Generally described, telecommunication devices and communication networks facilitate the collection and exchange of information. Utilizing a communication network and relevant communication protocols, a telecommunication device can engage in audio or data communications with other telecommunication devices, such as voice calls, video calls, messaging (e.g., short message service (“SMS”) or multimedia messaging service (“MMS”)), content streaming, instant messaging, resource browsing (e.g., Web browsing), and the like.
To facilitate communications, telecommunication devices can be associated with software and hardware components that allow the telecommunication device to maintain contact information, such as telephone numbers, email addresses, messaging addresses, etc., utilized to establish and engage in communications via available communication channels. Typically, such contact information is maintained as contact information in which all known contact information for an identified entity, such as user, can be presented to a telecommunication device user. For example, a telecommunication device may present a user interface in which the contact information associated with a selected individual is presented in a list-based format. In another example, a telecommunication device with voice calling functionality may maintain a “last call list” that keeps track of telephone numbers of the most recent incoming or outgoing calls from the telecommunication device.
Although contact management user interfaces and software can facilitate the input and management of contact information for a larger set of contacts, typical contact management approaches can become deficient as the set of entities associated with a user grows. In one example, typical call list approaches are limited in the number of contacts identified in the user interfaces (e.g., the last 4 numbers called). Accordingly, such approaches can become deficient as the number of incoming or outgoing communications (e.g., voice calls) increases because potentially desired contacts are removed from the display based on order of the most recent incoming or outgoing communications.
In another example, typical contact management approaches relate to the presentation of the entire set of contacts that are associated with a user, such as in alphabetical order. As the number of contacts maintained in the telecommunication device, or on behalf of the telecommunication device, users may have increased difficulty in identifying the contact information of specific entities. Additionally, for each contact, the typical contact management approach identifies all known contact information (e.g., phone numbers, IM aliases, email addresses, etc.) without regard to a desired, or preferred, communication method. Additionally, the typical contact management approach does not take into account the manner in which the contact was selected in presenting contact information.
In addition to the management of contact information accessible by a telecommunication device, current approaches to manage applications, or other executable components, on telecommunication device can be inefficient in relation to the incorporation of contacts. One approach to managing applications or other executable components relates to user interface in which the set of available application or executable components are presented in a desktop metaphor. In a typical desktop metaphor, each available application or executable component is represented on the user interface by a selectable display object that causes the initiation, or execution of the display object. For example, a user can initiate an email application by selecting a representative display object from the user interface. In another example, a user can interact with social networking services by selecting an executable component that generates an interface for posting information or displaying information. In such a desktop metaphor, the initiation and selection of applications or executable components are independent on the grouping of users. For example, assume a user that is a member of sports team wishes to access a game schedule, post pictures from a previous game to the other team members, and communicate a private message to the other team members. Under the typical desktop metaphor approach, such an individual would be required to independently access each corresponding application (e.g., a calendaring application, a sharing application and a messaging application) by selecting each application from the presentation of all available applications. Additionally, the user would further be required to utilize the interfaces presented by each selected application to control the receipt of information transmitted (e.g., an email distribution list and a sharing application distribution list). Accordingly, such approaches do not efficiently facilitate group-based interaction.
The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of the present disclosure will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Generally described, aspects of the present disclosure relate to the management of information associated with a telecommunication device user. In an illustrative embodiment, a contact information processing service makes information associated with a telecommunication device user available to network resources. The information associated the telecommunication device user can include contact information, group-based information, and communication information. The information associated with the telecommunication device user, or user account, can be information maintained by, or otherwise accessible to, the contact information processing service. Additionally, some portion of the information may be maintained on the telecommunication device and accessible by the contact information processing service. Specifically, the contact information processing service facilitates access to the information associated with at telecommunication user via an application protocol interface (“API”). In accordance with an API, a network resource can request aspects of information associated with a telecommunications device user, or request processing in accordance with the information associated with a telecommunication device user.
As previously described, in an illustrative embodiment, contact information can include any information, such as telephone numbers, email addresses, messaging addresses, etc., utilized to establish and engage in communications. The contact information can include a set of information associated with one or more identifiable entities. Additionally, the identification of contacts (and the corresponding contact information) may be provided by multiple data sources, such as address books, data files, network sources, etc. Contact information may also include information defining access rights, privacy filters, etc. that can specify how information associated with the contact may be provided to other entities. Contact information can further include login/password information that provides access to other information about the contact that is maintained, or otherwise provided, by a third party network resource (e.g., a social networking network resource). Still further, contact information can include information regarding a user's preferences for communication activities, which can be further defined according to user context.
In an illustrative embodiment, the group-based information displays correspond to a collection of display objects representative of either contacts associated with a user or applications or other executable components that are executable, or otherwise accessible, via a telecommunication device. The group-based information displays can be logically organized according to subject matter organizational criteria. The subject matter organizational criteria can include, for example, organization or other affiliates criteria, event-based or activity based criteria, topic-based criteria, and the like. By accessing group-based information displays generated on a display, telecommunication device users can initiate one or more actions by the selection or manipulation of display objects corresponding to applications or executable components.
