The present invention relates to patient wound care, and more specifically to systems and methods of wound coverings and dressings.
Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is a type of treatment used by physicians to promote the healing of acute or chronic wounds. For example, sealed wound dressings connected to a vacuum pump can be placed onto an open wound for applying sub-atmospheric pressure to the wound. Such types of negative-pressure applications can be used to draw out fluid from the wound and increase blood flow to a wound area.
Some embodiments include methods and systems for use in negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). A barrier can be configured to be positioned adjacent to wound tissue and prevent or reduce tissue ingrowth from the wound tissue into a pad positioned above the barrier. The barrier can have structures configured to allow for fluid flow yet still inhibit tissue ingrowth. The barrier can be provided separately from existing NPWT dressings and/or used with the existing NPWT dressing to improve performance. The barrier can include irrigation flow channels to allow for simultaneous irrigation and NPWT. The barrier can include one or more other features described herein.
In some implementations, a method of using a negative pressure wound therapy system includes providing or receiving a wound dressing comprising a pad and a membrane, wherein the pad is porous, wherein the pad and the membrane are configured to be used for negative pressure wound therapy, providing or receiving a barrier, wherein the barrier is provided separately from the wound dressing, wherein the barrier includes a plurality of perforations, wherein the barrier is configured to be positioned in a wound adjacent to wound tissue, and wherein the barrier is configured to prevent or reduce tissue ingrowth from the wound tissue into the pad, and positioning the barrier in the wound adjacent to the wound tissue. After positioning the barrier in the wound, the pad can be positioned in the wound on top of the barrier in a location that is spaced from the wound tissue by the barrier, the seal can be positioned on top of the pad and wound to at least partially seal the barrier and the pad in the wound, and negative pressure wound therapy can be applied to the wound while the pad and the barrier are positioned in the wound such that fluid is allowed to flow from the wound tissue, through the perforations of the barrier, through the pores of the pad, and through an outlet of the wound dressing.
Implementations can include any, all, or none of the following features. The pad may be an open cell foam sponge, wherein the barrier is an injection molded polymer barrier having complex geometry that is configured to space the open cell foam sponge material from the wound tissue to reduce or prevent tissue ingrowth. The barrier comprises a base layer and a plurality of walls extending from the base layer, wherein a first plurality of the perforations are positioned so as to extend through the base layer at positions between the walls, and wherein a second plurality of perforations are positioned so as to extend through the base layer at positions under the walls. The walls form a repeating polygonal shape, wherein the walls meet at wall intersections, and wherein the second plurality of perforations are positioned under the walls at some but not all of the wall intersections. The walls have a greater height at locations where the walls connect to the base layer than at locations which have the second plurality of perforations positioned under the walls. The barrier comprises a base layer and a plurality of walls extending from the base layer, wherein the walls form a repeating polygonal shape, and wherein posts extend from the base layer at indentations defined between the walls. The barrier comprises a base layer and a plurality of walls extending from top and bottom sides of the base layer, wherein the barrier comprises a plurality of tabs extending from the top side of the base layer, wherein the tabs are configured to be grabbed to pull the barrier out of the wound. The method can further include sucking liquid and exudate through the perforations of the barrier, removing the wound dressing, including removing the pad and the membrane, from the wound, and after removing the wound dressing, removing the barrier from the wound by grabbing one or more tabs extending from the barrier with a tool or one's fingers and pulling. The barrier comprises an injection molded polymer, a radiopaque marker positioned in the injection molded polymer, and a coating positioned on an outer surface of the polymer. The pad is an open cell foam sponge, wherein the barrier is a polymer barrier having complex geometry that is configured to space the wound tissue from the perforations of the barrier, wherein the barrier is integrally formed as a single piece. The barrier is designed to be used with the wound dressing and wherein the wound dressing is designed to be used without the barrier. The barrier has a width that is multiple centimeters long, wherein the barrier has a length that is multiple centimeters long, wherein the barrier has a thickness that is 1 to 5 mm thick, and wherein the perforations extending through the barrier have a 1 to 5 mm diameter. The plurality of perforations extend through a base layer of the barrier and wherein the barrier defines structure at least partially blocking the perforations. The method can further include cutting the pad to a pad size suitable to be placed in the wound and cutting the barrier to a barrier size suitable to be placed in the wound, wherein the pad and the barrier are cut separately in separate steps.
In some implementations, a method of using a negative pressure wound therapy system includes positioning a perforated barrier in a wound. After positioning the perforated barrier in the wound, positioning a pad in the wound on top of the perforated barrier, positioning a seal on top of the wound to at least partially seal the perforated barrier and the pad in the wound, and applying negative pressure wound therapy to the wound.
In some implementations, a barrier for use in negative pressure wound therapy includes a base layer and top surface structures. The base layer defines a plurality of perforations through the base layer, wherein the plurality of perforations are positioned, sized, and configured to allow flow therethrough for negative pressure wound therapy, wherein the base layer defines a top surface and a bottom surface. The top surface structures are positioned on the top surface of the base layer, wherein the top surface structures are positioned, sized, and configured to space porous foam material away from the perforations of the base layer when porous foam material is positioned on top of the barrier after the barrier is positioned in the wound.
Implementations can include any, all, or none of the following features. The barrier has a thickness and a structure configured to create a physical separation between the pad and reduce or prevent tissue ingrowth through the perforations to a porous foam material positioned above the barrier. The top surface structures comprise walls forming a repeating geometric shape, and wherein the walls at least partially cover and block at least some of the perforations through the base layer. The top surface structure comprises walls forming a repeating geometric shape, posts positioned between the walls, and tabs extending upward from the walls. The base layer and the top surface structures comprise a pliable medical grade polymer and further comprising filaments or radiopaque markers embedded in the pliable medical grade polymer. The barrier defines a first set of irrigation channels and a second set of irrigation channels, wherein a plurality of irrigation channels from the second set of irrigation channels branch out from each of the irrigation channels in the first set of irrigation channels. The barrier defines an inlet along an edge of the barrier, wherein the inlet is fluidly connected to the first set of irrigation channels and the second set of irrigation channels with the first set of irrigation channels positioned between the inlet and the second set of irrigation channels. This inlet can extend normal to the surface of the barrier, to pass through and overlying pad and connect to an irrigation source. The barrier defines an inlet at a middle portion of the barrier, wherein the inlet is fluidly connected to the first set of irrigation channels and the second set of irrigation channels with the first set of irrigation channels positioned between the inlet and the second set of irrigation channels.
In some implementations, a negative pressure wound therapy system includes a wound dressing comprising a membrane, a pad comprising a porous foam sponge configured to be positioned under the membrane, and a barrier configured to be positioned under the pad. The barrier includes a plurality of perforations, wherein the pad and the barrier are configured to be positioned together in a wound with the barrier positioned adjacent to wound tissue and the pad positioned between the barrier and the membrane, and wherein the barrier is configured to prevent or reduce tissue ingrowth from the wound tissue into the pad.
Implementations can include any, all, or none of the following features. The pad is an open cell foam sponge, wherein the barrier is an injection molded or otherwise fabricated polymer barrier having complex geometry that is configured to space the open cell foam sponge material from the wound tissue to prevent tissue ingrowth. The barrier comprises a base layer and a plurality of walls extending from the base layer, wherein a first plurality of the perforations are positioned so as to extend through the base layer at positions between the walls, and wherein a second plurality of perforations are positioned so as to extend through the base layer at positions under the walls. The barrier comprises a base layer and a plurality of walls extending from the base layer, wherein the walls form a repeating polygonal shape, and wherein posts extend from the base layer at indentations defined between the walls. The barrier comprises an injection molded polymer, a radiopaque marker positioned in the injection molded polymer, and a coating positioned on an outer surface of the polymer. The plurality of perforations extend through a base layer of the barrier and the barrier defines structure at least partially blocking the perforations. The barrier is physically attached to the pad so as to be sold and delivered together. The barrier is attachable to the pad via one or more fasteners. The barrier defines a first set of irrigation channels and a second set of irrigation channels, wherein a plurality of irrigation channels from the second set of irrigation channels branch out from each of the irrigation channels in the first set of irrigation channels.
