The present invention relates to a negative yarn feeder provided with a weft-braking device for locking the unwinding loops of yarn at the final step of the insertion of the yarn into the loom, which step is particularly critical in the case of projectile looms.
As known, the so-called “negative” yarn feeders comprise a stationary drum on which a motorized flywheel winds a plurality of yarn loops forming a weft reserve. Upon request from the loom, the loops are unwound from the drum, then pass through a device for controlling the tension of the yarn, and finally are fed to the loom. The yarn feeders of the above type have the essential aim of maintaining the amount of loops substantially constant on the drum, thereby minimizing the tension of the yarn coming from the drum.
Mainly in the case of projectile looms, the yarn feeder is generally provided with an “anti-balloon” device, which essentially consists of a funnel having the aim of containing the balloon which forms while the yarn is unwound from the feeder. Devices of this type are disclosed, e.g., in EP0719354, EP1094138, and EP1149793. Particularly, in EP1149793 the anti-balloon funnel has a frustoconical profile defined by a plurality of equally-spaced rods arranged along the generatrices of a frustum of cone, whereby the deposit of dust and the friction against the inner surface of the funnel are reduced.
As known, during the final step of the insertion, yarn loops in excess are liable to unwind from the drum by inertia. In order to contrast this drawback, it is known from U.S. Pat. No. 3,834,635 to provide the feeder with stationary brushes which are arranged in contact with the inner surface of the anti-balloon funnel. The unwinding yarn passes between the brushes and the funnel and, at the end of the insertion, when the loom has finished drawing yarn, it is braked by friction and consequently retained from further unwinding.
A drawback of the above device is that the brushes also brake the yarn during the insertion, when no braking action is required but, on the contrary, the yarn should run as freely as possible. This circumstance affects the smoothness of the yarn-feeding process and leads to a growth of dust generating by friction between the yarn and the brushes, which dust is liable to deposit within the funnel thereby affecting its operation.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,834,635 also discloses the use of air streams for braking the yarn. However, this solution is very complicated and expensive, because air-feeding means must pass through the swivelling, yarn-winding flywheel.
Therefore, it is a main object of the present invention to provide a yarn feeder having a weft-braking device which overcomes the above-cited drawbacks of the known brush-based devices, but which is simpler and cheaper to be manufactured then the pneumatic devices.
The above object and other advantages, which will better appear below, are achieved by the yarn feeder having the features recited in claim 1, while the dependent claims state other advantageous, though secondary features of the invention.
The invention will be now described in more detail with reference to a preferred, non-exclusive embodiment shown by way of non-limiting example in the attached drawings, wherein:
With reference to the above Figures, a negative yarn feeder 10 comprises a stationary drum 12 and a swivel flywheel 14 which is coaxially supported at one end of drum 12 and is driven by a motor 15 for winding loops of yarn F on the drum, thereby forming a stock S. Yarn F is unwound from drum 12 upon request from the loom, which in the present invention is preferably a projectile loom (not shown).
A stationary drum 16 longitudinally projects from the motor housing and supports an anti-balloon funnel 18. Anti-balloon funnel 18 consists of a plurality of equally-spaced rods 20 which are arranged along the generatrices of a frustum of cone and have one end attached to a smaller ring 22 defining the smaller base of the frustum of cone, and the opposite end attached to a larger ring 24 defining the larger base of the frustum of cone. A yarn-guide delivery eyelet 25 is arranged at the delivery end of the anti-balloon funnel.
Funnel 18 is coaxially arranged in front of drum 12 with its larger base facing the delivery end 12a of the drum. The inner surfaces of both smaller ring 22 and larger ring 24 are bevelled, and the innermost circumference of larger ring 24 advantageously has a diameter Da smaller than the yarn-winding diameter Dt of drum 12 (
An annular support 30 surrounding drum 12 near its delivery end 12a is attached to stationary drum 16 and holds a pair of movable braking members at diametrally opposite positions (
In the operation, during the insertion the brushes 34 are received in the respective seats 38 and do not interfere with the yarn, which consequently may be freely unwound from the drum without coming into contact with them. Funnel 18 adjusted as above prevents the formation of the balloon. During the final step of the insertion, but a few instants before a predetermined ending time, the microprocessor enables the brushes. The latter engage the outer surface of the drum with their tips, brake the unwinding yarn (which yarn runs between the brushes and the outer surface of the drum) by friction, and finally lock it, thereby preventing loops in excess from unwinding from the drum by inertia.
As the person skilled in the art will appreciate, with the device according to the invention the braking action is applied only when required, i.e., at the end of the insertion. Therefore, a smooth insertion is obtained and the formation of dust is limited.
A preferred embodiment of the invention has been described herein, but of course many changes may be made by a person skilled in the art within the scope of the claims. In particular, though the above-described assembly including the anti-balloon funnel and the bristle-based braking system effectively prevents both the formation of the balloon and the unwinding of loops in excess at the end of the insertion, which phenomena are strictly correlated, of course the braking system is capable of operating in association with other conventional anti-balloon funnels. Moreover, although the above-described embodiment is only provided with two braking brushes held by the annular support at diametrally opposite positions, of course a higher number of brushes may be installed, e.g., three or four brushes spaced at equal angles; on the contrary, in certain cases a sole brush could be sufficient. Nevertheless, as will be obvious to the person skilled in the art, the brushes can be operated by conventional actuators of a different type, e.g., electrical actuators.
The disclosures in European Patent Application No. 08425630.4 from which this application claims priority are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
EP08425630.4 | Sep 2008 | EP | regional |