Illustratively, communication categories correspond to a logical organization of one or more communication activities that can be initiated, or cause to be initiated, by the telecommunication device. The communication categories do not correspond to the communication activities. Rather, they represent a collection of specific communication activities that are intended to achieve types of communication. Examples of communication categories can include, but are not limited to, sharing, calling, messaging, posting, broadcasting, and the like.
Although aspects of the present disclosure will be described with regard to an illustrative telecommunication device user environment and component interactions, communication protocols, flow diagrams and user interfaces, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the disclosed embodiments are illustrative in nature and should not be construed as limiting. Specifically, although the term telecommunication device is used in this document, the term represents any type of device having a component for communicating with one or more other devices via one or more communication paths. Such communication paths can include wireless communication paths (via infra-red, RF, optical, terrestrial, or satellite communication media) and wired communication paths. Additionally, although the present disclosure references a telecommunication device, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that a telecommunication device may also be referred to as a wireless computing device, a mobile communication device, or a computing device. Accordingly, reference to a telecommunication device should not be interpreted as including any particular functionality or operation not described in the present disclosure. Still further, although the present disclosure is described with regard to specific methodologies and frameworks for processing data requests, the present disclosure should not be construed to require combination of the disclosed embodiments or any specific variation unless such combination or variation is expressly identified.
With reference now to
One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the contact information processing service 102 may correspond to a number of computer devices, such as server computing devices. Accordingly, while the contact information processing service 102 is depicted in
Additionally, the network resource interface component 104 and the data request processing component 108 may be implemented in a single computing device or across multiple computing devices. One skilled in the relevant art will also appreciate that the contact information processing service 102 may include any one of a number of additional hardware and software components that would be utilized in the illustrative computerized network environment to carry out the illustrative functions of the service 102 or any of the individually identified components.
With continued reference to
As previously described, in accordance with an aspect of the present disclosure, a network resource 110 can generate data requests to the contact information processing service 102 by utilizing one or more APIs defined, or otherwise provided by, the contact information processing service 102. Illustratively, a set of APIs can incorporate one or more data structures in which specific information, such as an entity identifier, is passed as a parameter to the contact information processing service 102. Additionally, the set of APIs can incorporate data structures in which information responsive to a data request is passed to the network resource 110 issuing the data request. Based on the information included in the data request and the information maintained in the data store 108, the contact information processing service 102 processes the data request to generate responsive information to the requesting network resource 110. The contact information processing service 102 then transmits the response information to the network resource 110.
With reference now to
With reference to
Based on the entity information included in the data request, the contact information processing service 102 processes the data request. In one embodiment, the contact information processing service 102 can identify a subset of contact information for each identified entity. The identified contact information does not have to include all possible contact information associated with the identified entity, such as in an address book. Rather, contact information processing service 102 can apply the contact filter information to a subset of the available contact information. The contact filter information can correspond to filter information provided by a user or a mobile service provider. For example, the set of contacts can be filtered based on contacts identified with a particular service level, communication preference, rate plan, etc. The contact filter information can further include keywords, tags or other criteria that can be applied to user profile information to find matching or substantially matching contacts (e.g. contacts associating with keywords, labels or tags). The contact information processing service 102 can then return the identified contact information as identifiers that can be accessed by the network resource 110. Alternatively, the identified contact information can include at least a portion of the contact information in the response.
Illustratively, the subset of contacts may be determined in a number of ways. In one example, the contact information processing service 102 can determine the subset of contacts based on a manual designation by a user associated with a telecommunications device, or other computing device. In another example, the contact information processing service 102 can determine automatically determine the subset of contacts. The automatic determination can be based a various factors, such as user context information, historical information (e.g., frequency of communication), profile matching, etc.
In another embodiment, the data request can include two or more specified entities. In this embodiment, the contact information processing service 102 identifies the subset of contacts for each identified entity in the manner described above. Additionally, the contact information processing service 102 can then further group, or otherwise process, the contact information to generate a group set of contact information. For example, the contact information processing service 102 may identify all common contacts for a set of specified entities. In another example, the contact information processing service 102 may identify all contacts not in common among the set of entities. In still a further example, the contact information processing service 102 can also identify, or provide, other information about the multiple entities, such as groups in common, communication categories in common, communication activities in common, preferences in common, and the like. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that any one of a variety of filtering/processing criteria may also be applied. The contact information processing service 102 can then return the processed contact information from the set of entities as identifiers that can be accessed by the network resource 110.
With reference to
Based on the entity information and the contact information included in the data request, the contact information processing service 102 processes the data request. In one embodiment, the contact information processing service 102 can verify whether the identified contact is associated with a subset of contact information for the identified entity. As previously described, the set of contacts do not have to include all possible contact information associated with the identified entity, such as in an address book. Rather, contact information processing service 102 can apply the contact filter information to a subset of the available contact information. The contact information processing service 102 can then return an indication of whether the contact was found, or was otherwise associated with the contact information, for the specified entity.
