Patent Grant
6855852
The present invention relates to a natural gas hydrate. More particularly, the present invention relates to a natural gas hydrate with improved gas content and stability characteristics and a method for producing the same.
Natural gas hydrates are a stable solid comprising water and natural gas, and have been known to scientists for some years as a curiosity. More recently, natural gas hydrates became a serious concern in regard to the transportation and storage of natural gas industries in cold climates, due to the tendency of hydrates to form in pipelines thereby blocking the flow the pipelines.
Natural gas hydrates may be formed by the combination of water and gas at relatively moderate temperatures and pressures, with the resulting solid having the outward characteristics of ice, being either white or grey in colour and cold to the touch. At ambient temperatures and pressures natural gas hydrates break down releasing natural gas.
Conventionally, gas storage is achieved through re-injecting into reservoirs, or pressurised reservoirs or through the use of line pack, where the volume of the pipeline system is of the same order of magnitude as several days' customer consumption. The use of natural gas hydrates in storage has the potential to provide a flexible way of storing reserves of natural gas to meet short to medium term requirements in the event of excessive demands or a reduction in the delivery of gas from source.
In any application, the gas content of the hydrate and the temperature at which the hydrate begins to decompose (i.e. the hydrate desolution temperature), are significant criteria that require consideration. Known natural gas hydrates exhibit a gas content of 163 Sm3 per m3 of hydrate, and a hydrate desolution temperature, at atmospheric pressure, of −15° C.
It is one object of the present invention to provide a natural gas hydrate and a method for the production thereof, with improved gas content and hydrate desolution temperature.
Throughout the specification, unless the context requires otherwise, the word “comprise” or variations such as “comprises” or “comprising”, will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated integer or group of integers but not the exclusion of any other integer or group of integers.
In accordance with the present invention there is provided a natural gas hydrate with a gas content in excess of 163 Sm3 per m3. Preferably, the natural gas hydrate has a gas content in excess of 170 Sm3 per m3. Preferably still, the natural gas hydrate has a gas content in excess of 180 Sm3 per m3. Further and still preferably, the natural gas hydrate has a gas content of 186 Sm3 per m3. In a highly preferred form of the invention, the natural gas hydrate has a gas content in excess of 220 Sm3 per m3. Preferably still, the natural gas hydrate has a gas content in excess of approximately 227 Sm3 per m3.
Preferably, the natural gas hydrate exhibits a hydrate desolution temperature in excess of −15° C. at atmospheric pressure. Preferably still, the natural gas hydrate exhibits a hydrate desolution temperature in excess of −13° C. at atmospheric pressure. Further and still preferably, the natural gas hydrate exhibits a hydrate desolution temperature in excess of −11° C. at atmospheric pressure. In a highly preferred form of the invention, the natural gas hydrate exhibits a hydrate desolution temperature in excess of −5° C. at atmospheric pressure. Preferably still, the natural gas hydrate exhibits a hydrate desolution temperature in excess of 3° C. at atmospheric pressure.
In accordance with the present invention, there is further provided a natural gas hydrate which exhibits a hydrate desolution temperature in excess of −15° C. at atmospheric pressure. Preferably, the natural gas hydrate exhibits a hydrate desolution temperature in excess of −13° C. at atmospheric pressure. Preferably still, the natural gas hydrate exhibits a hydrate desolution temperature in excess of −11° C. at atmospheric pressure. Further and still preferably, the natural gas hydrate exhibits a hydrate desolution temperature in excess of −5° C. at atmospheric pressure. In a highly preferred form of the invention, the natural gas hydrate exhibits a hydrate desolution temperature in excess of 3° C. at atmospheric pressure.
Preferably, the natural gas hydrate has a gas content in excess of 163 Sm3 per m3. Preferably still, the natural gas hydrate has a gas content in excess of 170 Sm3 per m3. Further and still preferably, the natural gas hydrate has a gas content in excess of 180 Sm3 per m3. In a highly preferred form of the invention, the natural gas hydrate has a gas content of 186 Sm3 per m3. In one form of the invention, the natural gas hydrate has a gas content in excess of 220 Sm3 per m3. Preferably still, the natural gas hydrate has a gas content in excess of approximately 227 Sm3 per m3.
In accordance with the present invention there is still further provided a method for the production of the natural gas hydrate of the present invention, the method comprising the steps of:
Preferably, the method of the present invention comprises the additional step of, before combining the natural gas and water, atomising the natural gas and water.
