The present disclosure is generally related to plasma actuators.
In general, a plasma actuator may induce the flow of a fluid, such as air or any other type of fluid in which the plasma actuator is located, due to the electro-hydrodynamic (EHD) body force that results from the electric field lines that are generated between electrodes of the plasma actuator.
Many aspects of the present disclosure can be better understood with reference to the following drawings. The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating the principles of the present disclosure. Moreover, in the drawings, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views.
The present disclosure describes various types of plasma actuators and related methods that utilize membranes for selectively passing oxygen particles, such as nitrophobic membrane(s).
Non-limiting examples of plasma actuators are described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,235,072, titled “Method and Apparatus for Multibarrier Plasma High Performance Flow Control,” issued on Aug. 7, 2012, U.S. Publication No. 2013/0038199, titled “System, Method, and Apparatus for Microscale Plasma Actuation,” filed on Apr. 21, 2011, and WIPO Publication No. WO/2011/156408, titled “Plasma Inducted Fluid Mixing,” filed on Jul. 6, 2011. Each of these documents is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Embodiments of the present disclosure utilize a new highly efficient type of selective membrane in a plasma actuator for the separation of oxygen from air and the enhanced thrust from generated plasma flow. Such a membrane structure can selectively enrich a top side of the plasma actuator with more oxygen thereby improving performance of the plasma actuator.
Studies have shown that plasma flow created in the presence of oxygen (O2) generates more force than plasma flow created in the presence of nitrogen (N2). Therefore, performance of the plasma actuator is improved by depleting nitrogen particles and enriching oxygen particles at a top surface of the plasma actuator near an exposed electrode. Further, not only is more oxygen generated in the neighborhood of the plasma actuator, the pressure drop or differential across the membrane structure is increased to great effect and benefit.
In one embodiment, an azo-covalent organic polymer material with nitrogen selectivity is utilized as plasma actuator material to increase plasma force due to substantial increase in majority oxygen atmosphere. In such an embodiment, the plasma actuator is, but not limited to, an atmospheric plasma actuator.
Experimental evidence suggests that a majority (˜98%) of plasma generated electric force is due to atomic and molecular oxygen gas, and its metastable and ionized forms. As such, nitrophobic surface increases oxygen concentration in a scalable fashion helping to improve plasma force. Additionally, the nitrophobic surface of an exemplary plasma actuator causes significant pressure differential due to nitrogen repulsion. Such pressure differential may generate an additional lifting force of about 2-4 Newtons for even a 70 mm diameter plate (see
Referring now to
As shown, the electrode pairs 150, 160 are separated by a dielectric or insulating material 140. The electrodes 150, 160 of the pair of electrodes can be located such that a constant distance is maintained between the two electrodes in some embodiments. In certain embodiments, the electrode pairs are maintained at a potential bias using steady, pulsed direct, or alternating current. Accordingly, when a voltage potential is applied across one of the pair of electrodes 150, 160, a plasma discharge is produced that induces air flow in a plasma channel. For example, when the plasma discharge is produced, an electrohydrodynamic (EHD) body force is generated which induces air flow in the plasma channel in various embodiments. In a further embodiment, a plurality of such actuators 100 may be used. A voltage potential can be applied to each actuator 100 in timed phases. For example, in one embodiment, three or more electrodes can be positioned in the plasma channel and powered in phased pairs. In certain embodiments, a serpentine plasma actuator can incorporate a pair of electrodes, where at least one of the pair of electrodes has a serpentine shape. Then, at least one serpentine electrode can have one or more turns.
In accordance with the present disclosure, a novel membrane structure 110 is provided at, adjacent to, or near an end of the plasma actuator assembly adjacent or near to a top electrode 160, in one embodiment. An exemplary membrane structure 110 comprises a series of parallel nano-sized support members 115 that are coated with a nitrogen-phobic (or nitrophobic (N2-phobic)) material 117 that repels nitrogen molecules (represented by square shaped particles in the figure) in the atmosphere, thereby allowing oxygen molecules (represented by spherical shaped particles in the figure) to pass through cylindrical column passageways or channels between the parallel support members 115 (e.g., with diameters in the range of one nanometer and relatively smooth walls).
