NiFeX-based seed layer for magnetic recording media

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9685184
  • Patent Number
    9,685,184
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, September 25, 2014
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 20, 2017
    6 years ago
Abstract
A recording medium having improved signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) capabilities includes a NiFeX-based magnetic seed layer over a soft magnetic underlayer, where X comprises an element that is soluble in and has a higher melting point than Ni. X may be selected from a group of elements, including ruthenium (Ru), which may facilitate growth of smaller grains and distributions in the corresponding magnetic recording layer(s).
Description
FIELD OF EMBODIMENTS

Embodiments of the invention may relate generally to hard disk drives and more particularly to magnetic recording media.


BACKGROUND

A hard-disk drive (HDD) is a non-volatile storage device that is housed in a protective enclosure and stores digitally encoded data on one or more circular disks having magnetic surfaces. When an HDD is in operation, each magnetic-recording disk is rapidly rotated by a spindle system. Data is read from and written to a magnetic-recording disk using a read/write head that is positioned over a specific location of a disk by an actuator. A read/write head uses a magnetic field to read data from and write data to the surface of a magnetic-recording disk. Write heads make use of the electricity flowing through a coil, which produces a magnetic field. Electrical pulses are sent to the write head, with different patterns of positive and negative currents. The current in the coil of the write head induces a magnetic field across the gap between the head and the magnetic disk, which in turn magnetizes a small area on the recording medium.


In order to improve the recording performance for media, it is desirable to increase the SNR (Signal-to-Noise Ratio) through structure design and materials selections.


Any approaches described in this section are approaches that could be pursued, but not necessarily approaches that have been previously conceived or pursued. Therefore, unless otherwise indicated, it should not be assumed that any of the approaches described in this section qualify as prior art merely by virtue of their inclusion in this section.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments are illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements and in which:



FIG. 1 is a plan view illustrating a hard disk drive, according to an embodiment;



FIG. 2 illustrates a perpendicular magnetic recording (PMR) media stack, according to an embodiment;



FIG. 3 is a plan view illustrating grains of magnetic recording media, according to an embodiment;



FIG. 4 is a histogram graph illustrating grain center-to-center distribution of magnetic recording media of FIG. 3, according to an embodiment; and



FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating a method of manufacturing a recording medium, according to an embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Approaches to a recording medium having a NiFeX-based magnetic seed layer under a magnetic recording layer are described. In the following description, for the purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments described herein. It will be apparent, however, that the embodiments described herein may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the embodiments described herein.


Physical Description of Illustrative Operating Environments

Embodiments may be used in the context of a perpendicular magnetic recording (PMR) medium for a hard-disk drive (HDD) data storage device. Thus, in accordance with an embodiment, a plan view illustrating an HDD 100 is shown in FIG. 1 to illustrate an exemplary operating environment.



FIG. 1 illustrates the functional arrangement of components of the HDD 100 including a slider 110b that includes a magnetic-reading/recording head 110a. Collectively, slider 110b and head 110a may be referred to as a head slider. The HDD 100 includes at least one head gimbal assembly (HGA) 110 including the head slider, a lead suspension 110c attached to the head slider typically via a flexure, and a load beam 110d attached to the lead suspension 110c. The HDD 100 also includes at least one magnetic-recording medium 120 rotatably mounted on a spindle 124 and a drive motor (not visible) attached to the spindle 124 for rotating the medium 120. The head 110a includes a write element and a read element for respectively writing and reading information stored on the medium 120 of the HDD 100. The medium 120 or a plurality of disk media may be affixed to the spindle 124 with a disk clamp 128.


The HDD 100 further includes an arm 132 attached to the HGA 110, a carriage 134, a voice-coil motor (VCM) that includes an armature 136 including a voice coil 140 attached to the carriage 134 and a stator 144 including a voice-coil magnet (not visible). The armature 136 of the VCM is attached to the carriage 134 and is configured to move the arm 132 and the HGA 110, to access portions of the medium 120, being mounted on a pivot-shaft 148 with an interposed pivot-bearing assembly 152. In the case of an HDD having multiple disks, the carriage 134 is called an “E-block,” or comb, because the carriage is arranged to carry a ganged array of arms that gives it the appearance of a comb.


An assembly comprising a head gimbal assembly (e.g., HGA 110) including a flexure to which the head slider is coupled, an actuator arm (e.g., arm 132) and/or load beam to which the flexure is coupled, and an actuator (e.g., the VCM) to which the actuator arm is coupled, may be collectively referred to as a head stack assembly (HSA). An HSA may, however, include more or fewer components than those described. For example, an HSA may refer to an assembly that further includes electrical interconnection components. Generally, an HSA is the assembly configured to move the head slider to access portions of the medium 120 for read and write operations.


With further reference to FIG. 1, electrical signals (e.g., current to the voice coil 140 of the VCM) comprising a write signal to and a read signal from the head 110a, are provided by a flexible interconnect cable 156 (“flex cable”). Interconnection between the flex cable 156 and the head 110a may be provided by an arm-electronics (AE) module 160, which may have an on-board pre-amplifier for the read signal, as well as other read-channel and write-channel electronic components. The AE 160 may be attached to the carriage 134 as shown. The flex cable 156 is coupled to an electrical-connector block 164, which provides electrical communication through electrical feedthroughs provided by an HDD housing 168. The HDD housing 168, also referred to as a base, in conjunction with an HDD cover provides a sealed, protective enclosure for the information storage components of the HDD 100.


Other electronic components, including a disk controller and servo electronics including a digital-signal processor (DSP), provide electrical signals to the drive motor, the voice coil 140 of the VCM and the head 110a of the HGA 110. The electrical signal provided to the drive motor enables the drive motor to spin providing a torque to the spindle 124 which is in turn transmitted to the medium 120 that is affixed to the spindle 124. As a result, the medium 120 spins in a direction 172. The spinning medium 120 creates a cushion of air that acts as an air-bearing on which the air-bearing surface (ABS) of the slider 110b rides so that the slider 110b flies above the surface of the medium 120 without making contact with a thin magnetic-recording layer in which information is recorded.


The electrical signal provided to the voice coil 140 of the VCM enables the head 110a of the HGA 110 to access a track 176 on which information is recorded. Thus, the armature 136 of the VCM swings through an arc 180, which enables the head 110a of the HGA 110 to access various tracks on the medium 120. Information is stored on the medium 120 in a plurality of radially nested tracks arranged in sectors on the medium 120, such as sector 184. Correspondingly, each track is composed of a plurality of sectored track portions (or “track sector”), for example, sectored track portion 188. Each sectored track portion 188 may be composed of recorded data and a header containing a servo-burst-signal pattern, for example, an ABCD-servo-burst-signal pattern, which is information that identifies the track 176, and error correction code information. In accessing the track 176, the read element of the head 110a of the HGA 110 reads the servo-burst-signal pattern which provides a position-error-signal (PES) to the servo electronics, which controls the electrical signal provided to the voice coil 140 of the VCM, enabling the head 110a to follow the track 176. Upon finding the track 176 and identifying a particular sectored track portion 188, the head 110a either reads data from the track 176 or writes data to the track 176 depending on instructions received by the disk controller from an external agent, for example, a microprocessor of a computer system.


