This application is a 371 application of International Patent Application PCT/AU2015/050215, titled “IMPROVED NEURAL MEASUREMENT” and filed on 5 May 2015, which application claims the benefit of Australian Provisional Patent Application No. 2014901639 filed 5 May 2014, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to measurement of neural activity, and in particular relates to measurement of a compound action potential or the like by using one or more electrodes implanted proximal to neural tissue.
There are a range of circumstances in which it is desirable to obtain an electrical measurement of a compound action potential (CAP) evoked on a neural pathway by an electrical stimulus applied to the neural pathway. However, this can be a difficult task as an observed CAP signal will typically have a maximum amplitude in the range of microvolts, whereas a stimulus applied to evoke the CAP is typically several volts. Electrode artefact usually results from the stimulus, and manifests as a decaying output of several millivolts throughout the time that the CAP occurs, presenting a significant obstacle to isolating the CAP of interest. As the neural response can be contemporaneous with the stimulus and/or the stimulus artefact, CAP measurements present a difficult challenge of amplifier design. In practice, many non-ideal aspects of a circuit lead to artefact, and as these mostly have a decaying exponential characteristic which can be of either positive or negative polarity, identification and elimination of sources of artefact can be laborious.
A number of approaches have been proposed for recording a CAP, including those of King (U.S. Pat. No. 5,913,882), Nygard (U.S. Pat. No. 5,758,651) and Daly (US Patent Application No. 2007/0225767).
Evoked responses are less difficult to detect when they appear later in time than the artifact, or when the signal-to-noise ratio is sufficiently high. The artifact is often restricted to a time of 1-2 ms after the stimulus and so, provided the neural response is detected after this time window, data can be obtained. This is the case in surgical monitoring where there are large distances between the stimulating and recording electrodes so that the propagation time from the stimulus site to the recording electrodes exceeds 2 ms. However, to characterize the responses from the dorsal columns for example, high stimulation currents and close proximity between electrodes are required, and therefore the measurement process must overcome contemporaneous artifact directly. Similar considerations can arise in deep brain stimulation where it can be desirable to stimulate a neural structure and immediately measure the response of that structure before the neural response propagates elsewhere.
Implanted electrical stimulus devices must also provide for charge recovery in order to ensure that transient currents delivered by stimuli do not lead to a net DC injection of charge into the tissue. One approach is to provide capacitors in series on each electrode, to prevent DC transfer to tissue, and such capacitors are often a requirement of regulatory bodies in order for an active implantable device to obtain market approval. Another arrangement as shown in
Any discussion of documents, acts, materials, devices, articles or the like which has been included in the present specification is solely for the purpose of providing a context for the present invention. It is not to be taken as an admission that any or all of these matters form part of the prior art base or were common general knowledge in the field relevant to the present invention as it existed before the priority date of each claim of this application.
Throughout this specification the word “comprise”, or variations such as “comprises” or “comprising”, will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated element, integer or step, or group of elements, integers or steps, but not the exclusion of any other element, integer or step, or group of elements, integers or steps.
In this specification, a statement that an element may be “at least one of” a list of options is to be understood that the element may be any one of the listed options, or may be any combination of two or more of the listed options.
According to a first aspect the present invention provides a method for measuring a neural response to a stimulus, the method comprising:
applying an electrical stimulus from stimulus electrodes to neural tissue;
imposing a delay during which the stimulus electrodes are open circuited; and
during the delay, measuring a neural response signal present at sense electrodes with a measurement amplifier, while ensuring that an impedance between the sense electrodes is sufficiently large that a voltage arising on the sense electrode tissue interface in response to the stimulus is constrained to a level which permits assessment of the neural response voltage seen at the sense electrode.
According to a second aspect the present invention provides an implantable device for measuring a neural response to a stimulus, the device comprising:
a plurality of electrodes including one or more nominal stimulus electrodes and one or more nominal sense electrodes;
a stimulus source for providing a stimulus to be delivered from the one or more stimulus electrodes to neural tissue in order to evoke a neural response;
a measurement amplifier for amplifying a neural response signal sensed at the one or more sense electrodes, wherein an impedance between the sense electrodes is sufficiently large that a voltage arising on the sense electrode tissue interface in response to the stimulus is constrained to a level which permits assessment of the neural response voltage seen at the sense electrode; and
a control unit configured to control application of a stimulus to the neural tissue and measurement of an evoked neural response, the control unit configured to apply an electrical stimulus from the stimulus electrodes to neural tissue, the control unit further configured to impose a delay during which the stimulus electrodes are open circuited, and the control unit further configured to, during the delay, measure a neural response signal present at the sense electrodes with the measurement amplifier.
It is to be noted that different embodiments may involve stimuli of varying intensity or duration, electrodes of varying geometry and size, and/or a varying spatial separation between the stimulus electrodes and the sense electrode(s). The present invention recognises that knowledge of each such parameter in an evoked response measurement system enables a determination to be made as to an expected voltage which will arise on the sense electrode(s) as a result of the electrical characteristics of the stimulus delivered. In particular, modelling the interface between the sense electrode(s) and the tissue as including a constant phase element impedance, representing the electrode-electrolyte interface capacitance and tissue capacitance, and determining the impedance of the constant phase element for the physical parameters of the implant concerned, enables an appropriate lower limit to be placed on the impedance between the sense electrodes.
The impedance between the sense electrodes is preferably chosen to be sufficiently large that the voltage arising on the sense electrode tissue interface in response to the stimulus is constrained to a level which is no more than 15 times larger than the neural response voltage seen at the sense electrode, more preferably is no more than 5 times larger than the neural response voltage seen at the sense electrode, more preferably is no more than 2 times larger than the neural response voltage seen at the sense electrode, even more preferably is no more than the same as the neural response voltage seen at the sense electrode, and most preferably is no more than half of the neural response voltage seen at the sense electrode.
Some embodiments may utilise a differential measurement of the neural response by using two sense electrodes. In such embodiments the voltage arising on the sense electrode tissue interface in response to the stimulus is to be understood to be the differential voltage arising between the two sense electrodes in response to the stimulus. The two sense electrodes for example may be mounted upon a single implanted electrode array. Alternative embodiments may undertake a single ended measurement utilising a single sense electrode and a distal reference electrode, and in such embodiments the voltage arising on the sense electrode tissue interface in response to the stimulus is to be understood to be the differential voltage arising between the sense electrode and the reference electrode in response to the stimulus.
