The present invention relates to medical needles (such as hypodermic needles, catheter insertion needles or cannulae, or other sharp-tipped hollow or solid cannulae) and, more particularly, to needle guards to protect users and others from the sharp tip of the needle after withdrawal from a patient.
A variety of different needle guards have been developed or proposed to protect, i.e., to enclose or otherwise shield, sharp needle tips in recognition of the need to reduce or eliminate accidental needle-sticks. Some needle guards include a housing to enclose essentially the entire needle shaft and needle tip, such as the PROTECTIV Safety I.V. Catheter being marketed by Medex, Inc., the assignee hereof. Others include a clip that moves along the needle shaft to enclose the tip after use, such as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,652,486. Still other needle guards provide a housing that moves along the needle shaft with an enclosed active element to secure a distal portion of the needle with the tip inside the housing. Particularly advantageous forms of these needle guards include as the active element a canted-plate as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,322,517.
In the canted-plate device of the '517 patent, a housing is provided through which the needle passes. Within the housing, a canting plate is defined by a wall with an aperture to slidably receive the needle shaft therethrough in a first state but which grips or bites into the needle shaft in a second, tilted or canted state relative to the first position. A second wall is connected to the first wall via an intermediate wall to define a generally rigid, single piece clip. The second wall includes a portion to ride along the needle shaft to hold the clip in the first state. When the needle tip is pulled into the housing and past the second wall portion, the clip can tilt into the second state such that the canting plate grips the needle shaft to prevent the needle from being pulled any further. Also, the second wall blocks the needle tip to prevent the needle from being pushed back out of the housing. A biasing spring is provided, bearing against the first wall, to urge the clip to the second state. The clip second and intermediate walls are to one side of the needle shaft in the first state with the spring to the other side of the needle shaft. While the clip design of the '517 patent has many advantages, further improvements and enhancements are desired.
One attempt to build upon the clip design of the '517 patent is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,280,419 which includes features intended to allow use of the clip with a guide wire. What is understood to be a commercial embodiment of the device of the '419 patent is the Arrow Radial Artery Catheterization device. The commercial embodiment is believed to have drawbacks including that its design also imposes significant drag force on the needle shaft, which make it difficult and undesirable to use.
Further, some needle guards are intended to be used with catheter assemblies. With such needle guards, it is advantageous to have a portion of the needle guard hold to the catheter hub while the needle projects out of the catheter tube, but to thereafter allow for ready removal of the needle guard upon withdrawal of the needle to the tip-protected position. One proposal is to provide a nose section of the needle guard with a pair of cooperating members extending from the needle guard housing. The cooperating members are sized to fit within the catheter hub and to normally define a passageway between the members, which is sized to slidably receive a needle shaft therethrough. One or both of the members has a detent at its distal end receivable in a respective radially outwardly extending recess formed in the interior wall of the catheter hub. The detent gives the member(s) the appearance of a duckbill. As will be appreciated, at least the distal portion of the catheter hub interior surface is tapered to female luer standards. The recess will be distal of the luer tapered surface and, when in the catheter hub, the detent(s) normally fit within the recess. When the needle shaft is removed from the passageway, one or both of the duckbill members is able to easily flex such that a slight tug on the housing causes the duckbill to yield against the recess allowing the needle guard to begin to come away from the catheter hub. But when the needle shaft is present, flexing of the members is limited such that the holding force is very high. The detents define an outer diameter of the duckbills sized to fit within the radially outwardly extending recesses. The inner diameter of the luer tapered surface, however, is smaller over a significant portion of its distal extent than the duckbill outer diameter. As a consequence, the duckbill members will remain flexed and will drag or scrape against the catheter hub interior surface during continued removal, which results in a feel and higher removal forces than might be desired by the medical practitioner.
The Arrow Radial Artery Catheterization device is an example of a duckbill design. But, the needle guard housing thereof cannot rotate relative to the catheter hub. Each duckbill detent has its own, limited circumferential length recess in the catheter hub, which thus holds the duckbill against rotation. It is often desirable to be able to rotate the needle guard housing relative to the catheter hub. As an example, it may be useful to rotate the components to thread the catheter tube into the patient. One proposed solution is to provide a continuous radially outwardly extending annular groove in the catheter hub such that the duckbill detent(s) may rotate therein as discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,221,047. But, in addition to the scraping problems mentioned above, a complete circumferential annular groove or recess in the catheter hub is believed to present manufacturing and product performance issues. Even one of the named inventors of the aforementioned '047 patent seemingly recognized the latter problem, and so subsequently proposed to go with the limited length recess such that the detent(s) would be inhibited from rotation within the catheter hub as discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,689,102. There is thus still a need for a viable rotatable solution for the duckbill, as well as a need to reduce or eliminate the problem produced by the scraping of the detents with the inner surface of the catheter hub during removal.