By doing so, oxygen-enriched air is introduced and present near the surface or exposed electrode 160 of the plasma actuator 100. The plasma discharge forms at or near the exposed surface of the electrode 160, which is also where the oxygen enriched environment/low-pressure oxygen enriched environment is created via techniques of the present disclosure. Therefore, the plasma actuator 100 gains momentum and benefit from the enriched oxygen by producing plasma flows with more force as compared to standard plasma actuators 100. Possible applications and industries that can benefit from such improved flows include those that utilize large vehicles, such as aircrafts, buses, trucks, etc.
Correspondingly, at a bottom surface 180 of the plasma actuator 100 (and membrane structure 110), nitrogen molecules from the surrounding air are rejected from passing or permeating through the membrane structure 110. However, oxygen molecules from the surrounding air passes through the column or vertical channels of the membrane structure 110 to the top surface causing the top atmospheric conditions to become more oxygen enriched and nitrogen depleted. In this way, the membrane structure 110 acts as a “smart gate” in selectively accepting oxygen particles and rejecting nitrogen particles from the surrounding air.
Next,
Increased plasma force is due to a substantial increase in oxygen particle concentration in the atmosphere. Experimental evidence suggests that a majority (˜98%) of plasma generated electric force is due to atomic and molecular oxygen gas, and its metastable and ionized forms. Therefore, a nitrophobic surface of the membrane structure 110 increases oxygen concentration in a scalable fashion helping to improve plasma force. However, bulk material density of the plasma actuator 100 is not affected, since an extremely thin layer of nitrophobic coating 117 on the membrane 110 (e.g., a few monolayers to 100 nm or possibly less) is applied in certain embodiments. Thus, nitrophobic plasma actuator technology is to become valuable to the flow control and propulsion community, such as the aerospace and automobile industry, among other possible industries or fields (e.g., wound therapy (plasma bandage) taking advantage of gas separation in the medical field).
The force of the plasma flow is shown to increase over time in the chart of
Consider that a small change in O2 mole fraction can significantly bias the surface pressure of the plasma actuator. For example, where an O2 mole fraction of 0.2 is the ratio of oxygen in normal atmospheric conditions, the atmospheric unit of pressure at an O2 mole fraction of 0.2 is 1 bar. By increasing the O2 mole fraction slightly to 0.21, a pressure differential measurement of −0.1 bar results which corresponds to a pressure drop of 10,000 Pascals (N/m2). Thus, a small change in balance between oxygen and nitrogen concentrations generates a large pressure differential. As an illustration, if the top surface of the plasma actuator 100 is singularly surrounded by oxygen on the top surface (i.e., an atmosphere of pure oxygen), the O2 mole fraction would be 1.0 and the resulting pressure differential would exceed −0.8 bar for a pressure drop of 80,000 Pascals (N/m2) which is quite significant or extreme.
Referring back to
In subsequent phases, the cascade effect due to the oxygen enriched environment generated by characteristics of the membrane structure 110 increases the force generated by the plasma flow. Potentially, the cascading effect in an embodiment of a nitrophobic plasma actuator 100 can exponentially increase force production due to the pressure differential ΔP. Embodiments of the present disclosure therefore can control the force production by deactivating the plasma actuator 100 (via a control mechanism 190, such as an electrical switch) so that there is no longer a local pressure drop downstream on an outlet/top side of the membrane structure 110 causing the production of oxygen to reduce and gradually stop along with the pressure differential.
In an exemplary embodiment, the membrane structure 110 of the present disclosure induces single-file diffusion for atmospheric particles, such as oxygen. Since the nitrogen molecule is larger in size than the oxygen molecule, passage of nitrogen molecules can be restricted through the membrane structure 110 by limiting the size of the column passageways or channels to not allow nitrogen molecules to pass. In one embodiment, a channel diameter of the membrane structure 110 corresponds to be less than the size of a nitrogen (N2) molecule (but larger than the size of an oxygen molecule), thereby restricting access of nitrogen molecules, while allowing oxygen molecules to pass. The flux of the smaller component through the membrane 110 will be drastically enhanced by restricting access of nitrogen molecules into the membrane channels acting as a specially designed smart gate within the membrane structure 110.
