The present invention relates to application management in computing devices, and more particularly to systems and methods for navigating among activities such as applications in such devices.
Many currently available computing devices run operating systems that offer users the opportunity to run several applications at the same time, and even to perform several activities simultaneously, within a single application and/or among two or more applications. For example, a user may open an e-mail application, a word processing application, an on-screen calculator, and a web browser, so that all of the applications are open concurrently. The user may open several documents within the word processing application, and may open several e-mail messages. Such an arrangement allows the user to easily move from one task to another by keeping these various applications and activities open at the same time.
Conventionally, such an operating paradigm is accomplished by the use of multiple overlapping windows within a graphical user interface. A desktop metaphor is often employed, wherein the user can move and resize windows on a display screen by direct manipulation. Thus, each application may have a window or several windows; at any given time, one window has focus (usually indicated as such by being situated on top of the other windows). Other windows may be visible, invisible, or partially visible (for example if they are partially or completely obscured by other windows). A user can switch from one task to another by causing a different window to have focus; this is commonly accomplished by clicking on a visible portion of the window being activated, or by clicking on a button or icon representing the window or application in a task bar, dock, or similar construct. In some operating systems, pop-up menus and/or keyboard shortcuts may be available for switching among applications or documents.
Overlapping windows are a highly effective mechanism for application management. They exploit the user's spatial memory by associating a particular area of the screen with a particular task being performed. A user may find it easier to return to a previously opened window when he or she remembers that the window was placed at a particular location on the screen, as compared with a list or menu of open windows that does not provide a model of spatial placement and stability.
One issue with conventional window-based mechanisms for application management is that a large screen size is usually needed. Users faced with limited screen space must choose between, on the one hand, making windows smaller and thus reducing available workspace within each application, and, on the other hand, stacking windows atop each other so that only one window (or very few) is visible at a time. Reducing workspace can make it very difficult to use an application, particularly for applications such as word processing, photo editing, drawing, and the like. Stacking windows reduces the ease with which the user can switch from one application or document to another, as it is more difficult to see what is currently open and to find the appropriate window to be activated. When windows are stacked, users usually resort to navigation via taskbar, dock, menu, keyboard shortcut, or the like, thereby reducing the advantages of the overlapping window paradigm.
Some systems, such as the Mac OS operating system offered by Apple, Inc. of Cupertino, Calif., offer a mechanism for navigating among open applications by temporarily moving and shrinking open windows, moving the windows apart from one another so that they do not overlap. The user can then activate one of the windows; the original window positions and sizes are then restored, with the activated window on top. This feature is effective in allowing users to quickly switch among open applications and documents, but still requires a relatively large amount of screen space so as to effectively show the temporarily shrunk windows when the user is to select among them.
Mobile devices such as smartphones, personal digital assistants, music players, handheld computers, and the like are becoming increasingly powerful. Many are now able to run several applications concurrently, and to perform sophisticated functions that rival traditional computing devices. However, most such devices have extremely small screens, when compared to laptop or desktop computers. Thus, the conventional window-based techniques for navigating among open applications and documents do not function very well on mobile devices. There is insufficient screen space to display multiple overlapping windows. In fact, many such devices do not even have enough space to display a task bar or dock. Rather, the entire screen is often devoted to a single application, document, message, task, or activity, so as to make the most effective use of the extremely limited amount of space available.
What is needed is a system and method for application management that provides the advantages of multiple overlapping windows but is effective for a device having a small screen. What is further needed is a system and method that allows users to switch easily among activities, including applications, documents, and tasks, in a device having limited screen space. What is further needed is a system and method that is scalable to different screen sizes, and that provides solutions for all application and activity management, including starting activities, ending activities, and switching from one activity to another.
According to the present invention, a computing device runs two or more activities concurrently and provides at least two modes for interacting with the activities. The user may toggle between the modes as desired. A button or other control is provided for switching between full-screen mode and windowed mode.
