Network control and optimization (NCO) system and method

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11930439
  • Patent Number
    11,930,439
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, September 4, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 12, 2024
    8 months ago
Abstract
A system and method for network control and optimization may be integrated into an application executed by a computing device so that the application and/or the user of the application can control the digital data network by which the application may access remote data. In one embodiment, the digital data network may include a cellular digital data network and a WiFi network.
Description
FIELD

The disclosure relates generally to a system and method for network control and optimization and in particular to a system and method for network control and optimization for a digital service provider (Developer of a Mobile App, Website, etc.) and to a consumer


BACKGROUND

The internet and the associated networks used by a consumer/consumer device to access a digital service as shown in FIG. 1 are well known. The internet allows different pieces of content/data required for a digital service to work to be delivered to a device, using a last mile network, like the smartphone shown in FIG. 1. The Internet shown in FIG. 1 is the combination of all physical units distributed across the globe that house all the information in the world. The internet data center is a series of distributed physical units that house all the networking and computing equipment, including redundant and backup components, infrastructure for power supply, data communications connections, environmental controls and various security devices. The CDN infrastructure is a geographically distributed network of servers that are housed in the Internet data center that serve most of the internet content today, especially web objects (text, graphics, scripts), downloadable objects (media files, software, documents), applications, live streaming media, on-demand streaming media and social media whose architecture is well known and whose operation is also known. The Internet, along with the Internet Data Center and the CDN Infrastructure is together termed as the Internet Infrastructure. A Digital Service Provider includes all individuals/companies/entities that use the Internet infrastructure to provide a service to consumers. The consumer Platform is/are mobile apps/websites/any interface through which a user accesses the service of a Digital Service Provider. The telecom Infra is an infrastructure setup by telecom companies that uses licensed wireless frequencies for access to the internet (2G/3G/4G/LTE—collectively, cellular data connections) and the Wi-Fi Infra is the infrastructure setup by Internet service providers to provide broadband/leased line connectivity to access internet or to which Access point's can be attached to access internet wirelessly using unlicensed frequency.


Using the conventional system shown in FIG. 1, the Service (Mobile App) shown in FIG. 1 works in the following manner. All information made available by a Digital Service Provider is stored/served either through server/s hosted by the Digital Service Provider or through a CDN. Based on data access patterns (what data is being consumed where), the CDN infrastructure caches certain data (a subset of all information) across multiple servers distributed across geographies. The CDN Edge servers (EDGE1, . . . , EDGEn in FIG. 1) are distributed globally and placed inside third party Internet Data Centers distributed globally and data centers operated by Internet Service Providers and Telecom service providers. When a consumer needs access to server/s hosted by the Digital Service Provider and the CDN (either via an Internet Service Provider or a Telecom service provider), the consumer needs to access the service over a “last mile” which is the data connection between the consumer (the smartphone device for example in FIG. 1) and the Internet Infrastructure. The experience of the consumer using the Service is dependent on the availability, the reliability and the throughput available on the last mile. More importantly, as the number of users and the data consumption per user increases, the load on the existing Internet Infrastructure, increases exponentially, affecting the experience of the user in densely concentrated areas.


Using a current convention system, accessing the service occurs in the following manner. An operating system (OS) of the smartphone of the consumer (see FIG. 1) detects the availability of connectivity over a cellular data connection (such as 4G/LTE as shown in FIG. 1) or Wi-Fi. If connectivity is available using only one module, the OS uses the available connectivity route. If both connectivity options are available, the OS detects which connection offers more stable and faster bandwidth availability and uses that connection to transact data packets, with priority assigned to Wi-Fi. If the above scenario changes at any point, the OS automatically shifts between the two, unless the user manually connects or disconnects from either of the two available options. From the perspective of the Service that the user is using, the Digital Service Provider or the user has no control over which connectivity route is used or when to switch from one to the other since that control and switching are device based, controlled by the OS running on the device.


Thus, existing systems have the technical problem that the data/service access over the last mile cannot be managed by a digital service provider based on the nature of the service and the amount of data that needs to be transacted or by the user who is experiencing the service and/or bearing the cost of last mile connectivity. Thus, it is desirable to be able to provide a technical solution that provides the digital service provider and the user with control over the connectivity route for the last mile and the ability to control the switching between the connectivity routes thus optimizing the consumer experience of the service being provided to the consumer and manage the cost borne by the consumer to access that service based on the consumer's preference.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates a conventional content delivery network system;



FIG. 2 illustrates a network control and optimization system (NCO) being used in a novel digital service system;



FIG. 3 illustrates an implementation of the NCO in a computing device that may be used as an interface between the novel digital service system and the device OS;



FIG. 4 illustrates more details of the NCO shown in FIGS. 2-3; and



FIG. 5 illustrates a method for using the computing device with NCO in the novel digital service system.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ONE OR MORE EMBODIMENTS

The disclosure is particularly applicable to a network control and optimization system (NCO) embedded or installed in a smartphone device or in a digital service as shown in the Figures for a content delivery system and method and it is in this context that the disclosure will be described. It will be appreciated, however, that the disclosed system and method has greater utility, such as to being implemented on various different computing devices that may be used to access a service from a digital service provider. In addition, the NCO may also be used to optimize the delivery of content or data from other systems (in addition to the exemplary digital service system) and can be used in any system in which it is desirable to optimize the consumer experience with a service. For purposes of this disclosure, the “service” provided to the consumer may be a piece of content (audio, visual and/or textual) or any piece of digital data being delivered to the consumer over any interface including a browser, a mobile application, a software application and the like.



FIG. 2 illustrates a network control and optimization system (NCO) being used in a novel digital service system 200 wherein the internet infrastructure has the same elements as shown in FIG. 1 and operates in the same manner as described above. In the system 200, one or more computing devices 202 (including the smartphone device shown in FIG. 2) may use the last mile connection that permits each consumer to access and interact with the services being provided by a digital service provider using the internet infrastructure. For example, each computing device may be processor based device with memory, persistent memory, a display and connectivity circuits (including at a GSM module to connect to and access the cellular data network (4G/LTE for example) and a Wi-Fi module to connect to and access the Wi-Fi networks that each access the respective digital data network in a known manner using known protocols, Bluetooth, NFC, IR, or any other form of connectivity that may be used by a service) for connecting to and accessing data from the Internet Infrastructure. For example, each computing device 202 may be a smartphone device, such as an Apple iPhone device or an Android operating system based device, a personal computer, a tablet device, a laptop computer or a terminal device. Each computing device 202 may execute an application for interfacing with the Internet Infrastructure that may be, for example, a mobile application (mobile app) as shown in FIG. 2, a browser application or any other application.


