The present disclosure relates generally to techniques for noise cancellation and, more particularly, for preemptive noise convergence for noise cancellation.
This section is intended to introduce the reader to various aspects of art that may be related to various aspects of the present disclosure, which are described and/or claimed below. This discussion is believed to be helpful in providing the reader with background information to facilitate a better understanding of the various aspects of the present disclosure. Accordingly, it should be understood that these statements are to be read in this light, and not as admissions of prior art.
Many electronic devices employ voice-related features that involve recording and/or analyzing a user's voice. Voice recognition features, for example, may analyze a voice command spoken by a user to perform a task related to the command. Similarly, voice note recording features may record voice notes spoken by the user. However, when a user speaks into a microphone of an electronic device, ambient sounds, or background noise, may be obtained by the microphone at the same time. These ambient sounds may obscure the user's voice and, in some cases, may impede the proper functioning of a voice-related feature of the electronic device.
A summary of certain embodiments disclosed herein is set forth below. It should be understood that these aspects are presented merely to provide the reader with a brief summary of these certain embodiments and that these aspects are not intended to limit the scope of this disclosure. Indeed, this disclosure may encompass a variety of aspects that may not be set forth below.
Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to systems, methods, and devices for noise profile determination for a voice-related feature of an electronic device. In one example, an electronic device capable of such noise profile determination may include a microphone and data processing circuitry. When a voice-related feature of the electronic device is not in use, the microphone may obtain ambient sounds. The data processing circuitry may determine a noise profile based at least in part on the obtained ambient sounds. The noise profile may enable the data processing circuitry to at least partially filter other ambient sounds obtained when the voice-related feature of the electronic device is in use.
Various aspects of this disclosure may be better understood upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the drawings in which:
One or more specific embodiments will be described below. In an effort to provide a concise description of these embodiments, not all features of an actual implementation are described in the specification. It should be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation, as in any engineering or design project, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which may vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it should be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of design, fabrication, and manufacture for those of ordinary skill having the benefit of this disclosure.
Present embodiments relate to techniques for determining a noise profile for voice cancellation used in combination with voice-related features of electronic devices. As used herein, the term “noise profile” generally may refer to information relating to noise in a signal, such as ambient sounds in an audio signal, which may be employed to exclude such noise from another signal. For example, using the techniques described herein, a noise profile may be employed to filter ambient sounds from a voice command for a voice recognition feature, to isolate a user's voice for recording voice notes, to isolate a subject's voice for recording video, to enhance the quality of sound for a telephone feature, and so forth. Rather than attempt to identify noise at the time when a user activates or uses such a voice-related feature, the electronic device may remove ambient sounds using a noise profile developed from a prior recording of ambient sounds. As used herein, the term “voice-related feature” may refer to any functionality of an electronic device, which may be implemented in hardware or software, that may at least partially filter ambient sounds from an audio signal that may include voice audio and the ambient sounds. Among other things, such a voice-related feature may include voice recognition software that may receive voice commands from a user and, after filtering away ambient sounds, may perform various tasks based on the voice command. By way of example, voice recognition software may include the Voice Control application by Apple Inc.
In particular, because attempting to identify noise after a user has begun to speak may result in delays or a misidentification of ambient noise, an electronic device employing the techniques disclosed herein may periodically sample ambient sounds and construct a noise profile based on such ambient sounds when the voice-related feature is not in use. Additionally or alternatively, the electronic device may sample ambient sounds based on a stimulus (e.g., activation of a non-voice-related feature, initialization of the electronic device, navigation to the voice-related feature, a change in the context of use of the electronic device, and/or when another person is speaking on a telephone feature of the electronic device). Moreover, in some embodiments, the electronic device may assess a current context of use of the electronic device at the time the ambient sounds are sampled and when the noise profile is subsequently constructed. By way of example, the electronic device may consider a time, a current location of the electronic device, an amount of ambient light surrounding the electronic device, an amount of motion of the electronic device, and/or a volume level of ambient sounds.
A general description of suitable electronic devices for performing the presently disclosed techniques is provided below. In particular,
Turning first to
By way of example, the electronic device 10 may represent a block diagram of the handheld device depicted in
In the electronic device 10 of
The I/O interface 24 may enable electronic device 10 to interface with various other electronic devices, as may the network interfaces 26. The network interfaces 26 may include, for example, interfaces for a personal area network (PAN), such as a Bluetooth network, for a local area network (LAN), such as an 802.11x Wi-Fi network, and/or for a wide area network (WAN), such as a 3G cellular network. Through the network interfaces 26, the electronic device 10 may interface with a wireless headset that includes a microphone 32. The image capture circuitry 28 may enable image and/or video capture, and the accelerometers/magnetometer 30 may observe the movement and/or a relative orientation of the electronic device 10.
When employed in connection with a voice-related feature of the electronic device 10, such as a voice recognition software application, the microphone 32 may obtain an audio signal of a user's voice and other ambient sounds. The CPU 12 may process the audio signal to exclude most ambient sounds using a previously-determined noise profile. As described in greater detail below, the noise profile may be determined prior to the activation of the voice-related feature of the electronic device 10, based on a recording of the ambient sounds. Although the microphone 32 generally may be inactive, the microphone 32 may periodically awaken, or may awaken after a stimulus, to record the ambient sounds when the user is not speaking.
The handheld device 34 may include an enclosure 36 to protect interior components from physical damage and to shield them from electromagnetic interference. The enclosure 36 may surround the display 18, which may display indicator icons 38. Such indicator icons 38 may indicate, among other things, a cellular signal strength, Bluetooth connection, and/or battery life. The I/O interfaces 24 may open through the enclosure 36 and may include, for example, a proprietary I/O port from Apple Inc. to connect to external devices. As indicated in
User input structures 40, 42, 44, and 46, in combination with the display 18, may allow a user to control the handheld device 34. For example, the input structure 40 may activate or deactivate the handheld device 34, the input structure 42 may navigate user interface 20 to a home screen, a user-configurable application screen, and/or activate a voice-recognition feature of the handheld device 34, the input structures 44 may provide volume control, and the input structure 46 may toggle between vibrate and ring modes. The microphones 32 may obtain a user's voice for various voice-related features, and a speaker 48 may enable audio playback and/or certain phone capabilities. Headphone input 50 may provide a connection to external speakers and/or headphones.
As illustrated in
A user may use a voice-related feature of the electronic device 10, such as a voice-recognition feature, in a variety of contexts.
To activate the voice-related feature on the electronic device 10, the user may navigate to an icon representing the voice-related feature or may press one or more of the input structures 40-46. For example, to activate a voice-recognition feature of the handheld device 34, the user may press down the input structure 42 for approximately two seconds. Thereafter, the user may speak the voice audio signal 58, which may enter the microphone 32 of the electronic device 10. At approximately the same time, however, ambient sounds 60 may also enter the microphone 32. Based on a previously-determined noise profile, the electronic device 10 may filter away the ambient sounds 60 such that the voice audio signal 58 is largely free of such noise.
The ambient sounds 60 may vary depending on the context 56 in which the electronic device 10 is being used. The various contexts 56 in which the voice-related feature may be used may include at home 62, in the office 64, at the gym 66, on a busy street 68, in a car 70, at a sporting event 72, at a restaurant 74, and at a party 76, among others. As should be appreciated, the typical ambient sounds 60 that occur on a busy street 68 may differ greatly from the typical ambient sounds 60 that occur at home 62 or in a car 70.
Because the character of the ambient sounds 60 may vary from context 56 to context 56, a single generic noise profile may not effectively eliminate the ambient sounds 60 in all of the contexts 56. Rather, as described in greater detail below, the electronic device 10 may filter the ambient sounds 60 using a noise profile determined from a prior recording of the ambient sounds 60 that occurs before the user activates the voice-related feature of the electronic device 10. Additionally, each of the contexts 56 may occur at certain locations and times, with varying amounts of electronic device 10 motion and ambient light, and/or with various volume levels of the voice signal 58 and the ambient sounds 60. As such, in some embodiments, the electronic device 10 may filter the ambient sounds 60 using a noise profile previously determined in a similar context 56 based on the time, location, motion, ambient light, and/or volume level.
In step 82, the electronic device 10 may receive audio from the microphone 32 that is currently active. The active microphone 32 may be located, for example, on the handheld device 34, the wired headset 52, or the wireless headset 54. In step 84, a most-recently-determined noise profile may be recalled from the memory 14 or nonvolatile storage 16. This noise profile may represent a noise profile determined based on a recent observation of the ambient sounds 60 prior to the activation of the voice-related feature in step 80.
In step 86, the ambient sounds 60 may be filtered out of the audio obtained in step 82, substantially isolating the voice audio signal 58. Thereafter, the voice audio signal 58 may be employed by the voice-related feature. By way of example, when the voice-related feature is a voice recognition feature, the electronic device 10 typically may subsequently analyze the voice audio signal 58 to ascertain a voice command. When the voice-related feature is a voice note recording feature, voice notes may be recorded with reduced background noise.
Because a generic noise profile may not sufficiently isolate the ambient sounds 60 found in the various contexts 56 in which voice-related features may be used, and because determining the noise profile after a voice-related feature has been activated, the electronic device 10 may periodically determine the noise profile by sampling the ambient sounds 60 when the voice-related feature is not in use and/or using the outward-facing microphone 32. A flowchart 100, illustrated in
In step 104, the active microphone 32 may obtain ambient sounds by sampling the ambient sounds 60 for a period of time. As described below with reference to
A flow diagram 110, representing a manner of performing the method of
As mentioned above with reference to the flowchart 100 of
A first factor 116 of the activation period factors 114 may be a current mode of the electronic device 10. By way of example, the electronic device 10 may be actively in use, may be inactive or in a sleep mode, and/or may be operating in a mode with reduced functionality, such as “airplane mode.” The factor 116 may weigh in favor of a shorter period of inactivity if the electronic device 10 is actively in use, and a voice-related feature is thus more likely to be activated by the user. The factor 116 may weigh in favor of a longer period of inactivity if the electronic device 10 is inactive or operating in a mode of reduced functionality.
