Voltage-gated ion channels play vital roles in generating cellular excitability, causing diseases when mutated, and being the target for drugs against diseases with increased cellular excitability, such as epilepsy, cardiac arrhythmia, and pain. Despite long-term efforts to develop effective medical drugs, many patients do not respond satisfactorily to the present-day drugs. For instance, one third of the patients with epilepsy do not respond properly. Therefore there is a need for new treatments. Voltage-gated ion channels, responsible for the generation and propagation of nervous and cardiac action potentials, are obvious targets.
Voltage-gated ion channels have a common structure: Four subunits packed together around an ion conducting pore. Each subunit has 6 transmembrane segments, named S1 to S6. The pore domain (S5-S6) includes the ion-conducting pore with the selectivity filter and the gates that open and close the pore. The voltage-sensor domain (VSD, S1-54) includes the positively charged voltage sensor S4 which moves through the channel protein during activation of the channel. Many of the present-day drugs block voltage-gated ion channels by plugging the ion-conducting pore. In most cases Na channels are targeted, but also Ca and K channels. However, there is an alternative mechanism that potentially can affect ion channel conductance—instead of blocking the ion conducting pore, a drug can affect (i) the gate that open and close the channel, or (ii) the voltage sensor that affects the gate. Retigabine, a new antiepileptic drug, opens the M-type K channel by acting on the gate and consequently shutting down electrical excitability. Spider toxins and some other compounds have been shown to specifically act on the voltage-sensor domain (VSD) of the ion channel, but there is presently no medical drug acting on the VSD.
A mechanism has been described, whereby charged hydrophobic compounds bind close to the VSD and thereby electrostatically affect the charged voltage sensor in the VSD. Negatively charged lipophilic substances (e.g. polyunsaturated fatty acids, PUFAs) was disclosed to bind to the lipid bilayer close to the ion channel and thereby shifting the channel's voltage dependence by electrostatically affecting the channel's voltage sensor, see Borjesson, S. I., et al Biophys. J. 95, 2242-2253 (2008). The binding site of PUFA is at the extracellular end of S3 and S4, distinct from previously described binding sites, and it is mainly the final opening step of the channel that is affected, see Borjesson, S. I. & Elinder, F., J. Gen. Physiol. 137, 563-640 (2011). However, to develop drug-like small-molecule compounds acting on voltage-gated channels with beneficial effects on for example epilepsy and pain, there is a need for other molecules than PUFAs.
A specific K channel is made supersensitive to PUFAs by inserting two extra positively charged residues in the extracellular end of the voltage sensor S4 (the 3R mutation), see. Ottosson, N. E. et al. J. Gen. Physiol. 143, 173-182 (2014). During certain circumstances, this channel increases the gain in open probability caused by PUFAs by more than 500 times compared to wild type. It was also described in this article that a resin acid, pimaric acid, had similar effects as PUFAs on the channel's voltage dependence.
Y-M Cui et al. Bioorg Med Chem, 18, 8642-8659 (2010) discloses that pimaric acid and other diterpene analogues, such as abietic acid and derivatives thereof have activity to open the calcium-activated BK channels, a subtype of K channels.
WO 2016/114707 discloses derivatives of dehydroabietic acid (DHAA) that are demonstrated as potent openers of a specific voltage-gated K channel and thereby exhibit usefulness as candidate drugs against cardiac arrhythmia and other hyperexcitability diseases including epilepsy and pain. The derivatization of Dehydroabietic acid on rings B and C suggested in WO 2016/114707 may enhance an anchoring capacity to the VSD, but does not further consider any electrostatic mechanisms of such compounds when opening voltage-gated K channels.
Various derivatives of dehydroabietic acid have also previously been disclosed as surfactants or antimicrobial agents, see for example WO 2016/051013; CN101972614; and JP61212547.
It is evident that there is a need for small-molecule drug candidates with improved properties to electrostatically open K channels and thereby being candidates to treat cardiac arrhythmia, epilepsy, and pain by compounds acting extracellularly on the voltage-sensor domain, rather than the traditional target, the ion-conducting pore domain.
The present invention relates to dehydroabietic acid derivatives according to Formula Ia or Formula Ib and all stereoisomers thereof, wherein R11, R12, and R14 are independently selected from hydrogen, halogen and R2; R13 is selected from hydrogen, halogen and R3; and R7 is selected from hydrogen, halogen, hydroxyl, carbonyl, and ═N—O—R1; where R1 is selected from hydrogen, and saturated or unsaturated lower alkyl groups selected from C1-C6 alkyl and C2-C6 alkenyl groups; R2 and R3 are independently from each other selected from straight, branched or cyclic saturated or unsaturated hydrocarbons comprising from 1 to 6 carbon atoms; wherein Formula Ia and Formula Ib are
and wherein,
A(x) is defined as A-X and comprises a saturated, unsaturated, branched, unbranched, substituted or unsubstituted linker chain A of 1 to 10 atoms selected from carbon, nitrogen and oxygen, between the fused tricyclic moieties of Formulas Ia and Ib and at least one group X capable of being negatively charged at a physiological pH, selected from carboxyl, sulfate, sulfonate and phosphate groups.
The compounds of the present invention are preferably for use in the treatment in a hyperexcitability disease which is a condition of including increased excitability, higher than in normal cells. A smaller current is needed to be injected into the cell to cause an action potential. Preferably, the hyperexcitability diseases are epilepsy, cardiac arrhythmia, multiple sclerosis and pain.
The structures of Formula Ia and Formula Ib and defined above are generally termed “dehydroabietic acid derivatives”, however, in accordance with the present invention, for example the ring system in Formula Ib can also include one or several double bounds and thereby obtaining a ring system similar to abietic acid, pimaric acid or isopimaric acid. For this reason, compounds according to the present invention can validly be termed derivatives of one of abietic acid, pimaric acid, isopimaric acid or podocarpic acid.
In the following general part of the description of the invention general aspects of the invention are presented also in combination with embodiments of the invention as well as particular derivatives.
In one aspect, the derivatives are selected so that R7, R11, R12, and R14 are hydrogen R13 is isopropyl.
In one aspect, the derivatives are selected so that the linker chain A is a carbon chain optionally interrupted by one or more atoms selected from nitrogen and oxygen and substituted with one or more of oxo groups, carboxyl groups, lower alkyl groups and halogen groups.
In one aspect, the derivatives are selected so that the linker chain A has 1 or 2 carbon atoms and X is a terminal carboxyl group. Particularly, according to this aspect, the derivatives are selected from 2-((1S,4aS)-7-isopropyl-1,4a-dimethyl-1,2,3,4,4a,9,10,10a-octahydrophenanthren-1-yl)acetic acid (Wu180) and 3-((1S,4aS)-7-isopropyl-1,4a-dimethyl-1,2,3,4,4a,9,10,10a-octahydrophenanthren-1-yl)propanoic acid (Wu179).
In one aspect, the derivatives are selected so that the linker chain A is a carbon chain, optionally interrupted with a nitrogen or oxygen atom, substituted with at least one of an oxo group and a carboxyl group, and wherein X is a terminal carboxyl group A particular derivative according to this aspect, is ((1R,4aS,10aR)-7-isopropyl-1,4a-dimethyl-1,2,3,4,4a,9,10,10a-octahydrophenanthrene-1-carbonyl)-L-aspartic acid (Wu148).