Unlike the conventional system shown in FIG. 1, the system 200 may further include a NCO element 204 that may be embedded in or installed on the computing device 202. Alternatively, the NCO element 204 may be part of the mobile application (such as an SDK as shown in FIG. 2) that is being used to connect to and access the digital data from the service of the digital service provider. Alternatively, the NCO element 204 may be integrated with each Service and/or a piece of configuration that is implemented at the network level for each network. The configuration at the network level ensures that the piece of code integrated in the Service can identify when the two networks are available simultaneously to a device (Wi-Fi and cellular data network), if the OS of the device doesn't allow the NCO to access either all or a part of the desired functionality required by the NCO and take decisions for utilizing one or the other based on specific data transfer requirements of the Service, characteristics of the network and preferences of the consumer.


The NCO element 204 may be implemented in a plurality of lines of instructions/computer code that are executed by the processor (or the central processing unit) of the computing device 202 so that the processor of the computing device 202 is configured to perform the NCO element processes and method described below. While the computing device 202 and its capability to connect to and interact with the digital service provider via the OS are known, routine and conventional, the computing device 202 having the NCO element 204 and the functions/operations of the NCO element 204 are atypical and not routine in the digital service industry and the computing device 202 having the NCO element 204 are a technical solution to the above described technical problem of current digital service systems and how data for a service is accessed.


Briefly, the NCO element 204 allows each digital service provider and/or the user of the service to control, for its different types of content and data as described below, how that data and content is accessed by each computing device (the technical solution) resulting in a better consumer experience of the service since the digital service provider can now customize network usage based on their data transfer requirement and the user can customize network usage based on attached cost of network usage. The NCO element 204 enables usage of Wi-Fi and cellular data connection simultaneously for a Service and enables the setting of a priority for Wi-Fi and/or cellular data connection for specific data requests made by a Service, when both networks are available simultaneously. The NCO element 204 may also enable setting a rule set to use only one type of network for specific data requests made by a Service and never use the other network for that type of data request. The NCO element 204 may also enable switching priority between Wi-Fi and cellular data network based on RSSI value of the network and/or available network throughput, when both networks are available simultaneously and may also enable switching priority between Wi-Fi and cellular data network based on the cost attached by the user to a network, when both networks are available simultaneously.



FIG. 3 illustrates an implementation of the NCO in a computing device 202 that may be used to retrieve different pieces of content from the novel digital service system. In the implementation shown in FIG. 3, the computing device 202 may have an application layer, an operating system (OS) layer and a hardware layer. The hardware layer may include the hardware elements and circuits of the computing device and may include the networking modules (Wi-Fi, Cellular Radio, Bluetooth, NFC, etc.) as well as the processor (CPU), screen and speaker and display and all other hardware components of the computing device. The OS layer may include known OS libraries and communicate to the hardware sub-system(s) using a Hardware Abstraction Layer (HAL). The application layer may include one or more applications (APP 1, . . . , APP 4 shown in FIG. 3) and each application utilizes the Operating libraries (OS Libraries) to provide different application functionalities and interacts with the actual hardware via the HAL. In one embodiment, the NCO element 204 is a piece of code integrated with a mobile application (APP 4) executed by the processor of the computing device and the NCO element 204 acts as an interface for network requests made by the application to the OS. In alternative embodiments, the NCO element 204 and its functions may be implemented using an operating system function or setting (in the computing device 202), as a service executed in the computing device 202 by the processor, and/or in a software development kit (SDK) that is executed by a processor of the computing device 202.



FIG. 4 illustrates more details of the NCO element 204 shown in FIGS. 2-3. In one embodiment, each application developer can customize their NCO element 204 based on a user profile as described below. In one implementation, the application developer may use a NCO console 400 (that may be located and executed on a processor remote from the NCO element 204, may be part of the NCO element 204 or may be a separate plurality of lines of computer code that reside within the NCO element 204) or may be a separate plurality of lines of computer code that reside within the digital service to configure/set a user profile (including an NCO rule set) that is used to determine a network decision (which network to select) for each network request.


The NCO element 204 may include the NCO rule set 404 (generated by the application developer as described above or a set of default rules) and a network decision engine 406 that uses the NCO rule set 404 and/or the preferences set by the user to generate a network decision for each network request. The NCO element 204 is therefore able to switch between the one or more available networks on the basis of the requested type of content as described below. The NCO element 204 may receive various input data that may be used, in combination with the NCO rule set, to generate the network decision output for each requested piece of content/data. For example, as shown in FIG. 4, the input data to the NCO element 204, for each network request may include: 1) information about the type of content/data requested; 2) information about each network and its availability to retrieve the requested content/data; and 3) the user profile if the set of rules are determined by the NCO element 204 itself. The NCO rule set 404 may be stored in a data structure/database, etc. in the NCO element 204 (on external to the NCO element 204). The network decision engine 406 may be implemented in hardware (if the NCO element 204 is implemented in hardware such as an FPGA, application specific integrated circuit, etc.) or software as a plurality of lines of computer code instructions executed by the processor of the computing device (when the NCO element 204 is implemented in hardware or software).


An example of the NCO rule set 404 that may be part of the NCO element 204 may be:














Request
Preferred



Type
Network
Preferred Network Ruleset







Type 1
1. Wi-Fi
If User Profile is:


(API
2. Cellular Data
Experience: Always use the network with higher


Requests)

throughput to process all requests




Cost: Use Wi-Fi as the first option, do not use cellular




data if Wi-Fi is available




Balanced/Default: Use the fastest connection first and




fall-back to the other connection if needed


Type 2
1. Wi-Fi (Only)
If User Profile is:


(Content

Experience: Always use the network with higher


Requests)

throughput to process all requests




Cost: Use Wi-Fi as the first option, do not use cellular




data if Wi-Fi is available. If user has selected Zero cost




setting, don't process request until a connection




marked as Zero cost by the user is available.