Some embodiments of the present invention further comprise a sense electrode capacitor provided in series between the sense electrode and the measurement amplifier, the sense electrode capacitor being chosen to have a capacitance which ensures that the voltage arising across the capacitor in response to the stimulus is constrained to a level which permits assessment of the neural response voltage seen at the sense electrode. Such embodiments may thus enable improved prevention of DC charge injection to the tissue, while nevertheless retaining neural response measurement capability. In such embodiments, the stimulus electrodes may have corresponding capacitors in order to prevent DC charge injection, and also to permit electrical reconfiguration of each electrode as either a stimulus electrode or sense electrode, as required.
In some embodiments, the input impedance to the measurement amplifier (ZIN) is defined as:
where
In such embodiments ZIN may comprise resistance and/or capacitance provided the above requirement is met. To give sufficient margin of VE over (VS1−VS2), in some embodiments ZIN may be limited by:
ZIN>A×ZC(Vs1−Vs2)/VE
A is a scalar provided to give sufficient margin of VE over (VS1−VS2), and may for example be in the range of 2-5. Alternatively, in embodiments utilising artefact compensation by way of exponential subtraction, A may be in the range of 0.5 or greater while still permitting assessment of the neural response and such embodiments are thus within the scope of the present invention.
Moreover, some embodiments may correlate the measurement against a filter template to extract the neural response from the measurement, in accordance with the teachings of Australian Provisional Patent Application No. 2013904519 by the present applicant, which is available as a published priority document for International Patent Publication No. WO 2015074121 and U.S. Patent Publication No. 2016/020287182, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference, and in such embodiments A may be in the range of 0.067 or greater while still permitting assessment of the neural response and such embodiments are thus within the scope of the present invention.
The neural response measurement may in some embodiments be conducted in the manner taught by International Patent Publication No. WO2012155183, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The method may further comprise obtaining neural measurements repeatedly over time and monitoring for changes. In response to detected changes some embodiments may provide feedback control of a therapy delivered to the patient, such as an electrical stimulus therapy and/or medication. Medication may be controlled automatically by an implanted drug pump or by producing a report for a physician to alter a prescription, for example.
In some embodiments, charge on the stimulus electrodes may be recovered by connecting the stimulus electrodes to each other by either a short circuit or via an impedance, before application of the stimulus and/or after measurement of the neural response.
In some embodiments, the measurement amplifier is kept connected to the sense electrodes throughout the stimulus and measurement. In such embodiments, the measurement amplifier is preferably a wide bandwidth amplifier with sufficient common mode range to avoid saturation by the stimulus. Alternatively, the amplifier may be used in an auto-zero state in which it can zero sufficiently quickly after the stimulus to track the neural response.
An example of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The input impedance required in this embodiment of the invention is determined by noting that noise input is comparable to stimulation voltage, and that the goal is for the stimulus to induce a voltage (Vs1−Vs2) on the CPE of the sense electrodes which is less than the evoked response VE. Consequently the desired input impedance is given by:
In one embodiment, being a spinal cord stimulator (SCS) having electrodes with an area of 14 mm2, Zc=20Ω, (Vs1−Vs2)˜1V, Ve=50 uV, so that the above equation dictates that the minimum value of Zin is 400 kΩ. To give a sufficient margin of Ve over artefact, a more desirable value of Zin is larger, perhaps in the range 1-2 MΩ. In alternative embodiments such as a cochlear implant with electrode area of about 0.1 mm2, being a fraction of the area of an SCS electrode, the minimum required amplifier input impedance is many times higher; 8 MΩ or for sufficient margin more preferably 20 MΩ, illustrating the difficulties of the resistance values chosen in
The importance of including the constant phase element model of the electrode-to-tissue interface in
An equivalent circuit of a CPE is shown in
Unlike an RC network that shows a response characteristic of the circuit, the response of a CPE is dominated by the RC networks that have a similar time constant to that of the length of the stimulation. For example a SCS may have a stimulus pulse width in the range of 100-500 μs. This result is important for defining the apparent conductance of a capacitor as discussed below.
Following a stimulus, there are three mechanisms or sources of artifact that can be identified in the circuit of
The ability of the model of
In addition to experimental verification a simulation of
While the plot of
In
From the simulation model, using the above described baseline definition of artifact and a 400 us pulse width, the sensitivity of artefact to resistance is 4.1×10−2 V·s per mho, and the sensitivity of artefact to capacitance is −2.85×10−2 Vs per mho. Thus for a load of R, and where the artifact is over a 1 ms interval, then the voltage is
V(r,t)=4.1×10−2/(R×t)
So for example, for an amplifier input resistance of 100 KΩ and a 1 ms artefact interval:
V(100 k,1 ms)=400 uV
Further, for a capacitive load, and where the artifact is over a 1 ms interval, then the voltage is:
V(C,t)=−7.14×101×C/t
So for example for a 1000 pF load, artifact over 1 ms, artifact=71.4 uV.
Using this artefact calculation method, the following table shows the artifact contributions of various stray impedances which might be present in a typical SCS.
As can be seen in the above table, appropriate adjustment and control of such impedances present in the neural measurement system can allow considerable sources of artefact to be reduced and ease the task measuring a neural signal of the order of 10 uV.