Introduction

A perpendicular magnetic recording (PMR) system records data as magnetizations oriented perpendicular to the plane of the magnetic recording disk. The magnetic disk has a magnetically soft underlayer covered by a thin magnetically hard top layer. A strong, highly concentrated magnetic field emits from the write pole in a direction perpendicular to the magnetic disk surface, magnetizing the magnetically hard top layer. The resulting magnetic flux then travels through the soft underlayer, returning to the return pole where it is sufficiently spread out and weak that it will not erase the signal recorded by the write pole when it passes back through the magnetically hard top layer on its way back to the return pole.


Perpendicular recording media may comprise a stack of several Co based magnetic layers, which is grown on a Ru intermediate layer or a combination of Ru and Ru—X intermediate layers, a Ni—W or Ni—W—Al or Ni—W—Al—Fe orientation control seed layer, a possible Ta seed layer, and soft magnetic underlayers on a substrate, in that order. If glass substrates are used, Cr or CrTi or CrTa adhesion layers may also be present underneath the soft magnetic underlayers. In the foregoing media design structure, the Ni-based orientation control seed layer, which is poly-crystalline, primarily sets the template for the grain size and its distribution in the Ru based intermediate layer and subsequently, in the Co based magnetic layer. The grains in poly-crystalline thin films grow by means of two events: (i) nucleation of grains at energetically favorable sites on the underlying layer or substrate, and (ii) once nucleated, grain growth is driven by diffusion processes. During thin film sputtering, since both nucleation and grain growth events happen simultaneously, a log-normal grain size distribution results. Nucleation is a thermodynamic process and is typically a random event that can be controlled to some extent by engineering pre-determined nucleation sites on the underlying layer or substrate. Grain growth, however, is a kinematical process and is governed by the mobility of the precipitate (sputtered atoms that have nucleated into grains). The latter process provides the context for embodiments described herein.



FIG. 2 illustrates a perpendicular magnetic recording (PMR) media stack, according to an embodiment. Media stack 202 comprises a substrate 202, over which an antiferromagnetically coupled soft magnetic underlayer (AFC-SUL) 204 laminate is fabricated, over which one or more seed layer 206 is fabricated, over which an intermediate layer 208 is fabricated, over which one or more magnetic recording layer 210 is fabricated, and over which an overcoat is fabricated. Further, and for example, one or more adhesion layer may be fabricated on the substrate 202.


Reference herein to a “layer” is not intended to be thereby limited to a single layer, rather each “layer” referenced may actually comprise multiple layers, or a “stack” of thin film layers. Further, the term “fabricated” may include any of a number of thin film processes, such as chemical and/or physical deposition processes (of which sputtering is commonly used in hard disk media production), which “grow” grains of poly-crystalline thin films, for example, as well as crystalline epitaxial growth, and the like. Therefore, use of the term “fabricated” and related terms are not limited to any particular process, unless otherwise indicated.


For example and according to an embodiment, media stack 200 may comprise a Al—Mg substrate 202 covered by (i) Cr or CrTa or CrTi adhesion layers, (ii) an antiferromagnetically coupled soft magnetic underlayer (AFC-SUL 204) laminate, (iii) a Ta based seed layer and a NiW or NiWAl or NiWAlFe based seed layer (seed layer 206), (iv) a Ru and/or RuCo based intermediate layer (intermediate layer 208), and (v) a stack of several magnetic layers (magnetic recording layer 210), including exchange-control layers (ECLs) or exchange-break layers (EBLs), covered with a carbon overcoat (overcoat 212). Such a media stack may use a exchange-coupled composite (ECC) design, including two exchange-break layers. According to an embodiment, intermediate layer 208 comprises dual Ru intermediate layers, comprising a Ru layer processed at low Ar gas sputter pressure of ˜7 mtorr, followed by another Ru layer processed using high Ar gas sputter pressure of ˜90 mtorr.


NiX-Based Seed Layer

In order to further increase areal storage densities from current levels, tighter grain sizes and distributions are highly desireable in the Co based magnetic recording layer. This is from the point of view of reducing noise (i.e., improving the signal-to-noise ratio, or SNR) not only by creating more uniform grain morphologies, but also by reducing inter-granular magnetic interactions. One way to achieve tighter grain size distributions in the magnetic recording layer is to improve the grain size distributions in the Ni based seed layer itself, since the latter acts as a template for the former. With that in mind, the grain growth process may be controlled to some extent based on the sputtering of the Ni based seed layer.


As mentioned, the grain growth process is a mobility driven event, thereby determined by the diffusion coefficient of the precipitate, which itself depends inversely on the melting point of the precipitate. Basis for the inverse relationship between the melting point and the diffusion coefficient for an element may be found in, e.g., “Correlations For Diffusion Constants” by A. M. Brown and M. F. Ashby, from Acta Metallurgica, Vol. 28, pp. 1085-1101, the entire contents of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes as if fully set forth herein. Section 2.1 of the foregoing paper may be particularly relevant.


In order to control the mobility of the precipitate, it is deemed beneficial to alloy the Ni seed material with elements that are both soluble in Ni and have higher melting points compared to Ni. The precipitates formed by sputtering this alloy seed material can be expected to have higher melting points compared to the original seed, and consequently lower diffusion coefficients.


The diffusion coefficient, or diffusivity, is typically described in the context of a relationship among at least two elements or substances, i.e., one with respect to another, and may be described in units of length/time (e.g., nm2/s). Thus, the lower the diffusivity of one substance with respect to the other, the slower the substances diffuse into each other. Consequently, this could lead to tighter grain size distributions in the seed, and subsequently in the magnetic recording layer, further leading to improved recording performance.


Continuing, the diffusion coefficient is the measure of mobility of diffusing species and, including in solids at different temperatures, is generally found to be well-predicted by Arrhenius plots. The diffusion coefficient may be characterized with the following equation:

D=D0 exp{−Qd/RT};  (1)

where


D is the diffusion coefficient (m2/s);


D0 is the temperature-independent preexponential (m2/s);


Qd is the activation energy for diffusion (J/mol or eV/atom);


R is the gas constant (8.31 J/mol-K or 8.62×10−5 eV/atom-K); and


T is the absolute temperature (K).


The above equation (1) can be rewritten as:

ln D=ln D0−(Qd/R)(1/T); or  (2)
log D=log D0−(Qd/2.3R)(1/T).  (3)

The activation energy Qd and preexponential D0, therefore, can be estimated by plotting ln D versus 1/T or log D versus 1/T, where such plots are aforementioned Arrhenius plots.


According to an embodiment, seed layer 206 comprises a magnetic NiFe-based seed layer. According to an embodiment, seed layer 206 comprises a NiFeX-based seed layer where X comprises an element that is soluble in Ni and has a higher melting point than Ni.


Table 1 presents a list of chemical elements that are soluble in nickel (Ni), up to approximately x at %, and have a higher melting point than nickel.












