This invention relates to earphones and has particular application to earphone apparatus having a sound transducer adapted for location directly in or adjacent to the human auditory canal. The invention also relates to noise cancellation systems and has application to an ear phone assembly for use in conjunction with, or as part of, a noise cancellation system
Noise cancellation headphones provide the wearer with an ability to listen to sound free from the disturbing effects of background noise. Noise cancellation headphones are used widely in commercial passenger aircraft and general aviation and are now experiencing adoption in the mainstream in a variety of consumer audio applications.
Headphones, whether passive or noise cancellation, can be designed in either a supra aural or circum aural configuration. In the case of the former, the headphone rests on top of the ear with the interface to the wearer typically being soft open-cell foam. In the case of the latter, the ear cup completely encloses the ear with the human-headphone interface typically being a foam based leatherette ear pad.
Noise cancellation headphones are also configured in circum aural or supra aural arrangements. Circum aural noise cancellation headphones, however, tend to provide a better overall noise suppression effect as the complete seal provided by the ear pad insulates the ear from the higher frequencies of sound which are more difficult to reduce by active noise cancellation techniques.
Headphones, whether passive or active noise cancellation, are typically large and comprise a headband that can either be worn on top of the head or behind the neck. Headphones can be clumsy, uncomfortable and space consuming, especially for those who travel frequently.
An alternative solution for the personal reproduction of sound is an earphone such as an “ear bud” which is placed directly in or adjacent to the auditory canal. Known earphones generally comprise one or two small audio transducers that are placed directly in or adjacent to the auditory canal. Earphones are used widely with hands-free cellular phone kits and portable audio devices such as mp3 and DVD players.
Earphones can be difficult to locate within the ear, leading to the user discomfort, and in some cases poor performance for the user. Incorrect fit can also lead to earphones falling from the user's ear.
Presently, few noise cancellation ear buds solutions exist in the marketplace. The few products that have been developed and commercialised rely on a feed forward active noise cancellation configuration.
A feed forward active noise cancellation system is relatively simple in that it relies on a reference signal to generate a control response; this reference signal being somehow related to the signal requiring control.
In the case of a feed forward earphone active noise cancellation solution, the best choice of reference signal is a measure of the ambient noise directly outside of the earphone's seal against the ear. This reference signal, obtained by way of a microphone transducer, is processed by noise cancellation electronic circuitry (filters) to generate an appropriate control response. The circuitry is designed to replicate the dynamic behaviour of the acoustic system between the reference measurement and control positions. All things being equal, the control response, once output via the earphone's speaker will effect cancellation of the noise that has infiltrated the ear canal. A feed forward controller is ‘dumb’ in the sense that it does not have any measure of its own performance. It relies on a prior knowledge of the disturbance (noise) and the acoustic system.
Unfortunately, in the case of a feed forward earphone active noise cancellation control configuration, the reference signal is not fully representative of the noise that actually penetrates the earphone's seal and enters the auditory canal. The maximum performance of a feed forward active noise cancellation system can be calculated mathematically by measuring the coherence between the reference signal and the sound that penetrates the ear canal. This can be significantly less than unity, especially where the ear bud does not present a tight seal around the ear canal or the acoustics of the ear canal varies from that measured to determine the control filters.
A feedback control configuration relies on an error measurement located downstream from the point of control. The error represents a logical difference between a desired outcome and the measured result.
As the control response of a feedback control configuration is directly related to its own output it is far more susceptible to an instability condition. This is especially true where the system under control is subject to change. In the context of active noise cancellation, instability manifests itself as an uncontrolled ringing. Such a condition is unpleasant and can damage the hearing organ. Instability problems have lead to very few earphones which incorporate active noise cancellation systems being successful, commercially viable, consumer products. Development of an effective active noise cancellation product requires a careful balancing of a number of system parameters.