It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that numerous variations and/or modifications may be made to the invention as shown in the specific embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention as broadly described. The present embodiments are, therefore, to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2014901639 | May 2014 | AU | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/AU2015/050215 | 5/5/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/168735 | 11/12/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3736434 | Darrow | May 1973 | A |
3817254 | Maurer | Jun 1974 | A |
3898472 | Long | Aug 1975 | A |
4158196 | Crawford, Jr. | Jun 1979 | A |
4418695 | Buffet | Dec 1983 | A |
4474186 | Ledley et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4628934 | Pohndorf et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4807643 | Rosier | Feb 1989 | A |
4856525 | Van Den et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
5113859 | Funke | May 1992 | A |
5139020 | Koestner et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5143081 | Young et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5156154 | Valenta, Jr. et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5172690 | Nappholz et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5184615 | Nappholz et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5188106 | Nappholz et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5215100 | Spitz | Jun 1993 | A |
5324311 | Acken | Jun 1994 | A |
5417719 | Hull et al. | May 1995 | A |
5431693 | Schroeppel | Jul 1995 | A |
5458623 | Lu et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5476486 | Lu et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5497781 | Chen et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5638825 | Yamazaki et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5702429 | King et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5758651 | Nygard et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5776170 | Macdonald et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785651 | Kuhn et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5792212 | Weijand et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5814092 | King | Sep 1998 | A |
5913882 | King | Jun 1999 | A |
5999848 | Gord et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6020857 | Podger | Feb 2000 | A |
6027456 | Feler et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038480 | Hrdlicka et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6066163 | John | May 2000 | A |
6114164 | Dennis et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6144881 | Hemming et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157861 | Faltys et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6212431 | Hahn et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6246912 | Sluijter et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6381496 | Meadows et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6463328 | John | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473649 | Gryzwa et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473653 | Schallhorn et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6493576 | Dankwart-Eder | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6522932 | Kuzma | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6600955 | Zierhofer et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6658293 | Vonk et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6675046 | Holsheimer | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6782292 | Whitehurst | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6898582 | Lange et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7089059 | Pless | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7171261 | Litvak et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7231254 | DiLorenzo et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7286876 | Yonce et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7412287 | Yonce et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7450992 | Cameron | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7734340 | De Ridder | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7742810 | Moffitt | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7792584 | Van Oort et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7818052 | Litvak et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7831305 | Gliner | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7835804 | Fridman et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8190251 | Molnar et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8224459 | Pianca et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8239031 | Fried et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8359102 | Thacker et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8454529 | Daly et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8494645 | Spitzer et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8588929 | Davis et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8670830 | Carlson et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8886323 | Wu et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9155892 | Parker et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9302112 | Bornzin et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9381356 | Parker et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9386934 | Parker et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9872990 | Parker et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9974455 | Parker et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10206596 | Single et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
20020055688 | Katims | May 2002 | A1 |
20020099419 | Ayal Shai et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020193670 | Garfield et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030032889 | Wells | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030045909 | Gross et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030139781 | Bradley et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030195580 | Bradley et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040088017 | Sharma et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040122482 | Tung et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040158298 | Gliner | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040225211 | Gozani et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254494 | Spokoyny et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010265 | Baru Fassio | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050017190 | Eversmann et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021104 | DiLorenzo | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050065427 | Magill | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050070982 | Heruth et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075683 | Miesel et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050101878 | Daly | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113877 | Giardiello et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050137670 | Christopherson et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149154 | Cohen | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050192567 | Katims | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203600 | Wallace | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209655 | Bradley et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050282149 | Kovacs et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060009820 | Royle et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020291 | Gozani | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060135998 | Libbus et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060195159 | Bradley et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060212089 | Tass | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217782 | Boveja et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060264752 | Rubinsky et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060287609 | Litvak et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070021800 | Bradley Kerry et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070073354 | Knudson et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070100378 | Maschino | May 2007 | A1 |
