The present application is related to U.S. Non-Provisional application Ser. No. 15/431,475, entitled “Neurostimulation Lead for Trial Nerve Stimulation and Methods of Use,” filed Feb. 13, 2017 and U.S. Non-Provisional application Ser. No. 14/827,081, entitled External Pulse Generator Device and Associated Methods for Trial Nerve Stimulation” filed on Aug. 14, 2015, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
Treatments with implanted neurostimulation systems have become increasingly more common in recent years. While such systems have shown promise in treating a number of chronic conditions, effectiveness of treatment may vary considerably between patients and viability of treatment can be difficult to determine before implantation. Although conventional methods of implantation often utilize preliminary testing with a temporary, partially implanted neurostimulation systems to assess viability of treatment, such systems may not provide an accurate representation of treatment with a fully implanted device. Many such temporary partially implanted systems may not operate in the same manner as their fully implanted counterparts due to differences between pulse generators or changes in position of the neurostimulation leads due to regression or migration of the lead. Regression of a temporary lead or tined lead can also cause failure of an electrical connection of the lead or infection of a secondary incision site. Therefore, it is desirable to provide methods and devices for providing neurostimulation leads that provide consistent treatment outcomes by improved leads and lead connections, improved implantation and removal, and more seamless conversion from a trial system to a long-term fully implanted neurostimulation system.
The present invention relates to neurostimulation treatment systems, and in particular a neurostimulation leads for nerve stimulation trials or evaluations as well as and permanently implanted systems.
In one aspect, the invention pertains to a neurostimulation lead that includes a retention feature between a conductor and a proximal contact connector. In some embodiments, the lead includes at least one coiled conductor extending from a proximal portion of the neurostimulation lead to a distal electrode on a distal portion of the neurostimulation lead and a proximal contact connector electrically coupled with the at least one coiled conductor and configured for electrically connecting the lead to a pulse generator or to an external cable which then connects to the pulse generator. The proximal contact connector includes a distal retention flange and a reduced profile coupling portion proximal of the distal retention flange, wherein one or more coils of the conductor are positioned along the coupling portion and fixedly attached thereto. One or more coils engage the proximal facing surface of the retention flange so as to resist tension between the coiled lead and proximal contact connector and maintain integrity of electrical connection between the coiled conductor and the coupling portion of the proximal contact connector.
In some embodiments, the retention flange includes a distal facing ramp surface extending at least partly about the circumference of the proximal contact connector to facilitate assembly of the coiled conductor with the proximal contact connector. In some embodiments, the retention flange includes an open notch portion having a reduced radius as compared to a remainder of the flange so as to allow the coiled conductor to be screwed onto the coupling portion past the flange. In some embodiments, the open notch portion is between 90 to 160 degrees about the circumference. The ramped surface of the retention flange is ramped, for example at an angle between 30 and 60 degrees, typically about 45 degrees to facilitate feeding of the coiled lead upon the connector. The proximal facing retention surface of the retention flange extends substantially perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the proximal connector.
In some embodiments, the coiled conductor is fixedly attached and electrically coupled to the coupling portion of the proximal contact connector by soldering or laser welding. The proximal contact connector can include a proximal portion that is elongate to facilitate connection of the lead to a pulse generator and includes a proximal opening to facilitate introduction of a stylet through an open lumen of the lead.
In some embodiments, the retention flange is configured to withstand a tensile force of at least 5 N. In the application described herein, the retention flange is configured to withstand a minimum tensile force of 10-12 N. It is appreciated that the desired minimum tensile force can vary according to the properties of a particular lead or application.
In some embodiments, the lead further includes an outer insulator coating disposed on the coiled conductor along at least an intermediate portion of the neurostimulation lead between the proximal portion and the distal electrode, wherein the distal electrode is defined by an exposed portion of the coiled conductor without the outer insulator coating. In some embodiments, the neurostimulation lead has substantially the same outer diameter along the coiled conductor and the proximal contact connector to facilitate passage of the lead through a foramen needle. In some embodiments, a majority of the coiled conductor is closed wound at a first pitch. The coiled conductor includes one or more open coiled portions wound at a second pitch, wherein the one or more open coiled portions are positioned at distances from the distal electrode that correspond to a length of one or more foramen needles.
In some embodiments, the neurostimulation lead includes a single electrode has a surface area within a range of about 0.01 in2 to 0.1 in2. The length or surface area of the first electrode can be configured to correspond to a dimension of an electrode portion of an implantable neurostimulation lead to be placed after percutaneous nerve evaluation. Such neurostimulation leads can be utilized for sacral nerve stimulation, in particular the lead is suited for use as a trial stimulation lead for percutaneous nerve evaluation.
In some embodiments, the neurostimulation lead includes one or more additional conductors extending from the proximal portion of the neurostimulation lead to one or more additional electrodes along the distal portion of the neurostimulation lead. The one or more additional coiled conductors can be electrically coupled and fixedly attached to the coupling portion of the proximal contact connector and one or more coils of each of the one or more additional coiled conductors are disposed proximal of the retention flange. In some embodiments, the coiled conductor and the one or more additional conductors are defined by a multi-ribbon conductor. In other embodiments, a multi-electrode lead can include multiple insulated conductors wound about a tube having a central lumen.
In any of the neurostimulation leads described herein, the conductor or lead body can include a coating of the coiled conductor comprised of a textured surface configured to provide improved retention along at least the one or more retention features. In some embodiments, the coating includes a barbed surface having a plurality of barbs oriented to inhibit movement of the neurostimulation lead.
In some embodiments, a neurostimulation lead defined by one or more coiled conductors includes an open coil pitch along at least a portion of an implantable length of the lead so as to resist migration of the lead. The open coil pitch can be of the same diameter as the closed coiled portions. Such open coiled portions can be formed during winding of the lead, as opposed to being formed by stretching or elongating closed wound portions, so as to avoid plastic deformation of the conductor.
In another aspect, a neurostimulation lead can include one or more anchors attached thereto. In some embodiments, such leads can include a retractable anchoring feature at a distal end, the anchoring feature attached to an elongate member extending through the proximal contact connector such that retraction of the elongate member retracts the distal anchor into a central lumen of the coiled conductor. In other embodiments, a lead can include a bioabsorbable anchor disposed at a distal end or adjacent the distal electrode, the anchor being configured to absorb after expiration of the trial period to allow ready removal of the lead. In some embodiments, the bioabsorbable anchor includes a radiopaque marker that remains within the body after the anchor absorbs to allow positioning of an electrode of a permanently implanted lead at the same location as the distal electrode of the lead. It is appreciated that these anchoring features are applicable to any type of lead (e.g., coiled, non-coiled, single electrode, multi-electrode) and for any application.
In another aspect, a neurostimulation lead having one or more coiled conductors can include a helical tined anchor configured to attach to the coiled conductor. In some embodiments, the helical tined anchor is wound at a same pitch as a portion of the conductor to which the anchor is attached. The helical tined anchor is formed of any suitable material (e.g. metal, polymer). In some embodiments, the anchor is formed of Nitinol and formed by heat setting so that the tines extend outward from the lead body when attached. In some embodiments, the helical tined anchor is configured to attach to an outer surface of a closed wound portion of the lead along or adjacent the distal electrode. In other embodiments, the helical tined anchor configured to attach to an interior portion of an open coil pitch portion of the coiled conductor such that the tines extend outward from the lead. In some embodiment, the helical tined anchor is configured to attach to a distal end of the lead and includes a distal atraumatic tip to provide an end stop for a stylet inserted within the coiled conductor.