In one aspect, the derivatives are selected so that the linker chain A is a carbon chain comprising 2 to 10 atoms, of which at least one atom is nitrogen and X is a terminal carboxyl group. Particularly, according to this aspect, the derivatives are selected from ((1R,4aS,10aR)-7-isopropyl-1,4a-dimethyl-1,2,3,4,4a,9,10,10a-octahydrophenanthrene-1-carbonyl)glycine (Wu117); 3-((1R,4aS,10aR)-7-isopropyl-1,4a-dimethyl-1,2,3,4,4a,9,10,10a-octahydrophenanthrene-1-carboxamido)propanoic acid (Wu152); 4-((1R,4aS,10aR)-7-isopropyl-1,4a-dimethyl-1,2,3,4,4a,9,10,10a-octahydrophenanthrene-1-carboxamido)butanoic acid (Wu149); 3-(3-((1R,4aS,10aR)-7-isopropyl-1,4a-dimethyl-1,2,3,4,4a,9,10,10a-octahydrophenanthrene-1-carboxamido)propanamido)propanoic acid (Wu153); 4-((1R,4aR,4bR,10aR)-7-isopropyl-1,4a-dimethyl-1,2,3,4,4a,4b,10,10a-decahydrophenanthrene-1-carboxamido)butanoic acid (Wu157); and 4-(4-((1R,4aS,10aR)-7-isopropyl-1,4a-dimethyl-1,2,3,4,4a,9,10,10a-octahydrophenanthrene-1-carboxamido)butanamido)butanoic acid (Wu151).
In one aspect, the derivatives are selected so that the linker chain A comprises 2 to 5 atoms of which one optionally is nitrogen or oxygen and X is a terminal phosphate, sulfate or sulfonate group. Particularly, according to this aspect, the derivatives are selected from 1R,4aS,10aR)-7-isopropyl-1,4a-dimethyl-1,2,3,4,4a,9,10,10a-octahydrophenanthren-1-yl)methyl hydrogen sulfate (Wu161); 2-((1R,4aS,10aR)-7-isopropyl-1,4a-dimethyl-1,2,3,4,4a,9,10,10a-octahydrophenanthrene-1-carboxamido)ethane-1-sulfonic acid (Wu154); 3-((1R,4aS,10aR)-7-isopropyl-1,4a-dimethyl-1,2,3,4,4a,9,10,10a-octahydrophenanthrene-1-carboxamido)propane-1-sulfonic acid (Wu150); and ((1R,4aS,10aR)-7-isopropyl-1,4a-dimethyl-w 1,2,3,4,4a,9,10,10a-octahydrophenanthren-1-yl)methyl dihydrogen phosphate (Wu162).
The so described compounds can be substituted in positions R7, R11, R12, R13 and R14 in three-ring system depicted in Formula Ia and Ib according to the following aspects and thereby combined with any of the described linker groups and associated charged groups X.
In one aspect, the groups R2 and R3 when defined as C1-C6 alkyl, C2-C6 alkenyl and C3-C6 cycloalkyl, as possible substitutes in positions R11, R12, R14 and R13 of formula Ia and Ib, hydrogens of said alkyl, alkenyl, and cycloalkyl groups optionally can be substituted with at least one halogen.
In one aspect the derivatives R3 is an isopropyl group. In this aspect, R13 preferably is isopropyl.
In one aspect, the dehydroabietic acid derivatives according to the invention are selected from compounds substituted according to groups a) to m) wherein:
In one aspect the dehydroabietic acid derivatives are selected so that R11, R12, and R14 are independently selected from hydrogen and halogen, R3 is isopropyl; and R7 is —H, ═N—O—CH3 or ═N—O—CH2—CH═CH2.
In one aspect, the dehydroabietic acid derivatives are selected so that R7 is —H, ═N—O—CH3 or ═N—O—CH2—CH═CH2; R3 is isopropyl; and R11, R12 and R14 independently are selected from —H, —F, —Cl, —Br.
In one aspect of the invention the dehydroabietic acid derivatives are selected so that R7 is ═O, ═N—O—CH3 or ═N—O—CH2—CH═CH2; R3 is isopropyl; and R11, R12 and R14 independently are selected from—hydrogen and halogen with the proviso that R12 is not bromo. In one embodiment of this aspect the halogen is iodo, preferably R12 is iodo.
According to one aspect, the dehydroabietic acid derivatives are selected so R7 is selected from hydrogen, halogen, and ═N—O—R1 and where R13 is selected from H or halogen. In one embodiment of this aspect the halogen is chloro. Preferably according to this aspect, the linker chain A is one carbon atom and X is sulfate. A particular derivative according to this aspect is ((1R,4aS,10aR)-6,7,8-trichloro-1,4a-dimethyl-2,3,4,9,10,10a-hexahydrophenanthrene-1-yl)methyl hydrogen sulfate (Wu181).
According to one aspect, the dehydroabietic acid derivatives are selected so R11 and R14 are hydrogen, R12 is R2, R13 is R3, and R7═N—O—R1.
According to one aspect, the dehydroabietic acid derivatives are selected so R11 is hydrogen, R12 and R14 is selected from hydrogen and halogen R3 is isopropyl, and R7 is carbonyl.
According to one aspect, the dehydroabietic acid derivatives are used as defined above, wherein R11 is hydrogen, R12 and R14 is selected from hydrogen and —I, R3 is isopropyl, and R7 is carbonyl or ═N—OH.
According to one aspect, the compounds of the invention are operable on the voltage-gated Kv (potassium) channel of the Kv family is selected from at least one of the subfamilies Kv-1, Kv-2, Kv-3, Kv-4, and Kv-7.
According to another aspect, the compounds which are operable voltage-gated potassium (Kv) channel of the Kv family are operable on the subfamily Kv-1 or Kv-7.
In one aspect one or more the previously described dehydroabietic acid derivatives are used in treatment, i.e. methods of treatment of epilepsy or pain. At least one dehydroabietic acid derivative according to the invention is administered in a therapeutically active amount in a pharmaceutical dose form.
In one aspect the previously defined dehydroabietic acid derivatives are for use in treatment i.e. methods of treatment of cardiac arrhythmia, especially atrial fibrillation (AF) in cardiac arrhythmia. At least one dehydroabietic acid derivative according to the invention is administered in a therapeutically active amount in a pharmaceutical dose form.
The present invention accordingly extends to pharmaceutical compositions comprising one or more of the previously described derivatives.
For the definition of the following terms, see WO 2016/114707.
In the context of the present invention, both when it is described in the previous generalized aspects and in the detailed forms in the following experimental part, the additional following definitions can be used.
A K channel is an ion channel selective for potassium ions.
A Na channel is an ion channel selective for sodium ions.
A Ca channel is an ion channel selective for calcium ions.
A Kv7.2/7.3 channel (hereinafter called M-channel) is a heteromeric Kv channel that belongs to the Kv7 subfamily.
A calcium-activated BK channel (hereinafter called BK channel) is a K channel that both is activated by voltage and the intracellular concentration of calcium.
The Voltage sensor S4 has a number of positively charged amino acids that detects and moves as a response to changes in membrane potential. The movement of S4 causes the opening and closing of a voltage-gated ion channel.
A gating charge refers to the positively charged amino acids in the voltage sensor S4.
A Polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) is a molecule with a lipophilic part and a carboxyl group that makes enables it to be negatively charged.
Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) is a PUFA.
Steady-state current refers to the invariant current recorded when clamping the membrane long enough.
Tail current refers to the current recorded when the voltage is switched from a level where the channel is at least partly open to a new level.
Anchor refers to the three-ring motif, the lipophilic part, of the resin acid or derivative thereof.
Effector refers to the chemical group attached to the anchor, generally containing the charge of the resin acid or derivative thereof. The effector refers to the at least one group X capable of being negatively charged at a physiological pH, selected from carboxyl, sulfate, sulfonate and phosphate groups
Stalk refers to the linker chain of atoms between C4 at the anchor and the effector. Linker chain and stalk are used with the same meaning in the present document in different context and refers to the chain of atoms between the fused tricyclic moieties of Formulas Ia and Ib a negatively charged group X, as previously defined.
Stalk lengths refers to number of atoms between the anchor and effector of the resin acid or derivative thereof.
Anchoring capacity refers to the capacity of a compound to bind close to the VSD.
Theoretical pKa refers to the logarithm of the acid dissociation constant calculated using a software according to Material and Methods
Theoretical pH dependence refers to calculated molecular microspecies (uncharged or with different valance) distribution at different pH
Functional pKa refers to the pKa calculated from recordings and corresponds to the pH where half of the maximum shift was achieved.
Functional pH dependence refers to G(V) shifting effects from recordings at different pH
Cut-off model refers to a model that based on electrostatic energy calculations predicts the preferred position of a charge in the effector.
Cut-off length refers to the stalk length were the G(V) shifting effect drastically change
Permanently charged refers to a compound with a theoretical pKa value below 1
Partially charged refers to a compound that have a functional pKa value close to 7, therefore both uncharged and charged at physiological pH
Materials and Methods
Molecular Biology and Expression of Channels
Experiments were made with the Shaker H4 channel incapable of fast N-type inactivation due to a Δ6-46 deletion, referred to as the wt Shaker Kv channel. The 3R Shaker Kv channel with two additional positively charged arginines (M356R/A359R) in the extracellular end of S4, was also used. The 3R Shaker Kv channel is more sensitive to the PUFA docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and resin acids compared to the wt Shaker Kv channel.
Experiments were also made with the human hKv7.2/Kv7.3, referred to as the M-channel. cRNAs were mixed in a 1:1 molar ratio before injection into oocytes. hKv7.2 [GenBank Acc. No. NM_004518]. hKv7.3 [GenBank Acc. No NM_004519].
For the Shaker channels, Bluescript II KS(+) plasmid was linearized with HindIII and synthesis of cRNA were made with the T7 mMessage mMachine kit (Ambion, Austin, Tex.). Point mutations around S4, on the Shaker Kv channel, were introduced using QuickChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, Calif.) and sequencing were used for verification.
50 nl cRNA was injected into Xenopus laevis oocytes using a Nanoject injector (Drummond Scientific, Broomall, Pa.) and the oocytes were stored at 8° C. in a modified Barth's solution (MBS) before experiments (16° C., M-channel, 1-2 days). The MBS contained (in mM): 88 NaCl, 1 KCl, 2.4 NaHCO3, 15 HEPES, 0.33 Ca(NO3)2, 0.41 CaCl2), and 0.82 MgSO4, pH was adjusted to 7.5 by NaOH and the MBS was supplemented sodium pyruvate (2.5 mM). All animal experiments were approved by the Linkoping's local Animal Care and Use Committee.
Electrophysiology
Currents were measured 1-6 days after cRNA injection using the two-electrode voltage clamp technique (GeneClamp 500B amplifier, Axon instruments). Signals were low pass filtered at 5 kHz and digitized by a Digidata 1440A converter (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, Calif.). The amplifiers leak compensation was used and Clampex 10.2 software (Molecular Devices) was used to obtain data and create voltage protocols. The extracellular control solution contained (in mM): 1 KCl, 88 NaCl, 0.8 MgCl2, 0.4 CaCl2) and 15 HEPES. pH were adjusted with NaOH. Electrode pipettes were made from borosilicate glass capillaries (Harvard apparatus, Kent, UK) using a two stage electrode puller (Narishige, Tokyo, Japan) and resistance was between 0.5-2.0 MO once filled with 3 M KCl solution. In the voltage protocol for the wt and 3R Shaker channel, holding potential was set to −80 mV and steady-state currents were measured at voltages between −80 and +50 mV (wt Shaker Kv channel) or +70 mV (3R Shaker Kv channel), using 5 mV increments, 100 ms. The S4 mutants of the Shaker Kv channel has previously been characterized, and voltage protocols were set accordingly, see Ottosson, N. E. et al. J. Gen. Physiol. 143, 173-182 (2014). For the M-channel, holding potential was set to −100 mV, test-voltages were measured between −120 and +50 mV (10 mV increments for 2 s) and tail currents were measured at −30 mV.
Control solution was perfused to the recording chamber (0.5 ml/min) and the test solution was added manually with a syringe, in a volume large enough to replace the control solution manifold. Resin acids compounds were dissolved in DMSO (100 mM) and stored at −20° C. Just prior to experiment the compound was diluted to desired concentration in control solution. Recovery was measured after continuously perfusion of control solution, maximum 5 min. All recordings were made with the perfusion off. Experiments were carried out in room temperature (20-23° C.) and chemicals were purchased from Sigma Aldrich if not stated otherwise.
Compound Synthesis and Calculated Chemical Properties
Marvin was used for drawing chemical structures (Marvin 16.12.9, 2016, ChemAxon (http://www.chemaxon.com). The logarithm of the acid dissociation constant, pKa, for the ionic forms of the compounds were calculated using the Marvin Calculation Plugin. The pH range was set between −2 and 16, temperature to 298 Kelvin, and the pKa was obtained from the global mass and charge conservation law (Macro mode). The ionic strength was considered to be 0.1 mol/L. Octanol-Water partitioning coefficient, log P, for uncharged compounds were calculated using Marvin Calculation Plugin. The consensus model in Chemaxon was used for calculations and electrolyte concentrations was set to 0.1 mol/dm3 for Cl−, Na+ and K+. Calculated pKa and log P values for all compounds are listed in Table 1.
Analysis
Currents were leak subtracted and steady-state currents were measured 80-86 ms after onset of the test voltages (Clampfit 10.5, Molecular Devices). K conductance, GK, was calculated using,
G
K(V)=IK/(V−VK), (1)
where IK is the steady-state current, V the absolute membrane voltage and VK the reversal potential for K ions (−80 mV), and the following Boltzmann curve was used to fit the data:
G
K(V)=A/(1+exp((V1/2−V)/s)n (2)
where A is the amplitude of the curve, V1/2 the midpoint when n=1, s the slope and n an exponent for better curve fitting, set to n=4. The voltage shift was calculated at 10% of maximal conductance in control curve.
For the M channel tail currents were measured 18 ms after onset and then plotted against the test voltage. The Boltzmann curve (Eq. 2) was used to fit data and the slope was set to shared value between control and test compound. V1/2 was used to calculate the GK(V) shift.
To quantify the concentration dependence or pH dependence of the GK(V) shifts the following equation was used:
ΔVG(V)=ΔVMAX/(1+c1/2/c), (3)
where ΔVG(v) is the voltage shift, ΔVMAX is the amplitude of the curve, c the concentration, c1/2 the concentration at which half maximum response occur. For compounds with no pH dependence the data was fitted with a horizontal line, with the slope set to 0.
For fitting the decreased G(V) shift with increasing stalk length/carbon length at pH 7.4, a one phase exponential decay curve was used:
ΔVG(V)=A*exp(−I/λ), (4)
where ΔVG(V) is the voltage shift, A is the maximal amplitude of the curve where the stalk length is 0 atoms long, I is the stalk length (in number of atoms), and λ is the length constant (in number of atoms).
The pH dependence for Wu162 with valance −1 and −2 was fitted with the following equation:
ΔV=(min1−A)/(1+10{circumflex over ( )}(X−pKa1))−(min2−A))/(1+10{circumflex over ( )}(x−pKa2)) (5)
where min1 is the bottom for valence −2, min2 is the bottom for uncharged molecules set to 0, A is the maximal amplitude, pKa1 and pKa 2 is set to 6.89 and 1.87, respectively, derived from the theoretical pH dependence for molecule microspecies with valance −1 and −2 (
Cut-Off Model
The electrostatic energy for the simple model system (
q′
i=−((ε2−ε1)/(ε2+ε1)qi (6)
is treated as being present in the lipid layer (medium 1). With ε1=2 and ε2=80 the image charge is close to −qi.
The electrostatic energy is calculated as:
W
e=½ΣqiVi, (7)
where the sum is over the two charges qi and Vi is the potential at qi due to its image charge and the other charge and its image charge.
The simple model in
Statistics
Average values are expressed as Mean±SEM. A two-tailed one sample t-test were the mean value was compared to a hypothetical value of 0 was used to analyse G(V)-shifts. When comparing groups, one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's multiple comparison tests or Dunnett's multiple comparison test was used. Correlation analysis was done with Pearson's correlation test and linear regression. p<0.05 was considered significant.
Synthesis of Compounds of the Invention
Supplementary Methods: Compounds Synthesis
General Methods and Materials
All the solvents and reagents were used without further distillation or drying. Dehydroabietic acid was bought from BOC Sciences, other reagents from Sigma-Aldrich. Analytical thin-layer chromatography was performed on the Merk silica gel 60F254 glass-backed plates. Flash chromatography was performed with silica gel 60 (particles size (0.040-0.063 mm). Preparative LC was run on either a Gilson Unipoint system with a Gemini C18 column (100×21.20 mm, 5 micron) or a Waters system with a XSELECT Phenyl-Hexyl column (250×19 mm, 5 micron), under neutral condition using gradient CH3CN/water as eluent (A, water phase: 95:5 water/CH3CN, 10 mM NH4OAc; B, organic phase: 90:10 CH3CN/water, 10 mM NH4OAc). NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Avance 300 MHz with solvent indicated. Chemical shift was reported in ppm on the 5 scale and referenced to solvents peak (CDCl3: δH=7.26 ppm, δC=77.16 ppm; Acetone-d6: δH=2.05 ppm, δC=29.84 ppm). 19F-NMR and 31P-NMR were recorded using benzotrifluoride in CDCl3 (δF=−63.24 ppm) and 85% H3PO4 in D2O (δP=0 ppm) as external standards respectively.
General Procedure of Amide Coupling
To dehydroabietic acid (70 mg, 0.233 mmol) and DiPEA (66.3 mg, 0.513 mmol) in 7 mL acetonitrile was added TBTU (78.6 mg, 0.245 mmol) and stirred at rt for about 0.5 h, then amino acid or ester (0.280 mmol) was added at rt and stirred over two nights. The solution was concentrated and dissolved in 25 mL DCM, washed with 15 mL water, concentrated and purified on flash silica chromatography or preparative LC to give the desired product.
Synthesis of Wu109-Wu111
To the solution of dehydroabietyl amine (60% technical purity) (66 mg, 0.231 mmol) and triethylamine (174.9 mg, 1.73 mmol) in DCM (3 mL) added chlorosulfonic acid (53.2 mg, 0.457 mmol). The mixture was stirred at rt for 3 h. Concentrated and purified using preparative LC (B/A: 20:80 to 90:10). The desired fractions was diluted with water, acidified with 2N HCl to pH˜1, extracted with EtOAc (10 mL×2), concentrated to give Wu109 (56.6 mg, 67%). 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 7.16 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (dd, J=8.1, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.90 (d, J=1.8 Hz, 1H), 3.46 (d, J=12.3 Hz, 1H), 3.07 (d, J=12.1 Hz, 1H), 2.98-2.76 (m, 3H), 2.34 (br d, J=12.9 Hz, 1H), 1.87-1.66 (m, 4H), 1.60 (br d, J=12.9 Hz, 1H), 1.47-1.27 (m, 3H), 1.24 (s, 3H), 1.23 (d, J=7.2 Hz, 6H), 1.05 (s, 3H). 13CNMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ 146.3, 146.0, 134.2, 127.0, 124.2, 124.1, 57.5, 47.5, 37.9, 37.6, 36.3, 35.8, 33.6, 29.7, 25.3, 24.1, 24.0, 19.3, 18.5, 17.4. MS (ESI−): m/z calcd for C20H30NO3S (M-H−) 364.19, found 364.26.
Following the synthesis procedure of Wu109, Wu110 was synthesized using dehydroabietyl amine (60% technical purity) (130 mg, 0.455 mmol), triethylamine (92.1 mg, 0.91 mmol) and methylsulfonyl chloride (57.4 mg, 0.501 mmol) as starting materials in 70% yield. 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 7.17 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (dd, J=8.4, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.90 (d, J=1.8 Hz, 1H), 4.67 (t, J=6.9 Hz, 1H), 3.05-2.77 (m, 8H), 2.30 (br d, J=12.6 Hz, 1H), 1.82-1.64 (m, 4H), 1.52 (dd, J=13.8, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 1.47-1.27 (m, 3H), 1.23 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 6H), 1.22 (s, 3H), 0.96 (s, 3H). 13CNMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ 147.1, 145.8, 134.7, 126.9, 124.2, 123.9, 54.0, 45.0, 40.1, 38.4, 37.5, 37.1, 35.9, 33.6, 30.0, 25.3, 24.1, 24.08, 18.9, 18.62, 18.57. MS (ESI−): m/z calcd for C21H32NO2S (M-H−) 362.22, found 362.29.
Following the synthesis procedure of Wu109, Wu111 was synthesized using dehydroabietyl amine (60% technical purity) (130 mg, 0.455 mmol), triethylamine (92.1 mg, 0.91 mmol) and acetyl chloride (39.3 mg, 0.501 mmol) as starting materials in 75% yield. 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 7.17 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (dd, J=8.1, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.90 (d, J=1.8 Hz, 1H), 5.50 (br s, 1H), 3.24 (dd, J=13.8, 5.1 Hz, 1H), 3.09 (dd, J=13.5, 5.1 Hz, 1H), 2.98-2.74 (m, 3H), 2.29 (br d, J=12.6 Hz, 1H), 1.98 (s, 3H), 1.94-1.55 (m, 4H), 1.46-1.28 (m, 4H), 1.23 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 6H), 1.22 (s, 3H), 0.94 (s, 3H). 13CNMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ 170.4, 147.3, 145.8, 134.9, 127.1, 124.3, 124.0, 50.1, 45.3, 38.5, 37.6, 37.4, 36.3, 33.6, 30.3, 25.4, 24.13, 24.09, 23.7, 19.1, 18.9, 18.7. MS (ESI−): m/z calcd for C22H32NO (M-H−) 326.25, found 326.37.
Followed the general procedure of amide coupling, dehydroabietic acid (30 mg, 0.10 mmol) and glycin tert-buthyl ester hydrochloride (33.5 mg, 0.20 mmol) were used. The reaction mixture was stirred at rt for one night. The reaction mixture was filtered, concentrated and dissolve in DCM (2 mL) followed by adding of 500 uL TFA. The reaction mixture was stirred at rt overnight. The reaction mixture was concentrated and purified using silica gel chromatography with EtOAc/n-heptane/HCOOH (50:50:0.5 to 100:0:0.5) to give Wu117 (32.4 mg, 91%). 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 8.09 (br s, 1H), 7.14 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.98 (dd, J=8.1, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (d, J=1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.64 (t, J=5.1 Hz, 1H), 4.06-3.87 (m, 2H), 2.89-2.75 (m, 3H), 2.28 (br d, J=12.6 Hz, 1H), 2.11 (dd, J=12.3, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 1.82-1.62 (m, 4H), 1.60-1.41 (m, 3H), 1.29 (s, 3H), 1.21 (d, J=6.6 Hz, 6H), 1.20 (s, 3H). 13CNMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ 180.1, 173.5, 147.0, 145.9, 134.8, 127.0, 124.1, 124.0, 47.4, 45.6, 42.3, 38.0, 37.2, 33.6, 30.0, 25.4, 24.1, 21.2, 18.8, 16.5. MS (ESI−): m/z calcd for C22H30NO3 (M-H−) 356.22, found 356.31.
Followed the general procedure of amide coupling, L-aspartic acid dimethylester hydrochloride (55.3 mg, 0.280 mmol) was used. The mixture was stirred at rt overnight, concentrated and purified using flash silica gel chromatography with EtOAc/n-heptane (25:75 to 50:50) to give the intermediate product of methyl ester (69.5 mg, 67%). 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 7.17 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (dd, J=8.4, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.88 (d, J=1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.83 (br d, J=7.8 Hz, 1H), 4.87 (dt, J=7.8, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 3.76 (s, 3H), 3.70 (s, 3H), 3.02 (dd, J=16.8, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 2.94-2.77 (m, 4H), 2.32 (br d, J=12.9 Hz, 1H), 2.11 (dd, J=12.3, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 1.84-1.44 (m, 7H), 1.30 (s, 3H), 1.23 (s, 3H), 1.22 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 6H). 13CNMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ 178.3, 171.8, 171.6, 147.0, 145.8, 134.7, 127.0, 124.2, 124.0, 52.9, 52.1, 48.9, 47.4, 45.8, 38.1, 37.3, 37.2, 36.1, 33.6, 30.2, 25.5, 24.1, 21.2, 18.8, 16.5.
To the intermediate (69.5 mg, 0.156 mmol) added LiOH monohydrate (37.9 mg, 0.936 mmol) and THF/water (5 ml/2 mL). The mixture was stirred at rt for 2 h. The mixture was diluted with water (5 mL), adjusted pH to about 4, extracted with EtOAc (12 mL×3). The organic phase was concentrated, dissolved in DCM (DCM was used to remove insoluble substances.) and concentrated again to give Wu148 (64.5 mg, 99%). 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 9.19 (br s, 2H), 7.15 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.03 (br d, J=7.8 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (dd, J=8.1, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.87 (d, J=1.8 Hz, 1H), 4.94-4.82 (m, 1H), 3.50 (dd, J=17.1, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 2.91-2.74 (m, 4H), 2.30 (d, J=12.0 Hz, 1H), 2.12 (d, J=12.3 Hz, 1H), 1.86-1.40 (m, 7H), 1.29 (s, 3H), 1.22 (s, 3H), 1.21 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 6H). 13CNMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ 179.6, 175.9, 175.2, 146.9, 145.9, 134.7, 127.1, 124.2, 124.1, 48.9, 47.5, 45.6, 38.0, 37.1, 36.0, 33.6, 30.1, 25.5, 24.1, 21.3, 18.8, 16.4. MS (ESI−): m/z calcd for C24H31NO5 (M-H−) 414.23, found 414.36.
Followed the general procedure of amide coupling, the reaction mixture was purified using preparative LC (B/A: 10:90 to 80:20) to give Wu150 (34.4 mg, 35%). Wu150: 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 9.20 (br s, 1H), 8.06 (br s, 1H), 7.03 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.95 (dd, J=8.4, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (d, J=1.5 Hz, 1H), 3.58-3.37 (m, 2H), 3.03-2.87 (m, 2H), 2.86-2.70 (m, 3H), 2.21-1.93 (m, 4H), 1.83-1.44 (m, 5H), 1.40-1.23 (m, 2H, not including methyl group), 1.27 (s, 3H), 1.19 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 6H), 1.13 (s, 3H). 13CNMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ 181.6, 146.7, 145.9, 134.4, 126.9, 124.2, 124.1, 49.0, 47.6, 44.8, 40.1, 37.7, 37.0, 36.5, 33.6, 29.9, 25.3, 24.3, 24.2, 21.3, 18.6, 16.5. MS (ESI−): m/z calcd for C23H34NO4S (M-H−) 420.22, found 420.31.
Followed the general procedure of amide coupling, the reaction mixture was purified using preparative LC (B/A: 10:90 to 80:20) to give Wu151 (7.7 mg, 7%) and Wu149 (29.9 mg, 33%). Wu149: 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 7.15 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (dd, J=8.4, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.87 (d, J=1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.16 (t, J=5.4 Hz, 1H), 3.39-3.28 (m, 2H), 2.91-2.75 (m, 3H), 2.39 (t, J=6.9 Hz, 2H), 2.30 (br d, J=12.9 Hz, 1H), 2.14 (dd, J=12.3, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 1.89-1.67 (m, 6H), 1.58-1.40 (m, 3H), 1.26 (s, 3H), 1.217 (s, 3H), 1.216 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 6H). 13CNMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ 179.4, 177.7, 147.1, 145.9, 134.7, 127.0, 124.2, 124.0, 47.5, 45.5, 39.4, 38.1, 37.4, 37.2, 33.6, 31.8, 30.1, 25.3, 24.9, 24.1, 21.3, 18.9, 16.6. MS (ESI−): m/z calcd for C24H34NO3 (M-H−) 384.25, found 384.34.
Wu151: 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 7.15 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.98 (dd, J=8.1, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (d, J=1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.37 (t, J=5.1 Hz, 1H), 3.39-3.18 (m, 4H), 2.90-2.74 (m, 3H), 2.44-2.03 (m, 6H), 1.90-1.66 (m, 8H), 1.59-1.38 (m, 3H), 1.26 (s, 3H), 1.210 (s, 3H), 1.209 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 6H). 13CNMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ 179.9, 173.5, 147.1, 145.9, 134.7, 127.0, 124.2, 124.1, 47.5, 45.5, 39.5, 39.4, 38.1, 37.4, 37.2, 33.9, 33.6, 30.1, 25.8, 25.3, 24.1, 21.3, 18.8, 16.7. MS (ESI−): m/z calcd for C28H41N2O4 (M-H−) 469.31, found 469.40.
Followed the general procedure of amide coupling, the reaction mixture was purified using preparative LC (B/A: 10:90 to 80:20) to give Wu153 (7.2 mg, 7%) and Wu152 (29.6 mg, 34%). Wu152: 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 7.15 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (dd, J=8.1, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (d, J=1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.50 (br s, 1H), 3.61-3.41 (m, 2H), 2.90-2.73 (m, 3H), 2.65-2.49 (m, 2H), 2.30 (br d, J=12.6 Hz, 1H), 2.12 (d, J=10.8 Hz, 1H), 1.84-1.65 (m, 4H), 1.58-1.38 (m, 3H), 1.25 (s, 3H), 1.212 (s, 3H), 1.215 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 6H). 13CNMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ 179.2, 176.9, 147.0, 145.9, 134.7, 127.0, 124.2, 124.0, 47.4, 45.5, 38.1, 37.3, 37.2, 35.4, 34.0, 33.6, 30.1, 25.4, 24.1, 21.3, 18.8, 16.6. MS (ESI−): m/z calcd for C23H32NO3 (M-H−) 370.24, found 370.35.
Wu153: 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 7.14 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (t, J=5.4 Hz, 1H), 6.98 (dd, J=8.4, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.85 (d, J=1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.79 (t, J=5.7 Hz, 1H), 3.56-3.39 (m, 4H), 2.88-2.72 (m, 3H), 2.59-2.33 (m, 4H), 2.28 (d, J=12.6 Hz, 1H), 2.08 (dd, J=12.6, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 1.83-1.64 (m, 4H), 1.56-1.35 (m, 3H), 1.24 (s, 3H), 1.21 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 6H) 1.20 (s, 3H). 13CNMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ 180.1, 175.2, 172.1, 147.0, 145.9, 134.7, 127.0, 124.2, 124.1, 47.5, 45.4, 38.1, 37.3, 37.2, 36.8, 35.6, 34.9, 33.9, 33.6, 30.0, 25.4, 24.1, 21.3, 18.8, 16.6. MS (ESI−): m/z calcd for C26H37N2O4 (M-H−) 441.28, found 441.37.
Followed the general procedure of amide coupling, the reaction mixture was purified using preparative LC (B/A: 15:85 to 100:0) to give fractions with right mass ion. Because neutral condition was used for the purification and the product was quite acidic. To the concentrated fractions was added 2 mL water, acidified with 1N HCl to pH˜1, extracted with ethyl acetate (4 mL×4), concentrated to give Wu154 (32.1 mg, 34%). 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 9.02 (br s, 1H), 8.23 (br s, 1H), 7.01 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.94 (dd, J=8.4, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J=1.2 Hz, 1H), 3.87-3.59 (m, 2H), 3.25-3.03 (m, 2H), 2.86-2.69 (m, 3H), 2.23-1.99 (m, 2H), 1.80-1.44 (m, 5H), 1.41-1.23 (m, 2H, not including methyl group), 1.26 (s, 3H), 1.19 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 6H), 1.12 (s, 3H). 13CNMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ 181.7, 146.7, 145.8, 134.4, 126.9, 124.2, 124.0, 49.7, 47.6, 44.7, 37.6, 37.1, 36.9, 36.4, 33.6, 29.9, 25.2, 24.1, 21.2, 18.5, 16.3. MS (ESI−): m/z calcd for C22H32NO4S (M-H−) 406.21, found 406.33.
Followed the synthesis and purification procedure for Wu149, instead of dehydroabietic acid, abietic acid (70 mg, 0.231 mmol) with 70% technical purity was used and compound Wu157 (15 mg, 17%) was obtained. 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 6.09 (t, J=5.7 Hz, 1H), 5.74 (s, 1H), 5.35-5.29 (m, 1H), 3.40-3.18 (m, 2H), 2.37 (t, J=6.9 Hz, 2H), 2.21 (m, 1H), 2.10-1.69 (m, 11H), 1.62-1.47 (m, 3H), 1.25 (s, 3H), 1.24-1.09 (m, 2H), 1.10 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.99 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.82 (s, 3H). 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 179.8, 168.1, 145.4, 135.7, 122.6, 120.6, 51.1, 46.5, 45.7, 39.4, 38.4, 37.7, 35.0, 34.8, 31.8, 27.6, 25.5, 25.0, 22.6, 21.6, 21.0, 18.4, 17.1, 14.3. MS (ESL): m/z calcd for C24H36NO3 (M-H−) 386.27, found 386.48.
Followed the general procedure of amide coupling, 10 equiv of DiPEA was used. The reaction mixture was stirred at rt overnight, little amount product was found. The reaction mixture was then stirred at 50° C. for another night. Following the purification procedure for Wu154. After concentration, to the product was added 2 mL water, acidified with 1N HCl to pH ˜2, extracted with ethyl acetate (4 mL×4), concentrated to give Wu158 (8.7 mg, 9%). 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 8.23 (br s, 2H), 7.14 (br s, 1H), 7.11 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.95 (dd, J=8.4, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.83 (d, J=1.5 Hz, 1H), 3.85-3.50 (m, 2H), 2.90-2.67 (m, 3H), 2.24 (br d, J=12.6 Hz, 1H), 2.13 (d, J=12.0 Hz, 1H), 1.82-1.34 (m, 7H), 1.26 (s, 3H), 1.18 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 6H), 1.15 (s, 3H). 13CNMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ 181.7, 146.9, 145.8, 134.8, 127.1, 124.1, 124.0, 47.7, 45.4, 38.0, 37.1, 36.9, 33.6, 30.1, 25.4, 24.15, 24.09, 21.2, 18.7, 16.5. 31PNMR (CDCl3, 121 MHz) δ 23.24. MS (ESI−): m/z calcd for C21H31NO4P (M-H−) 392.20, found 392.28.
The reaction mixture of alcohol (35 mg, 0.122 mmol) and PySO3 (36.7 mg, 0.232 mmol) in THF/DMF (2 mL/1 mL) was stirred at rt for about 2 h, concentrated and purified on preparative LC, extracted with EtOAc after adjusting with HCl to pH 4-5. Concentrated to give Wu161 (22.5 mg, 50%). 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 8.32 (br s, 1H), 7.14 (d, J=8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.96 (dd, J=8.2, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (d, J=1.9 Hz, 1H), 3.92 (d, J=9.0 Hz, 1H), 3.73 (d, J=9.0 Hz, 1H), 2.90-2.75 (m, 3H), 2.25 (br d, J=12.8 Hz, 1H), 1.80-1.60 (m, 5H), 1.50-1.32 (m, 3H), 1.21 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 6H), 1.19 (s, 3H), 0.93 (s, 3H). 13CNMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ 147.1, 145.7, 134.9, 126.9, 124.3, 123.9, 78.2, 44.1, 38.4, 37.5, 37.2, 35.2, 33.6, 30.1, 25.4, 24.1, 19.1, 18.6, 17.2. MS (ESI−): m/z calcd for C20H29O4S (M-H−) 365.18, found 365.25.
To the alcohol (41 mg, 0.143 mmol) in THF (2 mL) added pyridine (90.5 mg, 1.14 mmol), followed by POCl3 (24.1 mg, 0.157 mmol) at 0° C. The mixture was stirred at rt for 2 h. Then 1 mL 2N HCl aqueous solution was added and stirred at rt overnight. Desired compound was found according to LC, 2 mL water was added to the mixture and extracted with EtOAc 5 mL×3. Concentrated and purified with preparative LC (B/A: 15:85 to 100:0). The desired fractions were combined and acidified with 1N HCl (1.2 mL) to about pH 2, 5 mL water was added and extracted with EtOAc (5 mL×4), concentrated to give Wu162 (38.7 mg, 74%). 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 9.19 (br s, 2H), 7.17 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (dd, J=8.1, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.88 (d, J=1.8 Hz, 1H), 3.91-3.80 (m, 1H), 3.70-3.60 (m, 1H), 2.90-2.75 (m, 3H), 2.15 (d, J=12.9 Hz, 1H), 1.80-1.35 (m, 8H), 1.23 (d, J=6.3 Hz, 6H), 1.21 (s, 3H), 0.92 (s, 3H). 13CNMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ 147.2, 145.7, 134.9, 127.0, 124.4, 124.0, 76.1 (br d, JCP=5.0 Hz), 43.7, 38.3, 37.5, 37.45 (br d, JCP=7.5 Hz), 35.0, 33.6, 30.2, 25.5, 24.2, 24.1, 19.0, 18.6, 17.1. 31PNMR (CDCl3, 121 MHz) δ 2.14. MS (ESI−): m/z calcd for C20H30O4P (M-H−) 365.19, found 365.25.
Synthesis of Wu176 and Wu179
Step 1: Synthesis of Dehydroabietyl Aldehyde
To dehydroabietic acid (140 mg, 0.466 mmol) in anhydrous THF (8 mL) added LiAlH4 (1.5 mmol) and stirred at rt for about 40 min, the reaction was quenched with ice-water dropwise until no bubble was formed, filtered and washed with DCM/MO (3:1, 10 mL). Combined and concentrated, re-dissolve in DCM and concentrated to give a raw product, full conversion according to HNMR.
To the mixture of raw product (0.466 mmol) and Dess-Martin reagent (217.4, 0.513 mmol) added dry DCM (15 mL) and stirred at rt for about 2 h. Full conversed based on LC, pre-adsorbed on silica gel and purified using EtOAc/n-heptane (20:80) to give product (125 mg, 94%). 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 9.28 (s, 1H), 7.20 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.03 (dd, J=8.1, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.92 (d, J=1.8 Hz, 1H), 2.95-2.76 (m, 3H), 2.36 (dt, J=13.5, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 1.98-1.74 (m, 4H), 1.55-1.41 (m, 2H), 1.40-1.29 (m, 2H), 1.25 (br s, 3H), 1.24 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 6H), 1.18 (s, 3H). 13CNMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ 206.3, 146.3, 146.1, 134.5, 127.1, 124.3, 124.1, 49.9, 42.9, 38.0, 36.4, 33.6, 32.1, 29.9, 25.3, 24.11, 24.09, 21.5, 17.9, 14.1.
Step 2: Wittig Reaction Followed by Hydrolysis
To the mixture of methyldiethylphosphonic acetate (33.3 mg, 0.158 mmol) and NaH (3.8 mg, 0.158 mmol) added 0.7 mL THF and stirred at rt for 30 min. The solution of dehydroabietyl aldehyde (30 mg, 0.105 mmol)) in THF (750 uL) was added to the reaction mixture and stirred at rt for 3 h. HPLC indicated part of the acid (Wu176) was formed together with methyl ester as major. LiOH.H2O (25 mg, 0.597 mmol) was then added, followed by 0.4 mL water and 0.8 mL THF. The mixture was irradiated under MW for 25 min at 100° C. Full conversion was achieved. Acidified using 1N HCl to pH˜5, extracted with EtOAc (3 mL×4), concentrated and purified using preparative LC (B/A:30:70 to 100:0) to give Wu176 (28 mg, 82%). 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 7.17 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (dd, J=8.4, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.96 (d, J=15.9 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (d, J=1.8 Hz, 1H), 5.80 (d, J=15.9 Hz, 1H), 2.93-2.74 (m, 3H), 2.34 (br d, J=12.9 Hz, 1H), 1.87-1.34 (m, 8H), 1.25 (s, 3H), 1.22 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 6H), 1.17 (s, 3H). 13CNMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ 172.6, 164.0, 147.0, 145.9, 134.8, 127.1, 124.2, 124.1, 117.9, 47.7, 41.1, 38.8, 38.3, 37.1, 33.6, 30.1, 25.4, 24.1, 20.5, 18.7, 17.6. MS (ESI−): m/z calcd for C22H29O2 (M-H−) 325.22, found 325.27.
