Disclosures of ammunition casings are provided, including ammunition casing having dimensional profiles optimized for polymeric ammunition.
Ammunition and the firearm that the ammunition is used in have to function together. In order to facilitate this, dimensions of ammunition and the firearm chambers that it has to function in are very tightly dimensionally controlled. A variety of organizations exist that provide standards in order to help assure smooth functioning of all ammunition in all weapons. Non-limiting examples of these organizations include the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers' Institute (SAAMI) in USA, the Commission Internationale Permanente pour l'épreuve des armes à feu portatives (CIP) in Europe, as well as various militaries around the globe ans transnational organizations such as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).
SAAMI is the preeminent North American organization maintaining and publishing standards for dimensions of ammunition and firearms. Typically, SAAMI and other regulating agencies will publish two drawings, one that shows the minimum (MIN) dimensions for the chamber (i.e. dimensions that the chamber cannot be smaller than), and one that shows the maximum (MAX) ammunition external dimensions (i.e. dimensions that the ammunition cannot exceed). The MIN chamber dimension is always larger than the MAX ammunition dimension, assuring that the ammunition round will fit inside the weapon chamber. All published SAAMI, NATO, US Department of Defense (US DOD) and CIP drawings are incorporated here by reference.
It is important to note that SAAMI compliance and standardization is voluntary. SAAMI does not regulate all possible calibers, especially those for which the primary use is military (for example, .50 BMG (12.7 mm) calibers are maintained by the US DOD), or the calibers which have not yet been submitted (wildcat rounds, obscure calibers, etc.)
In general, new cases developed for established calibers (for which chamber/ammunition drawings are published) have to follow the published external dimensions very closely in order to function in the maximum number of weapons. This has also been true for development of cases with alternative case materials, such as for example polymers (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,240,252 and 8,813,650, each of which are incorporated herein by reference). Polymer cases have been an active area of research for a number of years as they offer advantages in areas such as ammunition weight and accuracy. The current invention provides ammunition casings having dimensional profiles optimized for polymeric ammunition.
The disclosure is directed generally to ammunition casings being dimensioned and configured for manufacture by polymeric materials.
In some embodiments the polymeric ammunition casing includes:
In other embodiments the longitudinal length of the neck portion of the polymeric ammunition casing exceeds a maximum longitudinal neck portion length standard for an ammunition casing of comparable caliber as set by at least one ammunition standards organization. In some such embodiments the at least one ammunition standards organization is selected from the group of the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers' Institute, the Commission Internationale Permanente pour l'épreuve des armes à feu portatives, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and the US Department of Defense. In other such embodiments, the longitudinal length of the neck portion of the polymeric ammunition casing exceeds a maximum longitudinal neck portion length standard for an ammunition casing of comparable caliber as set by at least one ammunition standards organization by at least 0.003 inches. In still other such embodiments, the longitudinal length of the neck portion of the polymeric ammunition casing exceeds a maximum longitudinal neck portion length standard for an ammunition casing of comparable caliber as set by at least one ammunition standards organization by from at least 0.020 inches. In yet other such embodiments, the longitudinal length of the neck portion of the polymeric ammunition casing exceeds a maximum longitudinal neck portion length standard for an ammunition casing of comparable caliber as set by at least one ammunition standards organization by from at least 0.050 inches.
In still other embodiments the longitudinal length of the neck portion of the polymeric ammunition casing is sufficient such that, when the ammunition casing is disposed within a firing chamber, the neck portion of the ammunition casing extends into the free bore portion of a firing chamber, but does not extend into the caliber-size portion of the firing chamber.
In yet other embodiments, the ammunition casing has a caliber selected from the group of .22, .22-250, .223, .243, .25-06, .264, .270, .277, .300, .30-30, .30-40, 30.06, .303, .308, .357, .38, .40, .44, .45, .45-70, .50 BMG, 5.45 mm, 5.56 mm, 6.5 mm, 6.8 mm, 7 mm, 7.62 mm, 8 mm, 9 mm, 10 mm, 12.7 mm, 14.5 mm, 20 mm, 25 mm, 30 mm, and 40 mm.
In still yet other embodiments at least the neck portion and a portion of the body portion are formed of a polymeric material.
In still yet other embodiments the polymeric material is selected from the group consisting of siloxane-modified Bisphenol-A polycarbonates, polycarbonates containing biphenyl linkages, and polyphenylsulfones.