In another aspect, methods of assembling a neurostimulation lead are provided herein. Such methods include assembly of trial leads, particularly PNE leads. Such methods can include: feeding at least one coiled conductor over a distal retention flange of a proximal contact connector so as to position one or more coils of the coiled conductor along a reduced profile coupling portion of the proximal contact connector proximal of the distal retention flange and electrically coupling and fixedly attaching the coiled conductor to the coupling portion by soldering or welding. Such methods further include engaging a proximal facing surface of the distal retention flange with a portion of the one or more coils disposed proximal of the retention flange so as to withstand tensile forces applied by tension in the lead, thereby maintaining the integrity of the electrical connection between the coiled conductor and the proximal contact connector. In some embodiments, a cover or shrink tube is advanced over the interface of the coiled conductor and the proximal contact connector for protection.
In some embodiments, the methods of assembling neurostimulation leads can include attaching one or more anchoring features, the one or more anchoring features including any of a helical anchor disposed along an outer surface of a closed wound portion of the lead, a helical anchor disposed within an open coil pitch portion of the lead, a retractable anchor that retracts into a central lumen of the lead, a bioabsorbable anchor that absorbs after a duration of a trial period, a bioabsorbable lead having a radiopaque marker that remains within the body after the anchor is dissolved.
In another aspect, a lead extension is provided herein. Such a lead extension can include a distal connector and proximal connector coupled via an extension cable. The distal connector is configured for electrically coupling with a fully implanted lead. The proximal connector is configured for coupling with an external pulse generator or intervening connection. The proximal connector is dimensioned for passage through a tool or cannula tunneled from a first incision area of a body of a patient and through a second incision outside the patient's body; an extension cable electrically coupling the distal connector with the proximal connector; and a regression stopper disposed on the extension cable between the proximal connector and the distal connector and configured to prevent regression of the proximal connector into a patient's body through the second incision, wherein the regression stopper is dimensioned for passage through the tunneled tool or cannula along with the proximal connector. In some embodiments, the regression stopper has a distal facing surface that is substantially perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the extension cable so as to interface with a skin of the patient or associated pad or gauze thereon so as to inhibit regression of the lead through the second incision. In some embodiments, the regression stopper is substantially cylindrical in shape, although it is appreciated various other shapes can be used. In some embodiments, the regression stop can be adjustable or removable, or configured to attach to a larger regression stopper feature.
In another aspect, methods of utilizing such a lead extension are provided. Such methods can include: implanting a neurostimulation lead in a body of a patient such that a proximal end of the lead is disposed at a first incision area; tunneling from the first incision area to a second incision; connecting a distal connector of the lead extension at the first incision area and implanting the distal connector at the first incision area, the distal connector being electrically coupled with a proximal connector of the lead extension via an extension cable including a regression stopper; and passing a proximal connector and the regression stopper through a tool or cannula tunneled from the first incision and through the second incision outside the patient's body. The tool or cannula are then removed. Engaging, with the regression stopper, an outer skin of the patient or a pad or gauze disposed thereon inhibit regression of the lead into the patient during a trial period or during explant of the lead extension. This prevents infection of the second incision site and facilitates removal of the lead extension after the trial.
Further areas of applicability of the present disclosure will become apparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating various embodiments, are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to necessarily limit the scope of the disclosure.
Neurostimulation has been used for many years to treat a variety of conditions, from chronic pain, to erectile dysfunction and various urinary dysfunctions. While neurostimulation has proven effective in many applications, effective therapy often relies on consistently delivering therapeutic activation by one or more neurostimulation electrodes to particular nerves or targeted regions with a pulse generator. In recent years, fully implantable neurostimulation have become increasingly more commonplace. Although such implantable systems provide patients with greater freedom and mobility, the neurostimulation electrodes of such systems are more difficult to adjust once they are implanted. The neurostimulation electrodes are typically provided on a distal end of an implantable lead that is advanced through a tunnel formed in a patient tissue.
The electrical pulses generated by the pulse generator are delivered to one or more nerves and/or to a target location via one or more leads that include one or more neurostimulation electrodes at or near the distal end. The leads can have a variety of shapes, can be a variety of sizes, and can be made from a variety of materials, which size, shape, and materials can be dictated by the application or other factors. In some applications, the leads may be implanted to extend along the spine or through one of the foramen of the sacrum, such as shown in
One or more properties of the electrical pulses can be controlled via a controller of the implanted pulse generator. In some embodiments, these properties can include, for example, the frequency, strength, pattern, duration, or other aspects of the timing and magnitude of the electrical pulses. These properties can include, for example, a voltage, a current, or the like. This control of the electrical pulses can include the creation of one or more electrical pulse programs, plans, or patterns, and in some embodiments, this can include the selection of one or more pre-existing electrical pulse programs, plans, or patterns. In the embodiment depicted in
Sacral neuromodulation (SNM), also known as sacral nerve stimulation (SNS), is defined as the delivery of mild electrical pulses to the sacral nerve to modulate the neural pathways controlling bladder and rectal function. This policy addresses use of SNM in the treatment of urinary or fecal incontinence, urinary or fecal nonobstructive retention, or chronic pelvic pain in patients with intact neural innervation of the bladder and/or rectum.
Treatment using SNM, also known as SNS, is one of several alternative modalities for patients with fecal incontinence or overactive bladder (urge incontinence, significant symptoms of urgency-frequency) or nonobstructive urinary retention who have failed behavioral (e.g., prompted voiding) and/or pharmacologic therapies. Urge incontinence is defined as leakage of urine when there is a strong urge to void. Urgency-frequency is an uncontrollable urge to urinate, resulting in very frequent small volumes. Urinary retention is the inability to completely empty the bladder of urine. Fecal incontinence is the inability to control bowel movements resulting in unexpected leakage of fecal matter.
The SNM device consists of an implantable pulse generator that delivers controlled electrical impulses. This pulse generator is attached to wire leads that connect to the sacral nerves, most commonly the S3 nerve root. Two external components of the system help control the electrical stimulation. A patient remote control may be kept by the patient and can be used to control any of the variety of operational aspects of the EPG and its stimulation parameters. In one such embodiment, the patient remote control may be used to turn the device on or return the EPG to a hibernation state or to adjust stimulation intensity. A console programmer is kept by the physician and used to adjust the settings of the pulse generator.
In a conventional approach, prior to implantation of the permanent device, patients undergo an initial testing phase to estimate potential response to treatment. The first type of testing developed was percutaneous nerve evaluation (PNE). This procedure is done under local anesthesia, using a test needle to identify the appropriate sacral nerve(s). Once identified, a temporary wire lead is inserted through the test needle and left in place for 4 to 7 days. This lead is connected to an external stimulator, which can be carried by patients in their pocket, secured against the skin under surgical dressings, or worn in a belt. The results of this test phase are used to determine whether patients are appropriate candidates for the permanent implanted device. For example, for overactive bladder, if patients show a 50 percent or greater reduction in symptom frequency, they are deemed eligible for the permanent device.
