This invention relates to a method, a network, and a system incorporating same for filtering liquid feedstocks using a plurality of submerged spiral wound membrane elements or cartridges, and more particularly to a method and network for supporting a plurality of spiral wound membrane elements for submerged operation as a filtration array for treating an aqueous feedstock.
Tertiary treatment of municipal sewage is a common wastewater application for ultrafiltration and microfiltration membranes; however, such systems need to be capable of operating on high suspended solids feedwaters while having a long life. Suspended solids that need to be removed may be materials that cause turbidity, such as bacteria, cysts and oocysts, viruses, colloidal material, such as iron oxides, clay, silt, sand and other insoluble impurities. Municipal sewage secondary treatment effluent typically has turbidity levels of 5 to 10 NTU with a suspended solids count of 10 to 20 parts per million (ppm). For membrane technology to be economically competitive in a tertiary treatment process, it should operate at sustained permeate flux rates of 15 to 30 gallons per square foot per day (gfd), while requiring chemical cleaning at a frequency of not more than once per month.
Historically, such difficult applications as treating feed solutions high in organic and suspended solids have employed hollow fiber, capillary, or tubular element designs because spiral wound membranes have heretofore required excessive net drive pressures to produce flow rates competitive with existing hollow fiber technology. On the other hand, hollow fiber and tubular membranes are often plagued with mechanical weaknesses and a high capital cost due to low packing density; thus, the ability to effectively deploy arrays of spiral wound membrane elements would offer an economically attractive filtration alternative because of its greater mechanical durability.
A submerged membrane system is shown in FIG. 6 of WO 00/78436 patent application (28 Dec. 2000) wherein a spirally wound membrane element is immersed in a tank that is filled with a body of water to be filtered. Required transmembrane pressure (TMP) is supplied by a vacuum pump that creates a vacuum which is in addition to any contribution from the static head. Alternatively, static liquid heads alone have been used to generate feed pressures for submerged filtration, see U.S. Pat. No. 5,916,441. Typical ultrafiltration or microfiltration hollow fiber and spiral wound membrane units operate at TMPs of from about 10 to substantially greater than 30 pounds per square inch (psi); however, low pressure, sheet-like membranes are now available for incorporation into ultralow pressure apparatus. As such, it should be possible to operate at a TMP of about 5 psi or less, still produce high permeate flux rates when operated at low pressure in such a submerged configuration.
Very generally, a spiral wound membrane element or cartridge contains a permeate carrier sheet, a membrane filter sheet that is adhesively bonded to the permeate carrier sheet (usually to both surfaces thereof to create an envelope about it), and a feed spacer sheet which separates two facing membrane filter layer sheets which are wound about a porous permeate collection tube. High flux membranes are generally formed of polyethersulfone (PES), polysulfone (PSF), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), or polyacrylonitrile (PAN) because these membranes are generally recognized in the industry to make excellent MF and UF membranes with high flux rates, good chemical resistance and good physical durability. Other polymers such as polypropylene, polyethylene, and chlorinated polyethylene may also be prospectively used to construct such membranes. A permeate carrier sheet is attached to a permeate collection tube, and an adhesive seal is applied to the permeate carrier sheet along its side and end edges, either before or as a membrane filter sheet-feed spacer sandwich is being pressed into juxtaposition with the permeate carrier sheet. The permeate carrier sheet, the membrane filter layer sheet, and the feed spacer sheet thus form the lay-up that is then wrapped around the permeate collection tube. The membrane filtration sheets act as a barrier, filtering out solids from an aqueous feed solution being treated to provide purified water permeate.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,607,593 teaches an installation for producing potable water which uses submerged filtering membranes in the form of cartridges of hollow fibers. The cartridges are supported on a horizontal wall, and the permeate exits the bottom of each cartridge and flows through the wall into an underlying permeate chamber. U.S. Pat. No. 6,348,148 discloses a system for producing potable water from seawater which supports a plurality of pressure hulls below the surface and connects the hulls to a permeate network for delivering potable water to the shore. Each of the hulls includes a plurality of membrane devices that create aqueous permeate. Seawater enters the hulls and permeates through the membranes creating potable water which is withdrawn through the network, while the concentrated brine is discharged in a manner so as to not mix with the seawater being supplied to the individual hulls.
