Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The present invention relates to papermaking machine elements which are loaded to establish a pressure profile in general and in particular to systems for measuring the pressure profile generated by the element.
In any part of a papermaking machine or paper processing machine, such as a press or calender, where a paper web is passed through a nip formed between two rolls or between a shoe and a backing roll, it is desirable to control the nip pressure in the cross machine direction, and the nip pressure profile in the machine direction. Typically it is desirable to make the nip pressure as uniform as possible in the cross machine direction so that the entire web is uniformly treated. The pressure profile in the machine direction is tailored to achieve optimal results in calendaring or dewatering, or to minimize wear. A uniform nip loading can be accomplished by employing a crowned roll; however, for a given amount of crown, only a single uniform nip loading can be achieved. Oftentimes, as the grade of paper or type of paper changes it is desirable to change the nip loading. Further, as the width of papermaking machines has been increased to as much as ten meters it has become more difficult to achieve uniform loading along the entire cross machine direction length of the nip using simple crowned rolls.
The solution is to use a deflection-compensated roll, sometimes also referred to as a crown control roll. In a deflection-compensated roll, one or more hydraulic pistons is arranged in the cross machine direction within a roll shell. The hydraulic pistons are mounted to a roll support beam. The hydraulic pistons form hydraulic loading devices which directly support the shell by applying load to the inside surface of the roll shell. Deflection-compensated rolls are typically employed in the pressing section of a papermaking machine, or in the rolls of a calender or supercalender. Deflection-compensated rolls require a high capital investment and, to gain full benefit from the investment, it is desirable to control each deflection-compensated roll as accurately as possible.
Deflection-compensated rolls can be divided into rolls with a mobile shell and rolls with a fixed shell. Both types of deflection-compensated roll have a nonrotating support beam about which the roll shell is mounted. The shell may be fixed with respect to the support beam by end bearings which may be roller bearings or hydraulic slide bearings. To close the nip between a deflection-compensated roll which is fixed with respect to a support beam, the entire support beam is moved onto loading arms to close the nip. Alternatively, the roll shell may be radially movable on the support beam with respect to the axis of the shell in the plane defined by the nip and the roll axis so that the nip may be opened and closed by such radial movement.
To determine the cross machine nip load, in a deflection-compensated roll where the roll shell is fixed with respect to the support beam, the total loading of the deflection-compensated roll may be determined by determining the loading of the support beam. Alternatively, or in addition, the loading applied to the roll shell by loads in the end bearings, and in the individual cross machine direction loading devices, can be determined, typically by measuring the hydraulic pressure supplied to the loading devices and end bearings, and calculating load based on the cross-sectional area of the pistons or bearings. Where the roll shell is mounted for radial motion, the nip loads can be determined from the total hydraulic loading of the cross machine direction loading devices.
The pressure in a nip between two rolls has been measured directly by pressure sensors which are placed in the nip as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,953,230, or by a process known as NipScan® developed by Albany International Corp. of Albany, N.Y. Determining nip pressure or roll bearing loads by any of the foregoing techniques is important because paper quality can depend on nip uniformity. In addition, excess nip loading can damage elastic roll covers which are used to provide a so-called “soft nip”. What is needed is a better technique and system for characterizing the nip load formed between two rolls, or between a shoe and a backing roll.
The nip characterization system of this invention employs sensors which detect the load applied by a series of hydraulic loading devices arrayed in the cross machine direction between a roll shell and a support beam in a deflection-compensated roll, and sensors which, in a fixed shell roll, detect the bearing loads, and the loads in loading arms which support the roll support beam. In a movable shell roll, sensors which detect the loading imposed on a support beam are used. In addition to the load measuring sensors, an array of cross machine direction pressure sensors are placed between the deflection-compensated roll and a backing element. More than sufficient information to completely characterize the nip is provided to a nip analysis system which has as inputs the pressure applied to the nip by the hydraulic loading devices, loads applied at the end bearings or the loads applied to the roll support beam; and, in addition, the nip loads measured with pressure sensors. The redundant information can be used to better characterize the nip loading and the cause of any irregularities in the nip loading.
