The present invention relates generally to a networked motorized drive roller conveyor.
Conventional conveyor control systems utilize a central Programmable Logic Controller (“PLC”) mounted in a central control panel. This type of system requires control devices, e.g., photo-eyes, solenoid valves, and motor starters, to be terminated at the main control panel. A typical control system utilizing a PLC requires several hundred to several thousand feet of control wiring, which requires significant time, labor and money to route and terminate the wiring. In addition, the PLC requires specialized knowledge, e.g., knowledge of ladder logic, and familiarity with the many different interface requirements unique to each manufacturer's product. Moreover, since there is a central controller, response time with respect to the control devices may be increased because the single processor must account for all operations occurring within the system.
A Motorized Drive Roller (“MDR”) is a conveyor roller with an integrated motor. An MDR is typically configured to drive a plurality of idler rollers, usually by way of urethane belts or chains. The MDR and idler rollers thus define a zone. There is typically one MDR per zone.
For conveyor systems that utilize MDR technology, networked motor controllers are frequently used to handle basic transport, diversion, and accumulation tasks to move items through a conveyor system. These motor controllers are mounted in close proximity to the MDR rollers and directly interface with the product sensors associated with each MDR. An MDR conveyor system has many advantages over other conveyor technologies, such as lower power consumption, noise reduction, and a decreased need for maintenance.
Unlike conventional control systems, modular distributed controls don't require hundreds to thousands of feet of wiring from a centralized PLC to each device in the system. With controls located near the control devices, wiring and wiring labor may be reduced. This shortens the time to complete implementation and provides a parallel control capability that minimizes response time issues common to conventional PLC based systems. Because the system is not limited by the speed of a central processor in a PLC, the system can grow without worry of overtaxing a centralized controller. Testing and start-up time is also reduced, as various segments of the system can be installed and tested independent of other segments.
It is common practice in existing conveyor systems that use MDR roller conveyor along with associated motor controllers to utilize smaller, localized PLC's distributed throughout the system to handle conveyor operations such as diverting, bar code scanning, RFID communication, label applications, etc. These peripherals typically communicate serially (RS232 or RS485) or via a network protocol such as Ethernet. Having multiple PLCs in this environment creates other undesirable issues as single point diagnostics are difficult to implement.
The networked, distributed control system of the present invention provides localized controls for various operations, e.g., diverting, bar code scanning, RFID transactions, labeling, etc. The inventive control system can also handle the basic MDR conveyor drive and accumulation responsibilities, which greatly reduces the wiring needed for the system, implementation time, and cost while maintaining a centralized diagnostic capability. Additional capability to allow localized programming as well as status and diagnostics capability are additional benefits of the inventive control system. Eliminating the need for PLCs and associated ladder logic is a further benefit of the inventive design because it reduces the complexity of installation, operation and modification of the control system and corresponding conveyor system.
As noted above, MDR conveyor systems have many advantages over other conveyor technologies, such as lower power consumption, noise reduction, and less maintenance. However, prior to the present invention, MDR systems lacked the ability to control the size of gaps between items on the conveyor system. Prior art systems are also limited to transporting “Items” that are shorter in length than a single “Zone”.
Existing technology is typically marketed as “Zero pressure Accumulation” conveyor technology, as items on the conveyor are allowed to accumulate with one item per zone. As such, with control technology currently marketed, items accumulate with varying gaps between items, based on the length of the items.
In accordance with one aspect of the inventive conveyor control system, a gap control arrangement is used to control gaps between items on the conveyor system. The elimination of gaps between items on the conveyor system is desirable, in that gaps reduce the number of items that can be accumulated on the conveyor, providing lower accumulation efficiency. Thus, reducing or even eliminating gaps between items helps to maximize the accumulation efficiency of the conveyor system. The gap control system incorporates the use of MDR technology and its desirable attributes while at the same time providing the operator with the ability to control the size of the gaps between items on the conveyor system.
In one embodiment of the invention, a networked motorized drive roller conveyor includes a plurality of motorized drive roller assemblies, where each assembly comprises a zone. The conveyor has a plurality of networked cards, with each card controlling a pair of adjacent zones. The conveyor further has a plurality of sensors for detecting items on the conveyor, with each sensor corresponding to a zone. For a pair of adjacent zones, the corresponding networked card measures a gap between consecutive items on the conveyor by beginning a counter when a trailing edge of a first item passes the sensor of an upstream zone within the pair of zones, and stopping the counter when a leading edge of the second item passes the sensor of the upstream zone within the pair of zones, to generate a counter value. If the first item is stopped in the downstream zone, the networked card causes the motorized drive roller assembly of the upstream zone to move the item into the downstream zone a distance derived from the counter value before stopping the movement of the second item.
