This a U.S. National Phase of PCT/EP2013/059501, filed May 7, 2013, which claims the benefit of priority to European Patent Application No. 12167999.7, filed May 15, 2012, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The invention relates to a needle punched carpet for use in automotive interiors, for instance covering of the main flooring, optional mats, seat backs, parcel shelves, pillar trim or covering of areas in the trunk or boot of a vehicle.
Automotive interiors and trunks were traditionally lined with various types of fabrics, but in more recent years tufted and needle punched carpets are used mostly.
Needle punched carpets, as known in the automotive industry comprise in general of:
EP 0518690 A discloses the use of conjugate fibers together with polypropylene fibers to form the needle punched top layer. The needle punched mat is subjected to a heat treatment to melt the conjugate fibers and to further bind the needle punched top layer increasing the overall performance of the so formed carpet. According to the disclosure by using conjugate fibers in a staple fiber mixture as disclosed the needle punched carpet does not need a backing layer.
Hollow fibers are mainly used for filling of bedding material or outerwear, due to the increase volume by weight the material is lighter and due to the higher level of air entrapped the thermal insulation is increased. Furthermore it is known to use hollow fibers for acoustic felts, partly used as acoustic backing layer for both needle punched and tufted automotive carpets. However the use of staple fibers with hollow cross section for needle punched carpet face layer has not been shown before. It is widely believed that in particularly a hollow cross section is prone to a higher risk of fibrillation or breakage and therefore would not work for a needle punched carpet surface layer, prone to abrasion due to wear.
Automotive carpets are subjected to wear mainly from shoes. The wear of an automotive carpet is more local abrasion due to the movement of the shoes than a compression due to normal walking (typical wear for home and industrial carpeting). In particularly the area under brake and gear pedals is heavy subjected to such a wear. However, also the trunk when heavily used for loads is subjected to an increase in wear. Therefore the automotive industry uses the abrasion performance as one of the important criteria for selecting suitable needle punched carpets. Abrasion properties are often but not exclusively measured using a Tabor taber test measurement according to SAE standard. The maximum weight loss during the first 300 cycles and/or the maximum amount of cycles before a first hole is visible, are evaluation criteria that differ per car maker.
To reach the criteria of car makers very often the weight of the basic mat is increased. However the trend in the automotive industry is to more lightweight products, as every kilo of material used in a vehicle is directly related to the fuel efficiency and CO2 release of that vehicle.
Another criterion is the visual appearance of the carpet after a period of wear, or at the end of an abrasion test. Due to the wear, damage and/or breakage of the top fibers occurs, this can cause a whitening effect of in particularly (black-) coloured carpets. This whitening effect is an unwanted feature that decreases the use expectance of a carpet surface. In particularly with the needle punch carpets made of solid fibers this poses a problem. As this whitening effect is a prominent problem for needle punch carpets momentarily on the market. These type of carpets are mainly accepted in the mid and lower segment cars and not in high end cars.
It is the objective of the invention to optimise the overall wear properties of a needle punched carpet for automotive use and/or alternatively to obtain a needle punched carpet with the same abrasion performance as current needle punched carpets at a lower overall weight. Furthermore it is an objective to obtain a carpet with the same or better overall performance as the needle punched carpet today on the market.
The objective is obtained with the needle punched carpet face layer according to the invention, with the features of the main claim. In particularly by using staple fibers with a hollow cross-section, it was found that abrasion performance of the needle punched carpets was increased in comparison to the same produced needle punched carpets made of round solid staple fibers.
Surprisingly, it was found that a needle punched carpet with a surface substantially made of hollow fibers has an increased abrasion performance. It is known that the use of hollow fibers has the advantage that the layer can be made lighter, keeping a high fiber density due to the void volume in the fibre itself. However the unexpected increase of the abrasion performance makes it possible to decrease the area weight used in carpet top layers even further and at the same time keeping visually good carpet appearance.
Surprisingly during the whole abrasion tests on the carpet layer made of hollow fiber according to the invention the samples did not show a substantial whitening of the abraded surface. This is an important criterion for the carpet surface used in the interior of a car in particularly for the acceptance of such flooring in high end cars.
With the inventive nonwoven carpet it was possible to produce flat—roll good—as well as moulded 3D carpet parts, with an abrasion performance acceptable by most car maker standards.
Hollow Staple Fibers
The hollow staple fibres for the needle punch surface according to the invention have a cross section with at least one void area extending axially over the whole length of the fiber (see
Preferably the outer cross section of the hollow fibers is substantially rounded, circular or oval. Because of varying conditions during manufacturing the fibers are rarely perfectly formed. It can be that the polymer material around the hollow area is open so the fiber cross section is more a C than a O. Preferably the hollow or void area is one core area (2) (
Depending on the area of the void, the density of the fibers is proportionally lower than the density of the material, for instance around 1.38 g/m3 for PET.
