The present invention relates to a flooring system and, more particularly, a noise control flooring system that reduces noise transmission in a building structure containing the system.
Multi-family housing is a large market for quite living and noise is one of the most litigated issues in apartment and condo construction. Building codes call for specific performance levels for noise and ASTM has separated the noise into airborne and structural causes. For many years, the common method of controlling vibration noise in wood and concrete floor/ceiling assemblies has been to pour a floating substrate on top of a void creating device commonly referred to as an “entangled net”. The entangled net is 90% air with more rigid polymer filaments supporting a separation fabric layer that suspended the floating substrate from 0.125″ to 1.0″ above a wood subsurface creating a void space. The void limited touching of the two solid materials (subfloor and floating substrate) limited the energy transfer. The limited energy transfer consequently limited the ability of the vibration waves to pass through to the ceiling side of the construction. There are a number of products in the market today that have these characteristics and are successful in achieving code compliance. There are also many developers that are keenly interested in higher levels of performance than this system provides.
The ASTM codes have a one number designation that identifies performance over a broad frequency range from 100 Hz to 3150 Hz. Product performance over the range is measured and deviations from the standard established limit the success of the system's performance. It has been proven that a void space creating material like an entangled net significantly enhances performance of the assembly.
The vibration noise passes in two manners. One means is through the actual touching of the floating floor to the filaments and the filament contact with the subfloor (conduction of vibration waves). The second method is through the air pressure build up within the “entangled net” product, “convection”. Consequently, thicker entangled net products perform better since the air is allowed to move more freely through the void space and limits air pressure.
Each flooring assembly performs differently for noise, add or subtract a component like wallboard, change a structural element from a 2″×10″ joist to an open web, add a resilient channel and the sound performance will change, sometimes dramatically. Assemblies are tested for their ability to control airborne sound and rated with a Sound Transmission Classification (STC) number. The higher the number, the better the job the assembly does of controlling airborne sound. Vibration or structural sound is rated in a similar manner with an ASTM test resulting in an Impact Insulation Classification number. Again, the higher the number, the better. Additionally, every assembly has a frequency at which it resonates. Just like a tuning fork, a floor will amplify a noise at a given frequency. The goal of the assembly is to bring that frequency down to an inaudible level, the lower the better, although humans can't hear much below 50 Hz.
Prior art patents and publications of interest include the U.S. patent to Keene et al. U.S. Pat. No. 7,096,630 and U.S. patent application Publication to Keene 2006/0230699. Both the patent and publication disclose the use of an “entangled net” in flooring systems. Neither, however, disclose or suggest that the net be combined with a compressible layer for achieving reduction in noise transmission. The disclosures of the aforesaid patent and publication are herein incorporated by reference.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, a noise control flooring system is provided that reduces noise transmission in a building structure containing the system. The system includes a solid substrate layer, such as a layer of concrete or wood or the like. A compressible layer overlies at least a portion of the substrate layer. An entangled net layer overlies at least a portion of the compressible layer with the entangled net layer being comprised of multiple polymers filaments and air, together forming a void space. A separation layer overlies at least a portion of the entangled net layer such that the separation layer serves to carry a floating, solid substrate layer, such as a concrete layer and wherein the concrete layer provides loading for causing the compressible layer to compress into the overlying entangled net layer.
In accordance with a more limited aspect of the present invention, the separation layer is constructed of material that is air and vapor pervious while, at the same time, is substantially liquid impervious.
In accordance with a still further limited aspect of the present invention, the compressible layer compresses into the bottom side of the entangled net layer as a result of the loading from the floating substrate, thereby creating a small cushion under the filaments of the entangled net layer pressing back toward the overlying floating substrate layer.
In accordance with a still further limited aspect of the present invention, the compressible layer is made from a polymer-based filament in a process known as carding.
In accordance with a still further aspect of the present invention, the carding process employed in the compressible layer includes combing the filaments of the compressible layer in one direction, together with needling them and heating them and causing them to be combined in a monolithic mat.
The foregoing and other features of the present invention will become more apparent to one skilled in the art to which the present invention relates upon consideration of the following description of the invention with reference to the accompanying drawing, wherein:
The sole FIGURE,
Referring now the drawing,
As more completely described in the aforesaid U.S. Pat. No. 7,096,630, the entangled net layer 16 includes a plurality of intertwined filaments that twist and turn about at random and are bonded at random into sections or contact zones as by heat bonding or other suitable bonding or connection technique. These filaments may be of any suitable strong and mildew-resistant polyethylene-type material, olefin or polymer. These are formed in a desired thickness such as on the order of about ¼″ to about ¾″ to provide the desired breathability and venting capability for water vapor, air and other gaseous substances.
