Embodiments of the present invention are generally directed to computer networks and, more particularly, to a system for conveniently adding devices to a network.
The proliferation of wireless-enabled laptops has created demand for wireless networks in the home. Consumers can purchase wireless routers (or access points) at electronics stores and add them to their existing ISP connection to create their own wireless access to broadband networks.
Transmissions between a laptop and an access point are typically unsecured. These transmissions often happen in clear-text, and a malicious user with limited skill can a) snoop on the conversation that is occurring between the laptop and the network and b) gain access to the network and resources on the internet. Fortunately, most routers and access points have the ability to enable wireless security. In doing so, a secret password is shared between all devices that want to communicate with the access point.
By default, typically, such devices ship with wireless security disabled. The act of enabling wireless security on these devices is challenging and complex to the average home user.
Wireless security is a complex field. There are many different types of wireless security available, such as WEP, WPA, WPA-PSK, WPA-RADIUS, WPA2, that often involve complex ‘hexadecimal keys’ or pass-phrases and sub-choices of encryption methods (TKIP/AES, etc). The method of securing a wireless network involves configuring the desired security settings inside the router and then configuring each wireless client with the same settings and pass-phrases.
To further complicate things, each device requiring configuration may have a very different user experience. For example, the router may have a difficult-to-navigate web-based administration console, different versions of Windows have different user interfaces, a Mac in the home would require a different approach, and finally “headless devices” that don't have a display console, such as a network enabled web-camera or networked Digital Video Recorder, may have yet a very different user interface.
Some efforts have been made by the industry to improve on the simplification of wireless network security. For example, the Microsoft Corporation has developed an approach known as “Windows Connect Now” (WCN) that allows wireless security configuration information to be stored in an XML file on removable storage devices such as USB keys. The Wi-Fi Alliance has been driving a set of standards around wireless configuration known as Wi-Fi Protected Setup (WPS).
However, the current industry efforts fall short in a number of areas. For example, the WPS wizards in Windows XP and Vista may allow for creation of new network settings onto a USB key. This helps with wireless clients that support the key format, but it does not help users reconfigure their existing router settings to match. This is a complex task that users often do not know how to complete. Additionally, there are no standard APIs to program routers. Most of them support a web-based administrative interface, but not a well structured API set. Moreover, WPS is hindered by many conflicting ways of accomplishing the same goal (e.g., PIN based configuration, Push-Button configuration etc.)
Once wireless security has been configured and enabled on a network, the task of adding a new device to that network is also complex; as it requires client configuration of the same settings. In many cases, a new device is added to the network a considerable amount of time after the network was originally secured, in which case the settings have been long forgotten.
An embodiment of the invention includes an article of manufacture having an interface component configured to couple to a computer, the computer being part of a network having a gateway device. The article further includes a memory component containing computer-implementable instructions that, when executed by the computer, gather network configuration information from the gateway device. The network configuration information is configured to enable an electronic device to join the network.
Preferred and alternative embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the following figures:
As is described in further detail below, various embodiments of the invention may employ elements of a network management tool. An embodiment of the network management tool, available from Pure Networks under the name NETWORK MAGIC, is described in detail in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/634,432, filed Dec. 7, 2004, entitled “Network Management” and naming Steve Bush et al. as inventors, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/297,809, filed on Dec. 7, 2005, entitled “Network Management” and naming Steve Bush et al. as inventors, which applications, along with commonly owned U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/789,522, filed Apr. 4, 2006, entitled “Network Management,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/916,642, filed on Aug. 10, 2004, entitled “Service Licensing And Maintenance For Networks,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/457,783, filed on Jul. 14, 2006, entitled “Network Device Management,” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/457,763, filed on Jul. 14, 2006, entitled “Network Device Setup Utility,” are incorporated entirely herein by reference.
Additionally, various embodiments of the invention may be employed within a small network.