In a full-screen mode, one activity occupies substantially an entire display screen.
In a windowed mode, the activity is visible within a window, and a portion of at least one other window is also visible. Thus, the window that has focus is visible in full, while at least one other window is only partially visible. The window occupied by the activity is referred to as having focus. In the windowed mode, the user can cause windows to move on the screen, so as to change focus from one activity to another. For example, the window having focus can be moved off the screen, to be replaced by a new window that is then given focus. In one aspect, the activities are ordered in a sequence and the windows appear in a corresponding sequence. In one aspect, the windows move in concert with one another; pushing one window off one edge of the screen causes a new window to appear at the opposite edge. A persistent positional relationship can be established among windows.
In response to a user command, the windows shift position on the screen, so that the window that currently has focus becomes only partially visible and one of the other windows becomes fully visible and has focus. The windows move in concert with each other, in response to user commands. Thus, for example, if the user indicates that the central window should move in a rightward direction, then the entire display shifts to the right, as follows:
The user indicates such movement, for example, by direct manipulation of the displayed windows. This can be performed on a touch screen, for example, by dragging the central window to the left or to the right on the screen or by tapping on a window that is partially displayed. Alternatively, a trackball, touch-sensitive pad, or other input device can be provided for facilitating such direct manipulation.
In one embodiment, the window that currently has focus is always fully visible and displayed in a substantially central location on the screen with respect to partially displayed windows.
Window motion can be constrained to a single axis, for example horizontal or vertical but not both, so as to simplify the positional relationship among windows. Alternatively, two or more axes of movements can be made available.
Once the user has moved the desired window to the central position so that it has focus, he or she can indicate that the display should return to full-screen mode, so that the activity having focus occupies substantially the entire screen. Alternatively, the device can return to full-screen mode automatically after a period of time elapses where no window movement takes place, or if the user starts to interact with the activity that has focus.
Thus, the full-screen display mode may be used for interacting with the activity, and the windowed mode may be used for switching from one activity to another. However, in one aspect the invention allows full interaction with the activity in windowed mode as well.
A persistent positional relationship can be established among windows. The positional relationship can be a one-dimensional sequence or some more complex two-dimensional relationship. The positional relationship is persistent in the sense that it does not change unless the user indicates that it should be changed, or some other event takes place that indicates a change is warranted (such as non-use of an application, or an application crashing or being dismissed).
Additional features and advantages will become apparent in the description provided below.
The accompanying drawings illustrate several embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. One skilled in the art will recognize that the particular embodiments illustrated in the drawings are merely exemplary, and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention.
In the following description, reference is made herein to “activities”. In the context of the present invention, an “activity” is intended to include a software application, a task, a document, a page, and/or any other activity that can be performed in connection with an electronic device. As described herein, the present invention provides techniques for starting and ending activities, and for switching among activities.
System Architecture
The present invention can be implemented on any electronic device, such as a handheld computer, personal digital assistant (PDA), personal computer, kiosk, cellular telephone, and the like. For example, the invention can be implemented as a feature of an application management paradigm for a software application or operating system running on such a device. Accordingly, the present invention can be implemented as part of a graphical user interface for controlling software on such a device.
The invention is particularly well-suited to devices such as smartphones, handheld computers, and PDAs, which have limited screen space and which are capable of running several software applications concurrently. One skilled in the art will recognize, however, that the invention can be practiced in many other contexts, including any environment in which it is useful to switch easily and smoothly from one activity to another. Accordingly, the following description is intended to illustrate the invention by way of example, rather than to limit the scope of the claimed invention.
Referring now to
In one embodiment, screen 101 is touch-sensitive, so that a user can activate an application or function by touching a displayed icon 104, 106. In one embodiment, device 100 also includes a touch-sensitive gesture area 102 for entering gesture-based commands, as described in the above-referenced related application. In another embodiment, screen 101 and/or gesture area 102 is sensitive to user motion in proximity to the surface, so as to detect gestures and commands performed near the surface but without necessarily contacting the surface.
