1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a nestable crate for transporting and storing containers, and particularly bottles.
2. Background Art
Bottles, particularly those used to contain soft drinks and other beverages, are often transported and stored in crates having a bottom surrounded by four sidewalls. These crates generally are configured to be stacked on top of each other both when empty and when loaded with bottles. These crates are known in the art generally as full-depth and half-depth crates. Half-depth crates are shorter than full-depth crates, thus providing for greater visibility of the crates' contents.
Full-depth and half-depth crates are not designed to nest with one another and do not significantly stack, and thus do not store efficiently when empty. They typically have vertical exterior surfaces from top to bottom, and minimal wall stock, for providing a minimal overall length and width to allow for as much bottle density and as little crate structure as possible, in order to provide for pallet optimization, with little or no pallet overhang. The bottom of these crates extends downwardly and inwardly offset from the sidewalls defining a crate footprint. The stacking feature of such crates is typically limited to this bottom footprint, which is received within the rim of a like container to achieve more stable stack. One design is shown in U.S. Design Pat. No. D 361,663.
These crates are designed to balance many factors, including the need for structure and strength against having a footprint appropriately sized to provide pallet optimization. However, to achieve a significant degree of nesting with such crates, beyond that described above, would require a larger footprint, a more significant sidewall structure and more taper in the walls, and therefore detracts from the aforementioned pallet optimization.
On the other hand a third type of crate, low-depth crates, have generally been designed for bottles having a straight, cylindrical body with tapering tops. Unlike their half-depth and full-depth counterparts, low-depth crates typically have a led construction with tapered sidewalls—thus leading to greater pallet overhang—in order to provide for a nesting height of typically 50% between like crates. Bottles placed in low-depth and half-depth crates extend above the sidewalls of the crates. Thus, when loaded with bottles and in a stacked orientation, containers in such crates must be able to support the weight of other cases stacked on top of them. Once loaded with bottles, crates are typically stacked on top of each other in layers on top of a pallet, which is then lifted and moved about by forklifts. However, many low depth nestable crates may lack the features for maintaining loaded bottles in a substantially vertically upright position to bear the compressive load of crates stacked thereon.
Further, it is common for entire layers of crates to be lifted and moved about by way of an automated product lifting and handling device which can be installed on a conventional forklift and enables the lifting of an entire layer of product from a pallet. Briefly, such devices typically grabs each side of a layer of crates and use compressive loads to keep the layer intact, transferring forces from the sidewalls of the crate to the bottles therein, to the sidewalls of an adjacent crate, and so on. Unfortunately, some crates may not provide sufficient surface area or vertical sidewall construction, which would hinder or prevent the use of the automatic handling machinery. The often tapered sidewalls of a low-depth crate is just one example.
Thus, there is a need for an improved crate for storing and transporting containers, and particularly beverage containers. Such crate should be nestable to provide for more efficient storing and handling of the crates when emptied. Further, such crates should maintain bottles stored therein in a generally upright position. The crates should also be able to nest with various types of crates, including similar crates and non-similar half-depth and full-depth crates. Moreover, when similar crates are in a layered orientation, such crates should be capable of being lifted by automated lifting machinery.
Accordingly, it is an object according to the present invention to provide a low-depth crate, which is nestable with other similar crates when empty in order to provide more efficient storage.
It is another object according to the present invention to provide a low-depth crate, which is nestable within empty crates of similar construction and half-depth crates.
Another object according to the present invention is to provide a lowdepth nestable crate, which maintains containers, stored therein in a substantially upright position.
Yet another object according to the present invention is to provide a lowdepth nestable crate which, when oriented in a layer with similar crates, is able to be lifted by automated lifting machinery.
In accordance with the objects and teachings of the present invention, provided is a nestable crate for bottles having a floor portion with a floor top surface and a floor bottom surface. The floor top surface has a plurality of bottle support areas for supporting bottles. Also included is a low-depth wall structure connected to the floor portion and forming a containment area therewith. The wall structure has a peripherally extending upper band portion having an interior surface and an exterior surface. The wall structure further has a single-walled lower wall construction comprising adjacent column members which extend between the upper band the and floor portion. The wall structure includes sidewalls and end walls. A plurality of bottle receiving pockets extends around the periphery of the wall structure for maintaining bottles in a vertically upright manner. Each pocket is defined by the inner surface of the upper band portion, one of the plurality of bottle support areas, and a pair of facing surfaces disposed on adjacent column members extending inwardly from the upper band portion into the containment area to secure bottles therein in an upright manner. The pair of facing surfaces preferably have a concave shape. Further the upper band member has an inner surface with a plurality of nesting members aligned with corresponding column members, such that an outer surface of the column members are configured to receive the nesting members of a like crate when in a nesting orientation. The nesting members have a double-walled construction. The band also includes a bottle contact surface that has a curvature corresponding to the pair of facing surfaces.
