This invention relates specifically to larger commercial aircraft and the tire wear thereof. The reduction of pre-mature tire wear is the nucleus of this invention.
Wheels of most aircraft are subjected instantaneous contact with the tarmac (runway) when landing. During this time, large billows of blue smoke from the skidding of tires is easily evident and prolific.
The specific problem of extreme tire wear during landing is addressed and can be rectified by instituting tire rotation at or near the ground speed of the aircraft involved. The result of this would be no/low skid, and/or an increase in tire longevity, and a goal of doubling the life of the tire, without avoiding safe tire parameters. The subsequent savings will be high.
The invention reduces tire skid/flat spots on aircraft when landing. By using ambient airflow when aircraft attempts to land, it initiates tire spin at or close to ground speed to reduce skidding.
Other features and aspects will be apparent from the following detailed description, the drawings, and the claims
Throughout the drawings and the detailed description, the same reference numerals refer to the same elements. The drawings may not be to scale, and the relative size, proportions, and depiction of elements in the drawings may be exaggerated for clarity, illustration, and convenience.
The following detailed description is provided to assist the reader in gaining a comprehensive understanding of the methods, products, and/or systems, described herein. However, various changes, modifications, and equivalents of the methods, products, and/or systems described herein will be apparent to an ordinary skilled artisan.
The invention addresses this with the use of a hub-cap using various air capturing shapes. These protrude from the wheel assembly and can include scoops, cups or slats, depending on RPM required and speed of aircraft when landing.
When the aircraft is about to land, wind speeds can reach 120-175 mph under the fuselage. At this point, the energy is captured by the captive design of the hub-cap and rotation of the wheel assembly starts in the direction desired. This use of energy in this fashion can be viewed when looking at a wind powered generator or an old fashioned wind-mill.
The hub-cap includes it being a circular shape and diameter corresponding to the diameter of the wheel and may be installed without any modification to the wheel.
An aircraft hubcap structure for attachment to an airplane wheel and tire assembly may have a circular configuration, and extend outwardly from said wheel with said wheel defining a plurality of bolt holes spaced from one another at or adjacent to said hubcap structure.
An embodiment of the invention includes:
1. A single pre-formed or cast hub cap;
2. protrusions/depressions to deflect airflow;
3. cast on to hub cap;
4. install hub cap on wheel.
Relationship Between the Components
Step 1 plastic, aluminum, steel, or fiber glass can be used as the material for the hub cap. Step 2 speed of aircraft during landing will determine the size and number of protrusion/depressions that are required to reduce the rate of spin needed to match as close as possible ground speed. This will eliminate and or reduce tire skid/wear. Witch would extend tire life reducing tire cost. Step 3 once the protrusions/depressions are determined, a single piece is created with no moving parts. Step 4 install hub caps on wheel.
By utilizing directed airflow, wheel spin is initiated to approximately landing speed at time of landing, eliminating or largely decreasing tire skid on runway.
Using machine dies and injection molding machines, there are no moving parts. First, it requires the inventive hub cap. Second, it requires airflow underneath the aircraft. Wind deflection shapes can be changed to many geometric possibilities to perform the same result. The invention is used by simple installation of the hub cap to wheel.
While this disclosure includes specific examples, it will be apparent after an understanding of the disclosure of this application has been attained that various changes in form and details may be made in these examples without departing from the spirit and scope of the claims and their equivalents.
This application claims priority under 35 USC § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/597,291 filed Dec. 11, 2017 the entire contents of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1829500 | Brown | Oct 1931 | A |
2452633 | Cautley | Nov 1948 | A |
2464872 | Koval | Mar 1949 | A |
3529792 | MacMahon | Sep 1970 | A |
4040582 | Krauss | Aug 1977 | A |
4383665 | Maclean | May 1983 | A |
4385739 | Soderberg | May 1983 | A |
4491288 | Sinclair | Jan 1985 | A |
4615498 | Ochiai | Oct 1986 | A |
4732350 | Lamont | Mar 1988 | A |
5165624 | Lewis, Jr | Nov 1992 | A |
5213285 | Stanko | May 1993 | A |
5251848 | Gannatal | Oct 1993 | A |
5417387 | Jennings | May 1995 | A |
5746393 | Gennaro | May 1998 | A |
6032900 | Smith | Mar 2000 | A |
6086017 | Al-Thani | Jul 2000 | A |
6499691 | Lyons | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6983911 | Nordquist | Jan 2006 | B1 |
9174726 | Ushiyama | Nov 2015 | B2 |
20040065771 | Snyder | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040123929 | Han | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20130112809 | Khal | May 2013 | A1 |
20130256452 | Ushiyama | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140048648 | Karl | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20150021435 | Abbasszadeh | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20160059955 | Yoshida | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160200424 | Mabie | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20170129594 | Essinger | May 2017 | A1 |
20170361925 | Pao | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180043999 | Yoshida | Feb 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102013020547 | Jun 2015 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62597291 | Dec 2017 | US |