Although some noise cancellation (e.g. less than 20 dB) can often be achieved, instability problems mean that effective noise cancellation using an earphone is very difficult without the need for a complex controller. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,985,925 discloses an earplug including a speaker and a microphone for use with an active noise reduction control circuit having a shunt feedback control filter. The earplug can for some audio frequencies provide effective noise cancellation, but a very complex control circuit is required. Also, despite the complex controller, active noise cancellation is poor between 1 kHz and 2 kHz, and the earplug may still have a stability problem in that frequency range.
Another constraint on a controller for present consumer earphone products is size, weight and power constraints. For example, when being used in conjunction with a portable MP3 player a controller needs to be small and light enough to be worn as a medallion, and typically needs to operate off a 1.5 to 3 volt battery power supply. Therefore the controller order, driving voltage swing and available power are very limited. This also makes it important to provide a solution that reduces the demands placed on the controller.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an earphone for a noise cancellation system which will allow the limitations of a feed forward noise cancellation ear bud earphone to be overcome by applying feedback control methods with an acoustic configuration conducive for such an application.
Alternatively or additionally it is an object of the present invention to provide an effective means of providing active noise cancellation in an ear bud that is also stable and robust.
Alternatively or additionally it is an object of the invention to provide an improved ear bud earphone, or an improved earphone noise cancellation system, or to at least provide a useful alternative to known constructions.
Accordingly in one aspect the invention broadly consists in an earphone for an active noise reduction system, the earphone having an auricle portion adapted to be received in the auricle of a human ear, and a canal portion adapted to be received in the auditory canal of the ear, the auricle portion having a speaker and a microphone provided anteriorly of the speaker, the canal portion being rotatably mounted relative to the auricle portion such that the canal portion can be angularly adjusted relative to the auricle portion dependent on the ear geometry of a user to allow the canal portion to be received in the auditory canal and the auricle portion to be supported in the auricle.
Preferably the assembly includes a locking means which may be activated to prevent adjustment of the canal portion relative to the auricle portion.
Preferably the locking means may be selectively deactivated to allow adjustment of the canal portion relative to the auricle portion.
Preferably the canal portion is received in the entrance to the auditory canal.
Preferably the canal portion is received in the auditory canal so as to make an effective acoustic seal between the canal portion and the auditory canal.
Preferably the canal portion is mounted eccentrically relative to the auricle portion.
Alternatively, the canal portion has a central axis disposed at an angle to a central axis of the auricle portion.
Preferably the auricle portion includes an acoustic transducer for producing sound in response to an electrical signal.
Preferably the auricle portion includes a microphone. Preferably the microphone is located anteriorly of the acoustic transducer.
Preferably the canal portion includes a tubular acoustic path, and one or both of the auricle portion and the canal portion provide a cavity upstream of the tubular acoustic path such that the cavity and the tubular acoustic path form a resonator having a desired resonant characteristic.
In a further aspect the invention broadly consists in an earphone for use with the noise cancellation system, the earphone including an acoustic transducer for producing sound in response to an electrical signal, and a microphone located anteriorly of the acoustic transducer.
In a further aspect the invention broadly consists in an earphone assembly comprising a carrier which carries an acoustic transducer for producing sound in response to an electrical signal, and carries a microphone, the carrier being adapted to be retained within a suitable housing.
Preferably the housing comprises a first component having a stem dependent therefrom, and a second component which is adapted to be received in the auricle of an ear.
In a further aspect the invention broadly provides an earphone feedback noise cancellation system including
an ear bud earphone having an acoustic transducer for producing sound in response to an electrical signal and a microphone, and
feedback noise cancellation circuitry adapted to receive a feedback signal from the microphone and provide an appropriate signal to the acoustic transducer to in use provide noise suppression.
In a further aspect the invention broadly provides an earphone having a housing, the housing including an acoustic outlet and at least a part of the housing adjacent to the acoustic outlet being adapted to be received in an ear canal, a speaker driver provided in the housing, an acoustic path from the driver through a pipe to the acoustic outlet, and wherein the construction is such that a resonance occurs at a predetermined frequency or over a predetermined frequency range.