In some implementations, a barrier for use in negative pressure wound therapy and wound irrigation includes a base layer defining a plurality of perforations through the base layer, wherein the plurality of perforations are positioned, sized, and configured to allow flow therethrough for negative pressure wound therapy, wherein the base layer defines a top surface and a bottom surface. The barrier defines a first set of irrigation channels and a second set of irrigation channels, wherein a plurality of irrigation channels from the second set of irrigation channels branch out from each of the irrigation channels in the first set of irrigation channels. The perforations of the barrier are sized, positioned, and configured to allow for suction flow from a wound surface positioned under the bottom surface of the base layer, through the perforations, and to an area above the top surface of the base layer. The first and second sets of irrigation channels of the barrier are sized, positioned, and configured to allow for irrigation through the first and second sets of irrigation channels to the wound surface. The barrier is configured to allow for the suction and the irrigation simultaneously.
Implementations can include any, all, or none of the following features. The barrier defines an inlet along an edge of the barrier, wherein the inlet is fluidly connected to the first set of irrigation channels and the second set of irrigation channels with the first set of irrigation channels positioned between the inlet and the second set of irrigation channels. The barrier defines an additional irrigation channel extending from the inlet to the second set of irrigation channels so as to fluidly connect the inlet to the first set of irrigation channels. The barrier defines an inlet at a middle portion of the barrier, wherein the inlet is fluidly connected to the first set of irrigation channels and the second set of irrigation channels with the first set of irrigation channels positioned between the inlet and the second set of irrigation channels. The inlet tube is of sufficient length to more than traverse the full thickness of the pad overlying the barrier, whether the pad is placed piece-meal as a separate unit during dressing application or is manufactured to be fixedly attached to the barrier as a single unit. The inlet tube will also penetrate the sealing membrane after complete application of the dressing and then connect to an irrigation supply tubing which communicates the irrigant from the irrigation source to the dressing. The point at which the inlet tube will penetrate or cross the sealing membrane can be further improved, by including an integrated flat manifold, which acts to hold the inlet tubing, generally normal to the dressing in a central location, and further provide a flat surface where the sealing membrane can be adhered at application of the dressing to the body. This flat surface allows for easier application of the sealing membrane encouraging an airtight seal for the dressing, which is a preferred state. This manifold can also include a separate attachment point or coupling for the suction tubing that extends from the regulated vacuum source to the dressing. The barrier further comprises top surface structures positioned on the top surface of the base layer, wherein the top surface structures are positioned, sized, and configured to space porous foam material away from the perforations of the base layer when porous foam material is positioned on top of the barrier after the barrier is positioned in the wound. The second set of irrigation channels terminate at outlets that are positioned at the bottom surface of the barrier, wherein some of the outlets are positioned proximate a perimeter of the barrier with other outlets positioned closer to a center of the barrier. A tubular extension extends from the inlet in a direction that is generally normal to the barrier. A system includes the barrier, a wound dressing comprising a pad with the barrier fixedly attached to the pad, and a tubular extension that extends from the irrigation inlet of the barrier through the pad to an end that is configured to be connected to an irrigation source. The tubular extension is configured to allow for simultaneous irrigation and negative pressure. The tubular extension is configured to allow for alternating irrigation and negative pressure. A manifold is fluidically connected to the tubular extension. The manifold is positioned adjacent the pad at a location where the tubular extension extends through the pad. The manifold defines a suction inlet configured to connect to suction tubing.
In some implementations, a system includes a wound dressing comprising a membrane, a pad, and a barrier. The pad comprises a porous foam sponge configured to be positioned under the membrane. The pad comprises a pad bottom, a pad top, and pad sides. The barrier is wrapped around the pad, wherein the barrier is configured to prevent or reduce tissue ingrowth from the wound tissue into the pad.
Implementations can include any, all, or none of the following features. The barrier is wrapped around a pad bottom and at least part of the pad sides. The barrier is wrapped around a circumference of the pad. The barrier is wrapped completely around a circumference of the pad. The barrier and the pad are sized and shaped to be used in fistulous or tunneled wounds that have a long narrow geometry. The pad comprises a sponge. The barrier comprised medical grade polymer The barrier defines perforations. The pad and barrier combine to form a shape that is long and narrow at a distal end and wider and flatter at a proximal end. The barrier is substantially nail shaped. The barrier is substantially funnel shaped. The barrier is substantially kettle shaped. The barrier comprises a head portion and a cylinder portion The cylinder portion is perforated. The cylinder portion is wrapped around the pad sides. The wound dressing comprises one or more irrigation flow paths configured to deliver irrigant to the barrier. The wound dressing comprised one or more suction flow paths configured to provide negative pressure at the dressing. The one or more irrigation flow paths are independent from the one or more suction flow paths. A method of using the wound dressing includes cutting a distal end of the wound dressing so as to cut both the pad and the barrier. The pad can be moved at least partially out of the distal end of the wound dressing. A portion of the pad that was pulled out of the distal end of the wound dressing can be cut. The pad can be moved back into the wound dressing. The pad can be positioned inside the barrier such that the pad is spaced inward from a distal opening of the barrier by a gap. A distal opening of the barrier can be closed after the barrier has been cut. A distal opening of the barrier can be sutured after the barrier has been cut.
Other features, aspects and potential advantages will be apparent from the accompanying description and figures.
The technology disclosed herein generally relates to a system, device and method for negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). A dressing for NPWT can include a foam sponge pad or wound filler that is placed in the wound and a sealing membrane that covers the wound and the foam sponge pad. A hose can connect the dressing to a vacuum source to apply regulated NPWT to the wound to beneficially facilitate healing of the wound. However, current systems can result in undesirable tissue ingrowth into pores of the foam sponge pad within 2 to 3 days. This ingrowth not only limits the potential safe duration of wear, it also leads to increased pain and wound tissue trauma when the dressing is changed. A barrier can be positioned under the foam sponge pad or wound filler to separate the foam sponge pad away from the wound and to prevent or restrict tissue ingrowth during NPWT. The barrier can be made of a flexible medical grade polymer material and can have complex geometry that can allow flow of fluid and exudate through the barrier during NPWT yet still prevent or restrict the wound tissue from growing into the foam sponge pad or wound filler. The barrier can be used with existing wound dressings that are designed for use without such a barrier, or can be part of a wound dressing where the barrier is attached to the foam sponge pad or other type of wound filler (i.e. gauze). In this scenario, during the manufacturing of the sponge or wound filler, a similar barrier construct could be attached to the sponge pad/wound filler in order to substantially prevent ingrowth. The barrier could also replace the sponge or wound filler completely. Replacement can be performed at the manufacturing stage by the product manufacturer or at the application stage by the clinician.
Tissue ingrowth is undesirable because it has several consequences. When a dressing is removed after tissue ingrowth into the dressing has occurred, this can result in the tearing of healthy tissue away from the wound surface. This is particularly problematic when the wound exposes critical or delicate structures, such as blood vessels, nerves or visceral organs. This phenomenon results in significant pain with dressing changes and traumatizes the wound tissues, which can be adverse to the healing process. For this reason, dressing changes are required frequently to prevent too much ingrowth, usually within 2 or 3 days, therefore a barrier that prevents or reduces in-growth could allow for extended duration of wear which is a unique clinical benefit of some aspects of this invention. Tissue ingrowth can also result in tearing of the sponge or wound filler resulting in foreign matter being left behind in the wound. These areas of foreign matter can create inflammatory responses, heterotopic ossification and/or infections.
