Noise damping device of rotation driving apparatus

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6360843
  • Patent Number
    6,360,843
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, June 24, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 26, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
A noise damping device of a rotation driving apparatus includes a housing; and at least one rotating disk installed to be rotated by a driving source within the housing. The rotating disk and the housing are assembled to satisfy the following Equationδm
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention relates to a noise damping device of a rotation driving apparatus, which can dampen noise caused by air flow generated when disks such as hard disks installed within a housing are rotated.




2. Description of the Related Art




As an example of a rotation driving apparatus, a hard disk drive (HDD) shown in

FIG. 1

comprises a housing including a base frame


12


installed in a computer main body (not shown) for supporting hard disks


18


and a cover frame


14


assembled to the base frame


12


for protecting the hard disks


18


, and a noise damping device.




The hard disks


18


are rotated by a driving source such as a spindle motor (not shown) installed on the base frame


12


so that a predetermined data recording/reproducing means (not shown) can record data on the hard disks


18


or reproduce the data recorded on the hard disks


18


.




The noise damping device is attached to the outer surface of the cover frame


14


by an adhesive such as a bond or a double-sided bonding tape so that the noise damping device can absorb noise generated within the housing


10


, and comprises a damper member


16


usually manufactured of stainless steel in a thin plate structure.




In the above structure, when the hard disks


18


are rotated at high speed so as to record data on the hard disks


18


or reproduce the recorded data, noise is generated within the housing


10


.




The noise can be classified into, for example, a structure-borne sound such as a solid-borne sound generated when impact and vibrations which a structural body experiences from a driving source propagate through the structural body, and a pneumatic or flow sound such as an air-borne sound generated when a structural body is forcibly vibrated by air flow. The air-borne sound is generated by an irregular eddy flow between a first boundary layer


22


and a second boundary layer


24


wherein the first boundary layer


22


flows in a direction away from a rotation center D between the hard disks


18


and the cover frame


14


, and the second boundary layer


24


flows from outer sides to the rotation center D as shown in FIG.


2


.




The noise generated in the housing


10


can be absorbed and reduced, to a certain extent, by the damper member


16


. However, in the above conventional art, since the damper member


16


for damping noise must be separately attached to the outer surface of the housing


10


, the manufacturing cost is high and more assembly operations are required. In addition, when the temperature within the computer main body rises, the bonding force of the adhesive deteriorates due to heat generated in the computer main body.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




To solve the above problems, it is an objective of the present invention to provide a noise damping device of a rotation driving apparatus, the structure of which is improved so that noises can be dampened by fundamentally suppressing abnormal air flow generated when disks rotate within a housing.




Accordingly, to achieve the above objective, there is provided a noise damping device of a rotation driving apparatus comprising: a housing; and at least one rotating disk installed to be rotated by a driving source within the housing, wherein the rotating disk and the housing are assembled to satisfy the following Equation,






δ


m




<h<δ




m


+1.5δ


f








where δ


m


is the thickness of air layers which move from a rotation center of the rotating disk to the outside thereof and are distributed around the rotating disk when the rotating disk rotates at a normal operating speed, δ


f


is the thickness of air layers which move from the outside of the rotating disk to the rotation center thereof and are distributed around an upper inside surface and the base surface of a housing, which face the rotating disk, and h is the distance between the rotating disk and the upper inside surface or the base surface of the housing.




In addition, it is preferable that the housing includes a base frame for supporting the rotating disk, and a cover frame assembled to the base frame to cover the rotating disk. The cover frame is installed on the base frame so that the following Equation can be satisfied,




 δ


m




<h




1





m


+1.5δ


f






where h


1


is the distance between the rotating disk and the cover frame.




Additionally, it is preferable that the rotating disk is installed on the base frame so that the following Equation can be satisfied,






δ


m<




h




2





m


+1.5δ


f








where h


2


is the distance between the rotating disk and the base frame.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




Other features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent by describing in detail preferred embodiments thereof with reference to the attached drawings in which:





FIG. 1

is a partially cut away perspective view illustrating a conventional hard disk drive;





FIG. 2

is a partially cut away perspective view for describing the operation of the hard disk drive shown in

FIG. 1

; and





FIG. 3

is a schematic sectional view illustrating a noise damping device of a rotation driving apparatus according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




Referring to

FIG. 3

, a noise damping device of a rotation driving apparatus according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention includes a housing


100


, hard disks


140


installed within the housing and a spindle motor


130


for rotating the hard disks


140


.




