This relates generally to power adapters and more particularly to noise suppression circuits for power adapters.
Noise can be a persistent concern for electronic devices because the noise can come from a variety of sources (both internal and external) and can adversely affect the devices' desired signals. In some circumstances, the noise can be related to the power adapters used to power the electronic devices.
As the Type B adapter 110 has ground prong 112-c that can couple to earth ground, noise induced in the adapter can be shunted to ground rather than into components of a connected electronic device. On the other hand, the Type A adapter 120 does not have a ground prong and therefore can induce noise that can be introduced into the connected electronic device that the adapter powers.
Because many electronic devices use the Type A adapter, the challenge is to suppress induced noise in those devices while using that adapter.
This relates to a noise suppression circuit for a power adapter to reduce or eliminate adapter-induced noise from being introduced into an electronic device powered by the adapter. This noise suppression circuit can be particularly helpful with power adapters, e.g., Type A adapters, which lack a ground prong in the adapter plug that could advantageously handle induced noise. In one example, the noise suppression circuit can include an active circuit to detect and attenuate or cancel the induced noise. In another example, the noise suppression circuit can include an RLC circuit in parallel with the adapter choke to suppress the induced noise at the operating frequencies of the connected electronic device. In still another example, the noise suppression circuit can include a modified adapter Y capacitor connection so as to bypass the adapter choke, thereby reducing or eliminating the choke's induced noise. By using a noise suppression circuit for a power adapter, electronic devices can operate properly with the power adapter because the devices' desired signals carry little or no adapter-induced noise that would interfere with the devices' operation.
In the following description of example embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings in which it is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments that can be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments can be used and structural changes can be made without departing from the scope of the various embodiments.
This relates to a noise suppression circuit for a power adapter that can be used to suppress adapter-induced noise that adversely affects desired signals in a device powered by the adapter. In some embodiments, the noise suppression circuit can include an active circuit to detect and attenuate or cancel the induced noise in the adapter. In some embodiments, the noise suppression circuit can include an RLC tuned circuit in parallel with the adapter choke to suppress the choke's induced noise at the operating frequencies of the connected electronic device. Alternatively, the RLC tuned circuit can be in parallel with the adapter Y capacitor to similarly suppress the capacitor's induced noise at the operating frequencies of the connected electronic device. In some embodiments, the noise suppression circuit can include a modified connection for the adapter Y capacitor so as to bypass the adapter choke, thereby reducing or eliminating the choke's induced noise.
By providing noise suppression circuitry in the power adapter, the adapter can suppress induced noise that would otherwise be introduced into desired signals of the device powered by the adapter. A power adapter with noise suppression circuitry can be particularly useful when powering touch sensitive devices because the devices depend on sense signals, which can be very sensitive to noise, to perform various functions on the devices.
Although various embodiments herein describe AC power adapters, it is to be understood that other types of adapters are also possible candidates for noise suppression.
When the touch sensitive device 240 is connected to a power adapter 210 that lacks a ground prong, e.g., a Type A adapter, the device can be vulnerable to noise induced by the adapter that can interfere with the sense signals. The touch sensitive device 240 can generate stimulation signals to stimulate drive circuitry (not shown) to drive the device. In response to the stimulation signals, sense circuitry (not shown) of the touch sensitive device 240 can generate sense signals, where the relative strength of the sense signals can be a function of the proximity of the object to the device. The induced noise in the adapter 210 can be introduced directly into the sense signals due to the noise being on the system's isolated DC ground (to which the sense signals are referenced) relative to the user, causing the noise to couple to the generated sense signals. The resulting sense signals can be erroneous, thereby causing the touch sensitive device 240 to perform an erroneous function based on the noisy sense signals. In some embodiments, the noise in the sense signals can be exacerbated by a poorly grounded object, such as the user's hand 250, touching or hovering over the touch sensitive device 240 at multiple locations.
Noise suppression circuit 215 for the power adapter 210 can suppress that induced noise so that its interference with the sense signals is reduced or eliminated. Exemplary noise suppression circuits will be described in detail in
Although various embodiments herein refer to touch sensitive devices, it is to be understood that other electronic devices can also be used with a noise suppression circuit for a power adapter.
The noise suppression circuit for the adapter 310 can employ active noise suppression to suppress induced noise in the adapter. To do so, the noise suppression circuit can include an active circuit, e.g., a feedback circuit, acting as a capacitance multiplier (capacitor C1 and operational amplifier 364) to effectively detect the induced noise, and a feedback capacitor (capacitor C3) to effectively feed back the detected noise so as to attenuate or cancel the noise between the primary ground and the secondary ground. The noise suppression circuit can be coupled to the AC neutral line 302 at a point where the AC voltage Vac is clean, i.e., relatively free of induced noise, and to the secondary side output of the transformer 362 at the noisy secondary side ground via the (+) input to the operational amplifier 364. The capacitance multiplier can include capacitor C1 and operational amplifier 364 with resistor R and capacitor C2, where the capacitor C1, with the help of the operational amplifier, can simulate a larger capacitor so as to sense the induced noise in the AC voltage Vac by sensing the differential voltage between the primary side ground and secondary side ground. There can a tendency for the AC voltage Vac at the secondary side to be higher than at the primary side, indicative of the induced noise. Accordingly, feedback capacitor C3 can feed back a current (including the induced noise) so as to reduce that differential voltage and, in the process, to couple the feedback noise into the AC voltage so as to attenuate or cancel out noise induced by the choke 361 and the Y capacitor Cy.