The second type of testing is a 2-stage surgical procedure. In Stage 1, a quadripolar-tined lead is implanted (stage 1). The testing phase can last as long as several weeks, and if patients show a specified reduction in symptom frequency, they can proceed to Stage 2 of the surgery, which is permanent implantation of the neuromodulation device. The 2-stage surgical procedure has been used in various ways. These include its use instead of PNE, for patients who failed PNE, for patients with an inconclusive PNE, or for patients who had a successful PNE to further refine patient selection.
In one aspect, the duration of battery life of the EPG is at least four weeks for a tined lead at nominal impedance (e.g. about 1200 Ohms), an amplitude of about 4.2 mA, and a pulse width of about 210 us, or the duration of battery life can be at least seven days for a PNE lead. In some embodiments, the battery is rechargeable and can be recharged by coupling the battery with a standard 120 V wall outlet, and may optionally utilize the same power cables or adapter as used by other system components (e.g. clinician programmer). Typically, the EPG is current controlled. The EPG can be configured with a pulse width between 60-450 μs, a maximum stimulation rate between 2 and 130 Hz, a maximum amplitude between 0 and 12.5 mA, a stimulation waveform that is biphasic charge-balanced asymmetric, minimum amplitude steps of about 0.05 mA, continuous or cycling operating modes, a set number of neurostimulation programs (e.g. two programs), ramping capability, and optional alert built into the EPG.
The permanent device is implanted under local or general anesthesia. An incision is made over the lower back and the electrical leads are placed in contact with the sacral nerve root(s). The wire leads are extended underneath the skin to a pocket incision where the pulse generator is inserted and connected to the wire leads. Following implantation, the physician programs the pulse generator to the optimal settings for that patient.
One example of a common process for treating bladder dysfunction is to employ a trial period of sacral neuromodulation with either a percutaneous lead or a fully implanted lead in patients that meet all of the following criteria: (1) a diagnosis of at least one of the following: urge incontinence; urgency-frequency syndrome; non-obstructive urinary retention; (2) there is documented failure or intolerance to at least two conventional therapies (e.g., behavioral training such as bladder training, prompted voiding, or pelvic muscle exercise training, pharmacologic treatment for at least a sufficient duration to fully assess its efficacy, and/or surgical corrective therapy); (3) the patient is an appropriate surgical candidate; and (4) incontinence is not related to a neurologic condition.
Permanent implantation of a sacral neuromodulation device may be considered medically necessary in patients who meet all of the following criteria: (1) all of the criteria (1) through (4) in the previous paragraph are met; and (2) trial stimulation period demonstrates at least 50% improvement in symptoms over a period of at least one week.
Other urinary/voiding applications of sacral nerve neuromodulation are considered investigational, including but not limited to treatment of stress incontinence or urge incontinence due to a neurologic condition, e.g., detrusor hyperreflexia, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, or other types of chronic voiding dysfunction. (See policy description of sacral nerve neuromodulation/stimulation coverage provided by Blue Cross Blue Shield available online at: http://www.bcbsms.com/com/bcbsms/apps/PolicySearch/views/ViewPolicy. php?&noprint=yes&path=%2Fpolicy%2Femed%2F Sacral_Nerve_Stimulation.html)
In another conventional approach, a similar method is used in peripheral neurostimulation (PNS) treatment systems. Generally, candidates for peripheral neurostimulation are assessed to determine their suitability for undergoing the PNS procedure. Prior to the surgery, the patient will undergo pre-surgical testing that includes routine blood tests as well as neuropsychological evaluation. The PNS procedure itself is typically performed in two separate stages. Each stage takes about one hour, and the patient can go home the same day.
In this aspect, Stage 1 involves implanting of trial electrodes, via small needles, which are connected to an external pulse generator (EPG), typically worn on a belt of the patient. A number of stimulation programs are administered over the next few days. If this trial demonstrates a significant improvement in the patient's headache or facial pain, permanent implantation can take place. In Stage 2, a new set of electrodes, the width of angel-hair pasta, are implanted under the skin. These are connected to a smaller implantable pulse generator implanted under the skin in the chest, abdomen, or back.
Among the drawbacks associated with these conventional approaches, is the discomfort associated with wearing an EPG. The effectiveness of a trial period such as in PNE and Stage 1 trial periods are not always indicative of effective treatment with a permanent implanted system. In one aspect, since effectiveness of treatment in a trial period may rely, in part, on a patient's subjective experience, it is desirable if the discomfort and inconvenience of wearing an EPG by the patient can be minimized so that the patient can resume ordinary daily activities without constant awareness of the presence of the EPG and treatment system. This aspect can be of particular importance in treatment of overactive bladder and erectile dysfunction, where a patient's awareness of the device could interfere with the patient's experience of symptoms associated with these conditions.
In one aspect, the invention allows for improved assessment of efficacy during trial periods by providing a trial system having improved patient comfort so that patients can more easily recognize the benefits and effectiveness of treatment. In another aspect, the portions of the EPG delivering the therapy are substantially the same as the IPG in the permanent system such that the effects in permanent treatment should be more consistent with those seen in the trial system.
In certain embodiments, the invention provides an EPG patch worn on a skin of the patient so as to improve patient comfort. Optionally, the EPG used in Stage 1 may be smaller than the IPG used in the corresponding Stage 2 so that the EPG can easily be supported by and sealed against contamination by an adherent patch that covers the EPG. In one aspect, the EPG is a modified version of the implantable IPG used in Stage 2. The IPG may be modified by removal of one or more components, such as removal of a remote charging coil with a smaller battery and associated components. In addition, the EPG may use a thinner, lighter housing than the IPG, since the EPG is not required to last for many years, such as the IPG would be. The EPG therefore, may be configured to be disposable. These aspects allow the EPG to be supported within a patch adhered to the skin of the patient at a convenient and comfortable location.
In one aspect, EPG 40 is configured with a multi-purpose connector receptacle 24. For example, connector receptacle 42 can be coupled with either a neurostimulation lead 20′ as described above, or can be coupled with a power connector of a charging cord to allow recharging of an internal battery of EPG 40. Such a configuration is advantageous as it allows the EPG housing 41 to be designed with a single opening or access port, which further reduces the potential exposure of internal components to water and debris, since the port is sealingly occupied by the lead connector during delivery of therapy during the trial period. In contrast, a device having a separate charging port would likely either remain open or may require use of a removable plug or cover to seal the additional port.
In another aspect, EPG 40 is designed as a substantially planar polygonal prism having parallel major surfaces that are positioned flat against the patient's body when affixed to the patient during the trial period, such as the rectangular prism shown in
In another aspect, trial neurostimulation system 100 includes an affixation device that secures EPG 40 to the patient while connected to a neurostimulation lead implanted at a target tissue within the patient. Typically, the affixation device is configured to secure the EPG on a mid-portion (e.g. lower back region) or hip of the patient, either through an adherent patch applied directly to a skin of the patient or a clip device that can be releasably attached to a garment of the patient. Various examples of differing types of affixation devices are described herein.
In some embodiments, the short cable connector 52 or “pigtail connector” is integrated with the EPG such that the electrical connections between the cable and the internal electronics of the EPG are permanently attached and sealed. This allows the EPG to further withstand intrusion of fluids and moisture during the trial stimulation period.
Depending on the selection of cables desired for use, the EPG may be used with a PNE lead (which may have one or more than one electrode and conductor), or a permanent lead. In addition, the EPG may be used for bilateral stimulation (the use of two leads, one for each for a patient's left and right sides) when a bilateral connector cable is used between the EPG and leads.
