Navigating among activities in a computing device

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11262889
  • Patent Number
    11,262,889
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, October 22, 2020
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 1, 2022
    2 years ago
Abstract
A mobile computing device runs multiple activities concurrently and provides at least two modes for interacting with the activities. The user may toggle between the modes as desired. In a full-screen mode, one activity occupies substantially an entire display screen. In a windowed mode, the activity is visible within a window, and a portion of at least one other window is also visible. In the windowed mode, the user can cause windows to move, thereby changing focus from one activity to another. For example, the window having focus can be moved off the screen, to be replaced by a new window that is then given focus. The windows are ordered in a sequence and move in concert with one another; pushing one window off one edge of the screen causes a new window to appear at the opposite edge. A persistent positional relationship can be established among windows.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to application management in computing devices, and more particularly to systems and methods for navigating among activities such as applications in such devices.


DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART

Many currently available computing devices run operating systems that offer users the opportunity to run several applications at the same time, and even to perform several activities simultaneously, within a single application and/or among two or more applications. For example, a user may open an e-mail application, a word processing application, an on-screen calculator, and a web browser, so that all of the applications are open concurrently. The user may open several documents within the word processing application, and may open several e-mail messages. Such an arrangement allows the user to easily move from one task to another by keeping these various applications and activities open at the same time.


Conventionally, such an operating paradigm is accomplished by the use of multiple overlapping windows within a graphical user interface. A desktop metaphor is often employed, wherein the user can move and resize windows on a display screen by direct manipulation. Thus, each application may have a window or several windows; at any given time, one window has focus (usually indicated as such by being situated on top of the other windows). Other windows may be visible, invisible, or partially visible (for example if they are partially or completely obscured by other windows). A user can switch from one task to another by causing a different window to have focus; this is commonly accomplished by clicking on a visible portion of the window being activated, or by clicking on a button or icon representing the window or application in a task bar, dock, or similar construct. In some operating systems, pop-up menus and/or keyboard shortcuts may be available for switching among applications or documents.


Overlapping windows are a highly effective mechanism for application management. They exploit the user's spatial memory by associating a particular area of the screen with a particular task being performed. A user may find it easier to return to a previously opened window when he or she remembers that the window was placed at a particular location on the screen, as compared with a list or menu of open windows that does not provide a model of spatial placement and stability.


One issue with conventional window-based mechanisms for application management is that a large screen size is usually needed. Users faced with limited screen space must choose between, on the one hand, making windows smaller and thus reducing available workspace within each application, and, on the other hand, stacking windows atop each other so that only one window (or very few) is visible at a time. Reducing workspace can make it very difficult to use an application, particularly for applications such as word processing, photo editing, drawing, and the like. Stacking windows reduces the ease with which the user can switch from one application or document to another, as it is more difficult to see what is currently open and to find the appropriate window to be activated. When windows are stacked, users usually resort to navigation via taskbar, dock, menu, keyboard shortcut, or the like, thereby reducing the advantages of the overlapping window paradigm.


Some systems, such as the Mac OS operating system offered by Apple, Inc. of Cupertino, Calif., offer a mechanism for navigating among open applications by temporarily moving and shrinking open windows, moving the windows apart from one another so that they do not overlap. The user can then activate one of the windows; the original window positions and sizes are then restored, with the activated window on top. This feature is effective in allowing users to quickly switch among open applications and documents, but still requires a relatively large amount of screen space so as to effectively show the temporarily shrunk windows when the user is to select among them.


Mobile devices such as smartphones, personal digital assistants, music players, handheld computers, and the like are becoming increasingly powerful. Many are now able to run several applications concurrently, and to perform sophisticated functions that rival traditional computing devices. However, most such devices have extremely small screens, when compared to laptop or desktop computers. Thus, the conventional window-based techniques for navigating among open applications and documents do not function very well on mobile devices. There is insufficient screen space to display multiple overlapping windows. In fact, many such devices do not even have enough space to display a task bar or dock. Rather, the entire screen is often devoted to a single application, document, message, task, or activity, so as to make the most effective use of the extremely limited amount of space available.


What is needed is a system and method for application management that provides the advantages of multiple overlapping windows but is effective for a device having a small screen. What is further needed is a system and method that allows users to switch easily among activities, including applications, documents, and tasks, in a device having limited screen space. What is further needed is a system and method that is scalable to different screen sizes, and that provides solutions for all application and activity management, including starting activities, ending activities, and switching from one activity to another.


SUMMARY

According to the present invention, a computing device runs two or more activities concurrently and provides at least two modes for interacting with the activities. The user may toggle between the modes as desired. A button or other control is provided for switching between full-screen mode and windowed mode.


In a full-screen mode, one activity occupies substantially an entire display screen.


In a windowed mode, the activity is visible within a window, and a portion of at least one other window is also visible. Thus, the window that has focus is visible in full, while at least one other window is only partially visible. The window occupied by the activity is referred to as having focus. In the windowed mode, the user can cause windows to move on the screen, so as to change focus from one activity to another. For example, the window having focus can be moved off the screen, to be replaced by a new window that is then given focus. In one aspect, the activities are ordered in a sequence and the windows appear in a corresponding sequence. In one aspect, the windows move in concert with one another; pushing one window off one edge of the screen causes a new window to appear at the opposite edge. A persistent positional relationship can be established among windows.


In response to a user command, the windows shift position on the screen, so that the window that currently has focus becomes only partially visible and one of the other windows becomes fully visible and has focus. The windows move in concert with each other, in response to user commands Thus, for example, if the user indicates that the central window should move in a rightward direction, then the entire display shifts to the right, as follows:

    • The central window (which has focus) moves to the right, so that it is only partially visible along the right hand side of the display.
    • If any window was partially visible to the right of the window that has focus, it moves off the right edge of the screen so that it is no longer visible.
    • If any window was partially visible to the left of the window that has focus, it moves to the right so that it is now fully visible and has focus.


The user indicates such movement, for example, by direct manipulation of the displayed windows. This can be performed on a touch screen, for example, by dragging the central window to the left or to the right on the screen or by tapping on a window that is partially displayed. Alternatively, a trackball, touch-sensitive pad, or other input device can be provided for facilitating such direct manipulation.


In one embodiment, the window that currently has focus is always fully visible and displayed in a substantially central location on the screen with respect to partially displayed windows.


Window motion can be constrained to a single axis, for example horizontal or vertical but not both, so as to simplify the positional relationship among windows. Alternatively, two or more axes of movements can be made available.


Once the user has moved the desired window to the central position so that it has focus, he or she can indicate that the display should return to full-screen mode, so that the activity having focus occupies substantially the entire screen. Alternatively, the device can return to full-screen mode automatically after a period of time elapses where no window movement takes place, or if the user starts to interact with the activity that has focus.


Thus, the full-screen display mode may be used for interacting with the activity, and the windowed mode may be used for switching from one activity to another. However, in one aspect the invention allows full interaction with the activity in windowed mode as well.


A persistent positional relationship can be established among windows. The positional relationship can be a one-dimensional sequence or some more complex two-dimensional relationship. The positional relationship is persistent in the sense that it does not change unless the user indicates that it should be changed, or some other event takes place that indicates a change is warranted (such as non-use of an application, or an application crashing or being dismissed).


Additional features and advantages will become apparent in the description provided below.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings illustrate several embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. One skilled in the art will recognize that the particular embodiments illustrated in the drawings are merely exemplary, and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention.



FIG. 1 depicts a display screen showing a launcher for initiating an activity such as an application.



FIG. 2 depicts a display screen in full-screen mode, wherein an activity occupies substantially the entire display screen, according to one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 3 depicts the display screen in windowed mode, including a window having focus and two partially displayed windows, according to one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4 depicts the display screen in windowed mode after the user has moved the windows, according to one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 5 depicts the display screen in full-screen mode after the user has designated a new activity as having focus, according to one embodiment of the present invention.



FIGS. 6A through 6F depict a sequence for switching from one activity to another according to one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 7 is a conceptual depiction of a sequence switching from one activity to another according to one embodiment of the present invention.