Preferably, the natural gas-water-agent system is agitated before the temperature is reduced.
Preferably, the agent is a compound that is at least partially soluble in water.
In one form of the invention, the agent is an alkali metal alkylsulfonate. Preferably, where the agent is an alkali metal alkylsulfonate, the alkali metal alkylsulfonate is a sodium alkylsulfonate. Where the agent is a sodium alkylsulfonate, the agent may be selected from the group; sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium 1-propanesulfonate, sodium 1-butane sulfonate, sodium 1-pentanesulfonate, sodium 1-hexane sulfonate sodium 1-heptane sulfonate, sodium 1-octanesulfonate, sodium 1-nonanesulfonate, sodium 1-decanesulfonate, sodium 1-undecanesuffonate, sodium 1-dodecanesulfonate and sodium 1-tridecane sulfonate.
Where the agent is an alkali metal sulfonate, the amount of agent added is preferably such that the concentration of the agent in the natural gas-water-agent system is less than about 1% by weight. Preferably still, the amount of agent added results in a concentration of the agent less than about 0.5% by weight. Further and still preferably, the amount of agent added results in a concentration of the agent between about 0.1 and 0.2% by weight.
In an alternate form of the invention, the agent is sodium lauryl sulfate. Where the agent is sodium lauryl sulfate, the amount of agent added is preferably such that the concentration of the agent in the natural gas-water-agent system is less than about 1% by weight. Preferably still, the amount of agent added results in a concentration of the agent less than about 0.5% by weight. Further and still preferably, the amount of agent added results in a concentration of the agent between about 0.1 and 0.2% by weight.
In an alternate form of the invention, the agent is sodium tripolyphoshate. Where the agent is sodium tripolyphosphate, the amount of agent added is preferably such that the concentration of the agent in the natural gas-water-agent system is between about 1 and 3% by weight.
In an alternate form of the invention, the agent is an alcohol. Preferably, where the agent is an alcohol, the agent is isopropyl alcohol. Where the agent is isopropyl alcohol, the amount of agent added is preferably such that the concentration of the agent in the natural gas-water-agent system is about 0.1% by volume.
The degree to which the temperature is decreased depends upon the degree to which the pressure is elevated. However, preferably the pressure exceeds about 50 bars and preferably, the temperature is below about 18° C.
Preferably, the natural-gas-water-agent system is constantly mixed throughout the hydration process.
The present invention will now be described in relation to five examples. However, it must be appreciated that the following description of those examples is not to limit the generality of the above description of the invention.
Hydrate Formation
Water and isopropyl alcohol (0.1% by volume) were introduced into a sapphire cell. The cell was pressurised with methane gas above the hydrate equilibrium pressure for a normal water-methane system. Equilibrium was achieved quickly by bubbling the methane through the water phase. The system was stabilised at a pressure of 206 bars (3000 psia) and room temperature of 23° C.
The temperature was then reduced at a rate of 0.1° C. per minute using a thermostat air bath to 17.7° C. Crystals of methane hydrate were observed on the sapphire window, and hydrate formation was assumed to be complete when pressure had stabilised in the cell.
Water and isopropyl alcohol (0.1% by volume) were introduced into a sapphire cell. The cell was pressurised with methane gas above the hydrate equilibrium pressure for a normal water-methane system. Equilibrium was achieved quickly by bubbling the methane through the water phase. The system was stabilised at a pressure of 138 bars (2000 psia) and room temperature of 23° C.
The temperature was then reduced at a rate of 0.1° C. per minute using a thermostat air bath to 15.5° C. Crystals of methane hydrate were observed on the sapphire window, and hydrate formation was assumed to be complete when pressure had stabilised in the cell.
Water and isopropyl alcohol (0.1% by volume) were introduced into a sapphire cell. The cell was pressurised with methane gas above the hydrate equilibrium pressure for a normal water-methane system. Equilibrium was achieved quickly by bubbling the methane through the water phase. The system was stabilised at a pressure of 102 bars and room temperature of 23° C.
The temperature was then reduced at a rate of 0.1° C. per minute using a thermostat air bath to 13.1° C. Crystals of methane hydrate were observed on the sapphire window, and hydrate formation was assumed to be complete when pressure had stabilised in the cell.
Water and isopropyl alcohol (0.1% by volume) were introduced into a sapphire cell. The cell was pressurised with methane gas above the hydrate equilibrium pressure for a normal water-methane system. Equilibrium was achieved quickly by bubbling the methane through the water phase. The system was stabilised at a pressure of 54.5 bars (800 psia) and room temperature of 23° C.