Each of these networked devices 103 communicates, either directly or indirectly, with a gateway device 105. In turn, the gateway device 105 typically will communicate with an external device or network. An external network may be another private network, or it may be a public network, such as the Internet 107. Thus, a gateway device is a device that can steer electronic data from one network to another network. Typically, a gateway device serves as a node on two incompatible networks (i.e., networks that use different communication protocol formats) and it can convert data from one network's communication protocol format into the other network's communication protocol format. As used herein, the term “small network” refers to a network made up of networked devices that each employ the same network address to communicate with the same gateway device, together with the gateway device itself.
The network devices 103 may be connected to the gateway device 105 using any suitable communication medium. For example, in the illustrated network 101, the desktop computers 103B are connected to the gateway device 105 through a hard-wired connection 109A (such as an Ethernet cable), while the laptop computer 103A is connected to the gateway device 105 through a IEEE 802.11 wireless connection 109B and the personal digital assistant 103C is connected to the gateway device 105 through a Bluetooth wireless connection 109C.
It should be appreciated that, as used throughout this application, the term “connect” and its derivatives (e.g., connection, connected, connects) includes both direct and indirect connections. Thus, with the network illustrated in
Typically, the gateway device 105 will be a router. As will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, a router routes data packets from the networked devices 103 to an external device or network. With some networks, however, the gateway device 105 alternately may be a computer performing router functions, a hub, a bridge, or “layer-3” switch. As will also be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, the computing devices or “nodes” making up the network 101 can communicate with the gateway device 105 using one or more defined communication protocols, such as the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) and the Internet Protocol (IP).
With these communication protocols, each computing device 103 and gateway device 105 in the network 101 can be assigned a logical address. For example, if the network 101 is connected to the Internet 107 through an Internet service provider, the Internet service provider can assign the gateway device 105 a logical Internet Protocol (IP) address. The Internet service provider may also provide the gateway device 105 with a block of logical Internet Protocol (IP) addresses for the gateway device 105 to reassign to each network device 103. Alternatively, the gateway device 105 can itself assign a range of logical Internet Protocol (IP) addresses to each network device 103, and then use a translation operation (e.g., a Network Address Translation (NAT) operation) to route data packets that it receives to the appropriate network device 103. This type of logical address typically is unrelated to the particular computing device to which it is assigned. Instead, a logical address identifies the relationship of that computing device to other computing devices in the network.
In addition to a logical address, each network device has a physical address. For example, most computing devices capable of communicating over a network, including routers, employ a network adapter with a media access control (MAC) address. This type of physical address is assigned to a network adapter according to standards (referred to as Project 802 or just 802 standards, which are incorporated entirely herein by reference) set forth by the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE). More particularly, these standards define a 48-bit and 64-bit physical address format for network devices. The first 14 bits of the address are assigned by the IEEE Registration Authority, and uniquely identify the manufacturer of the network adapter. The remaining bits are then assigned by the manufacturer to uniquely identify each network adapter produced by the manufacturer. Consequently, the physical address of a network adapter is unique across all networks unless manually changed by the user. The physical address is unique to the network adapter, and is independent of a computing device's relationship to other computing devices in a network. Thus, the physical address does not change over time or between uses in different networks.
A network may include both virtual devices and physical devices. Physical network devices can then include both computer devices and computing appliance devices. A “computer” may generally be characterized as a device that can be programmed to perform a number of different, unrelated functions. Examples of computers can thus include programmable personal computers, such as desktop computers and laptop computers. In addition, programmable media-purposed computers (e.g., “media adapters and servers”), network attached storage devices, programmable entertainment-purposed computers (e.g., video game consoles), some programmable personal digital assistants and some telephones (such as wireless “smart” telephones) may be characterized as computers in a network. A “computing appliance” then may generally be characterized as a device that is limited to primarily performing only specific functions. Examples of a computing appliance may thus include, for example, printers, cameras, telephones that exchange voice information in data packets (sometimes generically referred to as “Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) telephones or telephone adapters), digital video recorders, televisions, voice over Internet protocol (VoIP) adapters, print servers, media adapters, media servers, photo frames, data storage servers, routers, bridges and wireless access points.