20070178579 | Ross et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070185409 | Wu et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208394 | King et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225767 | Daly et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070244410 | Fridman et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250120 | Flach et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255372 | Metzler et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282217 | McGinnis et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070287931 | Dilorenzo | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080021292 | Stypulkowski | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080051647 | Wu et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080064947 | Heruth et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077191 | Morrell | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080097529 | Parramon et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080147155 | Swoyer | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080183076 | Witte | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080208304 | Zdravkovic et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080234780 | Smith et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080275527 | Greenberg et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294221 | Kilgore | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080300655 | Cholette | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090033486 | Costantino et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090082691 | Denison et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090157155 | Bradley | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090270957 | Pianca | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090287277 | Conn et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299214 | Wu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090306491 | Haggers | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010388 | Panken et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100058126 | Chang et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069835 | Parker | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069996 | Strahl | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070007 | Parker | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070008 | Parker | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100106231 | Torgerson | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100114258 | Donofrio et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125313 | Lee et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125314 | Bradley et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100145222 | Brunnett et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100152808 | Boggs | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100179626 | Pilarski | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191307 | Fang et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100204748 | Lozano et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100222844 | Troosters et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100222858 | Meloy | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249643 | Gozani et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249867 | Wanasek | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100258342 | Parker | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100262208 | Parker | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100262214 | Robinson | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100280570 | Sturm et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100286748 | Midani et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100331604 | Okamoto et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331926 | Lee et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110004207 | Wallace et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110021943 | Lacour et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110028859 | Chian | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110087085 | Tsampazis et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110093042 | Torgerson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110106100 | Bischoff | May 2011 | A1 |
20110184488 | De Ridder et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110204811 | Pollmann-retsch | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110224749 | Ben-David et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110264165 | Molnar et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110270343 | Buschman et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110313310 | Tomita | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110313483 | Hincapie et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120029377 | Polak | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120101552 | Lazarewicz et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120109236 | Jacobson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120253423 | Youn et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120277621 | Gerber et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120277823 | Gerber et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130053722 | Carlson et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130060302 | Polefko et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130172774 | Crowder et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130289661 | Griffith et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130289683 | Parker et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140066803 | Choi | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140142447 | Takahashi | May 2014 | A1 |
20140194771 | Parker et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140194772 | Single et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140236042 | Parker et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140236257 | Parker et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140243926 | Carcieri | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140243931 | Parker et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140276195 | Papay et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277250 | Su et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140288551 | Bharmi et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140288577 | Robinson et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140296737 | Parker et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140358024 | Nelson et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150018699 | Zeng et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150164354 | Parker et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150174396 | Fisher et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150238104 | Tass | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150238304 | Lamraoui | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150282725 | Single | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150313487 | Single | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150360031 | Bornzin et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150374999 | Parker | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160166164 | Obradovic et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160287126 | Parker et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160287182 | Single | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170001017 | Parker et al. | Jan 2017 | A9 |
20170071490 | Parker et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170135624 | Parker | May 2017 | A1 |
20170216587 | Parker | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170361101 | Single | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180110987 | Parker | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180117335 | Parker et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180132747 | Parker et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180132760 | Parker | May 2018 | A1 |
20180133459 | Parker et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180228391 | Parker et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180228547 | Parker | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180229046 | Parker et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180256052 | Parker et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0219084 | Apr 1987 | EP |
0998958 | Aug 2005 | EP |
2019716 | Nov 2007 | EP |
2243510 | Oct 2010 | EP |
2443995 | Apr 2012 | EP |
2013527784 | Jul 2013 | JP |
1983003191 | Sep 1983 | WO |