In another embodiment, the data request can include a request to provide additional information associated with the identified contact if the contact is determined to be within the subset of contacts associated with the specified entity. For example, assume that a specified entity is associated with more than one subset of contacts (e.g., a subset of contacts corresponding to a “home” identifier and a subset of contacts corresponding to “work” identifier). Accordingly, the contact information processing service 102 can identify which particular subset, or subsets, found for the submitted contact. In another example, assume that contacts are associated with different rates plans/service plans that represent a communication cost to a telecommunications device user. Accordingly, the contact information processing service 102 can identify which cost plan or service plan that has been associated with the contact. Additionally, the contact information processing service 102 can return an estimated communication cost based on historical user information for the specified contact, sets of contacts or all contacts. In still another example, the contact information processing service 102 can identify communication preference information or communication history specified for the particular contact. In yet another example, the contact information processing service 102 can identify privacy information or subscription for the contact that specifies what type of information the contact is willing to provide (e.g., sharing phone numbers or personal contact information) and what type of information the contact will process (e.g., specify whether to provide the contact with social networking data feeds).
With reference to
Based on the group information included in the data request, the contact information processing service 102 processes the data request. In one embodiment, the contact information processing service 102 can determine organizational criteria based on various criteria included as parameters in the data request, including entity identifiers and a set of contact identifiers. For example, the contact information processing service 102 can process information associated with a set of contacts to identify information common to each of the contacts (e.g., organization criteria, event criteria or topic/keyword criteria). In another embodiment, the organizational criteria may be included in the data request as a parameter of the data request submitted by the network resource.
Once the organizational criteria has been determined, or otherwise obtained, the contact information processing service 102 determines a set of one or more contacts associated with the user of the telecommunication device based on the organization criteria. If one or more contacts were included in the data request, the contact information processing service 102 can utilize the included set of contacts for the group-based information. Additionally, or alternatively, the contact information processing service 102 can add or remove contacts or determine the set of contacts independently. Additionally, the contact information processing service 102 determines a set of one or more applications or executable component to include in the group-based information based on the organizational criteria. The contact information processing service 102 can then return the group based information to the requesting network resource 110. An example of system for processing group-based information and illustrative group-based information display is disclosed in commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/412,943, entitled Group Based Information Displays, filed Mar. 27, 2009, and incorporated by reference herein.
With reference to
Based on the information included in the data request, the contact information processing service 102 processes the data request. In one embodiment, the contact information processing service 102 can determine one or more communication categories corresponding to the selected contact. For example, the contact information processing service 102 can process information associated with the specified contact to identify communication categories associated with the contact (e.g., “call,” “share,” “message,” “direction communication,” “asynchronous communication,” etc.). Additionally, the contact information processing service 102 can also include an identification of the set of communication activities that are associated with each identified communication activity. In another embodiment, if the communication category is included in the data request, the contact information processing service 102 may return the set of communication activities associated with specified communication category. An example of system for processing communication category information and communication activity information and for generating associated displays incorporating communication category and communication activity information is disclosed in commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/413,397, entitled “Managing Communications Utilizing Communication Categories,” and filed on Mar. 27, 2009. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/413,397, is incorporated by reference herein.
With reference now to
With reference to
At decision block 306, a test is conducted to determine whether multiple entities were specified in the data request and whether a common set of contacts were requested. In an illustrative embodiment, the contact information processing service 102 can specify a subset of contacts for one or more identified entities and return the contact information as specified in block 308. Alternatively, if the multiple entities were specified in the data request or whether the data request included a specific request for identifying common contacts, the routine 300 proceeds to block 308. At block 308, the contact information processing service 102 identifies any overlapping contacts in the set of contact previously identified for each specified entity (block 304). One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that any one of a variety of techniques may be implemented to identify common contacts. Additionally, the contact information processing service 102 may also identify a contact as being “common” so long as a contact is shared between two or more specified entities. Additionally, the contact information processing service 102 may rank, or otherwise prioritize contacts as a function of the number of entities to which the contact is found. At block 310, the contact information processing service 102 returns the set of contact information for each specified entity and the common contacts among the entities. In other embodiments, the contact information processing service 102 may only specify non-common contacts in the set of contacts associated with each specified entity. In further embodiments, the contact information processing service 102 may only return the common set of contact.
With reference to
At decision block 404, a test is conducted to determine whether the specified contact is associated with the specified entity. For example, the contact information processing service 102 may determine whether the specified contact in included in a specific subset of contacts associated with the specified entity (e.g., the “my favorites” subset). The contact information processing service 102 may recall various subsets associated with the specified contact and attempt to match the specified entity in accordance with various text or information matching techniques. If the specified contact is not otherwise associated with the specified entity, at block 406, the contact information processing service 102 returns a negative result. The negative result may be binary corresponding to a “yes” or “no” answer. Alternative, the result may include additional information such as explanation of the searching process and a closest attempted match to facilitate a secondary review.
