Patent Grant
11219439
The lateral access approach is frequently utilized to deliver interbody fusion cages to the lumbar spine. In comparison to conventional anterior or posterior approaches to the lumbar spine, the lateral approach is thought to minimize posterior and/or anterior tissue damage as well as reduce surgery time, associated blood loss, vascular damage and infection risk.
When the lateral access approach is utilized, the surgeon may use sequential dilation followed by tissue retraction in order to provide a minimally invasive path to the disc space. In addition, neuromonitoring is typically undertaken in order to avoid disturbing nerves residing in the lumbar plexus. In particular, one of the cannulae used in the sequential dilation or the retractor used for retraction may be fitted with an electrode capable of detecting a proximate nerve.
Despite these efforts, there still appears to be a significant incidence of neural deficit associated with the lateral approach to the spine. For example, there appears to be about a 30-35% incidence of transient but severe leg pain in patients undergoing an L4-L5 intervertebral fusion by a lateral approach.
Because of the proximity of the neural elements, in particular the femoral nerve, to the center of the disc space, the transpsoas lateral surgical approach to the L4-L5 disc space will likely cause intraoperative displacement of neural structures from their anatomic course during refractor dilation. Careful attention should be paid to refractor placement and dilation time during transpsoas lateral access surgery, particularly at the L4-L5 disc. Davis, J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Aug. 17;93(16):1482-7.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,686,839 (Parker) discloses a phototherapy treatment devices include a light emitter that is adapted to be placed in close proximity to a wound for applying light/heat energy to the wound to aid in the healing process. The light emitter may comprise a light guide that receives light from a light source or a light source that is affixed to a substrate used to position the light source over the wound.
The present invention is directed to using the neuroprotective abilities of near-infrared (NIR) or red light to decrease the incidence or severity of neural deficits in patients undergoing a lateral fusion.
The literature provides in vitro and in vivo instances of NIR light providing neuroprotection to ischemic cells. Zhang teaches that NIR light protects cardiomyocytes from hypoxia and reoxygenation and does so by a nitric oxide-dependent mechanism. Zhang, J. Molec. Cell. Cardiology, 46,2009, 4-14. Lapchak, Neuroscience, 148(2007) 907-914 reports that transcranial near infrared light therapy improves motor function following embolic strokes in rabbits.
It is believed that when a retractor is expanded during the lateral approach, increased pressure is placed upon the tissue adjacent the retractor tip, including nerves of the lumbar plexus and their associated arteries. The increased pressure upon these arteries causes an ischemic situation in the associated nerves, leading to the neural deficit.
Without wishing to be tied to a theory, it is believed that NIR/red light will help these distressed neurons cope with the ischemia by enhancing the energetics of their mitochondria.
Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method of protecting nerves, comprising the steps of:
a) making an incision in the patient,
b) inserting an access device into the patient through the incision to at least partially create a path to a spine of the patient,
c) irradiating nervous tissue adjacent the path with an amount of NIR or red light effective to provide neuroprotection.
Also in accordance with the present invention, there is provided (an assembly comprising:
For the purposes of the present invention, an arm of a retractor is considered to be a type of blade.
For the purposes of the present invention, a “NIR/red light emitter” may comprise a distal end of a light delivery catheter connected to a NIR/red light source. For the purposes of the present invention, a “NIR/red light emitter” may also comprise an NIR/red light LED.
In one method of the present invention, the patient is placed in a direct lateral decubitus position, and electrodes are applied to the patient's skin. The table should be appropriately flexed so that the patient's pelvis tilts away from the spine, thereby maximizing access to L4-5.
Next the operative disc space is identified using lateral fluoroscopy and two K-wires are crossed on the skin to mark the center of the disc.
An incision is made in the side of the spinal patient to afford the opportunity for a lateral retroperitoneal approach.
Next, blunt dissection of the oblique abdominal muscles is performed. This is followed by bluntly penetrating the transversalis fascia to expose the retroperitoneal fat and visualize the psoas muscle.
Next, a first of a series of cannulated dilators is introduced into the psoas muscle. Its distal end should approach the target disc just anterior to the medial-lateral midline of the disc. Sequential dilation is then performed by passing the next largest dilator over the first dilator, and so on. Next, a guidewire is passed through the first cannula until its distal end reaches about half way into the disc.
Next, a retractor is slid over the largest cannula until it reaches the desired depth. The retractor is then secured to a rigid arm to hold the retractor in place for the remainder of the surgery. The dilators are then removed.
The retractor is then expanded to its desired diameter.
Next, the desired portion of the annulus fibrosus is removed, and the desired portion of the nucleus pulposus is removed. The endplates are then prepared. The disc space is then distracted by a spreader, and then trialed to select the appropriately sized fusion cage.
An intervertebral lateral fusion cage adapted for a lateral approach may then be filled with a bone growth substance, passed through the path made by the access device, inserted into the disc space, and finally lightly impacted into place.
At least one of the cannulae and/or retractor is fitted with an electrode so that neuromonitoring can take place during the approach to the disc by those instruments. When the neuromonitoring system indicates that the so-fitted cannula and/or retractor has come too close to a nerve of the lumbar plexus, the system provides a warning signal, such as an audible sound or a visual cue (such as a red stop sign displayed on a computer screen). The surgeon then adjusts the approach of the instrument away from the affected nerve and provides appropriate red light therapy to that nerve.
In one embodiment, a blade tip of a retractor of the present invention is fitted with both an electrode and a red light emitter, and that these components are substantially adjacent one another on the blade tip. When the neuromonitoring system indicates that this blade tip has come too close to a nerve during its expansion, the system provides a warning signal, and the surgeon then activates the red light emitter for a desired period such as 90 seconds. After the therapy is finished, the surgeon can then move the blade away from the nerve.
The following section describes the downstream metabolic events that occur in LLT after therapy has been provided.
It is believed that the hypometabolism of the ischemic cell can be reversed or attenuated by low level laser therapy (“LLLT”) treatment of these cells with red/near infrared light (“red/NIR light”). In particular, it is believed that red/NIR light will beneficially act upon the ischemic cells through the following avenues:
Oron, Photomed Laser Surg. 2007 June;25(3):180-2. (2007) reports that in vitro red/NIR light approximately doubles the amount of ATP in neurons. Since metabolic processes of the neuron substantially use ATP as their fuel, it is believed that the increase in ATP afforded by LLLT will help normalize the hypometabolism in the ischemic cells experienced by the patient.