1993001863 | Feb 1993 | WO |
9612383 | Apr 1996 | WO |
2000002623 | Jan 2000 | WO |
2002036003 | Nov 2001 | WO |
2002038031 | May 2002 | WO |
2002049500 | Jun 2002 | WO |
2003028521 | Apr 2003 | WO |
2003043690 | May 2003 | WO |
2003103484 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2004021885 | Mar 2004 | WO |
20040103455 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2005032656 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2005105202 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2006091636 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2007064936 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2007127926 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007130170 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008004204 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008049199 | May 2008 | WO |
2009002072 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009002579 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009010870 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009130515 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2009146427 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010013170 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2010044989 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010051392 | May 2010 | WO |
2010057046 | May 2010 | WO |
2010124139 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2010138915 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2011011327 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011066477 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2011066478 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2011112843 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011119251 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011159545 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2012027791 | Mar 2012 | WO |
2012155183 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2012155184 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2012155185 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2012155187 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2012155188 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2012155189 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2012155190 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO 2012155183 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2013063111 | May 2013 | WO |
2013075171 | May 2013 | WO |
2014071445 | May 2014 | WO |
2014071446 | May 2014 | WO |
2014143577 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2015070281 | May 2015 | WO |
2015074121 | May 2015 | WO |
2015109239 | Jul 2015 | WO |
2015143509 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2015168735 | Nov 2015 | WO |
20160011512 | Jan 2016 | WO |
2016077882 | May 2016 | WO |
2016090420 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016090436 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016115596 | Jul 2016 | WO |
2016161484 | Oct 2016 | WO |
2016191807 | Dec 2016 | WO |
2016191808 | Dec 2016 | WO |
2016191815 | Dec 2016 | WO |
2017173493 | Oct 2017 | WO |
2017219096 | Dec 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Al-Ani et al., “Automatic removal of high-amplitude stimulus artefact from neuronal signal recorded in the subthalamic nucleus”, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 198, Issue 1, 2011, pp. 135-146. |
European Search Report for European Application 12785619.3 Search Completed Oct. 13, 2014, dated Oct. 23, 2014, 7 pgs. |
European Search Report for European Application 12785669.8 Search Completed Sep. 22, 2014, dated Sep. 29, 2014, 5 pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for EP Application 12785483.4 completed Sep. 16, 2014, 7 pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 11820923.8, report completed Dec. 9, 2013, report dated Dec. 17, 2013, 6 pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 13852669.4, Search completed Jun. 8, 2016, dated Jun. 22, 2016, 09 pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 14861553.7, Search completed Jun. 8, 2017, dated Jun. 19, 2017, 8 pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 14863597.2, Search completed Jun. 6, 2017, dated Jun. 13, 2017, 9 pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 13853514.1, Search completed Jun. 8, 2016, dated Jun. 15, 2016, 07 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2012/001441, Report dated May 27, 2014, 10 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2011/001127, date completed Nov. 11, 2011, dated Nov. 15, 2011, 13 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2012/001441, International Filing Date Nov. 23, 2012, Search Completed Feb. 26, 2013, dated Feb. 26, 2013, 14 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2014/001049, Search completed Feb. 10, 2015, dated Feb. 10, 2015, 8 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2014/050369, Search completed Feb. 20, 2015, dated Feb. 20, 2015, 14 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2015/050135, Search completed Jun. 30, 2015, dated Jun. 30, 2015, 26 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2015/050422, Search completed Oct. 14, 2015, dated Oct. 14, 2015, 17 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2015/050724, Search completed May 9, 2016, dated May 9, 2016, 8 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2015/050753, Search completed Feb. 10, 2016, dated Feb. 10, 2016, 10 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2015/050787, Search completed Mar. 16, 2016, dated Mar. 16, 2016, 10 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2016/050019, Search completed May 4, 2016, dated May 4, 2016, 16 pgs. |
International Search Report for Australian Application 2011901829 Search Completed Feb. 6, 2012, dated Feb. 7, 2012, 3 pgs. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/AU2012/000511, International Filing Date May 11, 2012, Search Completed May 17, 2012, dated May 18, 2012, 4 pgs. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/AU2012/000512, International Filing Date May 11, 2012, Search Completed Jul. 10, 2012, dated Jul. 11, 2012, 4 pgs. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/AU2012/000513, International Filing Date May 11, 2012, Search Completed May 29, 2012, dated May 30, 2012, 5 pgs. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/AU2012/000515, International Filing Date May 11, 2012, Search Completed May 21, 2012, dated Jun. 4, 2012, 5 pgs. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/AU2012/000516, International Filing Date May 11, 2012, Search Completed Jul. 11, 2012, dated Jul. 12, 2012, 8 pgs. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/AU2012/000517, International Filing Date May 11, 2012, Search Completed Jun. 4, 2012, dated Jun. 6, 2012, 3 pgs. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/AU2012/000518, International Filing Date May 11, 2012, Search Completed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Jun. 12, 2012, 4 pgs. |
Medtronic, Spinal Cord Stimulation, RestoreSensor Neurostimulator, Features and Specification: Specification, Printed Jun. 16, 2014, 2 pgs. |
Medtronic, Spinal Cord Stimulation, RestoreSensor Neurostimulator, Features and Specification: Summary Printed Jun. 16, 2014, 1 pg. |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2012/000511, International Filing Date May 11, 2012, Search Completed May 17, 2012, dated May 18, 2012, 5 pgs. |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2012/000512, International Filing Date May 11, 2012, Search Completed Jul. 10, 2012, dated Jul. 11, 2012, 7 pgs. |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2012/000513, International Filing Date May 11, 2012, Search Completed May 29, 2012, dated May 30, 2012, 10 pgs. |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2012/000515, International Filing Date May 11, 2012, Search Completed May 21, 2012, dated Jun. 4, 2012, 4 pgs. |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2012/000516, International Filing Date May 11, 2012, Search Completed Jul. 11, 2012, dated Jul. 12, 2012, 8 pgs. |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2012/000517, International Filing Date May 11, 2012, Search Completed Jun. 4, 2012, dated Jun. 6, 2012, 5 pgs. |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2012/000518, International Filing Date May 11, 2012, Search Completed Jun. 8, 2012, dated Jun. 12, 2012, 10 pgs. |
