The technical field of this invention is voice codecs in wireless telephones.
Enhanced Variable Rate Codec (EVRC) is a speech codec used in code division for multiple access (CDMA) wireless telephone systems. EVRC is source controlled variable rate coder where the a frame of speech corresponding to 20 mS of speech can be encoded in any one of full rate (171 bits), half rate (80 bits) and one-eighth rate (16 bits) depending on the speech content. The coder has noise pre-processor (NPP) which suppresses background noise to improve the quality of speech. There is a need in the art to improve the noise pre-processor under noisy conditions to improve the speech quality.
This invention is improvements in a noise pre-processor used in a speech codec. The method includes: forming a Fast Fourier transform of sampled speech input signals; filtering into a plurality of channels; forming a signal energy estimate for each channel; forming a signal to noise ratio estimate for each channel; forming a voice metric; determining whether to modify the signal to noise ratio estimate; and forming a channel gain for each channel.
Forming the signal energy estimate includes smoothing the energy estimate employing an adaptive smoothing constant α. The smoothing constant α is updated toward a first smoothing constant if a signal to noise ratio estimates in the previous frame are above a threshold value for more than five channels and toward a second lower smoothing constant otherwise.
Forming a signal to noise ratio estimate for each channel includes conditional boosting of the signal to noise ratio estimate. If the current signal energy estimate in a given channel is more than a predetermined factor of a noise energy estimate and a signal to noise ratio estimates in the previous frame are greater than a threshold value for more than five channels, then the channel's signal to noise ratio is a weighted sum of a current signal to noise ratio estimate with the previous frame signal to noise ratio estimate using a gain of 1.25. Otherwise it is unchanged. If the signal energy estimate is less than the predetermined factor of the noise energy estimate, then the signal to noise ratio estimate is averaged over the previous frame without any gain.
Deciding whether to modify the signal to noise estimates by resetting them to a predetermined value includes two long term prediction estimates.
Forming the voice metric for each channel includes comparing a pattern of signal to noise estimates for the plural channels to two templates corresponding to fricative and nasal speech sounds. If there is a match, the voice metric is set greater than a voice metric threshold and a signal to noise ratio modification flag is set to FALSE.
Forming gain factors includes a use of adaptive value of a minimum gain in the gain computation as opposed to the fixed minimum gain used in the prior art.
These and other aspects of this invention are illustrated in the drawings, in which:
Handset 110 is bidirectionally coupled to coder/decoder (codec) 120. Specifically, speaker 112 receives electrical speech signals from codec 120 for reproduction into speech and microphone 114 coverts received speech sounds into electrical speech signals supplied to codec 120. Codec 120 codes the electrical speech signals from microphone 114 into signals that can be wirelessly transmitted via transceiver 130. Codec 120 receives coded signals from transceiver 130 and decodes them into electrical speech signals that can be reproduced by speaker 112.
Transceiver 130 is bidirectionally coupled to codec 120 as previously described. Transceiver 130 transmits coded speech signals from codec 120 as radio waves via antenna 140. Transceiver 130 receives radio waves via antenna 140 and supplies corresponding coded speech signals to codec 120.
The input speech signal 201 is subject to a Fast Fourier Transform in FFT unit 210. The frequency domain data from FFT unit 210 is divided into 16 channels spanning frequencies from 125 Hz to 4000 Hz in filters 220a to 220p. These channels are adjacent and span the speech frequency range. The following processing is generally on a per-channel basis.
Channel energy estimate units 230a to 230p sum the energy in the corresponding frequency bin. Channel energy estimate units 230a to 230p also time smoothes these energy estimates for the corresponding frequency bins. The energy smoothing combines the previous frame's smoothed channel energy estimate with the energy estimate of the current frame as follows:
SEChi,n=α*EChi,n+(1−α)SEChi,n-1 (1)
where: SEChi,n is the smoothed energy estimate for channel i at time n; EChi,n is the current energy estimate for channel i at time n; and α is a smoothing constant equal to 0.55. Channel energy estimate units 230a to 230p further clamp the minimum smoothed energy estimate to MIN_CHAN_ENGR as follows:
Signal to noise estimators 240a to 240p compute respective channel estimated signal to noise ratios based on the channel signal SEChi,n and the channel noise energy estimate NEChi,n. A preliminary signal to noise ratio PSNRChi,n is set to zero if negative. This clamped PSNRChi,n is divided by a factor of 0.375 factor and added to a floor of 0.1875/0.375 as follows:
where: PSNRChi,n is the preliminary signal to noise ratio for channel i at time n; and SNRChi,n is the estimated channel signal to noise ratio for channel i at time n.
