This application claims priority from the following documents.
Each of these documents is hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. These documents are herein sometimes referred to as the “Incorporated Documents”.
Wireless communication systems include mobile stations (MS's), which communicate with access points (AP's), which collectively communicate using wireless and wired techniques. In a wireless communication system operating using an IEEE 802.11 protocol, or variant thereof, each access point controls wireless communication with those mobile stations in a localized communication region (also known as a “cell”). Mobile stations operating according to an IEEE 802.11 protocol, or variant thereof, attempt to determine in which cell they are operating, and attempt to communicate with the particular access point for that cell.
Using the feature named “KEY_SEARCH_AD1” in the Atheros 11n chipset, an access point can determine whether to send an ACK packet in response to a message packet in response to whether the BSSID present in the receiver address (not the sender address) is present in the keycache. This has the effect that the access point can maintain a list of about 128 arbitrarily selected BSSID's, to each of which it will respond with an ACK packet if it receives a message from a mobile station addressed to that BSSID. (Effectively, each of the access point's BSSID's represents a method for mobile stations to access the AP; this has the effect that BSSID's could be considered either addresses for AP's or addresses for services offered by AP's.) This has two effects: (1) the number of mobile stations that can be assigned to that AP is relatively greater, and (2) the selection of those BSSID's is no longer constrained by having to match the access point's BSSID using a mask. With selection of those BSSID's being no longer so constrained, it is easier to assign BSSID's for use by mobile stations while allowing those mobile stations to roam among multiple access points.
Overview
In systems described in the Incorporated Documents, handoff and other functions of wireless communication systems are controlled by access points, themselves under direction of a control element, rather than by the mobile stations seeking out and communicating with access points. The Incorporated Documents describe at least two techniques, “virtual cells” and “personal access points”, and their advantages, including for example roaming among access points without the mobile station having to conduct handoff operations.
In systems using virtual cells, mobile stations are all associated with a common BSSID they might access, which is shared among substantially all of the access points. In such cases, the control element selects one or more access points (typically one at any particular time) to communicate with the mobile station; those one or more access points are the only access points which respond to message packets from the mobile station.
In systems using personal access points, mobile stations are each associated with a unique BSSID they might access, which is associated with the particular one or more access points the system associates with that particular mobile station. In such cases, the mobile station's unique BSSID access ability is moved from one to another access point as it is desired to re-assign the mobile station; the one or more access points maintaining that unique BSSID (typically one at any particular time) are the only access points which respond to message packets from the mobile station.
In one vendor's implementation of access points in the IEEE 802.11n protocol, including at least the Atheros model AR5416 and the Atheros model AR9160 (and of course any other devices having this or a similar capability, whether or not from the same vendor), access points include a feature named “KEY_SEARCH_AD1”, which when enabled provides that the access point, when responding with an acknowledgement (ACK) packet to a message from a mobile station, will match the receiver (i.e., not sender) address of the incoming packet against an entry in a locally maintained table of mobile station address (the “keycache”). For each entry in the keycache, a separate register controls whether the access point will provide ACK packets in response to an address match on that entry.
When the mobile station sends a message packet to the access point, the sender address for that packet is the MAC address associated with the mobile station, and the receiver address is the BSSID for the access point. This has the effect that, if the access point determines whether to send an ACK packet in response to a message packet, it must do so in response to whether its own BSSID is present in the receiver address. In contrast, when an access point sends a message to a mobile station, the sender address for that packet is the BSSID for which the mobile station has been assigned the capability of access, and the receiver address for that packet is the MAC address for the mobile station.
In many implementations of the IEEE 802.11n protocol, the access point can also mask some of the bits of its BSSID. This has the effect that the access point can respond to multiple BSSID's, but the number of possibilities is limited by the ability to maintain unique BSSID's that still match the access point's own BSSID after masking. Mobile stations can thus be assigned the ability to access BSSID's that match the access point's own BSSID after masking, but the number of such BSSID's would be relatively limited. In systems using personal access points, this has the effect of limiting the number of mobile stations that can be assigned to the access point, as well as constraining the BSSID's that can be accessible by mobile stations while allowing those mobile stations to roam among multiple access points.