The hollow staple fibers used are between approximately 2 and 20 dtex, preferably between 4-17 dtex. Also a mixture of dtex, for instance fine and coarse, like 12 and 17 dtex, is possible.
The staple fibers have a staple length normally used for needle punched carpet layers for automotive use, preferably substantially between 40-120 mm, preferably between 50-80 mm.
The hollow staple fibers according to the invention are preferably made of thermoplastic material, for instance polyester polymers including aromatic and aliphatic polyester polymers, or polypropylene as normally found in automotive carpets, or Polyamide like PA6 or PA66, or Poly Lactic acid (PLA). Exemplary polyester polymers include but are not limited to polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) or polytrimethylene terephthalate (PTT).
The carpet face layer according to the invention comprises substantially of hollow staple fibers. At least up to 100% by weight is hollow staple fibers. (The % by weight is defined as the percentage fibers based on the total fiber weight of the needle punched face layer.) Preferably the amount of hollow fibers is at least 45% by weight, preferably at least 65% by weight.
As the staple fibres are used for their specific cross section, conjugate or bicomponent fibers losing the hollow shape after needling or other process steps, because they fall apart, cannot be used in the surface layer according to the invention to form the main structural components of the needle punched surface layer.
However in areas of high wear it might be advantageous to combine the hollow staple fibers with additional binding fibers. For instance conjugate, bicomponent or low melting staple fibers can be added to increase the locking or binding of the needle punched face. The binding fibers are chosen depending on the hollow fibers used. Preferably the binding fibers are made from low melting polymer like PP or polyester preferably co-Polyester (coPET). The amount of binding fibers may not exceed 25% of the total weight of the face layer.
In areas where the wear is not substantial or a lower level of abrasion performance is asked for a part of the hollow fibers can be replaced with standard polyester solid fibers. Up to 55% of the total fibers used can be such solid staple fibers. This might also be coloured fibers used to enhance the overall aesthetic performance of the needle punch face layer. Many car makers ask for a colour matching to individualise the interior appearance of their cars.
The additional fibers are preferably made from the same or similar polymeric material as the hollow staple fibers used. Preferably all staple fibers used are based on the same polymers or family of polymers. Also the use of recycled polymers is an option that fits within the scope of the invention as claimed, in particularly using polyester hollow fibers, eventually together with polyester solid fibers and/or conjugate binding polyester binding fibers, whereby part or all the polyester used is coming from recycled sources of polyester, such as bottle chips.
The needle punched carpet face layer according to the invention can be used as a decorative layer for instance as a cover layer for interior trim parts, like a parcel shelf, the trunk floor, or the back of the seats. For this it is enough that the needle punched carpet has an adhesive layer matching the trim part production, normally a thermoplastic material. It is also possible to use the needle punched carpet as the decorative top layer for an optional or throw-in mat, with additional backing layers to comply with the additional requirements specific for such optional mats, like stiffness or anti-skidding. For instance a backing layer of felt, flocking or rubber might be used.
Another possibility is the use of such needle punched material as a decorative face layer for main floor systems. For this the material normally obtains one or more backing layers which perform the acoustic function of the part, like for instance a heavy or mass layer and a decoupling layer to form a noise insulator. Another option is to use an airflow resistant layer for instance a foam or felt layer to obtain a sound absorber.
For instance the acoustic systems as disclosed in EP 0934180 A, EP 2365483 A or EP 2364881 A, a decorative top layer in the form of for instance a needle punched carpet is used, that has normally no influence on the acoustic performance of the underlying acoustic system. The carpet face layer according to the invention can be used with the acoustic systems as disclosed in these applications without negative interference with the acoustic properties of the disclosed systems.
The face layer according to the invention is porous. However, it will enhance possible acoustic absorbing properties only marginally, as it was measured that the face layer according to the invention has not a considerably absorbing property on its own. Against the published believe that hollow fibers can be used to produce an acoustic absorbing layer, this could not be proven for the needle punch carpet layer according to the invention. The reason might be that the process parameters used to produce an acoustic layer are different for those producing a carpet layer.
The area weight of needle punch decorative carpet face layers used as standard in vehicles are dependent on the area of use as well as the exclusivity of the car, normally in a range between 180-800 gr/m2. For instance in the high end car segment this can be up to 700 gr/m2, while in the low end car segment this can be as low as 200 g/m2.