For illustrative purposes, device 100 as shown in
Touch-sensitive screen 101 and gesture area 102 can be implemented using any technology that is capable of detecting a location of contact and/or user motion proximate to the surface. Alternatively, the present invention can be implemented with other user input mechanisms, such as a keyboard, trackball, stylus, or the like. One skilled in the art will recognize that the techniques of the present invention are well suited to direct manipulation, but that any input technique can be used. In one embodiment, gesture area 102 provides a touch-sensitive control area extending beyond the edges of touch-sensitive screen 101, as described in related application Ser. No. 12/115,992, filed May 6, 2008, for “Extended Touch-Sensitive Control Area for Electronic Device,” the disclosure of which is incorporated herein.
Device 101 as shown in
As described herein, at least two modes are available for interacting with device 101: a full-screen mode in which an application or other activity occupies substantially the entire display screen 101, and a windowed mode in which at least two windows are presented, at least one of which is only partially visible, with an application or other activity occupying each window. The full-screen mode is designed to devote a greater amount of screen space to the active activity, while the windowed mode provides a mechanism for navigating among activities and for rearranging, initiating, and terminating activities.
Referring now to
The user interacts with the active activity (such as the calendar application shown in
Referring now to
As can be seen in
Partially displayed windows 301A, 301C provide a positional context for window 301B, and provide a mechanism for navigating to other activities. In one embodiment, the user can designate a window 301A, 301C to have focus by touching any area within the window; this causes the designated window 301 to move to the central portion of display screen 101, and causes other windows to move as well, so that the same positional sequence is maintained. In one embodiment, the user can designate a window 301A, 301C to have focus by dragging any displayed window 301 to cause the desired window 301 to move to the central portion of display screen 101; again, other windows 301 move as well, so that the same positional sequence is maintained. In one embodiment, the user can move windows 301 left and right by dragging a finger along gesture area 102. In one embodiment, such a gesture can be performed even in full-screen mode, causing windows 301 to move left and right in the same manner as described above for windowed mode.
As described in more detail below, when the user drags a window 301 to the left or right within display screen 100, other windows 301 move in concert with the dragged window 301. Thus, for example, if the user drags window 301B to the right, windows 301A and 301C move to the right as well. This would cause window 301C to move off the screen, and window 301A would move to the central position of display screen 100. The same result would occur if the user drags window 301A to the right.
In one embodiment, if the user drags windows 301 so as to place a window 301 sufficiently close to the central position to make it clear that the intention is to give the window 301 focus, the window 301 snaps into the central position upon completion of the drag operation. Other windows 301 snap into place accordingly to maintain the same positional sequence. Thus, the user need not drag the window 301 all the way to the central position. If, on the other hand, the user drags windows 301 a small amount that does not cause a new window 301 to be sufficiently close to the central position, all windows 301 snap back to their previous positions upon completion of the drag operation.
In one embodiment, windows 301 show applications or other activities in operation. Thus, as the user navigates among windows 301, he or she can see the actual live application or other activity within each window 301.
Referring now to
The user can touch or double-tap window 301C to re-enter full-screen mode with the new activity having focus and being active, as shown in
In the examples described herein, windows 301 are arranged in a horizontal row. The user moves windows 301 along a horizontal axis to navigate from one activity to another. One skilled in the art will recognize that other arrangements are possible. For example, windows 301 could be arranged vertically instead of horizontally. Alternatively, a two-dimensional arrangement of windows 301 can be provided.
Referring now to
The movement of display screen 101 is conceptual. In actual operation, the switch from window 301B to window 301E is accomplished by moving windows 301 in a leftward direction on screen 101. For example, the user can repeatedly drag windows 301 in a leftward direction to cause windows 301C, 301D, and 301E to successively occupy the central position. Alternatively, the user can click on partially displayed window 301C to move it to the central position and to cause window 301D to be partially displayed, then on partially displayed window 301D to move it to the central position and to cause window 301E to be partially displayed, and then on partially displayed window 301E to move it to the central position. Either mechanism operates to shift focus from the activity represented by window 301B to the activity represented by window 301E.