Accordingly, membrane(s) 110 with dimensions suitable for single-file diffusion are integrated with highly-selective nitrophobic polymers in certain embodiments. In one embodiment, the single-file separation strategy is combined with smart gate functionality that restricts the flow of nitrogen particles into the channels as part of the membrane structure 110. This drastically reduces the concentration of nitrogen in the membrane 110, resulting in significant increases to the flux of oxygen particles, by avoiding frequent collisions between larger molecules (N2) and the smaller component (O2) in the channels which can lead to a relatively low flux of the smaller component through the channels in other arrangements.
As demonstrated in
In particular, an embodiment of the membrane structure shown in
In an exemplary embodiment, the nitrophobic coating 418, 117 is a material based on azo-linked polymers, e.g. azo-covalent organic polymer material. Further, the membrane structure 410, 110 may have a porous/dimpled/corrugated surface to enhance surface area for plasma generation which enables more ionization. Such surface modification acts to exploit molecular differences of N2 and O2. Certain embodiments of the plasma actuator provide 3-100 times improvement in plasma force by nitrogen rejection. Where standard plasma actuators can only produce milli-Newton level force, novel plasma actuators in accordance with the present disclosure can produce several Newton forces.
In an alternative embodiment, rather than fine-tune the channel diameter with a precision in the range of a fraction of the size of a N2 molecule, an inhibitor (<1 wt %) to the normal diffusion of N2 within the channels is used with the membrane structure 510, 110, as shown in
As discussed above, the nitrophobic coating 418, 117 may be based on azo-linked polymers, e.g. azo-covalent organic polymer material. Thus, in various embodiments, nitrophobic polymers containing azo functional groups may be synthesized. Correspondingly, in one exemplary embodiment, synthesized organic polymers that selectively exclude N2 through incorporation of azo-bridges (azo-COPS) may be used as a form of nitrophobic coating 418, 117, as shown by the structural material representations depicted in
Corresponding FTIR (Fourier Transform Infrared) data in
Next, a study of the influence of an azo-COP-2 polymer (as shown in
Referring next to the charts of
Next,
It should be emphasized that the above-described embodiments of the present disclosure are merely possible examples of implementations, merely set forth for a clear understanding of the principles of the disclosure. Many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiment(s) without departing substantially from the spirit and principles of the present disclosure. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and protected by the following claims.
This application claims priority to, U.S. Provisional Application entitled “NITROPHOBIC SURFACE FOR EXTREME THRUST GAIN,” filed on May 15, 2015, and assigned application No. 62/162,190, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
8235072 | Roy | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8944370 | Khozikov | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8957572 | Eden | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8999039 | Hilbig | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9220162 | Takenoshita | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9536709 | Koyama | Jan 2017 | B2 |
20050103193 | Lyons | May 2005 | A1 |
20070089795 | Jacob | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20130038199 | Roy | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20140321987 | Nolcheff | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150305132 | Mitra | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160200618 | Boughton | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20170165630 | Buchanan | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20180065690 | Han | Mar 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2011156408 | Dec 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Nelson, P.H. & Auerbach, S.M. Self-Diffusion in Single-File Zeolite Membranes is Fickian at Long Times. J. Chem. Phys. 110, 9235 (1999). |
Nelson, P.H. & Auerbach, S.M. Modeling Tracer Counter-Permeation through Anisotropic Zeolite Membranes: From Mean-Field Theory to Single-File Diffusion. Chem. Eng. J. 74, 43 (1999). |