As the needle punched carpet is used as an aesthetic or decorative face layer the web may be kept as a plain web or the plain needle punched carpet layer may be further enhanced by additional needling to give a more structured surface, this may be in the form of a ribbed, velour or random velour, also known as dilour. Other surface treatments to enhance the appearance without impairing the abrasion results are also possible and fall in the scope of this disclosure.
The needle punched face layer according to the invention, eventually combined with one or more backing layers can be moulded to form a part for the interior of a car, for instance the main flooring or the trunk area. The 3D forming can be done by cold and/or hot moulding using the conversion processes normally used in the automotive industry.
In comparison, the needle punch carpet according to the invention (FIG. 2) can suffice with the needle punch face layer according to the invention on its own, without the need of the fiber locking layer and the secondary layer, and will already have an increased abrasion performance.
If necessary an adhesive layer 4 can be used to bind the needle punch face layer directly to the substrate or other car parts in need of a needle punched face layer. Although it is not needed it might be preferable, in heavy used areas for instance, to use a light fiber locking system, for instance binding fibers in the face layer and/or a non-latex backing layer, for instance polyolefins such as LDPE, HDPE, PP or polyolefin dispersions such as Fixamine, and/or a latex backing layer eventually combined with an LDPE or other thermoplastic polymer material.
The needle punched surface 2 according to the invention can be combined with a mass spring system containing a non-porous heavy or mass layer 5, for instance EPDM, EVA, PP, PE based layer, such a layer may be filled with minerals, and a decoupling layer 6, for instance a foam or felt layer. Eventually an adhesive layer 4 might be used between the layers. Also a combination of the needle punched face layer according to the invention with a porous backing layer or a single backing layer in the form of an acoustic absorbing layer is an option.
The needle punched face layer according to the invention can also be used for a throw-in mat in the foot well area of the passengers. In particularly in the area before the front seats, the face layer can then be combined with anti-skid backing and possible rubber inlay areas to form such mats as known in the art. Also these mats might be moulded to follow the form of the area where they are used.
Sample Preparation,
Needle punched face layers were produced using a standard industrial scale needle punch carpet production line. Staple fibers as indicated were mixed and formed in a bat or mat using carding and cross-lapping. The mat was pre-needled using plain barbed needles to form the carpet face layer. The needle punched surface layers were subjected to a second dilour patterning step using fork dilour needles. For all samples the same settings were used.
Samples were coated with latex and LDPE backing, eventually combined with a standard felt backing layer. All samples were made with black solution dyed staple fibers, as these are used for the production of automotive carpets in general.
The samples were all tested for abrasion using the taber test according to DIN 53109 or the equivalent SAE J1530. The Test was performed on a Taber Abrader testing machine with a H18 grinding disk, and 10N pressure force. First after 300 cycles and then after every 1000 cycles the weight loss was measured until end of cycle was reached. Other changes on the sample like bearding were made notice of. The test was stopped and the end of cycle noted as soon as a hole in the needle punched surface was observed. The g weight loss measured was normalised for g weight loss per 1000 cycles to enable comparison.
Reference sample 1: PES solid fibers of around 13 dtex and a staple length of 76 mm were carded and cross lapped to form a mat with an area weight.
Examples according to the invention were made the same as the reference sample using hollow PES. The hollow PES fibers were around 12 dtex, with a staple length of 60 mm. The hollow fiber used has a round cross section and one void, the void area is round. Samples with 100%, 70% and 30% by weight of hollow fibers were made, by blending with the same solid PES fibers as used in the reference sample. Although the dtex of both fibers are similar, due to the void area in the hollow fiber, this fiber is coarser. Chemical analyses of the different PES fibers did not show relevant differences between the materials used for producing the different staple fibers.
All samples measure had the same area weight for the top needle punched surface layer of around 400 g/m2.
Surprisingly the samples with a hollow fiber content of 70% and 100% by weight showed an increased overall performance for the same area weight of the top needle punched layer. The end of cycle found in the roll good state (RG) was up to more than double that measured for the 100% solid fiber reference sample. While even in the moulded carpet (M) the difference between the reference and 100% Hollow fiber sample was almost 2 fold. Surprisingly the abraded surface did not show a substantial whitening effect, while the one of the solid fiber reference sample was whitened to an unacceptable level at the end of cycle. Even more surprisingly the g weight loss measured and normalised for 1000 cycles showed a considerable reduction for the 70 and 100% by weight hollow fiber samples for both the roll good carpet (RG) and the moulded carpet (M).
