The disclosed technology relates generally to electrical measurement equipment and, in particular, to ammeters for use in measuring electrical current.
Ammeters are often a sub component of electrical measurement products including digital multi-meters (DMMs) and source measure units (SMUs). There are several ways in which the current through a device under test (DUT) may be measured. SMUs are generally used to make precision measurements in many fields, including the testing of semiconductor products. Typical SMU designs include a voltage or current source with integrated voltage and current measurement capabilities. A device under test (DUT) is typically coupled to the SMU and then stimulated with either the voltage or current source.
There are several ways in which the current through a DUT may be measured. For example, a shunt ammeter may be used to simply sense the voltage across a resistor RS. RS must be kept small to not cause a large burden voltage to the input signal. A low noise gain stage is typically required to amplify the burden voltage so it can be measured.
One of the most common ammeters is the feedback ammeter.
However, a significant problem with the feedback ammeter is that it is generally prone to instability with capacitive loads. A variation of the feedback ammeter called an active shunt has been developed, in which the input-impedance is resistive from DC to the bandwidth of the op-amp, ω1.
An active shunt ammeter configuration generally replaces the op-amp used in the feedback ammeter with a fixed gain amplifier. The result is a gain that is constant to higher frequencies. At the frequency the amplifier begins to roll off, the capacitor impedance (1/jωCs) is designed to have a magnitude that equals RS. The roll off of the parallel impedance of RS and Cs combined with the roll off the amplifier's gain, results in an input-impedance of the ammeter that is constant across the entire bandwidth of the amplifier. The result is a shunt like ammeter with higher output signal vs. burden voltage than a traditional shunt ammeter and none to the stability issues of feedback ammeters.
In
If the feedback element 202 was resistive only, i.e., if capacitor 206 was omitted, the input impedance Zin would increase with frequency after the target frequency 252. The impedance of capacitor 206 may be selected to equal the impedance of the resistor at the target frequency 252. This causes the impedance of the feedback element 202 to drop at the same frequency the operational amplifier 210 begins to roll off. This configuration yields a flat input impedance that does not increase after the target frequency 252 as shown in
Certain implementations of the disclosed technology include a nested ammeter suitable for measuring the electrical current flowing through a device under test (DUT). The nested ammeter may include an input configured to receive an input signal having a frequency within a frequency band and representing the current flowing through the DUT. An output may be configured to generate an output voltage representing the current flowing through the DUT.
Certain implementations of the disclosed technology include a method of measuring the electrical current flowing through a device under test (DUT) that includes receiving an input signal having a frequency within a frequency band and representing the current flowing through the DUT. The method may also include generating an output voltage representing the electrical current flowing through the DUT.
Embodiments of the disclosed technology generally pertain to electrical measurement equipment and, more particularly, to a nested ammeter suitable for use in measuring electrical current.
Such configurations can be taken even further with the implementation of additional levels of nesting. For example,
Having described and illustrated the principles of the invention with reference to illustrated embodiments, it will be recognized that the illustrated embodiments may be modified in arrangement and detail without departing from such principles, and may be combined in any desired manner. And although the foregoing discussion has focused on particular embodiments, other configurations are contemplated.
In particular, even though expressions such as “according to an embodiment of the invention” or the like are used herein, these phrases are meant to generally reference embodiment possibilities, and are not intended to limit the invention to particular embodiment configurations. As used herein, these terms may reference the same or different embodiments that are combinable into other embodiments.
Consequently, in view of the wide variety of permutations to the embodiments that are described herein, this detailed description and accompanying material is intended to be illustrative only, and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention. What is claimed as the invention, therefore, is all such modifications as may come within the scope and spirit of the following claims and equivalents thereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4559502 | Hiujsing | Dec 1985 | A |
5880827 | Heinke | Mar 1999 | A |
6429641 | Montrose | Aug 2002 | B1 |
7023271 | Aram | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7173486 | Sutardja | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7304536 | Sutardja | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7701227 | Saulnier | Apr 2010 | B2 |
8143881 | Chen | Mar 2012 | B2 |
20020121929 | Gropl | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20060055456 | Niederkorn | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070103232 | Chen | May 2007 | A1 |
20080087544 | Zhou | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080111560 | Regier | May 2008 | A1 |
20090273338 | Goeke | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20110140945 | Sundblad | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20140111188 | Goeke | Apr 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180003741 A1 | Jan 2018 | US |