Medtronic, RestoreSensor Neurostimulator, Retrieved from: http://web.archive.org/web/20150328092923/http://professional.medtronic.com:80/pt/neuro/scs/prod/restore-sensor/features-specifications/index.htm, Capture Date Jul. 9, 2012, Printed on May 11, 2017. |
“Advanced Pain Therapy using Neurostimulation for Chronic Pain”, Medtronic RestoreSensor clinical trial paper,Clinical summary, Nov. 2011, pp. 32. |
“Battelle Neurotechnology—Moving Beyond the Limits in Neurotechnology”, Battelle, www.battelle.org, May 2014, pp. 1-2. |
“Haptic technology”, Wkipedia, Retrieved from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haptic_technology, Last modified on Sep. 15, 2014, Printed on Sep. 15, 2014, 5 pgs. |
“Implants for surgery, Cardiac pacemakers”, IS-1 standard ISO 5841-3-2000, Oct. 15, 2000. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2013/001280, Search Completed Jan. 16, 2014, dated Jan. 16, 2014, 8 pgs. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion for International Application PCT/AU2013/001279, Search Completed Jan. 9, 2014, dated Jan. 9, 2014, 9 pgs. |
“Neural Bypass Technology Enables Movement in Paralyzed Patient”, Posted on Jul. 29, 2014, 6 a.m. in Brain chips/computer interface, pp. 1-2. |
“Spinal Cord Stimulation, About Spinal Cord Stimulation”, Medtronic, Retrieved from: http://professional.medtronic.com/pt/neuro/scs/edu/about/index.htm, Printed on Jun. 16, 2014, 2 pgs. |
Andreassen, S. et al., “Muscle Fibre Conduction Velocity in Motor Units of the Human Anterior Tibial Muscle: a New Size Principle Parameter”, J. Physiol, (1987), 391, pp. 561-571. |
Andy, “Parafascicular-Center Median Nuclei Stimulation for Intractable Pain and Dyskinesia (Painful-Dyskinesia)”, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Appl. Neurophysiol., 43, No. 3-5, 1980, pp. 133-144. |
Balzer et al., “Localization of cervical and cervicomedullary stimulation leads for pain treatment using median nerve somatosensay evoked potential collision testing”, Journal of Neurosurgery, Jan. 2011, vol. 114, No. 1: pp. 200-205. |
Blum, A. R., “An Electronic System for Extracelluar Neural Stimulation and Recording”, Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, Aug. 2007, Retrieved from http://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/16192 on Jan. 30, 2012. |
Borg et al., “Conduction velocity and refractory period of single motor nerve fibres in antecedent poliomyelitis”, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, vol. 50, 1987, 443-446. |
Brown et al., “Impact of Deep Brain Stimulation on Upper Limb Askinesia in Parkingson's Disease”, Annals of Neurology, 45, No. 4, 1999, pp. 473-488. |
Budagavi et al., “Modelling of compound nerve action potentials health and disease”, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1992 14th Annual International Conference of the IEEE. vol. 6. IEEE, 1992. pp. 2600-2601. |
Coquery et al., “Backward and forward masking in the perception of cutaneous stimuli”, Perception & Psychophysics, 1973, vol. 13.No. 2, pp. 161-163. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2015/050215, Search completed Jul. 30, 2015, dated Jul. 30, 2015, 8 Pgs. |
“Wde bandwidth BioAmplifier”, http://www.psylab.com/html/default_bioamp.htm, 1-3 pages. |
Lempka, Scott, “The Electrode-Tissue Interface During Recording and Stimulation in the Central Nervous System”, published May 2010. |
Srinivasan, S, “Electrode/Electrolyte Interfaces: Structure and Kinetics of Charge Transfer”, Chapter 2, 67 Pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2011/001127, Report dated Mar. 5, 2013, 9 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2012/000511, Report dated Nov. 19, 2013, 6 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2012/000512, Report dated Nov. 19, 2013, 8 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2012/000513, Report dated Nov. 19, 2013, 11 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2012/000515, Report dated Nov. 19, 2013, 5 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2012/000516, Report dated Nov. 19, 2013, 9 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2012/000517, Report dated Nov. 19, 2013, 6 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2012/000518, Report dated Nov. 19, 2013, 11 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2013/001279, Report dated May 12, 2015, 6 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2013/001280, Report dated May 12, 2015, 6 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2014/001049, Report dated May 17, 2016, 5 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2014/050369, Report dated May 24, 2016, 8 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2015/050135, Report dated Oct. 4, 2016, 13 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2015/050215, Report dated Nov. 8, 2016, 4 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2015/050422, Report dated Jan. 31, 2017, 8 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2015/050724, Report dated May 23, 2017, 5 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2015/050787, Report dated Jun. 13, 2017, 6 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2016/050019, Report dated Jul. 25, 2017, 9 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2016/050263, Report dated Oct. 10, 2017, 9 pgs. |
International Type Search Report for International Application No. AU 2015902393, Search completed May 16, 2016, dated May 16, 2016, 8 Pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 15789515.2, Search completed Dec. 4, 2017, dated Jan. 30, 2018, 7 Pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 15768956.3, Search completed Oct. 3, 2017, dated Oct. 10, 2017, 8 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2015/050753, Report dated Jun. 13, 2017, 7 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2016/050263, Search completed Nov. 16, 2016, dated Nov 16, 2016, 8 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2016/050430, Search completed Aug. 16, 2016, dated Aug. 16, 2016, 10 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2016/050431, Search completed Aug. 16, 2016, dated Aug. 16, 2016, 11 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2016/050439, Search completed Jul. 15, 2016, dated Jul. 15, 2016, 8 Pgs. |
Alam et al., “Evaluation of optimal electrode configurations for epidural spinal cord stimulation in cervical spinal cord injured rats”, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Mar. 2015, 28 pgs. |
Fisher, “F-Waves—Physiology and Clinical Uses”, The Scientific World Journal, (2007) 7, pp. 144-160. |
Gad et al., “Development of a multi-electrode array for spinal cord epidural stimulation to facilitate stepping and standing after a complete spinal cord injury in adult rats”, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2013, 10:2, 18 pgs. |
Sayenko et al., “Neuromodulation of evoked muscle potentials induced by epidural spinal-cord stimulation in paralyzed individuals”, Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 111, No. 5, 2014, pp. 1088-1099, First published Dec. 11, 2013. |
Struijk et al., “Excitation of Dorsal Root Fibers in Spinal Cord Stimulation: a Theoretical Study”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Jul. 1993, vol. 40, No. 7, pp. 632-639. |
Yamada et al., “Extraction and Analysis of the Single Motor Unit F-Wave of the Median Nerve”, EMG Methods for Evaluating Muscle and Nerve Function, InTech, 2012, 15 pgs. |
Dawson, G. D., “The relative excitability and conduction velocity of sensory and motor nerve fibres in man”, Journal of Physiology, 1956, vol. 131(2), pp. 436-451. |
Devergnas et al., A “Cortical potentials evoked by deep brain stimulation in the subthalamic area”, Front Syst Neurosci. 2011; 5: 30. May 13, 2011. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2011.00030. |
Dijkstra, E. A., “Ultrasonic Distance Detection for a Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation System”, Proceedings—19th International Conference—IEEE/EMBS Oct. 30-Nov. 2, 1997, Chicago, IL, 4 pgs. |
Dillier, N et al., “Measurement of the electrically evoked compound action potential via a neural response telemetry system”, Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol, vol. 111, No. 5, May 2002, pp. 407-414. |
Doiron et al., “Persistent Na+ Current Modifies Burst Discharge by Regulating Conditional Backpropagation of Dendritic Spikes”, Journal of Neurophysiology 89, No. 1 (Jan. 1, 2003): 324-337, doi:10.1152/jn.00729.2002. |
England et al., “Increased Numbers of Sodium Channels Form Along Demyelinated Axons”, Brain Research 548, No. 1-2 (May 10, 1991): 334-337. |