Balanced/Default: Use Wi-Fi as the first option. Don't




use cellular data unless throughput on Wi-Fi falls below




a predetermined level, such as 128 kbps for example,




and available throughput on cellular is higher than a




predetermined threshold, such as 128 kbps for




example. Note that the particular thresholds can be




modified by a developer or a user. Shift over to Wi-Fi




again if the throughput on Wi-Fi becomes higher than




cellular data or if the throughput on Wi-Fi becomes




higher than 256 kbps


Type 3
1. Cellular Data
If User Profile is:


(DRM
2. Wi-Fi
Experience: Always use the network with higher


Keys)

throughput to process all requests




Cost: Use Wi-Fi as the first option, do not use cellular




data if Wi-Fi is available




Balanced/Default: Use the fastest connection first and




fall-back to the other connection if needed


Type 4
1. Cellular Data
If User Profile is:


(Ad.
2. Wi-Fi
Experience: Always use the network with higher


Requests)

throughput to process all requests




Cost: Use Wi-Fi as the first option, do not use cellular




data if Wi-Fi is available. If user has selected Zero cost




setting, don't process request until a connection




marked as Zero cost by the user is available.




Balanced/Default: Use Wi-Fi as the first option. Don't




use cellular data unless throughput on Wi-Fi falls below




128 kbps and available throughput on cellular is higher




than 128 kbps. Shift over to Wi-Fi again if the




throughput on Wi-Fi becomes higher than cellular data




or if the throughput on Wi-Fi becomes higher than 256




kbps









In addition to the rule set that may be generated by the application developer as described above, the App developer can also expose preferences/settings to the user of the computing device that allow the user to customize the experience for the user. For example, the user can select between optimizing speed of delivery or optimizing cost. Using this setting, the user can select one of the following preferences:

    • 1. Do not use the cellular data connection no matter what
    • 2. Use the cellular data connection for small requests
    • 3. Use the cellular data connection for all requests


The user can also assign a cost to each network that the user is connected to, which the NCO element 204 can factor to make each network decision.

    • 1. User can define the cost of a network on as “High”, “Low”, or “Unmetered” or on a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 being the lowest and 10 being the highest
    • 2. Unmetered means that the network has no cost attached to it, use this network the most, Low cost means, use this network when an unmetered network is not available, Higher cost means use this network the least
    • 3. Once a network has a cost value associated with it, the NCO element 204, rule set can also utilize the cost of the network to take a decision and route the delivery of requests over one or the other network interface


EXAMPLE





    • 1. User connects to Wi-Fi, and assigns a cost of “5” to this network

    • 2. The cellular data connection has a default cost of “10”, this being the most expensive network that you have

    • 3. In this scenario the NCO rule-set will make the decision to use the Wi-Fi network as the primary network, while monitoring the throughput of the Wi-Fi network.

    • 4. If the throughput of the Wi-Fi network drops at some point, it will switch over to using the cellular data connection which has a higher cost associated with it.





In a preferred embodiment, the NCO element 204 may use the following functionalities from an Operating System of the computing device:

    • 1. The Operating system should keep all the interfaces for each of the networks (collectively, the “interfaces”) active as requested by the NCO element.
    • 2. For every request to get resources from the network, the Operating system should allow the NCO element to choose the source interface from the list of available and connected interfaces.
    • 3. The Operating system should provide the ability to measure the throughput of each network interface on an on-demand basis (part of the network data used by the NCO element 204 to determine the network decision).
    • 4. The Operating system should provide the Received Signal Strength Indication on an on-demand basis for each network (again part of the network data used by the NCO element 204 to determine the network decision).
    • 5. The Operating system should allow for attaching a cost to data transfer on every network interface to enable cost optimizations for data transfer.
    • 6. Operating system should honor the classless static routes to allow the serving of network requests from a purely local environment.
    • Using the above functionalities from an Operating system, the NCO element 204 enables a Service to do the following:
    • 1. Set the source interface for each request made by the Service
    • 2. Define a rule set for switching the source interface based on RSSI, throughput and honouring the user's preferences on cost.



FIG. 5 illustrates a method 500 for using the computing device with an NCO element in the novel digital service system in which the NCO element is implemented as a plurality of lines of instructions being executed by the processor of the computing device. The user may install a mobile app (502) onto the computing device and the mobile app has the NCO functionality embedded into the mobile app in this example. The user may then select the NCO setting in the app (504) to activate the NCO processes and functionality as described above. Thus, the user may use the mobile app without the NCO processes and the mobile app operates as normal. Once the user activates the NCO processes, the NCO determines if the user, for network requests from the service, assign priority to cost of retrieval or user experience (506) based on the user profile for the particular user associated with the NCO.


The NCO may have a default mode (if there is no user profile for the particular user for example or the user profile does not include an assigned priority) and then each network request made by the service may be input to the NCO (508) that in turn makes the network decision for each request. In the default mode, the NCO may periodically update the status/state of each available network (510) that is one of the inputs to the network decision engine as described above. For each app request, the NCO in the default mode uses the NCO rule set (that may be a default NCO rule set) to process each app request (512).


If user experience is assigned priority for the particular user, the NCO may periodically check for available network interfaces/connections (514) and each network request may be processed by the NCO (516). The NCO may determine if two or more networks are available simultaneously (518), but will use the available network (520) if only one network is available at the time of a particular app request. If there are multiple networks available, the NCO may periodically check the available throughput for each network (522) and then, for each request, select the network that has the higher throughput (524) since that network should provide the better user experience.


If cost is assigned priority for the particular user, the NCO may periodically check for available network interfaces/connections (526) and each app request may be processed by the NCO (528). The NCO may then determine if the user has selected zero cost (530). If the user has selected zero cost, the NCO may compare each app request with the NCO rule set (532), determine if the particular app request is allowed on the available network (534) and communicate to the app that the network with the specified network preference is not available (536) if the particular app request is not allowed.

    • 1. An application is requesting to stream a video when the only available network to the device is LTE and this type of request is not allowed as per the NCO rule set and set user preferences.
    • 2. The request will not be processed and the NCO will communicate the same to the service to show a prompt to the user informing the user of the same and allow the user to make an informed exception, if the user so chooses.


If the particular app request is allowed, then the request is performed using the network (538). If the user has not selected the zero cost setting, then the NCO determines if two or more networks are available (540) and use the available network (542) if only one network is available. If two or more networks are available, then the NCO may select the network with the lower cost (544). For example, the NCO may use the free WiFi network instead of a cellular digital data plan.