In accordance with one of the principles of the present invention, there are provided canting-plate needle guards that have desired improvements and enhancements as compared to prior canted-plate designs. To that end, in one aspect, the needle guard includes a spring member, which may be a leaf spring, extending from the first wall past an edge of the intermediate wall, which may be defined by one or two struts, and into operative engagement with a bearing surface, with the extending portion of the spring member and the intermediate wall advantageously being to the same side of the needle. The bearing surface may be defined in or by a housing which contains the clip and spring member. The spring member and its operative relationship with the clip and/or the housing is believed to provide the appropriate biasing of the clip in a low profile and without imposing undue drag forces between the clip second wall portion and the needle shaft.
In a second aspect, the strut(s), i.e., the intermediate wall, advantageously extends from the first wall at an angle of less than 90 degrees relative to the first wall, and more advantageously, at an angle of between about 83 and about 87 degrees. That angling allows for an increase in the degree of clip rotation before gripping to the needle shaft to more reliably block or cap the needle tip. In a third aspect, a stylus is provided at the second wall to bear against the needle shaft thereby providing a smooth surface and reducing drag on the needle while also improving the tactile and audible feel and behavior of the needle guard. In a fourth aspect, the second wall may be generally L-shaped to define a lip at a free end which projects toward the first wall. The lip is disposed on one side of the needle shaft in the first state of the clip and assists in confining or capping the needle tip in the second state of the clip. The stylus may be a coined portion of the L-shaped wall.
In a fifth aspect, a heel extends from the first wall, with the heel and first wall disposed to opposite sides of the intermediate wall or strut. A ledge is provided with the heel abutting the ledge in the first state of the clip and pivoting about the ledge as the clip moves from the first state to the second state to thereby enhance its performance.
It will be appreciated that were the needle shaft to deflect in response to the force of the grip of the first wall, the shaft would seek to align with the aperture of the first wall, thus reducing the grip. To this end, in a sixth aspect, a needle support is fixedly positioned adjacent a plane transverse to a cylinder defined by the needle shaft so as to limit deflection of the needle shaft when the needle tip has been pulled into the needle guard. Thus, in the second state of the clip, the tendency of the needle shaft to flex is minimized by the needle support.
In addition to the foregoing aspects of the present invention, which can be used independently or in any desired combination, the present invention provides improvements to needle guards which can be used not only with canting-plate clips but with other needle guard designs as well. By way of example, needles or catheter assemblies with needles are usually provided with a protective sheath to enclose at least the needle tip and to overlie at least a portion of the needle guard prior to use. Gripping the needle hub to which the needle is affixed and the sheath portion overlying the needle guard to pull the sheath off could lead to inadvertent activation or removal of the needle guard from the catheter hub, thereby rendering the device unfit for use. One proposed solution is to provide a shroud on the needle hub that substantially encloses the needle guard when the needle hub is adjacent thereto. Thus, if the sheath portion overlying the needle guard is gripped, the force thereof will be transmitted to the shroud, rather than the needle guard, to reduce the likelihood of inadvertently activating the needle guard or pulling the needle guard loose from the catheter hub. That shroud, however, interferes with ready removal of the needle from the catheter in use. To that end, in accordance with another principle of the present invention, a split shroud is provided which overlies opposed portions of the needle guard but leaves another portion, such as finger tab thereof, exposed through the split shroud so as to allow for ready removal of the needle from the catheter in use.
In accordance with a yet further principle of the present invention, it is desired to hold the needle hub and needle guard from rotation before the needle guard is deployed so as to add stability when beginning a needle stick. To this end, cooperating structure, such as a lug with a non-circular periphery and a non-circular periphery recess, are provided on the respective confronting faces of the needle hub and needle guard. The cooperating structure engages when the needle hub is adjacent the needle guard, to thus hold them against relative rotation. As the components move apart, however, the cooperating structure no longer engages, thus allowing for such rotation.