A second factor 118 of the activation period factors 114 may be a current state of a power supply of the electronic device 10. By way of example, if the electronic device 10 is currently being charged, a user may be less likely to use a voice-related feature of the electronic device 10. Under such conditions, the factor 118 may weigh in favor of a longer period of inactivity. Alternatively, because the electronic device 10 may effectively have an unlimited supply of power, the factor 118 may instead weigh in favor of a shorter period of inactivity.
When the electronic device 10 is not currently being charged, the amount of remaining battery life may be considered. For example, when the battery life of the electronic device 10 remains high, the factor 118 may weigh in favor of a relatively shorter period of inactivity because the additional power needed to activate the microphone and to determine the noise profile may be justified. When the battery life of the electronic device 10 is relatively low, the factor 118 may weigh in favor of a relatively longer period of inactivity to conserve the remaining battery power.
A third factor 120 of the activation period factors 114 may be an amount of recent motion of the electronic device 10, as detected by the accelerometers/magnetometer 30. If very little motion is detected, the factor 120 may weigh in favor of a longer period of inactivity, as the electronic device 10 may have been set down by the user and, accordingly, a voice-related feature of the electronic device 10 may be less likely to be used. On the other hand, if a significant amount of motion is detected, the factor 120 may weigh in favor of a shorter period of inactivity, as the electronic device 10 is likely being carried by the user and, accordingly, a voice-related feature of the electronic device 10 may be more likely to be used.
A fourth factor 122 of the activation period factors 114 may be the variability of recently-determined noise profiles 96. Specifically, if a recently determined noise profile 96 is very similar to previously-determined noise profiles 96, further noise profiles 96 that are subsequently determined may likely provide little benefit over the previously-determined noise profiles 96. Under such conditions, the factor 122 may weigh in favor of a longer period inactivity, because additional sampling by the microphone 32 may be less likely to obtain ambient sounds 60 that would produce a significantly different noise profile 96. If recently-determined noise profiles 96 vary greatly, however, the factor 122 may weigh in favor of a shorter period of inactivity.
A fifth factor 124 of the activation period factors 114 may be the current location of the electronic device 10. If the user has previously used, or frequently uses, a voice-related feature of the electronic device 10 at the current location (e.g., at home), as determined by the location-sensing circuitry 22 or based on a wireless network currently visible to the network interfaces 26, the factor 124 may weigh in favor of a shorter period of inactivity. If not, the factor 124 may weigh in favor of a longer period of inactivity.
Similarly, a sixth factor 126 of the activation period factors 114 may be a history of voice-related feature use on the electronic device 10. By way of example, based on the history of use of the voice-related feature, the factor 126 may weigh in favor of a shorter period of inactivity at times of the day when the voice-related feature of the electronic device 10 is frequently used. The factor 126 may weigh in favor of a longer period of inactivity at times of the day when the voice-related feature is rarely used.
As noted above, the period of time in which the microphone 32 may sample the ambient sounds 60 in step 104 of the flowchart 100 may vary. The particular length of the sampling period may vary depending on a variety of factors, as illustrated in
A first factor 134 of the sampling time factors 132 may be an error rate that occurs when a voice-related feature is used. Certain voice-related features, such as voice-recognition features, may incorrectly identify a voice signal 98 if the ambient sounds 60 are not sufficiently filtered during noise cancellation. The error rate of such a voice-related feature may be stored and considered as the factor 134. As such, the factor 134 may weigh in favor of a longer sampling time as the error rate increases.
A second factor 136 of the sampling time factors 132 may be an amount of time required to converge the ambient sounds 60 in the digital audio signal 94 to obtain the noise profile 96. The factor 136 may weigh in favor of a sampling time that corresponds, longer or shorter, with recent convergence times.
A third factor 138 of the sampling time factors 132 may be a comparison of the digital audio signal 94 from the active microphone 32 to prior recordings of the ambient sounds 60 or a prior noise profile 96. By way of example, the factor 138 may weigh in favor of a shorter sampling time if the digital audio signal 94 appears to be very similar to previously-recorded ambient sounds 60 or prior noise profiles 96. In other words, if newly recorded ambient sounds 60 would simply result in a very similar noise profile 96, the sampling time 132 may be reduced or cut short.
A fourth factor 140 of the sampling time factors 132 may relate to whether other noise profiles 96 have been stored, which were previously obtained in the same or similar context 56 in which the electronic device is currently being used. As described below with reference to
In step 158, the electronic device 10 may determine its current context of use by ascertaining the time, the location, amount of ambient light, amount of motion, and/or volume of ambient sounds 60 currently associated with the electronic device 10. In some embodiments, more or fewer such indicators of the current context 56 may be considered. In step 160, the noise profile determined in step 156 and the contextual indicators assessed in step 158 may be associated. This may result in a contextual noise profile that may be identified for later use when the electronic device 10 is in the same or a similar context 56. In step 162, the contextual noise profile may be stored in memory 14 or nonvolatile storage 16.
At a later time, the contextual noise profile 174 may be used for noise-cancellation when a user activates a voice-related feature in a similar context 56, as described in a flowchart 176 of
As described above, a noise profile 96 and/or 174 may be determined on a periodic basis, before a user activates a voice-related feature of the electronic device 10 and/or using an outward-facing microphone 32. However, as described below with reference to
However, if a stored contextual noise profile 174 does not match the current context, as noted in decision block 224, or if the voice-related feature use history indicates that the voice-related feature is likely to be used, as noted in decision block 226, a new noise profile 96 and/or 174 may be determined. As such, the process may flow to steps 230-234. Steps 230-234 may performed in substantially the same manner as steps 104-108 of
The specific embodiments described above have been shown by way of example, and it should be understood that these embodiments may be susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms. It should be further understood that the claims are not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed, but rather to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of this disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3704345 | Coker et al. | Nov 1972 | A |
3828132 | Flanagan et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3979557 | Schulman et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4278838 | Antonov | Jul 1981 | A |
4282405 | Taguchi | Aug 1981 | A |
4310721 | Manley et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4348553 | Baker et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4653021 | Takagi | Mar 1987 | A |
4688195 | Thompson et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4692941 | Jacks et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4718094 | Bahl et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4724542 | Williford | Feb 1988 | A |
4726065 | Froessl | Feb 1988 | A |
4727354 | Lindsay | Feb 1988 | A |
4776016 | Hansen | Oct 1988 | A |
4783807 | Marley | Nov 1988 | A |
4811243 | Racine | Mar 1989 | A |
4819271 | Bahl et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4827520 | Zeinstra | May 1989 | A |
4829576 | Porter | May 1989 | A |
4833712 | Bahl et al. | May 1989 | A |
4839853 | Deerwester et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4852168 | Sprague | Jul 1989 | A |
4862504 | Nomura | Aug 1989 | A |
4878230 | Murakami et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4903305 | Gillick et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4905163 | Garber et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4914586 | Swinehart et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4944013 | Gouvianakis et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4965763 | Zamora | Oct 1990 | A |
4974191 | Amirghodsi et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4977598 | Doddington et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4992972 | Brooks et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5010574 | Wang | Apr 1991 | A |
5020112 | Chou | May 1991 | A |
5021971 | Lindsay | Jun 1991 | A |
5022081 | Hirose et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5027406 | Roberts et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5031217 | Nishimura | Jul 1991 | A |
5032989 | Tornetta | Jul 1991 | A |
5040218 | Vitale et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5072452 | Brown et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5091945 | Kleijn | Feb 1992 | A |
5127053 | Koch | Jun 1992 | A |
5127055 | Larkey | Jun 1992 | A |
5128672 | Kaehler | Jul 1992 | A |
5133011 | McKiel, Jr. | Jul 1992 | A |
5142584 | Ozawa | Aug 1992 | A |
5164900 | Bernath | Nov 1992 | A |
5165007 | Bahl et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5179652 | Rozmanith et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5194950 | Murakami et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5199077 | Wilcox et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5202952 | Gillick et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5208862 | Ozawa | May 1993 | A |
5216747 | Hardwick et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5220639 | Lee | Jun 1993 | A |
5220657 | Bly et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5222146 | Bahl et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5230036 | Akamine et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5235680 | Bijnagte | Aug 1993 | A |
5267345 | Brown et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5268990 | Cohen et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5282265 | Rohra Suda et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
RE34562 | Murakami et al. | Mar 1994 | E |
5291286 | Murakami et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5293448 | Honda | Mar 1994 | A |
5293452 | Picone et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5297170 | Eyuboglu et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5301109 | Landauer et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5303406 | Hansen et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5317507 | Gallant | May 1994 | A |
5317647 | Pagallo | May 1994 | A |
5325297 | Bird et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5325298 | Gallant | Jun 1994 | A |
5327498 | Hamon | Jul 1994 | A |
5333236 | Bahl et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5333275 | Wheatley et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5345536 | Hoshimi et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5349645 | Zhao | Sep 1994 | A |
5353377 | Kuroda et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5377301 | Rosenberg et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5384892 | Strong | Jan 1995 | A |