In operation, the power adapter 310 can receive AC voltage Vac from a power source, e.g., a wall outlet, transmit the AC voltage Vac through the choke 361, the transformer 362, the switching node 363, the Y capacitor Cy, the rectifier diode D1, and the smoothing capacitor C10 to process and convert the AC voltage Vac to DC voltage Vdc as described previously, and send the DC voltage Vdc to a connected touch sensitive device to power the device. While transmitting the AC voltage Vac, the power adapter 310 can also actively suppress induced noise in the AC voltage Vac using the active circuit as described previously so that the secondary DC ground provided to the connected touch sensitive device has little or no noise that could interfere with the device's sense signals. In some embodiments, the noise suppression circuit can include the capacitor C1 having a capacitance of about 220 pF, the operational amplifier 364, a gain-bandwidth product of about 12 MHz and a slew rate of about 400V/μs, the amplifier resistor R, a resistance of about 100 kΩ, the amplifier capacitor C2, a capacitance of about 47 pF, and the feedback capacitor C3, a capacitance of about 220 pF. The feedback current can be about 2 mA, at a peak voltage Vpk of about 5V and the touch frequency of about 300 kHz. Accordingly, at a touch frequency of 100 kHz, the noise suppression circuit can suppress induced noise in the adapter 310 by as much as 30 dB and, at a touch frequency of 300 kHz, by as much as 10 dB.
It should be understood that the power adapter 310 of
The noise suppression circuit of
The power circuit of the adapter 410 of
In operation, the power adapter 410 can operate in a similar manner as the power adapter 310 of
In an alternate embodiment, rather than having the RLC circuit in parallel with the choke, the RLC circuit can be in parallel with the Y capacitor Cy, which can also induce noise that could interfere with the sense signals, to help suppress the Y capacitor induced noise in a similar manner as the choke.
In another alternate embodiment, a first RLC circuit can be in parallel with the choke to help suppress the choke's induced noise, and a second RLC circuit can be in parallel with the Y capacitor to help suppress the Y capacitor's induced noise.
The power circuit of the adapter 510 of
In operation, the power adapter 510 can operate in a similar manner as the power adapter 310 of
In addition to suppressing noise in sense signals, a noise suppression circuit according to various embodiments can be used for certain kinds of EMI suppression, audio signal noise suppression, video signal noise suppression, and the like.
Although embodiments have been fully described with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be noted that various changes and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art. Such changes and modifications are to be understood as being included within the scope of the various embodiments as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3868606 | Driscoll | Feb 1975 | A |
4148097 | Deisch | Apr 1979 | A |
5483261 | Yasutake | Jan 1996 | A |
5488204 | Mead et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5825352 | Bisset et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5835079 | Shieh | Nov 1998 | A |
5880411 | Gillespie et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6188391 | Seely et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6310610 | Beaton et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6323846 | Westerman et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6528970 | Liu et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6643148 | Smyth | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6690387 | Zimmerman et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
7015894 | Morohoshi | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7184064 | Zimmerman et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7521990 | Bybee | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7659797 | Tucker | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7663607 | Hotelling et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7800380 | Banaska et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7876581 | Kim et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8479122 | Hotelling et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
20010015648 | Tokita | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20060026521 | Hotelling et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060197753 | Hotelling | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20080211310 | Jitaru et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090002343 | Land et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100027599 | Di Chiro et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100289566 | Ko et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20120314456 | Lanni | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202004507 | Oct 2011 | CN |
20 2006 018439 | Feb 2007 | DE |
1 355 408 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1 355 408 | Oct 2003 | EP |
61-224864 | Oct 1986 | JP |
09-27731 | Jan 1997 | JP |
2000-163031 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2002-342033 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2005-217839 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2008-029053 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2008-118424 | May 2008 | JP |
2009-177438 | Aug 2009 | JP |
WO-2013062686 | May 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Lee, S.K. et al. (Apr. 1985). “A Multi-Touch Three Dimensional Touch-Sensitive Tablet,” Proceedings of CHI: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 21-25. |
Rubine, D.H. (Dec. 1991). “The Automatic Recognition of Gestures,” CMU-CS-91-202, Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science at Carnegie Mellon University, 285 pages. |
Rubine, D.H. (May 1992). “Combining Gestures and Direct Manipulation,” CHI '92, pp. 659-660. |
Westerman, W. (Spring 1999). “Hand Tracking, Finger Identification, and Chordic Manipulation on a Multi-Touch Surface,” A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Electrical Engineering, 364 pages. |
International Search Report mailed Jul. 10, 2013, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/055657 filed Sep. 14, 2012, five pages. |
Search Report for ROC (Taiwan), dated Jun. 11, 2014, for Patent Application No. 101135382, with English translation, two page. |
Chinese Search Report dated Aug. 5, 2014, for CN Application No. 201210366607.2, filed Sep. 28, 2012, two pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130099854 A1 | Apr 2013 | US |