heating in order to solubilize progesterone or estradiol. For example, when the formulation comprises medium chain fatty acid mono- and diglycerides (e.g., CAPMUL® MCM) and polyethylene glycol glycerides (e.g., GELUCIRE®) as a surfactant, the oil and/or the surfactant can be warmed up, e.g., to about 65° C. in the case of the surfactant and less in the case of the oil, to facilitate mixing of the oil and surfactant. The estradiol can be added at this temperature or at lower temperatures as the mixture cools or even after it has cooled as temperatures above room temperature, e.g., about 20° C., are not required to solubilize the estradiol in preferred oils. The progesterone can also be added as the mixture cools, e.g., to below about 40° C. or to below about 30° C., even down to room temperature.


As a non-limiting example, an illustrative embodiment of a pharmaceutical composition of the invention comprises solubilized estradiol, progesterone at least 75% of the progesterone being solubilized (the balance being micronized as discussed elsewhere herein), and an oil, wherein the oil is medium chain fatty acid mono- and diesters of glycerol, with or without surfactant. In certain embodiments, a specification for progesterone is set at >80% solubilized, <20% micronized or >85% solubilized, <15% micronized. Specific examples of such illustrative embodiments, with GELUCIRE® as surfactant, in which at least about 85% of the progesterone can be solubilized, include, e.g., the following four formulations:









TABLE 3







Formulation A—P:50/E2:0.25:












Amount
Qty/Capsule



Ingredient(s)
(% w/w)
(mg)















Progesterone, USP,
33.33
50.00



micronized





Estradiol Hemihydrate
0.17
0.26



CAPMUL ® MCM, NF
65.49
98.24



GELUCIRE ® 44/14, NF
1.00
1.50



Total
100.00
150.00

















TABLE 4







Formulation B—P:50/E2:0.5:












Amount
Qty/Capsule



Ingredient(s)
(% w/w)
(mg)















Progesterone, USP,
33.33
50.00



micronized





Estradiol Hemihydrate
0.35
0.52



CAPMUL ® MCM, NF
65.32
97.98



GELUCIRE ® 44/14, NF
1.00
1.50



Total
100.00
150.00

















TABLE 5







Formulation C—P:100/E2:0.5:












Amount
Qty/Capsule



Ingredient(s)
(% w/w)
(mg)















Progesterone, USP,
33.33
100.00



micronized





Estradiol Hemihydrate
0.17
0.52



CAPMUL ® MCM, NF
65.49
196.48



GELUCIRE ® 44/14, NF
1.00
3.00



Total
100.00
300.00

















TABLE 6







Formulation D—P:100/E2:1:












Amount
Qty/Capsule



Ingredient(s)
(% w/w)
(mg)















Progesterone, USP,
33.33
100.00



micronized





Estradiol Hemihydrate
0.34
1.03



CAPMUL ® MCM, NF
65.32
195.97



GELUCIRE ® 44/14, NF
1.00
3.00



Total
100.00
300.00

















TABLE 7







Formulation E—P:200/E2:2:












Amount
Qty/Capsule



Ingredient(s)
(% w/w)
(mg)














Progesterone, USP,
33.33
200.00



micronized





Estradiol Hemihydrate
0.34
2.06



CAPMUL ® MCM, NF
65.32
391.94



GELUCIRE ® 44/14, NF
1.00
6.00



Total
100.00
600.00





*Note:


1.00 mg Estradiol equivalent to 1.03 mg Estradiol Hemihydrate.






In general terms, the above formulations comprise 30 to 35 wt % progesterone, 0.1 to 0.4 wt % estradiol (or estradiol hemihydrate), 55 to 75 wt % of an oil that is predominantly medium chain fatty acid mono- and diglycerides, such as CAPMUL® MCM, and 0.5 to 10 wt % non-ionic surfactant, such as GELUCIRE® 44/14. The above formulations may be modified to comprise excipients, e.g., gelatin such as Gelatin 200 Bloom, glycerin, coloring agents such as Opatint red and white, and, optionally, MIGLYOL® 812.


Estradiol solubilization helps ensure high content uniformity and enhanced stability. Fully solubilized progesterone formulations or partially solubilized progesterone formulations in which at least about 50% of the progesterone, e.g., 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, or >95%, is solubilized appear to provide improved PK-related properties.


Pharmaceutical formulations as described herein can be either solid or liquid. Solid form preparations include powders, tablets, pills, capsules, cachets, suppositories, and dispersible granules. A solid preparation can comprise one or more substances, which may also act as diluents, flavoring agents, binders, preservatives, tablet disintegrating agents, or an encapsulating material. Details on techniques for formulation and administration are well described in the scientific and patent literature, see, e.g., the latest edition of Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, Mack Publishing Co, Easton Pa. (“Remington's”).


In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical formulations described herein are prepared and administered as filled capsules, typically soft capsules of one or more materials well known in the art including, for example and without limitation, soft gelatin capsules. Micronized progesterone, as described herein, may also be prepared for administration in tablets or other well-known orally administered dosage forms using standard techniques.


In some embodiments, in which the carrier is a medium fatty acid ester of a glycol and which comprise a non-ionic surfactant as described herein, the formulations are in liquid form, i.e., not gels, hard fats or other solid forms.


In general, the type of composition is selected based on the mode of administration. A pharmaceutical composition (e.g., for oral administration or delivery by injection) can be in the form of a liquid (e.g., an elixir, syrup, solution, emulsion or suspension). Alternatively, a pharmaceutical composition as described herein can take the form of a pill, tablet, or capsule containing the liquid oil, and thus, the composition can contain any of the following: a diluent such as lactose, sucrose, dicalcium phosphate, and the like; a disintegrant such as starch or derivatives thereof; a lubricant such as magnesium stearate and the like; and a binder such a starch, gum acacia, polyvinylpyrrolidone, gelatin, cellulose and derivatives thereof. The composition can also be formulated into a suppository disposed, for example, in a polyethylene glycol (PEG) solubilizing agent.


Administration of the formulations described herein can be carried out via any of the accepted modes of administration. Thus, administration can be, for example, intravenous, topical, subcutaneous, transcutaneous, transdermal, intramuscular, oral, intra-joint, parenteral, intra-arteriole, intradermal, intraventricular, intracranial, intraperitoneal, intralesional, intranasal, rectal, vaginal, or by inhalation. In some embodiments, a composition as described herein is administered orally. For example, a pharmaceutical composition as described herein can be administered via capsules such as soft capsules. In some embodiments, a pharmaceutical composition as described herein is administered once daily.


According to various embodiments described herein, a 28-day or monthly regimen of capsules can be packaged in a single kit (e.g., a blister pack) having administration days identified to improve compliance and reduce associated symptoms, among others. One or more of the capsules may contain no estradiol, for example, and/or no progesterone. Capsules that comprise no estrogen or progesterone API may be referred to as placebos. A blister pack can have a plurality of scores or perforations separating blister pack into 28 days. Each day may further comprise a single blister or a plurality of blisters. In various embodiments, each unit dose may contain micronized and/or partially solubilized, or fully solubilized progesterone and/or solubilized estradiol in amounts as set forth herein above, although other dose ranges may be contemplated. In addition, kits having other configurations are also contemplated herein. For example, without limitation, kits having such blister packs may contain any number of capsules.


As referenced above, the formulations of the present disclosure are generally orally administered, typically via, for example, capsules such as soft capsules. The present formulations can also be used to form transdermal patches using standard technology known in the art. Solubilized formulations of the present invention can also be formulated for intraperitoneal administration using techniques well known in the art.


In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical formulations disclosed herein are useful in treating conditions in subjects caused, at least in part, by estrogen deficiency, particularly for women with a uterus. For example, in some embodiments, the formulations disclosed herein are useful for the treatment of an animal, especially a mammal, including humans, for menopause; for endometrial hyperplasia; for secondary amenorrhea; as a method of treatment for preterm birth, when said animal has a shortened cervix, and other disease states or conditions treated with supplemental progesterone or estrogen. In some embodiments, a formulation as disclosed herein is useful for treating one or more symptoms of menopause such as vaginal atrophy, vaginal dryness, watery discharge, skin dryness, osteoporosis, thin bones, painful fractures, incontinence, urinary frequency, urinary urgency, urinary tract infections, temperature dyregulation (e.g., feeling unusually hot or cold or temperature swings), dysfunctional bleeding, rapid heartbeat, migraine, breast tenderness or swelling, breast atrophy, decreased skin elasticity, back pain, joint pain, muscle pain, fatigue, decreased libido, dyspareunia, vasomotor symptoms (e.g., flushing, hot flashes), irritability, memory loss, mood disturbance, depression, anxiety, sleep disturbance, and sweating. Thus, in some embodiments, the present disclosure provides methods of treating such a condition by administering to the subject a composition comprising estradiol and progesterone as described herein. As used herein, the term “treatment,” or a derivative thereof, contemplates partial or complete inhibition of the stated disease state when a formulation as described herein is administered prophylactically or following the onset of the disease state for which such formulation is administered. For the purposes of the present disclosure, “prophylaxis” refers to administration of the active ingredient(s) to an animal, especially a mammal, to protect the animal from any of the disorders set forth herein, as well as others.


Bioavailability Properties


The pharmaceutical formulations of the present disclosure can be formulated to provide desirable pharmacokinetic parameters in a subject (e.g., a female subject) to whom the composition is administered. In some embodiments, a pharmaceutical composition as described herein produces desirable pharmacokinetic parameters for progesterone in the subject. In some embodiments, a pharmaceutical composition as described herein produces desirable pharmacokinetic parameters for estradiol in the subject. In some embodiments, a pharmaceutical composition as described herein produces desirable pharmacokinetic parameters for one or more metabolites of progesterone or estradiol in the subject, for example estrone or total estrone.


In certain embodiments, combination formulations of the present disclosure exhibit bioavailability properties that are comparable to the bioavailability properties of the components of the combination formulation when individually formulated (e.g., progesterone in a peanut oil, e.g., PROMETRIUM®, and a micronized estradiol tablet, e.g., ESTRACE®). In certain embodiments, a composition is within the scope of the invention if it has a value for a pharmacokinetic parameter that is about 80% to about 125% of the value of the pharmacokinetic parameter for a reference composition when said formulation is administered to a human subject.


Following the administration of a composition comprising progesterone and estradiol to a subject, the concentration and metabolism of progesterone or estradiol can be measured in a sample (e.g., a plasma sample) from the subject. Progesterone is metabolized to pregnanediols and pregnanolones, which are then conjugated to glucuronide and sulfate metabolites that are excreted or further recycled. Estradiol is converted reversibly to estrone, and both estradiol and estrone can be converted to the metabolite estriol. In postmenopausal women, a significant proportion of circulating estrogens exist as sulfate conjugates, especially estrone sulfate. Thus, estrone can be measured with respect to “estrone” amounts (excluding conjugates such as estrone sulfate) and “total estrone” amounts (including both free, or unconjugated, estrone and conjugated estrone such as estrone sulfate).


The pharmaceutical formulations of the present disclosure can be characterized for one or more pharmacokinetic parameters of progesterone, estradiol, or a metabolite thereof following administration of the composition to a subject or to a population of subjects. These pharmacokinetic parameters include AUC, Cmax, and Tmax.


In certain embodiments, a composition is within the scope of the invention if it has a Cmax value that is about 80% to about 125% of the Cmax value of the reference composition. Cmax is well understood in the art as an abbreviation for the maximum drug concentration in serum or plasma of the test subject. In certain embodiments, a composition is within the scope of the invention if it has a Tmax value that is about 80% to about 125% of the Tmax value of the reference composition. Tmax is well understood in the art as an abbreviation for the time to maximum drug concentration in serum or plasma of the test subject. In vivo testing protocols for determining a Cmax and/or Tmax value can be designed in a number of ways.


In certain embodiments, a composition is within the scope of the invention if it has an AUC value that is about 80% to about 125% of the AUC value of the reference composition. AUC is a determination of the area under the curve (AUC) plotting the serum or plasma concentration of drug along the ordinate (Y-axis) against time along the abscissa (X-axis). AUCs are well understood, frequently used tools in the pharmaceutical arts and have been extensively described, for example in “Pharmacokinetics Processes and Mathematics,” Peter E. Welling, ACS Monograph 185; 1986.


Any of a variety of methods can be used for measuring the levels of progesterone, estradiol, estrone, or total estrone in a sample, including immunoassays, mass spectrometry (MS), high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet fluorescent detection, liquid chromatography in conjunction with mass spectrometry (LC-MS), tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). It will be understood by a person of skill in the art that the sensitivity of the assay used will correlate with the level of quantification that can be detected, and that a more sensitivity assay will enable lower levels of quantification of progesterone, estradiol, estrone, or total estrone. In some embodiments, the levels of progesterone, estradiol, estrone, or total estrone are measured using a validated LC-MS/MS method. Methods of measuring hormone levels are well described in the literature.


The levels of progesterone, estradiol, estrone, or total estrone can be measured in any biological sample, e.g. a tissue or fluid such as blood, serum, plasma, or urine. In some embodiments, the sample is blood or plasma. In some embodiments, the levels of progesterone, estradiol, estrone, or total estrone are measured about 0.0, 0.10, 0.20, 0.05, 0.30, 0.35, 0.40, 0.45, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, or 48 hours after dosing, or any other appropriate time period that is common or useful in determining the levels of each of the hormones. Generally, assays to determine the levels of progesterone, estradiol, estrone, or total estrone are measured one or more times every 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 60, 120, 360, 480, 720, or 1440 minutes after administration, or combinations thereof (e.g., the first measurements are taken every 15 minutes for the first hour, followed by every 120 minutes thereafter). In some embodiments, the levels of progesterone, estradiol, estrone, or total estrone are measured about 48 hours after dosing. In embodiments, the timing of such measurements are designed to accurately measure Cmax, Tmax, or AUC. Timing can be adjusted based on the given circumstances (i.e., one formulation may cause a more rapid Cmax, in which case the initial times would be clustered closer together, closer to time zero, or both to ensure accurate measurement of Cmax, Tmax, and AUC).


In some embodiments, the values for Cmax, Tmax, and/or AUC represent a number of values taken from all the subjects in a patient test population and are, therefore, mean values averaged over the entire test population. Alternatively, the Cmax value, Tmax value, and/or AUC test/AUC control ratio may be determined for each subject, then averaged.


In some embodiments, administration of the pharmaceutical formulation as disclosed herein (e.g., a pharmaceutical formulation comprising solubilized estradiol, suspended progesterone, and a medium chain (C6-C12) oil) to a subject produces, in a plasma sample from the subject, one or more parameters selected from:


(i) an AUC(0-t) for estradiol that is from 1123 pg·h/ml to 1755 pg·h/ml;


(ii) an AUC(0-∞) for estradiol that is from 1968 pg·hr/ml to 3075 pg·hr/ml; or


(iii) a Cmax for estradiol that is from 52 pg/ml to 81 pg/ml.


In some embodiments, administration of the formulation to the subject produces both an AUC(0-t) for estradiol that is from 1123 pg·h/ml to 1755 pg·h/ml, and a Cmax for estradiol that is from 52 pg/ml to 81 pg/ml.


In some embodiments, administration of the formulation to the subject further produces, in a plasma sample from the subject, one or more parameters selected from:


(i) an AUC(0-t) for progesterone that is from 96 ng·hr/ml to 150 ng·hr/ml;


(ii) an AUC(0-∞) for progesterone that is from 105 ng·hr/ml to 164 ng·hr/ml; or


(ii) a Cmax for progesterone that is from 71 ng/ml to 112 ng/ml.


In some embodiments, administration of the composition to the subject produces both an AUC(0-t) for progesterone that is from 96 ng·hr/ml to 150 ng·hr/ml, and a Cmax for progesterone that is from 71 ng/ml to 112 ng/ml.


In some embodiments, administration of the formulation to the subject produces, in a plasma sample from the subject,


(i) an AUC(0-t) for estradiol that is from 1123 pg·h/ml to 1755 pg·h/ml;


(ii) a Cmax for estradiol that is from 52 pg/ml to 81 pg/ml;


(iii) an AUC(0-t) for progesterone that is from 96 ng·hr/ml to 150 ng·hr/ml; or


(iv) a Cmax for progesterone that is from 71 ng/ml to 112 ng/ml.


In some embodiments, administration of the pharmaceutical formulation to the subject produces, in a plasma sample from the subject, one, two, three or more parameters selected from:


(i) an AUC(0-t) for estradiol that is from 1123 pg·h/ml to 1755 pg·h/ml;


(ii) a Cmax for estradiol that is from 52 pg/ml to 81 pg/ml;


(iii) an AUC(0-t) for progesterone that is from 96 ng·hr/ml to 150 ng·hr/ml; or


(iv) a Cmax for progesterone that is from 71 ng/ml to 112 ng/ml.


In some embodiments, administration of the pharmaceutical formulation to the subject produces both parameters (i) and (ii). In some embodiments, administration of the formulation to the subject produces both parameters (i) and (iii). In some embodiments, administration of the formulation to the subject produces both parameters (i) and (iv). In some embodiments, administration of the formulation to the subject produces both parameters (ii) and (iii). In some embodiments, administration of the formulation to the subject produces both parameters (ii) and (iv). In some embodiments, administration of the formulation to the subject produces both parameters (iii) and (iv). In some embodiments, administration of the formulation to the subject produces all of parameters (i), (ii), and (iii). In some embodiments, administration of the formulation to the subject produces both parameters (i), (iii), and (iv). In some embodiments, administration of the formulation to the subject produces both parameters (ii), (iii), and (iv). In some embodiments, administration of the formulation to the subject produces all of parameters (i), (ii), (iii), and (iv).


In some embodiments, administration of the pharmaceutical formulation to the subject further produces, in a plasma sample from the subject, one or more parameters selected from:


(i) an AUC(0-t) for estrone sulfate that is from 7277 pg·hr/ml to 11370 pg·hr/ml;


(ii) an AUC(0-∞) for estrone sulfate that is from 9596 pg·hr/ml to 14994 pg·hr/ml; or


(ii) a Cmax for estrone sulfate that is from 341 pg/ml to 533 pg/ml.


In some embodiments, administration of the pharmaceutical composition to the subject further produces, in a plasma sample from the subject, one or more parameters selected from:


(i) an AUC(0-t) for total estrone that is from 161 pg·h/ml to 252 pg·h/ml;


(ii) an AUC(0-∞) for total estrone that is from 171 pg·hr/ml to 267 pg·hr/ml; or


(ii) a Cmax for total estrone that is from 28 pg/ml to 44 pg/ml.


In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is administered to a population of subjects in need thereof, and mean parameters are determined for samples (e.g., plasma samples) from the subjects administered the composition. Thus, in some embodiments, administration of the composition to a population of subject produces, in plasma samples from the subjects, one or more of a mean AUC(0-t) for estradiol that is from 1123 pg·h/ml to 1755 pg·h/ml, a mean AUC(0-∞) for estradiol that is from 1968 pg·hr/ml to 3075 pg·hr/ml, or a mean Cmax for estradiol that is from 52 pg/ml to 81 pg/ml. In some embodiments, administration of the composition to a population of subject produces, in plasma samples from the subjects, one or more of a mean AUC(0-t) for progesterone that is from 96 ng·hr/ml to 150 ng·hr/ml, a mean AUC(0-∞) for progesterone that is from 105 ng·hr/ml to 164 ng·hr/ml, or a mean Cmax for progesterone that is from 71 ng/ml to 112 ng/ml. In some embodiments, administration of the composition to a population of subject produces, in plasma samples from the subjects, one or more of a mean AUC(0-t) for estrone sulfate that is from 7277 pg·hr/ml to 11370 pg·hr/ml, a mean AUC(0-∞) for estrone sulfate that is from 9596 pg·hr/ml to 14994 pg·hr/ml, or a mean Cmax for estrone sulfate that is from 341 pg/ml to 533 pg/ml. In some embodiments, administration of the composition to a population of subject produces, in plasma samples from the subjects, one or more of a mean AUC(0-t) for total estrone that is from 161 pg·h/ml to 252 pg·h/ml, a mean AUC(0-t) for total estrone that is from 171 pg·hr/ml to 267 pg·hr/ml, or a mean Cmax for total estrone that is from 28 pg/ml to 44 pg/ml.


In some embodiments, method of treating a subject are provided. In some embodiments, the method comprises administering to the subject a pharmaceutical composition as described herein, wherein administration of the pharmaceutical composition produces, in a plasma sample from the subject, one or more parameters selected from: an AUC(0-t) for estradiol that is from 1123 pg·h/ml to 1755 pg·h/ml; an AUC(0-∞) for estradiol that is from 1968 pg·hr/ml to 3075 pg·hr/ml; a Cmax for estradiol that is from 52 pg/ml to 81 pg/ml; an AUC(0-t) for progesterone that is from 96 ng·hr/ml to 150 ng·hr/ml; an AUC(0-∞) for progesterone that is from 105 ng·hr/ml to 164 ng·hr/ml; a Cmax for progesterone that is from 71 ng/ml to 112 ng/ml; an AUC(0-t) for estrone sulfate that is from 7277 pg·hr/ml to 11370 pg·hr/ml; an AUC(0-∞) for estrone sulfate that is from 9596 pg·hr/ml to 14994 pg·hr/ml; a Cmax for estrone sulfate that is from 341 pg/ml to 533 pg/ml; an AUC(0-t) for total estrone that is from 161 pg·h/ml to 252 pg·h/ml; an AUC(0-∞) for total estrone that is from 171 pg·hr/ml to 267 pg·hr/ml; and a Cmax for total estrone that is from 28 pg/ml to 44 pg/ml.


III. EXAMPLES

The following examples are offered to illustrate, but not to limit, the claimed subject matter.


Example 1
Estradiol Solubility

In various experiments, suitable solvents were determined for providing sufficient solubility to make 2 mg of estradiol in a 100 mg fill mass, with a desired goal of achieving ˜20 mg/g solubility for estradiol. Initial solubility experiments were done by mixing estradiol with various solvents, saturate the solution with the estradiol, equilibrate for at least 3 days and filter the un-dissolved particles and analyzing the clear supernatant for the amount of estradiol dissolved by HPLC.


Estradiol solubility experiments were performed. From this list at least one item (e.g. propylene glycol) is known to be unsuitable for encapsulation in more than 20% w/w concentration.












TABLE 8







Ingredient
Solubility (mg/g)









PEG 400
105* 



Propylene Glycol
75*



Polysorbate 80
36*



TRANSCUTOL ® HP
141



CAPMUL ® PG8
31.2







*Literature reference—Salole, E.G. (1987) The Physicochemical Properties of Oestradiol, J Pharm and Biomed Analysis, 5, 635-640.






In further solubility studies, estradiol was soluble at least 6 mg/gm MIGLYOL® TRANSCUTOL® in ratios of 81:19 to 95:5, in MIGLYOL®; ethanol at 91:11, and in MIGLYOL®:CAPMUL® PG8 at 88:11, but not in MIGLYOL:TRANSCUTOL at 96:4, MIGLYOL®:LABRASOL® at 70:30 to 80:20, or MIGLYOL®:CAPMUL® PG8 at 86:14.


Example 2

It was desired to achieve 50 mg of progesterone suspended in a medium that can also solubilize 2 mg estradiol in a total capsule fill mass of 200 mg. In order to achieve this formulation, the required solubility of estradiol needs to be ˜10 mg/g. A total fill weight of 200 mg was considered suitable for a size 5 oval soft gelatin capsule.


Additional solubility studies were performed to find solvent mixtures that might possibly be more suitable for soft gelatin encapsulation. Solubility studies were conducted with CAPMUL® PG8 and CAPMUL® MCM by mixing estradiol with various solvent systems and as before by analyzing for the amount of estradiol dissolved by HPLC after filtration. Results of these experiments are presented in Table 9. It can be seen from these results that mixtures containing MIGLYOL®:CAPMUL® PG8 at 50%; and also CAPMUL® MCM alone or in combination with 20% Polysorbate 80 can achieve sufficient solubility to meet the target of 10 mg/g. CAPMUL® PG8 mixed with MIGLYOL® at the 15 and 30% level did not provide sufficient solubility.










TABLE 9





Ingredient
Solubility (mg/g)
















MIGLYOL ®:CAPMUL ® PG8 (85:15)
4.40


MIGLYOL ®:CAPMUL ® PG8 (70:30)
8.60


TRANSCUTOL:MIGLYOL ® 812:
>12


CAPMUL PG8 (5:65:28)



TRANSCUTOL ®:MIGLYOL ® 812:
>12


CAPMUL ® PG8 (5:47:47)



MIGLYOL ®:CAPMUL ® PG8 (50:50)
14.0


CAPMUL ® MCM
19.8


Polysorbate 80:CAPMUL ® MCM (20:80)
15.0









Example 3

Additional studies were performed to assess the stability of estradiol (4-6 mg) in solvent mixtures, as reported in Table 10. MIGLYOL® 812 with 4% TRANSCUTOL®precipitated on Hot/Cold cycling after 96 hours, while estradiol solubilized in MIGLYOL®:CAPMUL® blends at 30 and 50% or in CAPMUL® MCM alone, did not precipitate under the same conditions for a minimum of 14 days.











