This application claims the benefit of GM 28/2005, filed in Austria on Jan. 20, 2005.
The invention relates to a nipple protection device for breast-feeding mothers, which nipple protection device comprises a nipple portion projecting upwardly from an arched shield portion, the nipple portion being provided with at least one drinking opening at its front side.
Both, for mothers and also for the infant it is important that breast-feeding is free from stress and relaxing. Often, however, the start of breast-feeding or the breast-feeding procedure, respectively, is rendered difficult due to a poor sucking power of the infant or because the infant is a lazy feeder, due to the mother's lack of self-confidence or because the infant does not grab the mother's natural nipple well, due to organic malformations of the infant, because of special, peculiar shapes of the mother's natural nipple, such as plane or sunken nipples, due to an unfavorable milk flow reflex, because sucking of the infant causes pain to the mother, due to galactostasis, because of the mother's affinity to wounds or to chapped nipples or to an inflammation of the breast (mastitis), in the worst case.
In case of such difficulties or, quite generally, for breast feeding, so-called nipple protection devices or breast-feeding protection devices or nursing pads are used as auxiliary means, which are put over the nipple, over the areola or over part of the mother's breast for the breast-feeding procedure, in which case the infant will suck directly on the protection device.
Nipple protection devices of the initially defined type are known from DE 202 19 950 U1, DE 44 15 939 C1 and U.S. Pat. No. 2,364,866 A. These nipple protection devices for breast-feeding mothers consist of a thin-walled, supple material and have a large-area rim of e.g. circular or triangular shape with rounded corners, seen in top view. The sucking nipple of circular cross-section which projects upwardly from the base or shield portion, has drinking holes at its front face. When handling this nipple protection device it has, however, been found out that the drinking holes are not optimal for an unimpeded flow of milk during sucking. During the sucking procedure, the infant draws the nipple protection device, or the mother's natural nipple, respectively, comparatively deeply into his/her mouth so that it is “clamped” between palate and tongue, whereby also the circular cross-section of the nipple protection device is compressed. Thus, it may happen that the drinking holes are pressed together and the milk cannot flow freely through the holes. The milk already emerged accumulates between the mother's breast and the nipple protection device and may adversely affect the adherence of the nipple protection device on the mother's breast. There is a risk of the nipple protection device becoming unintentionally detached from the breast, which may not only have consequences for the sensitive skin of the natural nipple and the areola, but also entails the risk of the infant swallowing the nipple protection device with his/her natural sucking reflex.
It is now an object of the present invention to provide a nipple protection device of the aforementioned type, with which sucking of the mother's milk during breast-feeding will be facilitated for the infant and be rendered possible without any impediment, wherein such sucking shall also be gentle for the mother's breast itself.
The nipple protection device according to the invention of the initially defined type is characterized in that the nipple portion is of generally oval cross-section and in that the at least one drinking opening is formed by at least one longitudinal slit. The nipple portion of generally oval cross-section has a “flat” shape which is favorable for sucking in the first place, by which also the position during sucking is pre-determined, and at the same time a good adaptation of the nipple portion to the mother's natural nipple is provided. For the sucking procedure, the infant moves his/her tongue from bottom to top and “pulls out” the mother's milk from the mother's breast at the same time, using the sucking reflex and the vacuum in the infant's mouth. The cross-section of oval shape which is adapted to the natural oval shape of the lips and mouth of the infant therefore can be pressed together without any problems by the sucking movements of the infant, whereby furthermore, the drinking opening formed by the longitudinal slit is widened in a simple manner and thus will ensure an unimpeded flow of milk. It has been shown that opening of the longitudinal slit will be ensured in any event if the longitudinal slit is arranged in the region of the middle of the front part of the nipple portion.
Advantageously, the longitudinal slit extends transversely to the longer axis of the generally oval nipple portion cross-section. By this arrangement, the longitudinal slit will “automatically” widen to the extent desired as soon as the nipple portion is pressed together by the infant's sucking movement. Thus, also breast-feeding which is gentle for the mother's breast itself is enabled.
According to an alternative, preferred embodiment, two longitudinal slits are provided on both sides of an imaginary nipple portion middle plane. This embodiment has proved to be advantageous for withdrawing an amount of milk to an optimum extent. Also in case of a possible movement of the infant's head or mouth, respectively, undisturbed breast-feeding is made possible. In the embodiment exhibiting two longitudinal slits, the length thereof may be comparatively shorter.
It has proved to be suitable if the longitudinal slit(s) has (have) a length of from 4 mm to 8 mm. Since various sizes of nipple protection devices may be provided, the sizes of the drinking opening(s) can be adapted to the size of the nipple protection device and chosen according to the number of longitudinal slits. (Of course, also more than two longitudinal slits may be provided in the nipple portion).