TABLE 1







Element X
x Atomic %









Ruthenium (Ru)
0-35 at %



Osmium (Os)
0-10 at %



Platinum (Pt)
0-30 at %



Rhenium (Re)
0-15 at %



Rhodium (Rh)
0-40 at %



Technetium (Tc)
0-30 at %



Iridium (Ir)
0-15 at %



Cobalt (Co)
0-60 at %










According to an embodiment, seed layer 206 comprises a magnetic (NiFe)100-x(X)x alloy with X being selected from a group consisting of Ruthenium (Ru), Osmium (Os), Platinum (Pt), Rhenium (Re), Rhodium (Rh), Technetium (Tc), Iridium (Ir), and Cobalt (Co). According to a related embodiment, seed layer 206 comprises a magnetic (NiFe)100-x(X)x alloy with X being selected from a group consisting of Ruthenium (x=0-35 at %), Osmium (x=0-10 at %), Platinum (x=0-30 at %), Rhenium (x=0-15 at %), Rhodium (x=0-40 at %), Technetium (x=0-30 at %), Iridium (x=0-15 at %), and Cobalt (x=0-60 at %).


For a non-limiting example, seed layer material of the compositions Ni-3W-1Al-30Fe-(x at %)Ru, where x=3 and 6, were evaluated. According to published phase diagrams of the Ni—Ru binary alloy, pure Ni has a melting point (m.p.) of 1455° C., whereas pure Ru has a m.p. of 2334° C., and the solid solubility of Ru in Ni is around 5 at %. The published phase diagram is for a state of thermodynamic equilibrium, however, during sputtering of a single phase NiRu-based thin film alloy, the phases are typically meta-stable, i.e., not in thermodynamic equilibrium, therefore higher solubility of Ru in Ni is achievable. Therefore, the foregoing “up to approximately x at %” (˜x atomic percentage) of the different elements listed in Table 1 are deemed producible using current state-of-the-art sputtering tools and processes by controlling the sputter parameters accordingly, for example, the temperature and pressure. During sputtering, an alloy of Ni & Ru in the limit of solid solubility can be expected to form a precipitate with (i) a higher melting point compared to pure Ni precipitate, and (ii) a secondary phase structure that is insoluble in Ni and forms a grain boundary phase. Both properties of the precipitate can help to control the grain growth and grain segregation processes.


Thus, and according to an embodiment, seed layer 206 comprises a NiFeRu-based seed layer. According to a related embodiment, seed layer 206 comprises a NiFeRu-based seed layer comprising around 1-20 at % Ru. As discussed and as presented in Table 1, a NiFeRu-based alloy having a range up to 35 at % Ru is deemed producible, however, a range considered practical yet effective in a high-volume production environment is approximately 1-20 at % Ru.


As discussed in reference to FIG. 2, one or more seed layer 206 is fabricated over the soft magnetic underlayer (AFC-SUL) 204 laminate. According to an embodiment, the NiFeX-based magnetic seed layer is formed in direct contact with the soft magnetic underlayer.


Magnetic Grain Size, Uniformity, Segregation

To repeat, the grain growth process is a mobility driven event, thereby determined by the diffusion coefficient of the precipitate, which itself depends inversely on the melting point of the precipitate. In order to control the mobility of the precipitate, it is deemed beneficial to alloy the Ni seed material with elements that are both soluble in Ni and have higher melting points compared to Ni, as the precipitates formed by sputtering this alloy seed material (e.g., NiX) can be expected to have higher melting points compared to the original seed (e.g., Ni), and consequently lower diffusion coefficients, as well as a secondary phase structure that is insoluble in Ni and forms a grain boundary phase. These characteristics help to control the grain growth and grain segregation processes, thereby leading to tighter grain size distributions and intra-granular segregation in the seed, and consequently in the magnetic recording layer(s).



FIG. 3 is a plan view illustrating grains of magnetic recording media, according to an embodiment. FIG. 3 shows plan view images of the grains from magnetic recording medium taken using a Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM), from (a) medium using a Ni-3W-1Al-30Fe seed and (b) from medium using a Ni-3W-1Al-30Fe-6Ru seed, according to an embodiment. The average center-to-center distance between grains in the case of the (a) seed was 8.5±1.7 nm and in the case of the (b) seed the average center-to-center distance between grains was 7.9±1.5 nm. The grain center-to-center dispersion was 20.6% in the case of the (a) seed, and was about 19.4% in the case of the (b) seed. Thus, when the Ni-3W-1Al-30Fe-6Ru seed was introduced, not only did the grain center-to-center distance shrink, but the dispersion also became smaller.



FIG. 4 is a histogram graph illustrating grain center-to-center distribution of the magnetic recording media of FIG. 3, according to an embodiment. This histogram points to the conclusion that the medium on the Ni-3W-1Al-30Fe-6Ru seed (image (b) of FIG. 3) has few large grains (e.g., >9 nm in center-to-center distance) compared to the medium on the Ni-3W-1Al-30Fe seed (image (a) of FIG. 3). Resultantly, the average center-to-center distance and the dispersion were both lower for the (b) seed in comparison to the (a) seed, which highlights improvements facilitated by the NiFeRu-based seed material. A practical result illustrated by the lower average center-to-center distance and by the lower grain-to-grain center dispersion of the magnetic grains of the magnetic recording layer (e.g., magnetic recording layer 210 of FIG. 2) is that the magnetic grains are smaller (e.g., as evidenced by a lower average center-to-center distance) and more uniform in size (e.g., as evidenced by a lower grain-to-grain center dispersion) for a magnetic recording layer grown using the NiFeX-based seed material than would a magnetic recording layer grown on a NiFe-based seed layer not comprising the X element.


A comparison of the coercivity and of the demagnetization factor of the magnetic recording media of FIG. 3(a) and FIG. 3(b), for a single magnetic layer configuration, showed that the medium using the Ni-3W-1Al-30Fe-6Ru seed layer (image (b) of FIG. 3) demonstrated lower coercivities over a range of thicknesses, compared to medium using Ni-3W-1Al-30Fe seed layer (image (a) of FIG. 3). Further, for seed layer thicknesses>˜4 nm, the demagnetization factor is larger for the medium using the Ni-3W-1Al-30Fe-6Ru seed layer. Therefore, while the coercivities may be lower when using the Ni-3W-1Al-30Fe-6Ru seed layer, the inter-granular exchange coupling interactions are also reduced favorably (i.e., inter-granular segregation improved), which leads to an improvement in SNR performance.


A comparison of the coercivity and of the thermal stability factor of the magnetic recording media of FIG. 3(a) and FIG. 3(b), for a multiple magnetic layer stack (exchange-coupled composite media design), showed that the medium using the Ni-3W-1Al-30Fe-6Ru seed layer (image (b) of FIG. 3) demonstrated lower coercivities and thermal stability factors over a range of thicknesses, compared to medium using Ni-3W-1Al-30Fe seed layer (image (a) of FIG. 3). Therefore, this is an indication that the grains of the magnetic recording layer may be smaller when using the Ni-3W-1Al-30Fe-6Ru seed.


Embodiments described herein may be directed to a PMR media design utilizing a NiFeX-based magnetic seed layer for reduced noise and likewise improved SNR. In various embodiments, the introduction of a suitable seed layer results in a desirable decrease in the magnetic grain size and an increase in grain size uniformity, and more uniform inter-granular segregation, and a corresponding increase in the SNR for the PMR media. However, embodiments are not limited to PMR technology only, as embodiments may be implemented in the context of other types of magnetic recording media.