In one embodiment, a transition effect is performed to enhance the smoothness of the transition as windows 301 move and/or snap into place. In one embodiment, the window 301 that is centrally displayed at any given time is shown slightly larger than other windows 301.
In one embodiment, more than one window 301 can be completely visible within screen 101. For example, three windows 301 might be completely visible, with additional partially-visible windows 301 on either side. The above-described techniques for moving windows 301 in concert with one another to maintain positional sequence still apply in such a variation.
In general, the sequence of windows 301 is persistent, even when the user moves from one window to another 301. In one embodiment, the sequence is circular, so that the rightmost window 301 is considered to be to the left of the leftmost window 301. Thus, moving off one end of the sequence takes the user back to the other end of the sequence.
In one embodiment, windows 301 may be moved within the sequence automatically in some circumstances. For example, frequently used windows 301 can be moved to more prominent locations in the sequence, while less frequently used windows 301 can remain in less prominent locations.
Referring now to
Once the telephone application is in the central position in window 301A as shown in
The user can launch additional activities by returning to the launch screen as shown in
The user can dismiss applications, for example by closing a window 301. In one embodiment, a window 301 can be closed by clicking on a control within the window. In another embodiment, a window 301 can be closed by dragging the window upward off screen 101. Referring now to
As can be seen in
In one embodiment, dismissing a window 301 causes the application associated with the window to close. In another embodiment, the application remains open even when window 301 is closed.
In one embodiment, a window 301 might close automatically in certain circumstances. For example, if a task associated with an application is completed, or if an application crashes or terminates, the window 301 for the application can close automatically.
The user can also rearrange windows 301 manually when desired, by dragging a window 301 from one position to another. An example is shown in
In one embodiment, the user can resize windows 301 as desired. For example, the user can drag a comer of a window 301 to resize it, or can use two fingers to pinch the edges or comers of a window 301 to resize it.
To summarize, then, any or all of the following actions may be enabled for displayed windows 301:
The present invention has been described in particular detail with respect to one possible embodiment. Those of skill in the art will appreciate that the invention may be practiced in other embodiments. First, the particular naming of the components, capitalization of terms, the attributes, data structures, or any other programming or structural aspect is not mandatory or significant, and the mechanisms that implement the invention or its features may have different names, formats, or protocols. Further, the system may be implemented via a combination of hardware and software, as described, or entirely in hardware elements, or entirely in software elements. Also, the particular division of functionality between the various system components described herein is merely exemplary, and not mandatory; functions performed by a single system component may instead be performed by multiple components, and functions performed by multiple components may instead be performed by a single component.
Reference herein to “one embodiment,” “an embodiment,” or to “one or more embodiments” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiments is included in at least one embodiment of the invention. Further, it is noted that instances of the phrase “in one embodiment” herein are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.
Some portions of the above are presented in terms of algorithms and symbolic representations of operations on data bits within a computer memory. These algorithmic descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. An algorithm is here, and generally, conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of steps (instructions) leading to a desired result. The steps are those requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical, magnetic or optical signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared and otherwise manipulated. It is convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, or the like. Furthermore, it is also convenient at times, to refer to certain arrangements of steps requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities as modules or code devices, without loss of generality.
It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussion, it is appreciated that throughout the description, discussions utilizing terms such as “processing” or “computing” or “calculating” or “displaying” or “determining” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system, or similar electronic computing module and/or device, that manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (electronic) quantities within the computer system memories or registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.