The EVR 104 can include a controller (including one or more processors and memory) and a flow rate meter having one or more valves and sensors to measure and control the flow rate of liquid through the EVR 104 and/or the amount of negative pressure applied. In some embodiments, the EVR 104 can include a pump or other device configured to produce negative pressure. In some embodiments, the EVR 104 can be connected to a pump or other device configured to produce negative pressure, such as a wall vacuum source or a dedicated vacuum source.
The wound dressing 110 can be configured to cover and substantially seal a wound of the patient 102. The tubing system 108 can include one or more hoses to connect the wound dressing 110, the canister 106, and the EVR 104 to apply negative pressure (a vacuum) to the wound of the patient 102. The canister 106 can collect liquid removed from the wound of the patient 102.
In some embodiments, the NWPT system 100 can be configured differently than as illustrated. For example, one or more of the EVR 104, the canister 106, the tubing system 108, and the wound dressing 110 can be shaped and positioned differently than as illustrated. Additionally, one or more components can be added, replaced, or removed from the NWPT system 100. For example, the canister 106 can be replaced with a collection bag.
A portion of the patient 102 is shown including a wound 112. In the illustrated example, the wound 112 is a relatively deep wound into the flesh of the patient 102. The wound 112 can be deep enough to extend through skin tissue 122, through fat tissue 124, and into muscle tissue or visceral spaces 126 of the patient 102. In other examples, the wound 112 can be deeper or less deep depending on the injury to the patient 102.
In the illustrated embodiment, the wound dressing 110 includes a tubing connector 114, a membrane 116, and a pad 118, such as a foam sponge pad, a gauze pad, or other type of wound filler. The pad 118 can be an open cell foam pad (commonly called a sponge) that is cut to size and placed in the wound 112. The membrane 116 can be a relatively thin membrane configured to substantially seal the wound 112. The tubing connector 114 can connect to the tubing system and extend through the membrane 116 to allow for the EVR 104 to apply negative pressure to the wound 112. The pad 118 can be porous to allow flow of liquid and gas between the tubing connector 114 and a surface of the wound 112. The membrane 116 can have an adhesive positioned around a perimeter of the membrane 116 that is configured to stick the membrane 116 to the patient 102 and seal the wound 112 well enough that the EVR 104 can suitably apply negative pressure to the wound 112 to promote new tissue growth.
In some embodiments, an additional barrier 120 can be added under the pad 118. The barrier 120 can be a separation layer that is positioned between the pad 118 and the surface of the wound 112 to space the pad 118 from the surface of the wound 112 and prevent or reduce tissue in-growth into pores of the pad 118.
In some embodiments, the tubing connector 114, the membrane 116, and the pad 118 can be part of a wound dressing 110 for a negative pressure wound therapy system that is intended to be delivered without the barrier 120 and is configured for use without the barrier 120. In such situations, the wound dressing 110 can be intended to be used with the pad 118 placed into the wound 112 and covered by the membrane 116 without placing the barrier 120 under the pad 118. In such situations, NPWT can be performed without the barrier 120, however, doing so can allow for tissue ingrowth into pores of the pad 118. Therefore, the barrier 120 can be provided separately as an additional structure to improve upon an existing wound dressing 110 where the pad 118 is a porous foam material that is susceptible to tissue ingrowth.
The barrier can also be placed to provide protection from desiccation or drying out of susceptible structures such as tendons, nerves, blood vessels, and/or bone. The barrier can be coated with a lubricant such as Vaseline or even antimicrobials such as antibiotics, silver compounds or other materials such as growth factors or other chemicals or medications to promote tissue healing and/or prevent infection.
The barrier 120 can be added as an additional structure in order to prevent or reduce in-growth of tissue (e.g. the muscle tissue or visceral organs 126) into pores of the pad 118. The barrier 120 can space the pad 118 from one or more tissues in order prevent or reduce contact with those tissues. In the illustrated embodiment, the barrier 120 is positioned under the pad 118 and also wrapped at least partially around sides of the pad 118 to space the pad 118 from tissue. In the illustrated embodiment, the barrier 120 is positioned between the pad 118 and the muscle tissue 126, but not necessarily between the pad 118 and the fat tissue 124 (the barrier 120 is shown adjacent to only part of the fat tissue 124) or the skin tissue 122. Such a configuration can be used where it is desired to prevent ingrowth from the muscle tissue 126 while ingrowth by the fat tissue 124 and the skin tissue 122 is deemed to be less of a concern. In other embodiments, the barrier 120 can be larger or smaller and placed to cover more (e.g. covering all or part of each of the skin tissue 122, the fat tissue 124, and/or the muscle tissue 126) or fewer tissues as suitable for the application.
In other embodiments, not illustrated herein, the barrier 120 can be wrapped fully or partially around the pad 118, thereby fully or partially enclosing the pad 118. This particular embodiment would be most useful for deep tracts or tunnels in the wound, in which wound filler is often placed to apply NPWT and prevent loculation. These specific embodiments can have preferred shapes (i.e. cylindrical or rectangular) and dimensions for commonly treated deep wound tracts or tunnels. The advantage of these embodiments over traditional methods, is that the barrier can serve its innovative function of physically separating the wound filler from the wound tissue to prevent or reduce ingrowth in a more circumferential fashion in parts of the wound that have more than just a single planar surface that needs to heal.
As explained above, the barrier 120 can be a structure that is entirely separate from the pad 118, and it can be sold and provided separately for use with a version of the wound dressing 110 that was intended to be used without the barrier 120. In alternative embodiments, the barrier 120 can be attached to the pad 118 and can be sold and delivered together (see, for example, the dressings 610, 710, and 810 described below with respect to
The barrier 120 is a porous barrier configured to reduce or prevent tissue ingrowth. In some embodiments, the barrier 120 can be shaped and configured as illustrated in
Current sponges or other wound fillers are open cell structures that allow for pieces or parts of the sponge to be left behind in the wound. Likewise, when gauze is used as a wound filler, it can become unraveled also resulting in pieces being left in the wound. The barrier can be created to reduce this by ensuring a closed cell structure. A barrier that is devoid of surface pores that are in the 400-600 micron range for example, can prevent or reduce in-growth into the dressing. Avoiding foreign material being left inside the wound is optimal.
The walls 132 can define a repeating polygonal shape, such as the repeating hexagonal shape illustrated in
The walls 132 and the posts 134 can extend substantially normally from the base layer 130 to impart thickness to the barrier 120. The posts 134 can be positioned substantially centrally in one, more than one, or all of spaces (or indentations) defined by the walls 132. The posts 134 can provide an offset to help keep tissue (i.e. the muscle tissue 126) or material (i.e. material of the pad 118) out of the spaces defined by the walls 132. In other embodiments, the posts 134 can be omitted if the barrier is shaped and configured to suitably operate without the posts 134.
The base layer 130 of the barrier 120 can define a plurality of perforations (or pores) 136 extending through the base layer 130. The base layer 130 can define one or more perforations 136 extending through the base layer 130 in each of the spaces defined by the walls 132 and can define perforations 136 extending through the base layer 130 at positions under the walls 132. In some embodiments, the perforations 136 are the only passages extending entirely through the base layer 130.
As shown in
As shown in
As best illustrated in
In some embodiments, the barrier 120 can include one or more tabs 138 extending away from the base layer 130. The tabs 138 can be sized, shaped, and configured to allow for a user (e.g. a doctor or other medical provider) to pull on the tabs 138 to remove the barrier 120 from the wound 112. The tabs 138 can have a strength that is suitable to withstand the force of pulling on the tabs 138 without tearing after the barrier 120 has been left in the wound 112 for an extended period (e.g. several hours or several days). Additional embodiments include suture or wire that can extend outside the barrier 120 to enable or facilitate removal.