Method of Manufacturing Recording Media


FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating a method of manufacturing a recording medium, according to an embodiment. Embodiments may be implemented in a PMR hard disk drive including such PMR media. Fabrication of the media stack described herein may be through implementation of a sputtering process using a sputtering system using a NiX sputtering target for the seed layer, for example.


At block 502, at least one antiferromagnetically exchange coupled magnetically soft underlayer laminate is formed over a substrate. For example, AFC-SUL 204 (FIG. 2) is formed over substrate 202 (FIG. 2).


At block 504, a NiFeX-based magnetic seed layer is formed over the soft underlayer, where X comprises an element having a higher melting point than Ni. For example, a NiFeX-based seed layer 206 (FIG. 2) is formed over the AFC-SUL 204 (FIG. 2). According to an embodiment, a NiFeRu-based seed layer is formed over the AFC-SUL. According to a related embodiment, the NiFeRu-based seed layer formed at block 504 comprises a NiFeRu-based seed layer comprising around 1-20 at % Ru. As discussed and as presented in Table 1, a NiFeRu-based alloy having a range up to 35 at % Ru is deemed producible, however, a range considered practical yet effective in a high-volume production environment is approximately 1-20 at % Ru.


According to an embodiment, the NiFeX-based seed layer formed at block 504 comprises a magnetic (NiFe)100-x(X)x alloy with X being selected from a group consisting of Ruthenium (Ru), Osmium (Os), Platinum (Pt), Rhenium (Re), Rhodium (Rh), Technetium (Tc), Iridium (Ir), and Cobalt (Co). According to a related embodiment, the NiFeX-based seed layer formed at block 504 comprises a magnetic (NiFe)100-x(X)x alloy with X being selected from a group consisting of Ruthenium (x=0-35 at %), Osmium (x=0-10 at %), Platinum (x=0-30 at %), Rhenium (x=0-15 at %), Rhodium (x=0-40 at %), Technetium (x=0-30 at %), Iridium (x=0-15 at %), and Cobalt (x=0-60 at %).


At block 506, at least one magnetic recording layer is formed over the NiFeX-based magnetic seed layer. For example, a magnetic recording layer 208 (FIG. 2) stack is formed over the NiFeX-based seed layer 206 (FIG. 2).


The deposition of the various layers referenced in FIG. 5 can be performed using a variety of deposition sub-processes, for non-limiting examples, physical vapor deposition (PVD), sputter deposition and ion beam deposition, and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) including plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD), low pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD) and atomic layer chemical vapor deposition (ALCVD). Furthermore, other suitable deposition techniques known in the art may also be used.


Extensions and Alternatives

In the foregoing description, embodiments of the invention have been described with reference to numerous specific details that may vary from implementation to implementation. Therefore, various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the embodiments. Thus, the sole and exclusive indicator of what is the invention, and is intended by the applicants to be the invention, is the set of claims that issue from this application, in the specific form in which such claims issue, including any subsequent correction. Any definitions expressly set forth herein for terms contained in such claims shall govern the meaning of such terms as used in the claims. Hence, no limitation, element, property, feature, advantage or attribute that is not expressly recited in a claim should limit the scope of such claim in any way. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.


In addition, in this description certain process steps may be set forth in a particular order, and alphabetic and alphanumeric labels may be used to identify certain steps. Unless specifically stated in the description, embodiments are not necessarily limited to any particular order of carrying out such steps. In particular, the labels are used merely for convenient identification of steps, and are not intended to specify or require a particular order of carrying out such steps.