Alternatively, if the specified contact is associated with the specified entity, at block 408, the contact information processing service 102 can obtain, or otherwise identify, any additional information associated with the specified contact. As previously described, in an illustrative embodiment, a telecommunication device user can maintain multiple subsets of contacts according to different criteria. Additionally, a service provider, or other entity, can also classify contacts associated with a telecommunication device user, such as by rate plan, geographic distance, communication method (e.g., calling, messaging, etc.). Accordingly, for matching contacts, the contact information processing service 102 can identify descriptive information maintained about the contact as applicable to the specified entity. In another embodiment, the contact information processing service 102 can provide detailed information about the verified contact including communication preferences, privacy information, communication history, membership, social networking affiliations or identifiers, or additional information associated with the identified contact. At block 410, the contact information processing service 102 returns the verification of the entity as a contact and any applicable additional information. The routine 400 terminates.
With reference to
At block 504, the contact information processing service 102 determines the organizational criteria that will be utilized to generate the group-based information. If the organizational criteria were specified as a parameter, block 504 may be omitted. As previously described, the contact information processing service 102 can utilize various data processing techniques to identify the organizational criteria. At block 506, the contact information processing service 102 identifies a set of contacts associated with the organizational criteria. In one embodiment, the contact information processing service 102 can utilize a set of contacts that were specified as parameter of the data request. Additionally, the contact information processing service 102 can modify the set of contacts based on the organizational criteria or other filtering criteria. If a set of contacts was not included in the data request, the contact information processing service 102 can identify appropriate contacts as described above. At block 508, the contact information processing service 102 identifies a set of applications or executable components according to the organizational criteria. In one embodiment, the contact information processing service 102 can configure the applications or executable components in accordance with the organizational criteria. At block 510, the contact information processing service 102 returns the results to the requesting network resource. In one embodiment, the group-based information may be returned as a set of identifiers that can be processed by the requesting network resource 110. Alternatively, the contact information processing service 102 may save the results in a network source 112 and facilitate access by the requesting network resource 110.
With reference to
At block 604, the contact information processing service 102 identifies one or more communication categories associated with a specified contact. As previously described, the communication category information corresponds to logical groupings of communication activities that may be used to communicate with an identified contact. At block 606, the contact information processing service 102 identifies any communication activities associated with the identified communication categories. Illustratively, the contact information processing service 102 may proceed to block 606 if the communication categories are specified in the data request. Additionally, the contact information processing service 102 can configure the communication activities in accordance with the identified contact. For example, the contact information processing service 102 can configure the communication activities associated with a “sharing” category with the appropriate distribution lists, identifiers, etc. At block 608, the contact information processing service 102 returns the identified information and the routine 600 terminates. In one embodiment, the communication category and communication activity information may be returned as a set of identifiers that can be processed by the requesting network resource 110. Alternatively, the contact information processing service 102 may save the results in a network source 112 and facilitate access by the requesting network resource 110.
All of the processes described herein may be embodied in, and fully automated via, software code modules executed by one or more general purpose computers or processors. The code modules may be stored in any type of computer-readable medium or other computer storage device. Some or all the methods may alternatively be embodied in specialized computer hardware. In addition, the components referred to herein may be implemented in hardware, software, firmware or a combination thereof As such, reference in the disclosure to actions performed by a module or component relates to the execution of executable instructions by a processing device, or devices, to cause the referenced action to be preformed.
Conditional language such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might” or “may,” unless specifically stated otherwise, are otherwise understood within the context as used in general to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or steps are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without user input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or steps are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment.
Any process descriptions, elements or blocks in the flow diagrams described herein and/or depicted in the attached figures should be understood as potentially representing modules, segments, or portions of code which include one or more executable instructions for implementing specific logical functions or elements in the process. Alternate implementations are included within the scope of the embodiments described herein in which elements or functions may be deleted, executed out of order from that shown, or discussed, including substantially concurrently or in reverse order, depending on the functionality involved as would be understood by those skilled in the art.