    • 3. User has selected Experience:
      • a. Experience setting overrides all other parameters of the NCO and prioritizes the throughput of the network connection and uses the connection with the highest throughput to deliver the content to the application/user
      • b. The NCO will continuously measure the network throughput of all connections available and mark the best one out as the preferred connection for all types of network requests
    • 4. User has selected Zero Cost
      • a. The NCO will determine if a network with Zero cost is available. If yes, that will be marked as the preferred network.
      • b. If no network with zero cost is available, the lowest cost network will be marked by the NCO as the preferred network.


Below is a more specific example of how the NCO embedded in a mobile app, such as a video streaming app like Netflix, may operate. In this example, the application relies on a data connection (Wi-Fi or cellular data network) for the following 6 types of information/requests:

    • 1. API requests—The app requires access to the internet for multiple different forms of API requests like:
      • a. Content list to be displayed on each page
      • b. Authentication and subscription information about a user
      • c. User personalization information including user preferences, watchlists, watch history, favourites and user specific recommendations
    • 2. Content—The app requires access to the internet to fetch content including images, audio, video and associated meta-data including subtitles, etc.
    • 3. DRM Key—The app requires access to the internet to fetch DRM keys to decrypt content on the user device
    • 4. Advertisements—The app requires access to the internet to send out ad tags to the ad server and to fetch relevant advertisements based on the ad tags
    • 5. Analytics—The app requires access to the internet to transfer information regarding app performance, usage, user actions, ad impressions, ad interactions/click throughs, etc. to the analytics server or integrated third party analytics platforms
    • 6. Payment—The app requires access to the internet to facilitate payments using integrated payment gateways to provide a user access to premium content
    • Using the NCO and the method described above, the NCO can define the following:
    • 1. In an event that both Wi-Fi and cellular data network are available simultaneously to the mobile application
      • a. For API requests, requests for DRM keys, requests for ad tags, analytics requests and payment requests, set Cellular Data Network as Priority 1 and Wi-Fi as Priority 2. The reason for this is that all of these requests are very light (between few Bytes and few KB)
      • b. For all content requests and delivery of advertisements, set Wi-Fi as Priority 1 and cellular data network as Priority 2. The reason for this is that these requests are heavy (between a few MB and a few GB)
      • c. In an event that the Wi-Fi RSSI goes below a preset level, such as −85 dbm for example, don't use Wi-Fi as the default network for any request
    • 2. Offer a setting to the user to choose priority between Experience, Balance and Expense.
      • a. In an event wherein, the user chooses Expense, the app will use Wi-Fi as Priority 1 for all requests. For all data light requests, cellular data network will be set as Priority 2 and for all data heavy requests, there will be no priority set for the cellular data network (Only Wi-Fi to be used to process all heavy requests). So, when there is no Wi-Fi present, the mobile app will process all light requests to show user the available content, recommendations and other features, but will not stream or download any content or display any ads. This functionality will only be active when a Wi-Fi network is available to the user.
      • b. In an event wherein the user chooses Balance or doesn't choose any setting, the mobile app will use Wi-Fi as Priority 1 and cellular data network as Priority 2 for all heavy requests and use cellular data network as Priority 1 and Wi-Fi as Priority 2 for all light requests
      • c. In an event wherein the user chooses Experience, the SugarBox NCO will periodically detect which out of the two networks has higher throughput and assign Priority 1 to that network for all requests


In view of the above disclosure, the NCO processes described above are a technical solution (the overall combination of processes executed by the computing device and not the routine computing device) to a technical problem of the accessibility of a network requests by a service. In one aspect, the disclosed technical solution allows the app (with an embedded NCO) to control and effectively manage the request process instead of the known systems in which the Operating System of the computing device may select a network as described above.


The foregoing description, for purpose of explanation, has been described with reference to specific embodiments. However, the illustrative discussions above are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosure to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in view of the above teachings. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the disclosure and its practical applications, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the disclosure and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.


The system and method disclosed herein may be implemented via one or more components, systems, servers, appliances, other subcomponents, or distributed between such elements. When implemented as a system, such systems may include and/or involve, inter alia, components such as software modules, OS library/ies, firmware, etc. found in general-purpose computers. In implementations where the innovations reside on a server, such a server may include or involve components such as software modules, OS library/ies, firmware, such as those found in general-purpose computers.


Additionally, the system and method herein may be achieved via implementations with disparate or entirely different software, hardware and/or firmware components, beyond that set forth above. With regard to such other components (e.g., software, processing components, etc.) and/or computer-readable media associated with or embodying the present inventions, for example, aspects of the innovations herein may be implemented consistent with numerous general purpose or special purpose computing systems or configurations. Various exemplary computing systems, environments, and/or configurations that may be suitable for use with the innovations herein may include, but are not limited to: software or other components within or embodied on personal computers, servers or server computing devices such as routing/connectivity components, hand-held or laptop devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, set top boxes, consumer electronic devices, network PCs, other existing computer platforms, distributed computing environments that include one or more of the above systems or devices, etc.


In some instances, aspects of the system and method may be achieved via or performed by logic and/or logic instructions including program modules, executed in association with such components or circuitry, for example. In general, program modules may include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular instructions herein. The inventions may also be practiced in the context of distributed software, computer, or circuit settings where circuitry is connected via communication buses, circuitry or links. In distributed settings, control/instructions may occur from both local and remote computer storage media including memory storage devices.


The software, circuitry and components herein may also include and/or utilize one or more type of computer readable media. Computer readable media can be any available media that is resident on, associable with, or can be accessed by such circuits and/or computing components. By way of example, and not limitation, computer readable media may comprise computer storage media and communication media. Computer storage media includes volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and can accessed by computing component. Communication media may comprise computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules and/or other components. Further, communication media may include wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, however no media of any such type herein includes transitory media. Combinations of the any of the above are also included within the scope of computer readable media.


In the present description, the terms component, module, device, etc. may refer to any type of logical or functional software elements, circuits, blocks and/or processes that may be implemented in a variety of ways. For example, the functions of various circuits and/or blocks can be combined with one another into any other number of modules. Each module may even be implemented as a software program stored on a tangible memory (e.g., random access memory, read only memory, CD-ROM memory, hard disk drive, etc.) to be read by a central processing unit to implement the functions of the innovations herein. Or, the modules can comprise programming instructions transmitted to a general purpose computer or to processing/graphics hardware via a transmission carrier wave. Also, the modules can be implemented as hardware logic circuitry implementing the functions encompassed by the innovations herein. Finally, the modules can be implemented using special purpose instructions (SIMD instructions), field programmable logic arrays or any mix thereof which provides the desired level performance and cost. In addition to the implementations described above in which the settings/rules, code and configuration are implemented in the NCO in the application, the settings/rules, code and configuration may be implemented at the network level is network level elements that perform the same processes as described above.