Preferably the resonance is a Helmholtz resonance.
Preferably a cavity is provided in the acoustic path between the driver and the pipe.
Preferably the resonance allows a phase recovery to occur.
Preferably the pipe comprises an elongate or tubular acoustic path.
Preferably the predetermined frequency is approximately 500 Hz-1 kHz.
In a further aspect the invention provides an earphone feedback noise cancellation system including an earphone as set forth in the preceding statement of invention, and feedback noise cancellation circuitry adapted to receive a feedback signal from the microphone and provide an appropriate signal to the speaker in use provide noise suppression.
Further aspect of the invention will be apparent from the following description.
One or more embodiments of the invention will be described by way of example with reference to:
a which is a block diagram representative of a cross-section of an earphone according to the invention located in an auditory canal;
b which is an illustrative plot of the transfer function gain against frequency (Hz) for the open loop acoustic plant, showing the effect of a phase recovery;
c which is an illustrative plot of phase against frequency (Hz) for the open loop acoustic plant, showing the phase recovery provided by design of the earphone;
Referring to
The controller 2 may be provided in a housing which includes a power supply such as a battery. Alternatively, power could be provided from a remote source, the appropriate electrical connections being made via plug 3. In a preferred embodiment, plug 3 comprises an audio plug which is used to receive an audio signal for delivery to the earphones 1, and the noise cancellation controller 2 receives a feedback signal from a microphone (described further below) in each of the earphone assemblies so that the signal provided to the acoustic transducer in each earphone substantially cancels unwanted disturbance noise from the sound delivered to the user.
Turning to
In a preferred embodiment of the invention a carrier 14 provides a sub frame for receiving an acoustic transducer such as speaker 15, which may also be referred to as a driver, and for supporting and carrying a further transducer, being a microphone 35. Carrier 14 provides a convenient and simple way to support the electromechanical components, while also allowing them to be easily removed or replaced if required. The driver 15 exhibits appropriate gain and phase characteristics in a very small diameter. This is achieved by ensuring that the volume and damping conditions are appropriate. An o-ring 16 is provided in a preferred embodiment to ensure an acoustic seal is present between the carrier and housing part 5.
The microphone 35 is also designed with particular characteristics, mainly an effective low frequency response. In a preferred embodiment the microphone is selected to ensure that the phase response of the microphone drops as close to zero as possible.
Still referring again to
As can be seen from
Alternatively, or in addition to the pipe 20 being mounted eccentrically relative to the remainder of housing part 18, the central axis 32 of the canal portion may be angularly displaced relative to a central axis 34 of the auricle portion, such that the relative angle between the axes may be adjusted by rotation of the two portions.
During rotation of the part 18 relative to part 5 the integrity of the internal acoustic seal 22 is maintained so that performance is not compromised by adjustment of the housing parts.
The earphone 1 is designed to include a resonator or oscillator which has the effect of recovering the open loop system phase characteristics to extend the bandwidth over which active noise cancellation is effected and to improve the relative stability of the closed loop. This enables an increase in feedback gain and thus the level of noise cancellation which is achieved. This allows the controller to be kept relatively simple while still achieving effective noise cancellation without instability.
The resonator may be viewed as a Helmholtz resonator, and in a preferred embodiment is designed to create a resonance at a frequency band of approximately 500 Hz-1 kHz which has the effect of recovering the phase information in order to reduce the constructive interference of the system and as a result limits the amplification of the background noise created by the system.
Referring to
l=pipe (20) length
V=volume of the container (i.e. of the auditory canal cavity)
S=cross sectional area of the pipe (20)
c=speed of sound
An impedance change at the opening of the pipe 20 nearest the driver 15 is necessary to prevent the pipe otherwise appearing acoustically as an endless tube. The impedance change is achieved by having a sudden change in the diameter of the exit of the pipe 20 to the internal cavity 36 between the driver 15 and the pipe 20.