As discussed above, it is now believed that the survival of an ischemic neuron may lie in their ability to induce pro-survival proteins (i.e., neurotrophins) such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). It has been shown that LLLT acts upon neurons to increase BDNF 5× in neurons (Byrnes Lasers Surg Med. 2005 August;37(2):161-71), and (Anders, IEEE J. Quantum Electronics, 14/1 January/February 2008, 118-125).
bcl-2 is an anti-apoptotic gene that has been implicated in mediating neuronal plasticity. Manji, Psychopharmacol Bull. 2001 Spring;35(2):5-49. In this respect, red light has been shown to increase bcl-2 in neurons (Liang, Neuroscience. 2006 May 12;139(2):639-49) and (Zhang, supra, 2008).
Further without wishing to be tied to a theory, it is further believed that red/NIR light therapy of the ischemic cells will provide a number of additional advantages to the spinal patient.
First, red/NIR light therapy is a completely non-toxic therapy. Thus, it appears that its use poses no known danger to the patient. Therefore, red/NIR light therapy/LLLT can be used by the surgeon without any apparent risk to the patient.
Second, it is believed that red/NIR light therapy will work much more quickly than conventional therapeutics, with LLLT providing a first round of benefit within about an hour of the initial irradiation and a second round of benefit within a few days of the initial irradiation.
Respecting highly acute events, Oron (supra, 2007) reports that in vitro red/NIR light increases ATP in neurons within 10 minutes of the application of red/NIR exposure, while Zhang reports that LLLT activates PKC in neurons within one hour of the irradiation (Zhang, supra, 2008). Thus, two mechanisms are acting favorably upon the patient within an hour of LLLT treatment.
Respecting more subchronic events, Anders, 2008 reports that red/NIR light increases BDNF in neurons within 3-7 days of the beginning of red/NIR light exposure. Zhang (2008)/Liang & Whelan (2006) report that red/NIR light increases bcl-2 in neurons within 6-28 hours respectively of the beginning of red/NIR light exposure.
Preferably, the red/NIR light of the present invention has a wavelength of between about 600 nm and about 1500 nm, more preferably between about 600 nm and about 1000 nm. In some embodiments, the wavelength of light is between 800 and 900 nm, more preferably between 825 nm and 835 nm. In this range, NIR/red light has not only a large penetration depth (thereby facilitating its transfer to the fiber optic and OFC), but Wong-Riley reports that cytochrome oxidase activity is significantly increased at 830 nm, and Mochizuki-Oda reported increased ATP production via a 830 mn laser.
In some embodiments, the wavelength of light is between 600 and 700 nm. In this range, Wong-Riley reports that cytochrome oxidase activity was significantly increased at 670 nm. Wollman reports neuroregenerative effects with a 632 nm He—Ne laser.
In some embodiments, the light source is situated to irradiate adjacent tissue with between about 0.01 J/cm2 and 20 J/cm2 energy. Without wishing to be tied to a theory, it is believed that light transmission in this energy range will be sufficient to increase the activity of the cytochrome c oxidase around and in the target tissue. In some embodiments, the light source is situated to irradiate adjacent tissue with between about 0.05 J/cm2 and 20 J/cm2 energy, more preferably between about 2 J/cm2 and 10 J/cm2 energy.
The present inventor are aware of at least two reports of very favorable effects of red/NIR light irradiation of neuronal cells at fluences of less than 1 J/cm2. As discussed above, Byrnes, Lasers Surg Med. 2005 August;37(2):161-71 found that a significant (P<0.05) increase in brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and glial derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) in the 0.2 J/cm2 group in comparison to the non-irradiated group. Oron, Photomed Laser Surg. 2007 June;25(3):180-2 reports that normal human neural progenitor (NHNP) cells were grown in tissue culture and were treated by Ga—As laser (808 nm, 50 mW/cm2, 0.05 J/cm2). They found that the quantity of ATP in laser-treated cells 10 minutes after laser application was 7513+/−970 units, which was significantly higher (p<0.05) than the non-treated cells, which comprised 3808+/−539 ATP units. In sum, Oron found that the neuronal ATP level was essentially doubled by LLLT. In addition, Byrnes, Lasers Surgery Medicine, March 2005, 36(3) 171-85 reports that dosages as low as 0.001 stimulate cellular activity (such as DNA, RNA and protein production, proliferation and motility). Therefore, it is believed that fluences as low as about 0.01 J/cm2 (and possibly even about 0.001 J/cm2) will be effective in providing therapy to the pertinent ischemic cells neurons of the patient.
In some embodiments, the light source is situated to produce about 10-90 milliwatt/cm2, and preferably 7-25 milliwatt/cm2.
In accordance with US Patent Publication 2004-0215293 (Eells), LLLT suitable for the neuronal therapy of the present invention preferably has a wavelength between 630-1000 nm and power intensity between 25-50 mW/cm2 for a time of 1-3 minutes (equivalent to an energy density of 2-10 J/cm2). Eells teaches that prior studies have suggested that biostimulation occurs at energy densities between 0.5 and 20 J/cm2. Wong-Riley. J. Biol. Chem. 2005 Feb. 11, 280(6), 4761-71 reports that fluences as high as 30 J/cm2 appear to be effective in preventing cell death in neurons exposed to the mitochondrial poison KCN. In some embodiments, the preferable energy density of the present invention is between 0.1 and about 30 J/cm2, more preferably between 0.5-20 J/cm2, most preferably between 2-10 J/cm2. In summary, a preferred form of the present invention uses red and near infrared (red/NIR) wavelengths of 630-1000, most preferably, 670-900 nm (bandwidth of 25-35 nm) with an energy density fluence of 0.5-20 J/cm2, most preferably 2-10 J/cm2, to produce photobiomodulation. This is accomplished by applying a target dose of 10-90 mW/cm2, preferably 25-50 mW/cm2 LED-generated light for the time required to produce that energy density.