In some embodiments, the EPG includes a non-rechargeable single-use power source (e.g. battery) having sufficient power for operation of the EPG for at least the duration of the trial period (e.g. days, weeks, months). In such embodiments, the power source can be integrated and non-removable or non-replaceable by the patient.
As can be seen in
In some embodiments, the EPG includes one or more user interface features. Such user interface features can include any of a button, switch, light, touch screen, or an audio or haptic feature. In the embodiment shown in
In this embodiment, EPG 50 is configured such that pressing button 55 turns on a communication function of the EPG. Once actuated, the EPG has a pre-determined period of time (e.g. 60 seconds, 90 seconds) to wirelessly connect to an external programmer (e.g. Clinican Programmer). If the EPG connects to the clinician programmer, the EPG stays on to facilitate programming and operating to deliver of stimulation per programming instructions. If connection is not successful, the EPG automatically turns of. If button 55 is pressed when EPG is on, nothing happens and the communication or operating remains unchanged. If a patient desires to turn off stimulation, the patient remote could be used or alternatively, detachment of the neurostimulation lead could also suspend stimulation. Since subsequent pressing of button 55 during operation does not turn the EPG to the off or hibernation state, the button can be positioned on an underside of the EPG that is placed against the patient when worn during the trial stimulation period, although it is appreciated that the button could be disposed anywhere on the housing of the EPG. Thus, in this embodiment, the functionality of button 55 facilitates initial programming during set-up of the trial period or for reprogramming, but does not require interaction by the patient during the trial period. Typically, control or adjustment of stimulation by the patient would be performed by use of the patient remote. In some embodiments, the EPG is provided in a hibernation mode and communication can be initiated by actuation of a button on the EPG to facilitate programming with the CP. In some embodiments, when the patient remote is used to turn stimulation off, the EPG returns to the hibernation state and only the CP can fully turn the EPG to an off-state. In some embodiments, the EPG includes a single button thereon configured as described in any of the embodiments herein.
As shown in
In one aspect, the dimensions of the lead are defined in accordance with a given application of the neurostimulation lead. The embodiment depicted in
Typically, the outer diameter of the lead is about 0.025″ to facilitate passage through a foramen needle. The lead includes two markers, visual marker A (64A) and visual marker B (64B), positioned at two different locations corresponding to two differing lengths of respective foramen needles. Visual marker A is positioned at a first distance (e.g. 4-5″) from a distal end of the lead for use with a first foramen needle of a corresponding length and visual marker B is positioned at a second distance (e.g. about 6-7″) from a distal end of the lead for use with a second foramen needle of corresponding length. The differing lengths correspond to different locations at which the target region is located as suited for a particular patient or application. The open coiled markers can be between 0.1″ to 0.5″, or any suitable length. In the closed wound portions, the pitch (taken as an average measurement over 10 turns) is between 0.005 to 0.05″, typically about 0.010″. In the open coil portions, the pitch is within a range of about 0.01 to 0.05″, typically about 0.03″. In this embodiment, each open coiled marker is about 0.2″ in length. It is appreciated that such a lead could include a single marker, two markers, or multiple markers corresponding to differing locations as need for a given application.
As shown in
In another aspect, a proximal end of the lead 60 is coupled to a proximal contact connector 66, the conductor being electrically coupled and fixedly attached to the proximal contact connector. In some embodiments, the proximal connector 66 is dimensioned for passage through the foramen needle, for example, in the application described above, the proximal connector has an outer diameter of about 0.025″. An outer cover 65a (e.g. shrink tubing) is applied over the interface between the coiled conductor and the proximal connector 66.
As can be seen in
Engagement of one or more coils of the coiled conductor against the proximal facing retention surface resists the load from tension on the coiled lead and removes the load and stress concentration from the weld joint of the conductor along the coil portion, thereby protecting the weld joint. In this embodiment, the retention surface is configured to withstand a minimum tensile force when the coiled conductor is pulled in the distal direction. In this embodiment, the retention surface of the retention flange 68 is perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the connector 66.
The proximal portion 66b of the connector extends a sufficient length to facilitate connection of the proximal contact connector to a pulse generator or intermediary cable. The proximal portion has a length, l, between 0.1″ and 0.5″, typically about 0.25″ and can include an indented feature, 65b, to be used as a visual indicator for alignment of the cover (e.g. shrink tube) formed of any suitable material (e.g., polymer, PET). The indented portion can be spaced a distance l1 away from the proximal end of the connector, typically between 0.1 to 0.2″. The proximal end 66c includes an opening through which a style can be inserted through the proximal contact connector 66 and through the lead to the distal end to stiffen the lead and facilitate insertion of the lead through the foramen needle. After placement of the distal electrode at the target electrode, the foramen needle can be removed and the stylet withdrawn. In this embodiment, the proximal end of the contact connector 66 is tapered at angle a1, which can be between 30-60 degrees, typically about 40 degrees. The outside diameter of the proximal contact connector is substantially the same as that of the lead to facilitate passage through a foramen needle. In this embodiment, the outside diameter is about 0.023″.
In another aspect, a trial system can utilize a tined neurostimulation lead, similar or identical to the design of a permanently implanted tined lead, that is electrically coupled to an external pulse generator by a lead extension cable. Such tined neurostimulation leads typically include multiple electrodes and often utilize proximal connectors that mimic the connector receptacle of an IPG. Such connector receptacles are relatively larger than the proximal contact connector of the PNE lead described above. Such trial systems can be utilized for weeks or months to assess the efficacy of neurostimulation programs applied by an implanted multi-electrode neurostimulation lead. As describe above in the trial system of
As shown, the regression stopper 74 is substantially cylindrical in shape, however, it is appreciated that various other shapes and designs could be utilized in accordance with the concepts described above. In some embodiments, the regression stopper 74 can include a feature for coupling to a removable stopper feature, for example, a stopper component having a further enlarged diameter. The regression stopper can be formed of a polymer, metal, or any suitable material. Typically, the regression stopper is relatively rigid, however, the stopper can be semi-rigid or malleable for patient comfort.
In regard to trial leads generally, for example a PNE lead, it is desirable for such leads to be configured to fit within a delivery needle or cannula, such as a 20 gauge needle with an ID of 0.025″. Typically, such leads include at least one conductor and one distal electrode for monopolar stimulation. In some embodiments, trial leads can include multiple leads to allow for mono-polar stimulation at differing points during the trial, or to allow for bi-polar stimulation or sequential stimulation between differing electrodes. In some embodiments, trial leads include tissue retention features that minimize acute migration of the lead during the trial period.
In another aspect, a multi-electrode neurostimulation lead can be defined by a multiple conductors wound along a spiral or helical lead body. In some embodiments, such leads can includes a lead body defined by a helix of conductors attached on an outside of a lumen tubing. The helical twists along the length of the lead body provide textural surfaces that provide for improve tissue retention. It is appreciated that any of the other features described herein (e.g. barbs) can also be used in combination with these features.
In another aspect, anchoring features for use with implantable neurostimulation leads are provided. Such features can be applied to trial leads, such as PNE leads, so as to maintain a position of the lead and improve accuracy of the trial assessment as well as permanently implanted leads. In some embodiments, the neurostimulation lead includes a retractable anchor, a bioabsorbable anchor, and/or a bioabsorbable anchor with a radiopaque marker.