The microphone 15 is positioned near the open end of the pipe 20 in order to pick up the resonance.
As can be seen from
Turning now to
The open loop system is defined by Vo/Vin when not closed by the controller 2. When the open loop plant is closed through the controller the closed loop system is realised.
The control law is given by:
e(s)=1/(1+C(s)G(s))
Thus, the larger the gain, the lower the error. The control law may be implemented using known techniques as described in the prior art.
Performance of the system is seen in
From the foregoing that will be seen that an earphone assembly is provided which allows a feedback noise cancellation system to be used with a simple and inexpensive controller without stability problems because the earphone is designed to acoustically achieve a phase recovery. Thus the control law utilised is of as low an order as possible, is power efficient and does not require a substantial voltage swing. The assembly has significant advantages in being adjustable to suit the geometry of a user's ear while also providing an effective acoustic seal with the auditory canal. The assembly is also simple and easy to manufacture, and is easily assembled or disassembled. The modular nature of the electromechanical transducer arrangement means that these components are easily placed within the earphone assembly, and are easily removed if required. The feedback control system that is provided allows very effective noise rejection.
Although certain examples and embodiments have been disclosed herein it will be understood that various modifications and additions that are within the scope and spirit of the invention will occur to those skilled in the art to which the invention relates. All such modifications and additions are intended to be included in the scope of the invention as if described specifically herein.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
543567 | Nov 2005 | NZ | national |
545244 | Feb 2006 | NZ | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2006/003179 | 11/13/2006 | WO | 00 | 2/25/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/054807 | 5/18/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1368307 | Waldron | Feb 1921 | A |
1498727 | Haskel | Jun 1924 | A |
1514152 | Gernsback | Nov 1924 | A |
1586140 | Bonnette | May 1926 | A |
1807225 | Pack | May 1931 | A |
2346395 | Rettinger | Apr 1944 | A |
2379891 | Eckardt | Jul 1945 | A |
2427844 | Eklov | Sep 1947 | A |
2490466 | Olson | Dec 1949 | A |
2603724 | Kettler | Jul 1952 | A |
2622159 | Herman | Dec 1952 | A |
2714134 | Touger | Jul 1955 | A |
2761912 | Touger | Sep 1956 | A |
2775309 | Vilichur | Dec 1956 | A |
2848560 | Wiegand | Aug 1958 | A |
2972018 | Hawley et al. | Feb 1961 | A |
2989598 | Touger | Aug 1961 | A |
3073411 | Bleazey | Jan 1963 | A |
3112005 | Shaw | Nov 1963 | A |
RE26030 | Marchand | May 1966 | E |
3367040 | Vani | Feb 1968 | A |
3403235 | Bishop | Sep 1968 | A |
3532837 | Dyer | Oct 1970 | A |
3602329 | Bauer et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3644939 | Beguin | Feb 1972 | A |
3727004 | Bose | Apr 1973 | A |
3766332 | Carlson | Oct 1973 | A |
3927262 | Goeckel | Dec 1975 | A |
3997739 | Kishikawa | Dec 1976 | A |
4005267 | Gorike | Jan 1977 | A |
4005278 | Gorike | Jan 1977 | A |
4006318 | Sebesta | Feb 1977 | A |
4027117 | Nakamura | May 1977 | A |
4041256 | Ohta | Aug 1977 | A |
4058688 | Nishimura | Nov 1977 | A |
4156118 | Hargrave | May 1979 | A |
4158753 | Gorike | Jun 1979 | A |
4211898 | Atoji et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4297537 | Babb | Oct 1981 | A |
4311206 | Johnson | Jan 1982 | A |
4338489 | Gorike | Jul 1982 | A |
4347405 | Davis | Aug 1982 | A |
4399334 | Kakiuchi | Aug 1983 | A |
4403120 | Yoshimi | Sep 1983 | A |
4418248 | Mathis | Nov 1983 | A |