Certain aspects of the present invention include process steps and instructions described herein in the form of an algorithm. It should be noted that the process steps and instructions of the present invention can be embodied in software, firmware or hardware, and when embodied in software, can be downloaded to reside on and be operated from different platforms used by a variety of operating systems.
The present invention also relates to an apparatus for performing the operations herein. This apparatus may be specially constructed for the required purposes, or it may comprise a general-purpose computer selectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored in the computer. Such a computer program may be stored in a computer readable storage medium, such as, but is not limited to, any type of disk including floppy disks, optical disks, CD-ROMs, magnetic-optical disks, read-only memories (ROMs), random access memories (RAMs), EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnetic or optical cards, application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), or any type of media suitable for storing electronic instructions, and each coupled to a computer system bus. Further, the computers referred to herein may include a single processor or may be architectures employing multiple processor designs for increased computing capability.
The algorithms and displays presented herein are not inherently related to any particular computer, virtualized system, or other apparatus. Various general-purpose systems may also be used with programs in accordance with the teachings herein, or it may prove convenient to construct more specialized apparatus to perform the required method steps. The required structure for a variety of these systems will be apparent from the description above. In addition, the present invention is not described with reference to any particular programming language. It will be appreciated that a variety of programming languages may be used to implement the teachings of the present invention as described herein, and any references above to specific languages are provided for disclosure of enablement and best mode of the present invention.
While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having benefit of the above description, will appreciate that other embodiments may be devised which do not depart from the scope of the present invention as described herein. In addition, it should be noted that the language used in the specification has been principally selected for readability and instructional purposes, and may not have been selected to delineate or circumscribe the inventive subject matter. Accordingly, the disclosure of the present invention is intended to be illustrative, but not limiting, of the scope of the invention, which is set forth in the claims.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/932,439 filed Jul. 1, 2013 for “Navigating Among Activities in a Computing Device,” which claims priority as a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/316,004 filed Dec. 9, 2011 for “Navigating Among Activities in a Computing Device,” now U.S. Pat. No. 9,489,107, which claims priority as a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/126,145 filed May 23, 2008 for “Navigating Among Activities in a Computing Device,” now U.S. Pat. No. 8,296,684, the disclosures of all of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4680577 | Straayer et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
5146556 | Hullot et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5377317 | Bates et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5499330 | Lucas et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5574846 | Yoshimura et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5586244 | Berry et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5588105 | Foster et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5675361 | Santilli | Oct 1997 | A |
5677708 | Matthews, III et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5766708 | Panizza | Jun 1998 | A |
6011537 | Slotznick | Jan 2000 | A |
6061050 | Allport et al. | May 2000 | A |
6323846 | Westerman et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6407757 | Ho | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6441811 | Sawada et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6570557 | Westerman et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6577330 | Tsuda et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6590593 | Robertson et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6600936 | Kaerkkaeinen et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6613100 | Miller | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6677932 | Westerman | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6680677 | Tiphane | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6686906 | Salminen et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6765559 | Hayakawa | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6915489 | Gargi | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6924789 | Bick | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6958749 | Matsushita et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6992658 | Wu et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7030861 | Westerman et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7051291 | Sciammarella et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7151528 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7159176 | Billmaier et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7170500 | Canova et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7346855 | Hellyar et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7352363 | Coates et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7360166 | Krzanowski | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7394452 | Wong et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7434177 | Ording et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7454382 | Triplett | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7479949 | Jobs et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7610599 | Nashida et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7650569 | Allen et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7663607 | Hotelling et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7705830 | Westerman et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