In accordance with a still further principle of the present invention, and in particular for use with a catheter assembly, an improved needle guard duckbill catheter hub release mechanism is provided in which there is relative rotation between the needle guard and the catheter hub and without disadvantageous scraping during removal. To that end, an annular radially inwardly extending rib is provided in the catheter hub for selective engagement by the detent(s) of the extending cooperating members, rather than a radially outwardly extending recess or groove. The rib is distal of the luer tapered portion of the catheter hub interior surface, and the duckbill detents may be sized so as not to unduly scrape against the catheter hub interior on removal, yet to hold behind the rib prior to removal. The rib, which may be continuous or have gaps therein, presents advantages in manufacture and in performance of the device over the recesses or grooves characteristic of prior duckbill release mechanisms.
By virtue of the foregoing, individually and in various combinations, there are thus provided canting-plate needle guards that have improvements and enhancements as compared to prior canted-plate design. Also, by virtue of the foregoing, individually and in various combinations, there are thus also provided improvements to needle guards which can be used not only with canting-plate clips, but with other needle guard designs as well. These and other objects and advantages of the present invention shall be made apparent from the accompanying drawings and the description thereof.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention, and together with the general description of the invention given above, and the detailed description of the embodiments given below, serve to explain the principles of the present invention.
FIGS. 2A′ and 2B′ are detail views of portions of
With reference to
Although clip 12 is depicted in
Although spring member 14 could take any desired form of stored energy device, such as a coil or other wound spring, compressible foam substance or other material, or a compressible bladder, by ways of example, it will be described herein in the advantageous form of a leaf spring having a first end 40 with an opening 41 associated with an inner surface 42 of clip first wall 16 so as to overlie aperture 18 thereof, and having an elongated leaf 44 extending from the first wall 16 past the edges 27, 28 of struts 24, 26 through aperture 32 to a free end 46 of the leaf 44. Spring member 14 could be an integral part of clip 12, such that first end 40 is part of first wall 16 with leaf 44 extending therefrom. In that case, leaf 44 is advantageously thinner and more resilient than first wall 16 for purposes hereinafter to be described. Or, as shown in
With reference to
Clip 12 is situated within housing 60 such that aperture 18 is generally aligned along the longitudinal axis 65 of needle cannula 52, which axis is also defined between openings 62 and 64 of housing 60 and such that spring member 14 extends into operative engagement with a bearing surface 68 defined, for example, along an inner wall 70 of housing 60. Leaf 44 of spring member 14 and intermediate wall 22 are thus to the same side of needle shaft 56. Clip 12 has a first state, shown in
Spring member 14 biases clip 12 to cant first wall 16 proximally toward a second state shown in
As seen particularly in
In the second position of needle 52, with clip 12 in the second state, it will be appreciated that there is a flexing force on the distal tip end 58 of needle 52 which attempts to align that portion of needle shaft 56 with aperture 18. Were the shaft 56 to flex in that manner, there could be a reduction or loss of bite of periphery 18′ on shaft 56, such that needle 52 might be able to be pulled proximally out of needle guard 50. To reduce that possibility, a needle support 80 is provided adjacent a plane 82 extending transverse, and possibly tangent, to the cylinder 84 defined by needle shaft 56 in the first position thereof (see
Housing 60 has a barrel or canister proximal portion 94 and a distal cap portion 96. Canister portion 94 includes inner wall 70 (and rib 91′ if provided) and back wall 98 with opening 62 and a mouth 100 sized to matingly receive cap 96 thereto. Cap 96 includes opening 64, and is advantageously secured to mouth 100 of canister 94, such as by snap-fit, press-fit, and/or adhesive or ultrasonic welding. Canister 94 and cap 96 may have any desired cross-sectional shape, such as generally circular, such that housing 60 is generally cylindrical. Advantageously, the cross-sectional shape is rectangular by flattening opposed aspects thereof (as seen in
The foregoing construction and relationship of the components is believed to provide a needle guard that has very low drag forces, such that the tactile and audible sensations thereof are acceptable to the medical practitioner (not shown), while at the same time providing reliable protection of tip 58 thereby minimizing risk of accidental needle sticks therefrom.
