BACKGROUND
Nestable beverage crates often include a base with side walls and end walls extending upward from side edges and end edges of the base, respectively. Each wall includes a plurality of columns extending from the base to an upper band. The columns and base of the crate are receivable between the upper bands of an identical crate when empty. The nested height of the crates is the height of the upper bands, i.e. each additional crate added to the stack will only increase the height of the stack by the height of the upper bands. This nested height is efficient for storage and transportation when empty.
Sometimes adjacent crates will experience “shingling,” in which the lower edge of one side wall rides up on top of the upper edge of an adjacent side wall. This is undesirable but can happen if one crate is tilted or lifted higher than the adjacent crate by a height equal to the height of the upper band. Thus, decreasing the height of the upper band can reduce the nesting height, but will increase the possibility of shingling.
SUMMARY
A nestable beverage crate includes a base, side walls and end walls. Each side wall includes a plurality of side columns connecting a side upper band to the base. Each end wall includes a plurality of end columns connected an end upper band to the base. The side upper band and the end upper bands each have a plurality of peaks and valleys and are asymmetric, such that adjacent crates will have peaks aligned with valleys and vice-versa. For purposes of preventing shingling, the effective height of these two adjacent side walls is the full distance between the upper edge of the peak and the lower edge of the valley, but the nesting height of the crate is only the height of the upper bands.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a nestable crate according to one embodiment.
FIG. 2 is a side view of the crate of FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 shows the opposite side view of the crate of FIG. 2.
FIG. 4 is an end view of the crate of FIG. 1.
FIG. 5 shows the opposite end view of the crate of FIG. 4.
FIG. 6 is a top view of the crate of FIG. 1.
FIG. 7 is a bottom view of the crate of FIG. 1.
FIG. 8 shows the crate of FIG. 1 nested in an identical crate.
FIG. 9 shows two of the crates of FIG. 1 with their side walls abutting.
FIG. 10 shows one of the crates of FIG. 9 with an end wall abutting a side wall of the other crate of FIG. 9.
FIG. 11 shows the crates of FIG. 9 with end walls abutting one another.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a nestable beverage crate 10 having a base 12. Side walls 14 extend upward from side edges of the base 12. End walls 16 extend upward from end edges of the base 12. The side walls 14 each include a side upper band 18. The end walls 16 each include an end upper band 20. The side upper bands 18 and end upper bands 20 together are continuous about the entire periphery of the crate 10. Columns 22 connect the side upper band 18 to the side edges of the base 12. Corner columns 26 extend downward from corners where the side upper bands 18 and end upper bands 20 meet. End columns 28 extend downward from the end upper bands 20 on the end walls 16.
The side upper bands 18 are asymmetric about a plane extending perpendicularly between midpoints of the two side upper bands 18. Each side upper band 18 includes a plurality of peaks 30 alternating with a plurality of valleys 32, on the upper edge of the side upper band 18. At one end of the side upper band 18 (or corner) is a peak 30, while at the opposite end or corner of that side upper band 18 is a valley 32. The peaks 30 on one side upper band 18 align with valleys 32 on the other side upper band 18 and vice versa. In other words, the side upper bands 18 are the same, not mirror images of one another.
A handle opening 34 is formed in each end wall. Each handle opening 34 is offset from the center of the end walls 16 toward a different one of the side walls 14. Each handle opening is centered on one of the end columns 28.
A plurality of interior projections 36 are formed on the interior sides of the side upper bands 18 and are aligned with the side columns 22. Interior projections 38 are also aligned with the end columns 28, but not over the handle openings 34.
The crate 10 is preferably injection molded as a single piece of suitable plastic.
FIG. 2 is a side view of the crate 10. As shown, the peaks 30 at the upper edge of one side upper band 18 are aligned with the valleys 32 of the other side upper band 18 and vice versa. The lower edge of the side upper bands 18 rides and falls with the upper edge of the side upper band 18 so that the side upper band 18 has substantially uniform height. FIG. 3 is a side view of the crate 10 showing the opposite side wall 14 to that of FIG. 2. Again, the side upper bands 18 are asymmetric and are the same, not mirror images of one another.
FIG. 4 is an end view of the crate 10. Each end wall 16 also includes a plurality of alternating peaks 40 and valleys 42, as reflected in the upper edge of the end upper band 20. The peaks 40 of one end wall 16 align with the valleys 42 of the opposite end wall 16 and vice versa. The end upper bands 20 are asymmetric and are the same, not mirror images of one another. The lower edges of the end upper bands 20 rise and fall with the upper edge, so that the end upper band 20 maintains a substantially uniform height. The handle opening 34 of each end wall 16 is centered on a valley 42. The handle opening 34 is defined between an upper portion 44 and a lower portion 46, both having lower surfaces that are concave downward.
FIG. 5 is an end view of the opposite end wall 16 of the crate 10.
FIG. 6 is a top view of the crate 10. As shown, the upper portions 44 of the handle openings 34 (not visible) are offset toward opposite side walls 14. The upper portions 44 of the handles are centered on columns 28 that are aligned between bottle receiving pockets in the crate 10. This permits the handles and end walls 16 to be positioned closer to one another and still leave enough room for the user's hand because the user's hand will be aligned with the space between the cylindrical bodies of the bottles.
FIG. 7 is a bottom view of the crate 10. A plurality of bottle cap receiving areas 50 (in this example, 15 in a 3×5 array) are defined by perimeter ribs 52, which preferably provide full bottle cap capture of the bottle caps of bottles on which the crate 10 is stacked.
FIG. 8 shows the crate 10 nested in an identical empty crate 10. The columns 22, 26, 28 are received between the side upper bands 18 of the empty crate 10 below. The upper edges of the side upper bands 18 are complementary to the lower edges of the side upper bands 18 of the upper crate 10. Similarly, the upper edges of the end upper bands 20 are complementary to the lower edges of the end upper bands 20 of the upper crate 10. As a result, as shown in FIG. 8, the nesting height of the crates 10 is the height of the upper bands 18, 20. However, as shown in FIGS. 9 and 11, the effective height of two adjacent crates 10 is the full distance between the upper edge of a peak and the lower edge of a valley of the upper bands 18, 20.
In FIG. 9, two crates 10 have their side walls 14 abutting. The peak 30 of one side wall aligns with the valley 32 of the adjacent side wall, and vice versa. As far as preventing shingling, in which the lower edge of one side wall 14 rides up on top of the upper edge of an adjacent side wall 14, the effective height of these two adjacent side walls 14 is the full distance between the upper edge of the peak 30 of one side wall 14 and the lower edge of the valley 32 of the adjacent side wall 14. Thus, prevention of shingling is increased without a corresponding increase in the nesting height of the empty crates (FIG. 8).
Referring to FIG. 10, when an end wall 16 of one crate 10 abuts the side wall 14 of an identical crate 10, however, this anti-shingling advantage is not realized as in FIG. 9. Only the actual height of the upper bands 18, 20 prevents shingling.
In FIG. 11, the crates 10 are arranged with abutting end walls 16. In this arrangement, once again, the peaks 40 of each end wall 16 align with the valleys 42 of the adjacent end walls. This again provides the anti-shingling advantage without the corresponding increase in nesting height.
In accordance with the provisions of the patent statutes and jurisprudence, exemplary configurations described above are considered to represent a preferred embodiment of the invention. However, it should be noted that the invention can be practiced otherwise than as specifically illustrated and described without departing from its spirit or scope.
Patent Application
20200130885
