The present technology relates to consumer goods and, more particularly, to methods, systems, products, features, services, and other elements directed to voice-assisted control of media playback systems or some aspect thereof.
Options for accessing and listening to digital audio in an out-loud setting were limited until in 2003, when SONOS, Inc. filed for one of its first patent applications, entitled “Method for Synchronizing Audio Playback between Multiple Networked Devices,” and began offering a media playback system for sale in 2005. The SONOS Wireless HiFi System enables people to experience music from many sources via one or more networked playback devices. Through a software control application installed on a smartphone, tablet, or computer, one can play what he or she wants in any room that has a networked playback device. Additionally, using a controller, for example, different songs can be streamed to each room that has a playback device, rooms can be grouped together for synchronous playback, or the same song can be heard in all rooms synchronously.
Given the ever-growing interest in digital media, there continues to be a need to develop consumer-accessible technologies to further enhance the listening experience.
Features, aspects, and advantages of the presently disclosed technology may be better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings where:
The drawings are for purposes of illustrating example embodiments, but it should be understood that the inventions are not limited to the arrangements and instrumentality shown in the drawings. In the drawings, identical reference numbers identify at least generally similar elements. To facilitate the discussion of any particular element, the most significant digit or digits of any reference number refers to the Figure in which that element is first introduced. For example, element 103a is first introduced and discussed with reference to
I. Overview
Voice control can be beneficial in a “smart” home that includes smart appliances and devices that are connected to a communication network, such as wireless audio playback devices, illumination devices, and home-automation devices (e.g., thermostats, door locks, etc.). A network microphone device (NMD) may be used to control smart home devices. In various implementations described in greater detail below, an NMD may be implemented to control a playback device (which may include an NMD-equipped playback device), such as to adjust volume, change playback state (e.g., pause/play), select a song, and/or perform myriad other operations.
An NMD is a networked computing device that typically includes an arrangement of microphones, such as a microphone array, that is configured to detect sounds present in the NMD's environment. The detected sound may include a person's speech mixed with background noise (e.g., music being output by a playback device or other ambient noise). In practice, an NMD typically filters detected sound to remove the background noise from the person's speech to facilitate identifying whether the speech contains a voice input indicative of voice control. If so, the NMD may take action based on such a voice input.
A voice input will typically include a wake word followed by an utterance comprising a user request. A wake word is typically a predetermined word or phrase used to “wake up” an NMD and cause it to invoke a particular voice assistant service (“VAS”) to interpret the intent of the voice input. In practice, an NMD will typically transmit the voice input, or at least a portion thereof (e.g., the utterance portion), to the VAS corresponding to the particular wake word contained in the voice input. For example, a user might speak the wake word “Alexa” to invoke the AMAZON VAS, “Ok, Google” to invoke the GOOGLE VAS, “Hey, Siri” to invoke the APPLE VAS, or “Hey, Sonos” to invoke a VAS offered by SONOS, among other examples. In practice, a wake word may also be referred to as, for example, an activation-, trigger-, wakeup-word or -phrase, and may take the form of any suitable word, combination of words (e.g., a particular phrase), and/or some other audio cue.
An NMD often employs a wake-word engine, which is typically onboard the NMD, to identify whether sound detected by the NMD contains a voice input that includes a particular wake word. The wake-word engine may be configured to identify (i.e., “spot”) a particular wake word using one or more identification algorithms. This wake-word identification process is commonly referred to as “keyword spotting.” In practice, to help facilitate keyword spotting, the NMD may buffer sound detected by a microphone of the NMD and then use the wake-word engine to process that buffered sound to determine whether a wake word is present.
When a wake-word engine spots a wake word in detected sound, the NMD may determine that a wake-word event (i.e., a “wake-word trigger”) has occurred, which indicates that the NMD has detected sound that includes a potential voice input. The occurrence of the wake-word event typically causes the NMD to perform additional processes involving the detected sound. In some implementations, these additional processes may include outputting an alert (e.g., an audible chime and/or a light indicator) indicating that a wake word has been identified and extracting detected-sound data from a buffer, among other possible additional processes. Extracting the detected sound may include reading out and packaging a stream of the detected-sound data according to a particular format and transmitting the packaged detected-sound data to an appropriate VAS for interpretation.
In turn, the VAS corresponding to the wake word that was identified by the wake-word engine receives the transmitted sound data from the NMD over a communication network. A VAS traditionally takes the form of a remote service implemented using one or more cloud servers configured to process voice inputs (e.g., AMAZON's ALEXA, APPLE's SIRI, MICROSOFT's CORTANA, GOOGLE'S ASSISTANT, etc.). In some instances, certain components and functionality of the VAS may be distributed across local and remote devices. Additionally, or alternatively, a VAS may take the form of a local service implemented at an NMD or a media playback system comprising the NMD such that a voice input or certain types of voice input (e.g., rudimentary commands) are processed locally without intervention from a remote VAS.
In any case, when a VAS receives detected-sound data, the VAS will typically process this data, which involves identifying the voice input and determining an intent of words captured in the voice input. The VAS may then provide a response back to the NMD with some instruction according to the determined intent. Based on that instruction, the NMD may cause one or more smart devices to perform an action.
In operation, the action that the VAS instructs the NMD to take based on identifying a voice input can take a variety of forms. For example, the instruction may take the form of VAS response data that is indicative of a given VAS response corresponding to the voice input for the NMD to play back. The VAS response may generally involve the NMD outputting various types of audio and/or visual indications. For instance, a VAS response may comprise playing back chimes, spoken words, audible tones, and/or various other forms of audio played back in response to a voice input. Some of these VAS responses may indicate whether the VAS and/or the NMD will perform a given action (e.g., begin music playback, output requested information, etc.) specified by the voice utterance of the voice input. VAS responses may take various other forms as well.
In some implementations, an NMD may form part of a system comprising multiple NMDs. Indeed, a growing number of environments today have multiple NMDs. For instance, a household may include multiple NMD-equipped playback devices to fill more areas and/or rooms of a home with music and/or to provide more areas with voice-enabled services.
In environments having multiple NMDs, some or all of the NMDs may identify a same wake word. For example, when multiple NMDs in a given environment are configured to identify the same ALEXA wake word, and more than one of the NMDs identify the same wake word, each identifying NMD may trigger its respective internal voice capture components to extract detected-sound data for evaluation by a VAS. When more than one NMD identifies a common wake word, a VAS, which may be located in the cloud, may typically determine which of the NMDs identified the wake word with a highest confidence level. The VAS will then select a given NMD that identified the wake word with the highest confidence level, and after selecting the given NMD that identified the wake word with the highest measure of confidence, may cause the selected NMD to take one or more actions, which may take the form of one or more outputs, as some examples.
The non-selected NMDs may enter an idle state after determining that they have not been selected to perform extraction of detected-sound data. The selected NMD will also return to an idle state after extracting detected-sound data and/or generating any outputs. Once an NMD enters and idle state, an NMD may remain in the idle state until the NMD identifies another wake word.
When a user speaks the same wake word a subsequent time, and more than one NMD again identifies the same wake word, the VAS repeats the process of selecting a given one of the NMDs that identified the wake word with the highest confidence level. The NMD selected for the next interaction may be the previously-selected NMD if the previously-selected NMD identified the wake word with the highest confidence level or may be another NMD if an NMD other than the previously-selected NMD identified the wake word with the highest confidence level. The process of selecting a given NMD to extract sound-data that may contain a voice input from multiple NMDs that have identified a particular wake word may be referred to herein as “arbitration.”
Typically, the NMD that the VAS designates to perform extraction as part of performing the arbitration process is also designated to output the VAS response and to take one or more actions instructed by the VAS, for example to control audio playback, etc. However, there may be issues that arise from designating the same NMD that is selected to perform extraction to also output the VAS response and/or to take one or more instructed actions. Namely, the NMD that the VAS ultimately designates to perform extraction may not be the NMD that the user expected to output the VAS response or to take the one or more actions instructed by the VAS.
For instance, an NMD located in a different room than the user may identify a wake word with a greater confidence level than an NMD located in the same room as the user. As an example, the NMD in the different room may identify the wake word with a greater confidence level than the NMD in the same room as the user due to the way sound is reflected and absorbed by objects and surfaces in the two rooms. In any case, the selected NMD located in the different room may then output a VAS response. However, the user may have expected the NMD located in the same room to output the VAS response rather than the NMD located in the different room.
When an NMD other than the one a user expects outputs a VAS response in response to an identified wake word, this unexpected VAS response may cause user frustration. For example, a user located in a living room of a home may have wanted an NMD to take an action instructed by the VAS in the form of playing back audio in the living room. However, due to the acoustics in the user's home, the NMD in the bedroom may identify a spoken wake word with a higher confidence level than the NMD in the living room. As a result, the NMD in the bedroom may output a VAS response and may begin playing back audio in the bedroom. As a result of the NMD located in the bedroom playing back audio, the user may have user may have walk to the bedroom to stop the audio playback by speaking or otherwise issuing a command to stop the bedroom NMD's playback.
In some cases, the particular NMD that generates an output in response to identifying a wake word at a given time may appear to be arbitrarily chosen and may change seemingly without explanation, a phenomenon referred to herein as “ping-ponging.” Indeed, the NMDs that output VAS responses and/or take one or more actions instructed by the VAS in response to voice multiple inputs may appear to ping pong from one NMD to another NMD, which is seemingly arbitrary and also disorientating to a user. As an example, a user may speak a first wake word followed by a first voice input. In response to identifying the first wake word with a highest confidence level and being selected by a VAS, a first NMD of two or more NMDs may generate an output. Thereafter, the user who may be located in the same location as when speaking the first wake word and voice input, may speak a second wake word followed by a second voice input. In response to identifying the second wake word, a second NMD of the two or more NMDs may generate an output. Thus, the output generated by the first and second NMDs ping-pong's due to the outputting NMD changing between the first and second NMDs in response to successively identified wake words.
In addition to occurring between NMDs located in different rooms, ping-ponging can also occur between NMDs situated in the same room. For example, in response to a user speaking a first wake word followed by a voice utterance, a first NMD located near the user on one side of a room may identify the first wake word with a higher confidence level than a second NMD located on another side of a room. In response to the first NMD identifying the first wake word with the higher confidence level, the first NMD may output a VAS response. After the speaking the first wake word, the user may then turn to face the second NMD across the room and may speak a second wake word followed by a second voice utterance expecting the second NMD to identify the wake word with a higher confidence level, only to have the first NMD again identify the first wake word with a higher confidence level and respond to the user by outputting a VAS response.
Additionally, in the implementations described above, each NMD that identifies a given wake word followed by a voice utterance may transmit data associated with the voice utterance and/or wake word to the VAS, which is typically located in the cloud. The overall amount of bandwidth utilized by a media playback system having multiple NMDs that each send data for arbitration do a cloud-based VAS may be relatively high given that each NMD sends data associated with a wake word and/or a voice utterance to the VAS.
Example devices, systems, and methods disclosed herein address these and other technical problems that arise in the context of multiple NMDs. More specifically, this disclosure describes in various embodiments NMDs are configured to locally arbitrate between one another (i.e., rather than using remote cloud servers to perform arbitration). In one aspect of this disclosure, a single NMD within a set of NMDs is selected as the local arbitrator, or “arbitrator NMD.” Further, performing local arbitration as described herein may be advantageous over remote arbitration because of the bandwidth savings achieved by avoiding sending the data of multiple redundant wake words and/or voice inputs from each NMD to the VAS for remote arbitration. Local arbitration may be advantageous for a variety of other reasons as well.
In a related aspect, the arbitrator NMD may also be designated for outputting VAS responses, which may provide a behavior that more closely aligns with a user's expectations and reduces or eliminates the aforementioned unexpected behaviors, such as ping-ponging. While the arbitrator NMD is described as being the same NMD that is designated for outputting VAS responses, it should be understood that an NMD other than the arbitrator may be designated for outputting a VAS response as well.
In example embodiments, a network media playback system includes two or more NMDs, each of which is configured to detect sound that may comprise a voice input. At least one of these NMDs may be designated as the arbitrator NMD, which may be responsible for selecting which NMD is to be the default NMD for outputting a VAS response among a set of NMDs that have identified a same wake word. In various embodiments, the local arbitrator may also determine the NMD among the set of NMDs that is to extract detected-sound data for evaluation by a VAS in response to multiple NMDs in the set identifying a same wake word. In some embodiments, an NMD other than the arbitrator may be selected to extract detected-sound data to a remote VAS.
In some implementations, a device that may be designated to output a VAS response, which may comprise the arbitrator NMD, may be assigned during the configuration of the media playback system that includes the two or more NMDs. In some cases, the arbitrator responsibilities may be assigned to a given NMD in the set based on the NMD's role or hardware resources.
In addition, or alternatively, the arbitrator responsibilities may be assigned to a given NMD based on other considerations. For instance, the arbitrator responsibilities may be assigned to an NMD that has already been assigned other responsibilities within the media playback system. As one example, an NMD designated as the “group coordinator” that is responsible for facilitating synchronous playback of audio among the two or more NMDs may be assigned the arbitrator responsibilities as well. As another example, an NMD designated as the “primary” device that is responsible for playing back a given audio channel, such as the center channel of a home theatre setup or either the left channel of a stereo pair setup, may also be assigned the arbitrator responsibilities. However, in other instances, the arbitrator NMD may not be assigned any of the aforementioned other responsibilities.
In any case, in accordance with example embodiments provided herein, local arbitration may generally involve two or more NMDs of the media playback system identifying a particular wake word, the arbitrator NMD selecting one of the NMDs to extract detected-sound data that may include a voice input for evaluation by the VAS, and after evaluation of the voice input by the VAS, the arbitrator NMD playing back a VAS response generated by the VAS.
More specifically, in an example implementation, each non-arbitrator NMD that identifies a particular wake word may transmit to the arbitrator NMD a notification that a wake word was identified. In some examples, a given notification may include a confidence level that the given non-arbitrator NMD identified the particular wake word correctly. In the case that an identifying NMD is the arbitrator NMD, the arbitrator NMD may not transmit a message that includes a confidence level but instead may generate an internal notification, which may include a confidence level that the arbitrator NMD identified the wake word correctly.
In practice, a confidence level may take various forms. For example, the confidence level may be a metric calculated based on audio properties of the received wake word. Examples of some such metrics that may be used to calculate the confidence level may include a signal-to-noise ratio (SnR), a frequency spectrum of the identified wake word, a direction of the identified wake word, an amplitude (e.g., decibel level) of the identified wake word, etc. A confidence level may take various other forms as well.
In turn, the arbitrator NMD receives each of the notifications. Based on these notifications, the arbitrator NMD may determine that more than one of the NMDs has identified the wake word at the same time. In response to this determination, the arbitrator NMD may next select which of the identifying NMDs is to extract the detected-sound data for evaluation by the VAS. The arbitrator NMD may make this selection in various manners.
As one example, if the notifications include respective confidence levels, the arbitrator NMD may select the NMD having the highest confidence level. As another example, if the NMDs have differing roles, the arbitrator NMD may use these roles as a basis for selecting the NMD. Other examples of selecting the extraction NMD are also possible.
After selecting an NMD to extract the voice input, the arbitrator NMD may cause the selected NMD to extract detected-sound data that may include a voice input for evaluation by the VAS. In this respect, it should be understood that the extraction NMD may differ from, or be the same as, the arbitrator NMD that is designated to output a voice output. The process of causing the selected NMD to extract the detected-sound data that may include a voice input may take various forms.
As one example, if the arbitrator NMD selects a non-arbitrator NMD, then the arbitrator NMD may send an instruction to the non-arbitrator NMD to extract the detected-sound data for evaluation by the appropriate VAS. As another example, if the arbitrator NMD selects itself, then the arbitrator NMD may trigger its internal voice capture components to extract the detected-sound data that may include a voice input for evaluation by the VAS.
After extracting the voice input, the selected NMD may format the detected-sound data into a sound-data stream and transmit the sound-data stream containing at least the detected-sound data that may include a voice input (and perhaps also the wake word) to the VAS either directly via a communication network that couples the VAS and the media playback system or indirectly via the arbitrator NMD. In this respect, only one NMD transmits a sound-data stream to the VAS, which consumes significantly less bandwidth than when multiple NMDs make such transmission.
Based on the received the sound-data stream, the VAS may identify a voice input comprising a voice utterance and may determine an intent of the voice utterance. In this regard, the VAS advantageously only has to process a sound-data stream from the media playback system and does not need to perform analyses related to remote arbitration, which may help to conserve the VAS's compute resources.
Thereafter, the VAS may determine the identity of the arbitrator NMD and send to the arbitrator NMD a message including VAS response data that is indicative of a given VAS response via the communication network.
The VAS may determine the identity of the arbitrator of the NMD in various different manners. According to an embodiment, the VAS may identify the arbitrator NMD via UPnP (Universal Plug 'n Play). As one example, UPnP eventing may be used to set the value of a state indicator that specifies the identity of the arbitrator NMD to the VAS. In practice, the group coordinator of a set of NMDs may be the arbitrator NMD. The VAS may determine the identity of the arbitrator NMD in various other manners as well.
After receiving the VAS response data that is indicative of a given VAS response, the arbitrator NMD outputs the VAS response. In this way, the media playback system exhibits a more predictable behavior that aligns with users' expectations.
While some embodiments described herein may refer to functions performed by given actors, such as “users” and/or other entities, it should be understood that this description is for purposes of explanation only. The claims should not be interpreted to require action by any such example actor unless explicitly required by the language of the claims themselves.
II. Example Operating Environment
Within these rooms and spaces, the MPS 100 includes one or more computing devices. Referring to
With reference still to
As further shown in
In some implementations, the various playback devices, NMDs, and/or controller devices 102-104 may be communicatively coupled to at least one remote computing device associated with a VAS and at least one remote computing device associated with a media content service (“MCS”). For instance, in the illustrated example of
As further shown in
In various implementations, one or more of the playback devices 102 may take the form of or include an on-board (e.g., integrated) network microphone device. For example, the playback devices 102a-e include or are otherwise equipped with corresponding NMDs 103a-e, respectively. A playback device that includes or is equipped with an NMD may be referred to herein interchangeably as a playback device or an NMD unless indicated otherwise in the description.
In some cases, one or more of the NMDs 103 may be a stand-alone device. For example, the NMDs 103f and 103g may be stand-alone devices. A stand-alone NMD may omit components and/or functionality that is typically included in a playback device, such as a speaker or related electronics. For instance, in such cases, a stand-alone NMD may not produce audio output or may produce limited audio output (e.g., relatively low-quality audio output).
The various playback and network microphone devices 102 and 103 of the MPS 100 may each be associated with a unique name, which may be assigned to the respective devices by a user, such as during setup of one or more of these devices. For instance, as shown in the illustrated example of
As discussed above, an NMD may detect and process sound from its environment, such as sound that includes background noise mixed with speech spoken by a person in the NMD's vicinity. For example, as sounds are detected by the NMD in the environment, the NMD may process the detected sound to determine if the sound includes speech that contains voice input intended for the NMD and ultimately a particular VAS. For example, the NMD may identify whether speech includes a wake word associated with a particular VAS.
In the illustrated example of
Upon receiving the stream of sound data, the VAS 190 determines if there is voice input in the streamed data from the NMD, and if so the VAS 190 will also determine an underlying intent in the voice input. The VAS 190 may next transmit a response back to the MPS 100, which can include transmitting the response directly to the NMD that caused the wake-word event. The response is typically based on the intent that the VAS 190 determined was present in the voice input. As an example, in response to the VAS 190 receiving a voice input with an utterance to “Play Hey Jude by The Beatles,” the VAS 190 may determine that the underlying intent of the voice input is to initiate playback and further determine that intent of the voice input is to play the particular song “Hey Jude.” After these determinations, the VAS 190 may transmit a command to a particular MCS 192 to retrieve content (i.e., the song “Hey Jude”), and that MCS 192, in turn, provides (e.g., streams) this content directly to the MPS 100 or indirectly via the VAS 190. In some implementations, the VAS 190 may transmit to the MPS 100 a command that causes the MPS 100 itself to retrieve the content from the MCS 192.