TABLE 10






Estradiol
Results Hot/Cold


Formulation
(mg/g)
Cycling







TRANSCUTOL ®:
4
Crystallizes after


MIGLYOL ® 812 (4:96)

96 hours


MIGLYOL ® 812:
6
Clear, after 14 days


CAPMUL ® PG8 (70:30)




MIGLYOL 812:
6
Clear, after 14 days


CAPMUL ® PG8 (50:50)




TRANSCUTOL ®:MIGLYOL ®
6
Clear, after 14 days


812:CAPMUL ® PG8 (5:80:15)




CAPMUL ® MCM
6
Clear, after 14 days









As shown in Table 11 below, it was found that 12 mg estradiol solubilized in MIGLYOL®:CAPMUL® PG8 50:50, CAPMUL® MCM, and in mixtures of TRANSCUTOL®: MIGLYOL®: CAPMUL® PG8 are stable and do not precipitate for at least 12 days.













TABLE 11








Estradiol
Results Hot/Cold



Formulation
(mg/g)
Cycling









MIGLYOL ® 812:
12
Clear, after 12 days



CAPMUL ® PG8 (50:50)





TRANSCUTOL ®:
12
Clear, after 12 days



MIGLYOL ® 812:





CAPMUL ® PG8 (5:65:28)





TRANSCUTOL ®:
12
Clear, after 12 days



MIGLYOL ® 812:





CAPMUL ® PG8 (5:47:47)





CAPMUL ® MCM
12
Clear, after 12 days










Example 4

In addition to determining physical stability of the estradiol solutions over time, it is necessary to determine if the fill material will be stable during the encapsulation process. One way to test these preparations is with the addition of water to the fill mass. As can be seen in Table 12, estradiol solutions at a concentration of 6 mg/g in Polyethylene Glycol 400 and CAPMUL® MCM are able to absorb a minimum of 7% water without recrystallization, whereas the same concentration in MIGLYOL® 812:CAPMUL® PG8 (75:25) precipitates.


Estradiol solutions at a concentration of 12 mg/g in Polyethylene Glycol 400 and CAPMUL® MCM are able to absorb a minimum of 7% water without recrystallization. All CAPMUL® PG8 containing formulations turned hazy on the addition of water. However, it should be noted that estradiol recrystallization was not observed, and the addition of water to CAPMUL® PG 8 alone (without any estradiol) also turns hazy on the addition of water.











TABLE 12






Estradiol
Results after addition


Formulation
(mg/g)
of 7% water

















MIGLYOL ® 812:CAPMUL ®
6
Precipitated


PG8 (75:25)




MIGLYOL ® 812:CAPMUL ®
12
Hazy


PG8 (50:50)




TRANSCUTOL ®:MIGLYOL ®
12
Hazy


812:CAPMUL ® PG8




(5:65:28)




CAPMUL ® MCM
12
Clear


TRANSCUTOL ®:MIGLYOL ®
12
Hazy


812:CAPMUL ® PG8




(5:47:47)




Polyethylene Glycol 400
12
clear









Example 5

In an exemplary embodiment, a capsule is provided containing a fill material comprising:












TABLE 13







Ingredient
Mg/Capsule



















Estradiol Hemihydrate
2.00



Triglyceride of caprylic/capric acid
qs



(e.g., MIGLYOL ® 812)




Diethylene Glycol Monoethylether
65.00



(TRANSCUTOL ® HP)




Liquid lecithin
1.63



Butylated Hydroxytoluene
0.13



Total Fill Weight
325










Example 6

In an exemplary embodiment, a capsule is provided containing a fill material comprising:












TABLE 14







Ingredient
Mg/Capsule



















Estradiol Hemihydrate
2.00



Monoglycerides/diglycerides of capric acid
qs



(e.g., CAPMUL ® MCM)




Liquid lecithin
1.63



Polysorbate 80
97.5



Total Fill Weight
325










In an exemplary embodiment, a capsule is provided containing a fill material comprising:












TABLE 15





Ingredient
Mg/Capsule
% w/w
Amount/Batch


















Estradiol Hemihydrate
2.03
0.62
20.2 g 


Monoglycerides/diglycerides
322.97
99.38
3.23 kg


of capric acid





(e.g., CAPMUL ® MCM)





Total

100
3.25 kg









The above formulation is prepared as follows: estradiol is added to CAPMUL® MCM and mixed until dissolved.


Example 7
Progesterone Solubility

In various embodiments, both estradiol and progesterone may be dissolved in a solvent. In various embodiments, the solubility of both estradiol and progesterone will be such that a therapeutically effective dose may be obtained in a reasonably sized mass, generally considered to be between 1 mg and 1200 mg, preferably suitable for encapsulation in a size 3 to 22 oval or oblong capsule. For example, in various embodiments, 50 mg to 100 mg of progesterone may be dissolved in a volume of solvent; i.e., the solubility would be 50 mg to 100 mg per capsule. MIGLYOL® was attempted, and while it can be considered a good carrier for progesterone, it alone did not provide a desirable level of solubilization of estradiol (e.g., solubility of 12 mg/g may be desirable in various embodiments). Thus, MIGLYOL® may be used in embodiments comprising a suspension of progesterone, though MIGLYOL®, standing alone, is not desirable for use in embodiments having fully solubilized progesterone and/or estradiol.


As can be seen in Table 16, the solubility of progesterone in CAPMUL® MCM is ˜73 mg/g. Therefore, by suspending 200 mg progesterone in 400 mg of solvent, part of the dose (˜14%) is already dissolved and the remaining is still a suspension. In some aspects and embodiments, it is desired to minimize the partial solubility of progesterone in the formulation in order to minimize the possibility of recrystallization.


Based on 73 mg/g solubility, the capsule size required to make a capsule of 50 mg solubilized progesterone would be 685 mg. Therefore, it was shown that it would be feasible to make a 50 mg progesterone and 2 mg estradiol solubilized formulation. MIGLYOL® had the lowest solubility, but that solvent is unable to dissolve the estradiol, therefore under further experiments, it was decided to proceed with the second lowest or CAPMUL® MCM. It has also been found that 2 mg of estradiol may also be dissolved in 685 mg of CAPMUL® MCM.











TABLE 16







Progesterone Solubility



Ingredient
(mg/g)


















CAPMUL ® MCM
73.4



CAPMUL ® PG8
95



MIGLYOL ® 812
27.8



CAPMUL ® MCM:
86.4



GELUCIRE ® 44/14 (9:1)




CAPMUL ® MCM:
70.5



GELUCIRE 44/14 (7:3)




CAPMUL ® MCM:
57.4



GELUCIRE ® 44/14 (6:3)









In addition, it has been found that the solubility of progesterone in a solvent of CAPMUL® MCM in combination with GELUCIRE® 44/14 in a 9:1 ratio increases the solubility to approximately 86 mg/g. Therefore, in various embodiments, progesterone and/or estradiol may be dissolved in a CAPMUL® MCM and GELUCIRE® 44/14 system, wherein the ratio of CAPMUL® MCM to GELUCIRE® 44/14 is 9:1.












TABLE 17








Progesterone Solubility



Ingredient
(mg/g)









CAPMUL ® MCM:
86.4



GELUCIRE 44/14 (9:1)




CAPMUL ® MCM:
70.5



GELUCIRE ® 44/14 (7:3)




CAPMUL ® MCM:
57.4



GELUCIRE ® 44/14 (6:4)










Example 8

In an exemplary embodiment, a capsule is provided containing a fill material having fully solubilized progesterone and estradiol comprising:












TABLE 18








Qty/Capsule


Ingredient
Mass (mg)
% w/w
(mg)


















Progesterone, USP, micronized
50.00
7.14
50.00


Estradiol Hemihydrate, USP
2.03
0.29
2.03


CAPMUL ® MCM, NF

82.57
577.97


GELUCIRE ® 44/14, NF

10.0
70.00


TOTAL

100.00
700.00









A capsule such as that shown in Table 18 may be manufactured in any suitable manner. For the purposes of this Example, mixing may be facilitated by an impellor, agitator, or other suitable means. Also for the purposes of this Example, heating and/or mixing may be performed under an inert or relatively inert gas atmosphere, such as nitrogen gas N2. Mixing and/or heating for the purposes of this Example may be performed in any suitable vessel, such as a stainless steel vessel.


For example, CAPMUL® MCM may be heated to between 30° C. to 50° C., more preferably from 35° C. to 45° C., and more preferably to 40° C.+/−2° C. GELUCIRE® 44/14 may be added to the CAPMUL® MCM and mixed until dissolved. The addition may occur all at once or may occur gradually over a period of time. Heat may continue to be applied during the mixing of the GELUCIRE® 44/14 and the CAPMUL® MCM.


Heat may be removed from the GELUCIRE® 44/14 and CAPMUL® MCM mixture. Estradiol Hemihydrate may be added to the mixture. The addition may occur all at once or may occur gradually over a period of time. Micronized progesterone may then be added to the GELUCIRE® 44/14, CAPMUL® MCM and Estradiol Hemihydrate mixture until dissolved. The addition may occur all at once or may occur gradually over a period of time.


Example 9

In an exemplary embodiment, a capsule is provided containing a fill material having suspended progesterone comprising:














TABLE 19








mg/





Ingredient
Capsule
%
Function





















Micronized
200.00
30.77
Active



Progesterone






Medium Chain
qs
qs
Carrier



Triglyceride






(MIGLYOL ® 812 or






equivalent)






Lecithin Liquid
1.63
0.25
Lubricant/






Emulsifier



Butylated
0.13
0.02
Antioxidant



Hydroxytoluene (also






referred to as “BHT”)










The above formulation is prepared as follows: MIGLYOL® is heated to about 45° C. GELUCIRE® 44/14 is added and mixed until dissolved. BHT is added and mixed until dissolved. Progesterone is suspended and passed through a colloid mill. The resultant fill mass can be used for encapsulation.


In an exemplary embodiment, a capsule is provided containing a fill material having partially solubilized progesterone comprising:













TABLE 20






Qty/

Qty/
Amount/



Capsule
%
Capsule
Batch


Ingredient
(mg)
w/w
(mg)
(kg)



















Micronized
200.00
33.33
Active
2.0


Progesterone, USP






Monoglycerides/
394.0
65.67
Carrier
3.94


diglycerides/triglycerides






of caprylic/capric acid






(CAPMUL ® MCM)






Lauroyl polyoxyl-32-
6.0
1
Lubricant/
0.06


glycerides


Emulsifier



(GELUCIRE ® 44/14






or equivalent)






Total
600.00 mg
100

6.0 kg









For suspensions of progesterone and partially solubilized progesterone, GELUCIRE® 44/14 may be added at 1% to 2% w/w to increase viscosity. The above formulation is prepared as follows: CAPMUL® MCM is heated to about 65° C. GELUCIRE® 44/14 is added and mixed until dissolved. Heat is removed. Progesterone is added and the mixture is passed through a colloid mill. The resultant fill mass can be used for encapsulation.


Example 10

In an exemplary embodiment, a capsule is provided containing a fill material having suspended progesterone comprising:












TABLE 21







mg/



Ingredient
%
Capsule
Function


















Micronized Progesterone
30.77
200.00
Active


Medium Chain Triglyceride
65.93
428.55
Carrier


(MIGLYOL ® 812 or equivalent)





Lauroyl polyoxyl-32-glycerides
3.00
19.50
Suspending


(GELUCIRE ® 44/14 or


Agent


equivalent)





Butylated Hydroxytoluene
0.03
1.95
Antioxidant


Total
100
650









In various embodiments, amounts of MIGLYOL® may be present in a range from about 35-95% by weight; GELUCIRE® 44/14 from about 0.5-30% by weight; and BHT from about 0.01-0.1% by weight.


Example 11

For the purposes of this Example, a particle size analysis is conducted by using the Beckman Device. A sample API comprising micronized progesterone in accordance with various embodiments is provided for analysis.


Approximately 0.01 g of a sample API in accordance with various embodiments was combined with Coulter 1B and 10 mL of deionized water. Sonication was performed for 15 seconds. The Beckman Device, equipped with a ULM, performed analysis for 90 seconds. The Beckman Device was configured to use the Fraunhofer optical model. The Beckman Device yielded that the sample has an X50 of 4.279 μm, an X75 of 7.442 μm, and an X25 of 1.590 μm. The Beckman Device also yielded that the mean particle size is 4.975 μm, the median particle size is 4.279 μm, the mode particle size is 6.453 μm, and the standard deviation is 3.956 μm. A graph of the particle distribution obtained is shown in FIG. 4.


Example 12

A formulation sample having approximately 200 mg of micronized progesterone and 2 mg of estradiol was dispersed with oil. The Beckman Device, equipped with a MLM, performed analysis for 60 seconds. The Beckman Device was configured to use the Fraunhofer optical model. The Beckman Device yielded that the sample has an X50 of 11.0 μm, an X75 of 17.3 μm, and an X25 of 5.3 μm. The Beckman Device also yielded that the mean particle size is 11.8 μm, the median particle size is 11.04 μm, the mode particle size is 13.6 μm, and the standard deviation is 7.8 μm.


Example 13

In order to increase the solubility of progesterone in the final solution, GELUCIRE® 44/14 was added at about 10% w/w.









TABLE 22







Quantitative Formula: Batch Size 10,000 capsules














Label

Qty/
Amount/


Item

Claim
%
Capsule
Batch


No.
Ingredient(s)
(mg)
w/w
(mg)
(kg)















1.
Progesterone,
50.00
7.14
50.00
0.50



USP, micronized






2.
Estradiol
2.03
0.29
2.03
0.02



Hemihydrate, USP






3.
CAPMUL ®

82.57
577.97
5.78



MCM, NF






4.
GELUCIRE ®

10.0
70.00
0.70



44/14, NF








Total:
100.00
700.00
7.00









An example of the final formulation is provided in Table 22. The manufacturing process is as follows. CAPMUL® MCM is heated to 40° C. GELUCIRE® 44/14 is heated to 65° C. and added and mixed until dissolved. Heat is removed. Estradiol is added and mixed until dissolved. Micronized progesterone is then added and mixed until dissolved.


Example 14

In an exemplary embodiment, a capsule is provided containing a fill material having fully solubilized estradiol and partially solubilized progesterone comprising:














TABLE 23







Label

Qty/
Amount/


Item

Claim

Capsule
Batch


No.
Ingredient(s)
(mg)
% w/w
(mg)
(g)




















1.
Progesterone, USP,
50.00
25.000
50.00
500.00



micronized






2.
Estradiol Hemihydrate
0.25
0.129
0.26
2.58


3.
CAPMUL ® MCM,

73.371
146.74
1467.42



NF






4.
GELUCIRE ® 44/14,

1.500
3.00
30.00



NF








Total:
100.00
200.00 mg
2000.00









The manufacturing process is as follows. CAPMUL® MCM is heated to 65° C. GELUCIRE® 44/14 is added and mixed until dissolved. Heat is removed. Estradiol is added and mixed until dissolved. Micronized progesterone is then added and dispersed. The mixture is then passed through a colloid mill. The resultant fill mass can be used for encapsulation.


Example 15

In an exemplary embodiment, a capsule is provided containing a fill material having fully solubilized estradiol and partially solubilized progesterone comprising:














TABLE 24







Label

Qty/
Amount/


Item

Claim

Capsule
Batch


No.
Ingredient(s)
(mg)
% w/w
(mg)
(g)




















1.
Progesterone, USP,
200.00
33.33
200.0
2000.0



micronized






2.
Estradiol
2.00
0.35
2.07
20.7



Hemihydrate






3.
CAPMUL ® MCM,

65.32
391.93
3919.3



NF






4.
GELUCIRE ®

1.00
6.0
60.0



44/14, NF








Total:
100.00
600.0 mg
6000.0









The manufacturing process is as follows. CAPMUL® MCM is heated to 65° C. GELUCIRE® 44/14 is added and mixed until dissolved. Heat is removed. Estradiol is added and mixed until dissolved. Micronized progesterone is then added and dispersed. The mixture is then passed through a colloid mill. The resultant fill mass can be used for encapsulation. Alternatively, GELUCIRE® 44/14 is heated to 65 C and CAPMUL® MCM is heated to 40 C+/−5 C to achieve mixing of the oil and the surfactant before heat is removed; estradiol is added while the mixture is cooling; progesterone is added when the mixture has dropped below about 4° C.; the mixture is then passed through a colloid mill, e.g., three times.


Example 16
Study 352—Progesterone and Estradiol Combination Study Under Fed Conditions

This following study protocol was used to establish bio-availability and bioequivalence parameters for a combination product of the present disclosure comprising progesterone (200 mg) and estradiol (2.0 mg) as prepared via the process described in Example 14 and compared to 200 mg of PROMETRIUM® (Catalent Pharmaceuticals, St. Petersburg, Fla. (and 2.0 mg of ESTRACE® (estradiol vaginal cream, USP, 0.01%) (Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. Princeton, N.J.), administered to twenty-four (24) normal healthy, adult human post-menopausal female subjects under fed conditions.


The pharmaceutical formulation of the invention used in these PK studies had substantially the following formula as shown in Table 25:











TABLE 25







Qty/Capsule


Ingredient(s)
Amount (% w/w)
(mg)

















Progesterone,
33.33
200.00


USP,




micronized




Estradiol
0.35
2.07


Hemihydrate,




USP




Micronized




CAPMUL
65.32
391.93


MCM, NF,




USP




GELUCIRE
1.00
6.00


44/14, NF




Total
100.00
600









The Study Design: An open-label, balanced, randomized, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence, single-dose, two-way crossover study. The subjects were housed in the clinical facility from at least 11.00 hours pre-dose to at least 48.00 hours post-dose in each period, with a washout period of at least 14 days between the successive dosing days.


Subjects were fasted for at least about 10.00 hours before being served a high-fat, high-calorie breakfast, followed by dosing, then followed by a 04.00 hour, post-dose additional period of fasting. Standard meals were provided at about 04.00, 09.00, 13.00, 25.00, 29.00, 34.00 and 38.00 hours post-dose, respectively. Water was restricted at least about 01 hour prior to dosing until about 01 hour post-dose (except for water given during dosing). At other times, drinking water was provided ad libitum. Subjects were instructed to abstain from consuming caffeine and/or xanthine containing products (i.e. coffee, tea, chocolate, and caffeine-containing sodas, colas, etc.) for at least about 24.00 hours prior to dosing and throughout the study, grapefruit and\or its juice and poppy containing foods for at least about 48.00 hours prior to dosing and throughout the study.


Subjects remained seated upright for about the first 04.00 hours post-dose and only necessary movements were allowed during this period. Thereafter subjects were allowed to ambulate freely during the remaining part of the study. Subjects were not allowed to lie down (except as directed by the physician secondary to adverse events) during restriction period.


Subjects were instructed not to take any prescription medications within 14 days prior to study check in and throughout the study. Subjects were instructed not to take any over the counter medicinal products, herbal medications, etc. within 7 days prior to study check-in and throughout the study.


After overnight fasting of at least about 10.00 hours, a high-fat high-calorie breakfast was served about 30 minutes prior to administration of investigational product(s). All subjects were required to consume their entire breakfast within about 30 minutes of it being served, a single dose of either test product (T) of Progesterone 200 mg & Estradiol 2 mg tablets or the reference product (R) PROMETRIUM® (Progesterone) soft gel Capsule 200 mg and ESTRACE® (Estradiol) Tablets 2 mg (according to the randomization schedule) were administered with about 240 mL of water under fed condition, at ambient temperature in each period in sitting posture. A thorough mouth check was done to assess the compliance to dosing.


All dosed study subjects were assessed for laboratory tests at the end of the study or as applicable.


In each period, twenty-three (23) blood samples were collected. The pre-dose (10 mL) blood samples at −01.00, −00.50, 00.00 hours and the post-dose blood samples (08 mL each) were collected at 00.25, 00.50, 00.67, 00.83, 01.00, 01.33, 01.67, 02.00, 0.50, 03.00, 04.00, 05.00, 06.00, 07.00, 08.00, 10.00, 12.00, 18.00, 24.00 and 48.00 hours in labeled K2EDTA—vacutainers via an indwelling cannula placed in one of the forearm veins of the subjects. Each intravenous indwelling cannula was kept in situ as long as possible by injecting about 0.5 mL of 10 IU/mL of heparin in normal saline solution to maintain the cannula for collection of the post-dose samples. In such cases, blood samples were collected after discarding the first 0.5 mL of heparin containing blood. Each cannula was removed after the 24.00 hour sample was drawn or earlier or if blocked.


At the end of the study, the samples were transferred to the bio-analytical facility in a box containing sufficient dry ice to maintain the integrity of the samples. These samples were stored at a temperature of −70° C.±20° C. in the bio-analytical facility until analysis.


Progesterone (corrected and uncorrected), estradiol (unconjugated), total estrone, and estrone sulfate in plasma samples is assayed using a validated LC-MS/MS method.


The pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-∞) were calculated on data obtained from 24 subjects for the test product and reference product. In general, bioavailability of progesterone and estradiol were similar but bioequivalence was not established.


Corrected pharmacokinetic profile summaries are presented in Table 26, below, for progesterone.









TABLE 26







Summary of Primary Pharmacokinetic Profile of Test Product (T)


versus Reference Product (R) for Progesterone (Corrected)













Arithmetic Mean ± Standard









Pharmaco-
Geometric Mean*
Deviation











kinetic
Test
Reference
Test Product
Reference


Parameter
Product (T)
Product (R)
(T)
Product(R)














Cmax
47.0
43.0
81.0 ± 82.8
117.7 ± 173.7


AUC0-t
107.6
97.8
163.9 ± 136.5
191.1 ± 241.7


AUG0-∞
110.7
110.0
173.5 ± 143.0
207.1 ± 250.3





*Estimate of Least Square Mean used to calculate Geometric Mean






Example 17
Study 351—Progesterone and Estradiol Combination Study Under Fasting Conditions

Fasted studies using the above protocol and test and reference products were also conducted. However, rather than the high-fat meal prior to administration of the test and reference drug, each subject fasted for a period of at least twelve (12) hours prior to dose administration.


The pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-∞) were calculated on data obtained from 23 subjects under fasting conditions for the test product and reference product. In general, bioavailability of progesterone and estradiol were similar but bioequivalence was not established.


Corrected pharmacokinetic profile summaries are presented in Table 27, below, for progesterone.









TABLE 27







Summary of Primary Pharmacokinetic Profile of Test Product (T) versus


Reference Product (R) for Progesterone (Corrected)













Arithmetic Mean ± Standard









Pharmaco-
Geometric Mean*
Deviation











kinetic
Test
Reference
Test
Reference


Parameter
Product (T)
Product (R)
Product (T)
Product(R)














Cmax
2.3
3.0
 2.9 ± 2.3
3.9 ± 3.4


AUC0-t
8.4
10.9
11.2 ± 8.7
14.5 ± 11.0


AUG0-∞
12.9
17.2
15.1 ± 9.0
19.6 ± 10.2





*Estimate of Least Square Mean used to calculate Geometric Mean






The data indicate good (i.e., low) inter-patient and intra-patient variability relative to PROMETRIUM.


Example 18

Methods of manufacture in accordance with various embodiments are shown in FIGS. 1-3. With reference to FIG. 1, method of fill material 100 is shown. Step 102 comprises heating an oily vehicle carrier to 40° C.±5° C. Heating may be accomplished through any suitable means. The heating may be performed in any suitable vessel, such as a stainless steel vessel. The oily vehicle may be any oily vehicle described herein, for example, CAPMUL® MCM.


Step 104 comprises mixing GELUCIRE® 44/14 with the oily vehicle. Mixing may be facilitated by an impellor, agitator, or other suitable means. Step 102 may be performed under an inert or relatively inert gas atmosphere, such as nitrogen gas N2. Mixing may be performed in any suitable vessel, such as a stainless steel vessel.


Step 106 comprises mixing estradiol into the mixture of the oily vehicle and GELUCIRE® 44/14. Mixing may occur in a steel tank or vat. Mixing may be facilitated by an impellor, agitator, or other suitable means. Step 106 may be performed under an inert or relatively inert gas atmosphere, such as nitrogen gas N2.


Step 108 comprises cooling to room temperature. Cooling may be allowed to occur without intervention or cooling may be aided by application of a cooling system.