In another embodiment, the band includes a plurality of single-walled upright concave inner surfaces which are arranged in an alternating manner with the columns and are positioned to correspond to the bottles. The inner surface of the upper band portion includes a bottle contact surface adjacent the bottle receiving pocket. The upper band portion and facing surfaces define a window therebetween which is disposed below the top band.
Also provided is a low-depth nestable crate for holding bottles which has a low-depth wall structure having sidewalls and end walls, and a floor member having a floor top surface and a floor bottom surface. It also has a band extending around the periphery of the crate and spaced above the floor member for preventing the bottles from tipping. The band has spaced-apart interior nesting projections. Also included is a plurality of columns which are disposed along the sidewalls and end walls for connecting the band member and the floor member. The columns are spaced apart and have a nesting window disposed therebetween. The columns have an interior surface and an exterior surface and project inwardly from the band such that an adjacent pair of columns defines a bottle receiving area for containing one of the bottles therein. The interior surface of each column has a pair of opposed members meeting at a centrally disposed surface. The exterior surface of the column has a recess to matingly receive corresponding interior nesting projections from a similar crate nested therebelow. The interior surfaces of the columns preferably have a cylindrically concave surface extending from a lower column edge to an upper column edge. The band may also include a plurality of upright concave inner surfaces arranged in an alternating manner with the columns and positioned to correspond to the bottles. The cylindrically concave surface and its adjacent upright concave inner surface have a similar curvature radius.
Any of the crates disclosed herein are preferably arranged to nest within a lower bottle crate having a generally vertical wall structure having an upper surface, outer surface and inner surface, as well as a floor attached to the wall structure and defining a compartment therewith. When nested, the exterior surface of the upper wall member of the upper bottle crate disclosed herein is generally co-planar with the outer surface of the wall structure of the lower bottle crate.
The above objects and other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention are readily apparent from the following detailed description of the best modes for carrying out the invention when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.
In accordance with the present invention, provided in
As shown in
Top band 14 provides the desired strength and rigidity to crate 10, while allowing for a relatively lighter weight crate by its partial single-walled construction. Exterior surface 26 of top band is generally vertically disposed.
A handle portion 38 is also included in the band member 14 of end walls 22 by which a user may grasp crate 10. An opening 40 is disposed below handle member 38 through which a user's fingers may extend for handling crate 10 in association with handle 40. The central end wall columns define an inwardly extending nesting ledge 68, which provides an additional stop during nesting.
Floor member 12 has an open lattice pattern that provides for a relatively lightweight crate and allows drainage. Floor member 12 is generally flat and planar and includes support areas 42 arranged in rows and columns to define one or more arrays. In the embodiment shown, a 4×6 array accommodates 24 20-oz bottles. Of course, this is by example and not limitation as the crate may be designed to support various quantities and sizes of bottles, without departing from the teachings herein. As shown in
As shown in
The various embodiments of the crate according to the present invention are nestable with similar crates, as illustrated in
With reference again to
Interior surface 52 of column 16 is generally vertical and includes angled bottle surfaces 58 and 60 which meet at a centrally oriented, vertically disposed, inwardly directed lower surface or edge 62. In a preferred embodiment, bottle contact surface 21 is cylindrically planar with column surfaces 58,60. Upper inner surface 64 is disposed slightly outward from column inner surface 52, to provide a transition ledge 65 therebetween. Top band 14 is offset outwardly from columns 16 such that nesting is achieved, both with similar crates
Columns 16 should also be strong enough to support the band 14 should containers 5 push against band 14. Columns 16 are generally defined by two arcuate faces 58,60 intersecting at a central edge 62, and may have a relatively larger area and cross-section at their bottoms, thus being more robust in their connection with floor member 12. Opposed surfaces 58, 60 of column 16 have a curvature generally mirroring that of adjacent bottles 5, such that the adjacent facing surfaces 58 of one column and 60 of an adjacent column cradle the bottles 5 therein.
With reference to
As previously noted, typical half-depth crates may only stack (not nest) with similar half-depth crates due to their construction, while low-depth crates typically are nested within similar low-depth crates. Thus, crates according to this invention provide for dual application in that it may nest within similar container 210′ (
Ribs 230-236 enhance the strength of crate 210 while using relatively less material and are particularly advantageous when used in association with automate lifting devices. When crates 210 are stacked upon a pallet in layers, these ribs define a generally planar surface by which the lifting device may grasp crates efficiently. Upon gripping, a compressive force is distributed among the crates and ribs 230-236 may serve to catch onto corresponding ribs of an adjacent crate to enhance the support of adjacent crates and impede the separation and translation down of crates in a layer. When adjacent crates 210 are in a layer of crates being lifted, should one crate begin to slip, it is contemplated that, for example, upper horizontal rib 230 of crate 210 may cooperate with ribs 232 and 236 of the adjacent crate to impede slippage.