Keffer, D. The temperature dependence of single-file separation mechanisms in one-dimensional nanoporous materials. Chem. Eng. J. 74, 33 (1999). |
Patel, H.A., Je, S.H., Park, J., Chen, D.P., Jung, Y., Yavuz, C.T. & Coskun, A. Unprecedented high-temperature CO2 selectivity in N-2-phobic nanoporous covalent organic polymers. Nature Communications 4 (2013). |
Sridhar, S., Smitha, B. & Aminabhavi, T.M. Separation of Carbon Dioxide from Natural Gas Mixtures through Polymeric Membranes—A Review. Separation and Purification Reviews 36, 113 (2007). |
Du, N.Y. Park, H.B., Dal-Cin, M.M. & Guiver, M.D. Advances in high permeability polymeric membrane materials for CO2 separations. Energy & Environmental Science 5, 7306 (2012). |
Mckeown, N.B. & Budd, P.M. Exploitation of Intrinsic Microporosity in Polymer-Based Materials. Macromolecules 43, 5163 (2010). |
Furukawa, H., Ko, N., Go, Y.B., Aratani, N., Choi, S.B., Choi, E., Yazaydin, A.O., Snurr, R.Q., O'keeffe, M., Kim, J. & Yaghi, O.M. Ultrahigh Porosity in Metal-Organic Frameworks. Science 329, 424 (2010). |
Keskin, S. & Sholl, D.S. Screening Metal—Organic Framework Materials for Membrane-based Methane/Carbon Dioxide Separations. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 111, 14055 (2007). |
Cong, H., Radosz, M., Towler, B.F. & Shen, Y. Polymer-inorganic nanocomposite membranes for gas separation. Separation and Purification Technology 55, 281 (2007). |
Adams, R., Carson, C., Ward, J., Tannenbaum, R. & Koros, W. Metal organic framework mixed matrix membranes for gas separations. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 131, 13 (2010). |
Kiyono, M., Williams, P.J. & Koros, W.J. Effect of pyrolysis atmosphere on separation performance of carbon molecular sieve membranes. J Membrane Sci 359, 2 (2010). |
Ismail, A.F. & David, L.I.B. A review on the latest development of carbon membranes for gas separation. J Membrane Sci 193, 1 (2001). |
Yuan, J.Y. & Antonietti, M. Poly(ionic liquid)s: Polymers expanding classical property profiles. Polymer 52, 1469 (2011). |
Lin, B. Meron, M., Cui, B. & Rice, S.A. From Random Walk to Single-File Diffusion. Phys. Rev. Left. 94, 216001 (2005). |
Hinds, B.J., Chopra, N., Rantell, T., Andrews, R., Gavalas, V. & Bachas, L.G. Aligned Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube Membranes. Science 303, 62 (2004). |
Majumder, M., Chopra, N. & Hinds, B.J. Effect of Tip Functionalization on Transport through Vertically Oriented Carbon Nanotube Membranes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 9062 (2005). |
Xia, Y., Yang, P., Sun, Y., Wu, Y., Mayers, B., Gates, B., Yin, Y., Kim, F. & Yan, H. One-dimensional nanostructures: synthesis, characterization, and applications. Adv. Mater. 15, 353 (2003). |
Jessensky, O., Muller, F. & Gosele, U. Self-organized formation of hexagonal pore arrays in anodic alumina. Applied Physics Letters 72, 1173 (1998). |
Arnold, D.C., Hobbs, R.G., Zirngast, M., Marschner, C., Hill, J.J., Ziegler, K.J., Morris, M.A. & Holmes, J.D. Single step synthesis of Ge-SiOx core-shell heterostructured nanowires. J. Mater. Chem. 19, 954 (2009). |
Crowley, T.A., Ziegler, K.J., Lyons, D.M., Erts, D., Olin, H., Morris, M.A. & Holmes, J.D. Synthesis of metal and metal oxide nanowire and nanotube arrays within a mesoporous silica template. Chem. Mater. 15, 3518 (2003). |
Ziegler, K. Ryan, K.M., Rice, R. Crowley, T., Erts, D., Olin, H., Patterson, J., Spalding, T.R., Holmes, J.D. & Morris, M.A. The synthesis of matrices of embedded semiconducting nanowires. Faraday Discuss. 125, 311 (2004). |
Gudiksen, M.S. & Lieber, C.M. Diameter-selective synthesis of semiconductor nanowires. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 8801 (2000). |
Holmes, J.D., Johnston, K.P., Doty, R.C. & Korgel, B.A. Control of thickness and orientation of solution-grown silicon nanowires. Science 287, 1471 (2000). |
Wu, Y., Cui, Y., Huynh, L., Barrelet, C.J., Bell, D.C. & Lieber, C.M. Controlled growth and structures of molecular-scale silicon nanowires. Nano Lett. 4, 433 (2004). |
Krutyeva, M., Vasenkov , S., Yang , X., Caro, J. & Kärger, J. Surface barriers on nanoporous particles: A new method of heir quantitation by PFG NMR. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 104, 89 (2007). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160338185 A1 | Nov 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62162190 | May 2015 | US |