In use, needle 52 is inserted into a patient (not shown) possibly with a syringe (not shown) attached to needle hub 54. After injecting medication, for example, while housing 60 is held steady, needle hub 54 and needle 52 are retracted to withdraw needle 52 from the patient and to withdraw needle tip 58 proximally into housing 60. Alternatively, needle 52 can be removed from the patient with housing 60 in place adjacent hub 54, and then housing 60 can be pushed down along shaft 52 to withdraw needle tip 58 proximally into housing 60. In either case, spring member 14 biases clip 12 toward the second state to protect the needle tip 58. Continued attempted proximal movement of the needle 52 results in increased binding force applied to needle shaft 56 thereby resisting such movement. Further, lip 36 of clip second wall 20 is now positioned to the other side of longitudinal axis 65 and beyond tip 58 of the needle 52. As a result, attempts to push the needle 52 distally will bring tip 58 underneath lip 36 and/or against second wall 20 to block the needle tip 58.
With reference to
Catheter assembly 200 has a catheter hub 220 defining luer lugs 222 at its proximal end 224 and has a catheter tube 226 secured by eyelet 227 (
With further reference to
With reference to
With the needle cannula 52 in the first position (
Use of rib 268 overcomes drawbacks associated with prior recess-based duckbill release mechanisms. To that end, the rib is easier to manufacture and avoids requiring detents that are so large diametrically that they might drag or scrape on the interior surface of the catheter hub during removal.
The size of the passageway 258 may be closely dimensioned to the diameter of needle shaft 56 so the passageway 258 is largely taken up by the presence of needle shaft 56. Compression or other inward flexing of the cooperating members 250, 252 is thus limited, thereby restricting release of cooperating members 250, 252 from catheter hub 220. Tolerance of the gap between the relative inner diameter of passageway 258 of cooperating members 250, 252 and the outside diameter of needle shaft 56 may be selected to reduce the likelihood of removal of the duckbills 204, 206 from catheter hub 220 when needle 52 is present. These tolerances may vary for different gauge needles although clearances of between 0.0065″ and 0.0135″ are advantageous.
Members 250, 252 are shown defining a split cylinder. While they could be half-moon in cross-section, advantageously, each member 250, 252 is arcuate in cross-section and has an internal, depending longitudinal ridge 280 (
The needle guard duckbills 204, 206 and catheter hub rib 268 cooperate to define a duckbill release mechanism which, as are shown herein, may be combined with an active element to protect needle tip 58 in the form of a canting-plate clip. However, the duckbill release mechanism of the present invention is not limited in use to such active elements, but may be used with other clip designs and even non-clip-based needle guards such as those including housings that served as a needle guard. By way of example, the needle guard can be the needle guard housing of the PROTECTIV Safety I.V. Catheter being marked by Medex, Inc., the assignee hereof, and/or those shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,762,516 and 4,747,831, or the active element can include other structure to grip and/or block the needle as shown in or of U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,978,344; 5,215,528; 5,332,517; 5,328,482; and 5,558,651; European Patent No. 0,352,928 B2; and U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 10/905,047 and 10/906,171. Other features of the present invention are also not limited to needle guards based on canting-plate clips as will now be described.
Referring to
Referring to
In use of catheter assembly 200, sheath 370 is removed, and needle tip 58 inserted into a patient (not shown) to position catheter tube 226 as described, including if desired by rotation of catheter hub 220 relative to needle guard 202, but advantageously without relative rotation between needle hub 208 and needle guard 202. Once positioned as desired, needle hub 208 and needle 52 are moved proximally, such as with use of finger tab 203 (exposed through split shroud 320) as is well understood, to pull shaft 56 out of the catheter tube 226 and catheter hub 220, and toward a second position with tip 58 protected by needle guard 202. Needle guard 202 is similarly removed from catheter hub 220 leaving hub 220 ready for use. Advantageously, the drag forces on needle shaft 56 due to clip 12 are as low as possible. Moreover, the drag forces are advantageously lower than the forces required to separate the duckbills 204, 206 from catheter hub 202, whether or not shaft 56 is in passageway 258. Still further advantageously, the force required to separate the duckbills 204, 206 from catheter hub 220 with shaft 56 in passageway 258 (referred to as “catheter separation force”) is greater than, and most advantageously is at least twice, the force necessary to let them come loose when the passageway 258 is not obstructed by needle shaft 56 such as in the second position of needle 52 (referred to as “catheter release force”). The catheter release force may be determined by the “duckbill free length,” which is the length of the cooperating members 250, 252 from nose portion 236 (or any continuous portion as at 380). This length affects the stiffness of the cooperating members 250, 252, which in turn affects the catheter release force. For example, the longer the duckbill free length of a cooperating member 250 or 252, the less the stiffness leading to a more flexible member. Also, use of the arcuate shape to members 250, 252, and 260 and ridges 280 provide a generally consistent level of catheter release force (and/or catheter separation force) across a range of gauges of needle 52. That consistency is also enhanced by the lack of scraping between detents 260 and catheter hub surface 267. As can thus be seen, catheter assembly 200 provides a passive release of needle guard 202 from catheter hub 220. The normal activity of retracting needle hub 208 from catheter hub 220 activates needle guard 202 without any additional action by the healthcare worker (not shown). Similarly, further retraction of the needle hub 208, after activation, easily releases needle guard 202 from catheter hub 220 without additional manipulation by the healthcare worker.