Fagius, J. et al., “Sympathetic Reflex Latencies and Conduction Velocities in Normal Man”, Journal of Neurological Sciences, 1980. vol. 47, pp. 433-448. |
Falowski et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation: an update”, Neurotherapeutics: The Journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics 5, No. 1, Jan. 2008, pp. 86-99. |
Franke et al., FELIX, “An Online Spike Detection and Spike Classification Algorithm Capable of Instantaneous Resolution of Overlapping Spikes”, Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 2010, vol. 29, No. 1-2, pp. 127-148. |
Fuentes et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation Restores Locomotion in Animal Models of Parkinson's Disease”, Science, vol. 323, No. 5921, Mar. 20, 2009, pp. 1578-1582. |
George et al., “Vagus nerve stimulation: a new tool for brain research and therapy”, Biological Psychiatry 47, No. 4, Feb. 15, 2000, pp. 287-295. |
Goodall, E. V., “Modeling Study of Activation and Propagation delays During Stimulation of Peripheral Nerve Fibres with a Tripolar Cuff Electrode”, IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 3, No. 3, Sep. 1995, pp. 272-282. |
Gorman et al., “ECAP Mapping of the Spinal Cord: Influence of Electrode Position on Aβ Recruitment”, (2012), In 16th Annual Meeting Presented at the North American Neuromodulation Society, Las Vegas, NV. |
Gorman et al., “Neural Recordings for Feedback Control of Spinal Cord Stimulation: Reduction of Paresthesia Variability”, 2013, In International Neuromodulation Society 11th World Congress. Presented at the International Neuromodulation Society 11th World Congress, Berlin, Germany. |
Hallstrom et al, “Distribution of lumbar spinal evoked potentials and their correlation with stimulation-induced paresthesiae”, (1991), Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology 80:126-139. |
Harper, A. A. et al., “Conduction Velocity is Related to Morphological Cell Type in Rat Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurones”, J. Physiol, (1985), 359, pp. 31-46. |
Holsheimer et al., “Optimum Electrode Geometry for Spinal Cord Stimulation: the Narrow Bipole and Tripole”, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 35, No. 5, 1997, pp. 493-497. |
Huff, Terry B. et al., “Real-Time CARS Imaging Reveals a Calpain-Dependent Pathway for Paranodal Myelin Retraction during High-Frequency Stimulation”, PLoS ONE vol. 6, issue 3 (Mar. 3, 2011): e17176, 11 pgs. |
Hui, Ouyang et al., “Compression Induces Acute Demyelination and Potassium Channel Exposure in Spinal Cord”, Journal of Neurotrauma 27, No. 6, Jun. 2010, 1109-1120, doi:10.1089/neu.2010.1271. |
Kent et al., “Instrumentation to Record Evoked Potentials for Closed-Loop Control of Deep Brain Stimulation”, Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med Biol. Sol, Aug. 2012, 10 pgs. |
Kent et al., AR, “Recording evoked potentials during deep brain stimulation: development and validation of instrumentation to suppress the stimulus artefact”, J Neural Eng. Jun. 2012; 9 (3):036004, Apr. 18, 2012. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/9/3/036004. |
Kim et al., “A Wavelet-Based Method for Action Potential Detection From Extracellular Neural Signal Recording Wth Low Signal-to-Noise Ratio”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 50. No. 8, Aug. 2003. |
Kim et al., “Cell Type-specific Changes of the Membrane Properties of Peripherally-axotomized Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons in a Rat Model of Neuropathic Pain”, Neuroscience 86, No. 1 (May 21, 1998): 301-309, doi:10.1016/S0306-4522(98)00022-0. |
Krames et al., “Neuromodulation”, 1st Edition, Academic Press, 2009, p. 540-541. |
Krarup, Christian, “Compound sensory action potential in normal and pathological human nerves”, Muscle & nerve, vol. 29, No. 4 (2004), pp. 465-483. |
Krishnan et al., “Excitability Differences in Lower-Limb Motor Axons During and After lschemia”, Muscle & nerve, vol. 31, No. 2 (2005), pp. 205-213. |
Kumar et al., “Deep Brain Stimulation for Intractable Pain: a 15-year Experience”, Neurosurgery, Issue 40, No. 4, Apr. 1997, pp. 736-747. |
Kumar et al., “Double-blind evaluation of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in advanced Parkinson's disease”, by the American Academy of Neurology, 51, No. 3, Sep. 1, 1998, pp. 850-855. |
Kumar et al., “Globus Pallidus Deep Brain Stimulation for Generalized Dystonia: Clinical and PET Investigation”, Neurology, 53, No. 4, 1999, pp. 871-874. |
Laird et al., “A Model of Evoked Potentials in Spinal Cord Stimulation”, IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society, 35th Annual Conference. Osaka, Japan: Jul. 3-7, 2013, pp. 6555-6558. |
Levy et al., “Incidence and Avoidance of Neurologic Complications with Paddle Type Spinal Cord Stimulation Leads”, Neuromodulation 14(15), Sep. 2011, pp. 412-422. |
Li et al., S “Resonant antidromic cortical circuit activation as a consequence of high-frequency subthalamic deep-brain stimulation”, J Neurophysiol. Dec. 2007; 98(6): 3525-37. First published Oct. 10, 2007. doi:10.1152/jn.00808.2007. |
Ma et al., “Similar Electrophysiological Changes in Axotomized and Neighboring Intact Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons”, Journal of Neurophysiology 89, No. 3 (Mar. 1, 2003): 1588-1602, doi:10.1152/jn.00855.2002. |
Macefield, “Spontaneous and Evoked Ectopic Discharges Recorded from Single Human Axons”, Muscle & Nerve 21, No. 4, Apr. 1998, pp. 461-468. |
Mahnam, A et al., “Measurement of the current-distance relationship using a novel refractory interaction technique”, J. Neural Eng. 6 (2009), pp. 036005 (published May 20, 2009) Abstract, Sec. 2.2 & Figure 2b, 036005. |
Markandey, Vishal, “ECG Implementation on the TMS320C5515 DSP Medical Development Kit (MDK)”, Texas Instruments Application Report Jun. 2010, 35 pgs. |
Massachusetts Institute of Techn, “The Compound Action Potential of the Frog Sciatic Nerve”, Quantitative Physiology: Cells and Tissues. Fall, 1999, Retrieved from http://umech.mit.edu/freeman/6.021J/2001/lab.pdf on May 22, 2012. |
Matzner et al., “Na+ Conductance and the Threshold for Repetitive Neuronal Firing”, Brain Research 597, No. 1 (Nov. 27, 1992): 92-98, doi:10.1016/0006-8993(92)91509-D. |
McGill, Kevin et al., “On the Nature and Elimination of Stimulus Artifact in Nerve Signals Evoked and Recorded Using Surgace Electrodes”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. BME-29, No. 2, Feb. 1982, pp. 129-137. |
Melzack et al., “Pain mechanisms: a new theory”, Science, New York, New York, vol. 150, No. 3699, Nov. 19, 1965, pp. 971-979. |
Miles et al., “An Electrode for Prolonged Stimulation of the Brain”, Proc. 8th Meeting World Soc. Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Part III, Zurich, 1981, Appl. Neurophysiol, 45, 1982, pp. 449-445 1982. |
Misawa et al., “Neuropathic Pain Is Associated with Increased Nodal Persistent Na(+) Currents in Human Diabetic Neuropathy”, Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System: JPNS, 14, No. 4 (Dec. 2009): 279-284. |
Nordin et al., “Ectopic Sensory Discharges and Paresthesiae in Patients with Disorders of Peripheral Nerves, Dorsal Roots and Dorsal Columns”, Pain 20, No. 3 (Nov. 1984): 231-245, doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(84)90013-7. |
Oakley et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation: Mechanisms of Action”, Spine 27, No. 22, Nov. 15, 2002, pp. 2574-2583. |
Oakley et al., “Transverse Tripolar Spinal Cord Stimulation: Results of an International Multicenter Study”, Neuromodulation, vol. 9, No. 3, 2006, pp. 192-203. |
Obradovic et al., “Effect of pressure on the spinal cord during spinal cord stimulation in an animal model”, Poster, 18th Annual Meeting of the North American Neuromodulation Society, Dec. 11-14, 2014, Las Vegas. |
Oh et al., “Long-term hardware-related complications of deep brain stimulation”, Neurosurgery, vol. 50, No. 6, Jun. 2002, pp. 1268-1274, discussion pp. 1274-1276. |
Opsommer, E. et al., “Determination of Nerve Conduction Velocity of C-fibres in Humans from Thermal Thresholds to Contact Heat (Thermode) and from Evoked Brain Potentials to Radiant Heat (CO2 Laser)”, Neurophysiologie Clinique 1999, vol. 29, pp. 411-422. |
Orstavik, Kristin et al., “Pathological C-fibres in patients with a chronic painful condition”, Brain (2003), 126, 567-578. |
Parker et al., “Closing the Loop in Neuromodulation Therapies: Spinal Cord Evoked Compound Action Potentials During Stimulation for Pain Management (230)”, 2011, In 15th Annual Meeting, North American Neuromodulation Society (p. 48). Presented at the North American Neuromodulation Society, Las Vegas. |