As disclosed herein, features consistent with the disclosure may be implemented via computer-hardware, software and/or firmware. For example, the systems and methods disclosed herein may be embodied in various forms including, for example, a data processor, such as a computer that also includes a database, digital electronic circuitry, firmware, software, or in combinations of them. Further, while some of the disclosed implementations describe specific hardware components, systems and methods consistent with the innovations herein may be implemented with any combination of hardware, software and/or firmware. Moreover, the above-noted features and other aspects and principles of the innovations herein may be implemented in various environments. Such environments and related applications may be specially constructed for performing the various routines, processes and/or operations according to the invention or they may include a general-purpose computer or computing platform selectively activated or reconfigured by code to provide the necessary functionality. The processes disclosed herein are not inherently related to any particular computer, network, architecture, environment, or other apparatus, and may be implemented by a suitable combination of hardware, software, and/or firmware. For example, various general-purpose machines may be used with programs written in accordance with teachings of the invention, or it may be more convenient to construct a specialized apparatus or system to perform the required methods and techniques.


Aspects of the method and system described herein, such as the logic, may also be implemented as functionality programmed into any of a variety of circuitry, including programmable logic devices (“PLDs”), such as field programmable gate arrays (“FPGAs”), programmable array logic (“PAL”) devices, electrically programmable logic and memory devices and standard cell-based devices, as well as application specific integrated circuits. Some other possibilities for implementing aspects include: memory devices, microcontrollers with memory (such as EEPROM), embedded microprocessors, firmware, software, etc. Furthermore, aspects may be embodied in microprocessors having software-based circuit emulation, discrete logic (sequential and combinatorial), custom devices, fuzzy (neural) logic, quantum devices, and hybrids of any of the above device types. The underlying device technologies may be provided in a variety of component types, e.g., metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (“MOSFET”) technologies like complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (“CMOS”), bipolar technologies like emitter-coupled logic (“ECL”), polymer technologies (e.g., silicon-conjugated polymer and metal-conjugated polymer-metal structures), mixed analog and digital, and so on.


It should also be noted that the various logic and/or functions disclosed herein may be enabled using any number of combinations of hardware, firmware, and/or as data and/or instructions embodied in various machine-readable or computer-readable media, in terms of their behavioral, register transfer, logic component, and/or other characteristics. Computer-readable media in which such formatted data and/or instructions may be embodied include, but are not limited to, non-volatile storage media in various forms (e.g., optical, magnetic or semiconductor storage media) though again does not include transitory media. Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description, the words “comprise,” “comprising,” and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in a sense of “including, but not limited to.” Words using the singular or plural number also include the plural or singular number respectively. Additionally, the words “herein,” “hereunder,” “above,” “below,” and words of similar import refer to this application as a whole and not to any particular portions of this application. When the word “or” is used in reference to a list of two or more items, that word covers all of the following interpretations of the word: any of the items in the list, all of the items in the list and any combination of the items in the list.


Although certain presently preferred implementations of the invention have been specifically described herein, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains that variations and modifications of the various implementations shown and described herein may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only to the extent required by the applicable rules of law.