When using the feature named “KEY_SEARCH_AD1”, the access point can determine whether to send an ACK packet in response to a message packet in response to whether the BSSID present in the receiver address is present in the keycache. This has the effect that the access point can maintain a list of about 128 arbitrarily selected BSSID's, to each of which it will respond with an ACK packet if it receives a message from a mobile station assigned to that BSSID. This has two effects: (1) the number of mobile stations that can be assigned to that access point is relatively greater, and (2) the selection of those BSSID's is no longer constrained by having to match the access point's BSSID using a mask. With selection of those BSSID's being no longer so constrained, it is easier to assign BSSID's for access by mobile stations while allowing those mobile stations to roam among multiple access points.
A wireless communication system 100 includes a control element 110, a set of access points 120, and a set of mobile stations 130.
Each access point 120 includes registers maintaining its own AP BSSID 121, a “KEY_SEARCH_AD1 enabled” bit 122, and a keycache 123. The keycache 123 includes approximately 128 keycache registers 124, each including a MAC address associated with a mobile station 130. Each mobile station 130 includes a register maintaining its own MAC address 131.
Mobile stations 130 send message packets 132 wirelessly, those message packets 132 each including a sender address 133 and a receiver address 134. Each access point 120 is disposed for receiving those message packets 132. In operation, when an access point 120 receives a message packet 132, it uses the KEY_SEARCH_AD1 feature to determine whether to respond with an ACK packet 125. This has the effect that the access point 120 compares the receiver address 134 of the message packet 132 with its keycache registers 124. The access point 120 responds with an ACK packet 125 if and only if that receiver address 134 matches one of those keycache registers 124; otherwise it does not respond with an ACK packet 125.
In operation, the access point 120 is directed by the control element 110 to insert a BSSID to be accessible by a selected mobile station 130 into its keycache 123 when the control element 110 assigns that particular mobile station 130 to that access point 120. Similarly, the access point 120 is directed by the control element 110 to delete a BSSID previously accessible by a selected mobile station 130 from its keycache 123 when the control element 110 de-assigns that particular mobile station 130 from that access point 120.
One problem with the “KEY_SEARCH_AD1” feature is that current implementations by the Atheros model AR5416 and the Atheros model AR9160 access points 120 erroneously treat recovery from failed transmissions of message packets (sometimes known as “multiple retries”). More specifically, in proper operation, when a device, whether an access point 120 or otherwise, sends a unicast message packet, it should wait a designated duration of time for an ACK packet 125. If no ACK packet 125 arrives within that designated duration of time, the device resends the message packet, until a matching ACK packet 125 arrives or a maximum designated number of retries have been attempted. In many cases, the data-rate for transmission of the retried message packets is different, typically decreasing with each retry, with the effect that the chance of successful transmission is increased with each retry.
In current implementations by (at least) the Atheros model AR5416 and the Atheros model AR9160 access points 120, it is possible for software controlling the access point to designate a set of parameters for the access point 120 to use when attempting multiple retries. More specifically, that set of parameters might specify the maximum number of retries and the data-rate for each such retry. In such cases, when the access point 120 is ready to transmit a message packet, it should transmit the message packet and await an ACK packet 125 according to the designated set of parameters. If the access point 120 does not receive an ACK packet 125 within the designated duration of time for an ACK packet 125, it should retry transmission, according to the designated set of parameters, until either an ACK packet 125 is received or the designated maximum number of retries is reached. If an ACK packet 125 is ultimately received, the access point 120 should return a status code to the controlling software indicating successful transmission, while if no ACK packet 125 is received after the designated maximum number of retries is reached, the access point 120 should return a status code to the controlling software indicating failure of the transmission.
However, in current implementations by (at least) the Atheros model AR5416 and the Atheros model AR9160 access points 120, when the “KEY_SEARCH_AD1” feature is set. In such cases, the access point 120 fails to match received ACK packets 125 to those transmitted message packets. This has the effect that the access point 120 will fail to recognize receipt of any ACK packets 125; the access point 120 will therefore retry the message packet until the designated maximum number of retries is reached, and therefore always return a status code to the controlling software indicating failure of the transmission.
Accordingly, in one embodiment, software performs matching of transmitted message packets and received ACK packets 125.
In the
A method 300 includes a set of flow labels and method steps as shown in the
Reaching the flow label 300A indicates the beginning of the method.
At a method step 310 a packet is removed from the mobile station queue followed by a method step 312 wherein the MS queue is blocked preventing further queuing.
At a method step 314 the original packet descriptor is saved for later recall and setting the MAXRETRY parameter of the packet to 1 for providing only a subset of possible retries for the transmission.
The method step 316 provides for placing the modified packet (the TX packet) with the hardware (HW) queue for transmission reaching the flow label 300D.
Reaching a flow label 300B indicates the TX packet transmission is complete.