FIGS. 8A and 8B depict a sequence for dismissing an activity according to one embodiment of the present invention.



FIGS. 9A through 9D depict a sequence for rearranging activities according to one embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following description, reference is made herein to “activities”. In the context of the present invention, an “activity” is intended to include a software application, a task, a document, a page, and/or any other activity that can be performed in connection with an electronic device. As described herein, the present invention provides techniques for starting and ending activities, and for switching among activities.


System Architecture


The present invention can be implemented on any electronic device, such as a handheld computer, personal digital assistant (PDA), personal computer, kiosk, cellular telephone, and the like. For example, the invention can be implemented as a feature of an application management paradigm for a software application or operating system running on such a device. Accordingly, the present invention can be implemented as part of a graphical user interface for controlling software on such a device.


The invention is particularly well-suited to devices such as smartphones, handheld computers, and PDAs, which have limited screen space and which are capable of running several software applications concurrently. One skilled in the art will recognize, however, that the invention can be practiced in many other contexts, including any environment in which it is useful to switch easily and smoothly from one activity to another. Accordingly, the following description is intended to illustrate the invention by way of example, rather than to limit the scope of the claimed invention.


Referring now to FIG. 1, there is shown an example of an example of a device 100 including a display screen 101 showing a launcher including several icons 104 representing applications that can be opened by the user. A dock 105 is also shown, including additional icons 106 for launching commonly used applications and other functions. Dock 105 is not necessary for the present invention, but is shown for illustrative purposes only.


In one embodiment, screen 101 is touch-sensitive, so that a user can activate an application or function by touching a displayed icon 104, 106. In one embodiment, device 100 also includes a touch-sensitive gesture area 102 for entering gesture-based commands, as described in the above-referenced related application. In another embodiment, screen 101 and/or gesture area 102 is sensitive to user motion in proximity to the surface, so as to detect gestures and commands performed near the surface but without necessarily contacting the surface.


For illustrative purposes, device 100 as shown in FIG. 1 is a personal digital assistant or smartphone. Such devices commonly have telephone, email, and text messaging capability, and may perform other functions including, for example, playing music and/or video, surfing the web, running productivity applications, and the like. The present invention can be implemented in any type of device having a touch-sensitive screen, and is not limited to devices having the listed functionality. In addition, the particular layout shown in FIG. 1 is merely exemplary and is not intended to be restrictive of the scope of the claimed invention.


Touch-sensitive screen 101 and gesture area 102 can be implemented using any technology that is capable of detecting a location of contact and/or user motion proximate to the surface. Alternatively, the present invention can be implemented with other user input mechanisms, such as a keyboard, trackball, stylus, or the like. One skilled in the art will recognize that the techniques of the present invention are well suited to direct manipulation, but that any input technique can be used. In one embodiment, gesture area 102 provides a touch-sensitive control area extending beyond the edges of touch-sensitive screen 101, as described in related application Ser. No. 12/115,992, filed May 6, 2008, for “Extended Touch-Sensitive Control Area for Electronic Device,” the disclosure of which is incorporated herein.


Device 101 as shown in FIG. 1 also has a physical button 103. In one embodiment, physical button 103 can be used to toggle between full-screen mode and windowed mode, as described in more detail below. Physical button 103 is not needed for the present invention, and is shown for illustrative purposes only.


As described herein, at least two modes are available for interacting with device 101: a full-screen mode in which an application or other activity occupies substantially the entire display screen 101, and a windowed mode in which at least two windows are presented, at least one of which is only partially visible, with an application or other activity occupying each window. The full-screen mode is designed to devote a greater amount of screen space to the active activity, while the windowed mode provides a mechanism for navigating among activities and for rearranging, initiating, and terminating activities.


Referring now to FIG. 2, there is shown display screen 101 in full-screen mode. In the example, a calendar application occupies substantially the entire display screen 101; however, one skilled in the art will recognize that any activity can be presented in this manner. As shown in FIG. 2, even in full-screen mode, certain portions of display screen 101 may be reserved for a title bar, battery indicator, clock, signal strength indicator, and the like. Accordingly, the term “full-screen mode” as used herein is intended to refer to any arrangement wherein the primary focus of the screen 101 is a single activity, even if other, smaller areas of screen 101 are reserved for other functions.


The user interacts with the active activity (such as the calendar application shown in FIG. 2) by conventional user interface methods, including manipulating on-screen elements, entering text, and the like. Such techniques are well known in the art.


Referring now to FIG. 3, there is shown an example of display screen 101 in windowed mode. In one embodiment, the user can toggle between full-screen mode and windowed mode by pressing physical button 103. In another embodiment, the user can touch or double-tap an activity 301B in windowed mode to initiate a switch to full-screen mode. In yet another embodiment, device 100 switches from windowed mode to full-screen mode after some period of inactivity. Other mechanisms can also be provided for toggling between the modes.


As can be seen in FIG. 3, in windowed mode, window 301B having focus is fully visible. Other windows 301A, 301C are only partially visible and do not have focus. Usually, window 301B having focus represents the same activity that was displayed in full-screen mode immediately before the switch to windowed mode. Any number of partially displayed windows 301A, 301C can be presented. In the example of FIG. 3, two such windows 301A, 301C are shown, one on either side of window 301B having focus. Typically, in an arrangement where windows 301 are presented along a linear axis, one or two partially displayed window(s) 301 can be displayed adjacent to the window 301 that has focus. Also, as shown in FIG. 3, in one embodiment, partially displayed windows 301A, 301C are shown slightly smaller than window 301B having focus, so as to further emphasize the fact that window 301B has focus.


Partially displayed windows 301A, 301C provide a positional context for window 301B, and provide a mechanism for navigating to other activities. In one embodiment, the user can designate a window 301A, 301C to have focus by touching any area within the window; this causes the designated window 301 to move to the central portion of display screen 101, and causes other windows to move as well, so that the same positional sequence is maintained. In one embodiment, the user can designate a window 301A, 301C to have focus by dragging any displayed window 301 to cause the desired window 301 to move to the central portion of display screen 101; again, other windows 301 move as well, so that the same positional sequence is maintained. In one embodiment, the user can move windows 301 left and right by dragging a finger along gesture area 102. In one embodiment, such a gesture can be performed even in full-screen mode, causing windows 301 to move left and right in the same manner as described above for windowed mode.


As described in more detail below, when the user drags a window 301 to the left or right within display screen 100, other windows 301 move in concert with the dragged window 301. Thus, for example, if the user drags window 301B to the right, windows 301A and 301C move to the right as well. This would cause window 301C to move off the screen, and window 301A would move to the central position of display screen 100. The same result would occur if the user drags window 301A to the right.


In one embodiment, if the user drags windows 301 so as to place a window 301 sufficiently close to the central position to make it clear that the intention is to give the window 301 focus, the window 301 snaps into the central position upon completion of the drag operation. Other windows 301 snap into place accordingly to maintain the same positional sequence. Thus, the user need not drag the window 301 all the way to the central position. If, on the other hand, the user drags windows 301 a small amount that does not cause a new window 301 to be sufficiently close to the central position, all windows 301 snap back to their previous positions upon completion of the drag operation.


In one embodiment, windows 301 show applications or other activities in operation. Thus, as the user navigates among windows 301, he or she can see the actual live application or other activity within each window 301.


Referring now to FIG. 4, there is shown an example of display screen 101 in windowed mode, after the user has caused window 301C (representing an email application) to become centrally located and to have focus. As can be seen in FIG. 4, window 301B that previously had focus is now partially visible to the left of window 301C. Window 301A is no longer visible.


The user can touch or double-tap window 301C to re-enter full-screen mode with the new activity having focus and being active, as shown in FIG. 5. Alternatively, the user can press button 103 to toggle between full-screen mode and windowed mode. Thus, in FIG. 5 the user has completed the switch from the calendar application of FIG. 2 to the email application.


In the examples described herein, windows 301 are arranged in a horizontal row. The user moves windows 301 along a horizontal axis to navigate from one activity to another. One skilled in the art will recognize that other arrangements are possible. For example, windows 301 could be arranged vertically instead of horizontally. Alternatively, a two-dimensional arrangement of windows 301 can be provided.