In certain implementations, NMDs may facilitate arbitration amongst one another when voice input is identified in speech detected by two or more NMDs located within proximity of one another. For example, the NMD-equipped playback device 102d in the environment 101 (
In certain implementations, an NMD may be assigned to, or otherwise associated with, a designated or default playback device that may not include an NMD. For example, the Island NMD 103f in the Kitchen 101h (
Further aspects relating to the different components of the example MPS 100 and how the different components may interact to provide a user with a media experience may be found in the following sections. While discussions herein may generally refer to the example MPS 100, technologies described herein are not limited to applications within, among other things, the home environment described above. For instance, the technologies described herein may be useful in other home environment configurations comprising more or fewer of any of the playback, network microphone, and/or controller devices 102-104. For example, the technologies herein may be utilized within an environment having a single playback device 102 and/or a single NMD 103. In some examples of such cases, the LAN 101 (
a. Example Playback & Network Microphone Devices
As shown, the playback device 102 includes at least one processor 212, which may be a clock-driven computing component configured to process input data according to instructions stored in memory 213. The memory 213 may be a tangible, non-transitory, computer-readable medium configured to store instructions that are executable by the processor 212. For example, the memory 213 may be data storage that can be loaded with software code 214 that is executable by the processor 212 to achieve certain functions.
In one example, these functions may involve the playback device 102 retrieving audio data from an audio source, which may be another playback device. In another example, the functions may involve the playback device 102 sending audio data, detected-sound data (e.g., corresponding to a voice input), and/or other information to another device on a network via at least one network interface 224. In yet another example, the functions may involve the playback device 102 causing one or more other playback devices to synchronously playback audio with the playback device 102. In yet a further example, the functions may involve the playback device 102 facilitating being paired or otherwise bonded with one or more other playback devices to create a multi-channel audio environment. Numerous other example functions are possible, some of which are discussed below.
As just mentioned, certain functions may involve the playback device 102 synchronizing playback of audio content with one or more other playback devices. During synchronous playback, a listener may not perceive time-delay differences between playback of the audio content by the synchronized playback devices. U.S. Pat. No. 8,234,395 filed on Apr. 4, 2004, and titled “System and method for synchronizing operations among a plurality of independently clocked digital data processing devices,” which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, provides in more detail some examples for audio playback synchronization among playback devices.
To facilitate audio playback, the playback device 102 includes audio processing components 216 that are generally configured to process audio prior to the playback device 102 rendering the audio. In this respect, the audio processing components 216 may include one or more digital-to-analog converters (“DAC”), one or more audio preprocessing components, one or more audio enhancement components, one or more digital signal processors (“DSPs”), and so on. In some implementations, one or more of the audio processing components 216 may be a subcomponent of the processor 212. In operation, the audio processing components 216 receive analog and/or digital audio and process and/or otherwise intentionally alter the audio to produce audio signals for playback.
The produced audio signals may then be provided to one or more audio amplifiers 217 for amplification and playback through one or more speakers 218 operably coupled to the amplifiers 217. The audio amplifiers 217 may include components configured to amplify audio signals to a level for driving one or more of the speakers 218.
Each of the speakers 218 may include an individual transducer (e.g., a “driver”) or the speakers 218 may include a complete speaker system involving an enclosure with one or more drivers. A particular driver of a speaker 218 may include, for example, a subwoofer (e.g., for low frequencies), a mid-range driver (e.g., for middle frequencies), and/or a tweeter (e.g., for high frequencies). In some cases, a transducer may be driven by an individual corresponding audio amplifier of the audio amplifiers 217. In some implementations, a playback device may not include the speakers 218, but instead may include a speaker interface for connecting the playback device to external speakers. In certain embodiments, a playback device may include neither the speakers 218 nor the audio amplifiers 217, but instead may include an audio interface (not shown) for connecting the playback device to an external audio amplifier or audio-visual receiver.
In addition to producing audio signals for playback by the playback device 102, the audio processing components 216 may be configured to process audio to be sent to one or more other playback devices, via the network interface 224, for playback. In example scenarios, audio content to be processed and/or played back by the playback device 102 may be received from an external source, such as via an audio line-in interface (e.g., an auto-detecting 3.5 mm audio line-in connection) of the playback device 102 (not shown) or via the network interface 224, as described below.
As shown, the at least one network interface 224, may take the form of one or more wireless interfaces 225 and/or one or more wired interfaces 226. A wireless interface may provide network interface functions for the playback device 102 to wirelessly communicate with other devices (e.g., other playback device(s), NMD(s), and/or controller device(s)) in accordance with a communication protocol (e.g., any wireless standard including IEEE 1002.11a, 1002.11b, 1002.11g, 1002.11n, 1002.11ac, 1002.15, 4G mobile communication standard, and so on). A wired interface may provide network interface functions for the playback device 102 to communicate over a wired connection with other devices in accordance with a communication protocol (e.g., IEEE 1002.3). While the network interface 224 shown in
In general, the network interface 224 facilitates data flow between the playback device 102 and one or more other devices on a data network. For instance, the playback device 102 may be configured to receive audio content over the data network from one or more other playback devices, network devices within a LAN, and/or audio content sources over a WAN, such as the Internet. In one example, the audio content and other signals transmitted and received by the playback device 102 may be transmitted in the form of digital packet data comprising an Internet Protocol (IP)-based source address and IP-based destination addresses. In such a case, the network interface 224 may be configured to parse the digital packet data such that the data destined for the playback device 102 is properly received and processed by the playback device 102.
As shown in
In operation, the voice-processing components 220 are generally configured to detect and process sound received via the microphones 222, identify potential voice input in the detected sound, and extract detected-sound data to enable a VAS, such as the VAS 190 (
In some implementations, the voice-processing components 220 may detect and store a user's voice profile, which may be associated with a user account of the MPS 100. For example, voice profiles may be stored as and/or compared to variables stored in a set of command information or data table. The voice profile may include aspects of the tone or frequency of a user's voice and/or other unique aspects of the user's voice, such as those described in previously-referenced U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/438,749.
As further shown in
In some implementations, the power components 227 of the playback device 102 may additionally include an internal power source 229 (e.g., one or more batteries) configured to power the playback device 102 without a physical connection to an external power source. When equipped with the internal power source 229, the playback device 102 may operate independent of an external power source. In some such implementations, the external power source interface 228 may be configured to facilitate charging the internal power source 229. As discussed before, a playback device comprising an internal power source may be referred to herein as a “portable playback device.” On the other hand, a playback device that operates using an external power source may be referred to herein as a “stationary playback device,” although such a device may in fact be moved around a home or other environment.
The playback device 102 further includes a user interface 240 that may facilitate user interactions independent of or in conjunction with user interactions facilitated by one or more of the controller devices 104. In various embodiments, the user interface 240 includes one or more physical buttons and/or supports graphical interfaces provided on touch sensitive screen(s) and/or surface(s), among other possibilities, for a user to directly provide input. The user interface 240 may further include one or more of lights (e.g., LEDs) and the speakers to provide visual and/or audio feedback to a user.
As an illustrative example,
As further shown in
By way of illustration, SONOS, Inc. presently offers (or has offered) for sale certain playback devices that may implement certain of the embodiments disclosed herein, including a “PLAY:1,” “PLAY:3,” “PLAY:5,” “PLAYBAR,” “CONNECT:AMP,” “PLAYBASE,” “BEAM,” “CONNECT,” and “SUB.” Any other past, present, and/or future playback devices may additionally or alternatively be used to implement the playback devices of example embodiments disclosed herein. Additionally, it should be understood that a playback device is not limited to the examples illustrated in
b. Example Playback Device Configurations
For purposes of control, each zone in the MPS 100 may be represented as a single user interface (“UI”) entity. For example, as displayed by the controller devices 104, Zone A may be provided as a single entity named “Portable,” Zone B may be provided as a single entity named “Stereo,” and Zone C may be provided as a single entity named “Living Room.”
In various embodiments, a zone may take on the name of one of the playback devices belonging to the zone. For example, Zone C may take on the name of the Living Room device 102m (as shown). In another example, Zone C may instead take on the name of the Bookcase device 102d. In a further example, Zone C may take on a name that is some combination of the Bookcase device 102d and Living Room device 102m. The name that is chosen may be selected by a user via inputs at a controller device 104. In some embodiments, a zone may be given a name that is different than the device(s) belonging to the zone. For example, Zone B in
As noted above, playback devices that are bonded may have different playback responsibilities, such as playback responsibilities for certain audio channels. For example, as shown in
Additionally, playback devices that are configured to be bonded may have additional and/or different respective speaker drivers. As shown in
In some implementations, playback devices may also be “merged.” In contrast to certain bonded playback devices, playback devices that are merged may not have assigned playback responsibilities, but may each render the full range of audio content that each respective playback device is capable of. Nevertheless, merged devices may be represented as a single UI entity (i.e., a zone, as discussed above). For instance,
In some embodiments, a stand-alone NMD may be in a zone by itself. For example, the NMD 103h from
Zones of individual, bonded, and/or merged devices may be arranged to form a set of playback devices that playback audio in synchrony. Such a set of playback devices may be referred to as a “group,” “zone group,” “synchrony group,” or “playback group.” In response to inputs provided via a controller device 104, playback devices may be dynamically grouped and ungrouped to form new or different groups that synchronously play back audio content. For example, referring to
In various implementations, the zones in an environment may be assigned a particular name, which may be the default name of a zone within a zone group or a combination of the names of the zones within a zone group, such as “Dining Room+Kitchen,” as shown in
Referring back to
In some embodiments, the memory 213 of the playback device 202 may store instances of various variable types associated with the states. Variables instances may be stored with identifiers (e.g., tags) corresponding to type. For example, certain identifiers may be a first type “al” to identify playback device(s) of a zone, a second type “b1” to identify playback device(s) that may be bonded in the zone, and a third type “cl” to identify a zone group to which the zone may belong. As a related example, in
In yet another example, the MPS 100 may include variables or identifiers representing other associations of zones and zone groups, such as identifiers associated with Areas, as shown in
The memory 213 may be further configured to store other data. Such data may pertain to audio sources accessible by the playback device 102 or a playback queue that the playback device (or some other playback device(s)) may be associated with. In embodiments described below, the memory 213 is configured to store a set of command data for selecting a particular VAS when processing voice inputs.
During operation, one or more playback zones in the environment of
As suggested above, the zone configurations of the MPS 100 may be dynamically modified. As such, the MPS 100 may support numerous configurations. For example, if a user physically moves one or more playback devices to or from a zone, the MPS 100 may be reconfigured to accommodate the change(s). For instance, if the user physically moves the playback device 102c from the Patio zone to the Office zone, the Office zone may now include both the playback devices 102c and 102n. In some cases, the user may pair or group the moved playback device 102c with the Office zone and/or rename the players in the Office zone using, for example, one of the controller devices 104 and/or voice input. As another example, if one or more playback devices 102 are moved to a particular space in the home environment that is not already a playback zone, the moved playback device(s) may be renamed or associated with a playback zone for the particular space.
Further, different playback zones of the MPS 100 may be dynamically combined into zone groups or split up into individual playback zones. For example, the Dining Room zone and the Kitchen zone may be combined into a zone group for a dinner party such that playback devices 102i and 102l may render audio content in synchrony. As another example, bonded playback devices in the Den zone may be split into (i) a television zone and (ii) a separate listening zone. The television zone may include the Front playback device 102b. The listening zone may include the Right, Left, and SUB playback devices 102a, 102j, and 102k, which may be grouped, paired, or merged, as described above. Splitting the Den zone in such a manner may allow one user to listen to music in the listening zone in one area of the living room space, and another user to watch the television in another area of the living room space. In a related example, a user may utilize either of the NMD 103a or 103b (
c. Example Controller Devices
The memory 413 of the controller device 104 may be configured to store controller application software and other data associated with the MPS 100 and/or a user of the system 100. The memory 413 may be loaded with instructions in software 414 that are executable by the processor 412 to achieve certain functions, such as facilitating user access, control, and/or configuration of the MPS 100. The controller device 104 is configured to communicate with other network devices via the network interface 424, which may take the form of a wireless interface, as described above.
In one example, system information (e.g., such as a state variable) may be communicated between the controller device 104 and other devices via the network interface 424. For instance, the controller device 104 may receive playback zone and zone group configurations in the MPS 100 from a playback device, an NMD, or another network device. Likewise, the controller device 104 may transmit such system information to a playback device or another network device via the network interface 424. In some cases, the other network device may be another controller device.
The controller device 104 may also communicate playback device control commands, such as volume control and audio playback control, to a playback device via the network interface 424. As suggested above, changes to configurations of the MPS 100 may also be performed by a user using the controller device 104. The configuration changes may include adding/removing one or more playback devices to/from a zone, adding/removing one or more zones to/from a zone group, forming a bonded or merged player, separating one or more playback devices from a bonded or merged player, among others.
As shown in
The playback control region 442 (
The playback zone region 443 (
For example, as shown, a “group” icon may be provided within each of the graphical representations of playback zones. The “group” icon provided within a graphical representation of a particular zone may be selectable to bring up options to select one or more other zones in the MPS 100 to be grouped with the particular zone. Once grouped, playback devices in the zones that have been grouped with the particular zone will be configured to play audio content in synchrony with the playback device(s) in the particular zone. Analogously, a “group” icon may be provided within a graphical representation of a zone group. In this case, the “group” icon may be selectable to bring up options to deselect one or more zones in the zone group to be removed from the zone group. Other interactions and implementations for grouping and ungrouping zones via a user interface are also possible. The representations of playback zones in the playback zone region 443 (
The playback status region 444 (
The playback queue region 446 may include graphical representations of audio content in a playback queue associated with the selected playback zone or zone group. In some embodiments, each playback zone or zone group may be associated with a playback queue comprising information corresponding to zero or more audio items for playback by the playback zone or zone group. For instance, each audio item in the playback queue may comprise a uniform resource identifier (URI), a uniform resource locator (URL), or some other identifier that may be used by a playback device in the playback zone or zone group to find and/or retrieve the audio item from a local audio content source or a networked audio content source, which may then be played back by the playback device.
In one example, a playlist may be added to a playback queue, in which case information corresponding to each audio item in the playlist may be added to the playback queue. In another example, audio items in a playback queue may be saved as a playlist. In a further example, a playback queue may be empty, or populated but “not in use” when the playback zone or zone group is playing continuously streamed audio content, such as Internet radio that may continue to play until otherwise stopped, rather than discrete audio items that have playback durations. In an alternative embodiment, a playback queue can include Internet radio and/or other streaming audio content items and be “in use” when the playback zone or zone group is playing those items. Other examples are also possible.
When playback zones or zone groups are “grouped” or “ungrouped,” playback queues associated with the affected playback zones or zone groups may be cleared or re-associated. For example, if a first playback zone including a first playback queue is grouped with a second playback zone including a second playback queue, the established zone group may have an associated playback queue that is initially empty, that contains audio items from the first playback queue (such as if the second playback zone was added to the first playback zone), that contains audio items from the second playback queue (such as if the first playback zone was added to the second playback zone), or a combination of audio items from both the first and second playback queues. Subsequently, if the established zone group is ungrouped, the resulting first playback zone may be re-associated with the previous first playback queue or may be associated with a new playback queue that is empty or contains audio items from the playback queue associated with the established zone group before the established zone group was ungrouped. Similarly, the resulting second playback zone may be re-associated with the previous second playback queue or may be associated with a new playback queue that is empty or contains audio items from the playback queue associated with the established zone group before the established zone group was ungrouped. Other examples are also possible.
With reference still to
The sources region 448 may include graphical representations of selectable audio content sources and/or selectable voice assistants associated with a corresponding VAS. The VASes may be selectively assigned. In some examples, multiple VASes, such as AMAZON's Alexa, MICROSOFT's Cortana, etc., may be invokable by the same NMD. In some embodiments, a user may assign a VAS exclusively to one or more NMDs. For example, a user may assign a first VAS to one or both of the NMDs 102a and 102b in the Living Room shown in
d. Example Audio Content Sources
The audio sources in the sources region 448 may be audio content sources from which audio content may be retrieved and played by the selected playback zone or zone group. One or more playback devices in a zone or zone group may be configured to retrieve for playback audio content (e.g., according to a corresponding URI or URL for the audio content) from a variety of available audio content sources. In one example, audio content may be retrieved by a playback device directly from a corresponding audio content source (e.g., via a line-in connection). In another example, audio content may be provided to a playback device over a network via one or more other playback devices or network devices. As described in greater detail below, in some embodiments audio content may be provided by one or more media content services.
Example audio content sources may include a memory of one or more playback devices in a media playback system such as the MPS 100 of
In some embodiments, audio content sources may be added or removed from a media playback system such as the MPS 100 of
e. Example Network Microphone Devices
The microphones 222 of the NMD 503 are configured to provide detected sound, SD, from the environment of the NMD 503 to the VCC 560. The detected sound SD may take the form of one or more analog or digital signals. In example implementations, the detected sound SD may be composed of a plurality signals associated with respective channels 562 that are fed to the VCC 560.
Each channel 562 may correspond to a particular microphone 222. For example, an NMD having six microphones may have six corresponding channels. Each channel of the detected sound SD may bear certain similarities to the other channels but may differ in certain regards, which may be due to the position of the given channel's corresponding microphone relative to the microphones of other channels. For example, one or more of the channels of the detected sound SD may have a greater signal to noise ratio (“SNR”) of speech to background noise than other channels.
As further shown in
The spatial processor 566 is typically configured to analyze the detected sound SD and identify certain characteristics, such as a sound's amplitude (e.g., decibel level), frequency spectrum, directionality, etc. In one respect, the spatial processor 566 may help filter or suppress ambient noise in the detected sound SD from potential user speech based on similarities and differences in the constituent channels 562 of the detected sound SD, as discussed above. As one possibility, the spatial processor 566 may monitor metrics that distinguish speech from other sounds. Such metrics can include, for example, energy within the speech band relative to background noise and entropy within the speech band—a measure of spectral structure—which is typically lower in speech than in most common background noise. In some implementations, the spatial processor 566 may be configured to determine a speech presence probability, examples of such functionality are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/984,073, filed May 18, 2018, titled “Linear Filtering for Noise-Suppressed Speech Detection,” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
In operation, the one or more buffers 568—one or more of which may be part of or separate from the memory 213 (
In any event, the detected-sound data form a digital representation (i.e., sound-data stream), SDS, of the sound detected by the microphones 222. In practice, the sound-data stream SDS may take a variety of forms. As one possibility, the sound-data stream SDS may be composed of frames, each of which may include one or more sound samples. The frames may be streamed (i.e., read out) from the one or more buffers 568 for further processing by downstream components, such as the wake-word engine 570 and the voice extractor 572 of the NMD 503.
In some implementations, at least one buffer 568 captures detected-sound data utilizing a sliding window approach in which a given amount (i.e., a given window) of the most recently captured detected-sound data is retained in the at least one buffer 568 while older detected-sound data are overwritten when they fall outside of the window. For example, at least one buffer 568 may temporarily retain 20 frames of a sound specimen at given time, discard the oldest frame after an expiration time, and then capture a new frame, which is added to the 19 prior frames of the sound specimen.