A series of U.S. patents issued to Zenon Environmental, Inc., i.e. U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,245,239, 6,325,928, 6,375,848 and 6,620,319, each show arrangements for supporting filtration modules that employ hollow fibers in various submerged arrays, with air being supplied at lower locations through gas distributors to discharge streams of rising bubbles; however, these arrangements are not appropriate or adaptable to supporting arrays of cylindrical, spiral wound, membrane elements.
None of the foregoing arrangements are particularly well suited for creating an effective array of cylindrical, spiral wound elements or cartridges that can be submerged in a zone of aqueous feedstock for filtering to create purified water. Accordingly, efforts were made to design better arrangements that would facilitate efficient operation by incorporating a large amount of membrane surface area within a tank or chamber of a given size and to allow removal and replacement of individual cylindrical elements without difficulty when needed or desired.
The invention provides a method for supporting and interconnecting a plurality of spiral wound elements or cartridges in a submerged environment within a tank which may be open at the top. The cylindrical elements are designed with an end cap at at least one end thereof through which end the permeate is removed; the opposite end is open to upward flow of feedstock. A permeate manifold is provided to remove the permeate from the central tube of each element, and the element itself is supported from the permeate manifold by a connection with support piping that extends from the manifold. The connection creates a seal between the permeate tube and the support pipe, while a bayonet-type fitting locks the end cap in place on the pipe. A filtration network is thus provided which incorporates a plurality of supported and interconnected, spiral wound elements in an array which can be disposed or submerged within a tank. The manifold includes a linear conduit from which a plurality of support pipes extend generally radially. Permeate flows through the individual support tubes and is collected in the linear conduit. Each one of the support tubes is sealed with a permeate tube from a spiral wound element in an arrangement which allows the element to be quickly connected or disconnected. The cylindrical elements may hang vertically downward from an overlying manifold/support tube arrangement, or they may be supported so as to extend upward from an underlying manifold.
The invention provides methods and support networks for filtration of liquid feedstocks, preferably liquid feedstocks that are high in suspended solids, which are effective to produce permeate that is lean in suspended solids at an elevated production rate for a sustained period of operation before shutdown for substantial cleaning is needed in order to continue permeate production at a desired high rate of flux. Effective operation can be achieved with a TMP as low as about 0.5 psi (about 25 mm of Hg) using specially designed spiral wound elements that incorporate high flow, low pressure membranes, although the use of higher TMPs for increased flux are preferred. In this respect, a TMP of at least about one psi, e.g. about 2 to 5 psi, is preferred, while of course still higher TMPs may certainly be used, although such may well require additional power input and may encounter a higher rate of fouling. Examples of such elements are described in copending U.S. Application Ser. No. 60/535,295, filed Jan. 9, 2004, entitled “Submerged Operation with Low-Fouling, High-Flow, Low-Energy Spiral Wound Membrane Cartridges.”
As previously mentioned, the liquid feedstock that is being treated using the methods or systems of the invention may be any of a wide variety of feedstocks such as would be commonly treated in a system such as this, ranging from groundwater or surfacewater supplies to be used for drinking water through all types of wastewater, both industrial and municipal; they may also treat feed that is to be supplied to a membrane bioreactor (MBR). When, for example, the feedstock is from a municipal wastewater treatment facility, it will generally be supplied from a secondary treatment stage and will still be fairly high in suspended solids. The invention may also be used as a membrane bioreactor, for example, where it might be employed to treat municipal sewage in the primary wastewater treatment stage, or it might take effluent from a primary or secondary wastewater treatment stage. Thus the feedstock may or may not have undergone prior primary or secondary treatment where some substantial settling should have occurred, and it may contain very high suspended solids, e.g. 10,000-15,000 ppm, as well as high organic loading. As a part of such an MBR, there may be aerobic and/or anaerobic section(s) and an anioxic section which would reduce nitrate to nitrogen gas.