In still yet other embodiments the ammunition casing further includes a cylindrical strip of a polymeric material disposed within the internal cavity of the ammunition casing along at least a portion of the neck portion of said ammunition casing. In some such embodiments the cylindrical strip of polymeric material overlaps at least the portion of the neck portion of the ammunition casing that engages the cannelure of a projectile. In other such embodiments the hollow cylindrical strip is formed of the same polymeric material as the ammunition casing.
Additional embodiments and features are set forth in part in the description that follows, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the specification or may be learned by the practice of the invention. A further understanding of the nature and advantages of the present invention may be realized by reference to the remaining portions of the specification and the drawings, which forms a part of this disclosure.
The description will be more fully understood with reference to the following figures and data graphs, which are presented as exemplary embodiments of the invention and should not be construed as a complete recitation of the scope of the invention, wherein:
Turning now to the drawings, polymeric ammunition casings dimensioned for optimal fit within a firearm chamber are provided. In many embodiments the polymeric ammunition casings have a neck portion elongated in comparison to conventional brass casings of a comparable caliber. In some embodiments, the elongated neck portion of the ammunition casing extends into the free bore of the firing chamber. In still other embodiments the neck portion of the ammunition casing extends at least 0.003″ beyond the MAX recommended dimension for particular caliber to a maximum extension length at which the neck would engage the caliber-sized bore. In yet other embodiments the neck extension may be combined with a cylindrical shaped polymeric insert that protrudes into the internal cavity of the case.
As shown in
A weapon's cartridge chamber supports the majority of the cartridge casing wall in the radial direction, but, in many weapons, a portion of the cartridge base end (16) is unsupported. During firing, a stress profile is developed along the cartridge casing, the greatest stresses being concentrated in and around the base end. Therefore, the cartridge base end must possess the greatest mechanical strength, while a gradual decrease in material strength is acceptable in metal cartridges axially along the casing toward the end that receives the projectile (17). As discussed in the “Background” conventional brass cases and brass case manufacturers follow the recommended MAX dimensions set for by standard setting organizations like SAMMI, CIP, NATO and the US DOD. These dimensions also include specifications for other important cartridge attributes, such as headspace dimension, maximum diameters at various locations, hardness values, tolerances for all of the dimensions and possibly performance specifications such as peak chamber pressure, projectile velocities, action times, etc. It has now been discovered that the optimal external cartridge dimensions for polymeric cases differ quite significantly from the dimensions specified by the ammo/chamber specifications provided by the standard setting organizations. Accordingly, many embodiments are directed to ammunition casings configured specifically for polymeric materials.
Many embodiments are directed to polymeric ammunition casings having a neck portion that is elongated longitudinally when compared to conventional brass ammunition cases. Exemplary embodiments of such polymeric ammunition casings having such elongated neck geometries are presented schematically in
There are many ways of quantifying the elongation of the neck region required to obtain optimal fit and integrity for polymeric casings. In some embodiments, as shown in
Another way of establishing the relative lengths of ammunition casings is to describe their relative engagement within the firing chamber (24) of a weapon. In some embodiments, as shown in
Similar results were obtained in all the calibers tested, including 7.62 mm/0.308. The principle is operative for all cartridges that have the neck portions and all calibers. Many different types of ammunition articles are provided by the present invention. For example, polymeric cases that meet design guidelines of the invention may be used to produce ammunition components for various calibers of firearms. Non limiting examples include, for example, .22, .22-250, .223, .243, .25-06, .264, .270, .277, .300, .30-30, .30-40, 30.06, .303, .308, .357, .38, .40, .44, .45, .45-70, .50 BMG, 5.45 mm, 5.56 mm, 6.5 mm, 6.8 mm, 7 mm, 7.62 mm, 8 mm, 9 mm, 10 mm, 12.7 mm, 14.5 mm, 20 mm, 25 mm, 30 mm, 40 mm and others. Accordingly, in many embodiments polymeric ammunition casings are provided having a neck region that is elongated by a minimum of 0.003″ in a longitudinal direction. In other embodiments, the neck portion is longitudinally elongated by at least 0.020″, and in yet other embodiments the neck portion is elongated by at least 0.050″ in the longitudinal direction.