In one aspect, the coiled lead includes an open pitch coil design or one or more portions having an open pitch coil design along portions of the lead that are implanted. The open coiled markers noted above in regard to the markers remain outside the body. By including such open coil portions along the implantable length, the gaps between coil and/or texture of the open coils provide more resistance to migration or regression of the lead. This feature can be utilized in any type of neurostimulation lead.
In another aspect, anchoring features can include a helical tined anchor attached to the lead. Such a helical tined anchor can be attached over an outside of the lead along the lead body, along the electrode or adjacent thereto. In some embodiments, the helical anchor can be attached by placement within an open pitch coiled region of the lead. In other embodiments, the helical tined anchor can be attached to a distal end of the lead and can also function as a lead stop for the stylet.
In the foregoing specification, the invention is described with reference to specific embodiments thereof, but those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention is not limited thereto. Various features and aspects of the above-described invention can be used individually or jointly. Further, the invention can be utilized in any number of environments and applications beyond those described herein without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the specification. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded as illustrative rather than restrictive. It will be recognized that the terms “comprising,” “including,” and “having,” as used herein, are specifically intended to be read as open-ended terms of art.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/633,806, filed on Feb. 22, 2018, and entitled “NEUROSTIMULATION LEADS FOR TRIAL NERVE STIMULATION AND METHODS OF USE,” the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3057356 | Greatbatch | Oct 1962 | A |
3348548 | Chardack | Oct 1967 | A |
3646940 | Timm et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3824129 | Fagan, Jr. | Jul 1974 | A |
3825015 | Berkovits | Jul 1974 | A |
3888260 | Fischell | Jun 1975 | A |
3902501 | Citron et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3939843 | Smyth | Feb 1976 | A |
3942535 | Schulman | Mar 1976 | A |
3970912 | Hoffman | Jul 1976 | A |
3995623 | Blake et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4019518 | Maurer et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4044774 | Corbin et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4082097 | Mann et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4135518 | Dutcher | Jan 1979 | A |
4141365 | Fischell et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4166469 | Littleford | Sep 1979 | A |
4236529 | Little | Dec 1980 | A |
4269198 | Stokes | May 1981 | A |
4285347 | Hess | Aug 1981 | A |
4340062 | Thompson et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4379462 | Borkan et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4407303 | Akerstrom | Oct 1983 | A |
4437475 | White | Mar 1984 | A |
4512351 | Pohndorf | Apr 1985 | A |
4550731 | Batina et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4558702 | Barreras et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4654880 | Sontag | Mar 1987 | A |
4662382 | Sluetz et al. | May 1987 | A |
4719919 | Marchosky et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4721118 | Harris | Jan 1988 | A |
4722353 | Sluetz | Feb 1988 | A |
4744371 | Harris | May 1988 | A |
4800898 | Hess et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4848352 | Pohndorf et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4860446 | Lessar et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4957118 | Erlebacher | Sep 1990 | A |
4989617 | Memberg et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5012176 | Laforge | Apr 1991 | A |
5052407 | Hauser et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5197466 | Marchosky et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5204611 | Nor et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5255691 | Otten | Oct 1993 | A |
5257634 | Kroll | Nov 1993 | A |
5342408 | Decoriolis et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5366493 | Scheiner et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5439485 | Mar et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5476499 | Hirschberg | Dec 1995 | A |
5484445 | Knuth | Jan 1996 | A |
5545206 | Carson | Apr 1996 | A |
5571148 | Loeb et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5592070 | Mino | Jan 1997 | A |
5637981 | Nagai et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5676162 | Larson, Jr. et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5683447 | Bush et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5690693 | Wang et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5702428 | Tippey et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702431 | Wang et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5712795 | Layman et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713939 | Nedungadi et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5733313 | Barreras, Sr. et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735887 | Barreras, Sr. et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5741316 | Chen et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5871532 | Schroeppel | Feb 1999 | A |
5876423 | Braun | Mar 1999 | A |
5902331 | Bonner et al. | May 1999 | A |
5948006 | Mann | Sep 1999 | A |
5949632 | Barreras, Sr. et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957965 | Moumane et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5991665 | Wang et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6027456 | Feler et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6035237 | Schulman et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6052624 | Mann | Apr 2000 | A |
6055456 | Gerber | Apr 2000 | A |
6057513 | Ushikoshi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067474 | Schulman et al. | May 2000 | A |
6075339 | Reipur et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6076017 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081097 | Seri et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083247 | Rutten et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6104957 | Alo et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104960 | Duysens et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6138681 | Chen et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6165180 | Cigaina et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166518 | Echarri et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6169387 | Kaib | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6172556 | Prentice | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178353 | Griffith et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181105 | Cutolo et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6191365 | Avellanet | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208894 | Schulman et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212430 | Kung | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6212431 | Hahn et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221513 | Lasater | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6227204 | Baumann et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240322 | Peterfeso et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243608 | Pauly et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246911 | Seligman | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249703 | Stanton et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6265789 | Honda et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275737 | Mann | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278258 | Echarri et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6305381 | Weijand et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306100 | Prass | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315721 | Schulman et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6316909 | Honda et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321118 | Hahn | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327504 | Dolgin et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6354991 | Gross et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360750 | Gerber et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6381496 | Meadows et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393325 | Mann et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6438423 | Rezai et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442434 | Zarinetchi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6453198 | Torgerson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466817 | Kaula et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473652 | Sarwal et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6500141 | Irion | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505075 | Weiner | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6505077 | Kast et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510347 | Borkan | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6516227 | Meadows et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6517227 | Stidham et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6542846 | Miller et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553263 | Meadows et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6584355 | Stessman | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6600954 | Cohen et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6609031 | Law et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6609032 | Woods et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6609945 | Jimenez et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6652449 | Gross et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6662051 | Eraker et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6664763 | Echarri et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6685638 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6721603 | Zabara et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6735474 | Loeb et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6745077 | Griffith et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6792314 | Byers et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6809701 | Amundson et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6836684 | Rijkhoff et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6847849 | Mamo et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6892098 | Ayal et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6895280 | Meadows et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6896651 | Gross et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6901287 | Davis et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6941171 | Mann et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6971393 | Mamo et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6989200 | Byers et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990376 | Tanagho et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6999819 | Swoyer et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7051419 | Schrom et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7054689 | Whitehurst et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7069081 | Biggs et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7092764 | Williams et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7127298 | He et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7131996 | Wasserman et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7142925 | Bhadra et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7146219 | Sieracki et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7151914 | Brewer | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7167749 | Biggs et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7167756 | Torgerson et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7177690 | Woods et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7177698 | Klosterman et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7181286 | Sieracki et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7184836 | Meadows et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7187978 | Malek et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7191005 | Stessman | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7212110 | Martin et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7225028 | Della Santina et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7225032 | Schmeling et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7231254 | DiLorenzo | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7234853 | Givoletti | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7239918 | Strother et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7245972 | Davis | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7286880 | Olson et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7295878 | Meadows et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7305268 | Gliner et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7317948 | King et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7324852 | Barolat et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7324853 | Ayal et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7328068 | Spinelli et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7330764 | Swoyer et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7359751 | Erickson et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7369894 | Gerber | May 2008 | B2 |