It is further believed that red/NIR light irradiation of neurons will produce a significant upregulation in brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and glial derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF). Byrnes, Lasers Surg Med. 2005 August; 37(2):161-71 reports that olfactory ensheathing OECs were purified from adult rat olfactory bulbs and exposed to 810 nm light (150 mW; 0, 0.2, or 68 J/cm2). Byrnes found that a significant (P<0.05) increase in BDNF, GDNF and collagen expression in the 0.2 J/cm2 group in comparison to the non-irradiated and high dose groups.
Of note, it has been reported that the neuroprotective effects of red/NIR light can be effected by a single irradiation on the order of minutes. Wong-Riley, J. Biol. Chem. 2004, e-pub Nov. 22, reports that irradiating neurons with 670 nm red light for only ten minutes results in neuroprotection. Similarly, Wong-Riley Neuroreport 12(14) 2001:3033-3037 reports that a mere 80 second dose of red light irradiation of neuron provided sustained levels of cytochrome oxidase activity in those neurons over a 24 hour period. Wong-Riley hypothesizes that this phenomenon occurs because “a cascade of events must have been initiated by the high initial absorption of light by the enzyme”. The efficacy of a single irradiation would appear to be important for the application of LLLT to in-surgery neuroprotection.
In some embodiments, the red light irradiation is delivered in a continuous manner. In others, the red light irradiation is pulsed in order to reduce the heat associated with the irradiation.
In some embodiments, red light is combined with polychrome visible or white light.
In some embodiments, the light source is adapted so that at least 50% of its emission is NIR or red light (or a combination of each), preferably at least 75%, more preferably at least 90%.
In some embodiments, the NIR/red light is applied to the nerves for between about 30 and 300 seconds.
In some embodiments of the present invention, the light used to irradiate the nerves of the lumbar plexus is near-infrared (NIR) light. In others, it is red light. Each of NIR and red light are adequately absorbed by cytochrome c oxidase so as to increase its activity and effect neuroprotection. While NIR light has the advantage of penetrating substantially deeper into the tissue, red light has the advantage of being visually detectable by the surgeon. For the reason, red light may be more desirable when then the target nerves are close to the red light emitter mounted on the access instrument.
In some embodiments, the NIR/red light therapy is carried out after a warning. This warning may come from a neuromonitoring system. It may also come from the surgeon or attendant seeing a twitch in an affected muscle.
In some embodiments, the irradiation is carried out automatically via direction from a neuromonitoring system after the warning. In others, the irradiation is carried out via actuation (typically, manually) of the red light emitter by the surgeon.
In some embodiments, the irradiation may be carried out prophylactically upon the nerves of the lumbar plexus. In some embodiments, this prophylactic treatment is carried out upon insertion of the first access instrument into the psoas muscle.
In some embodiments, the irradiation may be carried out after the retractor has been expanded, whether or not a warning has been given.
It is understood by the present inventors that providing NIR/red light in the amounts described herein has no detrimental effect to the healthy cells, and so may be provided prophylactically without cause for concern.
In some embodiments, the neuromonitoring system provides a warning when it detects a nerve within a predetermined proximity. In some embodiments, the neuromonitoring system provides a warning when it detects a decline in nerve status or health.
In preferred embodiments, the access path of the present invention leads to an intervertebral disc space. In embodiments thereof, the path is one of a lateral path to an intervertebral disc space; a posterolateral path to an intervertebral disc space; an anterolateral path to an intervertebral disc space; or a translaminar path to the intervertebral disc space.
In some embodiments, the access device of the present invention is a cannula. Preferably, the cannula is one of a series of sequentially larger cannulae designed to dilate a tissue region. Preferably, the cannulated access device has an electrode fitted on its distal end portion. Preferably, the cannulated access device also has a red light emitter fitted on its distal end portion.
In other embodiments, the access device of the present invention is a retractor. Preferably it is an expandable retractor having at least two and preferably at least three blades. Preferably, at least one blade of the retractor has an electrode fitted on its distal end portion. Preferably, the blade also has a red light emitter fitted on its distal end portion.
In some embodiments, the access device has a NIR/red light emitter mounted thereon, and irradiation of the affected nerve is carried out by actuation of the mounted red light emitter. In preferred embodiments thereof, the red light emitter comprises a NIR/red light source mounted upon the access device. More preferably, the NIR/red light source is a diode. In other embodiments thereof, the red light emitter comprises a light delivery catheter that is connected to a NIR/red light source located outside the patient's body.
In some embodiments, the cannula or retractor has a wall having an inner surface 5 and an outer surface 3. The wall may have an L-shaped longitudinal channel 7 provided therein running from the proximal end portion to the distal end portion of the wall and terminating at the outer surface of the distal end portion of the wall.
In some embodiments, the light delivery catheter is secured to the channel of the wall via a taper-lock configuration, thereby allowing its secure fitting and its removal.
In some embodiments, a metallic strip may be coated across a portion of the the surface of the window to function as an electrode.
Now referring to
In most embodiments related to a lateral spinal approach, the retractor further comprises a second blade 19. Typically, the first and second blade are movable with respect to one another so as to create a first closed condition and a second expanded condition. This expanded condition usually provides a path for delivering an implant therethrough. In preferred embodiments, the retractor further comprises a third blade (not shown).
In preferred embodiments, the NIR/red light emitter mounted on the retractor is electrically connected to a neuromonitoring system, so that a signal from the neuromonitoring system can automatically actuate the red light emitter. However, in others, the emitter can be a stand-alone device independently actuatable by the surgeon. In preferred embodiments, the NIR/red light emitter is a NIR/red light source mounted on the outer surface of the first blade, while in others the NIR/red light emitter comprises a light delivery catheter connected to a NIR/red light source located outside the patient's body. In such situations, the first blade further preferably comprises a proximal portion 21, and the light delivery catheter runs along the proximal portion of the blade and terminates in the distal end portion of the blade.
In one embodiment, a blade of a retractor of the present invention is fitted with both an electrode and two red light emitters, and these emitters are disposed on either side of the electrode.
