Latin name: Prunus persica.
Varietal denomination: ‘A-662CN’.
A new and distinct nectarine tree named ‘A-662CN’ is described herein. The new cultivar originated from a hand-pollinated cross of ‘A-421CN’ nectarine (female parent; unreleased breeding selection) x ‘A-334CN’ nectarine (male parent; unreleased breeding selection) made in 1993. The seeds resulting from this controlled hybridization were germinated and grown in a greenhouse during the winter of 1993-94 and were planted in an orchard near Clarksville, Arkansas. This new cultivar was selected in 1997 for its potential as a fresh-market nectarine in Arkansas and the mid- to upper-southern United States. ‘A-662CN’ can be distinguished by its yellow, standard-acid, firm flesh, early-season ripening, high soluble solids content, outstanding flavor, good postharvest performance, and moderate tolerance to bacterial spot.
The new and distinct nectarine cultivar originated from a hand-pollinated cross of ‘A-421CN’ nectarine (female parent; unreleased breeding selection) x ‘A-334CN’ nectarine (male parent; unreleased breeding selection) made in 1993 near Clarksville, AR. The seeds resulting from this controlled hybridization were germinated in a greenhouse during the winter of 1993-94 and planted in a field near Clarksville, AR. The seedlings fruited during the summer of 1997, and one nectarine seedling, designated ‘A-662CN’, was selected for its yellow, standard-acid, firm flesh, early-season ripening, high soluble solids content, outstanding flavor, good postharvest performance, and moderate tolerance to bacterial spot.
The original plant selection was propagated asexually during 1993 at the above-noted location by budding onto the standard peach rootstock cultivar ‘Guardian’® (BY520-9; U.S. Plant Variety Protection No. 9,400,013) and a test plot of two plants was established. Subsequently, a larger test planting was established with asexually multiplied plants near Clarksville, Arkansas in 2016 and 2019. Propagation for the larger replicated trials were also budded onto the standard peach rootstock cultivar ‘Guardian’® from buds collected at the original Clarksville, AR test plot. No incompatibility with peach rootstocks has occurred following budding. During all asexual multiplication, the characteristics of the original plant have been maintained and no aberrant phenotypes have appeared.
The new cultivar has been named ‘A-662CN’.
The accompanying photographs show typical specimens of the new cultivar in color as nearly true as it is reasonably possible to make in a color illustration of this character.
‘A-662CN’ and both of its parents, ‘A-421CN’ and ‘A-334CN’, produce clingstone, non- melting flesh fruit with standard acidity. Both aforementioned parents and the new cultivar are of the genus and species Prunus persica. Plants and fruit of this new cultivar also differ phenotypically from its parents. ‘A-662CN’ differs from its male parent, ‘A-421CN’, in that ‘A-421CN’ had high occurrence of fruit crack after rain events, and ‘A-662CN’ generally maintains good quality after rain. Fruit from ‘A-421CN’ also was prone to having a pronounced pointed (mucron) tip, which is an undesirable trait for fresh-market nectarines, whereas ‘A-662CN’ generally has well-formed, rounded fruit. ‘A-662CN’ differs from the female parent, ‘A-334CN’, in that ‘A-662CN’ received higher and more consistent breeder ratings for fruit flavor and appearance. The average ripening date of ‘A-662CN’ in Clarksville, AR, is one week earlier than ‘Amoore Sweet’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 26,367) and ‘Bowden’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 26,402), similar to ‘Bradley’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 12,620), a few days to one week later than ‘Arrington’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 12,641), and typically about two weeks later than ‘Westbrook’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 12,622).
Trees of the new cultivar are vigorous, productive, standard in size, well-branched and symmetrical with a semi-upright growth habit, comparable to other nectarine trees. Tree size and form is comparable to that of the ‘Amoore Sweet’ and ‘Effie’ cultivars in west-central Arkansas. Trees express a moderate level of resistance to both foliar and fruit infection of bacterial spot [Xanthomonas campestris pv. pruni (Smith) Dye]. The new cultivar blooms in the spring on approximately the same date as ‘Bradley’, four days later than ‘Amoore Sweet’, and about one day later than ‘Arrington’, ‘Bowden’, ‘Effie’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 31,192), and ‘Westbrook’. No winter cold injury was observed on wood or buds of the new cultivar in Arkansas tests between 2012 and 2020 where minimum temperatures reached 2° F. (−17° C.) during evaluation. However, significant bud damage was observed in spring 2021 after low temperatures reached −15° F. (−26° C.) in February 2021. Chilling requirement to break dormancy is estimated to be 800 hours below 45° F. (7° C.).