In some embodiments, the base layer 130 can be the bottom-most layer of the barrier 120 and be configured for a bottom surface 142 of the base layer 130 to be positioned adjacent the surface of the wound 112. The structure extending up from a top surface 140 of the base layer (e.g. the walls 132 and the posts 134) can be positioned adjacent the porous material of the pad 118. In such embodiments, the barrier 120 can space the pad 118 away from the wound 112 so as to prevent or reduce tissue ingrowth into the pad 118 without additional structure extending from a bottom side of the base layer 130. In some embodiments, the barrier 120 can be manufactured as an integral component of the sponge pad or wound filler 118, such that the two elements are not separate, but one. Such a composite improved NPWT dressing could possess most commonly an open-cell foam sponge superficial surface (i.e. facing away from the wound), whose primary purpose would be to facilitate transmission of negative pressure to the wound and evacuation of wound fluids from the wound 112 surface. Then a barrier layer can be fixedly attached on a wound-facing surface of this composite dressing. Such a barrier layer can serve the same purpose as the barrier 120 does in other embodiments in which the barrier 120 is an independent and separate piece. Such a barrier would be a physical barrier intended to prevent or reduce tissue in-growth into the open-cell foam sponge or other wound filler material. In this way, this embodiment would not be an add on to current NPWT dressings, but rather a uniquely new NPWT dressing with enhanced capability over and above the current art.
In other embodiments, the barrier 120 can have structure extending from both of the top and bottom surfaces 140 and 142 of the base layer 130. For example, the barrier 120 can have walls 132 and posts 134 extending from the bottom surface 142 that are substantially a mirror image to the walls 132 and the posts 134 extending from the top surface 140 (except that the tabs 138 can be omitted). Alternatively, the barrier 120 can have structure extending from the bottom surface 142 of the base layer 130 that is different than the structure extending from the top surface 140 of the base layer 130. Structure that extends from the top surface 140 can be sized, shaped, and configured to interface with the pad 118. Structure that extends from the bottom surface 142 can be sized, shaped, and configured to interface with the muscle tissue 126 or some other tissue of the patient 102 to prevent or resist the muscle tissue 126 from clogging the pores 136 when the muscle tissue 126 grows during the negative pressure wound therapy.
As shown in
The barrier 120 can be a one piece structure with complex geometry. Accordingly, the base layer 130, the walls 132, the posts 134, and the tabs 136 can be integrally formed as a single construct. Alternative designs can allow for the barrier 120 to have multiple layers and allow for removal of some layers to decrease the height of the barrier by the treating provider at the time of dressing application. The barrier 120 can be integrally formed by injection molding via a pliable medical grade polymer. For example, the barrier 120 can be made of silicon or polyurethane. In other embodiments, the barrier 120 can be made of polydioxanone, or another material that is able to dissolve if left implanted in the patient 102 for many days.
The barrier 120 can be constructed of biodegradable material and left in the wound 112 permanently. The barrier 120 can be clear, colored, or tinted to allow for easy identification within the wound 112 in order to prevent it from being left in the wound 112, for versions of the barrier 120 that are not biodegradable. A radiographic marker can be included in the barrier 120 to allow for identification by radiograph, as a means of preventing unintended retention of a dressing in a wound.
In some embodiments, the barrier 120 can be made of a transparent or translucent material. This can allow for better visualization of the wound 112 under the barrier 120. The barrier 120 can also be tinted (such as tinted purple, green, and/or blue) to increase visibility in the wound 112 so as to avoid or reduce the risk of the barrier 120 being undesirably left in the wound 112. In some embodiments, the barrier 120 can be both tinted as well as transparent or translucent. In some embodiments, the tabs 138 (or other removal handles) can be colored and some or all of other portions of the barrier 120 can be clear and not colored.
In some embodiments, the barrier 120 can be formed of a material and can be sized and shaped to be both somewhat pliable and somewhat shape-retaining. For example, the barrier 120 can be pliable enough to bend to conform to a shape of a wound and/or to wrap at least partially around a sponge or other pad 118, such as shown schematically in
In some embodiments, the barrier 120 can be configured to be cut. Doctors or other medical personnel can cut the barrier 120 to shape so as to fit in the wound 112 depending on the shape of the wound 112. In some of such embodiments, the barrier 120 can also be rigid enough to be held in one hand and cut with the other hand without the barrier 120 sagging undesirably limp during the cutting process.
The barrier 120 can be sized to be relatively long and wide as viewed from the top (see
The barrier 120 can have a relatively high tensile strength so as to resist ripping when in tension.
The perforations 136 can be sized large enough to allow for flow through the barrier 120 such that the NPWT system 100 functions effectively to apply negative pressure to the wound 112 below the barrier 120. For example, the perforations 136 can each have a diameter of about 1 to 5 mm. The perforations 136 of the barrier 120 can be sized and shaped to allow for the sucking of liquid and exudate through the perforations 136 without clogging the perforations 136 (or with reduced clogging of the perforations 136).
The walls 132 and/or the posts 134 can have a thickness (when viewed from the top as in
In some embodiments, the barrier 120 can include radiopaque material. Radiopaque material can help ensure that the barrier 120 is visible during x-ray imaging, which, can allow medical professionals to remove the barrier 120 from the patient 102 in the event that the barrier 120 is accidentally left inside the patent after the barrier 120 was supposed to be removed. For example, the barrier 120 can include one or more radiopaque markers such as thin diameter wires (not shown) embedded within flexible, medical-grade polymer material that forms the barrier 120. In some embodiments, a radiopaque thin diameter wire can be positioned in the barrier 120 at the one or more tabs 138 to both reinforce the tabs 138 and to help confirm removal using radiography. The wire or suture can also be used as “rebar” to reinforce the tensile strength of the barrier 120 and resist tearing. The wire or suture in this embodiment would typically be manufactured to lay within the walls of the barrier 120.
In some embodiments, the barrier 120 can include a coating. For example, the barrier 120 can be coated with a lubricant. Coating with a lubricant can be beneficial in situations, such as, when used in wounds with exposed bone or tendon to help prevent (or resist) the bone or tendon from drying out. Alternatively or in addition, the barrier 120 can be coated with a bacteriostatic agent that is configured to stop or slow the reproduction of bacteria. Alternatively or in addition, the barrier 120 can be coated with an antibiotic coating. Moreover, the barrier 120 can be coated with another coating that is deemed suitable for the application.
In some embodiments, the barrier 120 can include irrigation flow channels (e.g. see the irrigation channels of
The barriers 150 and 170 can have features (e.g. walls 132, posts 134, and/or perforations 136) and uses that are the same or similar to those described herein for the barrier 120. For example, one of the barriers 150 or 170 can be used in a manner similar to the barrier 120 as described above for
In some embodiments, the barriers 150 and 170 can be configured to be trimmed (e.g. via scissors) to substantially match the size of the wound 112 and still function to supply irrigant to the surface of the wound 112. For example for the barrier 150, the tube 158 is attached to the barrier 150 along one edge. Accordingly, the barrier 150 can be trimmed down to size by trimming the other three edges while maintaining the structural integrity of the connection between the tube 158 and the barrier 150. During trimming, one or more of the channels 154 and 156 can be cut and yet the barrier 150 can still function to supply irrigant to the surface of the wound 112 through those portions of the channels 154 and 156 that remain.
Additionally, for the barrier 170, the tube 176 is attached to the barrier 160 at the middle portion 178. Accordingly, the barrier 170 can be trimmed down to size by trimming any of the four edges while maintaining the structural integrity of the connection between the tube 176 and the barrier 170 at the middle portion 178. During trimming, one or more of the channels 172 and 174 can be cut and yet the barrier 170 can still function to supply irrigant to the surface of the wound 112 through those portions of the channels 172 and 174 that remain.