Voice metric unit 250 computes a value of a voice metric (vm_sum) from the estimated signal to noise ratio of all channels. The value of vm_sum is computed every 10 ms as follows:
where: vm_sum is the voice metric to be computed; vm_table is a look-up table yielding a number for each signal to noise ratio input; and ch_snr[i] is the channel signal to noise ratio estimate for channel i SNRChi,n. Depending on the value of the voice metric vm_sum, signal to noise estimator 240i optionally updates the channel noise energy estimate NEChi,n.
SNR modification unit 260 determines whether the channel SNR estimates are modified. For each channel the channel SNR estimate is compared with a threshold INDEX_THLD. This value INDEX_THLD is typically 12. If for the sixth to the sixteenth channels the SNR estimates are less than INDEX_THLD for more than 5 channels, the SNR estimates are conditionally modified or reset to 1. In SNR modification unit 260 a signal to noise ratio modify_flag is set TRUE when channel SNR estimates for fewer than five channels ranging between the sixth channel to the sixteenth channel are above 12, else modify_flag is FALSE.
where: index_cnt is the count of channels where the SNR estimate is below INDEX_THLD, which is 12 in this example; INDEX_CNT_THLD is the index count threshold, which is 5 in this example. If SNR modification unit 260 determines the SNR estimates are to be modified, they are reset to 1 dB, subject to the condition that vm_sum is less than a voice metric threshold. This will be further detailed below.
Channel gain units 270a to 270p calculate a gain for the corresponding channel based upon the corresponding optionally modified SNR estimate. The prior art noise pre-processor 200 uses a fixed minimum gain value MIN_GAIN of −13 dB.
Channel energy estimate units 330a to 330p sum the energy in the corresponding frequency bin. Channel energy estimate units 330a to 330p also provide time smoothed energy estimates for the corresponding frequency bins. A fixed value of 0.55 for the updating constant α of the prior art subjectively introduces buzziness in the speech quality particularly noticeable in the speech transition regions and non-stationary regions. This invention uses an adaptive smoothing constant α. If the previous frame's SNR estimates are greater than 10 dB for more than five channels, then α is updated towards a value of 0.80. This change in α is based on the fact that the prior detected signal energy is sufficiently higher than background noise and thus should contribute less to the signal portion of the SNR estimate. This provides less averaging with the past value of smoothed channel energy if the frame is likely to be active speech frame and provides a more accurate estimate of the instantaneous signal energy for that time frame. Otherwise, when the previous frame's SNR estimate is more than 10 dB for less than or equal to five channels, then α is updated toward a value of 0.55 used in the prior art. This supplies a greater contribution from past speech frames which are likely to be noise-only frames. Thus the smoothed signal to noise estimate is computed as follows:
If count>threshold count1 then α=0.25*α+0.75*α1 else α=0.25*α+0.75*α2 (7)
SEChi,n=α*EChi,n+(1−α)SEChi,n-1 (8)
where: count is the number of channels for which the signal to noise ratio estimate for the previous frame is greater than 10 dB; threshold count1 is a predetermined constant which is 5 in this example; α is an adaptive smoothing constant; α1 is a first smoothing constant, in this example 0.80; α2 is a second smoothing constant, in this example 0.55; SEChi,n is the smoothed energy estimate for channel i at time n; and EChi,n is the current energy estimate for channel i at time n. Thus the smoothing constant α moves asymptotically toward 0.80 if the count exceeds threshold count and moves asymptotically toward 0.55 if not.