7386348 | North et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7387603 | Gross et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7396265 | Darley et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7415308 | Gerber et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7444181 | Shi et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7444184 | Boveja et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7450991 | Smith et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7460911 | Cosendai et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7463928 | Lee et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7470236 | Kelleher et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7483752 | Von Arx et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7486048 | Tsukamoto et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496404 | Meadows et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7515967 | Phillips et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7532936 | Erickson et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7539538 | Parramon et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7551960 | Forsberg et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7555346 | Woods et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7565203 | Greenberg et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7578819 | Bleich et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7580752 | Gerber et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7582053 | Gross et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7590451 | Tronnes et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7617002 | Goetz | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7640059 | Forsberg et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7643880 | Tanagho et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7650192 | Wahlstrand | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7676275 | Farazi et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7706889 | Gerber et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7720547 | Denker et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7725191 | Greenberg et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7734355 | Cohen et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7738963 | Hickman et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7738965 | Phillips et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7747330 | Nolan et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7771838 | He et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7774069 | Olson et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7801619 | Gerber et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7813803 | Heruth et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7813809 | Strother et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7826901 | Lee et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7848818 | Barolat et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7878207 | Goetz et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7881783 | Bonde et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7894913 | Boggs et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7904167 | Klosterman et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7912555 | Swoyer et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7925357 | Phillips et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7932696 | Peterson | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7933656 | Sieracki et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7935051 | Miles et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7937158 | Erickson et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7952349 | Huang et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7957818 | Swoyer | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7979119 | Kothandaraman et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7979126 | Payne et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7988507 | Darley et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8000782 | Gharib et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8000800 | Takeda et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8000805 | Swoyer et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8005535 | Gharib et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8005549 | Boser et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8005550 | Boser et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8019423 | Possover | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8019443 | Schleicher et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8024047 | Olson et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8036756 | Swoyer et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8044635 | Peterson | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8050769 | Gharib et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8055337 | Moffitt et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8068912 | Kaula et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8083663 | Gross et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8103360 | Foster | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8116862 | Stevenson et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8121701 | Woods et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8129942 | Park et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8131358 | Moffitt et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8140168 | Olson et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8145324 | Stevenson et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8150530 | Wesselink | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8175717 | Haller et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8180451 | Hickman et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8180452 | Shaquer | May 2012 | B2 |
8180461 | Mamo et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8214042 | Ozawa et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8214048 | Whitehurst et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8214051 | Sieracki et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8219196 | Torgerson | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8219202 | Giftakis et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8224460 | Schleicher et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8233990 | Goetz | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8255057 | Fang et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8311636 | Gerber et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8314594 | Scott et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8332040 | Winstrom | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8340786 | Gross et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8362742 | Kallmyer | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8364281 | Duncan et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8369943 | Shuros et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8386048 | McClure et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8417346 | Giftakis et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8423146 | Giftakis et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8447402 | Jiang et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8447408 | North et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8457756 | Rahman | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8457758 | Olson et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8467875 | Bennett et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8480437 | Dilmaghanian et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8494625 | Hargrove | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8515545 | Trier | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8538530 | Orinski | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8543223 | Sage et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8544322 | Minami et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8549015 | Barolat | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8554322 | Olson et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8555894 | Schulman et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8562539 | Marino | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8571677 | Torgerson et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8577474 | Rahman et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8588917 | Whitehurst et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8626314 | Swoyer et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8644933 | Ozawa et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8655451 | Klosterman et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8700175 | Fell | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8706229 | Lahti et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8706254 | Vamos et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8725262 | Olson et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8725269 | Nolan et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8738141 | Smith et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8738148 | Olson et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8750985 | Parramon et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8761897 | Kaula et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8768452 | Gerber | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8774912 | Gerber | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8855767 | Faltys et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8918174 | Woods et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8954148 | Labbe et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8989861 | Su et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9002476 | Geroy et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9044592 | Imran et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9050473 | Woods et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9089712 | Joshi et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9108063 | Olson et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9144680 | Kaula et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9149635 | Denison et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9155885 | Wei et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9166321 | Smith et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9168374 | Su | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9192763 | Gerber et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9197173 | Denison et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9199075 | Westlund | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9205255 | Strother et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9209634 | Cottrill et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9216294 | Bennett et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9227055 | Wahlstrand et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9227076 | Sharma et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9238135 | Goetz et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9240630 | Joshi | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9242090 | Atalar et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9244898 | Vamos et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9248292 | Trier et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9259578 | Torgerson et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9259582 | Joshi et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9265958 | Joshi et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9270134 | Gaddam et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9272140 | Gerber et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9283394 | Whitehurst et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9295851 | Gordon et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9308022 | Chitre et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9308382 | Strother et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9314616 | Wells et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9320899 | Parramon et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9333339 | Weiner | May 2016 | B2 |