In some embodiments, the barrier 120 (as well as the barriers 150 and 170) can include filaments that act to reinforce the integrity of the barrier 120 in a manner that is similar to rebar in concrete. Such filaments can be in the form of suture material, a metal, a fabric, and/or a stronger polymer. The filaments can be high tensile material that helps resist or prevent portions of the barrier 120 being fragmented and retained in the wound 112.
The filaments can be in a central portion of the barrier 120 in plane with the barrier 120, such that the filaments are in-line to transect or follow the margins of the perforations 136. The filaments can also be in a random pattern to allow for improved tensile strength without being too bulky. In some embodiments, the filaments can be in the form of a mesh layer that is embedded in the barrier 120 prior to the barrier 120 being perforated. A perforating tool can cut a hole in the barrier 120, and also in the mesh filaments imbedded in the barrier 120. Thus, the mesh filaments can optionally be positioned in order to prevent or reduce overlap across the perforations 136.
These filaments can optionally traverse the perforations 136. If the filaments do traverse the perforations 136, the filaments can serve as a sieve to prevent tissue in-growth yet permit the evacuation of wound fluids.
In alternative embodiments, the barrier 120 can be formed as a flat woven mesh layer or a three dimensional mesh structure (such as a pot scrubber or loofah) dipped or coated in silicone or similar material that is bio-compatible/inert. Such a mesh structure could also be similar to a honeycomb type structure. The mesh structure can offer tensile strength and compressibility. The mesh structure can be constructed of suture, metal, polymer, or fabric material. The mesh structure can form a core material that offers tensile strength and that is coated to prevent or reduce tissue ingrowth. Constructing the barrier 120 in this manner can allow for a compressible structure with significant fluid pathways to allow irrigation passage as well as transmit negative pressure. In some embodiments, the barrier 120 can have a structure that is constructed of transparent coating over thin filaments (such as a PDS, proline, monocryl, or woven polyester such as ethibond, fiberwire, or vycryl). The barrier 120 can be made of non-dissolvable or dissolvable material. In another embodiment, the barrier 120 can include a dissolvable polyglycolate material. In another embodiment, the barrier 120 can include collagen based materials to create structural support but still allow a fully dissolvable barrier 120.
In some embodiments, the barrier 120 can also be used with any suitable system as a sponge, pad, or wound filler replacement. By removing the pad 118 (or any other wound filler) and using the barrier 120, the clinician can see the wound 112 assuming the barrier 120 is constructed of a clear material. The tabs 138 can be trimmed to allow for easier sealing over the barrier 120. The barrier 120 can be used with any suitable system that incorporates a sealing layer 102 and suction tubing 108.
At step 206, the wound dressing 110 is prepared. Components of the wound dressing 110 can be removed from packaging, assembled, and/or trimmed. For example, the pad 118 can be trimmed to a size and shape suitable for being positioned in the wound 112 of the patient 102. The wound dressing 110 can now ready to be applied to the wound 112, except when it is deemed desirable to use the barrier 120. If the wound dressing 110 is to be used without the dressing 112, the method 200 can proceed to step 214. If the benefits of the barrier 120 are desired, steps 208, 210, and 212 can be performed.
At step 208, the barrier 120 is provided. The barrier 120 can be intended for use with the wound dressing 110 and similar wound dressings to improve treatment of the patient 102, yet the barrier 120 is provided separately from the wound dressing 110. At step 210, the barrier 120 is prepared. The barrier 120 can be removed from packaging. In embodiments where the barrier 120 is a single, integrally formed barrier, no assembly is needed. The barrier can be trimmed to a size and shape suitable for being positioned in the wound 112 under the pad 118 to separate the pores of the pad 118 from some or all of the surface of the wound 112.
At step 212, the barrier 120 can be positioned in the wound. The barrier 120 can be positioned to substantially cover all (or substantially all) of the surface of wound tissue. Alternatively, the barrier 120 can be positioned to cover only a portion of the tissue in the wound, such as the muscle tissue 126. Covering the muscle tissue 126 can be beneficial because the muscle tissue 126 can tend to grow into the pores of spongey material like the pad 118, and consequently, pain and tissue damage can result when the pad 118 is removed from the wound 112 when such tissue ingrowth occurs. Other tissue, such as fatty tissue 124, can be less prone to ingrowth, and consequently, it can be less important to cover such fatty tissue 124 in such circumstances. Nonetheless, the fatty tissue 124 and other tissue can also be covered by the barrier 120.
At step 214, the wound dressing 110 can be applied. The pad 118 can be placed in the wound 112 on top of the barrier 120 and the membrane 116 can be applied to cover the wound 112. The tubing connector 114 can be applied so as to connect to tubing for applying NPWT.
At step 216, negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) can be applied to the wound 112. The EVR 104 can work in conjunction with a vacuum source to apply negative pressure to the wound 112 in order to aid in healing.
When the wound dressing 110 is applied without the barrier 120, the wound dressing 110 can be used for a period of 24-72 hours or less. Even when removed within 24-72 hours or less, tissue ingrowth can occur potentially causing pain, tissue damage, and breakage of portions of the spongy material of the pad 118 and remaining in the wound 112 when the pad 118 is pulled out of the wound 112.
When the wound dressing 110 is applied with the barrier 120 positioned under the pad 118, pain, tissue damage, and/or breakage can be reduced. In some applications, the wound dressing 110 and the barrier 120 can be left in for longer than 24-72 hours because the barrier 120 can inhibit tissue ingrowth. Accordingly, use of the barrier 120 can increase the effective life and duration of each wound dressing 110.
In some embodiments, components and features of the wound dressing 300 can be similar to those described above (e.g. for wound dressing 110) and also have some differences suitable for use in treating relatively long and narrow wounds. For example, the pad 304 can be a foam pad (e.g. a foam sponge) like that described above for the pad 118, except the pad 304 is long and narrow.
Additionally, the barrier 306 can have features similar to barriers described above. For example, some embodiments of the barrier 306 can be a porous barrier (similar to the barrier 120) that provides physical separation between the wound and an in-growth inducing surface of the pad 304. In some embodiments, the barrier 306 can include irrigation channels similar to the barrier 150 or the barrier 170.
As shown in
In some embodiments, the barriers 306, 406, and 506 can be used with a pad (e.g. the pad 304 which can be a foam sponge) positioned inside the barriers 306, 406, and 506. In other embodiments, the barriers 306, 406, and 506 can be used without any pad or similar structure positioned inside the barriers 306, 406, and 506.
The dressing 610 can include a tubing system 608, a membrane 616, and an adhesive connection layer 624 (e.g. a “lily pad”). The membrane 616 can be positioned over the combined pad 618 and the barrier 620 to cover and seal the pad 618 and the barrier 620 in a wound. A hole 626 can be cut in the membrane 616 at a location aligned with the pad 618 and the adhesive connection layer 624 can be adhered to the membrane 616 at the hole 626 to connect the tubing system 608 to the hole 626 to provide suction to the dressing 610 and the corresponding wound.