In other embodiments a ledge or protrusion of polymeric material maybe disposed within the internal cavity of the casing to further improve the fit and integrity of polymeric ammunition casings. In such embodiments, as shown in
For the purposes of this disclosure, a “polymeric” ammunition casing refers to a casing wherein at least the neck portion and a portion of the body portion of the casing are formed from a polymeric material. Although any polymeric material suitable for use in ammunition articles, such as ammunition casings may be incorporated into embodiments of the casings, some exemplary materials include but are not limited to siloxane-modified Bisphenol-A polycarbonates (S-PC, for example, provided under the Trademark Lexan® EXL 9330 by General Electric Company-GE Plastics); polycarbonates containing biphenyl linkages (B-PC, for example, provided under the Trademark Makrolon® DP1-1848 by Bayer Polymers LLC of Pittsburgh Pa., and polyphenylsulfones (PPSU, for example, provided under the Trademark Radel® R-5700 NT, by Solvay Advanced Polymers, LLC of Alpharetta, Ga.). Additional, non limiting examples of suitable polymeric materials can be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,240,252 and 8,813,650, each of which are incorporated herein by reference.
It should be generally understood throughout this patent and the above description that all items are attached to relevant adjacent items by some means commensurate with the materials of which they are. While the above description contains many specificities, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention, but rather as an exemplification of preferred embodiments thereof. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be determined not by the embodiment(s), but by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.
The current application claims priority to U.S. Provisional App. No. 61/926,795, filed Jan. 13, 2014, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2455080 | Miller | Nov 1948 | A |
3060856 | Dunn | Oct 1962 | A |
3144827 | Boutwell | Aug 1964 | A |
3175901 | Jesmont et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
3485170 | Scanlon | Dec 1969 | A |
3609904 | Scanlon | Oct 1971 | A |
3675576 | Whitney | Jul 1972 | A |
3745924 | Scanlon | Jul 1973 | A |
3749023 | Kawaguchi et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3989017 | Reece | Nov 1976 | A |
3989792 | San Miguel | Nov 1976 | A |
3990366 | Scanlon | Nov 1976 | A |
4065437 | Blinne et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4108837 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4147107 | Ringdal | Apr 1979 | A |
4157684 | Clausser | Jun 1979 | A |
4175175 | Johnson et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4228218 | Takayanagi et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4308847 | Ruizzo | Jan 1982 | A |
4326462 | Garcia et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4565131 | Buchner | Jan 1986 | A |
4569288 | Grelle et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4574703 | Halverson | Mar 1986 | A |
4614157 | Grelle et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4711271 | Weisenbarger et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4726296 | Leshner et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4809612 | Ballreich et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4839435 | Gergen et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4867065 | Kaltmann et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4897448 | Romance | Jan 1990 | A |
4958567 | Olson | Sep 1990 | A |
4969386 | Sandstrom et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5033386 | Vatsvog | Jul 1991 | A |
5062343 | Sjoberg et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5129382 | Stamps et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5151555 | Vatsvog | Sep 1992 | A |
5161512 | Adam et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5175040 | Harpell et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5190018 | Costello et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5196252 | Harpell | Mar 1993 | A |
5227457 | Marrocco, III et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5259288 | Vatsvog | Nov 1993 | A |
5404913 | Gilligan | Apr 1995 | A |
5434224 | McGrail et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5471905 | Martin | Dec 1995 | A |
5496893 | Gagne et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5512630 | Gagne et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5519094 | Tseng et al. | May 1996 | A |
5539048 | Gagne et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5558765 | Twardzik | Sep 1996 | A |
5565543 | Marrocco et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5585450 | Oaks et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5616650 | Becker et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625010 | Gagne et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5637226 | Adam et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5646231 | Marrocco, III et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5646232 | Marrocco, III et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5654392 | Marrocco, III et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5659005 | Marrocco, III et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5668245 | Marrocco et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5670564 | Gagne et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5691401 | Morita et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5721335 | Marrocco, III et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5731400 | Marrocco, III et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5755095 | Maurer | May 1998 | A |
5756581 | Marrocco, III et al. | May 1998 | A |
5760131 | Marrocco, III et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5770815 | Watson | Jun 1998 | A |
5789521 | Marrocco, III et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5822904 | Beal | Oct 1998 | A |
5824744 | Gagne et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827527 | Leonard | Oct 1998 | A |
5827927 | Gagne et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5830945 | Gagne et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5869592 | Gagne et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5886130 | Trimmer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5976437 | Marrocco, III et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6087467 | Marrocco, III et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6135097 | Ruizzo, Jr. et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6228970 | Savariar | May 2001 | B1 |