Step 110 comprises mixing micronized progesterone into the mixture of oily vehicle, estradiol and GELUCIRE® 44/14. Mixing may occur in a steel tank or vat. Mixing may be facilitated by an impellor, agitator, or other suitable means. Step 110 may be performed under an inert or relatively inert gas atmosphere, such as nitrogen gas N2. Step 112 comprises degasing. The resulting mixture from step 112 may comprise a fill material suitable for production into a softgel capsule.


With reference to FIG. 2, softgel capsule, i.e. gel mass, production 200 is shown. Step 202 comprises mixing glyercin with water. The water used in step 202 may be purified by any suitable means, such as reverse osmosis, ozonation, filtration (e.g., through a carbon column) or the like. Mixing may be facilitated by an impellor, agitator, or other suitable means. Step 202 may be performed under an inert or relatively inert gas atmosphere, such as nitrogen gas N2. Heating may be performed until the temperature reaches 80° C.±5° C.


Step 204 comprises the addition of gelatin to the glycerin water mixture. Mixing may be facilitated by an impellor, agitator, or other suitable means. Step 204 may be performed under an inert or relatively inert gas atmosphere, such as nitrogen gas N2. A vacuum may be drawn in step 204 to de-aerate.


Step 206 comprises addition of a coloring agent such as a dye. A coloring agent may comprise products sold under the trademark OPATINT or other suitable agent. Step 206 may be performed under an inert or relatively inert gas atmosphere, such as nitrogen gas N2. Step 208 comprises degasing. The resulting mixture from step 208 may comprise a gel capsule material suitable for use as a gel capsule in production of a softgel capsule.


With reference to FIG. 3, softgel capsule assembly process 300 is shown. Step 302 comprises heating the fill material. The fill material may be heated to any suitable temperature. In various embodiments, the fill material is heated to 30° C.+/−3° C. Fill material may be heated in a fill hopper. A fill hopper may comprise a device configured to hold a volume of the fill material and/or to dispense the fill material in controlled volumes.


Step 304 comprises filling a gel mass. A gel mass may be taken from the gel capsule material produced in step 208 of FIG. 2. Filling may be performed by injecting, placing, or otherwise disposing the fill material within a volume defined by the gel capsule material. The filling may occur in an encapsulator. The spreader boxes may be a temperature of 55° C.+/−10° C. The wedge temperature may be 38° C.+/−3° C. The drum cooling temperature may be 4° C.+/−2° C. The encapsulator may be lubricated using MIGLYOL® 812 or other suitable lubricant. Step 304 thus produces one or more softgel capsules. Filling may comprise producing a ribbon of thickness 0.85 mm±0.05 mm using spreader box knobs. The fill material may be injected into the gel to produce a fill weight having target weight±5% (i.e., 650±33 mg and 325±16.3 mg).


Step 306 comprises drying the softgel capsules. Drying may be performed in a tumble dryer, tray dryer, or combinations thereof. For example, drying may be performed in a tumble drying basket for between about 10 minutes and about 120 minutes. Drying may continue in a drying room for about 24 hours to about 72 hours. Step 308 may comprise inspection and/or polishing. Polishing may be performed with isopropyl alcohol. Step 310 may comprise packaging. Packaging may be accomplished through any suitable means. Packaging may comprise packing softgel capsules into a blister pack, bottle, box, pouch, or other acceptable packaging.


Example 19
I. Solubility of Estradiol in Soy Bean Oil, Peanut Oil, and Safflower Oil

Data was obtained visually by making the mixtures described below, sonicating the mixtures, and then seeing if a clear solution resulted. If a clear solution was achieved, it was an indication of solubility at the level studied.


Procedures and Results:


Step 1.


0.3% of Estradiol suspension in each oil was prepared by adding 30 mg Estradiol to solvent and QS to 10 g. Samples were mixed on vortex for 2 hours, heated at 50° C. for 30 minutes and then mixed for 1 hour more. All samples were still in suspension form.


Step 2.


Each sample was diluted to 0.24% (by adding 2.5 g more oil) and mixed for 2 hours and heated at 50° C. for 30 min and mixed again for one hour. All the samples were still cloudy. Samples were kept at room temperature overnight to see if they precipitate or if un-dissolved API settles out. After 20 hours at room temperature, it was observed that all samples still had un-dissolved API.


Step 3.


Each sample was diluted to 0.2% (by adding 2.5 g more oil) and mixed 2 for hours and heated at 50° C. for 30 min and mixed again for one hour. All the samples were still slightly cloudy, indicating that the estradiol was not completely dissolved.











TABLE 28






Estradiol Solubility
Estradiol Solubility


Ingredient
(mg/g)
(% w/w)







Peanut Oil
<2
<0.2


Safflower Oil
<2
<0.2


Soy Bean Oil
<2
<0.2









The solubility of estradiol in all three oils was less than 2 mg/g (0.2% w/w). This level of solubility is significantly below the solubility that the present inventors have discovered can be achieved in other oils, e.g., medium chain fatty acid esters, such as the mono/diglycerides, propylene glycol esters, and polyethylene glycol esters discussed above.


In sum, if no heat is used to dissolve estradiol in safflower oil, it will not go into solution. Given that the estradiol did not dissolve at 50° C., oils such as safflower oil will not be useful in the methods of the invention using medium chain fatty acid esters as described hereinabove.


II. Solubility in Safflower Oil

In a separate experiment, 50 g of safflower oil was heated to 85-88° C. and 60 mg estradiol was added, mixed until fully dissolved (1 hr), and allowed to cool to room temperature. The solubility achieved was 1.0 mg/ml. Addition of progesterone to a sample of the estradiol solution did not affect the solubility of estradiol.


Unsaturated fats are prone to oxidation, i.e., rancidity. Peroxides are intermediates formed during oxidation and the Peroxide Value is an indicator of extent of oxidation. The US Pharmacopeia specification for Peroxide Value of safflower oil is 10 max. Heating the oil, e.g., to 85° C., has been shown to increase the Peroxide Value. In contrast, medium chain fatty acid glycols, such as CAPMUL® MCM and MYGLYOL® 812, which comprise saturated C8-C10 fatty acid esters, have much lower Peroxide Values, e.g., on the order of 1 or less.


Example 20
Dissolution

Dissolution studies were performed using a formulation of this invention comparing the dissolution of progesterone to the dissolution of PROMETRIUM® and comparing the dissolution of estradiol to the dissolution of ESTRACE®. In one study, a formulation of the invention in capsules comprising 200 mg of progesterone and 2 mg estradiol was used. In a second study, a formulation of the invention in capsules comprising 50 mg of progesterone and 2 mg estradiol was used. The two formulations comprised:


The dissolution study was performed using a USP dissolution apparatus (reciprocating cylinder) (“USP Apparatus 3”). The apparatus was set to 30 dips per minute. 250 mL of a solution of 0.1N HCl with 3% sodium lauryl sulfate was used at 37° C.


In both studies, progesterone was dissolved faster, and with smaller standard deviations, from the capsules of the invention than from PROMETRIUM®. Dissolution of estradiol was comparable but marginally slower from the capsules of the invention than from ESTRACE®. For illustrative purposes, a graph showing progesterone dissolution from the 200 mg progesterone capsule of the invention and from PROMETRIUM® is attached as FIG. 5.


Both capsules of the invention were stable on storage in white HDPE bottles. Positive stability data were obtained with the 200 mg progesterone formulation over 6 months (>6 months data unavailable) and with the 50 mg progesterone formulation over 3 months (>3 months data unavailable).


Example 21
Study 459—Combination Study Under Fed Conditions—Pharmacokinetics of the First Combination 17β-Estradiol/Progesterone Capsule in Clinical Development for Hormone Therapy

The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and oral bioavailability of a combination capsule of 17β-estradiol/progesterone in comparison to co-administration of the individual products ESTRACE® and PROMETRIUM®.


Subjects and Study Design:


An open label, balanced, randomized, single-dose, 2-treatment, 3-period, 3-sequence, crossover, partial-replicate, reference-scaled, oral, relative bioavailability study compared the bioavailability of an investigational 2-mg 17β-estradiol/200-mg progesterone combination capsule, without peanut oil (formulated in a manner similar to that set forth in Table 24), with that of co-administered 200-mg PROMETRIUM® (progesterone) and 2-mg ESTRACE® (17β-estradiol) tablets in healthy postmenopausal women aged 40-65 yrs (N=66). Key inclusion criteria for subjects included a BMI 18.50 to 29.99 kg/m2 who were nonsmokers or ex-smokers (no smoking in the last 3 months). Key exclusion criteria for subjects included consuming grapefruit juice or poppy-containing foods within 48 hours before and throughout the study, use of any hormonal agent within 14 days before the study, and use of menopausal hormone therapy within 6 months before dosing.


Patients were randomly assigned sequentially to 1 of 3 dosing sequences of the same dose of the combination capsule (Test, T) and reference products (Reference, R): TRR, RTR, or RRT. 66 subjects were randomized and 62 (94.0%) completed the study (FIG. 6). Subjects had a mean age of 49.5±5.6 years (range 40 to 64) and a mean BMI of 24.8±3.1 kg/m2 (range 18.7-29.9).


After consuming a high-fat, high-calorie breakfast, each woman received a single dose of the combination (Test) capsule in 1 period of the study and single doses of the co-administered products (Reference) in each of the 2 remaining periods. Plasma was collected pre-dose and at specified intervals over 48 h after dosing to determine progesterone, free (unconjugated) estradiol, and free and total (conjugated+free) estrone concentrations. The primary (Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞) and secondary (tmax, t1/2, and Ke) PK parameters for each analyte were determined for each subject during each period by non-compartment analyses using baseline-adjusted concentrations. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Scaled Average Bioequivalence (BE) method for highly variable drugs to determine whether the combination Test capsule had progesterone and estradiol bioavailability similar to that of the co-administered Reference products. This method is applicable when the within-subject coefficient of variation (CV) for the reference product is ≥30%. For any PK parameter with CV<30%, the BE method based on 90% CI must be used.


Results: All AUC and Cmax parameters met BE criteria for all analytes, except Cmax for total estrone (Table 29). The extent of estradiol and progesterone absorption for the Test capsule appeared to be similar to that for the ESTRACE® and PROMETRIUM® tablets, respectively (Table 29), while the rate of estradiol absorption for the Test capsule appeared to be faster than that for ESTRACE®, respectively (Table 30). Semilogarithmic plots of AUC over time for each analyte are presented in FIGS. 7 and 8. Pharmacokinetic data (Cmax, AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-∞)) for progesterone, estradiol, free estrone, and total estrone is presented in Tables 31-34. For Tables 31-34, “Test Product (T)” refers to the progesterone+estradiol pharmaceutical composition, while “Reference product (R1)” and “Reference product (R2)” refer to co-administered PROMETRIUM® (progesterone) and ESTRACE® (estradiol).


The bioequivalent outcomes for progesterone should allow the Test capsule to bridge to the safety data for PROMETRIUM®. A bridge to the safety data for the ESTRACE® tablet should also be viewed as having been established because the only parameter for which the Test capsule failed to meet BE criteria was the Cmax for just 1 estradiol-related analyte (total estrone). The extent of estradiol absorption, reflecting the total amount of estradiol delivered by the Test capsule, is the most critical safety measure.









TABLE 29





Scaled Average Bioequivalence Analyses for Each Analyte




















Test-to-Ref

95% Upper
Meets BE


Analyte/Parameter
Ratio
CV %
Confidence Bound
Criteria†





Progesterone






AUC(0-t)
1.05
122.2
−0.5422
Yes


AUC(0-inf)
0.94
116.4
−0.4941
Yes


Cmax
1.16
173.7
−0.7850
Yes


Unconjugated estradiol






AUC(0-t)
0.93
42.6
−0.0888
Yes


AUC(0-inf)
0.83
47.4
−0.0625
Yes


Cmax
0.88
35.4
−0.0399
Yes






Test-to-Ref

90% Confidence
Meets BE


Analyte/Parameter
Ratio
CV %
Interval
Criteria





Unconjugated estrone






AUC(0-t)
0.89
18.0
0.848-0.938
Yes


AUC(0-inf)
0.88
26.3
0.834-0.933
Yes


Cmax
0.93
23.3
0.873-0.991
Yes


Total estrone






AUC(0-t)
1.06
29.7
0.982-1.115
Yes


AUC(0-inf)
1.06
29.7
0.985-1.114
Yes


Cmax
1.75
35.9
0.3438*
No





*95% Upper Confidence Bound


†Scaled Average Bioequivalence requires Test-to-Reference ratio between 0.800 and 1.250 and the 95% upper confidence bound on the linearized statistic is ≤0. Unscaled Average Bioequivalence requires that the 90% confidence interval on the Test-to-Reference ratio is entirely within 0.800 and 1.250.


BE = Bioequivalence;


CV % = coefficient of variance.













TABLE 30







Tmax for Each Analyte










Analyte/Parameter
Test
Reference 1
Reference 2





Progesterone
3.00 (0.83-10.0)
3.00 (1.00-12.0)
4.00 (0.67-18.0)


Unconjugated estradiol
9.00 (0.50-36.0)
10.0 (0.50-35.1)
10.0 (0.25-36.6)


Unconjugated estrone*
5.50 (0.83-36.0)
8.00 (1.67-18.0)
10.0 (1.67-18.0)
















TABLE 31







Summary of Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Test Product (T) versus


Reference Product (R1, R2) for Progesterone (Corrected)

















Reference

Reference


PK Parameter
N
Test Product (T)
N
Product (R1)
N
Product (R2)





Cmax (ng/mL)
62
 89.2222 ± 149.7309
62
 72.7228 ± 101.8885
62
69.7590 ± 87.0777


Arithmetic Mean ±


SD


Cmax (ng/mL)
62
35.0996
62
30.6904
62
29.7178


Geometric Mean


AUC(0-t)
62
120.0869 ± 164.1385
62
125.9406 ± 152.3483
62
111.5867 ± 113.3200


(ng · hr/mL)


Arithmetic Mean ±


SD


AUC(0-t)
62
63.3952
62
61.5312
62
58.5421


(ng · hr/mL)


Geometric Mean


AUC(0-∞)
57
131.3817 ± 172.4806
57
142.1332 ± 160.4853
56
126.6006 ± 117.2665


(ng · hr/mL)


Arithmetic Mean ±


SD


AUC(0-∞)
57
72.1098
57
79.9008
56
75.7201


(ng · hr/mL)


Geometric Mean
















TABLE 32







Summary of Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Test Product (T) versus


Reference Product (R1, R2) for Estradiol (Corrected)

















Reference

Reference


PK Parameter
N
Test Product (T)
N
Product (R1)
N
Product (R2)





Cmax (pg/mL)
62
64.7902 ± 50.9833
62
69.1286 ± 33.0484
62
73.4236 ± 43.4077


Arithmetic Mean ±


SD


Cmax (pg/mL)
62
 56.1068
62
 62.2189
62
 64.5362


Geometric Mean


AUC(0-t)
62
1403.7333 ± 763.8136 
62
1508.2206 ± 876.7390 
62
1658.2502 ± 976.5556 


(pg · hr/mL)


Arithmetic Mean ±


SD


AUC(0-t)
62
1224.2031
62
1239.6990
62
1413.7331


(pg · hr/mL)


Geometric Mean


AUC(0-∞)
60
2459.4394 ± 4498.2737
60
2842.8805 ± 4582.6502
57
2110.9591 ± 1175.3995


(pg · hr/mL)


Arithmetic Mean ±


SD


AUC(0-∞)
60
1658.0281
60
1879.6716
57
1796.6988


(pg · hr/mL)


Geometric Mean
















TABLE 33







Summary of Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Test Product (T) versus


Reference Product (R1, R2) for Total Estrone (Corrected)

















Reference

Reference


PK Parameter
N
Test Product (T)
N
Product (R1)
N
Product (R2)





Cmax (pg/mL)
61
35.4289 ± 17.0856
61
19.8716 ± 7.4485
61
19.9048 ± 8.0288


Arithmetic Mean ±


SD


Cmax (pg/mL)
61
 31.9856
61
 18.3037
61
 18.4035


Geometric Mean


AUC(0-t)
61
201.7524 ± 94.2081 
61
182.7729 ± 88.8386
61
199.8295 ± 94.9392


(pg · hr/mL)


Arithmetic Mean ± SD


AUC(0-t)
61
182.7135
61
165.3741
61
182.1279


(pg · hr/mL)


Geometric Mean


AUC(0-∞)
61
213.2402 ± 104.6011
60
 193.6387 ± 100.5831
56
203.0289 ± 81.4884


(pg · hr/mL)


Arithmetic Mean ± SD


AUC(0-∞)
61
191.4769
60
173.4694
56
187.8867


(pg · hr/mL)


Geometric Mean
















TABLE 34







Summary of Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Test Product (T) versus


Reference Product (R1, R2) for Estrone Sulfate

















Reference

Reference


PK Parameter
N
Test Product (T)
N
Product (R1)
N
Product (R2)





Cmax (pg/mL)
62
426.5492 ± 179.3303
62
 455.5107 ± 189.4486
62
 467.2302 ± 207.4373


Arithmetic Mean ± SD


Cmax (pg/mL)
62
 391.6591
62
 416.8218
62
 425.6676


Geometric Mean


AUC(0-t)
62
9096.0907 ± 4377.2730
62
10156.0282 ± 5140.5831
62
10507.3557 ± 5183.1289


(pg · hr/mL)


Arithmetic Mean ± SD


AUC(0-t)
62
8043.8229
62
8872.7467
62
9204.9744


(pg · hr/mL)


Geometric Mean


AUC(0-∞)
61
11994.9695 ± 6678.5468 
62
13445.9048 ± 8699.4068
62
14066.2362 ± 7563.2370


(pg · hr/mL)


Arithmetic Mean ± SD


AUC(0-∞)
61
10264.7576 
62
11273.4294 
62
11936.6967 


(pg · hr/mL)


Geometric Mean









For the test product pharmaceutical formulation, pharmacokinetic data ranges for AUC and Cmax are presented in Table 35 below.









TABLE 35







pK Ranges for the Test Product (T) Pharmaceutical Formulation











Cmax
AUC(0-t)
AUC(0-∞)













Progesterone
 71 ng/mL to
  96 ng · hr/mL to
 105 ng · hr/mL to



112 ng/mL
 150 ng · hr/mL
 164 ng · hr/mL


Estradiol
 52 pg/mL to
 1123 pg · hr/mL to
 1968 pg · hr/mL to



 81 pg/mL
 1755 pg · hr/mL
 3075 pg · hr/mL


Estrone sulfate
341 pg/mL to
 7277 pg · hr/mL to
 9596 pg · hr/mL to



533 pg/mL
11370 pg · hr/mL
14994 pg · hr/mL


Total estrone
 28 pg/mL to
 161 pg · hr/mL to
 171 pg · hr/mL to



 44 pg/mL
 252 pg · hr/mL
 267 pg · hr/mL









CONCLUSION

The combination 17β-estradiol/progesterone capsule demonstrated similar bioavailability of its constituents to their individual respective references of ESTRACE® and PROMETRIUM®, when given together under fed conditions. This new capsule could represent an interesting development in hormone therapy, as no approved hormone therapy to date has been able to 1) combine natural progesterone with 17β-estradiol as an oral formulation, and 2) provide progesterone without peanut oil, a known allergen. The efficacy and safety of this new capsule combining 17β-estradiol with progesterone will be evaluated in phase 3 clinical trials.


It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present disclosure without departing from the spirit or scope of the disclosure. Thus, it is intended that the present disclosure cover the modifications and variations of this disclosure provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.


Likewise, numerous characteristics and advantages have been set forth in the preceding description, including various alternatives together with details of the structure and function of the devices and/or methods. This disclosure is intended as illustrative only and as such is not intended to be exhaustive. It will be evident to those skilled in the art that various modifications may be made, especially in matters of structure, materials, elements, components, shape, size and arrangement of parts including combinations within the principles of the disclosure, to the full extent indicated by the broad general meaning of the terms in which the appended claims are expressed. To the extent that these various modifications do not depart from the spirit and scope of the appended claims, they are intended to be encompassed therein.