In practice, when the sound-data stream SDS is composed of frames, the frames may take a variety of forms having a variety of characteristics. As one possibility, the frames may take the form of audio frames that have a certain resolution (e.g., 16 bits of resolution), which may be based on a sampling rate (e.g., 44,100 Hz). Additionally, or alternatively, the frames may include information corresponding to a given sound specimen that the frames define, such as metadata that indicates frequency response, power input level, SNR, microphone channel identification, and/or other information of the given sound specimen, among other examples. Thus, in some embodiments, a frame may include a portion of sound (e.g., one or more samples of a given sound specimen) and metadata regarding the portion of sound. In other embodiments, a frame may only include a portion of sound (e.g., one or more samples of a given sound specimen) or metadata regarding a portion of sound.
In any case, downstream components of the NMD 503 may process the sound-data stream SDS. For instance, the wake-word engine 570 is configured to apply or more identification algorithms to the sound-data stream SDS (e.g., streamed sound frames) to spot potential wake words in the detected-sound SD. When the wake-word engine 570 spots a potential wake word, the work-word engine 570 provides an indication of a “wake-word event” (also referred to as a “wake-word trigger”). In the illustrated example of
In multi-VAS implementations, the NMD 503 may include a VAS selector 574 (shown in dashed lines) that is generally configured to direct the voice extractor's extraction and transmission of the sound-data stream SDS to the appropriate VAS when a given wake-word is identified by a particular wake-word engine (and a corresponding wake-word trigger), such as the wake-word engine 570 and at least one additional wake-word engine 571 (shown in dashed lines). In such implementations, the NMD 503 may include multiple, different wake-word engines and/or voice extractors, each supported by a particular VAS. Similar to the discussion above, each wake-word engine may be configured to receive as input the sound-data stream SDS from the one or more buffers 568 and apply identification algorithms to cause a wake-word trigger for the appropriate VAS. Thus, as one example, the wake-word engine 570 may be configured to identify the wake word “Alexa” and cause the NMD 503 to invoke the AMAZON VAS when “Alexa” is spotted. As another example, the wake-word engine 571 may be configured to identify the wake word “Ok, Google” and cause the NMD 503 to invoke the GOOGLE VAS when “Ok, Google” is spotted. In single-VAS implementations, the VAS selector 574 may be omitted.
In response to the wake-word event (e.g., in response to the signal SW indicating the wake-word event), the voice extractor 572 is configured to receive and format (e.g., packetize) the sound-data stream SDS. For instance, the voice extractor 572 packetizes the frames of the sound-data stream SDS into messages.
After the voice extractor 572 packetizes the frames of the sound-data stream SDS into messages, the NMD 503 may perform some form of extraction. The extraction may take various forms which will now be described.
According to one implementation, referred to as “extraction” (and as opposed to “local extraction”), the voice extractor 572 transmits or streams these messages, MV, that may contain voice input in real time or near real time to a remote VAS, such as the VAS 190 (
According to the local extraction implementation, the voice extractor 572 transmits or streams these messages, MV, that may contain voice input in real time or near real time to local (e.g., playback or network microphone) device on the same local area network as NMD 503 via the network interface 224. The local device receives messages of the sound-data stream from NMD 503 and any other NMDs that have identified a same wake word based and performs arbitration by selecting the NMD that identified the given wake word with the highest confidence level.
In any case, The VAS is configured to process the sound-data stream SDS contained in the messages MV sent from the NMD 503. More specifically, the VAS is configured to identify voice input based on the sound-data stream SDS. Referring to
In the standard extraction implementation, the VAS may first process the wake word portion 680a within the sound-data stream SDS to verify the presence of the wake word. In some instances, the VAS may determine that the wake word portion 680a comprises a false wake word (e.g., the word “Election” when the word “Alexa” is the target wake word). In such an occurrence, the VAS may send a response to the NMD 503 (
In any case, the VAS processes the voice utterance portion 680b to identify the presence of any words in the detected-sound data and to determine an underlying intent from these words. The words may correspond to a certain command and certain keywords 684 (identified individually in
To determine the intent of the words, the VAS is typically in communication with one or more databases associated with the VAS (not shown) and/or one or more databases (not shown) of the MPS 100. Such databases may store various user data, analytics, catalogs, and other information for natural language processing and/or other processing. In some implementations, such databases may be updated for adaptive learning and feedback for a neural network based on voice-input processing. In some cases, the voice utterance portion 680b may include additional information, such as detected pauses (e.g., periods of non-speech) between words spoken by a user, as shown in
After processing the voice input, the VAS may send a response to the MPS 100 with an instruction to perform one or more actions based on an intent it determined from the voice input. For example, based on the voice input, the VAS may direct the MPS 100 to initiate playback on one or more of the playback devices 102, control one or more of these devices (e.g., raise/lower volume, group/ungroup devices, etc.), turn on/off certain smart devices, among other actions. After receiving the response from the VAS, the wake-word engine 570 of the NMD 503 (
NMD 503 may also include a local arbitrator 576. Local arbitrator 576 may configure the NMD 503 to take various roles, such an arbitrator-related role. In an implementation, local arbitrator 576 may configure an NMD to be either an arbitrator or a non-arbitrator. If the NMD is configured to be an arbitrator, the NMD may perform some or all arbitration functions related to selecting a particular NMD amongst multiple NMDs (including itself) as the device from which VAS responses will be output and the source device from which sound data will be extracted, for instance based on determining that the particular NMD identified a given wake word with the highest confidence level. If the NMD is not configured to be a non-arbitrator, the NMD may be configured not to perform the function of arbitration, and to defer the function of performing arbitration to a local device that is designated as an arbitrator and/or to a remote network device, such as a VAS that is configured to perform arbitration. Local arbitrator 576 may designate an NMD as an arbitrator or non-arbitrator in various manners, for instance based on the NMD's role, based on a selection by a user, etc.
Local arbitrator 576 may determine whether to designate an NMD as an arbitrator or non-arbitrator based on receiving one or more messages, such as UPnP eventing messages, as one example. Local arbitrator 576 may determine whether to designate an NMD as an arbitrator or non-arbitrator in various other manners as well.
Returning to
In some implementations, the one or more identification algorithms may be third-party identification algorithms (i.e., developed by a company other than the company that provides the NMD 103). For instance, operators of a voice service (e.g., AMAZON) may make their respective algorithms (e.g., identification algorithms corresponding to AMAZON's ALEXA) available for use in third-party devices (e.g., NMDs 103), which are then trained to identify one or more wake words for the particular voice service. Additionally, or alternatively, the one or more identification algorithms may be first-party identification algorithms that are developed and trained to identify certain wake words that may not be particular to a given voice service. Other possibilities also exist.
In practice, a wake-word engine may include a sensitivity level setting that is modifiable. The sensitivity level may define a degree of similarity between a word identified in the detected sound stream SDS and the wake-word engine 570's one or more particular wake words that is considered to be a match (i.e., that triggers the NMD 103 to invoke the corresponding VAS). In other words, the sensitivity level defines how closely, as one example, the spectral characteristics in the detected sound stream SDS must match the spectral characteristics of the engine's one or more wake words to be a wake-word trigger.
In this respect, the sensitivity level generally controls how many false positives that the wake-word engine 570 identifies. For example, if a wake-word engine 570 is configured to identify the wake-word “Alexa” with a relatively high sensitivity, then false wake words of “Election” or “Lexus” would cause the wake-word engine 570 to flag the presence of the wake-word “Alexa.” On the other hand, if this example wake-word engine 570 is configured with a relatively low sensitivity, then the false wake words of “Election” or “Lexus” would not cause the wake-word engine 570 to flag the presence of the wake-word “Alexa.”
In practice, a sensitivity level may take a variety of forms. In example implementations, a sensitivity level takes the form of a confidence threshold that defines a minimum confidence (i.e., probability) level for a wake-word engine that serves as a dividing line between triggering or not triggering a wake-word event when the wake-word engine is analyzing detected sound for its particular wake word. In this regard, a higher sensitivity level corresponds to a lower confidence threshold (and more false positives), whereas a lower sensitivity level corresponds to a higher confidence threshold (and fewer false positives). For example, lowering a wake-word engine's confidence threshold configures it to trigger a wake-word event when it identifies words that have a lower likelihood that they are the actual particular wake word, whereas raising the confidence threshold configures the engine to trigger a wake-word event when it identifies words that have a higher likelihood that they are the actual particular wake word. Other examples of sensitivity levels are also possible.
In example implementations, sensitivity level parameters (e.g., the range of sensitivities) for a particular wake-word engine can be updated, which may occur in a variety of manners. As one possibility, a VAS or other third-party provider of a given wake-word engine may provide to the NMD 503 a wake-word engine update that modifies one or more sensitivity level parameters for the given wake-word engine.
As another possibility, a remote server associated with the MPS 100 may update (or define in the first instance) sensitivity level parameters for a given wake-word engine, which it may do periodically or aperiodically. In some such cases, the remote server may define or otherwise update sensitivity level parameters for wake-word engines based on data regarding characteristics of detected sound (e.g., spectral and/or gain characteristics) associated with past occurrences of wake-word triggers (i.e., identifications of the respective particular wake-words for the given engines). In practice, the remote server may receive such data from NMDs when wake-word triggers occur or from another source of wake-word related sound data (e.g., Internet databases or the like). In any case, the remote server may be configured to perform operations based on such data (e.g., train predictive models and/or run simulations) to determine sensitivity parameters for a given wake-word engine to balance false positives and true identifications of the particular wake word.
In example embodiments, a wake-word engine 570 may take a variety of forms. For example, a wake-word 570 may take the form of one or more modules that are stored in memory of the NMD 503 (e.g., the memory 213;
With reference still to
In some embodiments, one or more of the components described above can operate in conjunction with the microphones 222 to detect and store a user's voice profile, which may be associated with a user account of the MPS 100. In some embodiments, voice profiles may be stored as and/or compared to variables stored in a set of command information or data table. The voice profile may include aspects of the tone or frequency of a user's voice and/or other unique aspects of the user, such as those described in previously-referenced U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/438,749.
In some embodiments, one or more of the components described above can operate in conjunction with the microphones 222 to determine the location of a user in the home environment and/or relative to a location of one or more of the NMDs 103. Techniques for determining the location or proximity of a user may include one or more techniques disclosed in previously-referenced U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/438,749, U.S. Pat. No. 9,084,058 filed Dec. 29, 2011, and titled “Sound Field Calibration Using Listener Localization,” and U.S. Pat. No. 8,965,033 filed Aug. 31, 2012, and titled “Acoustic Optimization.” Each of these applications is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
In some embodiments, the MPS 100 is configured to temporarily reduce the volume of audio content that it is playing while identifying the wake word portion 610 of a voice input. For instance, the MPS 100 may restore the volume after processing the voice input 600. Such a process can be referred to as ducking, examples of which are disclosed in previously-referenced U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/438,749.
III. Example Local Arbitration and Designation of VAS Response Playback
Further examples of local arbitration and designation of a playback device to output a VAS response with will now be described in detail. As discussed above, multiple playback or NMDs devices may combined in various manners. For example, NMD-equipped playback devices 102 may be bonded to form a “bonded set.” In a bonded set, a playback device may have a different playback responsibility than another playback device in the set. For instance, a first playback device of a bonded set may be responsible for audio playback of a left audio channel, and a second playback device may be responsible for playback of a right audio channel. An example of such a bonded set is shown and described above in connection with
In various implementations, implementing an arbitrator NMD in a bonded set may prevent the ping-pong effect. Further, an arbitrator NMD may conserve bandwidth by reducing the number of NMDs that communicate with a VAS when multiple NMDs identify a same wake word. In addition, or alternatively, an NMD may also be designated as the arbitrator NMD for a set of NMD-equipped playback devices comprising a group of playback devices in which none or only some of the playback devices are assigned a playback responsibility.
Turning to the example illustrated in
In the context of
In example embodiments, at least one of the playback devices 102 may comprise a device, such as the arbitrator NMD, which may be the default NMD for outputting VAS responses in a set of NMDs. While the arbitrator NMD is described according to various examples as the default NMD for outputting VAS responses, it should be understood that devices other than the arbitrator NMD may also be designated as the default device for outputting VAS responses.
The arbitrator NMD may also be responsible for selecting which of NMDs 102 that is to extract detected-sound data for evaluation by a VAS. In some examples, the arbitrator NMD may be an NMD that has a greater amount of computational resources (e.g., processing power, memory, storage, etc.). In some examples, a device other than the arbitrator NMD may be configured to extract the detected-sound data.
For example, in some implementations, the arbitrator NMD may be assigned during the configuration of the media playback system that includes the two or more NMDs, which may be arranged as a bonded set. According to an implementation, UPnP eventing may be used to set the value of a state indicator that specifies the identity of the arbitrator NMD to a VAS and/or to other playback devices on a same network as the arbitrator NMD. A user may also manually specify the arbitrator NMD during the configuration of the media playback system. In some cases, the arbitrator responsibilities may be assigned to a given NMD in the set based on the NMD's role or hardware resources.
In some implementations, the arbitrator responsibilities may be assigned to a given NMD based on other considerations. For instance, the arbitrator responsibilities may be assigned to an NMD that has already been assigned other responsibilities within the media playback system. As one example, an NMD designated as the “group coordinator” that is responsible for facilitating synchronous playback of audio among the two or more NMDs may be assigned arbitrator responsibilities as well. As another example, an NMD designated as the “primary” device that is responsible for playing back a given audio channel, such as the center channel (e.g., playback device 102j) of a home theatre setup or either the left channel of a stereo pair setup, may also be assigned the arbitrator responsibilities.
In any case, in accordance with example embodiments provided herein, local arbitration may generally involve two or more NMD-equipped playback devices (e.g., NMD-equipped playback devices 102a, 102b, and 102j) of the media playback system identifying a particular wake word, the arbitrator NMD (e.g., NMD-equipped playback device 102b) selecting one of the NMD-equipped playback devices to extract detected-sound data that may include a voice input for evaluation by the VAS, and after evaluation of the detected-sound data by the VAS, the arbitrator NMD playing back a VAS response indicated by VAS response data generated by the VAS.
More specifically, in an example implementation, each non-arbitrator device (e.g., NMD-equipped playback devices 102b and 102j) NMD that identifies a particular wake word may transmit to the arbitrator NMD a notification that a wake word was identified. In some examples, a given notification may include a confidence level that the given non-arbitrator NMD identified the particular wake word correctly. In the case that an identifying NMD is the arbitrator NMD, the arbitrator NMD may not transmit a message that includes a confidence level but instead may generate an internal notification, which may include a confidence level that the arbitrator NMD identified the wake word correctly.
In practice, a confidence level may take various forms. For example, the confidence level may be metadata such as a metric calculated based on audio properties of the received wake word. Examples of some such metrics that may be used to calculate the confidence level may include a signal-to-noise ratio (SnR), a frequency spectrum of the identified wake word, a direction of the identified wake word, an amplitude (e.g., decibel level) of the identified wake word, etc. A confidence level may take various other forms as well.
In turn, the NMD-equipped playback device comprising the arbitrator NMD receives each of the notifications. Based on these notifications received, the arbitrator NMD may determine that more than one of the NMD-equipped playback devices 102 has identified the wake word at the same time. In response to this determination, the arbitrator NMD may next select which of the identifying NMDs is to extract the detected-sound data that may include a voice input for evaluation by the VAS. The arbitrator NMD may make this selection in various manners.
As one example, if the notifications include respective confidence levels in their identification of the wake word, the arbitrator NMD may select the NMD having the highest confidence level. For instance, if the NMD-equipped playback device 102a identifies the wake word with a higher confidence level than the arbitrator NMD, the arbitrator NMD may select that playback device over all other playback devices of the set. As another example, if the NMDs have differing roles, the arbitrator NMD 102b may use these roles as a basis for selecting which of the NMDs is to extract detected-sound data. For instance, if the NMD of NMD-equipped playback device 102j has a group coordinator role in the bonded set in
After selecting an NMD to extract the detected-sound data, the arbitrator NMD may cause the selected NMD to extract the detected-sound data that may include the voice input for evaluation by the VAS. In this respect, it should be understood that the extraction NMD may differ from, or be the same as, the arbitrator NMD that is designated to output a voice output. The process of causing the selected NMD to extract the detected-sound data may take various forms.
As one example, if the arbitrator NMD selects a non-arbitrator NMD such as the NMD-equipped playback device 102b, then the arbitrator NMD may send an instruction to this non-arbitrator NMD to extract the detected-sound data that may include a voice input for evaluation by the appropriate VAS. As another example, if the arbitrator NMD selects itself for extraction, then the arbitrator NMD 102b may trigger its internal voice capture components (e.g., VCC 510) to extract the detected-sound data for evaluation by the VAS.
After extracting the detected-sound data, the selected NMD may format the detected-sound data into a sound-data stream and transmit the sound-data stream containing at least the detected-voice data that may include a voice input (and perhaps also the wake word) to the VAS either directly via a communication network that couples the VAS and the media playback system or indirectly via the arbitrator NMD. In this respect, only one NMD or NMD-equipped playback device transmits a sound-data stream to the VAS, which consumes significantly less bandwidth than when multiple devices make such transmission.
After receiving the voice utterance of the voice input, the VAS may generate a VAS response that is based at least on the voice utterance of the voice input. In this regard, the VAS advantageously only has to process a single sound-data stream from the media playback system and does not need to perform analyses related to remote arbitration, which may help to conserve the VAS' compute resources.
Thereafter, the VAS may determine the identity of the arbitrator NMD 102b and send to the arbitrator NMD 102b a message including, or otherwise indicating, the VAS response via the communication network.
The VAS may determine the identity of the arbitrator NMD 102b in various different manners. According to an embodiment, the VAS may identify the arbitrator NMD 102b via UPNP. As one example, UPNP eventing may be used to set the value of a state indicator that specifies the identity of the arbitrator NMD 102b to the VAS. In practice, the group coordinator of a bonded set may be the arbitrator NMD. The VAS may determine the identity of the arbitrator NMD in various other manners as well.
After receiving the VAS response message, the arbitrator NMD outputs the VAS response. In this way, the media playback system exhibits a more predictable behavior that aligns with users' expectations. Outputting the VAS response may comprise playing back spoken words, audible tones, and/or various other forms of audio played back in response to a voice input. Outputting the VAS response may also take the form of outputting various visual signals such as one or more lights, outputting graphics on a display, etc. Some of these VAS responses may indicate whether the VAS and/or the NMD will perform a given action (e.g., begin music playback, output requested information, etc.) specified by the voice utterance of the voice input. VAS responses may take various other forms as well.
In line with the above discussion, and with reference to
IV. Example Use Cases
Turning now to
The network media playback system depicted in
An example behavior of a set of NMD-equipped playback devices of a media playback system in response to a user speaking a voice input comprising a voice input comprising a wake word and a voice utterance will now be described in greater detail. In the illustrated example of
In the example of
After receiving the confidence levels from each of the playback devices, the front playback device 102b selects the playback device which identified the given wake word with the highest confidence level, the right playback device 102a in this example, to perform local extraction. In some examples, the right playback device 102a may send instructions to cause the non-selected playback device 102j to cease performing local extraction. Playback device 102b may send an instruction to cause left playback device 102a to perform local extraction.
In any case, after selecting the right playback device 102a to perform local extraction, the front playback device 102b sends the extracted sound-data stream received from the right playback device 102a to a remote network device, such as VAS 190, which in turn determines the intent of the voice input included in the sound-data stream and sends voice output response data back to the arbitrator NMD, which is the front playback device 102b in this example.