In another embodiment of the invention, a motorized drive roller conveyor includes an upstream zone and a downstream zone. Each zone has a drive roller, an idler roller that is driven by the drive roller, and a sensor. A card controls the upstream zone and the downstream zone. The card measures a gap between a first item on the conveyor and a second item on the conveyor by beginning a counter when a trailing edge of the first item passes the sensor of the upstream zone and stopping the counter when a leading edge of the second item passes the sensor of the upstream zone to generate a counter value. If the first item is stopped in the downstream zone, the card of the upstream zone causes the drive roller of the upstream zone to advance the second item into the downstream zone for a distance derived from the counter value before stopping the movement of the second item.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, a method for controlling a gap between items on a motorized drive roller conveyor includes the steps of: (a) detecting a trailing edge of a first item at a predetermined location in a first zone on a conveyor system; (b) beginning a counter once the trailing edge of the first item passes the predetermined location; (c) stopping the counter upon the first occurrence of the following: (i) a leading edge of a second item is detected at the predetermined location, or (ii) the first item is stopped in a downstream zone adjacent the first zone; and (d) generating a counter value.
These and other aspects and advantages of the present invention will be made apparent from the following description taken together with the drawings.
An exemplary embodiment of the invention is illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which like reference numerals represent like parts throughout.
In the drawings:
In the illustrated embodiment, the card 20 contains drivers 22, e.g., on a microprocessor, for one or more MDR rollers, which preferably feature a dual brushless motor. More specifically, for zero-pressure accumulation mode of operation, e.g., one in which the items on the conveyor are not intended to contact one another, each card 20 will service two zones 15. In other words, the card 20 will contain drivers for respective MDR rollers in adjacent zones 15. The drivers are adapted to support any variation of MDR roller, e.g. commonly available MDR rollers, e.g., those ranging from 22 watts to 50 watts, may be used.
The card 20 of the present invention includes a plurality of Inputs and Outputs (“I/O”) 23 for interfacing with various components that are typically utilized in conveyor assemblies, e.g., limit switches, solenoid valves, motor contactors, alarms/buzzers, and status beacons.
The card 20 further includes a plurality of photo sensor input jacks 24 that connect with sensors 14, which, as discussed above, detect items 11 that move along the conveyor system 10. For example, four such jacks 24 are shown on the block diagram in
The card 20 further includes a serial I/O port 26 to facilitate communications with external peripheral devices such as bar code scanners, RFID reader/writer devices, label applicators, in motion weigh scales, or other serial devices.
The card 20 may also feature an operator interface display 27. For example, the display may include button switches for interfacing with the module, a high intensity beacon for fault and error notification, and a display element that provides textual and/or graphical information to the operator. An operator interface display allows parameters such as roller speed, acceleration and deceleration rates, delays, etc. to be set locally from any card 20, rather than from a central point such as a PLC.
In this description, the term “card” is used to describe item 20, which controls operation of adjacent zones in conveyor system 10. It is understood that the term “card” is used for convenience, and that item 20 may be any satisfactory control device that includes the features and functionality to connect to the sensors and drive rollers of the adjacent zones of conveyor system 10 and to control their operation. The term “card” is not intended to denote any particular structural or physical characteristics of the control device.
The inventive conveyor system 10 improves upon existing designs by entirely eliminating the need for a PLC controller for normal conveyor operations. The conveyor system 10 allows additional functions to be implemented seamlessly without the need for PLCs or any knowledge of ladder logic on the part of the operator or system installer.
One configuration is an interface with an in-motion weigh scale as shown in
Another type of configuration is an interface with a label applicator or “print and apply” label applicator as shown in
Another type of configuration is a 90 degree transfer as shown in
Yet another configuration is a “+” transfer as shown in
Another configuration is a “T” transfer as shown in
The illustrated embodiment includes either a display on the card 20 or a touch screen type interface on a personal computer or industrial computing device. The touch screen allows a setup operator to easily drag and drop the aforementioned pre-programmed operations to each card 20, with no knowledge of programming ladder logic or other programming required. The interface also allows parameters such as speed, timing, direction, etc. to be easily communicated to the individual cards 20 via the network.
The illustrated embodiment of the conveyor system 10 also has the ability to retain a backup of each card 20 in the system, should a replacement be required because of a card failure. The parameters and standard code blocks can simply be downloaded to the card 20, greatly minimizing downtime in the event of a card failure.
As discussed above, it is not desirable to have gaps 30 between items 11 on a conveyor system 10. The gap control system of the present invention uses MDR rollers in conjunction with cards 20 and sensors 14 to control the gaps 30 between items 11. As shown in
Depending on the nature of the items 11 being conveyed, the size of the zones 15 may be smaller than the arrangement shown in
The illustrated embodiment uses brushless DC motors integrated within the MDRs. These motors provide feedback as to the position of the roller, e.g., via Hall effect sensors that are integral with the motor itself. The inventive gap control system utilizes the feedback from the Hall effect sensors to dynamically determine the length of the gap 30 between items 11 that are transported on the conveyor system 10.