Columns 216 that define side pockets 267 of crate 210 provide significant containment and wrap-around for bottles adjacent sidewalls 220 and end walls 222, as well as in the corners. This provides for more bottle surface contact and thus better bottle and load stability.
While embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it is not intended that these embodiments illustrate and describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This is a continuation application of U.S. Ser. No. 12/581,457, filed on Oct. 19, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,123,034, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 10/958,618, filed on Oct. 4, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,604,122, issued on Oct. 20, 2009, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 09/977,636, filed on Oct. 15, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,892,885, issued on May 17, 2005.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
D152907 | Richards | Sep 1946 | S |
4773554 | Warwick | Sep 1988 | A |
4819822 | Box | Apr 1989 | A |
4899874 | Apps et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4928841 | Arthurs | May 1990 | A |
4932532 | Apps et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4978002 | Apps et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
D318552 | Apps | Jul 1991 | S |
D319129 | Apps et al. | Aug 1991 | S |
D320298 | Apps et al. | Sep 1991 | S |
5060819 | Apps | Oct 1991 | A |
D325279 | Apps | Apr 1992 | S |
D327357 | Rehrig | Jun 1992 | S |
D327972 | Apps et al. | Jul 1992 | S |
D329931 | Apps | Sep 1992 | S |
5184748 | Apps | Feb 1993 | A |
5230601 | Apps et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5267649 | Apps et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
D343042 | Apps et al. | Jan 1994 | S |
5285899 | Apps et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5305884 | Apps et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5316172 | Apps et al. | May 1994 | A |
5320245 | Apps et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5323925 | Apps | Jun 1994 | A |
D356211 | Apps et al. | Mar 1995 | S |
D356679 | Apps et al. | Mar 1995 | S |
5405042 | Apps et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5421477 | Hammett | Jun 1995 | A |
D361431 | Koefelda | Aug 1995 | S |
D361663 | Kalin | Aug 1995 | S |
5445273 | Apps | Aug 1995 | A |
5465843 | Koefelda | Nov 1995 | A |
5487487 | Hammett | Jan 1996 | A |
5495945 | Apps et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5501352 | Apps | Mar 1996 | A |
5529176 | Apps et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
D371239 | Kelly | Jul 1996 | S |
D378249 | Apps et al. | Mar 1997 | S |
D379121 | Apps et al. | May 1997 | S |
D379717 | Apps et al. | Jun 1997 | S |
D380613 | Apps et al. | Jul 1997 | S |
D380901 | Apps et al. | Jul 1997 | S |
5651461 | Apps et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5660279 | Apps et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5704482 | Apps | Jan 1998 | A |
D398152 | Kelly | Sep 1998 | S |
D400012 | Apps | Oct 1998 | S |
5823376 | McGrath | Oct 1998 | A |
5842572 | Apps et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
D404204 | Apps | Jan 1999 | S |
5855277 | Apps et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5913424 | Kelly et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5918751 | Kelly | Jul 1999 | A |
5979654 | Apps | Nov 1999 | A |
D417784 | Umiker | Dec 1999 | S |
6006912 | McGrath | Dec 1999 | A |
D420220 | Apps et al. | Feb 2000 | S |
6047844 | McGrath | Apr 2000 | A |
6073793 | Apps et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6079554 | Hammett et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
D441957 | Kelly | May 2001 | S |
D462522 | Apps et al. | Sep 2002 | S |
6457599 | Apps et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
D487634 | Apps et al. | Mar 2004 | S |
6749065 | Hammett | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6892885 | Apps et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7322475 | Hassell et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7604122 | Apps et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
8123034 | Apps et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
52-80993 | Jul 1977 | JP |
0102261 | Jan 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“P&E Crate” Mar. 4, 1998, Angled Top View. |
“P&E Crate” Mar. 4, 1998, Bottom View. |
“P&E Crate” Mar. 4, 1998, Side View 1. |
“P&E Crate” Mar. 4, 1998, Side View 2. |
“P&E Crate” Mar. 4, 1998, Interior Corner View. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120152789 A1 | Jun 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12581457 | Oct 2009 | US |
Child | 13406604 | US | |
Parent | 10958618 | Oct 2004 | US |
Child | 12581457 | US | |
Parent | 09977636 | Oct 2001 | US |
Child | 10958618 | US |