The present disclosure relates generally to electronic display devices that depict image data. More specifically, the present disclosure relates to systems and methods for reducing noise present in sensing circuits used for calibrating light emitting diodes (e.g., organic light emitting diodes) in electronic display devices.
This section is intended to introduce the reader to various aspects of art that may be related to various aspects of the present techniques, which are described and/or claimed below. This discussion is believed to be helpful in providing the reader with background information to facilitate a better understanding of the various aspects of the present disclosure. Accordingly, it should be understood that these statements are to be read in this light, and not as admissions of prior art.
As electronic displays are employed in a variety of electronic devices, such as mobile phones, televisions, tablet computing devices, and the like, manufacturers of the electronic displays continuously seek ways to improve the consistency of colors depicted on the electronic display devices. For example, given variations in manufacturing or the various noise sources present within a display device, different pixels within a display device might emit a different color value or gray level even when provided with the same electrical input. It is desirable, however, for the pixels to uniformly depict the same color or gray level when the pixels programmed to do so to avoid visual display artifacts due to inconsistent color.
A summary of certain embodiments disclosed herein is set forth below. It should be understood that these aspects are presented merely to provide the reader with a brief summary of these certain embodiments and that these aspects are not intended to limit the scope of this disclosure. Indeed, this disclosure may encompass a variety of aspects that may not be set forth below.
In certain electronic display devices, light emitting diodes such as organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) or micro-LEDs (μLEDs) may be employed as pixels to depict a range of gray levels for display. However, due to various properties associated with the operation of these pixels within the display device, a particular gray level output by one pixel in a display device may be different from a gray level output by another pixel in the same display device upon receiving the same electrical input. As such, the electrical inputs may be calibrated to account for these differences by sensing the electrical values that get stored into the pixels and adjusting the input electrical values accordingly. Since a more accurate and/or precise determination of the sensed electrical value in the pixel may be used to obtain a more consistent and/or exact calibration, the present disclosure details various systems and methods that may be employed to filter noise that may be present within a signal of the sensed electrical value in one or more pixels.
One way to obtain a more accurate and/or precise measurement of the sensed electrical value in a pixel involves filtering noise using multiple samples. For instance, in one embodiment, a calibration system within the display device may provide a ramp voltage signal to a comparator component associated with a pixel. The calibration system may be designed such that when the voltage signal provided to the comparator component reaches a threshold, the comparator component may then keep the voltage signal constant at the threshold value. After the voltage signal reaches the threshold value, an averaging component coupled to the comparator component may obtain multiple samples of the voltage signal being output by the comparator component. Using the multiple samples of the voltage signal, which may be fluctuating within some range of voltage values due to noise present on the voltage signal, the averaging component may determine an average value of the obtained samples to determine a voltage value of the voltage signal that corresponds to the threshold. Using this determined voltage value, a display driver circuit may adjust the input voltage provided to the corresponding pixel to calibrate the respective pixel with other pixels within the display device.
In another embodiment, the calibration system may provide a ramp digital-to-analog (DAC) voltage signal to a comparator component associated with a pixel. The ramp DAC voltage signal may be a step function that may step down a voltage signal at uniform increments, such that a counter component may count each voltage step with respect to a clock signal provided by a clock component. When the ramp DAC voltage signal reaches a threshold voltage, the comparator component may switch states (e.g., turn off). When the comparator component switches states, the counter component may indicate a count at which the comparator component switched states. The count may then be used to determine a voltage value of the ramp DAC voltage signal when the ramp DAC voltage signal reached the threshold voltage. The determined voltage value may then be used to calibrate the respective pixel with other pixels within the display device.
In another embodiment, the calibration system may include a current source to provide a constant current to a pixel and a capacitor coupled to a comparator component. Using the constant current, the capacitor may output a time-to-digital conversion (TDC) voltage signal that may decrease linearly with respect to time. The comparator component may receive the TDC voltage signal and switch states (e.g., turn off) when the TDC voltage signal reaches a threshold voltage. The time at which the comparator component switches states may then be used to determine the voltage value of the TDC voltage signal that corresponds to the threshold voltage. The determined voltage value may then be used to calibrate the respective pixel with other pixels within the display device.