The separation layer 18 that overlies a portion of the entangled net layer 16 is preferably a material that is air and vapor pervious while, at the same time, is substantially liquid impervious. This layer is also described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 7,096,630 and is referred to therein as the barrier sheet. As described therein, this layer is preferably a non-woven film-like material. It functions to confine liquids, such as water, to the area atop thereof, such as a hardenable cement-type material may be poured to harden or cure in place. This substrate layer 20, which overlies at least a portion of layer 18, is a floating solid substrate and may take forms such as cement or wood, or the like. Preferably, however, it is a gypsum cement layer.
In the embodiment illustrated in
This compressible layer 14 is manufactured from an ultra lightweight fabric that is “cotton” like in nature. The “cotton” fabric is engineered to compress into the bottom side of the entangled net 16 creating a small cushion under the filaments and pressing back toward the floating substrate 20. The “cotton” fabric 14 is really made from a polymer based filament in a manufacturing process known as carding. In carding, chopped filaments are combed in one direction and then heated and needled to make them combine into a monolithic mat. Needling is the driving and removing of sharp, thin metal (needles) through the filaments to entangle them together. This carding/heating/needling process allows for the material to achieve a designation as a high loft or thick fabric quality With the thick product, a 100 gram per square meter material can be from 0.125″ thick to 0.626″ thick, depending on density. Many other products that are carded/heated/needled are engineered to be dense and flat. Consequently, this fabric is highly compressible and can be engineered to almost completely compress under a typical load, such as the load of a floating substrate.
In this application, the fabric is between 50 gsm (grams per square meter) and 200 gsm. The floating substrate 20 is typically a gypsum concrete underlayment that is poured onto a separation layer 18 and hardens to a compressive strength of approximately 2000 psi (pounds per square inch). The floating substrate is typically between 0.75″ and 2.0″ in thickness and overall weighs between 7.5 pounds per square foot and 20 pounds per square foot. Adjusting the fabric density will allow for the proper compression of the high loft fabric; with the goal of achieving a fully loaded compressible fabric that allows the gypsum concrete floating substrate to have a solid base.
Extensive sound tests have been performed on this product and found that it performs between 3 and 5 points (in the ASTM standard for IIC) better than a mat without the high loft fabric. In actual octave band performance, the material greatly limits the dB level from 125 Hz to 2500 Hz to the tune of 4 to 6 dB or a halving of the sound level. The mat with this compressible fabric layer performs better at 0.25″ than the typical “entangled net” at 0.75″ of thickness, without the compressed fabric.
Three qualities work in an impact noise control mat void space, resilience and thickness. Vibration noise is transmitted via conduction first and through air pressure build up secondly. So, the actual amount of contact between two solid materials works to pass vibration noise easily. If one of the materials is resilient, there is an absorption effect. If the materials have resilience or air space, the thicker the material or void space is, the better the noise absorption will be. The thickness in a resilient, mostly void product works well at controlling vibration noise. Next, different types of materials will absorb different frequencies so, if in the same space; the material changes from 95% air to 50% air and the resilience changes too, different frequencies will be absorbed adding to the noise control. The compressible fabric in conjunction with the “entangled net” product does a number of things. First, it is more resilient than the entangled net, second, it is a different density than the entangled net and lastly, it limits air pressure build up by “diffusing” air movement.
The compressible fabric adds so little to the thickness in the application and controls noise in the floor so well. It almost completely compresses to the original thickness of the entangled net mat (0.25″ is one version but the entangled net could be up to an inch in thickness and as small as 0.10″). The profile added is about 0.05″ and the stability/flex of the material is very good because the dense; entangled net material limits the deflection. Any product that was highly compressible like a fabric or foam would work in this case. Any product that had a void space such as dimpled sheets of plastic or has a dimpled bottom might have similar success with a highly compressible fabric.
Air movement is the important element. The overall thickness of the composite changes very little. The composite in this case is adding a fabric that, when left uncompressed, is of relative substantial thickness but when fully compressed, adds only about five one hundredths of an inch to the assembly. In fact, the fabric in many areas is as thick as the uncompressed fabric but has filled in the void area in the entangled net. The pressure built up in the entangled net is diffused by the highly compressed fabrics division of the air space. In this case, the composite almost completely compresses into the void space. Preferably, the composition is of a thickness equal to 0.25″. All of the products used must support the concrete substrate and finished floor overlying the structure so there is a balance between sponginess or resilience for noise control and stiffness for structural support. The filaments of the entangled net act as support points in the composite and limit deflection.