Claims
  • 1. A recording medium comprising: a substrate;at least one soft magnetic underlayer;a NiWAlFeX-based magnetic seed layer over said soft magnetic underlayer; andat least one magnetic recording layer over said NiWAlFeX-based magnetic seed layer;wherein X comprises an element that is soluble in Ni and has a higher melting point than Ni and is from a group consisting of osmium (Os), platinum (Pt), rhenium (Re), rhodium (Rh), technetium (Tc), and iridium (Ir).
  • 2. The recording medium of claim 1, wherein X comprises an element from a group consisting of osmium (1-10 at %), platinum (1-30 at %), rhenium (1-15 at %), rhodium (1-40 at %), technetium (1-30 at %), and iridium (1-15 at %).
  • 3. The recording medium of claim 1, wherein said NiWAlFeX-based magnetic seed layer is formed in direct contact with said soft magnetic underlayer.
  • 4. The recording medium of claim 1, wherein said soft magnetic underlayer is an antiferromagnetically exchange coupled soft magnetic underlayer laminate.
  • 5. The recording medium of claim 1, wherein X is selected such that NiX has a lower diffusion coefficient in WAlFe than the diffusion coefficient of Ni in WAlFe.
  • 6. The recording medium of claim 1, wherein said magnetic recording layer comprises smaller magnetic grains than would a magnetic recording layer grown on a NiFe-based seed layer not comprising X.
  • 7. The recording medium of claim 1, wherein said magnetic recording layer comprises magnetic grains more uniform in size than would a magnetic recording layer grown on a NiFe-based seed layer not comprising X.
  • 8. The recording medium of claim 1, wherein said magnetic recording layer comprises more uniform magnetic grain segregation than would a magnetic recording layer grown on a NiFe-based seed layer not comprising X.
  • 9. A data storage device comprising: a magnetic recording disk medium rotatably mounted on a spindle, said disk medium comprising: a substrate,at least one soft magnetic underlayer,a NiWAlFeX-based magnetic seed layer over said soft magnetic underlayer, andat least one magnetic recording layer over said NiWAlFeX-based magnetic seed layer,wherein X comprises an element that is soluble in Ni and has a higher melting point than Ni and is from a group consisting of osmium (Os), platinum (Pt), rhenium (Re), rhodium (Rh), technetium (Tc), and iridium (Ir);a head slider comprising a magnetic write head configured to write to said disk medium; anda voice coil motor configured to move said head slider to access portions of said disk medium.
  • 10. The data storage device of claim 9, wherein X comprises an element from a group consisting of osmium (1-10 at %), platinum (1-30 at %), rhenium (1-15 at %), rhodium (1-40 at %), technetium (1-30 at %), and iridium (1-15 at %).
  • 11. The data storage device of claim 9, wherein X is selected such that NiX has a lower diffusion coefficient in WalFe than the diffusion coefficient of Ni in WAlFe.
  • 12. The data storage device of claim 9, wherein said magnetic recording layer of said disk medium comprises smaller magnetic grains than would a magnetic recording layer grown on a NiFe-based seed layer not comprising X.
  • 13. The data storage device of claim 9, wherein said magnetic recording layer of said disk medium comprises magnetic grains more uniform in size than would a magnetic recording layer grown on a NiFe-based seed layer not comprising X.
  • 14. The data storage device of claim 9, wherein said magnetic recording layer of said disk medium comprises more uniform magnetic grain segregation than would a magnetic recording layer grown on a NiFe-based seed layer not comprising X.
  • 15. A method of manufacturing a recording medium, the method comprising: forming at least one antiferromagnetically exchange coupled magnetically soft underlayer laminate over a substrate;forming a NiWAlFeX-based magnetic seed layer over said at least one magnetically soft underlayer, wherein X comprises an element that has a higher melting point than Ni and is from a group consisting of osmium (Os), platinum (Pt), rhenium (Re), rhodium (Rh), technetium (Tc), and iridium (Ir); andforming at least one magnetic recording layer over said NiWAlFeX-based magnetic seed layer.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein forming said NiWAlFeX-based magnetic seed layer includes forming a NiWAlFeX-based magnetic seed layer wherein X comprises an element from a group consisting of osmium (1-10 at %), platinum (1-30 at %), rhenium (1-15 at %), rhodium (1-40 at %), technetium (1-30 at %), and iridium (1-15 at %).
  • 17. A recording medium comprising: a substrate;at least one soft magnetic underlayer;a NiWAlFeRu-based magnetic seed layer over said soft magnetic underlayer and comprising 15-20 atomic percent (at %) Ru; andat least one magnetic recording layer over said NiWAlFeRu-based magnetic seed layer.
US Referenced Citations (460)
Number Name Date Kind
5034286 Nasu et al. Jul 1991 A
5326637 Nasu et al. Jul 1994 A
5392290 Brown et al. Feb 1995 A
5603766 Visokay et al. Feb 1997 A
5820963 Lu et al. Oct 1998 A
5824409 Sellmyer et al. Oct 1998 A
5840394 Ranjan et al. Nov 1998 A
6007623 Thiele et al. Dec 1999 A
6013161 Chen et al. Jan 2000 A
6063248 Bourez et al. May 2000 A
6068891 O'Dell et al. May 2000 A
6086730 Liu et al. Jul 2000 A
6086974 Thiele et al. Jul 2000 A
6099981 Nishimori Aug 2000 A
6103404 Ross et al. Aug 2000 A
6117499 Wong et al. Sep 2000 A
6136403 Prabhakara et al. Oct 2000 A
6139907 Sellmyer et al. Oct 2000 A
6143375 Ross et al. Nov 2000 A
6145849 Bae et al. Nov 2000 A
6146737 Malhotra et al. Nov 2000 A
6149696 Jia Nov 2000 A
6150015 Bertero et al. Nov 2000 A
6156404 Ross et al. Dec 2000 A
6159076 Sun et al. Dec 2000 A
6164118 Suzuki et al. Dec 2000 A
6183606 Kuo et al. Feb 2001 B1
6200441 Gornicki et al. Mar 2001 B1
6204995 Hokkyo et al. Mar 2001 B1
6206765 Sanders et al. Mar 2001 B1
6210819 Lal et al. Apr 2001 B1
6216709 Fung et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221119 Homola Apr 2001 B1
6248395 Homola et al. Jun 2001 B1
6261681 Suekane et al. Jul 2001 B1
6270885 Hokkyo et al. Aug 2001 B1
6274063 Li et al. Aug 2001 B1
6283838 Blake et al. Sep 2001 B1
6287429 Moroishi et al. Sep 2001 B1
6290573 Suzuki Sep 2001 B1
6299947 Suzuki et al. Oct 2001 B1
6303217 Malhotra et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309765 Suekane et al. Oct 2001 B1
6358636 Yang et al. Mar 2002 B1
6362452 Suzuki et al. Mar 2002 B1
6363599 Bajorek Apr 2002 B1
6365012 Sato et al. Apr 2002 B1
6381090 Suzuki et al. Apr 2002 B1
6381092 Suzuki Apr 2002 B1
6387483 Hokkyo et al. May 2002 B1
6391213 Homola May 2002 B1
6395349 Salamon May 2002 B1
6403919 Salamon Jun 2002 B1
6406600 Takashima Jun 2002 B1
6408677 Suzuki Jun 2002 B1
6410133 Kirino et al. Jun 2002 B1
6426157 Hokkyo et al. Jul 2002 B1
6429984 Alex Aug 2002 B1
6468670 Ikeda et al. Oct 2002 B1
6472047 Kirino et al. Oct 2002 B1
6482330 Bajorek Nov 2002 B1
6482505 Bertero et al. Nov 2002 B1
6495252 Richter et al. Dec 2002 B1
6500567 Bertero et al. Dec 2002 B1
6528124 Nguyen Mar 2003 B1
6534206 Kirino et al. Mar 2003 B1
6548821 Treves et al. Apr 2003 B1
6552871 Suzuki et al. Apr 2003 B2
6565719 Lairson et al. May 2003 B1
6566674 Treves et al. May 2003 B1
6571806 Rosano et al. Jun 2003 B2
6599646 Suzuki et al. Jul 2003 B2
6602620 Kikitsu et al. Aug 2003 B1
6628466 Alex Sep 2003 B2
6664503 Hsieh et al. Dec 2003 B1
6670055 Tomiyasu et al. Dec 2003 B2
6682807 Lairson et al. Jan 2004 B2
6683754 Suzuki et al. Jan 2004 B2
6716516 Futamoto et al. Apr 2004 B2
6730420 Bertero et al. May 2004 B1
6730421 Kirino et al. May 2004 B1
6743528 Suekane et al. Jun 2004 B2
6749955 Kirino et al. Jun 2004 B2
6759138 Tomiyasu et al. Jul 2004 B2
6778353 Harper Aug 2004 B1
6795274 Hsieh et al. Sep 2004 B1
6797137 Sandlin et al. Sep 2004 B2
6811890 Zhou et al. Nov 2004 B1
6824817 Araki et al. Nov 2004 B2
6830824 Kikitsu et al. Dec 2004 B2
6834026 Fullerton et al. Dec 2004 B2