In turn, the front playback device 102b generates a voice output response which may take the form of an audio or visual response based on the voice output response data received from VAS 190. In the example of
Turning now to
The network media playback system depicted in
In the example depicted in
After receiving the confidence levels from each of the playback devices, the front playback device 102b selects the playback device which detected the given wake word with the highest confidence level, which is the front playback device 102b itself in this example, to perform local extraction. In some examples, in addition to selecting itself to perform local extraction, the front playback device 102b may send instructions to cause non-selected playback devices 102a and 102j to cease performing local extraction.
In any case, after the front playback device 102b selects itself to perform local extraction, the front playback device 102b sends the sound-data stream extracted locally to a remote network device, such as VAS 190, which in turn determines the intent of the voice input included in the sound-data stream and sends VAS response data back to the arbitrator device, which is the front the playback device 102b.
In turn, the front playback device 102b generates a VAS response which may take the form of an audio or visual response based on the VAS response data received from VAS 190. In the example of
Turning now to
To begin the flow illustrated in
Next, at block 810, the playback device 102b may compare sound features (e.g., as part of performing arbitration), such as confidence levels included in the sound features received from the playback device 102a and the playback device 102j and may select the playback device that detected the given wake word with the highest confidence level, which in this example is playback device 102a.
In some examples, after selecting a playback device, the arbitrator NMD, in this case playback device 102b, may output a confirmation 812 to indicate to any users that playback device 102b is designated as the arbitrator NMD and as such users should expect playback device 102b to generate and output any VAS responses. Outputting a VAS response take various forms. As an example, the VAS response may take the form of an audio indication (e.g., a voice response) and/or visual indication that playback device 102b may output. Outputting a VAS response may take various other forms as well.
At block 814, the playback device 102b may transmit the extracted sound data, (e.g., an extracted sound-data stream) received from the selected playback device 102a to the remote device 106a. At block 816, the remote device 106a, which may comprise a VAS, may process the voice input included in the extracted sound data 814 received from playback device 102b.
At block 818, the playback device 102b may transmit an instruction to cause playback device 102j to stop local extraction 818 due to the playback device 102b selecting playback device 102a to perform local extraction rather than playback device 102j. While block 818 is illustrated as occurring after block 814 and block 816, block 818 may occur before or between either of these blocks as well.
At block 820, after receiving sufficient extracted sound data to process the voice input, remote device 106a may transmit message 820 to cause the playback device 102b to stop extraction. Playback device 102b may, in turn, send a message to the selected playback device 102a to cause the playback device 102a to stop performing local extraction (not pictured for the sake of clarity).
At block 822, the playback device 102b may receive VAS response data, and based on the received VAS response data, the playback device 102b may process (block 824) a VAS response, which may comprise outputting a VAS response, based on the received VAS response data.
Turning now to
To begin the flow illustrated in
Next, at block 810, the playback device 102b may compare sound features, such as the received confidence levels included in the first and second sound features received from the playback device 102a and the playback device 102j, and optionally sound features detected by the playback device 102b itself, and may select the playback device that detected the given wake word with the highest confidence level, which may be the playback device 102j in the example of
In some examples, at block 812, after selecting a playback device, the arbitrator NMD, in this case the playback device 102b, may output a confirmation to indicate to any users that the playback device 102b is designated as the arbitrator NMD and as such, users should expect the playback device 102b to generate and output any VAS outputs. Outputting a confirmation may take various forms. As an example, the output confirmation may take the form of an audio indication (e.g., a voice response) and/or visual indication that the playback device 102b may output.
At block 842, the playback device 102b may transmit an instruction to cause the selected playback device 102j to begin performing extraction. In turn, at block 844, the playback device 102j may transmit extracted sound data, which may take the form of a sound-data stream, to the remote device 106a.
After the remote device 106a receives the extracted sound data, the remote device 106a may process the voice input 816 included in the extracted sound data received from the playback device 102j. Then, at block 846, after receiving sufficient extracted sound data to process the voice input, the remote device 106a may transmit a message to cause the playback device 102j to stop extraction.
Then, at block 852, remote device 106a may send a VAS response to the playback device 102j. Playback device 102j, in turn, transmits the VAS response data to the playback device 102b (block 854), which is designated as the arbitrator.
At block 856, the playback device 102b may receive VAS response data, and based on the received VAS response data, the playback device 102b may process (block 856) a VAS response, such as outputting a voice response, based on the received VAS response data.
In various implementations, the arbitrator NMD may also identify wake words as shown at block 800 in
In some implementations, NMDs and/or NMD-equipped playback devices may interact with one or more remote servers for remote arbitration between sets of devices (e.g., between two arbitrator NMDs of different sets of NMD-equipped playback devices) and/or between a set of devices and one or more NMDs that are not part of the set. In any case, each NMD that is configured to interact with the remote VAS for such arbitration may detect sound, capture detected-sound data in a respective buffer, identify the same wake word, and extract the detected-sound data that may include a voice input from the respective buffer. They may then send their respective extracted detected-sound data and voice inputs in the form of a detected-sound data stream to a VAS that determines which one NMD identified the wake word with a higher level of confidence.
Referring to
The network media playback system depicted in
An example behavior of media playback system in response to a user speaking a voice input comprising a voice input comprising a wake word and a voice utterance will now be described. In the example of
After receiving the confidence levels from each of the playback devices, the front playback device 102b selects the playback device which detected the given wake word with the highest confidence level. As an example, the left playback device 102a may have detected the given wake word with the highest level, and consequently the front playback device 102b may select the left playback device 102j to perform local extraction for the bonded set and may transmit an extracted sound-data stream from the selected left playback device 102j to the VAS for arbitration and voice processing. In some examples, as a result of selecting the left playback device 102a to perform local extraction, the front playback device 102b may send instructions to cause the non-selected playback device 102j and itself, to cause them to cease performing local extraction.
In addition to the local arbitration performed by the bonded set, the playback device 102e from the Bedroom zone group also detects the given wake word and may perform extraction by sending data indicating a confidence level determined associated with the identifying the given wake word and sound-stream data captured by the playback device 102e to a VAS for arbitration and voice processing.
After the VAS receives the confidence levels from the selected playback devices, namely the playback device 102e of the Bedroom zone group and the left playback device 102j, the VAS performs arbitration by selecting the playback device from the Bedroom zone group or the bonded set that detects the given wake word with the highest confidence level. In this example, the playback device 102e of the Bedroom zone group detects the given wake word with the highest confidence level.
After selecting the playback device 102e, VAS 190 determines the intent of the voice input included in the extracted sound-data stream received from the playback device 102e and also sends voice output response data back to the selected device, which is the playback device 102e in this example. In some examples, VAS 190 may also send an instruction to cause the device a non-selected device, such as the left playback device 102j or the front playback device 102b and/or not to output a VAS response.
After the selected playback device 102e receives the voice output data, playback device 102e generates a VAS response which may take the form of an audio or visual response based on the voice output response data received from VAS 190. In the example of
Turning now to
To begin the flow illustrated in
At block 960, and after identifying the wake word at block 902, the playback device 102e may also output a confirmation, which may be similar to the confirmation output by the playback device 102b. At block 962, the playback device 102e may transmit its own locally-extracted sound data, which may take the form of metadata that may include sound features that may define a confidence level, as well as an extracted sound-data stream, to the remote device 106a for arbitration.
At block 964, after receiving extracted sound data from the playback device 102e and the bonded set of playback devices, the remote device 106a may processes the received extracted sound data. Processing the extracted sound data further includes processing the voice input included in the extracted sound data received from the playback device 102b that identified the given wake word with the highest confidence level. Additionally, block 964 may include the remote device 106a performing arbitration between the playback device 102e and the arbitrator NMD (the NMD-equipped playback device 102b, not pictured) of the bonded set of playback devices. More particularly in the example of
At block 968, after receiving sufficient extracted sound data to process the voice input, the remote device 106a may transmit a message to cause the playback device 102e to stop extraction. Then, at block 970, remote device 106a may send VAS response data to the playback device 102e.
Finally, at block 972, the playback device 102e may receive the VAS response data, and based on the received VAS response data, may process (e.g., output) a VAS response based on the received VAS response data.
As another example, if the remote device 106a determines that the bonded set of playback devices detected the wake word with a higher confidence level than the playback device 102e, the remote device 106a can process extracted sound data that it receives from the bonded set (and cease extraction from the playback device 102e). The remote device 106a can then provide a VAS response to the arbitrator NMD, as described above.
V. Example Local Arbitration and Output Designation Flow Diagram
For purposes of illustration only, an example method 1000 for locally arbitrating between two or more playback devices in accordance with this disclosure is depicted in
Turning now to
At block 1004, the first playback device may identify a wake word based on the detected sound. The first playback device may identify the wake word based on the detected sound from a notification generated by the playback device or received from a second playback device, i.e., a non-arbitrating playback device.
At block 1006, the first playback device may receive, via the network interface 224, an indication that the second playback device, which may be in a bonded set or group with the first playback device, has also detected the sound and identified the wake word based on the sound as detected by the other playback device
At block 1008, after receiving the indication, the first playback device may evaluate which of the playback devices in a set or group of devices is to extract sound data representing the sound. In the illustrated exampled depicted in
At block 1010, in response to determining that the second playback device is to extract the sound data, the first playback device may forego extraction of the sound data at the first playback device. In some embodiments, the first playback device may then forward the extracted sound data of the second playback device to the VAS, while in other embodiments, the second playback device may directly transmit the extracted sound data to the VAS without forwarding the sound data to the first playback device, as discussed above.
At block 1012, the first playback device may receive, via the network interface 224 and from a network-based system configured to evaluate sound data for voice input and determine a corresponding VAS response (e.g., VAS 190), VAS response data that is indicative of a given VAS response corresponding to a given voice input identified in the sound data extracted by the second playback device.
Then, at block 1014, based on the VAS response data, the first playback device may output the given VAS response via one or more interfaces, such audio output interface 519, a visual interface or in various other manners.
The description above discloses, among other things, various example systems, methods, apparatus, and articles of manufacture including, among other components, firmware and/or software executed on hardware. It is understood that such examples are merely illustrative and should not be considered as limiting. For example, it is contemplated that any or all of the firmware, hardware, and/or software aspects or components can be embodied exclusively in hardware, exclusively in software, exclusively in firmware, or in any combination of hardware, software, and/or firmware. Accordingly, the examples provided are not the only way(s) to implement such systems, methods, apparatus, and/or articles of manufacture.
The specification is presented largely in terms of illustrative environments, systems, procedures, steps, logic blocks, processing, and other symbolic representations that directly or indirectly resemble the operations of data processing devices coupled to networks. These process descriptions and representations are typically used by those skilled in the art to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. Numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the present disclosure. However, it is understood to those skilled in the art that certain embodiments of the present disclosure can be practiced without certain, specific details. For example, in some implementations the arbitrator NMD may be configured to disregard some or all other NMDs in a set of bonded devices, such as by disabling wake-word detection on some or all of the NMDs in the set (e.g., to mitigate or further mitigate a ping-pong effect). In other instances, well known methods, procedures, components, and circuitry have not been described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring aspects of the embodiments. Accordingly, the scope of the present disclosure is defined by the appended claims rather than the forgoing description of embodiments.
When any of the appended claims are read to cover a purely software and/or firmware implementation, at least one of the elements in at least one example is hereby expressly defined to include a tangible, non-transitory medium such as a memory, DVD, CD, Blu-ray, and so on, storing the software and/or firmware.
The present technology is illustrated, for example, according to various aspects described below. Various examples of aspects of the present technology are described as numbered examples (1, 2, 3, etc.) for convenience. These are provided as examples and do not limit the present technology. It is noted that any of the dependent examples may be combined in any combination, and placed into a respective independent example. The other examples can be presented in a similar manner.
Example 1: A computer-implemented method comprising: detecting sound via at least one microphone, identifying a wake word based on the sound as detected by a first playback device, receiving, via a network interface, an indication that a second playback device has also detected the sound and identified the wake word based on the sound as detected by the second playback device, after receiving the indication, evaluating which of the first and second playback devices is to extract sound data representing the sound and thereby determining that the extraction of the sound data is to be performed by the second playback device over the first playback device, in response to the determining, foregoing extraction of the sound data at the first playback device, receiving, via the network interface from a network-based system that is configured to evaluate sound data for voice input and determine a corresponding VAS (Voice Assistant Service) response, VAS response data that is indicative of a given VAS response corresponding to a given voice input identified in the sound data extracted by the second playback device, and based on the VAS response data, playing back the given VAS response via an audio output interface.
Example 2: the computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein identifying the wake word based on the sound as detected by the first playback device triggers the first playback device to determine a first feature of the sound as detected by the first playback device, wherein the indication that the second playback device has also detected the sound and identified the wake word based on the sound as detected by the second playback device comprises an indication of a second feature of the sound as detected by the second playback device, and wherein evaluating which of the first and second playback devices is to extract the sound data comprises comparing the first feature to the second feature.
Example 3: the computer-implemented method of any combination of Examples 1-2, wherein the first feature comprises a first signal-to-noise ratio of the sound as detected by the first playback device, and wherein the second feature comprises a second signal-to-noise ratio of the sound as detected by the second playback device.
Example 4: The computer-implemented method of any combination of Examples 1-3, in response to the determining, instructing the second playback device to perform the extraction of the sound data.
Example 5: The computer-implemented method of any combination of Examples 1-4, wherein the extraction of the sound data involves transmission of the sound data to the network-based system.
Example 6: The computer-implemented method of any combination of Examples 1-5, further comprising: receiving the sound data from the second playback device via the network interface, and transmitting the received sound data to the network-based system via the network interface.
Example 7: The computer-implemented method of any combination of Examples 1-6, further comprising: detecting a second sound via the at least one microphone, identifying the wake word based on the second sound as detected by the first playback device, receiving, via the network interface, a second indication that the second playback device has also detected the second sound and identified the wake word based on the second sound as detected by the second playback device, after receiving the second indication, evaluating which of the first and second playback devices is to extract second sound data representing the second sound and thereby determining that the extraction of the second sound data is to be performed by the first playback device over the second playback device, begin to perform the extraction of the second sound data, and thereafter cease the extraction of the second sound data in response to receiving an indication that the network-based system has selected a third playback device to extract the second sound data.
Example 8: The computer-implemented method of any combination of examples 1-7, wherein the first playback device and the second playback device are members of a bonded set, and wherein the third playback device is not a member of the bonded set.
Example 9: The computer-implemented method of any combination of examples 1-8, wherein the VAS response data comprises at least one of (a) a data representation of the given VAS response or (b) an identifier of the given VAS response.
Example 10: A first playback device, comprising: at least one microphone, an audio output interface, a network interface, at least one processor, a non-transitory computer-readable medium; and program instructions stored on the non-transitory computer-readable medium that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the first playback device to perform functions comprising: any combination of Examples 1-9.
Example 11: A tangible, non-transitory, computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon that are executable by one or more processors to cause a first playback device to perform operations comprising: any combination of Examples 1-10.