By virtue of the foregoing, individually and in various combinations, there are thus provided canting-plate needle guards that have improvements and enhancements as compared to prior canted-plate design. Also, by virtue of the foregoing, individually and in various combinations, there are thus also provided improvements to needle guards which can be used not only with canting-plate clips, but with other needle guard designs as well.
While the present invention has been illustrated by the description of embodiments thereof, and while the embodiments have been described in considerable detail, it is not intended to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. For example, while the Figures and the description herein show clip 12 as having a first wall 16 that cants proximally upon retraction of the needle 52, it will be understood by those of skill in the art that clip 12 could be designed such that wall 16 cants distally. Further, second wall 20 of clip 12 could include an opening (not shown) for a guide wire but not with clearance for needle 52 in the second sized state of clip 12. Further still, stylus 38 of second wall 20 could join directly to intermediate wall 22 of clip 12, such that the stylus defines the second wall. Further still, spring member 14 could extend past outboard edges 29, 30 of intermediate wall 22 rather than inboard edges 27, 28 of intermediate wall 22. Also, if clip 12 and spring member 14 are sized small enough, they could be fitted directly into a catheter hub with a bearing surface in the catheter hub. The invention in its broader aspects is, therefore, not limited to the specific details, representative apparatus and method, and illustrative examples shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departing from the spirit or scope of the general inventive concept.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4778453 | Lopez | Oct 1988 | A |
4834718 | McDonald | May 1989 | A |
4846805 | Sitar | Jul 1989 | A |
4929241 | Kulli | May 1990 | A |
4944725 | McDonald | Jul 1990 | A |
4944728 | Carrell et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4952207 | Lemieux | Aug 1990 | A |
5000740 | Ducharme et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5026356 | Smith | Jun 1991 | A |
5053017 | Chamuel | Oct 1991 | A |
5102394 | Lasaitis et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5108379 | Dolgin et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5135504 | McLees | Aug 1992 | A |
5156599 | Ranford et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5205829 | Lituchy | Apr 1993 | A |
5215525 | Sturman | Jun 1993 | A |
5215528 | Purdy et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
RE34416 | Lemieux | Oct 1993 | E |
5279591 | Simon | Jan 1994 | A |
5300045 | Plassche, Jr. | Apr 1994 | A |
5322517 | Sircom et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5328482 | Sircom et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5334158 | McLees | Aug 1994 | A |
5344408 | Partika | Sep 1994 | A |
5348544 | Sweeney et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5395347 | Blecher et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5409461 | Steinman | Apr 1995 | A |
5423766 | Di Cesare | Jun 1995 | A |
5425720 | Rogalsky et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5458658 | Sircom | Oct 1995 | A |
5533974 | Gaba | Jul 1996 | A |
5549570 | Rogalsky | Aug 1996 | A |
5558651 | Crawford et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5584810 | Brimhall | Dec 1996 | A |
5599310 | Bogert | Feb 1997 | A |
5601532 | Gaba | Feb 1997 | A |
5601536 | Crawford et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5611781 | Sircom et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5662610 | Sircom | Sep 1997 | A |
5676656 | Brimhall | Oct 1997 | A |
5676658 | Erskine | Oct 1997 | A |
5690619 | Erskine | Nov 1997 | A |
5695474 | Daugherty | Dec 1997 | A |
5697907 | Gaba | Dec 1997 | A |
5735827 | Adwers et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5738660 | Luther | Apr 1998 | A |
5755699 | Blecher et al. | May 1998 | A |
5769827 | DeMichele et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5800395 | Botich et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5830189 | Chang | Nov 1998 | A |
5879337 | Kuracina et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5882337 | Bogert et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5935109 | Donnan | Aug 1999 | A |
5937605 | Wendt | Aug 1999 | A |
6004294 | Brimhall et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6077244 | Botich et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
RE36885 | Blecher et al. | Sep 2000 | E |
6117108 | Woehr et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6203527 | Zadini et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210373 | Allmon | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221047 | Greene et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6280419 | Vojtasek | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287278 | Woehr et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298623 | Wendt | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6322537 | Chang | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6379333 | Brimhall et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6443929 | Kuracina et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6485468 | Vojtasek | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6537259 | Niermann | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6582402 | Erskine | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585704 | Luther et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6595954 | Luther et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6595955 | Ferguson et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6616630 | Woehr et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6623458 | Woehr et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6629957 | Wiklund | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6629959 | Kuracina et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6635032 | Ward, Jr. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6652486 | Bialecki et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652490 | Howell | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6682510 | Niermann | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6689102 | Greene | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6692471 | Boudreaux | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6709419 | Woehr | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6732991 | Zakrzewski et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6761706 | Vaillancourt | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6796962 | Ferguson et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6832992 | Wilkinson | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6860871 | Kuracina et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6936036 | Wilkinson et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6972002 | Thorne | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7008402 | Ferguson et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7214211 | Woehr | May 2007 | B2 |
