1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to mine roof supports and, more particularly, to a set of mine roof supports designed to be nested.
2. Description of Related Art
Various roof support devices in the prior art have been designed and used to provide support to a mine roof. Deep mining results in removal of material from the interior of a mine, thereby leaving unsupported voids of various sizes within the mine. These unsupported voids are conducive to mine roof buckling and/or collapse. Thus, it has been desirable to provide support to mine roofs to prevent, delay, or control collapse thereof.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,308,196 to Frederick, herein incorporated by reference, discloses one commonly used prior art mine roof support. Specifically, the Frederick patent discloses a container that is placed between the mine roof and the mine floor and filled with a load-bearing material.
It is not economical to transport such containers for a mine roof support from the manufacturing site to the mine because of their overall size, which can be up to 15 feet in length and 72 inches in diameter, and weight. Because the containers are hollow, their weight is small relative to their volume. Therefore, the number of these containers which may be placed on a truck or railcar for transportation is limited by the volume of space that they occupy and not by their weight. Transportation costs are usually computed based on the distance that a load travels and not how efficiently it uses the available capacity of the transportation vehicle. Thus, the inefficient utilization of the available transportation capacity due to the combination of the high volume and low weight of the containers for the mine roof support results in high transportation costs relative to a load which more efficiently utilizes the capacity of the transportation vehicle.
Accordingly, the present invention is directed to a set of mine roof supports comprising a plurality of containers adapted to be placed between the mine roof and the mine floor and filled with a load-bearing material, wherein each container has a progressively smaller cross-sectional dimension such that the containers may be nested one within the other. The difference between the cross-sectional dimension of one container and the cross-sectional dimension of the next smaller container, and, thus, the space between the inside surface of the container and the outside surface of the container having the next smaller cross-sectional dimension may be minimized as long as the container having the smaller cross-sectional dimension may be inserted into and extracted from the container having the next larger cross-sectional dimension without binding or becoming stuck.
A method of supporting a mine roof is also disclosed in the present invention. A plurality of containers is associated with a container with a smaller cross-sectional dimension nested within another container with a larger cross-sectional dimension. The plurality of containers is transported via a transportation vehicle to a mine site. Once at the mine site, the containers are separated and filled with a load-bearing material. After the containers have been filled, each container's longitudinal axis is positioned between the mine roof and the mine floor.
The present invention includes a mine roof support set comprising a plurality of containers having a longitudinal axis and adapted to be placed in a void in a mine, with the longitudinal axis extending between the mine roof and the mine floor, and filled with a load-bearing material.
In use, the container is placed with its longitudinal axis 18 extending between a mine roof 20 and a mine floor 22 such that the bottom end 12 of the container 10 is in contact with the mine floor 22. The cavity 16 is then filled with a load-bearing material 24. In one embodiment of the invention, the load-bearing material 24 is particulate and flowable which provides efficient filling of the cavity 16. By using particulate and flowable materials, a maximum amount of space is filled in the cavity 16, unlike if larger rocks or objects were to be used. Exemplary and non-limiting load-bearing materials 24 include pea gravel, coal from a mine entry, mine slack (i.e., wash plant refuse), foamed cement (FOAMCRETE), concrete, polyurethane, and crushed mine tailings (e.g., discarded excavated mine material). Footing material (not shown), such as wood timber or other material, may be placed between either or both ends 12, 13 of the container 10 and the respective mine roof 20 and/or floor 22 to account for differences between the height of the container 10 and the height of the void in the mine. Alternatively, a cap or a base (not shown) having a thickness may be used in the manner of a shim to assure that the container 10 contacts both the roof and the floor of the mine. The cap or base may be a rubber ring or of any other suitable shape and/or material that effectively fills a gap between the mine roof 20 or floor 22 and the ends 12, 13 of the container 10. Other shims may include pumpable containment structures (e.g., bags) or a pumpable telescoping structure such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,394,707, incorporated herein by reference.
Although the container 10 shown in
In one embodiment, the containers 10 all possess the same or similar sidewall 14 thickness. The outer dimension of each subsequently smaller container 10 is determined at least in part by the inside diameter of the larger container 10 into which it is received, as well as the sidewall thickness. The difference in the cross-sectional dimension between each container 10 and the next smaller container 10 and, thus, the gap between the inner surface of the container 10 and outer surface of the next smaller container 10 is minimized. The cross-sectional dimension of the container 10 is one factor that determines the load-bearing capability of the mine support. Therefore, when it is desired that all of the mine supports in the set have load-bearing capability within a specific engineering tolerance, the difference in cross-sectional dimension between each container 10 and the next smaller container 10 may be minimized to allow the maximum number of containers 10 having a cross-sectional dimension providing load-bearing capability within the engineering tolerance to be nested. To accomplish this, the cross-sectional dimension of each successively smaller container 10 is reduced by the minimum amount necessary to allow it to be inserted into and removed from the container 10 having the next larger cross-sectional dimension, without binding or getting stuck. In one embodiment, a first container 10 is sized to be received within a second container 10 as a frictional fit. By frictional fit, it is meant that the respective surfaces of the first and second containers 10 may abut each other during insertion into or removal of the first container into the second container yet without binding therebetween or otherwise becoming stuck. To the extent that one or more of the smaller diameter containers 10 of the set 200 provides reduced load-bearing capabilities compared to other containers in the set, the roof support plan incorporating such containers may be adjusted as necessary. For example, the smaller diameter containers 10 may be spaced slightly closer together or closer to other such containers than larger diameter containers 10. The differences in the cross-sectional dimension between one container 10 and the next smaller container 10 may be of any magnitude and may be uniform or vary throughout the set. The lengths of the containers 10 may also be constant or vary from container to container. The containers may have the same cross-sectional shape or the shape of the cross-section may vary from container to container as long as the containers may still be nested one inside the other. In general, when nested, the cavity 16 of each container 10 is empty. In one embodiment, the cavity 16 is filled with the load-bearing material once the containers are separated at a mine site.
Referring to
Although the invention has been described in detail for the purpose of illustration based on what is currently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that such detail is solely for that purpose and that the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments, but, on the contrary, is intended to cover modifications and equivalent arrangements that are within the spirit and scope of this specification.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3564804 | Archer et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
4167361 | Petro et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4255071 | Koppers et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4277204 | Koppers et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4332512 | Heintzmann et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4983077 | Sorge et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5165824 | Corcoran et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5308196 | Frederick | May 1994 | A |
5921718 | Kolk | Jul 1999 | A |
6394707 | Kennedy et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
7232103 | Heath | Jun 2007 | B2 |
20060133899 | Seegmiller | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20100284752 | Skarbovig | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110114813 | Spearing et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110222970 | Skarbovig | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130136545 A1 | May 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61563976 | Nov 2011 | US |