6846583 Inaba et al. Jan 2005 B2
6855232 Jairson et al. Feb 2005 B2
6857937 Bajorek Feb 2005 B2
6866948 Koda et al. Mar 2005 B2
6881495 Kikitsu et al. Apr 2005 B2
6881496 Okamoto Apr 2005 B2
6881497 Coffey et al. Apr 2005 B2
6881503 Lu et al. Apr 2005 B2
6893748 Bertero et al. May 2005 B2
6899959 Bertero et al. May 2005 B2
6916558 Umezawa et al. Jul 2005 B2
6939120 Harper Sep 2005 B1
6946191 Morikawa et al. Sep 2005 B2
6967798 Homola et al. Nov 2005 B2
6972135 Homola Dec 2005 B2
7004827 Suzuki et al. Feb 2006 B1
7006323 Suzuki Feb 2006 B1
7016154 Nishihira Mar 2006 B2
7019924 McNeil et al. Mar 2006 B2
7033686 Hirayama et al. Apr 2006 B2
7045215 Shimokawa May 2006 B2
7070870 Bertero et al. Jul 2006 B2
7081309 Do et al. Jul 2006 B2
7090934 Hokkyo et al. Aug 2006 B2
7099112 Harper Aug 2006 B1
7105241 Shimokawa et al. Sep 2006 B2
7119990 Bajorek et al. Oct 2006 B2
7141316 Iwasaki et al. Nov 2006 B2
7147790 Wachenschwanz et al. Dec 2006 B2
7161753 Wachenschwanz et al. Jan 2007 B2
7166319 Ishiyama Jan 2007 B2
7166374 Suekane et al. Jan 2007 B2
7169487 Kawai et al. Jan 2007 B2
7174775 Ishiyama Feb 2007 B2
7179549 Malhotra et al. Feb 2007 B2
7184139 Treves et al. Feb 2007 B2
7195827 Maeda et al. Mar 2007 B2
7196860 Alex Mar 2007 B2
7199977 Suzuki et al. Apr 2007 B2
7208236 Morikawa et al. Apr 2007 B2
7220500 Tomiyasu et al. May 2007 B1
7226674 Koda et al. Jun 2007 B2
7229266 Harper Jun 2007 B2
7229588 Sandlin et al. Jun 2007 B2
7239970 Treves et al. Jul 2007 B2
7241517 Acharya et al. Jul 2007 B2
7241520 Shin et al. Jul 2007 B2
7252897 Shimokawa et al. Aug 2007 B2
7277254 Shimokawa et al. Oct 2007 B2
7281920 Homola et al. Oct 2007 B2
7282278 Nolan Oct 2007 B1
7286324 Yasui et al. Oct 2007 B2
7289298 Maeda et al. Oct 2007 B2
7292329 Treves et al. Nov 2007 B2
7301726 Suzuki Nov 2007 B1
7302148 Treves et al. Nov 2007 B2
7305119 Treves et al. Dec 2007 B2
7314404 Singh et al. Jan 2008 B2
7320584 Harper et al. Jan 2008 B1
RE40100 Zhang Feb 2008 E
7329114 Harper et al. Feb 2008 B2
7375362 Treves et al. May 2008 B2
7384699 Nolan et al. Jun 2008 B2
7420886 Tomiyasu et al. Sep 2008 B2
7425377 Fullerton et al. Sep 2008 B2
7425719 Treves et al. Sep 2008 B2
7435489 Umeda et al. Oct 2008 B2
7471484 Wachenschwanz et al. Dec 2008 B2
7482071 Do et al. Jan 2009 B2
7488545 Fullerton et al. Feb 2009 B2
7498062 Calcaterra et al. Mar 2009 B2
7498092 Berger et al. Mar 2009 B2
7531485 Hara et al. May 2009 B2
7537846 Ishiyama et al. May 2009 B2
7549209 Wachenschwanz et al. Jun 2009 B2
7550210 Berger et al. Jun 2009 B2
7556870 Do et al. Jul 2009 B2
7569490 Staud Aug 2009 B2
7572526 Berger et al. Aug 2009 B2
7582368 Berger et al. Sep 2009 B2
7597792 Homola et al. Oct 2009 B2
7597973 Ishiyama Oct 2009 B2
7608193 Wachenschwanz et al. Oct 2009 B2
7625643 Umeda et al. Dec 2009 B2
7632087 Homola Dec 2009 B2
7638210 Berger et al. Dec 2009 B2
7656615 Wachenschwanz et al. Feb 2010 B2
7682546 Harper Mar 2010 B2
7684152 Suzuki et al. Mar 2010 B2
7686606 Harper et al. Mar 2010 B2
7686991 Harper Mar 2010 B2
7687157 Berger et al. Mar 2010 B2
7695833 Ishiyama Apr 2010 B2
7722968 Ishiyama May 2010 B2
7733605 Suzuki et al. Jun 2010 B2
7736768 Ishiyama Jun 2010 B2
7736769 Ajan Jun 2010 B2
7755861 Li et al. Jul 2010 B1
7758732 Calcaterra et al. Jul 2010 B1
7833639 Sonobe et al. Nov 2010 B2
7833641 Tomiyasu et al. Nov 2010 B2
7846563 Berger et al. Dec 2010 B2
7910159 Jung Mar 2011 B2
7911736 Bajorek Mar 2011 B2
7924519 Lambert Apr 2011 B2
7944165 O'Dell May 2011 B1
7944643 Jiang et al. May 2011 B1
7955723 Umezawa et al. Jun 2011 B2
7983003 Sonobe et al. Jul 2011 B2
7989096 Berger et al. Aug 2011 B2
7993497 Moroishi et al. Aug 2011 B2
7993765 Kim et al. Aug 2011 B2
7998912 Chen et al. Aug 2011 B2
8000060 Zhang et al. Aug 2011 B2
8002901 Chen et al. Aug 2011 B1
8003237 Sonobe et al. Aug 2011 B2
8012920 Shimokawa Sep 2011 B2
8038863 Homola Oct 2011 B2
8057926 Ayama et al. Nov 2011 B2
8062778 Suzuki et al. Nov 2011 B2
8064156 Suzuki et al. Nov 2011 B1
8076013 Sonobe et al. Dec 2011 B2
8089829 Akagi et al. Jan 2012 B2
8092931 Ishiyama et al. Jan 2012 B2
8100685 Harper et al. Jan 2012 B1
8101054 Chen et al. Jan 2012 B2
8125723 Nichols et al. Feb 2012 B1
8125724 Nichols et al. Feb 2012 B1
8137517 Bourez Mar 2012 B1
8142916 Umezawa et al. Mar 2012 B2
8163093 Chen et al. Apr 2012 B1
8171949 Lund et al. May 2012 B1
8173282 Sun et al. May 2012 B1
8178480 Hamakubo et al. May 2012 B2
8206789 Suzuki Jun 2012 B2
8218260 Iamratanakul et al. Jul 2012 B2
8241766 Lu et al. Aug 2012 B2
8247095 Champion et al. Aug 2012 B2
8257783 Suzuki et al. Sep 2012 B2
8298609 Liew et al. Oct 2012 B1
8298689 Sonobe et al. Oct 2012 B2
8309239 Umezawa et al. Nov 2012 B2
8316668 Chan et al. Nov 2012 B1
8329321 Takenoiri et al. Dec 2012 B2
8331056 O'Dell Dec 2012 B2
8354618 Chen et al. Jan 2013 B1
8367228 Sonobe et al. Feb 2013 B2
8383209 Ayama Feb 2013 B2
8390956 Tonooka et al. Mar 2013 B2
8394243 Jung et al. Mar 2013 B1
8397751 Chan et al. Mar 2013 B1
8399809 Bourez Mar 2013 B1
8402638 Treves et al. Mar 2013 B1
8404056 Chen et al. Mar 2013 B1
8404369 Ruffini et al. Mar 2013 B2
8404370 Sato et al. Mar 2013 B2
8406918 Tan et al. Mar 2013 B2
8414966 Yasumori et al. Apr 2013 B2
8425975 Ishiyama Apr 2013 B2
8431257 Kim et al. Apr 2013 B2
8431258 Onoue et al. Apr 2013 B2
8453315 Kajiwara et al. Jun 2013 B2
8488276 Jung et al. Jul 2013 B1
8491800 Dorsey Jul 2013 B1
8492009 Homola et al. Jul 2013 B1
8492011 Itoh et al. Jul 2013 B2
8496466 Treves et al. Jul 2013 B1
8517364 Crumley et al. Aug 2013 B1
8517657 Chen et al. Aug 2013 B2
8524052 Tan et al. Sep 2013 B1
8530065 Chernyshov et al. Sep 2013 B1
8546000 Umezawa Oct 2013 B2
8551253 Na'im et al. Oct 2013 B2
8551627 Shimada et al. Oct 2013 B2
8556566 Suzuki et al. Oct 2013 B1
8559131 Masuda et al. Oct 2013 B2
8562748 Chen et al. Oct 2013 B1
8565050 Bertero et al. Oct 2013 B1
8570844 Yuan et al. Oct 2013 B1
8580410 Onoue Nov 2013 B2
8584687 Chen et al. Nov 2013 B1
8591709 Lim et al. Nov 2013 B1
8592060 Tamai et al. Nov 2013 B2
8592061 Onoue et al. Nov 2013 B2
8596287 Chen et al. Dec 2013 B1
8597723 Jung et al. Dec 2013 B1
8603649 Onoue Dec 2013 B2
8603650 Sonobe et al. Dec 2013 B2
8605388 Yasumori et al. Dec 2013 B2
8605555 Chernyshov et al. Dec 2013 B1
8608147 Yap et al. Dec 2013 B1
8609263 Chernyshov et al. Dec 2013 B1
8619381 Moser et al. Dec 2013 B2
8623528 Umezawa et al. Jan 2014 B2
8623529 Suzuki Jan 2014 B2
8634155 Yasumori et al. Jan 2014 B2
8658003 Bourez Feb 2014 B1
8658292 Mallary et al. Feb 2014 B1
8665541 Saito Mar 2014 B2
8668953 Buechel-Rimmel Mar 2014 B1
8674327 Poon et al. Mar 2014 B1
8685214 Moh et al. Apr 2014 B1
8685547 Bian et al. Apr 2014 B2
8696404 Sun et al. Apr 2014 B2
8696874 Wang et al. Apr 2014 B2
8711499 Desai et al. Apr 2014 B1
8743666 Bertero et al. Jun 2014 B1
8758912 Srinivasan et al. Jun 2014 B2
8787124 Chernyshov et al. Jul 2014 B1
8787130 Yuan et al. Jul 2014 B1
8791391 Bourez Jul 2014 B2
8795765 Koike et al. Aug 2014 B2
8795790 Sonobe et al. Aug 2014 B2
8795857 Ayama et al. Aug 2014 B2
8800322 Chan et al. Aug 2014 B1
8811129 Yuan et al. Aug 2014 B1
8817410 Moser et al. Aug 2014 B1
20020041980 Suzuki et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020060883 Suzuki May 2002 A1
20020110707 Kirino et al. Aug 2002 A1
20030022024 Wachenschwanz Jan 2003 A1
20030054202 Arisaka et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030108721 Fullerton et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030134154 Kirino et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030162041 Nemoto et al. Aug 2003 A1
20040013910 Acharya et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040022387 Weikle Feb 2004 A1