Referring now to FIG. 7, there is shown a conceptual depiction of a sequence switching from one activity to another according to one embodiment of the present invention. A number of activities are open, each represented by a window 301A through 301H. Screen 101 only shows a subset of the windows 301 at any given time. As can be seen in the Figure, a positional sequence is maintained even though most of the windows 301 are not visible at any given time. FIG. 7 depicts movement of the display screen 101 from an initial position where window 301B has focus (and windows 301A and 301C are partially visible) to a second position where window 301E is has focus (and windows 301D and 301F are partially visible).


The movement of display screen 101 is conceptual. In actual operation, the switch from window 301B to window 301E is accomplished by moving windows 301 in a leftward direction on screen 101. For example, the user can repeatedly drag windows 301 in a leftward direction to cause windows 301C, 301D, and 301E to successively occupy the central position. Alternatively, the user can click on partially displayed window 301C to move it to the central position and to cause window 301D to be partially displayed, then on partially displayed window 301D to move it to the central position and to cause window 301E to be partially displayed, and then on partially displayed window 301E to move it to the central position. Either mechanism operates to shift focus from the activity represented by window 301B to the activity represented by window 301E.


In one embodiment, a transition effect is performed to enhance the smoothness of the transition as windows 301 move and/or snap into place. In one embodiment, the window 301 that is centrally displayed at any given time is shown slightly larger than other windows 301.


In one embodiment, more than one window 301 can be completely visible within screen 101. For example, three windows 301 might be completely visible, with additional partially-visible windows 301 on either side. The above-described techniques for moving windows 301 in concert with one another to maintain positional sequence still apply in such a variation.


In general, the sequence of windows 301 is persistent, even when the user moves from one window to another 301. In one embodiment, the sequence is circular, so that the rightmost window 301 is considered to be to the left of the leftmost window 301. Thus, moving off one end of the sequence takes the user back to the other end of the sequence.


In one embodiment, windows 301 may be moved within the sequence automatically in some circumstances. For example, frequently used windows 301 can be moved to more prominent locations in the sequence, while less frequently used windows 301 can remain in less prominent locations.


Referring now to FIGS. 6A through 6F, the operation of the invention is further illustrated by way of an example of a sequence for switching from one activity to another; specifically, the user switches from a calendar application to a telephone application. FIG. 6A shows an initial state in which device 100 shows a calendar application in full-screen mode. In FIG. 6B, the user has switched to windowed mode, for example by pressing button 103. Now, the calendar application is visible in window 301B, and the telephone application is partially visible in window 301A. FIGS. 6C through 6E show the effect of the user dragging window 301B in a rightward direction. As the user drags window 301B, window 301A also moves in a rightward direction, until it is centrally located in display screen 101, as shown in FIG. 6E. As discussed above, this motion can also be initiated in response to the user touching the visible portion of window 301A in FIG. 6B, or by dragging in a horizontal rightward direction in gesture area 102.


Once the telephone application is in the central position in window 301A as shown in FIG. 6E, the user can tap on window 301A or press button 103 to switch to full-screen mode, as shown in FIG. 6F. In one embodiment, the user can also interact with the telephone application directly in windowed mode as shown in FIG. 6E.


The user can launch additional activities by returning to the launch screen as shown in FIG. 1. In one embodiment, this is performed by performing a gesture or other command. In one embodiment, the user can also launch additional activities by touching an icon 106 in dock 105. In one embodiment, newly launched activities generate new windows that are added to the end of the sequence of windows shown in FIG. 7. In one embodiment, the window for the newly launched activity is, by default, given focus and presented in the central position on screen 101.


The user can dismiss applications, for example by closing a window 301. In one embodiment, a window 301 can be closed by clicking on a control within the window. In another embodiment, a window 301 can be closed by dragging the window upward off screen 101. Referring now to FIGS. 8A and 8B, there is shown an example of a sequence where the user drags window 301B upward off screen 101, causing window 301B to be dismissed.


As can be seen in FIGS. 8A and 8B, dismissing window 301B causes 301C to move leftward to fill in the gap caused by window 301B being dismissed. In general, when a window 301 is dismissed, other windows 301 move to fill the gap.


In one embodiment, dismissing a window 301 causes the application associated with the window to close. In another embodiment, the application remains open even when window 301 is closed.


In one embodiment, a window 301 might close automatically in certain circumstances. For example, if a task associated with an application is completed, or if an application crashes or terminates, the window 301 for the application can close automatically.


The user can also rearrange windows 301 manually when desired, by dragging a window 301 from one position to another. An example is shown in FIGS. 9A through 9D. The user drags window 301B upward, causing windows 301C and 301D to move to fill the gap. The user does not release window 301B however; instead, he or she moves window 301B into a position between windows 301C and 301D, as shown in FIG. 9C. The result is the sequence shown in FIG. 9D, where window 301B is now positioned between windows 301C and 301D.


In one embodiment, the user can resize windows 301 as desired. For example, the user can drag a corner of a window 301 to resize it, or can use two fingers to pinch the edges or corners of a window 301 to resize it.


To summarize, then, any or all of the following actions may be enabled for displayed windows 301:

    • Press button 103: toggle between full-screen and windowed modes
    • Drag window 301 left or right: cause windows to move left or right, and change focus
    • Horizontal gesture in gesture area 102: cause windows to move left or right, and change focus
    • Touch partially displayed window 301: cause window 301 to gain focus and move to center
    • Touch (or double-tap) window 301 having focus: switch to full-screen mode
    • Drag window 301 upward: dismiss window
    • Drag window 301 downward: zoom out, causing more windows 301 to be shown concurrently on screen 101; the user can zoom back in by tapping any empty space.


The present invention has been described in particular detail with respect to one possible embodiment. Those of skill in the art will appreciate that the invention may be practiced in other embodiments. First, the particular naming of the components, capitalization of terms, the attributes, data structures, or any other programming or structural aspect is not mandatory or significant, and the mechanisms that implement the invention or its features may have different names, formats, or protocols. Further, the system may be implemented via a combination of hardware and software, as described, or entirely in hardware elements, or entirely in software elements. Also, the particular division of functionality between the various system components described herein is merely exemplary, and not mandatory; functions performed by a single system component may instead be performed by multiple components, and functions performed by multiple components may instead be performed by a single component.


Reference herein to “one embodiment,” “an embodiment,” or to “one or more embodiments” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiments is included in at least one embodiment of the invention. Further, it is noted that instances of the phrase “in one embodiment” herein are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.


Some portions of the above are presented in terms of algorithms and symbolic representations of operations on data bits within a computer memory. These algorithmic descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. An algorithm is here, and generally, conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of steps (instructions) leading to a desired result. The steps are those requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical, magnetic or optical signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared and otherwise manipulated. It is convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, or the like. Furthermore, it is also convenient at times, to refer to certain arrangements of steps requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities as modules or code devices, without loss of generality.


It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussion, it is appreciated that throughout the description, discussions utilizing terms such as “processing” or “computing” or “calculating” or “displaying” or “determining” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system, or similar electronic computing module and/or device, that manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (electronic) quantities within the computer system memories or registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.


Certain aspects of the present invention include process steps and instructions described herein in the form of an algorithm. It should be noted that the process steps and instructions of the present invention can be embodied in software, firmware or hardware, and when embodied in software, can be downloaded to reside on and be operated from different platforms used by a variety of operating systems.


The present invention also relates to an apparatus for performing the operations herein. This apparatus may be specially constructed for the required purposes, or it may comprise a general-purpose computer selectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored in the computer. Such a computer program may be stored in a computer readable storage medium, such as, but is not limited to, any type of disk including floppy disks, optical disks, CD-ROMs, magnetic-optical disks, read-only memories (ROMs), random access memories (RAMs), EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnetic or optical cards, application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), or any type of media suitable for storing electronic instructions, and each coupled to a computer system bus. Further, the computers referred to herein may include a single processor or may be architectures employing multiple processor designs for increased computing capability.