It should be emphasized that many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments, the elements of which are to be understood as being among other acceptable examples. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and protected by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4723209 | Hernandez et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
D296218 | Wells-Papanek et al. | Jun 1988 | S |
D298144 | Wells-Papanek et al. | Oct 1988 | S |
5590256 | Tchao et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
D384052 | Kodosky | Sep 1997 | S |
D388424 | DeMuro et al. | Dec 1997 | S |
D391948 | Eisenberg | Mar 1998 | S |
5724531 | Miyashita et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5751980 | Musashi et al. | May 1998 | A |
D395427 | Arora et al. | Jun 1998 | S |
5793365 | Tang et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796394 | Wicks et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
D397687 | Arora et al. | Sep 1998 | S |
D398595 | Baer et al. | Sep 1998 | S |
5822123 | Davis et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5867226 | Wehmeyer et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5880733 | Horvitz et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889517 | Ueda et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
D415483 | Decker | Oct 1999 | S |
5987107 | Brown | Nov 1999 | A |
5987469 | Lewis et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6006200 | Boies et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6023275 | Horvitz et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
D424036 | Arora et al. | May 2000 | S |
D424541 | Mugura | May 2000 | S |
6104398 | Cox, Jr. et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6130726 | Darbee et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144863 | Charron | Nov 2000 | A |
6151059 | Schein et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
D437858 | Yasui et al. | Feb 2001 | S |
6188406 | Fong et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
D438873 | Wang et al. | Mar 2001 | S |
6201957 | Son et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
D440979 | Wang et al. | Apr 2001 | S |
6222921 | Mugura et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226367 | Smith et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236398 | Kojima et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6249863 | Redford et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
D445426 | Wang et al. | Jul 2001 | S |
D446790 | Wang et al. | Aug 2001 | S |
6313877 | Anderson | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6332024 | Inoue et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
D454138 | Imamura et al. | Mar 2002 | S |
D454139 | Feldcamp | Mar 2002 | S |
6359635 | Perttunen | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6393430 | Van Ryzin | May 2002 | B1 |
D459361 | Inagaki | Jun 2002 | S |
D463444 | Istvan et al. | Sep 2002 | S |
6460181 | Donnelly | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6486870 | Kozu | Nov 2002 | B1 |
D467252 | Lee | Dec 2002 | S |
D469442 | Bohlen, Jr. et al. | Jan 2003 | S |
D470857 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2003 | S |
D471226 | Gray | Mar 2003 | S |
6532459 | Berson | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538635 | Ringot | Mar 2003 | B1 |
D472902 | Nashida et al. | Apr 2003 | S |
D473236 | Robbin et al. | Apr 2003 | S |
D474198 | Barnes | May 2003 | S |
D474778 | Barnes | May 2003 | S |
D475064 | Nashida et al. | May 2003 | S |
6563515 | Reynolds et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6577330 | Tsuda et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6600936 | Karkkainen et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
D478912 | Johnson | Aug 2003 | S |
D485279 | DeCombe | Jan 2004 | S |
6678891 | Wilcox et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
D486499 | Hayashi et al. | Feb 2004 | S |
6741268 | Hayakawa | May 2004 | B1 |
6757365 | Bogard | Jun 2004 | B1 |
D495339 | Gildred | Aug 2004 | S |
6775659 | Clifton-Bligh | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6781575 | Hawkins et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
D495715 | Gildred | Sep 2004 | S |
6788987 | Slechta et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801849 | Szukala et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6845153 | Tiburtius et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850255 | Muschetto | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6865404 | Tikkala et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
D506474 | Gildred | Jun 2005 | S |
6907575 | Duarte | Jun 2005 | B2 |
D507577 | Totten et al. | Jul 2005 | S |
6925650 | Arsenault et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
D510581 | Robbin et al. | Oct 2005 | S |
6959207 | Keinonen et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6975712 | Schnarel et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6978473 | Nsonwu et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7007239 | Hawkins et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7036091 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7046993 | Haaramo et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
D523439 | Kuroda | Jun 2006 | S |
D523440 | Hernandez et al. | Jun 2006 | S |
D523868 | Kuroda | Jun 2006 | S |
7083109 | Pouchak | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7086008 | Capps et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7089287 | Bellotti et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7099862 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
D528556 | Decombre | Sep 2006 | S |
7111788 | Reponen | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7117445 | Berger | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7137073 | Kim et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7174516 | Chipchase | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7178109 | Hewson et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7187761 | Bookstaff | Mar 2007 | B2 |
D540340 | Cummins | Apr 2007 | S |
D543986 | Rimas-Ribikauskas et al. | Jun 2007 | S |
D543987 | Rimas-Ribikauskas et al. | Jun 2007 | S |
D543992 | Vigesaa | Jun 2007 | S |
D544875 | Wang et al. | Jun 2007 | S |
D544877 | Sasser | Jun 2007 | S |
D545324 | Decombe | Jun 2007 | S |
7231229 | Hawkins et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7236576 | Schnarel et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7236780 | Benco et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
D545827 | Evans et al. | Jul 2007 | S |
D545832 | Armendariz | Jul 2007 | S |
D546342 | Armendariz | Jul 2007 | S |
D547321 | Viegers et al. | Jul 2007 | S |
7248677 | Randall et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7248857 | Richardson et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
D548239 | Rimas-Ribikauskas et al. | Aug 2007 | S |
D548743 | Takahashi et al. | Aug 2007 | S |
D550681 | Totten et al. | Sep 2007 | S |
D551252 | Andre et al. | Sep 2007 | S |
D552114 | Tolle et al. | Oct 2007 | S |
D554142 | Cameron | Oct 2007 | S |
7280652 | Bocking et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
D554652 | Shen et al. | Nov 2007 | S |
D556765 | Evans et al. | Dec 2007 | S |
D557268 | Fletcher | Dec 2007 | S |
D558221 | Nagata et al. | Dec 2007 | S |
D562343 | Fletcher | Feb 2008 | S |
7330845 | Lee et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
D563972 | Sherry | Mar 2008 | S |
7343565 | Ying et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
D565586 | Shin et al. | Apr 2008 | S |
D565627 | Kase | Apr 2008 | S |
D567251 | Sadler | Apr 2008 | S |
D567817 | Kwag et al. | Apr 2008 | S |
7353034 | Haney | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7360174 | Grossman et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
D568334 | Okaro et al. | May 2008 | S |
D568897 | Byeon | May 2008 | S |
D568898 | Byeon | May 2008 | S |
D568899 | Byeon | May 2008 | S |