At a method step 318 the TX packet is removed from the HW queue and at a method step 320 provides for storing the TX packet for later ACK matching. Reaching a method step 340 wherein a timer is set or timing indication is recorded. Upon completion of a timing indication, if a packet has not been received, then at a method label 300F reaching a timeout wherein operation transfers to a method step 334.
Reaching the flow label 300C indicates reception of an RX packet.
At a method step 322 the RX packet is removed from the received queue and tested in a method step 324. If the RX packet is not a complementary packet such as an ACK packet, the packet is passed unchanged to the access point (AP) software in a method step 326 thus reaching the end of the method at flow label 300E.
If the determination in the method step 324 is that the RX packet is a complementary packet such as an ACK packet, the ACK packet is stored for later matching in the method step 328.
A method step 330 provides for comparing the RX packet stored in the method step 328 with the TX packet stored in the method step 320 wherein the two packets are compared to determine if the RX packet is a complementary packet corresponding to the TX packet.
The method step 332 provides for the determination of a match wherein if there is a match, operation proceeds from the method step 336. If there is not a match, operation moves to a method step 334 wherein the number of retries is compared to a predetermined retry limit. If the retry limit is exceeded, operation proceeds to a method step 336. If the retry limit is not exceeded, operation proceeds to the method step 338.
At a method step 338 the TX packet is prepared for requeuing. This may include adjusting one or more transmission parameters, such as the transmission rate, to provide for more reliable communications with a mobile station. A method step 338 provides for incrementing a retry counter associated with the packet under consideration. When the method step 338 is completed, operation moves to a method step 316 for further transmission according to the foregoing description.
Returning to the method step 334, if the retry limit is found to be exceeded, operation moves to the method step 336. In the method step 336, the original descriptor from the method step 314 is restored to the packet. A flag indicating transmission success or failure is set, said flag indication being based on a comparison between the number of retries and a predetermined amount. The number of retries is associated with the packet before operation moves to a method step 338a.
The method step 338a unblocks the MS queue that has been previously blocked in the method step 312 thus allowing for system operation involving future packets. Operation then moves to the method step 326 wherein the packet is passed to the access point.
The method 300 terminates at the flow label 300E.
END OF METHOD
In one embodiment, the method 300 is repeated continually by the wireless communication system for each message packet to be transmitted.
To prevent re-ordering of message packets, the method 300 requires that only one frame per mobile station 130 is allowed to be enqueued at the hardware transmit queue 210 from the mobile station queue 230 for that mobile station 130. Accordingly, upon moving a message packet from the mobile station queue 230 for that mobile station 130, the method 300 requires the mobile station queue 230 for that mobile station 130 to wait for successful transmission of that message packet before attempting to move a further message packet from the mobile station queue 230 for that mobile station 130 onto the hardware transmit queue 210 for the access point 120.
After reading this application, those skilled in the art would recognize that the scope and spirit of the invention includes other and further embodiments beyond the specifics of those disclosed herein, and that such other and further embodiments would not require new invention or undue experimentation.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3956749 | Magorian | May 1976 | A |
5038151 | Kaminski | Aug 1991 | A |
5125108 | Talwar | Jun 1992 | A |
5177788 | Schanning et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5337397 | Lebby et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5519706 | Bantz et al. | May 1996 | A |
5966094 | Ward et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6023621 | Jackson et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6658047 | Komulainen et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6721334 | Ketcham | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728603 | Pruzan et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6760318 | Bims | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6788658 | Bims | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6839038 | Weinstein | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6877043 | Mallory et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6894649 | Ostervall | May 2005 | B2 |
6933909 | Theobold | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6950629 | Nagy | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6954177 | Channabasappa et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6978158 | Ghavami | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6999802 | Kim | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7057566 | Theobold | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7171215 | Khouaja et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7194008 | Chu et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197308 | Singhal et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7277728 | Kauhanen | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7319685 | Kim et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7321580 | Ramanathan et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7333455 | Bolt et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7359362 | King et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7379435 | Kinder | May 2008 | B1 |