This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 120 as a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/219,702 filed on Dec. 13, 2018, and titled “NETWORKED MICROPHONE DEVICES, SYSTEMS, & METHODS OF LOCALIZED ARBITRATION,” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4741038 | Elko et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4941187 | Slater | Jul 1990 | A |
4974213 | Siwecki | Nov 1990 | A |
5036538 | Oken et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5440644 | Farinelli et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5588065 | Tanaka et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5740260 | Odom | Apr 1998 | A |
5761320 | Farinelli et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5923902 | Inagaki | Jul 1999 | A |
5949414 | Namikata et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6032202 | Lea et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6088459 | Hobelsberger | Jul 2000 | A |
6256554 | DiLorenzo | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6301603 | Maher et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311157 | Strong | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6366886 | Dragosh et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6404811 | Cvetko et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408078 | Hobelsberger | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6469633 | Wachter | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6522886 | Youngs et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6594347 | Calder et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594630 | Zlokarnik et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611537 | Edens et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611604 | Irby et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6631410 | Kowalski et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6757517 | Chang | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6778869 | Champion | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6937977 | Gerson | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7099821 | Visser et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103542 | Doyle | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7130608 | Hollstrom et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130616 | Janik | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7143939 | Henzerling | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7174299 | Fujii et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7228275 | Endo et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7236773 | Thomas | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7295548 | Blank et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7356471 | Ito et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7383297 | Atsmon et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7391791 | Balassanian et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7483538 | McCarty et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7571014 | Lambourne et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7577757 | Carter et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7630501 | Blank et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7643894 | Braithwaite et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7657910 | McAulay et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7661107 | Van et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7702508 | Bennett | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7792311 | Holmgren et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7853341 | McCarty et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7961892 | Fedigan | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7987294 | Bryce et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
3014423 | Thaler et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
8019076 | Lambert | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8032383 | Bhardwaj et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8041565 | Bhardwaj et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8045952 | Qureshey et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8073125 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8073681 | Baldwin et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8103009 | McCarty et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8136040 | Fleming | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8165867 | Fish | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8234395 | Millington | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8239206 | LeBeau et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8255224 | Singleton et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8284982 | Bailey | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8290603 | Lambourne | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8340975 | Rosenberger | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8364481 | Strope et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8385557 | Tashev et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8386261 | Mellott et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8386523 | Mody et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8423893 | Ramsay et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8428758 | Naik et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8453058 | Coccaro et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8473618 | Spear et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8483853 | Lambourne | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8484025 | Moreno et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8588849 | Patterson et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8600443 | Kawaguchi et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8710970 | Oelrich et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8719039 | Sharifi | May 2014 | B1 |
8738925 | Park et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8775191 | Sharifi et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8831761 | Kemp et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8831957 | Taubman et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8848879 | Coughlan et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8861756 | Zhu et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8874448 | Kauffmann et al. | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8938394 | Faaborg et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
8942252 | Balassanian et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8983383 | Haskin | Mar 2015 | B1 |
8983844 | Thomas et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9015049 | Baldwin et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9042556 | Kallai et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9060224 | List | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9094539 | Noble | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9098467 | Blanksteen et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9124650 | Maharajh et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9124711 | Park et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9148742 | Koulomzin et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9190043 | Krisch et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9208785 | Ben-David et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9215545 | Dublin et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9245527 | Lindahl | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9251793 | Lebeau et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9253572 | Beddingfield, Sr. et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9262612 | Cheyer | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9263042 | Sharifi | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9275637 | Salvador et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9288597 | Carlsson et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9300266 | Grokop | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9304736 | Whiteley et al. | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9307321 | Unruh | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9318107 | Sharifi | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9319816 | Narayanan | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9324322 | Torok et al. | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9335819 | Jaeger et al. | May 2016 | B1 |
9361878 | Boukadakis | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9361885 | Ganong, III et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9368105 | Freed et al. | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9373329 | Strope et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9374634 | Macours | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9386154 | Baciu et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9390708 | Hoffmeister | Jul 2016 | B1 |
9401058 | De La Fuente et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9412392 | Lindahl et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9426567 | Lee et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9431021 | Scalise et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9443516 | Katuri et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9443527 | Watanabe et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9472201 | Sleator | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9472203 | Ayrapetian et al. | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9484030 | Meaney et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9489948 | Chu et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9494683 | Sadek | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9509269 | Rosenberg | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9510101 | Polleros | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9514476 | Kay et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9514752 | Sharifi | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9516081 | Tebbs et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9536541 | Chen et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9548053 | Basye et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9548066 | Jain et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9552816 | Vanlund et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9554210 | Ayrapetian et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9560441 | McDonough, Jr. et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9576591 | Kim et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9601116 | Casado et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9615170 | Kirsch et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9615171 | O'Neill et al. | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9626695 | Balasubramanian et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9632748 | Faaborg et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9633186 | Ingrassia, Jr. et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9633368 | Greenzeiger et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9633660 | Haughay et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9633661 | Typrin et al. | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9633671 | Giacobello et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9633674 | Sinha et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9640179 | Hart et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9640183 | Jung et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9641919 | Poole et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9646614 | Bellegarda et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9648564 | Cui et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9653060 | Hilmes et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9653075 | Chen et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9659555 | Hilmes et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9672821 | Krishnaswamy et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9674587 | Triplett et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9685171 | Yang | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9691378 | Meyers et al. | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9691379 | Mathias et al. | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9697826 | Sainath et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9697828 | Prasad et al. | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9698999 | Mutagi et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9704478 | Vitaladevuni et al. | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9721566 | Newendorp et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9721568 | Polansky et al. | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9721570 | Beal et al. | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9728188 | Rosen et al. | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9734822 | Sundaram et al. | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9736578 | Iyengar et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9743204 | Welch et al. | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9743207 | Hartung | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9747011 | Lewis et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9747899 | Pogue et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9747920 | Ayrapetian et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9747926 | Sharifi et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9749760 | Lambourne | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9754605 | Chhetri | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9762967 | Clarke et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9769420 | Moses | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9779725 | Sun et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9779732 | Lee et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9779734 | Lee | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9779735 | Civelli et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9805733 | Park | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9811314 | Plagge et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9813810 | Nongpiur | Nov 2017 | B1 |
9813812 | Berthelsen et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9818407 | Secker-Walker et al. | Nov 2017 | B1 |
9820036 | Tritschler et al. | Nov 2017 | B1 |
9820039 | Lang | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9826306 | Lang | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9865259 | Typrin et al. | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9865264 | Gelfenbeyn et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9881616 | Beckley et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9900723 | Choisel et al. | Feb 2018 | B1 |
9916839 | Scalise et al. | Mar 2018 | B1 |
9947316 | Millington et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9947333 | David | Apr 2018 | B1 |
9972318 | Kelly et al. | May 2018 | B1 |
9972343 | Thorson et al. | May 2018 | B1 |
9973849 | Zhang et al. | May 2018 | B1 |
9979560 | Kim et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10013381 | Mayman et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10013995 | Lashkari et al. | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10025447 | Dixit et al. | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10026401 | Mutagi et al. | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10048930 | Vega et al. | Aug 2018 | B1 |
10049675 | Haughay | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10051366 | Buoni et al. | Aug 2018 | B1 |
10051600 | Zhong et al. | Aug 2018 | B1 |
10057698 | Drinkwater et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
RE47049 | Zhu et al. | Sep 2018 | E |
10068573 | Aykac et al. | Sep 2018 | B1 |
10074369 | Devaraj et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10074371 | Wang et al. | Sep 2018 | B1 |
10079015 | Lockhart et al. | Sep 2018 | B1 |
10089981 | Elangovan et al. | Oct 2018 | B1 |
10108393 | Millington et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10115400 | Wilberding | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10116748 | Farmer et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10127911 | Kim et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10134388 | Lilly | Nov 2018 | B1 |
10134399 | Lang et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10136204 | Poole et al. | Nov 2018 | B1 |
10152969 | Reilly et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10181323 | Beckhardt et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10186265 | Lockhart et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10186266 | Devaraj et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10192546 | Piersol et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10224056 | Torok et al. | Mar 2019 | B1 |
10225651 | Lang | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10229680 | Gillespie et al. | Mar 2019 | B1 |
10241754 | Kadarundalagi Raghuram Doss et al. | Mar 2019 | B1 |
10248376 | Keyser-Allen et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10276161 | Hughes et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10297256 | Reilly et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10339917 | Aleksic et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10339957 | Chenier et al. | Jul 2019 | B1 |
10346122 | Morgan | Jul 2019 | B1 |
10354650 | Gruenstein et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10365887 | Mulherkar | Jul 2019 | B1 |
10365889 | Plagge et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10366688 | Gunn et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10366699 | Dharia et al. | Jul 2019 | B1 |
10374816 | Leblang et al. | Aug 2019 | B1 |
10381001 | Gunn et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10381002 | Gunn et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10381003 | Wakisaka et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10388272 | Thomson et al. | Aug 2019 | B1 |
10433058 | Torgerson et al. | Oct 2019 | B1 |
10445057 | Vega et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10445365 | Luke et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10469966 | Lambourne | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10499146 | Lang et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10510340 | Fu et al. | Dec 2019 | B1 |
10511904 | Buoni et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10515625 | Metallinou et al. | Dec 2019 | B1 |
10522146 | Tushinskiy | Dec 2019 | B1 |
10546583 | White et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10573312 | Thomson et al. | Feb 2020 | B1 |
10573321 | Smith et al. | Feb 2020 | B1 |
10580405 | Wang et al. | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10586540 | Smith et al. | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10599287 | Kumar et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10600406 | Shapiro et al. | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10602268 | Soto | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10614807 | Beckhardt et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10621981 | Sereshki | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10622009 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2020 | B1 |
10623811 | Cwik | Apr 2020 | B1 |
10624612 | Sumi et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10643609 | Pogue et al. | May 2020 | B1 |
10645130 | Corbin et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10672383 | Thomson et al. | Jun 2020 | B1 |
10679625 | Lockhart et al. | Jun 2020 | B1 |
10681460 | Woo et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10685669 | Lan et al. | Jun 2020 | B1 |
10694608 | Baker et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10706843 | Elangovan et al. | Jul 2020 | B1 |
10712997 | Wilberding et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10728196 | Wang | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10740065 | Jarvis et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10748531 | Kim | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10762896 | Yavagal et al. | Sep 2020 | B1 |
10777189 | Fu et al. | Sep 2020 | B1 |
10797667 | Fish et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10847143 | Millington et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10847149 | Mok et al. | Nov 2020 | B1 |
10848885 | Lambourne | Nov 2020 | B2 |
RE48371 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2020 | E |
10867596 | Yoneda et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10878811 | Smith et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10878826 | Li et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10897679 | Lambourne | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10911596 | Do et al. | Feb 2021 | B1 |
10943598 | Singh et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10971158 | Patangay et al. | Apr 2021 | B1 |
11127405 | Antos et al. | Sep 2021 | B1 |
20010003173 | Lim | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010042107 | Palm | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020022453 | Balog et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026442 | Lipscomb et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020034280 | Infosino | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020046023 | Fujii et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020072816 | Shdema et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020116196 | Tran | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020124097 | Isely et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030015354 | Edwards et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030038848 | Lee et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040908 | Yang et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030070182 | Pierre et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070869 | Hlibowicki | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030072462 | Hlibowicki | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030095672 | Hobelsberger | May 2003 | A1 |
20030130850 | Badt et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030157951 | Hasty, Jr. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030235244 | Pessoa et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040024478 | Hans et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040093219 | Shin et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040105566 | Matsunaga et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127241 | Shostak | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040128135 | Anastasakos et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040234088 | McCarty et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050031131 | Browning et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050031132 | Browning et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050031133 | Browning et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050031134 | Leske | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050031137 | Browning et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050031138 | Browning et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050031139 | Browning et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050031140 | Browning | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033582 | Gadd et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050047606 | Lee et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050077843 | Benditt | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050164664 | DiFonzo et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050195988 | Tashev et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201254 | Looney et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050207584 | Bright | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050235334 | Togashi et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050254662 | Blank et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050268234 | Rossi et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283330 | Laraia et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283475 | Beranek et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004834 | Pyhalammi et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060023945 | King et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041431 | Maes | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060093128 | Oxford | May 2006 | A1 |
20060104451 | Browning et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060147058 | Wang | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060190269 | Tessel et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190968 | Jung et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060247913 | Huerta et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060262943 | Oxford | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070018844 | Sutardja | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070019815 | Asada et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070033043 | Hyakumoto | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038999 | Millington | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070060054 | Romesburg | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070071206 | Gainsboro et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070071255 | Schobben | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076131 | Li et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070076906 | Takagi et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070140058 | Mcintosh et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070140521 | Mitobe et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070142944 | Goldberg et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070147651 | Mitobe et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070201639 | Park et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070254604 | Kim | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070286426 | Xiang et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080037814 | Shau | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080090537 | Sutardja | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080090617 | Sutardja | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080144858 | Khawand et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080146289 | Korneluk et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080182518 | Lo | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080207115 | Lee et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208594 | Cross et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080221897 | Cerra et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080247530 | Barton et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080248797 | Freeman et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080291896 | Tuubel et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301729 | Broos et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090003620 | McKillop et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090005893 | Sugii et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090010445 | Matsuo | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018828 | Nakadai et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090043206 | Towfiq et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090052688 | Ishibashi et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090076821 | Brenner et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090153289 | Hope et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090191854 | Beason | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090197524 | Haff et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090220107 | Every et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228919 | Zott et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090238377 | Ramakrishnan et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090238386 | Usher et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090248397 | Garcia et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090249222 | Schmidt et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090264072 | Dai | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090323907 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326949 | Douthitt et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100014690 | Wolff et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023638 | Bowman | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100035593 | Franco et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100041443 | Yokota | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100070922 | DeMaio et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100075723 | Min et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100088100 | Lindahl | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100092004 | Kuze | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100161335 | Whynot | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100172516 | Lastrucci | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100178873 | Lee et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100179874 | Higgins et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185448 | Meisel | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100211199 | Naik et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110033059 | Bhaskar et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110035580 | Wang et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110044461 | Kuech et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110044489 | Saiki et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110046952 | Koshinaka | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110066634 | Phillips et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110091055 | Leblanc | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110103615 | Sun | May 2011 | A1 |
20110131032 | Yang, II et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145581 | Malhotra et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110170707 | Yamada et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110182436 | Murgia et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110202924 | Banguero et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110218656 | Bishop et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110267985 | Wilkinson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276333 | Wang et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110280422 | Neumeyer et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110285808 | Feng et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110289506 | Trivi et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110299706 | Sakai | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120020486 | Fried et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022863 | Cho et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022864 | Leman et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120078635 | Rothkopf et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120086568 | Scott et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120123268 | Tanaka et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120128160 | Kim et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120131125 | Seidel et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120148075 | Goh et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120162540 | Ouchi et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120163603 | Abe et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120177215 | Bose et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120183149 | Hiroe | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120224715 | Kikkeri | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120297284 | Matthews, III et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120308044 | Vander et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120308046 | Muza | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130006453 | Wang et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130024018 | Chang et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130034241 | Pandey et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130039527 | Jensen et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130051755 | Brown et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130058492 | Silzle et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130066453 | Seefeldt | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080146 | Kato et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130124211 | Mcdonough | May 2013 | A1 |
20130148821 | Sorensen | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130170647 | Reilly et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130179173 | Lee et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130183944 | Mozer et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130191119 | Sugiyama | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130191122 | Mason | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130198298 | Li et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130211826 | Mannby | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130216056 | Thyssen | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130262101 | Srinivasan | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130315420 | You | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130317635 | Bates et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130322462 | Poulsen | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130322665 | Bennett et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130324031 | Loureiro | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130329896 | Krishnaswamy et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130331970 | Beckhardt et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130332165 | Beckley et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130339028 | Rosner et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130343567 | Triplett et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140003611 | Mohammad et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140003625 | Sheen et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140003635 | Mohammad et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140005813 | Reimann | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140006026 | Lamb et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140006825 | Shenhav | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140019743 | DeLuca | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140034929 | Hamada et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140046464 | Reimann | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140064501 | Olsen et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140073298 | Rossmann | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140075306 | Rega | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140075311 | Boettcher et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140094151 | Klappert et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140100854 | Chen et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140109138 | Cannistraro et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140122075 | Bak et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140136195 | Abdossalami et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140145168 | Ohsawa et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140146983 | Kim et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140149118 | Lee et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140163978 | Basye et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140164400 | Kruglick | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140167931 | Lee et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140168344 | Shoemake et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140172953 | Blanksteen | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140181271 | Millington | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140192986 | Lee et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140195252 | Gruber et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140207457 | Biatov et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140214429 | Pantel | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140215332 | Lee et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140219472 | Huang et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140222436 | Binder et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140229184 | Shires | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140244013 | Reilly | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140244712 | Walters et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140249817 | Hart et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140252386 | Ito et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140254805 | Su et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140258292 | Thramann et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140259075 | Chang et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140269757 | Park et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140270282 | Tammi et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140274185 | Luna et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140274203 | Ganong, III et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140274218 | Kadiwala et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277650 | Zurek et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140278372 | Nakadai et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140278933 | McMillan | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140291642 | Watabe et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140303969 | Inose et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140310002 | Nitz et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140310614 | Jones | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140324203 | Coburn, IV et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140330896 | Addala et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140334645 | Yun et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140340888 | Ishisone et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140357248 | Tonshal et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140358535 | Lee et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140363022 | Dizon et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140363024 | Apodaca | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140365227 | Cash et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140369491 | Kloberdans et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140372109 | Iyer et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150006176 | Pogue et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150006184 | Marti et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150010169 | Popova et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150014680 | Yamazaki et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150016642 | Walsh et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150018992 | Griffiths et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150019201 | Schoenbach | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150019219 | Tzirkel-Hancock et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150036831 | Klippel | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150039303 | Lesso et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150039317 | Klein et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150058018 | Georges et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150063580 | Huang et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150066479 | Pasupalak et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150086034 | Lombardi et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150091709 | Reichert et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150092947 | Gossain et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150104037 | Lee et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150106085 | Lindahl | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150110294 | Chen et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150112672 | Giacobello et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150124975 | Pontoppidan | May 2015 | A1 |
