Opening perforations through walls of a tubular to allow fluid flow therethrough after deployment of the tubular within a structure is not uncommon. One method of opening such perforations is through ignition of ballistic devices, referred to as guns. Due to the explosive nature of the guns shipment of them through some jurisdictions is not permitted. The art is, therefore, always receptive to alternate methods of opening perforations in tubulars that do not require guns.
Disclosed herein is a non-ballistic tubular perforating system. The system includes, a tubular having a wall with perforations therethrough, and plugs positioned within the perforations that are configured to dissolve in response to exposure to a first environment thereby creative of a second environment that can dissolve or increase porosity of cement.
Further disclosed herein is a method of opening perforations in a tubular system. The method includes, positioning a tubular having degradable plugs plugging perforations therein within a borehole, cementing an annular space between the tubular and the borehole with cement, exposing the degradable plugs to a first environment that dissolves the degradable plugs, dissolving the degradable plugs, exposing the cement radially of the perforations to a second environment that dissolves or increases porosity of the cement, and opening an inside of the tubular to fluid communication with the borehole through the perforations and openings or porous channels dissolved in the cement.
Further disclosed herein is a non-ballistic tubular perforating system. The system includes a tubular having a wall with perforations therethrough, plugs positioned within the perforations configured to dissolve in response to exposure to a first environment, and bristles oriented radially of the tubular proximate the perforations configured to be degradably removed to leave radial channels through cement surrounding the tubular.
The following descriptions should not be considered limiting in any way. With reference to the accompanying drawings, like elements are numbered alike:
A detailed description of one or more embodiments of the disclosed apparatus and method are presented herein by way of exemplification and not limitation with reference to the Figures.
Referring to
Referring to
The plugs 26 can be made of a degradable material such as a high strength controlled electrolytic metallic material that is degradable in brine, acid, or an aqueous fluid. For example, a variety of suitable materials and their methods of manufacture are described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2011/0135953 (Xu et al.), the Patent Application Publication of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The invention is not limited to this material, however, and the plugs 26 can be made of other degradable or dissolvable materials. For example, the plugs 26 can be made of calcium carbonate or a material containing amounts of calcium carbonate sufficient to cause the plugs 26 to dissolve when exposed to a solution that causes calcium carbonate to dissolve.
Optionally, the cement 30 can also be made of materials that contribute to dissolution thereof when exposed to a second environment. Such materials can include the materials employed in the plugs 26 described above, for example, if the cement 30 is made more highly degradable it could be made so only in the area 42. In so doing, the operator can provide further control to an amount of the cement 30 that is dissolvable or porous or increases its porosity when exposed to a particular environment, thereby better controlling what portion of the cement 30 remains and provides structural support to the walls 46 of the borehole 34.
Regardless of whether all, none or just the area 42 of the cement 30 is made of more readily degradable material or material with adjustable porosity dissolution of the cement 30 can still take place. Dissolution or increasing porosity of the cement can take place in a second environment created, at least in part, from byproducts of dissolution of the plugs 26. This second environment can also include fluid employed to form a first environment dissolvable of the plugs 26.
Additional control as to what portion of the cement 30 is dissolved or had an increase in porosity thereof can be accomplished through timing of exposure of the cement 30 to the dissolving environment. This can be done in at least a couple of different ways. One way is to only expose the cement 30 to the second environment through the perforations 22. This method assures that the cement 30 adjacent to the perforations 22 is exposed first and consequently the longest of all the cement 30.
Still further control of degradation of the cement 30 can be accomplished through dimensional parameters. This control is based on the ability of select materials to have a rate of depth of dissolution that is proportional, perhaps linearly, with time. Under such a scenario by making a radial dimension 54 between the tubular 14 and borehole 34 in the area 42 less than half a dimension 58 between adjacent perforations 22 the openings or porous channels 50 (defined by dissolution of the cement 30) will extend first from the tubular 14 to the walls 46 before they extend to open the space between adjacent openings or porous channels 50. This may be desirable since it could leave some of the cement 30 structurally engaged between the walls 46 and the tubular 14 in the area 42.
Another embodiment could employ a second environment that is configured to dissolve the cement 30 at different rates in different directions. For example, by dissolving the cement 30 faster in radial directions than in directions orthogonal to radial, the cement 30 will form openings or porous channels 50 that are longer than they are across.
Referring to
While the invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment or embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the claims. Also, in the drawings and the description, there have been disclosed exemplary embodiments of the invention and, although specific terms may have been employed, they are unless otherwise stated used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation, the scope of the invention therefore not being so limited. Moreover, the use of the terms first, second, etc. do not denote any order or importance, but rather the terms first, second, etc. are used to distinguish one element from another. Furthermore, the use of the terms a, an, etc. do not denote a limitation of quantity, but rather denote the presence of at least one of the referenced item.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3273641 | Bourne | Sep 1966 | A |
5515915 | Jones et al. | May 1996 | A |
6619398 | MacKenzie et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6662873 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6755249 | Robison et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6834725 | Whanger et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7243732 | Richard | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7318481 | Richard | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7392852 | Richard | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7578347 | Bosma | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7784532 | Sevre et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7866393 | Badalamenti et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
20040168804 | Reddy et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20060207765 | Hofman | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20100300689 | McRobb et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100314111 | Karcher et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110077324 | Ravi et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110220359 | Soliman et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110226479 | Tippel et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120175134 | Robisson et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2011218707 | Sep 2011 | AU |
20110218707 | Dec 2012 | AU |
2011131306 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2011131307 | Oct 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bob Brooks, Tim Davis, Frank Delucia, Tam International, “Use of Swellable Elastomers to Enhance Cementation in Deep Water Applications,” Paper Presentaton for Deep Offshore Technology Conference-International, Feb. 12-14, 2008, pp. 1-13, Houston. |
“FracPoint MP Sleeve with DirectConnect Ports”; Baker Hughes Incorporated; Trade Show Material, 2012; 4 pages. |
Brent Miller and John Paneitz, Whiting Petroleum Corporation, and Sean Yakely and Kent Evans, Baker Hughes, “Unlocking Tight Oil: Selective Multi-Stage Fracturing in the Bakken Shale,” SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Sep. 21-24, 2008, pp. 1-6, SPE 116105-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Denver. |
A.S. Metcalf et al., “Case Histories of Successful Acid Stimulation of Carbonate Completed With Horizontal Open Hole Wellbores”; Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, vol. 48, No. 6; Jun. 2006, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130180725 A1 | Jul 2013 | US |