Claims
  • 1. A pharmaceutical formulation for administering estradiol and progesterone to a female subject in need thereof, comprising: 17β-estradiol, wherein at least about 80% of the estradiol in the formulation is solubilized;suspended progesterone;a solubilizing agent comprising a medium chain oil comprising fatty acid esters of glycerol, polyethylene glycol, or propylene glycol, or mixtures thereof, wherein the fatty acid esters are predominantly esters of C6 to C12 fatty acids; anda surfactant comprising at least one of lauroyl macrogol-32 glycerides, lauroyl polyoxyl-32 glycerides, or lauroyl polyoxylglycerides,wherein the surfactant is present in the formulation in an amount from 0.01 wt % to 10 wt % and the ratio of the medium chain oil to the surfactant is 8:1 or greater; andwherein when administered to a female subject, the formulation produces:(a) one or more progesterone-related pharmacokinetic parameters selected from: (i) an area under the curve (AUC)(0-t) for progesterone that is from 96 ng·hr/mL to 150 ng·hr/mL; (ii) an AUC(0-∞) for progesterone that is from 105 ng·hr/mL to 164 ng·hr/mL; and (iii) a Cmax for progesterone that is from 71 ng/mL to 112 ng/mL; or(b) one or more stradiol-related pharmacokinetic parameters selected from: (i) an AUC(0-t) for estradiol that is from 1123 pg·hr/mL to 1755 pg·hr/mL; (ii) an AUC(0-∞) for estradiol that is from 1968 pg·hr/mL to 3075 pg·hr/mL; and (iii) a Cmax for unconjugated estradiol that is from 52 pg/mL to 81 pg/mL.
  • 2. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 1, wherein administration of the formulation to the female subject produces both an AUC(0-t) for estradiol that is from 1123 pg·hr/mL to 1755 pg·hr/mL and a Cmax for unconjugated estradiol that is from 52 pg/mL to 81 pg/mL.
  • 3. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 1, wherein administration of the formulation to the female subject produces both an AUC(0-t) for progesterone that is from 96 ng·hr/mL to 150 ng·hr/mL and a Cmax for progesterone that is from 71 ng/mL to 112 ng/mL.
  • 4. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 1, wherein when administered to the female subject, the formulation further produces one or more of the following: (i) an AUC(0-t) for estrone sulfate that is from 7277 pg·hr/mL to 11370 pg·hr/mL;(ii) an AUC(0-∞) for estrone sulfate that is from 9596 pg·hr/mL to 14994 pg·hr/mL; or(iii) a Cmax for estrone sulfate that is from 341 pg/mL to 533 pg/mL.
  • 5. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 4, wherein administration of the formulation to the female subject produces both an AUC(0-t) for estrone sulfate that is from 7277 pg·hr/mL to 11370 pg·hr/mL and a Cmax for estrone sulfate that is from 341 pg/mL to 533 pg/mL.
  • 6. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 1, wherein when administered to the female subject, the formulation further produces one or more of the following: (i) an AUC(0-t) for total estrone that is from 161 pg·hr/mL to 252 pg·hr/mL;(ii) an AUC(0-∞) for total estrone that is from 171 pg·hr/mL to 267 pg·hr/mL; or(iii) a Cmax for total estrone that is from 28 pg/mL to 44 pg/mL.
  • 7. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 6, wherein administration of the formulation to the female subject produces both an AUC(0-t) for total estrone that is from 161 pg·hr/mL to 252 pg·hr/mL and a Cmax for total estrone that is from 28 pg/mL to 44 pg/mL.
  • 8. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 1, wherein at least 50% of the fatty acid esters in the oil have a fatty acid chain length of C6-C12.
  • 9. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 1, wherein at least 90% of the fatty acid esters in the oil have a fatty acid chain length of C6-C12.
  • 10. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 1, wherein the medium chain oil is present in the formulation in an amount from 55 wt % to 75 wt %.
  • 11. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 1, wherein the medium chain oil is a mixture of mono- and diglycerides of capric and caprylic acid.
  • 12. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 1, wherein the medium chain oil comprises a mixture of mono- and diglycerides of capric and caprylic acid, and the surfactant comprises lauroyl polyoxyl-32 glycerides.
  • 13. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 1, wherein the formulation comprises progesterone in an amount from 30 wt % to 35 wt %, estradiol in an amount from 0.01 wt % to 0.04 wt %, the medium chain oil in an amount from 55 wt % to 75 wt %, and the surfactant in an amount from 0.01 wt % to 10 wt %.
  • 14. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 1, wherein the ratio of the medium chain oil to the surfactant is from 60:1 to 70:1.
  • 15. A method of treating a subject having one or more symptoms of estrogen deficiency, the method comprising administering to the subject an effective amount of the pharmaceutical formulation of claim 1.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the subject is female.
  • 17. The method of claim 15, wherein the subject is a woman having a uterus.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/843,428, filed on Mar. 15, 2013, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/684,002, filed on Nov. 21, 2012, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/661,302, filed on Jun. 18, 2012, and to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/662,265, filed on Jun. 20, 2012; and also claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/889,483, filed Oct. 10, 2013; the contents of each of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (1222)
Number Name Date Kind
1967351 Doisy Jan 1934 A
2232438 Butenandt Feb 1941 A
2379832 Serini et al. Jul 1945 A
2649399 Beall et al. Aug 1953 A
3198707 Nomine et al. Aug 1965 A
3478070 Stein et al. Nov 1969 A
3526648 Bertin et al. Sep 1970 A
3710795 Higuchi et al. Jan 1973 A
3729560 Hagerman Apr 1973 A
3729566 Ericsson et al. Apr 1973 A
3755573 Berman Aug 1973 A
3755575 Lerner Aug 1973 A
3903880 Higuchi et al. Sep 1975 A
3916898 Robinson Nov 1975 A
3916899 Theeuwes et al. Nov 1975 A
3921636 Zaffaroni Nov 1975 A
3923997 Meuly Dec 1975 A
3948254 Zaffaroni Apr 1976 A
3971367 Zaffaroni Jun 1976 A
3977404 Theeuwes Aug 1976 A
3993072 Zaffaroni Nov 1976 A
4008719 Theeuwes et al. Feb 1977 A
4012496 Schopflin et al. Mar 1977 A
4014334 Theeuwes et al. Mar 1977 A
4014987 Heller et al. Mar 1977 A
4016251 Higuchi et al. Aug 1977 A
4071623 van der Vies Jan 1978 A
4093709 Choi et al. Jun 1978 A
4154820 Simoons May 1979 A
4155991 Schopflin et al. May 1979 A
4196188 Besins Apr 1980 A
4215691 Wong Aug 1980 A
4237885 Wong et al. Dec 1980 A
4310510 Sherman et al. Jan 1982 A
4327725 Cortese et al. May 1982 A
4372951 Vorys Feb 1983 A
4384096 Sonnabend May 1983 A
4393871 Vorhauer et al. Jul 1983 A
4402695 Wong Sep 1983 A
4423151 Baranczuk Dec 1983 A
4449980 Millar et al. May 1984 A
4610687 Fogwell Sep 1986 A
4629449 Wong Dec 1986 A
4732763 Beck et al. Mar 1988 A
4738957 Laurent et al. Apr 1988 A
4756907 Beck et al. Jul 1988 A
4762717 Crowley, Jr. Aug 1988 A
4788062 Gale et al. Nov 1988 A
4816257 Buster et al. Mar 1989 A
4822616 Zimmermann et al. Apr 1989 A
4865848 Cheng et al. Sep 1989 A
4900734 Maxson et al. Feb 1990 A
4906475 Kim Mar 1990 A
4942158 Sarpotdar et al. Jul 1990 A
4961931 Wong Oct 1990 A
5030629 Rajadhyaksha Jul 1991 A
5043331 Hirvonen et al. Aug 1991 A
5059426 Chiang Oct 1991 A
5064654 Berner et al. Nov 1991 A
5108995 Casper Apr 1992 A
5128138 Blank Jul 1992 A
5130137 Crowley, Jr. Jul 1992 A
5140021 Maxson et al. Aug 1992 A
5208225 Boissonneault et al. May 1993 A
5211952 Spicer et al. May 1993 A
5252334 Chiang et al. Oct 1993 A
5280023 Ehrlich et al. Jan 1994 A
5288496 Lewis Feb 1994 A
5340584 Spicer et al. Aug 1994 A
5340585 Pike et al. Aug 1994 A
5340586 Pike et al. Aug 1994 A
5362497 Yamada et al. Aug 1994 A
5382573 Casper Jan 1995 A
5393528 Staab Feb 1995 A
5393529 Hoffmann et al. Feb 1995 A
5419910 Lewis May 1995 A
5453279 Lee et al. Sep 1995 A
5468736 Hodgen Nov 1995 A
5474783 Miranda et al. Dec 1995 A
5480776 Dullien Jan 1996 A
5514673 Heckenmueller et al. May 1996 A
5516528 Hughes et al. May 1996 A
5527534 Myhling Jun 1996 A
5529782 Staab Jun 1996 A
5538736 Barth Jul 1996 A
5543150 Bologna et al. Aug 1996 A
5547948 Barcomb Aug 1996 A
5556635 Grognet Sep 1996 A
5565199 Page et al. Oct 1996 A
5567831 Li Oct 1996 A
5569652 Beier et al. Oct 1996 A
5580572 Liorzou Dec 1996 A
5582592 Kendrick Dec 1996 A
5585370 Casper Dec 1996 A
5595759 Wright et al. Jan 1997 A
5595970 Garfield et al. Jan 1997 A
5605702 Math Feb 1997 A
5607691 Solas Mar 1997 A
5607693 Bonte Mar 1997 A
5609617 Cady Mar 1997 A
5620705 Dong et al. Apr 1997 A
5626866 Heiber May 1997 A
5629021 Wright May 1997 A
5633011 Dong et al. May 1997 A
5633242 Oettel et al. May 1997 A
5639743 Kaswan et al. Jun 1997 A
5645856 Lacy et al. Jun 1997 A
5653983 Bonte Aug 1997 A
5656286 Miranda et al. Aug 1997 A
5660839 Allec Aug 1997 A
5662927 Ehrlich Sep 1997 A
5663160 Dumas Sep 1997 A
5676968 Lipp et al. Oct 1997 A
5677292 Li et al. Oct 1997 A
5686097 Crisologo Nov 1997 A
5693335 Xia Dec 1997 A
5694947 Lehtinen et al. Dec 1997 A
5700480 Hille et al. Dec 1997 A
5709844 Arbeit et al. Jan 1998 A
5719197 Mantelle Feb 1998 A
5735801 Caillouette Apr 1998 A
5739176 Dunn et al. Apr 1998 A
5744463 Bair Apr 1998 A
5747058 Tipton et al. May 1998 A
5762614 Caillouette Jun 1998 A
5770176 Nargessi Jun 1998 A
5770219 Chiang et al. Jun 1998 A
5770220 Meconi Jun 1998 A
5770227 Dong Jun 1998 A
5776495 Duclos et al. Jul 1998 A
5780044 Tipton Jul 1998 A
5780050 Jain Jul 1998 A
5788980 Nabahi Aug 1998 A
5788984 Schmidt Gollwitzer Aug 1998 A
5789442 Garfield et al. Aug 1998 A
5811416 Chwalisz et al. Sep 1998 A
5811547 Nakamichi et al. Sep 1998 A
5814329 Shah Sep 1998 A
5820878 Shinmura Oct 1998 A
5827200 Caillouette Oct 1998 A
5840327 Gale Nov 1998 A
5843468 Yum Dec 1998 A
5843979 Wille Dec 1998 A
5858394 Lipp Jan 1999 A
5863552 Yue Jan 1999 A
5866603 Li et al. Feb 1999 A
5869084 Paradissis et al. Feb 1999 A
5882676 Yum Mar 1999 A
5885612 Meconi Mar 1999 A
5888533 Dunn Mar 1999 A
5891462 Carrara Apr 1999 A
5891868 Cummings et al. Apr 1999 A
5898038 Yallampalli et al. Apr 1999 A
5902603 Chen May 1999 A
5904931 Gunther May 1999 A
5906830 Farinas May 1999 A
5912010 Wille Jun 1999 A
5916176 Caillouette Jun 1999 A
RE36247 Plunkett et al. Jul 1999 E
5919477 Bevan Jul 1999 A
5922349 Elliesen et al. Jul 1999 A
5928666 Farinas et al. Jul 1999 A
5942243 Shah Aug 1999 A
5942531 Diaz et al. Aug 1999 A
5952000 Fikstad Sep 1999 A
5958446 Miranda et al. Sep 1999 A
5962445 Stewart Oct 1999 A
5968919 Gyurik Oct 1999 A
5972372 Saleh et al. Oct 1999 A
5985311 Cordes Nov 1999 A
5985850 Falk Nov 1999 A
5985861 Levine et al. Nov 1999 A
5993856 Ragavan et al. Nov 1999 A
5989568 De Lacharriere Dec 1999 A
6001846 Edwards et al. Dec 1999 A
6007835 Bon Lapillonne Dec 1999 A
6010715 Pollock Jan 2000 A
6013276 Teillaud Jan 2000 A
6022562 Autant et al. Feb 2000 A
6024974 Li Feb 2000 A
6024976 Miranda et al. Feb 2000 A
6028057 Burns Feb 2000 A
6030948 Mann Feb 2000 A
6039968 Nabahi Mar 2000 A
6040340 Garfield Mar 2000 A
6056972 Hermsmeyer May 2000 A
6060077 Meignant May 2000 A
6068853 Berner May 2000 A
6074625 Hawthorne et al. Jun 2000 A
6077531 Salin-Drouin Jun 2000 A
6080118 Blythe Jun 2000 A
6083178 Caillouette Jul 2000 A
6086916 Agnus et al. Jul 2000 A
6087352 Trout Jul 2000 A
6090404 Meconi Jul 2000 A
6096338 Lacy et al. Jul 2000 A
6106848 Willcox Aug 2000 A
6117446 Place Sep 2000 A
6117450 Dittgen et al. Sep 2000 A
6124362 Bradbury Sep 2000 A
6133251 Dittgen et al. Oct 2000 A
6133320 Yallampalli et al. Oct 2000 A
6139868 Hoffmann Oct 2000 A
6139873 Hughes, Jr. et al. Oct 2000 A
6149935 Tenzel Nov 2000 A
6153216 Cordes et al. Nov 2000 A
6165491 Grasset et al. Dec 2000 A
6165975 Adams et al. Dec 2000 A
6187323 Aiache Feb 2001 B1
6187339 de Haan et al. Feb 2001 B1
6190331 Caillouette Feb 2001 B1
6201072 Rathi et al. Mar 2001 B1
6217886 Reubinstein Apr 2001 B1
6225297 Stockemann May 2001 B1
6227202 Matapurkar May 2001 B1
6228383 Hansen May 2001 B1
6228852 Shaak May 2001 B1
6242509 MacQueen Jun 2001 B1
6245811 Horrobin Jun 2001 B1
6262115 Guittard et al. Jul 2001 B1
6267984 Hamlin Jul 2001 B1
6274165 Meconi Aug 2001 B1
6277418 Marakverich et al. Aug 2001 B1
6283927 Caillouette Sep 2001 B1
6284263 Place Sep 2001 B1
6287588 Shih et al. Sep 2001 B1
6287693 Savoir et al. Sep 2001 B1
6294188 Ragavan et al. Sep 2001 B1
6294192 Patel et al. Sep 2001 B1
6294550 Place et al. Sep 2001 B1
6299900 Reed et al. Oct 2001 B1
6303132 Nelson Oct 2001 B1
6303588 Danielov Oct 2001 B1
6306841 Place et al. Oct 2001 B1
6306914 de Ziegler et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309669 Setterstrom et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309848 Howett et al. Oct 2001 B1
6312703 Orthoefer Nov 2001 B1
6328987 Marini Dec 2001 B1
6342491 Dey et al. Jan 2002 B1
6344211 Hille Feb 2002 B1
6372209 Chrisope Apr 2002 B1
6372245 Vo Apr 2002 B1
6372246 Wei et al. Apr 2002 B1
6387390 Deaver et al. May 2002 B1
6402705 Caillouette Jun 2002 B1
6416778 Ragavan et al. Jul 2002 B1
6420352 Knowles Jul 2002 B1
6423039 Rathbone et al. Jul 2002 B1
6423683 Heaton et al. Jul 2002 B1
6432438 Shukla Aug 2002 B1
6436633 Kreider et al. Aug 2002 B1
6440454 Santoro et al. Aug 2002 B1
6444224 Rathbone et al. Sep 2002 B1
6444234 Kirby et al. Sep 2002 B1
6451300 Leyba Sep 2002 B1
6451339 Patel et al. Sep 2002 B2
6451779 Hesch Sep 2002 B1
6455246 Howett et al. Sep 2002 B1
6455517 Tanabe et al. Sep 2002 B1
6465004 Houze Oct 2002 B1
6465005 Biali Oct 2002 B1
6465006 Zhang Oct 2002 B1
6468526 Chrisope Oct 2002 B2
6469016 Place et al. Oct 2002 B1
6472434 Place et al. Oct 2002 B1
6479232 Howett et al. Nov 2002 B1
6495160 Esposito Dec 2002 B2
6500814 Hesch Dec 2002 B1
6503896 Tanabe et al. Jan 2003 B1
6511969 Hermsmeyer Jan 2003 B1
6521250 Seibertz Feb 2003 B2
6526980 Tracy et al. Mar 2003 B1
6528094 Savoir et al. Mar 2003 B1
6531149 Meconi Mar 2003 B1
6537580 Savoir et al. Mar 2003 B1
6538039 Laurent Mar 2003 B2
6544196 Caillouette Apr 2003 B2
6544553 Hsia et al. Apr 2003 B1
6548053 Murray Apr 2003 B1
6548491 Tanabe et al. Apr 2003 B2
6551611 Elliesen et al. Apr 2003 B2
6555131 Wolff Apr 2003 B1
6562367 Wolff May 2003 B1
6562370 Luo May 2003 B2
6562790 Chein May 2003 B2
6569463 Patel et al. May 2003 B2
6583129 Mazer et al. Jun 2003 B1
6586006 Roser et al. Jul 2003 B2
6589549 Shih et al. Jul 2003 B2
6593317 de Ziegler et al. Jul 2003 B1
6599519 Seo Jul 2003 B1
6610325 Meignant Aug 2003 B1
6610652 Adams et al. Aug 2003 B2
6610670 Backensfeld et al. Aug 2003 B2
6610674 Schreiber Aug 2003 B1
6635274 Carter Oct 2003 B1
6638528 Kanios Oct 2003 B1
6638536 Savoir et al. Oct 2003 B2
6645528 Straub et al. Nov 2003 B1
6649155 Dunlop Nov 2003 B1
6653298 Potter et al. Nov 2003 B2
6656929 Agnus et al. Dec 2003 B1
6660726 Hill et al. Dec 2003 B2
6663608 Rathbone et al. Dec 2003 B2
6663895 Savoir et al. Dec 2003 B2
6664296 Meignant Dec 2003 B1
6682757 Wright Jan 2004 B1
6692763 Cummings et al. Feb 2004 B1
6708822 Muni Mar 2004 B1
6716454 Meignant Apr 2004 B2
6720001 Chen Apr 2004 B2
6737081 Savoir et al. May 2004 B2
6740333 Beckett et al. May 2004 B2
6743448 Kryger Jun 2004 B2
6743815 Huebner et al. Jun 2004 B2
6747018 Tanabe et al. Jun 2004 B2
6750291 Kim Jun 2004 B2
6756208 Griffin et al. Jun 2004 B2
6776164 Bunt et al. Aug 2004 B2
6787152 Kirby et al. Sep 2004 B2
6805877 Massara et al. Oct 2004 B2
6809085 Elson et al. Oct 2004 B1
6818226 Reed et al. Nov 2004 B2
6821524 Marini Nov 2004 B2
6841716 Tsutsumi Jan 2005 B1
6844334 Hill et al. Jan 2005 B2
6855703 Hill et al. Feb 2005 B1
6860859 Mehrotra et al. Mar 2005 B2
6866865 Hsia et al. Mar 2005 B2
6869969 Heubner et al. Mar 2005 B2
6878518 Whitehead Apr 2005 B2
6901278 Notelovitz May 2005 B1
6905705 Palm et al. Jun 2005 B2
6911211 Tamarkin Jun 2005 B2
6911438 Wright Jun 2005 B2
6923988 Patel et al. Aug 2005 B2
6924274 Lardy et al. Aug 2005 B2
6932983 Straub et al. Aug 2005 B1
6939558 Massara et al. Sep 2005 B2
6943021 Klausner et al. Sep 2005 B2
6958327 Hillisch et al. Oct 2005 B1
6960337 Pike Nov 2005 B2
6962691 Lulla et al. Nov 2005 B1
6962908 Aloba et al. Nov 2005 B2
6967194 Matsuo et al. Nov 2005 B1
6974569 Boyd Dec 2005 B2
6977250 Rodriguez Dec 2005 B2
6978945 Wong et al. Dec 2005 B2
6987129 Mak et al. Jan 2006 B2
6995149 Reilhac Feb 2006 B1
7004321 Hackbirth Feb 2006 B1
7005429 Dey et al. Feb 2006 B2
7011846 Shojaei et al. Mar 2006 B2
7018992 Koch et al. Mar 2006 B2
7030104 Paris Apr 2006 B2
7030157 Ke et al. Apr 2006 B2
RE39104 Duclos et al. May 2006 E
7074779 Sui et al. Jul 2006 B2
7083590 Bunt et al. Aug 2006 B1
7091213 Metcalf, III et al. Aug 2006 B2
7094228 Zhang Aug 2006 B2
7097853 Keister Aug 2006 B1
7101342 Caillouette Sep 2006 B1
7105573 Krajcik Sep 2006 B2
7135190 Piao et al. Nov 2006 B2
7153522 Ikeura Dec 2006 B1
7163681 Giles-Komar et al. Jan 2007 B2
7163699 Besse Jan 2007 B2
7175850 Cevc Feb 2007 B2
7179799 Hill et al. Feb 2007 B2
7196074 Blye et al. Mar 2007 B2
7198800 Ko Apr 2007 B1
7198801 Carrara et al. Apr 2007 B2
7226910 Wilson et al. Jun 2007 B2
7247625 Zhang et al. Jul 2007 B2
7250446 Sangita et al. Jul 2007 B2
7267829 Kirby et al. Sep 2007 B2
7300926 Prokai et al. Nov 2007 B2
7303763 Ho Dec 2007 B2
7317037 Fensome et al. Jan 2008 B2
7329654 Kanojia et al. Feb 2008 B2
7335650 Potter et al. Feb 2008 B2
7374779 Chen et al. May 2008 B2
7378404 Peters et al. May 2008 B2
7381427 Ancira Jun 2008 B2
7387789 Klose et al. Jun 2008 B2
7388006 Schmees et al. Jun 2008 B2
7414043 Kosemund et al. Aug 2008 B2
7427413 Savoir et al. Sep 2008 B2
7427609 Leonard Sep 2008 B2
7429576 Labrie Sep 2008 B2
7431941 Besins et al. Oct 2008 B2
7456159 Houze Nov 2008 B2
7459445 Hill et al. Dec 2008 B2
7465587 Imrich Dec 2008 B2
7470433 Carrara et al. Dec 2008 B2
7485666 Villaneuva et al. Feb 2009 B2
7497855 Ausiello et al. Mar 2009 B2
7498303 Arnold Mar 2009 B2
7534765 Gregg et al. May 2009 B2
7534780 Ring May 2009 B2
7550142 Giles-Komar et al. Jun 2009 B2
7563565 Matsuo et al. Jul 2009 B1
7569274 Alphonse Aug 2009 B2
7572779 Aloba et al. Aug 2009 B2
7572780 Hermsmeyer Aug 2009 B2
7589082 Savoir et al. Sep 2009 B2
7671027 Loumaye Mar 2010 B2
7674783 Hermsmeyer Mar 2010 B2
7687281 Roth et al. Mar 2010 B2
7687485 Levinson et al. Mar 2010 B2
7694683 Callister et al. Apr 2010 B2
7704983 Hodgen et al. Apr 2010 B1
7727720 Dhallan Jun 2010 B2
7732408 Josephson et al. Jun 2010 B2
7749989 Hill et al. Jul 2010 B2
7767656 Shoichet et al. Aug 2010 B2
7799769 White Sep 2010 B2
7815936 Hasenzahl Oct 2010 B2
7815949 Cohen Oct 2010 B2
7829115 Besins et al. Nov 2010 B2
7829116 Frye Nov 2010 B2
RE42012 Deaver et al. Dec 2010 E
7850992 Hwang Dec 2010 B2
7854753 Kraft Dec 2010 B2
7858607 Mamchur Dec 2010 B2
RE42072 Deaver et al. Jan 2011 E
7862552 McIntyre et al. Jan 2011 B2
7867990 Schultz et al. Jan 2011 B2
7871643 Lizio Jan 2011 B2
7879830 Wiley Feb 2011 B2
7884093 Creasy et al. Feb 2011 B2
7925519 Greene Apr 2011 B2
7939104 Barbera et al. May 2011 B2
7943602 Bunschoten et al. May 2011 B2
7943604 Coelingh Bennink et al. May 2011 B2
7945459 Grace et al. May 2011 B2
7960368 Rao Jun 2011 B2
7989436 Hill et al. Aug 2011 B2
7989487 Welsh et al. Aug 2011 B2
8022053 Mueller et al. Sep 2011 B2
8048017 Xu Nov 2011 B2
8048869 Bunschoten et al. Nov 2011 B2
8063030 Ellman Nov 2011 B2
8071576 Visser Dec 2011 B2
8071729 Giles-Komar et al. Dec 2011 B2
8075916 Park Dec 2011 B2
8075917 Park Dec 2011 B2
8076317 Kulmann Dec 2011 B2
8076319 Leonard Dec 2011 B2
8080553 Auspitz Dec 2011 B2
8088605 Beudet et al. Jan 2012 B2
8096940 Iverson Jan 2012 B2
8101209 Legrand et al. Jan 2012 B2
8101773 Smith et al. Jan 2012 B2
8114152 Furst Feb 2012 B2
8114434 Sasaki et al. Feb 2012 B2
8114442 Tucker Feb 2012 B2
8119741 Pavlin Feb 2012 B2
8121886 Azar Feb 2012 B2
8124118 Lennernaes Feb 2012 B2
8124595 Boissonneault Feb 2012 B2
8147561 Binmoeller Apr 2012 B2
8148546 Schuster et al. Apr 2012 B2
8158613 Staniforth Apr 2012 B2
8158614 Lambert et al. Apr 2012 B2
8163722 Savoir Apr 2012 B2
8177449 Watkinson May 2012 B2
8182833 Hermsmeyer May 2012 B2
8187615 Friedman May 2012 B2
8187640 Dunn May 2012 B2
8195403 Wood, Jr. Jun 2012 B2
8202736 Mousa et al. Jun 2012 B2
8217024 Ahmed et al. Jul 2012 B2
8221785 Chien Jul 2012 B2
8222008 Thoene Jul 2012 B2
8222237 Narkunan Jul 2012 B2
8227454 Hill et al. Jul 2012 B2
8227509 Castro et al. Jul 2012 B2
8241664 Dudley et al. Aug 2012 B2
8247393 Ahmed et al. Aug 2012 B2
8257724 Cromack Sep 2012 B2
8257725 Cromack Sep 2012 B2
8268352 Karan Sep 2012 B2
8268806 Labrie Sep 2012 B2
8268878 Johnson Sep 2012 B2
8273730 Fernandez et al. Sep 2012 B2
8287888 Song et al. Oct 2012 B2
8288366 Gonzalez Oct 2012 B2
8318898 Fasel Nov 2012 B2
8324193 Lee Dec 2012 B2
8329680 Evans et al. Dec 2012 B2
8337814 Osbakken et al. Dec 2012 B2
8344007 Chui Jan 2013 B2
8349820 Zeun et al. Jan 2013 B2
8353863 Imran Jan 2013 B2
8357723 Satyam Jan 2013 B2
8361995 Schramm Jan 2013 B2
8362091 Besonov Jan 2013 B2
8372424 Berry Feb 2013 B2
8372806 Bragagna Feb 2013 B2
8377482 Laurie Feb 2013 B2
8377994 Drechsler Feb 2013 B2
8394759 Barathur et al. Mar 2013 B2
8415332 Reape Apr 2013 B2
8420111 Hermsmeyer Apr 2013 B2
8435561 Besins et al. May 2013 B2
8435972 Sayeed May 2013 B2
8449879 Laurent Applegate May 2013 B2
8450108 Boyce May 2013 B2
8454945 Narain Jun 2013 B2
8455468 Kellermann Jun 2013 B2
8461138 Boissonneault Jun 2013 B2
8476252 Pickersgill Jul 2013 B2
8481488 Carter Jul 2013 B2
8486374 Zlatkis Jul 2013 B2
8486442 Yamaji Jul 2013 B2
8492368 Lewandowski Jul 2013 B2
8507467 Ueda Aug 2013 B2
8512693 Azevedo Aug 2013 B2
8512754 Needham Aug 2013 B2
8518376 Schuz Aug 2013 B2
8536159 Zeng Sep 2013 B2
8540967 Trivedi Sep 2013 B2
8541400 Joabsson Sep 2013 B2
8551462 Marenus Oct 2013 B2
8557281 Tuominen Oct 2013 B2
8568374 De Graaff Oct 2013 B2
8591951 Kohn Nov 2013 B2
8613951 Troiano Dec 2013 B2
8633178 Cacace Jan 2014 B2
8633180 Zeng Jan 2014 B2
8636787 Sabaria Jan 2014 B2
8636982 Schuz Jan 2014 B2
8653129 Fein Feb 2014 B2
8658627 Voskuhl Feb 2014 B2
8658628 Baucom Feb 2014 B2
8663681 Ahmed et al. Mar 2014 B2
8663692 Mueller Mar 2014 B1
8663703 Moldavski Mar 2014 B2
8664207 Zheng Mar 2014 B2
8669293 Sharoni Mar 2014 B2
8679552 Guthery Mar 2014 B2
8694358 Tryfon Apr 2014 B2
8697127 Sah Apr 2014 B2
8697710 Zeng Apr 2014 B2
8703105 Besonov Apr 2014 B2
8709385 Schuz Apr 2014 B2
8709451 Rapoport Apr 2014 B2
8715735 Funke May 2014 B2
8721331 Raghuprasad May 2014 B2
8722021 Eini May 2014 B2
8734846 Hrkach May 2014 B2
8735381 Podolski May 2014 B2
8741336 Dipierro Jun 2014 B2
8741373 Rao Jun 2014 B2
8753661 Gassner Jun 2014 B2
8784882 Mattern Jul 2014 B2
8846648 Bernick et al. Sep 2014 B2
8846649 Bernick et al. Sep 2014 B2
8933059 Bernick et al. Jan 2015 B2
8987237 Bernick et al. Mar 2015 B2
8987238 Bernick et al. Mar 2015 B2
8993548 Bernick et al. Mar 2015 B2
8993549 Bernick et al. Mar 2015 B2
9006222 Bernick et al. Apr 2015 B2
9012434 Bernick et al. Apr 2015 B2
9114145 Bernick et al. Aug 2015 B2
9114146 Bernick et al. Aug 2015 B2
9180091 Bernick et al. Nov 2015 B2
9248136 Bernick et al. Feb 2016 B2
9289382 Bernick et al. Mar 2016 B2
9301920 Bernick et al. Apr 2016 B2
9931349 Shadiack et al. Apr 2018 B2
10052386 Bernick et al. Aug 2018 B2
10206932 Bernick et al. Feb 2019 B2
10258630 Mirkin et al. Apr 2019 B2
20010005728 Guittard et al. Feb 2001 A1
20010009673 Gunther Jul 2001 A1
20010021816 Caillouette Sep 2001 A1
20010023261 Ryoo Sep 2001 A1
20010027189 Bennink et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010029357 Bunt et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010031747 de Ziegler et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010032125 Bhan et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010034340 Pickar Oct 2001 A1
20120269878 Cantor et al. Oct 2001 A2
20010053383 Sablotsky Dec 2001 A1
20010056068 Chwalisz et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020012710 Lansky Jan 2002 A1
20020026158 Rathbone et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020028788 Bunt et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020035070 Gardlik Mar 2002 A1
20020058648 Hammerly May 2002 A1
20020058926 Rathbone et al. May 2002 A1
20020064541 Lapidot et al. May 2002 A1
20020076441 Shih et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020102308 Wei et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020107230 Waldon et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020114803 Deaver et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020119174 Gardlik Aug 2002 A1