The temperature was then reduced at a rate of 0.1° C. per minute using a thermostat air bath to 8.1° C. Crystals of methane hydrate were observed on the sapphire window, and hydrate formation was assumed to be complete when pressure had stabilised in the cell.
Water and sodium tripolyphosphate (1% by weight) and methane gas were introduced into a sapphire cell. The pressure was adjusted to 1400 psia, and the mixture cooled rapidly to −5° C., where formation of the hydrate was observed. The methane bubbling through the gas served to agitate the system.
Water and sodium lauryl sulfate (0.11% by weight) and methane gas were introduced into a sapphire cell. The mixture was pressurised to 2200 psia at 30° C., and left to equilibrate for 45 minutes. The mixture was then flashed into a cryogenic PVT cell at −3° C., causing the fluid to atomise and resulting in the formation of hydrate.
Water and sodium-octanesulfonate (0.15% by weight) and methane gas were introduced into a sapphire cell. The mixture was pressurised to 2200 psia at 30° C., and left to equilibrate for 45 minutes. The mixture was then flashed into a cryogenic PVT cell at −3° C., causing the fluid to atomise and resulting in the formation of hydrate.
Water and sodium 1-octanesulfonate (0.1% by weight) and methane gas were introduced into a sapphire cell. The mixture was pressurised to 2200 psia at 30° C., and left to equilibrate for 45 minutes. The mixture was then flashed into a cryogenic PVT cell at −3° C., causing the fluid to atomise and resulting in the formation of hydrate.
Having formed the hydrate as outlined in Example 1, excess methane was removed and the temperature of the system was reduced to −15° C., at a rate of 0.1° C. per minute, and the pressure of the system was observed to diminish to zero.
The hydrate was stored for more than 12 hours at −15° C., showing no observable changes in appearance. The pressure remained at zero throughout.
After 12 hours, the temperature of the system was gradually increased at a rate of 0.2° C. per minute, in an attempt to reverse the hydrate formation process. Throughout this stage the pressure of the system was carefully monitored and recorded by way of high precision digital pressure gauges. The pressure of the system remained stable until the temperature reached −11.5° C., at which point some increase was noted. The pressure continued to increase as the temperature increased until the pressure of the system stabilised at 206.3 bars at the ambient temperature of 23° C.
Quantities of methane and water generated from the desolution of the hydrate were measured, and the methane content of the methane hydrate was calculated to be 186 Sm3 per m3.
Having formed the hydrate as outlined in Example 5, the system was heated carefully. The hydrate was observed to melt at approximately 2° C. Based on the pressure-volume relationship, and excess methane before and after hydrate formation, the amount of methane contained in the hydrate was estimated to be in excess of 230 Sm3 per m3 of hydrate.
Having formed the hydrates as outlined in Examples 6 to 8, the systems were heated carefully. Each of the hydrates was observed to melt at approximately 3° C. Based on the pressure-volume relationship, and excess methane before and after hydrate formation, the amount of methane contained in the hydrate produced in Example 6 was estimated to be in excess of 227 Sm3 per m3 of hydrate. Similarly, the amount of methane contained in the hydrate produced in Example 7 was estimated to be in excess of 212 Sm3 per m3 of hydrate. The amount of methane contained in the hydrate produced in Example 8 was estimated to be in excess of 209 Sm3 per m3 of hydrate.
Each unique mixture of hydrocarbon and water has its own hydrate formation curve, describing the temperatures and pressures at which the hydrate will form, and it is envisaged that additional analysis will reveal optimum pressure and temperature combinations, having regard to minimising the energy requirements for compression and cooling.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PQ1188 | Jun 1999 | AU | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCTAU00/00719 | 6/23/2000 | WO | 00 | 4/5/2002 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO0100755 | 1/4/2001 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2270016 | Benesh | Jan 1942 | A |
| 3975167 | Nierman | Aug 1976 | A |
| 5536893 | Gudmundsson | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5778685 | Singh | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5806316 | Avakov et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 6082118 | Endrizzi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6389820 | Rogers et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 703736 | Dec 1996 | AU |
| 2309227 | Jul 1997 | GB |
| WO 9301153 | Jan 1993 | WO |
| WO 9827033 | Jun 1998 | WO |
| WO 9919662 | Apr 1999 | WO |