7238169 | Takagi et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7347838 | Kulli | Mar 2008 | B2 |
20020169418 | Menzi et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020193745 | Ferguson | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030100868 | Ferguson et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030125677 | Swenson et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030195471 | Woehr et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199827 | Thorne | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030216687 | Hwang | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040049155 | Schramm | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040078003 | Smith et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040116856 | Woehr et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122373 | Botich et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040186434 | Harding et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040204681 | Thoresen et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225260 | Villa et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236288 | Howell et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050004532 | Woehr et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027263 | Woehr et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038384 | Li | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050075609 | Latona | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096592 | Carylon et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050182362 | Sircom et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182363 | Kulli | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050277879 | Daga | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070073221 | Bialecki et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073222 | Lilley et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070191775 | Diep et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191776 | Bialecki et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191777 | King | Aug 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1172-03 | Aug 2004 | CL |
0554841 | Aug 1993 | EP |
1995024071 | Jan 1995 | JP |
2001190683 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2002210005 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2004113394 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004113523 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004113524 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004154364 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004321489 | Nov 2004 | JP |
0110488 | Feb 2001 | WO |
03103757 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2006047737 | May 2006 | WO |
2007018824 | Feb 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report for EP 06254013.3 dated Feb. 20, 2008 (6 pages). |
European Preliminary Written Opinion for EP 06254013.3 dated Feb. 20, 2008 (3 pages). |
Official Action mailed on Jan. 24, 2008 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,541. |
Office Action mailed Sep. 7, 2007 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,553. |
Official Action mailed Apr. 11, 2008 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,549 (11 pg). |
Official Action mailed Apr. 30, 2008 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,551 (8 pg). |
Official Action mailed Apr. 16, 2008 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,552 (9 pg). |
Official Action mailed Jan. 9, 2008 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,553 (6 pg). |
Official Action mailed Apr. 16, 2008 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,554 (11 pg). |
Official Action mailed Jul. 2, 2008 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,541 (13 pages). |
Official Action mailed Jun. 25, 2008 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,543 (15 pages). |
Official Action mailed Jul. 9, 2008 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,549 (11 pages). |
Official Action mailed Jun. 12, 2008 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,553 (7 pages). |
Official Action mailed Oct. 15, 2008 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,547 (11 pages). |
Official Action mailed Oct. 16, 2008 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,551 (7 pages). |
Official Action mailed Dec. 16, 2008 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,552 (7 pages), Oct. 23, 2009. |
Official Action mailed Dec. 31, 2008 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,554 (6 pages), Oct. 23, 2009. |
Official Action from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,541 mailed Jan. 7, 2009 (15 pages). |
Official Action from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,541 mailed Jun. 1, 2009 (16 pages). |
Official Action from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,543 mailed Jan. 8, 2009 (21 pages). |
Official Action from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,551 mailed Feb. 18, 2009 (8 pages). |
Official Action from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,553 mailed Jan. 26, 2009 (9 pages). |
Official Action from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,554 mailed Jun. 18, 2009 (9 pages). |
Official Action from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,541 mailed Oct. 23, 2009 (24 pages). |
Official Action from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,546 mailed Oct. 30, 2009 (10 pages). |
Official Action from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,551 mailed Sep. 17, 2009 (7 pages). |
Official Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,541 mailed on Dec. 30, 2009 (22 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070038184 A1 | Feb 2007 | US |