Although it can thus be seen that the invention is suitable for use in systems for treating a variety of different aqueous feedstocks, it is felt that such systems may have a particular advantage in being able to efficiently treat feedstocks having relatively high suspended solids and/or relatively high turbidity, e.g., aqueous feedstocks having suspended solids in amounts of 1,000 ppm and above and/or a turbidity of about 10 NTU or above. Very generally, an aqueous feedstock having suspended solids at a level of about 10 to about 50 ppm would be considered to contain a relatively high amount of suspended solids; similarly, wastewater having an NTU of about 3 to about 20 would be considered to have a turbidity that is relatively high. On the other hand, wastewater having suspended solids not greater than about 5 ppm might be referred to as being lean in suspended solids, and wastewater having a turbidity not greater than about 3 NTU might be referred to as being low in turbidity.
It is preferred that appropriate microfiltration or ultrafiltration membrane sheet material be employed in the elements that will provide a flux of between about 20 and 100 gfd per psi of TMP when tested on DI water or the like; preferably the membrane should exhibit a clean water flux of at least 50 gfd per psi. Such membranes are commercially available; for example, a polyethersulfone membrane sold as the UB50 membrane by TriSep Corporation of Goleta, Calif. has a clean water flux rate of about 50 gfd per psi and may be employed. Details of exemplary spiral wound elements are found in the '436 International Application mentioned hereinbefore.
Various submerged arrangements can be used to produce the desired net TMP that will drive the filtration process including both partial and complete submergence. For example, such can be provided through any suitable type of vacuum pump or even through an aspirator; and in such case, if desired, the cartridge may be only partially submerged with its upper end extending a few inches above the surface where the rising bubble stream will effect liquid overflow from the open upper end. However, rather than using such an arrangement that requires energy for its operation to provide the TMP, in some instances submerging the elements a distance sufficient to create a significant liquid level of water above the height of the element will provide sufficient drive pressure to satisfactorily carry out the filtration method. To effectively accomplish the use of a static head of water for the TMP, the permeate being produced is removed to an atmospheric tank or the like at a level that is lower than the liquid level in the tank and preferably lower than the level of the element itself. Such removal can be conveniently done through a fitting in the sidewall at such a level, or in the bottom of the tank, and the amount of TMP can then be controlled by adjusting the height of the water in the tank. Should the TMP be too high as a result of substantial submergence, a regulating valve in the permeate outlet line can be used to reduce it to the desired value. Very generally, each 2.3 feet (0.7 meter) of water corresponds to a pressure of about 1 psi (0.07 bar). Accordingly, a liquid head in the tank in the range of 6-10 feet would deliver a TMP of about 2.6 to about 4.3 psi. There are further advantages to using liquid head instead of vacuum to provide the TMP; these flow from simplification of the overall system and elimination of piping, valving, instrumentation and/or pumps. The use of the arrangement depicted in
Periodic back flushing using permeate has frequently been used to remove accumulated solids that build up on the surface of the membrane or other filtration element. In some cases, cleaning chemicals are injected into and mixed with the permeate water used for backwashing to aid in the removal of suspended solids and disinfection of the membrane surface. It is now felt that with certain element designs, certain feedstocks may be treated without back flushing at all (or at least back flushing that uses a substantial amount of permeate); such achievement is obtained by employing alternating periods of bubbling and idling, wherein permeate flow is shut off while the bubbling continues. Such continued bubbling without any permeate intrusion through the surface of the membrane has been found to exaggerate the scrubbing or scouring action of the bubbles on the membrane surface, thus tending to increase their effectiveness from the standpoint of accumulated solids removal, and carrying those removed solids upward out the open top of the cartridge. Because there is no liquid simultaneously being withdrawn from the tank, the tank itself becomes more quiescent in those regions unaffected by the bubbling, and as a result, suspended solids have a tendency to settle to the bottom of the tank. Solids removal may be achieved through the employment of scrapers or the like, as well known in this art; however, in most instances, the removal of some feedstock from a bottom or near bottom location in the tank is effective to remove settled solids without the need for such ancillary settling/scraping devices. Such withdrawal of liquid is best described in terms of its proportion to the supply of liquid to the tank because it is desired that the overall withdrawal of permeate and high-solids feedstock be such that the liquid level in the tank remains at about the same height. Typically, the withdrawal of feed solution from such a region at or near the bottom of the tank, where it will include a relatively high amount of suspended solids, is not greater than about 10% of the rate at which the feedstock is being introduced into the tank. Generally, the supply of feed and the withdrawal to drain will be continuous, even during those periods when permeate withdrawal ceases because intermittent operation is being employed to effect membrane idling as described hereinafter. However, if desired, all flow could cease during those intermittent periods and only bubbling be carried out, but such is not felt necessary as slight fluctuations in the level of the tank should be not detrimental.