5384893 | Hutchins | Jan 1995 | A |
5386494 | White | Jan 1995 | A |
5386556 | Hedin et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5390279 | Strong | Feb 1995 | A |
5396625 | Parkes | Mar 1995 | A |
5400434 | Pearson | Mar 1995 | A |
5424947 | Nagao et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5434777 | Luciw | Jul 1995 | A |
5455888 | Iyengar et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5469529 | Bimbot et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5475587 | Anick et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5479488 | Lenning et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5491772 | Hardwick et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5502790 | Yi | Mar 1996 | A |
5502791 | Nishimura et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5515475 | Gupta et al. | May 1996 | A |
5536902 | Serra et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5574823 | Hassanein et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5577241 | Spencer | Nov 1996 | A |
5579436 | Chou et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581655 | Cohen et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5596676 | Swaminathan et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5608624 | Luciw | Mar 1997 | A |
5613036 | Strong | Mar 1997 | A |
5617507 | Lee et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5621859 | Schwartz et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5642464 | Yue et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642519 | Martin | Jun 1997 | A |
5664055 | Kroon | Sep 1997 | A |
5675819 | Schuetze | Oct 1997 | A |
5682539 | Conrad et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5687077 | Gough, Jr. | Nov 1997 | A |
5712957 | Waibel et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5727950 | Cook et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5729694 | Holzrichter et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5732390 | Katayanagi et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734791 | Acero et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5748974 | Johnson | May 1998 | A |
5790978 | Olive et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794050 | Dahlgren et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794182 | Manduchi et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5799276 | Komissarchik et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5826261 | Spencer | Oct 1998 | A |
5828999 | Bellegarda et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5835893 | Ushioda | Nov 1998 | A |
5839106 | Bellegarda | Nov 1998 | A |
5860063 | Gorin et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864806 | Mokbel et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5867799 | Lang et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873056 | Liddy et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5895466 | Goldberg et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899972 | Miyazawa et al. | May 1999 | A |
5913193 | Huang et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5915249 | Spencer | Jun 1999 | A |
5943429 | Handel | Aug 1999 | A |
5943670 | Prager | Aug 1999 | A |
5970446 | Goldberg et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987404 | Della Pietra et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6016471 | Kuhn et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6029132 | Kuhn et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038533 | Buchsbaum et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6052656 | Suda et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6064960 | Bellegarda et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070140 | Tran | May 2000 | A |
6081750 | Hoffberg et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6088731 | Kiraly et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6108627 | Sabourin | Aug 2000 | A |
6122616 | Henton | Sep 2000 | A |
6144938 | Surace et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6173261 | Arai et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188999 | Moody | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195641 | Loring et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208971 | Bellegarda et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6233559 | Balakrishnan | May 2001 | B1 |
6246981 | Papineni et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6266637 | Donovan et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6285786 | Seni et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6308149 | Gaussier et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317594 | Gossman et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317707 | Bangalore et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317831 | King | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321092 | Fitch et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324502 | Handel et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6334103 | Surace et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6356854 | Schubert et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366883 | Campbell et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6366884 | Bellegarda et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6421672 | McAllister et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434524 | Weber | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446076 | Burkey et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453292 | Ramaswamy et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6466654 | Cooper et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477488 | Bellegarda | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487534 | Thelen et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6499013 | Weber | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501937 | Ho et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505158 | Conkie | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6513063 | Julia et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6523061 | Halverson et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526395 | Morris | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6532444 | Weber | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6532446 | King | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6553344 | Bellegarda et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6598039 | Livowsky | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601026 | Appelt et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6604059 | Strubbe et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6615172 | Bennett et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6615175 | Gazdzinski | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631346 | Karaorman et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6633846 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6647260 | Dusse et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6650735 | Burton et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6654740 | Tokuda et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6665639 | Mozer et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6665640 | Bennett et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665641 | Coorman et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6684187 | Conkie | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6691111 | Lazaridis et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6691151 | Cheyer et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697780 | Beutnagel et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6735632 | Kiraly et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6742021 | Halverson et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6757362 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757718 | Halverson et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6778951 | Contractor | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6778952 | Bellegarda | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6778962 | Kasai et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6792082 | Levine | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6807574 | Partovi et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6810379 | Vermeulen et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6813491 | McKinney | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6832194 | Mozer et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6842767 | Partovi et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6847966 | Sommer et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6851115 | Cheyer et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6859931 | Cheyer et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6895380 | Sepe, Jr. | May 2005 | B2 |
6895558 | Loveland | May 2005 | B1 |
6912499 | Sabourin et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6928614 | Everhart | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6937975 | Elworthy | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6937986 | Denenberg et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6964023 | Maes et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6980949 | Ford | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6980955 | Okutani et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6985865 | Packingham et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6988071 | Gazdzinski | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6996531 | Korall et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6999927 | Mozer et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7020685 | Chen et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7027974 | Busch et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7036128 | Julia et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7050977 | Bennett | May 2006 | B1 |
7058569 | Coorman et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7062428 | Hogenhout et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069560 | Cheyer et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7092887 | Mozer et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7092928 | Elad et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7093693 | Gazdzinski | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7127046 | Smith et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7136710 | Hoffberg et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7137126 | Coffman et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7139714 | Bennett et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7139722 | Perrella et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7177798 | Hsu et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7197460 | Gupta et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7200559 | Wang | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7203646 | Bennett | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7216073 | Lavi et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7216080 | Tsiao et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7225125 | Bennett et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7233790 | Kjellberg et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7233904 | Luisi | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7266496 | Wang et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7277854 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7290039 | Lisitsa et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7299033 | Kjellberg et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7310600 | Garner et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7324947 | Jordan et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7349953 | Lisitsa et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7376556 | Bennett | May 2008 | B2 |
7376645 | Bernard | May 2008 | B2 |