As will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, there may be no clear defining line between “computer” network devices and “computing appliance” network devices in a network. For example, a sophisticated print server may be programmable to additionally or alternately function as a data storage server, while a programmable media-purposed computer or programmable personal digital assistant may have restricted functionality due to limited memory, input devices or output devices. Accordingly, as used herein, the term “computer” can refer to any network device that is capable of implementing a network management tool according to one or more aspects of the invention, such as a personal programmable computer. The term “computer appliance” then can refer to a network device that typically cannot implement a network management tool according to at least one aspect of the invention without additional augmentation. The terms “computing device,” “network component,” or “electronic device” are then used herein to include both computers and computing appliances.
With conventional networks located in a home, small office or other local environment, a network management tool according to various aspects of the invention can be implemented on, or otherwise executed by, a programmable personal computer, such as a desktop or laptop computer. A general description of this type of computer will therefore now be described.
An illustrative example of such a computer 201 as may be present in the network 101 described above is illustrated in
The processing unit 205 and the system memory 207 are connected, either directly or indirectly, through a bus 213 or alternate communication structure to one or more peripheral devices. For example, the processing unit 205 or the system memory 207 may be directly or indirectly connected to additional memory storage, such as the hard disk drive 215, the removable magnetic disk drive 217, the optical disk drive 219, and the flash memory card 221. The processing unit 205 and the system memory 207 also may be directly or indirectly connected to one or more input devices 223 and one or more output devices 225. The input devices 223 may include, for example, a keyboard, touch screen, a remote control pad, a pointing device (such as a mouse, touchpad, stylus, trackball, or joystick), a scanner, a camera or a microphone. The output devices 225 may include, for example, a monitor display, television, printer, stereo, or speakers.
Still further, the computing unit 203 can be directly or indirectly connected to one or more network interfaces 227 for communicating with a network. This type of network interface 227, also sometimes referred to as a network adapter or network interface card (NIC), translates data and control signals from the computing unit 203 into network messages according to a communication protocol, such as the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), the Internet Protocol (IP), and the User Datagram Protocol (UDP). These protocols are well known in the art, and thus will not be described here in more detail. An interface 227 may employ any suitable connection agent for connecting to a network, including, for example, a wireless transceiver, a power line adapter, a modem, or an Ethernet connection.
It should be appreciated that one or more of these peripheral devices may be housed with the computing unit 203 and bus 213. Alternately or additionally, one or more of these peripheral devices may be housed separately from the computing unit 203 and bus 213, and then connected (either directly or indirectly) to the bus 213. Also, it should be appreciated that both computers and computing appliances may include any of the components illustrated in
It should be noted that, while a general description of a programmable personal computer was provided above, various aspects of the invention may be implemented on any desired device capable of supporting embodiments of the invention. For example, with some aspects of the invention, the network management tool may be implemented on special purposed programmable computers, such as a programmable media or entertainment-purposed computers, or personal digital assistants. Accordingly, the above description of a programmable personal computer should be understood as illustrative rather than limiting.
A computing appliance may have any combination of the components of the computer 201 discussed above. More typically, however, a computing appliance can be simpler to optimize the performance of a specific function, and thus may have only a subset of these components. For example, a computing appliance may have only a computing unit 203, an input device 223 or an output device 225, and a network interface 227. As will be apparent from the following description, however, a computing appliance will have sufficient computing resources to implement a desired embodiment of the invention in order to provide information to or receive information from a client operating on a separate computing device.