It seems that a certain % by weight of hollow fiber must be present in the sample to obtain the better overall abrasion performance, like the increase in maximum cycles and the g weight loss reduction. Based on these and other samples not shown the threshold value is expected to be around at least 45-50% by weight of hollow fibers, to have an increase in abrasion performance. Whereby 100% by weight of hollow fibers showed the best performance.
This is important as for certain car makers a colour matching is necessary, whereby different colour staple fibers are mixed, and a pure 100 weight % hollow fiber is than not necessary or economical. However by at least around 50 weight % hollow fibers, still a satisfying result can be achieved. These hollow fibers can be mixed up to 100% with coloured solid fibers and/or binding fibers depending on the specific request of the costumer.
Unexpectedly, comparison of the results with a standard PES needle punched carpet as currently sold on the market (results not shown) revealed that at a weight reduction of 200 g/m2 (600 g/m2 for the carpet surface found on the market vs. 400 g/m2 for the carpet surface according to the invention) the same abrading performance could be achieved.
The sample with 30% hollow fibers shows similar results in comparison to the reference sample. This might indicate that there is a threshold for the amount of hollow fibers used to make an impact on the abrasion performance. Considering the data the threshold is expected to be at least more than 50% by weight of the overall fibers used for the needle punched top layer according to the invention In comparison, the needle punch carpet according to the invention can suffice with the needle punch face layer according to the invention on its own, without the need of the fiber locking layer and the secondary layer, and will already have an increased abrasion performance.
None of the samples according to the invention, containing more than 50 weight % hollow fibers showed a substantial whitening effect, while the market sample and the reference sample both showed a noticeable whitening of the abraded surface. This means that the appearance of the carpet over use is not substantially changing visibly in colour and will longer appear new in comparison to a whitening carpet as currently on the market. Although some flattening of the top surface occurred also for the samples according to the invention during the abrasion tests, due to the fact that the colour remained the same, the flattening was less apparent.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
12167999 | May 2012 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2013/059501 | 5/7/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/171099 | 11/21/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2939201 | Holland | Jun 1960 | A |
3262257 | Martin | Jul 1966 | A |
3686848 | Miller et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
4195051 | Frankfort et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4295329 | Windley | Oct 1981 | A |
5108838 | Tung | Apr 1992 | A |
5144730 | Dilo | Sep 1992 | A |
5332457 | Katoh et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5486419 | Clementini et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5587229 | Clementini et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5622765 | Clementini et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5786083 | Harris | Jul 1998 | A |
5804115 | Burton et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5945215 | Bersted et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5997980 | Matoba | Dec 1999 | A |
6090485 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6145617 | Alts | Nov 2000 | A |
6548141 | Nagata et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6631785 | Khambete et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6716511 | Bersted et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6740385 | Gardner et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
20010008673 | Nagata | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020034606 | Miller et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020172795 | Gardner et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030194529 | Bersted et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20050249931 | Utsumi | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050260380 | Moon et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060121813 | Kobayashi | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070009723 | Ogawa et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20080292831 | Juriga et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20120064281 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20150224943 | Taylor et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160298273 | Meenakshisundaram et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101338455 | Jan 2009 | CN |
10 2009 031327 | Feb 2010 | DE |
0518690 | Oct 1992 | EP |
0902115 | Mar 1999 | EP |
1669490 | Jun 2006 | EP |
0934180 | Aug 2009 | EP |
2364881 | Sep 2011 | EP |
2365483 | Apr 2012 | EP |
2942829 | Sep 2010 | FR |
2297059 | Jul 1996 | GB |
S 60180643 | Nov 1985 | JP |
H 04185755 | Jul 1992 | JP |
5186947 | Jul 1993 | JP |
H 09175427 | Jul 1997 | JP |
9241956 | Sep 1997 | JP |
10 329596 | Dec 1998 | JP |
H 11139193 | May 1999 | JP |
2003 300290 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2004325973 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005097816 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005263225 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2008024066 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2008295477 | Dec 2008 | JP |
2009 195386 | Sep 2009 | JP |
WO 2005024104 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2006066601 | Jun 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report in PCT/EP2013/059501, dated Jun. 5, 2013 (4 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International (PCT) Patent Application No. PCT/EP2013/059501, dated Nov. 18, 2014, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International (PCT) Patent Application No. PCT/EP2010/056700, dated Oct. 4, 2010, 7 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International (PCT) Patent Application No. PCT/EP2010/056700, dated Nov. 22, 2011, 4 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International (PCT) Patent Application No. PCT/EP2014/073776, dated Jan. 27, 2015, 9 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International (PCT) Patent Application No. PCT/EP2014/073776, dated May 24, 2016, 6 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/177,364, dated Feb. 17, 2017, 10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150140260 A1 | May 2015 | US |