In another embodiment, when the comparator component changes states (e.g., turns off) due to the input voltage signal exceeding or falling below a threshold voltage, noise present on the input signal may cause the comparator component to switch states again. That is, if the comparator component initially changes states when the input voltage signal falls below the threshold voltage, the comparator component may change states again if the input voltage signal is noisy and exceeds the threshold voltage after falling below the threshold voltage. In this case, the clock time or count associated with each time the comparator component changes states may be recorded and the corresponding voltage values associated with each comparator state change may be averaged to determine a voltage value that more accurately represents the voltage at the comparator component when the input voltage signal reached the threshold voltage. The determined voltage value may then be used to calibrate the respective pixel with other pixels within the display device.
Various refinements of the features noted above may exist in relation to various aspects of the present disclosure. Further features may also be incorporated in these various aspects as well. These refinements and additional features may exist individually or in any combination. For instance, various features discussed below in relation to one or more of the illustrated embodiments may be incorporated into any of the above-described aspects of the present disclosure alone or in any combination. The brief summary presented above is intended only to familiarize the reader with certain aspects and contexts of embodiments of the present disclosure without limitation to the claimed subject matter.
Various aspects of this disclosure may be better understood upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the drawings in which:
One or more specific embodiments of the present disclosure will be described below. These described embodiments are only examples of the presently disclosed techniques. Additionally, in an effort to provide a concise description of these embodiments, all features of an actual implementation may not be described in the specification. It should be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation, as in any engineering or design project, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which may vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it should be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time consuming, but may nevertheless be a routine undertaking of design, fabrication, and manufacture for those of ordinary skill having the benefit of this disclosure.
When introducing elements of various embodiments of the present disclosure, the articles “a,” “an,” and “the” are intended to mean that there are one or more of the elements. The terms “comprising,” “including,” and “having” are intended to be inclusive and mean that there may be additional elements other than the listed elements. Additionally, it should be understood that references to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” of the present disclosure are not intended to be interpreted as excluding the existence of additional embodiments that also incorporate the recited features.
As mentioned above, in certain embodiments, a calibration system (e.g., circuit) may be coupled to a pixel of an electronic display. Generally, the voltage signal provided to the pixel is used to generate a particular gray level. However, due noise present on the voltage signal, the pixel may depict a different gray level than expected. That is, each pixel within the display may depict a different gray level when the same voltage signal is provided. To calibrate the voltage signal provided to each pixel, in one embodiment, the calibration system may average the voltage signal provided to the pixel to filter the noise component of the voltage signal. In another embodiment, the calibration system may use a ramp digital-to-analog converter (DAC) voltage signal, a clock, and a comparator component to track a number of counts of the ramp DAC voltage signal provided to the comparator component before the comparator component changes states. Using the number of counts, the calibration system may determine a noise-filtered voltage value that corresponds to a threshold voltage of the comparator component. The noise-filtered voltage value may then be used to calibrate the voltage provided to the pixel.
In yet another embodiment, the calibration system may use a time-to-digital converter (TDC) voltage signal and a comparator component to determine times in which the comparator component changes states. Using the times at which the comparator component changes states, the calibration system may determine a noise-filtered voltage value that corresponds to a threshold voltage of the comparator component. The noise-filtered voltage value may then be used to calibrate the voltage provided to the pixel.
In yet another embodiment, the comparator component of a calibration system may switch states multiple times when the input voltage signal is within a range of the threshold voltage of the comparator component. In this case, the calibration system may sample the voltage value received at the comparator component each time the comparator component changes states. The calibration system may then determine an average of the sampled voltage values to determine a noise-filtered voltage value provided to the pixel that corresponds to the threshold voltage.
Although each of the brief descriptions of the embodiments mentioned above has been described independently, it should be noted that, in some embodiments, the calibration may employ a combination of two or more of the proposed techniques to filter the noise of the voltage signal provided to a pixel. Accordingly, although the following description of various techniques for filtering noise of a voltage signal and calibrating the voltage signal provided to a pixel, it should be understood that two or more of the following techniques and circuits may be employed together to filter noise from the voltage signal and calibrate the voltages provided to pixels within a display.