D615989 | Chaudhri | May 2010 | S |
7770136 | Beeck et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7800592 | Kerr et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7934168 | Sakamoto et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8001479 | Katsuranis et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8001488 | Lam | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8019388 | Chiam et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8019389 | Kim et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8159469 | Shiplacoff et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8214768 | Boule et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8266550 | Cleron et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8296676 | Millington | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8296684 | Duarte et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8373673 | Shiplacoff et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8423076 | Kim et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8448083 | Migos et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8464176 | Van et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8490019 | Jarrett et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8564543 | Chandhri et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8633900 | Jin et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8683362 | Shiplacoff et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8893039 | Kawashima et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8933892 | Woolley et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9104292 | Chen | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9116721 | Matsushima et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9154606 | Tseng et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9330521 | Lutnick et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9395888 | Shiplacoff et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9489107 | Duarte et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9513765 | Miyazaki et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9772751 | Anzures et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
20010012023 | Kobayashi et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020032554 | Nakagawa | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020089536 | Dang | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020109735 | Chang et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020191013 | Abrams | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030071849 | Ferri | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030085870 | Hinckley | May 2003 | A1 |
20030146897 | Hunter | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030148799 | Chen | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030222917 | Trantow | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040025112 | Chasen et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049743 | Bogward | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040070631 | Brown et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040100479 | Nakano et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040189720 | Wilson et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193413 | Wilson et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050003851 | Chrysochoos et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021336 | Katsuranis | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050024322 | Kupka | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050057524 | Hill et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071761 | Kontio | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050078093 | Peterson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050088416 | Hollingsworth | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050102638 | Jiang et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050131945 | Muller et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149879 | Jobs et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050188329 | Cutler et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050190280 | Haas et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050192924 | Drucker et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050219227 | Yamahata et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240618 | Nickerson et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050243053 | Liess et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060007181 | Jung et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060010395 | Aaltonen | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015878 | Ritter | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026521 | Hotelling et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060026535 | Hotelling | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060053387 | Ording | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060075348 | Xu et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085757 | Andre et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060123359 | Schatzberger | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060125962 | Shelton et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060161847 | Holecek et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161861 | Holecek et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060181548 | Hafey et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060197753 | Hotelling | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060209016 | Fox et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218504 | Hiroi et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224989 | Pettiross et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060238517 | King et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060267951 | Rainisto | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060268100 | Karukka et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070101292 | Kupka | May 2007 | A1 |