7379874 | Schmid et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7386449 | Sun et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7392185 | Bennett | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7398209 | Kennewick et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7403938 | Harrison et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7409337 | Potter et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7415100 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7418392 | Mozer et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7426467 | Nashida et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7427024 | Gazdzinski et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7447635 | Konopka et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7451081 | Gajic et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7454351 | Jeschke et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7467087 | Gillick et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7475010 | Chao | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7483894 | Cao | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7487089 | Mozer | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496498 | Chu et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496512 | Zhao et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7502738 | Kennewick et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7508373 | Lin et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7522927 | Fitch et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7523108 | Cao | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7526466 | Au | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7529671 | Rockenbeck et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7529676 | Koyama | May 2009 | B2 |
7539656 | Fratkina et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7546382 | Healey et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7548895 | Pulsipher | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7555431 | Bennett | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7571106 | Cao et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7599918 | Shen et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7620549 | Di Cristo et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7624007 | Bennett | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7634409 | Kennewick et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7636657 | Ju et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7640160 | Di Cristo et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7647225 | Bennett et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7657424 | Bennett | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7672841 | Bennett | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7676026 | Baxter, Jr. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7684985 | Dominach et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7693715 | Hwang et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7693720 | Kennewick et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7698131 | Bennett | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7702500 | Blaedow | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7702508 | Bennett | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707027 | Balchandran et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707032 | Wang et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707267 | Lisitsa et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7711565 | Gazdzinski | May 2010 | B1 |
7711672 | Au | May 2010 | B2 |
7716056 | Weng et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7720674 | Kaiser et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7720683 | Vermeulen et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7725307 | Bennett | May 2010 | B2 |
7725318 | Gavalda et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7725320 | Bennett | May 2010 | B2 |
7725321 | Bennett | May 2010 | B2 |
7729904 | Bennett | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7729916 | Coffman et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7734461 | Kwak et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7752152 | Paek et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7774204 | Mozer et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7783486 | Rosser et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7801729 | Mozer | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7809570 | Kennewick et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7809610 | Cao | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7818176 | Freeman et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7822608 | Cross, Jr. et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7826945 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7831426 | Bennett | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7840400 | Lavi et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7840447 | Kleinrock et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7873519 | Bennett | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7873654 | Bernard | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7881936 | Longé et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7912702 | Bennett | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7917367 | Di Cristo et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7917497 | Harrison et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7920678 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7925525 | Chin | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7930168 | Weng et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7949529 | Weider et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7974844 | Sumita | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7974972 | Cao | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7983915 | Knight et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7983917 | Kennewick et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7983997 | Allen et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7987151 | Schott et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8000453 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8005679 | Jordan et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8015006 | Kennewick et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8024195 | Mozer et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8036901 | Mozer | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8041570 | Mirkovic et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8041611 | Kleinrock et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8055708 | Chitsaz et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8065155 | Gazdzinski | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8065156 | Gazdzinski | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8069046 | Kennewick et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8073681 | Baldwin et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8078473 | Gazdzinski | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8082153 | Coffman et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8095364 | Longé et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8099289 | Mozer et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8107401 | John et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8112275 | Kennewick et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8112280 | Lu | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8117037 | Gazdzinski | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8121837 | Agapi et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8140335 | Kennewick et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8165886 | Gagnon et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8166019 | Lee et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8190359 | Bourne | May 2012 | B2 |
8195467 | Mozer et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8204238 | Mozer | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8205788 | Gazdzinski et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8219407 | Roy et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8285551 | Gazdzinski | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8285553 | Gazdzinski | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8290778 | Gazdzinski | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8290781 | Gazdzinski | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8296146 | Gazdzinski | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8296153 | Gazdzinski | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8300801 | Sweeney et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8301456 | Gazdzinski | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8311834 | Gazdzinski | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8370158 | Gazdzinski | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8371503 | Gazdzinski | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8447612 | Gazdzinski | May 2013 | B2 |
20020032564 | Ehsani et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020046025 | Hain | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020069063 | Buchner et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077817 | Atal | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20040135701 | Yasuda et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050071332 | Ortega et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080620 | Rao et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080625 | Bennett et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050119897 | Bennett et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143972 | Gopalakrishnan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050182629 | Coorman et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050196733 | Budra et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060018492 | Chiu et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060122834 | Bennett | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143007 | Koh et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070055508 | Zhao et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055529 | Kanevsky et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070058832 | Hug et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070088556 | Andrew | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100790 | Cheyer et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118377 | Badino et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070174188 | Fish | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070185917 | Prahlad et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070282595 | Tunning et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080015864 | Ross et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021708 | Bennett et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080034032 | Healey et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052063 | Bennett et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080120112 | Jordan et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080129520 | Lee | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140657 | Azvine et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080221903 | Kanevsky et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228496 | Yu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080247519 | Abella et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249770 | Kim et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080300878 | Bennett | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090006100 | Badger et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090006343 | Platt et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030800 | Grois | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090058823 | Kocienda | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076796 | Daraselia | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090100049 | Cao | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112677 | Rhett | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090150156 | Kennewick et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157401 | Bennett | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164441 | Cheyer | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171664 | Kennewick