By way of introduction,
As shown in
Before continuing further, it should be noted that the system block diagram of the device 10 shown in
Considering each of the components of
The processor(s) 16 may control the general operation of the device 10. For instance, the processor(s) 16 may execute an operating system, programs, user and application interfaces, and other functions of the electronic device 10. The processor(s) 16 may include one or more microprocessors and/or application-specific microprocessors (ASICs), or a combination of such processing components. For example, the processor(s) 16 may include one or more instruction set (e.g., RISC) processors, as well as graphics processors (GPU), video processors, audio processors and/or related chip sets. As may be appreciated, the processor(s) 16 may be coupled to one or more data buses for transferring data and instructions between various components of the device 10. In certain embodiments, the processor(s) 16 may provide the processing capability to execute an imaging applications on the electronic device 10, such as Photo Booth®, Aperture®, iPhoto®, Preview®, iMovie®, or Final Cut Pro® available from Apple Inc., or the “Camera” and/or “Photo” applications provided by Apple Inc. and available on some models of the iPhone®, iPod®, and iPad®.
A computer-readable medium, such as the memory 18 or the nonvolatile storage 20, may store the instructions or data to be processed by the processor(s) 16. The memory 18 may include any suitable memory device, such as random access memory (RAM) or read only memory (ROM). The nonvolatile storage 20 may include flash memory, a hard drive, or any other optical, magnetic, and/or solid-state storage media. The memory 18 and/or the nonvolatile storage 20 may store firmware, data files, image data, software programs and applications, and so forth.
The network device 22 may be a network controller or a network interface card (NIC), and may enable network communication over a local area network (LAN) (e.g., Wi-Fi), a personal area network (e.g., Bluetooth), and/or a wide area network (WAN) (e.g., a 3G or 4G data network). The power source 24 of the device 10 may include a Li-ion battery and/or a power supply unit (PSU) to draw power from an electrical outlet or an alternating-current (AC) power supply.
The display 26 may display various images generated by device 10, such as a GUI for an operating system or image data (including still images and video data). The display 26 may be any suitable type of display, such as a liquid crystal display (LCD), plasma display, or an organic light emitting diode (OLED) display, for example. In one embodiment, the display 26 may include self-emissive pixels such as organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs) or micro-light-emitting-diodes (μ-LEDs). In addition, the display 26 may include switchable retarder pixels, each of which corresponds to one or more of the self-emissive pixels. The switchable retarder pixels may use liquid crystal materials to selectively retard or permit outside light. Using the switchable retarder pixels may thus allow for a high-contrast mode of operation of the display 26.
Additionally, as mentioned above, the display 26 may include a touch-sensitive element that may represent an input structure 14 of the electronic device 10. The imaging device(s) 28 of the electronic device 10 may represent a digital camera that may acquire both still images and video. Each imaging device 28 may include a lens and an image sensor capture and convert light into electrical signals.
In certain embodiments, the electronic device 10 may include a calibration system 30, which may be separate or integral to the display 26. The calibration system 30 may include a chip, such as processor or ASIC, that may control various aspects of the display 26. For instance, the calibration system 30 may use a voltage signal that is to be provided to a pixel of the display 26 to calibrate the gray level depicted by the pixel. Generally, the voltage signal provided to each pixel of the display 26 may include noise, such that the voltage provided to one pixel may result in one gray level, while the same voltage applied to another pixel may result in a different gray level. As such, the calibration system 30 may filter the noise from the voltage signal, such that the pixels of the display 26 are calibrated with each other.
As mentioned above, the electronic device 10 may take any number of suitable forms. Some examples of these possible forms appear in
The notebook computer 40 may include an integrated imaging device 28 (e.g., a camera). In other embodiments, the notebook computer 40 may use an external camera (e.g., an external USB camera or a “webcam”) connected to one or more of the I/O ports 12 instead of or in addition to the integrated imaging device 28. In certain embodiments, the depicted notebook computer 40 may be a model of a MacBook®, MacBook® Pro, MacBook Air®, or PowerBook® available from Apple Inc. In other embodiments, the computer 40 may be portable tablet computing device, such as a model of an iPad® from Apple Inc.