20150128065 | Torii et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150134456 | Baldwin | May 2015 | A1 |
20150154976 | Mutagi | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150161990 | Sharifi | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150169279 | Duga | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150170645 | Di et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150170665 | Gundeti et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150172843 | Quan | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150179181 | Morris et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150180432 | Gao et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150181318 | Gautama et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150189438 | Hampiholi et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150200454 | Heusdens et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150200923 | Triplett | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150201271 | Diethorn et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150221678 | Yamazaki et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150222563 | Burns et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150222987 | Angel, Jr. et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150228274 | Leppanen et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150228803 | Koezuka et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150237406 | Ochoa et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150243287 | Nakano et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150245152 | Ding et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150245154 | Dadu et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150249889 | Iyer et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150253292 | Larkin et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150253960 | Lin et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150254057 | Klein et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150263174 | Yamazaki et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150271593 | Sun et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150277846 | Yen et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150280676 | Holman et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150296299 | Klippel et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150302856 | Kim et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150319529 | Klippel | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150325267 | Lee et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150331663 | Beckhardt et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150334471 | Innes et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150338917 | Steiner et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150341406 | Rockefeller et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150346845 | Di et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150348548 | Piernot et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150348551 | Gruber et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150355878 | Corbin | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150363061 | De, III et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150363401 | Chen et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150370531 | Faaborg | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150371657 | Gao | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150371659 | Gao | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150371664 | Bar-Or et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150380010 | Srinivasan | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150382047 | Van Os et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160007116 | Holman | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160018873 | Fernald et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160021458 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160026428 | Morganstern et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160029142 | Isaac et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160035321 | Cho et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160035337 | Aggarwal et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160036962 | Rand et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160042748 | Jain et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160044151 | Shoemaker et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160050488 | Matheja et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160055850 | Nakadai et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160057522 | Choisel et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160070526 | Sheen | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160072804 | Chien et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160077710 | Lewis et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160086609 | Yue et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160088036 | Corbin et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160088392 | Huttunen et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160093304 | Kim et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094718 | Mani et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094917 | Wilk et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160098393 | Hebert | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160098992 | Renard et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160103653 | Jang | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160104480 | Sharifi | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160111110 | Gautama et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160125876 | Schroeter et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160127780 | Roberts et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160133259 | Rubin et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160134966 | Fitzgerald et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160134982 | Iyer | May 2016 | A1 |
20160140957 | Duta et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160148615 | Lee et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160154089 | Altman | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160155442 | Kannan et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160155443 | Khan et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160157035 | Russell et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160162469 | Santos | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160171976 | Sun et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160173578 | Sharma et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160173983 | Berthelsen et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160180853 | Vanlund et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160189716 | Lindahl et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160192099 | Oishi et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160196499 | Khan et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160203331 | Khan et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160210110 | Feldman | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160212538 | Fullam et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160216938 | Millington | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160217789 | Lee et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160225385 | Hammarqvist | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160232451 | Scherzer | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160234204 | Rishi et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160234615 | Lambourne | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160239255 | Chavez et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160240192 | Raghuvir | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160241976 | Pearson | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160253050 | Mishra et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160260431 | Newendorp et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160283841 | Sainath et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160302018 | Russell et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160314782 | Klimanis | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160316293 | Klimanis | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160322045 | Hatfield et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160336519 | Seo et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160343866 | Koezuka et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160343949 | Seo et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160343954 | Seo et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160345114 | Hanna et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160352915 | Gautama | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160353217 | Starobin et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160353218 | Starobin et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160357503 | Triplett et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160364206 | Keyser-Allen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160366515 | Mendes et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160372113 | David et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160372688 | Seo et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160373269 | Okubo et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160373909 | Rasmussen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160379634 | Vamamoto et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170003931 | Dvortsov et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170012207 | Seo et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170012232 | Kataishi et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170019732 | Mendes et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170025124 | Mixter et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170025615 | Seo et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170025630 | Seo et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170026769 | Patel | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170032244 | Kurata | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170034263 | Archambault et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170039025 | Kielak | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170040002 | Basson et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170040018 | Tormey | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170041724 | Master et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170053648 | Chi | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170053650 | Ogawa | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170060526 | Barton et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170062734 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170070478 | Park et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170076212 | Shams et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170076720 | Gopalan et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170076726 | Bae | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170078824 | Heo | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170083285 | Meyers et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170084277 | Sharifi | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170084292 | Yoo | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170084295 | Tsiartas et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170090864 | Jorgovanovic | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170092278 | Evermann et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170092297 | Sainath et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170092299 | Matsuo | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170092889 | Seo et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170092890 | Seo et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170094215 | Western | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170103748 | Weissberg et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170103754 | Higbie et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170103755 | Jeon et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170110124 | Boesen et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170110144 | Sharifi et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170117497 | Seo et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170123251 | Nakada et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170125037 | Shin | May 2017 | A1 |
20170125456 | Kasahara | May 2017 | A1 |
20170133007 | Drewes | May 2017 | A1 |
20170133011 | Chen et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170134872 | Silva et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170139720 | Stein | May 2017 | A1 |
20170140449 | Kannan | May 2017 | A1 |
20170140748 | Roberts et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170140759 | Kumar et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170151930 | Boesen | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170177585 | Rodger et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170178662 | Ayrapetian et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170180561 | Kadiwala et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170188150 | Brunet et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170188437 | Banta | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170193999 | Aleksic et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170206896 | Ko et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170206900 | Lee et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170214996 | Yeo | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170236512 | Williams et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170236515 | Pinsky et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170242649 | Jarvis et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170242651 | Lang et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170242653 | Lang et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170242657 | Jarvis et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170243576 | Millington et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170243587 | Plagge et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170245076 | Kusano et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170255612 | Sari et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170257686 | Gautama et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170269975 | Wood et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170270919 | Parthasarathi et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170278512 | Pandya et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170287485 | Civelli et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170300990 | Tanaka et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170330565 | Daley et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170331869 | Bendahan et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170332168 | Moghimi et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170346872 | Naik et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170352357 | Fink | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170353789 | Kim et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170357475 | Lee et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170357478 | Piersol et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170366393 | Shaker et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170374454 | Bernardini et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170374552 | Xia et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180018964 | Reilly et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180018967 | Lang et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180020306 | Sheen | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180025733 | Qian et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180033428 | Kim et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180033438 | Toma et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180040324 | Wilberding | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180047394 | Tian et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180053504 | Wang et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180054506 | Hart et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180061396 | Srinivasan et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180061402 | Devaraj et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180061404 | Devaraj et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180061419 | Melendo Casado et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180061420 | Patil et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180062871 | Jones et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180084367 | Greff et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180088900 | Glaser et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180091898 | Yoon et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180091913 | Hartung et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180096683 | James et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180096696 | Mixter | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180107446 | Wilberding et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180108351 | Beckhardt et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180122372 | Wanderlust | May 2018 | A1 |
20180122378 | Mixter et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180130469 | Gruenstein et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180132217 | Stirling-Gallacher | May 2018 | A1 |
20180132298 | Birnam et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180137861 | Ogawa | May 2018 | A1 |
20180152557 | White et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180158454 | Campbell et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180165055 | Yu et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180167981 | Jonna et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180174597 | Lee et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180182383 | Kim et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180182390 | Hughes et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180182397 | Carbune et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180188948 | Ouyang et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180190274 | Kirazci et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180190285 | Heckman et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180197533 | Lyon et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180199146 | Sheen | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180204569 | Nadkar et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180205963 | Matei et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180210698 | Park et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180211665 | Park et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180218747 | Moghimi et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180219976 | Decenzo et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180225933 | Park et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180228006 | Baker et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180233130 | Kaskari et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180233136 | Torok et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180233137 | Torok et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180233139 | Finkelstein et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180233142 | Koishida et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180233150 | Gruenstein et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180234765 | Torok et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180261213 | Arik et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180262793 | Lau et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180262831 | Matheja et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180270565 | Ganeshkumar | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180277107 | Kim | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180277113 | Hartung et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180277119 | Baba et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180277133 | Deetz et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180286394 | Li et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180286414 | Ravindran et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180293484 | Wang et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180308470 | Park et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180314552 | Kim et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180322891 | Van Den Oord et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180324756 | Ryu et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180335903 | Coffman et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180336274 | Choudhury et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180349093 | McCarty et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180356962 | Corbin | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180358009 | Daley et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180365567 | Kolavennu et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180367944 | Heo et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190012141 | Piersol et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190013019 | Lawrence | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190014592 | Hampel et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190033446 | Bultan et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190042187 | Truong et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190043488 | Booklet et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190043492 | Lang | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190051298 | Lee et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190066672 | Wood et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190066687 | Wood et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190074025 | Lashkari et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190079724 | Feuz et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190081507 | Ide | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190081810 | Jung | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190082255 | Tajiri et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190087455 | He et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190088261 | Lang et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190090056 | Rexach et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190096408 | Li et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190098400 | Buoni et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190104119 | Giorgi et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190104373 | Wodrich et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190108839 | Reilly et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190115011 | Khellah et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190130906 | Kobayashi et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190163153 | Price et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190172452 | Smith et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190173687 | Mackay et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190179607 | Thangarathnam et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190179611 | Wojogbe et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190182072 | Roe et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190206391 | Busch et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190206412 | Li et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190219976 | Giorgi et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190220246 | Orr et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190221206 | Chen et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190237067 | Friedman et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190239008 | Lambourne | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190239009 | Lambourne | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190243603 | Keyser-Allen et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190243606 | Jayakumar et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190244608 | Choi et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190281397 | Lambourne | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190287546 | Ganesh | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190288970 | Siddiq | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190289367 | Siddiq | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190295542 | Huang et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190295563 | Kamdar et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190297388 | Panchaksharaiah et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190304443 | Bhagwan | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190311710 | Eraslan et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190311712 | Firik et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190311720 | Pasko | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190317606 | Jain et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190342962 | Chang et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190347063 | Liu et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190348044 | Chun et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190362714 | Mori et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190364375 | Soto et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190364422 | Zhuo | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190371310 | Fox et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200007987 | Woo et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200034492 | Verbeke et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200051554 | Kim et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200074990 | Kim et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200090647 | Kurtz | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200092687 | Devaraj et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200098354 | Lin et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200098379 | Tai et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200105245 | Gupta et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200105256 | Fainberg et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200105264 | Jang et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200152206 | Shen et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200175989 | Lockhart et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200184964 | Myers et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200184980 | Wilberding | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200193973 | Tolomei et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200211539 | Lee | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200211550 | Pan et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200211556 | Mixter et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200213729 | Soto | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200216089 | Garcia et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200234709 | Kunitake | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200251107 | Wang et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200265838 | Lee et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200310751 | Anand et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200336846 | Rohde et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200366477 | Brown et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200395006 | Smith et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200395010 | Smith et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200395013 | Smith et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200409652 | Wilberding et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210035561 | D'Amato et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210035572 | D'Amato et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210067867 | Kagoshima | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210118429 | Shan | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210166680 | Jung et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210183366 | Reinspach et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210280185 | Tan et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2017100486 | Jun 2017 | AU |
2017100581 | Jun 2017 | AU |
1323435 | Nov 2001 | CN |
101310558 | Nov 2008 | CN |
101480039 | Jul 2009 | CN |
101661753 | Mar 2010 | CN |
101686282 | Mar 2010 | CN |
101907983 | Dec 2010 | CN |
102123188 | Jul 2011 | CN |
102256098 | Nov 2011 | CN |
102567468 | Jul 2012 | CN |
103052001 | Apr 2013 | CN |
103181192 | Jun 2013 | CN |
103210663 | Jul 2013 | CN |
103546616 | Jan 2014 | CN |
103811007 | May 2014 | CN |
104010251 | Aug 2014 | CN |
104035743 | Sep 2014 | CN |
104053088 | Sep 2014 | CN |
104092936 | Oct 2014 | CN |
104104769 | Oct 2014 | CN |
104115224 | Oct 2014 | CN |
104282305 | Jan 2015 | CN |
104520927 | Apr 2015 | CN |
104538030 | Apr 2015 | CN |
104575504 | Apr 2015 | CN |
104635539 | May 2015 | CN |
104865550 | Aug 2015 | CN |
105187907 | Dec 2015 | CN |
105204357 | Dec 2015 | CN |
105206281 | Dec 2015 | CN |
105284076 | Jan 2016 | CN |
105493442 | Apr 2016 | CN |
105679318 | Jun 2016 | CN |
106028223 | Oct 2016 | CN |
106375902 | Feb 2017 | CN |
106531165 | Mar 2017 | CN |
106708403 | May 2017 | CN |
107004410 | Aug 2017 | CN |
107919123 | Apr 2018 | CN |
109712626 | May 2019 | CN |
1349146 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1389853 | Feb 2004 | EP |
2051542 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2166737 | Mar 2010 | EP |
2683147 | Jan 2014 | EP |
2986034 | Feb 2016 | EP |
3128767 | Feb 2017 | EP |
3133595 | Feb 2017 | EP |
2351021 | Sep 2017 | EP |
3270377 | Jan 2018 | EP |
3285502 | Feb 2018 | EP |
S63301998 | Dec 1988 | JP |
H0883091 | Mar 1996 | JP |
2001236093 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2003223188 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2004347943 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2004354721 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005242134 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005250867 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005284492 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2006092482 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2007013400 | Jan 2007 | JP |
2007142595 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2008079256 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2008158868 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2010141748 | Jun 2010 | JP |
2013037148 | Feb 2013 | JP |
2014071138 | Apr 2014 | JP |
2014137590 | Jul 2014 | JP |
2015161551 | Sep 2015 | JP |
2015527768 | Sep 2015 | JP |
2016095383 | May 2016 | JP |
2017072857 | Apr 2017 | JP |
2017129860 | Jul 2017 | JP |
2017227912 | Dec 2017 | JP |
2018055259 | Apr 2018 | JP |
20100036351 | Apr 2010 | KR |
100966415 | Jun 2010 | KR |
20100111071 | Oct 2010 | KR |
20130050987 | May 2013 | KR |
20140005410 | Jan 2014 | KR |
20140035310 | Mar 2014 | KR |
20140054643 | May 2014 | KR |
20140111859 | Sep 2014 | KR |
20140112900 | Sep 2014 | KR |
200153994 | Jul 2001 | WO |
03054854 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2003093950 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2008048599 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2012166386 | Dec 2012 | WO |
2013184792 | Dec 2013 | WO |
2014064531 | May 2014 | WO |
2014159581 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2015017303 | Feb 2015 | WO |
2015037396 | Mar 2015 | WO |
2015105788 | Jul 2015 | WO |
2015131024 | Sep 2015 | WO |
2015178950 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2016014142 | Jan 2016 | WO |
2016022926 | Feb 2016 | WO |
2016033364 | Mar 2016 | WO |
2016057268 | Apr 2016 | WO |
2016085775 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016165067 | Oct 2016 | WO |
2016171956 | Oct 2016 | WO |
2016200593 | Dec 2016 | WO |
2017039632 | Mar 2017 | WO |
2017058654 | Apr 2017 | WO |
2017138934 | Aug 2017 | WO |
2017147075 | Aug 2017 | WO |
2017147936 | Sep 2017 | WO |
2018027142 | Feb 2018 | WO |
2018067404 | Apr 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