While the foregoing has been with reference to a particular embodiment of the disclosure, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes in this embodiment may be made without departing from the principles and spirit of the disclosure, the scope of which is defined by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus, comprising: a mobile device having a processor and a memory;the mobile device having a plurality of network hardware interfaces and each network hardware interface is connected to the processor and connects to a network to access a digital service by the mobile device over the plurality of network hardware interfaces from a content delivery network, the plurality of network hardware interfaces including a cellular data interface and a Wi-Fi interface;a network control and optimization (NCO) element resident in the mobile device and executed by the processor of the mobile device so that the processor is configured to: keep all network hardware interfaces of the mobile device active;provide a received signal strength indication and a throughput of each network hardware interface when so instructed by the NCO element;provide network details for each connected network from each network hardware interface to the NCO element;honor one or more classless static routes to allow the serving of network requests from a purely local environment;receive inputs for a plurality of requests from the NCO element;store a rule set that selects a particular hardware network interface for a type of request using a preferred network for a particular user having a particular user profile, wherein a rule for each particular type of request includes one or more preferred networks to use for the particular type of request, an experience setting for the particular user profile, a cost setting for the particular user profile and a balanced default setting for the particular user profile; andselect, for the particular user having the particular user profile, one of the plurality of hardware network interfaces to access one of the plurality of networks to be used to access each request from the NCO element to the content delivery network based on a rule selected from the stored rule set wherein the type of request matches the selected rule and the experience setting, cost setting and balanced default setting of the particular user profile for the particular user are met.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to determine to use one of a cellular digital data network or a Wi-Fi network for each NCO element request or both a cellular digital data network and a Wi-Fi network simultaneously for two different NCO element requests based on the type of request.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to store the rule set, the rule set having a plurality of rules which determine a network to use for each NCO element request.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein one of a network throughput and a Received Signal Strength Indicator can be set to determine which network to use for each NCO element request.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein the inputs further comprise the particular user profile or user setting that assigns a priority for determining which network interface to use for each NCO element request.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the priority is selected from one of cost, user experience and default.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein the user can assign a cost to each network that is connectible by the processor.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the processor is further configure to receive a Zero Cost preference for a particular network being a network usable without cost that provides limited NCO element functionality.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the NCO element further comprises one of an application having a plurality of lines of instructions, an operating system function, an operating system setting, a service executed by the processor and a software development kit executed by the processor.
  • 10. A method for accessing digital data, comprising: providing a computing device that has a network control and optimization (NCO) element executed by a processor of the computing device and a plurality of network hardware interfaces that each connect to a network through which each request for digital services is made from the NCO, each request having a request type;keeping all network hardware interfaces of the computing device active when so instructed by the NCO element;providing a received signal strength indication and a throughput of each network hardware interface when so instructed by the NCO element;providing network details for each connected network from each network hardware interface to the NCO element;honoring one or more classless static routes to allow the serving of network requests from a purely local environment;receiving, by the network control and optimization element, a plurality of inputs;storing a rule set that selects a particular hardware network interface for a type of request using a preferred network for a particular user having a particular user profile, wherein a rule for each particular type of request includes one or more preferred networks to use for the particular type of request, an experience setting for the particular user profile, a cost setting for the particular user profile and a balanced default setting for the particular user profile; andselecting, for the particular user having the particular user profile, one of the plurality of hardware network interfaces to access one of the plurality of networks to be used to access each request from the NCO element to the content delivery network based on a rule selected from the stored rule set wherein the type of request matches the selected rule and the experience setting, cost setting and balanced default setting of the particular user profile for the particular user are met.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein determining the network hardware interface for each NCO element request further comprises determining to use one of a cellular digital data network or a Wi-Fi network for each application request or both a cellular digital data network and a Wi-Fi network simultaneously for two different NCO element requests based on the type of request.
  • 12. The method of claim 10 further comprising storing the rule set, the rule set having a plurality of rules which determine a network to use for each NCO element request.
  • 13. The method of claim 12 further comprising setting one of a network throughput and a Received Signal Strength Indicator to determine which network to use for each NCO element request.
  • 14. The method of claim 12, wherein the inputs further comprise the particular user profile or user setting that assigns a priority for determining which network interface to use for each NCO element request.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the priority is selected from one of cost, user experience and default.
  • 16. The method of claim 14, wherein the user can assign a cost to each network.
  • 17. The method of claim 15 further comprising setting, by a user, a Zero Cost preference for a particular network being a network usable without cost that provides limited NCO element functionality.
  • 18. The method of claim 10, wherein providing the NCO element further comprises providing one of an application having a plurality of lines of instructions, an operating system function, an operating system setting, a service executed by the processor and a software development kit executed by the processor.