In some embodiments, the retractor comprises at least three base components, each of which having a blade extending substantially perpendicularly therefrom. Preferably, the outer surface of the distal end portion of at least one blade has both a red/NIR light emitter window W and an electrode E thereon (as in
In some retractor embodiments (as in
In some retractor embodiments, each blade has a proximal end portion connected to its respective base and a distal end portion having both a red/NIR light emitter window W and an electrode E thereon.
In some embodiments, the first blade has an axial cross-section substantially defining an arc. This describes most conventional retractor blades, and allows a plurality of such blades to be axially slid over a cannula.
In some embodiments, the first blade has a proximal end portion and a distal end portion, and the first blade curves from the proximal end portion to the distal end portion, thereby forming an arm.
In some embodiments, the distal end portion of the first blade has a flange extended distally therefrom, wherein the flange is adapted to dock into spinal tissue. This flange allows the surgeon to dock the retractor into either an adjacent vertebral body or the target disc space. In some embodiments, the flange is axially adjustable with respect to the first blade.
In some embodiments in which a retractor has both a NIR-red light window and an electrode, both the NIR-red light window and electrode are located on the same blade of the retractor.
In some embodiments, the NIR/red light window (which is typically the distal end portion of the red light emitter) has a width, and the window is located within one such width of the electrode. When the window is so close to the electrode, there is greater surety that light emanating from the emitter can effectively irradiate the nerve detected by the electrode. Typically, the window is located within 5 millimeters of the electrode.
In some embodiments, the retractor is a modified tracheal dilator.
In some embodiments, lateral access to the lumbar disc space is provided by first penetrating the transversalis fascia to expose the retroperitoneal fat and visualize the psoas muscle. Next, blunt dissection of the psoas is performed. Next, the surgeon inserts the modified tracheal dilator into the psoas. The modified tracheal dilator is then expanded to its desired diameter under neuromonitoring. Red light is irradiated onto a selected nerve adjacent an arm of the dilator, as desired. Next, the desired portion of the annulus fibrosus is removed, and the desired portion of the nucleus pulposus is removed. The endplates are then prepared. The disc space is then distracted by a spreader, and then trialed to select the appropriately sized fusion cage. A lateral fusion cage filled with a bone growth substance is then inserted into the disc space and lightly impacted into place.
In preferred embodiments, the retractor is made out of a conductive metal so that it can serve as an electrical conduit between the neuromonitoring system and the electrode. In some embodiments, the refractor is made predominantly out of a biocompatible metal such as titanium, cobalt-chrome or stainless steel. However, in others, a first blade of the retractor comprises a proximal portion made of metal, and a distal end portion made of a plastic, so that the distal portion is disposable. In one disposable embodiment, the distal end portion is plastic, has a metallic strip coating running along its outer surface to function as an electrode, and has a non-metallic reflective surface (such as a white pigment) coating the rest of the component, save one portion of the outer surface that functions as the light window W.
In some embodiments, the retractor blade has a channel or bore running substantially longitudinally from the proximal end portion to the distal end portion of the blade, and a light delivery catheter is disposed in the channel or bore. This catheter may be removable, thereby allowing it to be used as a disposable. Preferably, an NIR/red light source is connected to the proximal end portion of this light delivery catheter, and red/NIR light is emitted from the distal end portion of the light delivery catheter through a window W.
In some embodiments having a light delivery catheter, the light delivery catheter may be connected to an endoscope, thereby providing the surgeon with an opportunity to visualize nerves adjacent the retractor or cannula.
In some retractor embodiments, a first electrode and a NIR/red light emitter are each mounted upon a distal end portion of a first blade. In some embodiments, the NIR/red light emitter is a light emitting diode (LED). Typically, the electrode is in electrical connection with a neuromonitoring system. In some embodiments, a second blade of the retractor has a distal end portion having an NIR/red light emitter mounted thereon. Preferably, a second electrode is also present upon the distal end portion of the second blade.
The red light neuroprotection of the present invention may also be used in a number of other spinal procedures in which nerve health is compromised by retractors. For example, in a transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) approach, wherein the exiting root of the dorsal root ganglion may be impacted by a retractor, therapeutic or prophylactic red/NIR light may be irradiated upon the nerve root, In a transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) approach, wherein the traversing root of the dorsal root ganglion may be impacted, therapeutic or prophylactic red/NIR light may be irradiated upon the nerve root. In an anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) approach, wherein nerves may be impacted, therapeutic or prophylactic red/NIR light may be irradiated upon the nerve. In anACDF approach, wherein the recurrent laryngeal and sympathetic nerves may be impacted, therapeutic or prophylactic red/NIR light may be irradiated upon the nerve. In spinal deformity correction, wherein nerves may be impacted, therapeutic or prophylactic red/NIR light may be irradiated upon the nerve. In osteotomy retraction and correction, wherein nerves may be impacted, therapeutic or prophylactic red/NIR light may be irradiated upon the nerve.
Other clinical uses for the red/NIR light neuroprotection of the present invention may be realized in implantable devices for spinal cord injury; implantable “micro diode” devices for radiculopathy (providing long lasting ESI); post operative catheters treating ischemic nerve roots; and LEDs on intramedullary rods and external fixators.
In some embodiments respecting a lateral approach, the NIR/red light is delivered from the working channel instrument, such as a retractor. Now referring to
Therefore, in some embodiments, there is provided a surgical retractor comprising a plurality of blades assembled to form a working channel, wherein at least one blade has an outer surface having a NIR/red light emitter thereon.
There are many different ways in which the red light may be delivered through the red light emitter. For example, the emitter can be an LED. The emitter can comprise the distal terminus of a fiber optic cable whose proximal end is connected to a red light source. The emitter can be a hole in the blade through which red light is shined. The emitter can be a portion of the blade made from an optically transparent material.
In embodiments in which the retractor emits NIR/red light, it is preferable for light to be emitted from more than just the distal end of the retractor. This is because nerves of the lumbar plexus may be present in the psoas up to about 5-6 cm from the intervertebral disc. Accordingly, in some embodiments, and now referring to
Therefore, in some embodiments, there is provided a surgical retractor comprising a plurality of blades assembled to form a working channel, wherein at least one blade comprises an optically translucent portion. Preferably, the optically translucent portion is substantially optically transparent to red/NIR light. Preferably, the optically translucent portion traverses the thickness of the blade.