et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090187402 | Scholl | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090290718 | Kahn et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299745 | Kennewick et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090299849 | Cao et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005081 | Bennett | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023320 | Di Cristo et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100036660 | Bennett | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042400 | Block et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100088020 | Sano et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100145700 | Kennewick et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100204986 | Kennewick et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217604 | Baldwin et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100228540 | Bennett | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235341 | Bennett | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100257160 | Cao | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100277579 | Cho et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100280983 | Cho et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100286985 | Kennewick et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299142 | Freeman et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312547 | van Os et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318576 | Kim | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332235 | David | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332348 | Cao | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110060807 | Martin et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110082688 | Kim et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110112827 | Kennewick et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110112921 | Kennewick et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110119049 | Ylonen | May 2011 | A1 |
20110125540 | Jang et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110130958 | Stahl et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110131036 | Di Cristo et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110131045 | Cristo et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110144999 | Jang et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110161076 | Davis et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110175810 | Markovic et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110184730 | LeBeau et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110218855 | Cao et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231182 | Weider et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231188 | Kennewick et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110264643 | Cao | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110279368 | Klein et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110306426 | Novak et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120002820 | Leichter | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120016678 | Gruber et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120020490 | Leichter | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022787 | LeBeau et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022857 | Baldwin et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022860 | Lloyd et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022868 | LeBeau et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022869 | Lloyd et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022870 | Kristjansson et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022874 | Lloyd et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022876 | LeBeau et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023088 | Cheng et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120034904 | LeBeau et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120035908 | LeBeau et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120035924 | Jitkoff et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120035931 | LeBeau et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120035932 | Jitkoff et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120042343 | Laligand et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120271676 | Aravamudan et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120311583 | Gruber et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3837590 | May 1990 | DE |
198 41 541 | Dec 2007 | DE |
0138061 | Sep 1984 | EP |
0138061 | Apr 1985 | EP |
0218859 | Apr 1987 | EP |
0262938 | Apr 1988 | EP |
0293259 | Nov 1988 | EP |
0299572 | Jan 1989 | EP |
0313975 | May 1989 | EP |
0314908 | May 1989 | EP |
0327408 | Aug 1989 | EP |
0389271 | Sep 1990 | EP |
0411675 | Feb 1991 | EP |
0559349 | Sep 1993 | EP |
0559349 | Sep 1993 | EP |
0570660 | Nov 1993 | EP |
1245023 | Oct 2002 | EP |
2352377 | Jan 2001 | GB |
06 019965 | Jan 1994 | JP |
2001 125896 | May 2001 | JP |
2002 024212 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2003517158 | May 2003 | JP |
2009 036999 | Feb 2009 | JP |
10-0776800 | Nov 2007 | KR |
10-0810500 | Mar 2008 | KR |
10 2008 109322 | Dec 2008 | KR |
10 2009 086805 | Aug 2009 | KR |
10-0920267 | Oct 2009 | KR |
10 2011 0113414 | Oct 2011 | KR |
WO 2006129967 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2011088053 | Jul 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Alfred App, 2011, http://www.alfredapp.com/, 5 pages. |
Ambite, JL., et al., “Design and Implementation of the CALO Query Manager,” Copyright © 2006, American Association for Artificial Intelligence, (www.aaai.org), 8 pages. |
Ambite, J:., et al., “Integration of Heterogeneous Knowledge Sources in the CALO Query Manager,” 2005, The 4th International Conference on Ontologies, DataBases, and Applications of Semantics (ODBASE), Agia Napa, Cyprus, ttp://www.isi.edu/people/ambite/publications/integration—heterogeneous—knowledge—sources—calo—query—manager, 18 pages. |
Belvin, R. et al., “Development of the HRL Route Navigation Dialogue System,” 2001, In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Human Language Technology Research, Paper, Copyright © 2001 HRL Laboratories, LLC, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.10.6538, 5 pages. |
Berry, P. M., et al. “PTIME: Personalized Assistance for Calendaring,” ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, vol. 2, No. 4, Article 40, Publication date: Jul. 2011, 40:1-22, 22 pages. |
Butcher, M., “EVI arrives in town to go toe-to-toe with Siri,” Jan. 23, 2012, http://techcrunch.com/2012/01/23/evi-arrives-in-town-to-go-toe-to-toe-with-siri/, 2 pages. |
Chen, Y., “Multimedia Siri Finds and Plays Whatever You Ask for,” Feb. 9, 2012, http://www.psfk.com/2012/02/multimedia-siri.html, 9 pages. |
Cheyer, A. et al., “Spoken Language and Multimodal Applications for Electronic Realties,” © Springer-Verlag London Ltd, Virtual Reality 1999, 3:1-15, 15 pages. |
Cutkosky, M. R. et al., “PACT: An Experiment in Integrating Concurrent Engineering Systems,” Journal, Computer, vol. 26 Issue 1, Jan. 1993, IEEE Computer Society Press Los Alamitos, CA, USA, http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=165320, 14 pages. |
Elio, R. et al., “On Abstract Task Models and Conversation Policies,” http://webdocs.cs.ualberta.ca/˜ree/publications/papers2/ATS.AA99.pdf, 10 pages. |
Ericsson, S. et al., “Software illustrating a unified approach to multimodality and multilinguality in the in-home domain,” Dec. 22, 2006, Talk and Look: Tools for Ambient Linguistic Knowledge, http://www.talk-project.eurice.eu/fileadmin/talk/publications—public/deliverables—public/D1—6.pdf, 127 pages. |
Evi, “Meet Evi: the one mobile app that provides solutions for your everyday problems,” Feb. 8, 2012, http://www.evi.com/, 3 pages. |
Feigenbaum, E., et al., “Computer-assisted Semantic Annotation of Scientific Life Works,” 2007, http://tomgruber.org/writing/stanford-cs300.pdf, 22 pages. |
Gannes, L., “Alfred App Gives Personalized Restaurant Recommendations,” allthingsd.com, Jul. 18, 2011, http://allthingsd.com/20110718/alfred-app-gives-personalized-restaurant-recommendations/, 3 pages. |
Gautier, P. O., et al. “Generating Explanations of Device Behavior Using Compositional Modeling and Causal Ordering,” 1993, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.42.8394, 9 pages. |
Gervasio, M. T., et al., Active Preference Learning for Personalized Calendar Scheduling Assistancae, Copyright © 2005, http://www.ai.sri.com/˜gervasio/pubs/gervasio-iui05.pdf, 8 pages. |
Glass, A., “Explaining Preference Learning,” 2006, http://cs229.stanford.edu/proj2006/Glass-ExplainingPreferenceLearning.pdf, 5 pages. |
Gruber, T. R., et al., “An Ontology for Engineering Mathematics,” In Jon Doyle, Piero Torasso, & Erik Sandewall, Eds., Fourth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Gustav Stresemann Institut, Bonn, Germany, Morgan Kaufmann, 1994, http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/knowledge-sharing/papers/engmath.html, 22 pages. |
Gruber, T. R., “A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications,” Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University, Sep. 1992, Technical Report KSL 92-71, Revised Apr. 1993, 27 pages. |
Gruber, T. R., “Automated Knowledge Acquisition for Strategic Knowledge,” Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Machine Learning, 4, 293-336 (1989), 44 pages. |
Gruber, T. R., “(Avoiding) the Travesty of the Commons,” Presentation at NPUC 2006, New Paradigms for User Computing, IBM Almaden Research Center, Jul. 24, 2006. http://tomgruber.org/writing/avoiding-travestry.htm, 52 pages. |
Gruber, T. R., “Big Think Small Screen: How semantic computing in the cloud will revolutionize the consumer experience on the phone,” Keynote presentation at Web 3.0 conference, Jan. 27, 2010, http://tomgruber.org/writing/web30jan2010.htm, 41 pages. |
Gruber, T. R., “Collaborating around Shared Content on the WWW,” W3C Workshop on WWW and Collaboration, Cambridge, MA, Sep. 11, 1995, http://www.w3.org/Collaboration/Workshop/Proceedings/P9.html, 1 page. |
Gruber, T. R., “Collective Knowledge Systems: Where the Social Web meets the Semantic Web,” Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web (2007), doi:10.1016/j.websem.2007.11.011, keynote presentation given at the 5th International Semantic Web Conference, Nov. 7, 2006, 19 pages. |
Gruber, T. R., “Where the Social Web meets the Semantic Web,” Presentation at the 5th International Semantic Web Conference, Nov. 7, 2006, 38 pages. |
Gruber, T. R., “Despite our Best Efforts, Ontologies are not the Problem,” AAAI Spring Symposium, Mar. 2008, http://tomgruber.org/writing/aaai-ss08.htm, 40 pages. |
Gruber, T. R., “Enterprise Collaboration Management with Intraspect,” Intraspect Software, Inc., Instraspect Technical White Paper Jul. 2001, 24 pages. |
Gruber, T. R., “Every ontology is a treaty—a social agreement—among people with some common motive in sharing,” Interview by Dr. Miltiadis D. Lytras, Official Quarterly Bulletin of AIS Special Interest Group on Semantic Web and Information Systems, vol. 1, Issue 3, 2004, http://www.sigsemis.org 1, 5 pages. |
Gruber, T. R., et al., “Generative Design Rationale: Beyond the Record and Replay Paradigm,” Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University, Dec. 1991, Technical Report KSL 92-59, Updated Feb. 1993, 24 pages. |
Gruber, T. R., “Helping Organizations Collaborate, Communicate, and Learn,” Presentation to NASA Ames Research, Mountain View, CA, Mar. 2003, http://tomgruber.org/writing/organizational-intelligence-talk.htm, 30 pages. |
Gruber, T. R., “Intelligence at the Interface: Semantic Technology and the Consumer Internet Experience,” Presentation at Semantic Technologies conference (SemTech08), May 20, 2008, http://tomgruber.org/writing.htm, 40 pages. |
Gruber, T. R., Interactive Acquisition of Justifications: Learning “Why” by Being Told “What” Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University, Oct. 1990, Technical Report KSL 91-17, Revised Feb. 1991, 24 pages. |