20020119198 Gao Aug 2002 A1
20020132801 Heil et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020137749 Levinson et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020142017 Simonnet Oct 2002 A1
20020151530 Leonard et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156394 Mehrotra et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020169150 Pickar Nov 2002 A1
20020169205 Garfield Nov 2002 A1
20020173510 Levinson et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020193356 Van Beek et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020193758 Sandberg Dec 2002 A1
20020197286 Brandman Dec 2002 A1
20030003139 Gunther Jan 2003 A1
20030004145 Leonard Jan 2003 A1
20030007994 Bunt et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030027772 Breton Feb 2003 A1
20030091620 Venkateshwaran Feb 2003 A1
20030044453 Volkel Mar 2003 A1
20030049307 Gyurik Mar 2003 A1
20030064097 Patel et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030064975 Koch et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030072760 Sirbasku Apr 2003 A1
20030073248 Roth et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030073673 Hesch Apr 2003 A1
20030077297 Chen et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030078245 Bennink et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030091640 Ramanathan et al. May 2003 A1
20030092691 Besse et al. May 2003 A1
20030096012 Besse et al. May 2003 A1
20030104048 Patel et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030109507 Beckmann Jun 2003 A1
20030113268 Buenafae Jun 2003 A1
20030114420 Salvati et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030114430 MacLeod et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030124182 Shojaei et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030124191 Besse et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030130558 Massara et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030144258 Heil et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030157157 Luo et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030166509 Batycky et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030170295 Yoon Sep 2003 A1
20030175329 Mak Sep 2003 A1
20030175333 Shefer Sep 2003 A1
20030180352 Patel et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030181353 Nyce Sep 2003 A1
20030181728 Salvati et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030191096 Leonard et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030195177 Leonard et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030215496 Patel et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030219402 Rutter Nov 2003 A1
20030220297 Bernstein et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030224057 Martin-Letellier et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030224059 Lerner et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030225047 Friedman Dec 2003 A1
20030225048 Friedman Dec 2003 A1
20030225050 Eichardt et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030228686 Klausner et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030229057 Caubel et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030235596 Gao Dec 2003 A1
20030236236 Chen et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040009960 Heil et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040022820 Anderson Feb 2004 A1
20040034001 Karara Feb 2004 A1
20040037881 Guittard et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040039356 Maki Feb 2004 A1
20040043043 Schlyter Mar 2004 A1
20040043943 Guittard et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040044080 Place et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040048900 Flood Mar 2004 A1
20040052824 Abou Chacra-Vernet et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040073024 Metcalf, III et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040077605 Salvati et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040077606 Salvati et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040087548 Salvati et al. May 2004 A1
20040087564 Wright May 2004 A1
20040089308 Welch May 2004 A1
20040092494 Dudley May 2004 A9
20040092583 Shanahan-Prendergast May 2004 A1
20040093261 Jain et al. May 2004 A1
20040097468 Wimalawansa May 2004 A1
20040101557 Gibson et al. May 2004 A1
20040106542 Deaver et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040110732 Masini Eteve Jun 2004 A1
20040131670 Gao Jul 2004 A1
20040138103 Patt Jul 2004 A1
20040142012 Bunt et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040146539 Gupta Jul 2004 A1
20040146894 Warrington et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040147578 Calvet Jul 2004 A1
20040161435 Gupta Aug 2004 A1
20040176324 Salvati et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040176336 Rodriguez Sep 2004 A1
20040185104 Piao et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040191207 Lipari Sep 2004 A1
20040191276 Muni Sep 2004 A1
20040198706 Carrara et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040210280 Liedtke Oct 2004 A1
20040213744 Lulla et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040219124 Gupta Nov 2004 A1
20040225140 Sciano Nov 2004 A1
20040234606 Levine et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040241219 Hille Dec 2004 A1
20040243437 Grace et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040253319 Netke et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040259817 Waldon et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040266745 Schwanitz et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050003003 Deaver Jan 2005 A1
20050004088 Hesch Jan 2005 A1
20050009800 Thumbeck et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050014729 Pulaski Jan 2005 A1
20050020550 Latif Jan 2005 A1
20050020552 Aschkenasay et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021009 Massara et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050025833 Aschkenasay et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050031651 Gervais et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050042173 Besse et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050042268 Aschkenasay et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050048116 Straub et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050054991 Paterson Mar 2005 A1
20050079138 Chickering, III et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050085453 Govindarajan Apr 2005 A1
20050101579 Shippen May 2005 A1
20050113350 Duesterberg et al. May 2005 A1
20050118244 Theobald et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050118272 Besse et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050129756 Podhaisky Jun 2005 A1
20050152956 Dudley Jul 2005 A1
20050153946 Hirsh et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050164977 Coelingh Bennink Jul 2005 A1
20050182105 Nirschl et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050186141 Gonda Aug 2005 A1
20050187267 Hamann et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050192253 Salvati et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050192310 Gavai et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050196434 Brierre Sep 2005 A1
20050207990 Funke et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050209209 Koch et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050214384 Juturu et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050220825 Funke et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050220900 Wuttke Oct 2005 A1
20050222106 Bracht Oct 2005 A1
20050228692 Hodgdon Oct 2005 A1
20050228718 Austin Oct 2005 A1
20050239747 Le Oct 2005 A1
20050239758 Roby Oct 2005 A1
20050244360 Billoni Nov 2005 A1
20050244522 Carrara et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050245902 Cornish et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050250746 Iammatteo Nov 2005 A1
20050250750 Cummings et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050250753 Fink et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050256028 Yun et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050266078 Jorda et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050266088 Frijlink Dec 2005 A1
20050271597 Keith Dec 2005 A1
20050271598 Friedman et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050272685 Hung Dec 2005 A1
20050272712 Grubb et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060009428 Grubb et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060014728 Chwalisz et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060018937 Friedman et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060019978 Balog Jan 2006 A1
20060020002 Salvati et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060030615 Fensome et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060034889 Jo et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060034904 Weimann Feb 2006 A1
20060040904 Ahmed et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060051391 Dvoskin et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060052341 Cornish et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060069031 Loumaye Mar 2006 A1
20060078618 Constantinides Apr 2006 A1
20060083778 Allison et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060084704 Shin Apr 2006 A1
20060088580 Seibertz Apr 2006 A1
20060089337 Casper et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060093678 Chickering, III et al. May 2006 A1
20060100180 Bohlmann May 2006 A1
20060106004 Brody et al. May 2006 A1
20060110415 Gupta May 2006 A1
20060111424 Salvati et al. May 2006 A1
20060121102 Chiang Jun 2006 A1
20060121626 Imrich Jun 2006 A1
20060134188 Podhaisky et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060135619 Kick et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060165744 Anyarambhatla Jul 2006 A1
20060193789 Tamarkin Aug 2006 A1
20060194775 Tofovic et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060204557 Gupta et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060233743 Kelly Oct 2006 A1
20060233841 Pushpala Oct 2006 A1
20060235037 Purandare et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060240111 Fernandez et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060246122 Langguth Nov 2006 A1
20060247216 Haj-Yehia Nov 2006 A1
20060247221 Coelingh Bennink Nov 2006 A1
20060251581 Madenjian Nov 2006 A1
20060252049 Shuler et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060257472 Neilsen Nov 2006 A1
20060275218 Besonov Dec 2006 A1
20060275360 Ahmed et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060276414 Coelingh Bennink Dec 2006 A1
20060280771 Groenewegen et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060280797 Shoichet et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060280800 Nagi et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060292223 Mc Ilroy Dec 2006 A1
20070004693 Woolfson et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070004694 Woolfson et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070009559 Alosio Jan 2007 A1
20070009594 Grubb et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070010550 McKenzie Jan 2007 A1
20070014839 Bracht Jan 2007 A1
20070015698 Goldstein Jan 2007 A1
20070021360 Nyce et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070027201 McComas et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070031491 Levine et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070036843 Hirsh et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070037780 Anigbogu Feb 2007 A1
20070037782 Suzuki Feb 2007 A1
20070042038 Besse Feb 2007 A1
20070060589 Purandare et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070066628 Zhang et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070066637 Zhang et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070066675 Zhang et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070071777 Bromer et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070078091 Hubler Apr 2007 A1
20070088029 Balog et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070093548 Diffendal et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070116729 Palepu May 2007 A1
20070116829 Prakash et al. May 2007 A1
20070128263 Wall Jun 2007 A1
20070154533 Dudley Jul 2007 A1
20070167418 Ferguson Jul 2007 A1
20070178166 Bernstein et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070184558 Roth et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070185068 Ferguson Aug 2007 A1
20070190022 Chiao Aug 2007 A1
20070191319 Ke et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070191321 Ahmed et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070196415 Houston Aug 2007 A1
20070196433 Ron et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070207225 Squadrito Sep 2007 A1
20070225281 Zhang et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070232574 Bernard Oct 2007 A1
20070238713 Gast et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070243229 Smith et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070248658 Bracht Oct 2007 A1
20070254858 Cronk Nov 2007 A1
20070255197 Wilkins Nov 2007 A1
20070264309 Chollet et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070264345 Eros et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070264349 Lee et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070270394 El-Alfy et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070286819 DeVries et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070287688 Chan Dec 2007 A1
20070287789 Jones et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070292359 Schuz Dec 2007 A1
20070292387 Jon et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070292461 Danziger Dec 2007 A1
20070292493 Brierre Dec 2007 A1
20070298089 Yoshinaga Dec 2007 A1
20080026035 Chollet et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080026040 Rivera Guzman Jan 2008 A1
20080026062 Farr et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080038219 Carlson Feb 2008 A1
20080038350 Gerecke et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080039405 Joseph Feb 2008 A1
20080050317 Besonov Feb 2008 A1
20080051351 Ghisalberti Feb 2008 A1
20080063607 Berman Mar 2008 A1
20080069779 Schuz Mar 2008 A1
20080069791 Beissert Mar 2008 A1
20080085877 Bortz Apr 2008 A1
20080095831 Mc Graw Apr 2008 A1
20080095838 Abou Chacra-Vernet Apr 2008 A1
20080119537 Zhang et al. May 2008 A1
20080125402 Dilberti May 2008 A1
20080138379 Jennings-Spring Jun 2008 A1
20080138390 Gricenko Jun 2008 A1
20080139392 Yuan Jun 2008 A1
20080145423 Khan et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080153789 Dmowski Jun 2008 A1
20080175814 Phiasivongsa et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080175905 Liu et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080175908 Liu et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080188829 Creasy Aug 2008 A1
20080206156 Cronk Aug 2008 A1
20080206159 Schuz Aug 2008 A1
20080206161 Tamarkin et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080214512 Seitz Sep 2008 A1
20080220069 Allison Sep 2008 A1
20080226698 Beste Sep 2008 A1
20080227763 Paris Sep 2008 A1
20080234199 Katamreddy Sep 2008 A1
20080234240 Duesterberg Sep 2008 A1
20080255078 Katamreddy Oct 2008 A1
20080255089 Katamreddy Oct 2008 A1
20080261931 Stenlof Oct 2008 A1
20080113953 DeVries et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080114050 Fensome et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080299220 Tamarkin et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080306036 Katamreddy Dec 2008 A1
20080312197 Rodriguez Dec 2008 A1
20080312198 Rodriguez Dec 2008 A1
20080319078 Katamreddy Dec 2008 A1
20090004246 Woolfson Jan 2009 A1
20090010968 Peyrot Jan 2009 A1
20090011041 Musaeva Jan 2009 A1
20090017120 Brisco Jan 2009 A1
20090022683 Park Jan 2009 A1
20090047357 Tomohira Feb 2009 A1
20090053294 Prendergast Feb 2009 A1
20090060982 Ron et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090060997 Seitz Mar 2009 A1
20090068118 Eini et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090074859 Patel Mar 2009 A1
20090081206 Leibovitz Mar 2009 A1
20090081278 De Graaff et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090081303 Savoir et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090092656 Klamerus et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090093440 Murad Apr 2009 A1
20090098069 Vacca Apr 2009 A1
20090099106 Phiasivongsa et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090099149 Kresevic Apr 2009 A1
20090130029 Tamarkin May 2009 A1
20090131385 Voskuhl May 2009 A1
20090136574 Diaz-Astruc et al. May 2009 A1
20090137478 Bernstein et al. May 2009 A1
20090137538 Klamerus et al. May 2009 A1
20090143344 Chang Jun 2009 A1
20090164341 Sunvold et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090175799 Tamarkin Jul 2009 A1
20090181088 Song et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090186081 Slot Jul 2009 A1
20090197843 Notelovitz Aug 2009 A1
20090203658 Rose Aug 2009 A1
20090214474 Jennings Aug 2009 A1
20090227025 Nichols et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090227550 Mattern Sep 2009 A1
20090232897 Sahoo et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090258096 Cohen Oct 2009 A1
20090264395 Creasy Oct 2009 A1
20090264413 Lee et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090269403 Shaked et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090285772 Phiasivongsa et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090285869 Trimble Nov 2009 A1
20090318558 Kim et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090324714 Kresevic Dec 2009 A1
20090325916 Zhang et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100008985 Vermeulen Jan 2010 A1
20100028360 Atwood Feb 2010 A1
20100034838 Staniforth Feb 2010 A1
20100034880 Sintov Feb 2010 A1
20100040671 Ahmed et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100048523 Bachman et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100055138 Jacobs Mar 2010 A1
20100074959 Hansom et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100086501 Chang Apr 2010 A1
20100086599 Huempel et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100092568 Lerner et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100105071 Laufer et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100119585 Hille et al. May 2010 A1
20100129320 Phiasivongsa et al. May 2010 A1
20100136105 Chen et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100137265 Leonard Jun 2010 A1
20100137271 Chen et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100143420 Lee Jun 2010 A1
20100143481 Shenoy Jun 2010 A1
20100150993 Theobald et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100152144 Hermsmeyer Jun 2010 A1
20100168228 Bose et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100183723 Laurent-Applegate et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100184736 Coelingh Bennink et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100190758 Fauser et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100204326 D Souza Aug 2010 A1
20100210994 Zarif Aug 2010 A1
20100221195 Ziv Sep 2010 A1
20100227797 Danielsson Sep 2010 A1
20100240626 Kulkarni et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100247482 Chen Sep 2010 A1
20100247632 Dong et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100247635 Schmidt Sep 2010 A1
20100255085 Liu et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100273730 Hsu Oct 2010 A1
20100278759 Murad Nov 2010 A1
20100279988 Setiawan Nov 2010 A1
20100291191 Lapitsky Nov 2010 A1
20100292199 Leverd Nov 2010 A1
20100303825 Sirbasku Dec 2010 A9
20100312137 Gilmour et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100316724 Whitfield et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100322884 Wilkins Dec 2010 A1
20100330168 Gicquel et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110028439 Witt-Enderby et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110039814 Ross Feb 2011 A1
20110053845 Levine et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110066473 Bernick et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110076775 Stewart et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110076776 Stewart et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110086825 Chatroux Apr 2011 A1
20110087192 Uhland Apr 2011 A1
20110091555 De Luigi Bruschi et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110098258 Canet Apr 2011 A1
20110098631 McIntyre et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110104268 Segot Chicq May 2011 A1
20110104289 Savoir Vilboeuf et al. May 2011 A1
20110130372 Marliani Jun 2011 A1
20110135719 Besins et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110142945 Chen Jun 2011 A1
20110152840 Lee Jun 2011 A1
20110158920 Fisher Jun 2011 A1
20110171140 Illum Jul 2011 A1
20110182997 Lewis et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110190201 Wood, Jr. Aug 2011 A1
20110195031 Du Aug 2011 A1
20110195114 Carrara et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110195944 Mura et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110217341 Sah Sep 2011 A1
20110238003 Karabelas Sep 2011 A1
20110244043 Wang Oct 2011 A1
20110250256 Hyun Oct 2011 A1
20110250259 Buckman Oct 2011 A1
20110250274 Shaked et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110256092 Phiasivongsa et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110262373 Umbert Millet Oct 2011 A1
20110262494 Achleitner et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110268665 Tamarkin et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110275584 Volkmann Nov 2011 A1
20110281832 Wennogle Nov 2011 A1
20110287094 Penhasi Nov 2011 A1
20110293720 General et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110294738 Kuliopulos Dec 2011 A1
20110300167 Covic Dec 2011 A1
20110301087 McBride Dec 2011 A1
20110306579 Stein Dec 2011 A1
20110311592 Birbara Dec 2011 A1
20110312927 Nachaegari et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110312928 Nachaegari et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110318405 Erwin Dec 2011 A1
20110318431 Gulati Dec 2011 A1
20120009276 De Groote Jan 2012 A1
20120015350 Nabatiyan et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120021041 Rossi Jan 2012 A1
20120028888 Janz Feb 2012 A1
20120028910 Takruri Feb 2012 A1
20120028936 Popova Feb 2012 A1
20120045532 Cohen Feb 2012 A1
20120046264 Lieb Feb 2012 A1
20120046518 Yoakum Feb 2012 A1
20120052077 Truitt, III et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120058171 Zeeman Mar 2012 A1
20120058962 Sparrow Mar 2012 A1
20120058979 Auspitz Mar 2012 A1
20120064135 Harms Mar 2012 A1
20120065179 Andersson Mar 2012 A1
20120065221 Babul Mar 2012 A1
20120087872 Schuz Apr 2012 A1
20120101073 Mannion Apr 2012 A1
20120121517 Kim May 2012 A1
20120121692 Fang May 2012 A1
20120122829 Masini Eteve May 2012 A1
20120128625 Shalwitz et al. May 2012 A1
20120128654 Terpstra May 2012 A1
20120128683 Shantha May 2012 A1
20120128733 Perrin May 2012 A1
20120128777 Keck et al. May 2012 A1
20120129773 Geier May 2012 A1
20120129819 Vancaillie May 2012 A1
20120136013 Wennogle May 2012 A1
20120142645 Marx Jun 2012 A1
20120148670 Lee Jun 2012 A1
20120149748 Shanler et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120172343 Schuermann Jul 2012 A1
20120184515 Schwede Jul 2012 A1
20120231052 Brinton Sep 2012 A1
20120232011 Kneissel Sep 2012 A1
20120232042 Krenz Sep 2012 A1
20120263679 Wallace Oct 2012 A1
20120269721 Weng et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120277249 Tarrand Nov 2012 A1
20120277727 Doshi Nov 2012 A1
20120283671 Shibata et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120295911 Mannion Nov 2012 A1
20120301517 Warner Nov 2012 A1
20120301538 Latere Nov 2012 A1
20120302535 Caufriez Nov 2012 A1
20120316130 Hendrix Dec 2012 A1
20120316496 Horres Dec 2012 A1
20120321579 Edelson Dec 2012 A1
20120322779 Voskuhl Dec 2012 A9
20120328549 Edelson Dec 2012 A1
20120329738 Liu Dec 2012 A1
20130004619 Goh Jan 2013 A1
20130011342 Hazot Jan 2013 A1
20130017239 Fernandez Botello Jan 2013 A1
20130022674 Dudley et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130023505 Garfield Jan 2013 A1
20130023823 Volland Jan 2013 A1
20130028850 Hazot Jan 2013 A1
20130029947 Nachaegari et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130029957 Venkateshwaran Jan 2013 A1
20130045266 Kang Feb 2013 A1
20130045953 Grenier Feb 2013 A1
20130059795 Lo Mar 2013 A1
20130064897 Binay Mar 2013 A1
20130072466 Choi Mar 2013 A1
20130084257 Ishida Apr 2013 A1
20130085123 Zhao Apr 2013 A1
20130089574 Stock Apr 2013 A1