6283035 | Olson et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6367441 | Hoshiba et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6387985 | Wilkinson et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6441099 | Connell et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6525125 | Giardello et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6528145 | Berger et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6586554 | Takahashi | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6630538 | Ellul et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6752084 | Husseini et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6845716 | Husseini et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7610858 | Chung | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7992498 | Ruhlman et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8240252 | Maljkovic et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8408137 | Battaglia | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8443730 | Padgett | May 2013 | B2 |
8561543 | Burrow | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8763535 | Padgett | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8813650 | Maljkovic et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8869702 | Padgett | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9032855 | Foren et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
9182204 | Maljkovic et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9188412 | Maljkovic et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9335137 | Maljkovic et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9395165 | Maljkovic et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
20010013299 | Husseini et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020035946 | Jamison et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030019385 | LeaSure et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030131751 | MacKerell et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030181603 | Venderbosch et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040096539 | McCaffrey et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040211668 | Montminy et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050005807 | Wiley et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050016414 | Leitner-Wise | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050049355 | Tang et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050066805 | Park et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050188879 | Wiley et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060013977 | Duke et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060056958 | Gaines et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069236 | Brunelle et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060102041 | Wiley et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060105183 | Chu et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060207464 | Maljkovic et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070172677 | Biermann et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070261587 | Chung | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080017026 | Dondlinger et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090211483 | Kramer et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100016518 | El-Hibri et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100282112 | Battaglia | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110214583 | Dutch | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120052222 | Gagne | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120111219 | Burrow et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120180687 | Padgett et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120180688 | Padgett | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130014664 | Padgett et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130014665 | Maljkovic et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130186294 | Davies et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140060372 | Padgett et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140060373 | Maljkovic et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140076188 | Maljkovic et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140290522 | Padgett et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150033970 | Maljkovic et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150047527 | Padgett | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150285604 | Bosarge et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160025464 | Maljkovic et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160040970 | Maljkovic et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160216088 | Maljkovic et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2705235 | Aug 1978 | DE |
4015542 | Nov 1991 | DE |
222827 | May 1991 | EP |
436111 | Jul 1991 | EP |
861071 | Jan 1941 | FR |
672706 | May 1952 | GB |
732633 | Jun 1955 | GB |
1568545 | May 1980 | GB |
8300213 | Jan 1983 | WO |
8606466 | Nov 1986 | WO |
8907496 | Aug 1989 | WO |
9207024 | Apr 1992 | WO |
9513516 | May 1995 | WO |
9839250 | Sep 1998 | WO |
2008090505 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2013016730 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2015130409 | Sep 2015 | WO |
2015154079 | Oct 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2015/0011238, Completed Sep. 1, 2015, Mailed Sep. 30, 2015, 10 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2015/011238, issued Jul. 19, 2016, Mailed Jul. 29, 2016, 2016, 9 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2008/072810, completed Oct. 19, 2008, 9 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2015/024528, Completed Jun. 16, 2015, Mailed Jul. 8, 2015, 7 pgs. |
IPRP for International Application No. PCT/US2012/048848, Search Completed Jan. 28, 2014, 7 pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application EP12817294.7, Report completed Aug. 12, 2014, Mailed Aug. 19, 2014, 7 Pgs. |
“A Guide to Polycarbonate in General”, Engineering Polymer Specialists Polymer Technology & Services, LLC, pp. 1-5. |
“Development Product Makrolon® DPI-1848, Polycarbonate Copolymer Resin General Purpose Grade”, Bayer Polymers, May 2003, pp. 1-4. |
“GE Plastics, Lexan® EXL9330 Americas: Commercial”, General Electric Company, Sep. 29, 2004, pp. 1-5. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2012/048848, completed Oct. 12, 2012, 8 pgs. |
“Low Temperature Notched Izod Impact of RADEL R-5xxx Resins”, File No. 2803, Solvay Advanced Polymers, L.L.C., Jan. 7, 1999, 1 pg. |
“Preliminary Product Data, RTP 1899A X 83675 Polycarbonate/Acrylic Alloy (PC/PMMA) Thin Wall Grade”, RTP Company Product Data Sheet, available at http://www.rtpcompany.com/info/data/1800A/RTP1899AX83675.htm, printed, Mar. 7, 2005, 5 pgs. |
“Standard Test Methods for Determining the Izod Pendulum Impact Resistance of Plastics,1”, ASTM Designation: D256-00, Jan. 2001, pp. 1-19. |
Baldwin et al., “A microcellular processing study of poly(ethylene terephthalate) in the amorphous and semicrystalline states. Pat I : microcell nucleation”, Society of Plastics Engineers, Polymer Engingeering and Science (1996), vol. 36 (11), pp. 1437-1445. |
Naitove, “Self-reinforcing thermoplastic is harder, stronger, stiffer without added fibers”, Plastics Technology, Gardner Publication Inc., Jul. 2003, 2 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150316361 A1 | Nov 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61926795 | Jan 2014 | US |