Now referring to
Preferably, the blade also contains a plurality of light reflective particles 73 that cause the light to be dispersed. Preferably, these particles reside in at least the 20-25% distal-most portion of the blade. Thus, when the proximally injected light hits these particles, the light bounces off the particles, exits the blade laterally, and enters a portion of the psoas that contains the nerves of concern.
Therefore, in some embodiments, there is provided a surgical retractor comprising a plurality of blades assembled to form a working channel, wherein at least one blade comprises a proximal end portion and a distal end portion, and is made of an optically translucent material and comprises a plurality of reflective particles located in the distal end portion of the blade.
In some embodiments, and now referring to
Still referring to
Therefore, in some embodiments, there is provided a surgical retractor comprising a plurality of blades assembled to form a working channel, wherein at least one blade comprises a proximal end portion, a distal end portion, an outer surface and an inner surface, and is made of an optically translucent material and comprises a plurality of reflective particles located in the distal end portion of the blade, wherein the inner surface and the proximal end portion of the outer surface of the blade has a reflective coating thereon.
In some embodiments, as in
Now referring to
Therefore, in some embodiments, there is provided a surgical retractor comprising a plurality of blades assembled to form a working channel, wherein at least one blade comprises:
In some embodiments in which the proximal portion of the optically clear blade is substantially free of reflective particles while the distal portion of the optically blade comprises light reflective particles, the blade is constructed by first making the distal portion (with the particles), placing this distal potion in an appropriate mold and then filling the mold with a neat liquid of the same optically clear material used to make the distal end portion. Once the liquid hardens, the result will be a unitary blade have the particles only in its distal portion. Optionally, the inner and distal end surfaces of this blade may then be coated with a light-reflective coating.
Now referring to
Therefore, in some embodiments, there is provided a surgical retractor comprising a plurality of blades assembled to form a working channel, wherein at least one blade comprises a proximal end portion, a distal end portion, an outer surface and an inner surface, and is made of an optically translucent material and comprises a plurality of reflective particles located in the distal end portion of the blade, wherein the inner surface and the proximal end portion of the outer surface of the blade has a reflective coating thereon, and wherein the proximal end portion of the blade is fitted with at least one receptacle that receives a distal end of a fiber optic cable.
Now referring to
a) a first blade 103 made of an optically-clear base material, the first blade comprising a proximal end portion 105 having a proximal end surface 107, a distal end portion 109 having a distal end surface 111, an inner surface 113, and outer surface 115,
b) a plurality of reflective particles 73 vlocated substantially in the distal end portion of the first blade,
c) a connector 117 adapted to receive a fiber optic cable 69 and located on the outer surface of the proximal end portion of the blade,
d) a reflective coating 121 that coats substantially all of the inner surface of the first blade, and the proximal end portion of the outer surface of the first blade.
In some embodiments, and now referring to
Therefore, in some embodiments, there is provided a surgical retractor comprising a plurality of blades assembled to form a working channel, wherein at least one blade comprises a distal end portion having an outer surface having a light guide thereon, wherein the light guide comprises a plurality of optical fibers of different lengths terminating at respective ends at different locations over the length and width of the light guide to cause light to be emitted from the ends of the optical fibers in a pinpoint pattern at different points over the length and width of the light guide.
No referring to
Therefore, in some embodiments, there is provided a surgical refractor comprising a plurality of blades assembled to form a working channel, wherein at least one blade comprises a distal end portion having an outer surface having a light guide thereon, wherein the light guide comprises a plurality of optical fibers having roughened surfaces.
In some embodiments, the light guide (that is attached to the distal end portion of the outer surface of the blade) comprises a single optical fiber having a roughened outer surface, wherein the single optical fiber is wound in a coil shape. Preferably, the coil has a diameter of about 5-6 cm.
In other embodiments, and now referring to
Therefore, in some embodiments, there is provided a surgical retractor comprising a plurality of blades assembled to form a working channel, wherein at least one blade comprises a distal end portion having an outer surface having a fiber optic cable thereon, wherein the fiber optic cable comprises a plurality of reflective particles dispersed therein and is formed substantially in a spiral shape.
Therefore, in some embodiments, there is provided a surgical retractor comprising a plurality of blades assembled to form a working channel, wherein at least one blade comprises a distal end portion having an outer surface having a fiber optic cable therein, wherein the fiber optic cable has a roughened surface and is formed substantially in a spiral shape.
In some embodiments, and now referring to
Therefore, in some embodiments, there is provided a surgical retractor comprising a plurality of blades assembled to form a working channel, wherein at least one blade comprises a distal end portion having an outer surface having an LED array thereon.
A light diffusing panel is a panel of optically clear material that has reflecting particles dispersed therein. When focused (point source) light is delivered to a backside of the panel, the light becomes dispersed throughout the panel and emerges substantially evenly from the front side of the panel.
In some embodiments of the present invention, and now referring to
Therefore, in some embodiments, there is provided a surgical refractor comprising a plurality of blades assembled to form a working channel, wherein at least one blade is made of an optically transparent material and comprises a distal end portion having an outer surface having a light diffusing panel attached thereto.
In some light diffusing panel embodiments, the blade may be clear and have attached thereto at least one point light source directed outward. Light from the point light source is delivered to a backside of the panel (that is attached to the outside surface of the blade), the light becomes dispersed throughout the panel and emerges substantially evenly from the front side of the panel, where it enters the psoas. The point light source can be produced by many different avenues. The light source can be an LED attached to the inner surface of the blade. It may be a fiber optic cable attached to the inner surface of the blade and directed outward. The light source may also be a stand-alone device that is temporarily lowered into the working channel and shined towards the optically clear blade.
In some light diffusing panel embodiments, the blade may have a light guide attached thereto, wherein the light guide contains a plurality of point light sources. Upon this light guide, a light diffusing panel may be placed. This panel converts the light from a series of point sources to an evenly distributed pattern of light.
In some light diffusing panel embodiments, and now referring to
Therefore, in some embodiments, there is provided a surgical retractor comprising a plurality of blades assembled to form a working channel, wherein at least one blade comprises a proximal portion having a proximal end surface, a distal end portion having an outer surface, and a bore running from the distal end surface to the outer surface of the distal end portion of the blade.