US 9,299,346 B1, 03/2016, Hart et al. (withdrawn) |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 24, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/154,469, filed Oct. 3, 2018, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 25, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/723,909, filed Dec. 20, 2019, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 26, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/948,541, filed Apr. 9, 2018, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 26, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/927,670, filed Jul. 13, 2020, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 27, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/700,607, filed Dec. 2, 2019, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 27, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/214,666, filed Dec. 10, 2018, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 28, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/699,982, filed Sep. 8, 2017, 17 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 28, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/524,306, filed Jul. 29, 2019, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 29, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/131,776, filed Apr. 18, 2016, 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 29, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/290,599, filed Mar. 1, 2019, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 29, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/216,357, filed Dec. 11, 2018, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 29, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/600,949, filed Oct. 14, 2019, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 29, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/148,879, filed Oct. 1, 2018, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 29, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/876,493, filed May 18, 2020, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 3, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/160,107, filed Oct. 15, 2018, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 3, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/876,493, filed May 18, 2020, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 30, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/098,718, filed Apr. 14, 2016, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 30, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/131,254, filed Apr. 18, 2016, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 30, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/973,413, filed May 7, 2018, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 30, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/438,725, filed Feb. 21, 2017, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 30, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/131,392, filed Sep. 14, 2018, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 30, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/528,016, filed Jul. 31, 2019, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 31, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/717,621, filed Sep. 27, 2017, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 4, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/528,265, filed Jul. 31, 2019, 17 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 4, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/444,975, filed Jun. 18, 2019, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 5, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/178,122, filed Nov. 1, 2018, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 5, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/211,748, filed Jul. 15, 2018, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 6, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/102,153, filed Aug. 13, 2018, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 6, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/227,308, filed Dec. 20, 2018, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 7, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/098,760, filed Apr. 14, 2016, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 7, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/147,710, filed Sep. 29, 2018, 15 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 7, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/102,153, filed Aug. 13, 2018, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 7, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/528,224, filed Jul. 31, 2019, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 8, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/008,104, filed Aug. 31, 2020, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 9, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/229,868, filed Aug. 5, 2016, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 9, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/845,946, filed Apr. 10, 2020, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 9, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/584,782, filed May 2, 2017, 8 pages. |
Oord et al. WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audio. Arxiv.org, Cornell University Library, Sep. 12, 2016, 15 pages. |
Optimizing Siri on HomePod in Far-Field Settings. Audio Software Engineering and Siri Speech Team, Machine Learning Journal vol. 1, Issue 12. https://machinelearning.apple.com/2018/12/03/optimizing-siri-on-homepod-in-far-field-settings.html. Dec. 2018, 18 pages. |
Palm, Inc., “Handbook for the Palm VII Handheld,” May 2000, 311 pages. |
Parada et al. Contextual Information Improves OOV Detection in Speech. Proceedings of the 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Jun. 2, 2010, 9 pages. |
Pre-Appeal Brief Decision dated Jan. 18, 2022, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/806,747, filed Mar. 2, 2020, 2 pages. |
Pre-Appeal Brief Decision dated Jun. 2, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/213,570, filed Dec. 7, 2018, 2 pages. |
Preinterview First Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/434,426, filed Jun. 7, 2019, 4 pages. |
Preinterview First Office Action dated Mar. 25, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/109,375, filed Aug. 22, 2018, 6 pages. |
Preinterview First Office Action dated Sep. 30, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/989,715, filed May 25, 2018, 4 pages. |
Preinterview First Office Action dated May 7, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/213,570, filed Dec. 7, 2018, 5 pages. |
Preinterview First Office Action dated Jan. 8, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/798,967, filed Feb. 24, 2020, 4 pages. |
Presentations at WinHEC 2000, May 2000, 138 pages. |
Renato De Mori. Spoken Language Understanding: A Survey. Automatic Speech Recognition & Understanding, 2007. IEEE, Dec. 1, 2007, 56 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 25, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/213,570, filed Dec. 7, 2018, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 8, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/813,643, filed Mar. 9, 2020, 12 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 9, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/271,550, filed Feb. 8, 2019, 35 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/806,747, filed Mar. 2, 2020, 18 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 1, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/223,218, filed Jul. 29, 2016, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 2, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/584,782, filed May 2, 2017, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 3, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/438,741, filed Feb. 21, 2017, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 4, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/022,662, filed Jun. 28, 2018, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 5, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/416,752, filed May 20, 2019, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/131,244, filed Apr. 18, 2016, 12 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/098,892, filed Apr. 14, 2016, 17 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 9, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/098,760, filed Apr. 14, 2016, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 9, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/936,177, filed Mar. 26, 2018, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 1, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/138,111, filed Sep. 21, 2018, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/098,718, filed Apr. 14, 2016, 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/229,868, filed Aug. 5, 2016, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/438,725, filed Feb. 21, 2017, 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 10, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/670,361, filed Aug. 7, 2017, 17 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 11, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/841,116, filed Apr. 6, 2020, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 11, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/876,493, filed May 18, 2020, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 11, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/834,483, filed Mar. 30, 2020, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 11, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/177,185, filed Oct. 31, 2018, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 11, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/989,715, filed May 25, 2018, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 11, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/219,702, filed Dec. 13, 2018, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 12, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/528,224, filed Jul. 31, 2019, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 12, 2016, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/098,718, filed Apr. 14, 2016, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 12, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/670,361, filed Aug. 7, 2017, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 13, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/098,805, filed Apr. 14, 2016, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 13, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/717,621, filed Sep. 27, 2017, 23 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 13, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/160,107, filed Oct. 15, 2018, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 13, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/984,073, filed May 18, 2018, 18 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 13, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/679,538, filed Nov. 11, 2019, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 14, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/948,541, filed Apr. 9, 2018, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 14, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/178,180, filed Jun. 9, 2016, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 14, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/959,907, filed Apr. 23, 2018, 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 15, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/138,111, filed Sep. 21, 2018, 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 15, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/087,423, filed Nov. 2, 2020, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 15, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/173,797, filed Oct. 29, 2018, 6 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 15, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,530, filed Oct. 5, 2018, 17 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 16, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/681,937, filed Aug. 21, 2017, 5 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/131,254, filed Apr. 18, 2016, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/879,553, filed May 20, 2020, 24 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 17, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/236,559, filed Apr. 21, 2021, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 17, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/600,949, filed Oct. 14, 2019, 29 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 18, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/811,468, filed Nov. 13, 2017, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 18, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/845,946, filed Apr. 10, 2020, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 18, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/721,141, filed Sep. 29, 2017, 18 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 18, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/098,760, filed Apr. 14, 2016, 27 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 18, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/179,779, filed Nov. 2, 2018, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/131,776, filed Apr. 18, 2016, 12 pages. |
Restriction Requirement dated Aug. 14, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/214,711, filed Dec. 10, 2018, 5 pages. |
Restriction Requirement dated Aug. 9, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/717,621, filed Sep. 27, 2017, 8 pages. |
Rottondi et al., “An Overview on Networked Music Performance Technologies,” IEEE Access, vol. 4, pp. 8823-8843, 2016, DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2628440, 21 pages. |
Rybakov et al. Streaming keyword spotting on mobile devices, arXiv:2005.06720v2, Jul. 29, 2020, 5 pages. |
Shan et al. Attention-based End-to-End Models for Small-Footprint Keyword Spotting, arXiv:1803.10916v1, Mar. 29, 2018, 5 pages. |
Snips: How to Snips—Assistant creation & Installation, Jun. 26, 2017, 6 pages. |
Souden et al. “An Integrated Solution for Online Multichannel Noise Tracking and Reduction.” IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 19. No. 7, Sep. 7, 2011, 11 pages. |
Souden et al. “Gaussian Model-Based Multichannel Speech Presence Probability” IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 18, No. 5, Jul. 5, 2010, 6pages. |
Souden et al. “On Optimal Frequency-Domain Multichannel Linear Filtering for Noise Reduction.” IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 18, No. 2, Feb. 2010, 17pages. |
Speidel, Hans. Chatbot Training: How to use training data to provide fully automated customer support. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://www.crowdguru.de/wp-content/uploads/Case-Study-Chatbox-training-How-to-use-training-data-to-provide-fully-automated-customer-support.pdf. Jun. 29, 2017, 4 pages. |
Stemmer et al. Speech Recognition and Understanding on Hardware-Accelerated DSP. Proceedings of Interspeech 2017: Show & Tell Contribution, Aug. 20, 2017, 2 pages. |
Steven J. Nowlan and Geoffrey E. Hinton “Simplifying Neural Networks by Soft Weight-Sharing” Neural Computation 4, 1992, 21 pages. |
Tsiami et al. “Experiments in acoustic source localization using sparse arrays in adverse indoors environments”, 2014 22nd European Signal Processing Conference, Sep. 1, 2014, 5 pages. |
Tsung-Hsien Wen et al: “A Network-based End-to-End Trainable Task-oriented Dialogue System”, Corr (Arxiv), vol. 1604.04562v1, Apr. 15, 2016 (Apr. 15, 2016), pp. 1-11. |
Tsung-Hsien Wen et al: “A Network-based End-to-End Trainable Task-oriented Dialogue System”, Corr Arxiv, vol. 1604.04562v1, Apr. 15, 2016, pp. 1-11, XP055396370, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. |
Tweet: “How to start using Google app voice commands to make your life easier Share This Story shop @Bullet”, Jan. 21, 2016, https://bgr.com/2016/01/21/best-ok-google-voice-commands/, 3 page. |
Ullrich et al. “Soft Weight-Sharing for Neural Network Compression.” ICLR 2017, 16 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, U.S. Appl. No. 60/490,768, filed Jul. 28, 2003, entitled “Method for synchronizing audio playback between multiple networked devices,” 13 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, U.S. Appl. No. 60/825,407, filed Sep. 12, 2006, entitled “Controlling and manipulating groupings in a multi-zone music or media system,” 82 pages. |
UPnP; “Universal Plug and Play Device Architecture,” Jun. 8, 2000; version 1.0; Microsoft Corporation; pp. 1-54. |
Vacher at al. “Recognition of voice commands by multisource ASR and noise cancellation in a smart home environment” Signal Processing Conference 2012 Proceedings of the 20th European, IEEE, Aug. 27, 2012, 5 pages. |
Vacher et al. “Speech Recognition in a Smart Home: Some Experiments for Telemonitoring,” 2009 Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Speech Technology and Human-Computer Dialogoue, Constant, 2009, 10 pages. |
“S Voice or Google Now?”; https://web.archive.org/web/20160807040123/lowdown.carphonewarehouse.com/news/s-voice-or-google-now/ . . . , Apr. 28, 2015; 4 pages. |
Wen et al. A Network-based End-to-End Trainable Task-oriented Dialogue System, Corr (Arxiv), Apr. 15, 2016, 11 pages. |
Wu et al. End-to-End Recurrent Entity Network for Entity-Value Independent Goal-Oriented Dialog Learning. DSTC6—Dialog System Technology Challenges, Dec. 10, 2017, 5 pages. |
Wung et al. “Robust Acoustic Echo Cancellation in the Short-Time Fourier Transform Domain Using Adaptive Crossband Filters” IEEE International Conference on Acoustic, Speech and Signal Processing ICASSP, 2014, p. 1300-1304. |
Xiao et al. “A Learning-Based Approach to Direction of Arrival Estimation in Noisy and Reverberant Environments,” 2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Apr. 19, 2015, 5 pages. |
Xiaoguang et al. “Robust Small-Footprint Keyword Spotting Using Sequence-To-Sequence Model with Connectionist Temporal Classifier”, 2019 IEEE, Sep. 28, 2019, 5 pages. |
Xu et al. An End-to-end Approach for Handling Unknown Slot Values in Dialogue State Tracking. ARXIV.org, Cornell University Library, May 3, 2018, 10 pages. |
Yamaha DME 64 Owner's Manual; copyright 2004, 80 pages. |
Yamaha DME Designer 3.0 Owner's Manual; Copyright 2008, 501 pages. |
Yamaha DME Designer 3.5 setup manual guide; copyright 2004, 16 pages. |
Yamaha DME Designer 3.5 User Manual; Copyright 2004, 507 pages. |
Zaykovskiy, Dmitry. Survey of the Speech Recognition Techniques for Mobile Devices. Proceedings of Specom 2006, Jun. 25, 2006, 6 pages. |
International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Jun. 17, 2021, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2019/064907, filed on Dec. 6, 2019, 8 pages. |
International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Mar. 2, 2021, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2019/048558, filed on Aug. 28, 2019, 8 pages. |
International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Feb. 20, 2020, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2018/045397, filed on Aug. 6, 2018, 8 pages. |
International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Apr. 23, 2019, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2017/057220, filed on Oct. 18, 2017, 7 pages. |
International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Mar. 31, 2020, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2018053123, filed on Sep. 27, 2018, 12 pages. |
International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Mar. 31, 2020, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2018053472, filed on Sep. 28, 2018, 8 pages. |
International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Mar. 31, 2020, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2018053517, filed on Sep. 28, 2018, 10 pages. |
International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Sep. 7, 2018, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2017/018728, filed on Feb. 21, 2017, 8 pages. |
International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Sep. 7, 2018, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2017/018739, filed on Feb. 21, 2017, 7 pages. |
International Bureau, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 10, 2020, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2020/044250, filed on Jul. 30, 2020, 15 pages. |
International Bureau, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 11, 2019, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2019/052129, filed on Sep. 20, 2019, 18 pages. |
International Bureau, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 13, 2018, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2018/045397, filed on Aug. 6, 2018, 11 pages. |
International Bureau, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 14, 2019, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2018053472, filed on Sep. 28, 2018, 10 pages. |
International Bureau, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 14, 2020, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2020/017150, filed on Feb. 7, 2020, 27 pages. |
International Bureau, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 14, 2017, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2017/045521, filed on Aug. 4, 2017, 10 pages. |
International Bureau, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 17, 2019, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2019/032934, filed on May 17, 2019, 17 pages. |
International Bureau, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 18, 2019, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2019/048558, filed on Aug. 28, 2019, 11 pages. |
International Bureau, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 18, 2019, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2019052841, filed on Sep. 25, 2019, 12 pages. |
International Bureau, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 2, 2020, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2019064907, filed on Dec. 6, 2019, 11 pages. |
International Bureau, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 2, 2020, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2019/064907, filed on Dec. 6, 2019, 9 pages. |
International Bureau, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 20, 2019, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2019052654, filed on Sep. 24, 2019, 11 pages. |
International Bureau, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 21, 2020, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2020/037229, filed on Jun. 11, 2020, 17 pages. |
International Bureau, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 22, 2020, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2020/044282, filed on Jul. 30, 2020, 15 pages. |
International Bureau, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 23, 2021, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2021/070007, filed on Jan. 6, 2021, 11 pages. |
International Bureau, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 24, 2018, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2018/019010, filed on Feb. 21, 2018, 12 pages. |
International Bureau, International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 27, 2019, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2018/053123, filed on Sep. 27, 2018, 16 pages. |
International Bureau, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 27, 2019, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2019/039828, filed on Jun. 28, 2019, 13 pages. |
International Bureau, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 29, 2019, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2019/053253, filed on Sep. 29, 2019, 14 pages. |
International Bureau, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 4, 2019, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2019/033945, filed on May 24, 2019, 8 pages. |
International Bureau, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 6, 2020, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/FR2019/000081, filed on May 24, 2019, 12 pages. |
International Bureau, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 6, 2018, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2018/050050, filed on Sep. 7, 2018, 9 pages. |
International Bureau, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 6, 2019, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2019050852, filed on Sep. 12, 2019, 10 pages. |
International Bureau, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 6, 2017, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2017/045551, filed on Aug. 4, 2017, 12 pages. |
International Bureau, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 8, 2020, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2019/067576, filed on Dec. 19, 2019, 12 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 8, 2021, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/EP2020/082243, filed on Nov. 16, 2020, 10 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 12, 2021, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2020/056632, filed on Oct. 21, 2020, 10 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 19, 2018, in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2018/053517, 13 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 22, 2017, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2017/054063, filed on Sep. 28, 2017, 11 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 23, 2021, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2020/066231, filed on Dec. 18, 2020, 9 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 23, 2018, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2017/57220, filed on Oct. 18, 2017, 8 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 23, 2017, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2017/018739, Filed on Feb. 21, 2017, 10 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 23, 2017, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2017/042170, filed on Jul. 14, 2017, 15 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 24, 2017, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2017/042227, filed on Jul. 14, 2017, 16 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 30, 2017, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2017/018728, Filed on Feb. 21, 2017, 11 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, Decision of Refusal and Translation dated Jun. 8, 2021, issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-073348, 5 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, English Translation of Office Action dated Nov. 17, 2020, issued in connection with Japanese Application No. 2019-145039, 5 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, English Translation of Office Action dated Aug. 27, 2020, issued in connection with Japanese Application No. 2019-073349, 6 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, English Translation of Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2020, issued in connection with Japanese Application No. 2019-517281, 26 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, Non-Final Office Action and Translation dated Nov. 5, 2019, issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-517281, 6 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Reasons for Refusal and Translation dated Jun. 22, 2021, issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-517935, 4 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 4, 2022, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/879,549, filed May 20, 2020, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,530, filed Oct. 5, 2018, 21 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/424,825, filed May 29, 2019, 22 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 6, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/211,689, filed Jul. 15, 2016, 32 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 6, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/237,133, filed Aug. 15, 2016, 6 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 6, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/439,046, filed Jun. 12, 2019, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/141,875, filed Sep. 25, 2018, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 6, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/131,254, filed Apr. 18, 2016, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 6, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/098,760, filed Apr. 14, 2016, 29 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 7, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/168,389, filed Oct. 23, 2018, 36 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 7, 2022, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/135,123, filed Dec. 28, 2020, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/936,177, filed Mar. 26, 2018, 19 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/804,776, filed Nov. 6, 2017, 18 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/780,483, filed Feb. 3, 2020, 45 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 9, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/806,747, filed Mar. 2, 2020, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 9, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/818,051, filed Nov. 20, 2017, 22 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/168,389, filed Oct. 23, 2018, 29 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 10, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/157,686, filed Jan. 25, 2021, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 2, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/660,197, filed Oct. 22, 2019, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 31, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/813,643, filed Mar. 9, 2020, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 4, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/780,483, filed Feb. 3, 2020, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 2, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/718,521, filed Sep. 28, 2017, 15 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 4, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/277,810, filed Sep. 27, 2016, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 5, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/237,133, filed Aug. 15, 2016, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 9, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/438,741, filed Feb. 21, 2017, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 1, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/935,966, filed Mar. 26, 2018, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 1, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/297,627, filed Oct. 19, 2016, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 1, 2022, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/439,046, filed Jun. 12, 2019, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 1, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/219,702, filed Dec. 13, 2018, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 1, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/685,135, filed Nov. 15, 2019, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 1, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/936,177, filed Mar. 26, 2018, 22 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 10, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/424,825, filed May 29, 2019, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 10, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/138,111, filed Sep. 21, 2018, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 11, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/719,454, filed Sep. 28, 2017, 15 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 11, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/437,476, filed Jun. 11, 2019, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 11, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/154,071, filed Oct. 8, 2018, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 12, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/819,755, filed Mar. 16, 2020, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 12, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/811,468, filed Nov. 13, 2017, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 12, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/098,805, filed Apr. 14, 2016, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 12, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/670,361, filed Aug. 7, 2017, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 12, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/402,617, filed May 3, 2019, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 12, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/438,744, filed Feb. 21, 2017, 15 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 13, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/784,952, filed Oct. 16, 2017, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 13, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/879,553, filed May 20, 2020, 15 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 13, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/959,907, filed Apr. 23, 2018, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 13, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/192,126, filed Nov. 15, 2018, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 13, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/539,843, filed Aug. 13, 2019, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 13, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/131,409, filed Sep. 14, 2018, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 14, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/098,867, filed Apr. 14, 2016, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 14, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/598,125, filed Oct. 10, 2019, 5 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/147,710, filed Sep. 29, 2018, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 19, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/148,879, filed Oct. 1, 2018, 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 2, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/290,599, filed Mar. 1, 2019, 17 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 2, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/947,895, filed Aug. 24, 2020, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 20, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/211,748, filed Jul. 15, 2016, 31 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 20, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/946,585, filed Apr. 5, 2018, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 21, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/109,375, filed Aug. 22, 2018, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/192,126, filed Nov. 15, 2018, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 21, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/214,666, filed Dec. 10, 2018, 12 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 21, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/214,711, filed Dec. 10, 2018, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 21, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/598,125, filed Oct. 10, 2019, 25 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 21, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/973,413, filed May 7, 2018, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 22, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/145,275, filed Sep. 28, 2018, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 22, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/946,599, filed Apr. 5, 2018, 19 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 22, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/539,843, filed Aug. 13, 2019, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/439,032, filed Jun. 12, 2019, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 23, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/154,071, filed Oct. 8, 2018, 36 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 23, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/524,306, filed Jul. 29, 2019, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 23, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/177,185, filed Oct. 31, 2018, 17 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 24, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/297,627, filed Oct. 19, 2016, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 24, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/439,009, filed Jun. 12, 2019, 26 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 25, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/273,679, filed Jul. 22, 2016, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 26, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/154,469, filed Oct. 8, 2018, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 26, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/098,867, filed Apr. 14, 2016, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/438,744, filed Feb. 21, 2017, 12 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/736,725, filed Jan. 7, 2020, 12 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 27, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/438,749, filed Feb. 21, 2017, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 27, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/437,437, filed Jun. 11, 2019, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 27, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/437,476, filed Jun. 11, 2019, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/790,621, filed Feb. 13, 2020, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 27, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/715,713, filed Dec. 16, 2019, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/213,570, filed Dec. 7, 2018, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/715,984, filed Dec. 16, 2019, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/819,755, filed Mar. 16, 2020, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 28, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/145,275, filed Sep. 28, 2018, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 28, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/378,516, filed Apr. 8, 2019, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 28, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/247,736, filed Dec. 21, 2020, 12 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 29, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/102,650, filed Aug. 13, 2018, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 29, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/528,265, filed Jul. 31, 2019, 18 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/989,350, filed Aug. 10, 2020, 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/402,617, filed May 3, 2019, 12 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 3, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/145,275, filed Sep. 28, 2018, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 3, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/948,541, filed Apr. 9, 2018, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 3, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/178,122, filed Nov. 1, 2018, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 3, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/102,153, filed Aug. 13, 2018, 20 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/718,521, filed