20130090318 Gainer Apr 2013 A1
20130102781 Ely Apr 2013 A1
20130108551 Gruell May 2013 A1
20130116215 Lleo May 2013 A1
20130116222 Altomari May 2013 A1
20130122051 Gullapalli May 2013 A1
20130123175 McKee May 2013 A1
20130123220 Queiroz May 2013 A1
20130123351 Dewitt May 2013 A1
20130129818 Bernick et al. May 2013 A1
20130131027 Schmitz May 2013 A1
20130131028 Snyder May 2013 A1
20130131029 Bakker et al. May 2013 A1
20130149314 Bullerdiek Jun 2013 A1
20130164225 Besonov Jun 2013 A1
20130164346 Son Jun 2013 A1
20130165744 Carson Jun 2013 A1
20130178452 King Jul 2013 A1
20130183254 Cochran Jul 2013 A1
20130183325 Sforzini Jul 2013 A1
20130189193 Besonov Jul 2013 A1
20130189196 Tamarkin Jul 2013 A1
20130189230 Kooy Jul 2013 A1
20130189368 Mosqueira Jul 2013 A1
20130210709 Covic Aug 2013 A1
20130216550 Penninger Aug 2013 A1
20130216596 Fernandez Botello Aug 2013 A1
20130224177 Kim Aug 2013 A1
20130224257 Sah Aug 2013 A1
20130224268 Jaikaria Aug 2013 A1
20130224300 Maggio Aug 2013 A1
20130225412 Sardari Lodriche Aug 2013 A1
20130225542 Frick Aug 2013 A1
20130226113 Langguth Aug 2013 A1
20130243696 Wang Sep 2013 A1
20130245253 Mook Sep 2013 A1
20130245570 Jackson Sep 2013 A1
20130261096 Merian Oct 2013 A1
20130266645 Schoenecker Oct 2013 A1
20130267485 Da Silva Oct 2013 A1
20130273167 Kim Oct 2013 A1
20130274211 Prusthy Oct 2013 A1
20130280213 Voskuhl Oct 2013 A1
20130316374 Menon Nov 2013 A1
20130317065 Seto Nov 2013 A1
20130317315 Tsang Nov 2013 A1
20130324565 Zhao Dec 2013 A1
20130331363 Zhao Dec 2013 A1
20130338122 Bernick et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130338123 Bernick et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130338124 Zhao Dec 2013 A1
20130345187 Rodriguez Oquendo Dec 2013 A1
20140018335 Seto Jan 2014 A1
20140024590 Taylor Jan 2014 A1
20140031289 Kim Jan 2014 A1
20140031323 Perez Jan 2014 A1
20140066416 Leunis Mar 2014 A1
20140072531 Oh Mar 2014 A1
20140079686 Prouty Mar 2014 A1
20140088051 Bernick et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140088058 Maurizio Mar 2014 A1
20140088059 Santha Mar 2014 A1
20140094426 Drummond Apr 2014 A1
20140094440 Bernick et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140094441 Bernick et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140099362 Bernick et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140100159 Conrad Apr 2014 A1
20140100204 Bernick et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140100205 Bernick et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140100206 Cacace Apr 2014 A1
20140113889 Haine Apr 2014 A1
20140127185 Sayeed May 2014 A1
20140127280 Jukarainen May 2014 A1
20140127308 Opara May 2014 A1
20140128798 Malanchin May 2014 A1
20140148491 Valia et al. May 2014 A1
20140186332 Ezrin Jul 2014 A1
20140187487 Shoichet Jul 2014 A1
20140193523 Henry Jul 2014 A1
20140194396 Wennogle Jul 2014 A1
20140206616 Ko et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140213565 Bernick et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140329783 Bernick et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140370084 Bernick et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140371182 Bernick et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140371183 Bernick et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140371184 Bernick et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140371185 Bernick et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150031654 Amadio Jan 2015 A1
20150045335 Bernick et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150133421 Bernick et al. May 2015 A1
20150148323 Bernick et al. May 2015 A1
20150164789 Bernick et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150224117 Bernick et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150224118 Bernick et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150297733 Oberegger et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150302435 Bernick et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150342963 Bernick et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150352126 Bernick et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150359737 Bernick et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160030449 Persicaner et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160213685 Bernick et al. Jul 2016 A1
20170056418 Thorsteinsson et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170216310 Mirkin et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170281645 Shadiack et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170281646 Inskeep et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170281647 Shadiack et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170281776 Shadiack et al. Oct 2017 A1
20180161343 Mirkin et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180161344 Mirkin et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180161345 Bernick et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180221389 Amadio et al. Aug 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (202)
Number Date Country
PI1001367-9 Jul 2012 BR
2044371 Dec 1991 CA
2612380 Jun 2017 CA
102258455 Nov 2011 CN
0261429 Mar 1988 EP
0275716 Jul 1988 EP
0279977 Aug 1988 EP
0622075 Nov 1994 EP
0750495 Jan 1997 EP
0785211 Jul 1997 EP
0785212 Jul 1997 EP
0811381 Dec 1997 EP
0904064 Mar 1999 EP
0813412 Dec 1999 EP
1300152 Apr 2003 EP
1094781 Jul 2008 EP
2191833 Jun 2010 EP
2377616 Feb 2013 ES
452238 Aug 1936 GB
720561 Dec 1954 GB
848881 Sep 1960 GB
874368 Aug 1961 GB
1589946 May 1981 GB
2005KOL00053 Aug 2005 IN
216026 Mar 2008 IN
244217 Nov 2010 IN
H4-503810 Sep 1990 JP
H2-264725 Oct 1990 JP
2002 510336 Apr 2002 JP
2006 513182 Apr 2006 JP
2155582 Sep 2000 RU
2436579 Jun 2008 RU
199010425 Sep 1990 WO
1990011064 Oct 1990 WO
1993017686 Sep 1993 WO
1994022426 Oct 1994 WO
1995005807 Mar 1995 WO
1995030409 Nov 1995 WO
1996009826 Apr 1996 WO
1996019975 Jul 1996 WO
1996030000 Oct 1996 WO
1997005491 Feb 1997 WO
1997040823 Nov 1997 WO
1997043989 Nov 1997 WO
1998010293 Mar 1998 WO
1998032465 Jul 1998 WO
1998041217 Sep 1998 WO
1998051280 Nov 1998 WO
1999022680 May 1999 WO
1999032072 Jul 1999 WO
1999039700 Aug 1999 WO
1999042109 Aug 1999 WO
1999043304 Sep 1999 WO
1999048477 Sep 1999 WO
1999052528 Oct 1999 WO
1999053910 Oct 1999 WO
1999055333 Nov 1999 WO
1999062497 Dec 1999 WO
1999063974 Dec 1999 WO
2000001351 Jan 2000 WO
2000006175 Feb 2000 WO
2000038659 Jun 2000 WO
2000045795 Aug 2000 WO
2000050007 Aug 2000 WO
2000059577 Oct 2000 WO
2000076522 Dec 2000 WO
2001037808 May 2001 WO
2001054699 Aug 2001 WO
2001060325 Aug 2001 WO
2001087276 Nov 2001 WO
2001091757 Dec 2001 WO
2002007700 Jan 2002 WO
2002011768 Feb 2002 WO
2002022132 Mar 2002 WO
2002040008 May 2002 WO
2002041878 May 2002 WO
2002053131 Jul 2002 WO
2002078602 Oct 2002 WO
2002078604 Oct 2002 WO
2003028667 Apr 2003 WO
2003041718 May 2003 WO
2003041741 May 2003 WO
2003068186 Aug 2003 WO
2003077923 Sep 2003 WO
2003082254 Oct 2003 WO
2003092588 Nov 2003 WO
2004014397 Feb 2004 WO
2004014432 Mar 2004 WO
2004017983 Mar 2004 WO
2004032897 Apr 2004 WO
2004032942 Apr 2004 WO
2004052336 Jun 2004 WO
2004054540 Jul 2004 WO
2004054576 Jul 2004 WO
2004080413 Sep 2004 WO
2004105694 Dec 2004 WO
2004110402 Dec 2004 WO
2004110408 Dec 2004 WO
2005027911 Mar 2005 WO
2005030175 Apr 2005 WO
2005081825 Sep 2005 WO
2005087194 Sep 2005 WO
2005087199 Sep 2005 WO
2005105059 Nov 2005 WO
2005115335 Dec 2005 WO
2005120470 Dec 2005 WO
2005120517 Dec 2005 WO
2006013369 Feb 2006 WO
2006034090 Mar 2006 WO
2006036899 Apr 2006 WO
2006053172 May 2006 WO
2006105615 Oct 2006 WO
2006113505 Oct 2006 WO
2006138686 Dec 2006 WO
2006138735 Dec 2006 WO
2007045027 Apr 2007 WO
2007076144 Jul 2007 WO
2007103294 Sep 2007 WO
2007120868 Oct 2007 WO
2007123790 Nov 2007 WO
2007124250 Nov 2007 WO
2007144151 Dec 2007 WO
2008049516 May 2008 WO
2008152444 Dec 2008 WO
2009002542 Dec 2008 WO
2009036311 Mar 2009 WO
2009040818 Apr 2009 WO
2009069006 Jun 2009 WO
2009098072 Aug 2009 WO
2009133352 Nov 2009 WO
2010033188 Mar 2010 WO
2010146872 Dec 2010 WO
2011000210 Jan 2011 WO
2011073995 Jun 2011 WO
2011120084 Oct 2011 WO
2011128336 Oct 2011 WO
2012009778 Jan 2012 WO
2012024361 Feb 2012 WO
2012055814 May 2012 WO
2012055840 May 2012 WO
2012065740 May 2012 WO
2012098090 Jul 2012 WO
2012116277 Aug 2012 WO
2012118563 Sep 2012 WO
2012120365 Sep 2012 WO
2012127501 Sep 2012 WO
2012156561 Nov 2012 WO
2012156822 Nov 2012 WO
2012158483 Nov 2012 WO
2012166909 Dec 2012 WO
2012170578 Dec 2012 WO
2013011501 Jan 2013 WO
2013025449 Feb 2013 WO
2013028639 Feb 2013 WO
2013035101 Mar 2013 WO
2013044067 Mar 2013 WO
2013045404 Apr 2013 WO
2013059285 Apr 2013 WO
2013063279 May 2013 WO
2013064620 May 2013 WO
2013071281 May 2013 WO
2013078422 May 2013 WO
2013088254 Jun 2013 WO
2013102665 Jul 2013 WO
2013106437 Jul 2013 WO
2013112947 Aug 2013 WO
2013113690 Aug 2013 WO
2013124415 Aug 2013 WO
2013127727 Sep 2013 WO
2013127728 Sep 2013 WO
2013144356 Oct 2013 WO
2013149258 Oct 2013 WO
2013158454 Oct 2013 WO
2013170052 Nov 2013 WO
2013178587 Dec 2013 WO
2013181449 Dec 2013 WO
2013192248 Dec 2013 WO
2013192249 Dec 2013 WO
2013192250 Dec 2013 WO
2013192251 Dec 2013 WO
2014001904 Jan 2014 WO
2014004424 Jan 2014 WO
2014009434 Jan 2014 WO
2014018569 Jan 2014 WO
2014018570 Jan 2014 WO
2014018571 Jan 2014 WO
2014018856 Jan 2014 WO
2014018932 Jan 2014 WO
2014031958 Feb 2014 WO
2014041120 Mar 2014 WO
2014052792 Apr 2014 WO
2014056897 Apr 2014 WO
2014066442 May 2014 WO
2014074846 May 2014 WO
2014076231 May 2014 WO
2014076569 May 2014 WO
2014081598 May 2014 WO
2014086739 Jun 2014 WO
2014093114 Jun 2014 WO
2014104784 Jul 2014 WO
2015179782 Nov 2015 WO
2016018993 Feb 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (413)
Entry
US 6,214,374 B1, 04/2001, Schmirler et al. (withdrawn)
Chambin et al, “Interest of Multifunctional Lipid Excipients: Case of Gelucire® 44/14,” Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 527-534 (Year: 2005).
Abbas et al., Regression of endometrial implants treated with vitamin D3 in a rat model of endometriosis, European J of Pharma, 715 (2013) 72-75, Elsevier.
Abitec, CapmulMCM, EP, Technical Data Sheet, version 10, 2014, Columbus, OH.
Abitec, CapmulMCM, NF, Technical Data Sheet, version 6, 2014, Columbus, OH.
Abitec, CapmulMCM, Saftey Data Sheet, 2011, Janesville, WI.
Abitec, CapmulMCM, Technical Data Sheet, version 17, 2014, Columbus, OH.
Abitec, CapmulPG8, CAS No. 31565-12-5, version 11, 2006, Columbus, OH.
Abitec, Excipients for the Pharmaceutical Industry—Regulatory and Product Information, 2013, 2 pages.
Acarturk, Fusun, Mucoadhesive Vaginal Drug Delivery System, Recent Patents on Drug Delivery & Formulation, 2009, vol. 3, pp. 193-195.
Alabi, K. A., et al., Analysis of Fatty Acid Composition of Thevetia peruviana and Hura crepitans Seed oils using GC-FID, Fountain Journal of Nat. and Appl. Sciences, vol. 2(2), pp. 32-37, 2013, Osogbo.
Alexander, KS, Corn Oil, CAS No. 8001-30-7, Jan. 2009.
Alvarez et al., Ectopic uterine tissue as a chronic pain generator, Neuroscience, Dec. 6, 2012, 225: 269-272.
Application Note FT-IR: JI-Ap-FT0508-008, CD spectra of pharmaceuticals substances—Steroids (2), JASCO International Co., Ltd., 2 pages.
Araya-Sib1ja et al., Crystallization of progesterone polymorphs using polymer-induced heteronucleation (PIHn) method, Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, Early Online, pp. 1-8, 2014, Informa Healthcare.
Araya-Sib1ja, Andrea M.A., Morphology Study of Progesterone Polymorphs Prepared by Polymer-Induced Heteronucleation (PIHn), Scanning vol. 35 pp. 213-221, 2013, Wiley Period., Inc.
Araya-Sib1ja, Andrea Manela, et al., Chemical Properties of Progesterone Selected Refer., SciFinder, 2014, American Chemical Society & US Natl. Lib. of Med.
Araya-Sib1ja, Andrea Manela, et al., Polymorphism in Progesterone Selected References, SciFinder, Feb. 24, 2014, pp. 1-12, American Chem. Society & Natl. Lib. of Med.
Araya-Sib1ja, Andrea Manela, et al., Polymorphism in Progesterone, SciFinder, pp. 1-46, Feb. 24, 2014, American Chem. Society & Natl. Lib. of Med.
Archer et al., Effects of ospemifene on the female reproductive and urinary tracts: translation from preclinical models into clinical evidence, Menopause: The Journal of the North American Menopause Society, vol. 22, No. 77, pp. 1-11 (2015).
Archer et al., Estrace® vs Premarin® for Treatment of Menopausal Symptoms: Dosage Comparison Study, Advances in Therapy®, vol. 9 No. 1, Jan./Feb. 1992.
Ashburn et al., Cardiovascular, Hepatic and Renal Lesions in Mice Receiving Cortisone, Estrone and Progesterone, Yale J Bilogy and Medicine, vol. 35, Feb. 1963, pp. 329-340.
Azeem, Adnan et al., Microemulsions as a Surrogate Carrier for Dermal Drug Delivery, Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, May 2000, vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 525-547 (abstract only). http://informahealtheare.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03639040802448646.
Azure Pharma, Inc., ELESTRIN™—Estradiol Gel, Drug Info, http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/archives/fdaDrugInfo.cfm?archiveid=11885, 26 pages, Aug. 2009.
Bakhmutova-Albert, Ekaterina, et al., Enhancing Aqueous Dissolution Rates of Progesterone via Cocrystallization, SSCI, Division of Aptuit, Poster No. R6247, West Lafayette.
Banerjee, Sila, et al., On the Stability of Salivary Progesterone Under Various Conditions of Storage, Steroids, vol. 46(6), pp. 967-974, Dec. 1985.
Barnett, Steven M, Pressure-tuning infared and solution Raman spectroscopic studies of 17B-estradiol and several A-ring . . . , Vibrational Spectroscopy 8, Elsevier, pp. 263, 1995.
Bartosova, Transdermal Drug Delivery In Vitro Using Diffusion Cells, Current Medicinal Chemistry, 2012, 19, 4671-4677, Bentham Science Publishers.
Benbow et al., Distribution and Metabolism of Maternal Progesterone in the Uterus, Placenta, and Fetus during Rat Pregnancy, Biology of Reproduction 52, 1327-1333 (1995).
Bernabei, M.T., et al., Release of progesterone polymorphs from dimethylpolysiloxane polymeric matrixes, Bollettino Chimico Farmaceutico, vol. 122(1) pp. 20-26, 1983 SciFinder.
Bhavnani Bhagu R. et al., “Misconception and Concerns about Bioidentical Hormones Used for Custom-Compounded Hormone Therapy,” J Clin Endocrinol Metab, Mar. 2012, 97(3):756-759.
Bhavnani et al., Structure Activity Relationships and Differential Interactions and Functional Activity of Various Equine Estrogens Mediated via Estrogen Receptors (ERs) ERα and ERβ, Endocrinology, Oct. 2008, 149(10):4857-4870.
Bhavnani, B.R., Stanczyk, F.Z., Pharmacology of conjugated equine estrogens: Efficacy, safety and mechanism of action, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2013), Elsevier.
Bhavnani, B.R., Stanczyk, F.Z., Use of medroxyprogesterone acetate for hormone therapy in postmenopausal women: Is it safe? J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2013), Elsevier.
BioMed Central, Solubility of Progesterone in Organic Solvents, Online PDF, http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/supplementary/1475-2859-11-106-S2.pdf.
Blake et al., Single and multidose pharmacokinetic study of a vaginal micronized progesterone insert (Endometrin) compared with vaginal gel in healthy reproductiveaged female subjects, Fertility and Sterility# vol. 94, No. 4, Sep. 2010, Elsevier.
Borka, Laszlo, Crystal Polymorphism of Pharmaceuticals, Acta Pharm. Jugosl., vol. 40 pp. 71-94, 1990.
Brinton, L.A., Felix, A.S., Menopausal hormone therapy and risk of endometrial cancer, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2013), Elsevier.
British Pharmacocopoeia 2014 Online, Refined Maize Oil, Ph. Eur. Monograph 1342, vol. I & II, Monographs: Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Substances, http://www.pharmacopoeia.co.uk/bp2014/ixbin/bp.cgi?a=print&id=7400&tab=a-z%20index [Feb. 3, 2014 1:37:50 PM].
Burry, Kenneth A, Percutaneous absorption of progesterone in postmenopausal women treated with transdermal estrogen, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 180(6) part 1, pp. 1504-1511, 1999.
Busetta, Par Bernard, Structure Cristalline et Moleculair de l'Oestradiol Hemihydrate, Acta Cryst., B28 pp. 560, 1972, Bis(dimethyl-o-thiolophenylarsine)palladium(II).
Busetta, Par Bernard, Structure Cristalline et Moleculaire du Complexe Oestradiol-Propanol, Acta Cryst., B28 pp. 1349, 1972, J.A. Kanters and J. Kroon.
Campsteyn, Par H, et al., Structure Cristalline et Molcculaire de la Progesterone C21H30O2, Acta Cryst., B28 pp. 3032-3042, 1972.
Cendejas-Santana, G, et al., Growth and characterization of progesterone crystallites, Revista Mexicana de Fisica, 50, Suplemento 1 pp. 1-3, 2004.
ChemPro, Top-Notch Technology in Production of Oils and Fats, Chempro-Edible-Oil-Refining-ISO-TUV-Austria Available May 26, 2010.
Christen et al., Phase I/Pharmacokinetic Study of High-Dose Progesterone and Doxorubicin, J Clin Oncol 11:2417-2426, 1993.
Christensson et al., Limonene hydroperoxide analogues differ in allergenic activity, Contact Dermatitis 2008: 59: 344-352.
Christensson et al., Limonene hydroperoxide analogues show specific patch test reactions, Contact Dermatitis, 70, 291-299, 2014.
Christensson et al., Positive patch test reactions to oxidized limonene: exposure and relevance , Contact Dermatitis, 71, 264-272, 2014.
Chun et al., Transdermal Delivery of Estradiol and Norethrindrone Acetate: Effect of Vehicles . . . , J. Kor. Pharm. Sci., vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 173-177 (2005).
Cicinelli et al., Direct Transport of Progesterone From Vagina to Uterus, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 95, No. 3, Mar. 2000, pp. 403-406.
Cole, Wayne & Julian, Percy L, Sterols. I. A Study of the 22-Ketosteroids, Cont. of the Research Lab. of the Glidden Co., Soya Prod. Div., vol. 67 pp. 1369-1375, Aug. 1945, Chicago.
Committee Opinion, Incidentally Detected Short Cervical Length, Committee of Obstetric Practice, Obstetrics & Gynecology, ACOG, vol. 119, No. 4, Apr. 2012, pp. 879-882.
Commodari, Fernando, Comparison of 17β-estradiol structures from x-ray diffraction and solution NMR, Magn. Reson. Chem., vol. 43, pp. 444-450, 2005, Wiley InterScience.
Cooper, A, et al., Systemic absorption of progesterone from Progest cream in postmenopausal women, The Lancet, vol. 351, pp. 1255-1256, Research Letters, Apr. 25, 1998.
Corbett et al., “Trends in Pharmacy Compounding for Women's Health in North Carolina: Focus on Vulvodynia,” Southern Medical Journal, vol. 107, No. 7, Jul. 2014, pp. 433-436.
Corn Refiners Association, Corn Oil, 5th Edition, Washington, D.C., 2006.
Critchley et al., Estrogen Receptor β, But Not Estrogen Receptor α, Is Present in the Vascular Endothelium of the Human and Nonhuman Primate Endometrium, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2001, vol. 86, No. 3, pp. 1370-1378.
Dauqan, Eqb1l M. A., et al., Fatty Acids Composition of Four Different Vegetable Oils (Red Palm Olein, Palm Olein, Corn Oil, IPCBEE, vol. 14, 2011, IACSIT Press, Singapore.
Dideberg, O, et al., Crystal data on progesterone (C21H3002), desoxycorticosterone (C21H30O3), corticosterone (C21H30O4) and aldosterone . . . , J. Appl. Cryst. vol. 4 pp. 80, 1971.
Diramio, Jackie A., Polyethylene Glycol Methacrylate/Dimetacrylate Hydrogels for Controlled Release of Hydrophobic Drugs, Masters of Science Thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 2002, 131 pages.
Drakulic, Branko J, Role of complexes formation between drugs and penetration enhancers in transdermal . . . , Inter. Journal of Pharmaceutics, Elsevier, vol. 363, pp. 40-49, 2009.
Du et al., Percutaneous progesterone delivery via cream or gel application in postmenopausal women: a randomized cross-over study of progesterone levels in serum, whole blood, saliva, and capillary blood, Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society, 2013, vol. 20, No. 11, pp. 1-7.
Duax, William L, et al., Conformation of Progesterone Side Chain: Conflict between X-ray Data and Force-Field Calculations, J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 103 pp. 6705-6712, Jun. 1981.
Duclos, R, et al., Polymorphism of Progesterone: Influence of the carrier and of the solid dispersion manufacturing . . . , J. Thermal Anal., vol. 37 pp. 1869-1875, 1991, Wiley.
Ebian, A.R., Ebian Article: Polymorphism and solvation of ethinyl estradiol, SciFinder, Pharmaceutica Acta Helvetiae, vol. 54(4), pp. 111-114, 1979, Alexandria, Egypt.
Eisenberger, A., Westhoff, C., Hormone replacement therapy and venous thromboembolism, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2013), Elsevier.
Engelhardt et al., Conceptus Influences the Distribution of Uterine Leukocytes During Early Porcine Pregnancy, Biology of Reproduction 66, 1875-1880 (2002).
Estradiol, The Merck Index Online, Royal Society of Chemistry, https://www.rsc.org/Merck-Index/monograph/mono1500003758/estradiol?q=unauthorize.
Ettinger et al., Comparison of endometrial growth produced by unopposed conjugated estrogens or by micronized estradiol in postmenopausal women, Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176:112-117.
Excipients for Pharmaceuticals, Sasol Olefins & Surfactants GmbH, 2010, 28 pages.
Faassen, Fried, Physicochemical Properties and Transport of Steroids across Caco-2 Cells, Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 20(2), 2003, Plenum Pub. Corp.
FDA, Draft Guidance on Progesterone, Recommended Apr. 2010, Revised Feb. 2011 http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM209294.pdf.
Ferrari, Roseli AP., et al., Oxidative Stability of Biodiesel From Soybean Oil Fatty Acid Ethyl Esters, Sci. Agric., vol. 62(3), pp. 291-295, 2005, PiracicaB1, Braz.
Filipsson et al., Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 5: Limonene, first draft, World Health Organization, Geneva, 1998, 36 pages.
Final Report on the Safety Assessment of BHT, International Journal of Toxicology, 21(Suppl. 2):19-94, 2002/.
Flyvholm, Sensitizing risk of butylated hydroxytoluene B1sed on exposure and effect data, Contact Dermatitis 1990: 23: 341-345.
Fotherby, K., Bioavailability of Orally Administered Sex Steroids Used in Oral Contraception and Hormone Replacement Therapy, Contraception, 1996; 54:59-69.
Franklin et al., Characterization of immunoglobulins and cytokines in human cervical mucus: influence of exogenous and endogenous hormones, Journal of Reproductive Immunology 42 (1999) 93-106, Elsevier.
Franz et al., Use of Excised Human Skin to Assess the Bioequivalence of Topical Products, Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2009;22:276-286.
Freedman, R.R., Menopausal hot flashes: Mechanisms, endocrinology, treatment, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.(2013), Elsevier.
Fuchs et al., The Effects of an Estrogen and Glycolic Acid Cream on the Facial Skin of Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized Histologic Study, Cutis. Jun. 2003;71(6):481-8.
Fugh-Berman, Adriane, Bioidentical Hormones for Menopausal Hormone Therapy: Variation on a Theme, Journal of General Internal Medicine, vol. 22, pp. 1030-1034, 2007.
Furness et al., Hormone therapy in postmenopausal women and risk of endometrial hyperplasia (Review), 2012, pp. 1-204, The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by JohnWiley & Sons, Ltd.
Gäfvert et al., Free radicals in antigen formation: reduction of contact allergic response to hydroperoxides by epidermal treatment with antioxidants, British Journal of Dermatology 2002; 146: 649-656.
Ganam-Quintanar et al., Evaluation of the transepidermal permeation of diethylene glycol monoethyl ether and skin water loss, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vo. 147, No. 2, Feb. 28, 1997, pp. 165-171 (abstract only).
Gattefossé SAS, Material Safety Data Sheet, Gelot 64, 2012, 8 pages.
Gattefossé SAS, Regulatory Data Sheet, Gelot 64, 2012, 6 pages.
Gattefossé SAS, Regulatory Data Sheet, Lauroglycol 90, 2012, 5 pages.
Gattefossé, “Excipients for Safe and Effective Topical Delivery, Drug Development and Delivery” Jul./Aug. 2012, http://drug-dev.com/Main/B1ck-Issues/Transdermal-Topical-Subcutaneous-NonInvasive-Deliv-5.aspx#.
Geelen, Math J.H. et al., “Dietary medium-chain fatty acids raise and (n-3) polyunsaturated fatty acids lower hepatic triacylglycerol synthesis in rats,” The Journal of Nutrition, 1995, 125(10):2449-2456.
Gillet et al., Induction of amenorrhea during hormone replacement therapy: optimal micronized progesterone dose. A multicenter study, Maturitas 19 (1994) 103-115.