While this specification contains many specific implementation details, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the disclosed technology or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features that may be specific to particular embodiments of particular disclosed technologies. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment in part or in whole. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable subcombination. Moreover, although features may be described herein as acting in certain combinations and/or initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a subcombination or variation of a subcombination. Similarly, while operations may be described in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order or in sequential order, or that all operations be performed, to achieve desirable results. Particular embodiments of the subject matter have been described. Other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
A number of embodiments of the inventions have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, in some embodiments various components such as radiopaque material, filaments, flow passages, etc. need not be included. Moreover, the shape of various features of the barrier can be modified as appropriate. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/749,511, filed on Jan. 22, 2020. The disclosure of the prior application is considered part of (and is incorporated by reference in) the disclosure of this application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1000001 | Holz | Aug 1911 | A |
1355846 | Rannells | Oct 1920 | A |
1385346 | Taylor | Jul 1921 | A |
1596754 | Moschelle | Aug 1926 | A |
1936129 | Fisk | Nov 1933 | A |
2195771 | Estler | Apr 1940 | A |
2221758 | Elmquist | Nov 1940 | A |
2338339 | LaMere et al. | Jan 1944 | A |
2443481 | Sene | Jun 1948 | A |
2573791 | Howells | Nov 1951 | A |
2577945 | Atherton | Dec 1951 | A |
2632443 | Lesher | Mar 1953 | A |
2682873 | Evans et al. | Jul 1954 | A |
3026874 | Stevens | Mar 1962 | A |
3292619 | Egler | Dec 1966 | A |
3315665 | MacLeod | Apr 1967 | A |
3367332 | Groves | Feb 1968 | A |
3382867 | Reaves | May 1968 | A |
3520300 | Flower, Jr. | Jul 1970 | A |
3528416 | Chamberlain | Sep 1970 | A |
3568675 | Harvey | Mar 1971 | A |
3599830 | Gilchrist et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3610238 | Rich | Oct 1971 | A |
3648692 | Wheeler | Mar 1972 | A |
3782377 | Rychlik | Jan 1974 | A |
3812972 | Rosenblum | May 1974 | A |
3814095 | Lubens | Jun 1974 | A |
3831588 | Rindner | Aug 1974 | A |
3874387 | Barbieri | Apr 1975 | A |
3903882 | Augurt | Sep 1975 | A |
3935863 | Kliger | Feb 1976 | A |
3954105 | Nordby et al. | May 1976 | A |
4080970 | Miller | Mar 1978 | A |
4112947 | Nehring | Sep 1978 | A |
4139004 | Gonzalez, Jr. | Feb 1979 | A |
4149541 | Gammons et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4178974 | Levin | Dec 1979 | A |
4191204 | Nehring | Mar 1980 | A |
4224941 | Stivala | Sep 1980 | A |
4250882 | Adair | Feb 1981 | A |
4275721 | Olson | Jun 1981 | A |
4297995 | Golub | Nov 1981 | A |
4341209 | Schaar | Jul 1982 | A |
4373519 | Errede et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4382441 | Svedman | May 1983 | A |
4399816 | Spangler | Aug 1983 | A |
4457755 | Wilson | Jul 1984 | A |
4460354 | Weilbacher et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4460370 | Allison et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4465062 | Versaggi et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4469092 | Marshall et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4559035 | Benjamin et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4608041 | Nielsen | Aug 1986 | A |
4624656 | Clark et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4633863 | Filips et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4637819 | Ouellette et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4641643 | Greer | Feb 1987 | A |
4655754 | Richmond et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4661093 | Beck et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4664652 | Weilbacher | May 1987 | A |
4664662 | Webster | May 1987 | A |
4667666 | Fryslie | May 1987 | A |
4679590 | Hergenroeder | Jul 1987 | A |
4717382 | Clemens et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4733659 | Edenbaum et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4740202 | Stacey et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4743232 | Kruger | May 1988 | A |
4747166 | Kuntz | May 1988 | A |
4759354 | Quarfoot | Jul 1988 | A |
4765316 | Marshall | Aug 1988 | A |
4778446 | Jensen | Oct 1988 | A |
4778456 | Lokken | Oct 1988 | A |
4820265 | DeSatnick et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4820284 | Hauri | Apr 1989 | A |
4834110 | Richard | May 1989 | A |
4872450 | Austad | Oct 1989 | A |
4886502 | Poirier et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4897081 | Poirier et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4906240 | Reed et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4915694 | Yamamoto et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4917112 | Kalt | Apr 1990 | A |
4921492 | Schultz et al. | May 1990 | A |
4930997 | Bennett | Jun 1990 | A |
4941882 | Ward et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4953565 | Tachibana et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4890608 | Steer | Oct 1990 | A |
4962761 | Golden | Oct 1990 | A |
4969880 | Zamierowski | Nov 1990 | A |
4969881 | Viesturs | Nov 1990 | A |
4988336 | Kohn | Jan 1991 | A |
4990144 | Blott | Feb 1991 | A |
4991574 | Pocknell | Feb 1991 | A |
4997425 | Shioya et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5002528 | Palestrant | Mar 1991 | A |
5002529 | Cunningham | Mar 1991 | A |
5003971 | Buckley | Apr 1991 | A |
5014389 | Ogilvie et al. | May 1991 | A |
5034003 | Denance | Jul 1991 | A |
5034006 | Hosoda et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5042978 | Quenin et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5045777 | Itagaki | Sep 1991 | A |
5060662 | Farnsworth, III | Oct 1991 | A |
5071409 | Rosenberg | Dec 1991 | A |
5073172 | Fell | Dec 1991 | A |
5086763 | Hathman | Feb 1992 | A |
5086764 | Gillman | Feb 1992 | A |
5100396 | Zamierowski | Mar 1992 | A |
5101808 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5106362 | Gilman | Apr 1992 | A |
5106629 | Cartmell et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5135518 | Vera | Apr 1992 | A |
5147338 | Lang et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5149331 | Ferdman et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5152757 | Eriksson | Oct 1992 | A |
5160322 | Scheremet et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5167613 | Karami et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5170781 | Loomis | Dec 1992 | A |
5176502 | Sanderson et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5176663 | Svedman et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5176667 | DeBring | Jan 1993 | A |
5215539 | Schoolman | Jun 1993 | A |
5228431 | Giarretto | Jul 1993 | A |
5230350 | Fentress | Jul 1993 | A |
5238654 | Nohl et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5261893 | Zamierowski | Nov 1993 | A |
5263922 | Sova et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5291887 | Stanley et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5298015 | Komatsuzaki et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5330452 | Zook | Jul 1994 | A |
5344415 | DeBusk et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5349965 | McCarver | Sep 1994 | A |
5358494 | Svedman | Oct 1994 | A |
5374254 | Buma | Dec 1994 | A |
5376252 | Ekstrom et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5395315 | Griep | Mar 1995 | A |
5419768 | Kayser | May 1995 | A |
5431622 | Pyrozyk et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5437651 | Todd et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5445604 | Lang | Aug 1995 | A |
5451215 | Wolter | Sep 1995 | A |
5478333 | Asherman, Jr. | Dec 1995 | A |
5484420 | Russo | Jan 1996 | A |
5484427 | Gibbons | Jan 1996 | A |
5484428 | Drainville et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5487889 | Eckert et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5520652 | Peterson | May 1996 | A |
5527293 | Zamierowski | Jun 1996 | A |
5531670 | Westby et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5533981 | Mandro et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5542918 | Atkinson | Aug 1996 | A |
5549584 | Gross | Aug 1996 | A |
5556375 | Ewall | Sep 1996 | A |
5578022 | Scherson et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5607388 | Ewall | Mar 1997 | A |
5624418 | Shepard | Apr 1997 | A |
5628735 | Skow | May 1997 | A |
5636643 | Argenta et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5645081 | Argenta et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5655258 | Heintz | Aug 1997 | A |
5656027 | Ellingboe | Aug 1997 | A |
5660350 | Byrne et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5662598 | Tobin | Sep 1997 | A |
5662624 | Sundstrom et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5662625 | Westwood | Sep 1997 | A |
5669892 | Keogh et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5672152 | Mason et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5678564 | Lawrence et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5690815 | Krasnoff et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5697920 | Gibbons | Dec 1997 | A |
5735833 | Olson | Apr 1998 | A |
5741237 | Walker | Apr 1998 | A |
5755706 | Kronenthal et al. | May 1998 | A |
5759570 | Arnold | Jun 1998 | A |
5762640 | Kajiwara et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5782871 | Fujiwara et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5817145 | Augustine et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827246 | Bowen | Oct 1998 | A |
5911222 | Lawrence et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919476 | Fischer et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5921972 | Skow | Jul 1999 | A |
5928174 | Gibbins | Jul 1999 | A |
5941859 | Lerman | Aug 1999 | A |
5947914 | Augustine | Sep 1999 | A |
5954680 | Augustine | Sep 1999 | A |
5961480 | Augustine | Oct 1999 | A |
5964721 | Augustine | Oct 1999 | A |
5964723 | Augustine | Oct 1999 | A |
5986163 | Augustine | Nov 1999 | A |
6010527 | Augustine et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6017493 | Cambron et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6039724 | Seifert et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045518 | Augustine | Apr 2000 | A |
6045541 | Matsumoto et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6048337 | Svedman | Apr 2000 | A |
6056730 | Greter | May 2000 | A |
6071254 | Augustine | Jun 2000 | A |
6071267 | Zamierowski | Jun 2000 | A |
6071304 | Augustine et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080189 | Augustine et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080243 | Insley et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6093160 | Augustine et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6093230 | Johnson, III et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6095992 | Augustine | Aug 2000 | A |