Gruber, T. R., “It Is What It Does: The Pragmatics of Ontology for Knowledge Sharing,” (c) 2000, 2003, http://www.cidoc-crm.org/docs/symposium—presentations/gruber—cidoc-ontology-2003.pdf, 21 pages. |
Gruber, T. R., et al., “Machine-generated Explanations of Engineering Models: A Compositional Modeling Approach,” (1993) In Proc. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.34.930, 7 pages. |
Gruber, T. R., “2021: Mass Collaboration and the Really New Economy,” TNTY Futures, the newsletter of The Next Twenty Years series, vol. 1, Issue 6, Aug. 2001, http://www.tnty.com/newsletter/futures/archive/v01-05business.html, 5 pages. |
Gruber, T. R., et al.,“NIKE: A National Infrastructure for Knowledge Exchange,” Oct. 1994, http://www.eit.com/papers/nike/nike.html and nike.ps, 10 pages. |
Gruber, T. R., “Ontologies, Web 2.0 and Beyond,” Apr. 24, 2007, Ontology Summit 2007, http://tomgruber.org/writing/ontolog-social-web-keynote.pdf, 17 pages. |
Gruber, T. R., “Ontology of Folksonomy: A Mash-up of Apples and Oranges,” Originally published to the web in 2005, Int≡l Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems, 3(2), 2007, 7 pages. |
Gruber, T. R., “Siri, a Virtual Personal Assistant—Bringing Intelligence to the Interface,” Jun. 16, 2009, Keynote presentation at Semantic Technologies conference, Jun. 2009. http://tomgruber.org/writing/semtech09.htm, 22 pages. |
Gruber, T. R., “TagOntology,” Presentation to Tag Camp, www.tagcamp.org, Oct. 29, 2005, 20 pages. |
Gruber, T. R., et al., “Toward a Knowledge Medium for Collaborative Product Development,” In Artificial Intelligence in Design 1992, from Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Design, Pittsburgh, USA, Jun. 22-25, 1992, 19 pages. |
Gruber, T. R., “Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing,” In International Journal Human-Computer Studies 43, p. 907-928, substantial revision of paper presented at the International Workshop on Formal Ontology, Mar. 1993, Padova, Italy, available as Technical Report KSL 93-04, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University, further revised Aug. 23, 1993, 23 pages. |
Guzzoni, D., et al., “Active, A Platform for Building Intelligent Operating Rooms,” Surgetica 2007 Computer-Aided Medical Interventions: tools and applications, pp. 191-198, Paris, 2007, Sauramps Médical, http://lsro.epfl.ch/page-68384-en.html, 8 pages. |
Guzzoni, D., et al., “Active, A Tool for Building Intelligent User Interfaces,” ASC 2007, Palma de Mallorca, http://lsro.epfl.ch/page-34241.html, 6 pages. |
Guzzoni, D., et al., “Modeling Human-Agent Interaction with Active Ontologies,” 2007, AAAI Spring Symposium, Interaction Challenges for Intelligent Assistants, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, 8 pages. |
Hardawar, D., “Driving app Waze builds its own Siri for hands-free voice control,” Feb. 9, 2012, http://venturebeat.com/2012/02/09/driving-app-waze-builds-its-own-siri-for-hands-free-voice-control/, 4 pages. |
Intraspect Software, “The Intraspect Knowledge Management Solution: Technical Overview,” http://tomgruber.org/writing/intraspect-whitepaper-1998.pdf, 18 pages. |
Julia, L., et al., Un éditeur interactif de tableaux dessinés à main levée (An Interactive Editor for Hand-Sketched Tables), Traitement du Signal 1995, vol. 12, No. 6, 8 pages. No English Translation Available. |
Karp, P. D., “A Generic Knowledge-Base Access Protocol,” May 12, 1994, http://lecture.cs.buu.ac.th/˜f50353/Document/gfp.pdf, 66 pages. |
Lemon, O., et al., “Multithreaded Context for Robust Conversational Interfaces: Context-Sensitive Speech Recognition and Interpretation of Corrective Fragments,” Sep. 2004, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 11, No. 3, 27 pages. |
Leong, L., et al., “CASIS: A Context-Aware Speech Interface System,” IUI'05, Jan. 9-12, 2005, Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, San Diego, California, USA, 8 pages. |
Lieberman, H., et al., “Out of context: Computer systems that adapt to, and learn from, context,” 2000, IBM Systems Journal, vol. 39, Nos. 3/4, 2000, 16 pages. |
Lin, B., et al., “A Distributed Architecture for Cooperative Spoken Dialogue Agents with Coherent Dialogue State and History,” 1999, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.42.272, 4 pages. |
McGuire, J., et al., “SHADE: Technology for Knowledge-Based Collaborative Engineering,” 1993, Journal of Concurrent Engineering: Applications and Research (CERA), 18 pages. |
Milward, D., et al., “D2.2: Dynamic Multimodal Interface Reconfiguration,” Talk and Look: Tools for Ambient Linguistic Knowledge, Aug. 8, 2006, http://www.ihmc.us/users/nblaylock/Pubs/Files/talk—d2.2.pdf, 69 pages. |
Mitra, P., et al., “A Graph-Oriented Model for Articulation of Ontology Interdependencies,” 2000, http://ilpubs.stanford.edu:8090/442/1/2000-20.pdf, 15 pages. |
Moran, D. B., et al., “Multimodal User Interfaces in the Open Agent Architecture,” Proc. of the 1997 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI97), 8 pages. |
Mozer, M., “An Intelligent Environment Must be Adaptive,” Mar./Apr. 1999, IEEE Intelligent Systems, 3 pages. |
Mühlhäuser, M., “Context Aware Voice User Interfaces for Workflow Support,” Darmstadt 2007, http://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/876/1/PhD.pdf, 254 pages. |
Naone, E., “TR10: Intelligent Software Assistant,” Mar.-Apr. 2009, Technology Review, http://www.technologyreview.com/printer—friendly—article.aspx?id=22117, 2 pages. |
Neches, R., “Enabling Technology for Knowledge Sharing,” Fall 1991, AI Magazine, pp. 37-56, (21 pages). |
Nöth, E., et al., “Verbmobil: The Use of Prosody in the Linguistic Components of a Speech Understanding System,” IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 8, No. 5, Sep. 2000, 14 pages. |
Rice, J., et al., “Monthly Program: Nov. 14, 1995,” The San Francisco Bay Area Chapter of ACM SIGCHI, http://www.baychi.org/calendar/19951114/, 2 pages. |
Rice, J., et al., “Using the Web Instead of a Window System,” Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University, http://tomgruber.org/writing/ksl-95-69.pdf, 14 pages. |
Rivlin, Z., et al., “Maestro: Conductor of Multimedia Analysis Technologies,” 1999 SRI International, Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery (CACM), 7 pages. |
Sheth, A., et al., “Relationships at the Heart of Semantic Web: Modeling, Discovering, and Exploiting Complex Semantic Relationships,” Oct. 13, 2002, Enhancing the Power of the Internet: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, SpringerVerlag, 38 pages. |
Simonite, T., “One Easy Way to Make Siri Smarter,” Oct. 18, 2011, Technology Review, http://www.technologyreview.com/printer—friendly—article.aspx?id=38915, 2 pages. |
Stent, A., et al., “The CommandTalk Spoken Dialogue System,” 1999, http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/P/P99/P99-1024.pdf, 8 pages. |
Tofel, K., et al., “SpeakToIt: A personal assistant for older iPhones, iPads,” Feb. 9, 2012, http://gigaom.com/apple/speaktoit-siri-for-older-iphones-ipads/, 7 pages. |
Tucker, J., “Too lazy to grab your TV remote? Use Siri instead,” Nov. 30, 2011, http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/too-lazy-to-grab-your-tv-remote-use-siri-instead/, 8 pages. |
Tur, G., et al., “The CALO Meeting Speech Recognition and Understanding System,” 2008, Proc. IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop, 4 pages. |
Tur, G., et al., “The-CALO-Meeting-Assistant System,” IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 18, No. 6, Aug. 2010, 11 pages. |
Vlingo, “Vlingo Launches Voice Enablement Application on Apple App Store,” Vlingo press release dated Dec. 3, 2008, 2 pages. |
YouTube, “Knowledge Navigator,” 5:34 minute video uploaded to YouTube by Knownav on Apr. 29, 2008, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRH8eimU—20on Aug. 3, 2006, 1 page. |
YouTube,“Send Text, Listen to and Send E-Mail ‘By Voice’ www.voiceassist.com,” 2:11 minute video uploaded to YouTube by VoiceAssist on Jul. 30, 2009, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tEU61nHHA4, 1 page. |
YouTube,“Text'nDrive App Demo—Listen and Reply to your Messages by Voice while Driving!,” 1:57 minute video uploaded to YouTube by TextnDrive on Apr. 27, 2010, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WaGfzoHsAMw, 1 page. |
YouTube, “Voice on the Go (BlackBerry),” 2:51 minute video uploaded to YouTube by VoiceOnTheGo on Jul. 27, 2009, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJqpWgQS98w, 1 page. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 29, 2011, received in International Application No. PCT/US2011/20861, which corresponds to U.S. Appl. No. 12/987,982, 15 pages. (Thomas Robert Gruber). |
Glass, J., et al., “Multilingual Spoken-Language Understanding in the MIT Voyager System,” Aug. 1995, http://groups.csail.mit.edu/sls/publications/1995/speechcomm95-voyager.pdf, 29 pages. |
Goddeau, D., et al., “A Form-Based Dialogue Manager for Spoken Language Applications,” Oct. 1996, http://phasedance.com/pdf/icslp96.pdf, 4 pages. |
Goddeau, D., et al., “Galaxy: A Human-Language Interface to On-Line Travel Information,” 1994 International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Sep. 18-22, 1994, Pacific Convention Plaza Yokohama, Japan, 6 pages. |
Meng, H., et al., “Wheels: A Conversational System in the Automobile Classified Domain,” Oct. 1996, httphttp://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.16.3022, 4 pages. |
Phoenix Solutions, Inc. v. West Interactive Corp., Document 40, Declaration of Christopher Schmandt Regarding the MIT Galaxy System dated Jul. 2, 2010, 162 pages. |
Seneff, S., et al., “A New Restaurant Guide Conversational System: Issues in Rapid Prototyping for Specialized Domains,” Oct. 1996, citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.16...rep . . . , 4 pages. |
Vlingo InCar, “Distracted Driving Solution with Vlingo InCar,” 2:38 minute video uploaded to YouTube by Vlingo Voice on Oct. 6, 2010, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vqs8XfXxgz4, 2 pages. |
Zue, V., “Conversational Interfaces: Advances and Challenges,” Sep. 1997, http://www.cs.cmu.edu/˜dod/papers/zue97.pdf, 10 pages. |
Zue, V. W., “Toward Systems that Understand Spoken Language,” Feb. 1994, ARPA Strategic Computing Institute, ©1994 IEEE, 9 pages. |
Bussler, C., et al., “Web Service Execution Environment (WSMX),” Jun. 3, 2005, W3C Member Submission, http://www.w3.org/Submission/WSMX, 29 pages. |
Cheyer, A., “About Adam Cheyer,” Sep. 17, 2012, http://www.adam.cheyer.com/about.html, 2 pages. |
Cheyer, A., “A Perspective on AI & Agent Technologies for SCM,” VerticalNet, 2001 presentation, 22 pages. |
Domingue, J., et al., “Web Service Modeling Ontology (WSMO)—An Ontology for Semantic Web Services,” Jun. 9-10, 2005, position paper at the W3C Workshop on Frameworks for Semantics in Web Services, Innsbruck, Austria, 6 pages. |
Guzzoni, D., et al., “A Unified Platform for Building Intelligent Web Interaction Assistants,” Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, Computer Society, 4 pages. |
Roddy, D., et al., “Communication and Collaboration in a Landscape of B2B eMarketplaces,” VerticalNet Solutions, white paper, Jun. 15, 2000, 23 pages. |
Acero, A., et al., “Environmental Robustness in Automatic Speech Recognition,” International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'90), Apr. 3-6, 1990, 4 pages. |
Acero, A., et al., “Robust Speech Recognition by Normalization of the Acoustic Space,” International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1991, 4 pages. |
Ahlbom, G., et al., “Modeling Spectral Speech Transitions Using Temporal Decomposition Techniques,” IEEE International Conference of Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'87), Apr. 1987, vol. 12, 4 pages. |
Aikawa, K., “Speech Recognition Using Time-Warping Neural Networks,” Proceedings of the 1991 IEEE Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processing, Sep. 30 to Oct. 1, 1991, 10 pages. |
Anastasakos, A., et al., “Duration Modeling in Large Vocabulary Speech Recognition,” International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'95), May 9-12, 1995, 4 pages. |