The electronic device 10 may also take the form of portable handheld device 60 or 70, as shown in
The display 26 may display images generated by the handheld device 60 or 70. For example, the display 26 may display system indicators that may indicate device power status, signal strength, external device connections, and so forth. The display 26 may also display a GUI 52 that allows a user to interact with the device 60 or 70, as discussed above with reference to
Having provided some context with regard to possible forms that the electronic device 10 may take, the present discussion will now focus on the calibration system 30 of
The self-emissive pixel array 80 is shown having a controller 84, a power driver 86A, an image driver 86B, and the array of self-emissive pixels 82. The self-emissive pixels 82 are driven by the power driver 86A and image driver 86B. Each power driver 86A and image driver 86B may drive one or more self-emissive pixels 82. In some embodiments, the power driver 86A and the image driver 86B may include multiple channels for independently driving multiple self-emissive pixels 82. The self-emissive pixels may include any suitable light-emitting elements, such as organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs), micro-light-emitting-diodes (μ-LEDs), and so forth.
The power driver 86A may be connected to the self-emissive pixels 82 by way of scan lines S0, S1, . . . Sm-1, and Sm and driving lines D0, D1, . . . Dm-1, and Dm. The self-emissive pixels 82 receive on/off instructions through the scan lines S0, S1, . . . Sm-1, and Sm and generate driving currents corresponding to data voltages transmitted from the driving lines D0, D1, . . . Dm-1, and Dm. The driving currents are applied to each self-emissive pixel 82 to emit light according to instructions from the image driver 86B through driving lines M0, M1, . . . Mn-1, and Mn. Both the power driver 86A and the image driver 86B transmit voltage signals through respective driving lines to operate each self-emissive pixel 82 at a state determined by the controller 84 to emit light. Each driver may supply voltage signals at a duty cycle and/or amplitude sufficient to operate each self-emissive pixel 82.
The controller 84 may control the color of the self-emissive pixels 82 using image data generated by the processor(s) 16 and stored into the memory 18 or provided directly from the processor(s) 16 to the controller 84. The controller 84 may also provide a signal to the calibration system 30 to filter noise from voltage signals provided to each self-emissive pixel 82 in accordance with the techniques that will be described in detail below.
With the foregoing in mind,
For example,
As shown in
With the foregoing in mind,
Referring now to
After determining that the comparator component 96 changed states, the averaging component 98 may proceed to block 124. At block 124, the averaging component 98 may acquire multiple samples of the voltage signal output by the comparator component 96. As discussed above, the voltage output by the comparator component 96 after the comparator component 96 changes states may fluctuate due to the noise component present on the voltage signal. At block 126, the averaging component 98 may determine an average value of the sample voltage measurements acquired at block 124. The average value of the sample voltage measurements may filter at least a portion of the noise component from the voltage signal. The processor 16 or another suitable component may then use the average voltage value to calibrate the pixel 94.
In addition to the circuit 90 described above,
Referring back to
In operation, the comparator component 96 may receive the ramp DAC voltage signal via the switch 102 and compare the ramp DAC voltage signal to a threshold voltage (Vtrip). When the ramp DAC voltage signal reaches the threshold voltage (Vtrip), the comparator component 96 may change states. After the comparator component 96 changes states, the count value according to the counter component 134 that corresponds to when the comparator component 96 changed states may be used to determine a precise voltage value of the ramp DAC voltage signal that corresponds to the threshold voltage. For instance, as shown in
Although the above description for determining the voltage value that corresponds to the threshold voltage (Vtrip) may assist in calibrating the pixel 94, the comparator component 96 continuously monitors the ramp DAC voltage signal 142 until it reaches the threshold voltage (Vtrip). This continuous monitoring of the ramp DAC voltage signal 142 consumes a large portion of the energy in the circuit 130. With this in mind,
Referring now to
If the controller 84 determines that the comparator component 96 has changed states (e.g., by receiving an indication from the comparator component 96), the controller 84 may proceed to block 158 and determine a voltage range in which the comparator component 96 changed states. With this in mind, at block 160, the controller 84 may send another signal to the ramp DAC voltage source 132 to provide a second ramp DAC voltage signal to the comparator component 96. The second ramp DAC voltage signal may include smaller voltage increments as compared to the first ramp DAC voltage signal. As such, the first ramp DAC voltage signal may employ relatively large voltage increments at each voltage step to determine a range of voltages that include the particular voltage value that causes the comparator component 96 to change states.