6110197 | Augustine et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113561 | Augustine | Sep 2000 | A |
6117111 | Fleischmann | Sep 2000 | A |
6135116 | Vogel et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6142982 | Hunt et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6143945 | Augustine et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6165994 | Henley | Dec 2000 | A |
6174306 | Fleischmann | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176868 | Detour | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179804 | Satterfield | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6203563 | Fernandez | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207875 | Lindqvist et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6213965 | Augustine et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6213966 | Augustine | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217535 | Augustine | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6235009 | Skow | May 2001 | B1 |
6235047 | Augustine et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241697 | Augustine | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6241698 | Augustine | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6244311 | Hand et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6244698 | Hand et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6248084 | Augustine et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254557 | Augustine et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6254580 | Svedman | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264622 | Augustine | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264979 | Svedman | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267740 | Augustine et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6283931 | Augustine | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6284941 | Cox et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290685 | Insley et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293917 | Augustine et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6345623 | Heaton et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6398767 | Fleischmann | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6458109 | Henley et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468237 | Lina | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6491682 | Paderni | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6645226 | Jacobs et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6648862 | Watson | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6663349 | Discenzo et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6685681 | Anker et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6691047 | Fredericks | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6695823 | Lina et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6749592 | Lord | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6752794 | Lockwood et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755807 | Risk, Jr. et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764462 | Risk, Jr. et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6767334 | Randolph | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6800074 | Henley et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6824533 | Risk, Jr. et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6855135 | Lockwood et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6893452 | Jacobs | May 2005 | B2 |
6978816 | Byrne et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6978884 | Lockwood | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7004915 | Boynton et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7022113 | Lockwood et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7108683 | Zamierowski | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7117869 | Heaton et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7128795 | Byrne et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7156862 | Jacobs et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7195624 | Lockwood et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7198046 | Argenta et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7216651 | Argenta et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7276051 | Henley et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7338482 | Lockwood et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7361184 | Joshi | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7381211 | Zamierowski | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7413571 | Zamierowski | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7422576 | Boynton et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7438705 | Karpowicz et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7520872 | Biggie et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7524286 | Johnson | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7524315 | Blott et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7532953 | Vogel | May 2009 | B2 |
7534927 | Lockwood et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7608066 | Vogel | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7645269 | Zamierowski | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7651484 | Heaton et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7678090 | Risk, Jr. et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7723560 | Lockwood et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7763000 | Risk, Jr. et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7794438 | Henley et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7837673 | Vogel | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7867206 | Lockwood et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7883494 | Martin | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7896864 | Lockwood et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7922703 | Riesinger | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7927318 | Risk, Jr. et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7927352 | Wilke et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7951100 | Hunt et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7967810 | Freedman | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7927362 | Wilke et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7988680 | Lockwood et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8057446 | Kane et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8066243 | Svedman et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8084664 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8142405 | Vogel | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8162909 | Blott et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8168848 | Lockwood et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8187210 | Hunt et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8350116 | Lockwood et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8372049 | Jaeb et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8376972 | Fleischmann | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8425478 | Olson | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8444613 | Svedman et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8447375 | Freedman et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8460258 | Jones et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8460273 | Freedman et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8974428 | Freedman | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9393354 | Freedman et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
10058643 | Freedman et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10149930 | Freedman | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10258270 | Freedman | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10485906 | Freedman | Nov 2019 | B2 |
11160917 | Shuler | Nov 2021 | B2 |
20010031943 | Urie | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020065494 | Lockwood et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020115967 | Svedman | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020143286 | Tumey | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150720 | Howard et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161346 | Lockwood | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020183702 | Henley | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030050594 | Zamierowski | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030139255 | Lina | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030163160 | O'Malley et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030208149 | Coffey | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040006319 | Lina et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040054338 | Bybordi et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064111 | Lockwood et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040064132 | Boehringer et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040243073 | Lockwood et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040265040 | Rosenberg | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050070858 | Lockwood et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050085795 | Lockwood | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060041238 | Bowen | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060065494 | Kim | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060129137 | Lockwood et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060155260 | Blott et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060282028 | Howard et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070038247 | Lebner et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070167926 | Blott et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070225634 | Ferren et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225663 | Watt et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233022 | Henley et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080041401 | Casola et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080167593 | Fleischmann | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080208011 | Shuler | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080300555 | Olson | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090012482 | Pinto et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090082740 | Lockwood et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090177051 | Arons et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090221977 | Blott et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100049151 | Aicher | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100057022 | Horrigan | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100063483 | Adahan | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069885 | Stevenson | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100160876 | Robinson | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100174250 | Hu | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185236 | Elliott et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191196 | Heagle | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191198 | Heagle | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100262091 | Larsson | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100280428 | Widgerow et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100292549 | Shuler | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110034888 | Aali | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110054283 | Shuler | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110106026 | Wu et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110125110 | Cotton | May 2011 | A1 |