  • 19. A data delivery system, comprising: a digital service system that stores data accessing over a plurality of networks that are part of the internet infrastructure and local/private networks that are outside the purview of the internet infrastructure;a computing device having a processor, a memory, a plurality of network hardware interfaces, the plurality of network hardware interfaces including a cellular digital data interface and a WiFi interface to each access the digital service system and an network control and optimization (NCO) element;the NCO element executed by the processor of the computing device so that the processor is configured to: keep all network hardware interfaces active when so instructed by the NCO element;provide a Received Signal Strength Indication and a throughput of each network hardware interface when so instructed by the NCO element;provide network details for each connected network from each network hardware interface to the NCO element;honor one or more classless static routes to allow the serving of network requests from a purely local environment;receive inputs for a plurality of requests from the NCO element;store a rule set that selects a particular hardware network interface for a type of request using a preferred network for a particular user having a particular user profile, wherein a rule for each particular type of request includes one or more preferred networks to use for the particular type of request, an experience setting for the particular user profile, a cost setting for the particular user profile and a balanced default setting for the particular user profile; andselect, for the particular user having the particular user profile, one of the plurality of hardware network interfaces to access one of the plurality of networks to be used to access each request from the NCO element to the content delivery network based on a rule selected from the stored rule set wherein the type of request matches the selected rule and the experience setting, cost setting and balanced default setting of the particular user profile for the particular user are met.
  • 20. The system of claim 19, wherein the processor is further configured to determine to use one of a cellular digital data network or a Wi-Fi network for each NCO element request or both a cellular digital data network and a Wi-Fi network simultaneously for two different NCO element requests based on the type of request.
  • 21. The system of claim 19, wherein the processor is further configured to store the rule set, the rule set having a plurality of rules which determine a network to use for each NCO element request.
  • 22. The system of claim 21, wherein one of a network throughput and a Received Signal Strength Indicator can be set to determine which network to use for each NCO element request.
  • 23. The system of claim 21, wherein the inputs further comprise the particular user profile or user setting that assigns a priority for determining which network interface to use for each NCO element request.
  • 24. The system of claim 23, wherein the priority is selected from one of cost, user experience and default.
  • 25. The apparatus of claim 24, wherein the user can assign a cost to each network.
  • 26. The apparatus of claim 25, wherein the processor is further configured to receive a Zero Cost preference for a particular network being a network usable without cost that provides limited NCO element functionality.
  • 27. The apparatus of claim 19, wherein the NCO element further comprises one of an application having a plurality of lines of instructions, an operating system function, an operating system setting, a service executed by the processor and a software development kit executed by the processor.
Priority Claims (2)
Number Date Country Kind
201921000950 Jan 2019 IN national
201921000982 Jan 2019 IN national
PRIORITY CLAIMS/RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority under 35 USC 120 and is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/355,394 filed on Mar. 15, 2019 and entitled “Network Control & Optimization (NCO) System and Method” that in turn claims priority under 35 USC 119 to Indian Patent Application No. 201921000950 filed Jan. 9, 2019, that entirety of both of which are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (181)
Number Name Date Kind
7127713 Davis Oct 2006 B2
7307956 Kaplan Dec 2007 B2
7395355 Afergan et al. Jul 2008 B2
7505944 Moulart et al. Mar 2009 B2
7752258 Lewin et al. Jul 2010 B2
7860950 Menon et al. Dec 2010 B2
7921259 Elazary et al. Apr 2011 B2
8516529 Lajoie et al. Aug 2013 B2
8737357 Denny et al. May 2014 B2
8746553 Burdett Jun 2014 B2
8838480 Damola et al. Sep 2014 B2
8843758 Dharmarajan et al. Sep 2014 B2
8937903 Bari Jan 2015 B2
9001682 Kovvali et al. Apr 2015 B2
9003436 Tidwell et al. Apr 2015 B2
9105021 Tobin Aug 2015 B2
9173158 Varma Oct 2015 B2
9282352 McDysan et al. Mar 2016 B2
9367857 Linden et al. Jun 2016 B2
9374619 Andreasen et al. Jun 2016 B2
9419845 Wainner et al. Aug 2016 B2
9497496 Corley et al. Nov 2016 B1
9565117 Dahod et al. Feb 2017 B2
9584598 Phillips et al. Feb 2017 B2
9661374 Erdmann et al. May 2017 B1
9674239 Wong et al. Jun 2017 B2
9875493 Nuzzi Jan 2018 B2
9904934 Kumar et al. Feb 2018 B1
9911154 Baker et al. Mar 2018 B2
10009741 Burcham et al. Jun 2018 B1
10019724 Patel Jul 2018 B2
10045070 Markley et al. Aug 2018 B2
10049349 Grassadonia et al. Aug 2018 B1
10055721 Mocko et al. Aug 2018 B1
10097503 Bergman Oct 2018 B2
10110710 Cook et al. Oct 2018 B2
10134026 Koeppel Nov 2018 B1
10142444 Reynolds et al. Nov 2018 B2
10200480 Zhang et al. Feb 2019 B2
10248975 Garcia-Martinez et al. Apr 2019 B2
10470060 Paranjpe et al. Nov 2019 B1
10496979 Taveau et al. Dec 2019 B2
10554748 Sivasubramanian et al. Feb 2020 B2
10630769 Carver et al. Apr 2020 B2
10693813 Jacob Da Silva et al. Jun 2020 B1
10715411 Jacob Da Silva et al. Jul 2020 B1
10878404 Lu et al. Dec 2020 B2
20010023180 Sauer Sep 2001 A1
20020023002 Staehelin Feb 2002 A1
20020143798 Lisiecki et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020194171 Judd et al. Dec 2002 A1
20040093419 Weihl et al. May 2004 A1
20040205162 Parikh Oct 2004 A1
20040232221 Beenau Nov 2004 A1
20050021462 Teague et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050027543 Labrou Feb 2005 A1
20050177624 Oswald Aug 2005 A1
20060036493 Aufricht et al. Feb 2006 A1
20070094691 Gazdzinski Apr 2007 A1
20070106626 Mundie et al. May 2007 A1
20070124662 Streuter et al. May 2007 A1
20070255617 Maurone et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080010192 Rackley, III Jan 2008 A1
20080049630 Kozisek Feb 2008 A1
20080102947 Hays et al. May 2008 A1
20080162589 Rodeheffer et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080107264 Van Wie et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080215747 Menon Sep 2008 A1
20080222281 Dilley et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080262941 Feiner Oct 2008 A1
20090030765 Cameron et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090094160 Webster et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090132365 Gruenhagen et al. May 2009 A1
20090132395 Lam et al. May 2009 A1
20090157537 Miller Jun 2009 A1
20090164286 Gupta et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090164329 Bishop Jun 2009 A1
20090164330 Bishop Jun 2009 A1
20090254661 Fullagar Oct 2009 A1
20090287515 Mehta et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090323693 Yin Dec 2009 A1
20100074267 Ladd Mar 2010 A1
20100121715 Shiojinna May 2010 A1
20110078079 Shin Mar 2011 A1
20110082724 Le Chevalier et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110087602 Rutman Apr 2011 A1
20110105150 Moon et al. May 2011 A1
20110161462 Hussain et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110314145 Raleigh Dec 2011 A1
20120054837 Yoon Mar 2012 A1
20120096106 Blumofe et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120166618 Dahod et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120215915 Sakata et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120231844 Coppinger Sep 2012 A1
20120330769 Arceo Dec 2012 A1
20130013688 Wang et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130024363 Cunescu et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130085864 Ahmed et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130107732 O'Donnell et al. May 2013 A1
20130110984 Raciborski et al. May 2013 A1
20130132504 Kohli et al. May 2013 A1
20130238503 Patel Sep 2013 A1
20130346305 Mendes Dec 2013 A1
20140082126 Kim Mar 2014 A1
20140094159 Raleigh Apr 2014 A1
20140095320 Sivarannakrishnan et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140115606 Hamzata et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140229277 Khambete et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140250191 Altman et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140279047 Wang et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140282725 Brandstetter Sep 2014 A1
20140373049 Carr et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150143397 Bies May 2015 A1
20150172135 Coppola et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150237512 Chang Aug 2015 A1
20150278796 Jiang Oct 2015 A1
20150310421 Xie Oct 2015 A1
20150339318 O'Toole et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150339667 Dua Nov 2015 A1