In some embodiments, and now referring to
Commercial red/NIR light arrays of LEDs having a 30-40 mm width are known to exist. For example, one red/NIR LED array which is a 30 mm×30 mm square is sold by Shenzhen Perry Electronic Company Limited. It is believed that such arrays can conveniently fit down the working channel of a standard refractor, which is typically about 36 mm×54 mm when fully expanded. In some embodiments, the surgeon can insert the array through 54 mm slot and the turn the array 90 degrees as it reaches the lower parts of the working channel. In some embodiments, this hand-held array is placed against a clear posteriormost blade of the retractor. In some embodiments, two arrays measuring about 30 mm×30 mm are attached to produce a 30 mm×60 mm array. This embodiment has the advantage of being able to treat in a single episode a region of psoas tissue considered to be most susceptible. In some embodiments, the outer surface 213 of the array has a convex shape that conform to the concavity of the inner surface of the blade, so that contact is maintained and light transfer efficiency is high.
Therefore, in some embodiments, there is provided a method comprising:
a) inserting into a patient a surgical retractor comprising a plurality of blades assembled to form a working channel, wherein a first blade is made of a substantially optically transparent material,
b) expanding the retractor to form the working channel,
c) inserting a red light source into the working channel, and
d) activating the NIR/red light source to shine red light through the first blade and into the patient,
e) removing the red light source from the working channel, and
passing a spinal implant through the working channel.
This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/726,418, filed Oct. 6, 2017. U.S. application Ser. No. 15/726,418 is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/287,231, filed Oct. 6, 2017. U.S. application Ser. No. 15/287,231 is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/784,059, filed Mar. 4, 2013 and now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,480,855. U.S. application Ser. No. 13/784,059 claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/705,712 filed Sep. 26, 2012. U.S. application Ser. No. 133/784,059 also claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/748,489 filed Jan. 3, 2013. The entire contents of each of these applications are incorporated by reference herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4562832 | Wilder | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4573448 | Kambin | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4646738 | Trott | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4678459 | Onik et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4863430 | Klyce et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4878487 | Sinnett | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4888146 | Dandeneau | Dec 1989 | A |
| 5080662 | Paul | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5195541 | Obenchain | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5285795 | Ryan et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5395317 | Kambin | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5439464 | Shapiro | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5529580 | Kusunoki et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5540706 | Aust et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5569290 | McAfee | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5591187 | Dekel | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5601569 | Pisharodi | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5662300 | Michelson | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5688222 | Hluchy et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5730754 | Obenchain | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5733242 | Rayburn et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5735792 | Vanden Hoek et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5820623 | Ng | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5885300 | Tokuhashi et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5894369 | Akiba et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5899425 | Corey, Jr. et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5954635 | Foley et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6033105 | Barker et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6036641 | Taylor | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6053907 | Zirps | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6063021 | Hossain et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6110182 | Mowlai-Ashtiani | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6139493 | Koros | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6200322 | Branch et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6217509 | Foley et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6234961 | Gray | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6283966 | Houfburg | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6286179 | Byrne | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6296644 | Saurat et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6322498 | Gravenstein et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6354992 | Kato | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6371968 | Kogasaka et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6383191 | Zdeblick et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6447446 | Smith et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6468289 | Bonutti | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6558407 | Ivanko et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6575899 | Foley et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6579281 | Palmer et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6616603 | Fontana | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6626830 | Califiore et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6648915 | Sazy | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6676597 | Guenst et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6688564 | Salvermoser et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6758809 | Briscoe et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6808505 | Kadan | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6887198 | Phillips et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6945933 | Branch et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6983930 | La Mendola et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 7087058 | Cragg | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7104986 | Hovda et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7137949 | Scirica et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7182731 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7341556 | Shalman | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7434325 | Foley et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7582058 | Miles et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
| 7591790 | Pflueger | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7594888 | Raymond et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7618431 | Roehm, III et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7636596 | Solar | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7637905 | Saadat et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7641659 | Emstad et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7686839 | Parker | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7771384 | Ravo | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7794456 | Sharps et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7811303 | Fallin et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7868839 | Gonzalez | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7874982 | Selover | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7901353 | Vayser | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7931579 | Bertolero et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7946981 | Cubb | May 2011 | B1 |
| 7951141 | Sharps et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7959564 | Ritland | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7988623 | Pagliuca et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8007492 | DiPoto et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8038606 | Otawara | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8043381 | Hestad et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8062218 | Sebastian et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8092464 | McKay | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8096944 | Harrel | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8202216 | Melkent et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8236006 | Hamada | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8333690 | Ikeda | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8360970 | Mangiardi | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8372131 | Hestad et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8382048 | Nesper et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8397335 | Gordin et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8435174 | Cropper et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8460180 | Zarate et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
| 8460186 | Ortiz et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8460310 | Stern | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8518087 | Lopez et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8535220 | Mondschein | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8556809 | Vijayanagar | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8585726 | Yoon et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8602979 | Kitano | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8622894 | Banik et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8636655 | Childs | Jan 2014 | B1 |
| 8690764 | Clark et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8721536 | Marino et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8740779 | Yoshida | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8784421 | Carrison et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8798701 | Izzetoglu et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8821378 | Morgenstern Lopez et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8834507 | Mire et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8845734 | Weiman | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8852242 | Morgenstern Lopez et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8870753 | Boulais et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8870756 | Maurice | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8876712 | Yee et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8894573 | Loftus et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8894653 | Solsberg et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8926502 | Levy et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8932207 | Greenburg et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8932360 | Womble et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8936605 | Greenberg | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8974381 | Lovell et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