The algorithms and displays presented herein are not inherently related to any particular computer, virtualized system, or other apparatus. Various general-purpose systems may also be used with programs in accordance with the teachings herein, or it may prove convenient to construct more specialized apparatus to perform the required method steps. The required structure for a variety of these systems will be apparent from the description above. In addition, the present invention is not described with reference to any particular programming language. It will be appreciated that a variety of programming languages may be used to implement the teachings of the present invention as described herein, and any references above to specific languages are provided for disclosure of enablement and best mode of the present invention.


While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having benefit of the above description, will appreciate that other embodiments may be devised which do not depart from the scope of the present invention as described herein. In addition, it should be noted that the language used in the specification has been principally selected for readability and instructional purposes, and may not have been selected to delineate or circumscribe the inventive subject matter. Accordingly, the disclosure of the present invention is intended to be illustrative, but not limiting, of the scope of the invention, which is set forth in the claims.

Claims
  • 1. A mobile computing device comprising: a processor configured to operate at least a first application and a second application concurrently;a touch-sensitive display screen coupled to the processor, the processor to receive gesture input on the touch-sensitive display screen and operate the mobile computing device in any one of at least two display modes that includes a full-screen mode and a windowed mode, wherein:in the full-screen mode, the processor presents, on the touch-sensitive display screen, a user interface for only one of the first application or the second application; andin the windowed mode, the processor: presents a plurality of windows arranged linearly along an axis of the touch-sensitive display screen, the plurality of windows including at least a first window displaying a view of the first application and at least a portion of a second window displaying a view of the second application, the first application different than the second application;responds to a first user directional contact on the touch-sensitive display screen in a first direction along the axis by moving the plurality of windows in concert with one another in the first direction along the axis such that the portion of the second window presented on the touch-sensitive display screen increases or decreases based on the first direction;responds to a second user directional contact on a selected window of the first window or the second window that drags the selected window along a second direction that is different than the first direction out of linear arrangement with the non-selected windows arranged along the axis by dismissing the selected window from the touch-sensitive display screen in the second direction; andcloses the corresponding first application or second application based on the dismissal of the selected window;wherein the processor, in response to receiving a user input indicating a mode change, transitions the mobile computing device at least (i) from the full-screen mode to the windowed mode, or (ii) from the windowed mode to the full-screen mode.
  • 2. The mobile computing device of claim 1, wherein in the full-screen mode, the processor: presents the user interface for the first application as a full-screen window or presents the user interface for the second application as a full-screen window; andresponds to a gesture on a gesture area of the touch-sensitive display screen in the first direction by moving the full-screen window of one of the first application and the second application to be replaced by the full-screen window of the other of the first application and the second application.
  • 3. The mobile computing device of claim 1, wherein the first direction is along a horizontal axis of the touch-sensitive display screen, and wherein the second direction is along a vertical axis of the touch-sensitive display screen.
  • 4. The mobile computing device of claim 3, wherein the second direction is upwards.
  • 5. The mobile computing device of claim 1, wherein the second user directional contact on the selected window comprises an upward dragging gesture beginning on the selected window.
  • 6. The mobile computing device of claim 1, wherein the first direction is along a vertical axis of the touch-sensitive display screen, and wherein the second direction is along a horizontal axis of the touch-sensitive display screen.
  • 7. The mobile computing device of claim 1, wherein a same type of the user input indicating the mode change is used to transition the mobile computing device from the full-screen mode to the windowed mode and from the windowed mode to the full-screen mode.
  • 8. The mobile computing device of claim 1, further comprising a physical button coupled to the processor, wherein the user input indicating the mode change comprises pressing the physical button.
  • 9. The mobile computing device of claim 1, wherein dismissing the selected window from the touch-sensitive display screen in the second direction comprises dragging the selected window upward off the touch-sensitive display screen.
  • 10. The mobile computing device of claim 9, wherein the selected window is dragged off an edge of the touch-sensitive display screen.
  • 11. The mobile computing device of claim 1, wherein a direction of the second user directional contact is the same direction in which the selected window is dragged by the second user directional contact.
  • 12. The mobile computing device of claim 1, wherein the selected window of the first window or the second window is selected based on the second user directional contact being performed on the selected window.
  • 13. The mobile computing device of claim 1, wherein the selected window is dragged along the second direction in concert with the second user directional contact.
  • 14. A method for managing applications on a mobile computing device having a touch-sensitive display screen coupled to a processor that operates at least a first application and a second application concurrently, the method comprising: operating the mobile computing device in any one of at least two display modes that includes a full-screen mode and a windowed mode;in the full-screen mode, presenting, on the touch-sensitive display screen, a user interface for only one of the first application or the second application; andin the windowed mode: presenting a plurality of windows arranged linearly along an axis of the touch-sensitive display screen, the plurality of windows including at least a first window displaying a view of the first application and at least a portion of a second window displaying a view of the second application, the first application different than the second application;responding to a first user directional contact on the touch-sensitive display screen in a first direction along the axis by moving the plurality of windows in concert with one another in the first direction along the axis such that the portion of the second window presented on the touch-sensitive display screen increases or decreases based on the first direction;responding to a second user directional contact on a selected window of the first window or the second window that drags the selected window along a second direction that is different than the first direction out of linear arrangement with the non-selected windows arranged along the axis by dismissing the selected window from the touch-sensitive display screen in the second direction; andclosing the corresponding first application or second application based on the dismissal of the selected window; andin response to receiving a user input indicating a mode change, transitioning the mobile computing device at least (i) from the full-screen mode to the windowed mode, or (ii) from the windowed mode to the full-screen mode.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, further comprising, in the full-screen mode: presenting the user interface for the first application as a full-screen window or presents the user interface for the second application as a full-screen window; andresponding to a gesture on a gesture area of the touch-sensitive display screen in the first direction by moving the full-screen window of one of the first application and the second application to be replaced by the full-screen window of the other of the first application and the second application.
  • 16. The method of claim 14, wherein the first direction is along a horizontal axis of the touch-sensitive display screen, and wherein the second direction is along a vertical axis of the touch-sensitive display screen.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the second direction is upwards.
  • 18. The method of claim 14, wherein the second user directional contact on the selected window comprises an upward dragging gesture beginning on the selected window.
  • 19. The method of claim 14, wherein the first direction is along a vertical axis of the touch-sensitive display screen, and wherein the second direction is along a horizontal axis of the touch-sensitive display screen.
  • 20. The method of claim 14, wherein a same type of the user input indicating the mode change is used to transition the computer system from the full-screen mode to the windowed mode and from the windowed mode to the full-screen mode.
  • 21. The method of claim 14, wherein the computer system further comprises a physical button coupled to the processor, and the user input indicating the mode change comprises the user pressing the physical button.
  • 22. The method of claim 14, wherein dismissing the selected window from the touch-sensitive display screen in the second direction comprises dragging the selected window upward off the touch-sensitive display screen.
  • 23. The method of claim 22, wherein the selected window is dragged off an edge of the touch-sensitive display screen.
  • 24. The method of claim 14, wherein a direction of the second user directional contact is the same direction in which the selected window is dragged by the second user directional contact.
  • 25. The method of claim 14, wherein the selected window of the first window or the second window is selected based on the second user directional contact being performed on the selected window.
  • 26. The method of claim 14, wherein the selected window is dragged along the second direction in concert with the second user directional contact.
  • 27. A mobile computing device comprising: means for operating at least a first application and a second application concurrently;a touch-sensitive display screen coupled to the means for operating;means for receiving gesture input on the touch-sensitive display screen; andmeans for operating the mobile computing device in any one of at least two display modes that includes a full-screen mode and a windowed mode, wherein: in the full-screen mode, the means for operating presents, on the touch-sensitive display screen, a user interface for only one of the first application or the second application; andin the windowed mode, the means for operating: presents a plurality of windows arranged linearly along an axis of the touch-sensitive display screen, the plurality of windows including at least a first window displaying a view of the first application and at least a portion of a second window displaying a view of the second application, the first application different than the second application;responds to a first user directional contact on the touch-sensitive display screen in a first direction along the axis by moving the plurality of windows in concert with one another in the first direction along the axis such that the portion of the second window presented on the touch-sensitive display screen increases or decreases based on the first direction;responds to a second user directional contact on a selected window of the first window or the second window that drags the selected window along a second direction that is different than the first direction out of linear arrangement with the non-selected windows arranged along the axis and dismisses the selected window from the touch-sensitive display screen in the second direction; andcloses the corresponding first application or second application based on the dismissal of the selected window; andin response to receiving a user input indicating a mode change, transitions the mobile computing device at least (i) from the full-screen mode to the windowed mode, or (ii) from the windowed mode to the full-screen mode.
  • 28. The mobile computing device of claim 27, further comprising: means for presenting, in the full-screen mode, the user interface for the first application as a full-screen window or the user interface for the second application as a full-screen window; andmeans for responding, in the full-screen mode, to a gesture on a gesture area of the touch-sensitive display screen in the first direction by moving the full-screen window of one of the first application and the second application to be replaced by the full-screen window of the other of the first application and the second application.
  • 29. The mobile computing device of claim 27, wherein the first direction is along a horizontal axis of the touch-sensitive display screen, and wherein the second direction is along a vertical axis of the touch-sensitive display screen.
  • 30. The mobile computing device of claim 29, wherein the second direction is upwards.
  • 31. The mobile computing device of claim 27, wherein the second user directional contact on the selected window comprises an upward dragging gesture beginning on the selected window.
  • 32. The mobile computing device of claim 27, wherein dismissing the selected window from the touch-sensitive display screen in the second direction comprises dragging the selected window upward off the touch-sensitive display screen.
  • 33. The mobile computing device of claim 32, wherein the selected window is dragged off an edge of the touch-sensitive display screen.
  • 34. The mobile computing device of claim 27, wherein a direction of the second user directional contact is the same direction in which the selected window is dragged by the second user directional contact.
  • 35. The mobile computing device of claim 27, wherein the selected window of the first window or the second window is selected based on the second user directional contact being performed on the selected window.
  • 36. The mobile computing device of claim 27, wherein the selected window is dragged along the second direction in concert with the second user directional contact.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/865,732 filed May 4, 2020 for “Navigating Among Activities in a Computing Device,” which claims priority as a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/112,194 filed Aug. 24, 2018 for “Navigating Among Activities in a Computing Device,” now U.S. Pat. No. 10,678,403, which claims priority as a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/932,439 filed Jul. 1, 2013 for “Navigating Among Activities in a Computing Device,” which claims priority as a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/316,004 filed Dec. 9, 2011 for “Navigating Among Activities in a Computing Device,” now U.S. Pat. No. 9,489,107, which claims priority as a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/126,145 filed May 23, 2008 for “Navigating Among Activities in a Computing Device,” now U.S. Pat. No. 8,296,684, all of which are assigned to the assignee hereof. The disclosures of all prior Applications are considered part of and are incorporated by reference in this Patent Application in their respective entireties.