Preferably, the nipple portion of generally oval cross-section has a rough surface at least on one of its longer side faces. The rough surface has the effect that the nipple portion in these regions will have a skin-like feel, similar to that of a mother's breast. Accordingly, it is furthermore suitable if regions with a rough surface are provided on both longer side faces. Moreover, it is advantageous for the nipple portion to have a rough surface on its front side. By this, the infant will feel a soft, skin-like object not only on his/her tongue and upper jaw, but also in the region of his/her palate.
In order to obtain a good imitation of the skin-like texture of a female nipple and areola, it is suitable if the surface roughness of the side faces and/or of the front side of the nipple portion is 100 μm at the most, in particular 50 μm at the most. Tests have shown that for the desired texture it is particularly advantageous if the zone with the rough surface has a surface roughness of approximately 10 μm to approximately 40 μm, preferably 15 μm to 30 μm.
Likewise, the surface of the shield portion may be formed with a texture similar to that of a mother's natural nipple. In particular, it is advantageous if the shield portion has outwardly projecting knobs. Upon contact with the infant's lips or cheeks, these knobs can convey a pleasant feeling.
For good handling of the nipple protection device during its application and removal, respectively, it is suitable if the shield portion is lemniscate-shaped, wherein the longer axis of the shield portion lemniscate extends in parallel to the longer axis of the nipple portion cross-section. By this specific shape having narrowed portions on account of the lemniscate shape, the nipple protection device can be gripped easily and securely and applied to the front breast in the correct orientation and after the breast-feeding procedure, it can also be grasped well and taken off.
With regard to the material of the nipple protection device, it has been found suitable to make the shield portion and the nipple portion—in one piece—of silicone caoutchouc. This material is tasteless, fits snugly to the breast of the breast-feeding mother, is simple to process and meets the requirements of hygiene. Another preferred material is latex or a thermo-plastic elastomer.
In connection with a good/soft fit of the nipple protection device it is advantageous if the material of the shield portion and/or of the nipple portion has a Shore hardness A of at least 40.
Preferably, a wall thickness of the shield portion and/or of the nipple portion of from 0.9 mm to 1.50 mm is chosen; a wall thickness of 1.20 mm has proved particularly suitable.
In the following, the invention will be explained in more detail by way of preferred exemplary embodiments illustrated in the drawings.
Therein,
On the front side 6, a drinking opening 7 is provided which is formed by a longitudinal slit 7′ that extends transversely to the longer axis of the nipple portion 3 of generally oval cross-section. During sucking, the nipple portion 3 will be pressed or slightly squeezed, respectively, by the tongue and the upper jaw of the infant, whereby the longitudinal slit 7′ will slightly widen and the milk will be able to pass through the drinking opening 7 without impediment.
At its outer side (which faces the infant during use), the shield portion 2 illustrated has protruding knobs 8. Preferably, the knobs 8 have different sizes and are only provided in the wider regions of the lemniscate-shaped shield portion 2. The knobs 8 may, however, also be distributed over the entire surface of the shield portion 2, and their arrangement may be random or regular.
As is particularly visible in
The longitudinal slit 7′ provided on the front side 6 extends transversely to the longer axis 3″ of the generally oval nipple portion cross-section.
Moreover, it is visible from
As it is visible from
In the embodiment according to
The position of the longitudinal slits 7′ substantially in the region of the middle of the front side 6 allows for a “centered” passage of the milk. Insofar, also the two longitudinal slits 7′ according to
The surface roughness may be 100 μm at the most, in particular 50 μm at the most, and is preferably within a range of approximately 10 μm to 40 μm, preferably from 15 μm to 30 μm.
The material thickness of the shield portion 2 and of the nipple portion 3 is approximately from 0.9 mm to 1.5 mm, in particular 1.2 mm. As for the material, preferably silicone caoutchouc or latex is chosen, wherein a Shore-A hardness of at least 40, preferably approximately 50, is provided.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
GM28/2005 U | Jan 2005 | AT | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2364866 | Meynier, Jr. | Dec 1944 | A |
4195639 | Lee | Apr 1980 | A |
4946062 | Coy | Aug 1990 | A |
5403349 | Rohrig | Apr 1995 | A |
5730336 | Lerner | Mar 1998 | A |
5797505 | Kaura | Aug 1998 | A |
6027396 | Yonchar | Feb 2000 | A |
6161710 | Dieringer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6968964 | Gilmore | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7175502 | Clark | Feb 2007 | B2 |
20040220618 | Rohrig | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050145636 | Albright et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
44 15 939 | Jan 1996 | DE |
202 19 950 | Mar 2003 | DE |
WO 2005077264 | Aug 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060157065 A1 | Jul 2006 | US |