D569387 | Byeon | May 2008 | S |
7369850 | Andrew et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
D570369 | Fletcher | Jun 2008 | S |
D571819 | Scott et al. | Jun 2008 | S |
D573601 | Gregov et al. | Jul 2008 | S |
D574392 | Kwag et al. | Aug 2008 | S |
D575297 | Glezer et al. | Aug 2008 | S |
D575298 | Chen et al. | Aug 2008 | S |
D575792 | Benson | Aug 2008 | S |
D576174 | Ording et al. | Sep 2008 | S |
D577364 | Flynt et al. | Sep 2008 | S |
D578134 | Jasinski | Oct 2008 | S |
D578543 | Ulm et al. | Oct 2008 | S |
7437005 | Drucker et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
D580450 | Chen et al. | Nov 2008 | S |
D580946 | Chen et al. | Nov 2008 | S |
7450927 | Creswell et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
D582426 | Chen et al. | Dec 2008 | S |
D582928 | Blankenship et al. | Dec 2008 | S |
D583823 | Chen et al. | Dec 2008 | S |
D584737 | Stone et al. | Jan 2009 | S |
D585453 | Chen et al. | Jan 2009 | S |
D585454 | Ismail | Jan 2009 | S |
D586361 | Horowitz et al. | Feb 2009 | S |
D586362 | Horowitz et al. | Feb 2009 | S |
7490295 | Chaudhri et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
D588148 | Stone et al. | Mar 2009 | S |
D588149 | Brownell et al. | Mar 2009 | S |
D588150 | Stone et al. | Mar 2009 | S |
7503014 | Tojo et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
D589970 | Bhat et al. | Apr 2009 | S |
D590407 | Watanabe et al. | Apr 2009 | S |
D590412 | Saft et al. | Apr 2009 | S |
7519912 | Moody et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7526306 | Brems et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
D592218 | Blankenship et al. | May 2009 | S |
D592674 | Kwag | May 2009 | S |
D593120 | Bouchard et al. | May 2009 | S |
7536654 | Anthony et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
D593574 | Guimaraes et al. | Jun 2009 | S |
D593576 | Ball et al. | Jun 2009 | S |
D594015 | Singh et al. | Jun 2009 | S |
D594465 | Hong et al. | Jun 2009 | S |
D594872 | Akimoto | Jun 2009 | S |
7543245 | Irimajiri | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7546543 | Louch et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7555727 | Hawkins et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
D596192 | Shotel | Jul 2009 | S |
7562304 | Dixon et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7577700 | Tolson et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7580363 | Sorvari et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
D599368 | Kanga et al. | Sep 2009 | S |
D599806 | Brown et al. | Sep 2009 | S |
D599807 | Marashi | Sep 2009 | S |
D599810 | Scalisi et al. | Sep 2009 | S |
D599811 | Watanabe et al. | Sep 2009 | S |
D599812 | Hirsch | Sep 2009 | S |
D599813 | Hirsch | Sep 2009 | S |
D599814 | Ogura et al. | Sep 2009 | S |
D601153 | Setiawan et al. | Sep 2009 | S |
7587215 | Chakraborty et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7587683 | Ito et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
D602038 | Channell et al. | Oct 2009 | S |
7603628 | Park et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
D603415 | Lin et al. | Nov 2009 | S |
D603416 | Poling et al. | Nov 2009 | S |
D603418 | Magnani et al. | Nov 2009 | S |
D603420 | Channell | Nov 2009 | S |
D603867 | La et al. | Nov 2009 | S |
D604310 | Ahn | Nov 2009 | S |
D604316 | Hoefnagels et al. | Nov 2009 | S |
D604317 | Hoefnagels et al. | Nov 2009 | S |
D604740 | Matheny et al. | Nov 2009 | S |
7620996 | Torres et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
D605200 | Sakai | Dec 2009 | S |
D605652 | Plaisted et al. | Dec 2009 | S |
D605653 | Danton | Dec 2009 | S |
D606088 | Yokouchi et al. | Dec 2009 | S |
D606550 | La et al. | Dec 2009 | S |
D607002 | Jonasson et al. | Dec 2009 | S |
7636889 | Weber et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
D608364 | Walsh et al. | Jan 2010 | S |
D608366 | Matas | Jan 2010 | S |
D608367 | Scalisi et al. | Jan 2010 | S |
D608368 | Bamford | Jan 2010 | S |
7646745 | Caldwell et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7650361 | Wong et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
D609714 | Oda et al. | Feb 2010 | S |
D609715 | Chaudhri | Feb 2010 | S |
D610159 | Matheny et al. | Feb 2010 | S |
D610161 | Matas | Feb 2010 | S |
7665028 | Cummins et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7665033 | Byrne et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
D611056 | Langlois et al. | Mar 2010 | S |
D611484 | Mays et al. | Mar 2010 | S |
D611485 | Marashi | Mar 2010 | S |
D611489 | Bell et al. | Mar 2010 | S |
D611490 | Lee et al. | Mar 2010 | S |
D612394 | La et al. | Mar 2010 | S |
D612860 | Tarara et al. | Mar 2010 | S |
7673017 | Kim et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7685520 | Rashkovskiy et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7685530 | Sherrard et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
D613300 | Chaudhri | Apr 2010 | S |
D613747 | Jonasson et al. | Apr 2010 | S |
D614191 | Takano et al. | Apr 2010 | S |
D614192 | Takano et al. | Apr 2010 | S |
D614633 | Watanabe et al. | Apr 2010 | S |
D614643 | Viegers et al. | Apr 2010 | S |
D614646 | Chen et al. | Apr 2010 | S |
7702543 | MacKay et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7703031 | Nakagawa et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7705833 | Kim | Apr 2010 | B2 |
D615090 | Sogabe | May 2010 | S |
D615546 | Lundy et al. | May 2010 | S |
D615549 | Caine et al. | May 2010 | S |
7720498 | Lee | May 2010 | B2 |
D617804 | Hirsch | Jun 2010 | S |
D617805 | Scalisi et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D618250 | Stallings et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
7735021 | Padawer et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7738912 | Hawkins et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
D619593 | Fujioka et al. | Jul 2010 | S |
D619594 | Jonasson et al. | Jul 2010 | S |
D620948 | Scalisi et al. | Aug 2010 | S |
D621844 | Van Os | Aug 2010 | S |
D621845 | Anzures et al. | Aug 2010 | S |
D622280 | Tarara | Aug 2010 | S |
7779358 | Gupta et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
D624556 | Chaudhri | Sep 2010 | S |
7797641 | Karukka et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
D625325 | Vu et al. | Oct 2010 | S |
D626136 | Fujimura | Oct 2010 | S |
D627790 | Chaudhri | Nov 2010 | S |
D628206 | Lemay | Nov 2010 | S |
7831675 | Narayanaswami et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7898600 | Lee et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
D638025 | Saft et al. | May 2011 | S |
7971222 | Ellis | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8015187 | Choi et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8032470 | Heidenreich et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8046801 | Ellis et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
D652843 | van Os | Jan 2012 | S |
8631351 | Fong et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
20010044743 | McKinley et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010046886 | Ishigaki | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020045960 | Phillips et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052754 | Joyce et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020054164 | Uemura | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059201 | Work | May 2002 | A1 |
20020145623 | DeCombe | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030014179 | Szukala et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030078033 | Sauer et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030164818 | Miller-Smith et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030210265 | Haimberg | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030224816 | Kundaje et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040017376 | Tagliabue et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040041836 | Zaner et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040046796 | Fujita | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040067751 | Vandermeijden et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040075691 | Moon | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040077340 | Forsyth | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040091093 | Bookstaff | May 2004 | A1 |