Giron-Forest, D, et al., Thermal analyis methods for pharmacopoeial materials, J. Pharmaceutical & Biomedical Anal., vol. 7(12) pp. 1421-1433, 1989, Pergamon Press, Gr. Britain.
Giron-Forest, D, Thermal analysis and calorimetric methods in the characterisation of polymorphs and solvates, Thermochimica Acta, vol. 248 pp. 1-59, 1995, Elsevier.
Glaser et al, Pilot Study: Absorption and Efficacy of Multiple Hormones Delivered in a Single Cream Applied to the Mucous Membranes of the Labia and Vagina, Gynecol Obstet Invest 2008;66:111-118.
Golatowski et al., Comparative evaluation of saliva collection methods for proteome analysis, Clinica Chimica Acta 419 (2013) 42-46.
Graham et al, Physiological Action of Progesterone in Target Tissues, Endocrine Reviews, 1997, vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 502-519.
Groothuis et al., Estrogen and the endometrium: lessons learned from gene expression profiling in rodents and human, Human Reproduction Update, vol. 13, No. 4 pp. 405-417, 2007.
Gunstone, Frank D, et al., Vegetable Oils in Food Technology: Composition, Properties and Uses, Blackwell Publishing, CRC Press, 2002.
Gurney, E.P. et al., The Women's Health Initiative trial and related studies: 10 years later: A clinician's view, J.Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2013), Elsevier.
Hamid et al., The effects of common solubilizing agents on the intestinal membrane B1rrier functions and membrane toxicity in rats, International Journal of Pharmaceutics 379 (2009) 100-108, Elsevier.
Haner, Barbara, Crystal data (I) for some pregnenes and pregnadienes, Acta Cryst., vol. 17 pp. 1610, 1964.
Hapgood, J.P., et al., Potency of progestogens used in hormonal therapy: Toward understanding differential actions, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2013), Elsevier.
Hargrove et al., Menopausal Hormone Replacement Therapy With Continuous Daily Oral Micronize Estradiol and Progesterone, Obstet Gynecol, vol. 73, No. 4, Apr. 1989, pp. 606-612.
Hatton et al., “Safety and efficacy of a lipid emulsion containing medium-chain triglycerides,” Clinical Pharmacy, 1990, vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 366-371.
He et al., Apoptotic Signaling Pathways in Uteri of Rats with Endometrial Hyperplasia Induced by Ovariectomy Combined with Estrogen, Gynecol Obstet Invest 2013;76:51-56.
Helbling, Ignacio M, et al., The Optimization of an Intravaginal Ring Releasing Progesterone Using a Mathematical Model, Pharm Res, vol. 31 pp. 795-808, 2014, Springer Science.
Helmy et al., Estrogenic Effect of Soy Phytoestrogens on the Uterus of Ovariectomized Female Rats, Clinic Pharmacol Biopharmaceut, 2014, S2, 7 pages.
Henderson, V.W., Alzheimer's disease: Review of hormone therapy trials and implications for treatment and prevention after . . . , J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2013), Elsevier.
Henriksen, Thormod, et al., An ENDOR Sturdy of Radiation-Induced Molecular Damage to Progesterone, Jour. of Mag. Resonance, vol. 63, pp. 333-342, 1985, Acedemic Press, Inc.
Herman, Anna et al., “Essential oils and their constituents as skin penetration enhancer for transdermal drug delivery: a review,” 2014 Royal Pharmaceutical Society, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, pp. 1-13.
Hodis, H.N., Mack, W.J., Hormone replacement therapy and the association with heart disease and overall mortality: Clinical . . . , J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2013), Elsevier.
Hospital, Michel, et al., X-ray Crystallography of Estrogens and Their Binding to Receptor Sites, Mol. Pharmacology, vol. 8 pp. 438-445, Acedemic Press, Inc., 1972.
Hostynek, JJ, Predictinga bsorptiono f fragrancec hemicalst hrough human skin, j. Soc.C osmeCt. hem.,4 6, 221-229 (Jul./Aug. 1995).
Hulsmann, Stefan, Stability of Extruded 17B-Estradiol Solid Dispersions, Pharmaceutical Development and Tech., vol. 6(2) pp. 223-229, 2001, Marcel Dekker, Inc.
Humberstone, Andrew et al., “Lipid-based vehicles for the oral delivery of poorly water soluble drugs,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 25 (1997) 103-128.
Hurn et al., Estrogen as a Neuroprotectant in Stroke, Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 20:631-652, 2000, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc., Philadelphia.
Hyder et al., Synthetic Estrogen 17α-Ethinyl Estradiol Induces Pattern of Uterine Gene Expression Similar to Endogenous Estrogen 17β-Estradiol, JPET 290(2):740-747, 1999.
Idder, Salima, et al., Physicochemical properties of Progesterone, SciFinder, pp. 1-26, Feb. 24, 2014, American Chem. Society & US Natl. Lib. of Med.
Johanson, Gunnar, Toxicity Review of Ethylene Glycol Monomethyl Ether and its Acetate Ester, Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 2000, vol. 30, No. 3 , pp. 307-345 (abstract only). http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10408440091159220.
Johnson, William S, et al., Racemic Progesterone, Tetrahedron Letters No. 4, pp. 193-196, 1963, Pergamon Press Ltd., Great Britain.
Joshi et al., Detection and synthesis of a progestagen-dependent protein in human endometrium, J Reprod Fert (1980) 59, 273-285.
Kanno et al., The OECD Program to Validate the Rat Uterotrophic Bioassay to Screen Compounds for in Vivo Estrogenic Responses: Phase 1, Environmental Health Perspectives ⋅ vol. 1091 | No. 8 | Aug. 2001, pp. 785-794.
Karlberg et al., Air oxidation of d-limonene (the citrus solvent) creates potent allergens, Contact Dermatitis, 1992: 26: 332-340.
Karlberg et al., Influence of an anti-oxidant on the formation of allergenic compounds during auto-oxication of d-limonene, Ann. Occup. Hyg., vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 199-207, 1994.
Kaunitz, Andrew M., Extended duration use of menopausal hormone therapy, Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society, 2014, vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 1-3.
Khalil, Sah, Stability and Dissolution Rates of Corticosteroids in Polyethylene Glycol Solid Dispersions, Drug Dev. & Indus. Pharm., vol. 10(5) pp. 771-787, 1984, Marcel Dekker.
Kharode et al., The Pairing of a Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator, B1zedoxifene, with Conjugated Estrogens as a New Paradigm for the Treatment of Menopausal Symptoms and Osteoporosis Prevention, Endocrinology 149(12):6084-6091, 2008.
Kim et al., Safety Evaluation and Risk Assessment of d-Limonene, Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B: Critical Reviews, 2013, 16:1, 17-38 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2013.769418.
Kincl et al., Increasing Oral Bioavailability of Progesterone by Formulation, Journal of Steroid Biochemistry, 1978, vol. 9, pp. 83-84.
Knuth et al., Hydrogel delivery systems for vaginal and oral applications: Formulation and biological considerations, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 11, No. 1-2, Jul.-Aug. 1993, pp. 137-167 (abstract only).
Koga et al., Enhancing mechanism of Labrasol on intestinal membrane permeability of the hydrophilic drug gentamicin sulfate, European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 64 (2006) 82-91.
Komm et al., B1zedoxifene Acetate: A Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator with Improved Selectivity, Endocrinology 146(9):3999-4008, 2005.
Korkmaz, Filiz, Byophysical Studies of Progesterone-Model Membrane Interactions, Thesis, Grad. School of Nat. and App. Sci. of The Middle East Tech. University, Sep. 2003.
Kotiyan, P.N., Stability indicating HPTLC method for the estimation of estradiol, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 22 pp. 667-671, 2000, Elsevier.
Krzyminiewski, R, et al., EPR Study of the Stable Radical in a y-Irradiated Single Crystal of Progesterone, Jour. of Mag. Resonance, vol. 46 pp. 300-305, 1982, Acedemic Press.
Kubli-Garfias, C, et al., Ab initio calculations of the electronic structure of glucocorticoids, Jour. of Mol. Structure, Theochem, vol. 454 pp. 267-275, 1998, Elsevier.
Kubli-Garfias, Carlos, Ab initio study of the electronic structure of progesterone and related progestins, Jour. of Mol. Structure, Theochem vol. 425, pp. 171-179, 1998, Elsevier (abstract only).
Kuhnert-Brandstaetter and Grimm. Zur Unterscheidung von losungsmittelhaltigen pseudopolymorphen Kristallformen und polymorphen Modifikationen bei Steroidhormonen.II, Mikrochimica Acta, vol. 1, pp. 127-139, 1968.
Kuhnert-Brandstaetter and Junger and Kofler. Thermo-microscopic and spectrophotometric: Determination of steroid hormones, Microchemical Journal 9, pp. 105-133, 1965.
Kuhnert-Brandstaetter and Kofler. Zur mikroskopischen Identitatsprufung und zur Polymorphic der Sexualhormone, Mikrochimica Acta, vol. 6, pp. 847-853, 1959.
Kuhnert-Brandstaetter and Linder. Zur Hydratbildung bei Steroidhormonen, Sci. Pharm, vol. 41(2), pp. 109-116, 1973.
Kumasaka et al., Effects of Various Forms of Progestin on the the Estrogen-Primed, Ovariectomized Rat, Endocrine Journal 1994, 41(2), 161-169.
Kuon et al., A Novel Optical Method to Assess Cervical Changes during Pregnancy and Use to Evaluate the Effects of Progestins on Term and Preterm Labor, Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jul. 2011; 205(1): 82.e15-82.e20.
Kuon et al., Actions of progestins for the inhibition of cervical ripening and uterine contractions to prevent preterm birth, FVV in Obgyn, 2012, 4 (2): 110-119.
Kuon et al., Pharmacological actions of progestins to inhibit cervical ripening and prevent delivery depend upon their properties, the route of administration and the vehicle, Am J Obstet Gynecol. May 2010 ; 202(5): 455.e1-455.e9.
Labrie, et al., Intravaginal prasterone (DHEA) provides local action without clinically significant changes in serum concentrations of estrogens or androgens, Journal of Steroid Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, vol. 138, pp. 359-367, 2013, Elsevier.
Lacey, J.V. Jr., The WHI ten year's later: An epidemiologist's view, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2013), Elsevier.
Lahiani-Skib1, Malika, Solubility and Dissolution Rate of Progesterone-Cyclodextrin . . . , Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, Informa Healthcare vol. 32, pp. 1043-1058, 2006.
Lancaster, Robert W, et al., The Polymorphism of Progesterone: Stabilization of a ‘Disappearing’ Polymorph by . . . , Jour. of Pharm. Sci., vol. 96(12) pp. 3419-3431, 2007, Wiley-Liss.
Land, Laura M, The influence of water content of triglyceride oils on the solubility of steriods, Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 22(5) May 2005, Springer Science+Business Media.
Lauer et al., “Evaluation of the hairless rat as a model for in vivo percutaneous absorption,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 86, No. 1, Jan. 1997, pp. 13-18.
Leonetti et al., Transdermal progesterone cream as an alternative progestin in hormone therapy, Alternative Therapies, Nov./Dec. 2005, vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 36-38.
Leonetti, Helene B, et al., Topical progesterone cream has an antiproliferative effect on estrogen-stimulated endometrium, Fertility and Sterility, vol. 79(1), Jan. 2003.
Lewis, John G. et al., Caution on the use of saliva measurements to monitor absorption of progesterone from transdermal creams in postmenopausal women, Maturitas, The European Menopause Journal, vol. 41, pp. 1-6, 2002.
Li, Guo-Chian, Solid-state NMR analysis of steroidal conformation of 17a- and 17B-estradiol in the absence and presence of lipi . . . , Steroids, Elsevier, vol. 77, pp. 185-192, 2012.
Lindmark, Tuulikki et al., “Absorption Enhancement through Intracellular Regulation of Tight Junction Permeability by Medium Chain Fatty Acids in Caco-2 Cells,” JPET 284(1):362-369, 1998.
Lindmark, Tuulikki et al., “Mechanisms of Absorption Enhancement by Medium Chain Fatty Acids in Intestinal Epithelial Caco-2 Cell Monolayers,” JPET 275(2):958-964, 1995.
Lobo, R.A., Foreword, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2014), Elsevier.
López-Belmonte, Corrigendum to “Comparative uterine effects on ovariectomized rats after repeated treatment with different vaginal estrogen formulations” [Maturitas 72 (2012) 353-358], Maturitas 74 (2013) 393, Elsevier.
Lucy et al., Gonadotropin-releasing hormone at estrus: lutenizing hormone, estradiol, and progesterone during . . . Biol Reprod Sep. 1986;35(2):300-311 (abstract only).
Lvova, M. SH., et al., Thermal Analysis in the Quality Control and Standardization of Some Drugs, J Thermal Anal., vol. 40 pp. 405-411, 1993, Wiley.
Madishetti et al., Development of domperidone bilayered matrix type transdermal patches: physicochemical, in vitro and ex vivo characterization, DARU vol. 18, No. 3, 2010, pp. 221-229.
Magness, R.R., et al., Estrone, Estradiol-17β and Progesterone Concentrations in Uterine Lymph and Systematic Blood throughout the Porcine Estrone Estrous Cycle, Journal of Animal Science, vol. 57, pp. 449-455, ISU, 1983.
Manson, JoAnn E. et al., “Menopausal hormone therapy and health outcomes during the intervention and extended poststoping phases of the women's health initiative randomized trials,” JAMA, Oct. 2, 2013, vol. 310, No. 13, pp. 1353-1368.
McGuffy, Irena, Softgel Technology as a Lipid-B1sed Delivery Tool for Bioavailability Enhancement, Catalent Pharma Solutions, Somerset, NJ, Mar. 2011.
Mesley, R.J., Clathrate Formation from Steroids, Chemistry and Industry, vol. 37 pp. 1594-1595, Sep. 1965.
Miao, Wenbin, et al., Chemical Properties of Progesterone, SciFinder, 2014, American Chemical Society & US Natl. Lib. of Med.
Miles et al., Pharmacokinetics and endometrial tissue levels of progesterone after administration bv'Intramuscular and vaginal routes: a comparative study, Fertility and Sterility, vol. 62, No. 3, Sep. 1994, pp. 485-490.
Miller et al., Safety and Feasibility of Topical Application of Limonene as a Massage Oil to the Breast, Journal of Cancer Therapy, 2012, 3, 749-754.
Mueck, A.O. et al., Genomic and non-genomic actions of progestogens in the breast, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol.Biol. (2013), Elsevier.
Muramatsu, Mitsuo, Thermodynamic Relationship between a- and B-Forms of Crystalline Progesterone, J. Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 68(2) pp. 175-178, 1979, Amer. Pharm. Assoc.
Ng, Jo-Han et al., Advances in biodiesel fuel for application in compression ignition engines, Clean Techn Environ Policy, vol. 12, pp. 459-493, 2010, Springer-Verlag.
Nicklas, Martina, Preparation and characterization of marine sponge collagen nanoparticles and employment for the trans . . . , Drug Devel. & Indust. Pharmacy,35(9) pp. 1035, 2009.
Nilsson et al., Analysis of Contact Allergenic Compounds in Oxidized d-Limonene, Chromatographia vol. 42, No. 3/4, Feb. 1996, pp. 199-205.
Notelovitz, Morris, et al., Initial 17-b-Estradiol Dose for Treating Vasomotor Symptoms, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 95(5), pp. 726-731, part 1, May 2000, Elsevier.
NuGen, What is NuGen HP Hair Growth System.
NuGest900, NuGest 900™.
O'Leary, Peter, Salivary, but not serum or urinary levels of progesterone are elevated after topical application of pregersterone cream to pre-and post-menopausal women, Clinical Endocrinology, vol. 53 pp. 615-620, Blackwell Science 2000.
Opinion on the Diethylene Glycol Momoethyl Ether (DEGEE), Scientific Committee on Consumer Products, Dec. 19, 2006, 27 pages.
Outterson, K., The Drug Quality and Security Act—Mind the Gaps, n engl j med 370;2 nejm.org Jan. 9, 2014, pp. 97-99.
Palamakula et al., Preparation and In Vitro Characterization of Self-Nanoemulsified Drug Delivery Systems of Coenzyme Q10 Using Chiral Essential Oil Components, Pharmaceutical Technology Oct. 2004, pp. 74-88.
Panay et al., The 2013 British Menopause Society & Women's Health Concern recommendations on hormone replacement therapy, Menopause International: The Integrated Journal of Postreproductive Health, published online May 23, 2013, Sage Publications. http://min.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/05/23/1754045313489645.1.
Panchangnula et al., Development and evaluation of an intracutaneous depot formulation of corticosteroids using Transcutol . . . , J Pharm Pharmacol. Sep. 1991;43(9):609-614 (abstract only).
Parasuraman et al., Blood sample collection in small laboratory animals, Journal of Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapeutics | Jul.-Dec. 2010 | vol. 1 | Issue 2, pp. 87-93.
Park, Jeong-Sook, Solvent effects on physicochemical behavior of estradiols recrystalized for transdermal delivery, Arch Pharm Res, vol. 31(1), pp. 111-116, 2008.
Park, Jeong-Sook, Use of CP/MAS solid-state NMR for the characterization of solvate . . . , European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, vol. 60, pp. 407-412, 2005.
Parrish, Damon A., A new estra-1,3,5(10)-triene-3,17b-diol solvate: estradiol-methanol-water, Crystal Structure Comm., Intn'l Union of Crystallography, ISSN 0108-2701, 2003.
Patel et al., Transdermal Drug Delivery System: A Review, www.thepharmajournal.com, vol. 1, No. 4, 2012, pp. 78-87.
Payne, R.S., et al., Examples of successful crystal structure prediction: polymorphs of primidone and progesterone, Intl. Jour. of Pharma., vol. 177 pp. 231-245, 1999, Elsevier.
PCCA, Apothogram, PCCA, May 2014, Houston, TX.
Persson, Linda C, et al., Physicochemical Properties of Progesterone Selecte, SciFinder, pp. 1-5, Feb. 24, 2014, American Chem. Society & US Natl. Lib. of Med.
Pfaus et al., Selective facilitation of sexual solicitation in the female rat by a melanocortin receptor agonist, PNAS, Jul. 6, 2004, vol. 101, No. 27, pp. 10201-10204.
Pheasant, Richard, Polymorphism of 17-Ethinylestradiol, Schering Corporation, Bloomfield, NJ, May 1950.
Pickles, VR, Cutaneous reactions to injection of progesterone solutions into the skin, Br Med Journal, Aug. 16, 1952, pp. 373-374.
Pinkerton et al., What are the concerns about custom-compounded “bioidentical” hormone therapy? Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society, vol. 21, No. 12, 2014,pp. 1-3.
Pinkerton, J.V., Thomas, S., Use of SERMs for treatment in postmenopausal women, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2014), Elsevier.
Pisegna, Gisia L, A High-pressure Vibrational Spectroscopic Study of Polymorphism in Steroids . . . , Thesis, McGill University, Dept. of Chem, Nov. 1999, Natl. Lib. of Canada.
Portman, David et al., One-year treatment persistence with local estrogen therapy in postmenopausal women diagnosed as having vaginal atrophy, Menopause, vol. 22, No. 11, 2015, pp. 000/000 (8 pages).
Position Statement, Management of symptomatic vulvovaginal atrophy: 2013 position statement of the North American Menopause Society (NAMS), Menopause, vol. 20, No. 9, pp. 888-902.
Practice Bulletin No. 141, Management of Menopausal Symptoms, Obstetrics & Gynecology, ACOG, vol. 123, No. 1, Jan. 2014, pp. 202-216.
Prajapati Hetal N. et al., “A Comparative Evaluation of Mono-, Di- and Triglyceride of Medium Chain Fatty Acids by Lipid/Surfactant/Water Phase Diagram, Solubility Determination and Dispersion Testing for Application in Pharmaceutical Dosage Form Development,” Pharm Res. Jan. 2012; 29(1): 285-305. Published online Aug. 23, 2011. doi: 10.1007/s11095-011-0541-3.
Prajapati Hetal N. et al., “Effect of Difference in Fatty Acid Chain Lengths of Medium-Chain Lipids on Lipid/Surfactant/Water Phase Diagrams and Drug Solubility,” J. Excipients and Food Chem. 2 (3) 2011:73-88.
Prajapati, Hetal N, et al., A comparative Evaluation of Mono-, Di- and Triglyceride of Medium Chain Fatty Acids by Lipid/Surfactant/Water, Springerlink.com, pp. 1-21, Apr. 2011.
Prausnitz et al., Transdermal drug delivery, Nat Biotechnol. Nov. 2008 ; 26(11): 1261-1268.
Price, Sarah L, The computational prediction of pharmaceutical crystal structures and polymorphism, Adv. Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 56 pp. 301-319, 2004, Elsevier.
Product Information Sheet, Body B1lance Cream, Tahitian Noni International, 2013, 1 page.
Product Safety Assessment: Diethylene Glycol Monoethyl Ether, Created: Sep. 24, 2007 The Dow Chemical Company Page, 5 pages.
Progesterone, The Merck Index Online, Royal Society of Chemistry, 2013, search Feb. 17, 2014 https://www.rsc.org/Merck-Index/monograph/print/mono1500007889/progesterone?q=authorize.
Progynova TS 100, available online at file:///C:/Users/Call%20Family/Desktop/Progynova%20TS%20100%2012%20Patches_Pack%20%28Estradiol%20Hemihydrate%29.html, 2010.
Provider Data Sheet, About Dried Blood Spot Testing, ZRT Laboratory, 2014, 3 pages.
Rahn et al., Vaginal Estrogen for Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause A Systematic Review, Obstet Gynecol 2014;124(6):1147-56.
Rao, Rajeswara et al., “Intra Subject Variability of Progesterone 200 mg Soft Capsules in Indian Healthy Adult Postmenopausal Female Subjects under Fasting Conditions,” J Bioequiv Availab. 2014, 6: 139-143.
Reisman et al., Topical Application of the Synthetic Triterpenoid RTA 408 Protects Mice from Radiation-Induced Dermatitis, Radiation Research 181, 512-520 (2014).
Rosilio, V, et al., Physical Aging of Progesterone-Loaded Poly(D,L,-lactide-co-glycolide) Microspheres, Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 15(5) pp. 794-799,1998, Plenum Pub. Corp.
Ross et al., Randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study of the endometrial effects of a vaginal progesterone gel in estrogen-treated postmenopausal women, AnnJ Obstet Gynecol, Oct. 1997, vol. 177, No. 4, pp. 937-941.
Ruan et al., Systemic progesterone therapy—Oral, vaginal, injections and even transdermal? Maturitas 79 (2014) 248-255, Elsevier.
Salem, HF, Sustained-release progesterone nanosuspension following intramuscular injection in ovariectomized rats, International Journal of Nanomedicine 2010:5 943-954, Dove Press.
Sallee, Verney L. et al., “Determinants of intestinal mucosal uptake of short- and medium-chain fatty acids and alcohols,” Journal of Lipid Research, 1973, vol. 14, 475-484.
Salole, Eugene G., Estradiol, Analytical Profiles of Drug Substances, vol. 15, pp. 283-318, 1986.
Salole, Eugene G., The physicochemical properties of oestradiol, Journal of Pharmaceutical & Biomedical Analysis, vol. 5, No. 7, pp. 635-648, 1987.
Santen, R.J., Menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2013), Elsevier.
Santen, RJ, Vaginal administration of estradiol: effects of dose, preparation and timing on plasma estradiol levels, Climacteric 2014;17:1-14.
Sarkar, B1su, et al., Chemical Stability of Progesterone in Compounded Topical Preparations using PLO Transdermal Cream™ and HRT Cream™ B1se . . . , J Steroids Horm Sci, 4:2, 2013.
Sarpal, K. et al., “Self emulsifying drug delivery systems: a strategy to improve oral bioavailability,” Current Research & Information on Pharmaceuticals Sciences (CRIPS), 2010, vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 42-49.
Sarrel, et al., The Mortality Toll of Estrogen Avoidance: An Analysis of Excess Deaths Among Hysterectomized Women Aged 50 to 59 Years, American Journal of Public Health, Research and Practice, e1-e6. Published online ahead of print Jul. 18, 2013.
Satyanarayana, D, et al., Aqueous Solubility Predictions of Aliphatic Alcohols, Alkyl Substituted Benzoates and Steroids, Asian J. Chem., vol. 9 (3) pp. 418-426, 1997.
Scavarelli, Rosa Maria, et al., Progesterone and Hydrate or Solvate, SciFinder, pp. 1-2, Feb. 24, 2014, American Chem. Society.
Schindler, A.E., The “newer” progestogens and postmenopausal hormone therapy (HRT), J. Steroid Biochem.Mol. Biol. (2013), Elsevier.
Schindler, Aldof E. et al., Classification and pharmacology of progestins, Maturitas 46S1 (2003) S7-S16.
Schutte et al., A tissue engineered human endometrial stroma that responds to cues for secretory differentiation, decidualization and menstruation, Fertil Steril. Apr. 2012 ; 97(4): 997-1003, Elsevier.
Schweikart et al., Comparative Uterotrophic Effects of Endoxifen and Tamoxifen in Ovariectomized Sprague-Dawley Rats, Toxicologic Pathology, 42: 1188-1196, 2014.
SciFinder Scholar Prednisone Chemical Properties, SciFinder, 2014, pp. 1-7, National Library of Medicine.
SciFinder Scholar Prednisone Physical Properties, SciFinder, 2014, pp. 1-10, Natioinal Library of Medicine.
SciFinder Scholar Progesterone Experimental Properties, SciFinder, pp. 1-9, Feb. 24, 2014, American Chem. Society.
Search Report, Extended European Search Report for EP13741053.6, dated Jul. 1, 2015.
Search Report, International Search Report for PCT/US12/66406, dated Jan. 24, 2013.
Search Report, International Search Report for PCT/US13/23309, dated Apr. 9, 2013.