20150341705 Rauhe et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150350018 Hui Dec 2015 A1
20150371215 Zhou Dec 2015 A1
20160034876 Speiser Feb 2016 A1
20160042344 Thimmana et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160011718 Jajara Apr 2016 A1
20160191651 Balakrishnan et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160210622 Yang et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160248879 Fliam Aug 2016 A1
20160300272 Ao et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160328740 Chan et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160337206 Bugenhagen et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160371716 Aitenbichler Dec 2016 A1
20170032345 Gideon et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170142024 Fromentoux et al. May 2017 A1
20170155739 Ao Jun 2017 A1
20170178090 Sarin Jun 2017 A1
20170187837 Ao Jun 2017 A1
20170215042 Lee Jul 2017 A1
20170223029 Sharma et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170228766 Mahajan Aug 2017 A1
20170255924 White Sep 2017 A1
20170262902 Weston et al. Sep 2017 A1
20180048700 Gummadi Feb 2018 A1
20180068290 Xia Mar 2018 A1
20180068293 Dunne Mar 2018 A1
20180077258 Newton Mar 2018 A1
20180124143 Bologh May 2018 A1
20180124646 Thubert May 2018 A1
20180184132 Mao Jun 2018 A1
20180184477 Paredes et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180232732 Rodrigues et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180310279 Pathak Oct 2018 A1
20180317067 Ameixieira Nov 2018 A1
20190028743 He Jan 2019 A1
20190069003 Panagos Feb 2019 A1
20190114631 Madhu et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190122202 Sun Apr 2019 A1
20190130386 Bhat May 2019 A1
20190139029 Kadiwala May 2019 A1
20190141561 Altay May 2019 A1
20190166395 Li May 2019 A1
20190197539 Chang Jun 2019 A1
20190268392 Santangelo et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190274082 Vemuri Sep 2019 A1
20190289059 Vanahallli et al. Sep 2019 A1
20200034172 Wu et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200082404 Zhang et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200126062 Sun Apr 2020 A1
20200153932 Bao et al. May 2020 A1
20200167742 Zhai et al. May 2020 A1
20200167746 Yu et al. May 2020 A1
20200220942 Paranjpe et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200242616 Waughtal Jul 2020 A1
20200250644 Oberholtzer Aug 2020 A1
20210065174 Singh Mar 2021 A1
20210097521 Kumar Apr 2021 A1
20210103910 Subramaniam Apr 2021 A1
20210243072 Peterson Aug 2021 A1
20210289039 Paranjpe et al. Sep 2021 A1
20220020016 Scott Jan 2022 A1
20220224594 Peterson Jul 2022 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (30)
Number Date Country
101741869 Apr 2013 CN
103782571 May 2014 CN
106790552 May 2017 CN
107852609 Mar 2018 CN
107645475 Dec 2019 CN
2815541 Dec 2014 EP
3 557 843 Oct 2019 EP
201921000982 Jan 2020 IN
201921000950 Oct 2020 IN
100572478 Dec 2006 KR
20070067005 Jun 2007 KR
20130102792 Sep 2013 KR
101574074 Dec 2015 KR
WO2006133655 Dec 2006 WO
WO2008022339 Feb 2008 WO
WO2009101600 Aug 2009 WO
WO2012000438 Jan 2012 WO
2012131287 Oct 2012 WO
WO2013052028 Apr 2013 WO
WO2013123162 Aug 2013 WO
WO2013170864 Nov 2013 WO
2015090360 Jun 2015 WO
WO2015181591 Dec 2015 WO
WO2016043839 Mar 2016 WO
2018027984 Feb 2018 WO
WO2018087275 May 2018 WO
2018158729 Sep 2018 WO
WO2018215681 Nov 2018 WO
WO2019123273 Jun 2019 WO
WO2020144701 Jul 2020 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (29)
Entry
US 8,782,123 B2, 07/2014, Seed et al. (withdrawn)
Bhardwaj, Ketan et al., “AppFlux: Taming App Delivery Streaming,” Georgia Institute of Technology, pp. 1-14.
Kalva, Hari et al., “Techniques for Improving the Capacity of Video-on Dmand Systems,” Proceeds of the 29th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, (1996), 309-315.
Lai, Yuan-Cheng et al., “A Hierarchical Network Storage Architecture for Video-on-Demand Services,” IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, vol. 43:2, (Jun. 1997), 145-154.
Little, T.D.C. et al., “Prospects for Interactive Video-on-Demand,” Multimedia Communications Laboratory, MCL Technical Report, (Feb. 15, 1994), pp. 1-22.
“How to Auto Switch between WiFi and Mobile the Smart Way,” (Dec. 2018), 6 pp., Speedicyhttps://speedify.com/blog.
Kos, Tomislav et al., “CATV Broadband Technologies,” EC-VIP-MC 2003, 4th EURASIP Conference, (2003), pp. 829-834.
Alloush, Alaa et al., “Initial use cases, scenarios and requirements,” CogNet, (Nov. 30, 2015), Ver. 0.9, pp. 1-107.
Velasco, L. et al., “A Service-Oriented Hybrid Access Network and Cloud Architecture,” (2015) pp. 8.
Bulander et al., “Comparison of Different Approaches for Mobile Advertising,” The Second IEEE International Workshop on Mobile Commerce and Services (WMCS '05) Jul. 19, 2005, Munich, Germany, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 174-182, 10 pages.
Callejo et al., “Opportunities and Challenges of Ad-based Measurements from the Edge of the Network,” © 2017 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM ISBN 978-1-4503-5569-8/17/11, Dec. 1, 2017, Palo Alto, CA, USA© 2017 Association for Computing Machinery, ACM ISBN 978-1-4503-5569-8/17/11, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152434.3152895.
Khan et al., “CAMEO: A Middleware for Mobile Advertisement Delivery,” Network Architecture and Design]: Wireless Communication, Research performed by author as a Research Fellow at Singapore Managemetn University, Jun. 25-28, 2013, 13 pages.
Toubiana et al., “Adnostic: Privacy Preserving Targeted Advertising,” NYU.edu and stanford.edu, supported by the NSF PORTIA and MURI PRESIDIO projects, 23 pages.
Adi et al., “Secured Multi-Identity Mobile Infrastructure and Offline Mobile-Assisted Micro-Payment Application,” WCNC 2004 / IEEE Communications Society, 4 pages.
Kiran et al., “Building Robust m-Commerce Payment System on Offline Wireless Network,” Dept. of Electronics & Communication Eng. Sai Vidya Institute of Technology and Electronics & Communication Eng. UVCE, 3 pages.
Van Damme et al., “Offline NFC Payments with Electronic Vouchers,” Dept. Electrical Engineering-ESAT/SCD/IBBT-COSIC, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, 3001 Heverlee-Leuven, Belgium, MobiHeld'09, Aug. 17, 2009, Barcelona, Spain, 6 pages.
Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, Distributed Computing, Internet Archive WayBack Machine Capture date of Dec. 10, 2013, Internet Archive WayBack Machine (Year: 2013), 11 pages.
Mu, Su. “Application networking for pervasive content delivery.” (2008). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/48630854.pdf. Disclosing CDN Components with a Network (Fig 2.2, p. 16 with Section “2.4.1 Open Pluggable Edge Service” from pp. 26-28).
Frangoudis,“An architecture for on-demand service deployment, over a telco CDN,” IEEE ICC 2016 Next-Gen IRISA/University of Rennes 1, France, Aalto University, Finland, 6 pgs.
Frangoudis et al. “CDN-as-a-Service Provision over a Telecom Operator's Cloud,” IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, IEEE, Dec. 9, 2017, 4(3), pp. 702-716, 16 pgs.
Griwodz et al. “Content Distribution Infrastructures,” Jul. 2, 2004, Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings 04201 http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2006/502, 6 pgs.
Hamzeh et al.“Residential Network Architectures and Services,” Cable Networks, Services, and Management, 1st Edition, 2015 Edited by Mehmet Toy, 372 pgs.
Huang, Shufeng, “A HyperNet Architecture” (2014), Theses and Dissertations-Computer Science. 18. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/cs_etds/18, 165 pgs.
Ravindran, “A Management Framework for Service Personalization,” 2002, SOMA Networks Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada, 13 pgs.
Tyson, “A Topology Aware Clustering Mechanism” 2007, Computing Department Lancaster University, 6 pages.
Yala, “QoE-Aware Computing Resource Allocation for CDN-as-a-Service Provision” IRISA/University of Rennes 1, France, EURECOM Institute, Sophia Antipolis, France, 2016, 6 pgs.
Egorov, et al., “NuCypher KMS: Decentralized key management system” NuCypher and NICS Lab, Universidad de Malaga, Spain, Nov. 15, 2017, 21 pages.
Agile I.T., “Azure Rights Management” webpage, https://www.agileit.com/azure- rightsmanagement/, 9 pages.
Arkko, et al., “MIKEY: Multimedia Internet KEYing”, Network Working Group, Ericsson Research, Aug. 2004, 66 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200221365 A1 Jul 2020 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 16355394 Mar 2019 US
Child 16560795 US