Examples and aspects of network management tools, such as the network management tool 330, that may be employed according to various implementations of the invention are discussed in more detail in, for example, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/467,534 filed on Aug. 25, 2006, entitled “Network Administration Tool Employing A Network Administration Protocol” and naming Breft Marl as inventor, which application in turn claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/297,809 filed on Dec. 7, 2005, entitled “Network Management” and naming Steve Bush et al. as inventors, which application in turn claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/634,432, filed Dec. 7, 2004, entitled “Network Management” and naming Steve Bush et al. as inventors, each of which applications are incorporated entirely herein by reference. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/457,783, filed Jul. 14, 2006, entitled “Network Device Management” and naming Brett Marl as inventor is incorporated entirely herein by reference as well.
In an embodiment of the invention, a software system, such as network management tool 330, is pre-loaded on removable media, such as key 310 to add network intelligence to the key for the purpose of assisting with wireless-network security configuration. With the inclusion of this software, and referring now to
An embodiment of the invention allows the network management tool 330 to be run by a PC or other device from an external media device, such as key 310, without being installed onto the hard disk of such PC or other device.
As such, and referring specifically to a process 400 illustrated in
At a block 410, the wizard checks to see if the computing device 103 is connected to an existing home network, such as the network 101. If the computing device 103 is connected to a network, then the process 400 proceeds to a block 505 of a process 500 (
Referring now to
SSID or name of wireless network;
Security Mode (e.g., None, WEP, WPA-PSK, WPA-RADIUS, WPA2-PSK, etc.);
Security key or pass-phrase.
Encryption Method (TKIP/AES)
If the login succeeds and the settings are obtained, the process 500 continues to a block 510. If the login fails due to administrative credentials being incorrect, at a block 515, the wizard can prompt the user for necessary credentials and re-try the login. If, after examining the gateway 105, it is determined that the gateway is a non-wireless device, the wizard may terminate with an error.
After obtaining the settings from the gateway 105, in an embodiment, the wizard looks for a network description file on the key 310 that, for example, is in WCN format. If such a file does not exist (e.g., the key 310 is blank), the wizard, at a block 520, invokes a displayed dialog asking the user to wait while the settings are saved to the key. Simultaneously, at a block 535, the router settings obtained at block 505 are saved to a file (e.g., XML) on the key 310. The process 500 then proceeds to a block 525 described below.
If such a file does exist, and the settings in the file are identical to the network settings obtained from the gateway 105, then, at a block 525, the wizard invokes a displayed dialog instructing the user to plug the key 310 into a device 103 to be joined to the network 101. The process 500 then terminates.
If such a file does exist, but the settings in the file are different from the network settings obtained from the gateway 105, then, at a block 530, the wizard invokes a displayed dialog asking the user if he/she wishes to create a new key for the network (i.e., override the current network settings). If the user answers in the affirmative, then the process 500 continues to block 520. Otherwise, the process 500 terminates.
Referring back to
If such a file is not present, then, at a block 420, the wizard invokes a displayed dialog prompting the user to insert the key 310 into another device that is already connected to the network 101. If the user complies with this request, the process 400 continues to block 405.
If such a file is present, the tool 330 assumes that the user wishes that the device 103 be joined to the network 101. If the device 103 has a wireless network card, and the SSID of the network 101 stored in the file is within range, the tool 330, at a block 425, attempts to join the device 103 to the network 101 using the settings stored in the file. If the tool 330 determines that the device 103 was successfully joined to the network 101, then, at a block 430, the wizard invokes a displayed dialog informing the user of such. The process 400 then terminates.
The processes 400, 500 shown in and described with reference to
By way of example, and referring back to
Optionally advantageous aspects of at least one embodiment of the invention include the notion of a binary that can run from a removable media device, such as a key, that can automatically extract settings associated with a network. The key is agnostic to the type of router installed. The key is also intelligent enough to know if the device is or is not connected to a network, and if previous settings have been stored on the key.