Search Report, International Search Report for PCT/US13/46442, dated Nov. 1, 2013.
Search Report, International Search Report for PCT/US13/46443, dated Oct. 31, 2013.
Search Report, International Search Report for PCT/US13/46444, dated Oct. 31, 2013.
Search Report, International Search Report for PCT/US13/46445, dated Nov. 1, 2013.
Search Report, International Search Report for PCT/US14/61811, dated Jan. 21, 2015.
Search Report, International Search Report for PCT/US15/23041, dated Jun. 30, 2015.
Serantoni, Foresti, et al., 4-Pregnen-3,20-dione (progesterone, form II), Crystal Structure Comm., vol. 4(1) pp. 189-192, 1975, CAPLUS DataB1se.
Shao et al., Review Open Access Direct effects of metformin in the endometrium: a hypothetical mechanism for the treatment of women with PCOS and endometrial carcinoma, Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research 2014, 33(1):41, 11 pages.
Sharma, H.C., et al., Physical Properties of Progesterone Selected Refer, SciFinder, pp. 1-5, Feb. 24, 2014, American Chem. Society & US Natl. Lib. of Med.
Shrier et al., “Mucosal Immunity of the Adolescent Female Genital Tract,” Journal of Adolescent Health, 2003; 32:183-186.
Shufelt et al., Hormone therapy dose, formulation, route delivery, and risk of cardiovascular events in women: findings from the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study, Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society, vol. 21, No. 3, 2014, pp. 1-7, 2013.
Siew, Adeline, moderator, Bioavailability Enhancement with Lipid-B1sed Drug-Delivery Systems, Pharmaceutical Technology, Aug. 2014, pp. 28, 30-31.
Sigma-Aldrich, Progesterone-Water Soluble: powder, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture), MSDS available online: http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/sigma/p7556.
Simon et al., Effective Treatment of Vaginal atrophy with an Ultra-low-dose estradiol vaginal tablet, Obstetrics & Gynocology, vol. 112, No. 5, Nov. 2008, pp. 1053-1060.
Simon, James A., What if the Women's Health Initiative had used transdermal estradiol and oral progesterone instead? Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society, 2014, vol. 21, No. 7, pp. 1-15.
Sitruk-Ware et al., Progestogens in hormonal replacement therapy: new molecules, risks, and benefits, Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society. vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 6-15, 2002.
Sitruk-Ware, Regine, “Pharmacological profile of progestins,” Maturitas 47 (2004) 277-283.
Sitruk-Ware, Regine, Oral Micronized Progesterone—Bioavailability pharmacokinetics, pharmacological and therapeutic implications—A review, Contraception, Oct. 1987, vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 373-402.
Smith et al., Lower Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Postmenopausal Women Taking Oral Estradiol Compared with Oral Conjugated Equine Estrogens, JAMA Internal Medicine, Published online Sep. 30, 2013, E1-E7. jamainternalmedicine.com.
Smyth et al., Summary of Toxicological Data, a 2-Yr Study of Diethylene Glycol Monoethyl Ether in Rats, Fd Cosmet. Toxicol. vol. 2, pp. 641-642, 1964.
Stanczyk et al., Thereaputically equivalent pharmacokinetic profile across three application sistes for AG200-15, a novel low-estrogen dose contraceptive patch, Contraception, 87 (2013) pp. 744-749.
Stanczyk, F.Z. et al., “Percutaneous administration of progesterone: blood levels and endometrial protection,” Menopause: The Journal of the North American Menopause Society, 2005, vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 232-237.
Stanczyk, F.Z. et al., Ethinyl estradiol and 17β-estradiol in combined oral contraceptives: pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and risk assessment, Contraception 87 (Jun. 2013) vol. 87, No. 6, pp. 706-727.
Stanczyk, F.Z., “All progestins are not created equal,” Steroids 68 (2003) 879-880.
Stanczyk, F.Z., “Treatment of postmenopausal women with topical progesterone creams and gels: are they effective?” Climacteric 2014;17 (Suppl 2):8-11.
Stanczyk, F.Z., Bhavnani, B.R., Current views of hormone therapy for the management and treatment of postmenopausal women, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2014), Elsevier.
Stein, Emily A, et al., Progesterone Physical Properties, SciFinder, pp. 1-46, Feb. 24, 2014, American Chem. Society & US Natl. Lib. of Med.
Stephenson et al., “Transdermal progesterone: Effects on Menopausal symptoms and on thrombotic, anticoagulant, and inflammatory factors in postmenopausal women,” Int J Pharmaceutical Compounding, vol. 12, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 2008, pp. 295-304.
Strickley, Robert T., Solubilizing excipients in oral and injectable formulations, Pharmaceutical Research Feb. 2004, vol. 21, Issue 2, pp. 201-230 (abstract only).
Strocchi, Antonino, Fatty Acid Composition, and Triglyceride Structure of Corn Oil, Hydrogenated Corn Oil, and Corn Oil Margarine, Journal of Food Science, vol. 47, pp. 36-39, 1981.
Struhar, M, et al., Estradiol Benzoate: Preparation of an injection suspension . . . , SciFinder, Cesko-Slovenska Farmacie, vol. 27(6), pp. 245-249, 1978, Bratislava, Czech.
Sullivan et al., “A review of the nonclinical safety of Transcutol®, a highly purified form of diethylene glycol monoethyl ether (DEGEE) used as a pharmaceutical excipient,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, 72 (2014) pp. 40-50.
Sun, Jidong, D-Limonene: Safety and Clinical Applications, Alternative Medicine Review vol. 12, No. 3, 2007, pp. 259-264.
Tait, Alex D, Characterization of the Prod. from the Oxidation of Progesterone with Osmium Tetroxide, Dept of Investigative Med., Univ. Cambridge, Gt. Britain pp. 531-542, 1972.
Takacs M. et al., The light sensitivity of corticosteroids in crystalline form, Pharmaceutica acta Helvetiae, vol. 66 (5-6) pp. 137-140, 1991, Hardin Library.
Tan, Melvin S. et al., A Sensitive Method for the Determination of Progesterone in Human Plasma by LC-MS-MS, M1025, Cedra Corporation, Austin, Texas.
Tang et al., Effect of Estrogen and Progesterone on the Development of Endometrial Hyperplasia in the Fischer Rat, Biology of Reproduction 31, 399-413 (1984).
Tas et al., Comparison of antiproliferative effects of metformine and progesterone on estrogen-induced endometrial hyperplasia in rats, Gynecol Endocrinol, Early Online: 1-4, 2013. http://informahealthcare.com/gye.
Tella, S.H., Gallagher, J.C., Prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2013), Elsevier.
Thomas, Joshua, et al., The effect of water solubility of solutes on their flux through human skin in vitro: An . . . , Intl. J. of Pharmaceut., vol. 339 pp. 157-167, 2007, Elsevier.
Thomas, Peter, Characteristics of membrane progestin receptor alpha (mPRα) and progesterone membrane receptor component 1 (PGMRC1) and their roles in mediating rapid progestin actions, Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology 29 (2008) 292-312.
Tripathi, R, et al., Study of Polymorphs of Progesterone by Novel Melt Sonocrystallization Technique: A Technical Note, AAPS PhamSciTech, vol. 11, No. 3, Sep. 2010.
Trommer et al., Overcoming the stratum Corneum: The modulation of Skin Penetration, Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2006;19:106-121.
Tuleu et al., “Comparative Bioavailability Study in Dogs of a Self-Emulsifying Formulation of Progesterone Presented in a Pellet and Liquid Form Compared with an Aqueous Suspension of Progesterone,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 93, No. 6, Jun. 2004, pp. 1495-1502.
Ueda et al., Topical and Transdermal Drug Products, Pharmacopeial Forum, vol. 35(3) [May-Jun. 2009], 750-754.
USP, 401 Fats and Fixed Oils, Chemical Tests, Second Suplement to USP36-NF 31, pp. 6141-6151, 2013.
USP, Certificate—Corn Oil, Lot G0L404, Jul. 2013.
USP, Lauroyl Polyoxylglycerides, Safety Data Sheet, US, 5611 Version #02, pp. 1-9, 2013.
USP, Monographs: Progesterone, USP29, www.pharmacopeia.cn/v29240/usp29nf24s0_m69870.html, search done: Feb. 25, 2014.
USP, Official Monographs, Corn Oil, NF 31, pp. 1970-1971, Dec. 2013.
USP, Official Monographs, Lauroyl Polyoxylglycerides, NF 31, pp. 2064-2066, Dec. 2013.
USP, Official Monographs, Medium Chain Triglycerides, NF 31, pp. 2271-2272, Dec. 2013.
USP, Official Monographs, Mono- and Di-glycerides, NF 31, pp. 2101, Dec. 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/843,428 Jul. 2, 2015 Non-Final Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,655 Jun. 19, 2015 Final Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/561,515_Dec. 12, 2011 Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/561,515_Oct. 26, 2012 Final Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/561,515_Jan. 29, 2013_Advisory_Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/561,515_Sep. 11, 2013 Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/684,002_Mar. 20, 2013_Non-Final_Office_Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/684,002_Jul. 16, 2013_Final_Office_Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/684,002_Dec. 6, 2013_Notice_of_Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/843,362_Mar. 16, 2015_Restriction_Requirement.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/843,428_Apr. 14, 2015_Restriction_Requirement.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,545_Feb. 18, 2014_Non-Final_Office_Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,545_Jul. 14, 2014_Notice_of_Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,562_Feb. 20, 2014_Restriction_Requirement.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,562_Mar. 27, 2014_Non-Final_Office_Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,562_Jul. 2, 2014_Final_Office_Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,562_Dec. 10, 2014_Notice_of_Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,571_Mar. 28, 2014_Restriction_Requirement.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,571_Jul. 15, 2014_Notice_of_Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,582_Apr. 29, 2014_Restriction_Requirement.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,582_Jun. 17, 2014_Non-Final_Office_Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,582_Nov. 7, 2014_Notice_of_Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,582_Jan. 22, 2015_Notice_of_Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,598_May 13, 2014_Restriction_Requirement.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,598_Jul. 3, 2014_Non-Final_Office_Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,598_Dec. 10, 2014_Notice_of_Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,612_Mar. 20, 2014_Restriction_Requirement.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,612_Oct. 30, 2014_Non-Final_Office_Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,612_Nov. 26, 2014_Notice_of_Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,623_Mar. 5, 2014_Restriction_Requirement.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,623_Jul. 18, 2014_Non-Final_Office_Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,623_Dec. 15, 2014_Notice_of_Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,655_Jul. 3, 2014_Restriction_Requirement.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,655_Dec. 8, 2014_Non-Final_Office_Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/125,554_Dec. 5, 2014_Restriction_Requirement.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/125,554_Apr. 14, 2015_Non-Final_Office_Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/136,048_Nov. 4, 2014_Restriction_Requirement.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/136,048_Mar. 12, 2015_Non-Final_Office_Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/475,814_Oct. 1, 2014_Non-Final_Office_Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/475,814_Feb. 13, 2015_Notice_of_Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/475,864_Oct. 2, 2014_Non-Final_Office_Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/475,864_Feb. 11, 2015_Notice_of_Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/476,040_Mar. 26, 2015_Restriction_Requirement.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/521,230_Dec. 5, 2014_Restriction_Requirement.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/521,230_Feb. 18, 2015_Non-Final_Office_Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/624,051_Apr. 7, 2015_Non-Final_Office_Action.
Utian, Wulf H, et al., Relief of vasomotor symptoms and vaginal atrophy with lower doses of conjugated equine estrogens, Fertility and Sterility, vol. 75(6) pp. 1065, Jun. 2001.
Voegtline et al., Dispatches from the interface of salivary bioscience and neonatal research, Frontiers in Endocrinology, Mar. 2014, vol. 5, article 25, 8 pages.
Waddell et al., Distribution and metabolism of topically applied progesterone in a rat model, Journal of Steroid Biochemistry & Molecular Biology 80 (2002) 449-455.
Waddell et al., The Metabolic Clearance of Progesterone in the Pregnant Rat: Absence of a Physiological Role for the Lung, Biology of Reproduction 40, 1188-1193 (1989).
Walter et al., The role of progesterone in endometrial angiogenesis in pregnant and ovariectomised mice, Reproduction (2005) 129 765-777.
Weber, E.J., Corn Lipids, Cereal Chem., vol. 55(5), pp. 572-584, The American Assoc of Cereal Chem, Sep.-Oct. 1978.
Weber, M.T., et al., Cognition and mood in perimenopause: A systematic review and meta-analysis, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2013), Elsevier.
Weintraub, Arlene, “Women fooled by untested hormones from compounding pharmacies,”Forbes, Feb. 20, 2015; retrieved online at http://onforb.es/1LIUm1V_on Feb. 23, 2015, 3 pages.
Whitehead et al., Absorption and metabolism of oral progesterone, The British Medical Journal, vol. 280, No. 6217 (Mar. 22, 1980), pp. 825-827, BMJ Publishing Group.
Wiranidchapong, Chutima, Method of preparation does not affect the miscibility between steroid hormone and polymethacrylate, Thermochimica Acta 485, Elsevier, pp. 57, 2009.
Wood et al., Effects of estradiol with micronized progesterone or medroxyprogesterone acetate on risk markers for breast cancer in postmenopausal monkeys, Breast Cancer Res Treat (2007) 101:125-134.
Wren et al., Effect of sequential transdermal progesterone cream on endometrium, bleeding pattern, and plasma progesterone and salivary progesterone levels in postmenopausal women, Climacteric, 2000, 3(3), pp. 155-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13697130008500109.
Wu et al., Gene Expression Profiling of the Effects of Castration and Estrogen Treatment in the Rat Uterus, Biology of Reproduction 69, 1308-1317 (2003).
Yalkowsky, Samuel H, & Valvani, Shri C, Solubility and Partitioning I: Solubility of Nonelectrolytes in Water, J. of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 69(8) pp. 912-922, 1980.
Yalkowsky, Samuel H, Handbook of Acqueous Solubility Data, Solutions, pp. 1110-1111, CRC PRESS, Boca Raton, London, New York, Wash. D.C.
Yue, W., Genotoxic metabolites of estradiol in breast: potential mechanism of estradiol induced carcinogenesis, Journal of Steroid Biochem & Mol Biology, vol. 86 pp. 477-486, 2003.
Zava, David T. et al., Percutaneous absorption of progesterone, Maturitas 77 (2014) 91-92, Elsevier.
Zava, David T., Topical Progesterone Delivery and Levels in Serum, Saliva, Capillary Blood, and Tissues, Script, ZRT Laboratory, pp. 4-5. http://www.zrtlab.com/component/docman/cat_view/10-publications?Itemid.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/684,002, filed Nov. 21, 2012, U.S. Pat. No. 8,633,178, Jan. 21, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/843,362, filed Mar. 15, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/843,428, filed Mar. 15, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,545, filed Dec. 6, 2013, U.S. Pat. No. 8,846,648, Sep. 30, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,562, filed Dec. 6, 2013, U.S. Pat. No. 8,987,237, Mar. 24, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,571, filed Dec. 6, 2013, U.S. Pat. No. 8,846,649, Sep. 30, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,582, filed Dec. 6, 2013, U.S. Pat. No. 9,012,434, Apr. 21, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,598, filed Dec. 6, 2013, U.S. Pat. No. 8,987,238, Mar. 24, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,612, filed Dec. 6, 2013, U.S. Pat. No. 8,933,059, Jan. 13, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,623, filed Dec. 6, 2013, U.S. Pat. No. 9,006,222, Apr. 14, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/125,547, filed Dec. 11, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/125,554, filed Dec. 12, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,655, filed Dec. 13, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/136,048, filed Dec. 20, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/475,814, filed Sep. 3, 2014, U.S. Pat. No. 8,993,548, Mar. 31, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/475,864, filed Sep. 3, 2014, U.S. Pat. No. 8,993,549, Mar. 31, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/475,946, filed Sep. 3, 2014, U.S. Pat. No. 9,114,145, Aug. 25, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/476,040, filed Sep. 3, 2014, U.S. Pat. No. 9,114,146, Aug. 25, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/521,002, filed Oct. 22, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/521,230, filed Oct. 22, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/645,661, filed Mar. 12, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/690,913, filed Apr. 20, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/690,955, filed Apr. 20, 2015.
Holm et al., “Examination of oral absorption and lymphatic transport of halofantrine in a triple-cannulated canine model after administration in self-microemulsifying drug delivery systems (SMEDDS) containing structured triglycerides,” European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2003, 20:91-97.
Hitchcock, Christine L. et al., “Oral micronized progesterone for vasomotor symptoms—a placebo-controlled randomized trial in healthy postmenopausal women,” Menopause: The Journal of the North American Menopause Society. 19(8):886-893, Aug. 2012.
Hosmer, Jaclyn et al., “Microemulsions Containing Medium-Chain Glycerides as Transdermal Delivery Systems for Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Drugs,” AAPS Pharm Sci Tech, 2009, vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 589-596.
Castelo-Branco Camil et al., “Treatment of atrophic vaginitis,” Therapy, 2007, vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 349-353.
Cho, Y.A. et al., Transdermal Delivery of Ketorolac Tromethamine: Effects of Vehicles and Penetration Enhancers, Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 30(6):557-564, Jun. 2004.
Cicinelli et al., “First uterine pass effect” is observed when estradiol is placed in the upper but not lower third of the vagina, Fertility and Sterility, vol. 81, No. 5, May 2004, pp. 1414-1416.
Cicinelli, Intravaginal oestrogen and progestin administration: advantages and disadvantages, Best Practices & Research Clinical Obstretrics and Gynaecology vol. 22, No. 2, 2008, pp. 391-405.
Crandall, Carolyn, “Vaginal Estrogen Preparations: A Review of Safety and Efficacy for Vaginal Atrophy,” Journal of Women's Health, 2002, vol. 11, No. 10, pp. 857-877.
Cremer Care, ““MIGLYOL® 810, 812 INCI: Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride,”” Cremer Oleo GmbH & Co. KG, pp. 1-7, available at http://s3.amazonaws.com/petercremerna/products/spec_sheets/159/339/301 /originai/M IGLYOL_81 0_812_ TDS.pdf?1389204445 (Mar. 2013) accessed on Dec. 30, 2016.
Ettinger et al., “Measuring symptom relief in studies of vaginal and vulvar atrophy: the most bothersome symptom approach,” Menopause, vol. 15, No. 5, 2008, pp. 885-889.
Eugster-Hausmann et al., “Minimized estradiol absorption with ultra-low-dose 10 μg 17β-estradiol vaginal tablets,” Climacteric 2010;13:219-227.
Garad S. et al., “Preclinical Development for Suspensions,” A.K. Kulshreshtha et al. (eds.), Pharmaceutical Suspensions: From Formulation Development to Manufacturing, Springer, New York 2010, pp. 127-176.
Karande, et al., Enhancement of transdermal drug delivery via synergistic action of chemicals, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1788:2362-2373, Sep. 2009.
Knuth et al., Hydrogel delivery systems for vaginal and oral applications: Formulation and biological considerations, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 11, No. 1-2, Jul.-Aug. 1993, pp. 137-167.
Lopes, Luciana B. et al., Enhancement of transdermal delivery of progesterone using medium-chain mono and diglycerides as skin penetration enhancers, Pharmaceutical Development and Technology, 14:5, 524-529, Mar. 2009.
Mac Bride, Maire B. et al., “Vulvovaginal Atrophy,” Mayo Clin Proc, Jan. 2010, 85(1):87-94.
March, Charles M. et al., “Roles of Estradiol and Progesterone in Eliciting the Midcycle Luteinizing Hormone and Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Surges,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 49, Issue 4, Oct. 1, 1979, pp. 507-513.
Martelli, Mary Elizabeth, “Vaginal Medicine Administration,” The Gale Encyclopedia of Nursing and Allied Health, Gale Group, 2002, pp. 2542-2543.
Monti, D. et al., Effect of different terpene-containing essential oils on permeation of estradiol through hairless mouse skin, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 237:209-24, 2002.
Pachman et al., “Management of menopause-associated vasomotor symptoms: Current treatment options, challenges and future directions,” International Journal of Women's Health, May 7, 2010.
Potluri, Praveen and Guru V. Betageri, “Mixed-micellar proliposomal systems for enhanced oral delivery of progesterone,” Drug Delivery, 2006, vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 227-232.
Rao, R. et al., “The Affect of Capmul, Labrafil and Transcutol on Progesterone 100 Mg Soft Capsules Bioavailability in Indian Healthy Adult Postmenopausal Female Subjects Under Fasting Conditions,” Bioequivalence & Bioavailability, 7(2):095-107, 2015.
Regidor, P., “Progesterone in Peri- and Postmenopause: A Review,” Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd, Nov. 2014 74(11):995-1002.
Simon, James A. et al., “A vaginal estradiol softgel capsule, TX-004HR, has negligible to verylow systemic absorption of estradiol: Efficacy and pharmacokineticdata review,” Maturitas 99 (2017) 51-58.
Sofi, Showkat Hussain et al., “Gelucire: A Versatile Formulation Excipient,” Ijppr.Human, 2017; vol. 10 (3): 55-73.
Stefanick, “Estrogens and progestins: background and history, trends in use, and guidelines and regimens approved by the US Food and Drug Administration,” The American Journal of Medicine (2005) vol. 118 (12B), 64S-73S.
Activella Label, Revised Nov. 2015 and Nov. 2017, 39 pages.
Cicinelli et al., “Placement of the vaginal 17β-estradiol tablets in the inner or outer one third of the vagina affects the preferential delivery of 17β-estradiol toward the uterus or periurethral areas, thereby modifying efficacy and endometrial safety,” Am J Obstet Gynocol, vol. 189, No. 1, Jul. 2003, pp. 55-58.
Khera, M. “Testosterone Therapy for Female Sexual Dysfunction,” Sex Med Rev, Jul. 2015; 3(3):137-144.
Kingsberg et al., “Treating dyspareunia caused by vaginal atrophy: a review of treatment options using vaginal estrogen therapy,” Int J Womens Health 2009; 1: 105-111.
Mirkin, S. et al., “17β-Estradiol and natural progesterone for menopausal hormone therapy: Replenish phase 3 study design of a comnbination capsule and evidence review,” Maturitas, vol. 81, No. 1, 2015, pp. 28-35.
Prometrium Label, Jun. 2009, 33 pages.
Tang et al., “Pharmacokinetics of different routes of administration of misoprostol,” Human Reproduction, 2002; 17(2):332-226.
Vagifem Label, Nov. 2009, 14 pages.
Wang et al., “Pharmacokinetics of hard micronized progesterone capsules via vaginal or oral route compared with soft micronized capsules in healthy postmenopausal women: a randomized open-label clinical study,” Drug Des Devel Ther., 2019; 13: 2475-2482.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150031654 A1 Jan 2015 US
Provisional Applications (3)
Number Date Country
61661302 Jun 2012 US
61662265 Jun 2012 US
61889483 Oct 2013 US
Continuation in Parts (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 13843428 Mar 2013 US
Child 14512046 US
Parent 13684002 Nov 2012 US
Child 13843428 US