7400604 | Lee et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7403506 | Lee et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7406319 | Kostic et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7420942 | Wang | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7426388 | Wright et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7430397 | Suda et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7433722 | Sakamoto et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7444425 | Lehmann, Jr. et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7466981 | Abdelhamid et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7499673 | Saliga et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7515909 | Jain et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7555287 | Heinonen et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7630402 | Un et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7630403 | Ho et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7693513 | Chou | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7826426 | Bharghavan et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7843910 | Loughran et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7996554 | Venkatraman | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8027637 | Bims | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8090374 | Rezvani et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8472359 | Bharghavan et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8787309 | Bharghavan et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
20020022483 | Thompson et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020060995 | Cervello et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020086640 | Belcher et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020112008 | Christenson et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020147031 | Hood | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020181629 | Shibata | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030162546 | Jordan | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030198305 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199247 | Striemer | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030206532 | Shpak | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030206535 | Shpak | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030207697 | Shpak | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030207698 | Shpak | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030207699 | Shpak | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030236103 | Tamaki et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040051668 | Chang | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040063455 | Eran et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040121770 | Tigerstedt | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040141617 | Volpano | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040156399 | Eran | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040183726 | Theobold | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040185904 | Yamakita | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040235453 | Chen et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050054370 | Shpak | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050111405 | Kanterakis | May 2005 | A1 |
20050122919 | Touag | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135321 | Sharony | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050152314 | Sun et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050153713 | Sharony | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050156794 | Theobold et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050156799 | Theobold | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050195110 | Lin et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050219143 | Schadler et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050220048 | Lee et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050238054 | Sharma | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050261970 | Vucina et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060002331 | Bhagwat et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025127 | Cromer et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060049987 | Herrick | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060056443 | Tao et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060098613 | Kish et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111112 | Maveddat | May 2006 | A1 |
20060132360 | Caimi et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060203819 | Farinacci et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215691 | Kobayashi et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060221993 | Liao et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060281500 | Huang et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070014267 | Lam et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070026807 | Kish | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070081477 | Jakkahalli et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070117514 | Gainey et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070165610 | Tseng et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070195725 | Iino et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070213071 | Hwang | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080014956 | Balasubramanian | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080102835 | Zhao et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080112373 | Shpak | May 2008 | A1 |