The above-mentioned operations depend upon the generation of bubbles as a key element. Bubble velocity and air flow rates are variables that are controlled to achieve high efficiency; however, a wide variety of gas delivery devices may be employed at locations below the generally vertically aligned cartridges to provide the bubbling desired. These may range from a simple open pipe to other types of sophisticated diffusers having porous sintered plates or patterns of perforations that will result in more uniform bubbling or in a desired pattern of bubbles of relatively similar size. It is of course realized, that the generation of air bubbles through the use of a blower or a compressor or the like involves some expense in the expenditure of energy, and in an effort to truly minimize energy expenditure in the operation of these systems and methods, it has been found that using aeration only on a periodic basis, if appropriately regulated, can still sustain the rates of flux desired. When such periodic bubbling is employed, alternating periods of bubbling and non-bubbling of at least about 3 minutes are preferably used, and such periods preferably do not exceed about 5 minutes. Accordingly, operating using such on/off periods, for example with the bubbling on only about 75% of the time, or even for as little as only 25% to 50% of the time, can still, under many conditions, stabilize permeate fluxes in the range desired. When such periodic bubbling is employed alternating periods of bubbling and non-bubbling of at least about 3 minutes are preferably used and such periods preferably do not exceed about 5 minutes. Fluxes achieved in such systems are preferably at least about 10 gfd per psi of TMP (246 lmh/bar), and oftentimes fluxes double that rate can be achieved.
One preferred embodiment is illustrated in
Openings are created in the sidewall of the horizontal stainless steel conduit 19 at regular intervals along its length, and preferably the pattern of openings is such that pairs of openings are provided at the same axial locations along the conduit to create the regular arrangement that is seen in
Piping is affixed to the network conduit 19 so as to radially extend from the conduit (see
Each support pipe 21 has a straight lower base section 23 and a straight upper section 27 which are interconnected by an elbow section 25 of arcuate shape so that the two straight sections are oriented at about 60 degrees to each other. The end of the upper portion 27, as indicated, is welded or otherwise permanently affixed to the manifold conduit 19 so that the support pipe resides in a vertical plane and the base section 23 is oriented vertically. The base section 23 is preferably swaged to a larger diameter, as perhaps best seen in
As best seen in
As seen in
As best seen in
As previously mentioned, if it is desired to use the static liquid head of the body of feedstock to supply the TMP, or part of the TMP, the array is simply located at a lower level in a tank of perhaps greater depth (as illustrated in the copending application mentioned hereinbefore). In the
As operation continues, the suspended solids that are rejected by the membrane begin to gravitate to the bottom region of the tank 17, and they can be removed by any suitable manner well-known in this art. Although scrapers or the like might be used along with a sloping bottom to focus the collection of settled solids, it has been found that the simple withdrawal of a stream of more concentrated solids-containing feedstock from the bottom region of the tank via an outlet line 61 containing an adjustable valve 63 leading to drain. By removing an amount equal to between about 5% and 10% of the volume of flow 65 into the tank, feedstock of suitable quality for filtration will be maintained, and build-up of solids in the tank 17 will be prevented. The remainder of the liquid inflow 65 is of course removed through the creation of permeate, which is usually the purpose of the overall installation.