The housing


100


includes a base frame


110


for supporting the spindle motor


130


, and a cover frame


120


assembled to the base frame


110


for protecting the hard disks


140


.




The hard disks


140


are stacked with a first disk


142


and a second disk


144


for increased data storage capacity. Heads


150


which are moved by a predetermined moving means within the housing


100


record data on the hard disks


140


and reproduce the recorded data.




In order to dampen noise generated when the hard disks


140


rotate, the hard disks


140


and the housing


100


are assembled so that the distance h


1


between the hard disks


140


and the inner upper surface


122


of the housing


100


and/or the distance h


2


between the hard disks


140


and the inner base surface


112


of the housing


100


satisfy Equation (1)






δ


m




<hi<δ




m


+1.5δ


f


(


i=


1, 2)  (1)






where δ


m


and δ


f


are the thicknesses of the first and second boundary layers


162


and


164


, respectively, when a boundary layer


160


of air flowing within the housing


100


is divided according to the flow direction when the hard disks


140


rotate at a normal operating speed.




Here, Equation (1) is derived from Equation (2) which theoretically expresses the thickness δ of the boundary layer


160


(usually called Eckman layer) composed of the first and second boundary layers


162


and


164


,









δ




u
Ω




(


δ
f

>

δ
m


)






(
2
)













where δ is the thickness of the boundary layer


160


in mm, u is the dynamic viscosity of fluid in cm


2


/sec, and Ω is the angular velocity of the hard disks


140


in revolutions/min.




Theoretically, in order to prevent friction between the hard disks


140


and the cover frame


120


and suppress the formation of an eddy flow layer, it is sufficient that the distances h


1


and h


2


are both less than δ. However, in reality, since the thickness δ


f


of the second boundary layer


164


becomes thick due to a predetermined gap dθ between the outer edge of the hard disks


140


and the inner side surface of cover frame


120


, there is a blowing effect. Therefore, the actual thickness of the second boundary layer is 1.5δ


f


, which is larger than the theoretical value by about 20˜30%. Hence, the distances h


1


and h


2


must be smaller than the sum of the thickness δ


m


of the first boundary layer


162


and the actual thickness 1.5δ


f


.




The cover frame


120


may be designed so that the distance h


1


can satisfy Equation (1) by attaching an auxiliary member (not shown) of a predetermined thickness on the inner side surface of a conventional cover frame


14


(please refer to FIG.


1


).




The operation of a rotation driving apparatus according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to Table 1.




When the rotation speed Ω of the hard disks


140


is 5,400 rpm, the theoretical thickness δ of the boundary layer


160


based on Equation 2 is about 0.17 mm, and when the rotation speed Ω is 7,200 rpm, the theoretical thickness δ is about 0.15 mm. In addition, in an ideal case in which there is no structural body around the hard disks


140


, the thickness δ


m


of the first boundary layer


162


is about 4δ and the thickness δ


f


of the second boundary layer


164


is about 8δ. Therefore, even though the sum of the theoretical thicknesses of the two boundary layers


162


and


164


, i.e., δ


m





f


=12δ is about 2.04 mm, the actual thickness δ


m





f


=12δ is about 2.3˜2.5 mm due to the blowing effect and is thicker than the theoretical thickness.















TABLE 1











h1 [mm]




Noise [dBA]




























First Experimental Example




4




35.5







Second Experimental Example




3




34.0







Third Experimental Example




2.7




33.3







Fourth Experimental Example




2.5




32.8







Fifth Experimental Example




2.3




32.7







Comparative Example




5




35.2















Referring to Table 1, in the Comparative Example in which a conventional damper member


16


(

FIG. 1

) was attached on the outside of the housing


10


and the distance h


1


was 5 mm, measured noise was 35.2 dBA; however in the fifth Experimental Example in which the distance h


1


was 2.3 mm, measured noise was 32.7 dBA and was reduced by about 2.5 dBA in comparison to the Comparative Example. Hence, if the housing


100


and the hard disks


140


are designed so that the distance h


1


can satisfy the conditions of Equation 1, the formation of an eddy flow layer can be suppressed and noise can be effectively reduced even without a conventional damper


16


.