More specifically, as an item 11 passes a sensor 14, the sensor 14 transitions from blocked (i.e., when the item 11 is triggering the sensor 14) to unblocked (i.e., when the item 11 is not triggering the sensor 14). Accordingly, as an item 11 passes a sensor 14, a counter is initiated within a microprocessor 28 on the card 20. The counter counts the number of pulses received by the Hall effect sensor within an MDR until a subsequent item 11 blocks the sensor 14. In other words, the counter records the number of pulses received from the MDR while no item 11 was being transported by the MDR, which is a measure of the gap 30 between consecutive items 11. A counter value is calculated and maintained for every sensor 14 in the conveyor system by corresponding cards 20. Thus, as a downstream item 11 approaches a blocked zone 15, the corresponding counter value is used to continue to transport an item 11 the requisite number of pulses, i.e., the number of pulses stored in the counter value, in order to close the gap 30. This effectively transports the item 11 right up to the stopped item 11, barely touching it, providing zero pressure accumulation as desired.
In addition to the scenario discussed above, i.e., wherein a sensor 14 detects a second item 11 after a first item 11 has passed the sensor 14, there is another scenario in which the counter may be stopped. Specifically, the second scenario occurs when an item 11 that has passed a particular sensor 14 is stopped on the conveyor system 10 before a second item 11 is detected by the particular sensor 14. In other words, the item 11 is stopped before the second item 11 reaches the particular sensor 14. Thus, when the item 11 has been stopped, the card 20 corresponding to the downstream zone 15 in which the item 11 is stopped communicates with the card 20 corresponding to the adjacent upstream zone 15, which then stops the counter. Accordingly, the counter value represents the distance between the end of the stopped, downstream item 11 and the sensor 14 in the adjacent, upstream zone 15. Thus, the cards 20 communicate with one another such that a subsequent item 11 is moved up to the stopped item 11, thus closing the gap 30 between the two items.
The illustrated embodiment also allows the counter value to be converted to a known distance, such that the counter value could be modified to allow the user to select a desired gap distance between items 11 so that items 11 do not touch, but have a minimal gap 30.
The present invention further includes a method for determining a gap 30 between items 11 on a conveyor system 10. Generally speaking, as shown in
Additional steps of the method may include using the counter value to eliminate the gap 30 between the items 11. For example, the counter value may be used to rotate an MDR a corresponding number of rotations in order to close the gap 30 between the adjacent items 11 in the event that the downstream item 11 has been stopped on the conveyor system. Moreover, the counter value may be adjusted or converted to a predetermined value so that the size of the gap remains fixed if a gap (preferably minimal) between items 11 is desired.
The method may also include steps to stop the counter when an item has been stopped in a downstream zone. For example, the method may include the steps of (a) detecting a first edge of a first item at a predetermined location on a conveyor system; (b) detecting a second edge of the first item at the predetermined location on the conveyor system; (c) beginning a counter once the second edge of the first item passes the predetermined location on the conveyor system; (d) stopping the counter when the item has been stopped on the conveyor system; and (e) generating a counter value based upon the counter data. Further steps may include using the counter data to rotate an MDR a corresponding amount of rotations in order to close the gap 30 between the adjacent items 11.
Various alternatives and modifications are contemplated as being within the scope of the following claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter regarded as the invention.