If desired and as taught in '436 international application, periodic backflushing can be utilized to further assure that membrane flux remains at the desired high level. A pump or compressor or cylinder of compressed gas or the like (not shown) may be used to cause the flow of fluid in reverse direction through the line 54 and the manifold conduits 19 and the permeate piping systems so as to effect momentary flow through the sheetlike membranes 32b in the opposite direction that removes solids that might have accumulated on the surface thereof There may well be sufficient residual permeate in the manifolds 19 and all the associated piping to provide the desired volume of back flush permeate flow; however, a small tank (not shown) can be provided in the line 54 for situations where a greater volume of flow is desired, or suction may alternatively be taken from the permeate reservoir 57. As an alternative to such backflushing, it has been found that, under certain conditions, it is possible to merely idle the filtration modules by halting flow of permeate and allowing the upwardly moving streams of bubbles to scour accumulated solids from the surface of the membranes and the spiral passageways; such may negate the need for any backflushing.
Regardless of the use of periodic backflushing and occasional chemical cleaning which may, if desired, be incorporated into the periodic backflushing, there will always be some maintenance required, and of course, the spiral wound membranes do have a finite lifetime. The support method provided herein not only provides a simple, straightforward, efficient manner of supporting rows of vertically aligned cylindrical filtration elements 15 in a tank 17, but it facilitates quick replacement of an element or a row of elements by simply rotating an element a quarter turn or so to disengage at the bayonet fitting and remove it from its position in the array depending from the manifold conduit 19. Thus, it can be seen that this arrangement not only makes servicing and replacement of these elements quite easy, but the overall arrangement is one having a relatively low capital cost when compared to more elaborate racks and the like that have previously been employed in systems for creating arrays of filtration devices in submerged condition in a tank of aqueous feedstock or the like. From strictly a mechanical standpoint, it has been found that stainless steel tubing made of 316L stainless steel or its equivalent, having about a four inch diameter and a wall thickness of about 3.4 mm, has satisfactory strength to support a double-row of cylindrical spiral wound filtration elements 15 of about nine-inch diameter and about 40 inches in length, which elements may weigh in the vicinity of 30 pounds (14 kg) apiece. The individual arcuate support pipes 21 may be made from stainless steel tubing having a diameter of about 1.5 inches and would be welded to the four inch manifold conduits 19 at the spaced-apart holes or openings; they might extend therefrom at about an angle of 60° to the vertical. The base portion 23 of each support pipe 21 can be swaged to a slightly larger diameter so as to accommodate a permeate outlet tube 31 from the element that may have an outer diameter of about 1.9 inch and that may also have a pair of grooves in its exterior surface, spaced apart about 0.5 inch, each of which will seat an O-ring 49 as shown in
The overall arrangement wherein two or three or 10 or more of these networks 13 of vertically disposed filtration elements 15 are arranged in an open top tank 17 or the like provides an extremely efficient array for treating surface water, wastewater and/or municipal sewerage. As shown in
Although the invention has been illustrated and described with regard to certain preferred embodiments which constitute the best mode presently known for carrying out the invention, it should be understood various changes and modifications as would be obvious to one having ordinary skill in this art may be made without departing from the scope of the invention which is set forth in the claims appended hereto. For example, although an illustrative embodiment has been described which uses vacuum to create the desired TMP, it should be appreciated that, by submerging the array of elements to a desired depth, static liquid head can provide the TMP to operate effectively.
As an alternative arrangement, the header 71 and the interconnected manifolds may be located below the filtration elements so that the arcuate pipes would extend generally upward and support filtration elements extending upward therefrom, that are aligned vertically above each manifold rather than hanging therefrom. Such an arrangement is illustrated in
The manifold arrangement which is shown in
The arrangement at the bottom of each element is best seen in
The disclosures of all U.S. patents and applications mentioned herein are expressly incorporated herein by reference. Particular features of the invention are emphasized in the claims that follow.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/574,846, filed May 26, 2004.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60574846 | May 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US05/18291 | May 2005 | US |
Child | 11561819 | Nov 2006 | US |