20070101297 | Forstall et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124694 | Van et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070146347 | Rosenberg | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070152978 | Kocienda et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070152984 | Ording et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070165004 | Seelhammer et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174791 | Park et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070177803 | Elias et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070220440 | Song et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226647 | Louch | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070236477 | Ryu et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070245263 | Hale et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070247431 | Skillman et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070247440 | Shin et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250787 | Kawahara et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070273668 | Park et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070277124 | Shin et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288860 | Ording et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070296709 | Guanghai | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080001924 | De et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080034317 | Fard et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080036743 | Westerman et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052637 | Ben-Yoseph et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080055265 | Bewley et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080062139 | Hotelling et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080062140 | Hotelling et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080062147 | Hotelling et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080062148 | Hotelling et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080064499 | Grant et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082930 | Omernick et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080084400 | Rosenberg | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080084440 | Omata et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080089587 | Kim et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080094371 | Forstall et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080100593 | Skillman et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080104544 | Collins et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080115081 | Sankaravadivelu et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080122796 | Jobs et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080148149 | Singh et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080168403 | Westerman et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080168405 | Tolmasky et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177994 | Mayer | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080195969 | Brown | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080204402 | Hirata et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080256472 | Kim et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281689 | Blinnikka et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080297484 | Park et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080303794 | Bolt et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080307335 | Chaudhri et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080316183 | Westerman et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090013282 | Mercer | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090019031 | Krovitz et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090070691 | Jain | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090085886 | Huang et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090093277 | Lee et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106694 | Kraft et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090153438 | Miller | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164928 | Brown et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090183120 | Ording et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090199241 | Unger et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090217198 | Jung | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090249203 | Tsuruta et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090267909 | Chen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271731 | Lin et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276702 | Bamford et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090278806 | Duarte et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100031202 | Morris et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100081475 | Chiang et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100122290 | Allen et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100156656 | Duarte et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100156813 | Duarte et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100169766 | Duarte et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100211872 | Rolston et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100214278 | Miura | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100235733 | Drislane et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100295801 | Bestle et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110093494 | Chandler et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20120278756 | Shah et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130298057 | Duarte et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140258897 | Shiplacoff et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150169528 | Sjogreen et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20160202859 | Anzures et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20180018072 | Shiplacoff et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20190012054 | Shiplacoff et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2008100003 | Feb 2008 | AU |
1073784 | Jun 1993 | CN |
1274439 | Nov 2000 | CN |
1107259 | Apr 2003 | CN |
1458565 | Nov 2003 | CN |
1739083 | Feb 2006 | CN |
1860429 | Nov 2006 | CN |
1896921 | Jan 2007 | CN |
1901637 | Jan 2007 | CN |
1910577 | Feb 2007 | CN |
1920762 | Feb 2007 | CN |
101005547 | Jul 2007 | CN |
101038524 | Sep 2007 | CN |
101052939 | Oct 2007 | CN |
101057209 | Oct 2007 | CN |
101133385 | Feb 2008 | CN |
101167045 | Apr 2008 | CN |
101390039 | Mar 2009 | CN |
101566917 | Oct 2009 | CN |
101627360 | Jan 2010 | CN |