The present application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/230,304, filed on Dec. 21, 2018, entitled “Networked Motorized Drive Roller Conveyor,” which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/799,817, filed on Oct. 31, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,160,607 issued on Dec. 25, 2018, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/920,284, filed on Oct. 22, 2015, which is now abandoned, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/468,245, filed on Aug. 25, 2014, which is now abandoned, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/192,679, filed Jul. 28, 2011, which is now abandoned, which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/368,902, filed on Jul. 29, 2010. The contents of each of these applications are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4002886 | Sundelin | Jan 1977 | A |
4331328 | Fasig | May 1982 | A |
4424082 | Rowan | Jan 1984 | A |
4447446 | Kay et al. | May 1984 | A |
4491982 | Candy et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4500880 | Gomersall et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4598275 | Ross et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4792273 | Specht | Dec 1988 | A |
4854439 | Ueda | Aug 1989 | A |
4936738 | Brennan et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4962466 | Revesz et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5151684 | Johnsen | Sep 1992 | A |
5228558 | Hall | Jul 1993 | A |
5260694 | Remahl | Nov 1993 | A |
5271703 | Lindqvist et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5294004 | Leverett | Mar 1994 | A |
5315094 | Lisy | May 1994 | A |
5348485 | Briechle et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5505473 | Radcliffe | Apr 1996 | A |
5676514 | Higman et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5730274 | Loomer | Mar 1998 | A |
5781443 | Street et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5812986 | Danelski | Sep 1998 | A |
5842555 | Gannon et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5862907 | Taylor | Jan 1999 | A |
5886634 | Muhme | Mar 1999 | A |
5990437 | Coutant et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6021888 | Itoh et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023034 | Nakajima | Feb 2000 | A |
6047812 | Horn et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6205396 | Teicher et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6246023 | Kugle | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6289260 | Bradley et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6315104 | Ebert | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331437 | Cohen et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6377867 | Bradley et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6481261 | Ellis | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6505093 | Thatcher et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6543693 | Stern et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6544068 | Hatton | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6597969 | Greenwald et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6650225 | Bastian, II et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6711461 | Flores | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6729463 | Pfeiffer | May 2004 | B2 |
6731094 | Itoh et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6762382 | Danelski | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6762681 | Danelski | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6775588 | Peck | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6820736 | Itoh | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6827202 | Topmiller et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6873881 | Schneible, Sr. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6879306 | Spoonower et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6971833 | Freudelsperger et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7084738 | Bastian, II | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7263409 | LeVasseur et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7542823 | Nagai | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7591365 | Knepple et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7591366 | Taylor | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7631869 | Bowers et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7705742 | Delaney, III et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7756603 | Delaney, III et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7905345 | Taylor | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7909155 | Lupton et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8073562 | Danelski | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8746437 | Schiesser | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8757363 | Combs et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
9446908 | Danelski | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9555977 | Combs et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9944470 | Danelski | Apr 2018 | B2 |
20020174038 | Chien | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20040010337 | Mountz | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050035694 | Stevens | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043850 | Stevens et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050047895 | Lert, Jr. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071234 | Schon | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050140498 | Bastian, II | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149226 | Stevens et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060238307 | Bauer et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060289274 | Knepple et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070210923 | Butler et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080183326 | Danelski | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183328 | Danelski | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080234853 | Antonuk et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080270327 | Freudelsperger | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090074545 | Lert, Jr. et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090173780 | Ramamoorthy et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090301839 | Taylor | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100015925 | Gruber | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100223781 | Sumi | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100322473 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20120022684 | Hernot | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120024669 | Danelski et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120150342 | Song et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120160637 | Itoh et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120290126 | Combs et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20140343720 | Danelski | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140351101 | Danelski | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20170066598 | Danelski | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20180334333 | Danelski | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190291965 | Danelski et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1395199 | Feb 2003 | CN |
1396543 | Feb 2003 | CN |
1817757 | Aug 2006 | CN |
101968860 | Feb 2011 | CN |
4000603 | Jul 1991 | DE |
19947259 | Sep 2000 | DE |
102006051777 | May 2008 | DE |
2810220 | Dec 2014 | EP |
2810225 | Dec 2014 | EP |
2881663 | Aug 2006 | FR |
H02(1990)-285403 | Nov 1990 | JP |
H03(1991)-221359 | Sep 1991 | JP |
2000034004 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2001171841 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2003065833 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2005216957 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2006160388 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2009263018 | Nov 2009 | JP |
2009298522 | Dec 2009 | JP |
2016533579 | Oct 2016 | JP |
10-2004-0036899 | May 2004 | KR |
10-2006-0020301 | Mar 2006 | KR |
2003007256 | Jan 2003 | WO |
2012024278 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2013116620 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013116652 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2015020976 | Feb 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
CHENEY “No Gags in Spencer's Distribution” Jun. 1994, American Shipper 36(6):56-69. |
Hitchcock “Paperless Picking Increases Productivity by Over 300%” Jul. 1993, Modem Materials Handling 48(8):20(30). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US14/49638 dated Mar. 12, 2015. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2013/024308 dated May 15, 2013. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2013/024349 dated May 15, 2013. |
Supplemental European Search Report and Written Opinion for EP 14758722 dated Dec. 22, 2016. |
Supplemental European Search Report and Written Opinion for EP 14759363 dated Aug. 17, 2017. |
Supplemental European Search Report for EP 13743539 dated Aug. 5, 2015. |
Supplemental European Search Report for EP 13744016 dated Aug. 5, 2015. |
Wei et al. “Solving the Fixed Shelf Order-Picking Optimization Problem Using the Modified LK Algorithm” June, 2004 Computer Applications 24(6):1. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200140203 A1 | May 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61368902 | Jul 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16230304 | Dec 2018 | US |
Child | 16735900 | US | |
Parent | 15799817 | Oct 2017 | US |
Child | 16230304 | US | |
Parent | 14920284 | Oct 2015 | US |
Child | 15799817 | US | |
Parent | 14468245 | Aug 2014 | US |
Child | 14920284 | US | |
Parent | 13192679 | Jul 2011 | US |
Child | 14468245 | US |