20080153497 | Kalhan | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080165866 | Teo et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080167093 | Nagano et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080212535 | Karaoguz et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080242305 | Kahlert et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080287130 | Laroia et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090022127 | Traynor et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090023434 | Trainor et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090061873 | Bao et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090061879 | Gallagher et al. | Mar 2009 | A9 |
20090111472 | Promenzio | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090252165 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100080151 | Proctor et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110040969 | Yao et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110188484 | Reznik et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110305217 | Seok | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120307792 | Ram et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120314696 | Liu | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120317619 | Dattagupta et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130148609 | Ram et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130188539 | Han et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140112322 | Ram et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140126466 | Hamdi et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2005311580 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2006229972 | Aug 2006 | JP |
Entry |
---|
“Information technology—Telecommunications and information exchange between systems—Local and metropolitan area networks—Specific requirements—Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications,” ANSI/IEEE Std 802.11, 1999 Edition (R2003) , vol., no., pp. i-513, 2003. |
Habib et al. “Multi-antenna techniques for OFDM based WLAN.” Proceedings of First International Conference on Next-Generation Wireless Systems, Jan. 2006, pp. 186-190. |
Kitahara et al. “A base station adaptive antenna for downlink transmission in a DS-CDMA system.” IEEE 51st Vehicular Technology Conference Proceedings, 2000 (abstract). |
Mahler et al. “Design and optimisation of an antenna array for WiMAX base stations.” IEEE/ACES International Conference on Wireless Communications and Applied Computational Electromagnetics, 2005 (abstract). |
Miaris et al. “On the base stations antenna system design for mobile communications.” Electrical Engineering, 2006, pp. 157-163, vol. 88. |
Miura et al. “Study of array pattern tuning method using hybrid genetic algorithms for figure-8 satellite's earth station antenna.” Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference Proceedings, 2000 (abstract). |
Ponnapalli et al. “Design and packaging of antennas for wireless systems.” Proceedings of Electrical Performance of Electrical Packaging, 1995 (abstract). |
Sarolic. “Base station antenna near-field radiation pattern distortion analysis.” Sixth International Conference on Computational Methods for the Solution of Electrical and Electromagnetic Engineering Problems Incorporating Electromagnetic Effects on Human Beings and Equipment Seminar, 2003 (abstract). |
IEEE. “Information technology—Telecommunications and information exchange between systems—Local and metropolitan area networks—Specific requirements—Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications.” IEEE Std 802.11-1997, Nov. 1997, pp. i-445 (Abstract). |
Amir. “Fast handoff for seamless wireless mesh networks.” MobiSys '06, Jun. 19-22, 2006, pp. 83-95, ACM, Uppsala, Sweden. |
IEEE. “Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications.” IEEE Std 802.11-1997, vol. no. pp. i-445, Nov. 18, 1997. |
Chen et al. “A seamless handoff mechanism for DHCP-Based IEEE 802.11 WLANS.” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 1, No. 8, Aug. 2007, pp. 665-667. |
Cheung et al. “Network configurations for seamless support of CDMA soft handoffs between cell clusters.” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 15, No. 7, Sep. 1997, pp. 1276-1288. |
Murray et al. “Intelligent access and mobility management in heterogeneous wireless networks using policy.” First International Workshop on Information and Communication Technologies, ACM, 2003, pp. 181-186. |
Chui et al. “An Access point coordination system for improved VoIP/WLAN handover performance.” IEEE 2006, pp. 501-505. |
Fan et al. “Managing heterogeneous access networks.” 32nd IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks, IEEE 2007, pp. 651-658. |
Huang et al. “Incorporating AP selection and call admission control for seamless handoff procedure.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering 2008, pp. 823-826, 2008. |
Huang et al. “SAP: Seamless authentication protocol for vertical handoff in heterogeneous wireless networks.” Third International Conference on Quality of Service in Heterogeneous Wired/Wireless Networks, Aug. 7-9, 2006, ACM, Waterloo, ON, Canada, pp. 1-10. |
Wei et al. “Seamless handoff support in wireless mesh networks.” IEEE 2006, pp. 1-8. |
Zhou et al. “A seamless handoff scheme for Mobile IP.” IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, vol. 2, pp. 927-931, 2006. |
Manodham et al. “A Seamless handoff scheme with new AP module for wireless LANs support VoIP.” Proceedings of the 2005 Symposium on Applications and the Internet. IEEE, 2006, pp. 1-6. |
Kist. “Instant handoffs for wireless infrastructure meshed networks,” Proceedings of the 2008 Australasian Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference, pp. 288-293, 2008. |
Liao et al. “Practical schemes for smooth MAC layer handoff in 802.11 wireless networks.” Proceedings of the 2006 International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks, IEEE, pp. 1-10. |
LV. “Intelligent seamless vertical handoff algorithm for the next generation wireless networks.” Mobilware '08, Feb. 12-15, 2008, Innsbruck, Austria, pp. 1-10. |
Amir. “Fast Handofffor Seamless Wireless Mesh Networks.” MobiSys '06, Jun. 19-22, 2006, pp. 83-95, ACM, Uppsala, Sweden. |