106095323 | Nov 2016 | CN |
0548646 | Jun 1993 | EP |
1462921 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1688830 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1705583 | Sep 2006 | EP |
1942402 | Jul 2008 | EP |
1962480 | Aug 2008 | EP |
2068236 | Jun 2009 | EP |
2076000 | Jul 2009 | EP |
2480777 | Nov 2011 | GB |
2002259001 | Sep 2002 | JP |
100801089 | Feb 2008 | KR |
WO-03007143 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO-2006017138 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO-2008030976 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO-2009080653 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO-2010096219 | Aug 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report—EP19156309—Search Authority—Munich—dated Apr. 16, 2019. |
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China Notification of Examination Decision for Invalidation Request, Application/Patent No. 200980118088.4; Case No. 4W106638, Nov. 7, 2018, 30 Pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China Notification of Examination Decision for Invalidation Request, Application/Patent No. 201310491586.1; Case No. 4W106649, Jul. 25, 2018, 38 Pages. |
Bederson B B., et al., “DateLens: A Fisheye Calendar Interface for PDAs,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 11 (1), Mar. 2004, pp. 90-119. |
Bederson B. B., “Fisheye Menus,” Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGCPR Conference, 2000, pp. 217-225. |
Card S K., et al., “The Design Space of Input Devices,” CHI 90 Proceedings, Apr. 1990, pp. 117-124. |
Card S K., et al., “The Information Visualizer, an Information Workspace,” CHI 91 Proceedings, 1991, pp. 181-188. |
Celeste T., “The Mac as a Touchscreen Business Computer,” Tom's Guide, URL: https://www.tomsguide.com/us/macworld-touchscreen-mac,news-417.html, Jan. 22, 2008, 6 pages. |
“Designing for the Multitasker,” Internet Article, Publication Date: Mar. 17, 2010;<http://blog.graphicpeel.com/post/454779602/designing-for-the-multitasker>. |
Extended European Search Report, European Application No. 09751303.0, dated Apr. 2, 2012, pp. 1-6. |
Extended European Search Report, European Application No. 09751304.8, dated Apr. 3, 2012, pp. 1-6. |
Furnas G W., “Generalized Fisheye Views,” CHI' 86 Proceedings, Apr. 1986, pp. 16-23. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority in International Application PCT/US2007/066889, ISA US Commissioner for Patents, dated Nov. 24, 2008, 9 pages. |
International Search Report dated Jan. 25, 2011, issued in International Application No. PCT/US2010/038037. |
International Search Report dated Oct. 30, 2009, issued in international application No. PCT/US2009/044389. |
International Search Report dated Oct. 30, 2009, issued in international application No. PCT/US2009/044390. |
iPhone User's Guide, Chapter 5, pp. 58-59, Apple Safari Browser, “Opening Multiple Webpages at Once,” (2007). |
“A Unique Landscape: Comprehensive Introduction of iPhone”, Digital Communication, No. 21, 2007, publication date: Nov. 15, 2007. |
Moyle M., et al., the Design and Evaluation of Flick Gesture for ‘Back’ and ‘Forward’ in Web Browsers, Proceedings of the Fourth Australian user interface conference on User interfaces 2003, vol. 18, Australian Computer Society, Inc. Darlinghurst, Australia, copyright 2003, ISBN:0-909925-96-8. 8 pages. |
Myers B. A., “User-Interface Tools: Introduction and Survey,” IEEE Software, Jan. 1989, pp. 15-23. |
Patent Assignment history log from USPTO for U.S. Pat. No. 9,116,593. |
Patent Assignment history log from USPTO for U.S. Appl. No. 13/93,2439. |
Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark—Case 3:17-cv-02403, filed Nov. 30, 2017, 1 page. |
Robertson G. G., et al., “Cone Trees: Animated 3D Visualizations of Hierarchical Information,” CHI 91' Proceedings, 1991, pp. 189-194. |
Rubine D. H., “The Automatic Recognition of Gestures,” Dec. 1, 1991, XP055109432, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/viewdocjdownload?doi=10.1.1.116.1350&rep=rep1&type=pdf [retrieved on Mar. 24, 2014] , 285 pages. |
Rubine D., “Specifying Gestures by Example”, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, Jul. 1991, vol. 25 (4), pp. 329-337. |
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China Notice of Acceptance of Request for Invalidation for Application No. 201310491586.1 dated Dec. 12, 2017, 1 Page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/048,219, Inventor Lin Y-C., filed Apr. 27, 2008. |
“Welcome to Leopard,” User Manual, Apple Inc, 2007, 81 pages. |
“Welcome to Panther,” User Manual, Apple Computer Inc, 2004, 24 pages. |
“Welcome to Tiger,” User Manual, Apple Computer Inc, 2005, 32 pages. |
Westerman W., et al., “Multi-Touch: A New Tactile 2-D Gesture Interface for Human Computer Interaction,” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting, 2001, pp. 632-636. |
Yamaashi K., et al., “Fisheye Videos: Distorting Multiple Videos in Space and Time Domain According to Users' Interests,” CHI 93' Proceedings, 1993, pp. 119-120. |
CNN: “5 Decades of CES hits and epic flops,” CNN Money, Jan. 4, 2011, 1 Page, Retrieved from the URL: https://money.cnn.com/galleries/2011/technology/1101/gallery.CES_history/7.html. |
Megna M., “Palm Pre Sales Fail to Meet Analyst Expectations,” InternetNews, Aug. 14, 2009, 1 Page, Retrieved from the URL: http://www.internetnews.com/mobility/article.php/3834521. |
Spear Z., “Apple awarded key “multi-touch” patent covering the iPhone,” AppleInsider, Jan. 26, 2009, 14 pages. Retrieved from the URL: https://appleinsider.com/articles/09/01/26/apple_awarded_key_multi_touch_patent_covering_the_iphone. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/937,993, Inventor Jobs S.P., filed Jun. 29, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/019,841, Inventor Anzures F.A., filed Jan. 8, 2008. |
Williams A., “Why WebOS Failed, According to ex-Palm Exec,” Trusted Reviews, Jan. 3, 2012, pp. 1-3, Retrieved from the URL: https://www.trustedreviews.com/news/why-webos-failedaccording-to-ex-palm-exec-2907024. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180364876 A1 | Dec 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12126145 | May 2008 | US |
Child | 13316004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13932439 | Jul 2013 | US |
Child | 16112194 | US | |
Parent | 13316004 | Dec 2011 | US |
Child | 13932439 | US |