Parker et al., “Compound Action Potentials Recorded in the Human Spinal Cord During Neurostimulation for Pain Relief”, Pain, vol. 153, 2012, pp. 593-601. |
Parker et al., “Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials Recorded From the Sheep Spinal Cord”, Neuromodulation, vol. 16, 2013, pp. 295-303. |
Penar et al., “Cortical Evoked Potentials Used for Placement of a Laminotomy Lead Array: A Case Report”, Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, accessed Apr. 19, 2011, doi:10.1111/j.1525-1403.2011.00352.x. |
Richter et al., “EMG and SSEP Monitoring During Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation”, Journal of Neurosurgical Review 2011, Southern Academic Press, 1(S1), 2011, pp. 61-63. |
Ridder et al., “Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation for Limb and Back Pain”, World Neurosurgery, 2013, 9 pgs. |
Ridder et al., “Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation toward Paresthesia-Free Pain Suppression”, May 2010, vol. 66, pp. 986-990. |
Roy, S. H. et al., “Effects of Electrode Location on Myoelectric Conduction Velocity and Median Frequency Estimates”, J. Appl. Physiol. 61 (4), 1986, pp. 1510-1517. |
Schmidt et al., “Gating of tactile input from the hand”, Exp Brain Res, 1990, 79, pp. 97-102. |
Siegfried et al., “Bilateral Chronic Electrostimulation of Ventroposterolateral Pallidum: A New Therapeutic Approach for Alleviating all Parkinsonian Symptoms”, Neurosurgery, 35, No. 6, Dec. 1994, pp. 1126-1130. |
Siegfried et al., “Intracerebral Electrode Implantation System”, Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 59, No. 2, Aug. 1983, pp. 356-3591. |
Struijk et al, “Paresthesia Thresholds in Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Comparison of Theoretical Results with Clinical Data”, IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 1, No. 2, Jun. 1993, pp. 101-108. |
Sufka et al., “Gate Control Theory Reconsidered”, Brain and Mind, 3, No. 2, 2002, pp. 277-290. |
Tamura et al., “Increased Nodal Persistent Na+ Currents in Human Neuropathy and Motor Neuron Disease Estimated by Latent Addition”, Clinical Neurophysiology 117, No. 11 (Nov. 2006): 2451-2458, doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2006.07.309. |
Tasker, “Deep Brain Stimulation is Preferable to Thalamotomy for Tremor Suppression”, Surgical Neurology, 49, No. 2, 1998, pp. 145-153. |
Taylor et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Back and Leg Pain and Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Analysis of Prognostic Factors”, Spine, vol. 30, No. 1, 2004, pp. 152-160. |
Texas Instruments, “Precision, Low Power Instrumentation Amplifiers”, Texas Instruments SBOS051B Oct. 1995, Revised Feb. 2005, 20 pgs. |
Tomas et al., “Dorsal Root Entry Zone (DREZ) Localization Using Direct Spinal Cord Stimulation Can Improve Results of the DREZ Thermocoagulation Procedure for Intractable Pain Relief”, Pain, 2005, vol. 116, pp. 159-163. |
Tscherter et al., “Spatiotemporal Characterization of Rhythmic Activity in Rat Spinal Cord Slice Cultures”, European Journal of Neuroscience 14, No. 2 (2001), pp. 179-190. |
Van Den Berg et al., “Nerve fiber size-related block of action currents by phenytoin in mammalian nerve”, Epilepsia, Nov. 1994, 35(6), pp. 1279-1288. |
Villavicencio, Alan T., “Laminectomy versus Percutaneous Electrode Placement for Spinal Cord Stimulation,” Neurosurgery, vol. 46 (2), Feb. 2000, pp. 399-405. |
Vleggeert et al., LANKAMP, “Electrophysiology and morphometry of the Aalpha- and Abeta-fiber populations in the normal and regenerating rat sciatic nerve”, Experimental Neurology, vol. 187, No. 2, Jun. 1, 2004, Available online Apr. 2, 2004, pp. 337-349. |
Woessner, “Blocking Out the Pain, Electric Nerve Block Treatments for Sciatic Neuritis”, Retrieved from: http://www.practicalpainmanagement.com/pain/spine/radiculopathy/blocking-out-pain, Last updated Jan. 10, 2012. |
Wolter et al., “Effects of sub-perception threshold spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain: A randomized controlled double-blind crossover study”, European Federation of International Association for the Study of Pain Chapters, 2012, pp. 648-655. |
Wu et al., “Changes in Aβ Non-nociceptive Primary Sensory Neurons in a Rat Model of Osteoarthritis Pain”, Molecular Pain 6, No. 1 (Jul. 1, 2010): 37, doi: 10.1186/1744-8069-6-37. |
Xie et al., “Functional Changes in Dorsal Root Ganglion Cells after Chronic Nerve Constriction in the Rat”, Journal of Neurophysiology 73, No. 5 (May 1, 1995): 1811-1820. |
Xie et al., “Sinusoidal Time-Frequency Wavelet Family and its Application in Electrograstrographic Signal Analysis”, Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol. 20, No. 3, Oct. 29, 1998, pp. 1450-1453. |
Yearwood, T. L., “Pulse Width Programming in Spinal Cord Stimulation: a Clinical Study”, Pain Physician. 2010. vol. 13, pp. 321-335. |
Yingling et al., “Use of Antidromic Evoked Potentials in Placement of Dorsal Cord Disc Electrodes”, Applied Neurophysiology, 1986, vol. 49, pp. 36-41. |
Yuan, S. et al., “Recording monophasic action potentials using a platinum-electrode ablation catheter”, Europace. Oct. 2000; 2(4):312-319. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 16739680.3, Search completed Jun. 1, 2018, dated Jun. 12, 2018, 9 Pgs. |
French et al., “Information transmission at 500 bits/s by action potentials in a mechanosensory neuron of the cockroach”, Neuroscience Letters, vol. 243, No. 1-3, Feb. 1, 1998, pp. 113-116. |
Herreras, “Local Field Potentials: Myths and Misunderstandings”, Frontiers in Neural Circuits, Dec. 15, 2016, vol. 10, Article 1101, 16 pgs. |
European Search Report for European Application No. 15861444.6, Search completed Jul. 13, 2018, dated Jul. 23, 2018, 8 pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 16802238.2, Search completed Oct. 17, 2018, dated Oct. 24, 2018, 8 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report for International Application No. PCT/AU2017/050647, dated Dec. 25, 2018, 8 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2017/050296, Search completed Jul. 28, 2017, dated Jul. 28, 2017, 10 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2017/050647, Search completed Sep. 29, 2017, dated Sep. 29, 2017, 13 Pgs. |
Partial European Search Report for European Application No. 16775966.1, Search completed Oct. 26, 2018, dated Nov. 6, 2018, 11 Pgs. |
Bahmer et al., “Application of triphasic pulses with adjustable phase amplitude ratio (PAR) for cochlear ECAP recording: I. Amplitude growth functions”, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Clinical Neuroscience, 2012, vol. 205, pp. 202-211. |
Bahmer et al., “Effects of electrical pulse polarity shape on intra cochlear neural responses in humans: Triphasic pulses with cathodic second phase”, Hearing Research, 2013, vol. 306, pp. 123-130. |
Gnadt et al., “Spectral Cancellation of Microstimulation Artifact for Simultaneous Neural Recording In Situ”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2003, vol. 50, No. 10, pp. 1129-1135. |
He et al., “Perception threshold and electrode position for spinal cord stimulation”, Pain, 59 (1994) 55-63 pages. |
Holsheimer et al., “Significance of the Spinal Cord Position in Spinal Cord Stimulation”, Acta Neurochir (1995) [Suppl] 64: 119-124 pages. |
Holsheimer et al., “Spinal Geometry and Paresthesia Coverage in Spinal Cord Stimulation”, (1998 paper) 8 Pages. |
Olin et al., “Postural Changes in Spinal Cord Stimulation Perceptual Thresholds”, Neuromodulation, vol. 1, No. 4, 1998, pp. 171-175. |
Rattay, “Analysis of Models for External Stimulation of Axons”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. BME-33, No. 10, Oct. 1986, pp. 974-977. |
Ross et al., “Improving Patient Experience with Spinal Cord Stimulation: Implications of Position-Related Changes in Neurostimulation”, Neuromodulation 2011; e-pub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2011.00407.x, 6 pages. |
Struijk, “The Extracellular Potential of a Myelinated Nerve Fiber in an Unbounded Medium and in Nerve Cuff Models”, Biophysical Journal vol. 72 Jun. 1997 2457-2469. |
Tronnier et al., “Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Implanted Neurostimulators: An In Vitro and In VIvo Study”, Jan. 1999, Neurosurgery, vol. 44(1), p. 118-125 (Year: 1999). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170049345 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |