NEW SALT FORMS OF AMILORIDE AND ITS DERIVATIVES FOR PHARMACEUTICAL USE

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20250002463
  • Publication Number
    20250002463
  • Date Filed
    September 28, 2022
    2 years ago
  • Date Published
    January 02, 2025
    18 days ago
Abstract
The present invention relates to lactic, acetic, and phosphoric acid salts of amiloride and certain amiloride derivatives. The invention also relates to the use of such salts in medicine, pharmaceutical and cosmetic compositions comprising the novel salts, and to methods of treatment of psoriasis using the salts.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the field of pharmaceutical treatment, and in particular pharmaceutical treatment using new salts of certain amiloride derivatives.


BACKGROUND

Amiloride (3,5-diamino-6-chloro-N-(diaminomethylidene)pyrazine-2-carboxamide, CAS registry number 2609-46-3) is commonly used, as the hydrochloride salt, as a potassium-sparing diuretic in the therapy of edema, often in combination with thiazide diuretics. Amiloride is known to interact with the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) and acid-sensing ion channel proteins, as well as sodium/hydrogen antiporters (NHE) and sodium/calcium exchangers (NCX). Amiloride as the hydrochloride salt has been approved for marketing in Europe since at least the early 1970s.


One amiloride derivative is benzamil, or benzyl amiloride (3,5-diamino-N—(N′-benzylcarbamimidoyl)-6-chloropyrazine-2-carboxamide, CAS registry number 2898-76-2). WO2015/168574 suggests the use of epithelial ion channel blockers such as amiloride and its derivative benzamil in the treatment of psoriasis. WO2015/168574 discusses the use of pharmaceutically acceptable salts of amiloride and its derivatives, but does not mention specific salts or how to choose a specific salt. US 2013/109856 discloses a process of preparing the trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) salt of benzamil. The skilled person appreciates that TFA is not a suitable counterion for pharmaceutical purposes.


Psoriasis is an immune-mediated skin disease appearing in a chronic recurring manner. Prevalence estimates show that it affects 1-2% of the worldwide population with equal gender distribution. Psoriasis can emerge at any time of life and usually peaks between the ages of 30-39 and 60-69. Sufferers may experience itch, pain, and/or psoriasis-related nail disease and arthritis. Significant morbidity extends to the psychosocial impact on the individual. Psoriatic patients are often stigmatized by people staring at their disfigured skin; they may have low self-esteem and would face difficulties in relationships and employment.


Psoriasis has also been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases, stroke and cancer.


Histological assessment of psoriatic plaques demonstrates keratinocyte hyperproliferation with parakeratosis, epidermal elongation or rete ridges, increased angiogenesis, and dermal infiltration of inflammatory cells, including T cells, neutrophils, macrophages, and dendritic cells (DCs). Other histological features often observed in psoriatic skin include micropustules of Kogoj, microabscesses of Munro, thinned or absent granular layer, thinned suprapapillary plates, and the papillary dermis containing dilated superficial vessels.


The etiology of psoriasis is multifactorial. Environmental triggers, such as trauma, stress, infections and drugs, activate in predisposed individuals an exaggerated inflammatory response in the skin. Although psoriasis is a disease of dysfunctional proliferation and differentiation of the keratinocytes, there is significant T cell involvement through the release of inflammatory cytokines that promote further recruitment of immune cells, keratinocyte proliferation, and sustained chronic inflammation. These T-cells proliferate in the epidermis of psoriatic plaques.


The presence of innate immune cells and their products in psoriatic skin plaques indicates a role for innate immunity. Cells of the innate immune system include macrophages, NK and NKT cells, and DCs. There is an increased number of plasmacytoid and myeloid DCs in psoriatic skin compared with non-lesional skin. Other cellular elements of innate immunity are also involved in the development of psoriasis, including high numbers of macrophages which can secrete IL-6, IL-12, IL-23, and TNF. Keratinocytes are also capable resident antigen-presenting cells (APCs) in the skin. When stimulated they produce large amounts of cytokines (e.g., TNF, IL-6, and IL-18), chemotactic chemokines (e.g., IL-8 and CCL20), and antimicrobial peptides (e.g., β-defensin and LL37).


Genome wide scans have reported at least nine chromosomal loci linked to psoriasis, where the PSORS1 locus accounts for 35-50% of the heritability of the disease. PSORS1 is located on the major histological complex (MHC) region of chromosome 6 (6p21), and several genes contained within this region are thereby associated with psoriasis, namely, HLA-Cw6, CCHCR1 (coiled-coil o helical rod protein), and CDSN (corneodesmosin). Other susceptibility loci have been identified which include genes expressed in keratinocytes (LCE3B (late cornified envelope 3B) and LCE3C1 (late cornified envelope 3C1)) and immune cells (IL-12B, IL23R, and IL23A). This indicates that both the epidermal skin barrier and immune responses against pathogens are implicated in psoriasis pathogenesis.


Currently the first line of treatment for mild to moderate psoriasis is the use of topical agents. When topical therapy fails, escalated treatment often includes phototherapy, oral systemic agents, and/or injectable biological therapies. Corticosteroids, vitamin D analogues, and tazarotene all are used in the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis. However, prolonged exposure to topical corticosteroids may lead to atrophy of the skin, permanent striae, and telangiectasia. Vitamin D analogues (e.g., calcitriol, calcipotriol, and tacalcitol) are effective antipsoriatic agents, but excessive use can lead to hypercalcemia. The probability of treatment success increases when combining vitamin D analogues with topical corticosteroids as compared with the vitamin D analogue monotherapy. As a result, an often recommended first-line induction treatment of plaque psoriasis is a combination of a vitamin D analogue and a topical steroid.


Other topical agents are commonly combined with topical corticosteroids and vitamin D analogues when treating psoriatic plaques. Salicylic acid is a topical keratolytic agent used adjunctly for removing scales, and it acts by reducing coherence between keratinocytes, increasing hydration, and softening of the stratum corneum by decreasing the skin pH. However, systemic salicylic acid toxicity can occur after long-term use over large skin areas. Retinoids, another popular treatment agent for psoriasis, act on skin by mediating or inducing cell differentiation and normalizing proliferation. Systemic retinoids, e.g. tazarotene, are associated with several adverse effects including teratogenicity, serum lipid elevations, mucocutaneous toxicity, skeletal changes, and hair loss.


Ultraviolet (UV) light therapy induces T-lymphocyte apoptosis in psoriatic lesions of the dermis and epidermis. Oral 8-methoxypsoralen-UV-A (PUVA) and narrowband UVB (NB-UVB) are well-established and effective treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis. PUVA has a response rate of approximately 80% compared with 70% for NB-UVB, however, NB-UVB is preferred because of higher convenience, except in case of very thick plaques. Systemic treatments are often used in combination with topical therapy and phototherapy for patients with severe psoriasis. Oral systemic agents for the treatment of psoriasis include methotrexate, cyclosporine, and acitretin. Injectable biological therapies are emerging approaches for the treatment of psoriasis by targeting molecules in the inflammatory pathways. They are considered for patients with severe psoriasis that are resistant to oral immunosuppressants and phototherapy. The two major therapeutic classes of injectable biological therapies include anti-cytokine therapies and T-cell-targeted therapies. The first class consists of injectable immunoglobulins (Ig), infliximab, and adalimumab, target soluble and membrane-bound TNF. Other anti-cytokine therapies include etanercept and ustekinumab. A second therapeutic class of injectable therapies include agents that bind to T cells and prevent T-cell activation, including alefacept and efalizumab.


Dermatologists and patients would benefit from new therapies for psoriasis, both those that can be delivered topically as well as those that can be delivered systemically.


SUMMARY

The present inventors have found that certain salts of the amiloride derivative benzamil have improved properties at least in terms of improved stability, increased water solubility, and/or reduced polymorphism as compared to the free base compound and known salts of benzamil.


The present invention thus provides novel salt forms of benzamil, amiloride and certain amiloride derivatives.


Free base compounds useful in the present invention are those of formula (I)




embedded image


wherein R is selected from




embedded image


According to a first aspect there is provided a salt of the free base above, which is a lactic acid salt, an acetic acid salt, or a phosphoric acid salt.


In one embodiment, the salt is the lactic acid salt.


In one embodiment, the free base compound is benzamil.


In one embodiment, the salts are in only one crystal form.


In a second aspect, the present invention relates to a pharmaceutical or cosmetic composition comprising the salt according to the invention, and optionally pharmaceutically and/or cosmetically acceptable excipients.


In one embodiment, the pharmaceutical composition is adapted for topical administration.


In a third aspect, the present invention relates to the salt according to the first aspect, or the pharmaceutical composition according to the second aspect, for use in medicine.


In one embodiment, the present invention relates to the salt or pharmaceutical composition for use in a method of treatment of psoriasis.


In one embodiment, the psoriasis is chronic psoriasis or plaque psoriasis.


In one embodiment, the salt or composition is administered topically or systemically.


In a fourth aspect, the present invention relates to the use of the salt according to the first aspect in the manufacture of a pharmaceutical composition for use in in a method of treatment of psoriasis.


In one embodiment, the psoriasis is chronic psoriasis or plaque psoriasis.


In one embodiment, the salt is administered topically or systemically.


In a fifth aspect, the present invention relates to a method for treatment of psoriasis comprising administering to an individual in need thereof an effective amount of a salt according to the first aspect, or of a pharmaceutical composition according to the second aspect.


In one embodiment, the psoriasis is chronic psoriasis or plaque psoriasis.


In one embodiment, the salt is administered topically or systemically.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1 shows a High Throughput XRPD diffractogram for the form LAC1 of the lactic acid salt of benzamil.



FIG. 2 shows a High Throughput XRPD diffractogram for the form LAC1 of the lactic acid salt of benzamil as prepared and after submission to accelerated Aging Conditions (AAC).



FIG. 3 shows a High Throughput XRPD diffractogram for the form ACA1 of the acetic acid salt of benzamil.



FIG. 4 shows a High Throughput XRPD diffractogram for the form ACA2 of the acetic acid salt of benzamil.



FIG. 5. shows a High Throughput XRPD diffractogram for the forms ACA1 and ACA2 of the acetic acid salt of benzamil as prepared and after submission to accelerated Aging Conditions (AAC).



FIG. 6 shows a High Throughput XRPD diffractogram for the form PHO2 of the phosphoric acid salt of benzamil.



FIG. 7 shows a High Throughput XRPD diffractogram for the form PHO2 of the phosphoric acid salt of benzamil as prepared and after submission to accelerated Aging Conditions (AAC).



FIG. 8 shows intrinsic dissolution rate profiles in water of A) benzamil lactate (LAC1) and B) benzamil TFA (TFA2).





DEFINITIONS

Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood to one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs.


The term “sensitivity” and “sensitive” when made in reference to treatment is a relative term which refers to the degree of effectiveness of a treatment compound in lessening or decreasing the symptoms of the disease being treated. For example, the term “increased sensitivity” when used in reference to treatment of a cell or patient refers to an increase of at least 5% or more, in the effectiveness in lessening or decreasing the symptoms of psoriasis when measured using any methods well-accepted in the art.


As used herein, and unless otherwise specified, the term “therapeutically effective amount” of a compound is an amount sufficient to provide a therapeutic benefit in the treatment or management of psoriasis, or to delay or minimize one or more symptoms associated with psoriasis. A therapeutically effective amount of a compound means an amount of therapeutic agent, alone or in combination with other therapies, which provides a therapeutic benefit in the treatment or management of psoriasis. The term “therapeutically effective amount” can encompass an amount that improves overall therapy, reduces or avoids symptoms or causes of psoriasis, or enhances the therapeutic efficacy of another therapeutic agent.


The term “likelihood” generally refers to an increase in the probability of an event. The term “likelihood” when used in reference to the effectiveness of a patient response generally contemplates an increased probability that the symptoms of psoriasis will be lessened or decreased.


The terms “determining”, “measuring”, “evaluating”, “assessing” and “assaying” as used herein generally refer to any form of measurement, and include determining if an element is present or not. These terms include both quantitative and/or qualitative determinations. Assessing may be relative or absolute. “Assessing the presence of” can include determining the amount of something present, as well as determining whether it is present or absent.


The term “sample” as used herein relates to a material or mixture of materials, typically, although not necessarily, in fluid form, containing one or more components of interest.


“Biological sample” as used herein refers to a sample obtained from a biological subject, including sample of biological tissue or fluid origin, obtained, reached, or collected in vivo or in situ. A biological sample also includes samples from a region of a biological subject containing precancerous or cancer cells or tissues. Such samples can be, but are not limited to, organs, tissues, fractions and cells isolated from a mammal. Exemplary biological samples include but are not limited to cell lysate, a cell culture, a cell line, a tissue, oral tissue, gastrointestinal tissue, an organ, an organelle, a biological fluid, a blood sample, a urine sample, a skin sample, and the like. Preferred biological samples include but are not limited to whole blood, partially purified blood. PBMCs, tissue biopsies, and the like.


The term “combination” as in the phrase “a first agent in combination with a second agent” includes co-administration of a first agent and a second agent, which for example may be dissolved or intermixed in the same pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, or administration of a first agent, followed by the second agent, or administration of the second agent, followed by the first agent. The present invention, therefore, includes methods of combination therapeutic treatment and combination pharmaceutical compositions.


The term “concomitant” as in the phrase “concomitant therapeutic treatment” includes administering an agent in the presence of a second agent. A concomitant therapeutic treatment method includes methods in which the first, second, third, or additional agents are co-administered. A concomitant therapeutic treatment method also includes methods in which the first or additional agents are administered in the presence of a second or additional agents, wherein the second or additional agents, for example, may have been previously administered. A concomitant therapeutic treatment method may be executed step-wise by different actors. For example, one actor may administer to a subject a first agent and a second actor may to administer to the subject a second agent, and the administering steps may be executed at the same time, or nearly the same time, or at separate times, so long as the first agent (and additional agents) are after administration in the presence of the second agent (and additional agents). The actor and the subject may be the same entity (e.g., human).


As used herein, the term “dose amount” refers to the quantity, e.g., milligrams (mg), of the substance which is administered to the subject. In one embodiment, the dose amount is a fixed dose, e.g., is not dependent on the weight of the subject to which the substance is administered. In another embodiment, the dose amount is a relative and not fixed dose, e.g., is dependent on the weight of the subject to which the substance is administered, or for a topical therapy a dose may be related to the surface area that is treated, e.g. dose/m2 of skin.


As used herein, the term “periodicity” as it relates to the administration of a substance refers to a (regular) recurring cycle of administering the substance to a subject.


The “duration of a periodicity” refers to a time over which the recurring cycle of administration occurs.


As used herein, and unless otherwise specified, the terms “treat,” “treating” and “treatment” refer to an action that occurs while a patient is suffering from psoriasis, which reduces the severity of psoriasis, or retards or slows the progression of the psoriasis, or achieves or maintains a therapeutic objective. An “effective patient response” refers to any increase in the therapeutic benefit to the patient. An “effective patient psoriasis response” can be, for example, a 5%, 10%, 25%, 50%, or 100% decrease in the physical symptoms of psoriasis.


The term “kit” as used herein refers to a packaged product comprising components with which to administer the novel salt form of the invention for treatment of psoriasis. The kit preferably comprises a box or container that holds the components of the kit. The box or container may be affixed with a label or a Food and Drug Administration approved protocol. The box or container holds components of the invention which are preferably contained within plastic, polyethylene, polypropylene, ethylene, or propylene vessels. The vessels can be capped-tubes or bottles. The kit can also include instructions for use.


The phrase “pharmaceutically acceptable” is employed herein to refer to those compounds, materials, compositions, and/or dosage forms which are, within the scope of sound medical judgment, suitable for use in contact with the tissues of the subject with toxicity, irritation, allergic response, or other problems or complications, commensurate with a reasonable benefit/risk ratio. Compounds, materials, compositions, and/or dosage forms that are pharmaceutically acceptable are also considered cosmetically acceptable.


The phrase “pharmaceutically acceptable excipient” as used herein refers to an acceptable material, composition or vehicle, such as a liquid or solid filler, diluent, carrier, manufacturing aid (e.g., lubricant, talc, magnesium, calcium or zinc stearate, or steric acid), solvent or encapsulating material, involved in carrying or transporting the, optionally therapeutic, compound for administration to the subject. Each excipient should be “acceptable” in the sense of being compatible with the other ingredients of the formulation and not injurious to the subject. Some examples of materials which can serve as pharmaceutically excipients include: ethanol, sugars, such as lactose, glucose and sucrose; starches, such as corn starch and potato starch; cellulose and its derivatives, such as sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, ethyl cellulose and cellulose acetate; gelatin; talc; waxes; oils, such as peanut oil, cottonseed oil, safflower oil, sesame oil, olive oil, corn oil and soybean oil; glycols, such as ethylene glycol and propylene glycol; polyols, such as glycerin, sorbitol, mannitol and polyethylene glycol; esters, such as ethyl oleate and ethyl laurate; agar; buffering agents; water; isotonic saline; pH buffered solutions; and other non-toxic compatible substances employed in pharmaceutical formulations. If desired, certain sweetening and/or flavoring and/or coloring agents may be added. Pharmaceutically acceptable excipients are also considered cosmetically acceptable excipients.


The term “compound” as used herein includes compounds in free base from as well as in salt forms.


PSM001, benzyl amiloride and benzamil are used interchangeably and are all intended to refer to 3,5-diamino-N—(N′-benzylcarbamimidoyl)-6-chloropyrazine-2-carboxamide (CAS registry number 2898-76-2).


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention provides novel salts of amiloride, and of amiloride derivatives, that have improved properties at least in terms of improved stability, increased water solubility, and/or reduced polymorphism.


According to a first aspect, the invention relates to a salt of a free base compound represented by formula (I)




embedded image


wherein the salt is selected from the lactic acid salt, acetic acid salt, and phosphoric acid salt.


A salt according to the present invention may have an increased water solubility, compared to salts of the prior art. The skilled formulator appreciates that an increased water solubility is advantageous when preparing an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) formulation. For example, a higher concentration of the API may be used which may provide a higher dose in a formulation. Such formulation may be a topical formulation or a formulation intended for systemic delivery.


In one embodiment, R is benzyl, i.e. the free base compound is benzamil.


In one embodiment the salt is the lactic acid salt. An advantage with lactate as a counterion in a pharmaceutical salt is that it is endogenous, and is present for example in the skin of a human. This is particularly advantageous in topical formulations. Another advantage with lactic acid is that it is a keratolytic agent. Thus, in embodiments wherein the salt is a lactic acid salt, both the free base and the counterion may have a therapeutic effect. Thus, a formulation comprising a free base compound of formula (I) in combination with a lactate salt may provide for a formulation with a combination effect, suitable for a combination treatment.


In one embodiment the salt is the acetic acid salt.


In one embodiment the salt is the phosphoric acid salt.


In one embodiment, the salt is in only one crystal form. The skilled formulator appreciates that the presence of a single polymorph may be advantageous for formulations of an API. For example, API's in different polymorphs may have different release rates. Moreover, a ratio of the different polymorphs in a formulation may change over time. This may lead to an undesired change in release rate over time in a formulation of a salt having more than one polymorph.


In one embodiment, the free base compound is benzamil, the salt is the lactic acid salt, and the X-ray powder diffractogram of the salt comprises characteristic peaks as shown in FIG. 1. In one embodiment, the free base compound is benzamil, the salt is the acetic acid salt, and the X-ray powder diffractogram of the salt comprises characteristic peaks as shown in FIG. 3. In one embodiment, the free base compound is benzamil, the salt is the acetic acid salt, and the X-ray powder diffractogram of the salt comprises characteristic peaks as shown in FIG. 4. In one embodiment, the free base compound is benzamil, the salt is the phosphoric acid salt, and the X-ray powder diffractogram of the salt comprises characteristic peaks as shown in FIG. 6.


In one embodiment, R is hydrogen, i.e. the free base compound is amiloride. In one embodiment the salt is the lactic acid salt. In one embodiment the salt is the acetic acid salt.


In one embodiment the salt is the phosphoric acid salt. In one embodiment, the salt is in only one crystal form.


In one embodiment, R is —C(CH3)2CH2C(CH3)3. In one embodiment the salt is the lactic acid salt. In one embodiment the salt is the acetic acid salt. In one embodiment the salt is the phosphoric acid salt. In one embodiment, the salt is in only one crystal form.


In one embodiment, R is




embedded image


In one embodiment the salt is the lactic acid salt. In one embodiment the salt is the acetic acid salt. In one embodiment the salt is the phosphoric acid salt. In one embodiment, the salt is in only one crystal form.


In one embodiment, R is phenyl, i.e. the free base compound is phenamil. In one embodiment the salt is the lactic acid salt. In one embodiment the salt is the acetic acid salt. In one embodiment the salt is the phosphoric acid salt. In one embodiment, the salt is in only one crystal form.


In one embodiment, R is




embedded image


In one embodiment the salt is the lactic acid salt. In one embodiment the salt is the acetic acid salt. In one embodiment the salt is the phosphoric acid salt. In one embodiment, the salt is in only one crystal form.


Pharmaceutical Use of the Novel Salts

The therapeutic effect of amiloride as a potassium-sparing diuretic is well established. The therapeutic effect of benzamil on psoriasis has been plausibly shown in the examples of published PCT application WO2015168574, incorporated herein by reference.


WO2015168574 furthermore discloses that benzamil targets the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) and sodium/calcium exchangers (NCX1) in human psoriatic keratinocytes. The present inventors have realized that related compounds with potency similar to benzamil on ENaC, NCX1, and also the Na+/H+ exchanger NHE, are likely to provide similar advantageous effects as benzamil. Such compounds are disclosed in the prior art (Kleyman et al (1988), J Membrane Biol, 105:1-21), and include the free base compounds used in the present invention. Therapeutic efficacy can be plausibly established using the experimental protocol provided in WO2015168574.


The present invention thus in certain aspects relates to novel salts of benzamil, amiloride, and certain other amiloride derivatives for use in medicine.


In certain aspects, the present invention relates to novel salts of benzamil, amiloride, and certain other amiloride derivatives for use in the treatment of psoriasis. In embodiments, the form of psoriasis to be treated is any of the forms further discussed below.


Chronic plaque psoriasis (also referred to as psoriasis vulgaris) is the most common form of psoriasis. Chronic plaque psoriasis is characterized by raised reddened patches of skin, ranging from coin-sized to much larger. In chronic plaque psoriasis, the plaques may be single or multiple, they may vary in size from a few millimeters to several centimeters. The plaques are usually red with a scaly surface, and reflect light when gently scratched, creating a “silvery” effect. Lesions (which are often symmetrical) from chronic plaque psoriasis occur all over body, but with predilection for extensor surfaces, including the knees, elbows, lumbosacral regions, scalp, and nails. Occasionally chronic plaque psoriasis can occur on the penis, vulva and flexures, but scaling is usually absent. Diagnosis of patients with chronic plaque psoriasis is usually based on the clinical features described above. In particular, the distribution, color and typical silvery scaling of the lesion in chronic plaque psoriasis are characteristic of chronic plaque psoriasis.


Guttate psoriasis refers to a form of psoriasis with characteristic water drop shaped scaly plaques. Flares of guttate psoriasis generally follow an infection, most notably a streptococcal throat infection. Diagnosis of guttate psoriasis is usually based on the appearance of the skin, and the fact that there is often a history of recent sore throat.


Inverse psoriasis is a form of psoriasis in which the patient has smooth, usually moist areas of skin that are red and inflamed, which is unlike the scaling associated with plaque psoriasis. Inverse psoriasis is also referred to as intertiginous psoriasis or flexural psoriasis. Inverse psoriasis occurs mostly in the armpits, groin, under the breasts and in other skin folds around the genitals and buttocks, and, as a result of the locations of presentation, rubbing and sweating can irritate the affected areas.


Pustular psoriasis, also referred to as palmar plantar psoriasis, is a form of psoriasis that causes pus-filled blisters that vary in size and location, but often occur on the hands and feet. The blisters may be localized, or spread over large areas of the body. Pustular psoriasis can be both tender and painful, can cause fevers.


Erythroderma psoriasis is a particularly inflammatory form of psoriasis that often affects most of the body surface. It may occur in association with von Zumbusch pustular psoriasis. It is a rare type of psoriasis, occurring once or more during the lifetime of 3 percent of people who have psoriasis. It generally appears on people who have unstable plaque psoriasis. Widespread, fiery redness and exfoliation of the skin characterize this form. Severe itching and pain often accompany this manifestation. Erythrodermic psoriasis causes protein and fluid loss that can lead to severe illness. Edema (swelling from fluid retention), especially around the ankles, may develop, along with infection. Erythrodermic psoriasis also can bring on pneumonia and congestive heart failure. People with severe cases often require hospitalization. Erythrodermic psoriasis can occur abruptly at the first signs of psoriasis or it can come on gradually in people with plaque psoriasis. Combination treatments are frequently required, for example topical products and one or two systemic medications.


The present invention thus also relates to and makes use of pharmaceutically acceptable compositions which comprise a therapeutically-effective amount of at least one salt according to the invention, optionally combined with one or more additional agents for treatment of psoriasis, formulated together with one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipients. The active ingredients and excipient(s) may be formulated into compositions and dosage forms according to methods known in the art. The pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention may be formulated for administration via topical application, for example, as a lotion, cream, ointment, spray, patch, microneedle array, etc. applied to the skin; in solid, liquid or semi-liquid form, including those adapted for the following: oral administration, for example, tablets, capsules, powders, granules, pastes for application to the tongue, aqueous or non-aqueous solutions or suspensions, drenches, or syrups.


The present invention thus also relates to and makes use of cosmetically acceptable compositions which comprise an amount of at least one salt according to the invention, optionally combined with one or more additional agents, formulated together with one or more acceptable excipients. Cosmetic compositions may be useful in improving appearance or feel of the skin of a subject, while not having an effect on the skin that is considered therapeutic. The salt and excipient(s) may be formulated into compositions and dosage forms according to methods known in the art. The cosmetic compositions of the present invention may be formulated for administration via topical application, for example, as a lotion, cream, ointment, spray, patch, microneedle array, etc. applied to the skin; in solid, liquid or semi-liquid form, including those adapted for the following: oral administration, for example, tablets, capsules, powders, granules, pastes for application to the tongue, aqueous or non-aqueous solutions or suspensions, drenches, or syrups.


The medicaments, pharmaceutical compositions, or therapeutic combinations according to the present invention may be in any form suitable for the application to humans and/or animals, preferably humans including infants, children and adults, and can be produced by standard procedures known to those skilled in the art. The medicament, (pharmaceutical) composition or therapeutic combination can be produced by standard procedures known to those skilled in the art, e.g. from the table of contents of “Pharmaceutics: The Science of Dosage Forms”, Second Edition, Aulton, M. E. (ED. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh (2002); “Encyclopedia of Pharmaceutical Technology”, Second Edition, Swarbrick, J. and Boylan J. C. (Eds.), Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York (2002); “Modern Pharmaceutics”, Fourth Edition, Banker G. S. and Rhodes C. T. (Eds.) Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York 2002 y “The Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy”, Lachman L., Lieberman H. And Kanig J. (Eds.), Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia (1986). The respective descriptions are hereby incorporated by reference and form part of the disclosure.


An effective dose of the salt according to the invention may include a “therapeutically effective dose or amount” or a “prophylactically effective dose or amount” as defined above. A therapeutically effective amount may vary according to factors such as the disease state, age, sex, and weight of the individual, and the ability to elicit a desired response in the individual. A therapeutically effective dose/amount is also one in which any toxic or detrimental effects are outweighed by the therapeutically beneficial effects. A “prophylactically effective dose/amount” refers to an amount effective, at dosages and for periods of time necessary, to achieve the desired prophylactic result. Typically, since a prophylactic dose is used in subjects prior to or at an earlier stage of disease, the prophylactically effective amount will be less than the therapeutically effective amount.


Treatment of psoriasis may entail achieving or maintaining a PGA score of 0/1 or a PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, or PASI 100 response score for a period of time during or following treatment (e.g., for at least 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 46, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58 or 60 weeks or longer). Treatment of psoriasis may also entail achieving or maintaining a health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcome. HRQOL outcomes include Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), visual analog scales for Ps-related (VAS-Ps) and psoriatic arthritis-related (VAS-PsA) pain, Short Form 36 Health Survey Mental (MCS) and Physical (PCS) Component Summary scores, and Total Activity Impairment (TAI) scores.


Treatment of psoriasis may also entail achieving or maintaining a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for any of the HRQOL outcomes provided herein, e.g., any one or combination of DLQI, VAS-Ps, VAS-PsA, MCS, PCS and TAI.


Treatment of psoriasis may also entail achieving or maintaining a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) response rate for any of the HRQOL outcomes provided herein, e.g., any one or combination of DLQI, VAS-Ps, VAS-PsA, MCS, PCS and TAI. “Treatment of” or “treating” psoriasis may also mean achieving or maintaining a clinically meaningful reduction in any of the HRQOL outcomes provided herein, e.g., any one or combination of DLQI, VAS-Ps, VAS-PsA, MCS, PCS and TAI. “Treatment of” or “treating” psoriasis may also mean achieving or maintaining a Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score for a period of time during or following treatment (e.g., for at least 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 46, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58 or 60 weeks or longer).


Treatment of psoriasis may also entail achieving or maintaining any of the outcomes provided herein in a certain percentage of a population of subjects (e.g., in at least about 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 99%, or 100% of a population of subjects).


Dosage regimens may be adjusted to provide the optimum desired response (e.g., a therapeutic or prophylactic response). For example, a single dose may be administered, several divided doses may be administered over time or the dose may be proportionally reduced or increased as indicated by the exigencies of the therapeutic situation. The dose may be administered to the subject upon symptoms of skin disease, or before onset of symptoms.


It is to be noted that dosage values may vary with the type and severity of the condition to be alleviated. It is to be further understood that for any particular subject, specific dosage regimens should be adjusted over time according to the individual need and the professional judgment of the person administering or supervising the administration of the compositions, and that dosage ranges set forth herein are exemplary only and are not intended to limit the scope or practice of the claimed composition.


In one embodiment, the dose amount is a fixed dose, e.g., is not dependent on the weight of the subject to which the substance is administered. In another embodiment, the dose amount is not a fixed dose, e.g., is dependent on the weight of the subject to which the substance is administered, or for a topical therapy a dose may be related to the surface area that is treated, e.g. dose/m2 of skin.


Exemplary dose amounts, e.g., fixed dose amounts, for use in treating an adult human may include about 0.01 mg, about 0.05 mg, about 0.1 mg, about 0.5 mg, about 1 mg, about 5 mg, about 10 mg, about 50 mg, about 100 mg, about 500 mg, or more.


Exemplary dose amounts, e.g., dose amounts for topical use treating an adult human by the methods of the invention include about 0.01 mg/m2 surface area, about 0.05 mg/m2 surface area, about 0.1 mg/m2 surface area, about 0.5 mg/m2 surface area, about 1 mg/m2 surface area, about 5 mg/m2 surface area, about 10 mg/m2 surface area, about 50 mg/m2 surface area, about 100 mg/m2 surface area, about 500 mg/m2 surface area, or more.


Ranges intermediate to the above-recited ranges are also contemplated. For example, ranges having any one of these values as the upper or lower limits are also intended to be part of the invention, e.g., from about 0.01 mg to about 100 mg, from about 1 mg to about 10 mg, etc.


The administration of the composition may comprise a recurring cycle of administration of composition to the subject. The periodicity of administration of the composition may be about once a week, once every other week, about once every three weeks, about once every 4 weeks, about once every 5 weeks, about once every 6 weeks, about once every 7 weeks, about once every 8 weeks, about once every 9 weeks, about once every 10 weeks, about once every 11 weeks, about once every 12 weeks, about once every 13 weeks, about once every 14 weeks, about once every 15 weeks, about once every 16 weeks, about once every 17 weeks, about once every 18 weeks, about once every 19 weeks, about once every 20 weeks, about once every 21 weeks, about once every 22 weeks, about once every 23 weeks, about once every 24 weeks, about once every 5-10 days, about once every 10-20 days, about once every 10-50 days, about once every 10-100 days, about once every 10-200 days, about once every 25-35 days, about once every 20-50 days, about once every 20-100 days, about once every 20-200 days, about once every 30-50 days, about once every 30-90 days, about once every 30-100 days, about once every 30-200 days, about once every 50-150 days, about once every 50-200 days, about once every 60-180 days, or about once every 80-100 days. Periodicities intermediate to the above-recited times are also contemplated by the invention. Ranges intermediate to the above-recited ranges are also contemplated by the invention. For example, ranges having any one of these values as the upper or lower limits are also intended to be part of the invention, e.g., from about 110 days to about 170 days, from about 160 days to about 220 days, etc.


A duration of the periodicity of administration of a substance may be may be up to about 4 weeks, up to about 8 weeks, up to about 12 weeks, up to about 16 weeks or more, up to about 20 weeks, up to about 24 weeks, up to about 28 week, up to about 32 weeks or more, during which the periodicity of administration is about once every week. For example, a duration of the periodicity may be about 6 weeks during which the periodicity of administration is about once every 4 weeks, e.g., the substance is administered at week zero and at week four.


EXAMPLES

The abbreviations of Table 1 are used throughout the disclosure.










TABLE 1





General abbreviations
Solvent abbreviations


















AAC
Accelerated
ACN
Acetonitrile



Ageing Conditions
DME
1,2-Dimethoxyethane



(40° C./75% RH)
DMSO
Dimethyl sulfoxide


Am
Amorphous
EtOH
Ethanol


Amb
Ambient-dried solid sample
FaSSIF
Fasted State


API
Active Pharmaceutical

Simulated



Ingredient

Intestinal Fluid


DSC
Differential Scanning
FeSSIF
Fed State Simulated



Calorimetry

Intestinal Fluid


DVS
Dynamic Vapor Sorption
IPA
Isopropanol/


Evap
Solid sample recovered

2-Propanol



by evaporation
MEK
2-Butanone


HR-XRPD
High Resolution X-Ray
MeOH
Methanol



Powder Diffraction
SGF
Simulated Gastric


HT-XRPD
High Throughput X-Ray

Fluid



Powder Diffraction
THF
Tetrahydrofuran



Intensity of diffraction peak
TBME
tert-Butyl methyl


IDR
Intrinsic Dissolution rate

ether


ML
Mother liquor





(liquid phases)




MS
Mass Spectroscopy




Pc
Poorly crystalline




RH
Relative Humidity




RT
Room Temperature




SM
Starting Material




TGA
Thermogravimetric Analysis




TGMS
Thermogravimetric





Analysis coupled with





Mass Spectroscopy




UPLC
Ultra-Performance Liquid





chromatography




Vac
Vacuum-dried solid sample









Example 1: Preparation of Novel Salts

The thermal stability of benzamil was evaluated in three solvent systems: acetonitrile:water 1:1, ethanol, and 0.1 M HCl. Solutions of benzamil (˜0.5 mg/mL) were prepared in the selected solvents and split over 3 vials. The solutions were stirred at room temperature, 50° C. and 80° C. for one hour and then analyzed by UPLC MS. The chemical purity of benzamil measured in the solutions incubated at 50° C. and 80° C. for 1 h was compared to that measured initially in the starting solutions. Benzamil appeared to be stable upon incubation in ethanol at 50° C. for 1 h, whereas some chemical degradation was observed in the solution incubated at 80° C. Based on these results, the highest temperature applied in further studies was set to 50° C.


The solubility of benzamil free base was estimated qualitatively in ethanol, water, 1,4-dioxane, 1,2-dimethoxyethane, acetonitrile, tert-butyl methyl ether, heptane, ethylacetate, THF, and methanol. Aliquots of solvent were added to approximately 5 mg of benzamil free base until dissolution occurred. When the benzamil did not dissolve for a concentration of approximately 3 mg/mL, the suspensions were incubated at 50° C. for 30 min to investigate the effect of the temperature on the solubility. Benzamil was insoluble in most of the tested solvents, except for methanol and 1,2-dimethoxyethane, where it was slightly soluble. The suspension in THF appeared lighter upon incubation at 50° C. for 30 min, indicating that the high temperature slightly improved the solubility.


Based on the results of the thermal stability and qualitative solubility test, the salt formation experiments were performed by slurry conversion in methanol (MeOH), 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) and THF.


Suspensions of benzamil free base were prepared in the three selected solvents and counterions were added in relations 1:0.5, 1:1 and 1:2 (depending on the pKa difference) as aqueous solutions. The mixtures were initially heated at 50° C. for 1 h and afterwards cooled down to 5° C.


The precipitated solids were analyzed by high throughput X-ray powder diffractometry (HT XRPD). Liquid phases (both solutions and mother liquors) were evaporated at ambient conditions and the residual solids were analyzed by HT XRPD. 23 novel crystalline phases were identified (probably as single phases). At least one crystalline form was identified by reaction of benzamil with each tested counterion, except for the gluconic acid. The salt formation with lactic acid in DME and THF produced the same crystalline phase (denoted “LAC1”), whereas in MeOH amorphous material was recovered. In salt formation with acetic, benzoic, tartaric, nitric, phosphoric, p-toluenesulfonic and sulfuric acids different XRPD patterns were often identified in the solids isolated from different solvents, suggesting that the salt could be polymorphic. The reaction of benzamil with benzoic, nitric and p-toluenesulfonic acids also produced mixtures of crystalline phases in several cases.


Solids were being exposed to 40° C./75% relative humidity (RH) for 2 days (Accelerated Aging Conditions, AAC) to test the physical stability of the novel identified phases.


Results are presented in Table 2. Benzamil may be referred to in the Tables as “API”.





















TABLE 2









Concen-





Vacuum-





API

Solvent
tration

API:CI

Precip-
Vacuum-
dried


Exp
Mass

Volume
(mg/
Counterion
ratio
CI
itated
dried
solids

Evap.


ID
(mg)
Solvent
(μL)
mL)
(CI)
1:x
mmol
solid?
solids
(AAC)
Evap.
(AAC)



























SSm1
30.1
MeOH
400
75.3
Sulfuric acid
1.1
0.104
No


SUL2
SUL8













deliq.
sticky


SSm2
29.7
MeOH
400
74.4
L-Tartaric acid
1.1
0.102
Yes
TAR1 pc
TAR1 pc



SSm3
29.9
MeOH
400
74.7
Acetic acid
1.1
0.103
No


ACA2
ACA2


SSm4
29.8
MeOH
400
74.6
Nitric acid
1.1
0.103
Yes
NIT4 pc
NIT5
NIT1 +
NIT5













NIT5


SSm5
30.0
MeOH
400
74.9
p-
1.1
0.103
Yes
TOS1
TOS1
TOS1 +
TOS1 +







Toluenesulfonic





TOS3
TOS3







acid


SSm6
30.7
MeOH
400
76.7
Phosphoric
1.1
0.106
Yes
PHO1 pc
PHO1 +








acid




PHO2 pc


SSm7
30.1
MeOH
400
75.3
Lactic acid
1.1
0.104
No


Am
LAC1


SSm8
30.2
MeOH
400
75.6
Gluconic acid
1.1
0.104
No


Am deliq.
Am deliq.


SSm9
29.8
MeOH
400
74.5
Benzoic acid
1.1
0.103
No


BNZ3
BNZ3


SSm10
30.5
MeOH
400
76.4
Sulfuric acid
0.55
0.053
Yes
SUL3
Am deliq.
Am ly
pc ly


SSm11
30.6
MeOH
400
76.4
L-Tartaric acid
0.55
0.053
Yes
Am
Am deliq.




SSm13
30.2
MeOH
400
75.5
Sulfuric acid
2.1
0.199
No


SUL6 pc
SUL6













sticky
deliq.


SSm14
29.5
MeOH
400
73.9
Nitric acid
2.1
0.194
Yes
NIT1 +
NIT5
NIT1
NIT5











NIT3


SSm15
30.4
MeOH
400
76.0
p-
2.1
0.199
Yes
TOS1 +
TOS1 +
TOS2a
TOS2b







Toluenesulfonic



TOS3
TOS3

deliq.







acid


SSm16
30.3
MeOH
400
75.9
None


Yes
1 (FB)
1 (FB)
3 (FB)
3 (FB)


SSm17
30.6
DME
500
61.1
Sulfuric acid
1.1
0.105
Yes
SUL4 pc
SUL7 pc ly
SUL5 ly
SUL8 ly


SSm18
29.5
DME
500
58.9
L-Tartaric acid
1.1
0.101
Yes
TAR1 pc
TAR1 pc



SSm19
30.4
DME
500
60.8
Acetic acid
1.1
0.105
Yes
ACA1
ACA1
ACA2
ACA2


SSm20
29.6
DME
500
59.1
Nitric acid
1.1
0.102
Yes
4.0° +
ep +
ep +
NIT1 +











NIT6
NIT5
NIT1 +
NIT5













NIT2


SSm21
29.5
DME
500
59.0
p-
1.1
0.102
Yes
TOS1
TOS1
TOS1 +
TOS1 +







Toluenesulfonic





TOS3
TOS3







acid


SSm22
30.4
DME
500
60.7
Phosphoric
1.1
0.105
Yes
PHO2
PHO2









acid


SSm23
30.4
DME
500
60.8
Lactic acid
1.1
0.105
Yes
LAC1
LAC1




SSm24
30.1
DME
500
60.3
Gluconic acid
1.1
0.104
Yes
Am deliq.
Am deliq.




SSm25
29.9
DME
500
59.7
Benzoic acid
1.1
0.103
Yes
BNZ1
BNZ1
BNZ1 + ep
BNZ1 ly


SSm26
30.6
DME
500
61.2
Sulfuric acid
0.55
0.053
Yes
SUL1
SUL1




SSm27
30.5
DME
500
61.1
L-Tartaric acid
0.55
0.053
Yes
TAR2 pc
TAR2 pc




















SSm29
30.1
DME
500
60.1
Sulfuric acid
2.1
0.198
No
Am deliq
SUL8 + ep deliq.




















SSm30
30.5
DME
500
61.0
Nitric acid
2.1
0.200
Yes
NIT1 +
NIT5
NIT1
NIT1 +











NIT6


NIT5


SSm31
30.4
DME
500
60.8
p-
2.1
0.200
Yes
TOS1 +
TOS1 +
TOS2a
TOS3 +







Toluenesulfonic



TOS3
TOS3

ep sticky







acid


SSm32
30.2
DME
500
60.4
None


Yes
1
1
1
1


SSm33
30.0
THF
400
74.9
Sulfuric acid
1.1
0.103
No


Am deliq
SUL7


SSm34
29.6
THF
400
73.9
L-Tartaric acid
1.1
0.102
Yes
TAR1 pc
TAR1 pc




SSm35
30.4
THF
400
76.0
Acetic acid
1.1
0.105
Yes
ACA1
ACA1




SSm36
30.5
THF
400
76.3
Nitric acid
1.1
0.105
Yes
NIT2
NIT5
ep + NIT2
NIT5


SSm37
30.3
THF
400
75.8
p-
1.1
0.104
Yes
TOS4b +
TOS1 +
TOS4a +
TOS4a +







Toluenesulfonic



TOS3
TOS4b pc
TOS3
TOS3







acid


SSm38
29.6
THF
400
74.0
Phosphoric
1.1
0.102
Yes
PHO3
PHO1 +









acid




PHO2


SSm39
30.0
THF
400
75.1
Lactic acid
1.1
0.103
Yes
LAC1
LAC1




SSm40
30.1
THF
400
75.3
Gluconic acid
1.1
0.104
Yes
Am deliq.
Am deliq.




SSm31
30.3
THE
400
75.7
Benzoic acid
1.1
0.104
Yes
BNZ2
BNZ2
BNZ1 +
BNZ1 +













ep ly
ep ly


SSm42
29.8
THF
400
74.5
Sulfuric acid
0.55
0.051
Yes
SUL1
SUL1




SSm43
29.7
THF
400
74.2
L-Tartaric acid
0.55
0.051
Yes
TAR1 pc
TAR1 pc




SSm45
29.8
THF
400
74.5
Sulfuric acid
2.1
0.196
No


Am deliq
Am deliq


SSm46
29.8
THF
400
74.5
Nitric acid
2.1
0.196
Yes
NIT1 +
NIT5
NIT1
NIT5











NIT2


SSm47
30.3
THF
400
75.7
p-
2.1
0.199
Yes
TOS4a +
TOS4a +
TOS3
TOS3







Toluenesulfonic



TOS3
TOS3







acid


SSm48
29.6
THF
400
74.0
None


Yes
2 (FB)
1 + 2 (FB)
2 (FB) ly
2 ly(FB)


SSm49
30
Meth-
400
75
Hydrochloric
2.1
0.1970
Yes
Di-HCl1
Di-
Di-HCl3
N/A




anol


acid




HCl1 +












Mono-












HCl(A + B)


SSm50
30
DME
500
60
Hydrochloric
2.1
0.1970
Yes
Di-HCl2
Mono-
Mono-HCl
N/A







acid




HCl(A + B)
A + ep


SSm51
30
THF
400
75
Hydrochloric
2.1
0.1970
Yes
Di-
Mono-
Di-HCl3
N/A







acid



HCl2 +
HCl(A + B)











Mono-











HCl(A + B)





The notations “deliq.”, “pc”, “Am”, ly” and “ep” stand for “deliquescent”, “poorly crystalline, “amorphous”, “low yield” and “extra peaks”.


The notations “deliq.”, “pc”, “Am”, indicate that the material was deliquescent, poorly crystalline or amorphous, respectively.


The notations “ly” and “ep” indicates that poor amount of material was recovered and that extra peaks not belonging to any of the known phases were identified.


When a single extra peak was identified in the diffractogram, its 2θ value is reported.






The XRPD patterns for the salts ACA1, ACA2, BNZ1, BNZ2, BNZ3, Di-HC11, Di-HCl2, LAC1, NIT1, NIT2, PHO2, PHO3, TOS1, TOS2a, TOS3, TOS4, TOS5, SUL1, SUL3 showed good crystallinity, while the XRPD patterns for TAR1, TAR2, NIT4, PHO1, SUL2, SUL4, SUL5, SUL6 showed poor crystallinity. FIG. 1 shows an HR-XRPD pattern for the form LAC1 of the lactic acid salt of benzamil. FIG. 2 shows an HR-XRPD pattern for the forms ACA1 and ACA2 of the acetic acid salt of benzamil. FIG. 3 shows an HR-XRPD pattern for the form PHO2 of the phosphoric acid salt of benzamil.


The physically stability test performed at 40° C./75% RH for 2 days indicated that ACA1, ACA2, BNZ1, BNZ2, BNZ3, LAC1, TAR1, TAR2, PHO2, TOS1, TOS3, and SUL1 were physically stable salts, whereas Di-HC11, Di-HCl2, NIT1, NIT2, NIT4, PHO1, PHO3, TOS2a, SUL2, SUL3, SUL4, SUL5, SUL6 were physically unstable salts.


Novel XRPD patterns were distinguished for the salt forms obtained for HCl in methanol and DME. The novel forms were designated “Di-HC11” and “Di-HCl2”. Upon exposure to AAC (40° C./75% RH) for 2 days, both phases partially or fully converted to the mixture of Mono HCl salts A+B (denoted “SM1”). Therefore, both Di-HCl1 and Di-HCl2 were physically unstable.


The aqueous solubility of the salts was estimated qualitatively by the solvent aliquot addition method. Aliquots of water up to 500-600 μL were added to approximately 5 mg of salt. The solubility of the free base was also estimated. Results of the solubility tests are shown in Table 3. LAC1 showed solubility of 26-51 mg/mL; ACA1 and ACA2 showed solubility of 15-19 and 12-16 mg/mL, respectively, and PHO2 showed solubility of 12-16 mg/mL.


The rest of the experiments remained as suspensions (for a concentration of approximately 10 mg/mL). The suspensions were let equilibrating at room temperature for 24 h. Afterwards, solids were separated from the liquid phases. The liquid phases were filtered and analyzed by HPLC to determine the solubility. The pH of solutions/mother liquors was also measured. BNZ1, BNZ2, BNZ3, SUL1, TAR1 pc, TOS1 and NIT5 showed solubility lower than 2 mg/mL. Benzamil free base was practically insoluble in water.





















TABLE 3








API:CI
Physically




Thermal
API:CI





Solid

ratio
stable
Poly-
Crystal-
Chemical
Solvation
events
ratio
Water


Exp. ID
form
Salt
1:x
after AAC
morphism
linity
purity
state
in DCS
(NMR)
solubility
pH



























Benzamil
1 + ep



Yes
Good
99.7
Anhydrous
exo 135; endo

<0.1
8.1


FB SM2








216


Benzamil
A + B
Hydro-
1
No
Yes
Good
99.2
Sesqui-
br. endos 70-

2-3
6.6


HCl SM1

chloric





hydrate
210; endo 244




acid


SSm19.1
ACA1
Acetic
1
Yes
Yes
Good
99.5
Hemi-
brendo 40-70;
1:1
15-19
6.4




acid





hydrate
endo 122


SSm3.1
ACA2
Acetic
1
Yes
Yes
Good
99.5
Mono-
br. endos 40-
1:1
12-16
6.6


(Evap.)

acid





hydrate
130


SSm25.1
BNZ1
Benzoic
1
Yes
Yes
Good
98.1
Anhydrous
endo 198
1:1
0.4
7.5




acid


SSm41.1
BNZ2
Benzoic
1
Yes
Yes
Good
98.1
Anhydrous
endo 197
1:1
0.4
7.2




acid


SSm9.1
BNZ3
Benzoic
1
Yes
Yes
Good
97.2
Di-hydrate
brendos 50-100;
  1:1.2
0.6
4.5


(Evap.)

acid






endo 196


SSm23.1
LAC1
L-(+)-
1
Yes
No
Good
99.7
Anhydrous
endo 190
1:1
26-51
6.1




Lactic




acid


SSm22.1
PHO2
Phosphoric
1
Yes
Yes
Good
100
Mono-
sm. endos 80-

12-16
4.5




acid





hydrate
150; endo/exo











170-200; endo











222


SSm26.1
SUL1
Sulfuric
0.55
Yes
Yes
Poor
99.8
Di-hydrate
br. endos 30-

1.5
6.6




acid






150


SSm34
TAR1
L-Tartaric
1
Yes
Unclear
Poor
99.6
Sesqui-
br. endos 30-
1:1
1.1
3.2



pc
acid





hydrate
150; exo 188


SSm5.1
TOS1
Toluene-
1
Yes
Unclear
Good
99.7
Anhydrous
sm. exo/endo
1:1
0.2
7.4




4-sulfonic






200-230; endo




acid






254


SSm36.1
NIT5
Nitric acid
1

Yes
Good

Anhydrous
exo 225

0.6
5.7


(AAC)









Although physically unstable upon AAC (40° C./75% RH) for 2 days, the aqueous solubility was estimated also for the Di-HCl salts in order to have a comparison with the solubility value of 2-3 mg/mL previously estimated for the Mono-HCl salt (Sigma-Aldrich, product number B2417). Suspensions of the two salts were prepared in water with a concentration of 9-10 mg/mL. The mixtures were let equilibrating at RT for 24 h. Afterwards, solids were separated from the liquid phases. The liquid phases were filtered and analyzed by HPLC to determine the solubility. The pH of mother liquors was also measured. The solubility of both salts appeared to be approximately 3 mg/mL, thus being comparable to that of the Mono HCl salt.


The hygroscopic behaviour of the salts was evaluated through Dynamic Vapor Sorption (DVS) measurements with an RH profile 40-95-0-40% at 25° C. and a dm/dt of 0.002. The classification of the hygroscopic behaviour is based on the water vapour uptake at 25° C./80% RH in first adsorption cycle of sorption isotherm. ACA1 and BNZ1 adsorbed 0.1% of water vapour, therefore being non hygroscopic. BNZ2, LAC1, PHO2, TOS1 and NIT5 adsorbed between 0.2 and 0.9% of water vapour, therefore being slightly hygroscopic. The analyzed salts were physically stable upon exposure to variable RH level, since their XRPD pattern was unchanged after the DVS measurement.


Only one polymorph of the lactate salt was found.


In summary, the lactic acid, phosphoric acid, and acetic acid salts of benzamil show improved stability, increased water solubility, demonstrate only slight or no hygroscopicity, and reduced polymorphism.


Example 2: Preparation of Further Novel Salts

Further salt formation experiments were performed to test additional salts, involving 35 pharmaceutically accepted counterions, in order to test crystallinity, stability and solubility.


Analytical Methods

The following analytical methods were used in Examples 2 and 3.


High Throughput X-Ray Powder Diffraction (HT-XRPD)

XRPD patterns were obtained using the Ardena T2 high-throughput XRPD set-up. The plates were mounted on a Bruker General Area Detector Diffraction System (GADDS) equipped with a VÅNTEC-500 gas area detector corrected for intensity and geometric variations. The calibration of the measurement accuracy (peaks position) was performed using NIST SRM1976 standard (Corundum).


Data collection was carried out at room temperature using monochromatic Cu Kα radiation in the 2θ region between 1.5° and 41.5°, which is the most distinctive part of the XRPD pattern. The diffraction pattern of each well was collected in two 2θ ranges (1.5°≤2θ≤21.5° for the first frame, and 19.5°≤2θ≤41.5° for the second) with an exposure time of 90 s for each frame. No background subtraction or curve smoothing was applied to the XRPD patterns.


Thermal Analysis

TGA/SDTA and TGMS analysis: Mass loss due to solvent or water loss from the crystals was determined by TGA/DSC. Monitoring the sample weight, during heating in a TGA/DSC 3+ STARe system (Mettler-Toledo GmbH, Switzerland), resulted in measure points for a weight vs. temperature curve and a heat flow signal. The TGA/DSC 3+ was calibrated for temperature with samples of indium and aluminum. Samples (circa 2 mg) were weighed into 100 μL aluminum crucibles and sealed. The seals were pin-holed, and the crucibles heated in the TGA from 25 to 300° C. at a heating rate of 10° C. min-1. Dry N2 gas was used for purging. The gases coming from the TGA samples were analyzed by a mass spectrometer Omnistar GSD 301 T2 (Pfeiffer Vacuum GmbH, Germany), a quadrupole mass spectrometer which analyzes masses in the temperature range of 0-200 amu.


DSC analysis: Thermal events were visualized from DSC thermograms, recorded with a heat flux DSC3+ STARe system (Mettler-Toledo GmbH, Switzerland). The DSC3+ was calibrated for temperature and enthalpy with a small piece of indium (m.p.=156.6° C.; δHf=28.45 J/g) and zinc (m.p.=419.6° C.; δHf=107.5 J/g). Samples (circa 2 mg) were sealed in standard 40 μL aluminum pans, pin-holed and heated in the DSC from 25° C. to 300° C., at a heating rate of 10° C./min. Dry N2 gas at a flow rate of 50 mL/min was used to purge the DSC equipment during measurement.


1H-NMR Spectroscopy


1H-NMR spectroscopy in DMSO-d6 was used for compound integrity characterization and to determine the stoichiometry of the salts and cocrystals where appropriate. The spectra were recorded at room temperature (RT) on a 500 MHz instrument (Bruker BioSpin GmbH) using standard pulse sequences. The data was processed with ACD Labs software Spectrus Processor 2016.2.2 (Advanced Chemistry Development Inc. Canada).


UPLC Analysis














UPLC System:



UPLC:
Agilent 1290


Detector 1:
Diode array UV detector (set at 286 nm)


Detector 2:
MSD XT single quad in Positive Scan mode


UPLC Conditions:



Auto sampler temp.:
RT


Column:
Agilent Eclipse Plus C18 HD



(50 × 2.1 mm; 1.8 μm)


Column temp:
40° C.


Flow cell:
10 mm path


Mobile phase A:
10 mM Ammonium acetate in Water


Mobile phase B:
Acetonitrile


Flow:
0.6 ml/min













Gradient:
Time [min]:
Eluent A:
Eluent B:






0.00
95%
 5%



0.10
95%
 5%



2.50
10%
90%



2.55
10%
90%



2.56
95%
 5%



3.50
95%
 5%











Run time:
3.5 min


Sample:



Concentration:
appr 1.0 mg/ml


Solvent:
MeCN


Injection volume:
1 μl


Retention time:
1.22 min


MS:
m/z 320









The compound integrity was expressed as a peak-area percentage, calculated from the area of each peak in the chromatogram, except the “injection peak”, and the total peak-area, as follows:







peak


area



(
%
)


=




peak


area


total


area


of


all


peaks


·
100


%





The peak area percentage of the compound of interest was employed as an indication of the purity of the component in the sample.


Experimental Methods
Materials

Approximately 3 g benzamil lactate salt (batch SBO-84-44) was provided by Ardena, Södertälje, Sweden. All chemicals were obtained from Fisher Scientific or Sigma Aldrich. Chemicals used are of research grade and at least 99% pure.


Free base preparation: Approximately 5 g of benzyl lactate were dissolved in 320 mL of water. The pH of the solution was 5.8. 1 M solution of NaOH in water was added stepwise until the pH was stabilized at 10.5 (in total 14 mL of 1 M NaOH was added) and a white precipitate had formed. The suspension was stirred for 30 min to age the precipitate. The precipitate was filtered over a Buchner funnel and washed twice with 200 mL of water. The obtained solid was dried overnight at 50° C./5 mbar. Yield=3.6 g (92%). The solid was characterized by HT-XRPD, UPLC-MS, TGMS (thermogravimetric analysis coupled with mass spectroscopy) and 1H-NMR prior to be used as starting material for the salt screen.


Methods

The salt screen experiments were carried out in methanol (MeOH), 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) and tetrahydrofuran (THF). Suspensions of benzamil free base prepared in the three solvents and counterion solutions were added to reach benzamil free base: counter ion molar ratios of: 1:0.55, 1:1.1 and 1:2.2. The counterions of the experiment are listed in Table 4.









TABLE 4







List of the tested pharmaceutically accepted acidic counterions and their


abbreviations (Abbrev.). The GRAS class, pKa values and composition of the


solutions used in the salt screen are also reported for each counterion.














#
Acids
Abbrev.
Class
pKa1
pKa2
pKa3
Added

















1
Hydrobromic acid
HBR
3
<−6


1M (Water)


2
Naphthalene-1,5-disulfonic acid
NDS
2
−3.4
−2.6

1M (Water)


3
Ethane-1,2-disulfonic acid
EDY
2
−2.1
−1.5

1M (Water)


4
Methanesulfonic acid
MES
2
−1.2


1M (Water)


5
Naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid
NAS
2
0.2


1M (Water)


6
Benzenesulfonic acid
BES
2
0.7


1M (Water)


7
Oxalic acid
OXA
2
1.3
4.3

1M (Water)


8
L-Aspartic acid
ASP
1
1.9
3.7
9.6 (b)
1M (Water)


9
Maleic acid
MAE
1
1.9
6.2

1M (THF)


10
Ethanesulfonic
ESY
2
2.1


1M (Water)


11
Glutamic acid
GLU
1
2.2
4.3
9.7 (b)
Solid


12
Pamoic acid
PAM
2
2.5
3.1

Solid


13
Malonic acid
MAO
2
2.8
5.7

1M (Water)


14
Gentisic acid
GEN
2
2.9


1M (MeOH)


15
Salicylic acid
SAL
3
3.0


1M (MeOH)


16
2-Furoic acid
FUR

3.1


Solid


17
Fumaric acid
FUM
1
3.0
4.4

0.3M (EtOH)


18
Galactaric acid
GAL
1
3.1
3.6

1M (Water)


19
Citric acid
CIT
1
3.1
4.8
6.4
1M (Water)


20
L-Malic acid
MAL
1
3.5
5.1

1M (Water)


21
Hippuric acid
HIP
1
3.6


Solid)


22
Formic acid
FOR
3
3.8


1M (Water)


23
L-Ascorbic acid
ASC
1
4.2
11.6

1M (Water)


24
Succinic acid
SUC
1
4.2
5.6

1M (MeOH)


25
Glutaric acid
GLT
1
4.3
5.3

1M (Water)


26
Cinnamic acid
CIN
3
4.4


1M (MeOH)


27
Adipic acid
ADI
1
4.4
5.4

1M (MeOH)


28
Valeric acid
VAL

4.8


Liquid


29
Butyric acid
BUT

4.8


Liquid


30
Nicotinic acid
NIC
2
4.9
2.1 (b)

Solid


31
Pivalic acid
PIV

4.9


Solid


32
Propionic acid
PRO
2
4.9


1M (Water)


33
Stearic acid
STE
1
4.9


Solid


34
Orotic acid
ORO
2
5.9
9.0

1M (Water)


35
Trifluoroacetic acid
TFA

0.5


1M (Water)









The suspensions were heated at 50° C. for 1 h and afterwards cooled down at V° C./h to Y° C. and aged at this temperature for 3 days. The solids were separated from the liquid phases by centrifugation, dried overnight under vacuum at 50° C. and analyzed by HT-XRPD. Solvents from the remaining mother liquors and solutions were evaporated under ambient conditions (evaporative crystallization experiments) and the residual solids were analyzed by HT-XRPD. All solids were exposed to Accelerated Aging Conditions (AAC, 40° C./75% RH) for 2 days and re-analyzed by HT-XRPD.


Counterions, applied benzamil counter ion (API:CI) ratio and isolation conditions (crystallization method and solvent) are reported per each identified salt form, together with an indication of the crystallinity and the physical stability are reported in Table 5.


Results








TABLE 5







List of benzamil salts identified.













Solid
API:Cl
Isolation

Physical


Counterion
form
ratio
conditions
Crystallinity
Stability





1,2-Ethanedisulfonic
EDY1
1:1.1;
Equilibration in THF
Good
Unstable


acid

1:0.55






EDY2
1:1.1
Equilibration in MeOH
Good
Stable



EDY3
1:0.55;
Equilibration in DME
Good
Stable




1:2.1






EDY4
1:0.55
Equilibration in MeOH
Good
Unstable



EDY5
1:1.1
After exposure to AAC
Moderate






from AM





EDY6
1:0.55
After exposure to AAC
Good






from EDY4




1,5-
NDS1
1:0.55;
Equilibration in THF,
Good
Stable


Naphthalenedisulfonic

1:1.1;
DME and MeOH




acid

1:2.1





Gentisic acid
GEN1
1:1.1
Equilibration and
Moderate
Stable





evaporation from DME





GEN2
1:1.1
Evaporation from THF
Moderate
Stable



GEN3
1:1.1
Equilibration from MeOH
Moderate
Unstable


2-Furoic acid
FUR1
1:1.1
Equilibration in DME
Good
Stable



FUR2
1:1.1
After exposure to AAC
Good






from equilibration and







evaporation in THF





FUR3
1:1.1
Equilibration and
Good
Unstable





evaporation from DME





FUR4
1:1.1
As a mixture after
Obtained as mixture
Unstable





equilibration in THF





FUR5
1:1.1
After exposure to AAC
Obtained as mixture






from AM




Adipic acid1
ADI1
1:1.1
Evaporation from THE,
Good
Unstable





DME and MeOH





ADI3
1:1.1
After exposure to AAC
Good






from ADI1




Benzenesulfonic acid
BES1
1:1.1
Evaporation from THF
Good
Unstable



BES2
1:1.1
Equilibration in MeOH
Good
Unstable



BES3
1:1.1
After exposure to AAC
Good






from all the systems




Butyric acid
BUT1
1:1.1
Evaporation from THF
Good
Stable





and Equilibration in DME





BUT2
1:1.1
Evaporation from MeOH
Poor
Unstable



BUT3
1:1.1
After exposure to AAC
Obtained as a mixture






from evaporation &







equilibration in MeOH




Cinnamic acid
CIN1
1:1.1
Equilibration and
Moderate
Stable





evaporation from DME







and MeOH





CIN2
1:1.1
Equilibration in THF
Good
Stable


Citric acid
CIT1
1:1.1
Equilibration and
Moderate/Poor
Unstable





evaporation from DME







and MeOH





CIT2
1:1.1
After exposure to AAC
Good






from CIT1




Ethanesulfonic Acid
ESY1
1:1.1
Equilibration in MeOH
Good
Stable



ESY2
1:1.1
Evaporation from DME
Obtained as a mixture
Unstable





and MeOH





ESY3
1:1.1
Evaporation from THF
Poor
Unstable



ESY4
1:1.1
After exposure to AAC
Moderate






from ESY3




Formic acid
FOR1
1:1.1
Equilibration in THF
Good
Unstable



FOR2
1:1.1
Equilibration in MeOH
Moderate/Poor
Unstable



FOR3
1:1.1
After exposure to AAC
Good






from all the systems





FOR4
1:1.1
Evaporation from MeOH
Good
Unstable



FOR5
1:1.1
Evaporation from THF
Good
Unstable


Fumaric acid
FUM1
1:1.1
Equilibration in THF and
Good
Unstable





DME





FUM2
1:1.1
Equilibration in MeOH
Good
Stable





and after exposure to







AAC from FUM1




Glutaric acid
GLU1
1:1.1
Equilibration in THF and
Moderate
Stable





MeOH. Evaporation from







THF





GLU2
1:1.1
Equilibration in DME
Obtained as mixture
Stable


Hippuric acid
HIP1
1:1.1
Equilibration in THF
Good
Unstable



HIP2
1:1.1
After exposure to AAC
Poor



Hydrobromic acid
HBR1
1:1.1;
Equilibration in MeOH
Moderate
Stable




1:2.1






HBR2
1:1.1;
Equilibration in THF
Moderate
Unstable




1:2.1






HBR3
1:2.1
Equilibration in DME
Moderate
Unstable



HBR4
1:1.1;
Evaporation from MeOH
Moderate
Unstable




1:2.1
and THF





HBR5
1:1.1;
After exposure to AAC
Moderate





1:2.1






HBR6
1:1.1;
After exposure to AAC
Good





1:2.1






HBR7
1:1.1;
After exposure to AAC
Good





1:2.1






HBR8
1:1.1
After exposure to AAC
Good




HBR9
1:2.1
After exposure to AAC
Obtained as mixture




HBR10
1:1.1
Equilibration in DME
Moderate
Unstable


L-Glutamic acid
GLT1
1:1.1
Equilibration in MeOH
Moderate
Stable


L-Malic acid
MAL1
1:1.1
Equilibration in THF,
Good
Stable





DME and MeOH





MAL2
1:1.1
After exposure to AAC
Obtained as mixture



Maleic acid
MAE1
1:1.1
Equilibration in DME,
Good
Unstable





MeOH and THF





MAE2
1:1.1
After exposure to AAC
Good
Stable



MAE3
1:1.1
After exposure to AAC
Moderate
Stable


Malonic acid
MAO1
1:1.1
Equilibration in MeOH
Good
Stable



MAO2
1:1.1
Equilibration in DME
Obtained as mixture




MAO3
1:1.1
Equilibration in THF
Obtained as mixture




MAO4
1:1.1
After exposure to AAC
Good






from MAO3




Methanesulfonic acid
MES1
1:1.1;
Equilibration in THE,
Good
Stable




1:2.1
DME and MeOH





MES2
1:1.1
Equilibration in DME and
Obtained as mixture
Unstable





THF





MES3
1:1.1
After exposure to AAC
Moderate






from MES2




Naphthalene-
NSA1
1:1.1;
Equilibration in MeOH;
Good
Unstable


2-sulfonic acid

1:2.1
Equilibration and







evaporation from DME





NSA2
1:1.1
Evaporation from THF
Moderate
Stable



NSA3
1:2.1
After exposure to AAC
Obtained as mixture






from MeOH





NSA4
1:1.1
Equilibration and
Poor
Stable





evaporation from MeOH




Nicotinic Acid
NIC1
1:1.1
Equilibration and
Good
Stable





evaporation from THF,







DME and MeOH




Orotic acid
ORO1
1:1.1
Equilibration and
Good
Stable





evaporation from MeOH





ORO2
1:1.1
Equilibration and
Good - poorly
Stable





evaporation from MeOH
crystalline after







exposure to AAC




ORO3
1:1.1
Equilibration in DME
Poor
Poor-







Stable


Oxalic acid
OXA1
1:1.1
Equilibration in THF,
Moderate
Stable





DME and MeOH




Pamoic acid
PAM1
1:1.1
Equilibration and
Obtained as mixture
Stable





evaporation from MeOH





PAM2
1:1.1
Evaporation from THF
Poor
Stable



PAM3
1:1.1
Equilibration in DME
Poor
Unstable



PAM4
1:1.1
After exposure to AAC
Poor






from PAM3




Pivalic acid
PIV1
1:1.1
Equilibration in THF,
Good
Stable





DME and MeOH




Propionic acid
PRO1
1:1.1
Equilibration in DME
Good
Unstable



PRO2
1:1.1
After exposure to AAC
Moderate






after equilibration in







MeOH





PRO3
1:1.1
Evaporation from THF
Moderate
Unstable



PRO4
1:1.1
Equilibration in THF and
Obtained as mixture
Unstable





Evaporation from MeOH





PRO5
1:1.1
After exposure to AAC
Moderate






from PRO3





PRO6
1:1.1
After exposure to AAC
Obtained as mixture



Salicylic acid
SAL1
1:1.1
Equilibration in THF
Good
Stable



SAL2
1:1.1
After exposure to AAC
Poor






from AM made in MeOH





SAL3
1:1.1
After exposure to AAC
Moderate
Unstable-





from AM made in DME

Deliq


Stearic acid
STE1
1:1.1
Equilibration in DME
Obtained as mixture
Stable



STE2
1:1.1
Evaporation from DME
Poor
Stable


Succinic Acid
SUC1
1:1.1
Equilibration in THF,
Good
Stable





DME and MeOH




Trifluoroacetic acid
TFA1
1:1.1
Equilibration and
Good
Stable





evaporation from THF,







DME and MeOH




Valeric acid
VAL1
1:1.1
Evaporation from THE,
Good
Stable





DME and MeOH





VAL2
1:1.1
After exposure to AAC
Poor






from evaporation in







MeOH






1After further characterization, ADI2 was classified as physical mixture







No salts were found with ethane L-ascorbic, L-aspartic and galactaric acid. However, for the same counterion, different XRPD patterns were often identified in the solids isolated from the different crystallization solvents, suggesting that the salt in question was polymorphic.


In the cases of 1,5-naphthalenedisulfonic acid (NDS1), L-glutamic acid (GLT1), nicotinic acid (NIC), oxalic acid (OXA1), pivalic acid (PIV1), succinic acid (SUC1) and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA1), only one salt polymorph was found from all three crystallization solvents and those forms were all physically stable upon exposure to ACC.


Two crystalline salt forms were distinguished in the solids isolated with cinnamic acid (CIN1-2), citric acid (CIT1-2), fumaric acid (FUM1-2), glutaric acid (GLU1-2), hippuric acid (HIP1-2), L-malic acid (MAL1-2), stearic acid (STE1 and STE3), adipic acid (ADI1 and ADI3) and valeric acid (VAL1-2). Three crystalline salt forms were identified with gentisic acid (GEN1-3), benzenesulfonic acid (BES1-3), butyric acid (BUT1-3), maleic acid (MAE1-3), methane sulfonic acid (MES1-3), orotic acid (ORO1-3) and salicylic acid (SAL1-3). However, upon further analytical characterization it was discovered that ADI2 and STE3 were physical mixtures of the API and CI.


Several forms were identified by salt formation with 1,2-ethanedisulfonic acid (EDY1-6), 2-furoic acid (FUR1-5), ethanesulfonic acid (ESY1-4), formic acid (FOR1-5), hydrobromic acid (HBR1-10), malonic acid (MAO1-4), naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid (NSA1-4), pamoic acid (PAM1-4) and propionic acid (PRO1-6).


The salt forms EDY1, EDY2, EDY3, EDY4, EDY6, NDS1, FUR1, FUR2, FUR3, ADI1, ADI3, BES1, BES2, BES3, BUT1, CIN2, CIT2, ESY1, FOR1, FOR3, FOR4, FOR5, FUM1, FUM2, HIP1, HBR6, HBR7, HBR8, MAL1, MAE1, MAE2, MAO1, MAO4, MES1, NSA1, NIC1, ORO1, ORO2, PIV1, PRO1, SAL1, SUC1, TFA1 and VAL1 showed good crystallinity. The other salt forms showed moderate or poorly crystalline phases or were not isolated as pure forms, only as mixtures, so crystallinity was not evaluated.


Upon exposure to AAC (40° C./75% RH) for 2 days, only the following solid phases were physically stable salts: EDY2, EDY3, NSD1, GEN1, GEN2, FUR1, BUT1, CIN1, CIN2, ESY1, FUM2, GLU1, GLU2, HBR1, GLT1, MAL1, MAE2, MAE3, MAO1, MES1, NSA2, NSA4, NIC1, ORO1, ORO2, OXA1, PAM1, PAM2, PIV1, SAL1, STE1, STE2, SUC1, TFA1 and VAL1.


In conclusion, benzamil showed a tendency to form physically stable salts.


Solid-State Characterization of Salts

The salts that were physically stable, phase pure forms with good crystallinity were subjected to physicochemical characterization by UPLC, TGA, DSC and 1H-NMR. The salts obtained after 1 week at 40° C./75% RH were also analyzed by TGMS. Analysis by TGMS determined the amount and nature of solvent that evaporated upon heating the sample.


Results

The chemical purity of benzamil in the novel identified salts was between 98.7 and 99.9% (area %). More than one crystalline phase was found for some of the salts, not only anhydrous polymorphs but also hydrates, hemihydrates, dihydrates, solvates and combination of water and solvent in the crystal lattice.









TABLE 6







Classification of the salt forms according to the water/solvent content.








Classification
Solid phase





Anhydrous
NDS1; FUR1; BUT1; CIN1 & CIN2;



ESY1; FOR3; FUM1; GLT1; MAO1; NIC1;



OXA1; PIV1; SUC1; TFA1; VAL1


Hemihydrate
GLU1


Monohydrate
HBR1; MAL1; MAO4—with residual



THF; NSA4; ORO1; PRO2


Dihydrate
MES1


Mixed hydrate/non-
EDY3—H2O and 0.5 equivalents DME


stoichiometric solvate



Solvate
GEN1—DME solvate



CIT1—MeOH solvate



FOR1—THF solvate



HIP1—THF solvate



ORO2—THF solvate



SAL1—THF solvate









The DSC curves usually showed one single event for the anhydrous salts that likely corresponded to the melting and/or starting of the decomposition. For the hydrated/solvated forms, broad endothermic events were recorded before the final melting/starting of decomposition which were assigned to the evaporation of the water and/or solvent from the crystal lattice.


Among the anhydrous salts, the 1,5-napadisylate salt NDS1 showed the highest melting point (280° C.), followed by the esylate salt ESY1 (260° C.), the fumarate salt FUM1 (253° C.), the succinate salt SUC1 (241° C.) and the TFA salt TFA1 (239° C.).


In most of the cases the salt formation was confirmed by 1H-NMR analysis. Benzamil signals (especially the CH2 group) were found shifted in the spectra of the salts, suggesting that proton transfer had occurred from the acidic counterion to the basic benzamil free base. The stoichiometry of the salt was calculated by proton signal integration.


Most of the salt forms had a 1:1 stoichiometric ratio between benzamil (API) and counter ion, except for MAL1, FUM1 and EDY3 in which the stoichiometric ratio API:CI was 1:0.5. Moreover, for CIT1, HBR1, OXA1 and TFA1 it was not possible to determine the stoichiometry as either the counter ion did not show in the 1H-NMR spectra or the signals overlaps with the signal of water.


Some salts did not show any shift in their signals (BUT1, CIN1, CIN2, GLU1, PIV1 and VAL1). As can be seen in Table 7, most of those salt forms showed a single event in the DSC trace which most likely corresponded to the melting of the salt, so even though the 1H-NMR analysis could not confirm salt formation they can be classified as salts. The lack of movement in the NMR signals can be explained by the small difference in their pKa values.









TABLE 7







Classification of the salts according to the water/solvent content














CI melting
Stoichiometric


Salt
DSC results
Classification
point
ratio





BUT1
186.9 (m/d)
Anhydrous
Liquid
Not shifted—1:1


CIN1
217.1 (m/d)
Anhydrous
133° C.
Not shifted—1:1


CIN2
207.1 (m), 208.6 (d)
Anhydrous
133° C.
Not shifted—1:1


GLU1
40-100 (br),
Hemi-
97.5-98° C.
Not shifted—1:1



130.1-134.8-150.0
hydrate





(en-ex-en), 193 (sh)





PIV1
208.1 (m/d)
Anhydrous
32-35° C.
Not shifted—1:1


VAL1
203.6 (m/d)
Anhydrous
Liquid
Not shifted—1:1









To further rank the salts, the aqueous solubility was determined for the anhydrous and hydrated salt forms, as well as for the salts found after the stability study. Given the presence of organic solvent in the solid phase in GEN1, CIT1, FOR1, HIP1, ORO2 and SAL1, no further investigations were carried out on those salts. Additionally, not enough solid of FUR3, ESY1, MAE2 and PAM2 was recovered during the screening so no further studies could be carried out on these salts. Table 8 provides an overview of the physicochemical characterization results collected for the tested salts and their crystalline phase discovered in the screen.









TABLE 8







Summary of solid-state characterization results for the novel physically stable salt


forms. The abbreviations “sm”, “br”, “endo” and “exo” stand for small, broad, endothermic


and exothermic events.














Mass





Solid
Chemical
loss


API:CI


form*
Purity (%)
(%)
Solvation state
Thermal events
ratio















EDY3
99.6
4.0
Monohydrate + DME
56.1 (br), 103.8 (br), 125-180 (d)
1:0.5





solvate (0.5 eq)




NDS1
99.7
1.1
Anhydrous
280.6 (m)
1:1


GEN1
99.4
7.9
DME solvate (0.5 eq)
153.4 (br)
1:1


FUR1
99.5
1.7
Anhydrous
217.9 (m), 221.9 (d)
1:1


BUT1
99.9
1.1
Anhydrous
186.9 (m/d)
Not shifted—1:1


CIN1
99.6
1.1
Anhydrous
217.1 (m/d)
Not shifted—1:1


CIN2
99.2
0.3
Anhydrous
207.1 (m), 208.6 (d)
Not shifted—1:1


CIT1
99.7
3.2
MeOH solvate
90-200 (br)
Overlaps


ESY1
99.9
0.7
Anhydrous
259.9 (m)
1:1


FOR1
99.8
6.1
THE solvate (0.3 eq)
149.2 (en), 156.2 (ex), 218 (m/d)
1:1


FOR3
Not
<0.1
Anhydrous
Not analyzed




analyzed






FUM1
99.8
3.0
Anhydrous
194.6 (sm), 252.7 (m/d)
1:0.5


GLU1
99.6
0.5
Hemi-hydrate
40-100 (br), 130.1-134.8-150.0
Not shifted—1:1






(en-ex-en), 193 (sh)



HIP1
99.7
10.0
THE solvate (0.7 eq)
126.1 (br), 134.8 (br)
1:1


HBR1
99.7
4.8
Monohydrate
80-150 (br), 163.9 (ex), 256.8 (m/d)
Not possible


GLT1
98.7
1.4
Anhydrous
204.4 (m/d)
1:1


MAL1
99.4
2.4
Hemihydrate
91.1 (br), 130.1 (br),
1:0.5






153.8 (br), 178 (d)



MAO1
99.8
2.2
Anhydrous
163.4 (sm), 181.5 (m)
1:1


MAO4
Not
3.8
Monohydrate/
Not analyzed




analyzed

Residual THF




MES1
99.6
9.1
Dihydrated
25-1215 (br), 212.2 (m/d)
1:1


NSA4
99.8
4.7
Monohydrate
99.0 (br), 120.9 (sh),
1:1






173.6 (ex), 201.7







(sh), 240.1 (ex)



NIC1
99.8
2.3
Anhydrous
204.8 (m/d)
1:1


ORO1
99.6
3.6
Monohydrate
25-70 (br), 90-160 (br),
1:1






199.8 (br), 255 (d)



ORO2
99.5
10.5
THE solvate (0.7 eq)
182.3 (br)
1:1


OXA1
99.5
2.0
Anhydrous
232.2 (m/d)
Overlaps








PAM2
Low yield












PIV1
99.9
1.7
Anhydrous/residual
208.1 (m/d)
Not shifted—1:1





DME




PRO2
Not
4.6
Monohydrate
Not analyzed




analyzed






SAL1
99.7
13.5
THE solvate (1 eq)
80-140 (br), 148.9 (ex), 162.8 (sh),
1:1






179.2 (m)



SUC1
99.4
1.1
Anhydrous
241.0 (m/d)
1:1


TFA1
99.9
<0.1
Anhydrous
239.0 (m/d)
Not possible


VAL1
99.6
1.1
Anhydrous
203.6 (m/d)
Not shifted—1:1








EDY2
Obtained after 1 week at 40° C./75%—Not analyzed


EDY6
Obtained after 1 week at 40° C./75%—Not analyzed


GEN2
Obtained after 1 week at 40° C./75%—Not analyzed


FUR3
Obtained after 1 week at 40° C./75%—Not analyzed


ADI3
Obtained after 1 week at 40° C./75%—Not analyzed


BES3
Obtained after 1 week at 40° C./75%—Not analyzed


CIT2
Obtained after 1 week at 40° C./75%—Not analyzed


FUM2
Obtained after 1 week at 40° C./75%—Not analyzed


MAE2
Obtained after 1 week at 40° C./75%—Not analyzed


MAE3
Obtained after 1 week at 40° C./75%—Not analyzed


PAM4
Obtained after 1 week at 40° C./75%—Not analyzed





*Full name of counterion is given in Table 4.






Aqueous Solubility

Aqueous solubility was determined for the anhydrous and hydrated salt forms, as well as for the salts found after the stability study. Aliquots of water were added to the solid salts until dissolution occurred or 1600 μL of water was added. The lactate salt was taken along in the solubility studies as a reference. Full dissolution occurred for MES1, GLT1 and BUT1. All other salt forms did not dissolve completely after addition of 1600 μL of water and remain suspensions. To facilitate full dissolution, these suspensions were heated to 50° C. for 15 min. HBR1, MAO1, FOR3 and PRO2 dissolved under these conditions. The results (in mg/mL free base dissolved for better comparison between salt forms) of the solubility determination performed in water are reported in Table 9.


Upon completion of the solubility determination, the remaining solids were separated from the liquid phases and allowed to air dry. Dried solids were analyzed by HT-XRPD.









TABLE 9







Results of aqueous solubility determination


at RT for a selection of salts.













Dissolved




Solid
Dissolved
at 50° C.,
Concentration



form
at RT?
15 min
FB [mg/ml]
XRPD





HBR1
No
Yes
≈3
No solid


NDS1
No
No
<3
NDS1


EDY3
No
No
<3
EDY3 +






EDY5


EDY2
No
No
<3
EDY6


EDY6
No
No
<3
EDY6


MES1
Yes

Between
MES1 +





100-50
MES5a





crashed out



NSA4 pc
No
No
<3
NSA1 +






NSA2


BES3
No
No
<3
BES3


OXA1
No
No
<3
OXA1


MAE3
No
No
<3
MAE3


GLT1
Yes

Between 12-8
No solid


MAO1
No
Yes
≈3
ly—MAO4


MAO4
No
No
<3
ly—MAO4


GEN2
No
No
<3
ly—GEN2






pc


FUR1
No
No
<3
ly—FUR1






(pc)


FUM1
No
No
<3
FUM2


FUM2
No
No
<3
ly—FUM2


CIT2
No
No
<3
CIT2


MAL1
No
No
<3
MAL1


SUC1
No
No
<3
ly—SUC1


FOR3
Almost
Yes
≈3
No solid


GLU1
Almost
No
<3
GLU3


CIN1
No
No
<3
CIN1


CIN2
No
No
<3
CIN3ª


ADI3
No
No
<3
ADI2


VAL1
No
No
<3
VAL1 pc


BUT1
Yes

Between 3-5
No solid


NIC1
Almost
No
<3
NIC2a


PIV1
No
No
<3
ly—PIV1


PRO2
Almost
Yes
≈3
No solid


STE3
No
No
<3
STE2 +






STE3


ORO1
No
No
<3
ORO4a


TFA1
No
No
<3
TFA1


PAM4
No
No
<3
PAM1 +






PAM0


LAC1—SM (ref)
Yes

≈20











Mono-HCl (ref)
See Example 1,
2.4-3.0




table 2






anew polymorphs found after the water solubility assessment.







Only MES1 showed a better solubility value than the starting material (LAC1). However, precipitation was observed after full dissolution. The aqueous solubility determination was repeated but this time aiming for a concentration of 50 mg/ml. The salt quickly dissolved at RT and after 15 min it crashed out again as a white solid.


Example 3: Comparative Study of the Lactate and Tri-Fluoroacetic Acid Salts of Benzamil

In this example, the lactate salt and the TFA salt of benzamil were compared with respect to physicochemical parameters, polymorphism, solubility and dissolution rate.


Materials

Chemicals were obtained from Fisher Scientific or Sigma Aldrich. Chemicals used were of research grade and at least 99% pure. Psomri provided 5 grams of lactate PSM001 (Benzamil lactate, batch SB084-44). Benzamil lactate (in the anhydrous form LAC1), was confirmed by 1H-NMR. The counter-ion of the lactate salt is visible by 1H-NMR, and the stoichiometry of the salt was confirmed to be 1:1. A UPLC analysis confirmed the chemical purity to be 99.4% (area %).


Experimental Methods

Free base preparation: Approximately 2 g of benzamil lactate were dissolved in 128 mL of water. The pH of the solution was 5.8. A 1 M solution of NaOH in water was added stepwise until the pH was stabilized at 10.5 (in total 7 mL of 1M NaOH was added) and a white precipitate had formed. The suspension was stirred for 30 min to age the precipitate. The precipitate was filtered over a Buchner funnel and washed twice with 200 mL of water at RT. The obtained solid was dried overnight at 50° C./5 mbar. Yield was 1.4 g (72%) of the benzamil free base. The solid was analyzed by HT-XRPD and 1H-NMR and compared against the starting material to ensure the free base formation.


TFA salt preparation: A suspension of the free base (1.2 grams) was prepared in THF (14.75 ml) at RT. The counterion solution (1M TFA in water) was added until an API:CI ratio 1:1.1 was reached. The suspension was heated to 50° C. and held at this temperature for 1 h, subsequently cooled to 5° C. and kept at this temperature for 3 days. Upon completion of the aging time, solid was separated from the liquid phase by centrifugation and analyzed by HR-XRPD, TGA, DSC, UPLC and 1H-NMR as a vacuum-dried solid (Sample ID: GEN8); confirming the product as the benzamil TFA salt.


Generation of amorphous benzamil lactate salt: Approximately 10 mg of API was dissolved in mixtures of organic solvents and water (listed in Table 10). The solutions were frozen in liquid nitrogen and dried in a Freeze Dryer (Christ Alpha 2-4 LD) overnight. The recovered solids were analyzed by HT-XRPD.


Amorphous solids were obtained from tert-butanol/water (50/50), 1,4-dioxane/water (50/50), tetrahydrofuran/water (50/50), acetonitrile/water (50/50) and 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol/water (50/50). Amorphous solids were analyzed by TGMS to determine the residual solvent/water content. Experimental details and results are reported in Table 10. A larger batch of amorphous material was prepared according to the experimental conditions applied in Exp. ID GEN3 (from 1,4-dioxane/water (50/50), considering that a very high API concentration could be reached in solution and the final preparation contained low residual solvent. The obtained amorphous solid (Exp. ID GEN9) was used for the thermocycling experiments.









TABLE 10







Generation of amorphous phase of benzamil lactate. Solids recovered by


lyophilization were analyzed by HT-XRPD and TGMS. “pc” and “Am”


stand for “poor crystalline” and “Amorphous”.














Concen-


Mass




tration


loss


Exp. ID
Solvent (v/v)
(mg/mL)
Dissolved?
XRPD
(%)















GEN2
Tert-butanol/water
21.0
Yes
Am




(50/50)






GEN3
1,4-Dioxane/water
51.5
Yes
Am
2.8



(50/50)






GEN4
Tetrahydrofuran/water
70.7
Yes
Am
4.1



(50/50)






GEN5
Acetonitrile/water
51.5
Yes
Am
2.8



(50/50)






GEN6
2,2,2-trifluoroethanol/
105.0
Yes
Am




water (50/50)






GEN7
Ethanol/water (50/50)
26.5
Yes
LAC1 pc



GEN9
1,4-Dioxane/water
50.0
Yes
Am
2.3



(50/50)













Generation of amorphous benzamil TFA salt: Approximately 10 mg of TFA salt (from Exp. ID GEN8) was dissolved in mixtures of organic solvents and water (listed in Table 11). The solutions were frozen in liquid nitrogen and dried in a Freeze Dryer (Christ Alpha 2-4 LD) overnight. The recovered solids were analyzed by HT-XRPD. Amorphous solids were obtained from 1,4-dioxane/water (70/30), tetrahydrofuran/water (50/50) and acetonitrile/water (70/30). The amorphous solids were analyzed by TGMS to determine the residual solvent/water content. Experimental details and results are reported in Table 11. A larger batch of amorphous material was prepared according to the experimental conditions applied in Exp. ID GEN11 (from 1,4-dioxane/water (70/30), considering that the highest API concentration was reached in solution and the final preparation contained low residual solvent. The obtained amorphous solid (Exp. ID GEN16) was used for the thermocycling experiments.









TABLE 11







Generation of amorphous phase of benzamil TFA salt. Solids recovered by


lyophilization were analyzed by HT-XRPD and TGMS. “pc” and “Am”


stand for “poor crystalline” and “Amorphous”.














Concen-


Mass




tration


loss


Exp. ID
Solvent (v/v)
(mg/ml)
Dissolved?
XRPD
(%)





GEN10
Tert-butanol/Water
15.0
No





(50/50)






GEN11
1,4-Dioxane/Water
40.0
Yes
Am
3.8



(70/30)






GEN12
Tetrahydrofuran/
25.5
Yes
Am
5.2



Water (50/50)






GEN13
Acetonitrile/Water
20.6
Yes
Am
3.8



(70/30)






GEN14
2,2,2-trifluoroethanol/
20.6
Yes
Am + ep




Water (70/50)






GEN15
Ethanol/Water (50/50)
14.6
No




GEN16
1,4-Dioxane/Water
40.0
Yes
Am
2.7



(70/30)









Polymorphic Landscapes

The polymorphic landscapes of both benzamil lactate and TFA salts were evaluated by thermocycling. Slurries of the amorphous solids (GEN9 and GEN16, respectively) were prepared in 15 solvents at room temperature. The suspensions were subjected to a temperature profile, which comprised of three heating and cooling cycles. At the end of the temperature profile, the solids were isolated by centrifugation and dried at ambient conditions and under vacuum at 50° C. Upon completion of all crystallization experiments, all solids were analyzed by HT-XRPD. Subsequently, all solids were exposed to accelerated aging conditions (AAC, 40° C./75% RH) for 48 h before being analyzed by HT-XRPD again.


Results

The results are provided in Tables 12 and 13 below. Only one polymorph of the lactate salt was found (LAC1), whereas two forms of the TFA salt was found (TFA1 and TFA2).









TABLE 12







Results of thermocycling experiments - lactate salt













API

Concen-
Solid
HT-XRPD

















Mass

Volume
tration
after

Vac.

Evap.


Exp. ID
(mg)
Solvent
(mL)
(mg/mL)
TCP?
Vac.
(AAC)
Evap.
(AAC)



















TCP1
24.9
TBME
500
49.8
Yes
LAC1
LAC1




TCP2
24.9
Acetone
600
41.5
Yes
LAC1
LAC1




TCP3
24.9
MeOH
450
55.3
No


Oil
Oil


TCP4
24.9
THF
600
41.5
Yes
LAC1
LAC1




TCP5
24.9
EtOAc
600
41.5
Yes
LAC1
LAC1




TCP6
24.9
EtOH
600
41.5
Yes
LAC1
LAC1




TCP7
24.9
MEK
600
41.5
Yes
LAC1
LAC1




TCP8
24.9
ACN
600
41.5
Yes
LAC1
LAC1




TCP9
24.9
IPA
600
41.5
Yes
LAC1
LAC1




TCP10
24.9
Water
500
49.8
Yes
ly
ly
LAC1
LAC1


TCP11
24.9
1,4-Dioxane
600
41.5
Yes
LAC1
LAC1




TCP12
24.9
DME
600
41.5
Yes
LAC1
LAC1




TCP13
24.9
Acetone/water
600
41.5
Yes
LAC1
LAC1






(95/5% v/v)


TCP14
24.9
EtOH/water
600
41.5
Yes
LAC1
LAC1
LAC1
LAC1




(95/5% v/v)


TCP15
24.9
IPA/water
600
41.5
Yes
LAC1
LAC1






(95/5% v/v)
















TABLE 13







Results of thermocycling experiments - TFA salt













API

Concen-
Solid
HT-XRPD

















Mass

Volume
tration
after

Vac.

Evap.


Exp. ID
(mg)
Solvent
(mL)
(mg/mL)
TCP?
Vac.
(AAC)
Evap.
(AAC)



















TCP16
20.04
TBME
600
33.4
Yes
TFA1
TFA1




TCP17
20.04
Acetone
600
33.4
Yes
TFA1
TFA1




TCP18
20.04
MeOH
300
66.8
Yes
TFA1 + TFA2
TFA1 + TFA2




TCP19
20.04
THF
600
33.4
Yes
TFA1
TFA1




TCP20
20.04
EtOAc
600
33.4
Yes
TFA1
TFA1




TCP21
20.04
EtOH
500
40.1
Yes
TFA1
TFA1
TFA1
TFA1


TCP22
20.04
MEK
600
33.4
Yes
TFA1
TFA1




TCP23
20.04
ACN
500
40.1
Yes
TFA1
TFA1




TCP24
20.04
IPA
500
40.1
Yes
TFA1
TFA1




TCP25
20.04
Water
400
50.1
Yes
TFA2
TFA2




TCP26
20.04
1,4-Dioxane
400
50.1
Yes
TFA1
TFA1




TCP27
20.04
DME
600
33.4
Yes
TFA1
TFA1




TCP28
20.04
Acetone/water
600
33.4
Yes
TFA1
TFA1
TFA1
TFA1




(95/5% v/v)


TCP29
20.04
EtOH/water
400
50.1
Yes
TFA1
TFA1
TFA1
TFA1




(95/5% v/v)


TCP30
20.04
IPA/water
400
50.1
Yes
TFA1
TFA1






(95/5% v/v)









For the lactate salt, LAC1 was the only polymorph found from all the solvent systems used in the screen. LAC1 was also the crystalline phase delivered as starting material. Based on the results, benzamil lactate salt appears not to be polymorphic. LAC1 was physically stable upon exposure to stress conditions.


In the polymorph screen started with the amorphous TFA salt, next to TFA1 (Example 2, see table 7), TFA2 was recovered. TFA2 and a mixture of TFA1+TFA2 were only found from water and MeOH, respectively. All other solvents resulted in TFA1. Both TFA salts (TFA1 and TFA2) were physically stable upon exposure to AAC (no solid form conversion was observed upon exposure to stress conditions, 2 days at 40° C. and 75% RH). Benzamil TFA salt appeared to be polymorphic.


Solids comprised of the three obtained powder patterns (LAC1, TFA1 and TFA2) were further characterized by UPLC, 1H-NMR, DSC and TGMS analysis.


Solid-State Characterization

LAC1 (from Exp. ID TCP2), TFA1 (from Exp. ID TCP16) and TFA2 (from Exp. ID TCP25) were characterized by TGMS, DSC, UPLC and 1H-NMR.


Salt formation was confirmed by 1H-NMR analysis, as well as the 1-to-1 stoichiometry in the case of LAC1 (TFA not seen on 1H-NMR). The thermal analyses were indicative of the anhydrous and non-solvated nature of LAC1 (residual solvent content of 0.5%) and that both TFA1 and TFA2 are non-solvated anhydrous forms. The melting temperature and chemical purity of LAC1, TFA1 and TFA2 are found in Table 14.









TABLE 14







Analytical characterization of salt forms.

















Thermal



Chemical





events by
Solvent

Salt
purity by



Exp.
Physically
DSC
content by

formation
UPLC


Salt
ID
stable?
(Tpeak, ° C.)
TGMS
Nature
by 1H-NMR
(area %)





LAC1
TCP2
Yes
196.4 (m)
0.5% -
Anhydrous
Shifted -
100%






residual

1:1






water


TFA1
TCP16
Yes
240.4 (m)
0.3% -
Anhydrous
Shifted
100%






residual






water


TFA2
TCP25
Yes
243.0 (m)
0.19% -
Anhydrous
Shifted
100%






residual






water





(m) indicates melting event






Additional attempts were made to prepare TFA1 to be able to perform additional characterization. However, all attempts led to TFA2. Therefore, the TFA1 salt obtained in the screen was used for the follow-up studies of solubility and physical and chemical stability, and for the intrinsic dissolution rate studies. TFA2 prepared at large scale (Exp. ID GEN8) was used for the follow-up studies (the anhydrous form with the highest melting temperature).


Solubility Study

The kinetic and thermodynamic solubilities of the lactate (LAC1) and TFA salts (TFA1 and TFA2) were determined in water upon incubation for 1 h and 18 h at 37° C. under continuous magnetic stirring.


Two sets of suspensions at 30 mg/ml of the LAC1, TFA1 and TFA2 salts were prepared in the selected vehicles. The first set of suspensions were equilibrated at 37° C. for 1 h under continuous stirring while the second set was equilibrated at 37° C. for 18 h under continuous stirring. After 10 min incubation, the pH was measured and upon completion of the equilibration times the pH was measured again. The pH values did not change during the incubation times. After completion of the equilibration times, the liquid phases were separated from the solid phases, filtered and analyzed by UPLC for solubility determination. In water, a solubility around 0.7 mg/mL was determined for both incubation times (1 and 18 h) indicating that the maximum solubility was reached already after 1 h at 37° C. Comparing the solubility results of both TFA salts, it became apparent that the solubility of the TFA1 salt is lower than that determined for the TFA2 salt.


The residual solids were harvested and analyzed by HT-XRPD both as ambient- and as vacuum-dried (5 mbar/25° C.) solids. The solubility determination results are shown in Table 15 below.









TABLE 15







Solubility determination.










Solubility
XRPD












pH after
(mg/mL)
1 h
18 h

















Exp. ID
Medium
10 min
1 h
18 h
1 h
18 h
Amb.
Vac.
Amb.
Vac.




















QSA75/58 LAC1
Water
5.9
5.8
5.8
24.3
23.6
LAC1
LAC1
Am
LAC1


QSA84/66 TFA2
Water
6.0
6.2
6.1
2.6
1.6
TFA2
TFA2
TFA2
TFA2


QSA103/101 TFA1
Water
6.1
6.2
6.2
0.7
0.7
TFA1
TFA1
TFA1
TFA1





Amb. = Ambient-dried solid samle.


Vac. = Vacuum-dried solid sample






Intrinsic Dissolution Rate Study

The intrinsic dissolution rates were determined for LAC1 (batch SB084-44), TFA2 (Exp. ID GEN8) and TFA1 (Exp. ID in TCP17) in water and FaSSIF (Fasted State Simulated Intestinal Fluid).


Materials and Methods

Rotating disc intrinsic dissolution determinations were performed with a μDiss apparatus (Pion, USA) equipped with 6 independent glass fiber probes each connected to a diode area. Before the start of the experiment the probes were calibrated using the spectrum of a Mercury 362 nm pen-ray lamp. Discs were prepared in a passivated aluminum dye with a mini-IDR press (Heath Scientific, UK).


Six dilutions of benzamil lactate salt were prepared in the dissolution media in the range from 0 to 0.5 mg/mL, and the solutions were stirred with a cross-shaped magnetic stirrer. These dilutions were used for the calibration curve which is used for the calculation of the amount of benzamil in solution. Moreover, the solutions were used to select the wavelength at which the samples were to be measured and to select the proper path length.


About 6-10 mg of the different salts (LAC1, TFA1, TFA2) were compressed in a passivated aluminum dye (standardized surface area of 0.071 cm2) with 40 tons of pressure for 1 minute. The dyes were placed in their Teflon holder magnet stirrer and placed into 20 mL glass vials. Before to the sample measurement, a blank of each media was taken in the respective channel. The experiment started by the gentle addition of the pre-warmed dissolution media. Vials were incubated at 37° C. under continuous stirring at 100 rpm for a maximum of 4 h. UV absorption was measured with the in-line probes at regular intervals. Upon completion of the experiment the pH of the solution was determined. Concentrations of API in solution were calculated with use of the calibration curve and plotted against time. Dissolution rates were calculated over the linear parts of the curves. All dissolution rate experiments were done in triplicate except for TFA1 which were done in duplicate due to the lack of material.


Results

The results are presented in FIG. 8 and Table 16 below. As evident from Table 16 below, the dissolution rate for LAC1 was significantly faster than for TFA2 and TFA1. For LAC1, after about 50 min the whole tablet has been dissolved and the curve becomes flat (FIG. 8A). The IDR of benzmil LAC1 in water was 1.87±0.06 mg/cm2/min calculated over the range from 1 to 36 min.


The dissolution of TFA2 and TFA1 was slower. After about 4 h, the tablet was still not completely dissolved (TFA2: FIG. 8B; TFA1: not shown). The IDR of benzmil TFA2 and TFA1 was 0.13±0.01 and 0.09±0.01 mg/cm2/min (calculated between 10-100 min), respectively.









TABLE 16







Experimental conditions and results for the intrinsic dissolution


rate determinations on benzmil LAC1, TFA2 and TFA1.












Mass tablet
IDR (mg/cm2/min)











Form(s)
Medium
(mg)a
Individual
Average














LAC1
Water
9.48
1.870
1.87 ± 0.06




8.07
1.811





12.22
1.933




FaSSIF
9.58
0.285
0.39 ± 0.11




10.34
0.510





10.47
0.389



TFA2
Water
23.15
0.116
0.13 ± 0.1 




18.37
0.143





11.24
0.130




FaSSIF
13.24
0.145
 0.14 ± 0.004




17.89
0.143





12.45
0.138



TFA1
Water
5.19
0.082
0.09 ± 0.01




6.97
0.093




FaSSIF
10.38
0.094
0.09 ± 0.01




6.08
0.076






aAfter the incubation time, the tablets are still intact







Conclusion

The Intrinsic Dissolution Rate of LAC1 in water is almost 5-fold faster than the rate in FaSSIF. For TFA1 and TFA2, the Intrinsic Dissolution Rate is between 15 and 20-fold lower than that of LAC1 in water while in FaSSIF the difference is about 4-fold.


Physio-Chemical Stability Study

Stability studies on benzmil LAC1 (SM, batch SB084-44), TFA2 (from Exp. ID GEN8) and TFA1 (from Exp. ID TCP16) salts were conducted under two stress conditions:

    • 1. Open container at 25° C. and 60% RH
    • 2. Open container at 40° C. and 75% RH


Materials and Methods

Solids were analyzed by UPLC, TGMS and HT-XRPD after 3 days, 1 week and 3 weeks incubation under stress conditions for LAC1 and TFA2. For TFA1 solids were analyzed after 3 days and 1 week.


Results

The analytical data is presented in Table 17. No solid form conversion was observed for any of the salts upon incubation in both conditions for 3 weeks, suggesting that both salts were physically stable under the tested conditions.


The chemical purity determined by UPLC for the solids incubated for 3 days, 1 week and 3 weeks at both conditions was comparable to the purity of the solid at the start (t0). This result suggests that no chemical degradation was occurring for any of the salts during the tested conditions.


The thermal analyses (TGMS) showed a small deviation when comparing the t0 and 3 days to the 1 and 3-weeks incubation (from ˜1% to 0.1%). This observation was made for both LAC1 and TFA2. These results could be explained by the presence of traces of residual process solvents in the first two samples (t0 and t3 days) which is released or replaced by water only after 1 week incubation at 25° C./60% RH and 40° C./75% RH.









TABLE 17







HT-XRPD, TGMS and UPLC results of LAC1 (batch SB084-44), TFA2 (from Exp. ID GEN8) andTFA1 (from


Exp. ID TCP16) upon exposure to 25° C./60% RH and 40° C./75% RH for 3 days, 1 week and 3 weeks.












t0
3 days
1 week
3 weeks




















Salt
Conditions
XRPD
UPLC
TGMS
XRPD
UPLC
TGMS
XRPD
UPLC
TGMS
XRPD
UPLC
TGMS





LAC1
25° C. and 60%
LAC1
99.4
0.4%
LAC1
99.4%
1.2%
LAC1
99.4%
<0.1%
LAC1
99.4%
<0.1%



RH


water


water


water


water


LAC1
40° C. and 75%



LAC1
99.4%
1.5%
LAC1
99.2%
0.2%
LAC1
99.4%
<0.1%



RH





water


water


water


TFA2
25° C. and 60%
TFA2
99.1
1.0%
TFA2
99.9%
1.4%
TFA2
99.9%
0.1%
TFA2
 100%
<0.1%



RH


water


water


water


water


TFA2
40° C. and 75%



TFA2
99.9%
1.2%
TFA2
 100%
0.1%
TFA2
 100%
<0.1%



RH





water


water


water


TFA2
25° C. and 60%
TFA1
100%
0.3%
TFA1
 100%
<0.1
TFA1
 100%
<0.1






RH


water


water


water


TFA2
40° C. and 75%



TFA1
 100%
<0.1
TFA1
 100%
<0.1






RH





water


water









Conclusion

It was concluded that salts LAC 1, TFA1 and TFA2 are physically and chemically stable upon incubation for 3 weeks at 25° C./60% RH and 40° C./75% RH.


Overall Conclusion from Example 3


Overall, it can be concluded that the lactate salt of benzamil has a significantly higher solubility than the TFA salts.

Claims
  • 1. A salt of a free base compound represented by formula (I)
  • 2. The salt according to claim 1, wherein the salt is the lactic acid salt.
  • 3. The salt according to claim 1, wherein the free base compound is benzamil.
  • 4. The salt according to claim 1, wherein the salt is in only one crystal form.
  • 5. A pharmaceutical or cosmetic composition comprising: a salt of a free base compound represented by formula (I)
  • 6. The composition according to claim 5, wherein the composition is adapted for topical administration.
  • 7. The salt according to claim 1, wherein the salt is for use in medicine.
  • 8. The salt according to claim 7, wherein the use in medicine is a use in a method of treatment of psoriasis.
  • 9. The salt according to claim 8, wherein said psoriasis is chronic psoriasis or plaque psoriasis.
  • 10. The salt according to claim 7, wherein the salt is administered topically or systemically.
  • 11. Use of the salt according to claim 1 in the manufacture of a pharmaceutical composition for use in a method of treatment of psoriasis.
  • 12. A method for treatment of psoriasis comprising administering to an individual in need thereof an effective amount of a salt according to claim 1.
  • 13. The method for treatment of psoriasis according to claim 12, wherein the salt is administered topically.
  • 14. The method for treatment of psoriasis according to claim 12, wherein the psoriasis is chronic psoriasis or plaque psoriasis.
  • 15. The composition according to claim 5, wherein the salt is for use in medicine.
  • 16. The composition according to claim 15, wherein the use in medicine is a use in a method of treatment of psoriasis.
  • 17. The composition according to claim 16, wherein said psoriasis is chronic psoriasis or plaque psoriasis.
  • 18. The composition according to claim 15, wherein the salt is administered topically or systemically.
  • 19. Use of the salt according to claim 2 in the manufacture of a pharmaceutical composition for use in a method of treatment of psoriasis.
  • 20. Use of the salt according to claim 3 in the manufacture of a pharmaceutical composition for use in a method of treatment of psoriasis.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
21199548.5 Sep 2021 EP regional
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/EP2022/077018 9/28/2022 WO