20040047758 Olson et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040110035 Shin et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040132301 Harper et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040166376 Kirino et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040185307 Oikawa et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040191578 Chen et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040202793 Harper et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040202865 Homola et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040209123 Bajorek et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040209470 Bajorek Oct 2004 A1
20050036223 Wachenschwanz et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050100764 Ranjan et al. May 2005 A1
20050106422 Lu et al. May 2005 A1
20050142990 Homola Jun 2005 A1
20050150862 Harper et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050151282 Harper et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050151283 Bajorek et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050151300 Harper et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050155554 Saito Jul 2005 A1
20050167867 Bajorek et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050202286 Chen et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050214520 Oikawa et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050214588 Iwasaki et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050227120 Ichihara et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050233174 Munteanu et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050255336 Mukai Nov 2005 A1
20050263401 Olsen et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060024432 Nolan et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060090998 Honda et al. May 2006 A1
20060147758 Jung et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060166039 Berger et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060177704 Berger et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060181697 Treves et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060188743 Seki et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060199044 Thangaraj et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060204791 Sakawaki et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060207890 Staud Sep 2006 A1
20060222902 Mukai Oct 2006 A1
20060286414 Racine et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060289294 Racine et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070009654 Watanabe et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070026262 Maeda Feb 2007 A1
20070031705 Hattori et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070070549 Suzuki et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070072011 Li et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070172706 Chen Jul 2007 A1
20070189916 Zhang Aug 2007 A1
20070231609 Ajan et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070243418 Fullerton et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070245909 Homola Oct 2007 A1
20070292720 Suess Dec 2007 A1
20080075845 Sonobe et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080093760 Harper et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080131735 Das et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080144213 Berger et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080180843 Zhang et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080198512 Mukai Aug 2008 A1
20080206601 Mukai Aug 2008 A1
20080292907 Berger et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080299416 Yoon et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080311430 Chen et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090110961 Shibata et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090117408 Umezawa et al. May 2009 A1
20090130346 Osawa et al. May 2009 A1
20090135527 Lee et al. May 2009 A1
20090136784 Suzuki et al. May 2009 A1
20090169922 Ishiyama Jul 2009 A1
20090191331 Umezawa et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090202866 Kim et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090257147 Ajan Oct 2009 A1
20090290256 Berger et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090292720 De Peuter et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090296278 Inamura et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090311557 Onoue et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100062286 Suess Mar 2010 A1
20100128391 Berger et al. May 2010 A1
20100140727 Shimatsu et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100143752 Ishibashi et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100149676 Khizorev et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100190035 Sonobe et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100196619 Ishiyama Aug 2010 A1
20100196740 Ayama et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100209601 Shimokawa et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100209737 Bian et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100215992 Horikawa et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100232065 Suzuki et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100247960 Qiu et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100247962 Sasaki Sep 2010 A1
20100247965 Onoue Sep 2010 A1
20100261039 Itoh et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100279151 Sakamoto et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100300884 Homola et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100304186 Shimokawa Dec 2010 A1
20110003175 Valcu et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110097603 Onoue Apr 2011 A1
20110097604 Onoue Apr 2011 A1
20110122525 Nemoto et al. May 2011 A1
20110171495 Tachibana et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110206947 Tachibana et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110212346 Onoue et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110223446 Onoue et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110244119 Umezawa et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110299194 Aniya et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110311841 Saito et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120026626 Nolan et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120069466 Okamoto et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120070692 Sato et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120077060 Ozawa Mar 2012 A1
20120127599 Shimokawa et al. May 2012 A1
20120127601 Suzuki et al. May 2012 A1
20120129009 Sato et al. May 2012 A1
20120140359 Tachibana Jun 2012 A1
20120141833 Umezawa et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120141835 Sakamoto Jun 2012 A1
20120148875 Hamakubo et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120156523 Seki et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120164488 Shin et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120170152 Sonobe et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120171369 Koike et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120175243 Fukuura et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120189872 Umezawa et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120196049 Azuma et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120207919 Sakamoto et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120219827 Kim et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120225217 Itoh et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120251842 Yuan et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120251846 Desai et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120276417 Shimokawa et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120308722 Suzuki et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130040167 Alagarsamy et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130071694 Srinivasan et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130165029 Sun et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130175252 Bourez Jul 2013 A1
20130216865 Yasumori et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130230647 Onoue et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130314815 Yuan et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140011054 Suzuki Jan 2014 A1