| 8983567 | Miles et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
| 8986199 | Weisenburgh, II et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8992580 | Bar et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9028522 | Prado | May 2015 | B1 |
| 9050146 | Woolley et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9055936 | Mire et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9072431 | Adams et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9078562 | Poll et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9131948 | Fang et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9144374 | Maurice, Jr. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9198674 | Benson et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9211059 | Drach et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9216016 | Fiechter et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9216125 | Sklar | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9232935 | Brand et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9247997 | Stefanchik et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9265491 | Lins et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9277928 | Morgenstern Lopez | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9307972 | Lovell et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9320419 | Kirma et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| RE46007 | Banik et al. | May 2016 | E |
| RE46062 | James et al. | Jul 2016 | E |
| 9380966 | Mao et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9386971 | Casey et al. | Jul 2016 | B1 |
| 9387313 | Culbert et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9414828 | Abidin et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9480855 | DiMauro et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9486296 | Mire et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9492194 | Morgenstern Lopez et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9510853 | Aljur et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9526401 | Saadat et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9579012 | Vazales et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9603510 | Ammirati | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9603610 | Richter et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9610095 | To | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9615818 | Baudouin et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9629521 | Ratnakar | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9655605 | Serowski et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9655639 | Mark | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9668643 | Kennedy, II et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9675235 | Lieponis | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9700378 | Mowlai-Ashtiani | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 9706905 | Levy | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 9795367 | Lee | Oct 2017 | B1 |
| 10349930 | DiMauro et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
| 10499898 | DiMauro et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
| 10542965 | DiMauro et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
| 20020022762 | Beane et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138020 | Pflueger | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20030083555 | Hunt et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030171744 | Leung et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030191474 | Cragg et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040034429 | Lambrecht et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040122446 | Solar | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040127992 | Serhan et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040143165 | Alleyne | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040215293 | Eells et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20050075578 | Gharib et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050085692 | Kiehn et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050090848 | Adams | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050187570 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050240209 | Hamada | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050256525 | Culbert et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060206118 | Kim et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060264957 | Cragg et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070055259 | Norton et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070073363 | DiMauro et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070129634 | Hickey et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070149975 | Oliver et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070179570 | De Taboada et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070185367 | Abdou | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070203396 | McCutcheon et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070225556 | Ortiz et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070260113 | Otawara | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070276191 | Selover | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080015621 | Emanuel | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080033251 | Araghi | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080081951 | Frasier et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080188714 | McCaffrey | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080310181 | Gurevich et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080319290 | Mao et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090018566 | Escudero et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090024158 | Viker | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090054908 | Zand et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090062685 | Bergethon et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090062871 | Chin et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090105543 | Miller et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090156898 | Ichimura | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090187080 | Seex | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090240111 | Kessler et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090287061 | Feigenbaum et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090318765 | Torii | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100004651 | Biyani | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100022841 | Takahashi et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100076476 | To et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100114147 | Biyani | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100121153 | To | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100151161 | Da Rolo | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100161060 | Schaller et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100211136 | De Taboada et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100217088 | Heiges et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100256446 | Raju | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100262244 | Savage-Erickson et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100280325 | Ibrahim et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100284580 | OuYang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100286477 | OuYang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100312053 | Larsen | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110021970 | Vo-Dinh et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110028791 | Marino et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110054507 | Batten et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110106261 | Chin et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110118553 | Stopek | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110125158 | Diwan et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110130634 | Solitario, Jr. et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110160731 | Bleich et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110295070 | Yasunaga | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110319941 | Bar et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120095296 | Trieu et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120101338 | O'Prey et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120158099 | Lee | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120209273 | Zaretzka et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120221007 | Batten et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120232350 | Seex | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120232552 | Morgenstern Lopez et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120298820 | Manolidis | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120316400 | Vijayanagar | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130090541 | MacFarlane et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130103067 | Fabro et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130103103 | Mire et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130150670 | O'Prey et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130150674 | Haig et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130172676 | Levy et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130274557 | Bowman et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130282022 | Yousef | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130289354 | Ainsworth | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130289399 | Choi et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130303846 | Cybulski et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140005484 | Charles | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140066940 | Fang et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140074170 | Mertens et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140088367 | DiMauro et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140142584 | Sweeney | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140148647 | Okazaki | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140180321 | Dias et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140194697 | Seex | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140215736 | Gomez et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140257489 | Warren et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140275799 | Schuele | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140276840 | Richter et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140277204 | Sandhu | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140318582 | Mowlai-Ashtiani | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140357945 | Duckworth | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150018623 | Friedrich et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150065795 | Titus | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150073218 | Ito | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150112398 | Morgenstern Lopez et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150164496 | Karpowicz et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150216593 | Biyani | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150223676 | Bayer et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150230697 | Phee et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150342621 | Jackson, III | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150374213 | Maurice, Jr. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160015467 | Vayser et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160030061 | Thommen et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160066965 | Chegini et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160067003 | Chegini et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160074029 | O'Connell et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160095505 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160106408 | Ponmudi et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160166135 | Fiset | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160174814 | Igov | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160213500 | Beger et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160228280 | Schuele et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160235284 | Yoshida et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160287264 | Chegini et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160296220 | Mast et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160353978 | Miller et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170003493 | Zhao | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170007226 | Fehling | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170020452 | DiMauro et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170027606 | Cappelleri et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170042408 | Washburn et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170042411 | Kang et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170042525 | DiMauro et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170065269 | Thommen et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170065287 | Silva et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170086939 | Vayser et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170135699 | Wolf | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170156755 | Poll et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170156814 | Thommen et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170196549 | Piskun et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170224391 | Biester et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20180021032 | DiMauro et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180333061 | Pracyk et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20200085418 | DiMauro et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 102727309 | Nov 2014 | CN |
| 9415039 | Nov 1994 | DE |
| 29916026 | Nov 1999 | DE |
| 0537116 | Apr 1993 | EP |
| 0807415 | Nov 1997 | EP |
| 2481727 | Jan 2012 | GB |
| 2007-029454 | Feb 2007 | JP |
| 9629014 | Sep 1996 | WO |
| 2001056490 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| 2001089371 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| 2002002016 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| 2004103430 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| 2008121162 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| 2009033207 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| 2012026981 | Mar 2012 | WO |
| 2013033426 | Mar 2013 | WO |
| 2013059640 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| 2014050236 | Apr 2014 | WO |
| 2014100761 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| 2014185334 | Nov 2014 | WO |
| 2016111373 | Jul 2016 | WO |
| 2016131077 | Aug 2016 | WO |
| 2016168673 | Oct 2016 | WO |
| 2017006684 | Jan 2017 | WO |
| 2017015480 | Jan 2017 | WO |
| 2017083648 | May 2017 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| **Anders, “Light supports neurite outgrowth of human neural progenitor cells in vitro: The role of P2Y receptors,” IEEE J. Quantum Electronics, 2008, v. 14, No. 1, pp. 118-125 (abstract). |
| **Byrnes, “Light promotes regeneration and functional recovery and alters the immune response after spinal cord injury”, Lasers Surgery Medicine, Mar. 2005,36(3) 171-85 (Abstract). |
| **Byrnes, “Low power laser irradiation alters gene expression of olfactory ensheathing cells in vitro”, Lasers Surg Med., Aug. 2005; 37(2):161-71 (Abstract). |
| **Davis, Lumbar Plexus Anatomy within the Psoas Muscle: Implications for the Transpsoas Lateral Approach to the L4-L5 Disc, J Bone Joint Surg Am., Aug. 17, 2011; 93(16): pp. 1482-1487. |
| **European Office Action for Application No. 13773935.5, dated Aug. 30, 2017 (4 pages). |
| **International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US13/60282, dated Mar. 13, 2014 (17 pages). |
| **Lapchak, Transcranial near-infrared light therapy improves motor function following embolic strokes in rabbits: an extended therapeutic window study using continuous and pulse frequency delivery modes. Neuroscience. Sep. 21, 2007; 148( 4):907-14. Epub Jul. 12, 2007. |
| **Liang, Photobiomodulation partially rescues visual cortical neurons from cyanide-induced apoptosis Neuroscience. May 12, 2006;139(2):639-49. Epub Feb. 7, 2006. Abstract. |
| **Manji, Impairments of neuroplasticity and cellular resilience in severe mood disorders: implications for the development of novel therapeutics. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2001, Soring;35(2):5-49. Abstract. |
| **Mochizuki-Oda, N., “Effects of near-infra-red laser irradiation on adenosine triphosphate and adenosine diphosphate contents of rat brain tissue,” Neurosci. Lett., 2002, v. 323, pp. 207-210. |
| **Oron, “Ga-As (808 nm) laser irradiation enhances ATP production in human neuronal cells in culture”, Photomed. Laser Surg., Jun. 2007; 25(3) 180-2, Abstract. |
| **Wollman, Y., et al., “In vitro cellular processes sprouting in cortex microexplants of adult rat brains induced by low power laser irradiation,” Neurolog. Res., 1998, v. 20, pp. 470-472. |
| **Wong-Riley, Photobiomodulation directly benefits primary neurons functionally inactivated by toxins: role of cytochrome c oxidase, J. Biol. Chem. Feb. 11, 2005, pp. 4761-4771, 280(6), Epub Nov. 22, 2004. |
| **Wong-Riley, Light-emitting diode treatment reverses the effect of TTX on cytochrome oxidase in neurons, Neuroreport, Oct. 8, 2001, pp. 3033-3037, vol. 12(14) Abstract. |
| **Zhang, Near infrared light protects cardiomyocytes from hypoxia and reoxygenation injury by a nitric oxide dependent mechanism J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. Jan. 2009;46(1):4-14. doi: 10.1016/i.vimcc.2008.09.707. Epub Sep. 30, 2008. |
| Brink, et al. “The role of orbitofrontal codex in processing empathy stories in 4- to 8-year-old children,” Frontiers in Psychology, 2001, vol. 2(80) pp. 1-16. |
| Davis et al. Estimated Contribution of Hemoglobin and Myoglobin to Near Infrared Spectroscopy. Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology, 2013, 182(2), pp. 180-187. |
| Germon, et al. “Cerebral near infrared spectroscopy: emitter-detector separation must be increased.” British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1999, 82(6), pp. 831-837. |
| Glassman, et al. “The relationship between dorsolateral prefrontal activation and speech performance-based social anxiety using functional near infrared spectroscopy.” Brain Imaging and Behavior. 2016, 11(3), pp. 797-807. |
| Ferrari et al. “The use of near-infrared spectroscopy in understanding skeletal muscle physiology: recent developments.” Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society, 369, 2011, pp. 4577-4590. |
| Khan, et al. “Spatiotemporal relations of primary sensorimotor and secondary motor activation patterns mapped by NIR Imaging.” Biomedial Optics Express, 2011, 2(12), pp. 3367-3386. |
| Kokan, et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy of orbitofrontal codex during odorant stimulation. American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy, 2011, 25(3), pp. 163-165. |
| Kroczek, et al. “Prefrontal functional connectivity measured with near-infrared spectroscopy during smoking cue exposure.” Addiction Biology, 2015, 22(2) (Abstract Only). |
| Leon-Carrion, et al. “Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS): Principles and Neuroscientific Applications.” Neuroimaging—Methods. Prof. Peter Bright (Ed.), 2012, ISBN: 978-953-51-0097-3. |
| McKendrick, et al. “Wearable functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): expanding vistas for neurocognitive augmentation.” Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 2015, 9(27), pp. 1-14. |
| Murkin, et al. “Near-infrared spectroscopy as an index of brain and tissue oxygenation.” British Journal of Anaesthesia /03(BJA/PGA Supplement), 2009, pp. i3-i13. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2015/043554, dated Nov. 19, 2015 (8 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2015/048485, dated Feb. 9, 2016. (16 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2015/060978, dated Feb. 15, 2016 (8 pages). |
| Invitation to Pay Additional Fees for Application No. PCT/US2016/050022, dated Nov. 3, 2016 (2 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2016/050022, dated Feb. 1, 2017 (19 pages). |
| Iprenburg, M, “Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy: The Thessys Method,” in Lewandrowski, K., et al, Minimally Invasive Spinal Fusion Techniques, Summit Communications, 2008 pp. 65-81. |
| Jung, K., et al., “A hands-free region-of-interest selection interface for solo surgery with a wide-angle endoscope: preclinical proof of concept,” Surg Endosc, 2017, v. 31, pp. 974-980. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190167246 A1 | Jun 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61748489 | Jan 2013 | US | |
| 61705712 | Sep 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15726418 | Oct 2017 | US |
| Child | 16271680 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15287231 | Oct 2016 | US |
| Child | 15726418 | US | |
| Parent | 13784059 | Mar 2013 | US |
| Child | 15287231 | US |