US Referenced Citations (237)
Number Name Date Kind
4680577 Straayer et al. Jul 1987 A
5146556 Hullot et al. Sep 1992 A
5377317 Bates et al. Dec 1994 A
5499330 Lucas et al. Mar 1996 A
5574846 Yoshimura et al. Nov 1996 A
5586244 Berry et al. Dec 1996 A
5588105 Foster et al. Dec 1996 A
5675361 Santilli Oct 1997 A
5677708 Matthews, III et al. Oct 1997 A
5766708 Panizza Jun 1998 A
6011537 Slotznick Jan 2000 A
6061050 Allport et al. May 2000 A
6323846 Westerman et al. Nov 2001 B1
6407757 Ho Jun 2002 B1
6441811 Sawada et al. Aug 2002 B1
6570557 Westerman et al. May 2003 B1
6577330 Tsuda et al. Jun 2003 B1
6590593 Robertson et al. Jul 2003 B1
6600936 Kaerkkaeinen et al. Jul 2003 B1
6613100 Miller Sep 2003 B2
6677932 Westerman Jan 2004 B1
6680677 Tiphane Jan 2004 B1
6686906 Salminen et al. Feb 2004 B2
6765559 Hayakawa Jul 2004 B2
6915489 Gargi Jul 2005 B2
6924789 Bick Aug 2005 B2
6958749 Matsushita et al. Oct 2005 B1
6992658 Wu et al. Jan 2006 B2
7030861 Westerman et al. Apr 2006 B1
7051291 Sciammarella et al. May 2006 B2
7151528 Taylor et al. Dec 2006 B2
7159176 Billmaier et al. Jan 2007 B2
7170500 Canova et al. Jan 2007 B2
7346855 Hellyar et al. Mar 2008 B2
7352363 Coates et al. Apr 2008 B2
7360166 Krzanowski Apr 2008 B1
7394452 Wong et al. Jul 2008 B2
7434177 Ording et al. Oct 2008 B1
7454382 Triplett Nov 2008 B1
7479949 Jobs et al. Jan 2009 B2
7480872 Ubillos Jan 2009 B1
7610599 Nashida et al. Oct 2009 B1
7650569 Allen et al. Jan 2010 B1
7653883 Hotelling Jan 2010 B2
7663607 Hotelling et al. Feb 2010 B2
7705830 Westerman et al. Apr 2010 B2
D615989 Chaudhri May 2010 S
7770136 Beeck et al. Aug 2010 B2
7800592 Kerr et al. Sep 2010 B2
7934168 Sakamoto et al. Apr 2011 B2
8001479 Katsuranis et al. Aug 2011 B2
8001488 Lam Aug 2011 B1
8019388 Chiam et al. Sep 2011 B2
8019389 Kim et al. Sep 2011 B2
8159469 Shiplacoff et al. Apr 2012 B2
8214768 Boule et al. Jul 2012 B2
8266550 Cleron et al. Sep 2012 B1
8296676 Millington Oct 2012 B2
8296684 Duarte et al. Oct 2012 B2
8373673 Shiplacoff et al. Feb 2013 B2
8423076 Kim et al. Apr 2013 B2
8448083 Migos et al. May 2013 B1
8464176 Van Dok et al. Jun 2013 B2
8490019 Jarrett et al. Jul 2013 B2
8549429 Tsuruta et al. Oct 2013 B2
8564543 Chandhri et al. Oct 2013 B2
8633900 Jin et al. Jan 2014 B2
8683362 Shiplacoff et al. Mar 2014 B2
8893039 Kawashima et al. Nov 2014 B2
8933892 Woolley et al. Jan 2015 B2
9104292 Chen Aug 2015 B2
9116721 Matsushima et al. Aug 2015 B2
9154606 Tseng et al. Oct 2015 B2
9330521 Lutnick et al. May 2016 B2
9395888 Shiplacoff et al. Jul 2016 B2
9489107 Duarte et al. Nov 2016 B2
9513765 Miyazaki et al. Dec 2016 B2
9772751 Anzures et al. Sep 2017 B2
10678403 Duarte et al. Jun 2020 B2
10732821 Platzer et al. Aug 2020 B2
20010012023 Kobayashi et al. Aug 2001 A1
20020032554 Nakagawa Mar 2002 A1
20020033848 Sciammarella et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020089536 Dang Jul 2002 A1
20020109735 Chang et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020191013 Abrams Dec 2002 A1
20030071849 Ferri Apr 2003 A1
20030085870 Hinckley May 2003 A1
20030117440 Hellyar et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030146897 Hunter Aug 2003 A1
20030148799 Chen Aug 2003 A1
20030222917 Trantow Dec 2003 A1
20040025112 Chasen et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040049743 Bogward Mar 2004 A1
20040070631 Brown et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040100479 Nakano et al. May 2004 A1
20040181804 Billmaier et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040189720 Wilson et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193413 Wilson et al. Sep 2004 A1
20050003851 Chrysochoos et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021336 Katsuranis Jan 2005 A1
20050024322 Kupka Feb 2005 A1
20050057524 Hill et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050071761 Kontio Mar 2005 A1
20050078093 Peterson et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050088416 Hollingsworth Apr 2005 A1
20050102638 Jiang et al. May 2005 A1
20050131945 Muller et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050149879 Jobs et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050188329 Cutler et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050190280 Haas et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050192924 Drucker et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050204306 Kawahara et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050219227 Yamahata et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050240618 Nickerson et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050243053 Liess et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060007181 Jung et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060010395 Aaltonen Jan 2006 A1
20060015878 Ritter Jan 2006 A1
20060026521 Hotelling et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060026535 Hotelling et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060053387 Ording Mar 2006 A1
20060075348 Xu et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060085757 Andre et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060097991 Hotelling et al. May 2006 A1
20060123359 Schatzberger Jun 2006 A1
20060125962 Shelton et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060161847 Holecek et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060161861 Holecek et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060181548 Hafey et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060197750 Kerr et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060197753 Hotelling Sep 2006 A1
20060209016 Fox et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060218504 Hiroi et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060224989 Pettiross et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060238517 King et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060267951 Rainisto Nov 2006 A1
20060268100 Karukka et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070101292 Kupka May 2007 A1
20070101297 Forstall et al. May 2007 A1
20070124694 Van De Sluis et al. May 2007 A1
20070146347 Rosenberg Jun 2007 A1
20070152978 Kocienda et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070152984 Ording et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070165004 Seelhammer et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070174791 Park et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070177803 Elias et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070180400 Zotov Aug 2007 A1
20070220440 Song et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070226647 Louch Sep 2007 A1
20070236477 Ryu et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070245263 Hale et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070247431 Skillman et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070247440 Shin et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250787 Kawahara et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070273668 Park et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070277124 Shin et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070288860 Ording et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070296709 Guanghai Dec 2007 A1