Using the voltage range determined at block 158, the controller 84 may, at block 162, activate the comparator component 96 for counts that correspond to when the second ramp DAC voltage signal is within the determined range. As such, the comparator component 96 may be active for a portion of the time in which the second ramp DAC voltage signal is provided to the comparator component 96.
At block 164, the controller 84 may determine whether the comparator component 96 has changed states. If the comparator component 96 has not changed states, the controller 84 may return to block 164 and continue monitoring the status of the comparator component 96. If, however, the comparator component 96 does change states, the controller 84 may proceed to block 166 and determine a voltage that corresponds to the count at which the comparator component 96 changed states. That is, the controller 84 may use the count that corresponds to when the comparator component 96 changes states to determine a voltage value of the second ramp DAC voltage signal that corresponds to the threshold voltage (Vtrip).
By employing the method 150 described above, the comparator component 96 may be active for less time as compared to using a single ramp DAC voltage signal. To better illustrate the power savings of the comparator component 96 by employing the method 150m
Keeping the method 150 in mind, the controller 84 may, in some embodiments, send a command to the ramp DAC voltage source 132 to provide the second ramp DAC voltage signal 174 again as illustrated in
In addition to using a ramp DAC voltage signal as described above with regard to
With this in mind,
Referring to
At block 224, the controller 84 may monitor the state of the comparator component 96. The controller 84 may then determine whether the comparator component 96 has changed states at block 226. If the comparator component 96 has not changed states, the controller 84 may return to block 224. If, however, the comparator component 96 changes states, the controller 84 may proceed to block 228 and determine a time T1 at which the state change occurred.
At block 230, the controller 84 may again monitor the state of the comparator component 96, which may have reset after changing states at block 226. At block 232, the controller 84 may determine whether the comparator component 96 has changes states again (e.g., at the second threshold voltage (Vtrip2)). If the comparator component 96 has not changed states, the controller 84 may return to block 230 and continue monitoring the state of the comparator component 96. If the comparator component 96 changes states at block 232, the controller 84 may proceed to block 234 and determine a time T2 that the comparator component 96 changed states.
After determining the times T1 and T2 that the state changes occurred, the controller 84 may proceed to block 236 and determine current values that correspond to the times T1 and T2. That is, the controller 84 may use the time T1 to determine a first current I1 provided to the comparator component 96 that corresponds to the first threshold voltage (Vtrip1). Since the comparator component 96 switched states at time T1 when the voltage at the comparator component 96 reached the first threshold voltage (Vtrip1), the controller 84 may determine the first current I1 based on the first threshold voltage (Vtrip1), the capacitance (C) of the capacitor 104, and the time T1 according to Equation 1 below:
I1=(C*Vtrip1)/T1 (1)
In the same manner, the controller 84 may determine the second current I2 based on the second threshold voltage (Vtrip2), the capacitance (C) of the capacitor 104, and the time T2 according to Equation 2 below:
I2=(C*Vtrip2)/T2 (2)
It should be noted that although the method 220 is described as being performed for two threshold voltages, the method 220 may be performed for a number of threshold voltages.
Since the current source 202 provides a constant current I to the comparator component 96, the first current I1 and the second current I2 should match the constant current I output by the current source 202. However, due to noise being present within the display 26, the first current I1 and the second current I2 may be different from each other. As such, the controller 84 may determine an average value of the first current I1 and the second current I2 to filter at least a portion of the noise. The controller 84 or another suitable component may then calibrate the pixel 94 based on the average current.
As discussed above, the comparator component 96 consumes energy when it monitors the input voltage with regard to the threshold voltage. As such, in some embodiments, when monitoring the state of the comparator component 96 at blocks 224 and 230, the controller 84 may send signals to the comparator component 96 to activate for periods of time in which the times at which the comparator component 96 is expected to change states. In this way, the comparator component 96 may not be active for the entire duration of the input voltage waveform. Instead, the comparator component 96 may be active for just portions of time when it receives the input voltage.