Noise pre-processor 300 differs from noise pre-processor 200 in the SNR estimators 340a to 340p. The SNR estimates of SNR estimators 240a to 240p were noisy. This noise was especially evident in the speech ONSET and OFFSET regions where fricatives, nasals or stop-consonants are most likely. The weak speech signal in such frames causes the SNR estimates to be low. This resulted in unwanted suppression of these frames via the channel gain output. This frame suppression causes deterioration of speech quality. SNR estimators 340a to 340p employ a running conditional averaging of SNR estimates with applying conditionally a gain to boost the SNR estimates. This conditional smoothing 340a to 340p causes SNR estimates to be highly smoothed version of SNR of current and the past frame if SNR of the current frame is found to be below a threshold value (same as when signal energy after noise suppression is more than twice as strong as the noise energy i.e. a posteriori SNR of about 4.77 dB). Otherwise it follows the current frame's SNR estimate but except for the condition where more than five channels show SNR greater than 10 dB for the current frame. For this particular case, band SNR estimates are scaled up with a gain factor of 1.25. The highly smoothed version of SNR estimate for the conditions when noise level is relatively high helps reducing the musical noise effect. Conditionally boosting of SNR estimates helps speech transition regions not to be suppressed. This is shown as follows:
where: threshold count2 is a predetermined constant which is 5 in this example; SEChi,n is the smoothed signal energy for channel i at time n; NEChi,n is the noise energy for channel i at time n; PSNRChi,n is the preliminary signal to noise ratio for channel i at time n; count is the number of channels for which the posterior signal to noise ratio estimate for the previous frame is greater than 10 dB; and SNRChi,n is the estimated channel signal to noise ratio for channel i at time n as derived in equations (3) and (4). This modification of the SNR smoothing protects speech transition regions from being suppressed and results in better speech quality.
Voice metric unit 350 computes vm_sum based on the channel SNR estimates at every 10 ms. This metric plays a crucial role in making a decision to update noise band energies in SNR estimators 340a to 340p. For the speech regions where speech signal energy is relatively weak, such as low energy fricatives, nasals and vowels such as schwas, voice metric unit 250 computes a value of vm_sum that is generally low, below a threshold value METRIC_THLD. Such a low value of vm sum causes the SNR estimates to reset to 1 dB in SNR modification unit 250 and wrongly updates the noise energies. This invention uses the following solution to mitigate this problem. Voice metric unit 350 employs two SNR templates which are trained on two broad categories of speech sounds fricatives and nasals. Voice metric unit 350 compares the current SNR estimate pattern across the channels with these two templates every 10 ms frame. Noise update decision unit 353 determines if the correlation between either template and the current SNR estimate pattern across the channels exceeds 0.6. If this is found, then noise estimator 357 causes vm_sum to be set to METRIC_THLD+1. This prevents setting the channel SNR estimate to 1 dB in SNR modification unit 360 if the vm_sum≦METRIC_THLD condition is true.
SNR modification unit 360 uses two estimates of long term prediction coefficient from previous frame (β, β1) to make a decision to whether further conditionally modify the SNR estimates. The state variable modify_flag, which controls the SNR estimate modification, is determined as follows:
where: index cnt is the count of channels where the SNR estimate is below INDEX_THLD, which is 12 is this example; INDEX_CNT_THLD is the index count threshold, which is 5 in this example; and β and β1 are two long term prediction coefficients estimated from a previous frame. As in the case of channel gain units 270a to 270p if modification is determined, the SNR estimates are conditionally reset to 1 dB.
Channel gain units 370a to 370p use an adaptive scheme to choose MIN_GAIN factor between −13 dB and −16 dB depending on SNR estimates of channels. This leads to a significant reduction in audible background noise. The MIN_GAIN is changed linearly between −16 dB to −13 dB for channel SNR estimates between 6 dB and 40 dB. The MIN_GAIN is set to −13 dB for channel SNR estimates greater than 40 dB.
The above enhancements of the noise pre-processor achieve a significant gain of between 0.03 and 0.20 in Mean Opinion Score (MOS), a subjective quality score, in noisy background conditions while maintaining same quality in the clean conditions. This improvement is validated by a listening test laboratory and subjective listening tests. PESQ, another objective speech quality measure based on the P.862 standard of ITU, also shows significant improvements with an average gain of between 0.046 and 0.078 per noisy condition. The enhanced noise pre-processor of this invention requires less than 10% additional complexity compared to the prior art.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e)(1) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/748,737 filed Dec. 9, 2005.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60748737 | Dec 2005 | US |