20110172617 | Riesinger | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110213319 | Blott et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120041403 | Bennett et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120316518 | Croizt et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130096520 | Lockwood et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130138060 | Haggstrom et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130144230 | Wu et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130165821 | Freedman et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130165878 | Heagle | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130172834 | Heagle | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130274695 | Freedman et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140018752 | Shuler et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140052083 | Freedman | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140066868 | Freedman | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140221907 | Scholz | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150190288 | Dunn | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150320434 | Ingram | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160120706 | Collinson et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20170028113 | Shuler | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20180353334 | Locke et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190111192 | Freedman | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190117465 | Osborne | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190240383 | Freedman | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190262181 | Long et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190343687 | Locke | Nov 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2014291873 | Feb 2016 | AU |
2013290346 | Jun 2018 | AU |
2789685 | Sep 2011 | CA |
2879108 | Jan 2014 | CA |
103623496 | Mar 2014 | CN |
1304966 | May 2003 | EP |
2815731 | Dec 2014 | EP |
WO 1997005838 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO 2003057070 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 2006114648 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007041642 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2008106396 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO 2008100440 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2009062327 | May 2009 | WO |
WO 2009093116 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2009141820 | Nov 2009 | WO |
WO 2010129528 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO 2011091045 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO 2013066694 | May 2013 | WO |
WO 2017063036 | Apr 2017 | WO |
WO-2017063036 | Apr 2017 | WO |
WO 2018226664 | Dec 2018 | WO |
WO 2019136164 | Jul 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report in European Appln No. 21743873.8, dated Dec. 16, 2022, 7 pages. |
‘o-wm.com’ [online]. “Negative pressure wound therapy: “a rose by any other name”,” Mar. 2005, [retrieved on Nov. 19, 2015]. Retrieved from the Internet: URLhttp://www.o-wm.com/content/negative-pressure-wound-therapy-%E2%80%9Ca-rose-any-other-name%E2%80%9D, 10 pages. |
Argenta et al., “Vacuum-Assisted Closure: A New Method for Wound Control and Treatment: Basic Foundation,” Annals of Plastic Surgery, 1997, 38(6): 553-562. |
Argenta et al., “Vacuum-Assisted Closure: A New Method for Wound Control and Treatment: Clinical Experience,” Annals of Plastic Surgery, 1997, 38(6): 563-577. |
Barker et al., “Vacuum pack technique of temporary abdominal closure: a 7-year experience with 112 patients,” J Trauma, Feb. 2000, 48(2): 201-6. |
Barnea et al., “Our experience with Wisebands: a new skin and soft-tissue stretch device,” Plast Reconstr Surg, Mar. 2004, 113(3): 862-9. |
Brock et al., “Temporary Closure of Open Abdominal Wounds: The Vacuum Pack,” Am Surg., 1995, 61(1): 30-35. |
Buckman, “Vacuum Assisted Wound Closure System,” Drexel University white paper, Jul. 15, 2006. |
Campbell, “Surgical wound case studies with the versatile 1 wound vacuum system for negative pressure wound therapy,” J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, Mar. 2006, 33(2): 176-85. |
Chariker et al., “An algorithmic approach to the use of gauze-based negative-pressure wound therapy as a bridge to closure in pediatric extremity trauma,” Plast Reconstr Surg, May 2009, 123(5): 1510-20. |
Chariker et al., “Effective management of incisional and cutaneous fistulae with closed suction wound drainage,” Contemp Surg 1989;34:59-63. |
Conde-Green, et al., “Incisional Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Conventional Dressings Following Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Comparative Study,” Ann. Plast. Surg., 2013, 71:394-397. |
Davydov et al., “Concepts for Clinical Biological Management of the Wound Process in the Treatment of Purulent Wounds Using Vacuum Therapy,” The Kremlin Papers; Perspectives in Wound Care from the Russian Medical Journal, 1991, 132-135. |
Davydov et al., “The Bacteriological and Cytological Assessment of Vacuum Therapy of Purulent Wounds,” The Kremlin papers, Perspectives in Wound Care from the Russian Medical Journal, 1988, 48-52. |
Davydov et al., “Vacuum Therapy in the Treatment of Purulent lactation Mastitis,” The Kremlin papers, perspectives in Wound Care from the Russian Medical Journal, 1986, 66-70. |
Giovinco et al., “Wound chemotherapy by the use of negative pressure wound therapy and infusion,” Eplasty, Jan. 2010, 8(10): e9, 8 pages. |
Jeter, “Closed suction wound drainage system,” J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, Mar. 2004, 31(2): 51. |
Kostiuchenok et al., “The Vacuum Effect in the Surgical Treatment of Purulent Wounds,” The Kremlin Papers, Perspectives in Wound Care from the Russian Medical Journal, 1986, 18-21. |
Leininger et al., “Experience with wound VAC and delayed primary closure of contaminated soft tissue injuries in Iraq,” J Trauma, Nov. 2006, 61(5): 1207-11. |
Miller et al., “Negative pressure wound therapy: An option for hard-to-heal wounds,” J Wound Care 2006, 15(7):321-324. |
Morykwas et al., “Vacuum-Assisted Closure: A New Method for Wound Control and Treatment: Basic Foundation,” Annals of Plastic Surgery, 1997, 38(6): 553-562. |
Morykwas et al., “Vacuum-assisted closure: state of basic research and physiologic foundation,” Plast Reconstr Surg, Jun. 2006, 117(7 Suppl): 121S-126S. |
Navsaria et al., “Temporary closure of open abdominal wounds by the modified sandwich-vacuum pack technique,” Br J Surg, Jun. 2003, 90(6): 718-22. |
Nguyen, et al., “Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Methods of Securing Skin Grafts Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: Vacuum-Assisted Closure and Gauze Suction,” J. Burn Care Res., 2015, 36:324-328. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Appln. No. PCT/US2021/14608, dated May 24, 2021, 13 pages. |
Perez et al., “Modern wound care for the poor: a randomized clinical trial comparing the vacuum system with conventional saline-soaked gauze dressings,” The American Journal of Surgery, 2010, 199: 14-20. |
Pliakos et al., “Vacuum-assisted closure in severe abdominal sepsis with or without retention sutured sequential fascial closure: a clinical trial,” Surgery, Nov. 2010, 148(5): 947-53. |
Polymer Science, Inc., “P-Derm Hydrogels,” Nov. 29, 2014, Retrieved from the Internet on Dec. 29, 2016: URL: <https://web.archive.org/web/20141129100425/http://www.polymerscience.com/products/hydrogel/>, 2 pages. |
Psoinos, et al., “Use of gauze-based negative pressure wound therapy in a pediatric burn patient,” J. Pediatric Surgery, 2009, 44:E23-E26. |
Scherer et al., “The vacuum assisted closure device: A method for securing skin grafts and improving graft survival,” Arch Surg., 2002, 137(8): 930-933. |
Singh et al., “Dynamic Wound Closure for Decompressive Leg Fasciotomy Wounds,” Am Surg, 2008, 74(3): 217-220. |
Svedman et al., “A dressing system providing fluid supply and suction drainage used for continuous or intermittent irrigation,” Ann Plast Surg, Aug. 1986, 17(2): 125-33. |
Thai et al., “Ultraviolet light C in the treatment of chronic wounds with MRSA: a case study,” Ostomy Wound Manage, Nov. 2002, 48(11): 52-60. |
Thomas, “Silicones in Medical Applications,” Dow Coring Europe SA, Sep. 8, 2011, Retrieved from the Internet on Dec. 29, 2016: URL:<https://web.archive.org/web/20110908185846/http://www.dowcorning.com/content/publishedlit/Chapter17.pdf >, 9 pages. |
Usupov et al., “Active Wound Drainage,” The Kremlin Papers, Perspectives in Wound Care from the Russian Medical Journal, 1987, 42-45. |
Utz et al., “Metalloproteinase expression is associated with traumatic wound failure,” J Surg Res, Apr. 2010, 159(2): 633-9. |
Valenta, “Using the Vacuum Dressing Alternative for Difficult Wounds,” American J. of Nursing, 1994, 44-45. |
Van der Velde and Hudson, “VADER (vacuum-assisted dermal recruitment: a new method of wound closure,” Annals of Plastic Surgery, 2005, 55(6): 660-664. |
Wackenfors, et al., “Effects of vacuum-assisted closure therapy on inguinal wound edge microvascular blood flow,” Wound Repaire and Regeneration, 2004, 12(6): 600-606. |
Webb, “New Techniques in Wound Management: Vacuum-assisted Wound Closure,” J. Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2002, 10(5): 303-311. |
Webster, et al., “Negative pressure wound therapy for skin gra s and surgical wounds healing by primary intention,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2014, 10:CD0009261, 3 pages. |
Wolvos, “Wound instillation—the next step in negative pressure wound therapy. Lessons learned from initial experiences.,” Ostomy Wound Manage, Nov. 2004, 50(11): 56-66. |
Zannis et al, “Comparison of Fasciotomy Wound Closures Using Traditional Dressing Changes and the Vacuum-assisted Closure Device,” Annals of Plastic Surgery, 2009, 62(4): 407-409. |
Zorilla, et al, “Shoelace technique for gradual closure of fasciotomy wounds,” The Journal of Trama, 2005, 59(6): 1515-1517. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220193325 A1 | Jun 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16749511 | Jan 2020 | US |
Child | 17515896 | US |