Anderson, R. H., “Syntax-Directed Recognition of Hand-Printed Two-Dimensional Mathematics,” In Proceedings of Symposium on Interactive Systems for Experimental Applied Mathematics: Proceedings of the Association for Computing Machinery Inc. Symposium, © 1967, 12 pages. |
Ansari, R., et al., “Pitch Modification of Speech using a Low-Sensitivity Inverse Filter Approach,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 5, No. 3, Mar. 1998, 3 pages. |
Anthony, N. J., et al., “Supervised Adaption for Signature Verification System,” Jun. 1, 1978, IBM Technical Disclosure, 3 pages. |
Apple Computer, “Guide Maker User's Guide,” © Apple Computer, Inc., Apr. 27, 1994, 8 pages. |
Apple Computer, “Introduction to Apple Guide,” © Apple Computer, Inc., Apr. 28, 1994, 20 pages. |
Asanović, K., et al., “Experimental Determination of Precision Requirements for Back-Propagation Training of Artificial Neural Networks,” In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Microelectronics for Neural Networks, 1991, www.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU, 7 pages. |
Atal, B. S., “Efficient Coding of LPC Parameters by Temporal Decomposition,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'83), Apr. 1983, 4 pages. |
Bahl, L. R., et al., “Acoustic Markov Models Used in the Tangora Speech Recognition System,” In Proceeding of International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'88), Apr. 11-14, 1988, vol. 1, 4 pages. |
Bahl, L. R., et al., “A Maximum Likelihood Approach to Continuous Speech Recognition,” IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. PAMI-5, No. 2, Mar. 1983, 13 pages. |
Bahl, L. R., et al., “A Tree-Based Statistical Language Model for Natural Language Speech Recognition,” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, vol. 37, Issue 7, Jul. 1989, 8 pages. |
Bahl, L. R., et al., “Large Vocabulary Natural Language Continuous Speech Recognition,” In Proceedings of 1989 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, May 23-26, 1989, vol. 1, 6 pages. |
Bahl, L. R., et al, “Multonic Markov Word Models for Large Vocabulary Continuous Speech Recognition,” IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 1, No. 3, Jul. 1993, 11 pages. |
Bahl, L. R., et al., “Speech Recognition with Continuous-Parameter Hidden Markov Models,” In Proceeding of International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'88), Apr. 11-14, 1988, vol. 1, 8 pages. |
Banbrook, M., “Nonlinear Analysis of Speech from a Synthesis Perspective,” A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The University of Edinburgh, Oct. 15, 1996, 35 pages. |
Belaid, A., et al., “A Syntactic Approach for Handwritten Mathematical Formula Recognition,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. PAMI-6, No. 1, Jan. 1984, 7 pages. |
Bellegarda, E. J., et al., “On-Line Handwriting Recognition Using Statistical Mixtures,” Advances in Handwriting and Drawings: A Multidisciplinary Approach, Europia, 6th International IGS Conference on Handwriting and Drawing, Paris- France, Jul. 1993, 11 pages. |
Bellegarda, J. R., “A Latent Semantic Analysis Framework for Large-Span Language Modeling,” 5th European Conference on Speech, Communication and Technology, (EUROSPEECH'97), Sep. 22-25, 1997, 4 pages. |
Bellegarda, J. R., “A Multispan Language Modeling Framework for Large Vocabulary Speech Recognition,” IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 6, No. 5, Sep. 1998, 12 pages. |
Bellegarda, J. R., et al., “A Novel Word Clustering Algorithm Based on Latent Semantic Analysis,” In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'96), vol. 1, 4 pages. |
Bellegarda, J. R., et al., “Experiments Using Data Augmentation for Speaker Adaptation,” International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'95), May 9-12, 1995, 4 pages. |
Bellegarda, J. R., “Exploiting Both Local and Global Constraints for Multi-Span Statistical Language Modeling,” Proceeding of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'98), vol. 2, May 12-15 1998, 5 pages. |
Bellegarda, J. R., “Exploiting Latent Semantic Information in Statistical Language Modeling,” In Proceedings of the IEEE, Aug. 2000, vol. 88, No. 8, 18 pages. |
Bellegarda, J. R., “Interaction-Driven Speech Input—A Data-Driven Approach to the Capture of Both Local and Global Language Constraints,” 1992, 7 pages, available at http://old.sigchi.org/bulletin/1998.2/bellegarda.html. |
Bellegarda, J. R., “Large Vocabulary Speech Recognition with Multispan Statistical Language Models,” IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 8, No. 1, Jan. 2000, 9 pages. |
Bellegarda, J. R., et al., “Performance of the IBM Large Vocabulary Continuous Speech Recognition System on the ARPA Wall Street Journal Task,” Signal Processing VII: Theories and Applications, © 1994 European Association for Signal Processing, 4 pages. |
Bellegarda, J. R., et al., “The Metamorphic Algorithm: A Speaker Mapping Approach to Data Augmentation,” IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 2, No. 3, Jul. 1994, 8 pages. |
Black, A. W., et al., “Automatically Clustering Similar Units for Unit Selection in Speech Synthesis,” In Proceedings of Eurospeech 1997, vol. 2, 4 pages. |
Blair, D. C., et al., “An Evaluation of Retrieval Effectiveness for a Full-Text Document-Retrieval System,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 28, No. 3, Mar. 1985, 11 pages. |
Briner, L. L., “Identifying Keywords in Text Data Processing,” In Zelkowitz, Marvin V., ED, Directions and Challenges, 15th Annual Technical Symposium, Jun. 17, 1976, Gaithersbury, Maryland, 7 pages. |
Bulyko, I., et al., “Joint Prosody Prediction and Unit Selection for Concatenative Speech Synthesis,” Electrical Engineering Department, University of Washington, Seattle, 2001, 4 pages. |
Bussey, H. E., et al., “Service Architecture, Prototype Description, and Network Implications of A Personalized Information Grazing Service,” INFOCOM'90, Ninth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communication Societies, Jun. 3-7, 1990, http://slrohall.com/publications/, 8 pages. |
Buzo, A., et al., “Speech Coding Based Upon Vector Quantization,” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. Assp-28, No. 5, Oct. 1980, 13 pages. |
Caminero-Gil, J., et al., “Data-Driven Discourse Modeling for Semantic Interpretation,” In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, May 7-10, 1996, 6 pages. |
Cawley, G. C., “The Application of Neural Networks to Phonetic Modelling,” PhD Thesis, University of Essex, Mar. 1996, 13 pages. |
Chang, S., et al., “A Segment-based Speech Recognition System for Isolated Mandarin Syllables,” Proceedings TENCON '93, IEEE Region 10 conference on Computer, Communication, Control and Power Engineering, Oct. 19-21, 1993, vol. 3, 6 pages. |
Conklin, J., “Hypertext: An Introduction and Survey,” Computer Magazine, Sep. 1987, 25 pages. |
Connolly, F. T., et al., “Fast Algorithms for Complex Matrix Multiplication Using Surrogates,” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Jun. 1989, vol. 37, No. 6, 13 pages. |
Deerwester, S., et al., “Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 41, No. 6, Sep. 1990, 19 pages. |
Deller, Jr., J. R., et al., “Discrete-Time Processing of Speech Signals,” © 1987 Prentice Hall, ISBN: 0-02-328301-7, 14 pages. |
Digital Equipment Corporation, “Open VMS Software Overview,” Dec. 1995, software manual, 159 pages. |
Donovan, R. E., “A New Distance Measure for Costing Spectral Discontinuities in Concatenative Speech Synthesisers,” 2001, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.21.6398, 4 pages. |
Frisse, M. E., “Searching for Information in a Hypertext Medical Handbook,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 31, No. 7, Jul. 1988, 8 pages. |
Goldberg, D., et al., “Using Collaborative Filtering to Weave an Information Tapestry,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 35, No. 12, Dec. 1992, 10 pages. |
Gorin, A. L., et al., “On Adaptive Acquisition of Language,” International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'90), vol. 1, Apr. 3-6, 1990, 5 pages. |
Gotoh, Y., et al., “Document Space Models Using Latent Semantic Analysis,” In Proceedings of Eurospeech, 1997, 4 pages. |
Gray, R. M., “Vector Quantization,” IEEE ASSP Magazine, Apr. 1984, 26 pages. |
Harris, F. J., “On the Use of Windows for Harmonic Analysis with the Discrete Fourier Transform,” In Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 66, No. 1, Jan. 1978, 34 pages. |
Helm, R., et al., “Building Visual Language Parsers,” In Proceedings of CHI'91 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 8 pages. |
Hermansky, H., “Perceptual Linear Predictive (PLP) Analysis of Speech,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 87, No. 4, Apr. 1990, 15 pages. |
Hermansky, H., “Recognition of Speech in Additive and Convolutional Noise Based on Rasta Spectral Processing,” In proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'93), Apr. 27-30, 1993, 4 pages. |
Hoehfeld M., et al., “Learning with Limited Numerical Precision Using the Cascade-Correlation Algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 3, No. 4, Jul. 1992, 18 pages. |
Holmes, J. N., “Speech Synthesis and Recognition—Stochastic Models for Word Recognition,” Speech Synthesis and Recognition, Published by Chapman & Hall, London, ISBN 0 412 53430 4, © 1998 J. N. Holmes, 7 pages. |
Hon, H.W., et al., “CMU Robust Vocabulary-Independent Speech Recognition System,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP-91), Apr. 14-17, 1991, 4 pages. |
IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, “Speech Editor,” vol. 29, No. 10, Mar. 10, 1987, 3 pages. |
IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, “Integrated Audio-Graphics User Interface,” vol. 33, No. 11, Apr. 1991, 4 pages. |
IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, “Speech Recognition with Hidden Markov Models of Speech Waveforms,” vol. 34, No. 1, Jun. 1991, 10 pages. |
Iowegian International, “FIR Filter Properties,” dspGuro, Digital Signal Processing Central, http://www.dspguru.com/dsp/taqs/fir/properties, downloaded on Jul. 28, 2010, 6 pages. |
Jacobs, P. S., et al., “Scisor: Extracting Information from On-Line News,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 33, No. 11, Nov. 1990, 10 pages. |
Jelinek, F., “Self-Organized Language Modeling for Speech Recognition,” Readings in Speech Recognition, edited by Alex Waibel and Kai-Fu Lee, May 15, 1990, © 1990 Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., ISBN: 1-55860-124-4, 63 pages. |
Jennings, A., et al., “A Personal News Service Based on a User Model Neural Network,” IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, vol. E75-D, No. 2, Mar. 1992, Tokyo, JP, 12 pages. |
Ji, T., et al., “A Method for Chinese Syllables Recognition based upon Sub-syllable Hidden Markov Model,” 1994 International Symposium on Speech, Image Processing and Neural Networks, Apr. 13-16, 1994, Hong Kong, 4 pages. |
Jones, J., “Speech Recognition for Cyclone,” Apple Computer, Inc., E.R.S., Revision 2.9, Sep. 10, 1992, 93 pages. |
Katz, S. M., “Estimation of Probabilities from Sparse Data for the Language Model Component of a Speech Recognizer,” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-35, No. 3, Mar. 1987, 3 pages. |
Kitano, H., “PhiDM-Dialog, An Experimental Speech-to-Speech Dialog Translation System,” Jun. 1991 Computer, vol. 24, No. 6, 13 pages. |
Klabbers, E., et al., “Reducing Audible Spectral Discontinuities,” IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 9, No. 1, Jan. 2001, 13 pages. |
Klatt, D. H., “Linguistic Uses of Segmental Duration in English: Acoustic and Perpetual Evidence,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 59, No. 5, May 1976, 16 pages. |
Kominek, J., et al., “Impact of Durational Outlier Removal from Unit Selection Catalogs,” 5th ISCA Speech Synthesis Workshop, Jun. 14-16, 2004, 6 pages. |
Kubala, F., et al., “Speaker Adaptation from a Speaker-Independent Training Corpus,” International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'90), Apr. 3-6, 1990, 4 pages. |