20040100479 | Nakano et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102225 | Furuta et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040119758 | Grossman et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122683 | Grossman et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122684 | Kaikuranta | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133638 | Doss et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040155908 | Wagner | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162812 | Lane | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172455 | Green et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040185890 | Drozt et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040221239 | Hachigian et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040235520 | Cadiz et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236749 | Cortright et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040237048 | Tojo et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040239982 | Gignac | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040250217 | Tojo et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268228 | Croney et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268265 | Berger | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005235 | Satterfield et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010876 | Robertson et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050020243 | Benco et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033603 | Suzuki et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033698 | Chapman | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050039140 | Chen | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050041011 | Silfverberg et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050071780 | Muller et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050079863 | Macaluso | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086611 | Takabe et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091272 | Smith et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050094205 | Lo et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114374 | Juszkiewicz et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050118996 | Lee et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050120306 | Klassen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138574 | Lin | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143135 | Brems et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143138 | Lee et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050160376 | Sciammarella et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050163290 | Gilles et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050172001 | Zaner et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182837 | Harris et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050209994 | Noro et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050210104 | Torvinen | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050229110 | Gegner et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050235225 | Pradhan et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050235226 | Watanabe et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050235251 | Arend et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050243979 | Starbuck et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050245236 | Servi et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050246654 | Hally et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261011 | Scott | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261032 | Seo et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050278652 | Scholz | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060009249 | Fu et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060010395 | Aaltonen | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060030347 | Biswaas | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060048076 | Vronay et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060053379 | Henderson et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060055700 | Niles et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060084410 | Sutaria et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060101350 | Scott | May 2006 | A1 |
20060112354 | Park et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060123360 | Anwar et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060140015 | Kasamsetty | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060141996 | Huh | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143574 | Ito et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060146765 | Van De Sluis et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060148499 | Chie | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060148522 | Chipchase et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168539 | Hawkins et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060174121 | Omae et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060212829 | Yahiro et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060223518 | Haney | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060224675 | Fox et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242581 | Manion et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242597 | Park | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253787 | Fogg | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277488 | Cok et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293057 | Mazerski et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070011617 | Akagawa et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027920 | Alvarado et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070032267 | Haitani et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070033540 | Bridges et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043688 | Kountz et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070060206 | Dam Nielsen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067738 | Flynt et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070072586 | Morhenn et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073874 | Moghaddam et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070079246 | Morillon et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070118813 | Forstall et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070129112 | Tarn | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135103 | Middleton | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136687 | Pak | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070162862 | Ogasawara et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168262 | Morotomi et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174389 | Armstrong et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070198947 | Cox et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070226645 | Kongqiao et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070250936 | Nakamura et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070268908 | Linkola et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271528 | Park et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080022228 | Kwon et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080034317 | Fard et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059570 | Bill | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080081653 | Mock et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086703 | Flynt et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080098311 | Delarue et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080111826 | Endrikhovski