In addition, it can be seen that less noise was generated when the distance h


1


was smaller within the range satisfying Equation (1). Also, when the rotation speed Ω of the hard disks was 5,400 rpm and the distance h


1


was larger than the thickness δ


m


of the first boundary layer


162


, the thickness δ


m


of the first boundary layer


162


could be less than about 0.7˜0.8 mm and the possible drag force between the hard disks


140


and the cover frame


120


could be prevented in advance.




Further, noise generated when the hard disks


140


are upon installation tilted due to the assembly tolerance of the hard disks


140


or when the center of mass and the rotation center D of the hard disks


140


do not coincide with each other, can be effectively reduced by determining the distances h


1


and h


2


to satisfy Equation (1).




The following Table 2 shows noise values of experimental results of first, second, and third Experimental Examples and a Comparative Example. In the first Experimental Example, noise generated with the housing


100


was measured when the hard disks


140


were tilted. In the second Experimental Example, noise was measured when the center of mass and the rotation center D of the hard disks


140


did not coincide with each other. In the third Experimental Example, noise was measured when the hard disks


140


were tilted and the distance h


1


was determined to satisfy Equation 1, i.e., h


1


=2.5 mm, and in the Comparative Example, noise was measured when a conventional damper member


16


(

FIG. 1

) was attached to the housing


100


.














TABLE 2











Noise [dBA]



























First Experimental Example




34.7







Second Experimental Example




37.2







Third Experimental Example




33.3







Comparative Example




35.0















Referring to Table 2, even though the first Experimental Example had minimal influence on noise in comparison with the Comparative Example, the second Experimental Example generated noise greater than the Comparative Example by about 2.2 dBA. In addition, the third Experimental Example had reduced noise by about 4 dBA in comparison with the second Experimental Example.




Even though this embodiment has been described mainly in connection with the distance h


1


between the cover frame


120


and the hard disks


140


, noise can be reduced when the distance h


2


is determined to satisfy Equation 1.




It is contemplated that numerous modifications may be made to the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the claims.



Claims
  • 1. A noise damping device of a rotation driving apparatus comprising:a housing; and at least one disk rotatable mounted within the housing, wherein the disk and the housing are assembled to satisfy the following Equation, δm<h<δm+1.5δf where δm is a thickness of air layers which move from a rotation center of the disk to an outside thereof and are distributed around the disk when the disk rotates at a normal operating speed, δf is a thickness of air layers which move from the outside of the disk to the rotation center thereof and are distributed around an upper inside surface and a base surface of the housing, which face the disk when the disk rotates at a normal operating speed, and h is a distance between the disk and the upper inside surface or the base surface of the housing.
  • 2. The noise damping device of claim 1, wherein the at least one disk is rotated by a driving source within the housing.
  • 3. The noise damping device of claim 1, wherein the housing includes a base frame for supporting the at least one disk and a cover frame assembled to the base frame for covering the at least one disk.
  • 4. A noise damping device of a rotation driving apparatus comprising:a housing having a base frame and a cover frame assembled to the base frame, and a first and second disk positioned within the housing, wherein the cover frame is installed on the base frame so that the following Equation is satisfied, δm<h1<δm+1.5δf where δm is a thickness of air layers which move from a rotation center of the first and second disks to an outside thereof and are distributed around the disks when the disks rotate at a normal operating speed, δf is a thickness of air layers which move from the outside of the first and second disks to the rotation center thereof and are distributed around an upper inside surface and a base surface of the housing, which face the disks when the disks rotate at a normal operating speed and where h1 is the distance between the first disk and the cover frame.
  • 5. The noise damping device of a rotation driving apparatus as claimed in claim 4, wherein the second disk is installed on the base frame so that the following Equation is satisfied,δm<h2<δm+1.5δf where h2 is the distance between the second disk and the base frame.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
98-24410 Jun 1998 KR
US Referenced Citations (4)
Number Name Date Kind
5761184 Dauber et al. Jun 1998 A
5781373 Larson et al. Jul 1998 A
6097568 Ekhoff Aug 2000 A
6177173 Nelson Jan 2001 B1