9352148 | Stevenson et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9352150 | Stevenson et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9358039 | Kimmel et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9364658 | Wechter | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9375574 | Kaula et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9393423 | Parramon et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9399137 | Parker et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9409020 | Parker | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9415211 | Bradley et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9427571 | Sage et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9427573 | Gindele et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9427574 | Lee et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9433783 | Wei et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9436481 | Drew | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9446245 | Grill et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9463324 | Olson et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9468755 | Westlund et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9471753 | Kaula et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9480846 | Strother et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9492672 | Vamos et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9492675 | Torgerson et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9492678 | Chow | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9498628 | Kaemmerer et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9502754 | Zhao et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9504830 | Kaula et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9522282 | Chow et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9592389 | Moffitt | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9610449 | Kaula et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9615744 | Denison et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9623257 | Olson et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9636497 | Bradley et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9643004 | Gerber | May 2017 | B2 |
9653935 | Cong et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9656074 | Simon et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9656076 | Trier et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9656089 | Yip et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9675809 | Chow | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9687649 | Thacker | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9707405 | Shishilla et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9713706 | Gerber | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9717900 | Swoyer et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9724526 | Strother et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9731116 | Chen | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9737704 | Wahlstrand et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9744347 | Chen et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9750930 | Chen | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9757555 | Novotny et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9764147 | Torgerson | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9767255 | Kaula et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9776002 | Parker et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9776006 | Parker et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9776007 | Kaula et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9782596 | Vamos et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9814884 | Parker et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9821112 | Olson et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9827415 | Stevenson et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9827424 | Kaula et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9833614 | Gliner | Dec 2017 | B1 |
9844661 | Franz et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9849278 | Spinelli et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9855438 | Parramon et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9872988 | Kaula et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9878165 | Wilder et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9878168 | Shishilla et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9882420 | Cong et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9884198 | Parker | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9889292 | Gindele et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9889293 | Siegel et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9889306 | Stevenson et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9895532 | Kaula et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9899778 | Hanson et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9901284 | Olsen et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9901740 | Drees et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9907476 | Bonde et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9907955 | Bakker et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9907957 | Woods et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9924904 | Cong et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9931513 | Kelsch et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9931514 | Frysz et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9950171 | Johanek et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9974108 | Polefko | May 2018 | B2 |
9974949 | Thompson et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9981121 | Seifert et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9981137 | Eiger | May 2018 | B2 |
9987493 | Torgerson et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
9993650 | Seitz et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
9999765 | Stevenson | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10004910 | Gadagkar et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10016596 | Stevenson et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10027157 | Labbe et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10045764 | Scott et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10046164 | Gerber | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10047782 | Sage et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10052490 | Kaula et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10065044 | Sharma et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10071247 | Childs | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10076661 | Wei et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10076667 | Kaula et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10083261 | Kaula et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10086191 | Bonde et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10086203 | Kaemmerer | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10092747 | Sharma et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10092749 | Stevenson et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10095837 | Corey et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10099051 | Stevenson et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10103559 | Cottrill et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10109844 | Dai et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10118037 | Kaula et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10124164 | Stevenson et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10124171 | Kaula et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10124179 | Norton et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10141545 | Kraft et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10173062 | Parker | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10179241 | Walker et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10179244 | Lebaron et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10183162 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10188857 | North et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10195419 | Shiroff et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10206710 | Kern et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10213229 | Chitre et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10220210 | Walker et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10226617 | Finley et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10226636 | Gaddam et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10236709 | Decker et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10238863 | Gross et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10238877 | Kaula et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10244956 | Kane | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10245434 | Kaula et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10258800 | Perryman et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10265532 | Carcieri et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10277055 | Peterson et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10293168 | Bennett et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10328253 | Wells | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10363419 | Simon et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10369275 | Olson et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10369370 | Shishilla et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10376701 | Kaula et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10448889 | Gerber et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10456574 | Chen et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10471262 | Perryman et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10485970 | Gerber et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10493282 | Caparso et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10493287 | Yoder et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10561835 | Gerber | Feb 2020 | B2 |
20020040185 | Atalar et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020051550 | Leysieffer | May 2002 | A1 |
20020051551 | Leysieffer et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020140399 | Echarri et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020177884 | Ahn et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030023296 | Osypka | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028231 | Partridge et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030114899 | Woods et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030212440 | Boveja | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040087984 | Kupiecki et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098068 | Carbunaru et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040172115 | Miazga et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210290 | Omar-Pasha | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230282 | Cates et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040250820 | Forsell | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267137 | Peszynski et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004619 | Wahlstrand et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050004621 | Boveja et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021108 | Klosterman et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050075693 | Toy et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075694 | Schmeling et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075696 | Forsberg et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075697 | Olson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075698 | Phillips et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075699 | Olson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075700 | Schommer et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050104577 | Matei et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050187590 | Boveja et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060041295 | Osypka | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060074412 | Zerfas et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095078 | Tronnes et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122676 | Ko et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142822 | Tulgar | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149345 | Boggs et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060200205 | Haller | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206166 | Weiner | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070032836 | Thrope et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070239224 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255368 | Bonde et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070255369 | Bonde et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070265675 | Lund et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070293914 | Woods et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080065182 | Strother et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080103570 | Gerber et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080132969 | Bennett et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154335 | Thrope et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080161874 | Bennett et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183236 | Gerber | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183257 | Imran et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090012592 | Buysman et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100076254 | Jimenez et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076534 | Mock | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100100158 | Thrope et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100121421 | Duncan | May 2010 | A1 |