Step 3: Hydrogenation
The mixture of Wu176 (17 mg, 0.052 mmol) and 10% Pd/C (2.8 mg, 0.0026 mmol) in 3 mL THF was stirred at rt under atm H2 for 72 h. The conversion was not completed. The reaction mixture was filtered, concentrated and purified using preparative LC (B/A: 30:70 to 100:0) to give Wu179 (12.4 mg, 73%). 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 7.18 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (dd, J=8.1, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.90 (d, J=1.8 Hz, 1H), 2.98-2.76 (m, 3H), 2.34-2.23 (m, 3H), 1.89-1.54 (m, 6H), 1.47-1.31 (m, 3H), 1.28-1.15 (m, 10H), 0.95 (s, 3H). 13CNMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ 180.7, 147.5, 145.7, 134.8, 127.0, 124.4, 124.0, 48.0, 38.6, 37.7, 37.0, 35.6, 33.6, 30.4, 28.8, 25.4, 24.1, 20.4, 19.0, 18.8. MS (ESI−): m/z calcd for C22H31O2 (M-H−) 327.23, found 327.30.
Synthesis of Wu180
Step 1: Wittig Reaction
The mixture of Ph3PCH3Br (75.4 mg, 0.211 mmol) and NaH (5 mg, 0.211 mmol) in 0.7 mL THF was stirred at 50° C. for 15 min. The dehydroabietyl aldehyde (40 mg, 0.141 mmol) was added and stirred at 50° C. overnight. The reaction mixture was purified using preparative LC with eluent (B/A: 100:0, 10 mM NH4OAc) to give the alkene (40 mg, 100%). 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 7.18 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (dd, J=8.1, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (d, J=1.8 Hz, 1H), 5.65 (dd, J=17.1, 11.4 Hz, 1H), 5.00-4.92 (m, 2H), 2.93-2.72 (m, 3H), 2.35-2.27 (m, 1H), 1.88-1.57 (m, 4H), 1.51-1.30 (m, 4H), 1.24 (s, 3H), 1.23 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 6H), 1.08 (s, 3H). 13CNMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ 151.7, 147.6, 145.7, 135.1, 127.1, 124.3, 124.0, 111.0, 48.2, 40.4, 39.9, 38.7, 37.3, 33.6, 30.5, 25.5, 24.1, 19.9, 19.1, 17.3.
Step 2: Hydroboration
To the resulted alkene (40 mg, 0.142 mmol) from last step in 2 mL THF added 1 mL 1 M borane in THF. The solution was stirred at rt overnight. The conversion was not completed due to the poor quality of borane. The reaction was still quenched with 2 mL water, followed by 0.5 mL 1M NaOH and 1 mL 30% H2O2. The mixture was stirred overnight. The reaction mixture was extracted with DCM (3 mL×3), concentrated and purified using silica gel chromatography with EtOAc/n-heptane (10:90 to 25:75) to give an alcohol (13 mg, 30%). 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 7.17 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (dd, J=8.1, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.90 (d, J=1.8 Hz, 1H), 3.69 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.97-2.74 (m, 3H), 2.27 (m, 1H), 1.92-1.56 (m, 6H), 1.47-1.32 (m, 4H), 1.23 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 6H), 1.21 (s, 3H), 0.97 (s, 3H). 13CNMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ 147.6, 145.7, 134.9, 127.0, 124.4, 124.0, 59.4, 48.3, 46.9, 38.6, 37.9, 37.7, 35.8, 33.6, 30.5, 25.5, 24.1, 21.0, 19.1, 19.0.
Step 3: Oxidation
The mixture of alcohol (13 mg, 0.0433 mmol) from last step, RuCl3 (0.9 mg, 0.00433 mmol) and NalO4 (13.9 mg, 0.0650 mmol) in 1.5 mL solvent mixture CCl4/CH3CN/Water (0.5:0.5:0.5) was stirred at rt for 5 h. Quenched with 1 N HCl and ice. Extracted with DCM (3 mL×3), concentrated and purified using preparative LC (B/A: 30:70 to 100:0) to give Wu180 (6.2 mg, 46%). 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 7.16 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (dd, J=8.1, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (d, J=1.8 Hz, 1H), 2.95-2.76 (m, 3H), 2.32 (s, 2H), 2.27 (dt (J=12.6, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 1.90-1.49 (m, 7H), 1.45-1.33 (m, 1H), 1.25-1.20 (m, 9H), 1.07 (s, 3H). 13CNMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ 177.6, 147.3, 145.7, 134.9, 127.0, 124.4, 124.0, 48.3, 38.4, 38.0, 37.6, 37.5, 33.6, 30.4, 25.5, 24.1, 20.8, 19.5, 19.0. MS (ESI−): m/z calcd for C21H29O2 (M-H−) 313.22, found 313.20.
Wu50 was synthesized according to methods described in WO 2016/114707. To the substance Wu50 (23 mg, 0.0636 mmol) added MeOH/toluene (1/1.5 mL), followed by 2M Me3SiCHN2 (70 uL, 0.140 mmol) in hexane. Full conversion was achieved after 2 h. The reaction was then quenched with 2 drops of HOAc, concentrated and co-evaporated with 2 mL toluene. The crude product was dissolved in 1 mL anhydrous THF, and LiBH4 (4.2 mg, 0.191 mmol) was then added. The mixture was stirred at rt overnight. The reaction was quenched with methanol and pre-adsorbed on silica gel, purified using EA-n-heptane (20:80 to 30:70) to give the alcohol (20.5 mg, 93%). 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 7.30 (s, 1H), 3.49 (d, J=10.8 Hz, 1H), 3.12 (d, J=10.8 Hz, 1H), 3.01-2.89 (m, 1H), 2.81-2.66 (m, 1H), 2.25-2.16 (m, 1H), 1.96-1.85 (m, 1H), 1.82-1.55 (m, 4H), 1.52-1.27 (m, 4H), 1.20 (d, J=0.9 Hz, 3H), 0.87 (d, J=0.6 Hz, 3H). 13CNMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ 151.0, 134.3, 133.8, 130.8, 128.4, 124.8, 71.8, 42.6, 38.6, 38.02, 37.95, 34.9, 29.4, 25.3, 18.6, 18.4, 17.6.
Step 2: Formation of Wu181
The reaction mixture of alcohol (10 mg, 0.0288 mmol) and PySO3 salt (18.2 mg, 0.115 mmol) in THF/DMF (1.5/0.5 mL) was stirred at rt for 1 h. Full conversion was achieved according to LC analysis. The mixture was concentrated and purified using preparative LC (B/A: 10:90 to 70:30) to give Wu181 (10 mg, 81%). 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 7.262 (s, 1H), 3.91 (br d, J=9.0 Hz, 1H), 3.64 (br d, J=9.0 Hz, 1H), 2.91 (dd, J=18.3, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 2.76-2.58 (m, 1H), 2.18-2.06 (m, 1H), 1.96-1.82 (m, 1H), 1.74-1.18 (m, 7H), 1.14 (s, 3H), 0.87 (s, 3H). 13CNMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ 150.7, 134.3, 133.8, 130.8, 128.4, 124.8, 77.0, 42.6, 38.3, 38.0, 37.1, 34.8, 29.2, 25.2, 18.4, 17.3. MS (ESL): m/z calcd for C17H2035Cl3O4S (M-H−) 425.01, found 425.18; m/z calcd for C17H2035Cl237ClO4S (M-H−) 427.01, found 427.10; m/z calcd for C17H2035Cl37Cl2O4S (M-H−) 429.01, found 429.01.