Kubala, F., et al., “The Hub and Spoke Paradigm for CSR Evaluation,” Proceedings of the Spoken Language Technology Workshop, Mar. 6-8, 1994, 9 pages. |
Lee, K.F., “Large-Vocabulary Speaker-Independent Continuous Speech Recognition: The SPHINX System,” Apr. 18, 1988, Partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Computer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University, 195 pages. |
Lee, L., et al., “A Real-Time Mandarin Dictation Machine for Chinese Language with Unlimited Texts and Very Large Vocabulary,” International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, vol. 1, Apr. 3-6, 1990, 5 pages. |
Lee, L, et al., “Golden Mandarin(II)—An Improved Single-Chip Real-Time Mandarin Dictation Machine for Chinese Language with Very Large Vocabulary,” 0-7803-0946-4/93 © 1993IEEE, 4 pages. |
Lee, L, et al., “Golden Mandarin(II)—An Intelligent Mandarin Dictation Machine for Chinese Character Input with Adaptation/Learning Functions,” International Symposium on Speech, Image Processing and Neural Networks, Apr. 13-16, 1994, Hong Kong, 5 pages. |
Lee, L., et al., “System Description of Golden Mandarin (I) Voice Input for Unlimited Chinese Characters,” International Conference on Computer Processing of Chinese & Oriental Languages, vol. 5, Nos. 3 & 4, Nov. 1991, 16 pages. |
Lin, C.H., et al., “A New Framework for Recognition of Mandarin Syllables With Tones Using Sub-syllabic Unites,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP-93), Apr. 27-30, 1993, 4 pages. |
Linde, Y., et al., “An Algorithm for Vector Quantizer Design,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 28, No. 1, Jan. 1980, 12 pages. |
Liu, F.H., et al., “Efficient Joint Compensation of Speech for the Effects of Additive Noise and Linear Filtering,” IEEE International Conference of Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP-92, Mar. 23-26, 1992, 4 pages. |
Logan, B., “Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients for Music Modeling,” In International Symposium on Music Information Retrieval, 2000, 2 pages. |
Lowerre, B. T., “The-HARPY Speech Recognition System,” Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Apr. 1976, 20 pages. |
Maghbouleh, A., “An Empirical Comparison of Automatic Decision Tree and Linear Regression Models for Vowel Durations,” Revised version of a paper presented at the Computational Phonology in Speech Technology workshop, 1996 annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics in Santa Cruz, California, 7 pages. |
Markel, J. D., et al., “Linear Prediction of Speech,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York 1976, 12 pages. |
Martin, D., et al., “The Open Agent Architecture: A Framework for building distributed software systems,” Jan.-Mar. 1999, Applied Artificial Intelligence: An International Journal, vol. 13, No. 1-2, http://adam.cheyer.com/papers/oaa.pdf, 38 pages. |
Morgan, B., “Business Objects,” (Business Objects for Windows) Business Objects Inc., DBMS Sep. 1992, vol. 5, No. 10, 3 pages. |
Mountford, S. J., et al., “Talking and Listening to Computers,” The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design, Copyright © 1990 Apple Computer, Inc. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., 17 pages. |
Murty, K. S. R., et al., “Combining Evidence from Residual Phase and MFCC Features for Speaker Recognition,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 13, No. 1, Jan. 2006, 4 pages. |
Murveit H. et al., “Integrating Natural Language Constraints into HMM-based Speech Recognition,” 1990 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Apr. 3-6, 1990, 5 pages. |
Nakagawa, S., et al., “Speaker Recognition by Combining MFCC and Phase Information,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Mar. 14-19, 2010, 4 pages. |
Niesler, T. R., et al., “A Variable-Length Category-Based N-Gram Language Model,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'96), vol. 1, May 7-10, 1996, 6 pages. |
Papadimitriou, C. H., et al., “Latent Semantic Indexing: A Probabilistic Analysis,” Nov. 14, 1997, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/messages/downloadsexceeded.html, 21 pages. |
Parsons, T. W., “Voice and Speech Processing,” Linguistics and Technical Fundamentals, Articulatory Phonetics and Phonemics, © 1987 McGraw-Hill, Inc., ISBN: 0-07-0485541-0, 5 pages. |
Parsons, T. W., “Voice and Speech Processing,” Pitch and Formant Estimation, © 1987 McGraw-Hill, Inc., ISBN: 0-07-0485541-0, 15 pages. |
Picone, J., “Continuous Speech Recognition Using Hidden Markov Models,” IEEE ASSP Magazine, vol. 7, No. 3, Jul. 1990, 16 pages. |
Rabiner, L. R., et al., “Fundamental of Speech Recognition,” © 1993 AT&T, Published by Prentice-Hall, Inc., ISBN: 0-13-285826-6, 17 pages. |
Rabiner, L. R., et al., “Note on the Properties of a Vector Quantizer for LPC Coefficients,” The Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 62, No. 8, Oct. 1983, 9 pages. |
Ratcliffe, M., “ClearAccess 2.0 allows SQL searches off-line,” (Structured Query Language), ClearAcess Corp., MacWeek Nov. 16, 1992, vol. 6, No. 41, 2 pages. |
Remde, J. R., et al., “SuperBook: An Automatic Tool for Information Exploration-Hypertext?,” In Proceedings of Hypertext'87 papers, Nov. 13-15, 1987, 14 pages. |
Reynolds, C. F., “On-Line Reviews: A New Application of the HICOM Conferencing System,” IEE Colloquium on Human Factors in Electronic Mail and Conferencing Systems, Feb. 3, 1989, 4 pages. |
Rigoll, G., “Speaker Adaptation for Large Vocabulary Speech Recognition Systems Using Speaker Markov Models,” International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'89), May 23-26, 1989, 4 pages. |
Riley, M. D., “Tree-Based Modelling of Segmental Durations,” Talking Machines Theories, Models, and Designs, 1992 © Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., North-Holland, ISBN: 08-444-89115.3, 15 pages. |
Rivoira, S., et al., “Syntax and Semantics in a Word-Sequence Recognition System,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'79), Apr. 1979, 5 pages. |
Rosenfeld, R., “A Maximum Entropy Approach to Adaptive Statistical Language Modelling,” Computer Speech and Language, vol. 10, No. 3, Jul. 1996, 25 pages. |
Roszkiewicz, A., “Extending your Apple,” Back Talk—Lip Service, A+ Magazine, The Independent Guide for Apple Computing, vol. 2, No. 2, Feb. 1984, 5 pages. |
Sakoe, H., et al., “Dynamic Programming Algorithm Optimization for Spoken Word Recognition,” IEEE Transactins on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Feb. 1978, vol. ASSP-26 No. 1, 8 pages. |
Salton, G., et al., “On the Application of Syntactic Methodologies in Automatic Text Analysis,” Information Processing and Management, vol. 26, No. 1, Great Britain 1990, 22 pages. |
Savoy, J., “Searching Information in Hypertext Systems Using Multiple Sources of Evidence,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol. 38, No. 6, Jun. 1993, 15 pages. |
Scagliola, C., “Language Models and Search Algorithms for Real-Time Speech Recognition,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol. 22, No. 5, 1985, 25 pages. |
Schmandt, C., et al., “Augmenting a Window System with Speech Input,” IEEE Computer Society, Computer Aug. 1990, vol. 23, No. 8, 8 pages. |
Schütze, H., “Dimensions of Meaning,” Proceedings of Supercomputing'92 Conference, Nov. 16-20, 1992, 10 pages. |
Sheth B., et al., “Evolving Agents for Personalized Information Filtering,” In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications, Mar. 1-5, 1993, 9 pages. |
Shikano, K., et al., “Speaker Adaptation Through Vector Quantization,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'86), vol. 11, Apr. 1986, 4 pages. |
Sigurdsson, S., et al., “Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients: An Evaluation of Robustness of MP3 Encoded Music,” In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR), 2006, 4 pages. |
Silverman, K. E. A., et al., “Using a Sigmoid Transformation for Improved Modeling of Phoneme Duration,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Mar. 15-19, 1999, 5 pages. |
Tenenbaum, A.M., et al., “Data Structure Using Pascal,” 1981 Prentice-Hall, Inc., 34 pages. |
Tsai, W.H., et al., “Attributed Grammar—A Tool for Combining Syntactic and Statistical Approaches to Pattern Recognition,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. SMC-10, No. 12, Dec. 1980, 13 pages. |
Udell, J., “Computer Telephony,” BYTE, vol. 19, No. 7, Jul. 1, 1994, 9 pages. |
van Santen, J. P. H., “Contextual Effects on Vowel Duration,” Journal Speech Communication, vol. 11, No. 6, Dec. 1992, 34 pages. |
Vepa, J., et al., “New Objective Distance Measures for Spectral Discontinuities in Concatenative Speech Synthesis,” In Proceedings of the IEEE 2002 Workshop on Speech Synthesis, 4 pages. |
Verschelde, J., “MATLAB Lecture 8. Special Matrices in MATLAB,” Nov. 23, 2005, UIC Dept. of Math., Stat. & C.S., MCS 320, Introduction to Symbolic Computation, 4 pages. |
Vingron, M. “Near-Optimal Sequence Alignment,” Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Abteilung Theoretische Bioinformatik, Heidelberg, Germany, Jun. 1996, 20 pages. |
Werner, S., et al., “Prosodic Aspects of Speech,” Université de Lausanne, Switzerland, 1994, Fundamentals of Speech Synthesis and Speech Recognition: Basic Concepts, State of the Art, and Future Challenges, 18 pages. |
Wolff, M., “Poststructuralism and the ARTFUL Database: Some Theoretical Considerations,” Information Technology and Libraries, vol. 13, No. 1, Mar. 1994, 10 pages. |
Wu, M., “Digital Speech Processing and Coding,” ENEE408G Capstone—Multimedia Signal Processing, Spring 2003, Lecture-2 course presentation, University of Maryland, College Park, 8 pages. |
Wu, M., “Speech Recognition, Synthesis, and H.C.I.,” ENEE408G Capstone-Multimedia Signal Processing, Spring 2003, Lecture-3 course presentation, University of Maryland, College Park, 11 pages. |
Wyle, M. F., “A Wide Area Network Information Filter,” In Proceedings of First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence on Wall Street, Oct. 9-11, 1991, 6 pages. |
Yankelovich, N., et al., “Intermedia: The Concept and the Construction of a Seamless Information Environment,” Computer Magazine, Jan. 1988, © 1988 IEEE, 16 pages. |
Yoon, K., et al., “Letter-to-Sound Rules for Korean,” Department of Linguistics, The Ohio State University, 2002, 4 pages. |
Zhao, Y., “An Acoustic-Phonetic-Based Speaker Adaptation Technique for Improving Speaker-Independent Continuous Speech Recognition,” IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 2, No. 3, Jul. 1994, 15 pages. |
International Search Report dated Nov. 9, 1994, received in International Application No. PCT/US1993/12666, which corresponds to U.S. Appl. No. 07/999,302, 8 pages. (Robert Don Strong). |
International Preliminary Examination Report dated Mar. 1, 1995, received in International Application No. PCT/US1993/12666, which corresponds to U.S. Appl. No. 07/999,302, 5 pages. (Robert Don Strong). |
International Preliminary Examination Report dated Apr. 10, 1995, received in International Application No. PCT/US1993/12637, which corresponds to U.S. Appl. No. 07/999,354, 7 pages. (Alejandro Acero). |
International Search Report dated Feb. 8, 1995, received in International Application No. PCT/US1994/11011, which corresponds to U.S. Appl. No. 08/129,679, 7 pages. (Yen-Lu Chow). |
International Preliminary Examination Report dated Feb. 28, 1996, received in International Application No. PCT/US1994/11011, which corresponds to U.S. Appl. No. 08/129,679, 4 pages. (Yen-Lu Chow). |
Written Opinion dated Aug. 21, 1995, received in International Application No. PCT/US1994/11011, which corresponds to U.S. Appl. No. 08/129,679, 4 pages. (Yen-Lu Chow). |
International Search Report dated Nov. 8, 1995, received in International Application No. PCT/US1995/08369, which corresponds to U.S. Appl. No. 08/271,639, 6 pages (Peter V. De Souza). |
International Preliminary Examination Report dated Oct. 9, 1996, received in International Application No. PCT/US1995/08369, which corresponds to U.S. Appl. No. 08/271,639, 4 pages. (Peter V. De Souza). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110166856 A1 | Jul 2011 | US |