Fruit of the new cultivar ripens mid-early-season, averaging one to two weeks later than ‘Westbrook’, four days later than ‘Arrington’, and two to three weeks earlier than ‘Effie’ reference cultivars. The average first ripening date is July 1 in west-central Arkansas (Clarksville). Fruit yields have been fair and are comparable to the nectarine cultivar ‘Arrington’.
The fruit is round in shape. Fruits are attractive with an average 63% light red blush. The average fruit finish rating of ‘A-662CN’ was 7.0, higher than the comparison cultivars ‘Amoore Sweet’, ‘Bowden’, ‘Effie’, and ‘Westbrook’. The flesh of the fruit is yellow in color with no red flecking or discoloration. Flesh is of the non-melting type, crisp at early ripening and remains crisp fully ripe. The fruit is a clingstone, and the flesh does not separate cleanly from the pit. Fruit size is small to medium, averaging 145 g, slightly larger than the early-ripening comparison cultivars ‘Arrington’ (133 g) and ‘Westbrook’ (124 g), and smaller than ‘Amoore Sweet’ (166 g), ‘Bowden’ (163 g), ‘Bradley’ (181 g), and ‘Effie’ (160 g). The fresh fruit has excellent yellow nectarine flavor and was rated highly in evaluations. Fruits average 14.9% soluble solids, higher than ‘Amoore Sweet’, ‘Bowden’, ‘Bradley’, and ‘Westbrook’, but lower than ‘Effie’. The acidity level of ‘A-662CN’ was 0.67-0.81% malic acid, which was higher than ‘Amoore Sweet’ and lower than ‘Westbrook’ on average. The overall flavor of ‘A-662CN’ is sweet with standard acidity and noteworthy tropical-like aromatics.
The following is a detailed description of the botanical and pomological characteristics of the subject nectarine. Color data are presented in Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart designations (1986, 2nd edition). Where dimensions, sizes, colors and other characteristics are given, it is to be understood that such characteristics are approximations of averages set forth as. accurately as practical.
Plants used for botanical data were fifteen years old and grown on a fine sandy loam soil with trickle irrigation near Clarksville, AR. Trees were trained to an open-center training system and dormant pruned annually. The exception to this is that yield data was collected on trees four years old and trained to a perpendicular V training system. Fruits on all trees were thinned to approximately 6-8 inches between fruits 4-5 weeks after full bloom. The trees were fertilized near budbreak (late March on average) with complete or nitrogen fertilizer. Weeds were controlled with pre- and postemergence herbicides. Routine commercial fungicide and insecticide applications were made to the trees. No bactericides were applied to plantings during testing before fall 2018. Beginning in fall 2018, copper was applied twice annually during dormancy and delayed dormancy to reduce inoculum of bacterial canker (Pseudomonas syringae pv. persicae) and bacterial spot (Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni). The descriptions reported herein are from specimens grown near Clarksville, AR.
The outstanding characteristics of ‘A-662CN’ are its early-season ripening, high soluble solids content, outstanding flavor, yellow, standard-acid, non-melting flesh, and moderate resistance to bacterial spot.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PP12620 | Clark et al. | May 2002 | P2 |
PP12622 | Clark et al. | May 2002 | P2 |
PP12641 | Clark et al. | May 2002 | P2 |
PP15159 | Clark et al. | Sep 2004 | P3 |
PP17742 | Clark et al. | May 2007 | P3 |
PP17911 | Clark et al. | Aug 2007 | P3 |
PP22464 | Clark et al. | Jan 2012 | P3 |
PP26367 | Clark et al. | Feb 2016 | P3 |
PP26402 | Clark et al. | Feb 2016 | P3 |
PP26920 | Clark | Jul 2016 | P3 |
PP31192 | Worthington et al. | Dec 2019 | P2 |
PP35017 | Clark et al. | Feb 2023 | P2 |
PP35897 | Clark et al. | Jun 2024 | P3 |
Entry |
---|
Beckman, T. G., et al. “Peach tree short life.” Southeastern peach growers handbook. University of Georgia, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences. Cooperative Extension Service, Athens (2004): 199-205. |
Ghiani, A., et al. “Melting of ‘Big Top’ nectarine fruit: Some physiological, biochemical, and molecular aspects.” Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 136.1 (2011): 61-68. |
Plant Variety Protection 9400013. Peach BY520-9. Issued Jun. 14, 2001. |
Sandefur, P. et al. “Peach texture.” Horticultural Reviews vol. 41 (2013): 241-302. |
Vauterin, L., et al. “Reclassification of xanthomonas.” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 45.3 (1995): 472-489. |
Worthington, M. and Clark, J.R. Peach breeding at the University of Arkansas. Acta Hortic. (2021). 1304, 21-28. |