It is established that polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) bind to at least five different sites in different voltage-gated ion channels, see Elinder F & Liin SI Front. Physiol. 8:43 2017. One site found on the Drosophila Shaker Kv (Kv1-type) channel, and on the human Kv7.1 and Kv7.2/7.3 channels is close to S4. PUFAs anchored to this site, electrostatically open the channel via its negatively charged carboxyl group. The hydrophobic tail seems to act as an anchor for binding, and the charged group as the executor part, altering the S4 movement, the direction depending on the valence of the charge (
Hydrophobic resin acids (e.g. dehydroabietic acid (DHAA),
The inventors have previously performed a systematic exploration of molecular properties of the anchor of resin acids, primarily DHAA derivatives, when side chains on C7 in ring B (
Increasing the Stalk Length Decreases the Effect on the 3R Channel at Neutral pH
We hypothesized that a shorter distance between this negatively charged effector (carboxyl group) and the positively charged gating charges (arginines) of the voltage sensor S4 should increase the G(V)-shifting efficacy of the resin acid on the Shaker Kv channel. To explore this, we used the 3R Shaker Kv channel (with two additional arginines in the top of S4, M356R and A359R,
A Critical Cut-Off Point for Stalks Between Three and Four Atoms
To explore the effect with a fully charged effector experiments were performed either at pH 10 to make sure that the carboxyl group, regardless of stalk length, was fully charged (see
The data on the 3R Shaker Kv channel shows that (i) the largest effect was found for the permanently charged P3 DHAA derivative, and that (ii) there was a drastic decrease in effect beyond three carbons. A critical question is if this behaviour is found also for the wt Shaker Kv channel (with clear sequence similarity in S4 to several human Kv channels) with apparent therapeutic implications, or if it is restricted to the artificial 3R Shaker Kv channel. When the stalk-length series was tested on the wt Shaker Kv channel a noticeable difference, except for the absolute magnitude, was that derivative-induced G(V) shift increased when the stalk length was prolonged from P1 to P3, but the cut-off was not shifted (
If a longer stalk brings the negative charge closer to S4 and thereby increases channel opening and the G(V) shift (
The Cut-Off Model
The experimental data presented above showed that the G(V)-shifting effect increased if the stalk was prolonged, as if the negative resin-acid charge was allowed to come closer to the positive S4 charge to more strongly pull the channel open. At a certain length the G(V)-shifting effect disappeared and a sudden break occurred in the curve (
To explore this theoretically and quantitatively we analysed a simple system (
Even though the distance d is not known some general conclusions can be drawn: (i) The shorter the cut-off length of the stalk is, the closer the anchor point is to the surface. (ii) For a specific cut-off length of the stalk, the possible anchor points are relatively independent of the distance d of the gating charge from the surface (
The Valence of the Charge is Critical
Above, we have analysed the effect of a single fully charged effector on stalks of different lengths. A critical finding was that, most strikingly for the wt Shaker Kv channel, there was a maximal G(V) shift when the effector group was 3 atoms away from the anchor point. However, for longer stalks, for both the wt and the 3R Shaker Kv channels, the effect was eliminated, probably because of snorkelling of the charge towards the extracellular solution.
Our next hypothesis was that the G(V)-shifting effect could be increased by increasing the valance of charge on the stalk. To further corroborate that the charge was critical for the effect we introduced a neutral group instead of the carboxyl group. Two different uncharged P3 compounds (
Contrary, two different permanently single-charged P3 compounds (
Wu162 (
In conclusion, a divalent charge does not increase the G(V)-shifting effect compared with a monovalent charge, but decreased it. A possible explanation is that a divalent charge instead finds a more energetic favourable position towards the water rather than the voltage sensor. Therefore, the stalk length is better modifier of the effect than to increase the valance above −1.
Wu161—a Functional Chimera Between a Fatty Acid and a Resin Acid
The aim of this investigation was to modify the carboxyl-group of DHAA to enhance the G(V) shift. So far we have described that a three-atom long stalk combined with a decreased pKa value for the effector group is the most efficient modification. Increasing the valance above one did not increase the effect, but rather decreased it. P3-Wu161 (
Wu161 at 10 μM, clearly shifted the G(V) of the 3R Shaker Kv channel along the voltage axis by −12.3±1.0 mV (n=4;
For compounds acting close to the voltage sensor, the positions of the gating charges play a large role. We explored a series of single mutations where the top charge of S4 (R362) was moved residue by residue towards the extracellular end of S4 (from R362R to M356R), or explored the effect on a channel where this area was uncharged (R362Q) (
Combined Stalk and Anchor Modifications Enhanced the G(V) Shift
The G(V)-shifting effect of the DHAA derivatives can also be increased by modifications on the three ringed motif (the anchor), not only by modifications of the effector as shown in above. Wu161 and Wu50 (
DHAA Derivatives Open the Human M-Channel
Wu161 and Wu181 were shown to have large effects on the 3R Shaker Kv channel (
This investigation suggests that resin acids act on a voltage-gated K channel by having (i) an anchor, which bind the molecule close to the VSD, and (ii) an effector, which electrostatically exerts the effect on the voltage sensor S4.
The major findings are the following:
Knowledge of resin acids in detail can potentially lead to development of new drugs with high specificity, affinity and selectivity.
The family of resin acids includes many compounds acting on several types of ion channels a general theme on mechanism of their effects emerges. Most compounds open voltage-gated ion channels by shifting the G(V) curve along the voltage axes. Pimaric acid, isopimaric acid, DHAA, and abietic acids shifts the G(V) of the Shaker Kv channel, while podocarpic acid with a polar side chain in its anchor does not shift the G(V). Pimaric acid shifts the voltage dependence of activation of Kv1.1-2.1 channels, but not of Kv4.3 channels. Resin acids also open ion channels outside the Kv family. They open large-conductance voltage- and Ca2+-activated K+(BK) channels, also by shifting the G(V) curve along the voltage axis. But the effects are not limited K channels but also include voltage-gated Na and Ca channels; isopimaric acid acts on five of six explored voltage-gated ion channels in a mouse cardiac atrial cell line. However, in addition to the effects on the G(V) curves, also the steady-state inactivation curves were shifted in negative direction along the voltage axis. Thus, it is clear that several resin acids act on many types of voltage-gated ion channels.
Although, binding sites for the resin acids have not been assigned to most ion channels, the communalities in effects suggests that the different types of channels share a common binding site. We have suggested that resin acids electrostatically interact with the voltage sensor of the Shaker Kv channel by binding in a pocket between the transmembrane segments S3 and S4 of the VSD, and the lipid bilayer. Together with the effects reported in the present investigation on the M channel, all these data suggests that the resin acid pocket is conserved between different Kv channels. However, it is also known that subtle side chain alterations of the compounds can have large effects on the effects, and we know that the effect varies from channel to channel. Therefore, it is likely that compounds with high channel specificity can be developed.
In the present investigation, the G(V)-shifting effect of DHAA was improved with modifications at the carboxyl-site, up to five-fold for Wu161 with a permanent negative charge on a stalk three atoms away for the anchor. Thus, modifications at the carboxyl-site can help to increase the G(V)-shifting effect and possible help to tune the resin acid sensitivity between different ion channels, with different charge profile around the voltage sensor, suggesting that the carboxyl-site of resin acids is a powerful site to modify Kv channel opening activity in future drug design.
In conclusion, all flexibilities at the carboxyl-site described in the present investigation suggests that it is likely that lipoelectric compounds can be improved to increase the G(V) shift and developed into channel specific compounds to cause desired effects in different tissues.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1751207-0 | Sep 2017 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2018/050992 | 9/27/2018 | WO | 00 |