20080001924 De Los Reyes et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080034317 Fard et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080036743 Westerman et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080052637 Ben-Yoseph et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080055265 Bewley et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080062139 Hotelling et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080062140 Hotelling et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080062141 Chandhri Mar 2008 A1
20080062147 Hotelling et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080062148 Hotelling et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080064499 Grant et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080068344 Kim Mar 2008 A1
20080082930 Omernick et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080084400 Rosenberg Apr 2008 A1
20080084440 Omata et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080089587 Kim et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080094371 Forstall et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080100593 Skillman et al. May 2008 A1
20080104544 Collins et al. May 2008 A1
20080115081 Sankaravadivelu et al. May 2008 A1
20080122796 Jobs et al. May 2008 A1
20080148149 Singh et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080168401 Boule et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080168403 Westerman et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080168405 Tolmasky et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080174570 Jobs et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080177994 Mayer Jul 2008 A1
20080195969 Brown et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080204402 Hirata et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080256472 Kim et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080281689 Blinnikka Nov 2008 A1
20080297484 Park et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080303794 Bolt et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080307335 Chaudhri et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080316183 Westerman et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090013282 Mercer Jan 2009 A1
20090019031 Krovitz et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090070691 Jain Mar 2009 A1
20090085886 Huang et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090093277 Lee et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090106694 Kraft et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090153438 Miller et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090164928 Brown et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090183120 Ording et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090193364 Jarrett et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090199241 Unger et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090217198 Jung Aug 2009 A1
20090228828 Beatty Sep 2009 A1
20090249203 Tsuruta et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090267909 Chen et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090271731 Lin et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090276702 Bamford et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090278806 Duarte et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100031202 Morris et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100039399 Kim Feb 2010 A1
20100081475 Chiang et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100095240 Shiplacoff et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100122290 Allen et al. May 2010 A1
20100146455 Wilson et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100156656 Duarte et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100156813 Duarte et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100169766 Duarte et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100211872 Rolston et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100214278 Miura Aug 2010 A1
20100235733 Drislane et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100295801 Bestle et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110093494 Chandler et al. Apr 2011 A1
20120084711 Duarte et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120278756 Shah et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130298057 Duarte et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140157191 Shiplacoff et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140258897 Shiplacoff et al. Sep 2014 A1
20150169528 Sjogreen et al. Jun 2015 A1
20160202859 Anzures et al. Jul 2016 A1
20180018072 Shiplacoff et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180364876 Duarte et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190012054 Shiplacoff et al. Jan 2019 A1
20200264740 Duarte et al. Aug 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (41)
Number Date Country
2008100003 Feb 2008 AU
1073784 Jun 1993 CN
1274439 Nov 2000 CN
1107259 Apr 2003 CN
1458565 Nov 2003 CN
1739083 Feb 2006 CN
1860429 Nov 2006 CN
1896921 Jan 2007 CN
1901637 Jan 2007 CN
1910577 Feb 2007 CN
1920762 Feb 2007 CN
101005547 Jul 2007 CN
101038524 Sep 2007 CN
101052939 Oct 2007 CN
101057209 Oct 2007 CN
101133385 Feb 2008 CN
101167045 Apr 2008 CN
101390039 Mar 2009 CN
101566917 Oct 2009 CN
101627360 Jan 2010 CN
106095323 Nov 2016 CN
0548646 Jun 1993 EP
1462921 Sep 2004 EP
1688830 Aug 2006 EP
1705583 Sep 2006 EP
1942402 Jul 2008 EP
1962480 Aug 2008 EP
2068236 Jun 2009 EP
2076000 Jul 2009 EP
2682853 Jul 2016 EP
1969450 May 2018 EP
3385824 Oct 2018 EP
2480777 Nov 2011 GB
2002259001 Sep 2002 JP
100801089 Feb 2008 KR
WO-03007143 Jan 2003 WO
WO-2006017138 Feb 2006 WO
WO-2008030976 Mar 2008 WO
WO-2009080653 Jul 2009 WO
2009143076 Nov 2009 WO
WO-2010096219 Aug 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (119)
Entry
Bederson B B., et al., “DateLens: A Fisheye Calendar Interface for PDAs,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 11 (1), Mar. 2004, pp. 90-119.
Bederson B.B., “Fisheye Menus”, Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGCPR Conference, Chicago, IL, Apr. 6-8, 2000; [ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology], New York, NY, ACM, US, Nov. 5, 2000 (Nov. 5, 2000), pp. 217-225, XP001171611, DOI: 10.1145/354401.354782, ISBN: 978-1-58113-212-0, p. 217, col. 1, paragraph 1-p. 222, col. 1, paragraph 2, figures 1 -4.
Card S K., et al., “The Design Space of Input Devices,” CHI 90 Proceedings, Apr. 1990, pp. 117-124.
Card S K., et al., “The Information Visualizer, an Information Workspace,” CHI 91 Proceedings, 1991, pp. 181-188.
Celeste T., “The Mac as a Touchscreen Business Computer,” Tom's Guide, URL: https://www.tomsguide.com/US/macworld-touchscreen-mac,news-417.html, Jan. 22, 2008, 6 pages.
Chinese Office Action, Chinese Patent Application No. 200980118088.4, dated Sep. 24, 2012, pp. 1-5.
CNN: “5 Decades of CES hits and epic flops,” CNN Money, Jan. 4, 2011, 1 Page, Retrieved from the URL: https://money.cnn.com/galleries/2011/technology/1101/gallery.CES_history/7.html.
“Design Principles for Human-Computer Interfaces,” 1983.
“Designing for the Multitasker,” Internet Article, Publication Date: Mar. 17, 2010; http://blog.graphicpeel.com/post/454779602/designing-for-the-multitasker.
European Search Report—EP19156309—Search Authority—Munich—dated Apr. 16, 2019.
Examination Report, Application No. G219131.8, dated Nov. 26, 2012, pp. 1-8.
Examination Report, Application No. GB1219130.0, dated Nov. 26, 2012, pp. 1-8.
Extended European Search Report, European Application No. 09751303.0, dated Apr. 2, 2012, pp. 1-6.
Extended European Search Report, European Application No. 09751304.8, dated Apr. 3, 2012, pp. 1-6.
Furnas G W., “Generalized Fisheye Views,” CHI' 86 Proceedings, Apr. 1986, pp. 16-23.