Sep. 28, 2017, 39 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/277,810, filed Sep. 27, 2016, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 4, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/718,911, filed Sep. 28, 2017, 21 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 4, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/600,644, filed Oct. 14, 2019, 30 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 4, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/948,541, filed Apr. 9, 2018, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 14, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/229,855, filed Aug. 5, 2016, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 14, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/087,423, filed Nov. 2, 2020, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 14, 2022, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/966,397, filed Jul. 30, 2020, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 14, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/282,554, filed Sep. 30, 2016, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 14, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/297,627, filed Oct. 19, 2016, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 15, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/223,218, filed Jul. 29, 2016, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 15, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/439,009, filed Jun. 12, 2019, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 15, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/804,776, filed Nov. 6, 2017, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 15, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/437,437, filed Jun. 11, 2019, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 15, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/715,713, filed Dec. 16, 2019, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 15, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/213,570, filed Dec. 7, 2018, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 15, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/685,135, filed Nov. 15, 2019, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 16, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/798,967, filed Feb. 24, 2020, 16 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 16, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/098,892, filed Apr. 14, 2016, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 17, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/131,244, filed Apr. 18, 2016, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 17, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/715,984, filed Dec. 16, 2019, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 17, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/718,911, filed Sep. 28, 2017, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 17, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/141,875, filed Sep. 25, 2018, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 17, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/211,689, filed Jul. 15, 2016, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 18, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/173,797, filed Oct. 29, 2018, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 18, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/434,426, filed Jun. 7, 2019, 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 18, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/022,662, filed Jun. 28, 2018, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 18, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/438,749, filed Feb. 21, 2017, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 18, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/721,141, filed Sep. 29, 2017, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 18, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/177,185, filed Oct. 31, 2018, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 19, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/271,560, filed Feb. 8, 2019, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 19, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/818,051, filed Nov. 20, 2017, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 19, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/681,937, filed Aug. 21, 2017, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 19, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/157,686, filed Jan. 25, 2021, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 2, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/102,650, filed Aug. 13, 2018, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 2, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/989,715, filed May 25, 2018, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 2, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/841,116, filed Apr. 6, 2020, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 2, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/214,711, filed Dec. 10, 2018, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 20, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/984,073, filed May 18, 2018, 12 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 20, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/784,952, filed Oct. 16, 2017, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 20, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/439,032, filed Jun. 12, 2019, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 20, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/946,599, filed Apr. 5, 2018, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 21, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/145,275, filed Sep. 28, 2018, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 21, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/271,550, filed Feb. 8, 2019, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 21, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/416,752, filed May 20, 2019, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 21, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/672,764, filed Nov. 4, 2019, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 21, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/600,644, filed Oct. 14, 2019, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 21, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/946,585, filed Apr. 5, 2018, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 22, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/273,679, filed Sep. 22, 2016, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 22, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/178,180, filed Jun. 9, 2016, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 22, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/131,409, filed Sep. 14, 2018, 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 22, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/790,621, filed Feb. 13, 2020, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 22, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/834,483, filed Mar. 30, 2020, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 23, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/109,375, filed Aug. 22, 2018, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 23, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/814,844, filed Mar. 10, 2020, 8 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 21, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/297,627, filed Oct. 19, 2016, 12 pages. |
Final Office Action dated May 21, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/989,715, filed May 25, 2018, 21 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 22, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/936,177, filed Mar. 26, 2018, 20 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 22, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/213,570, filed Dec. 7, 2018, 12 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 22, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/179,779, filed Nov. 2, 2018, 16 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Mar. 23, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/145,275, filed Sep. 28, 2018, 11 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/936,177, filed Mar. 26, 2018, 20 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 26, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/721,141, filed Sep. 29, 2017, 20 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/236,559, filed Apr. 21, 2021, 11 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/098,760, filed Apr. 14, 2016, 6 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 4, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/168,389, filed Oct. 23, 2018, 38 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Oct. 4, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/806,747, filed Mar. 2, 2020, 17 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/438,749, filed Feb. 21, 2017, 17 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/948,541, filed Apr. 9, 2018, 8 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/271,550, filed Feb. 8, 2019, 41 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/213,570, filed Dec. 7, 2018, 12 pages. |
Fiorenza Arisio et al. “Deliverable 1.1 User Study, analysis of requirements and definition of the application task,” May 31, 2012, http://dirha.fbk.eu/sites/dirha.fbk.eu/files/docs/DIRHA_D1.1., 31 pages. |
First Action Interview Office Action dated Mar. 8, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/798,967, filed Feb. 24, 2020, 4 pages. |
First Action Interview Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/227,308, filed Dec. 20, 2018, 4 pages. |
First Action Interview Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/213,570, filed Dec. 7, 2018, 4 pages. |
First Action Interview Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/109,375, filed Aug. 22, 2018, 10 pages. |
First Action Interview Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/989,715, filed May 25, 2018, 3 pages. |
First Action Interview Office Action dated Jul. 5, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/227,308, filed Dec. 20, 2018, 4 pages. |
Freiberger, Karl, “Development and Evaluation of Source Localization Algorithms for Coincident Microphone Arrays,” Diploma Thesis, Apr. 1, 2010, 106 pages. |
Giacobello et al. “A Sparse Nonuniformly Partitioned Multidelay Filter for Acoustic Echo Cancellation,” 2013, IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics, Oct. 2013, New Paltz, NY, 4 pages. |
Giacobello et al. “Tuning Methodology for Speech Enhancement Algorithms using a Simulated Conversational Database and Perceptual Objective Measures,” 2014, 4th Joint Workshop on Hands-free Speech Communication and Microphone Arrays HSCMA, 2014, 5 pages. |
Han et al. “Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Coding.” ICLR 2016, Feb. 15, 2016, 14 pages. |
Hans Speidel: “Chatbot Training: How to use training data to provide fully automated customer support”, Jun. 29, 2017, pp. 1-3, XP055473185, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://www.crowdguru.de/wp-content/uploads/Case-Study-Chatbot-training-How-to-use-training-data-to-provide-fully-automated-customer-support.pdf [retrieved on May 7, 2018]. |
Helwani et al “Source-domain adaptive filtering for MIMO systems with application to acoustic echo cancellation”, Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing, 2010 IEEE International Conference, Mar. 14, 2010, 4 pages. |
Hirano et al. “A Noise-Robust Stochastic Gradient Algorithm with an Adaptive Step-Size Suitable for Mobile Hands-Free Telephones,” 1995, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 2, 4 pages. |
Indian Patent Office, Examination Report dated May 24, 2021, issued in connection with Indian Patent Application No. 201847035595, 6 pages. |
Indian Patent Office, Examination Report dated Feb. 25, 2021, issued in connection with Indian Patent Application No. 201847035625, 6 pages. |
International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Apr. 1, 2021, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2019/052129, filed on Sep. 20, 2019, 13 pages. |
International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Jul. 1, 2021, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2019/067576, filed on Dec. 19, 2019, 8 pages. |
International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Aug. 10, 2021, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2020/017150, filed on Feb. 7, 2020, 20 pages. |
International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Dec. 10, 2020, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2019/033945, filed on May 25, 2018, 7 pages. |
International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Mar. 10, 2020, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2018/050050, filed on Sep. 7, 2018, 7 pages. |
International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Apr. 15, 2021, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2019/054332, filed on Oct. 2, 2019, 9 pages. |
International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Jan. 15, 2019, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2017/042170, filed on Jul. 14, 2017, 7 pages. |
International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Jan. 15, 2019, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2017/042227, filed on Jul. 14, 2017, 7 pages. |
International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Mar. 25, 2021, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2019/050852, filed on Sep. 12, 2019, 8 pages. |
International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Aug. 27, 2019, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2018/019010, filed on Feb. 21, 2018, 9 pages. |
International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Mar. 31, 2020, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2018/053517, filed on Sep. 28, 2018, 10 pages. |
International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 5, 2019, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2017/045521, filed on Aug. 4, 2017, 7 pages. |
International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 5, 2019, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2017/045551, filed on Aug. 4, 2017, 9 pages. |
International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Jan. 7, 2021, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2019/039828, filed on Jun. 28, 2019, 11 pages. |
International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Apr. 8, 2021, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2019/052654, filed on Sep. 24, 2019, 7 pages. |
International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Apr. 8, 2021, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2019/052841, filed on Sep. 25, 2019, 8 pages. |
International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Apr. 8, 2021, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2019/053253, filed on Sep. 26, 2019, 10 pages. |
International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Apr. 11, 2019, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2017/0054063, filed on Sep. 28, 2017, 9 pages. |
Douke et al. Efficient Keyword Spotting using Dilated Convolutions and Gating, arXiv:1811.07684v2, Feb. 18, 2019, 5 pages. |
Dell, Inc. “Dell Digital Audio Receiver: Reference Guide,” Jun. 2000, 70 pages. |
Dell, Inc. “Start Here,” Jun. 2000, 2 pages. |
“Denon 2003-2004 Product Catalog,” Denon, 2003-2004, 44 pages. |
European Patent Office, European EPC Article 94.3 mailed on Nov. 11, 2021, issued in connection with European Application No. 19784172.9, 5 pages. |
European Patent Office, European EPC Article 94.3 mailed on Feb. 23, 2021, issued in connection with European Application No. 17200837.7, 8 pages. |
European Patent Office, European EPC Article 94.3 mailed on Feb. 26, 2021, issued in connection with European Application No. 18789515.6, 8 pages. |
European Patent Office, European Extended Search Report dated Oct. 7, 2021, issued in connection with European Application No. 21193616.6, 9 pages. |
European Patent Office, European Extended Search Report dated Nov. 25, 2020, issued in connection with European Application No. 20185599.6, 9 pages. |
European Patent Office, European Extended Search Report dated Feb. 3, 2020, issued in connection with European Application No. 19197116.7, 9 pages. |
European Patent Office, European Extended Search Report dated Jan. 3, 2019, issued in connection with European Application No. 177570702, 8 pages. |
European Patent Office, European Extended Search Report dated Jan. 3, 2019, issued in connection with European Application No. 17757075.1, 9 pages. |
European Patent Office, European Extended Search Report dated Oct. 30, 2017, issued in connection with EP Application No. 17174435.2, 11 pages. |
European Patent Office, European Extended Search Report dated Aug. 6, 2020, issued in connection with European Application No. 20166332.5, 10 pages. |
European Patent Office, European Office Action dated Jul. 1, 2020, issued in connection with European Application No. 17757075.1, 7 pages. |
European Patent Office, European Office Action dated Jan. 14, 2020, issued in connection with European Application No. 17757070.2, 7 pages. |
European Patent Office, European Office Action dated Jan. 21, 2021, issued in connection with European Application No. 17792272.1, 7 pages. |
European Patent Office, European Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2019, issued in connection with European Application No. 17174435.2, 9 pages. |
European Patent Office, European Office Action dated Sep. 23, 2020, issued in connection with European Application No. 18788976.1, 7 pages. |
European Patent Office, European Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2020, issued in connection with European Application No. 18760101.8, 4 pages. |
European Patent Office, European Office Action dated Aug. 30, 2019, issued in connection with European Application No. 17781608.9, 6 pages. |
European Patent Office, European Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2020, issued in connection with European Application No. 18792656.3, 10 pages. |
European Patent Office, Examination Report dated Jul. 15, 2021, issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 19729968.8, 7 pages. |
European Patent Office, Extended Search Report dated Aug. 13, 2021, issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 21164130.3, 11 pages. |
European Patent Office, Extended Search Report dated May 16, 2018, issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 17200837.7, 11 pages. |
European Patent Office, Extended Search Report dated Jul. 25, 2019, issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 18306501.0, 14 pages. |
European Patent Office, Extended Search Report dated May 29, 2020, issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 19209389.6, 8 pages. |
European Patent Office, Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings mailed on Dec. 20, 2019, issued in connection with European Application No. 17174435.2, 13 pages. |
European Patent Office, Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings mailed on Dec. 9, 2021, issued in connection with European Application No. 17200837.7, 10 pages. |
Fadilpasic,“Cortana can now be the default PDA on your Android”, IT Pro Portal: Accessed via WayBack Machine; http://web.archive.org/web/20171129124915/https://www.itproportal.com/2015/08/11/cortana-can-now-be- . . . , Aug. 11, 2015, 6 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Jul. 23, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/439,046, filed Jun. 12, 2019, 12 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/098,760, filed Apr. 14, 2016, 25 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 10, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/219,702, filed Dec. 13, 2018, 9 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 10, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/402,617, filed May 3, 2019, 13 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Nov. 10, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/600,644, filed Oct. 14, 2019, 19 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 11, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/131,254, filed Apr. 18, 2016, 17 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Aug. 11, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/131,776, filed Apr. 18, 2016, 7 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Dec. 11, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/227,308, filed Dec. 20, 2018, 10 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Sep. 11, 2019, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/178,122, filed Nov. 1, 2018, 13 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/131,254, filed Apr. 18, 2016, 18 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/438,744, filed Feb. 21, 2017, 20 pages. |
Final Office Action dated May 13, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,530, filed Oct. 5, 2018, 20 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Jul. 15, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,530, filed Oct. 5, 2018, 22 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/098,718, filed Apr. 14, 2016, 15 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/819,755, filed Mar. 16, 2020, 12 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/804,776, filed Nov. 6, 2017, 18 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/109,375, filed Aug. 22, 2018, 9 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/438,725, filed Feb. 21, 2017, 10 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Dec. 17, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/813,643, filed Mar. 9, 2020, 12 pages. |
Final Office Action dated May 18, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/177,185, filed Oct. 31, 2018, 16 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Reasons for Refusal and Translation dated Nov. 28, 2021, issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-550102, 9 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, Office Action and Translation dated Mar. 16, 2021, issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-506725, 7 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, Office Action and Translation dated Nov. 17, 2020, issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-145039, 7 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, Office Action and Translation dated Apr. 20, 2021, issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-513852, 9 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, Office Action and Translation dated Feb. 24, 2021, issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-517281, 4 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, Office Action and Translation dated Apr. 27, 2021, issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-518400, 10 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, Office Action and Translation dated Aug. 27, 2020, issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-073349, 6 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, Office Action and Translation dated Jul. 30, 2020, issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-517281, 6 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, Office Action and Translation dated Jul. 6, 2020, issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-073348, 10 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, Office Action and Translation dated Jul. 6, 2021, issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-073349, 6 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, Office Action and Translation dated Oct. 8, 2019, issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-521032, 5 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, Office Action dated Dec. 7, 2021, issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-513852, 6 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, Office Action Translation dated Nov. 5, 2019, issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-517281, 2 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, Office Action Translation dated Oct. 8, 2019, issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-521032, 8 pages. |
Jo et al., “Synchronized One-to-many Media Streaming with Adaptive Playout Control,” Proceedings of SPIE, 2002, pp. 71-82, vol. 4861. |
Johnson, “Implementing Neural Networks into Modem Technology,” IJCNN'99. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks . Proceedings [Cat. No. 99CH36339], Washington, DC, USA, 1999, pp. 1028-1032, vol. 2, doi: 10.1109/IJCNN.1999.831096. [retrieved on Jun. 22, 2020]. |
Jones, Stephen, “Dell Digital Audio Receiver: Digital upgrade for your analog stereo,” Analog Stereo, Jun. 24, 2000 http://www.reviewsonline.com/articles/961906864.htm retrieved Jun. 18, 2014, 2 pages. |
Jose Alvarez and Mathieu Salzmann “Compression-aware Training of Deep Networks” 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Nov. 13, 2017, 12pages. |
Joseph Szurley et al, “Efficient computation of microphone utility in a wireless acoustic sensor network with multi-channel Wiener filter based noise reduction”, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Kyoto, Japan, Mar. 25-30, 2012, pp. 2657-2660, XP032227701, DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP .2012.6288463 ISBN: 978-1-4673-0045-2. |
Ketabdar et al. Detection of Out-of-Vocabulary Words in Posterior Based ASR. Proceedings of Interspeech 2007, Aug. 27, 2007, 4 pages. |
Kim et al. Character-Aware Neural Language Models. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1508.06615v3.pdf, Oct. 16, 2015, 9 pages. |
Korean Patent Office, Korean Examination Report and Translation dated Nov. 25, 2021, issued in connection with Korean Application No. 10-2021-7008937, 14 pages. |
Korean Patent Office, Korean Examination Report and Translation dated Apr. 26, 2021, issued in connection with Korean Application No. 10-2021-7008937, 15 pages. |
Korean Patent Office, Korean Examination Report and Translation dated Dec. 27, 2021, issued in connection with Korean Application No. 10-2021-7008937, 22 pages. |
Korean Patent Office, Korean Office Action and Translation dated Oct. 14, 2021, issued in connection with Korean Application No. 10-2020-7011843, 29 pages. |
Korean Patent Office, Korean Office Action and Translation dated Aug. 16, 2019, issued in connection with Korean Application No. 10-2018-7027452, 14 pages. |
Korean Patent Office, Korean Office Action and Translation dated Apr. 2, 2020, issued in connection with Korean Application No. 10-2020-7008486, 12 pages. |
Korean Patent Office, Korean Office Action and Translation dated Mar. 25, 2020, issued in connection with Korean Application No. 10-2019-7012192, 14 pages. |
Korean Patent Office, Korean Office Action and Translation dated Aug. 26, 2020, issued in connection with Korean Application No. 10-2019-7027640, 16 pages. |
Korean Patent Office, Korean Office Action and Translation dated Mar. 30, 2020, issued in connection with Korean Application No. 10-2020-7004425, 5 pages. |
Korean Patent Office, Korean Office Action and Translation dated Jan. 4, 2021, issued in connection with Korean Application No. 10-2020-7034425, 14 pages. |
Korean Patent Office, Korean Office Action and Translation dated Sep. 9, 2019, issued in connection with Korean Application No. 10-2018-7027451, 21 pages. |
Korean Patent Office, Korean Office Action dated May 8, 2019, issued in connection with Korean Applicatior No. 10-2018-7027451, 7 pages. |
Korean Patent Office, Korean Office Action dated May 8, 2019, issued in connection with Korean Applicatior No. 10-2018-7027452, 5 pages. |
Lei et al. Accurate and Compact Large Vocabulary Speech Recognition on Mobile Devices. Interspeech 2013, Aug. 25, 2013, 4 pages. |
Lengerich et al. An End-to-End Architecture for Keyword Spotting and Voice Activity Detection, arXiv:1611.09405v1, Nov. 28, 2016, 5 pages. |
Louderback, Jim, “Affordable Audio Receiver Furnishes Homes With MP3,” TechTV Vault. Jun. 28, 2000 retrieved Jul. 10, 2014, 2 pages. |
Maja Taseska and Emanual A.P. Habets, “MMSE-Based Blind Source Extraction in Diffuse Noise Fields Using a Complex Coherence-Based a Priori Sap Estimator.” International Workshop on Acoustic Signal Enhancement 2012, Sep. 4-6, 2012, 4pages. |
Matrix—The Ultimate Development Board Sep. 14, 2019 Matrix—The Ultimate Development Board Sep. 14, 2019 https-//web.archive.org/web/20190914035838/https-//www.matrix.one/ , 1 page. |
Mesaros et al. Detection and Classification of Acoustic Scenes and Events: Outcome of the DCASE 2016 Challenge. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing. Feb. 2018, 16 pages. |
Morales-Cordovilla et al. “Room Localization for Distant Speech Recognition,” Proceedings of Interspeech 2014, Sep. 14, 2014, 4 pages. |
Newman, Jared. “Chromecast Audio's multi-room support has arrived,” Dec. 11, 2015, https://www.pcworld.com/article/3014204/customer-electronic/chromcase-audio-s-multi-room-support-has . . . , 1 page. |
Ngo et al. “Incorporating the Conditional Speech Presence Probability in Multi-Channel Wiener Filter Based Noise Reduction in Hearing Aids.” EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing vol. 2009, Jun. 2, 2009, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 12, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/008,104, filed Aug. 31, 2020, 6 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 18, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/236,559, filed Apr. 21, 2021, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 21, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/153,530, filed Oct. 5, 2018, 22 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 22, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/179,779, filed Nov. 2, 2018, 19 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 23, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/660,197, filed Oct. 22, 2019, 9 pages. |
Advisory Action dated Jun. 10, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/936,177, filed Mar. 26, 2018, 4 pages. |
Advisory Action dated Aug. 13, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/271,550, filed Feb. 8, 2019, 4 pages. |
Advisory Action dated Apr. 23, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/219,702, filed Dec. 13, 2018, 3 pages. |
Advisory Action dated Apr. 24, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/948,541, filed Apr. 9, 2018, 4 pages. |
Advisory Action dated Jun. 28, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/438,744, filed Feb. 21, 2017, 3 pages. |
Advisory Action dated Dec. 31, 2018, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/804,776, filed Nov. 6, 2017, 4 pages. |
Advisory Action dated Sep. 8, 2021, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/168,389, filed Oct. 23, 2018, 4 pages. |
Advisory Action dated Jun. 9, 2020, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/145,275, filed Sep. 28, 2018, 3 pages. |
Andra et al. Contextual Keyword Spotting in Lecture Video With Deep Convolutional Neural Network. 2017 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems, IEEE, Oct. 28, 2017, 6 pages. |
Anonymous,. S Voice or Google Now—The Lowdown. Apr. 28, 2015, 9 pages, [online], [retrieved on Nov. 29, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet (URL:http://web.archive.org/web/20160807040123/http://lowdown.carphonewarehouse.com/news/s-voice-or-google-now/29958/). |
Anonymous: “What are the function of 4 Microphones on iPhone 6S/6S+?”, ETrade Supply, Dec. 24, 2015, XP055646381, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://www.etradesupply.com/blog/4-microphones-iphone-6s6s-for/ [retrieved on Nov. 26, 2019]. |
Audhkhasi Kartik et al. End-to-end ASR-free keyword search from speech. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Mar. 5, 2017, 7 pages. |
AudioTron Quick Start Guide, Version 1.0, Mar. 2001, 24 pages. |
AudioTron Reference Manual, Version 3.0, May 2002, 70 pages. |
AudioTron Setup Guide, Version 3.0, May 2002, 38 pages. |
Australian Patent Office, Australian Examination Report Action dated Apr. 14, 2020, issued in connection with Australian Application No. 2019202257, 3 pages. |
Australian Patent Office, Australian Examination Report Action dated Oct. 3, 2019, issued in connection with Australian Application No. 2018230932, 3 pages. |
Australian Patent Office, Australian Examination Report Action dated Apr. 7, 2021, issued in connection with Australian Application No. 2019333058, 2 pages. |
Australian Patent Office, Australian Examination Report Action dated Aug. 7, 2020, issued in connection with Australian Application No. 2019236722, 4 pages. |
Australian Patent Office, Examination Report dated Jun. 28, 2021, issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2019395022, 2 pages. |
Australian Patent Office, Examination Report dated Oct. 30, 2018, issued in connection with Australian Application No. 2017222436, 3 pages. |
“Automatic Parameter Tying in Neural Networks” ICLR 2018, 14 pages. |
Bertrand et al. “Adaptive Distributed Noise Reduction for Speech Enhancement in Wireless Acoustic Sensor Networks” Jan. 2010, 4 pages. |
Bluetooth. “Specification of the Bluetooth System: The ad hoc SCATTERNET for affordable and highly functional wireless connectivity,” Core, Version 1.0 A, Jul. 26, 1999, 1068 pages. |
Bluetooth. “Specification of the Bluetooth System: Wireless connections made easy,” Core, Version 1.0 B, Dec. 1, 1999, 1076 pages. |
Canadian Patent Office, Canadian Examination Report dated Dec. 1, 2021, issued in connection with Canadian Application No. 3096442, 4 pages. |
Canadian Patent Office, Canadian Examination Report dated Nov. 2, 2021, issued in connection with Canadian Application No. 3067776, 4 pages. |
Canadian Patent Office, Canadian Examination Report dated Oct. 26, 2021, issued in connection with Canadian Application No. 3072492, 3 pages. |
Canadian Patent Office, Canadian Examination Report dated Mar. 9, 2021, issued in connection with Canadian Application No. 3067776, 5 pages. |
Canadian Patent Office, Canadian Office Action dated Nov. 14, 2018, issued in connection with Canadian Application No. 3015491, 3 pages. |
Chinese Patent Office, Chinese Office Action and Translation dated Jul. 2, 2021, issued in connection with Chinese Application No. 201880077216.4, 22 pages. |
Chinese Patent Office, Chinese Office Action and Translation dated Mar. 30, 2021, issued in connection with Chinese Application No. 202010302650.7, 15 pages. |
Chinese Patent Office, First Office Action and Translation dated Dec. 1, 2021, issued in connection with Chinese Application No. 201780077204.7, 11 pages. |
Chinese Patent Office, First Office Action and Translation dated Dec. 20, 2021, issued in connection with Chinese Application No. 202010302650.7, 10 pages. |
Chinese Patent Office, First Office Action and Translation dated Mar. 20, 2019, issued in connection with Chinese Application No. 201780025028.2, 18 pages. |
Chinese Patent Office, First Office Action and Translation dated Mar. 27, 2019, issued in connection with Chinese Application No. 201780025029.7, 9 pages. |
Chinese Patent Office, First Office Action and Translation dated May 27, 2021, issued in connection with Chinese Application No. 201880026360.5, 15 pages. |
Chinese Patent Office, First Office Action and Translation dated Dec. 28, 2020, issued in connection with Chinese Application No. 201880072203.8, 11 pages. |
Chinese Patent Office, First Office Action and Translation dated Nov. 5, 2019, issued in connection with Chinese Application No. 201780072651.3, 19 pages. |
Chinese Patent Office, First Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2020, issued in connection with Chinese Application No. 201780061543.6, 29 pages. |
Chinese Patent Office, Second Office Action and Translation dated May 11, 2020, issued in connection with Chinese Application No. 201780061543.6, 17 pages. |
Chinese Patent Office, Second Office Action and Translation dated Jul. 18, 2019, issued in connection with Chinese Application No. 201780025029.7, 14 pages. |
Chinese Patent Office, Second Office Action and Translation dated Sep. 23, 2019, issued in connection with Chinese Application No. 201780025028.2, 15 pages. |
Chinese Patent Office, Second Office Action and Translation dated Mar. 31, 2020, issued in connection with Chinese Application No. 201780072651.3, 17 pages. |
Chinese Patent Office, Third Office Action and Translation dated Sep. 16, 2019, issued in connection with Chinese Application No. 201780025029.7, 14 pages. |
Chinese Patent Office, Third Office Action and Translation dated Aug. 5, 2020, issued in connection with Chinese Application No. 201780072651.3, 10 pages. |
Chinese Patent Office, Translation of Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2019, issued in connection with Chinese Application No. 201780025029.7, 8 pages. |
Chung et al. Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Network on Sequence Modeling. Dec. 11, 2014, 9 pages. |
Cipriani,. The complete list of OK, Google commands—CNET. Jul. 1, 2016, 5 pages, [online], [retrieved on Jan. 15, 2020]. Retrieved from the Internet: (URL:https://web.archive.org/web/20160803230926/https://www.cnet.com/how-to/complete-list-of-ok-google-commands/). |
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Mar. 8, 2017, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/229,855, filed Aug. 5, 2016, 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220013110 A1 | Jan 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16219702 | Dec 2018 | US |
Child | 17486574 | US |