et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080122870 | Brodersen et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080158189 | Kim | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080172030 | Blomquist | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080189614 | Jeong et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080189627 | Nikitin et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080194934 | Ray et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215978 | Bamba | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080220751 | De Bast | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080220752 | Forstall et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235248 | Krantz et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080256170 | Hayashi et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080261569 | Britt et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263069 | Harris et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080280600 | Zhou | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080282158 | Aaltonen et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288612 | Kwon | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288880 | Reponen et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090040875 | Buzescu et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090043847 | Laurila | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090077496 | Aravamudan et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090164923 | Ovi | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090187630 | Narayanaswami et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090193512 | Buckley | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090199120 | Baxter et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090228513 | Tian | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090300518 | Mock et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090303188 | Triplett | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100004008 | Abolrous et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100020727 | Narayan et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100020953 | Lidstrom et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100062753 | Wen et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100064231 | Gupta | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100094837 | O'Sullivan et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100144331 | Koberg et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100180001 | Hardt | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100190467 | Scott et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100190468 | Scott et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100241544 | Benson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100245262 | Vance et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100248701 | Vance et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100287504 | Vance et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100333029 | Smith et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110258547 | Symons et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120071244 | Gillo et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130019173 | Kotler et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130019203 | Kotler et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130024780 | Sutedja et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130275897 | Vance et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130281161 | Vance et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130283180 | Vance et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140033071 | Gruber et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140220942 | Vance et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150072644 | Sherrard et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10155431 | Jun 2003 | DE |
0767418 | Apr 1997 | EP |
1246434 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1469374 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1482758 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1571808 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1608190 | Dec 2005 | EP |
07-129363 | May 1995 | JP |
08-123658 | May 1996 | JP |
09-083630 | Mar 1997 | JP |
09-311661 | Dec 1997 | JP |
H11-088496 | Mar 1999 | JP |
H11-327741 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2000-259304 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2000-348058 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2002-009899 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2003-198705 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2004-208217 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004-348601 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005-072958 | Mar 2005 | JP |
3834039 | Oct 2006 | JP |
10-2002-0069964 | Sep 2002 | KR |
10-2004-0024967 | Mar 2004 | KR |
10-2005-0043148 | May 2005 | KR |
10-2006-0042808 | May 2005 | KR |
10-2007-0029009 | Mar 2007 | KR |
10-2008-0004127 | Jan 2008 | KR |
10-2008-0019614 | Mar 2008 | KR |
10-2008-0079716 | Sep 2008 | KR |
WO 0025501 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 03044756 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 03062976 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 2005045799 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2005064441 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005120112 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2006016227 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2006067567 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2007093997 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2007143678 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2008030776 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2010111610 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO 2010111614 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO 2010111637 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO 2010111642 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO 2010111643 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO 2010111670 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO 2010111675 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO 2010111679 | Sep 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Alltel Launches ‘My Circle,’ a One-of-a-Kind Program That Gives Customers Free Calls to Any Network or Number They Choose, Business Wire, Apr. 20, 2006, pp. 1, New York. |
Alltel's ‘My Circle’ Plan Lets Subscribers Adds 10 Numbers for Unlimited Calls, Wireless News, Apr. 23, 2006, pp. 2, Coventry. |
Cuneo, Alice Z., Alltel Gets Aggressive in Telecom War, Advertising Age, Apr. 24, 2006, vol. 77, Issue 17, pp. 8, 1 pg., Chicago (Midwest region edition). |
Weisser, Cybele and Farnoosh Torabi. “What do you pay to stay connected?” Money Magazine, Nov. 24, 2003. http://money.cnn.com/2003/11/20/pf/portability—strategy—0312/index.htm. |
AT&T, LG Xenon User Guide, Apr. 8, 2009, pp. 1-146. |
Boy Genius. “LG Xenon hitting AT&T before Christmas?” Boy Genius Report, Sep. 24, 2008. http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2008/09/24/lg-xenon-hitting-att-before-christmas/. |
Belson, K., Alltel to Offer Free-Calling Plan, With Limits,, New York Times (Late Edition (East Coast), Apr. 21, 2006, p. C9, New York. |
MobileCom Provides All Residential Pay As You Go Subscribers the Ability to Talk for 1 Piaster Per Minute Day and Night, www.albawaba.com, Mar. 14, 2006. |
Sellers, P., MCI Communications Yes, Brands Can Still Work Magic, www.money.cnn.com, Feb. 7, 1994. |
“Alltel Corp at Lehman Brothers Worldwide Wireless, Wirelein, and Media Conference”. Fair Disclosure Wire. May 22, 2006. |
“Alltel's free wireless calling plan paying off”, Virgil Larson, Knight Rider Tribune Business News, May 2005, 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100250606 A1 | Sep 2010 | US |