GB Examination Report, Application No. GB1021636.4, dated Mar. 20, 2012, pp. 1-3.
GB Examination Report, Patent Application No. GB1021630.7, dated Jan. 24, 2012, pp. 1-5.
International Preliminary Examination Report dated Nov. 9, 2010, in International Application No. PCT/US2009/042735.
International Preliminary Reporton Patentability, International Application No. PCT/US2010/038037, dated Feb. 2, 2012, pp. 1-6.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 23, 2010, in international application No. PCT/US2009/044390.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 30, 2010, in International Application No. PCT/US2009/044389.
International Preliminary Reporton Patentability of the International Bureau of WIPO, PCT/US2007/066889, dated Dec. 31, 2008, 5 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 17, 2007, issued in International Application No. PCT/2009/042735.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority in International Application PCT/US2007/066889, ISA US Commissioner for Patents, dated Nov. 24, 2008, 9 pages.
International Search Report dated Jan. 25, 2011, issued in International Application No. PCT/US2010/038037.
International Search Report dated Oct. 30, 2009, issued in international application No. PCT/US2009/044389.
International Search Report dated Oct. 30, 2009, issued in international application No. PCT/US2009/044390.
IPhone User's Guide, Chapter 5, pp. 58-59, Apple Safari Browser, “Opening Multiple Webpages at Once,” (2007).
“A Unique Landscape: Comprehensive Introduction of iPhone”, Digital Communication, No. 21, 2007, publication date: Nov. 15, 2007.
Megna M., “Palm Pre Sales Fail to Meet Analyst Expectations,” InternetNews, Aug. 14, 2009, 1 Page, Retrieved from the URL: http://www.internetnews.com/mobility/article.php/3834521.
“Minority Report (Twentieth Century Fox)”, URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7SFeCgoep1c, 2002.
Moyle M., et al., The Design and Evaluation of Flick Gesture for ‘Back’ and ‘Forward’ in Web Browsers, Proceedings of the Fourth Australian user interface conference on User interfaces 2003, vol. 18, Australian Computer Society, Inc. Darlinghurst, Australia, copyright 2003, ISBN:0-909925-96-8. 8 pages.
Myers B. A., “User-Interface Tools: Introduction and Survey,” IEEE Software, Jan. 1989, pp. 15-23.
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 3, 2011, in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/416,279, filed Apr. 1, 2009.
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 11, 2011, for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/505,543, filed Jul. 20, 2009.
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 22, 2012, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/505,543.
Office Action, Chinese Application No. 200980126335.5, dated Oct. 8, 2012, pp. 1-8.
Office Action dated Jan. 18, 2012, issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/126,145, filed May 23, 2008.
Office Action dated Jun. 25, 2012, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/115,992.
Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2012, for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/115,992, filed May 6, 2008.
Office Action dated May 18, 2011, for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/115,992, filed May 6, 2008.
Office Action dated Oct. 31, 2011, for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/115,992, filed May 6, 2008.
Patent Assignment history log from USPTO for U.S. Pat. No. 9,116,593.
Patent Assignment history log from USPTO for U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,439.
Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark—Case 3:17-cv-02403, filed Nov. 30, 2017, 1 page.
Robertson G. G., et al., “Cone Trees: Animated 3D Visualizations of Hierarchical Information,” CHI 91' Proceedings, 1991, pp. 189-194.
Rubine D. H., “The Automatic Recognition of Gestures,” Dec. 1, 1991, XP055109432, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/viewdocjdownload?doi=10.1.1.116.1350&rep=rep1&type=pdf [retrieved on Mar. 24, 2014] , 285 pages.
Rubine D., “Specifying Gestures by Example”, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, Jul. 1991, vol. 25 (4), pp. 329-337.
Spear Z., “Apple awarded key “multi-touch” patent covering the iPhone,” AppleInsider, Jan. 26, 2009, 14 pages. Retrieved from the URL: https://appleinsider.com/articles/09/01/26/apple_awarded_key_multi_touch_patent_covering_the_iphone.
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China Notice of Acceptance of Request for Invalidation for Application No. 201310491586.1 dated Dec. 12, 2017, 1 Page.
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China Notification of Examination Decision for Invalidation Request, Application/Patent No. 200980118088.4; Case No. 4W106638, dated Nov. 7, 2018, 30 Pages.
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China Notification of Examination Decision for Invalidation Request, Application/Patent No. 201310491586.1; Case No. 4W106649, dated Jul. 25, 2018, 38 Pages.
“Steve Jobs Introduces MAC OS Panther at World Wide Developer's Conference”, URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktTNcj0fAM4, 2003.
“Steve Jobs iPhone Presentation at MacWorld 2007”, URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vN4U5FqrOdQ, Sep. 1, 2007.
Supplementary European Search Report—EP09743405—Search Authority—The Hague—dated Feb. 19, 2014.
Supplementary European Search Report—EP10802593—Search Authority—Berlin—dated Dec. 3, 2013.
“The Island (Twentieth Century Fox)”, URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaMosTtWz10, 2005.
“The Radical Promise of the Multi-Touch Interface”, URL: https://www.ted.com/talks/jeff_han_demos_his_breakthrough_touchscreen, 2006.
Threshold, (1992), In C, Morris (Ed.), Academic press Dictionary of Science and Technology, Oxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier Science & Technolog, 2 Pages, Retrieved from http://search.oredoreference.eom/content/entry/apdst/threshoid/0.
“Threshold” and Related Definitions: IEEE 100, The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standards Terms, 7th edition, copyright 2000 by The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, ISBN 0-7381-2601-2., pp. 1177-1178.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/937,993, Inventor Jobs S.P., filed Jun. 29, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/019,841, Inventor Anzures F.A., filed Jan. 8, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/048,219, Inventor Lin Y-C., filed Apr. 27, 2008.
“Welcome to Leopard,” User Manual, Apple Inc, 2007, 81 pages.
“Welcome to Panther,” User Manual, Apple Computer Inc, 2004, 24 pages.
“Welcome to Tiger,” User Manual, Apple Computer Inc, 2005, 32 pages.
Westerman W., et al., “Multi-Touch: A New Tactile 2-D Gesture Interface for Human Computer Interaction,” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting, 2001, pp. 632-636.
Williams A., “Why WebOS Failed, According to ex-Palm Exec,” Trusted Reviews, Jan. 3, 2012, pp. 1-3, Retrieved from the URL: https://www.trustedreviews.com/news/why-webos-failedaccording-to-ex-palm-exec-2907024.
Written Opinion—PCT/US2009/044389—ISA/EPO—dated Oct. 30, 2009.
Written Opinion—PCT/US2009/044390—ISA/EPO—dated Oct. 30, 2009.
Written Opinion—PCT/US2010/038037—ISA/EPO—dated Jan. 25, 2011.
Yamaashi K., et al., “Fisheye Videos: Distorting Multiple Videos in Space and Time Domain According to Users' Interests,” CHI 93' Proceedings, 1993, pp. 119-120.