4441576 | Allen | Apr 1984 | A |
4455675 | Bose | Jun 1984 | A |
4494074 | Bose | Jan 1985 | A |
4527282 | Chaplin et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4528689 | Katz | Jul 1985 | A |
4529058 | Emery | Jul 1985 | A |
4572324 | Fidi et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4581496 | Sweany | Apr 1986 | A |
4592366 | Sainomoto | Jun 1986 | A |
4644581 | Sapiejewski | Feb 1987 | A |
4646872 | Kamon | Mar 1987 | A |
4669129 | Chance | Jun 1987 | A |
4670733 | Bell | Jun 1987 | A |
4742887 | Yamagishi | May 1988 | A |
4809811 | Gorike | Mar 1989 | A |
4847908 | Nieuwendijk | Jul 1989 | A |
4852177 | Ambrose | Jul 1989 | A |
4893695 | Tamura et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4905322 | Aileo et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4922542 | Sapiejewski | May 1990 | A |
4949806 | Hofer | Aug 1990 | A |
4985925 | Langberg et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4989271 | Sapiejewski | Feb 1991 | A |
5001763 | Moseley | Mar 1991 | A |
5020163 | Aileo et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5117461 | Moseley | May 1992 | A |
5134659 | Moseley | Jul 1992 | A |
5181252 | Sapiejewski | Jan 1993 | A |
5182774 | Bourk | Jan 1993 | A |
5208868 | Sapiejewski | May 1993 | A |
5267321 | Langberg | Nov 1993 | A |
5305387 | Sapiejewski | Apr 1994 | A |
5333622 | Casali et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5343523 | Bartlett et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5497426 | Jay | Mar 1996 | A |
5504281 | Whitney | Apr 1996 | A |
5652799 | Ross et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5675658 | Brittain | Oct 1997 | A |
5740257 | Marcus | Apr 1998 | A |
5913178 | Olsson | Jun 1999 | A |
5937070 | Todter et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5970160 | Nilsson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6061456 | Andrea et al. | May 2000 | A |
6084976 | Lin | Jul 2000 | A |
6163615 | Callahan | Dec 2000 | A |
6278786 | McIntosh | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6532296 | Vaudrey et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6597792 | Sapiejewski | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6831984 | Sapiejewski | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7103188 | Jones | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7248705 | Mishan | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7289636 | Saunders et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7616772 | Sabick et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
20020015501 | Sapiejewski | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20040017919 | Miyakura | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20060067555 | Tsai | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060098836 | Sabick et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20080159554 | Sung et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1101203 | Apr 1995 | CN |
1213626 | Apr 1999 | CN |
3512405 | Oct 1985 | DE |
8703084 | Nov 1987 | DE |
0195641 | Sep 1986 | EP |
0582404 | Feb 1994 | EP |
0582404 | Feb 1994 | EP |
0414479 | Sep 1995 | EP |
0688143 | Dec 1995 | EP |
0873040 | Oct 1998 | EP |
0688143 | Aug 2001 | EP |
2595178 | Sep 1987 | FR |
1379372 | Jan 1975 | GB |
2000941 | Jan 1979 | GB |
2168220 | Jun 1986 | GB |
2172470 | Sep 1986 | GB |
2187361 | Sep 1987 | GB |
2188210 | Sep 1987 | GB |
3706481 | Sep 1987 | GB |
2234882 | Feb 1991 | GB |
2234882 | Feb 1991 | GB |
04227396 | Aug 1992 | JP |
8101815 | Nov 1981 | NL |
WO9113429 | Sep 1991 | WO |
WO 9500946 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO 9508907 | Mar 1995 | WO |
WO 9841974 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 02084982 | Oct 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100142726 A1 | Jun 2010 | US |