While embodiments of the invention have been described with respect to specific examples including presently preferred modes of carrying out the invention, those skilled in the art will appreciate that there are numerous variations and permutations of the above described systems and techniques that fall within the spirit and scope of the invention as described herein.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/949,618, filed Jul. 13, 2007, entitled “ADDING NETWORK INTELLIGENCE TO A REMOVABLE DEVICE,” which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5383178 | Unverrich | Jan 1995 | A |
5396485 | Ohno et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5758083 | Singh et al. | May 1998 | A |
5768483 | Maniwa et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774667 | Garvey et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5838907 | Hansen | Nov 1998 | A |
5974237 | Shurmer et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5978568 | Abraham et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6006272 | Aravamudan et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6023723 | McCormick et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6157950 | Krishnan | Dec 2000 | A |
6456306 | Chin et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6530018 | Fleming, III | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6584074 | Vasamsetti et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6631118 | Jones | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6678250 | Grabelsky et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6728262 | Woram | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6778505 | Bullman et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6801941 | Stephens et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6892245 | Crump et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6925085 | Krishna et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6954785 | Martin et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6965614 | Osterhout et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6980556 | Vimpari | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7020701 | Gelvin et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7020720 | Donahue et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7027808 | Wesby | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039688 | Matsuda et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7042988 | Juitt et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7080141 | Baekelmans et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7111054 | Lo | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7155493 | Weber | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7177957 | Vance | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7187461 | Schlonski et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7200551 | Senez | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7240106 | Cochran et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7249171 | Goto | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7269653 | Mentze et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7283517 | Yan et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7310664 | Merchant et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7319873 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7337910 | Cartmell et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7340512 | Cochran et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7388839 | Chafle et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7392310 | Motoyama et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7418702 | Tsao | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7421466 | Haines | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7457737 | Patiejunas | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7460546 | Anderson, IV | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7475133 | Nuggehalli | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7496660 | Blaisdell et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7499999 | Ocepek et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7506048 | Motoyama et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7509415 | Baekelmans et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7545762 | McConnell et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7565418 | Ferrari et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7581039 | Martinez et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7603710 | Harvey et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7657612 | Manchester et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7769409 | Harris et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7783777 | Pabla et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7787416 | Gidwani | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7823199 | Rathi et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7853880 | Porter | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8159949 | Pham | Apr 2012 | B2 |
20010039580 | Walker et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020004935 | Huotari et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010866 | McCullough et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026503 | Bendinelli et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026505 | Terry | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020112076 | Rueda et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116544 | Barnard et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020147938 | Hamiltonet al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161865 | Nguyen | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161867 | Cochran et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020174207 | Battou | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020191556 | Krishnarajah et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196463 | Schlonski et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030005112 | Krautkremer | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018889 | Burnett et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030033402 | Battat et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040813 | Gonzales et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030041238 | French et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030061336 | Van Den Bosch et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069947 | Lipinski | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078965 | Cocotis