It is a feature of the present invention to provide at least two measurements which are diagnostic of the nip loading between a deflection-compensated roll and a backing roll.
It is another feature of the present invention to provide a technique for better assessing the cross machine direction nip loading profile, and the source and possible solution to any undesirable variation in nip loading.
Further objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Referring more particularly to
A computer 36, data acquisition devices, or other type of controller, with a display system 37 is used to monitor the loads applied by the loading arms 34 to the support beam 28 and the loads applied to the roll shell 22. The hydraulic pressure measurements PT are taken from pressure lines 38 which communicate with the roll end slide bearings 24. Hydraulic measurements are taken from pressure lines 40 which communicate with each of the plurality of hydraulic loading devices 30, and hydraulic measurements are taken from pressure lines 41 which communicate with each of the loading arms 34. U.S. Patent publication No. 2002/0011116A1, which is incorporated herein by reference, describes in more detail how pressure measurements with respect to internal hydraulic elements can be made external to a deflection-compensated roll. In addition to the foregoing loading data, the computer 36 is simultaneously connected to a system 44 which directly measures the cross machine direction nip profile. This system may be a series of piezoelectric pressure sensors 42 which are arrayed in the cross machine direction. Further, if the backing roll 32 is a vacuum roll, the vacuum level 46 can also be measured through a sensor line 48 which transmits vacuum levels to the computer 36. If the vacuum roll has one or more suction glands the vacuum level from each suction gland can be measured as a separate input to the computer 36.
If a self-loading deflection-compensated roll is employed, pressure data can be taken from the hydraulic loading devices and from load cells, air rides, or strain gauges positioned to determine the loading on the associated load support beam. If the backing roll 32 is a vacuum roll, the vacuum can be measured and changes in the amount of vacuum can also be correlated with measured nip loads.
The benefit of combining actual nip loading data with applied nip pressure data is better characterization of a deflection-compensated roll, both for diagnosing problems and for improving the control of the nip pressure in the cross machine direction.
As illustrated in
It should be understood that the techniques for measuring actual nip pressure are not limited to the use of piezoelectric sensors—other types of sensors or sensor systems, for example fiber-optic sensors, could be used. The NipScan® system from Albany International could also be used to determine nip pressure directly.
It is understood that the invention is not limited to the particular construction and arrangement of parts herein illustrated and described, but embraces all such modified forms thereof as come within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4625637 | Pav et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4644860 | Brendel | Feb 1987 | A |
4975153 | Nelson et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5048353 | Justus | Sep 1991 | A |
5127141 | Roerig et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5358606 | Makkonen | Oct 1994 | A |
5370327 | Adamski | Dec 1994 | A |
5379652 | Allonen | Jan 1995 | A |
5381341 | Herrala et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5383371 | Laitinen | Jan 1995 | A |
5592875 | Moschel | Jan 1997 | A |
5699729 | Moschel | Dec 1997 | A |
5703574 | Allonen | Dec 1997 | A |
5762759 | Wedel | Jun 1998 | A |
5785636 | Bonander et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5813496 | Hyvonen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5908537 | Bentele et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5930136 | Nakajima et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5953230 | Moore | Sep 1999 | A |
6205369 | Moore | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6228009 | Van Haag | May 2001 | B1 |
6231722 | Vestola | May 2001 | B1 |
6270628 | Suomi et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6423186 | Trokhan et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430459 | Moore | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6523465 | Kayser | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6662630 | Onnela et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669821 | Edwards et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6685610 | Holopainen | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6769314 | Moore et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6835283 | Weigant et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6910376 | Maenpaa | Jun 2005 | B2 |
20020011116 | Onnela et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20040237665 | Mucke et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040244609 A1 | Dec 2004 | US |