Business Wire. “Meru Networks Delivers Industry's Only Zero-Loss Mobility Across WLAN Access Points and IP Subnets.” Jun. 21, 2004, pp. 1-2. |
Chen et al. “A Seamless Handoff Mechanism for OHCP-Based IEEE 802.11 WLANS.” IEEE Communications Letters, Aug. 2007, pp. 665-667, vol. 1, No. 8. |
Cheung et al. “Network Configurations for Seamless Support of COMA Soft Handoffs Between Cell Clusters.” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Sep. 1997, pp. 1276-1278, vol. 15, No. 7. |
Chou et al. “Intelligent Agent Over WLAN With Seamless Handover and Load Balancing.” 2006 International Conference on Communication Technology, Nov. 27-Nov. 30, 2006, pp. 1-7, IEEE. (Abstract). |
Chui et al. “An Access Point Coordination System for Improved VoIP/WLAN Handover Performance.” IEEE, 2006, pp. 501-505. |
Fan et al. “Managing Heterogeneous Access Networks.” 32nd IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks, 2007, pp. 651-658, IEEE 2007, pp. 651-658. |
Finneran. “Can WLAN switches support voice? Today's controllers offer key security and QoS capabilities, but as always, the devil's in the details.” Business Communications Review, Oct. 2006, pp. 42-47. |
Huang et al. “Incorporating AP Selection and Call Admission Control for Seamless Handoff Procedure.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering 2008, pp. 823-826. |
Huang et al. “SAP: Seamless Authentication Protocol for Vertical Handoff in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks.” Third International Conference in Heterogeneous Wired/Wireless Networks, Aug. 7-9, 2006, pp. 1-10, Waterloo, ON, CA. |
Hur et al. “A Distributed-Request-Based Diffsery CAC for Seamless Fast-Handoff in Mobile Internet.” J. Sole-Pareta et al. (Eds.): Q of IS 2004: International Workshop on Quality of Future Internet Services, LNCS 3266, pp. 184-193, 2004. |
IEEE Std 802. Nov. 1997 Information Technology—telecommunications and Information exchange between systems—Local and Metropolitan Area Networks—specific Requirements—part 11: Wireless Lan Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications, IEEE Std 802.11-1997, vol., no., pp. i-445, Nov. 18, 1997. |
IEEE. “Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications.” IEEE Std. 802.11, 1999 Edition (R2003), 2003, vol. no. pp. i-513. |
Jang et al. “Mobility Support Algorithm Based on Wireless 802.11 b LAN for Fast Handover.” 5th International Conference, PDCAT 2004, Dec. 8-10, 2004, pp. 715-718, Springer Verlag. (Abstract). |
Zhou et al. “A Seamless Handoff Scheme for Mobile IP.” 2006 IEEE 63rd Vehicular Technology Conference, VTC 2006-Spring, May 7-Jul. 102006, pp. 927-931, IEEE. (Abstract). |
Kist. “Instant Handoffs for Wireless Infrastructure Meshed Networks.” Proceedings of the 2008 Australasian Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference, 2008, pp. 288-293. |
Liao et al. “Practical Schemes for Smooth MAC Layer Handoff in 802.11 Wireless Networks.” Proceedings of the 2006 International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks. IEEE, 2006, pp. 1-10. |
LV. “Intelligent Seamless Vertical Handoff Algorithm for the Next Generation Wireless Networks.” Mobilware '08, Feb. 12-15, 2008, pp. 1-10, Innsbruck, Austria. |
Mannion. “Foundry Networks enters WLAN management fray—Bets on integration with wired infrastructure, market timing to take on Cisco.” Electronic Engineering Times, Sep. 8, 2003, p. 32, No. 1286. |
Manodham. “A Seamless Handoff Scheme with New AP Module for Wireless LANs Support VoIP.” 2006. International Symposium on Applications and the Internet, SAINT 2006, Jan. 23-27, 2006, pp. 253-258, IEEE. (Abstract). |
Manodham et al. “A Seamless Handoff Scheme with New AP Module for Wireless LANs support VoIP.” Proceedings of the 2005 Symposium on Applications and the Internet, 2006, pp. 1-6, IEEE. |
Marsh. “Power and wireless options extend Ethernet's reach: Ethernet's power-delivery and wireless abilities offer new application potential that hugely extends the reach of the IEEE's 802.X series of standards.” EDN, Nov. 11, 2004, p. 67, Reed Business Information. |
Murray et al. “Intelligent Access and Mobility Management in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks Using Policy.” ACM First International Workshop on Information and Communication Technologies, 2003, pp. 181-186. |
Rist et al. “Wireless LANs—Look, Ma. . . . No Wires—Wireless networking products prove they are finally ready for prime time.” Internetweek, Mar. 20, 2000, p. 41, No. 805, CMP Media, Inc. |
Sattari et al. “Seamless Handover Between WLAN and UMTS.” 2004 IEEE 59th Vehicular Technology Conference, VTC2004-Spring: Towards a Global Wireless World, May 17-19, 2004, pp. 3035-3038, IEEE. (Abstract). |
Thomsen. “Development Platform for Dynamic Bandwidth Allocation Schemes in Future MPCP Enabled Ethernet Passive Optical Network (EPON).” WSEAS Transactions on Communications, Apr. 5, 2006, pp. 92-98, WSEAS. (Abstract). |
Wei et al. “Seamless Handoff Support in Wireless Mesh Networks.” 2006, pp. 1-8, IEEE. |
Xhafa et al. “Seamless Handover in Building Using HVAC Ducts: A New System Architecture.” IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM'03, Dec. 1-5, 2003, pp. 3093-3097, IEEE. (Abstract). |
Yaakob et al. “An Integration of Mobile Motion Prediction with Dedicated Solicitation Message for Seamless Handoff Provisioning in High Speed Wireless Environment.” 2008 International Conference on Electronic Design, Dec. 1-3, 2008, Pernang, Malaysia, pp. 1-5. |
Yamagata et al. “Seamless Handover for Hotspot Network Using Adaptive Flow Control Method.” 2005 Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications, Oct. 3-5, 2005, pp. 502-506, IEEE. (Abstract). |
Zhou et al. A Seamless Handoff Scheme for Mobile IP. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, 2006, pp. 927-931, vol. 2. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11298864 | Dec 2005 | US |
Child | 11715287 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11715287 | Mar 2007 | US |
Child | 12035925 | US |