20140044992 Onoue Feb 2014 A1
20140050843 Yi et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140151360 Gregory et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140234666 Knigge et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140300994 Hong et al. Oct 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
2005353256 Dec 2005 JP
2007-073136 Mar 2007 JP
2008030199 Mar 2008 WO
2009044794 Apr 2009 WO
2010038448 Aug 2010 WO
WO2012070464 May 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (44)
Entry
English Machine Translation of JP 2007-073136, Mar. 2007, Japan, pp. 1-22.
English machine translation of Japanese Publication No. 08-030951, Japan, Feb. 2, 1996, 8 pages.
Ariake, J., et al., “Co—Pt—TiO2 Composite Film for Perpendicular Magnetic Recording Medium,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 41 (10), Oct. 2005. pp. 3142-3144.
Arnett, P.C., et al.,“TMR and Squeeze at Gigabit Areal Densities,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 28 (4), Jul. 1992, pp. 1-4.
Berger, A., et al., “Improved media performance in optimally coupled exchange spring layer media,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 93 (122502), Sep. 22, 2008, pp. 1-3.
Chen, J.S., et al., “High Coercivity L 10 FePt Films with Perpendicular Anistropy Deposited on Glass Substrate at Reduced Temperature,” Applied Physics Letters 90 (042508), Jan. 25, 2007, pp. 1-3.
Choe, G., et al., “Magnetic and Recording Characteristics of Reactively Sputtered CoPtCr—(Si—O, Ti—O, and Cr—O) Perpendicular Media,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 42 (10), Oct. 2006, pp. 2327-2329.
Choe, G., et al., “Control of Exchange Coupling Between Granular Oxide and Highly Exchange Coupled Cap Layers and the Effect on Perpendicular Magnetic Switching and Recording Characteristics,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 45 (6), Jun. 2009, pp. 2694-2700.
Choe, G., et al., “Writeability Enhancement in Perpendicular Magnetic Multilayered Oxide Media for High Area Density Recording,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 47 (1), Jan. 2011, pp. 55-62.
Hashimoto, A.,, et al., “Improvement of Magnetic Properties of Granular Perpendicular Recording Media by Using a FCC Nonmagnetic Intermediate Layer With Stacking Faults,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 89 (262508), Dec. 28, 2006, pp. 1-3.
Hashimoto, A., et al., “Pseudo-HCP Nonmagnetic Intermediate Layer for Granular Media with High Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropy,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 41 (012002), 2008, pp. 1-4.
Hu, J.F., et al., “Exchange Coupling Assisted FePtC Perpendicular Recording Media,” Applied Physics Letters 93 (072504), Aug. 19, 2008, pp. 1-3.
Jung, H.S., et al., “Effect of Oxygen Incorporation on Microstructure and Media Performance in CoCrPt—SiO2 Perpendicular Recording Media,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 43 (2), Feb. 2007, pp. 615-620.
Jung, H.S., et al., “CoCrPtO-Based Granular Composite Perpendicular Recording Media,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 43 (6), Jun. 2007, pp. 2088-2090.
Jung, H.S., et al., “Origin of Incoherent Magnetic Switching Behavior in CoCrPt—SiO2 Perpendicular Magnetic Recording Media,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 91 (212502), Jul. 2007, pp. 1-3.
Jung, H.S., et al., “Effect of magnetic softness in a soft layer on media properties of hard/soft stacked composite perpendicular media,” Journal of Applied Physics 105 (07B740), Apr. 9, 2009, pp. 1-3.
Kirby, B.J., et al., “Vertically Graded Anistropy in Co/Pd Multilayers,” Physics Department, University of California, Davis, CA, pp. 1-16.
Kwon, U., et al., “Ru/Ru-Oxide Interlayers for CoCrPtO Perpendicular Recording Media,”IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 41 (10), Oct. 2005, pp. 3193-3195.
MSE 201, Introduction to Materials Science, Diffusion, Callister, Ch. 5, University of Tennessee, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, pp. 1-26.
Nakagawa, H., et al., “Effects of thin carbon intermediate layer on magnetic and structural properties of perpendicular recording media,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 235, 2001, pp. 73-77.
Nolan, T., et al., “Microstructure and Exchange Coupling of Segregated Oxide Perpendicular Recording Media,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 43 (2), Feb. 2007, pp. 639-644.
Nolan, T., et al., “Effect of Composite Designs on Writability and Thermal Stability of Perpendicular Recording Media,” IEEE Trans. on Magnetics, vol. 47 (1), Jan. 2011, pp. 63-68.
Park, S.H., et al., “Effect of MgO and Al203 on the Microstructure and Magnetic Properties of CoCrPt-oxide Perpendicular Recording Media,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 97 (10), 2005, pp. 106-1-106-3.
Piramanayagam, S.N., et al., “Advanced Perpendicular Recording Media Structure With a Magnetic Intermediate Layer,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 88 (092501), Feb. 27, 2006, pp. 1-3.
Rauch, G.C., et al., “The Effect of Cluster Size on Media Noise in Co—Ni—P Thin Films,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 28 (5), Sep. 1992, pp. 3105-3107.
Richter, H.J., “The Physics of Perpendicular Records,” Seagate Technology, Fremont, California, Dec. 2006, 22 pp.
Sonobe, Y., et al., “Thermally Stable CGC Perpendicular Recording Media With PT-Rich CoPtCR and Thin PT Layers,” IEEE Trans. on Magn., vol. 38 (5), Sep. 2002, pp. 2006-2011.
Suess, D., et al., “Optimization of Exchange Spring Perpendicular Recording Media,” IEEE Trans. on Magn., vol. 41 (10), Oct. 2005, pp. 3166-3168.
Suess, D., et al., “Concepts of Magnetic 3D and Multilayer Recording,” Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria and The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, pp. 1-34.
Suess, D., et al., “Optimizing Graded Perpendicular Media,” University of California, Davis, CA, pp. 1-14.
Victora, R.H., et al., “Composite Media for Perpendicular Magnetic Recording,” IEEE Trans. on Magn., vol. 41 (2), Feb. 2005, pp. 537-542.
Victora, R.H., et al., “Exchange Coupled Composite Media,” IEEE, Conference-Related Paper, Aug. 15, 2007, pp. 1-9.
Wang, J.P., et al., “Exchange Coupled Composite Media for Perpendiculat Magnetic Recording,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 41 (10), Oct. 2005, pp. 3181-3186.
Wierman, K. W., et al., “RuxCr1—x/Ta Underlayer for Co-alloy Perpendicular Magnetic Recording,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 91 (10), May 15, 2002, pp. 8031-8033.
Yuan, H., et al., “Ru+Oxide Interlayer for Perpendicular Magnetic Recording Media,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 103 (07F513), Jan. 30, 2008, pp. 1-3.
Zhang, K., et al., “Effects of exchange coupling between cap layer and oxide layer on the recording performance in perpendicular media,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 105 (07B710), Mar. 9, 2009, pp. 1-3.
Zheng, M., et al., “Role of Oxygen Incorporation in Co—Cr—Pt—Si—O Perpendicular Magnetic Recording Media,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 40 (4), Jul. 2004, pp. 2498-2500.
Zhu, J., “Understand PMR Media,” Data Storage Systems Center, Carnegie Mellon University, 2009, pp. 1-12.
Mrugesh Desai, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,419, filed Mar. 31, 2011, 22 pages.
Kumar Srinivasan, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/919,282, filed Jun. 17, 2013, 24 pages.
Chengjun Sun, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/625,504, filed Nov. 24, 2009, 27 pages.
Johannes van Ek, U.S. Appl. No. 12/978,225, filed Dec. 23, 2010, 19 pages.
Hua Yuan, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/850,951, filed Aug. 5, 2010, 19 pages.
Kumar Srinivasan et al., U.S. Appl. No. 14/556,993, filed Dec. 1, 2014, 37 pages.