et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078999 | Lund et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030086425 | Bearden et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097439 | Strayer et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030115298 | Baker | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115314 | Kawashima | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030187985 | Rohling et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195937 | Kircher et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200303 | Chong | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200318 | Chen et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030221122 | Hatori | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229688 | Liang | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003292 | Kato | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040005873 | Groenendaal et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015575 | Motoyama | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030620 | Benjamin et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039704 | Gilliam et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040040023 | Ellis et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049714 | Marples et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054558 | Miyake | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083299 | Dietz et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040093383 | Huang et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111505 | Callahan et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040146006 | Jackson | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040155899 | Conrad | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040156346 | O'Neill | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162986 | Metzger | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172469 | Takahashi et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193709 | Selvaggi et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199630 | Sarkissian et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040199647 | Ramarao et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203592 | Kermode et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204051 | Scott et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040236759 | Young | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040255023 | Motoyama | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004866 | Bonalle et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050005013 | Saint-Hilaire et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050018241 | Azami | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050050189 | Yang | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050050190 | Dube | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050054326 | Rogers | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060535 | Bartas | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050063350 | Choudhury et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050078681 | Sanuki et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085244 | Choi et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086197 | Boubez et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086282 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091504 | Shirogane | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050111420 | Fuji | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114490 | Redlich et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050125527 | Lu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149626 | Manchester et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050160138 | Ishidoshiro | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165828 | Lango et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165919 | Qian et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050184852 | Lee et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198221 | Manchester et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198274 | Day | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216602 | Armstrong et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050229238 | Ollis et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234568 | Chung et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234683 | Graves et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050235227 | Martineau et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240665 | Gu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240758 | Lord et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050243777 | Fong | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060015939 | Aston et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060031457 | Motoyama | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036847 | Bush et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060037036 | Min et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060037075 | Frattura et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041891 | Aaron | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060101109 | Nishio | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106918 | Evert et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060120293 | Wing | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129664 | Reimert et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060153080 | Palm | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168195 | Maturana et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168263 | Blackmore | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060172734 | Tak et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060258341 | Miller et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060272014 | McRae et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060280189 | McRae et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060291443 | Harrington et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070015463 | Abel | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070022185 | Hamilton et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070058567 | Harrington et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076621 | Malhotra et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070106768 | Frietsch et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070111568 | Ferrari et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070115950 | Karaoguz et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130286 | Hopmann et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070133569 | Lee et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143749 | Date et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070146782 | Lehotsky et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070204150 | Jokela et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070253384 | Kanagala et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070254609 | Rosenthal et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070268506 | Zeldin | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070268514 | Zeldin et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070268515 | Freund et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070268516 | Bugwadia et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276931 | Mahdavi et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070291945 | Chuang et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080008125 | Pham et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080037552 | Dos Remedios et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080043989 | Furutono et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049779 | Hopmann et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052384 | Marl et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080065760 | Damm et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080070603 | Mao | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080134164 | Stich et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080175187 | Lowry et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080216154 | Fontaine | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243699 | Hilerio et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090017832 | Tebbs et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090019141 | Bush et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090019147 | Ahlers et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090019314 | Younger et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090037606 | Diab | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090046656 | Kitazoe et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090052338 | Kelley et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090109897 | Woo | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100020694 | Jones | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100035595 | Duggal et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100093278 | Abel | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100250725 | Meenan et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110235549 | Ahlers et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120008529 | Averbuch et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20130046722 | Hanson | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130250801 | Kennedy et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1315334 | May 2003 | EP |
1370025 | Dec 2003 | EP |
1538792 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1553729 | Jul 2005 | EP |
1638258 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1639751 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1701478 | Sep 2006 | EP |
1894314 | Mar 2008 | EP |
1965541 | Sep 2008 | EP |
2324652 | May 2011 | EP |
2411801 | Sep 2005 | GB |
2001-222497 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001-352328 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2004-0047209 | Jul 2004 | KR |
10-2005-0031175 | Apr 2005 | KR |
2005-0078541 | Aug 2005 | KR |
2005-0094247 | Sep 2005 | KR |
WO2005004401 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO2007001629 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO2007136804 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2008156898 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009011962 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2009011963 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2009011964 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2009011965 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2009011966 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO2010016855 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO2011119264 | Sep 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 13/029,335, filed Feb. 17, 2011, entitled “Network Management,” Inventor(s) Steven M. Bush, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/030,982, filed Feb. 18, 2011, entitled “Network Management,” inventor(s) Steven M. Bush, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/031,121, filed Feb. 18, 2011, entitled “Network Management,” inventor(s) Steven M. Bush, et al. |
Marcia Zangrilli, et al., “Using Passive Traces of Application Traffic in a Network Monitoring System,” copyright 2004 IEEE. |
Kazuya Kubo, et al., “Hybrid Peer-to-Peer System for Network Monitoring of Field Devices,” Downloaded May 14, 2009 at 10:08 from IEEE Xplore, copyright 2003 SICE, 6 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2008/063335 mailed Sep. 22, 2008 (1 page). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2008/063335 mailed Sep. 22, 2008 (4 pages). |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2008/063308 mailed Oct. 30, 2008 (2 pages). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2008/063308 mailed Oct. 30, 2008 (4 pages). |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2008/063333 mailed Sep. 26, 2008 (2 pages). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2008/063333 mailed Spetember 26, 2008 (4 pages). |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2008/059490 mailed Apr. 21, 2009 (2 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued Oct. 6, 2009 (1 page) and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed Apr. 21, 2009 (3 pages) for International Application No. PCT/US2008/059490. |
Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability (1 page), International Preliminary Report on Patentability (1 page), and Written Report of the International Searching Authority (4 pages) mailed Jan. 28, 2010 for International Application No. PCT/US2008/063318. |
PCT Aug. 25, 2011 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from International Application No. PCT/US2011/024462; 12 pages. |
Karygiannos, Tom, et al., “Wireless Network Security 802.11 Bluetooth and Handheld Devices,” NIST Special Publication 800-48, Technology Administration, Dept. of Commerce, 2002, 119 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/235,007, filed Sep. 16, 2011, entitled “Configuring a Secure Network,” Inventor(s) Aaron H. Averbuch, et al. |