“Apple Introduces iPhone 5c—The Most Colorful iPhone Yet,” Sep. 10, 2013, pp. 1-3, https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2013/09/10Apple-Introduces iPhone-5c-The-Most-Colorful-iPhone-Yet/.
Attachment 7—Amended Sheets of Claim Marked Version of the Involved Patent.
Beijing Intellectual Property Court, 200980118088.4, Civil Complaint, Qualcomm Incorporated versus Zhuhai Meizu Technology Co., Ltd. & Beijing Tianyu Daxin Technology Co., Ltd., Jun. 29, 2016, pp. 1-5.
Complaint for Patent Infringement [Demand for a Jury Trial], Qualcomm Incorporated vs Apple Incorporated, Case No. 17CV2403 BAS NLS, Nov. 29, 2017, pp. 1-39.
Costello S., “iPhone 5 Hardware and Software Features”, LifeWire, Nov. 24, 2018, 12 Pages, https://www.lifewire.com/iphone-5-hardware-features-2000692.
Curriculum Vitae of Dr Andrew L.Sears , pp. 1-11.
Curriculum Vitae of Jacob O. Wobbrock, Oct. 9, 2018, pp. 1-25.
Declaration of Dr Andrew L. Sears for IPR2019-00112 against U.S. Pat. No. 8,683,362, pp. 1-83.
Declaration of Dr Andrew L. Sears, U.S. Pat. No. 8,683,362, U.S. Appl. No. 12/416,279, pp. 1-92.
Declaration of Jacob O. Wobbrock in Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response, Cases IPR2018-01252 & IPR2018-01253, Apple Inc. vs Qualcomm Incorporated, U.S. Pat. No. 8,683,362, 53 Pages.
Declaration of Jacob O. Wobbrock in Support of Patent Owner Response, Case IPR2018-01252, Apple Inc. vs Qualcomm Incorporated, U.S. Pat. No. 8,683,362, 32 Pages.
Declaration of Jacob O. Wobbrock, Qualcomm Exhibit 2009, Apple v. Qualcomm, IPR2018-01252, pp. 1-20.
Declaration of Richard Pravata, Qualcomm Exhibit 2008, Apple v. Qualcomm, IPR2018-01252, pp. 1-6.
Dillet R., “iOS 7 Steals Mailbox's Gestures, Sunrise's Layout, BB10's Back Button, WebOS's Multitasking”, TechCrunch, Jun. 10, 2013, 5 Pages, https://techcrunch.com/2013/06/10/ios-7-steals-mailboxs-gestures-sunrises-layout-bb10s-back-button-weboss-multitasking/.
Duffy J., “Which Devices Will Run iOS 7?”, PC Magazine, Sep. 13, 2013, 1 Page, https://www.pcmag.com/article/315782/which-devices-will-run ios-7.
Excerpts from the file history of the '362 Patent, 51 Pages.
Exhibit A-4, Invalidity Contentions for U.S. Pat. No. 8,683,362, Based on: The Safari Browser Application as Implemented in the iPhone 1st Gen. (“Safari System”), pp. 1-45.
FHPC, Civil Complaint; Wait for acceptance of the case; ZL201310491586.1; filed Mar. 8, 2019, pp. 1-24.
Fuzhou IP Tribunal, Case No. 1207; ZL200980118088.4; Qualcomm Incorporated versus Apple, Filed Nov. 15, 2017, 12 Pages.
Fuzhou IP Tribunal, Case No. 1208; ZL201310491586.1; Qualcomm Incorporated versus Apple, Filed Nov. 15, 2017, 14 Pages.
Grothaus M., “iOS 7: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly,” Know Your Mobile, Jun. 13, 2013, 15 Pages, https://www.knowyourmobile.com/apple/20445/ios-7-good-bad and-ugly.
Heisler Y., “iOS 7: Multitasking has a Brand-New Look”, Engadget, Sep. 18, 2013, available at https://www.engadget.com/2013/09/18/ios-7-multitasking-has a-brand-new-look/, pp. 1-7.
“iPhone 5—Technical Specifications”, Mar. 30, 2019, pp. 1-6, https://support.apple.com/kb/sp655.
“iPhone User Guide for iOS 7 Software”, pp. 1-154, https://images.comparecellular.com/phones/1994/Apple-iPhone-iOS-7-User-Guide.pdf.
Lomas N., “The iPhone X Reveals Why Tim Cook was So Mad About Palm”, TechCrunch, Sep. 13, 2017, pp. 1-3, https://techcrunch.com/2017/09/13/the-iphone-x-reveals-why-tim-cook-was-so-mad-about-palm/.
Mies G., et al., “Hands-On: A Closer Look at the Palm Pre and webOS”, PCWorld, Jan. 10, 2009, pp. 1-3, https://vww.pcworld.com/article/156861/palm_pre_webos.html.
Moren D., “Get to know iOS 7: Multitasking”, Macworld, Sep. 18, 2013, pp. 1-3, https://www.macworld.com/article/2048935/get-to-know-ios-7- multitasking.html.
“Multitasking in iOS 7,” iOS Guides, Jun. 12, 2013, pp. 1-7, https://iosguides.net/multitasking-ios-7/.
Orf D., “A Brief History of iOS,” Gizmodo, Jun. 7, 2016, 14 Pages, https://gizmodo.com/a-brief-history-of-ios1780790.
“Palm Pre CES Press Event”, published on Jan. 10, 2009, available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dw3cHOEnwTw, 1 Page.
Patel N., “CES 2009: All the Stuff (and more)”, Engadget, Jan. 12, 2009, pp. 1-7. https://www.engadget.com/2009/01/12/ces-2009-all-the-stuff and-more/.
PC World Editors: “Best Products of CES 2009: Let Us Introduce You”, PC World, Jan. 10, 2009, pp. 1-14, https://www.pcworld.com/article/156388/best_of_ces.html.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of United States Patent, Petition for IPR2019-00112 against U.S. Pat. No. 8,683,362, pp. 1-82.
Sears A., “Improving Touchscreen Keyboards: Design Issues and a Comparison with Other Devices”, Qualcomm Exhibit 2005, Apple v. Qualcomm, IPR2018-01252, pp. 1-19.
Sevilla G.C., “Palm's Best WebOS Features get ‘Adopted’ by Rival Mobile Operating Systems”, Calgary Herald, Jul. 17, 2013, pp. 1-3, http://www.calgaryherald.com/technology/Palm+best+webOS+f eatures+adopted+rival+mobile+operating+systems/8667242/stor y.html.
Singh T., “What Apple Copied from WebOS, Android, WP8, BB10 in iOS 7”, Geeknizer, Jun. 11, 2013, pp. 1-7, http://geeknizer.com/what-apple-copied-webos-android-wp8- bb10-in-ios-7/.
Sprint: “Palm® Pre™ Phone User Guide”, 2009, pp. 1-344, https://support.sprint.com/global/pdf/user_guides/palm/pre/palm _pre_ug.pdf.
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China Notification of Examination Decision for Invalidation Request, 4W104924, Aug. 10, 2016, 37 pages.
Supplemental Curriculum Vitae of Jacob O. Wobbrock, Jun. 4, 2019, pp. 1-26.
Thordarson B., “How to Close Apps and Multitask in iOS 7,” Scrubly, Nov. 16, 2013, pp. 1-5, https://www.scrubly.com/blog/how-to ios/how-to-close-apps-and-multitask-in-ios-7-video/.
Topolsky J., “Live from Palm's CES Press Conference”, Engadget, Jan. 8, 2009, pp. 1-61, https://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/live-from-palms-ces press-conference/.
Topolsky J., “Palm Pre: Everything You Ever Wanted to Know”, Engadget, Jan. 13, 2009, pp. 1-29, https://www.engadget.com/2009/01/13/palm-pre-everything you-ever-wanted-to-know/.
Transcript of Deposition of Dr. Andrew Sears, Case No. IPR2018-01252, Apple Inc. vs Qualcomm Incorporated, U.S. Pat. No. 8,683,362, May 22, 2019, pp. 1-81.
U.S. Dist Court Case No. 3:17-cv-2403-CAB-MDD—Apple Inc's Invalidity Contentions Dated May 10, 2018, 413 Pages.
USPTO Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc, Petitioner, and Qualcomm Incorporated, Patent Owner; IPR2018-01252; U.S. Pat. No. 8,683,362B2; Judgment; Jan. 22, 2020, pp. 1-36.
USPTO Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc, Petitioner, and Qualcomm Incorporated, Patent Owner; IPR2018-01253; U.S. Pat. No. 8,683,362B2; Decision Denying of Inter Partes Review; Feb. 28, 2019, pp. 1-24.
USPTO Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc, Petitioner, and Qualcomm Incorporated, Patent Owner; IPR2019-00112; U.S. Pat. No. 8,683,362B2; Decision Denying of Inter Partes Review; Apr. 11, 2019, pp. 1-14.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210041995 A1 Feb 2021 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12126145 May 2008 US
Child 13316004 US
Continuations (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 16865732 May 2020 US
Child 17077596 US
Parent 16112194 Aug 2018 US
Child 16865732 US
Parent 13932439 Jul 2013 US
Child 16112194 US
Parent 13316004 Dec 2011 US
Child 13932439 US