It will be understood that the above description of the present invention is susceptible to various modifications, changes and adaptations, and the same are intended to be comprehended within the meaning and range of equivalents of the appended claims. The presently disclosed embodiment is considered in all respects to be illustrative, and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is indicated by the appended claims, rather than the foregoing description.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2069755 | Foster | Feb 1937 | A |
2388968 | Hedgren | Nov 1945 | A |
2799232 | Jaeger | Jul 1957 | A |
2897109 | Voigtman | Jul 1959 | A |
3122073 | Masse | Feb 1964 | A |
3451758 | McClain | Jun 1969 | A |
3468096 | Franz | Sep 1969 | A |
3500618 | Sokol | Mar 1970 | A |
3501878 | Segal | Mar 1970 | A |
3596425 | Kodaras | Aug 1971 | A |
3686049 | Manner et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3687759 | Werner et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3691004 | Werner et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3837988 | Hennen et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3847524 | Mott | Nov 1974 | A |
3900102 | Hurst | Aug 1975 | A |
4010748 | Dobritz | Mar 1977 | A |
4012249 | Strapp | Mar 1977 | A |
4073997 | Richards et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4094380 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4211807 | Yazawa et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4212692 | Rasen et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4315392 | Sylvest | Feb 1982 | A |
4546024 | Brown | Oct 1985 | A |
4617219 | Schupack | Oct 1986 | A |
4681786 | Brown | Jul 1987 | A |
4685259 | Eberhart et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4698249 | Brown | Oct 1987 | A |
4841705 | Fuhrer | Jun 1989 | A |
4851277 | Valkenburg et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4879856 | Jones et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4942699 | Spinelli | Jul 1990 | A |
5031721 | Barden et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5052157 | Ducroux et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5099627 | Coulton et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5111627 | Brown | May 1992 | A |
5187905 | Pourtau et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5205091 | Brown | Apr 1993 | A |
5224315 | Winter, IV | Jul 1993 | A |
5230189 | Sourlis | Jul 1993 | A |
5230192 | Webb et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5259157 | Ault | Nov 1993 | A |
5343661 | Sourlis | Sep 1994 | A |
5369926 | Borland | Dec 1994 | A |
5383314 | Rothberg | Jan 1995 | A |
5489462 | Sieber | Feb 1996 | A |
5572842 | Stief et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5584950 | Gaffigan | Dec 1996 | A |
5589242 | Stief et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5598673 | Atkins | Feb 1997 | A |
5619832 | Myrvold | Apr 1997 | A |
5641950 | Kotter | Jun 1997 | A |
5652001 | Perry et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5669192 | Opdyke et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5673521 | Coulton et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5730548 | Brero et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5756942 | Tanaka et al. | May 1998 | A |
5867957 | Holtrop | Feb 1999 | A |
5902432 | Coulton et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907932 | LeConte et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5937594 | Sourlis | Aug 1999 | A |
5960595 | McCorsley, III et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5984044 | Christensen | Nov 1999 | A |
6023892 | Sourlis | Feb 2000 | A |
RE36676 | Sourlis | May 2000 | E |
6067781 | Ford et al. | May 2000 | A |
6112476 | Schulenburg | Sep 2000 | A |
6131353 | Egan | Oct 2000 | A |
6167668 | Fine et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6171984 | Paulson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6253872 | Neumann | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6256955 | Lolly et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277024 | Coulton | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6298613 | Coulton | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308472 | Coulton | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6355333 | Waggoner et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6594965 | Coulton | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6662504 | Krogstad | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6676199 | Buisson et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6759135 | Bramlett et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6786013 | Coulton | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6804922 | Egan | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6817442 | Van Sleet et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6883284 | Burgunder et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6920723 | Downey | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6981916 | Coulton | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6983822 | O'Regan et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990775 | Koester | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7093395 | Hinault et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7096630 | Keene et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7182688 | Coulton | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7384331 | Coulton | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7393273 | Ehrman et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7422520 | Coulton et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7765761 | Paradis | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20020025751 | Chen et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020170648 | Dinkel | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030033779 | Downey | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030114055 | Burton et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030207640 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040129493 | Campbell | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040182037 | Sourlis | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050009428 | Porter et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050103568 | Sapoval et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050144901 | Egan et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050178613 | Humphries et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050194205 | Guo | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050284059 | Rerup | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050284690 | Proscia et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060117687 | Ehrman et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060144012 | Manning et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060230699 | Keene | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070000198 | Payne et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070051069 | Grimes | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070234650 | Coulton et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070261365 | Keene | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070289238 | Payne et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080041005 | Ehrman et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080148669 | Ehrman et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080220714 | Caruso et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080289292 | Giles et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090025316 | Coulton et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090038249 | Coulton et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090241453 | Dellinger et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090242325 | Dellinger et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100229486 A1 | Sep 2010 | US |