20100160997 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100256696 | Schleicher et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110251662 | Griswold et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110257701 | Strother et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110270269 | Swoyer et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282416 | Hamann et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110301667 | Olson et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110313427 | Gindele et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120041512 | Weiner | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120046712 | Woods et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120053665 | Stolz et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120095478 | Wang et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120130448 | Woods et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120179221 | Reddy et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120191169 | Rothstein et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120203320 | DiGiore et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120276854 | Joshi et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120276856 | Joshi et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120310317 | Lund et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120330354 | Kane et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130004925 | Labbe et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130006330 | Wilder et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130006331 | Weisgarber et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130018445 | Sakai | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130018447 | Ollivier et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130023724 | Allen et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130131766 | Crosby et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130150925 | Vamos et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130150936 | Takahashi | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130150939 | Burnes et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130184773 | Libbus et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130197608 | Eiger | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130207863 | Joshi | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130310894 | Trier | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130331909 | Gerber | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140081363 | Clark | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140128952 | Jang | May 2014 | A1 |
20140222112 | Fell | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140237806 | Smith et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140277270 | Parramon et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150088227 | Shishilla et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150214604 | Zhao et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20160045724 | Lee et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20170197079 | Illegems et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170340878 | Wahlstrand et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180021587 | Strother et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180036477 | Olson et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20190269918 | Parker | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190351244 | Shishilla et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190358395 | Olson et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
520440 | Sep 2011 | AT |
4664800 | Nov 2000 | AU |
5123800 | Nov 2000 | AU |
2371378 | Nov 2000 | CA |
2554676 | Sep 2005 | CA |
2957962 | May 2018 | CA |
3146182 | Jun 1983 | DE |
0656218 | Jun 1995 | EP |
1205004 | May 2002 | EP |
1680182 | Jul 2006 | EP |
1680182 | Jul 2006 | EP |
2243509 | Oct 2010 | EP |
2395128 | Feb 2013 | ES |
1098715 | Mar 2012 | HK |
2007268293 | Oct 2007 | JP |
4125357 | Jul 2008 | JP |
WO 199820933 | May 1998 | WO |
9918879 | Apr 1999 | WO |
9934870 | Jul 1999 | WO |
9942173 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 0056677 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0027469 | May 2000 | WO |
0065682 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0069012 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0183029 | Nov 2001 | WO |
0209808 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 2003084433 | Oct 2003 | WO |
2004021876 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2004103465 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2005079295 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2005081740 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2006116205 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007022180 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO 2008021524 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO 2008094952 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2008153726 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009102536 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO 2009135075 | Nov 2009 | WO |
WO 2010107751 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO 2011059565 | May 2011 | WO |
WO 2013063798 | May 2013 | WO |
WO 2013070490 | May 2013 | WO |
WO 2013156038 | Oct 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
US 9,601,939 B2, 03/2017, Cong et al. (withdrawn) |
Bosch, J., et al., Sacral (S3) Segmental Nerve Stimulation as a Treatment for Urge Incontinence in Patients With Detrusor Instability: Results of Chronic Electrical Stimulation Using an Implantable Neural Prosthesis, The Journal of Urology, Aug. 1995, vol. 154, pp. 504-507. |
Chartier-Kastler, E., Sacral neuromodulation for treating the symptoms of overactive bladder syndrome and non-obstructive urinary retention:> 10 years of clincial experience, Journal Compilation, BJU International, 2007,101, pp. 417-423. |
Ghovanloo, M., et al., A Small Size Large Voltage Compliance Programmable Current Source for Biomedical Implantable Microstimulators, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, Sep. 17-21, 2003, pp. 1979-1982. |
Tanagho, E., et al., Bladder Pacemaker: Scientific Basis and Clinical Future, Urology, Dec. 1982, vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 614-619. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/827,081, filed Aug. 14, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/827,108, filed Aug. 14, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/991,752, filed Jan. 8, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/827,095, filed Aug. 14, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/827,067, filed Aug. 14, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/991,784, filed Jan. 8, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/101,888, filed Jan. 9, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/101,899, filed Jan. 9, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/041,611, filed Aug. 25, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/038,131, filed Aug. 15, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/101,897, filed Jan. 9, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/101,666, filed Jan. 9, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/101,884, filed Jan. 9, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/101,782, filed Jan. 9, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/191,134, filed Jul. 10, 2015. |
“Bu-802a: How Does Rising Internal Resistance Affect Performance? Understanding the Importance of Low Conductivity”, BatteryUniversity.com, Available Online at https://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/rising_internal_resistance, Accessed from Internet on: May 15, 2020, 10 pages. |
“DOE Handbook: Primer on Lead-Acid Storage Batteries”, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Available Online at: htt12s://www.stan dards.doe.gov/standards- documents/ I 000/1084-bhdbk-1995/@@images/file, Sep. 1995, 54 pages. |
“Medical Electrical Equipment—Part 1: General Requirements for Safety”, British Standard, BS EN 60601-1:1990-BS5724-1:1989, Mar. 1979, 200 pages. |
“Summary of Safety and Effectiveness”, Medtronic InterStim System for Urinary Control, Apr. 15, 1999, pp. 1-18. |
“The Advanced Bionics PRECISION™ Spinal Cord Stimulator System”, Advanced Bionics Corporation, Apr. 27, 2004, pp. 1-18. |
“UL Standard for Safety for Medical and Dental Equipment”, UL 544, 4th edition, Dec. 30, 1998, 128 pages. |
Barnhart et al., “A Fixed-Rate Rechargeable Cardiac Pacemaker”, APL Technical Digest, Jan.-Feb. 1970, pp. 2-9. |
Benditt et al., “A Combined Atrial/Ventricular Lead for Permanent Dual-Chamber Cardiac Pacing Applications”, Chest, vol. 83, No. 6, Jun. 1983, pp. 929-931. |
Boyce et al., “Research Related to the Development of an Artificial Electrical Stimulator for the Paralyzed Human Bladder: a Review”, The Journal of Urology, vol. 91, No. 1, Jan. 1964, pp. 41-51. |
Bradley et al., “Further Experience With the Radio Transmitter Receiver Unit for the Neurogenic Bladder”, Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 20, No. 11, Nov. 1963, pp. 953-960. |
Broggi et al., “Electrical Stimulation of the Gasserian Ganglion for Facial Pain: Preliminary Results”, Acta Neurochirurgica, vol. 39, 1987, pp. 144-146. |
Cameron et al., “Effects of Posture on Stimulation Parameters in Spinal Cord Stimulation”, Neuromodulation, vol. 1, No. 4, Oct. 1998, pp. 177-183. |
Connelly et al., “Atrial Pacing Leads Following Open Heart Surgery: Active or Passive Fixation?”, Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, vol. 20, No. 10, Oct. 1997, pp. 2429-2433. |
Fischell , “The Development of Implantable Medical Devices at the Applied Physics Laboratory”, Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest, vol. 13 No. 1, 1992, pp. 233-243. |
Gaunt et al., “Control of Urinary Bladder Function With Devices: Successes and Failures”, Progress in Brain Research, vol. 152, 2006, pp. 1-24. |
Helland , “Technical Improvements to be Achieved by the Year 2000: Leads and Connector Technology”, Rate Adaptive Cardiac Pacing, Springer Verlag, 1993, pp. 279-292. |
Hidefjall , “The Pace of Innovation—Patterns of Innovation in the Cardiac Pacemaker Industry”, Linkoping University Press, 1997, 398 pages. |
Ishihara et al., “A Comparative Study of Endocardial Pacemaker Leads”, Cardiovascular Surgery, Nagoya Ekisaikai Hospital, 1st Dept. of Surgery, Nagoya University School of Medicine, 1981, pp. 132-135. |
Jonas et al., “Studies on the Feasibility of Urinary Bladder Evacuation by Direct Spinal Cord Stimulation. I. Parameters of Most Effective Stimulation”, Investigative urology, vol. 13, No. 2, 1975, pp. 142-150. |
Kakuta et al., “In Vivo Long Term Evaluation of Transcutaneous Energy Transmission for Totally Implantable Artificial Heart”, ASAIO Journal, Mar.-Apr. 2000, pp. 1-2. |
Kester et al., “Voltage-to-Frequency Converters”, Available Online at: https://www.analog.com/media/cn/training-seminars/tutorials/MT-028.pdf, 7 pages. |
Lazorthes et al., “Chronic Stimulation of the Gasserian Ganglion for Treatment of Atypical Facial Neuralgia”, Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, vol. 10, Jan.-Feb. 1987, pp. 257-265. |
Lewis et al., “Early Clinical Experience with the Rechargeable Cardiac Pacemaker”, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 18, No. 5, Nov. 1974, pp. 490-493. |
Love et al., “Experimental Testing of a Permanent Rechargeable Cardiac Pacemaker”, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 17, No. 2, Feb. 1, 1974, pp. 152-156. |
Love , “Pacemaker Troubleshooting and Follow-up”, Clinical Cardiac Pacing, Defibrillation, and Resynchronization Therapy, Chapter 24, 2007, pp. 1005-1062. |
Madigan et al., “Difficulty of Extraction of Chronically Implanted Tined Ventricular Endocardial Leads”, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 3, No. 3, Mar. 1984, pp. 724-731. |
Meglio , “Percutaneously Implantable Chronic Electrode for Radiofrequency Stimulation of the Gasserian Ganglion. A Perspective in the Management of Trigeminal Pain”, Acta Neurochirurgica, vol. 33, 1984, pp. 521-525. |
Meyerson , “Alleviation of Atypical Trigeminal Pain by Stimulation of the Gasserian Ganglion via an Implanted Electrode”, Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum , vol. 30, 1980, pp. 303-309. |
Mitamura et al., “Development of Transcutaneous Energy Transmission System”, Available Online at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312810915 Ch.28, Jan. 1988, pp. 265-270. |
Nakamura et al., “Biocompatibility and Practicality Evaluations of Transcutaneous Energy Transmission Unit for the Totally Implantable Artifical Heart System”, Journal of Artificial Organs, vol. 27, No. 2, 1998, pp. 347-351. |
Nashold et al., “Electromicturition in Paraplegia. Implantation of a Spinal Neuroprosthesis”, Arch Surg., vol. 104, Feb. 1972, pp. 195-202. |
Painter et al., “Implantation of an Endocardial Tined Lead to Prevent Early Dislodgement”, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 77, No. 2, Feb. 1979, pp. 249-251. |
Perez , “Lead-Acid Battery State of Charge vs. Voltage”, Available Online at http://www.rencobattery.com/resources/SOC vs-Voltage.pdf, Aug.-Sep. 1993, 5 pages. |
Schaldach et al., “A Long-Lived, Reliable, Rechargeable Cardiac Pacemaker”, Engineering in Medicine, vol. 1: Advances in Pacemaker Technology, 1975, 34 pages. |
Scheuer-Leeser et al., “Polyurethane Leads: Facts and Controversy”, Pace, vol. 6, Mar.-Apr. 1983, pp. 454-458. |
Smith , “Changing Standards for Medical Equipment”, UL 544 and UL 187 vs. UL 2601 (“Smith”), 2002, 8 pages. |
Tanagho , “Neuromodulation and Neurostimulation: Overview and Future Potential”, Translational Androl Urol, vol. 1, No. 1, 2012, pp. 44-49. |
Torres et al., “Electrostatic Energy-Harvesting and Battery-Charging CMOS System Prototype”, Available Online at : http://rincon mora.gatech.edu/12ublicat/jrnls/tcasi09_hrv_sys.pdf, pp. 1-10. |
Young , “Electrical Stimulation of the Trigeminal Nerve Root for the Treatment of Chronic Facial Pain”, Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 83, No. 1, Jul. 1995, pp. 72-78. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190255339 A1 | Aug 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62633806 | Feb 2018 | US |