For instance,
In addition to the time duration that the comparator component 96 is active, the amount of energy consumed by the comparator component 96 is proportional to the clock speed in which the comparator component 96 samples the voltage signal 242. As such, in some embodiments, the controller 84 may cause the comparator component 96 to use change its clock speed during different time periods when a threshold voltage is expected to occur.
With this in mind,
Referring to
During the first time period, the comparator component 96 may monitor the input voltage at the first sampling rate. When the comparator component 96 changes states, at block 256, the controller 84 may determine the time T1 at which the comparator component 96 changes states. At block 258, the controller 84 may determine a second threshold voltage (Vtrip2) based on the slope of the voltage input. That is, the controller 84 may determine the second threshold voltage (Vtrip2) based on a calculated current I1, as determined based on the time T1, the capacitance of the capacitor 104, and the first threshold voltage (Vtrip1).
Since the current I1 is determined based on the time T1 that the comparator component 96 changes states, the current I1 may be used to determine a more accurate slope of the voltage input to the comparator component 96. As such, at block 260, the controller 84 may activate the comparator component 96 during a second period of time in which the second threshold voltage (Vtrip2) is expected. With the increased accuracy of the slope, the second period of time may be shorter than the first period of time. Additionally, in some embodiments, the controller 84, at block 260, may increase the sampling rate at which the comparator component 96 may sample the voltage input signal during the second period of time.
At block 262, the controller 84 may determine the time T2 when the comparator component 96 changes states due to the voltage input signal reaching the second threshold voltage (Vtrip2). In some embodiments, the controller 84 may repeat blocks 258-262 a number of times. As such, each subsequent time period may be shorter than the previous time period and the sampling rate of the comparator component 96 may continue to increase. As a result, the controller 84 may obtain a number of times, such that a number of current values may be determined and averaged to filter noise from the input current. Using the average current value, the controller 84 may then calibrate the pixel 94.
Although the methods described above may improve the signal-to-noise ratio of the voltage and current that correspond to a threshold voltage of the comparator component 96, additional techniques may be employed to filter more of the noise component present on the voltage and current. With this in mind, an expected voltage signal without noise present in the signal is depicted in
The fluctuations of the voltage signal 282, for example, is depicted in
Referring to
At block 294, the controller 84 may determine an average time value of the time values collected at block 292. It should be noted that the distribution of the times at which the comparator component 96 changes states may generally follow a Gaussian trend. For instance,
After determining the average time value, at block 296, the controller 84 may determine the voltage value that corresponds to the average time value. That is, as discussed above, the controller 84 may use the average time value to determine the current I provided to the comparator component 96 of the circuit 200 and thus filter the noise present on the current I. As such, the controller 84 may use the current I to calibrate the pixel 94.
The specific embodiments described above have been shown by way of example, and it should be understood that these embodiments may be susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms. It should be further understood that the claims are not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed, but rather to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of this disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6040812 | Lewis | Mar 2000 | A |
6243034 | Regier | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6411273 | Nakamura | Jun 2002 | B1 |
9106888 | Chou | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9215472 | Orr et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9218639 | Cote et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9224186 | Rygh et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9224187 | Cote et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9270999 | Cote et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9292899 | Schaub et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9299122 | Okruhlica et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9305325 | Cheng et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9336558 | Cote et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9351003 | Cote et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9373280 | Yoon | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9380312 | Cote et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9780129 | Eshel | Oct 2017 | B2 |
20030174083 | Mayfield | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20080001855 | Hamer | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080180365 | Ozaki | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090115795 | Pae | May 2009 | A1 |
20100141667 | Chiou et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100176855 | Huffman | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110279444 | Chung | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20130016091 | Kato | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140152642 | Kim | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140198092 | Azizi | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140347310 | Hargreaves | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150048881 | Kwon | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150077314 | Kim | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150092833 | Ku et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150092843 | Millet et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150092855 | Chou et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150170569 | Han et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150187094 | Lee et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150279274 | Pyo | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160007038 | Chou et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160012798 | Oh | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160021385 | Chou et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160065969 | Cheng et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160065973 | Cote et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160078805 | Woo | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160078813 | Mizukoshi | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160078824 | Meador | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160163255 | Kim et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2014174472 | Oct 2014 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180005562 A1 | Jan 2018 | US |