EPO Nov. 15, 2007 European Search Report and Opinion from European Application No. EP07017509; 8 pages. |
Khedr, Mohamed, et al., “Acan-Ad Hoc Context Aware Networks,” Online! 2002, XP002300569; 5 pages http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.20.1469. |
Krishnamurthy, Lakshman, et al., “Meeting the Demands of the Digital Home with high-Speed Multi-Hop Wireless Networks,” Intel Technology Journal, vol. 6, Nov. 15, 2002, pp. 57-68; http://download.intel.com/technology/itj/2002/volume06issue04/vol6iss4—interoperable—home—infrastructure.pdf. |
“Near Field Communication White Paper,” Ecma International, 2005; 12 pages http://www.ecma-international.org/activities/Communications/tc32-tg19-2005-012.pdf. |
PCT Oct. 27, 2004 International Search Report from International Application No. PCT/US2004/021429; 3 pages. |
PCT Jan. 3, 2006 International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Search Authority from International Application No. PCT/US2004/021429; 7 pages. |
PCT Dec. 24, 2007 International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Search Authority from International Application No. PCT/US2006/17500; 6 pages. |
PCT Aug. 7, 2007 International Search Report from International Application No. PCT/US06/17500; 1 page. |
PCT Nov. 21, 2008 International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Search Authority from International Application No. PCT/US2007/012016; 5 pages. |
PCT Jan. 4, 2008 International Search Report from International Application No. PCT/US07/12016; 1 page. |
PCT Apr. 24, 2009 International Search Report from International Application No. PCT/US2008/08544; 2 pages. |
PCT Aug. 2, 2011 International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Search Authority from International Application No. PCT/US2008/08544; 7 pages. |
Rasheed, Yasser, et al, “Home Interoperability Framework for the Digital Home,” Intel Technology Journal, vol. 6, Nov. 15, 2002, pp. 5-16; http://download.intel.com/technology/itj/2002/volume06issue04/vol6iss4—interoperable—home—infrastructure.pdf. |
“Universal Plug and Play Device Architecture, UPnP, Version 1.0,” Microsoft Corporation, Protocols, Jun. 8, 2000; 54 pages http://upnp.org/specs/arch/UPnPDA10—20000613.pdf. |
Walker, Mark, et al., “Remote I/O: Freeing the Experience from the Platform with UPnP Architecture,” Intel Technology Journal, vol. 6, Nov. 15, 2002, pp. 30-36; http://download.intel.com/technology/itj/2002/volume06issue04/vol6iss4—interoperable—home—infrastructure.pdf. |
PCT Oct. 11, 2012 Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability and the International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from Application No. PCT/US2011/024462; 9 pages. |
EPO—Oct. 24, 2012 Response to Written Opinion from European Application 0876920.4; 21 pages. |
PCT Notification of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, International Application No. PCT/US2008/063318, mailed Sep. 25, 2008, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/696,638, filed Apr. 4, 2007, entitled “Network Management Providing Network Health Information and Lockdown Security,” Inventor(s) Steve Bush et al. |
Barb Bowman, “Introduction to Windows XP Service Pack 2,” Published Aug. 25, 2004, 8 pages; © 2010 Microsoft Corporation http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/security/expert/bowman—introtosp2.mspx. |
Microsoft TechNet, “The Cable Guy—Jun. 2004: The New Wireless Network Setup Wizard in Windows XP Service Pack 2,” Published May 25, 2004; Updated Aug. 4, 2004, 10 pages; © 2010 Microsoft Corporation; http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb878069.aspx. |
Microsoft Corporation, “Windows Connect Now-UFD for Windows XP Specification,” © 2010, Updated Sep. 15, 2006, 1 page; http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/connect/Rally/WCN-UFD—XPspec.mspx. |
Microsoft Corporation, “Windows Connect Now-UFD for Windows XP,” Version 1.1 © 2010—Sep. 15, 2006, 33 pages; http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/connect/Rally/WCN-Netspec.doc. |
Microsoft Corporation, “Windows Connect Now-UFD and Windows Vista Specification,” Version 1.0 © 2010—Sep. 15, 2006, 1 page; http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/connect/Rally/WCN-UFD—Vistaspec.mspx. |
Microsoft Corporation, “Windows Connect Now-UFD Windows Vista” Version 1.0 © 2010—Sep. 15, 2006, 28 pages; http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/connect/Rally/WCN-UFD—Vistaspec.doc. |
Microsoft Corporation, “Windows Connect Now—Access Point has No USB Port in Wireless Networking,” © 2010, printed Mar. 24, 2010, 2 pages; http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.aspx?dg=microsoft.public.windows.networking.wireless&tid=c55b567e-fec3-43be-8bd1-a3216125c7f9&cat=en—US—d02fc761-3f6b-402c-82f6-ba1a8875c1a7&lang=en&cr=&sloc=en-us&m=1&p=1. |
Flip Video, “Quick Start Guide: FlipshareTV,” © 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc., 19 pages; http://www.theflip.com/pdf/en-US/FlipShareTVQuickStartGuide.pdf. |
“Wi-Fi Certified™ for Wi-Fi Protected Setup™: Easing the User Experience for Home and Small Office Wi-Fi® Networks,” © 2007, 14 pages; http://www.wi-fi.org/files/kc/20090123—Wi-Fi—Protected—Setup.pdf. |
“Cisco Access Router USB Flash Memory Module and Usb eToken Hardware Installation Guide,” © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc., 12 pages; https://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/access/2800/hardware/notes/mithril.html. |
“Wi-Fi Alliance™ for Wi-Fi Protected Setup Specification,” Version 1.0h, Dec. 2006, 110 pages. |
Byoung-Koo Kim/Jong-Su Jang/Tai M. Chung, Design of Network Security Control System for Cooperative Intrusion Detection, 2002, pp. 389-398. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued Jan. 19, 2010 (1 page) and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed Oct. 30, 2008 (4 pages) for International Application No. PCT/US2008/063308. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued Jan. 19, 2010 (1 page) and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed Sep. 26, 2008 (4 pages) for International Application No. PCT/US2008/063333. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued Jan. 19, 2010 (1 page) and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed Sep. 22, 2008 (4 pages) for International Application No. PCT/US2008/063335. |
EPO Apr. 5, 2012 Search Report and Written Opinion from European Application 08769420.4; 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090055514 A1 | Feb 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60949618 | Jul 2007 | US |